Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX

East Midlands Regional Assembly

February 2010 A . Housing Data Appendix

A Housing Data Appendix

Policy 2 Promoting Better Design

Table A.1 Density of Dwellings Completed on Sites of 10 or more 2008/09

New dwellings New dwellings New dwellings completed at less completed between completed above than 30 dph 30 and 50 dph 50 dph No. per cent No. per cent No. per cent Central Lincolnshire HMA 100 28.3 205 58.1 48 13.6 Coastal Lincolnshire HMA 333 56.2 148 25.0 111 18.8 Derby HMA 69 15.4 168 37.4 212 47.2 Leicester & Leicestershire HMA 277 14.0 566 28.5 1,140 57.5 North Northamptonshire HMA 76 7.9 438 45.3 453 46.8 Northern HMA 237 35.6 274 41.2 154 23.2 Nottingham Core HMA 57 4.2 423 31.0 884 64.8 Nottingham Outer HMA 242 33.8 321 44.8 153 21.4 Peak, Dales & Park HMA 41 28.5 41 28.5 62 43.1 Peterborough Partial HMA 107 15.2 320 45.6 275 39.2 West Northamptonshire HMA 4 0.6 442 62.2 265 37.3 East Midlands 1,543 17.8 3,346 38.7 3,757 43.5

Source: Local Authorities No data from Rutland, South Northamptonshire, West Lindsey. Broxtowe no return for sites under 30 dph Policy 13 a/b Regional and Local Housing Trajectories

2 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX Table A.2 Completions and Projected Completions 2001/02 to 2025/26 Part 1

Net Dwellings in Past Years Net additional dwellings for future years 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 Central Lincs HMA 2,091 1,886 1,200 2,058 2,058 2,208 2,295 2,469 Lincoln 743 703 406 837 837 987 1,074 1,248 N Kesteven 475 515 288 619 619 619 619 619 West Lindsey 873 668 506 602 602 602 602 602 Coastal Lincs HMA 999 1,037 871 772 922 922 922 922 Boston 271 503 282 322 322 322 322 322 | Annual East Lindsey 728 534 589 450 600 600 600 600 Peterborough Partial HMA 1,523 1,552 1,191 1,046 1,628 1,723 1,863 2,250 Monitoring Rutland 204 106 121 78 70 116 106 197 S Holland 348 560 417 300 350 400 400 450

Report S Kesteven 971 886 653 668 1,208 1,207 1,357 1,603 Nottingham Outer HMA 1,618 1,206 839 1,363 1,840 2,673 2,747 2,338 A

2008/09 Ashfield 640 616 283 434 400 1,025 753 327 . Mansfield 497 260 209 350 450 500 550 550 Housing

DA Newark & Sherwood 481 330 347 579 990 1,148 1,444 1,461 T

A Northern HMA 1,389 1,470 896 783 1,338 1,783 1,370 1,331 APPENDIX

Bolsover 214 223 243 287 585 365 119 195 Data Chesterfield 351 428 64 226 469 824 427 303 NE Derbyshire 493 305 230 135 69 121 298 306 Appendix Bassetlaw 331 514 359 135 215 473 526 527 Peak, Dales & Park HMA 888 622 436 434 461 476 477 760 Derbyshire Dales 186 241 169 180 180 179 179 179 3 4 A Net Dwellings in Past Years Net additional dwellings for future years . Housing 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 High Peak 599 353 167 254 254 254 254 538 Peak District 103 28 100 0 27 43 44 43 | Annual

Derby HMA 2,033 2,461 1,172 917 1,425 1,931 2,091 2,258 Data Derby 1,052 1,104 476 277 471 802 880 861 Monitoring

Amber Valley 530 548 338 257 314 389 460 577 Appendix S Derbyshire 451 809 358 383 640 740 751 820 Leicester & Leics HMA 3,977 3,809 3,466 2,692 2,985 4,235 4,080 3,807 Report Leicester 1,215 942 1,208 659 1,150 1,654 1,774 1,944

2008/09 Blaby 218 329 197 115 362 476 371 320 Charnwood 967 924 713 545 337 577 611 396

DA Harborough 450 586 263 441 182 283 464 276 T

A Hinckley & Bosworth 438 398 474 428 460 683 339 357 APPENDIX Melton 199 237 284 204 193 233 161 118 NW Leicestershire 336 354 235 220 202 230 261 297 Oadby & Wigston 154 39 92 80 99 99 99 99 Nottingham Core HMA 2,999 3,114 1,768 2,114 2,585 2,557 2,787 3,210 Erewash 362 482 414 458 595 412 346 301 Nottingham 1,518 1,316 718 988 648 864 1,039 1,278 Broxtowe 367 376 241 100 413 221 165 144 Gedling 296 447 204 409 518 586 710 796 Rushcliffe 456 493 191 159 411 474 527 691 North Northamptonshire 2,041 2,153 1,363 1,019 1,781 3,033 3,595 4,085 Corby 573 457 476 366 695 1,153 1,235 1,355 Kettering 572 685 422 185 383 799 775 1,034 Net Dwellings in Past Years Net additional dwellings for future years 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 East Northamptonshire 504 536 170 272 404 582 821 851 Wellingborough 392 475 295 196 299 499 764 845 West Northamptonshire 2,354 1,550 1,110 1,867 2,173 3,861 4,072 3,427 Daventry 295 319 183 231 304 282 282 508 Northampton 1,824 1,020 707 876 1,059 2,704 2,865 1,944 South Northamptonshire 235 211 220 760 810 875 925 975 East Midlands 21,912 20,860 14,312 15,065 19,196 25,402 26,299 26,857 | Annual Source: Local Authorities The figures for Lincoln is for the whole Lincoln PUA, districts have been adjusted accordingly Dwellings in South Northamptonshire which are part of the Northampton Implementation Area have been included in Northampton figures Monitoring The Peak authority has no housing provision target but the RSS assumes 43 dwellings per year net additional dwellings- this is not a target nor a limit. Nottingham City completion figures include student dwellings. Leicester City completion figures only include student dwellings for 2008/09 Table A.3 Completions and Projected Completions 2001/02 to 2025/26 Part 2 Report Net additional Dwellings for Future Years

14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 A 2008/09 .

Central Lincs HMA 1,913 1,938 1,385 1,325 1,275 1,275 1,100 Housing Lincoln 932 957 957 897 847 847 672 DA

T N Kesteven 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 A

APPENDIX West Lindsey 602 602 49 49 49 49 49 Data Coastal Lincs HMA 922 922 230 Boston 322 322 Appendix East Lindsey 600 600 230 Peterborough Partial HMA 2,185 1,584 1,725 1,694 953 953 953 Rutland 132 210 201 170 170 170 170 S Holland 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 5 6 A Net additional Dwellings for Future Years . Housing 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 S Kesteven 1,603 924 1,074 1,074 333 333 333 Nottingham Outer HMA 4,135 3,834 2,689 2,202 1,920 3,145 3,169 | Annual

Ashfield 528 356 262 196 140 129 104 Data Mansfield 600 600 650 650 650 650 650 Monitoring

Newark & Sherwood 3,007 2,878 1,777 1,356 1,130 2,366 2,415 Appendix Northern HMA 1,480 2,159 2,206 2,256 2,303 2,270 2,081 Bolsover 310 400 450 501 550 600 543 Report Chesterfield 125 407 406 406 405 326 326

2008/09 NE Derbyshire 619 1,034 1,032 1,031 1,030 1,026 894 Bassetlaw 426 318 318 318 318 318 318

DA Peak, Dales & Park HMA 1,090 1,090 1,090 1,090 913 644 644 T

A Derbyshire Dales 509 509 509 509 509 240 240 APPENDIX High Peak 538 538 538 538 361 361 361 Peak District 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 Derby HMA 2,059 1,298 837 655 285 355 230 Derby 1,059 560 510 410 190 260 160 Amber Valley 378 281 126 105 105 105 80 S Derbyshire 622 457 201 140 -10 -10 -10 Leicester & Leics HMA 3,714 3,794 3,483 3,177 3,269 3,072 2,976 Leicester 1,753 1,862 1,546 1,489 1,480 1,425 1,335 Blaby 489 575 564 486 453 446 436 Charnwood 265 203 178 178 169 100 98 Harborough 255 240 215 119 90 90 90 Hinckley & Bosworth 419 354 384 374 564 573 576 Net additional Dwellings for Future Years 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 Melton 112 144 187 144 145 145 145 NW Leicestershire 340 338 329 310 281 200 200 Oadby & Wigston 81 78 80 77 87 93 96 Nottingham Core HMA 3,984 3,660 3,018 2,620 2,386 2,437 2,623 Erewash 621 545 408 338 252 398 455 Nottingham 1,297 1,101 976 773 695 691 845 Broxtowe 393 394 393 394 393 394 393 | Annual Gedling 567 416 235 199 150 151 150 Rushcliffe 1,106 1,204 1,006 916 896 803 780 Monitoring North Northamptonshire 4,041 4,212 4,061 3,999 3,767 3,296 3,270 Corby 1,588 1,570 1,591 1,479 1,336 1,028 1,028 Kettering 1,121 1,202 1,037 1,157 963 940 968 Report East Northamptonshire 478 455 378 308 413 398 394 A

2008/09 Wellingborough 854 985 1,055 1,055 1,055 930 880 .

West Northamptonshire 3,422 3,622 3,261 2,772 2,357 2,341 2,057 Housing Daventry 708 957 958 958 958 958 958 DA

T Northampton 1,789 1,790 1,478 1,139 824 808 524 A

APPENDIX South Northamptonshire 925 875 825 675 575 575 575 Data East Midlands 28,945 28,113 23,985 21,790 19,428 19,788 19,103

Source: Local Authorities Appendix The figures for Lincoln is for the whole Lincoln PUA, districts have been adjusted accordingly Dwellings in South Northamptonshire which are part of the Northampton Implementation Area have been included in Northampton figures The Peak authority has no housing provision target but the RSS assumes 43 dwellings per year net additional dwellings- this is not a target nor a limit. 7 8 A Table A.4 Completions and Projected Completions 2001/02 to 2025/26 Part 3 . Housing Net additional Dwellings for Future Years Targets 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 RSS Total RSS Annual Average |

Annual Central Lincs HMA 1,100 1,100 1,100 869 519 40,600 2,030 Data Lincoln 672 672 672 820 470 19,800 990

Monitoring N Kesteven 379 379 379 11,200 560 Appendix West Lindsey 49 49 49 49 49 9,600 480 Coastal Lincs HMA 8,700 870 Report Boston 2,700 270 East Lindsey 6,000 600 2008/09 Peterborough Partial HMA 953 953 627 503 503 24,000 1,370 Rutland 170 170 170 170 170 3,000 150 DA

T S Holland 450 450 124 7,400 540 A

APPENDIX S Kesteven 333 333 333 333 333 13,600 680 Nottingham Outer HMA 2,238 1,770 1,621 1,510 1,653 36,600 1,830 Ashfield 105 74 70 70 70 11,200 560 Mansfield 600 600 600 500 500 10,600 530 Newark & Sherwood 1,533 1,096 951 940 1,083 14,800 740 Northern HMA 2,029 2,024 2,250 2,143 1,212 30,200 1,510 Bolsover 493 493 493 493 443 8,000 400 Chesterfield 326 326 553 451 451 7,600 380 NE Derbyshire 892 887 886 881 7,600 380 Bassetlaw 318 318 318 318 318 7,000 350 Peak, Dales & Park HMA 644 644 283 252 252 10,000 500 Derbyshire Dales 240 240 240 209 209 4,000 200 Net additional Dwellings for Future Years Targets 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 RSS Total RSS Annual Average High Peak 361 361 6,000 300 Peak District 43 43 43 43 43 #REF! - Derby HMA 165 162 161 160 155 36,600 1,830 Derby 160 160 160 160 160 14,400 720 Amber Valley 15 12 11 10 5 10,200 510 S Derbyshire -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 12,000 600

| Leicester & Leics HMA 2,759 2,557 2,309 1,946 1,833 80,400 4,020 Annual Leicester 1,200 1,131 1,004 855 754 25,600 1,280

Monitoring Blaby 432 372 370 317 305 7,600 380 Charnwood 68 15,800 790 Harborough 66 40 40 40 40 7,000 350

Report Hinckley & Bosworth 552 580 562 502 502 9,000 450

Melton 145 145 145 145 145 3,400 170 A 2008/09

NW Leicestershire 200 200 10,200 510 . Housing Oadby & Wigston 96 89 88 87 87 1,800 90 DA Nottingham Core HMA 2,890 2,760 2,124 2,862 2,863 57,000 2,850 T A

APPENDIX Erewash 425 376 300 598 598 7,200 360

Nottingham 1,299 1,082 650 1,111 1,111 20,000 1,000 Data Broxtowe 394 393 394 393 394 6,800 340

Gedling 8,000 400 Appendix Rushcliffe 772 909 780 760 760 15,000 750 North Northamptonshire *66,075 2,643 Corby - - 9 10 A Net additional Dwellings for Future Years Targets . Housing 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 RSS Total RSS Annual Average Kettering - - |

Annual East Northamptonshire - - Data Wellingborough - -

Monitoring West Northamptonshire 1,606 1,556 1,256 1,256 1,256 *62,125 2,485 Appendix Daventry 557 557 557 557 557 - - Northampton 474 424 124 124 124 - - Report South Northamptonshire 575 575 575 575 575 - - East Midlands 14,384 13,526 11,731 11,501 10,246 452,300 21,938 2008/09

Source: Local Authorities The figures for Lincoln is for the whole Lincoln PUA, districts have been adjusted accordingly Dwellings in South Northamptonshire which are part of the Northampton Implementation Area have been included in Northampton figures DA The Peak authority has no housing provision target but the RSS assumes 43 dwellings per year net additional dwellings- this is not a target nor a limit. T A APPENDIX A . Housing Data Appendix

Housing Trajectory Graphs

The following charts give housing trajectories at HMA level based on data supplied by local authorities. The end date for chart varies depending on the date all districts in the HMA could supply projections up to. Note that different methods are used across districts to determine trajectories.

The source for the following charts is Local Authorities.

Figure A.1 Completions compared with Proposed Target Central Lincs. HMA

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 11 A . Housing Data Appendix

Figure A.2 Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Coastal Lincs. HMA

Figure A.3 Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Derby HMA

12 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX A . Housing Data Appendix

Figure A.4 Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Leicestershire HMA

Figure A.5 Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target North Northants HMA

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 13 A . Housing Data Appendix

Figure A.6 Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Northern HMA

Figure A.7 Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Nottingham Core HMA

14 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX A . Housing Data Appendix

Figure A.8 Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Nottingham Outer HMA

Figure A.9 Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Peak HMA (target not applicable to Peak Park)

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 15 A . Housing Data Appendix

Figure A.10 Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target Peterborough Partial HMA

Figure A.11 Completions and Projected Completions compared with Proposed Target West Northants HMA

16 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX A . Housing Data Appendix

Policy 14 Regional Priorities for Affordable Housing

Table A.5 Lower quartile house prices in the third quarter of 2004 to 2009 (pounds)

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009* Derby 87,315 94,725 100,000 109,000 100,000 97,312 Derbyshire 90,000 96,500 105,000 110,000 104,950 100,000 Leicester 95,000 97,500 102,000 110,000 101,125 94,500 Leicestershire 119,000 119,995 125,000 132,000 122,000 120,000 Lincolnshire 98,725 105,000 113,000 118,500 110,000 106,188 Northants 105,000 110,500 115,000 124,950 117,000 110,000 Nottingham 80,000 85,000 89,000 87,000 83,000 79,950 Nottinghamshire 89,950 93,000 100,000 105,000 98,125 98,000 Rutland 145,625 147,995 156,875 163,500 150,000 148,500 East Midlands 97,000 102,000 109,950 115,000 106,623 104,000

Source: CLG Housing Statistics * Q3 2009 is provisional Table A.6 Indexed Lower quartile house prices based on Land Registry data Third Quarter 1997 to 2009 (1997=100)

1997 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Derby 100 265 287 303 330 303 295 Derbyshire 100 240 257 280 293 280 267 Leicester 100 306 315 329 355 326 305 Leicestershire 100 265 267 278 294 271 267 Lincolnshire 100 263 280 301 316 293 383 Northants 100 263 277 288 313 293 275 Nottingham 100 246 262 274 268 255 246 Nottinghamshire 100 237 245 263 276 258 258 Rutland 100 278 282 299 312 286 283

Source: CLG Housing Statistics

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 17 A . Housing Data Appendix

Policy 16 Regional Priorities for Provision for Gypsies and Travellers

Table A.7 Gypsy and Traveller Pitches 2008/09

Permanent Transit New New Unauthorised Total Total Pitches in Pitches in Caravans Pitches Pitches Year Year Central Lincolnshire HMA 75 0 26 0 41 Coastal Lincolnshire HMA 24 0 24 0 2 Derby HMA* 47 0 2 0 67 Leicester & Leicestershire HMA* **** 240 24 25 0 117 North Northamptonshire HMA 117 6 0 0 26 Northern HMA 67 1 32 0 16 Nottingham Core HMA** 31 2 0 0 3 Nottingham Outer HMA 162 0 4 0 67 Peak, Dales & Park HMA*** 0 0 2 0 0 Peterborough Partial HMA 53 0 18 0 57 West Northamptonshire HMA 60 1 0 0 7 East Midlands 876 34 133 0 403

Source: Local Authorities *No data from Amber Valley or Melton **No unauthorised encampments from Rushcliffe ***Derby Dales N/A on total permanent pitches ****Hinckley unauthorised encampment is pitches not caravans

18 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX A . Housing Data Appendix

Policy 17 Regional Priorities for Managing the Release of Land for Housing

Table A.8 Local Authorities with Phasing Policies 2008/09

Number of Number of Total Number Authorities With Authorities With of Authorities a Policy Across a Policy Across LA Boundary HMA Central Lincolnshire HMA 0 0 3 Coastal Lincolnshire HMA 1 0 2 Derby HMA 1 0 3 Leicester & Leicestershire HMA 2 0 8 North Northamptonshire HMA 4 4 4 Northern HMA 0 0 4 Nottingham Core HMA 1 0 5 Nottingham Outer HMA 0 0 3 Peak, Dales & Park HMA 0 0 3 Peterborough Partial HMA 0 0 3 West Northamptonshire HMA 0 0 3 East Midlands 9 4 41

Source: Local Authorities N/R or N/A Melton, Peak, Bassetlaw and at HMA level by Amber Valley

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 19 A . Housing Data Appendix

Table A.9 Proportion of New Dwellings Completed on PDL 2004/05 to 2008/09 (per cent)

2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Total on PDL 2008/09 Central Lincolnshire HMA 31.3 35.9 40.8 47.3 42.6 499 Coastal Lincolnshire HMA 45.2 54.2 51.0 61.4 51.4 464 Derby HMA 68.8 73.2 78.9 81.5 84.9 1,133 Leicester & Leicestershire HMA 65.9 75.4 71.7 68.2 68.6 2,452 North Northamptonshire HMA 45.9 60.9 62.0 44.6 63.2 912 Northern HMA 70.7 64.1 72.3 80.1 81.7 771 Nottingham Core HMA 86.1 97.0 94.8 88.1 83.7 1,573 Nottingham Outer HMA 70.9 59.7 78.0 70.9 64.8 581 Peak, Dales & Park HMA 60.6 67.4 58.9 72.1 75.2 345 Peterborough Partial HMA 44.7 52.6 53.4 61.6 63.6 772 West Northamptonshire HMA 64.1 76.6 83.6 62.0 60.4 695 East Midlands 61.9 67.8 70.9 68.3 68.1 10,197

Source: Local Authorities 2008/09 excludes 56 new dwellings in North Kesteven of unknown PDL status Latest Data post April 2009

20 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX A . Housing Data Appendix

Table A.10 Quarterly House Sales

Derby Derbys. Leicester Leics. Lincs. Northants. Notts. Rutland 2006 Q1 1,077 3,403 1,140 2,979 3,570 3,783 1,166 172 Q2 1,418 4,264 1,368 3,856 4,627 5,001 1,376 214 Q3 1,487 4,628 1,489 4,051 5,033 5,314 1,576 218 Q4 1,469 4,762 1,549 4,106 5,360 5,554 1,426 214 2007 Q1 1,215 3,723 1,280 3,109 4,176 4,212 1,294 161 Q2 1,417 4,336 1,450 3,974 5,016 5,242 1,533 213 Q3 1,527 4,485 1,506 3,823 5,028 4,905 1,704 234 Q4 1,154 3,841 1,263 3,380 4,250 4,277 1,346 177 2008 Q1 844 2,401 844 2,031 2,644 2,654 961 137 Q2 873 2,648 866 2,201 2,900 2,837 878 109 Q3 669 1,879 588 1,759 2,244 2,062 688 114 Q4 551 1,735 500 1,578 1,963 1,907 577 83 2009 Q1 400 1,200 390 1,190 1,410 1,256 425 74 Q2 613 1,866 562 1,835 2,279 1,923 549 111 Q3* 736 2,465 587 2,132 2,542 2,321 797 144

Source: Land Registry data from CLG Housing Statistics * Q3 2009 is provisional Table A.11 Quarterly Mean House Price (pounds)

East Midlands England 2006 Q1 151,468 195,695 Q2 159,237 202,688 Q3 163,383 214,471 Q4 164,237 210,557 2007 Q1 162,446 213,240 Q2 169,101 218,899 Q3 171,926 232,345 Q4 170,972 224,467 2008 Q1 164,367 221,270 Q2 164,644 222,441 Q3 166,213 227,182 Q4 156,493 207,372 2009 Q1 149,565 200,539 Q2 153,004 205,736 Q3* 161,879 226,648

Source: Land Registry data from CLG Housing Statistics * Q3 2009 is provisional

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 21 B . Economy Data Appendix

B Economy Data Appendix

Table B.1 Regional Unemployment Rates April 2008 to November 2009 (per cent)

North North Yorkshire East West East London South South England East West Humb. Midlands Midlands East West Apr 08 3.1 2.6 2.5 2.0 3.0 1.7 2.6 1.3 1.3 2.2 May 08 3.1 2.6 2.5 2.0 3.0 1.7 2.6 1.3 1.3 2.2 Jun 08 3.1 2.6 2.5 2.1 3.0 1.7 2.6 1.4 1.3 2.2 Jul 08 3.2 2.7 2.6 2.2 3.1 1.7 2.6 1.4 1.4 2.3 Aug 08 3.3 2.9 2.8 2.3 3.3 1.8 2.7 1.5 1.5 2.4 Sep 08 3.5 2.9 2.9 2.4 3.4 1.9 2.8 1.6 1.6 2.5 Oct 08 3.6 3.0 2.9 2.4 3.4 2.0 2.8 1.6 1.7 2.5 Nov 08 3.9 3.2 3.2 2.7 3.7 2.2 3.0 1.9 1.9 2.7 Dec 08 4.2 3.5 3.5 2.9 4.0 2.4 3.1 2.0 2.1 3.0 Jan 09 4.7 3.9 3.9 3.3 4.5 2.7 3.3 2.3 2.5 3.3 Feb 09 5.2 4.3 4.4 3.8 5.1 3.2 3.7 2.8 2.9 3.8 Mar 09 5.3 4.5 4.6 4.0 5.3 3.4 4.0 2.9 3.1 4.0 Apr 09 5.3 4.6 4.7 4.1 5.4 3.5 4.1 3.0 3.1 4.1 May 09 5.4 4.6 4.7 4.1 5.4 3.5 4.2 3.0 3.1 4.1 Jun 09 5.3 4.6 4.7 4.0 5.4 3.4 4.2 3.0 3.0 4.1 Jul 09 5.3 4.7 4.7 4.0 5.4 3.4 4.3 3.0 3.0 4.1 Aug 09 5.3 4.7 4.8 4.1 5.5 3.5 4.4 3.1 3.0 4.2 Sep 09 5.3 4.7 4.8 4.1 5.5 3.4 4.5 3.0 3.0 4.2 Oct 09 5.3 4.7 4.8 4.1 5.5 3.4 4.5 3.0 2.9 4.1 Nov 09 5.3 4.6 4.8 4.0 5.4 3.4 4.4 3.0 2.9 4.1

Source: Job Centre Plus Claimant Count Resident based rates

22 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX B . Economy Data Appendix

Policy 19 Regional Priority Areas for Regeneration

Table B.2 Number and Proportion of Working Age Population in Districts with ERDF Funding Claiming Any Benefit, February 2006 to 2009

Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Feb- 06 Feb- 07 Feb- 08 Feb- 09 Ashfield 12,170 17.0 12,110 17.0 11,970 16.8 13,400 18.8 Bassetlaw 11,190 16.5 10,880 16.0 10,690 15.7 11,850 17.4 Bolsover 9,330 20.8 9,120 20.2 8,760 19.4 9,560 21.2 Boston 5,290 15.6 5,250 15.5 5,120 15.1 5,830 17.3 Chesterfield 11,730 19.1 11,570 18.9 11,000 18.0 12,210 20.0 Corby 5,760 16.9 5,700 16.7 5,620 16.4 6,910 20.2 Derby 24,170 16.5 23,740 16.0 23,230 15.7 26,530 17.9 East Lindsey 14,100 18.1 14,190 18.1 13,880 17.7 15,080 19.2 Leicester 36,780 19.6 36,660 19.2 35,770 18.7 40,050 21.0 Lincoln 9,320 16.3 9,360 16.3 9,190 16.0 10,600 18.5 Mansfield 12,490 20.3 12,320 20.0 12,220 19.8 13,310 21.6 Nottingham 37,300 19.0 37,620 18.9 36,960 18.6 40,750 20.5 East Midlands 364,010 13.4 363,430 13.3 355,380 13.0 409,180 14.9 England 4,448,760 14.1 4,411,890 13.9 4,296,520 13.5 4,848,740 15.3

Source: DWP Working Age Client Group Benefits Data

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 23 B . Economy Data Appendix

Policy 20 Regional Priorities for Employment Land

NET CHANGE IN EMPLOYMENT LAND

Table B.3 Employment Land Developed 2008/09 (hectares)

B1 B1a B1b B1c B1 B2 B8 B Mixed Total unsp.* Total unsp.** *** Derby 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.7 8.4 0.0 10.5 Derbyshire 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.2 0.2 9.1 0.0 10.9 Leicester 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 Leicestershire 0.7 1.5 0.0 0.8 3.0 4.9 0.8 5.1 0.6 14.5 Lincolnshire 1.5 0.6 0.0 5.3 7.4 0.9 12.5 1.5 31.0 53.3 Northamptonshire 2.1 0.5 0.0 0.6 3.2 1.6 27.5 16.3 6.0 54.5 Nottingham 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.6 0.0 1.5 Nottinghamshire 1.3 1.4 0.0 0.9 3.7 3.1 5.6 11.9 0.0 24.3 Peak District 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 Rutland 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.3 3.4 East Midlands 6.1 5.4 0.0 8.1 19.7 12.7 50.8 52.8 39.0 174.9

Source: Local Authorities *Either mixed B1 use or sub category not specified (this may include B1a, B1b, B1c and mixed use B1) ** Either a mixture of B1, B2 and B8 or B land type unspecified *** Indeterminable split between B and non-B uses Table B.4 Employment Floorspace Developed 2008/09 (sqm) B1 uses

B1 unsp.* B1a B1b B1c B1 Total Derby 0 9,252 0 0 9,252 Derbyshire 1,000 0 0 0 1,000 Leicester 1,200 0 0 0 1,200 Leicestershire 3,521 19,352 0 1,728 24,601 Lincolnshire 6,553 2,376 0 16,699 25,628 Northamptonshire 14,307 4,039 0 2,035 20,381 Nottingham 0 0 0 0 0 Nottinghamshire 4,992 8,407 0 930 14,329 Peak District 0 0 0 0 0 Rutland 0 0 0 695 695 East Midlands 31,573 43,426 0 22,087 97,086

Source: Local Authorities *Either mixed B1 use or sub category not specified (this may include B1a, B1b, B1c and mixed use B1)

24 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX B . Economy Data Appendix

Table B.5 Employment Floorspace Developed 2008/09 (sqm) Summary

B1 Total B2 B8 B unsp.* Mixed ** Total Derby 9,252 0 2,262 40,890 0 52,404 Derbyshire 1,000 4,760 952 24,349 0 31,061 Leicester 1,200 1,155 7,436 0 0 9,791 Leicestershire 24,601 5,569 7,470 17,698 1,070 56,408 Lincolnshire 25,628 23,308 11,084 5,658 223,013 288,691 Northamptonshire 20,381 11,042 99,290 53,268 53,748 237,730 Nottingham 0 0 3,842 2,545 0 6,387 Nottinghamshire 14,329 5,600 37,510 40,780 0 98,219 Peak District 0 2,597 1,212 0 0 3,809 Rutland 695 0 2,136 0 6,226 9,057 East Midlands 97,086 54,031 173,195 185,188 284,057 793,558

Source: Local Authorities * Either a mixture of B1, B2 and B8 or B land type unspecified ** Indeterminable split between B and non-B uses There was 1 small Mixed use site in Lincolnshire for which a floorspace figure was not provided Table B.6 Employment Land Losses 2008/09 (hectares)

Status at Start of Year Allocated With Under In Total planning construction Employment permission Land Use Derby 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Derbyshire 3.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 4.8 Leicester 0.0 31.1 0.0 0.0 31.1 Leicestershire 0.0 9.7 2.6 0.1 12.4 Lincolnshire 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.3 1.7 Northamptonshire 35.0 24.2 0.6 0.8 60.7 Nottingham 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 3.4 Nottinghamshire 2.0 4.4 0.8 2.5 9.8 Peak District 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rutland 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 East Midlands 41.3 74.2 4.0 5.1 124.6

Source:Local Authorities Data may be incomplete

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 25 B . Economy Data Appendix

EMPLOYMENT LAND SUPPLY

Table B.7 Employment Land Allocations 2008/09 (hectares)

B1 B1a B1b B1c B1 B2 B8 B Mixed Total unsp. * Total unsp. *** ** Derby 10.3 3.8 0.0 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 97.1 0.0 111.2 Derbyshire 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 9.5 0.0 164.6 20.8 196.7 Leicester 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.8 0.0 13.8 Leicestershire 0.0 20.4 0.0 0.8 21.2 0.0 0.0 33.9 15.1 70.2 Lincolnshire 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.2 3.0 0.0 243.4 187.1 472.7 Northamptonshire 3.7 2.8 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 4.3 11.8 Nottingham 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 40.8 0.0 41.3 Nottinghamshire 34.2 14.5 0.0 0.0 48.6 5.3 48.4 148.6 2.9 253.9 Peak District 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 4.3 5.5 Rutland 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 East Midlands 90.3 41.5 0.0 0.8 132.6 19.2 48.4 742.2 234.6 1,177.1

Source: Local Authorities *Either mixed B1 use or sub category not specified (this may include B1a, B1b, B1c and mixed use B1) **Either a mixture of B1, B2 and B8 or B land type unspecified *** Indeterminable split between B and non-B uses Table B.8 Employment Land Outstanding Planning Permissions 2008/09 (hectares)

B1 B1a B1b B1c B1 B2 B8 B Mixed Total unsp. * Total unsp. *** ** Derby 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 142.5 0.0 146.4 Derbyshire 2.2 4.8 0.0 0.0 6.9 5.3 11.7 146.4 3.0 173.3 Leicester 4.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 4.6 4.6 0.6 10.9 0.0 20.7 Leicestershire 13.2 6.4 0.0 1.8 21.4 11.2 38.6 43.7 48.1 163.1 Lincolnshire 6.9 1.8 0.0 2.7 11.4 14.7 14.2 79.9 95.9 216.1 Northamptonshire 22.9 17.0 0.0 0.2 40.1 20.8 56.5 8.1 127.1 252.6 Nottingham 28.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.7 0.0 2.6 8.3 0.0 39.6 Nottinghamshire 18.1 6.9 0.0 0.8 25.8 5.7 3.6 256.2 0.0 291.4 Peak District 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Rutland 4.5 4.2 0.0 4.3 13.0 2.7 4.4 0.0 14.5 34.7 East Midlands 100.5 45.6 0.0 9.9 156.0 65.5 132.3 696.1 288.6 1,338.4

Source: Local Authorities *Either mixed B1 use or sub category not specified (this may include B1a, B1b, B1c and mixed use B1) **Either a mixture of B1, B2 and B8 or B land type unspecified *** Indeterminable split between B and non-B uses

26 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX B . Economy Data Appendix

Table B.9 Employment Land Under Construction 2008/09 (hectares)

B1 B1a B1b B1c B1 B2 B8 B Mixed Total unsp* Total unsp. *** ** Derby 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Derbyshire 2.6 1.7 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 2.7 12.9 0.0 19.9 Leicester 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 Leicestershire 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.2 2.4 0.1 7.8 15.0 Lincolnshire 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 7.3 3.2 4.4 15.7 Northamptonshire 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.1 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.8 5.6 Nottingham 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nottinghamshire 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.3 3.1 0.3 0.0 3.7 0.0 7.1 Peak District 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Rutland 0.0 0.6 0.0 2.7 3.3 2.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 East Midlands 8.0 9.9 0.0 3.0 20.9 4.6 14.4 19.9 13.0 72.8

Source: Local Authorities *Either mixed B1 use or sub category not specified (this may include B1a, B1b, B1c and mixed use B1) **Either a mixture of B1, B2 and B8 or B land type unspecified *** Indeterminable split between B and non-B uses

EMPLOYMENT LAND REVIEWS

Table B.10 Employment Land Reviews 2008/09

Covered by up to date Employment Land Review at HMA Level Central Lincolnshire HMA Underway at HMA level Coastal Lincolnshire HMA Boston and East Lindsey at district level Derby HMA HMA level Leicester & Leicestershire HMA HMA level North Northamptonshire HMA Underway at county level but will be subdivided by HMA Northern HMA HMA level via Northern sub area Nottingham Core HMA HMA level (inc. Hucknall) Nottingham Outer HMA HMA level (exc. Hucknall) via Northern sub area Peak, Dales & Park HMA HMA level Peterborough Partial HMA The Housing Implications of Employment Land in the Peterborough Sub-Region by Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners was published in August 2009 West Northamptonshire HMA Underway at county level but will be subdivided by HMA

Source: Local Authorities

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 27 B . Economy Data Appendix

POLICIES FOR PRIORITY AREAS

Table B.11 Policies in LDDs to Encourage Development in Priority Areas 2008/09

Areas with Policy in Place Derby None Derbyshire Amber Valley Leicester Leicester Leicestershire Hinckley & Bosworth Lincolnshire None Northamptonshire East Northamptonshire, Northampton, South Northamptonshire Nottingham None Nottinghamshire None Peak District PDNA Rutland None

Source: Local Authorities Policy 22 Regional Priorities for Town Centres and Retail Development

Table B.12 Retail Completions 2008/09 (sqm)

City Town District Local Edge of Out of Total Centre Centre Centre Centre Centre Centre Derby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Derbyshire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Leicester 53,754 0 0 0 0 0 53,754 Leicestershire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lincolnshire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Northamptonshire 0 0 0 0 12,100 6,549 18,649 Nottingham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nottinghamshire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak District 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rutland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 East Midlands 53,754 0 0 0 12,100 6,549 72,403

Source: Local Authorities Figures refer to only those sites reported on

28 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX B . Economy Data Appendix

Table B.13 Retail Land Under Construction or Committed 2008/09 (sqm)

City Town District Local Edge of Out of Total Centre Centre Centre Centre Centre Centre Derby 7,372 0 0 0 0 4,343 11,715 Derbyshire 0 2,420 0 0 3,763 12,764 18,947 Leicester 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Leicestershire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lincolnshire 0 2,138 0 0 0 13,599 15,737 Northamptonshire 0 30,675 4,900 1,000 3,010 3,760 43,345 Nottingham 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nottinghamshire 0 3,500 12,213 0 12,420 3,104 31,237 Peak District 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rutland 0 0 0 0 East Midlands 7,372 38,733 17,113 1,000 19,193 37,570 120,981

Source: Local Authorities Figures refer to only those sites reported on Table B.14 Leisure Land Completed 2008/09 (hectares)

City Town District Local Edge of Out of Total Centre Centres Centres Centres Centre Centre Derby 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Derbyshire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 Leicester 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Leicestershire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 Lincolnshire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.3 23.3 Northamptonshire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nottingham 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nottinghamshire 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 3.0 5.8 Peak District 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rutland 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 East Midlands 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 28.0 31.3

Source: Local Authorities Figures refer to only those sites reported on

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 29 B . Economy Data Appendix

Table B.15 Leisure Land Under Construction or Committed 2008/09 (hectares)

City Town District Local Edge of Out of Total Centre Centres Centres Centres Centre Centre Derby 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Derbyshire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 273.8 273.8 Leicester 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Leicestershire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 Lincolnshire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 26.2 27.4 Northamptonshire 0.0 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 14.7 Nottingham 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 Nottinghamshire 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 6.5 Peak District 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 6.2 Rutland 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 10.9 15.2 East Midlands 0.5 11.8 0.0 0.0 5.4 329.2 347.1

Source: Local Authorities Figures refer to only those sites reported on Policy 24 Regional Priorities for Rural Diversification

Table B.16 VAT Registrations and Deregistrations in Rural/Urban Areas 2004 to 2007

Rural Registrations per 10,000 population Deregistrations per 10,000 population Category 2004 2005 2006 2007 2004 2005 2006 2007 R80 42 41 41 44 34 32 33 33 R50 40 39 39 41 30 28 28 30 SR 37 35 34 37 30 27 26 26 OU 31 30 30 32 24 23 21 22 LU 31 31 31 33 27 26 23 24 East Midlands 36 35 35 37 29 27 26 27

Source: BERR VAT registrations data via ONS Defra rural definition pre April 2009

LU- Large Urban: districts with either 50,000 people or 50 percent of their population in one of 17 urban areas with a population between 250,000 and 750,000. OU- Other Urban: districts with fewer than 37,000 people or less than 26 percent of their population in rural settlements and larger market towns. SR- Significant Rural: districts with more than 37,000 people or more than 26 percent of their population in rural settlements and larger market towns. R50- Rural-50: districts with at least 50 percent but less than 80 percent of their population in rural settlements and larger market towns. R80- Rural-80: districts with at least 80 percent of their population in rural settlements and larger market towns.

30 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX B . Economy Data Appendix

Table B.17 VAT Registered Stock in Rural/Urban Areas 2004 to 2008 per 10,000 adult population

Rural 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Category Rural R80 500 500 501 502 524 R50 392 399 406 412 434 SR 364 366 368 371 397 Urban OU 269 274 278 283 311 LU 301 304 304 307 319 East Midlands 368 371 376 379 388

Source: NOMIS VAT registrations data via ONS Defra rural definition pre April 2009- see previous table Table B.18 Job Density in Rural/Urban Areas 2003 to 2007

Rural Type 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 R80 0.75 0.74 0.77 0.78 0.79 R50 0.71 0.70 0.74 0.75 0.77 SR 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.74 OU 0.91 0.93 0.94 0.93 0.91 LU 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.93 0.89 East Midlands 0.78 0.78 0.80 0.81 0.81 England 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.88 0.84

Source: ONS Job Density figures Defra rural definition pre April 2009- see table B.16

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 31 B . Economy Data Appendix

Table B.19 Accessibility of Services in Rural/Urban Areas 2000 to 2009, percentage households with access

2000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Service Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban Banks and building societies (4km) 60.7 99.7 59.4 99.4 59.6 99.4 59.4 99.3 59.9 99.5 60.0 99.5 Cashpoints (all) (4km) 85.7 100.0 # # 88.9 99.9 90.9 99.9 # # 90.5 100.0 Cashpoints (free) (4km) # # # # 67.3 99.6 77.4 99.8 # # 90.5 100.0 GP surgeries (all sites) (4km) # # # # 85.3 99.9 85.4 99.9 86.8 100.0 88.5 100.0 GP surgeries (principal sites) (4km) 81.5 99.9 80.4 99.7 80.5 99.7 80.5 99.7 80.5 99.8 80.3 99.8 Jobcentres (8km) 60.6 98.0 57.8 98.1 51.8 97.6 50.1 97.6 50.9 97.7 50.8 97.6 NHS Dentists (4km) # # # # 65.9 99.4 61.7 99.3 63.3 99.6 63.0 99.6 Petrol stations (4km) 90.2 100.0 88.1 99.9 87.5 99.9 85.8 99.9 85.7 100.0 85.2 100.0 Post offices (2km) 87.3 99.9 # # 86.6 99.7 85.9 99.5 83.5 99.6 82.0 99.5 Primary schools (2km) 90.2 100.0 90.2 99.8 90.0 99.8 89.7 99.7 89.5 100.0 89.1 99.9 Public Houses (2km) # # # # # # 91.8 99.8 92.8 99.9 92.8 99.9 Secondary schools (4km) 64.3 99.6 63.3 99.4 62.9 99.4 63.0 99.3 63.4 99.6 62.8 99.5 Supermarkets (4km) 73.5 99.8 75.2 99.8 75.3 99.8 75.7 99.8 76.2 99.9 76.2 99.9

Rural Services Data Series: Availability of Services and Outlets by Region 2009 Rural households are those defined in the 2004 Rural and Urban definition as 'hamlet and isolated dwellings, village and town and fringe

32 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX B . Economy Data Appendix

Policy 42 Regional Priorities for Tourism

Table B.20 Number of Full Time Equivalent Jobs Supported by Tourism 2003 to 2008

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Derbyshire 24,510 24,316 24,015 23,651 24,568 24,336 Leicestershire and Rutland 19,158 18,979 18,995 20,517 21,058 21,384 Lincolnshire 16,773 16,156 16,399 16,120 16,683 16,826 Northamptonshire 12,624 12,607 13,138 12,710 13,043 12,944 Nottinghamshire 21,622 21,547 22,547 22,132 22,476 21,362 East Midlands 94,563 93,635 95,124 95,130 97,828 96,852

Source: STEAM (Scarborough Tourism Economic Activity Monitor) Table B.21 Spend by Visitors 2003 to 2008 (million pounds)

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Derbyshire 1,287 1,293 1,285 1,368 1,404 1,420 Leicestershire and Rutland 1,109 1,109 1,112 1,314 1,326 1,387 Lincolnshire 864 828 850 903 927 958 Northamptonshire 702 721 762 798 824 834 Nottinghamshire 1,257 1,264 1,342 1,436 1,437 1,388 East Midlands 5,206 5,216 5,351 5,820 5,918 5,987

Source: STEAM (Scarborough Tourism Economic Activity Monitor)

Table B.22 Number of Overnight Stays 2003 to 2008 (million)

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Derbyshire 9.0 9.5 9.7 9.4 9.9 9.6 Leicestershire and Rutland 6.2 6.2 6.3 9.3 9.5 9.5 Lincolnshire 12.4 12.1 12.4 12.1 12.7 12.3 Northamptonshire 5.9 6.1 6.3 6.4 6.6 6.5 Nottinghamshire 7.9 7.7 8.1 8.5 8.8 8.5 East Midlands 41.4 41.6 42.7 45.7 47.4 46.4

Source: STEAM (Scarborough Tourism Economic Activity Monitor)

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 33 B . Economy Data Appendix

Latest Economy Data

Table B.23 Number of Job Seekers Allowance Claimants November 2008 to 2009

Derby Derbys. Leicester Leics. Lincs. Northants Nottingham Notts. Rutland East England Midlands Nov 08 5,069 11,393 8,779 6,853 10,532 10,486 8,583 10,841 188 72,724 878,047 Dec 08 5,456 12780 9,212 7,636 11,699 11,967 9,153 12,157 223 80,283 959,419 Jan 09 5,995 14,646 9,913 9,109 12,739 14,093 9,767 13,716 274 90,252 1,065,839 Feb 09 6,988 16,863 11,136 10,974 14,753 16,780 10,912 15,946 351 104,703 1,217,446 Mar 09 7,235 17,403 11,513 11,583 15,178 17,729 11,505 16,596 373 109,115 1,272,858 Apr 09 7,374 17,825 12,086 12,008 14,974 18,510 11,809 16,984 389 111,959 1,304,456 May 09 7,512 17,712 12,320 11,977 14,846 18,775 11,843 16,816 382 112,183 1,311,683 Jun 09 7,392 17,328 12,326 11,847 14,639 18,372 11,667 16,315 392 110,278 1,298,572 Jul 09 7,467 17,351 12,467 12,032 14,564 18,408 11,817 16,455 380 110,941 1,311,098 Aug 09 7,464 17,586 13,033 12,224 14,711 18,472 12,067 16,687 397 112,641 1,333,857 Sep 09 7,444 17,368 13,108 11,777 14,562 18,039 12,392 16,663 382 111,735 1,329,142 Oct 09 7,412 17,422 13,398 11,824 14,759 17,427 12,556 16,432 368 111,598 1,322,077 Nov 09 7,390 17,095 12,808 11,177 15,110 16,976 12,603 16,365 378 109,902 1,307,139

Source: Job Centre Plus Claimant Count

Table B.24 Percentage of Resident Working age Population Claiming Job Seekers Allowance November 2008 to 2009

Derby Derbys. Leicester Leics. Lincs. Northants Nottingham Notts. Rutland East England Midlands Nov 08 3.4 2.5 4.6 1.7 2.6 2.4 4.2 2.3 0.8 2.7 2.7 Dec 08 3.7 2.8 4.8 1.9 2.9 2.8 4.5 2.6 1.0 2.9 3.0 Jan 09 4.0 3.2 5.2 2.3 3.1 3.3 4.8 2.9 1.2 3.3 3.3 Feb 09 4.7 3.6 5.8 2.7 3.6 3.9 5.4 3.4 1.5 3.8 3.8 Mar 09 4.9 3.8 6.0 2.9 3.7 4.1 5.7 3.5 1.6 4.0 4.0 Apr 09 5.0 3.9 6.3 3.0 3.7 4.3 5.8 3.6 1.7 4.1 4.1 May 09 5.0 3.8 6.4 3.0 3.6 4.4 5.8 3.5 1.7 4.1 4.1 Jun 09 5.0 3.7 6.4 3.0 3.6 4.3 5.7 3.4 1.7 4.0 4.1 Jul 09 5.0 3.7 6.5 3.0 3.6 4.3 5.8 3.5 1.7 4.0 4.1 Aug 09 5.0 3.8 6.8 3.1 3.6 4.3 5.9 3.5 1.7 4.1 4.2 Sep 09 5.0 3.8 6.8 2.9 3.6 4.2 6.1 3.5 1.7 4.1 4.2 Oct 09 5.0 3.8 7.0 3.0 3.6 4.1 6.2 3.5 1.6 4.1 4.1 Nov 09 5.0 3.7 6.7 2.8 3.7 4.0 6.2 3.4 1.7 4.0 4.1

Source: NOMIS Claimant Count

34 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX B . Economy Data Appendix

Table B.25 Change in Business Confidence October 2007 - January 2010

Oct-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Aug-09 Decreased substantially 14 17 26 31 33 13 Decreased slightly 19 25 19 27 24 33 No Change 32 25 30 24 26 23 Increased slightly 20 20 13 11 11 24 Increased substantially 15 13 12 7 6 7

Source: Federation of Small Businesses

Table B.26 Change in Business Sales October 2007 - January 2010

Oct-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Aug-09 Decreased substantially 15 8 25 24 31 33 Decreased slightly 17 27 19 21 20 21 No Change 30 27 20 25 23 15 Increased slightly 18 20 20 21 15 16 Increased substantially 20 18 16 9 11 16

Source: Federation of Small Businesses

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 35 B . Economy Data Appendix

Available Employment, Retail and Leisure Land Maps

Figure B.1 Committed Sites in the Three Cities Sub Area 2008/09

36 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX B . Economy Data Appendix

Figure B.2 Committed Sites in the Eastern Sub Area 2008/09

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 37 B . Economy Data Appendix

Picture B.1 Committed Sites in the Northern Sub Area 2008/09

38 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX B . Economy Data Appendix

Picture B.2 Committed Sites in the Southern sub Area 2008/09

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 39 B . Economy Data Appendix

Picture B.3 Committed Sites in the Peak Sub Area 2008/09

40 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX C . Environment Data Appendix

C Environment Data Appendix

Policy 26 Protecting and Enhancing the Region’s Natural and Cultural Heritage

Table C.1 SSSI condition September 2008 and 2009 (per cent)

SSSI Condition September-2008 September-2009 Percentage Area Favourable 44 48 Percentage Area Unfavourable Recovering 48 47 Percentage Area Unfavourable No Change 6 3 Percentage Area Unfavourable Declining 2 2 Percentage Area Destroyed/Part Destroyed 0 0

Source: Natural England Policy 27 Regional Priorities for the Historic Environment

Table C.2 Historic environment records at 31st March 2008 and 2009 Number of Authorities

Authorities which systematically With access With direct use the Historic Environment through a access Record (HERS) in determining service level planning applications as part of agreement (or the Development Control similar) Process 2008/09 Number Percentage of Number Number All Authorities in the area Derby 1 100 0 1 Derbyshire* 7 88 5 1 Leicester 1 100 0 1 Leicestershire 4 57 4 0 Lincolnshire** 4 57 3 1 Northamptonshire 2 29 0 2 Nottingham 0 0 0 0 Nottinghamshire 3 43 1 2 Peak District 1 100 1 0 Rutland 1 100 1 0 East Midlands 24 59 15 8

Source: Local Authorities *One authority didn't specify the type of access **Lincoln use their own archaeological database rather than HERs

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 41 C . Environment Data Appendix

Policy 28 Regional Priorities for Environmental and Green Infrastructure

Table C.3 Green infrastructure as at 31st March 2008 and 2009

Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Authorities with Authorities with Authorities Authorities Authorities with an adopted an adopted where a Green where a Green Local Plan/LDF Green Green Infrastructure Infrastructure include polices Infrastructure Infrastructure Strategy is being Strategy is being relating to Green Strategy 2007/08 Strategy 2008/09 prepared 2007/08 prepared 2008/09 Infrastructure 2008/09* Derbys. 0 0 7 5 3 Leics. 0 1 6 5 6 Lincs. 1 0 5 6 1 Northants. 1 1 0 2 5 Notts. 0 1 4 5 1 Unitaries and Peak 0 2 0 1 3 East Midlands 2 5 22 24 19

Source: Local Authorities * N/A returned for Charnwood, Mansfield and North East Derbyshire Policy 29 Priorities for Enhancing the Region’s Biodiversity

Table C.4 Biodiversity- Local Wildlife Sites 2008/09 (per cent)

Proportion of Local Sites where positive conservation management has been or is being implemented Amber Valley N/R Ashfield *3 Bassetlaw N/A Blaby N/R Bolsover 32 Boston 44 Broxtowe 6 Charnwood 13 Chesterfield 38 Corby 17 Daventry N/R Derby 42 Derbyshire Dales 36 East Lindsey N/R East Northamptonshire N/R Erewash 30

42 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX C . Environment Data Appendix

Proportion of Local Sites where positive conservation management has been or is being implemented Gedling 14 Harborough N/R High Peak 35 Hinckley and Bosworth N/R Kettering N/R Leicester 42 Lincoln 38 Mansfield 34 Melton N/A Newark and Sherwood 21 North East Derbyshire 27 North Kesteven 46 North West Leicestershire N/R Northampton 10 Nottingham 53 Oadby and Wigston 30 Peak District N/A Rushcliffe 6 Rutland 78 South Derbyshire 31 South Holland 18 South Kesteven 5 South Northamptonshire N/R Wellingborough N/R West Lindsey 0

Source: Local Authorities N/A: Not applicable N/R: Not returned *Local Sites have been determined as SINCs. The total is likely to be higher than this, as data only available for of the management of those SINCs that are in the Council's or Nottinghamshire County Council's ownership

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 43 C . Environment Data Appendix

Policy 31 Priorities for the Management and Enhancement of the Region’s Landscape

Table C.5 Areas Covered by Landscape Character Assessments as at 31st March 2009 (number of authorities)

Derbys. Leics. Lincs. Northants. Notts. Unitaries Total East and Midlands Peak Percentage of Authorities Development plan containing a supporting landscape character policy framework 5 2 2 4 3 1 17 41.5 Systematically users of a Landscape Character related SPD in determining planning applications as part of its Development Control process 3 0 0 1 1 0 5 12.2 Plans to produce a relevant SPD 0 1 0 0 2 1 4 9.8 Landscape Strategy 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 4.9 Prepared or are considering preparing a European Landscape Convention Action Plan 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2.4 Undertaken landscape capacity or sensitivity studies to inform the location and design of new urban extensions or other major development 2 3 0 6 3 1 15 36.6 Undertaken a landscape capacity or sensitivity study to help inform the location of wind energy schemes 4 2 1 0 0 1 8 19.5 Number of dedicated and trained landscape staff (FTEs) 5 1 1 2 2 6 17 N/A

Source: Local Authorities Several authorities unable to provide complete data. No or incomplete data: Hinckley & Bosworth, Lincoln, Harborough, S Northamptonshire, Gedling, Kettering, Melton. North Kesteven, West Lindsey, Mansfield, NW Leicestershire, Oadby & Wigston, East Lindsey, Rutland

44 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX Figure C.1 Landscape Character Types | Annual Monitoring C Report . Environment 2008/09 DA T A APPENDIX Data

This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of Her Majesty's Stationary Office. (c) Crown Copyright. Unauthorised re[production infringes Crown Appendix Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings Natural England 100046223 (2009) Source: 'East Midlands Regional Landscape Character Assessment’, LDA Design for Natural England 45 C . Environment Data Appendix

Policy 32 A Regional Approach to Water Resources and Water Quality

Table C.6 Planning Permissions with SuDs 2008/09

Number of Approximate Number of Approximate Approximate total domestic total area industrial/ total number of area covered by dwelling sites covered by business non-residential non-residential covered dwelling sites sites covered units covered units (ha) (ha) Boston 23 3.0 1 1 0.9 Chesterfield 2 4.2 7 200 138.9 Leicester 14 30.6 2 2 12.8 Lincoln 0 0.0 1 1 0.8 Newark and 0 0.0 1 14 0.5 Sherwood North East 7 1.1 2 2 0.1 Derbyshire Rushcliffe 1,200 106.5 0 N/A N/A South Derbyshire 3 148.0 0 0 0.0 South 1 0.0 0 0 N/A Northamptonshire East Midlands 1,250 293.3 14 220 154.0

Source: Local Authorities Note figures above relate only to those authorities who were able to return data and had some developments with SuDs N/A: Not applicable Policy 33 Regional Priorities for Strategic River Corridors

Table C.7 East Midlands GQAHI grade Percentage River Length 1990 to 2008- Biology (per cent)

Very Good and Good Fairly good or Fair Poor or Bad 1990 43.9 48.8 7.4

1995 48.8 44.7 6.5

2000 63.3 32.8 3.9 2002 61.4 35.3 3.3 2003 63.8 32.6 3.6 2004 62.8 33.2 4.0 2005 67.0 29.2 3.7 2006 69.7 27.2 3.1 2007 71.2 27.1 1.6 2008 70.5 27.6 1.9

Source: Environment Agency

46 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX C . Environment Data Appendix

Table C.8 East Midlands GQAHI grade Percentage River Length 1990 to 2008- Chemistry (per cent)

Very Good and good Fairly good or Fair Poor or Bad 1990 34.5 55.1 10.4 1993 53.4 40.7 5.9 1994 60.9 36.2 2.9 1995 66.4 31.0 2.6 1996 63.0 33.6 3.4 1997 56.4 38.6 4.9 1998 58.9 37.6 3.4 1999 65.8 32.1 2.1 2000 72.8 25.2 2.0 2001 75.0 23.1 1.9 2002 72.9 26.0 1.1 2003 70.8 26.7 2.5 2004 68.5 27.8 3.7 2005 71.1 24.1 4.8 2006 71.9 23.3 4.8 2007 74.9 21.8 3.3 2008 77.5 19.9 3.3

Source: Environment Agency Table C.9 East Midlands GQAHI grade Percentage River Length 1990 to 2008-Phosphates (per cent)

Very Low and Low Moderately or High Very High or Excessively High 1990 2.5 13.8 83.7

1995 11.7 19.7 68.6

2000 9.1 21.6 69.3 2001 8.2 21.2 70.6 2002 7.6 23.2 69.2 2003 6.8 23.7 69.4 2004 6.2 25.6 68.2 2005 8.9 24.3 66.8 2006 10.5 24.3 65.2 2007 12.6 27.7 59.6 2008 14.3 30.2 55.5

Source: Environment Agency

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 47 C . Environment Data Appendix

Table C.10 East Midlands GQAHI grade Percentage River Length 1990 to 2008- Nitrates (per cent)

Very Low and Low Moderately low or High or Very High Moderate 1990 4.8 34.1 61.2

1995 4.9 25.6 69.5

2000 4.7 20.7 74.7 2001 4.7 23.9 71.4 2002 4.9 27.2 67.8 2003 5.8 32.5 61.7 2004 5.3 33.2 61.5 2005 5.3 35.3 59.4 2006 5.9 36.0 58.1 2007 8.0 37.0 55.0 2008 7.6 37.2 55.2

Source: Environment Agency Policy 35 A Regional Approach to Managing Flood Risk

Table C.11 Planning applications approved contrary to Environment Agency advice on flood risk grounds 20001/02 to 2006/07

Minor development Major development 2001/02 62 3 2002/03 39 4 2003/04 132 1 2004/05 19 1 2005/06 20 2 2006/07 16 4

Source: Environment Agency

48 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX C . Environment Data Appendix

Table C.12 Level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessments as at 31st March 2009

Areas Covered Derbyshire Erewash included in Nottingham Core HMA Leicestershire Hinckley & Bosworth, Blaby, Oadby & Wigston, Melton, North West Leicestershire and specific sites in Charnwood Lincolnshire Boston, Sleaford & the Fens, Grantham and specific sites in West Lindsey Northamptonshire All districts Nottinghamshire Nottingham Core HMA, Bassetlaw Unitaries & Peak Oakham & Uppingham in Rutland

Source: Local Authorities All districts bar Derby (in progress) are covered by an SFRA Level 2 SFRA: Where a Level 1 SFRA shows that land outside flood risk areas cannot accommodate the necessary development and the Exception Test needs to be applied, the scope of the SFRA should be widened. This increased scope SFRA is referred to as a Level 2 SFRA. Policy 39 Regional Priorities for Energy Reduction and Efficiency

Table C.13 Gas Consumption in East Midlands 2006/07

Domestic consumers Commercial and All consumers Sales per consumer industrial consumers Sales Number Sales Number Sales Number Domestic Commercial (GWh) of (GWh) of (GWh) of (kWh) and consumers consumers consumers industrial (thousands) (thousands) (thousands) (kWh) Derby 1,613 99 981 1 2,594 100 16,362 773,545 Derbys. 5,617 307 2,737 4 8,353 312 18,271 616,487 Leicester 2,038 114 1,655 2 3,693 117 17,836 740,463 Leics. 4,494 242 2,451 4 6,945 246 18,573 652,174 Lincs. 3,919 228 1,773 3 5,692 231 17,193 586,253 Northants. 4,366 255 2,694 4 7,061 258 17,153 713,886 Not'ham 1,874 114 1,470 2 3,344 116 16,488 684,521 Notts. 5,731 306 2,577 4 8,308 310 18,710 690,977 Rutland 225 12 76 0 300 12 19,350 288,357 East Midlands 29,878 1,676 16,413 25 46,290 1,701 17,823 666,187

Source: DTI Regional Energy Consumption Statistics

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 49 C . Environment Data Appendix

Table C.14 Electricity Consumption in the East Midlands 2007

Domestic consumers Commercial and All consumers Sales per consumer industrial consumers Sales Number Sales Number Sales Number Domestic Comm. and (GWh) of (GWh) of (GWh) of (kWh) indust.(kWh) consums consums consums (000s) (000s) (000s) Derby 435 107 743 7 1,178 115 4,065 99,201 Derbys. 1,438 340 2,743 28 4,181 367 4,233 99,261 Leicester 473 126 1,070 13 1,542 138 3,758 84,461 Leics. 1,231 272 1,904 21 3,135 294 4,518 89,557 Lincs. 1,493 318 2,157 31 3,650 349 4,690 70,598 Northants. 1,387 301 2,236 24 3,622 325 4,609 92,780 Not'ham 511 131 948 12 1,459 143 3,889 80,149 Notts. 1,467 346 1,997 24 3,464 370 4,243 83,119 Rutland 83 16 322 2 405 18 5,246 188,431 East Midlands 8,518 1,957 14,120 161 22,637 2,118 4,352 87,555

Source: DTI Regional Energy Consumption Statistics

Table C.15 Authorities which have Adopted Supplementary Planning Documents underpinning sustainable energy policy as at 31st March 2009

Authorities in the Area 2007/08 Authorities in the Area 2008/09 Derbyshire None Chesterfield Leicestershire Oadby & Wigston Oadby and Wigston Lincolnshire Lincoln Lincoln Northamptonshire South Northants, Daventry Corby, Daventry, Kettering, South Northamptonshire Nottinghamshire None Newark and Sherwood Unitaries and Peak Leicester, Peak Park Leicester

Source: Local Authorities

50 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX C . Environment Data Appendix

Policy 40 Regional Priorities for Low Carbon Energy Generation

Table C.16 Generation in East Midlands of Electricity from Renewable Sources 2003 to 2008 (GWh)

Hydro Wind/Wave Landfill Gas Other Bio fuels Total 2003 5.5 1.3 223.1 202.7 432.6 2004 11.1 # 287.2 79.0 377.3 2005 14.7 17.2 305.3 307.7 644.9 2006 15.2 81.2 290.3 276.9 663.6 2007 14.2 132.3 312.1 384.6 843.2 2008 17.5 176.5 333.5 419.3 946.8

Source: Energy Trends # 2004 wind/wave data not shown due to small number of sites Table C.17 Planning Permissions for Renewable Energy 2008/09

Completed Developments Bassetlaw 2MW onshore wind Boston 26MW onshore wind, 4MW plant biomass East Lindsey 29MW onshore wind Rushcliffe 3MW onshore wind

Source: Local Authorities Only includes authorities who were able to provide data and had non zero returns Table C.18 Inter-Regional Comparison of Consumption and Renewable Generation 2008

Region Electricity Renewable Proportion of Wind Proportion of Consumption Electricity Consumption Electricity Consumption (GWh) Generation from a Generation from Wind (per (GWh) Renewable (GWh) cent) Source (per cent) East 27,522 2,164 7.9 579 2.1 East Midlands 22,276 947 4.3 177 0.8 London 41,814 384 0.9 8 0.0 North East 12,761 615 4.8 92 0.7 North West 34,568 1,862 5.4 837 2.4 South East 40,456 1,554 3.8 271 0.7 West Midlands 25,849 697 2.7 0 0.0 South West 25,566 675 2.6 136 0.5 Yorkshire & Humber 25,250 1,449 5.7 108 0.4

Source: Energy Trends and DTI Regional Energy Consumption Statistics

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 51 C . Environment Data Appendix

Table C.19 East Midlands Wind Farms as of Summer 2009

Operational/ Onshore/ Date Name County No. of Capacity Total Approved Offshore turbines per Capacity turbine (MW) (MW) Operational Onshore Jul-02 Mablethorpe Lincolnshire 2 0.6 1.2 Oct-04 Bamber 1 Lincolnshire 8 0.6 4.8 Nov-06 Bamber 2 Lincolnshire 6 # 4.8 Apr-06 Burton Wold Wind Farm Northamptonshire 10 2.0 20.0 Jul-06 Gedney Marsh (Red Lincolnshire House) 6 2.0 12.0 Jul-06 Deeping St Nicholas Lincolnshire 8 2.0 16.0 May-08 Conisholme Fen Lincolnshire Re-submission 20 0.8 16.0 Nov-08 Bicker Fen Lincolnshire 13 2.0 26.0 Sep-08 Hollies Farm Lincolnshire 2 1.3 2.6 Jun-08 B&Q Manton Nottinghamshire 1 2.0 2.0 Total Installed Onshore 105.4 Offshore Jul-08 Lynn& Inner Dowsing Lincolnshire 54 # 194.4 Approved 2009 Carsington Water Derbyshire 4 2.0 8.0 2008 Burton Wold Extension Northamptonshire 7 2.0 14.0 2008 Wymswold Leicestershire 1 0.7 0.7 2008 Lindhurst Nottinghamshire 5 2.0 10.0 2008 EM Airport Leicestershire 4 0.9 3.6 2008 Crick DIRFT Tesco Northants 1 0.9 0.9 2009 Newark and Sherwood Nottinghamshire Stonish Hill 5 2.0 10.0 2008 Swinford Leicestershire 11 2.5 27.5 Total Approved 74.6

Source: Compiled by EMRA's Energy Policy Advisor using Best Foot Forwards's 'Regional Renewable Targets and Scenarios' (29005), AECOM's 'Reviewing Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Targets for the East Midlands (2009) and in-house intelligence #: Unknown

52 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX C . Environment Data Appendix

Table C.20 Wind Generation in Planning as of 2009

Date Place County No. of Capacity Total turbines per Capacity turbine (MW) (MW) 2006 Orby Marsh nr Skegness Lincolnshire 20 # # 2007 Langham Wind Farm Nr Lincolnshire Skegness 6 2 12 2008 Brixworth Northants 6 2 12 2008 North Kilworth Leicestershire 1 # # 2008 Nun farm Bozeat Northants 3 # # 2009 Palmers Hollow (currently in Leicestershire appeal) 8 2 16 2009 Low Spinney nr Gilmorton Leicestershire 4 # # 2009 Matlock Moor Derbys 5 # # 2009 Spalding Lincolnshire # # # pending Billsborough Fen Lincolnshire # # # pending Lillbourne Northants 12 2 24 Quenibourogh Leicestershire 5 2 10 Apr-09 Yelvertoft Nr M1 Northants 8 2 16 Mar-09 Notts Cottam Wind 12 2 24

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 53 C . Environment Data Appendix

Figure C.2 Wind Power Installations

54 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX C . Environment Data Appendix

Table C.21 Small Hydro Generation in Operation

Name Installed Capacity (kWh) Beeston Weir 1,676 Belper Mill 350 Bilstone Mill 5 Borrowash Mill 180 Bottoms Reservoir Hydro 160 Bugbrooke Mills 18 Calver Mill 90 Cromwell Weir 1,158 Errwood HES 150 Holme Pierrepont 890 Masson Mill 240 Milford Mill 185 Oak Hurst Mill 240 Rhodeswood Hydro 250 Thrumpton Weir 952 Torside Reservoir Hydro 245 Chatsworth House # East Mill # Peak District National Park #

Source: Compiled using Best Foot Forwards's 'Regional Renewable Targets and Scenarios' (2005), AECOM's 'Reviewing Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Targets for the East Midlands (2009) and in-house intelligence #:Unknown

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 55 D . Minerals & Waste Data Appendix

D Minerals & Waste Data Appendix

Policy 37 Regional Priorities for Minerals

Table D.1 Comparison of East Midlands* Rock and Sand Landbanks 2003 to 2008 (million tonnes)

Aggregate Sales Permitted Reserves Limestone / Dolomite 2003 14.1 1,528 2004 14.7 1,252 2005 14.6 1,007 2006 14.8 998 2007 15.8 978 2008 13.2 1,056 Igneous Rock / Sandstone 2003 14.3 410 2004 13.2 393 2005 14.1 376 2006 14.6 358 2007 14.6 339 2008 13.5 324 Chalk 2003 0.2 10 2004 0.3 12 2005 0.1 8 2006 0.2 14 2007 0.3 13 2008 0.7 14 Total Rock 2003 28.6 1,948 2004 28.2 1,657 2005 28.8 1,391 2006 29.7 1,369 2007 30.7 1,330 2008 26.8 1,394 Sand/Gravel 2003 10.8 94 2004 10.3 92 2005 10.1 77 2006 9.9 74

56 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX D . Minerals & Waste Data Appendix

Aggregate Sales Permitted Reserves 2007 8.9 80 2008 7.5 79

Source: EMAWP 2008 * Includes the whole Peak Park Policy 38 Regional Priorities for Waste Management

Table D.2 Existing capacity 2005 (thousand tonnes)

Recycling/ Landfill Re-use Disposal Total composting Diversion Derbyshire*, Derby City 441 1,161 210 1,188 3,000 Leicestershire, Leicester City, Rutland** 478 264 296 1,199 2,237 Lincolnshire 570 316 113 567 1,566 Northamptonshire 906 205 19 1,479 2,609 Nottinghamshire, Nottingham City 636 961 288 1,150 3,035 Regional Total 3,031 1,907 926 5,583 12,447

Source: Waste Planning Guidance for EMRA, SLR Consulting Ltd (August 2006) * Information relating to the whole Peak District National Park included in Derbyshire figures ** Information from the Environment Agency indicates that in 2005 Leicestershire, Leicester City and Rutland handled 2,725,398 tonnes of waste which is in excess of the capacity estimated by SLR Table D.3 Capacity Requirement 2020 (thousand tonnes)

Recycling/ Landfill Re-use Disposal Total composting Diversion Derbyshire*, Derby City 2,047 187 999 1,301 4,534 Leicestershire, Leicester City, Rutland 2,240 195 999 1,301 4,735 Lincolnshire 1,573 123 651 825 3,172 Northamptonshire 1,543 121 651 871 3,186 Nottinghamshire, Nottingham City 2,218 214 1,042 3,054 6,526 Regional Total 9,621 840 4,342 7,352 22,155

Source: Waste Planning Guidance for EMRA, SLR Consulting Ltd (August 2006) * Information relating to the whole Peak District National Park included in Derbyshire figures

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 57 D . Minerals & Waste Data Appendix

Table D.4 Existing MSW Capacity 2005 (thousand tonnes)

Recycling/ Landfill Re-use Disposal Total composting Diversion

Derbyshire*, Derby City 85 # 433 518 Leicestershire, Leicester City, Rutland 98 110 # 398 606 Lincolnshire 182 # 272 454 Northamptonshire 102 # 274 376 Nottinghamshire, Nottingham City 128 150 # 334 612 Regional Total 595 260 # 1,711 2,566

Source: Waste Planning Guidance for EMRA, SLR Consulting Ltd (August 2006) * Information relating to the whole Peak District National Park included in Derbyshire figures Table D.5 MSW Capacity Requirement 2020 (thousand tonnes)

Recycling/ Landfill Re-use Disposal Total composting Diversion

Derbyshire*, Derby City 326 187 # 138 651 Leicestershire, Leicester City, 333 195 # 139 667 Rutland Lincolnshire 213 123 # 90 426 Northamptonshire 222 121 # 101 444 Nottinghamshire, Nottingham 386 214 # 172 772 City Regional Total 1,480 840 # 640 2,960

Source: Waste Planning Guidance for EMRA, SLR Consulting Ltd (August 2006) * Information relating to the whole Peak District National Park included in Derbyshire figures

58 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX D . Minerals & Waste Data Appendix

Table D.6 Municipal Waste Management in the East Midlands 2000/01 to 2008/09 (million tonnes)

2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Landfill 1,783 1,881 1,899 1,791 1,680 1,448 1,452 1,279 1,168 Percentage 78 78 78 73 67 60 58 53 50 Incineration 152 156 142 151 167 121 160 166 161 Percentage 7 6 6 6 7 5 6 7 7 Recycled/ composted 354 371 393 492 678 772 865 969 1,010 Percentage 15 15 16 20 27 32 35 40 43 Other 0 2 15 11 0 88 13 0 14 Percentage 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 0 1 Total 2,290 2,409 2,449 2,445 2,525 2,428 2,490 2,413 2,353

Source: Waste Data Flows Table D.7 Household recycling rates 2000/01 to 2008/09 (per cent)

2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 East Midlands 13.1 13.7 15.1 19.3 26.3 31.8 35.6 41.9 44.5 England 11.2 12.5 14.5 17.8 22.5 26.7 30.9 34.5 37.6

Source: Waste Data Flows

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 59 E . Transport Data Appendix

E Transport Data Appendix

Policy 45 Regional Approach to Traffic Growth Reduction

Table E.1 East Midlands Motor Vehicle Traffic 2001 to 2008 (billion vehicle kilometres)

Motorway Rural Urban Minor All Trunk Principal Total Trunk Principal Total Rural Urban 2001 6.2 8.3 6.2 14.5 1.0 3.8 4.8 5.9 6.7 38.0 2002 6.3 8.5 6.4 14.9 1.0 3.8 4.8 6.1 6.9 39.2 2003 6.5 6.6 8.9 15.4 0.7 4.2 4.8 6.1 7.0 39.9 2004 6.8 6.5 9.2 15.6 0.7 4.3 4.9 6.3 7.0 40.7 2005 6.8 5.9 9.8 15.7 0.5 4.3 4.8 6.4 7.0 40.6 2006 6.8 6.1 9.8 15.9 0.5 4.3 4.9 6.5 7.1 41.2 2007 6.8 6.2 9.9 16.1 0.5 4.3 4.8 6.8 7.2 41.7 2008 6.6 6.1 9.7 15.8 0.5 4.3 4.8 6.8 7.1 41.1

Source: DfT Transport Statistics National Road Traffic Survey Policy 46 A Regional Approach to Behavioural Change

Table E.2 Proportion of Pupils and Workforce covered by Travel Plans 2006/07 to 2008/09 (per cent)

Percentage of workforce employed Percentage of pupils attending by companies with travel plans schools with travel plans 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Derby 40 40 N/R 62 ****71 82 Derbyshire N/R N/R 9 63 82 93 Greater Nottingham 22 36 *29 35 61 69 Leicester** 21 34 36 33 52 66 Leicestershire*** 10 11 12 53 66 66 Lincolnshire N/R N/R N/R 75 90 96 North Nottinghamshire 22 25 25 30 45 63 Northamptonshire N/R N/R N/R N/R 74 86 Rutland 0 0 0 43 49 67

Source: Local Authorities * Nottingham City area only ** Relates to percentage of workforce in central area of Leicester - within the 'Central Transport Zone' cordon *** Businesses with over 250 employees only ****Percentage of schools N/R: Not returned

60 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX E . Transport Data Appendix

Policy 53 Regional Trunk Road Priorities

Table E.3 Investment in the Road Network - length of principal A and B roads improved or constructed 2008/09

Scheme Total Length improved or constructed /km Derbyshire Ilkeston - Awsworth Bypass 1.2 M1 Junction 29A 1.6 Greater A611 Hucknall Road (commuter cycle route) 1.3 Nottingham A609 Ilkeston Road 1.0 A6008 Maid Marion Way/Castle Gate 0.1 B682 Nottingham Road 1.0 Leicestershire Earl Shilton bypass "Clickers Way" 4.8 Northants Ecton, A4500 Wellingborough Road 0.5 Daventry, A425 Leamington Way 2.0 Northampton, A5123 Kingsley Park Road 0.4 Broughton, A5199 Welford Road 0.3 Grafton Regis, A508 Welford Road 0.8 Northampton, Redhouse Road 0.3 Northampton, Rushmere Way 1.2 Daventry, A361 Ashby Road 0.6 Rockingham, A6003 Uppingham Road 0.7 Rushden, A5028 Higham Road 0.4 Nether Heyford,A45 Weedon Road M1junction 16 0.5 Weldon, A43 Stamford Road 1.6 Irthlingborough, A6 Station Road 0.4 Easton on the Hill, A47 Peterborough Road 0.7

Source:Local Authorities There may have been some inconsistencies between authorities to which road investment schemes should be included. The definition will be clarified before 2009/10

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 61 E . Transport Data Appendix

Policy 54 Regional Major Highway Priorities

Table E.4 Road Users Killed or Seriously Injured 2008

Pedestrians All Road Users Children All Ages Children All Ages Derby 8 38 13 113 Derbyshire 18 61 34 425 Leicester 11 *36 18 97 Leicestershire 8 34 14 253 Lincolnshire 7 38 16 337 Northamptonshire 29 72 46 435 Nottingham 9 48 13 157 Nottinghamshire 21 76 40 480 Rutland 0 4 0 30 East Midlands 111 371 194 2,327

Source: Department for Transport *includes 4 ‘age unknown’ pedestrian KSI Table E.5 Local Authority Roads Where Maintenance Should be Considered 2008/09

County/Authority Proportion of principal road Proportion of B and C non-principal road carriageway where maintenance carriageway where maintenance should should be considered (%) be considered (%) Derby 4 4 Derbyshire 4 12 Leicester 8 8 Leicestershire 2 4 Lincolnshire 3 8 Nottingham City 9 6 Nottinghamshire 2 8 Northamptonshire 4 7 Rutland 1 7

Source:Local Authorities Derby figure is unconfirmed

62 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX E . Transport Data Appendix

Policy 55 Implementation of the Regional Freight Strategy

Table E.6 Freight lifted at East Midlands airports: 1993 to 2008 (thousand tonnes)

1993 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 East Mids. 30 178 195 219 227 253 267 272 275 262

Source: Civil Aviation Authority Figures include some double counting because domestic traffic is counted at airport on arrival and departure and exclude mail and passengers' luggage Policy 56 Regional Priorities for Air Transport

Table E.7 Air transport movements (aircraft landing or take-offs) at East Midlands airports 1993 to 2008 (thousands)

1993 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 East Mids 27.1 39.9 40.9 48.6 54 55.9 53.8 56.3 61.5 66.1

Source: Civil Aviation Authority Figures include some double counting because domestic traffic is counted at airport on arrival

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 63 F . Sub Areas Data Appendix

F Sub Areas Data Appendix

GENERAL SUB AREA

Policy 3- Distribution of New Development

Table F.1 Vacancy Rates by Tenure Type 2008/09

Private RSL Local Other Public Tenure Type Total Sector Authority Sector Unknown No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % Central Lincolnshire 4,889 4.4 77 2.8 153 1.3 310 24.3 N/R N/A 5,429 4.2 Coastal 2,500 3.1 57 1.1 N/R N/A N/R N/A 1,576 N/A 4,133 3.0 Lincolnshire Derby 4,824 2.7 224 1.1 439 2.6 51 63.0 2,348 4.3 7,886 3.5 Leicester & Leics 10,002 4.0 320 2.0 410 1.2 23 4.1 2,419 3.1 13,174 3.5 North Northants N/R N/A N/R N/A 103 2.1 N/R N/A 977 2.7 1,080 2.6 Northern 2,246 3.1 34 4.4 413 1.4 11 4.1 3,386 4.8 6,090 3.5 Nottingham Core 6,413 4.7 713 4.9 786 2.7 29 N/A 4,580 3.2 12,521 3.8 Nottingham Outer 1,716 4.0 41 0.4 374 2.7 N/R N/A 1,209 2.4 3,340 2.8 Peak, Dales & N/R N/A N/R N/A N/R N/A N/R N/A 1,370 6.5 1,370 6.5 Park* Peterborough 1,231 2.6 34 1.4 127 1.1 96 13.6 639 1.3 2,127 1.9 Partial West Northants 4,281 4.2 71 0.9 336 2.7 3 15.8 764 N/A 5,455 3.8 East Midlands 38,102 3.9 1,571 2.2 3,141 1.9 523 17.0 19,268 3.3 62,605 3.5

Source: Local Authorities * Excludes the part of the Peak District National Park outside of Derbyshire as vacancies are the responsibility of the constituent authorities N/R: Not returned N/A: Not applicable Incomplete data was returned from a large proportion of authorities, where only a total number or a number of vacant dwellings has been provided these figures have been excluded from percentage calculations The following list excludes those authorities who did not provide full data but did provide figures for 'tenure type unknown' as it is not possible to ascertain if this data is complete or not. It will also exclude those who entered 0 rather than N/R No data at all: Kettering, High Peak, Melton Private Sector: Mansfield no data, Derby no total number RSL: no vacant number East Lindsey and Chesterfield, no total number Derby, no data Hinckley and Bosworth, Mansfield, Rutland Other public sector: no total number Nottingham, no data Harborough, Hinckley and Bosworth, Mansfield, Oadby and Wigston LA: No data Harborough Tenure split unknown: East Lindsey and South Northampton no total number, Wellingborough no vacant number East Northamptonshire, NW Leicestershire, South Kesteven some figures moved into split unknown column in order to calculate percentages

64 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX F . Sub Areas Data Appendix

THREE CITIES SUB AREA

Policy 12- Development in the 3 Cities Sub Area

Table F.2 Benefit Claimants February 2007 to 2009

February-2007 February-2008 February-2009 Number of Proportion Number of Proportion Number of Proportion working age of Working working age of Working working age of Working claimants of Age claimants of Age claimants of Age any benefit Population any benefit Population any benefit Population Claiming any Claiming any Claiming Benefit (%) Benefit (%) any Benefit (%) Amber Valley 9,750 13.3 9,370 12.7 10,820 14.7 Blaby 4,520 8.0 4,360 7.7 5,360 9.4 Broxtowe 7,710 10.9 7,440 10.5 8,670 12.3 Charnwood 9,140 8.5 9,100 8.5 10,850 10.1 Derby 23,740 16.0 23,230 15.7 26,530 17.9 Erewash 8,920 13.1 8,640 12.7 10,470 15.3 Gedling 8,180 12.0 8,010 11.7 9,320 13.6 Harborough 3,230 6.5 3,240 6.5 3,970 8.0 Hinckley & Bosworth 5,900 9.1 5,880 9.1 7,150 11.0 Leicester 36,660 19.2 35,770 18.7 40,050 21.0 Melton 2,340 7.8 2,180 7.3 2,850 9.5 North West Leicestershire 6,230 11.2 6,050 10.9 7,060 12.7 Nottingham 37,620 18.9 36,960 18.6 40,750 20.5 Oadby & Wigston 3,110 9.1 3,030 8.8 3,560 10.4 Rushcliffe 4,960 7.4 4,850 7.2 5,620 8.4 South Derbyshire 5,940 10.4 5,790 10.2 6,930 12.2 3 Cities Sub-area 177,950 13.3 173,900 13.0 199,960 14.8 East Midlands 363,430 13.3 355,380 13.0 409,180 14.9 England 4,411,890 13.9 4,296,520 13.5 4,848,740 15.3

Source: DWP Benefits Data

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 65 F . Sub Areas Data Appendix

NORTHERN SUB AREA

Policy 7- Regeneration of the Northern Sub-Area

Table F.3 Economic Activity Rate Northern Sub-area 2004 to 2008 (percentage of working age population)

Jan 04-Dec Jan 05-Dec Jan 06-Dec Jan 07-Dec Jan 08-Dec 04 05 06 07 08 Ashfield 79.3 79.9 78.5 78.5 78.7 Bassetlaw 80.4 79.0 75.4 77.4 78.2 Bolsover 71.7 75.5 77.6 80.1 77.1 Chesterfield 74.9 81.0 82.9 79.5 80.7 Mansfield 74.4 75.5 76.3 80.3 82.0 Newark & Sherwood 80.2 80.7 80.3 83.0 78.7 North East Derbyshire 78.1 79.8 82.1 76.5 78.7 Northern Sub-area 77 79 79 79 79 East Midlands 78.8 79.5 80.5 80.0 80.8

Source: Annual Population Survey 0 decimal places for Northern Sub-area as calculated using rounded data Table F.4 Employment Rates Northern Sub-area (percentage working age population) 2004 to 2008 (per cent)

Jan 04-Dec 04 Jan 05-Dec 05 Jan 06-Dec 06 Jan 07-Dec 07 Jan 08-Dec 08 Ashfield 75.6 75.4 73.6 72.9 74.2 Bassetlaw 76.3 76.0 70.9 76.4 74.7 Bolsover 67.8 69.4 71.2 71.8 74.0 Chesterfield 71.7 76.5 76.4 73.7 76.4 Mansfield 71.3 68.9 70.7 74.6 76.9 Newark & Sherwood 78.2 78.5 76.9 76.0 73.8 North East Derbyshire 75.1 76.4 79.3 71.4 75.3 Northern Sub-area 74 75 74 74 75 East Midlands 75.4 75.8 76.3 75.9 75.9

Source: Annual Population Survey 0 decimal places for Northern Sub-area as calculated using rounded data

66 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX F . Sub Areas Data Appendix

Table F.5 Benefit Claimants Northern Sub-area February 2006 to 2009

Feb 06 Feb 07 Feb 08 Feb 09 Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Number Per cent Ashfield 12,170 17.0 12,110 17.0 11,970 16.8 13,400 18.8 Bassetlaw 11,190 16.5 10,880 16.0 10,690 15.7 11,850 17.4 Bolsover 9,330 20.8 9,120 20.2 8,760 19.4 9,560 21.2 Chesterfield 11,730 19.1 11,570 18.9 11,000 18.0 12,210 20.0 Mansfield 12,490 20.3 12,320 20.0 12,220 19.8 13,310 21.6 Newark & 9,140 13.6 9,190 13.6 8,910 13.2 9,980 14.8 Sherwood North East 8,520 14.6 8,230 14.0 7,970 13.6 9,050 15.4 Derbyshire Northern 74,570 17.2 73,420 16.9 71,520 16.5 79,360 18.3 sub-area East 364,010 13.4 363,430 13.3 355,380 13.0 409,180 14.9 Midlands England 4,448,760 14.1 4,411,890 13.9 4,296,520 13.5 4,848,740 15.3

Source: DWP Benefits Data Northern Policy 4- Enhancing Green Infrastructure Through Development

Table F.6 Green infrastructure as at 31st March 2009

Has an adopted Local Plan/LDF includes polices relating Green Infrastructure to Green Infrastructure Strategy Ashfield (whole district) In progress A Green Infrastructure policy will be included in the Core Strategy Bassetlaw In progress A Green Infrastructure Study is currently being developed, which will inform the Core Strategy and further DPDs Bolsover No Yes Chesterfield No, although a study Polices are being developed for inclusion in has been carried out upcoming Core Strategy Mansfield Yes A Green Infrastructure Action Plan is currently being developed and will include policy wording for the LDF Newark & Sherwood In progress Yes North East Derbyshire A study is in progress Green Infrastructure Study will provide evidence for the LDF and so Green Infrastructure policies can be included in the developing Core Strategy DPD

Source: Local Authorities

| Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX 67 F . Sub Areas Data Appendix

EASTERN SUB AREA

Policy 4- Development in the Eastern Sub-Area

Table F.7 Job Density Number of Workforce jobs per Resident Working age Population 2001 to 2007

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Boston 0.79 0.79 0.84 0.82 0.89 0.88 0.98 East Lindsey 0.68 0.68 0.70 0.69 0.68 0.76 0.76 Lincoln 1.09 1.06 1.03 1.01 1.03 1.06 1.11 North Kesteven 0.70 0.68 0.69 0.70 0.68 0.69 0.69 South Holland 0.81 0.86 0.85 0.79 0.83 0.85 0.90 South Kesteven 0.73 0.74 0.76 0.72 0.75 0.74 0.78 West Lindsey 0.62 0.62 0.63 0.56 0.57 0.60 0.61 Rutland 0.79 0.85 0.86 0.82 0.82 0.91 0.86 East Midlands 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.80 0.81 0.81 England 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.88 0.84

Source: ONS Job Density Data Table F.8 Visitor Spend in Lincolnshire 2003 to 2008 (million pounds)

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Spend by staying visitors both overseas and domestic 527 502 506 529 556 558 Spend by day visitors 337 326 343 374 371 400 Total Spend 864 828 850 903 927 958

Source: STEAM Model www.eastmidlandstourism.co.uk

68 | Annual Monitoring Report 2008/09 DATA APPENDIX