DOCSLIB.ORG

Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm Preliminary Environmental Information Report: Chapter 10 – Seascape and Visual Resources Date: July 2017 Chapter 10 - Seascape and Visual Resources Preliminary Environmental Information Report July 2017 Environmental Impact Assessment Preliminary Environmental Information Report Liability Volume 2 Chapter 10 – Seascape and Visual Resources This report has been prepared by RPS, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of their contracts with DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd. Report Number: P6.2.10 Version: Final Date: July 2017 This report is also downloadable from the Hornsea Project Three offshore wind farm website at: www.dongenergy.co.uk/hornseaproject3 DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd. 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG Prepared by: RPS © DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd, 2017. All rights reserved Checked by: Julian Carolan, Sergio Zappulo and Kieran Bell. Front cover picture: Kite surfer near one of DONG Energy's UK offshore wind farms © DONG Energy Hornsea Accepted by: Sophie Banham Project Three (UK) Ltd., 2016. Approved by: Stuart Livesey i Chapter 10 - Seascape and Visual Resources Preliminary Environmental Information Report July 2017 Table of Contents List of Tables 10. Seascape and Visual Resources ..................................................................................................................... 1 Table 10.1: Summary of NPS EN-1 policy relevant to seascape and visual resources and consideration of the 10.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Hornsea Three assessment. ................................................................................................................ 4 10.2 Purpose of this chapter ................................................................................................................................ 1 Table 10.2: Summary of NPS EN-1 on decision making with regard to seascape and visual resources and 10.3 Study area ................................................................................................................................................... 1 consideration in the Hornsea Three assessment. ................................................................................. 4 10.4 Planning policy context ................................................................................................................................ 4 Table 10.3: Summary of NPS EN-3 policy relevant to seascape and visual resources and consideration of the 10.5 Consultation ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Hornsea Three assessment. ................................................................................................................ 5 Table 10.4: Summary of NPS EN-3 policy on decision making with regard to seascape and visual resources and 10.6 Methodology to inform baseline ................................................................................................................... 8 consideration in the Hornsea Three assessment. ................................................................................. 6 10.7 Baseline environment .................................................................................................................................. 9 Table 10.5: Summary of key consultation issues raised during consultation activities undertaken for Hornsea 10.8 Key parameters for assessment ................................................................................................................ 17 Three relevant to seascape and visual resources. ............................................................................... 7 10.9 Impact assessment criteria ........................................................................................................................ 23 Table 10.6: Summary of key desktop reports. ......................................................................................................... 8 a 10.10 Measures adopted as part of Hornsea Three ............................................................................................ 30 Table 10.7: Details of the ferry crossings within the array SVIA study area . ....................................................... 17 Table 10.8: Maximum design scenario considered for the assessment of potential impacts on seascape and 10.11 Assessment of significance ....................................................................................................................... 30 visual resources.................................................................................................................................. 18 10.12 Cumulative Effect Assessment methodology ............................................................................................. 55 Table 10.9: Impacts scoped out of the assessment for seascape and visual resources a. .................................... 23 10.13 Cumulative effect assessment ................................................................................................................... 64 Table 10.10: Definition of terms relating to resource value (as expressed through designation). ............................ 26 10.14 Transboundary Effects ............................................................................................................................... 73 Table 10.11: Definition of terms relating to the sensitivity of present day seascape resource. ................................ 26 10.15 Inter-related Impacts .................................................................................................................................. 73 Table 10.12: Sensitivity of visual resource receptors. ............................................................................................. 26 Table 10.13: Definition of terms relating to the magnitude of impact – present day seascape resource. ................ 27 10.16 Conclusion and summary .......................................................................................................................... 73 Table 10.14: Definition of terms relating to the magnitude of impact - visual resources. ......................................... 27 10.17 Next Steps ................................................................................................................................................. 73 Table 10.15: Matrix used for assessment of significance of effects showing the combinations of receptor/resource 10.18 References ................................................................................................................................................ 75 sensitivity and the magnitude of impact for present day seascape assessment. ................................ 28 Table 10.16: Definition of terms relating to the significance criteria for seascape, historic seascape and visual effects. ................................................................................................................................................ 28 Table 10.17: Definition of terms to the HSC sensitivity. ........................................................................................... 29 Table 10.18: Definition of terms relating to the magnitude of impact on HSC type. ................................................. 29 Table 10.19: Matrix used for assessment of significance showing the combinations of receptor sensitivity and the magnitude of impact for historic seascape assessment. .................................................................... 29 Table 10.20: Summary of construction effects on present day seascape character areas as a result of Hornsea Three associated offshore infrastructure including Hornsea Three offshore cable corridor and offshore HVAC booster stations. ........................................................................................................ 30 Table 10.21: Summary of temporary construction effects on the visual resources as a result of Hornsea Three, offshore cable corridor and offshore HVAC booster stations. ............................................................. 34 Table 10.22: Summary of operation and maintenance effects on present day seascape character areas a result of Hornsea Three array area, offshore cable corridor and offshore HVAC booster stations. .................. 41 Table 10.23: Summary of maximum design scenario for operation and maintenance effects on visual resources as a result of Hornsea Three, offshore cable corridor and offshore HVAC booster stations.................... 48 Table 10.24: List of other projects and plans considered within the CEA. ............................................................... 58 Table 10.25: Maximum design scenario considered for the assessment of potential cumulative impacts on SVIA. 60 Table 10.26: Cumulative effects upon present day national seascape character areas. ......................................... 68 Table 10.27: Simultaneous and successive cumulative effects from permanent surface structures on receptors on ferries at sample viewpoints. .............................................................................................................. 71 ii Chapter 10 - Seascape and Visual Resources Preliminary Environmental Information Report July 2017 Table 10.28: Summary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Building Offshore Wind in England CORE: Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering
    Building Offshore Wind in England CORE: Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering BUSINESS IS 2 Building Offshore Wind in England Ministerial Foreword Offshore wind is a UK success story and the UK is open for business. The UK is the world leader in offshore wind. We have more offshore wind installed than anywhere else in the world. We are an island nation, blessed with strong winds and shallow seas – and this energy resource is on our doorstep. We are determined to move to cleaner electricity generation and offshore wind has an important role to play in our long term plan for a balanced, low carbon energy mix. I want the UK to secure the economic benefits of this new industry. Through our offshore wind industrial strategy, the Government is committed to working in partnership with business to build a competitive, innovative UK supply chain for offshore wind, delivering jobs and economic growth. Building a strong supply chain needs the commitment and expertise of local partners, working alongside central government to support businesses who want to invest here. The Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering (CORE) partnership offers an integrated and cooperative approach between Government and Local Enterprise Partnerships in England, to provide the best possible support to businesses choosing England as an investment location. The Rt Hon Matthew Hancock MP Minister of State for Business, Enterprise and Energy CORE brings together the relevant expertise from UK Central Government and the six major investment hubs in England to support business growth and showcase opportunities for foreign direct investment (FDI) for the offshore wind sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in Planning up to Detailed Plans Submitted
    Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in planning up to detailed plans submitted. PLANS APPROVED Projects where the detailed plans have been approved but are still at pre-tender stage. TENDERS Projects that are at the tender stage CONTRACTS Approved projects at main contract awarded stage. Agent: Plan My Property, 1 Regent Street, Council of Kings Lynn & West Norfolk Norfolk Job: Detail Plans Granted for 4 Plans Granted for housing Client: Cambridge Ltd Agent: John Thompson & Partners Ltd, 17 Street, Skipton, North Yorkshire, BD23 1JR Tel: Fraisthorpe Wind Farm Limited, Willow Court, Finedon, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, Developer: Trundley Design Services, Salgate houses Client: Mr. David Master Developer: City Council Agent: Cambridge City Council, - 23 Calton Road, Edinburgh, Lothian, EH8 01756 700364 West Way, Minns Business Park, Oxford, OX2 MIDLANDS/ NN9 5NB Tel: 01933 383604 Barn, Islington Road, Tilney All Saints, King’s Peter Humphrey Associates, 30 Old Market, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 8DL Contractor: Keepmoat Homes Ltd, Land Adjacent, Halton Moor Road 0JB Tel: 01865 261300 NOTTINGHAM £4.8M Lynn, Norfolk, PE34 4RY Tel: 01553 617700 Town Centre, Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, PE13 3QJ Contractor: Keepmoat Homes, 950 Regeneration House, Gorsey Lane, Coleshill, Halton £1m DURHAM £0.8M EAST ANGLIA Land South Of, Abbey Lane Aslockton LEICESTER £1.1M 1NB Tel: 01945 466966 Capability Green, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 Birmingham, West Midlands, B46 1JU Tel: Planning authority: Leeds Job: Outline Brancepeth
    [Show full text]
  • 10Th July 2000
    News Release 14 March 2012 Siemens awards multi-million tower contract to South Wales firm Fifteen towers destined for Mynydd y Betws wind farm project as Mabey Bridge is awarded first contract by the UK’s largest provider of wind turbines Siemens, the leading global engineering and technology company, has announced that it has placed an order with South Wales based Mabey Bridge to manufacture towers for 15, 2.3MW turbines bound for the Mynydd y Betws wind farm in Carmarthenshire. Siemens will supply, transport, install and commission the two-section 63-metre- high, 105 tonne towers for local developer, Cambrian Renewable Energy Limited (CREL), owned by the ESB, Ireland’s main electricity utility company. The wind turbines will have a tip height of 110 metres, and an installed capacity of up to 34.5MW. The project will generate electricity to power approximately 18,250 households, equivalent to almost a quarter of Carmarthenshire. More than two million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions will be saved over the lifetime of the project. The towers will be delivered in summer 2012 and the project is due for completion by February 2013. Originally developed by CREL, a Welsh consortium of Eco2 and local investors, Mynydd y Betws Wind Farm was acquired in June 2010 by ESB. ESB is committed to halving its carbon emissions by 2020 and achieving carbon net-zero emissions Page 1 of 3 by 2035. In addition to Mynydd y Betws, other projects include the Fullabrook Wind Farm in Devon and the West Durham Wind Farm. Commenting on the Mynydd y Betws Wind Farm project a spokesperson from ESB said: "ESB is committed to realising benefits for local communities by developing new green energy sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity Market Reform
    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee Electricity Market Reform Fourth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 25 January, 2 and 15 February, 15 March and 27 April 2011 Published on 16 May 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/parliament.uk/ecc.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Regenerating Regions - Investment and Innovation in the UK
    Offshore Wind Regenerating Regions - Investment and Innovation in the UK November 2017 Offshore Wind: Regenerating Regions - Investment and Innovation in the UK 1 1 RenewableUK RenewableUK is the not-for-profit trade association representing the onshore and offshore wind, wave and tidal energy industries and their supply chains, with over 400 member companies based throughout the county, from large multinationals to small businesses. All information in this document is provided by RenewableUK and has been sourced from either Offshore Wind Week partners or publicly available information. This information is correct as of October 2017 Front cover photo credit: Innogy 02 Offshore Wind: Regenerating Regions - Investment and Innovation in the UK Contents Foreword 4 Introduction 6 Summary of Offshore Wind Activity in the UK 7 East of England 8 Feature: Galloper Wind Farm 11 Feature: East Anglia ONE 12 North East 13 Feature: Evolving the Industrial Revolution 16 North West, Wales and Northern Ireland 17 Scotland 20 Feature: Beatrice Offshore Windfarm Limited 23 Feature: Innovation in Scotland 24 Feature: Moray Offshore Windfarm (East) Limited 25 South of England 26 Feature: MHI Vestas - Supply Chain Heroes 29 Yorkshire and The Humber 30 Feature: Triton Knoll 33 Feature: Ørsted: Hornsea Project One 34 Supported by Renewables 04 Offshore Wind: Regenerating Regions - Investment and Innovation in the UK Foreword This year, we found out that Britain has backed a winner. Offshore wind has fallen in cost by nearly 50% in just two and a half years. In achieving this, the industry has rewritten the rules for how to deliver cost reductions in energy through innovation and new business models.
    [Show full text]
  • Generating Growth: NECC's First Energy Policy Report
    Generating Growth: NECC’s First Energy Policy Report Produced in partnership with Generating Growth NECC’s First Energy Policy Report seeks to provide a private sector assessment of the challenges and opportunities facing the energy sector in the North East of England and is focused on helping to unlock growth potential in this important sector of the North East economy. It has been produced by the North East Chamber of Commerce with the guidance of the NECC Energy Policy Working Group, which includes representatives from a variety of energy related businesses and organisations with an important part to play in the various debates that surround the energy challenge. NECC The North East Chamber of Commerce (NECC) is the North East’s leading business membership organisation and the only regional chamber of commerce in the country, representing 4,200 businesses on a regional, national, and international level. Its members are drawn from all sizes of business across all sectors and employ about 30% of the region’s workforce. NECC lobbies on behalf of members on a variety of issues in order to improve the conditions for business in the North East. Eversheds Eversheds has 47 offices and over 3,500 legal and business advisers across Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Its vision is to be a great place to work and the most client-centred international law firm. As one of the world’s largest law firms Eversheds provides expertise, resources and local service delivery. Eversheds’ Newcastle office provides a full service covering five main practice areas; company commercial; human resources; legal systems; litigation and dispute management; and real estate.
    [Show full text]
  • East Anglia TWO Offshore Windfarm Chapter 12
    East Anglia TWO Offshore Windfarm Chapter 12 Ornithology Preliminary Environmental Information Volume 1 Document Reference: EA2-DEVWF-ENV-REP-IBR-000807 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved by: www.scottishpowerrenewables.com East Anglia TWO Offshore Windfarm Preliminary Environmental Information Report Revision Summary Rev Date Document Prepared by Checked by Approved by Status 01 11/01/2019 For issue Paolo Pizzolla Julia Bolton Helen Walker Description of Revisions Rev Page Section Description 01 n/a n/a Final Draft EA2-DEVWF-ENV-REP-IBR-000807-Chapter 12 Ornithology Page i East Anglia TWO Offshore Windfarm Preliminary Environmental Information Report Table of Contents 12 Ornithology 1 12.1 Introduction 1 12.2 Consultation 1 12.3 Scope 8 12.4 Assessment Methodology 15 12.5 Existing Environment 24 12.6 Potential Impacts 34 12.7 Cumulative Impacts 105 12.8 Transboundary Impacts 153 12.9 Interactions 154 12.10 Inter-relationships 155 12.11 Summary 156 12.12 References 161 EA2-DEVWF-ENV-REP-IBR-000807-Chapter 12 Ornithology Page ii East Anglia TWO Offshore Windfarm Preliminary Environmental Information Report The Chapter 12 Ornithology figure is presented in Volume 2 and listed in the table below. Figure number Title 12.1 Ornithology Survey Area The Chapter 12 Ornithology appendix is presented in Volume 3 and listed in the table below. Appendix number Title 12.1 Baseline Offshore Ornithology Technical Report EA2-DEVWF-ENV-REP-IBR-000807-Chapter 12 Ornithology Page iii East Anglia TWO Offshore Windfarm Preliminary Environmental Information Report
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Impacts of Offshore Wind Farms on Well-Being
    Understanding the Impacts of Offshore Wind Farms on Well-Being Caroline Hattam, Tara Hooper and Eleni Papathanasopoulou (PML) Marine Research Report Understanding the Impacts of Offshore Wind Farms on Well-Being Caroline Hattam, Tara Hooper and Eleni Papathanasopoulou Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML) © Crown copyright 2015 ISBN: 978-1-906410-65-0 Published by The Crown Estate The basis of this report was work undertaken by Caroline Hattam, Tara Hooper and Eleni Papathanasopoulou of the Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK, on behalf of The Crown Estate. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this report are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of The Crown Estate. The Crown Estate is not liable for the accuracy of the information provided or responsible for any use of the content. Dissemination Statement This publication (excluding the logos) may be re-used free of charge in any format or medium. It may only be used accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as The Crown Estate copyright and use of it must give the title of the source publication. Where third party copyright material has been identified, further use of that material requires permission from the copyright holders concerned. Suggested Citation Hattam, C., Hooper, T. and Papathanasopoulou, E. 2015. ‘Understanding the Impacts of Offshore Wind Farms on Well-Being’, The Crown Estate, 77 pages, ISBN: 978-1-906410- 65-0 This report is available on The Crown Estate website at www.thecrownestate.co.uk ii Contents List Page Executive Summary v 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Well-being and the five capitals approach 1 1.2 Offshore wind generation in the UK 4 1.3 Aims and scope of this review 6 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 26313 Energy Bill.Indd
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee Energy BILL WRITTEN EVIDENCE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED PBC (Bill 100) 2012 - 2013 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] Distributed by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online The Houses of Parliament Shop www.tsoshop.co.uk 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square London SW1A 2JX Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail Telephone orders: 020 7219 3890 TSO General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Email: shopwparliament.uk Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-call 0845 7 023474 Internet: Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 http://www.shop.parliament.uk E-mail: customer.serviceswtso.co.uk Textphone: 0870 240 3701 TSOwBlackwell and other Accredited Agents 26313 Energy Bill Contents British Chambers of Commerce (EN 02) Opus Energy (EN 03) ESB International (EN 04) IPPR (EN 07) E.ON (EN 10) Energy UK (EN 11) Vattenfall (EN 12) Prof Catherine Mitchell (EN 13) WWF (EN14) Dalestone Energy (EN19) UK Youth Climate Coalition (EN 20) RWE npower (EN 21) National Grid (EN 22) DONG Energy (EN 23) Solar Trade Association (EN 24) Department for
    [Show full text]
  • MARTYN EARLE and GAYLE BLACK BANKS GROUP PLANNING FOR
    PLANNING FOR ONSHORE WIND MARTYN EARLE and GAYLE BLACK BANKS GROUP The Banks Group Founded in County Durham in 1977. Commenced development of wind farms in 2003. Gained consent for first wind farm in 2005. Have now gained consent for 6 wind farms in England, 4 more in planning. With programme to submit 7 schemes over the next 12 months. Built West Durham Wind Farm (Tow Law). 24 MW. Largest wind consent in NE England (at the time). Commence construction on 2 more this year in Barnsley and Doncaster PRESENTATION OVERVIEW Wind Farm Specifications The Capacity Question National Policy Wind Energy Constraint Mapping Common Issues with Wind Farms Planning Balance for Renewable Energy Current Turbine Specifications Max height to tip 100m – 145m Rated output 2MW – 3.4MW 1,100 – 1,900 homes Output range 26GWh/a – 33GWh/a Wind speed range 3m/s – 25m/s Power Outputs Tip Height Annual Percentage Yield/MWh/An Increase from 100m turbine 100m 5,136 - 125m 6,486 26% 132m 9,064 76% 150m 9,823 91% What is a wind farm ? Access tracks min. 5m wide Crane pads and turning areas Wind monitoring mast/ performance mast(s) 60m or 80m (hub height of turbine) Screening and Scoping What is a wind farm ? Turbine transformers can be housed internally or externally Grid connection building size depends on type of connection e.g. 33KV, 66KV, 132KV. Grid connection underground/over ground. Most likely wooden poles. Route dictated by grid operator. The Capacity Question Banks operate at approx 30% capacity. Varies from site to site. Generally generate for 80% of the time but not at full rated capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices to Summary of Feedback from 2015 Consultation
    The Dumfries and Galloway Strategic Reinforcement Project Appendices to Summary of Feedback from 2015 Consultation July 2016 Appendix A: Summary of responses from statutory consultees 1 APPENDIX A: Summary of responses from statutory consultees This appendix contains SPEN’s specific responses to feedback raised which is relevant to the Kendoon to Tongland 132kV Reinforcement (KTR) Project as defined within paragraph 2.2.7 of Chapter 2. Consultee Issues Raised SPEN Response Dumfries and Galloway 1. The project already enjoys national development 1. The present statement of why the project is Council Planning status within NPF3 and as such the need has been needed is inadequate and relies too heavily on the Applications Committee established. The statement of need on page 74 of fact that it is included in NPF3. The Council would Response NPF 3 confirms that new and/or upgraded expect SPEN to publish the Need Case for the onshore transmission infrastructure of or in project as soon as possible and certainly in excess of 132kV is needed to support the delivery advance of the 2nd public consultation. of an enhanced high voltage electricity transmission grid which is vital in meeting 2. The Council would expect SPEN to take into national targets for electricity generation, account the views of local communities likely to statutory climate change targets and security of be impacted by the route / options and to include energy supplies. Through the development of the residential amenity in their assessment. project, we have considered a range of strategic options which have been filtered (balancing 3. The Council would expect SPEN to more fully environmental, technical and economic criteria) detail the economic impact, both positive and into a smaller subset which has been subject to a negative, of their proposals, with reference to the more detailed cost-benefit analysis (CBA) Council’s Regional Economic Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Markets Day 2018
    Capital Markets Day 2018 DISCLAIMER This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements, including but not limited to, the statements and expectations contained in the “Financial Outlook” section of this presentation. Statements herein, other than statements of historical fact, regarding our future results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, business strategy, plans and future objectives are forward-looking statements. Words such as “targets”, “believe”, “expect”, “aim”, “intend”, “plan”, “seek”, “will”, “may”, “should” ”anticipate”, “continue”, “predict” or variations of these words, as well as other statements regarding matters that are not historical fact or regarding future events or prospects, constitute forward-looking statements. Ørsted have based these forward-looking statements on its current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These views involve a number of risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted in the forward-looking statements and from the past performance of Ørsted. Although, Ørsted believes that the estimates and projections reflected in the forward- looking statements are reasonable, they may prove materially incorrect and actual results may materially differ due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to market risks, development of construction and production assets, regulatory risks, operation of offshore and onshore wind farms, cost of electricity for offshore and onshore wind power. As a result you should not rely on these forward-looking statements. Please also refer to the overview of risk factors in “Risk and Management” on p. 47 of the Annual Report 2017, available at www.orsted.com. Unless required by law, Ørsted is under no duty and undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement after the distribution of this presentation, whether as a result of new information future events or otherwise.
    [Show full text]