DOCSLIB.ORG

The Little Book of Stoicism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Little Book of Stoicism Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness Jonas Salzgeber Illustrations © 2019 Jonas Salzgeber. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2019 Jonas Salzgeber THE LITTLE BOOK OF STOICISM. All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the publisher except for the use of brief quotations in critical articles or reviews. First paperback published 2019. FIRST EDITION. ISBN: 978-1791967284 www.njlifehacks.com Contents Introduction 1 PART 1: WHAT IS STOICISM 9 Chapter 1: The Promise of Stoic Philosophy 11 Practice the Art of Living: Become a Warrior- Philosopher 12 Promise #1: Eudaimonia 14 Promise #2: Emotional Resilience 17 Tame Restricting Emotions (≠ Unemotional) 19 Practice Stoicism and Become more Tranquil as a By-Product 23 Chapter 2: A Quick History Lesson 26 The Most Important Stoic Philosophers 29 Seneca the Younger (c. 4 BCE – 65 CE) 30 Musonius Rufus (c. 30 CE – c. 100 CE) 32 Epictetus (c. 55 CE – c. 135 CE) 33 Marcus Aurelius (121 CE – 180 CE) 34 Chapter 3: The Stoic Happiness Triangle 36 The Stoic Happiness Triangle in A Nutshell 38 1. Live with Areté: Express Your Highest Self in Every Moment 40 The Perfection of Our Natural Potential 43 The Four Cardinal Virtues 47 Character Beats Beauty 51 The Stoic Love of Mankind: Act for the Common Welfare 53 2. Focus on What You Control: Accept Whatever Happens and Make the Best Out of It 56 The Stoic Archer: Focus on the Process 60 Stoic Acceptance: Enjoy the Ride or Get Dragged Along 63 The Good, the Bad, and the Indifferent Things 67 In Poker as in Life, You Can Win with Any Hand 71 3. Take Responsibility: Get Good from Yourself 73 The Freedom of Choice 76 The Mind Makes You Rich, Even in Exile 80 Disturbed or Invincible: That’s Up to You 83 Chapter 4: The Villain: Negative Emotions Get in the Way 87 We Want What’s Beyond Our Control 92 We Lack Awareness and Get Carried Away by Impressions 94 PART 2: 55 STOIC PRACTICES 99 Chapter 5: How to Practice Stoicism? 101 Brace Yourself 103 Be Mindful 104 Recharge Your Self-Discipline 106 Don’t Call Yourself a Philosopher 107 Chapter 6: Preparing Practices 109 Practice 1 The Stoic Art of Acquiescence: Accept and Love Whatever Happens 110 Practice 2 Undertake Actions with a Reserve Clause 114 Practice 3 What Stands in the Way Becomes the Way 117 Practice 4 Remind Yourself of the Impermanence of Things 120 Practice 5 Contemplate Your Own Death 123 Practice 6 Consider Everything as Borrowed from Nature 125 Practice 7 Negative Visualization: Foreseeing Bad Stuff 128 Practice 8 Voluntary Discomfort 131 Practice 9 Prepare Yourself for the Day: The Stoic Morning Routine 134 Practice 10 Review Your Day: The Stoic Evening Routine 137 Practice 11 Keep a Role Model in Mind: Contemplate the Stoic Sage 140 Practice 12 Stoic Aphorisms: Keep Your “Weapons” Ready at Hand 143 Practice 13 Play Your Given Roles Well 146 Practice 14 Eliminate the Nonessential 149 Practice 15 Forget Fame 151 Practice 16 Like a Minimalist: Live Simple 153 Practice 17 Take Back Your Time: Cut Out News and Other Timewasters 156 Practice 18 Win at What Matters 159 Practice 19 Become an Eternal Student 162 Practice 20 What Do You Have to Show for Your Years? 165 Practice 21 Do What Needs to Get Done 168 Chapter 7: Situational Practices: How to Deal with Yourself When Life Gets Tough? 171 Practice 22 Your Judgment Harms You 173 Practice 23 How to Deal With Grief 175 Practice 24 Choose Courage and Calm over Anger 178 Practice 25 Beat Fear with Preparation and Reason 182 Practice 26 Blame Your Expectations 185 Practice 27 Pain and Provocation: Great Opportunities for Virtue 188 Practice 28 The Equanimity Game 191 Practice 29 The Anti-Puppet Mindset 194 Practice 30 Life Is Supposed to Be Challenging 197 Practice 31 What’s so Troublesome Here and Now? 200 Practice 32 Count Your Blessings 203 Practice 33 Other-ize 205 Practice 34 Take the Bird’s-Eye View 208 Practice 35 It’s the Same Old Things 210 Practice 36 Meat Is Dead Animal: Observe Objectively 212 Practice 37 Avoid Rashness: Test Your Impressions 215 Practice 38 Do Good, Be Good 219 Chapter 8: Situational Practices: How to Handle Yourself When Other People Challenge You? 222 Practice 39 We Are All Limbs of the Same Body 224 Practice 40 Nobody Errs on Purpose 226 Practice 41 Find Your Own Faults 229 Practice 42 Forgive and Love Those Who Stumble 231 Practice 43 Pity Rather than Blame the Wrongdoer 234 Practice 44 Kindness Is Strength 237 Practice 45 How to Deal with Insults 239 Practice 46 Scratches Happen In Training 243 Practice 47 Don’t Abandon Others nor Yourself 246 Practice 48 For Such a Small Price, Buy Tranquility 249 Practice 49 Put Yourself in Other People’s Shoes 251 Practice 50 Choose Your Company Well 254 Practice 51 Don’t Judge But Yourself 257 Practice 52 Do Good, Not Only No Evil 260 Practice 53 Say Only What’s Not Better Left Unsaid 263 Practice 54 Listen with the Intent to Understand 265 Practice 55 Lead by Example 267 Acknowledgments 271 Selected Bibliography 272 Want More? 275 The Power of Philosophy “The power of philosophy to blunt the blows of fate is beyond belief. No missile can settle in her body; she is well- protected and impenetrable. She spoils the force of some missiles and wards them off with the loose folds of her dress, as if they had no power to harm; others she dashes aside, and throws them back with such force that they rebound upon the sender. Farewell.” – SENECA Introduction Introduction Maybe you’ve stumbled upon a smart quote by an ancient Stoic philosopher or you’ve read an article that shared some inspiring Stoic ideas. Maybe you’ve been told about that helpful and flourishing old philosophy by a friend or you’ve already studied a book or two about Stoicism. Or maybe, although chances are very low, you’ve never even heard about it before. However, encountering Stoicism in one way or another is the easy part. Understanding and explaining exactly what it is, though, is the tricky part. Recognizing and seeing exactly how it’s relevant today and how it can help you, is the challenging part. Fully grasping it and putting it into practice, is the ambitious part—that’s where the gold is hidden. What the Stoics taught and practiced in the era of gladiators fighting for their lives and Romans socializing in steaming baths is still remarkably applicable in the era of Game of Thrones and Facebook. The wisdom of this ancient philosophy is timeless, and its value in the quest for a happy and meaningful life is undeniable. With this book, you’re holding the treasure map in your hands. It introduces you to the leading philosophers. It gives you an easy to understand overview of the philosophy. It 1 The Little Book of Stoicism teaches you the core principles. It provides you with 55 Stoic Practices and helpful hints for the application in your challenging life. And most importantly, it shows you how to translate it from book page to action in the real world. Cool! But how does a twenty-something know how to write the Stoic treasure map for the good life? Fair enough, I’d be wondering about that too. After many years of school and university, I was sick of reading academic books and papers and learning about stuff that didn’t really teach me anything of real life value. So, literally the day after handing in my final paper, I left the country and started my seven months long travel around the world. I wanted to get away, see places and other cultures, but mainly I wanted to get to know myself so I’d know what I wanted to do with my life when I got back. That last part did not work out; however, I did figure out something else instead: “I somehow must have missed the class on how to live?!” In fifteen and a half years of schooling, I learned math, physics, chemistry, biology, and a bunch of other stuff, except how to deal with challenging situations? How to face my fears and struggles? What to do about my depressive feelings? How to deal effectively with the death of my friend? What to do with my anger? How to be more confident? Nope, I must have missed all those classes. That, by the way, is exactly what schools of philosophy were all about in the ancient world, they taught you how to live. And even though these schools don’t exist anymore, you and I and most people are in as much need of a philosophy that teaches us how to live as we ever were. Long story short, I decided to invest in myself and learn how to live well. From all the wisdom I devoured in the 2 Introduction following years, Stoic philosophy helped me the most, even though it didn’t start on good terms. Before I knew much (anything) about the philosophy, I thought this must be the most boring thing on earth. I mean, after all, it’s called Stoicism and not “Supermanism” or something else that would indicate it’s worth studying. I gave it a shot anyway, got hooked, and since then I’ve been a voracious student and practitioner of Stoic philosophy.
Recommended publications
  • Letters from a Stoic Chapters

    Letters from a Stoic Chapters

    Letters From A Stoic Chapters Scarey Udell balances beyond while Dion always inchoate his sulphurations plats debasingly, he unbalances so despondently. Vincent reindustrializes polygamously as muggiest Will circumstances her appropriations famish abandonedly. Tight-fisted and underhanded Lazare canalising her scudding plaits while Niven whacks some funny synchronistically. Modern introductions to Stoic philosophy as a knot of life. Spirit down before these letters from? Ch 1 An Essay in Interpretation In all chapter Engberg-Pederson situates his importance among the. Dodgson during slumber, than from one by ferriss tips on. Study Flashcards On Lord cause the Flies Vocabulary Chapters 1-3 at Cramcom Quickly memorize the. A Field grow to a sinister Life 53 Brief Lessons for Living UK title The Stoic Guide alongside a crap Life. He says that event like a sound practices, if you demand attention. Stoics did when it demands, pigliucci offers one is finite is an interconnected disciplines required to a chapter? He is from each! The Roman Stoics Self Responsibility and Affection. Letters from a Stoic by Seneca The John Lennon Letters by John Lennon Yoko Ono Tim Ferriss Harvard Business Review Paw. Arranged thematically in chapters about the topics of judgement externals perspective. Meditations by Marcus Aurelius stoic philosopher and roman emperor Letters from a Stoic by Seneca the. There appeared that from provocations to love is no man is pleasure which prosperity has arranged upon. Stoic Html Seneca Letters Stoic Html Learn what about using the public. So you have a definite purposes. Those who discovered by loving embrace our sense. Detail of thread of chapters 6- of that book The Physical World case the Greeks 1956 Sambursky's account of Stoic physics is also welcome for its own merits for exclude is marked.
  • A Stoic Renaissance

    A Stoic Renaissance

    FROM ANTIQUITY TO AI: A STOIC RENAISSANCE Best-selling books. A following among some corporate heads. An ancient philosophy is making a comeback. But why? By Meghan Walsh says Hansson, who also authored the programming language Ruby on Rails, which powers web apps like Airbnb, Hulu, and Twitch. “Most businesses go out of business. When I can remove the fear that it’s all going to end, the calmer my life is.” It’s a practice ancient philosophers termed “negative visualization,” which Hansson learned after entrepreneur and author Tim Ferriss recom- mended he read A Guide to the It was early November 2018, Good Life: The Ancient Art of and the Woolsey Fire hurtled through Stoic Joy by William B. the Santa Monica Mountains, devour- Irvine. Stoics also dabble ing hundreds of structures with stun- in self-imposed ning ferocity. As the fire drew closer austerity as The Problem and gusty winds changed direction a means of Different guiding principles can be confusing unpredictably, David Heinemeier honing oneself for managers and corporate chiefs. Hansson, known as DHH, imagined against the his Malibu Hills home going up in hardships of Why It Matters flames. It wasn’t a morbid hallucination. life. So when Leaders are more effective when their world Instead, the Danish programmer turned Hansson finds is in perspective. tech darling deliberately envisioned himself impa- with pixelated precision the flaky ash tient that his The Solution For some, looking centuries back can his home might become; he played out Uber is taking be helpful. the years of battling insurance adjusters five minutes that would inevitably follow.
  • The Stoics and the Practical: a Roman Reply to Aristotle

    The Stoics and the Practical: a Roman Reply to Aristotle

    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2013 The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle Robin Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Robin, "The Stoics and the practical: a Roman reply to Aristotle" (2013). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 143. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/143 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE STOICS AND THE PRACTICAL: A ROMAN REPLY TO ARISTOTLE A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August, 2013 BY Robin Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences DePaul University Chicago, IL - TABLE OF CONTENTS - Introduction……………………..............................................................................................................p.i Chapter One: Practical Knowledge and its Others Technê and Natural Philosophy…………………………….....……..……………………………….....p. 1 Virtue and technical expertise conflated – subsequently distinguished in Plato – ethical knowledge contrasted with that of nature in
  • Stoicism and Cosmopolitanism

    Stoicism and Cosmopolitanism

    Stoicism and Cosmopolitanism Although the term cosmopolitan (κοσμοπολίτης, literally, world-citizen ), was used by Greeks earlier than the Stoic philosophers (who started with Zeno [c. 335-263 BC]), it was these philosophers who took this term and gave it a genuine, “cosmopolitan” meaning, a meaning rather different from its modern usage. Prior to the Stoics Asked where he was from, Diogenes the Cynic (c. 390-323 BC) said, “I am a citizen of the world (in the Greek, kosmopolites ).” The atomist philosopher Democritus said, “To a wise man every land is accessible; for the entire world ( kosmos ) is a good soul’s native land.” Many Greek Sophists held cosmopolitan views. The Sophist Antiphon (d. 411 BC) wrote that “by nature we are all constituted alike in all things, both barbarians and Greeks. This can be seen by consideration of those things which are essential by nature to all men… In these things no barbarian is set apart from us, nor any Greek. For we all breathe into the air through mouth and nostrils…” Stoic Cosmopolitanism Zeno’s earliest and most famous work, Republic , was summarized by Plutarch: Moreover, the much-admired Republic of Zeno, the founder of the Stoic sect, may be summed up in this one main principle: that all the inhabitants of this world of ours should not live differentiated by their respective rules of justice into separate cities and communities, but that we should consider all men to be of one community and one polity, and that we should have a common life and an order common to us all, even as a herd that feeds together and shares the pasturage of a common field.
  • James Bond the Life Worth Living by Rev

    James Bond the Life Worth Living by Rev

    James Bond The Life Worth Living By Rev. Dr. Todd F. Eklof During the 1992 televised debate between Vice Presidential candidates Al Gore, Dan Quail, and billionaire populist Ross Perot’s choice for a running mate, James Stockdale, the latter introduced himself to the nation by uttering two questions; Who am I? Why am I here? They were the perfect questions to set the nation at ease with this unfamiliar, unvetted Washington outsider. Almost everyone had been wondering the same thing about Stockdale, who was he and why was he Perot’s pick? The live audience laughed and his self-deprecating humor, which also immediately endeared him to viewers all over the country. Unfortunately for Stockdale, and Ross Perot, his moment as a wise, funny, white-headed grandfatherly figure didn’t last long. As the evening transpired his inability to intelligibly answer questions just as quickly turned him into a national joke, including being portrayed on Saturday Night Live as a befuddled, senile, old man by comedian Phil Hartman. He became the Sarah Palin of his day. By the time the debate was over, perhaps the only people left whom Stockdale had permanently endeared himself to were the nation’s philosophers, whose minds were made up about him almost the moment he started speaking. He had us with, Who am I? Why am I here? Today, even those unfamiliar with philosophy understand these are quintessential philosophical questions—perennial questions dating back thousands of years. We can trace them back at least to Athens in the 4th century BCE, about 300 years after philosophy simultaneously began in Greece, China, and India.
  • Stoicism a School of Thought That Flourished in Greek and Roman

    Stoicism a School of Thought That Flourished in Greek and Roman

    Stoicism A school of thought that flourished in Greek and Roman antiquity. It was one of the loftiest and most sublime philosophies in the record of Western civilization. In urging participation in the affairs of man, Stoics have always believed that the goal of all inquiry is to provide man with a mode of conduct characterized by tranquillity of mind and certainty of moral worth. Nature and scope of Stoicism For the early Stoic philosopher, as for all the post-Aristotelian schools, knowledge and its pursuit are no longer held to be ends in themselves. The Hellenistic Age was a time of transition, and the Stoic philosopher was perhaps its most influential spokesman. A new culture was in the making. The heritage of an earlier period, with Athens as its intellectual leader, was to continue, but to undergo many changes. If, as with Socrates, to know is to know oneself, rationality as the sole means by which something outside of the self might be achieved may be said to be the hallmark of Stoic belief. As a Hellenistic philosophy, Stoicism presented an ars vitae, a way of accommodation for people to whom the human condition no longer appeared as the mirror of a universal, calm, and ordered existence. Reason alone could reveal the constancy of cosmic order and the originative source of unyielding value; thus, reason became the true model for human existence. To the Stoic, virtue is an inherent feature of the world, no less inexorable in relation to man than are the laws of nature. The Stoics believed that perception is the basis of true knowledge.
  • Hellenistic Philosophy

    Hellenistic Philosophy

    Hellenistic Philosophy drishtiias.com/printpdf/hellenistic-philosophy Introduction The Greek philosophy began as speculation into the nature of the cosmos or universe (Meta Physics). The early philosophers, in the Pre-Socratic era, like Sophists, Democritus, Pythagoras and others made bold speculations about the origins and nature of the universe. With the advent of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, the focus of philosophy also shifted towards morality, virtues and ethics. However, due to the sudden death of Alexander the Great (in 323 BC), the whole of Greece fell into a state of uncertainty & local wars and later it became a province of Rome. The empires that succeeded him, known as the Hellenistic empires, lasted for hundreds of years and spread Greek culture over huge territories. As the life of the average citizen was changing, the prevalent philosophical thought also underwent a change. Political, social and moral environment no longer sustained the creative impulses in philosophical thought and this gave rise to Hellenistic Age or post-Aristotelian philosophy. A common element of the philosophers in Hellenistic age was that the focus of Philosophy was shifting from general understanding of the universe to individual life and its perception as an “art of life”. Philosophy ends up being a driver of life and a source of relief, a healing art, a way to cope with a hostile world. This period saw the emergence of the three great schools of moral philosophy viz. Epicureanism, Stoicism and Skepticism. Epicureanism This school derives its name from its founder Epicurus, who founded his school on the outskirts of Athens and famously called it as the Garden (307 BC).
  • Stoicism, Friendship, and Grief: a Response to Johnson

    Stoicism, Friendship, and Grief: a Response to Johnson

    Reason Papers Vol. 40, no. 1 Stoicism, Friendship, and Grief: A Response to Johnson Massimo Pigliucci City College of New York Brian Johnson, in his commentary on my effort to update Stoicism,1 provides a cogent critique of ancient Stoicism and a reasonable suggestion for my attempt to define modern Stoicism. I do not (much) disagree with him in terms of his conclusions, which he applies to the specific cases of friendship and grief, but which also hold for all of the Stoic “preferred indifferents.” I do, however, want to push back on two points: (1) the path he takes to arrive at those conclusions, and (2) the notion that all ancient Stoics would have proposed the same approach to friendship and grief that Epictetus takes. To begin with, Johnson points out that, for the Stoics, only virtue is good (agathos), while everything else is either worthy (axia) of choice or to be rejected.2 Hence the famous Stoic distinction between virtue, on the one hand, and preferred and dispreferred “indifferents” (i.e., everything else), on the other hand. However jarring the word “indifferent” may sound to modern ears, we need to be clear about what it means on the Stoic view. Things like wealth, health, education, friendship, love, and so forth are indifferents in the specific sense that they do not make us morally better or worse persons. The Stoic project is, fundamentally, one of moral self- improvement. This can be seen, for instance, in Epictetus: “What decides whether a sum of money is good? The money is not going to tell you; it must be the faculty that makes use of such impressions— reason” (Discourses I, 1.5).
  • In Defense of Stoicism

    In Defense of Stoicism

    In Defense of Stoicism by ALEX HENDERSON* Georgetown University Abstract This article employs Cicero’s assault on Stoic philosophy inPro Murena as a point of departure to engage three critical aspects of Stoicism: indifference to worldly concerns, the sage as an ideal, and Stoic epistemology. It argues that Cicero’s analysis fails to clearly distinguish between these elements of Stoic philosophy and, therefore, presents Stoicism in a misleadingly unfavorable light. harges of bribery were brought against Lucius Licinius Murena in 62 bce. Despite entrenched opposition from the popular Cparty, Murena was able to enlist the aid of the famed orator and presiding consul Marcus Tullius Cicero. His prosecutor was the most conservative of senators—Marcus Porcius Cato, famed for his rectitude and his unbending adherence to Stoic philosophy. In order to defend Murena, who was almost certainly guilty, Cicero chose to go on the offensive and discredit his opponent by undermining Stoic philosophy in the eyes of the jury. Cicero portrays Stoicism as follows: A wise person never allows himself to be influenced… Philosophers are people who, however ugly, remain handsome; even if they are very poor, they are rich; even if they are slaves, they are kings. All sins are equal, so that every misdemeanor is a serious crime… The philosopher has no need to offer conjectures, never regrets what he has done, is never mistaken, never changes his mind.1 Cicero’s portrayal seems to argue that (1) the Stoics’ commitment to remain indifferent to worldly influence causes them to lack compassion for the circumstances of other people, (2) Stoics are too severe when * [email protected].
  • Combating Judicial Misconduct: a Stoic Approach

    Combating Judicial Misconduct: a Stoic Approach

    Buffalo Law Review Volume 67 Number 5 Article 1 12-1-2019 Combating Judicial Misconduct: A Stoic Approach Michael D. Cicchini Cicchini Law Office, CLL Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview Part of the Judges Commons, and the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons Recommended Citation Michael D. Cicchini, Combating Judicial Misconduct: A Stoic Approach, 67 Buff. L. Rev. 1259 (2019). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol67/iss5/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Buffalo Law Review VOLUME 67 DECEMBER 2019 NUMBER 5 Combating Judicial Misconduct: A Stoic Approach MICHAEL D. CICCHINI† I like and respect some judges, but not as many as I should. Too many are mean-spirited and arrogant, going out of their way to insult, ridicule, and demean those who come before them. —Abbe Smith, Law Professor and Clinic Director *** A vast variety of missiles are launched with us as their target. If you want a man to keep his head when the crisis comes you must give him some training before it comes. —Seneca, Stoic Philosopher and Imperial Advisor ABSTRACT Judicial ethics rules require criminal court judges to be competent, even-tempered, and impartial. In reality, however, many judges are grossly ignorant of the law, incredibly hostile toward the defense, and outright biased in favor of the state.
  • Stoicism and Anti-Stoicism in Qoheleth

    Stoicism and Anti-Stoicism in Qoheleth

    STOICISM AND ANTI-STOICISM IN QOHELETH by JOHN G. GAMMIE The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104 It is a distinct pleasure to submit this comparative and linguistic study to a volume in honor of Shlomo Dov Goitein whose scholarly work did so much to illumine the life of Jewish communities in the Arab world. The present study seeks to probe the impact of one particular Hellenistic philosophy on a Jewish intellectual of the third century B.C.E. whose work was destined to become part of the sacred scripture of his own people as well as of the people of a daughter religion. Over fifty years ago Galling (1932, p. 276) identified four mam questions among researchers in Qoheleth: (I) How should one read the theme of the book and understand its arrangement? (2) Are the "I-sayings" signs of an autobiography, and can they be coordinated with "historical allusions"? (3) Do there exist con­ nections between Qoheleth's wisdom and the wisdom literature of the ancient near East? and (4) Has Greek philosophy been worked into the book? (My translation) By and large the same basic questions have continued to dominate in the research since Galling. A fairly thorough survey of research on Qoheleth by James Crenshaw may be found in a recent issue of the Hebrew Annual Review (1983, pp. 41-56). Accordingly, a selective update in response to the questions in Galling's earlier essay may serve as an introduction to the present inquiry. (I) On the issue of arrangement, Zimmerli (1974) has convincingly shown there is a greater coherence among the various sentences than Galling was inclined to accept; Loader (l 979) has identified "polarities" within the book and has demonstrated its dynamic unity on the basis of their presence, whereas Wright (1968) and Murphy (1981) have focused on key phrases as a means of establishing its formal unity.
  • Ancient Greek Philosophy. Part 1. Pre-Socratic Greek Philosophers

    Ancient Greek Philosophy. Part 1. Pre-Socratic Greek Philosophers

    Ancient Greek Philosophy. Part 1. Pre-Socratic Greek philosophers. The pre-Socratic philosophers rejected traditional mythological explanations for the phenomena they saw around them in favor of more rational explanations. Many of them asked: From where does everything come? From what is everything created? How do we explain the plurality of things found in nature? How might we describe nature mathematically? The Milesian school was a school of thought founded in the 6th Century BC. The ideas associated with it are exemplified by three philosophers from the Ionian town of Miletus, on the Aegean coast of Anatolia: Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximenes. They introduced new opinions contrary to the prevailing viewpoint on how the world was organized. Philosophy of nature These philosophers defined all things by their quintessential substance (which Aristotle calls the arche) of which the world was formed and which was the source of everything. Thales thought it to be water. But as it was impossible to explain some things (such as fire) as being composed of this element, Anaximander chose an unobservable, undefined element, which he called apeiron. He reasoned that if each of the four traditional elements (water, air, fire, and earth) are opposed to the other three, and if they cancel each other out on contact, none of them could constitute a stable, truly elementary form of matter. Consequently, there must be another entity from which the others originate, and which must truly be the most basic element of all. The unspecified nature of the apeiron upset critics, which caused Anaximenes to define it as being air, a more concrete, yet still subtle, element.