DOCSLIB.ORG

Denticare in Canada: an Unfinished Piece of Medicare

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Denticare in Canada: an Unfinished Piece of Medicare Denticare in Canada: An Unfinished Piece of Medicare Canadian Doctors for Medicare Position Statement on Dental Care Canadian Doctors for Medicare is proud to advocate for a single-payer public Denticare system. Oral health is an important part of an individual’s overall health, and a single-payer public dental care system is an efficient and equitable way to ensure that every person in Canada has access to essential oral health care. Executive Summary: Oral health is an important part of an individual’s overall health; however, dental care is not included in the Canadian public health care system. The share of public dental care spending in Canada has been decreasing steadily since the 1980s. This has resulted in many Canadians struggling to access dental care: six million Canadians avoid seeing the dentist each year due to cost. The most vulnerable groups include children from low-income families, low-income adults, seniors, indigenous communities, and those with disabilities. Canadian Doctors for Medicare supports the creation of a single-payer, publicly-funded dental care system in Canada. In addition to public financing, CDM supports the expansion of public delivery of dental care to ensure equitable, efficient, and sustainable dental care is available to every person in Canada. Oral Health and Overall Health Oral health is critical to an individual’s overall health. Poor oral health is associated with poor general health, specifically cardiovascular disease, diabetes, having a low birth weight infant, erectile dysfunction, osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, and stroke(1–8). There is increasing evidence, however, that poor oral health exacerbates other general medical conditions due to chronic inflammation(9). Treating gum disease in diabetics improves blood sugar control similar to adding an additional oral diabetes medication(10). Providing oral care in long-term care reduces the risk of aspiration pneumonia(11). Periodontal therapy can reduce patients’ cardiovascular risk category(12). Integrated comprehensive oral health care has been shown to increase completion of substance use disorder treatment, increase employment, increase drug abstinence, and reduce homelessness(13). Poor oral health also has a negative impact on a person’s self-esteem, social interactions, and employability(14). Given the important relationship between oral health and overall health, our current dental care system conflicts with the principles of Canadian Doctors for Medicare: accessible, high- quality, equitable, and sustainable health care for every Canadian. The History of Dental Care in Canada In 1943, the Canadian federal government proposed a draft bill for health insurance that included dental services. After World War II, however, the plan for public dental coverage was deferred, with the Dominion-Provincial Conference on Reconstruction describing dental care as a service that would be publicly financed at a ‘later stage’, after physician and hospital services(15). Unfortunately, we are still waiting for that ‘later stage’: dental care remains one of several unfinished pieces of Medicare to this day. Several factors contributed to dental care being left out of the Medicare basket. Canada began adopting community water fluoridation in the 1950s during the genesis of Medicare. This led to a sharp decline in dental caries, and a false reassurance that the solutions to oral health concerns would be non-provider based(16). It was also felt at the time that the number of dental professionals working in Canada was insufficient to support a public program for all Canadians(15). The 1964 Commission on Health Services did not include dental care in its recommendation of publicly financed services, believing oral health care to be a personal responsibility. At the same time, tax incentives for employers and employees led to an expansion of employment-based dental insurance, which further reduced public investments in times of economic hardship(16). Despite economic growth, public investment in dental care has continued to decline. In the early 1980s, approximately 20% of all spending on oral health care was public, compared to approximately 5% currently(17). Canada ranks amongst the lowest in public spending for dental care of all OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries, second only to Spain. In fact, public spending on dental care in Canada is less than the United States, where 10% of all dental care is publicly financed(18). Furthermore, Canada has been reducing its proportion of public dental expenditures, while the United States and most other OECD countries have been increasing their public share of dental spending(19). Historical justifications to exclude dental care from Medicare are no longer relevant, nor are they compatible with our current understanding of the importance of oral health to overall health. Fluoridation has been a successful oral health program, but clearly there are dental conditions that fluoridation cannot address. The number of dental professionals per capita in Canada has increased significantly: since 2000, the number of dental professionals per capita has shown higher growth than physicians in Canada(20). www.canadiandoctorsformedicare.ca/resources Without steps to increase equitable access to dental care, Canada will continue to fall further behind other OECD nations in this critical component of our nation’s health. Access Accessibility is one of the core principles of Canadian Medicare: financial barriers should not impede care. But our current dental care system is inaccessible for far too many Canadians. Approximately six million Canadians avoid visiting a dentist each year due to the cost(16). More than 1 in 5 people cite cost as a barrier for seeing a dentist(21). Currently, dental care in Canada is almost entirely funded through the private sector. Public spending on dental care is only $24 per capita, compared to $337 on drugs, and $999 on physician services(22,23). 51% of dental spending is paid for by employment-based insurance, and 44% through direct out-of-pocket payments(17). The remaining 5% that is funded publicly is delivered through a patchwork of policies targeting marginalized and low-income groups(16). Financial barriers to dental care do not only affect the lowest income Canadians. Middle- income earners have seen the highest increase in out-of-pocket dental expenses, and have the lowest levels of insurance coverage for dental care. In 2018, Statistics Canada estimated that the average annual household out-of-pocket dental spending was $430, ranging up to $600, depending on household income level. These often unaffordable costs deter families from seeking dental care. A single-payer Denticare system with universal coverage would eliminate the financial barriers to accessing care, ensuring that our Canadian dental care system is consistent with the core principles of Medicare. Equity The lack of public dental care in Canada is an alarming equity issue. The people who experience the most difficulty accessing oral health care are also the ones who experience the highest burden of dental disease, including children, low income adults, seniors, indigenous communities, refugees, people with disabilities, and people living in rural areas(16,19,24–26). In Ontario, 1 in 30 people avoid social interactions, including conversation, laughing, and smiling, due to a dental condition; this increases to almost 1 in 10 for those in lower income groups(25). Previous research has shown that lower income Canadians shoulder a disproportionate amount of out-of-pocket dental costs compared to the affluent(24,27). Despite having higher needs, seniors are 40% less likely to have private dental insurance compared to the general population(25). When we compare Canada with similar developed www.canadiandoctorsformedicare.ca/resources nations, our inequitable access has significant consequences. Canada is an outlier when it comes to the proportion of seniors who have lost their teeth – more than 20%(28). These equity concerns are striking when you compare access to dental services and access to physician services based on income. Approximately 42% of low income Canadians avoid seeing a dentist when they need to due to cost, compared to only 15% of high income Canadians – a difference of 27%(19). This is in stark contrast to physician services, where only 9% of low income Canadians and 3% of high income Canadians avoid seeing a physician due to cost – a difference of only 6%(19). Despite access and cost challenges, most Canadians still see a dentist each year, highlighting that Canadians understand that oral health is an important part of their overall health. 70% of Ontarians have seen a dentist in the last year, but there is a significant difference between those with insurance (80%) and those without insurance (50%)(25). Those without insurance are far more likely to report only visiting a dentist in emergency cases (40% compared 10% for those with insurance. Those without insurance are also far more likely to have lost their teeth (10% compared to 4% in those with insurance). This suggests that Canadians without insurance lack access to preventative dental care, likely leading to more dental emergencies and more expensive downstream care. A single-payer Denticare system would ensure that those who need dental care the most are able to access it – an aspect of Medicare that Canadians take great pride in. Sustainability Canadians are not getting good value for the money they are spending
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inter-Jurisdictional Medical Licensing to Support Telemedicine
    CADTH POLICY BRIEF Inter-jurisdictional Medical Licensing to Support Telemedicine Publication Date: August 6, 2020 Report Length: 17 Pages Cite as: Inter-jurisdictional Medical Licensing to Support Telemedicine. Ottawa: CADTH; 2020 Aug. (CADTH Policy Brief). Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care professionals, health systems leaders, and policy-makers make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. While patients and others may access this document, the document is made available for informational purposes only and no representations or warranties are made with respect to its fitness for any particular purpose. The information in this document should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or as a substitute for the application of clinical judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or other professional judgment in any decision-making process. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) does not endorse any information, drugs, therapies, treatments, products, processes, or services. While care has been taken to ensure that the information prepared by CADTH in this document is accurate, complete, and up-to-date as at the applicable date the material was first published by CADTH, CADTH does not make any guarantees to that effect. CADTH does not guarantee and is not responsible for the quality, currency, propriety, accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in any third-party materials used in preparing this document. The views and opinions of third parties published in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of CADTH.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYSICIANS and SURGEONS Lindsay Hedden
    PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS Lindsay Hedden Introduction to the Health Workforce in Canada | Physicians and Surgeons 1 Physicians and Surgeons INTRODUCTION Focused on improving the health and wellbeing of individuals, families and communities, physicians are perhaps the most readily recognizable health-care practitioners. They diagnose and treat injuries, illnesses and impairment, and also counsel patients on how to maintain and improve their health. Physicians have a long history in Canada, with regulation and licensing first occurring in Ontario in 1865. By the late 19th century, medicine had become the dominant health-care profession in Canada; however, the 1962 Saskatchewan doctor’s strike and the rise (and regulation) of other health professions have since tempered the dominance of the physician profession (Coburn, Torrence & Kaufert, 1983). Physicians are trained in stages, beginning with a generalized medical degree followed by post-graduate training in one or more specialty areas, which become the focus of their practice. Primary care physicians (also known as family medicine physicians) are usually a patient’s first point of contact with the Canadian health-care system. They also coordinate additional health-care services patients may require, ensuring Health Information, 2020). Although this number was continuity of care and access to specialized services increasing by more than 4% each year, this has since (Health Canada, 2011). In contrast, medical and slowed to a 1.8% increase in 2019. surgical specialists focus on specific diseases, certain This chapter introduces the practice of medicine in patients, or methods of diagnosis and treatment. Canada and focuses on the following topic areas: They generally treat patients who have been referred to them by a primary care physician.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Really Behind Canada's Unemployed Specialists?
    What’s really behind Canada’s unemployed specialists? Too many, too few doctors? Findings from the Royal College’s employment study - 2013 Findings from the Royal College’s employment study – 2013 Report Authors: Research Team: Danielle Fréchette, MPA1, 2 Danielle Fréchette, MPA1,2 Executive Director Principal Investigator Executive Director Daniel Hollenberg, Ph.D.1,2 Research Associate Daniel Hollenberg, Ph.D.1, 2 Co-Principal Investigator Arun Shrichand, BA1,2 Research Associate Senior Analyst, Health System and Policies Carole Jacob, MCS1,2 Carole Jacob, MCS 1,2 Manager, Health Policy Program Development Manager, Health Policy Program Development Arun Shrichand, BA1, 2 3 Indraneel Datta, MD, MSc (HEPM), FRCSC Senior Analyst, Health System and Policies Clinical Assistant Professor General Surgeon, Alberta Health Services Galina Babitskaya, BSc1, 2 Database Analyst Jonathan Dupré, BSc1 Data and Research Analyst, Educational Research Unit Indraneel Datta, MD, MSc (HEPM), FRCSC3 Clinical Assistant Professor General Surgeon, Alberta Health Services Suggested citation: Fréchette, D., Hollenberg, D., Shrichand, A., Jacob, C., & Datta, I. 2013. What’s really behind Canada’s unemployed specialists? Too many, too few doctors? Findings from the Royal College’s employment study. Ottawa, Ontario: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. 1 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 2 Offi ce of Health Systems Innovation and External Relations © 2013 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. 3 Department of Surgery, University of Calgary Executive summary A fi rst in health system research In 2010, several of Canada’s national medical specialty societies reported to the Royal College that a growing number of specialist physicians were unemployed or under-employed.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada. Still at the Crossroads Canada
    Canada. Still at the Crossroads Canada Canada is rightfully proud of its health system. What started out as hospital insurance for the people of just one province around 50 years ago, has now blossomed into Universal Healthcare for 36 million people. Canadians know its faults, but need only peer over the fence at their American neighbours and reflect on the fact that they spend half as much on healthcare and yet lead longer, healthier lives. Tommy Douglas, founder of its famous Medicare system, is something of a national hero in Canada. And yet, for a health system so young, it is surprisingly traditional. Canada has been slow to adopt innovations like group-based care, value-based care, even multi-disciplinary team working, and as a result, its workforce struggles to keep up with the demands of an ageing, ailing society. Wait lists are long. Hallway medicine is a problem, and access to a primary care doctor is unavailable to 1 in 6.i Burnout is rife. A recent Lancet articleii criticized Canada for its slow and incremental approach to reform – not just in training numbers – but in the work it has done to improve productivity and efficiency in the system. Canada is not so much a system in crisis it says, as a system in stasis. For example, ‘In Search of the Perfect Health System’ (2015), which examined health systems from around the world, included a chapter entitled ‘Canada at the Crossroads’. It seems this great nation is still stuck there. Canada’s pride is testament to the power of universal healthcare to generate social cohesion and solidarity, but it must not be complacent.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Mental Health Care in Canada
    HISTORICAL DOCUMENT Canadian Psychiatric Association Association des psychiatres du Canada Shared Mental Health Care in Canada Nick Kates, FRCPC, Marilyn Craven, CCFP, Joan Bishop, FRCPC, Theresa Clinton, CCFP, Danny Kraftcheck, CCFP, Ken LeClaIr, FRCPC, John Leverette, FRCPC, Lynn Nash, CCFP, Ty Turner, FRCPC This position paper was reviewed and delisted as an official position of the Canadian Psychiatric Association on September 17, 2010. It is being made available for historical purposes only. The paper was originally developed by the Joint Working Group of the Canadian Psychiatric Association and The College of Family Physicians of Canada and approved by the CPA’s Board of Directors on October 4, 1996. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recognizing the need to respond to these issues, the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) and the The family physician already plays an extensive role Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA) set up a working as a provider of mental health care in almost every commu- group to prepare a report that would highlight the advan- nity in Canada. In theory, the family physician and the tages of greater collaboration between family physicians psychiatrist are natural partners in the mental health care and psychiatrists and its benefits for both patients and system. While neither may be able to meet every need of providers and describe a range of practitioner behaviours, a patient with a mental disorder, each can offer comple- practices, and policies which could contribute to collabora- mentary services, which enables them to play a key role at tive mental health care. different stages of an episode of illness and the subsequent period of recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Times, Are They A-Changin'?
    COMMENTARY OF TE ION ACH CT ER SE S The times, are they a-changin’? Celebrating Paul Rainsberry PhD Louise Nasmith MD CM MEd CCFP FCFP W. Wayne Weston MD CCFP FCFP Family Medicine Nick Busing MD CCFP FCFP(LM) Nancy Fowler MD CCFP FCFP James Goertzen MD MClSc CCFP FCFP Teaching SINC 78 Brent Kvern MD CCFP FCFP David Tannenbaum MD CCFP FCFP Ivy F. Oandasan MD CCFP MHSc FCFP E 19 his year we celebrate an important anniversary. Forty the Canadian Medical Association to provide a home, the years ago, the College of Family Physicians of Canada College of General Practice of Canada, to support and nur- (CFPC) established the Section of Teachers of Family ture general practice. They saw that training standards and TMedicine (SOT) as a national home for family medicine Certification were needed to compete for new practitioners teachers and the academic community. Anniversaries are and establish the discipline as having an expert and unique an opportune time to remember past accomplishments role. The struggle was long and hard, but within 2 decades and to look to the challenges of the future. the College, now the CFPC, conducted its first Certification By many measures family medicine is in good shape in examination and set standards for training that sup- Canada. Interest in family medicine residency has been high ported family medicine residencies in all medical schools in recent years. More than half of all physicians in Canada in Canada. With a base in the medical schools, academic are family physicians, and Canada is sought out for advice by leaders like Ian McWhinney were attracted to Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Health Care Providers
    Canada’s Health Care Providers About the Canadian Institute for Health Information Since 1994, the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), a national, independent, not-for-profit organization, has been working to improve the health of Canadians and the health system by providing quality, reliable health information. The Institute's mandate, as established by Canada's health ministers, is to develop and maintain an integrated approach to health information in the country. To this end, CIHI provides information to advance Canada's health policies, improve the health of the population, strengthen our health care system, and assist leaders in our health sector to make informed decisions. As of September 2001, the following individuals serve on CIHI's Board of Directors: • Mr. Michael Decter (Chair), • Mr. Terry Kaufman, Director General, Lawrence Decter Investment CLSC Notre-Dame de Grâce Counsel Inc. • Dr. Cameron Mustard, Scientific • Mr. Tom Closson (Vice-Chair), Director, Institute for Work and President and CEO, University Health Health Network • Dr. Brian Postl, CEO, Winnipeg • Mr. Richard Alvarez (Ex-officio), Regional Health Authority President and CEO, CIHI • Mr. Rick Roger, CEO, • Mr. Daniel Burns, Deputy Minister, Capital Health Region Ontario Ministry of Health and • Dr. Tom Ward, Deputy Minister, Long-Term Care Nova Scotia Department of Health • Dr. Ivan Fellegi, Chief Statistician of • Ms. Sheila Weatherill, President and Canada, Statistics Canada CEO, Capital Health Authority • Mr. Rory Francis, Deputy Minister, • Ms. Kathleen Weil, Chair of the Prince Edward Island Ministry of Board of Directors, Régie régionale Health and Social Services de la santé et des services sociaux • Mr. Ian Green, Deputy Minister, de Montréal-Centre Health Canada • Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Health Insurance: Lessons for the United States
    J lltlth l!N 1 CANADIAN HEALTH INSURANCE Lessons for the United States IllII144039 118 IIII , ._------.- ‘! CAO/EEKI)-w-!10 GAllIll ~$iz?t&z&Lwmf&, . Human Resources Division B-244081 June 4,199l The Honorable John Conyers, Jr. Chairman, Committee on Government Operations House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: This report, prepared at the Committee’s request, reviews Canada’s universal, publicly funded insurance system. The report describes the policies used in this system, consequences for both health care spending and access, and implications for the United States. We are sending copies of this report to interested congressional committees and are making copies available to others on request. This report was prepared under the direction of Mark V. Nadel, Associate Director, National and Public Health Issues, who may be reached on (202) 276-6196 if you or your staff have any questions. Other major contributors to this report are listed in appendix II. Sincerely yours, Lawrence H. Thompson Assistant Comptroller General Executive Summary Recent polls indicate widespread dissatisfaction with the way the Purpose United States finances and controls the cost of health care. Health spending consumes a steadily rising share of our national income- almost 12 percent of gross national product in 1989, headed to 16 per- cent by the end of the decade. Yet many Americans who lack health insurance face severe difficulty gaining access to health care. This situa- tion has revived national debate over the way we finance health care. Meanwhile, other industrialized nations assure that everyone has access to the health care system, have health status indicators that equal or exceed those of the United States, and accomplish these goals while spending less than the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Health Care in Canada
    Research Ecology of health care in Canada Moira Stewart PhD Bridget Ryan MSc PhD Abstract Objective To provide a population-based, Canada-wide picture of health care needs and health care use, and present it in a highly accessible manner, allowing provincial comparisons and comparisons with other international jurisdictions. Design A comparison of the rates of health care use among jurisdictions, using Canadian-population survey data and health administrative data. Setting Provincial jurisdictions across Canada. Main outcome measures Canadian and provincial rates of ill health (presence of chronic conditions) and health care use (contacts with family physicians, contacts with other specialist physicians, contacts with nurses, and hospitalizations) as monthly rates per 1000 population standardized by age and sex. Results The monthly rate per 1000 population of having at least 1 chronic condition ranged from 524 in Quebec to 638 in Nova Scotia; contacts with family physicians ranged from 158 in EDITor’s kEY POINTS Quebec to 295 in British Columbia; contacts with other physician • This study provides a Canadian synthesis of health care use at a population level comparing specialists ranged from 53 in Saskatchewan to 79 in Ontario; and provincial jurisdictions. Data were primarily contacts with nurses ranged from 23 in British Columbia to 41 in self-reported, identically measured across Quebec. Hospital stays ranged from 8 to 11 per 1000 people, and provinces, and adjusted by age and sex. rates were similar among the provinces. • The key differences among the provinces were Conclusion Recognizing the differences among jurisdictions as follows: use of family physicians was highest is critical to informing health care policy across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Medical Workforce Is Changing
    Tracking change in medical residencies and the physician workforce Health Systems and Policy, Royal College ICRE, October 20th,2017 The best health for all. The best care for all. I do not have an affiliation (financial or otherwise) with a pharmaceutical, medical device or communications organization. Je n’ai aucune affiliation (financière ou autre) avec une entreprise pharmaceutique, un fabricant d’appareils médicaux ou un cabinet de communication. 2 Delete this box before presenting: Supprimez cette boîte avant de faire votre présentation : Please keep only the applicable statement, shown above is Option Veuillez conserver uniquement l’énoncé pertinent; ci-dessus se 1 with Option 2 to follow on next slide. trouve l’option 1, l’option 2 paraissant à la diapo suivante. Note: Speakers who have no involvement with industry should Note: Les conférenciers qui n’ont aucun lien avec l’industrie inform the audience that they cannot identify any conflict of doivent aviser leur auditoire qu’ils n’ont aucun conflit d’intérêts à interest. déclarer. Workshop Objectives • At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Identify critical data sources utilized in studying physician workforce Interpret physician workforce supply changes in the context of population health needs and the broader health care system Highlight knowledge gaps and propose novel data collection and analytical priorities To start…Who’s participating? Post-graduate dean Program director Clinician educator Fellow Resident Academic/Researcher Epidemiologist/Statistician
    [Show full text]
  • Physicians by Categories
    OECD Health Statistics 2021 Definitions, Sources and Methods Physicians by categories Three main categories and eight sub-categories selected for the common module: Generalist medical practitioners (ISCO-08 code: 2211) General practitioners Other generalist (non-specialist) medical practitioners Specialist medical practitioners (ISCO-08 code: 2212) General paediatricians Obstetricians and gynaecologists Psychiatrists Medical group of specialists Surgical group of specialists Other specialists not elsewhere classified Medical doctors not further defined (ISCO-08 code: 2210) The breakdown by categories should be provided for practising physicians where possible. (If not possible, the data can be reported for professionally active physicians or physicians licensed to practise). Notes: - The following criteria are proposed in order to avoid double counting of doctors who have more than one specialty: 1) the predominant (main) area of practice of doctors; or 2) the last specialty for which doctors have received registration. - The number should be at the end of the calendar year. Generalist medical practitioners (ISCO-08 code: 2211) Generalist medical practitioners do not limit their practice to certain disease categories or methods of treatment, and may assume responsibility for the provision of continuing and comprehensive medical care to individuals, families and communities. Inclusion - General practitioners - District medical doctors - therapists - Family medical practitioners - Primary health care physicians - Medical doctors
    [Show full text]
  • The Contributions of W.D. Stevenson to the Development of Neurosurgery in Atlantic Canada
    HISTORICAL NEUROSURGERY The Contributions of W.D. Stevenson to the Development of Neurosurgery in Atlantic Canada K. Mukhida and I. Mendez ABSTRACT: The establishment of a neurosurgical department in Halifax in January 1948 marked the beginnings of the first dedicat­ ed neurosurgical service in Atlantic Canada. The development of neurosurgery in Halifax occurred in a receptive place and time. The Victoria General Hospital, the region's largest tertiary care centre, and the Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine were in a period of growth associated with medical specialization and departmentalization, changes inspired in part by the Flexner Report of 1910. Atlantic Canadians during this period were increasingly looking to specialists for their medical care. Although this social environment encouraged the establishment of surgical specialty services, the development of neurosurgery in Halifax, as in other parts of Canada, was closely associated with the efforts of individual neurosurgeons, such as William D. Stevenson. After training with Kenneth G. McKenzie in Toronto, Stevenson was recruited to Halifax and established the first neurosurgical department in Atlantic Canada. From the outset and over his twenty-six years as Department Head at the Victoria General Hospital and Dalhousie University, Stevenson worked to maintain the department's commitment to clinical practice, medical education, and research. Although Stevenson single-hand­ edly ran the service for several years after its inception, by the time of his retirement in 1974 the neurosurgery department had grown to include five attending staff surgeons who performed over two thousand procedures each year. This paper highlights the importance of Stevenson's contributions to the development of neurosurgery in Atlantic Canada within the context of the social and medical envi­ ronment of the region.
    [Show full text]