DOCSLIB.ORG

26313 Energy Bill.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
26313 Energy Bill.Indd PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee Energy BILL WRITTEN EVIDENCE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED PBC (Bill 100) 2012 - 2013 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] Distributed by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online The Houses of Parliament Shop www.tsoshop.co.uk 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square London SW1A 2JX Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail Telephone orders: 020 7219 3890 TSO General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Email: shopwparliament.uk Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-call 0845 7 023474 Internet: Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 http://www.shop.parliament.uk E-mail: customer.serviceswtso.co.uk Textphone: 0870 240 3701 TSOwBlackwell and other Accredited Agents 26313 Energy Bill Contents British Chambers of Commerce (EN 02) Opus Energy (EN 03) ESB International (EN 04) IPPR (EN 07) E.ON (EN 10) Energy UK (EN 11) Vattenfall (EN 12) Prof Catherine Mitchell (EN 13) WWF (EN14) Dalestone Energy (EN19) UK Youth Climate Coalition (EN 20) RWE npower (EN 21) National Grid (EN 22) DONG Energy (EN 23) Solar Trade Association (EN 24) Department for Energy and Climate Change (EN 25) Dr Nick Eyre, University of Oxford (EN 26) Renewable Energy Association (EN 27) Independent Renewable Energy Generator (IREGG) (EN 28) Carbon Capture and Storage Association (CCSA) (EN 29) Centre for Energy Policy and Technology, Imperial College London (EN 30) Sedgemoor District Council (EN 31) Statkraft (EN 32) Nuclear Industry Association (NIA) (EN 33) E.ON supplementary evidence (EN 34) EEF (EN 35) Cornwall Energy (EN 36) Royal Academy of Engineering (EN 37) The Co-operative Group (EN 38) Energy Bill Written evidence Memorandum submitted by British Chambers of Commerce (EN 02) INTRODUCTION 1. The British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) is the national body for a powerful and influential network of Accredited Chambers of Commerce across the UK; a network that directly serves not only its member businesses but the wider business community. Representing over 100,000 businesses that together employ more than five million employees, every Chamber sits at the heart of its local community. SUMMARY 2. We welcome the opportunity to submit evidence to the Public Bill Committee on the Energy Bill. Our comments relate to Part One, Electricity Market Reform, and to Part Five, Consumer Redress. 3. We support the main objectives of the Bill and hope that it will complete its passage through Parliament without unnecessary delays. The sooner the Bill receives Royal Assent the better for the future energy security of the UK. Part One: Electricity Market Reform 4. The Bill must ensure that the energy market delivers affordability, certainty and security for business. This is what we found were the key business requirements when we conducted a major survey of Chamber members during July/August 2012. 5. Almost 3,500 businesses responded to the survey. The survey received responses from businesses of all sizes and across the manufacturing and services sectors. 6. Respondents were generally supportive of the major reform of the electricity market that the Government is currently undertaking. Almost half (47%) believe that it should help UK competiveness. Only 10% thought it would have a negative impact. 7. However, one element of the reform, the Carbon Floor Price, is a cause of concern. Over a quarter (27%) think it will negatively impact on competitiveness. While the Carbon Floor Price is not part of the Energy Bill, we believe that its potential cost to business should be borne in mind by Committee members when scrutinising the Bill. 8. Elsewhere the survey found that businesses believe that energy security issues will become a major concern in the future, with 59% of large businesses, 44% of medium-sized businesses, and 38% of small businesses already worried about their future energy supply; disruption to supply is currently a reality for some businesses, with 10% experiencing a cut in their energy supply on five or more occasions in the past three years. 9. With nearly 40% of businesses feeling that rising costs have adversely affected their growth and 90% believing that the UK requires a diverse energy mix to avoid future supply problems, it is clear that action is needed now. Therefore we support the main objective of the Bill. We believe that the Bill as it currently stands should deliver the required certainty for investors and help guarantee future energy security. 10. The announcement that energy intensive firms will be protected from some of the additional cost was welcome and goes some way to addressing our affordability concerns. However, we still feel the Government could explore the possibility of widening the list of electro intensive industries that should be protected. 11. We support the Government preferred choice of the Contracts for difference (CFD) Feed-in Tariff for attracting investment in low carbon forms of energy. The CFD has a number of advantages over other Feed-in Tariff designs that were being considered. As it is a long-term contract it will provide greater revenue certainty; it is less complex than other designs; it provides greater security from price volatility, and thereby reduces the commercial risks faced by investors in low carbon projects. Lower commercial risks should in turn lower the cost of raising finance, and, this should lead to the least additional cost to consumers. 12. Prior to the publication of the Bill a key concern that we heard from our members was over the issues of the counterparty. Therefore we welcome the creation of a Government-owned company to act as a single counterparty. This should further add to investor certainty. 13. However, as the Bill only sets out the powers to be given to the Government to introduce the various market mechanisms, we will have to wait for the regulation to fully understand the details of how the counterparty will work in practice. Investors would be keen to see the detail as soon as possible. 14. The main certainty that the Government must now provide is the strike price for different technologies. We would hope this is revealed as soon as possible and after Government has consulted widely with the nuclear and renewable industry. Eventually we would like to a move towards a situation where the price is set by the market. Energy Bill Part One: Capacity Mechanism 15. As our survey found energy security is a major concern for business. Therefore we have always been mindful to support policies, such as the capacity mechanism, that will help ensure a reliable electricity supply for business consumers. We can see the benefit of moving from the current arrangement, whereby generators are only paid for the electricity they produce, to an arrangement whereby generators receive a payment to ensure they have sufficient capacity to meet future peak electricity demand and protect consumers against the risk of supply shortages. 16. While we support having the first capacity auctions in 2014, industry will need further certainty around the design of the Capacity Mechanism and it is clear from the lack of detail in the Bill that work on the Capacity Mechanism is less advanced that on other parts of the electricity market reform. Full details won’t be known until we see the regulations and we would encourage the Government to ensure the final detailed design proposals are published no later than May 2013. Part One: Possible Amendments 17. We do not support amending the Bill to include a decarbonisation target. The decision to wait until 2016 we feel is a sensible one. We hope the debate on a target does not cause unnecessary delays to the Bill reaching the Statute books. 18. We feel that there are currently enough targets in place to ensure the UK adequately reduces it greenhouse gas emissions and to allow the UK to play a leading role in achieving a global and comprehensive legally- binding climate change agreement. Part Five: Miscellaneous: Consumer Redress 19. We welcome the Government commitment in their response to the consultation on a proposed new power for Ofgem to compel regulated energy businesses to provide redress to consumers that smaller businesses would be within scope for redress. We would like see the Minister reaffirm this commitment during the committee proceedings and to clarify what is meant as a smaller business. 20. The level of protection for businesses in the energy market has long been a concern for our members. In comparison to the domestic sector the safeguards in place for businesses are relatively weak, even though smaller business customers, in particular, engage in the energy market in a similar way to households. We believe that unless it can be demonstrated otherwise, all micro and small businesses should receive the same level of protection as domestic consumers. Clearly smaller businesses must have access to redress if they suffer loss, damage or inconvenience as a result of the breach of conditions by energy companies. CONCLUSION 21. As with all enabling legislation, the Bill only sets out the powers to be given to the Government to introduce the various market mechanisms. It is difficult to fully understand the impact of the Bill until all the details are revealed through regulations. 22. It is our view that this Bill will be one of the most important pieces of legislation during the lifetime of the current Parliament.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of the Energy Market 2017 REPORT
    State of the energy market 2017 REPORT State of the energy market report Foreword The energy sector is changing rapidly, with significant • Third, the dramatic progress to ensure potential benefits for consumers. clean and secure electricity supplies has sometimes come at a higher cost to • In generation, new technologies, encouraged consumers than necessary. On average, by regulation and financial support, mean that consumers currently pay about £90 each year pollution is falling rapidly. Renewable power towards environmental policies. This will rise as sources now provide around a quarter of total low-carbon generation increases. Rapid falls electricity generation, compared to 5% in 2006. in the costs of wind and solar generation show • In retail markets, the number of accounts, not the scope for competition and innovation to limit including prepayment, on poor-value standard future cost increases. But consumers will lose variable tariffs has fallen from 15 million in April out if there isn’t effective competition for low- 2016 to 14 million only 12 months later (which we carbon support schemes and for measures to estimate to be around 12 million households). This help the energy system to work effectively. is because of near-record switching rates in 2017 so far. There are two major challenges to ensure that a transformed energy market works for all consumers. These changes are exciting, but looking at the state • Vulnerable consumers must be protected, of energy markets, we have three concerns about and able to engage in the market more how they currently work for consumers: effectively. We are consulting on extending our • First, the market works well for those who safeguard tariff to a further 1 million vulnerable engage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of the Green Investment Bank: Costs and Benefits, Rationale and Value for Money
    The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money Report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills Final report October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 2 Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Vivid Economics would like to thank BIS staff for their practical support in the review of outputs throughout this project. We would like to thank McKinsey and Deloitte for their valuable assistance in delivering this project from start to finish. In addition, we would like to thank the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), the Carbon Trust and Sustainable Development Capital LLP (SDCL), for their valuable support and advice at various stages of the research. We are grateful to the many individuals in the financial sector and the energy, waste, water, transport and environmental industries for sharing their insights with us. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors and not those of BIS or any other party, and the authors take responsibility for any errors or omissions. An appropriate citation for this report is: Vivid Economics in association with McKinsey & Co, The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money, report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 3 Executive Summary The UK Government is committed to achieving the transition to a green economy and delivering long-term sustainable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Offshore Wind in England CORE: Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering
    Building Offshore Wind in England CORE: Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering BUSINESS IS 2 Building Offshore Wind in England Ministerial Foreword Offshore wind is a UK success story and the UK is open for business. The UK is the world leader in offshore wind. We have more offshore wind installed than anywhere else in the world. We are an island nation, blessed with strong winds and shallow seas – and this energy resource is on our doorstep. We are determined to move to cleaner electricity generation and offshore wind has an important role to play in our long term plan for a balanced, low carbon energy mix. I want the UK to secure the economic benefits of this new industry. Through our offshore wind industrial strategy, the Government is committed to working in partnership with business to build a competitive, innovative UK supply chain for offshore wind, delivering jobs and economic growth. Building a strong supply chain needs the commitment and expertise of local partners, working alongside central government to support businesses who want to invest here. The Centres for Offshore Renewable Engineering (CORE) partnership offers an integrated and cooperative approach between Government and Local Enterprise Partnerships in England, to provide the best possible support to businesses choosing England as an investment location. The Rt Hon Matthew Hancock MP Minister of State for Business, Enterprise and Energy CORE brings together the relevant expertise from UK Central Government and the six major investment hubs in England to support business growth and showcase opportunities for foreign direct investment (FDI) for the offshore wind sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in Planning up to Detailed Plans Submitted
    Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in planning up to detailed plans submitted. PLANS APPROVED Projects where the detailed plans have been approved but are still at pre-tender stage. TENDERS Projects that are at the tender stage CONTRACTS Approved projects at main contract awarded stage. Agent: Plan My Property, 1 Regent Street, Council of Kings Lynn & West Norfolk Norfolk Job: Detail Plans Granted for 4 Plans Granted for housing Client: Cambridge Ltd Agent: John Thompson & Partners Ltd, 17 Street, Skipton, North Yorkshire, BD23 1JR Tel: Fraisthorpe Wind Farm Limited, Willow Court, Finedon, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, Developer: Trundley Design Services, Salgate houses Client: Mr. David Master Developer: City Council Agent: Cambridge City Council, - 23 Calton Road, Edinburgh, Lothian, EH8 01756 700364 West Way, Minns Business Park, Oxford, OX2 MIDLANDS/ NN9 5NB Tel: 01933 383604 Barn, Islington Road, Tilney All Saints, King’s Peter Humphrey Associates, 30 Old Market, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 8DL Contractor: Keepmoat Homes Ltd, Land Adjacent, Halton Moor Road 0JB Tel: 01865 261300 NOTTINGHAM £4.8M Lynn, Norfolk, PE34 4RY Tel: 01553 617700 Town Centre, Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, PE13 3QJ Contractor: Keepmoat Homes, 950 Regeneration House, Gorsey Lane, Coleshill, Halton £1m DURHAM £0.8M EAST ANGLIA Land South Of, Abbey Lane Aslockton LEICESTER £1.1M 1NB Tel: 01945 466966 Capability Green, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU1 Birmingham, West Midlands, B46 1JU Tel: Planning authority: Leeds Job: Outline Brancepeth
    [Show full text]
  • A Holistic Framework for the Study of Interdependence Between Electricity and Gas Sectors
    November 2015 A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors OIES PAPER: EL 16 Donna Peng Rahmatallah Poudineh The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2015 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-042-9 A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors i Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to Malcolm Keay, Howard Rogers and Pablo Dueñas for their invaluable comments on the earlier version of this paper. The authors would also like to extend their sincere gratitude to Bassam Fattouh, director of OIES, for his support during this project. A holistic framework for the study of interdependence between electricity and gas sectors ii Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. ii Contents ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • G59 Generator Protection Settings - Progress on Changes to New Values (Information Received As at End of 2010 - Date of Latest Updates Shown for Each Network.)
    G59 Generator Protection Settings - Progress on Changes to new Values (Information received as at End of 2010 - Date of latest updates shown for each network.) DNO [Western Power Distribution - South West Area] total responses as at 05/01/11 User Data Entry Under Frequency Over Frequency Generator Generator Generator Changes Generator Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 1 Stage 2 Agreed to capacity capacity capacity changes Site name Genset implemented capacity unable Frequency Frequency Frequency Frequency Comments changes (Y/N) installed agreed to implemented (Y/N) to change (MW) (Hz) (Hz) (Hz) (Hz) (MW) change (MW) (MW) Scottish and Southern Energy, Cantelo Nurseries, Bradon Farm, Isle Abbots, Taunton, Somerset Gas Y Y 9.7 9.7 9.7 0.0 47.00 50.50 Following Settings have been applied: 47.5Hz 20s, 47Hz 0.5s, 52Hz 0.5s Bears Down Wind Farm Ltd, Bears Down Wind Farm, St Mawgan, Newquay, Cornwall Wind_onshore Y N 9.6 9.6 0.0 0.0 47.00 50.50 Contact made. Awaiting info. Generator has agreed to apply the new single stage settings (i.e. 47.5Hz 0.5s and 51.5Hz 0.5s) - British Gas Transco, Severn Road, Avonmouth, Bristol Gas Y Y 5.5 5.5 5.5 0.0 47.00 50.50 complete 23/11/10 Cold Northcott Wind Farm Ltd, Cold Northcott, Launceston, Cornwall Wind_onshore Y Y 6.8 6.8 6.8 0.0 47.00 50.50 Changes completed. Generator has agreed to apply the new single stage settings (i.e. 47.5Hz 0.5s and 51.5Hz Connon Bridge Energy Ltd, Landfill Site, East Taphouse, Liskeard, Cornwall 0.5s).Abdul Sattar confirmed complete by email 19/11/10.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Background
    Appendix 2.2: Industry background Contents Page Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Evolution of major market participants ....................................................................... 1 The Six Large Energy Firms ....................................................................................... 3 Gas producers other than Centrica .......................................................................... 35 Mid-tier independent generator company profiles .................................................... 35 The mid-tier energy suppliers ................................................................................... 40 Introduction 1. This appendix contains information about the following participants in the energy market in Great Britain (GB): (a) The Six Large Energy Firms – Centrica, EDF Energy, E.ON, RWE, Scottish Power (Iberdrola), and SSE. (b) The mid-tier electricity generators – Drax, ENGIE (formerly GDF Suez), Intergen and ESB International. (c) The mid-tier energy suppliers – Co-operative (Co-op) Energy, First Utility, Ovo Energy and Utility Warehouse. Evolution of major market participants 2. Below is a chart showing the development of retail supply businesses of the Six Large Energy Firms: A2.2-1 Figure 1: Development of the UK retail supply businesses of the Six Large Energy Firms Pre-liberalisation Liberalisation 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
    [Show full text]
  • Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System
    Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process This document has been issued by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, together with the Devolved Administrations for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. April 2012 UK’s National Implementation Measures submission – April 2012 Modified UK National Implementation Measures for Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System As submitted to the European Commission in April 2012 following the first stage of their scrutiny process On 12 December 2011, the UK submitted to the European Commission the UK’s National Implementation Measures (NIMs), containing the preliminary levels of free allocation of allowances to installations under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System (2013-2020), in accordance with Article 11 of the revised ETS Directive (2009/29/EC). In response to queries raised by the European Commission during the first stage of their assessment of the UK’s NIMs, the UK has made a small number of modifications to its NIMs. This includes the introduction of preliminary levels of free allocation for four additional installations and amendments to the preliminary free allocation levels of seven installations that were included in the original NIMs submission. The operators of the installations affected have been informed directly of these changes. The allocations are not final at this stage as the Commission’s NIMs scrutiny process is ongoing. Only when all installation-level allocations for an EU Member State have been approved will that Member State’s NIMs and the preliminary levels of allocation be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • 10Th July 2000
    News Release 14 March 2012 Siemens awards multi-million tower contract to South Wales firm Fifteen towers destined for Mynydd y Betws wind farm project as Mabey Bridge is awarded first contract by the UK’s largest provider of wind turbines Siemens, the leading global engineering and technology company, has announced that it has placed an order with South Wales based Mabey Bridge to manufacture towers for 15, 2.3MW turbines bound for the Mynydd y Betws wind farm in Carmarthenshire. Siemens will supply, transport, install and commission the two-section 63-metre- high, 105 tonne towers for local developer, Cambrian Renewable Energy Limited (CREL), owned by the ESB, Ireland’s main electricity utility company. The wind turbines will have a tip height of 110 metres, and an installed capacity of up to 34.5MW. The project will generate electricity to power approximately 18,250 households, equivalent to almost a quarter of Carmarthenshire. More than two million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions will be saved over the lifetime of the project. The towers will be delivered in summer 2012 and the project is due for completion by February 2013. Originally developed by CREL, a Welsh consortium of Eco2 and local investors, Mynydd y Betws Wind Farm was acquired in June 2010 by ESB. ESB is committed to halving its carbon emissions by 2020 and achieving carbon net-zero emissions Page 1 of 3 by 2035. In addition to Mynydd y Betws, other projects include the Fullabrook Wind Farm in Devon and the West Durham Wind Farm. Commenting on the Mynydd y Betws Wind Farm project a spokesperson from ESB said: "ESB is committed to realising benefits for local communities by developing new green energy sources.
    [Show full text]
  • TEI Times July 2013
    THE ENERGY INDUSTRY July 2013 • Volume 6 • No 5 • Published monthly • ISSN 1757-7365 www.teitimes.com TIMES Special Lessons from little Supplement Britain Final Word Junior Isles analyses the London Array: offshore wind Is Britain smarter than the rest of problems of the elephant comes of age Europe on metering? Page 13 in the room. Page 16 News In Brief Anti-dumping duty escalates Improved coal EU-China tension The European Commission’s decision to impose an anti-dumping duty on Chinese-made solar panels looks set to start a trade war and creates market uncertainty. plant efficiency Page 2 Pakistan load shedding a government priority Converting existing thermal power can “keep climate plants to coal would help combat power shortages and bring down the cost of power generation, wiping billions off Pakistan’s circular debt. Page 6 goals alive” Van der Hoeven: Climate change has “quite frankly slipped to the back burner” of policy priorities UK debates market reforms The UK government’s plans to According to the International Energy Agency, improving coal plant efficiency is one of four policies reform the electricity market sector remain on track in spite of a fierce governments must adopt to get climate change efforts back on track. While the IEA’s proposals debate over decarbonisation targets. Page 7 for carbon dioxide emission reductions from coal plant are ambitious, industry argues they are achievable. Junior Isles Global dynamics drive The International Energy Agency burner of policy priorities. But the two-thirds of global GHG emissions, industry and transport; limiting the energy changes (IEA) says it is possible to “keep climate problem is not going away – quite the reveal a 1.4 per cent increase in 2012, construction and use of the least effi- Trends published in BP’s latest goals alive” without harming econom- opposite.” reaching a record high of 31.6 giga- cient coal-fired power plants; actions Statistical Review of World Energy ic growth if governments swiftly en- The report, which highlights the tonnes (Gt).
    [Show full text]
  • UK Coal Phaseout to Be Introduced with Dangerous Loopholes and Delays
    February 201 8 UK Coal Phaseout to be introduced with dangerous loopholes and delays The Government announced in 201 5 that it seeks to end coal burning for electricity within a decade, albeit only if “a shift to new gas can be achieved within these timescales”. It has now published its plan on how to achieve this: from October 2025, coal power stations will have to close unless their CO2 emissions are no higher than 450 kg/MWh at any time. By comparison, CO2 emissions from power stations that only burn coal are above 900 kg/ MWh. A coal phaseout is well overdue in the UK, and it is regrettable that the Government seeks to continue subsidising coal power until 2025, when, without subsidies, it might come to an end much sooner. However, there are two serious concerns about the Government’s decision even beyond 2025: firstly, power stations can continue to burn coal indefinitely, as long as they co-fire at least 54% biomass in each unit. This is based on flawed carbon accounting for biomass, using a methodology which ignores carbon emissions from burning biomass as most of those associated with logging and which has been denounced by hundreds of scientists worldwide. Whether companies can afford to co-fire that much biomass with coal remains to be seen. The second serious problem, however, is that the Secretary of State will be given powers to suspend the coal phaseout until such time as significant new gas power capacity has been built. It seems little coincidence that four of the companies operating coal power stations (Drax, RWE, Eggborough Power and SSE) have recently drawn up plans for major new gas power plants/units, ones which they are unlikely to afford without new or much higher subsidies for gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Energy Bill: Pre-Legislative Scrutiny
    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee Draft Energy Bill: Pre-legislative Scrutiny First Report of Session 2012–13 Volume I HC 275-I House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee Draft Energy Bill: Pre-legislative Scrutiny First Report of Session 2012–13 Volume I Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes Oral and written evidence from witnesses is published in Volume II Additional written evidence is contained in Volume III, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/ecc Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 17 July 2012 HC 275-I Published on 23 July 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Energy and Climate Change Committee The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Tim Yeo MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) (Chair) Dan Byles MP (Conservative, North Warwickshire) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Ian Lavery MP (Labour, Wansbeck) Dr Phillip Lee MP (Conservative, Bracknell) Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Christopher Pincher MP (Conservative, Tamworth) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Laura Sandys MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Gemma Doyle MP (Labour/Co-operative, West Dunbartonshire) Tom Greatrex MP (Labour, Rutherglen and Hamilton West) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]