DOCSLIB.ORG

BROWNFIELDS: Keys to Community Revitalization III

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BROWNFIELDS: Keys to Community Revitalization III Unlocking Brownfields KEYS TO COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION National Association of Local Government Environmental Professionals Northeast-Midwest Institute About the National Association of Local Government Environmental Professionals Founded in 1993 by a group of local officials, NALGEP is a non-profit national organization representing local government professionals responsible for environmental compliance and the development and implementation of local environmental policy. NALGEP’s membership includes more than 200 local government entities located throughout America. NALGEP brings together local environmental officials to network and share information on innovative practices, conduct environmental policy projects, promote environmental training and education, and communicate views on national environmental issues. NALGEP is conducting projects on a wide range of environmental issues including brownfields, smart growth, USTfields, clean air, transportation innovation, and clean water. NALGEP is managed by Spiegel & McDiarmid, a national law firm located in Washington, DC. Please visit NALGEP’s website at www.nalgep.org. About the Northeast-Midwest Institute The Northeast-Midwest Institute is a Washington-based, private, non-profit, and non-partisan research organization dedicated to economic vitality, environmental quality, and regional equity for Northeast and Midwest States. Formed in the mid-1970’s, it fulfills it’s mission by conducting research and analysis, developing and advancing innovative policy, providing evaluation of key federal and state programs, disseminating information, and highlighting sound economic and environmental technologies and practices. The Institute is unique among policy centers because of its ties to Congress through the Northeast-Midwest Congressional and Senate coalitions. Co-chaired by Senators Susan Collins (R-ME) and Jack Reed (D-RI), and Representatives Marty Meehan (D-MA) and Jack Quinn (R-NY), the bipartisan coalitions advance federal policies that enhance the region’s economy and environment. Please visit NE-MW’s website at www.nemw.org. Contributors to this report include: Charles Bartsch Matt Ward Ken Brown Dave Dickson Bridget Thorsen Amy Ewen Peter Fox Unlocking Brownfi elds KEYS TO COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION National Association of Local Government Environmental Professionals Northeast-Midwest Institute Acknowledgements he publication of this report marks the culmination of a decade of involvement in brownfields. Being a part of this growing national movement has been one of the most T exciting and challenging endeavors of our careers thus far. Indeed, the brownfields movement and brownfields success are really about people — people with ideas, people with vision, people with energy and enthusiasm, people with dedication, people not satisfied with the status quo of blighted communities, people willing to venture outside the box and reach out to other partners. On behalf of NALGEP and the Northeast-Midwest Institute (NE-MW), we wish to acknowledge some of these innovative people with whom we have had the pleasure to work during the past decade. We would like to give special thanks and appreciation to the members of the Brownfield Communities Network Advisory Council. Listed on page v, these local officials represent the nation’s true brownfields leaders. They are on the front lines day in and day out building the partnerships, leveraging the resources, and coming up with the new strategies required to revitalize their communities. They have each made major, positive differences in their own communities, as well as valuable contributions to the national brownfields movement. The Advisory Council’s expertise and support have been critical to the success of our work during the past decade and their input helped to shape the profiles, findings, and recommendations included in this report. We also want to thank all of the localities that are profiled in this report. Their innovation is an inspiration to us and to communities across the nation. We appreciate their cooperation and support in our effort to prepare this report. No one embodies the spirit of brownfields innovation more than Linda Garczynski, UNLOCKING BROWNFIELDS: Keys to Community Revitalization BROWNFIELDS: Keys UNLOCKING Director of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment. Linda was instrumental in launching the national brownfields movement, and in providing the leadership in Washington to establish the federal brownfields partnership, which has garnered the support of more than 20 federal agencies and helped leverage billons of dollars in private sector resources for community revitalization. Linda, we thank you for your vision, your leadership, your support, and your unwavering belief in the ability of each individual to make an important difference if empowered with the right tools, resources, and information. We want to thank the following funders who have helped make this report possible: the EPA Office of Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment; the EPA Land Revitalization Initiative; EPA Region 3; and EPA Region 4. We give special thanks to the Council for Excellence in Government and the Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, who jointly administer the “Innovations in American Government” awards program. The EPA Brownfields Program was a national winner of this prestigious award in 2000. NALGEP and the Northeast-Midwest Institute were the proud recipients of the cash prize associated with this award, since EPA was unable to accept the funds. In the brownfields spirit, we used this grant to leverage well over $500,000 in additional funds for our work to conduct research, education, and outreach on the tools for successful brownfields reuse. The publication of this report is an important part of this effort. III We would also like to thank the following individuals who have been important partners and instrumental to the success of our work during the past decade: Sven-Erik Kaiser, Tony Raia, Gayle Rice, Myra Blakely, Patricia Overmeyer and others in the EPA Brownfields Office; Marjorie Buckholtz in the EPA OSWER Assistant Administrator’s office; Stephen Luftig and Christopher Prins of the EPA Land Revitalization Initiative; Cliff Rothenstein and Stephen McNeely of the EPA Office of Underground Storage Tanks; Larry D’Andrea and the EPA Region 2 brownfields team; Tom Stolle, Andrew Krieder, and other members of the EPA Region 3 brownfields team; Mickey Hartnett, Olga Perry, Eddie Wright, and the EPA Region 4 brownfields team; Joe Dufficy, Deborah Orr, and the Region 5 brownfields team; and Kathie Atencio, Mary Ahlstrom, and other members of the EPA Region 8 brownfields team. We appreciate your leadership, your commitment, and your friendship. We thank the NALGEP Board of Directors for their support and guidance in the implementation of this project and their commitment to brownfield redevelopment. We also want to thank the NE-MW board and NE-MW Executive Director Dick Munson for their support for this project. We give special thanks to David Dickson, Bridget Thorsen, Amy Ewen and Peter Fox for helping to prepare the many profiles of local brownfields innovation included in the report. And we thank Jean Donaldson and Fran Hobson for their efforts to prepare the final report for publication. Finally, thanks to Freehand Press and designer Holly Mansfield for their excellent design of this report. Charlie Bartsch • Ken Brown • Matt Ward UNLOCKING BROWNFIELDS: Keys to Community Revitalization BROWNFIELDS: Keys UNLOCKING IV Brownfields Communities Network — Advisory Council Scott Alphonse, City of New Bedford, MA Lucy Auster, King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Seattle, WA Charles Bartsch, Northeast Midwest Institute Timothy Beeble, City of Stamford, CT Robert Benrubi, Nassau County, NY Jennifer Blumberg, City of Missoula, MT Andrew Bracker, City of Kansas City, MO J.R. Capasso, City of Trenton, NJ Brian Connors, City of Lowell, MA Sandra Dennies, City of Stamford, CT Noemi Emeric, City of Los Angeles, CA Mark Gregor, City of Rochester, NY Ann Grimes, City of Dallas, TX Roberta Groch, City of Providence, RI Jerry Haile, El Paso County, CO Dianne Hanna, Gila River Indian Community, Sacaton, AZ Clark Henry, City of Portland, OR Marcia Jimenez, City of Chicago, IL Sven-Erik Kaiser, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC Mayor Frederick Kalisz, City of New Bedford, MA Lily Lee, City of East Palo Alto, CA Mayor Dannel P. Malloy, City of Stamford, CT Terry Manning, South Florida Regional Planning Council, Hollywood, FL Michael McCormack, City of New Bedford, MA UNLOCKING BROWNFIELDS: Keys to Community Revitalization BROWNFIELDS: Keys UNLOCKING LaVonne McGee, City of Jackson, MS Kevin McGrew, City of St. Louis Development Corporation, St. Louis, MO Dawn Moses, City of Houston, TX Robert Neely, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Kelly Novak, National Association of Development Organizations, Washington, DC Danielle Oglesby, City of Glen Cove, NY Evans Paull, Baltimore Development Corporation, Baltimore, MD Tony Raia, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC David Reel, City of Houston, TX Cyndi Romero, City of Allentown, PA Valda Tarbet, Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, UT Ron Townley, Land of Sky Regional Council, Asheville, NC Ellen Walkowiak, City of Des Moines, IA Tom Warshauer, City of Charlotte, NC Kimberly Worthington, City of Chicago, IL V Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Report on Preventing Any Further Desecration of the Jewish Cemetery of Thessaloniki, Greece Findings, Concerns and Recommendations
    A Report on Preventing any Further Desecration of the Jewish Cemetery of Thessaloniki, Greece Findings, Concerns and Recommendations Prepared for Asra Kadisha, Conference of Academicians for the Protection of Jewish Cemeteries and the Central Rabbinical Congress July 2008 By David Rubel Jewish Cemetery of Thessaloniki, Greece Findings, Concerns and Recommendations 2 BACKGROUND 1. The old Jewish cemetery of Thessaloniki is being desecrated by construction under the authority of the City of Thessaloniki and Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. The cemetery was once the largest Jewish cemetery in the world and is located in a city that was home to one of longest continuous Jewish communities only to be destroyed during the Nazi occupation in World War II. The Asra Kadisha (Committee for the Preservation of Gravesites), the leadership of the Jewish community of Greece, as well as other Jewish organizations dedicated to the preservation of cemeteries abroad, have all strongly protested the desecration of the Jewish cemetery as violation of their religious beliefs. All of these organizations have stated that construction is taking place inside the boundaries of the Jewish cemetery..All construction work of a new Metro station and a campus building should be halted immediately. CURRENT DESECRETION 2. Until an authoritative and unbiased map is finally produced of the Jewish cemetery of Thessaloniki, all construction in contested areas should stop immediately. An area of land with such great religious and historical significance deserves a full and exhaustive research undertaking. A professional land survey and thorough historical investigation are essential. Just from the research that we have conducted on the cemetery, it is abundantly clear that there is compelling evidence that significantly differs from the United States Consulate General Office in Thessaloniki (which is based on mapping from the Survey Office of Thessaloniki in 1936 and cannot be judged an objective party).
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Student Housing Mid-Year Market Overview 2020 Student Housing Mid-Year Market Overview
    2020 STUDENT HOUSING MID-YEAR MARKET OVERVIEW 2020 STUDENT HOUSING MID-YEAR MARKET OVERVIEW 2 MOONTOWER AUSTIN, TX CONTENTS Student Housing Sales Volume 6 Buyer Profile 7 Seller Profile 8 Cap Rates 9 Pricing Metrics 10 Capital Markets 12 The Team 14 About Us 16 3 Newmark Knight Frank’s Student Housing group proudly presents the 2020 Student Housing Mid-Year Market Overview. The research and conclusions contained within this report are based on our detailed and committed tracking of relevant data metrics across the entire student housing industry. We strive to offer the best brokerage services in the industry and pride ourselves on seamlessly integrating best-in-class investment sales with debt and equity, offering clients unparalleled access to domestic and international capital sources. For more information on this report or details on our available listings, please feel free to contact our team. Student Housing Investment Sales Ryan Lang Vice Chairman T 512.637.1296 [email protected] Jack Brett Associate Director T 832.434.5575 [email protected] Ben Harkrider Transaction Manager T 512.637.1435 [email protected] Jeremy Borst Senior Financial Analyst T 512.637.1239 [email protected] Mallory Rodriguez Transaction Services Coordinator T 737.236.0356 [email protected] Debt & Structured Finance Trent Houchin Director T 512.637.1298 [email protected] Matt Greer Executive Managing Director T 512.637.1236 [email protected] NEWMARK KNIGHT FRANK STUDENT HOUSING 2530 Walsh Tarlton Lane, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78746 T 512.342.8100 | F 512.637.1740 | www.ngkf.com 4 THE RIDGE CLEMSON CLEMSON, SC 5 2020 STUDENT HOUSING MID-YEAR MARKET OVERVIEW STUDENT HOUSING SALES VOLUME After a strong 2019, the student housing sector has shown resilience in 2020, 2020 YTD BROKER MARKET SHARE due to COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report
    Bureau of Justice Statistics Research and Development Series Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report Christopher Krebs, Christine Lindquist, Marcus Berzofsky, Bonnie Shook-Sa, and Kimberly Peterson RTI International 3040 Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 Michael Planty, Lynn Langton, and Jessica Stroop Bureau of Justice Statistics 810 Seventh Street, NW Washington, DC 20531 R&DP-2015:04 NCJ 249545 January 2016 Research papers have been reviewed by BJS to ensure the accuracy of information presented and adherence to confidentiality and disclosure standards. This paper is released to inform interested parties about research and methodologies sponsored by BJS. Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of BJS and the U.S. Department of Justice. This report was prepared using federal funds provided by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, under award number 2011-NV-CX-K068. The BJS project managers were Michael Planty, Victimization Unit Chief, and Lynn Langton, Senior Statistician. Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Abstract Presents the results of a nine-school pilot test that was conducted to develop a campus climate survey that collects school-level data on sexual victimization of undergraduate students. The report describes the development of the survey instrument and procedures for data collection, nonresponse bias analysis, weighting, and validity assessment. It presents estimates for each school on the prevalence and incidence of sexual assault, rape, and sexual battery during the 2014–15 academic year, as well as characteristics of the victims and incidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Water Management on Brownfields Sites
    Sustainable Water Management on Brownfields Sites Ryan Fenwick, Graduate Assistant, Environmental Finance Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY Water Infrastructure Capacity Building Team | HUD Capacity Building for Sustainable Communities Program | October 2012 Background This practice guide was developed by the Environmental Finance Center Network (EFCN) through the Capacity Building for Sustainable Communities program funded by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development and the US Environmental Protection Agency. Through a cooperative agreement with HUD, EFCN is providing capacity building and technical assistance to recipients of grants from the federal Partnership for Sustainable Communities, an interagency collaboration that aims to help towns, cities, and regions develop in more economically, environmentally, and socially sustainable ways. Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Brownfields: An Unintended Consequence ........................................................................................................ 2 Water Management and Brownfields: New Challenges and First Steps ............................................................. 3 Potential for GI and LID on Brownfields Sites .................................................................................................... 4 Funding Sources ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Campus
    Downtown Campus 4.1 Existing Conditions 4.2 Planning Principles 4.3 Program 4.4 Planning Framework 4.5 Campus Districts 4.6 Phasing Priorities 4.1 Existing Conditions Location and Context Figure 4.1 Downtown Campus Location and General Land Use Context The currently developed part of the Downtown Campus is situated within a nexus of publicly and privately controlled land on the western edge of downtown and just off the eastern border of the culturally and historically distinctive West Side neighborhood. Recent changes have the potential to dramatically modify the campus footprint and better connect the university to its surroundings. Agreements between UTSA, the City of San Antonio, Bexar County, and Weston Martin Street Urban have added roughly two city blocks to the San Antonio River Downtown Campus east of the freeway. Future Via Centro agreements may provide substantial land to both Plaza West Commerce Street the immediate west and south of the current Cattleman’s Buena Vista Street Square Downtown developed campus as well additional land to the Historic east such as the Continental Hotel site. Market West Side Square Neighborhood Dolorosa Street West Cesar E. Chavez Boulevard Zarzamora Street Convention Guadalupe Street Center South Frio Street Hackberry Street South Flores Street King William Neighborhood N Residential neighborhood Commercial/Mixed-use Industrial Park/Open space Creek/River Campus boundary The University of Texas at San Antonio - Campus Master Plan 84 4.1 Existing Conditions Downtown Campus Surrounding Context The existing developed campus is bounded on the east and west by the I-10/I-35 highway and freight railroad tracks, respectively, which have traditionally been perceived as barriers to connections in those directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies to Reduce Air Pollution Exposure Near High-Volume
    DOCKETED Docket Number: 20-IEPR-02 Project Title: Transportation TN #: 235613 Strategies to Reduce Air Pollution Exposure Near High-Volume Document Title: Roadways Research Division - CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL Description: PROTECTION AGENCY AIR RESOURCES BOARD Filer: Raquel Kravitz Organization: California Energy Commission Submitter Role: Commission Staff Submission Date: 11/16/2020 10:18:51 AM Docketed Date: 11/16/2020 Research Division CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY | AIR RESOURCES BOARD TECHNICAL ADVISORY Strategies to Reduce Air Pollution Exposure Near High-Volume Roadways April 2017 b Technical Advisory: Strategies to Reduce Air Pollution Exposure Near High-Volume Roadways Acknowledgements ARB staff would like to acknowledge the exceptional contributions made to this document by several stakeholders and contributors. Individuals from various state, national, and international agencies; local and regional governments; academic institutions; and other organizations were especially instrumental in compiling the information contained herein and in providing comments and reviews. ARB thanks individual reviewers from the following agencies, organizations, and institutions: Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) California Air Pollution Control Offcers Association (CAPCOA) California Association of Councils of Governments (CalCOG) California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) California Department of Public Health (CDPH) California
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Springs Q1 2021
    Colorado Springs Q1 2021 OFFFICE MARKET REPORT SM FULL-SERVICE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS PRIVATELY-OWNED AND OPERATED FOR OVER 40 YEARS 303.321.5888 UNIQUEPROP.COM Colorado Springs Office OFFICE MARKET REPORT Market Key Statistics 1 Leasing 2 Rent 6 Construction 9 Under Construction Properties 10 Sales 12 Sales Past 12 Months 14 Economy 16 Market Submarkets 21 Supply & Demand Trends 23 Rent & Vacancy 25 Sale Trends 27 4/21/2021 Copyrighted report licensed to Unique Properties, Inc. - 1130503 Overview Colorado Springs Office 12 Mo Deliveries in SF 12 Mo Net Absorption in SF Vacancy Rate 12 Mo Rent Growth 240K (311K) 8.9% 1.7% The headline numbers in Colorado Springs' office market existing buildings. Although absorption turned negative in couldn't have been much better before the pandemic. 20Q3 when net absorption was nearly -50,000 SF, Thanks to a strong recovery in the job market since the Colorado Springs appears to be weathering the storm coronavirus-induced downturn, Colorado Springs is in better than most. far better shape than most markets even though supply pressure pushed vacancies to 8.7% in 21Q1. Developers have been wary of testing the waters in Colorado Springs throughout this cycle, with regional Rent growth is outperforming the national average, developers focusing almost entirely instead on Denver ending 21Q1 at about 2.1% compared to a negative and Boulder. 1.6% from the national index. Investors were active in the Colorado Springs market in While a handful of large deals have played a role in the 21Q1 with nearly $130 million in traded assets.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nation Repays Its Debt: the National Soldiers' Home and Cemetery in Dayton, Ohio
    National Park Service Teaching with Historic Places U.S. Department of the Interior A Nation Repays Its Debt: The National Soldiers' Home and Cemetery in Dayton, Ohio A Nation Repays Its Debt: The National Soldiers' Home and Cemetery in Dayton, OH Dayton National Cemetery (U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs) More than 3000 disabled veterans who were residents of the Central Home since its establishment have died and been buried with military honors in the grove west of the Hospital, which had been tastefully laid out for a cemetery. "Their comrades, officers and men have erected there a beautiful monument of Peru white marble, fifty feet high, and surmounted with a splendid figure of a private soldier. It was unveiled on the 12th of September, 1887, [The year in this quote is incorrect. The monument was actually dedicated in 1877.] by the President of the United States, with grand ceremonies and in the presence of 25,000 people. On the pedestal are the words 'To our fallen Comrades' and 'These were honorable men in their generation.'…"¹ Upon entering Dayton National Cemetery, the hilly landscape is dotted with uniform marble headstones, all in neat rows with the Dayton Soldiers Memorial standing tall and proud in the center. The more than 100 acres of cemetery landscape is bathed with sunshine today, as there are few trees to shade visitors and mourners. Except for the sounds of birds, there is a solemn quiet. Beyond the gentle hills and headstones and over the horizon, you might glimpse a large old brick soldiers' home building which was built to house disabled Union veterans from the Civil War.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Load Skyscraper Project
    Skyscraper Project Based Learning 1.Overview 1.1.Overall Goal Allow students to describe, anticipate and plan for some of the realistic factors encountered in a real engineering project through a team activity. 1.2.Societal Context In the 1920’s there was an economic boom that drove up real estate prices in cities in America, particularly in New York City. Inspired by the rising cost of land, the availability of new materials such as stainless steel, and the competition for bragging rights for the tallest building in the world, a number of projects were launched to build successively taller buildings. In this race, as soon as one building was announced at a certain planned height, competitors would begin planning for another building that would be slightly taller. One of these projects, commissioned by the Chrysler Corporation in 1928, added an innovation to the competition. Planned and announced at 925 ft., the building design included a “secret” tall spike, which at the last minute was assembled in 90 minutes and raised into position, suddenly adding 121 extra feet to the height of the building. At 1046 ft., it became the tallest structure in the world at the time. Combined with its beautiful art deco exterior, the innovation cemented the place of the Chrysler Building in the hearts of Americans as one of the great “skyscrapers” (a term originally used for the highest sail on a clipper ship). 1.3.Program Integration This project is targeted for first and second year engineering students. With variations, it can be used for third year students as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Future for the Sydney Harbour Highline?
    Is there a future for the Sydney Harbour HighLine? A comparative study of opportunities and limitations in re-vitalisation of elevated railway corridors. ALICJA BATOROWICZ August 2019 Diploma in Local Government Management University of Technology Sydney TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Chapter 1. HIGH-LINES AS AN OPEN SPACE STRATEGY 5 Chapter 2. SYDNEY HARBOUR HIGHLINE: THE NEXT GREEN OPEN SPACE OF SYDNEY 9 Chapter 3. COMPARATIVE METHODOLOGY 15 Chapter 4. PARKS OF THE HIGH LINE 17 Promenade Plantée and Viaduc des Arts 18 New York City High Line 23 Analysis 28 Chapter 5. ANALYSIS 30 Conclusion 35 REFERNCES 36 pg. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The objective of this dissertation is a research of existing examples of former urban railway corridors defined as high lines, successfully reclaimed and transformed to become a recreational open space. Through detailed analysis of two prime examples including Parisian Promenade Plantée and New York City High Line, the aim is to investigate and define the best model for the successful delivery of recently proposed Sydney Harbour HighLine. The aim is to establish a theory that adopted urban high lines are drivers behind economic growth, provide countless benefits to the society and work in harmony with the environment and cultural heritage. This dissertation seeks answers to the following questions: Is there a future for the Sydney Harbour HighLine? Will the revitalisation of Lavender Bay railway line become an elevated challenge or an opportunity? This dissertation has been presented in five chapters. The first chapter begins with an exploration of the unsustainable rate of rapid urbanization and its impact on the environment we live in.
    [Show full text]
  • Campus Plan Overview
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY Advancing Knowledge, Building Community TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................1 SECTION 2 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................9 SECTION 3 THE UNIVERSITY AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA . ...................11 3.1 History and Academic Profile ..........................................................12 3.2 Mission and Strategic Plan .............................................................14 3.3 Students ............................................................................................15 3.4 Outreach Opportunities and Service . ............................................15 3.5 Economic Contributions ..................................................................17 3.6 Sustainability .....................................................................................17 SECTION 4 CAMPUS PLAN OVERVIEW ..............................................................19 4.1 Campus Development History . ......................................................20 4.2 Campus Plan Goals .........................................................................20 4.3 Campus Plan Process .......................................................................20 SECTION 5 POLICIES SHAPING THE FUTURE ....................................................23 5.1 Student Needs ..................................................................................24 5.2 Enrollment and Personnel ..............................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Issues and Challenges
    Paper 2 Challenges in the human environment Section A: Urban issues and challenges Small Things – Quick Wins! • 1 mark = 1 minute • Check the command word and the marks available • Describe (4 marks) = give 4 points • Explain (4 marks) = give 2 points and explain each (P E E) • 6 mark questions – These will often require you to argue both sides of an issue. Start with a bold statement that answers the question. Then explain (P E E). Then use a good connective (e.g. ‘However…’) to give the opposing view. • 9 mark questions – There will be 2 of these on each exam. Some will have 3 SPAG marks attached. Plan them carefully. • If it’s about a specific place/event make sure your refer to this in your opening sentence (e.g.. Rio de Janeiro, a city on the East coast of Brazil…) • Then think about writing 3 paragraphs 1. Arguments for one side 2. Arguments for the other side 3. A conclusion where you answer the question – make sure you substantiate it with a key piece of evidence that you are basing it on (E.g.. I think the challenges in Rio de Janeiro outweigh the opportunities. A key reason is that 25% of people live in favelas. This is more important than… because…) • Some questions will ask you to look at a figure (a map, graph, photo etc.). Make sure your answer starts with ‘In figure X I can see…’ • SPAG doesn’t just affect the 9 mark questions. They way you communicate information throughout the 4-6 marks questions can determine what level they achieve.
    [Show full text]