Religious Freedom, Discarding Hate Speech and Contempt of Religions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CONTENTS Editorial .......................................................................................................................... 6 By Prof. Ibrahim Saleh Al-Naimi Interview with His Eminence ............................................................................ 7 the Grand Mufti of Australia Prof. Dr. Ibrahim Abu Mohamed By Ahmed Abdelreheem A whole-of-society Approach to Countering ......................................... 19 Hate Speech and Hate-motivated Aggression By Brian J. Adams Religion and Hate Speech in Korea .............................................................. 27 By Chae Young Kim Hate Speech Root .................................................................................................... 37 Causes and Proposed Remedies: An Islamic Perspective By Jamal Badawi Revisiting Sacred Scriptures ............................................................................. 51 And We have not sent you, O Muhammad, except as a A strategy for Facing Hate Speech Against Women mercy to the worlds By Kelita Cohen Cultural and Economic Diversity in (Al – Andalus) .............................. 59 An Approach to Ibn Khaldun’s Sociology By Kian Foei Nio Tjong The Concept of Radicalism ............................................................................. 67 and Religious Recognition By Tito Marci 2 3 The Activity of the Hungarian Catholic Church .................................. 77 to promote interfaith dialogue and against hatred By Ujházi Lóránd Combating Hate Speech from ....................................................................... 89 the Perspective of Islamic Philosophy: Building a Moral Paradigm By Mykhaylo Yakubovych Religious Freedom, Discarding Hate Speech ....................................... 97 and Contempt of Religions By Neven Melek Hate Speech within Islamic ......................................................................... 107 and Social Science Perspectives By Mahmoud Dhaouadi Los Moriscos: ........................................................................................................ 117 Víctimas de la Persecución Religiosa By Mohamed Abdel Samie Abstract Los Moriscos: .............................................................................. 129 Víctimas de la Persecución Religiosa By Mohamed Abdel Samie Biographies ............................................................................................................ 130 4 5 Therefore, the role of the Catholic control. The concept of the Council Church in the area of sensitization of regarding interfaith dialogue could be Catholic faithful and the society against implemented with limitation. After the hate speech is much more important. regime change, the social position of the Catholic Church leaders, besides Church changed significantly. Regarding generally passing Catholic teaching, faith questions, the Church got especially spoke against hate speech.57 considerable freedom, but it was lack of In 2012, reflecting to an MP’s offending the continuity, which was a characteristic statement, the Catholic Church – feature of western Churches. Pope John together with other denominations – Paul II’s visit to Hungary in 1991 gave declared, “we find it really annoying that interfaith dialogue a push. The Catholic hate speech was, could be said in the Church spoke against religious hatred, if Parliament. Hungarian legislation, MPs applicable against hate speech more and and politicians, who are responsible for more strongly. In theory, the Church is determining political public discourse, asked in case of the legislation regarding have increased responsibility against religious and ethical questions. However, 58 hate speech. those utterances that the church makes Combating Hate Speech from the for interfaith dialogue locally are more Perspective of Islamic Philosophy: Summary important. In Hungary, regarding non- During the most important Catholic Christian religions, the Church has Building a Moral Paradigm event of the 20th century, the Second experience in the dialogue with Jewish 1 Introduction Vatican Council, communist dictatorship communities. The challenge of the of what is ‘hateful’ reigned in Hungary. The representatives future is what kind of sensitization the Encyclopedia Britannica is controversial and of the Hungarian Catholic Church could Church can present along the pressure denoted “hate speech” as disputed. In the context take part in the Second Vatican Council appearing with refugee and migration a “speech or expression of this document, the with state permission under strict processes, namely against hate speech. that denigrates a person term hate speech is or persons on the basis of understood as any (alleged) membership in kind of communication a social group identified in speech, writing or by attributes such as race, behavior, that attacks ethnicity, gender, religion, or uses pejorative or age, physical or mental discriminatory language disability, and others1”. As Mykhaylo Yakubovych with reference to a the UN Strategy and Plan person or a group on the of Action on Hate Speech Center for Islamic basis of who they are, in (published by May, 2019) Studies-National other words, based on clearly explain it, there University of their religion, ethnicity, Ostroh-Ukraine is no international legal nationality, race, colour, definition of hate speech, descent, gender or other and the characterization identity factor2. 57 MAZSIHISZ: Keresztény egyházi vezetők a gyűlöletbeszéd ellen. https://mazsihisz.hu/hirek-a-zsido-vilagbol/mazsihisz-hirek/kereszteny-egyhazi-vezetok-a-gyuloletbeszed-ellen 1 https://www.britannica.com/topic/hate-speech, Accessed Decemeber 03, 2019. (downloaded: 10 January 2020) 2 https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/UN%20Strategy%20and%20Plan%20of%20Action%20 58 ibidem on%20Hate%20Speech%2018%20June%20SYNOPSIS.pdf. Accessed Decemeber 03, 2019. 88 89 Within the legal proceedings of the one must combat it by the reason and be linked to hate speech is the one there are no necessity to speak about European Union, hate speech is revelation proofs (both on the individual from surah “The Women” (4:148): that in order to avoid “greater damage”. approached from the position that and social level), and how this kind of “Allah does not like the public mention So, there are some places when it the rise in prejudice and intolerance moral illness can be “cured” spiritually, of evil except by one who has been should be done, for example, if someone can in many cases be directly linked approaching the paradigm of Islamic wronged. And ever is Allah Hearing really oppressed (mazlum). Mentioning to the respective governments’ own philosophical thinking. According to and Knowing” (Saheen International sayings of Qatadah, Ibn Abbbas, Mujahid policies and communications strategies. Saeed Alzahrani, hate speech under the Translation). Al-Wahidi in his book and some other of the earlier generation Representatives of prominent traditional Islamic perspective (Shariah) “Reasons of Revelations” comments of the scholars, al-Razi also speak about political parties, public officials, and, is ambiguous and that in turn increases over this by the next way: “Allah loveth some “hidden affairs” (ahwal al-mastura in some countries, even government hate speech under the justification of not the utterance of harsh speech…) al-maktuma) which should not be ministers, have used inflammatory and protection of freedom of expression. [4:148]. Said Mujahid: “One man sought revealed if the person has no right for derogatory language in their public At the same time, the ambiguity in hospitality with some people. However, doing that. If this rule is violated, this will communications, and have targeted the definition for the concept of hate because they did not show him proper “lead a people to the backbiting and a various minorities, refugees and speech in Islam has been leading many hospitality, he complained about them. person to a doubt”. Thus, there are two migrants, as well as the EU agenda. As countries to suppress peaceful political And so this verse was revealed, giving perspectives for the verse can be related a result, there is minimal political will to opposition under the justification of the him dispensation to complain”. In the to the problem of the hate speech: adequately and appropriately respond fight against hate speech later tafsirs, like the one by Jalalayn, the that is, the legal one, and the second is to instances of ‘hate speech’ surfacing similar commentary is given: “God does social one. For the first perspective, the in society at large. Taking all this into consideration, our not like the utterance of evil words out one may criticize others only being in study will be concentrated over three loud by any person that is to say He will charge of it or having special right to it; Islamic philosophy, being it medieval or main tasks: first of all, how do Islamic punish him for it unless a person has contemporary one, usually described thinkers of the past understood hate for the second one, this should be done been wronged in which case He would in proper way and not in the public one. as the tradition where both revelation speech in the approach to the Qur’an, not punish him for uttering it out loud Comparing this to the contemporary (naql) and reason (‘aql) play an secondly, the perspective of akhlaq when he is informing others of the definitions of the hate speech, the one important role. When any of the modern and adab writings on the free speech wrong done