DOCSLIB.ORG

Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report Bureau of Justice Statistics Research and Development Series Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Final Technical Report Christopher Krebs, Christine Lindquist, Marcus Berzofsky, Bonnie Shook-Sa, and Kimberly Peterson RTI International 3040 Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 Michael Planty, Lynn Langton, and Jessica Stroop Bureau of Justice Statistics 810 Seventh Street, NW Washington, DC 20531 R&DP-2015:04 NCJ 249545 January 2016 Research papers have been reviewed by BJS to ensure the accuracy of information presented and adherence to confidentiality and disclosure standards. This paper is released to inform interested parties about research and methodologies sponsored by BJS. Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of BJS and the U.S. Department of Justice. This report was prepared using federal funds provided by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, under award number 2011-NV-CX-K068. The BJS project managers were Michael Planty, Victimization Unit Chief, and Lynn Langton, Senior Statistician. Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Abstract Presents the results of a nine-school pilot test that was conducted to develop a campus climate survey that collects school-level data on sexual victimization of undergraduate students. The report describes the development of the survey instrument and procedures for data collection, nonresponse bias analysis, weighting, and validity assessment. It presents estimates for each school on the prevalence and incidence of sexual assault, rape, and sexual battery during the 2014–15 academic year, as well as characteristics of the victims and incidents. It also provides estimates of the prevalence of sexual assault since entering college and during the student’s lifetime. In addition, the report examines the relationship between measures of campus climate and rates of sexual victimization. ii Campus Climate Survey Validation Study Table of Contents Section Page Abstract . ii Executive Summary . ES-1 1 . Background . 1 1 .1 Campus Climate Survey Validation Study (CCSVS) . 2 2 . Instrument Development and Testing . 5 2 .1 Instrument Development . 6 2 .2 Cognitive Testing . 12 2 .2 .1 Crowdsourcing . 12 2 .2 .2 In-Person Cognitive Interviewing . 15 2 .3 Final CCSVS Instrument . 20 2 .4 Instrument Programming and Testing . 22 3 . Pilot Test Sample Selection and Data Collection Methodology . 24 3 .1 School Recruitment . 24 3 .1 .1 Eligible Schools . 24 3 .1 .2 Recruitment . 26 3 .2 Student Sampling . 27 3 .2 .1 Developing the Sampling Frames . 27 3 .2 .2 Determining CCSVS Pilot Test Sample Sizes . 28 3 .2 .3 Selection of Student Samples . 30 3 .3 Data Collection . 31 3 .3 .1 Materials . 31 3 .3 .2 Recruitment Procedures and Data Collection Schedule . 34 4 . Pilot Test Data Assessment and Weighting . 36 4 .1 Completed Surveys . 36 4 .1 .1 Sample Yield . 36 4 .1 .2 Completed Surveys by Time in the Field . 38 4 .1 .3 Completed Surveys by Type of Device . 40 4 .2 Data Cleaning and Adjustments . 41 4 .2 .1 Assessment of Item Nonresponse . 41 4 .2 .2 Missing Data for Key Derived Variables . 42 4 .2 .3 Breakoff Rates . 45 4 .2 .4 Response Rates . 47 4 .2 .5 Nonresponse Bias . 48 4 .2 .6 Weighting Approach . 51 4 .2 .7 Timing . 56 4 .3 Study Sample . 58 iii Campus Climate Survey Validation Study 5 . Sexual Assault, Rape, and Sexual Battery . 62 5 .1 Measurement . 63 5 .2 Prevalence Estimates . 69 5 .2 .1 Prevalence of Sexual Assault during the 2014–2015 Academic Year . 69 5 .2 .2 Prevalence of Sexual Assault since Entering College and in Lifetime . 72 5 .2 .3 Prevalence of Female Sexual Assault during Academic Year 2014–2015, by Key Population Subgroups . 74 5 .2 .4 Impact of Weighting on Female Sexual Assault Prevalence Estimates . 79 5 .2 .5 Alternative Methods for Estimating Sexual Assault Prevalence . 80 5 .3 Victimization Estimates . 84 5 .3 .1 Number of Sexual Assault Incidents in the 2014–2015 Academic Year . 84 5 .3 .2 Sexual Assault Incidence Rates (Academic Year 2014–2015) . 86 5 .4 Characteristics of Female Sexual Assault Incidents . 89 5 .4 .1 Classification and Distribution of Sexual Assault Type . 89 5 .4 .2 Distribution of Type of Penetration . 91 5 .4 .3 Type of Tactic . 92 5 .4 .4 Month of Occurrence . 95 5 .4 .5 Offender Characteristics . 100 5 .4 .6 Victim-Offender Relationship . 101 5 .4 .7 Location and Offender School Affiliation . 104 5 .4 .8 Drug and Alcohol Use . 105 5 .4 .9 Reporting of Incidents . 107 5 .4 .10 Reasons for Not Reporting . 111 5 .4 .11 Impact of Incidents . 113 5 .5 Methodological Assessments Related to Sexual Assault Estimates . 117 5 .5 .1 Field Period Assessment . 117 5 .5 .2 Assessment of Incident Ordering . 123 5 .5 .3 Latent Class Analysis Results . 130 6 . Sexual Harassment and Coercion . 137 6 .1 Measurement . 137 6 .2 Prevalence Estimates . 138 6 .2 .1 Female Estimates . 138 6 .2 .2 Male Estimates . 140 6 .3 Methodological Assessments . 141 6 .3 .1 Type of Tactic . 141 6 .3 .2 Field Period Assessment . 142 7 . Intimate Partner Violence Victimization . 145 7 .1 Measurement . 145 7 .2 Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence . 145 iv Campus Climate Survey Validation Study 7 .2 .1 Female Estimates . 145 7 .2 .2 Male Estimates . 147 8 . Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault Perpetration . 148 8 .1 Measurement . 148 8 .2 Sexual Harassment Perpetration Prevalence Estimates . 149 8 .3 Sexual Assault Perpetration Prevalence Estimates . 150 9 . School Connectedness and Campus Climate . 152 9 .1 Measurement . 152 9 .2 Creation of Scales . 159 9 .3 Association between Campus Climate and Sexual Assault Victimization . 167 10 . Experiments . 173 10 .1 Greeting Experiment . 173 10 .1 .1 Methodology . 173 10 .1 .2 Results of Bivariate Analysis . 175 10 .1 .3 Results of Model-Based Analysis . 175 10 .2 Incentive Experiment . 178 10 .2 .1 Methodology . 178 10 .2 .2 Results of Bivariate Analysis . 179 10 .2 .3 Results of Model-Based Analysis . 181 11 . Summary and Conclusions . 187 11 .1 What Worked . 188 11 .2 Potential Modifications to Consider . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • March 26, 2019 Name: Marco Luciano Loggia, Phd
    Curriculum Vitae Date Prepared: March 26, 2019 Name: Marco Luciano Loggia, PhD Office Address: A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging Massachusetts General Hospital 149 Thirteenth Street, Room 2301 Charlestown, MA 02129 Work Phone: (617) 643-7267 Work Email: [email protected] Work FAX: (617) 726-7422 Place of Birth: Vizzolo Predabissi, Milan, Italy Education 2003 Laurea Experimental Psychology Università Vita-Salute San summa cum laude (Profs. Cappa SF and Perani D) Raffaele (Italy) 2008 PhD Neurological Sciences McGill University (Canada) (Prof. Bushnell MC) Postdoctoral Training 08/08 - 09/12 Research Fellow Anesthesia – Pain neuroimaging Brigham and Women’s (Drs. Gollub, Wasan, Edwards) Hospital, Harvard Medical School 09/12 - 02/13 Research Fellow Radiology – Pain neuroimaging Massachusetts General (Drs. Napadow, Wasan, Edwards) Hospital, Harvard Medical School Faculty Academic Appointments 02/13 - 09/14 Instructor Radiology Harvard Medical School 10/14 – 03/19 Assistant Professor Radiology Harvard Medical School 03/19 - present Associate Professor Radiology Harvard Medical School 1 Marco Luciano Loggia, PhD Appointments at Hospitals/Affiliated Institutions Past 02/13 - 12/15 Assistant Radiology Massachusetts General (Neuroscience) Hospital Current 01/16 - present Research Staff Radiology Massachusetts General (Neuroscience) Hospital Other Professional Positions Past 2014 - 2017 Consultant (study on negative affect in University of Pittsburgh chronic pain patients; PI: Wasan AD) Current 2018 - 2021 Consultant (Boston
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Value of Arts & Culture | the AHRC Cultural Value
    Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska 2 Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska THE AHRC CULTURAL VALUE PROJECT CONTENTS Foreword 3 4. The engaged citizen: civic agency 58 & civic engagement Executive summary 6 Preconditions for political engagement 59 Civic space and civic engagement: three case studies 61 Part 1 Introduction Creative challenge: cultural industries, digging 63 and climate change 1. Rethinking the terms of the cultural 12 Culture, conflict and post-conflict: 66 value debate a double-edged sword? The Cultural Value Project 12 Culture and art: a brief intellectual history 14 5. Communities, Regeneration and Space 71 Cultural policy and the many lives of cultural value 16 Place, identity and public art 71 Beyond dichotomies: the view from 19 Urban regeneration 74 Cultural Value Project awards Creative places, creative quarters 77 Prioritising experience and methodological diversity 21 Community arts 81 Coda: arts, culture and rural communities 83 2. Cross-cutting themes 25 Modes of cultural engagement 25 6. Economy: impact, innovation and ecology 86 Arts and culture in an unequal society 29 The economic benefits of what? 87 Digital transformations 34 Ways of counting 89 Wellbeing and capabilities 37 Agglomeration and attractiveness 91 The innovation economy 92 Part 2 Components of Cultural Value Ecologies of culture 95 3. The reflective individual 42 7. Health, ageing and wellbeing 100 Cultural engagement and the self 43 Therapeutic, clinical and environmental 101 Case study: arts, culture and the criminal 47 interventions justice system Community-based arts and health 104 Cultural engagement and the other 49 Longer-term health benefits and subjective 106 Case study: professional and informal carers 51 wellbeing Culture and international influence 54 Ageing and dementia 108 Two cultures? 110 8.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Framework to Reinforce Evidence Synthesis Features in Cloud-Based Systematic Review Tools
    applied sciences Article A Comprehensive Framework to Reinforce Evidence Synthesis Features in Cloud-Based Systematic Review Tools Tatiana Person 1,* , Iván Ruiz-Rube 1 , José Miguel Mota 1 , Manuel Jesús Cobo 1 , Alexey Tselykh 2 and Juan Manuel Dodero 1 1 Department of Informatics Engineering, University of Cadiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain; [email protected] (I.R.-R.); [email protected] (J.M.M.); [email protected] (M.J.C.); [email protected] (J.M.D.) 2 Department of Information and Analytical Security Systems, Institute of Computer Technologies and Information Security, Southern Federal University, 347922 Taganrog, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Systematic reviews are powerful methods used to determine the state-of-the-art in a given field from existing studies and literature. They are critical but time-consuming in research and decision making for various disciplines. When conducting a review, a large volume of data is usually generated from relevant studies. Computer-based tools are often used to manage such data and to support the systematic review process. This paper describes a comprehensive analysis to gather the required features of a systematic review tool, in order to support the complete evidence synthesis process. We propose a framework, elaborated by consulting experts in different knowledge areas, to evaluate significant features and thus reinforce existing tool capabilities. The framework will be used to enhance the currently available functionality of CloudSERA, a cloud-based systematic review Citation: Person, T.; Ruiz-Rube, I.; Mota, J.M.; Cobo, M.J.; Tselykh, A.; tool focused on Computer Science, to implement evidence-based systematic review processes in Dodero, J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Lighting Quality and Office Work: a Field Simulation Study
    PNNL-14506 Lighting Quality and Office Work: A Field Simulation Study Peter R. Boyce1 Jennifer A. Veitch2 Guy R. Newsham2 Michael Myer1 Claudia Hunter1 Judith H Heerwagen, Research Manager Carol C. Jones, Project Manager December 2003 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830 1 Lighting Research Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute RPI # A11106 2 National Research Council of Canada, Institute for Research in Construction NRC # B3214.1 PNNL-14506 Lighting Quality and Office Work: A Field Simulation Study Peter R. Boyce1 Jennifer A. Veitch2 Guy R. Newsham2 Michael Myer1 Claudia Hunter1 Judith H Heerwagen, Research Manager Carol C. Jones, Project Manager December 2003 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 1 Lighting Research Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute RPI # A11106 2 National Research Council of Canada, Institute for Research in Construction NRC # B3214.1 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on Preventing Any Further Desecration of the Jewish Cemetery of Thessaloniki, Greece Findings, Concerns and Recommendations
    A Report on Preventing any Further Desecration of the Jewish Cemetery of Thessaloniki, Greece Findings, Concerns and Recommendations Prepared for Asra Kadisha, Conference of Academicians for the Protection of Jewish Cemeteries and the Central Rabbinical Congress July 2008 By David Rubel Jewish Cemetery of Thessaloniki, Greece Findings, Concerns and Recommendations 2 BACKGROUND 1. The old Jewish cemetery of Thessaloniki is being desecrated by construction under the authority of the City of Thessaloniki and Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. The cemetery was once the largest Jewish cemetery in the world and is located in a city that was home to one of longest continuous Jewish communities only to be destroyed during the Nazi occupation in World War II. The Asra Kadisha (Committee for the Preservation of Gravesites), the leadership of the Jewish community of Greece, as well as other Jewish organizations dedicated to the preservation of cemeteries abroad, have all strongly protested the desecration of the Jewish cemetery as violation of their religious beliefs. All of these organizations have stated that construction is taking place inside the boundaries of the Jewish cemetery..All construction work of a new Metro station and a campus building should be halted immediately. CURRENT DESECRETION 2. Until an authoritative and unbiased map is finally produced of the Jewish cemetery of Thessaloniki, all construction in contested areas should stop immediately. An area of land with such great religious and historical significance deserves a full and exhaustive research undertaking. A professional land survey and thorough historical investigation are essential. Just from the research that we have conducted on the cemetery, it is abundantly clear that there is compelling evidence that significantly differs from the United States Consulate General Office in Thessaloniki (which is based on mapping from the Survey Office of Thessaloniki in 1936 and cannot be judged an objective party).
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Writing
    Technical Writing Engineers and scientists perform many complex and intricate tasks using the world's most sophisticated equipment. However, their performance as engineers and scientists is almost always related to their use of one of the oldest tools - the pen. In academia, the saying "publish or perish" often describes the process of acquiring tenure as well as credibility. In industry, both large and small organizations communicate everything through memos, reports, and short presentations. Product development decisions are often made by a committee of people far removed from the actual technology. The saying "he who has the most convincing viewgraphs and reports, wins..." can sometimes apply to industry. Therefore, it should be clear that an ability to concisely and efficiently prepare technical reports, research papers, and or viewgraph presentations can have a profound positive impact on an individual's career. Consider the following statement by anonymous Fortune 500 corporate vice president: "... in any large organization, the person who decides whether you get a promotion, or who determines the size of a pay raise, does not know you personally. The only thing they have to go on is what other people write about you and what you write about you ..." It can be seen that if one should write a lot of material to get ahead in one's career, it makes sense to write as objectively and concisely as possible. Objective writing is essential because good technical writing should not be seen as erroneous after new discoveries are made. A good technical report should present a clear milestone of what was done and understood at the time of the writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliometric Impact Measures Leveraging Topic Analysis
    Bibliometric Impact Measures Leveraging Topic Analysis Gideon S. Mann, David Mimno, Andrew McCallum Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst MA 01003 {gmann,mimno,mccallum}@cs.umass.edu ABSTRACT tical methods that leverage the availability of large digital Measurements of the impact and history of research liter- document collections can enhance bibliometric analysis. ature provide a useful complement to scientific digital li- Discovering topical affinities between documents is an ac- brary collections. Bibliometric indicators have been exten- tive area of research in bibliometrics and scientometrics. In sively studied, mostly in the context of journals. However, particular, the use of journals as a representation of topics journal-based metrics poorly capture topical distinctions in is problematic for a variety of reasons. Journals generally fast-moving fields, and are increasingly problematic with the represent a variety of sub-areas and publications often com- rise of open-access publishing. Recent developments in la- bine multiple topical facets. Additionally, with the growth tent topic models have produced promising results for au- of open-access publishing, publication venue information is tomatic sub-field discovery. The fine-grained, faceted top- becoming increasingly dispersed and frequently simply un- ics produced by such models provide a clearer view of the available or undefined. topical divisions of a body of research literature and the There has been much work recently in machine learning interactions between those divisions. We demonstrate the on latent topic models, such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation usefulness of topic models in measuring impact by applying (LDA) [2], the Author-Topic model [22], and the Author- a new phrase-based topic discovery model to a collection Recipient-Topic model [19].
    [Show full text]
  • Field of Study Focus: Architecture Advising Resource GENERAL DESCRIPTION Architecture Is the Art and Science of Designing Buildings and Structures
    Field of Study Focus: Architecture Advising Resource GENERAL DESCRIPTION Architecture is the art and science of designing buildings and structures. A wider definition would include the design of the total built environment, from the macrolevel of town planning, urban design, and landscape architecture to the microlevel of creating furniture. Architecture is both the process and product of planning, designing, and constructing form, space, and ambience that reflect functional, technical, social, and aesthetic considerations. Architectural design usually must address both feasibility and cost for the builder, as well as function and aesthetics for the user. Some programs are theory-based programs while others are design-based programs. COMMON SPECIALIZATIONS ARCHITECTURAL Emphasizes the engineering aspects of the building design and construction process. This is a multidisciplined engineer- ENGINEERING ing approach with a focus on architecture and design. Architectural Engineering includes the design of building systems including electrical, lighting, heating/ventilation/air conditioning (HVAC), and structural systems. ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Studies the evolution and history of architecture across the world through a consideration of various influences including artistic, cultural, political, economic, and technological. ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN/ Emphasizes the integration of architecture with the environment to minimize the negative environmental impact of build- SUSTAINABLE DESIGN ings by enhancing efficiency and moderation in the use of materials, energy, and development space. Deals with design that incorporates ecologically sustainable energy and waste systems; energy efficiency, renewable energy, water conserva- tion, indoor air quality, and use of appropriate technology. GENERAL ARCHITECTURE: Prepares one for a professional career as a design specialist or a general practitioner. Employs a range of methodologies, DESIGN, THEORY, METHODS processes and philosophies, techniques, and technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Benchmarking of Control Strategies for Wastewater Treatment Plants Layout, Controllers, Sensors, Performance Criteria and Test Procedures, I.E
    ©2020 The Author(s) This is an Open Access book distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution provided the original work is properly cited. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This does not affect the rights licensed or assigned from any third party in this book. This title was made available Open Access through a partnership with Knowledge Unlatched. IWA Publishing would like to thank all of the libraries for pledging to support the transition of this title to Open Access through the KU Select 2019 program. Downloaded from https://iwaponline.com/ebooks/book-pdf/650794/wio9781780401171.pdf by guest on 26 February 2020 Wastewater treatment plants are large non-linear systems subject to large 23 No. Report Technical and Scientific perturbations in wastewater flow rate, load and composition. Nevertheless these Scientific and Technical Report No. 23 plants have to be operated continuously, meeting stricter and stricter regulations. Many control strategies have been proposed in the literature for improved and more efficient operation of wastewater treatment plants. Unfortunately, their evaluation and comparison – either practical or based on simulation – are difficult. This is partly due to the variability of the influent, to the complexity of the biological and physico-chemical phenomena and to the large range of time constants (from a few seconds to several weeks). The lack of standard evaluation criteria is also a tremendous disadvantage. To really enhance the acceptance of innovative control strategies, such an evaluation Benchmarking of needs to be based on a rigorous methodology including a simulation model, plant Plants Treatment Strategies for Wastewater Benchmarking of Control layout, controllers, sensors, performance criteria and test procedures, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Reports, Working Papers, and Preprints
    LIBRARY OF CONGRESS COLLECTIONS POLICY STATEMENTS Technical Reports, Working Papers, and Preprints Contents I. Scope II. Research Strengths III. Collecting Policy IV.Best Editions and Preferred Formats V. Acquisition Sources I. Scope This statement describes the Library's collection policies for technical reports, working papers, and preprints, in all subjects. These formats for publication are used by researchers or contractors to inform sponsoring agencies, peers, or others of the progress of research. This policy statement covers these formats when issued either by government or non-government publishers, or from both domestic and foreign sources. This statement is further limited to technical reports, working papers, and preprints that are issued in numbered or otherwise clearly identifiable series. Some technical reports, working papers, and preprints may be collected on a case-by-case basis rather than as a series, in which case they will fall under the Library's other Collections Policy Statements by subject rather than this Collections Policy Statement. Although the Library of Congress has a separate custodial Technical Reports collection, all Recommending Officers in appropriate fields are responsible for identifying series of technical reports, working papers, and preprints that are of interest to the Library's legislative, federal, and research clientele. The custodial location of reports acquired by the Library may include the Science, Technology & Business Division’s Automation, Collections Support and Technical Reports Section, the Serial and Government Publications Division, the Collections Management Division or any other appropriate custodial divisions, including Law and custodial area studies divisions. Format characteristics of technical reports, working papers, and preprints: The names given to these publication series vary.
    [Show full text]
  • SOHO Design in the Near Future
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses 12-2005 SOHO design in the near future SooJung Lee Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Lee, SooJung, "SOHO design in the near future" (2005). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rochester Institute of Technology A thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The College of Imaging Arts and Sciences In Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Fine Arts SOHO Design in the near future By SooJung Lee Dec. 2005 Approvals Chief Advisor: David Morgan David Morgan Date Associate Advisor: Nancy Chwiecko Nancy Chwiecko Date S z/ -tJ.b Associate Advisor: Stan Rickel Stan Rickel School Chairperson: Patti Lachance Patti Lachance Date 3 -..,2,2' Ob I, SooJung Lee, hereby grant permission to the Wallace Memorial Library of RIT to reproduce my thesis in whole or in part. Any reproduction will not be for commercial use or profit. Signature SooJung Lee Date __3....:....V_6-'-/_o_6 ____ _ Special thanks to Prof. David Morgan, Prof. Stan Rickel and Prof. Nancy Chwiecko - my amazing professors who always trust and encourage me sincerity but sometimes make me confused or surprised for leading me into better way for three years. Prof. Chan hong Min and Prof. Kwanbae Kim - who introduced me about the attractive
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report Writing
    Technical Report Writing CHAPTER 1 Introduction A. Course Overview An overview of this course is presented below as Figure 1-1. Take a moment to glance through the topics to be covered and then consider this one central idea. The premise of this course is that good technical reports don't just happen. They are "designed". Their design may be learned and that knowledge can be applied in your everyday work in the same way as you apply your other technical skills. We cannot all be William Shakespeare or Ernest Hemingway, but it is possible to acquire enough writing skill to write simple, declarative sentences and readable reports. Subjects you know about, you can also learn to write about. Figure 1-1 B. Types of Reports The suggestions presented in this course may be employed whether you are writing a single page letter report or a multi-volume research study. That is true because technical reports do, or at least should, have an explicit purpose and an identifiable audience. If you know clearly "why" you are writing and "who" will read your report, you have the basis for the report design. Your audience, and their needs, must remain at the forefront of your thinking as you write. In most organizations, the audience is a multi-layered collection of people. Some of your intended readers may be known to you while others may not. Once you have determined the purpose of your writing, you need to analyze your audience to the best of your ability. This course will suggest some ways to do that in systematic fashion.
    [Show full text]