Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty The Royal Society For further information and uncertainty Geoengineering the climate: science, governance The Royal Society The Royal Society is a Fellowship of more than 1400 outstanding Science Policy Centre individuals from all areas of science, mathematics, engineering and 6–9 Carlton House Terrace medicine, who form a global scientifi c network of the highest calibre. The London SW1Y 5AG Fellowship is supported by over 130 permanent staff with responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Society and its activities. The Society T +44 (0)20 7451 2500 encourages public debate on key issues involving science, engineering F +44 (0)20 7451 2692 Geoengineering and medicine, and the use of high quality scientifi c advice in policy- E [email protected] making. We are committed to delivering the best independent expert W royalsociety.org advice, drawing upon the experience of the Society’s Fellows and Foreign Members, the wider scientifi c community and relevant stakeholders. the climate In our 350th anniversary year and beyond we are working to achieve fi ve strategic priorities: Science, governance and uncertainty • Invest in future scientifi c leaders and in innovation • Infl uence policymaking with the best scientifi c advice September 2009 • Invigorate science and mathematics education • Increase access to the best science internationally • Inspire an interest in the joy, wonder and excitement of scientifi c discovery September 2009 Society Royal The ISBN 978-0-85403-773-5 ISBN: 978-0-85403-773-5 Centre report 10/09 Science Policy Issued: September 2009 Report 10/09 RS1636 Founded in 1660, the Royal Society is the independent scientific academy of the UK, dedicated to promoting excellence in science 9 780854 037735 Registered Charity No 207043 Price £39 Royal Society policy reports, statements and responses New approaches to biological risk assessment Submission to the NDA consultation on management (July 2009) options for the UK’s separated plutonium Hidden wealth: The contribution of science to service (December 2008) sector innovation Letter to CBD on ground-level ozone (July 2009) (December 2008) Towards a low carbon future Royal Society’s response to a vision for Science and (June 2009) Society: a consultation on developing a new strategy EASAC: Transforming Europe’s electricity supply—full for the UK report and summary (October 2008) (June 2009) Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, Joint Academies’ statement: Climate change and the impacts and policy implications transformation of energy technologies for a low carbon (October 2008) future Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: summary for (June 2009) policy makers Submission to DFID’s Consultation for its White (October 2008) Paper “Eliminating World Poverty: Assuring our Synthetic biology scientifi c discussion meeting summary Common Future” (August 2008) (June 2009) Royal Society activities on reducing the risk of the Inter-Academy Panel statement on ocean acidifi cation misuse of scientifi c research (June 2009) (August 2008) EASAC: Healthcare-associated infections Innovative mechanisms for tackling antibacterial (May 2009) resistance Submission to the IUSS committee inquiry ’putting (July 2008) science and engineering at the heart of Government Joint science academies’ statement: Climate change policy’ adaptation and the transition to a low carbon society (April 2009) (June 2008) UK-India workshop on food-crop production Joint science academies’ statement: global health (April 2009) (June 2008) Submission to House of Lords Science and Technology Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill brief Committee on nanotechnologies and food (April 2008) (March 2009) Letter to Secretary of State on carbon capture and storage EASAC: Drug-resistant tuberculosis—full report and (April 2008) summary Royal Society submission to the Efra committee call for (March 2009) views on Defra’s scientifi c infrastructure European Academies Science Advisory Council (March 2008) (EASAC): Ecosystem services and biodiversity Royal Society submission to the IUS Committee inquiry in Europe into engineering (February 2009) (March 2008) An integrated approach to infectious disease in the UK Stem cell and embryo research statement (February 2009) (March 2008) Emerging technologies and social change: report Pandemic Infl uenza: report of the follow-up symposium on the third joint Royal Society—Science Council (March 2008) of Japan workshop on new and emerging technologies Detecting nuclear and radiological materials (January 2009) (March 2008) Letter to Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Royal Society submission to DIUS UK science and Change on the management of separated plutonium innovation strategy (December 2008) (February 2008) Cover image from DaisyBall model, by Ginger Booth, http://gingerbooth.com, Copyright © Yale University 1997–2008. The cover image comes from the Daisyworld model developed by Dr. James Lovelock and Professor Andrew Watson, both Fellows of the Royal Society. This conceptual model illustrates the tight coupling between climate and the biosphere through the connection between surface refl ectivity and temperature—white daisies refl ect more and absorb less solar radiation than do dark daisies These reports can be found on the Royal Society’s website (royalsociety.org) thereby keeping the Earth cooler. This is the principle on which Geoengineering by the refl ection of solar radiation is based. Further copies of these reports can be obtained from: Daisyworld has been instrumental in drawing attention to the tight link between the Earth’s surface climate and the presence of living organisms. See: Watson, A. J. and Lovelock, J.E. (1983). Biological homeostasis of the global environment: the parable Science Policy Centre, The Royal Society, of Daisyworld. Tellus 35B, 284–289. 6–9 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AG Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty RS Policy document 10/09 Issued: September 2009 RS1636 ISBN: 978-0-85403-773-5 © The Royal Society, 2009 Requests to reproduce all or part of this document should be submitted to: The Royal Society Science Policy 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG Tel +44 (0)20 7451 2500 Email [email protected] Web royalsociety.org Design by Franziska Hinz, Royal Society, London Copyedited and Typeset by Techset Composition Limited Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty Contents Foreword v Membership of working group vii Summary ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Geoengineering 1 1.3 The climate system 1 1.4 Climate change and geoengineering—the policy context 4 1.5 Conduct of the study 6 2 Carbon dioxide removal techniques 9 2.1 Introduction 9 2.2 Land-based CDR methods 10 2.3 Ocean ecosystem methods 16 2.4 Discussion 19 2.5 Conclusion 21 3 Solar radiation management techniques 23 3.1 Introduction 23 3.2 General characteristics of SRM methods 23 3.3 Specifi c techniques 24 3.4 Discussion 34 3.5 Conclusion 36 4 Governance 37 4.1 Introduction 37 4.2 Governance, risk and uncertainty 37 4.3 Ethics 39 4.4 International frameworks 39 4.5 Governance of geoengineering research and development 41 4.6 Public and civil society engagement 42 4.7 Economic factors 44 The Royal Society Geoengineering the Climate I September 2009 I iii 4.8 Option of last resort? 44 4.9 Conclusion 45 5 Discussion 47 5.1 Geoengineering methods and their properties 47 5.2 Criteria and methods for evaluation 47 5.3 Overall evaluation 48 5.4 Human and governance dimensions 50 5.5 Research requirements 52 5.6 Guidance for decision makers 54 5.7 Conclusion 56 6 Conclusions and recommendations 57 6.1 The future of geoengineering 57 6.2 Major characteristics of geoengineering methods 57 6.3 Preliminary evaluation of CDR and SRM methods 58 6.4 Criteria and methods of assessment 59 6.5 Public attitudes and engagement 59 6.6 Governance 60 6.7 Geoengineering research and development 61 7 References 63 8 Annexes 69 8.1 Evaluation criteria 69 8.2 Project terms of reference 70 8.3 Ethics panel 71 8.4 Call for submissions 72 9 Glossary 75 10 Acknowledgements 81 iv I September 2009 I Geoengineering the Climate The Royal Society Foreword Lord Rees of Ludlow OM The continuing rise in the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse President of the Royal Society gases, mainly caused by the burning of fossil fuels, is driving changes in the Earth’s climate. The long-term consequences will be exceedingly threatening, especially if nations continue ‘business as usual’ in the coming decades. Most nations now recognise the need to shift to a low-carbon economy, and nothing should divert us from the main priority of reducing global greenhouse gas emissions. But if such reductions achieve too little, too late, there will surely be pressure to consider a ‘plan B’—to seek ways to counteract the climatic effects of greenhouse gas emissions by ‘geoengineering’. Many proposals for geoengineering have already been made—but the subject is bedevilled by much doubt and confusion. Some schemes are manifestly far-fetched; others are more credible, and are being investigated by reputable scientists; some are being promoted over-optimistically. In this report, the Royal Society aims to provide an authoritative and balanced assessment of the main geoengineering options. Far more detailed study would be needed before any method could even be seriously considered for deployment on the requisite international scale. Moreover, it is already clear than none offers a ‘silver bullet’, and that some options are far more problematic than others. This report is therefore offered as a clarifi cation of the scientifi c and technical aspects of geoengineering, and as a contribution to debates on climate policy. The Society is grateful to all the members of the Working Group, and especially to John Shepherd, its chairman. We also acknowledge the valuable inputs from the Council’s review group, and the expert support, throughout the exercise, of the Society’s Science Policy team.
Recommended publications
  • Abstract Book
    Table of Contents Committees ...............................................................................................................................................................3 Final programme Wednesday 26th November ........................................................................................................................5 Thursday 27th November ............................................................................................................................7 Friday 28th November .................................................................................................................................9 Poster sessions ........................................................................................................................................................10 Abstracts..................................................................................................................................................................14 Organising Committee Christine Gommenginger / NOC, UK Matthew Martin / Met Office, UK Lesley Challenger / Met Office, UK Jacqueline Boutin / LOCEAN, France Nicolas Reul / IFREMER, France Chris Banks / NOC, UK Ellis Ash / SatOC, UK Antonio Turiel / ICM-CSIC, Spain Craig Donlon / ESA, Netherlands Scientific Committee Detlef Stammer / Universität Hamburg, Germany Gilles Reverdin / LOCEAN, France Jordi Font / ICM-CSIC, Spain Ray Schmidt / WHOI, USA Arnold Gordon / LDEO, Uni. Columbia Thierry Delcroix / LEGOS, France Gary Lagerloef / ESR / Aquarius
    [Show full text]
  • In Pdf Format
    COLD WIND TWO GYRES A Tribute To VAL WORTHINGTON by a few of his friends in honor of his forty-one years of activity in oceanography Publication costs for this supplementary issue have been subsidized by the National Science Foundation, by the Office of Naval Research, and by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Printed in U.S.A. for the Sears Foundation for Marine Research, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, U.S.A. Van Dyck Printing Company, North Haven, Connecticut, 06473, U.S.A. EDITORIAL PREFACE Val Worthington has worked in oceanography for forty-one years. In honor of his long career, and on the occasion of his sixty-second birthday and retirement from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, we offer this collection of forty-one papers by some of his friends. The subtitle for the volume, “Cold Wind- Two Gyres,” is a free translation of his Japanese nickname, given him by Hideo Kawai and Susumu Honjo. It refers to two of his more controversial interpretations of the general circulation of the North Atlantic. The main emphasis of the collection is physical oceanography; in particular the general circulation of "his ocean," the North Atlantic (ten papers). Twenty-nine papers deal with physical oceanographic studies in other regions, modeling and techniques. There is one paper on the “Worthington effect” in paleo oceanography and one on fishes – this last being a topic dear to Val's heart, but one on which his direct influence has been mainly on population levels in Vineyard Sound. Many more people would like to have contributed to the volume but were prevented by the tight time table, the editorial and referee process, or the paper limit of forty-one.
    [Show full text]
  • BIO Review This Year
    Bedford Institute of Oceanography The Bedford Institute of Oceanography (BIO) is the principal oceanographic institution in Canada; it is operated within the framework of several federal government de- partments; its staff, therefore, are public servants. BIO facilities (buildings, ships, computers, library, workshops, etc.) are operated by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, through its Director-General, Ocean Science and Surveys (Atlantic). The principal laboratories and departments are: Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) = Canadian Hydrographic Service (Atlantic Region) = Atlantic Oceanographic Laboratory = Marine Ecology Laboratory = Marine Fish Division Department of Energy, Mines and Resources (DEMR) = Atlantic Geoscience Centre Department of the Environment (DOE) = Seabird Research Unit BIO operates a fleet of three research vessels, together with several smaller craft. The two larger scientific ships, Hudson and Baffin, have global capability, extremely long endurance, and are Lloyds Ice Class I vessels able to work throughout the Canadian Arctic. BIO has four objectives: (1) To perform fundamental long-term research in all fields of the marine sciences (and to act as the principal Canadian repository of expertise). (2) To perform shorter-term applied research in response to present national needs, and to advise on the management of our marine environment including its fisheries and offshore hydrocarbon resources. (3) To perform necessary surveys and cartographic work to ensure a supply of suitable navigational charts for the region from George’s Bank to the Northwest Passage in the Canadian Arctic. (4) To respond with all relevant expertise and assistance to any major marine emergen- cy within the same region W.D. Bowen - Chief, Marine Fish Division, DFO M.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 10/02/21 12:36 PM UTC AUGUST 1997 BARINGER and PRICE 1655
    1654 JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 27 Mixing and Spreading of the Mediterranean Out¯ow MOLLY O'NEIL BARINGER NOAA/Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Miami, Florida JAMES F. P RICE Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts (Manuscript received 3 March 1996, in ®nal form 28 January 1997) ABSTRACT Hydrographic and current pro®ler data taken during the 1988 Gulf of Cadiz Expedition have been analyzed to diagnose the mixing, spreading, and descent of the Mediterranean out¯ow. The u±S properties and the thickness and width of the out¯ow were similar to that seen in earlier surveys. The transport of pure Mediterranean Water (i.e., water with S $ 38.4 psu) was estimated to be about 0.4 3 106 m3 s21, which is lower than historical estimatesÐmost of which were indirectÐbut comparable to other recent estimates made from direct velocity observations. The out¯ow transport estimated at the west end of the Strait of Gibraltar was about 0.7 3 106 m3 s21 of mixed water, and the transport increased to about 1.9 3 106 m3 s21 within the eastern Gulf of Cadiz. This increase in transport occurred by entrainment of fresher North Atlantic Central Water, and the salinity anomaly of the out¯ow was consequently reduced. The velocity-weighted salinity decreased to 36.7 psu within 60 km of the strait and decreased by about another 0.1 before the deeper portion of the out¯ow began to separate from of the bottom near Cape St. Vincent. Entrainment appears to have been correlated spatially with the initial descent of the continental slope and with the occurrence of bulk Froude numbers slightly greater than 1.
    [Show full text]
  • CRUISE REPORT: A05 (Updated JUL 2010)
    CRUISE REPORT: A05 (Updated JUL 2010) HIGHLIGHTS Cruise Summary Information WOCE Section Designation A05 Expedition designation (ExpoCodes) 74DI20040404 Chief Scientist Stuart Cunningham/SOC-JRD Dates Apr 4, 2004 - May 10, 2004 Ship RSS Discovery Ports of call Santa Cruz de Tenerif - Freeport, Grand Bahama 27° 54' N Geographic Boundaries 79° 56' W 13° 22' W 24° 29' N Stations 125 Floats and drifters deployed 1 Argo float deployed Moorings deployed or recovered 0 Chief Scientist Contact Info.: Stuart Cunningham • National Oceanography Centre University of Southampton Waterfront Campus • European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH Phon: +44 (0) 23 8059643 • Email: [email protected] 1 Links to Select locations Shaded sections are not relevant to this cruise or were not available when this report was compiled Cruise Summary Information Hydrographic Measurements Description of Scientific Program CTD Data: Geographic Boundaries Acquisition Cruise Track (Figure): PI CCHDO Processing Description of Stations Calibration Description of Parameters Sampled Temperature Pressure Bottle Depth Distributions (Figure) Salinities Oxygens Floats and Drifters Deployed Bottle Data Moorings Deployed or Recovered Salinity Oxygen Principal Investigators Nutrients Cruise Participants Carbon System Parameters CFCs Problems and Goals Not Achieved Helium / Tritium Other Incidents of Note Radiocarbon Underway Data Information References Navigation Bathymetry Highlights Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) Salinity Analysis Thermosalinograph Autoflux XBT and/or XCTD Carbon System Parameters Meteorological Observations Atmospheric Chemistry Data Data Report Processing Notes Acknowledgments 2 A05 • 2004 • Station Locations • Cunningham • RSS Discovery 3 SOUTHAMPTON OCEANOGRAPHY CENTRE CRUISE REPORT NO. 54 RRS Discovery Cruise 279 04 APR - 10 MAY 2004 A Transatlantic Hydrographic Section at 24.5°N Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • CPY Document
    WHOI-91-08 Û¡y2 Woods Hole . Oceanographic Institution 1930 Abstracts of Manuscripts Submitted in 1990 for Publication Technical Report WHOI-91-08 DOCU~if1ENT '\ ~ ?-"" ',~ .... .0 ~ I'. " ' ,'. ,"" \.f ., If¡!"",:" ~~.i:::'r;:-iq\J-~ v:)', ~~ vv..¡.l , " .. -. 'c...-'..:~,"\7.~,..... ""f' ...~ w \" - '¡';;~.:'¡!.;'i;;~~èri!! ¡ '-J; Ci ¡Ji1C .., lJ ..~~;".. iilU "-'- -- WHOI-91-08 Research In Progress Abstract of Manuscripts Submitted in 1990 for Publication Woos Hole Oceanographic Institution Woos Hole, Massachusetts Editor: Alora K. Paul Approved for Distribution: When citing this report, it should be referenced as: Woos Hole Oceaographic Institution I" Technical Report No. WHOI-9l-08 ~rncO -o .Jirru ~3:__.. c: c: -i11-- ,- ~ -- c: rn c: -c: PREFACE This volume contains the abstracts of manuscripts submitted for publication during calendar year 1990 by the staff and students of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. We identify the journal of those manuscripts which are in press or have been published. The volume is intended to be informative, but not a bibliography. The abstracts are listed by title in the Table of Contents and are grouped into one of our five departments, marine policy center, coastal research center, or the student category. An author index is presented in the back to faciltate locating specific papers. Acknowledgements Special thanks to Suzanne B. Volkmann, Reseach Associate; Staff Assistants Shirley Bowman, Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering; Peggy Dimmock, Biology; Molly Lump- ing, Chemistry; Pamela Foster, Geology & Geophysics; Lisa Wolfe, Physical Oceanography; Ellen Gately, Marne Policy Center; Olimpia McCall, Coasta Reseach Center; Pamela Goular, Education; and Maureen O'Donnell, Library Assistat. TABLE OF CONTENTS DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED OCEAN PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING Improved Meteorological Measurements from Ships and Buoys Kenneth Prada, David Hosom and Alan Hinton ........................
    [Show full text]
  • ROTY08 Presented Drf8
    Invest in future scientific leaders and in innovation Influence policymaking with the best scientific advice Invigorate science and mathematics education Increase access to the best science internationally Inspire an interest in the joy, wonder and excitement of scientific discovery Invest in future scientific leaders and in innovation Influence policymaking with the best scientific advice Invigorate science and mathematics education Increase access to the best science internationally Inspire an interest in the joy, CHALLENGES wonder and excitement of scientific discovery Invest in future scientific leaders FOR THE FUTURE and in innovation Influence policymaking with the best scientific advice Invigorate Review of the Year 2007/08 science and mathematics education Increase access to the best science internationally Inspire an interest in the joy, wonder and excitement of scientific discovery PRESIDENT’S FOREWORD This year our efforts have Thanks to a number of large donations in support of the Royal Society Enterprise Fund, we were able to launch the Fund in focused on meeting our strategic February 2008. It will provide early-stage investments for innovative objectives as we approach our new businesses emerging from the science base and is intended to 350th Anniversary in 2010. make a significant impact on the commercialisation of scientific research in the UK for the benefit of society. We have had a particularly successful year Our Parliamentary-Grant-in-Aid is another vital source of income, for fundraising. In July we officially allowing us to support active researchers. Our private funds, launched the Royal Society 350th generously provided by many donors and supplemented by our own Anniversary Campaign with the aim of activities, enable us to undertake a wide range of other initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Trustees' Report and Financial Statements 2015-2016
    TRUSTEES’ REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1 Trustees’ report and financial statements For the year ended 31 March 2016 2 TRUSTEES’ REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Trustees Executive Director The Trustees of the Society are the Dr Julie Maxton members of its Council, who are elected Statutory Auditor by and from the Fellowship. Council is Deloitte LLP chaired by the President of the Society. Abbots House During 2015/16, the members of Council Abbey Street were as follows: Reading President RG1 3BD Sir Paul Nurse* Bankers Sir Venki Ramakrishnan** The Royal Bank of Scotland Treasurer 1 Princes Street Professor Anthony Cheetham London EC2R 8BP Physical Secretary Professor Alexander Halliday Investment Managers Rathbone Brothers PLC Foreign Secretary 1 Curzon Street Sir Martyn Poliakoff CBE London Biological Secretary W1J 5FB Sir John Skehel Internal Auditors Members of Council PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Sir John Beddington CMG* Cornwall Court Professor Andrea Brand 19 Cornwall Street Sir Keith Burnett** Birmingham Professor Michael Cates B3 2DT Dame Athene Donald DBE* Professor George Efstathiou** Professor Brian Foster** Professor Carlos Frenk* Registered Charity Number 207043 Professor Uta Frith DBE Registered address Professor Joanna Haigh 6 – 9 Carlton House Terrace Dame Wendy Hall DBE London SW1Y 5AG Dr Hermann Hauser Dame Frances Kirwan DBE* royalsociety.org Professor Ottoline Leyser CBE* Professor Angela McLean Dame Georgina Mace CBE Professor Roger Owen* Dame Nancy Rothwell DBE Professor Stephen Sparks CBE Professor Ian Stewart Dame Janet Thornton DBE Professor Cheryll Tickle** Dr Richard Treisman** Professor Simon White** * Until 30 November 2015 ** From 30 November 2015 Cover image Tadpoles overhead by Bert Willaert, Belgium. TRUSTEES’ REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 3 Contents President’s foreword ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty
    The Royal Society For further information and uncertainty Geoengineering the climate: science, governance The Royal Society The Royal Society is a Fellowship of more than 1400 outstanding Science Policy Centre individuals from all areas of science, mathematics, engineering and 6–9 Carlton House Terrace medicine, who form a global scientifi c network of the highest calibre. The London SW1Y 5AG Fellowship is supported by over 130 permanent staff with responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Society and its activities. The Society T +44 (0)20 7451 2500 encourages public debate on key issues involving science, engineering F +44 (0)20 7451 2692 Geoengineering and medicine, and the use of high quality scientifi c advice in policy- E [email protected] making. We are committed to delivering the best independent expert W royalsociety.org advice, drawing upon the experience of the Society’s Fellows and Foreign Members, the wider scientifi c community and relevant stakeholders. the climate In our 350th anniversary year and beyond we are working to achieve fi ve strategic priorities: Science, governance and uncertainty • Invest in future scientifi c leaders and in innovation • Infl uence policymaking with the best scientifi c advice September 2009 • Invigorate science and mathematics education • Increase access to the best science internationally • Inspire an interest in the joy, wonder and excitement of scientifi c discovery September 2009 Society Royal The ISBN 978-0-85403-773-5 ISBN: 978-0-85403-773-5 Centre report 10/09 Science
    [Show full text]
  • Pnas Acknowledgement
    Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2011 The PNAS editors would like to thank all the individuals who dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal by serving as reviewers in 2011. Their generous contribution is deeply appreciated. A Michael Adams Edoardo Airoldi Mauro Alini Guillermo Alvarez Stuart Aaronson Ralf Adams John Aitchison Antonios Aliprantis de Toledo Mark Aarts Iwona Adamska Alastair Aitken Kari Alitalo Lisa Alvarez-Cohen Snezhana Abarzhi Lia Addadi Yacine Ait-Sahalia A. Paul Alivisatos Pedro Alzari Adam Abate John Adelman Joanna Aizenberg Robin Allaby Jeff Amack Elio Abbondanzieri Zach Adelman Javier Aizpurua Ravi Allada Luis Amaral Joshua Abbott Pia Adelroth Pulickel Ajayan Frederic Allain Gaya Amarasinghe Richard Abbott Robert Adelstein Ghada Ajlani Tony Allan Richard Amasino Chaouki Abdallah Alan Aderem Myles Akabas Ben Allen Christian Amatore Maha Abdellatif Hillel Adesnik Koichi Akashi Craig Allen James Amatruda Reza Abdi Sankar Adhya Omid Akbari Eric Allen Jayakrishna Ambati Ahmed Abdulla Jess Adkins Erol Akcay John Allen Victor Ambros Steffen Abel Milo Adkison Anna Akhmanova Karen Allen Gro Amdam Ted Abel Sina Adl Shizuo Akira Melinda Allen Yuri Amelin Johannes Abeler Arie Admon Gustav Akk Paul Allen Nina Amenta John Abelson Ralph Adolphs Ivona Aksentijevich Phillip Allen James Ames Kenneth Able Markus Aebi Dag Aksnes Thorsten Allers Sebastian Amigorena Ninan Abraham Markus Affolter Serap Aksoy Stefano Allesina Ido Amit Robert Abraham Jeffrey Agar Levent Akyurek Bill Alley Angelika Amon Elihu Abrahams David Agard Claude Alain Frank Allgöwer Linda Amos Dale Abrahamson Anil Agarwal David Alais Rick Allis Hubert Amrein Elaine Abrams Anupam Agarwal Eric Alani Edward Allison Ronald Amundson Peter Abrams Girish Agarwal Azita Alavi John Allman L.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Scientific Report 2001
    Annual Scientific Report 2001 Director's Message The past year has been one of exceptional activity and accomplishment, and while we share the country's grief and concern about the events of September 11, we also want to acknowledge the progress that we have made at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. We have completed an ambitious, far-reaching strategic plan for future research directions and initiated several of the highest priority activities outlined in that plan. We have been able to add to our human capital through a number of new hires in the early career scientist ranks. We have also been able to invest in two new community facilities through NSF's support. I have inaugurated an Advisory Council of preeminent scientists, educators, industry leaders and policy makers to provide advice and input on future directions for the Center. And at the end of this year, we successfully completed the NSF's review of our research programs, our outreach and support to the atmospheric sciences community, and our management. I would like to touch briefly on all of these topics below. I encourage you to read more about all of these activities in the pages below to get a sense of the full year we have just completed. NCAR Strategic Plan The NCAR Strategic Plan, NCAR as an Integrator, has been the work of the past 15 months. We developed a set of statements that describe our mission, vision, values and goals for the next decade, and using a 'grass roots', inclusive process, we engaged all of NCAR's scientific staff and many external collaborators in a reevaluation of directions and priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Band Current Variability Over the Northern California Continental Shelf
    -1- TIDAL BAND CURRENT VARIABILITY OVER THE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CONTINENTAL SHELF by Leslie Karen Rosenfeld B.S. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (1978) SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY and the WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION December 1986 @ Lesl i e K. Rosenfel d 1986 The author hereby grants to MIT and WHOI permission to reproduce and distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author Joint Program in Oceanography, Massachusetts Institute of Technology!Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst;tut;on Certified by Robert c. Beardsley « Thesis Supervisor Accepted by J~Ph -~eal osky - · C-;man. Joint Conmittee -for Physical Oceanography, Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution -3- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My interest in oceanographY started long before graduate school, and I have been fortunate to meet along the way a number of people who taught me, encouraged me, and offered me the opportunities that have enabled me to get to this point in my career. My thanks to Bob Graunke, Nikos Orphanoudakis, Mike Rawson, John Thompson, Hal Mofjeld, Bill Boicourt, Oick Whaley, and Bill Ryan for believing in me and for showing me that oceanographY could be fun. I would like to express my appreciation to the scientists of the Physical OceanographY Departments at WHOI and MIT, most of whom I have called upon for assistance, at one time or another, during my years as a graduate student in the Joint Program. In particular, I would like to thank my advisor: Bob Beardsley; my thesis committee members: Ken Brink, Jim Price, Paola Rizzoli, and Bob Weller; and Dave Chapman, Harry Bryden, and Mel Briscoe, with whom I have had many helpful discussions.
    [Show full text]