The Governor’s Economic and Demographic Report

2006-2007

Kansas Division of the Budget

January 2007

Acknowledgements

The Governor’s Economic and Demographic Report 2006-2007 was prepared under the general direction of Duane A. Goossen, Director of the Budget.

This report was written by Dr. John D. Wong, Professor of Public Administration, Hugo Wall School of Urban and Public Affairs, Wichita State University and Ann H. Durkes, Principal Budget Analyst/Tax Policy and Demographics, Division of the Budget.

Publication coordination and editing were provided by Louis S. Chabira, Deputy Director; Ann H. Durkes, Principal Budget Analyst/Tax Policy and Demographics; Jeff Arpin, Principal Budget Analyst; and Shelly Dechand, Accountant.

Readers of The Governor's Economic and Demographic Report can access this information on the Kansas Division of the Budget’s website at http://budget.ks.gov. Table of Contents Chapter 1 The U.S. Economy 2006 U.S. Economic Review...... 1 2007 U.S. Economic Outlook ...... 6

Chapter 2 Kansas Employment & Income Overview...... 12 Kansas Employment Review ...... 13 Comparative Employment in the Plains Region...... 23 Kansas Personal Income Review...... 26 Kansas Personal Income Estimates...... 27 Comparative Personal Income ...... 28

Chapter 3 Local & Regional Employment & Income Major Labor Market Employment ...... 30 Kansas & Adjacent States Metro Areas’ Employment Trends...... 40 Regional Labor Market Employment ...... 42 County Personal Income...... 43 The Four Urban Counties...... 45

Chapter 4 Kansas Demographics Overview...... 49 U.S. Census Bureau’s Methodology of Estimating State Populations...... 50 The Decennial Census...... 51 Poverty...... 51 School District Populations...... 52 Health Insurance Coverage...... 53 Demographics ...... 53 Kansas Population Projections...... 55

Appendices A Kansas Personal Income, 2004-2005 ...... 57 B State Personal Income & Growth Rates, 2002-2004...... 60 C State Disposable Income & Growth Rates, 2002-2004...... 62 D Kansas County Personal Income, 2004...... 64 E Kansas County Personal Income, 2005...... 67 F Kansas Certified Population, Certified to the Secretary of State on July 1, 2006...... 70 G Resident Population for U.S., Regions, States, & Kansas Counties, 2001-2005 ...... 116 H Poverty Thresholds in 2005, by Size of Family & Number of Related Children under 18 Years...... 121 I Kansas School District Populations, 2003...... 122 J Health Insurance Coverage Status & Type of Coverage for the U.S. & Kansas, 1988-2005...... 130 K Kansas Resident Population, 2000 through 2005...... 131 L Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007-2018...... 135

i Table of Tables

1-1 Major U.S. Economic Trends, 2006 & 2007 ...... 1 1-2 U.S. GDP Composition & Growth, 2005-2006 ...... 3 1-3 U.S. Personal Consumption Expenditure Growth Percent Change, Seasonally Adjusted, 2005-2006 ...... 4 1-4 U.S. Personal Income Growth, 2005-2006 ...... 5 1-5 U.S. Consumer Prices Percent Change, Seasonally Adjusted, 2005-2006 ...... 6 1-6 U.S. GDP Composition & Growth, 2006-2007 ...... 8 1-7 U.S. Personal Consumption Expenditure Growth Percent Change, Seasonally Adjusted, 2006-2007 ...... 8 1-8 U.S. Personal Income Growth, 2006-2007 ...... 10 1-9 U.S. Consumer Prices Percent Change, Seasonally Adjusted, 2006-2007 ...... 10

2-1 Major Kansas Economic Trends...... 12 2-2 Kansas Employment, by Place of Residence, October 2005-October 2006 ...... 13 2-3 Kansas Employment, by Place of Work, October 2005-October 2006 ...... 14 2-4 Plains Region Employment Growth Rates, 2004-2005 ...... 24 2-5 Plains Region Employment Growth Rates, October 2005-October 2006...... 25 2-6 Kansas Personal Income, 2005 Actual, 2006 Estimate, & 2007 Forecast ...... 27 2-7 Per Capita Personal Income, 1994-2005...... 29

3-1 Wichita Metropolitan Area Employment...... 31 3-2 Topeka Metropolitan Area Employment ...... 34 3-3 Lawrence Metropolitan Area Employment...... 36 3-4 Kansas City, KS Metropolitan Area Employment...... 37 3-5 Metropolitan Area Employment Growth Rates, Oct. 2005-Oct. 2006 ...... 41 3-6 County Employment, October 2005-October 2006 ...... 43

ii Table of Figures

1-1 U.S. Civilian Labor Force Growth...... 2 1-2 U.S. Employment Growth...... 2 1-3 U.S. Unemployment Rate ...... 2 1-4 Consumer Price Index (CPI-U)...... 3 1-5 U.S. Gross Domestic Product Growth ...... 3 1-6 U.S. Real GDP Growth...... 3 1-7 U.S. Personal Income Growth ...... 5 1-8 U.S. Economic Indicators ...... 6

2-1 Kansas Civilian Labor Force Growth ...... 13 2-2 Kansas Employment Growth by Place of Residence...... 14 2-3 Kansas Unemployment Rate...... 14 2-4 Employment by Place of Work...... 14 2-5 Natural Resources Employment ...... 15 2-6 Construction Employment ...... 16 2-7 Manufacturing Employment ...... 16 2-8 Durable Goods Employment ...... 16 2-9 Transportation Equipment Employment...... 16 2-10 Nondurable Goods Employment...... 17 2-11 Food Manufacturing Employment...... 17 2-12 Trade, Transportation, & Utilities Employment ...... 18 2-13 Utilities Employment...... 18 2-14 Transportation & Warehousing Employment...... 19 2-15 Wholesale Trade Employment...... 19 2-16 Retail Trade Employment...... 19 2-17 Information Employment...... 19 2-18 Financial Activities Employment ...... 20 2-19 Professional & Business Services Employment ...... 21 2-20 Education & Health Services Employment ...... 21 2-21 Leisure & Hospitality Services Employment...... 22 2-22 Other Services Employment ...... 22 2-23 Government Employment...... 22 2-24 Farm Employment ...... 23

3-1 Percent Change in County Personal Income, 2004-2005 ...... 47 3-2 Per Capita Personal Income, 2005...... 47 3-3 Total Personal Income, by Region, 2004 & 2005...... 48 3-4 Percent Change in Total Income, 2004 & 2005, & 2005 per Capita Income, by Region...... 48

iii Chapter 1

The U.S. Economy

2006 U.S. Economic Review increased by a similar amount. The recent slowing in the housing market was an unavoidable consequence of the robust growth during the first half of the decade. November marked the fifth anniversary of the However, notwithstanding the sharp reduction in starts beginning of the current economic expansion. The of new single-family houses, inventories of both new U.S. economy continued to expand at a moderate rate and existing homes for sale have increased markedly during 2006, even though it suffered a temporary this year. Although residential construction continues setback resulting from energy price spikes in August to sag, some indications suggest that the rate of home and September. This sharp rise in energy prices had a purchases may be stabilizing. This steadying of the negative effect on the purchasing power of households market may be in response to modest declines in and raised business costs. The increases in energy- mortgage interest rates over the past few months and related materials and shipping costs also significantly lower prices in some markets. affected profit margins for manufacturers and retailers.

On a positive note, the U.S. probably is less vulnerable In 2006, motor vehicle sales also experienced a slow to this year’s oil price shock than it was to the shocks down that was the result of weaker demand and an of the 1970s and early 1980s because energy accompanying buildup in stocks of unsold cars and represents a smaller share of household purchases now trucks. Energy prices contributed to these develop- than it did in the 70s and 80s. In addition, energy’s ments. In short, consumers responded to higher proportion of business input costs is lower now than it gasoline prices by reducing their demand for less fuel- was in those earlier periods. Another positive point is efficient vehicles such as sport-utility vehicles (SUVs) that despite the substantial rise in oil prices, core and trucks. The decline in sales of these vehicles consumer prices rose at only a moderate pace. caused inventories to accumulate, resulting in auto-

makers significantly reducing production. Nevertheless, with the U.S. economy expanding and unemployment declining, the Federal Reserve Although there have been “drags” on the economy, continued to increase the federal funds rate in an overall the economic trends appear to be positive. As attempt to circumvent potential inflationary pressures. shown in Table 1-1, which presents major U.S. These rate increases were motivated in part by rising economic trends for 2006 and the forecast for 2007, crude oil prices, which surged to nearly $75 per barrel during mid-summer before retreating to the $60 per Table 1-1 barrel range toward the end of the year. Conditions contributing to higher energy prices include overseas Major U.S. Economic Trends production uncertainties in the Middle East and 2006 & 2007 elsewhere, as well as strong demand from China and 2006 2007 India. GDP Growth ($ Constant) 3.4 % 2.9 % Personal Income Growth ($ Current) 6.8 5.4 Housing has played a significant role in the recent Consumer Price Index Increase (CPI-U) 3.4 2.6 slowing of overall economic activity too. Develop- Unemployment Rate (Monthly Average) 4.7 4.9 ments in this sector are likely to have an important influence on economic growth going forward as well. real GDP continues a general upward trend, while The slowdown in the housing market follows a personal income continues to show strong upward housing boom that persisted for most of the first half growth. The Consumer Price Index for All Urban of this decade. Between 2000 and late 2005, the rate Consumers (CPI-U) shows stable yearly increases for of construction of single-family homes rose more than the last several years. The only rather large increase 40.0 percent, and sales of both new and existing homes occurred in 2005 when it jumped by 5.3 percent. This was the highest rate of increase since 1992 when the Figure 1-2: CPI-U increased by 4.2 percent. The unemployment rate also is showing a definite downward trend, which U.S. Employment Growth indicates strength in the economy. 5.0% 4.0%

Employment data are important when analyzing the 3.0% economy. The initial datum derived is the civilian 2.0% labor force, which is based on a sample survey of 1.0% households. Once the civilian labor force is deter- Change mined, then employment, unemployment, and the 0.0% unemployment rate are derived. The civilian labor -1.0% force includes those who are at least 16 years old and -2.0% either employed or looking for employment. Military 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 personnel, retirees, children, and those not actively Year seeking work are not included. In 2006, the labor force grew 1.3 percent, the same growth rate as in 2005. This is the highest growth rate since 2000 when the U.S. steadily declined every year through 2000. At the labor force increased 2.3 percent. Figure 1-1 that time, the unemployment rate was 4.0 percent. shows the U.S. civilian labor force growth rate from Then in 2001, the unemployment rate increased to 4.7 1970 through 2006. percent. Subsequently, the unemployment rate soared to 5.8 percent in 2002, which was the largest increase Figure 1-1: since 1991. In 2003, it increased further to 6.0 percent, then dropped back to 5.1 percent in 2005. U.S. Civilian Labor Force Growth Figure 1-3 shows the U.S. unemployment rate from 3.5% 1970 through 2006.

3.0% Figure 1-3: 2.5%

2.0% U.S. Unemployment Rate ange

h 1.5% 12.0% C

1.0% 10.0%

0.5% 8.0%

0.0% 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 6.0%

Year Change 4.0%

2.0% The level of employment is the number of individuals in the civilian labor force who are employed. In 2006, 0.0% 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 employment in the U.S. increased by 1.4 percent. This Year employment level compares with a 1.8 percent increase in 2005 and a 1.1 percent decrease in 2004. Figure 1-2 presents the U.S. employment growth rate Inflation is another important economic indicator. In from 1970 through 2006. general, inflation is the increase in the price of a given “market basket” of goods. Inflation can be measured The unemployment rate is expressed as a percentage in several ways. However, the most commonly used of the number of people unemployed to the total measurement is the Consumer Price Index. This index number of people in the labor force. In 2006, the was first constructed during World War I as a basis for unemployment rate stood at 4.7 percent, the lowest adjusting shipbuilders’ wages, which were under rate since 2001. In 1992, the unemployment rate was government control during the war. In this report, the 7.5 percent. Since that time, the unemployment rate in CPI-U is used because it is reflective of the typical urban consumer’s purchases and is the most U.S. nominal GDP increased at a 6.5 percent rate in commonly used measurement. In 2006, the rate of 2006 compared to a 6.3 percent rate in 2005 and a 6.9 inflation, as measured by the CPI-U, increased by 3.4 percent rate in 2004. Real GDP grew by 3.4 percent in percent compared to a 3.5 percent increase in 2005. 2006, compared to a 3.2 percent increase in 2005 and a Figure 1-4 shows the CPI-U from 1970 through 2006. 3.9 percent increase in 2004. Figure 1-6 presents the Figure 1-6: Figure 1-4: U.S. Real GDP Growth Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) (Annualized Quarterly Growth Rate) 6.0% 16.0%

14.0% 5.0%

12.0% 4.0%

10.0% 3.0% 8.0% Change 2.0% Change 6.0%

4.0% 1.0%

2.0% 0.0% 00.1 00.3 01.1 01.3 02.1 02.3 03.1 03.3 04.1 04.3 05.1 05.3 06.1 06.3 0.0% 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 Year.Quarter Year annualized quarterly growth rate for the U.S. real GDP from the first quarter of 2000 through the fourth Gross Domestic Product quarter of 2006. Real and nominal GDP in 2005 and 2006 are shown in Table 1-2. Gross domestic product, or GDP, is the value of final goods and services produced within the country during Table 1-2 a given year. GDP is measured both in real terms and U.S. GDP Composition & Growth, 2005-2006 in nominal terms. Nominal GDP is the dollar value of (Dollars in Billions) the final goods and services, while real GDP is the Real Percent Change value of the final goods and services as adjusted for 2006 2004-2005 2005-2006 price changes (inflation) that occurred over the course Gross Domestic Prod. 11,408.7 3.2 % 3.3 % of that year. Figure 1-5 presents U.S. gross domestic Consumption 8,085.4 3.5 3.1 product growth from 1970 through 2006. Durables 1,201.6 5.5 4.9 Nondurables 2,356.4 4.5 3.5 Services 4,551.5 2.6 2.6 Figure 1-5: Investment 1,954.7 5.4 4.7 Fixed 1,908.7 7.5 3.6 U.S. Gross Domestic Product Growth Nonresidential 1,319.7 6.8 7.8 14.0% Equipment 1,055.1 8.9 7.1

12.0% Nominal Real Structures 275.7 1.1 9.6 Residential 587.6 8.6 ( 3.4) 10.0% Chng. in Invent. 46.0 ( 63.3) 134.5 8.0% Exports 1,300.0 6.8 8.7

6.0% Imports 1,934.0 6.1 6.5 Government 1,997.0 0.9 2.0 4.0% Change Federal 740.1 1.5 1.7 2.0% Nat. Defense 489.6 1.7 1.2

0.0% Nondefense 250.4 1.1 2.8 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 State & Local 1,256.7 0.5 2.1 -2.0% *Estimated -4.0% Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Year Analysis, and Moody's Economy.com There are five major categories of GDP: consumption, rose by 2.4 percent in 2006, which is slightly lower investment, exports, imports (exports and imports than the 2.9 percent increase in 2005. Within the constitute international trade), and government housing category, expenditures for building materials, spending. equipment, and supplies increased by 10.3 percent. Much of this increase was driven by rebuilding in the Consumption. The largest component of GDP is Gulf areas that were affected by last year’s devastating consumption, or consumer spending. Changes in hurricanes. In other categories, increased spending consumer spending are affected by a variety of factors, was realized in food and drink from restaurants, etc. including personal income, the savings rate, debt (8.4 percent) and from stores (4.6 percent). Increases accumulation, discretionary income, and consumers’ also occurred in expenditures for general merchandise confidence in the economy. Consumer discretionary (5.5 percent), as well as clothing and accessories (6.7 income was significantly affected by the spike in the percent). Retail sales and food services expenditures cost for gasoline in 2006. Although prices have fallen also increased (6.6 percent), but retail sales, excluding recently, prices during the late summer and early fall automobile sales, did not realize as large an increase were significantly higher than a year ago. (3.5 percent).

In 2006, real (adjusted for inflation) consumption Business Investment. Capital investment has increased by 3.1 percent, compared to a 3.5 percent continued to expand at a reasonable rate. Spending on increase last year. The overall increase in real nonresidential construction has been particularly consumer spending was led by a 4.9 percent increase strong, reflecting higher outlays for new office and in purchases of durable goods, or those with an commercial buildings, as well as a rapid increase in expected useful life of more than one year. expenditures on drilling and mining structures. Nondurables are goods with an expected useful life of Outlays for equipment and software have slowed one year or less. Expenditures on nondurable goods somewhat, though backlogs for “on order” capital increased by 3.5 percent in 2006 compared to a 4.5 goods, such as industrial machinery and other types of percent increase in 2005. Table 1-3 presents U.S. real heavy equipment, remain high. Moreover, financial personal consumption expenditure growth for 2005 conditions continue to be favorable for investment and 2006. spending because profitability is high, the cost of Table 1-3 capital is relatively low, and significant cash reserves remain on firms’ books. U.S. Personal Consumption Expenditure Growth Percent Change, Seasonally Adjusted, 2005-2006 In real terms, overall investment increased by 4.7 Expenditures percent in 2006 following a 5.4 percent surge in 2005. 2005 2006 Specifically, fixed investment increased 3.6 percent. Personal Consumption 3.5 % 3 .1 % Nonresidential investment rose dramatically (7.8 Durables 5.5 4.9 percent), while residential investment decreased 3.4 Nondurables 4.5 3.5 percent and inventories surged 134.5 percent.

Services 2.6 2.6 International Trade. In 2006, real imports increased Retail Sales & Food Services 7.2 6.6 by 6.5 percent following a 6.1 percent increase in Ret. Sales & Food Less Autos 8.2 3.5 2005. During that same period, real exports increased Bldg. Mat., Equip., & Supplies 10.3 10.3 by 8.7 percent in 2006 following a 6.8 percent increase General Merchandise 6.1 5.5 in 2005. The result was that real net exports recorded Food & Beverage Stores 5.0 4.6 an increasing trade deficit of over $600.0 billion in Clothing & Accessories 6.1 6.7 2006. Food Serv. & Drinking Places 6.8 8.4 Source: Moody's Economy.com Government Expenditures. Real government spend- ing increased by 2.0 percent in 2006 compared to a 0.9 Overall, expenditures on services grew by 2.6 percent, percent increase in 2005. Specifically, federal the same rate as in 2005. Most noteworthy in the government expenditures increased 1.7 percent in services category are housing expenditures. These 2006, which is slightly more than the 1.5 percent increase experienced in 2005. Within the federal personal income composition and growth from 2005 to government category, national defense expenditures 2006. increased 1.2 percent in 2006 compared to a 1.7 percent increase in 2005, and non-defense Table 1-4 expenditures increased 2.8 percent in 2006 compared U.S. Personal Income Growth, 2005-2006 to a 1.1 percent increase in 2005. At the state and (Dollars in Billions of Chain Weighted 2000 Dollars) local government levels, expenditures increased at a Percent Change 2.1 percent rate in 2006 compared to a 0.5 percent 2006* 2004-2005 2005-2006 increase in 2005. Median Household Income 48,4 05 4.5 % 4 .5 % Personal Income. Personal income is the dollar value Personal Income 9,50 0.0 2.3 4.0 of income available to households for consumption Disposable Income 8,40 0.0 1.2 3.1 Dividends 63 6.0 7.0 10.7 expenditures. Total personal income is derived by summing salaries and wages, other labor income, Interest 1,00 0.0 6.1 8.6 proprietors’ income, rental income, personal dividend Rent 72 .9 (42.7) 0.2 Personal Saving Rate (%) income, personal interest income, and transfer (0.4) (2.4) -- payments. From this sum, personal contributions for * Estimated social insurance and personal taxes are deducted. In Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic 2006, personal income increased by 4.0 percent, which Analysis, and Moody's Economy.com is a healthy increase over the 2.3 percent growth rate experienced in 2005. Figure 1-7 presents U.S. Personal Savings. Personal savings is derived by personal income growth from 1970 through 2006. subtracting personal outlays from disposable personal income. The personal savings rate is personal savings Figure 1-7: expressed as a percentage of disposable personal income. In 2006, the personal savings rate was -0.4 U.S. Personal Income Growth percent, which is the same rate as in 2005. 14.0%

12.0% Inflation & Prices. Overall inflation has slowed significantly since mid-year. This improvement is 10.0% largely the result of the recent declines in energy 8.0% prices. The price of crude oil has fallen nearly 25.0

6.0%

Change percent since its recent peak. However, the core

4.0% inflation rate, the rate of inflation excluding the energy and food components, remains relatively high. Several 2.0% factors underlie the increase in core inflation over the 0.0% past year. The sharp increases in energy and materials 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 Year costs contributed to the rise in core inflation because some suppliers of non-energy goods and services may have been able to pass their higher input costs into Rental income increased 0.2 percent in 2006, final prices. Increases in housing costs also boosted compared to a 42.7 percent decline in 2005, while core consumer inflation over the past year. dividend income surged 10.7 percent compared to a 7.0 percent surge in 2005. Interest income in 2006 Inflation can be measured using several methods. Two increased 8.6 percent, following a 6.1 percent increase specific methods are the Consumer Price Index for All in 2005. Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Price Deflator. In general, inflation Disposable personal income is personal income less has been less than 4.0 percent since 1992. In 2006, personal taxes. Disposable income increased 3.1 inflation, as measured by the CPI-U, remained percent in 2006 compared to a 1.2 percent increase in relatively modest. The inflation rate for 2006 was 3.4 2005. Median household income increased 4.5 percent percent, while inflation in 2005 was 3.5 percent. More in both 2005 and 2006. Table 1-4 presents U.S. specifically, the cost of food less energy increased 2.6 percent in 2006 compared to 2.2 percent in 2005. The close to or slightly below the economy’s long-run cost of shelter increased 3.4 percent in 2006 compared sustainable rate. Core inflation is expected to slow to 2.6 percent in 2005, and the cost of food generally gradually from its recent level, reflecting the reduced increased 2.4 percent in both 2005 and 2006. The cost impetus from high prices for energy and other of food away from home specifically increased 3.1 commodities, and contained inflation expectations. It percent in 2006 compared to 3.2 percent in 2005. is possible that further reductions may occur in the rate Finally, the cost of medical care increased 4.2 percent of increase of housing costs. Also, some easing in the in both 2005 and 2006. During that same time frame, pressures on capital and labor resources may happen. inflation, as measured by the GDP Price Index, stood However, the slowing pace of residential construction at 3.0 percent in both 2005 and 2006. Table 1-5 is likely to be a drag on economic growth into 2007. presents the seasonally adjusted percent change for U.S. consumer prices for 2005 and 2006. Four commonly cited predictors of future economic performance are the Composite Index of Leading Table 1-5 Economic Indicators, the Consumer Confidence Index, U.S. Consumer Prices the Index of Consumer Sentiment, and the Index of Percent Change, Seasonally Adjusted, 2005-2006 Consumer Expectations. Figure 1-8 presents these indices for 2006. Prices 2005 2006 Figure 1-8 GDP Chain Price Deflator 3.0 % 3.0 % U.S. Economic Indicators Consumer Price Index 3.4 3.5 Less Food & Energy 2.2 2.6 162.6 Shelter 2.6 3.4 Food 2.4 2.4 142.1 Food Away from Home 3.2 3.1 4.2 4.2 121.5

Medical Care ands ous

h 101.0 Source: Moody's Economy.com T

80.5 Productivity. One major factor contributing to hold- ing inflation in check in recent years has been strong 60.0 productivity growth. Productivity growth, as measured Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov by output per hour, increased only 1.8 percent in 2006, Month compared to a 2.3 percent growth rate in 2005. This is Consumer Expectations Consumer Sentiment not cause for alarm, but it does bear watching. Consumer Confidence Leading Indicators

The Composite Index of Leading Economic Indicators and the Consumer Confidence Index are compiled by 2007 U.S. Economic Outlook the Conference Board, which is a private, not-for- profit organization that conducts business and By most measures, the economy has been performing economic research and forecasting. The Composite satisfactorily. However, persistently high oil prices Index of Leading Economic Indicators is a composite combined with several months of modest job growth index of ten leading economic indicators that reach have raised questions about the strength and the cyclical turning points before the actual turning point durability of the economic expansion. These concerns occurs in the economy as a whole. Each series are tempered because consumer spending growth is included in the Composite Index of Leading Indicators likely to be sustained through 2007 even if holiday is selected because of its performance on six important retail sales are mediocre. In addition, the economy characteristics, including economic significance, sta- now appears to be on course for a sustained period of tistical adequacy, timing consistency at business cycle expansion at a moderate pace. For 2007, the economy peaks and troughs, conformity to business expansions appears likely to expand at a moderate rate that is and contractions, smoothness, and prompt availability. The Index of Consumer Sentiment and the Index of Nominal personal income also is forecasted to increase Consumer Expectations are compiled by the Survey in 2007 (5.4 percent) compared to 2006 (6.7 percent). Research Center at the University of Michigan. These Even though inflation in 2006 was well above the level indices focus on how consumers view prospects for forecast at the start of the year, inflation is expected to their own financial situation, how they view prospects remain modest for 2007. The CPI is expected to for the general economy over the near term, and their increase by 2.6 percent in 2007 as oil prices remain view of prospects for the economy over the long term. near $60 per barrel through 2007.

The underlying economy appears to be on reasonably Overall, the economy is likely to expand at a moderate stable ground. While the overall inflation rate during rate in 2007. Economic growth is expected to be 2006 was higher than expected, the difference was slightly above the long-run trend in the near term, but almost entirely a result of higher energy prices. it is expected to return to a rate that is generally Excluding food and energy, the core CPI increased 2.6 consistent with the growth rate of the economy’s percent during 2006. Inflation forecasts for the CPI underlying productive capacity. This scenario and the GDP price index show overall inflation assumes that consumer spending will continue to grow resuming a lower trend in 2007. near its trend rate and that the drag on the economy from the motor vehicle and housing sectors will Through August, the Consumer Expectations and gradually dissipate over time. The effects of the Consumer Sentiment Indices drifted downward. housing correction on real economic activity are likely However, the indices rebounded in September and to persist into early 2007, but the rate of decline in October, only to fall back slightly in November. The home construction should slow as the inventory of Consumer Confidence Index is based on the Consumer unsold new homes is gradually absorbed. Confidence Survey, which is compiled from a representative sample of 5,000 U.S. households. This index fell to 102.9 in November, the lowest level since Gross Domestic Product August, when the reading was 100.2. The November value was up from 105.1 in October. The drop in the The robust growth in the U.S. economy prior to the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index recent downturn was driven by strong consumer raised concerns that consumer spending might not be spending that resulted from rapid growth in stock as robust as previously anticipated during the holiday market wealth. Compared to the early 2000s, the stock season, despite its upbeat start. Reports show that at market was markedly less volatile in 2006 with the the beginning of the holiday season, discounters and Dow-Jones Industrial Average hitting record highs and electronic retailers fared well. Their success was staying above the 12,000 level for much of the year. driven by the release of video gaming devices, such as However, high energy prices, rising interest rates, and Sony’s PlayStation 3 and Nintendo’s Wii. Finally, the continuing international uncertainty may keep the Index of Leading Economic Indicators has remained stock market somewhat subdued in 2007. Table 1-6, relatively flat during the course of the year. Thus, no which is shown at the top of the next page, presents major changes, positive or negative, appear to be the nominal and the real U.S. GDP composition and imminent on the economic horizon. growth estimates for 2006 and the forecasts for 2007.

Real GDP is expected to grow at a 2.9 percent rate in Consumption. Consumer spending has continued to 2007. Total nonfarm employment growth is expected expand at a strong rate. During the 2001 recession and to decrease from the current 1.4 percent rate to 1.0 subsequent recovery, consumer spending continued to percent in 2007. Productivity, as measured by output expand in spite of the economic slowdown. per hour, is also expected to slow from 2.4 percent to Immediately following the recession, consumer 2.2 percent. Growth in business investment spending spending was motivated primarily by tax cuts and low by firms was 4.7 percent in 2006 and is expected to interest rates. Now growth in consumer spending decrease to 2.9 percent in 2007. seems to be driven more by stronger business activity in the form of greater job growth and rising household The unemployment rate is expected to increase slightly incomes. Continuing this transition is the key to from 4.7 percent in 2006 to 4.9 percent in 2007. sustaining the economic expansion. However, interest Table 1-6 2000 ended this trend. Currently, the low savings rate U.S. GDP Composition & Growth, 2006-2007 combined with a high debt level indicates that many (Dollars in Billions) consumer budgets are tight. The personal savings rate Real is expected to increase slightly from -0.4 percent in ($Chained 1996) Percent 2006 to 0.3 percent in 2007. Table 1-7 presents U.S. 2006* 2007** Change personal consumption expenditure growth estimates

Gross Domestic Prod. 11,408.7 11,708.8 2.6 % for 2006 and the forecasts for 2007. Consumption 8 ,085.4 8,303.4 2.7 Table 1-7 Durables 1,201.6 1,211.9 0.9 Nondurables 2 ,356.4 2,402.6 2.0 U.S. Personal Consumption Expenditure Growth Services 4,551.5 4,714.6 3.6 Percent Change, Seasonally Adjusted, 2006-2007 Investment 1,954.7 2,010.4 2.9 Expenditures Fixed 1 ,908.7 1,968.3 3.1 2006 2007 Nonresidential 1 ,319.7 1,417.4 7.4 Personal Consumption 3 .1 %2 .7% Equipment 1 ,055.1 1,114.9 5.7 Durables 4.9 0.9 Structures 275.7 312.5 13.3 Nondurables 3 .5 2.0 Residential 587.6 553.5 ( 5.8) Services 2.6 3.6 Chng. in Invent. 46.0 42.1 ( 8.4) Retail Sales & Food Services 6.6 4.2 Exports 1 ,300.0 1,389.0 6.8 Ret. Sales & Food Less Autos 3 .5 3.6 Imports 1 ,934.0 2,023.8 4.6 Bldg. Mat., Equip., & Supplies 10.3 0.5 Government 1,997.0 2,024.6 1.4 General Merchandise 5 .5 4.9 Federal 740.1 737.5 ( 0.3) Food & Beverage Stores 4.6 2.3 Nat. Defense 489.6 489.6 ( 0.0) Clothing & Accessories 6 .7 6.4 Nondefense 250.4 247.9 ( 1.0) Food Serv. & Drinking Places 8.4 8.6 State & Local 1 ,256.7 1,287.1 2.4 Source: Moody's Economy.com *Estimated **Forecasted Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Energy prices are a key component to continued slow Analysis, and Moody's Economy.com growth in consumer spending. These prices will have a pronounced effect on big ticket and durable goods rate increases, employment trends, and high gasoline purchases because there will be less to spend on the prices may cause consumer spending growth to slow bigger items. Moreover, higher interest rates will significantly during 2007. Crude oil prices have more further reduce the cash infusion into the economy that than doubled since 2002. Natural gas and home heat- has resulted from refinancing home mortgages in the ing oil prices also rose dramatically. According to the past. Higher interest rates also will slow overall Department of Energy, the average U.S. household residential investment. spent $928 for home heating in 2006, slightly less than in 2005 when the amount spent was $947. During the unprecedented economic expansion of the 1990s, a tight labor market and low inflation allowed Overall, real consumption growth is projected to slow consumers to realize significant gains in real from 3.1 percent in 2006 to 2.7 percent in 2007. Since purchasing power. Now, however, those particular the last recession in 1991, consumer spending has circumstances are not present. The result is that real consistently increased at a more rapid rate than disposable income is expected to increase by 3.6 disposable income. The result was that the savings percent in 2007, compared to 3.1 percent in 2006. rate fell. The decline implied that most of the Real consumer spending growth is expected to drop spending growth over this period was driven by capital back slightly to 2.7 percent in 2007 after a 3.1 percent gains and/or consumer credit. In the latter half of the increase in 2006. This trend will be supported largely 1990s, the low savings rate did not appear to be a by a 3.6 percent increase in services consumption. severe problem because stock market investments were not only sustaining, but enriching many Consumption of durables is expected to increase by households. However, the stock market correction in 0.9 percent in 2007 compared to a 4.9 percent increase in 2006. Automobile purchases are expected to compared to a 4.7 percent growth rate in 2006. The decrease 1.1 percent in 2007, which is the same rate as composition of growth will change also as spending in 2006. Within the durable goods category, the key shifts from equipment to structure. Real fixed invest- growth sector in recent years has been electronics. ment is expected to rise 3.1 percent; nonresidential in- Expenditures for nondurable goods are forecasted to vestment is forecasted to increase 7.4 percent; and increase 2.0 percent in 2007, which is lower than the residential construction is expected to decrease 5.8 3.5 percent increase in 2006. Expenditures for percent in 2007. Within nonresidential investment, services also are forecasted to increase by 3.6 percent spending on structures should rise 13.3 percent, while in 2007 compared to a 2.6 percent increase in 2006. spending on equipment should rise 5.7 percent.

More specifically, expenditures for food services and International Trade. In 2007, oil prices may drinking places is expected to increase 8.6 percent in continue to be a significant drag on many world 2007, while clothing and accessories expenditures are economies. However, the global economy continues expected to increase 6.4 percent. Increases are to be strong. This growth in international markets expected also in general merchandise expenditures should support the continuing expansion of U.S. (4.9 percent), as well as retail sales and food services exports of goods and services. (4.2 percent). Retail sales and food excluding auto- mobiles are expected to increase 3.6 percent. Other Real trade exports are expected to increase by 6.8 expenditure categories forecasted to increase include percent in 2007 compared to an 8.7 percent increase in food and beverage (2.3 percent) and building 2006. Meanwhile, real trade imports are expected to materials, equipment, and supplies (0.5 percent). increase 4.6 percent in 2007 compared to a 6.5 percent increase in 2006. Given these increases, the real trade Business Investment. Business investment spending deficit is likely to remain over $600.0 billion in 2007. also has showed signs of renewed strength. This is in contrast to the sharp decline in business investment Government Expenditures. Although projected that was partially responsible for the 2001 recession deficits are not as high, relative to GDP, as the 1983- and the subsequent slow recovery. Businesses now record setter, there is concern that the deficits are large seem poised to reenter the market for items ranging and are likely to persist indefinitely. The most likely from high-tech equipment and software to warehouses consequences are accelerating inflation, rising interest and equipment. These investments seem to be rates, private capital formation being crowded out by allowing businesses to position themselves for greater government borrowing, and slower GDP growth. efficiency and greater productive capacity in the future. In real terms, government expenditures are estimated to increase by 1.4 percent in 2007. However, total The inventory surge in 2006 signals a production federal government expenditures are estimated to decline in 2007. In addition, rebuilding from the Gulf decrease by 0.3 percent. Specifically, national defense hurricanes is expected to continue during 2007. Thus, expenditures are expected to remain constant, and non- the residential “bubble” may not be as serious as defense expenditures are expected to decrease by 1.0 originally feared. According to Freddie Mac, percent. Real state and local government expenditures inventories of unsold new homes have begun to drift are forecasted to increase 2.4 percent. down from their July peak after having risen nearly 25.0 percent over the previous year. In addition, the Personal Income. In 2007, real personal income in National Association of Homebuilders’ Survey of the U.S. is forecasted to grow at a 3.2 percent rate. Consumer Traffic turned upward in October and Increases also are anticipated in personal interest November amid anecdotes that current conditions are income (10.0 percent), personal dividend income (6.4 beginning to draw potential buyers back into the percent), and disposable personal income (3.6 market. Freddie Mac expects housing markets to percent). However, rental income is expected to stabilize some time during the first half of 2007. decrease (4.9 percent). The median household income is expected to increase 3.1 percent to $49,928 in 2007. For 2007, real business investment spending is Table 1-8 on the next page presents the categories of expected to increase to a 2.9 percent growth rate U.S. Personal Income Growth for 2006 and 2007. Table 1-8 Sectors that will be particularly hard hit by high oil prices include airlines, other transportation services, U.S. Personal Income Growth, 2006-2007 utilities, the chemical industry, and heavy manufac- (Dollars in Billions) turing. However, the run up in oil prices has had a Percent surprisingly limited effect on overall inflation. During 2006* 2007** Change 2006, the core inflation rate, which includes all sectors Median Household Income 48,405 49,928.0 3.1 % except food and energy, rose at a modest 2.2 percent Personal Income 9,500.0 9,800.0 3.2 annual rate. The overall inflation rate was 3.4 percent. Disposable Income 8,400.0 8,700.0 3.6 This is, in part, a result of the U.S. presently requiring Dividends 636.0 676.6 6.4 approximately only one-half as much oil to generate Interest 1,000.0 1,100.0 10.0 $1.00 of GDP as was required in the mid-1970s. This Rent 72.9 69.3 (4.9) means that for any given increase in the price of oil, Personal Saving Rate (%) (0.4) 0.3 0.7 the effect on the U.S. economy is approximately one-

* Estimated half of what it was in the 1970s. ** Forecasted One important question about inflation is the extent to Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis and Moody's Economy.com which businesses will pass through to consumers the recent energy costs increases. If they do, core inflation will rise. Unless energy costs continue to surge, such Personal Savings. The rate of personal savings is increases would result in a temporary spike in the core expected to increase to a rate of 0.3 percent in 2007. inflation rate, not a sustained higher rate. Once This increase will move the personal savings rate into businesses adjust their prices to cover the higher costs, “the black” from its -0.4 percent rate in 2006. prices should not rise further and inflation should return to its earlier rate. Furthermore, although oil Inflation & Prices. As productivity growth returns to prices remain high, they have recently fallen. Futures more modest levels, unit labor costs are likely to rise, markets are not expecting a rebound. However, if the which will put upward pressure on prices. Moreover, rate of inflation begins increasing consistently, this continuing high prices for oil and other commodities may ultimately result in a self-fulfilling prophesy of a will exacerbate inflationary pressures, as producers try higher rate of inflation indefinitely. As such, inflation to pass on their higher input costs to consumers. is expected to remain moderate in 2007. As measured by the CPI-U, inflation is forecasted to be 2.5 percent. In short, energy prices may continue to be a drag on As measured by GDP Chain Price Deflator, it is the economy. The recent surge in oil prices is the expected to be 2.8 percent. Table 1-9 presents price result of a combination of fundamental changes in changes for 2006 and 2007 as measured by the GDP petroleum markets and fears about supply disruptions. Price Index. Since mid-2003, growth in the demand for oil has far outstripped growth in supply. Compounding the Table 1-9 fundamental oil market price pressures are fears over U.S. Consumer Prices supply disruptions. High oil prices are likely to persist Percent Change, Seasonally Adjusted, 2006-2007 because there are virtually no immediately available Prices incremental supply sources outside of the Organization 2006 2007 of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Capacity GDP Chain Price Deflator 3.0 %2 .8% 2.5 has not increased significantly in recent years because Consumer Price Index 3.4 2.7 of a relatively limited level of exploration. Oil Less Food & Energy 2.2 Shelter 2.6 3.1 companies have not been convinced that high oil Food 2.4 2.3 prices will be sustained. Moreover, many places with Medical Care 4.2 5.3 potential exploration opportunities are plagued by political instability, terrorism, and/or stifling govern- Source: Moody's Economy.com ment bureaucracies. Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, Venezuela, Russia, and Indonesia have not been The core rate of inflation is expected to moderate reliable sources for increased production. gradually during 2007. Some of the factors that pushed up core inflation in the recent past should expected to increase 5.3 percent, shelter costs are dissipate. One factor that is looming on the horizon is expected to increase 3.1 percent, food away from labor costs, which depend on both the compensation home is expected to increase 2.4 percent, and food received by workers and labor productivity. Labor itself is expected to increase 2.3 percent. costs, which account for roughly two-thirds of a firm’s total costs, have been rising quickly recently. Some Productivity. Productivity, as measured by output per part of this acceleration reflects the tightening of the hour, is expected to grow during 2007, but at a slower labor market. pace than was experienced in 2006 when the growth rate reached 4.7 percent. Although productivity More specifically, the core rate of inflation is expected growth is expected to grow, the increase is expected to to be 2.7 percent in 2007. Medical care costs are be only 2.7 percent.

Chapter 2

Kansas Employment & Income

Overview (also 2.4 percent); government (2.3 percent); other services (1.1 percent); finance (0.7 percent), and Overall, the Kansas economy is expected to continue education and health services (0.5 percent). Decreases experiencing modest growth in 2007. Gross state in employment occurred in information (-4.6 percent); product (GSP) is forecasted to increase by 4.8 percent, trade, transportation, and utilities (-1.1 percent); and and personal income is expected to increase by 5.3 leisure and hospitality (0.8 percent). Farm employment percent. Table 2-1 presents major Kansas economic increased 0.5 percent in 2006. trends for 2006 and 2007. Table 2-1 Over-the-year (October 2005 to October 2006) job growth in October reflected the improving Kansas Major Kansas Economic Trends economy. Non-farm salaries and wages employment 2006 2007 reached 1,352,300 jobs, an increase of 9,400 jobs since GSP Growth ($ Constant) 5.6 % 4.8 % October 2005. Eight of the eleven reporting industry Personal Income Growth ($ Current) 6.4 5.3 sectors showed job increases in October compared to a Employment Growth Rate year before. Primary contributors to the increase Place of Residence 0.7 1.6 include government (5,900 jobs), professional and Place of Work 0.9 1.5 technical services (3,100 jobs); construction (2,200 Unemployment Rate (Monthly Average) 5.1 4.7 jobs); and manufacturing (1,500 jobs). The state’s unemployment rate fell from 4.8 percent in October Personal income growth in 2007 will be sustained by 2005 to 4.2 percent in October 2006. growth in nonfarm proprietors’ income (8.1 percent) and other labor income (7.9 percent). Contributions Although employment growth was experienced during for social insurance are expected to increase 6.5 2006, the state’s economic recovery proceeded at a percent, while transfers are expected to increase 5.4 slower rate than the nation as a whole. One factor that percent. Salaries and wages, as well as dividends, caused the slower recovery relative to the nation was interest, and rents, are expected to grow modestly at that the growth in manufacturing employment was 4.6 percent each. Meanwhile, the residence sluggish. Kansas’ manufacturing industry accounts for adjustment is expected to increase by 3.0 percent. more than 13.0 percent of total employment. Within Employment by place of residence in expected to the manufacturing industry, job growth in the increase by 1.6 percent, while employment by place of transportation manufacturing sector is significant work is expected to increase by 1.5 percent in 2007. because of the Wichita area’s focus on aircraft The unemployment rate is expected to decrease from manufacturing and the Kansas City area’s focus on car 5.1 percent in 2006 to 4.7 percent in 2007. This is and truck manufacturing. Changes in employment in slightly below the forecasted unemployment rate for either sector are noteworthy. The Wichita area’s the U.S. of 4.9 percent. aircraft related production industry accounts for approximately 20.0 percent of all of the state’s In 2006, annual employment increased in both the manufacturing jobs, while the Kansas City area’s car goods producing industries (1.6 percent) and the and truck manufacturing accounts for 1.9 percent. services producing industries (0.5 percent). Within the Although nationwide aircraft manufacturing has been goods producing industries, construction employment affected severely since the September 11th terrorist increased 3.4 percent; natural resources and mining attacks, aerospace products manufacturing rebounded employment increased by 9.2 percent; and 4.4 percent in 2006. manufacturing employment increased by 0.8 percent. Within the services producing industries, increases The Kansas agricultural sector produces a wide array were specific to professional and technical services of products, with wheat, corn, sorghum, and soybeans as the main crops. Kansas is the nation’s largest wheat Table 2-2 presents Kansas over-the-year employment producer, harvesting nearly 400.0 million bushels of details for 2005 and 2006, by place of residence. wheat per year, which is approximately 20.0 percent of Table 2-2 the total U.S. wheat output. Although prices were higher in 2006, yields for the primary fall crops in Kansas Employment, by Place of Residence Kansas are expected to decline from 2005 levels. October 2005-October 2006 Overall crop production across the state also is down % considerably. In fact, corn, soybeans, and sorghum are 2005 2006 Chng. forecasted to be down significantly according to Place of Residence Data Kansas Agricultural Statistics Service. In addition to Civilian Labor Force 1,481,525 1,483,633 0.1 % the significant contribution Kansas makes to the Employment 1,410,044 1,420,675 0.8 production of row crops, the state is a large producer Unemployment 71,481 62,958 ( 11.9) of livestock. More than 60.0 percent of the state’s Unemployment Rate 4.8 4.2 (0.6 ) agricultural receipts are derived from cattle Source: KS Dept. of Labor, Labor Market Info. Servs. production. These receipts are expected to remain steady even though they are below last year’s levels. Using the civilian labor force as the base, other Overall, farm income in 2006 is expected to be lower information can be derived. Specifically, employment than the previous year because of high yields for major in Kansas can be determined. Figure 2-1 presents crops across Kansas in 2005, this year’s lower trends in the Kansas civilian labor force from 1977 commodity prices, higher fuel prices, and limited through 2006. export flows. Figure 2-1: Kansas Civilian Labor Force Growth 4.0% Kansas Employment Review 3.5% 3.0%

2.5% Employment data are compiled in two ways: by place 2.0% of residence and by place of work. The first 1.5% ange

h 1.0% compilation, employment by place of residence, is C based on a sample survey of households. From the 0.5% 0.0% sample survey, the civilian labor force is determined. -0.5%

Once the civilian labor force is determined, then -1.0% employment, unemployment, and the unemployment -1.5% rate are derived. Children, retirees, military personnel, 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 Year and those who are not actively seeking work, are not considered to be part of the civilian labor force. The second compilation is based on employment by place Similar to the civilian labor force, Kansas of work. For this compilation, data are compiled from employment, as measured by place of residence, grew information primarily obtained directly from firms as more rapidly during 2006 (0.5 percent) than in 2005 part of the unemployment insurance program. Place of (0.4 percent). In 2006, Kansas employment grew at a work data are further categorized by industry. rate of 4.4 percent compared to a 1.0 percent increase in 2005. Figure 2-2, which is shown at the top of the next page, presents Kansas employment trends by Employment by Place of Residence place of residence from 1977 through 2006.

From October 2005 to October 2006, the Kansas The unemployment rate is based on the civilian labor civilian labor force grew at a rate of 0.1 percent, with force also. The unemployment rate in Kansas employment increasing 0.8 percent and unemployment decreased from 5.1 percent to 4.7 percent. The highest decreasing 11.9 percent. These changes resulted in a rate during the last several decades occurred in 1982 0.6 percent decrease in the state’s unemployment rate. when the unemployment rate reached 6.5 percent and Figure 2-2: a 0.7 percent rate. Figure 2-4 presents Kansas employment by place of work for 2005 and 2006. Kansas Employment Growth (by Place of Residence) Figure 2-4 5.0% 4.0% Employment by Place of Work 3.0% Kansas, 2005-2006 2.0% 1,360.0

1.0% 1,350.0 nge 1,340.0

Cha 0.0%

-1.0% 1,330.0 1,320.0 -2.0% ands 1,310.0 -3.0% ous h T -4.0% 1,300.0 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 1,290.0 2006 2005 Year 1,280.0

1,270.0 then fell to 6.0 percent in 1983. Rates have not Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec reached those levels for quite some time; however, the Month low levels experienced in the late 1990s are not anticipated in the near future either. Figure 2-3 presents the Kansas unemployment rate from 1977 Table 2-3 presents Kansas employment details for through 2006. 2005 and 2006, by place of work.

Figure 2-3: Table 2-3 Kansas Employment, by Place of Work Kansas Unemployment Rate October 2005-October 2006

7.0% % 2005 2006 Chng. 6.0% Place of Work Data 5.0% All Industries 1,342,900 1,352,300 0.7 % 4.0% Goods Producing Ind. 250,800 254,700 1.6

Rate 3.0% Natural Resources 7,500 7,700 2.7 Mining 7,500 7,700 2.7 2.0% Construction 64,400 66,600 3.4 1.0% Manufacturing 178,900 180,400 0.8 0.0% Durable Goods 112,000 116,100 3.7 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 Fabricated Metal 14,100 15,000 6.4 Year Machinery 16,900 17,300 2.4 Elect. Equipment 4,500 4,600 2.2 Trans. Equip. 46,700 48,900 4.7 Employment by Place of Work Aerospace Prod. 36,300 37,900 4.4 Non-Durable Goods 66,900 64,300 ( 3.9) There are three broad classifications of employment by Food Mfg. 31,600 31,500 ( 0.3) place of work: the goods producing industries, the Animal Slaughter. 18,400 19,500 6.0 services producing industries, and farming. This Print. & Rltd. Prod. 11,000 11,000 -- section presents an overview of employment in the Plastics & Rubber 10,000 8,700 (13.0) goods producing industries by subcategory. The next Service Producing Ind. 1,092,100 1,097,600 0.5 section presents employment in the services producing Trade & Transport. 261,100 258,300 ( 1.1) industries in the same manner, followed by farming Wholesale Trade 60,600 60,500 ( 0.2) Retail Trade 148,300 147,600 ( 0.5) Compared to October a year ago, overall employment Motor Vehicles 18,400 18,600 1.1 in Kansas, as measured by place of work, increased at Table 2-3 (cont'd) the mining sector. The agriculture, forestry, fishing, Kansas Employment, by Place of Work and hunting sector is establishments primarily engaged October 2005-October 2006 in growing crops, raising animals, harvesting timber, % and harvesting fish or other animals from a farm, 2005 2006 Chng. ranch, or their natural habitats. The mining sector is Place of Work Data made up of establishments that extract naturally Grocery Stores 1 9,300 19, 800 2.6 % occurring mineral solids (coal and ores), liquid Gen. Merchandise 3 6,100 34, 800 (3.6) minerals (crude petroleum), and gases (natural gas). Trans. Warehouse 5 2,200 50, 200 (3.8) The term mining is used in the broad sense to include Utililties 7,400 7, 000 (5.4) quarrying, well operations, beneficiating (e.g., Elec. Power Trans. 5,300 5,400 1.9 crushing, screening, washing, and flotation), and other Trans. & Wrhse. 44,800 43, 200 (3.6) preparation that is customarily performed at the mine Truck Trans. 16,500 15, 700 (4.8) site, or as a part of mining activity. During 2006, Information 39,100 37, 300 (4.6) natural resources mining employment rose by 2.7 Telecomm. 23,300 23,100 (0.9) percent. Figure 2-5 compares monthly employment in Finance 70,700 71, 200 0.7 natural resources for 2005 and 2006. Credit Intermed. 28,000 28, 400 1.4 Figure 2-5 Insurance Carriers 22,100 23, 200 5.0 Real Estate 15,500 15, 200 (1.9) Natural Resources Employment Prof. & Tech. Serv. 131,000 134, 100 2.4 Kansas, 2005-2006 Prof. & Science 53,900 54,200 0.6 8.0 Mgmt., Commun. 9,800 9,800 - - 7.5 Administrative 67,300 70, 100 4.2 Edu. & Health Serv. 166,200 167, 100 0.5 7.0 ands Educational 16,400 16, 200 (1.2) 6.5 ous

Health Care & Serv. 149,800 150, 900 0.7 h Hospitals 40,500 42, 300 4.4 T 6.0 2006 2005 Leisure & Hosp. 112,400 111, 500 (0.8) 5.5 Arts & Entertain. 12,000 11, 400 (5.0) 5.0 Amuse./Gambling 8 ,800 9,000 2.3 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Accommodations 10 0,400 100, 100 (0.3) Month Food Services 88,800 88, 400 (0.5) Other Services 52,900 53, 500 1.1 Government 25 8,700 264, 600 2.3 Construction. The construction sector includes Federal 26,000 25, 900 (0.4) establishments primarily engaged in the construction State 54,700 55, 300 1.1 of buildings or engineering projects (e.g., highways Local 178,000 183, 400 3.0 and utility systems). Establishments primarily Farm Employment 84,300 84, 700 0.5 engaged in the preparation of sites for new construction and establishments primarily engaged in Source: KS Dept. of Labor, Labor Market Info. Serv. subdividing land for sale as building sites also are included in this sector. Construction work done may Goods Producing Industries include new work, additions, alterations, or maintenance and repairs. Activities of these establish- As measured by place of work, employment in the ments generally are managed at a fixed place of goods producing industries increased 1.8 percent in business, but they usually perform construction 2006. There are three general categories within the activities at multiple project sites. goods producing industries: natural resources, construction, and manufacturing. During 2006, monthly construction employment has consistently remained above 2005 levels through Natural Resources & Mining. The natural resources October. Overall, construction employment grew at a and mining super-sector is made up of two parts: the 3.4 percent rate in 2006. This particular industry agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting sector, and sector is affected greatly by the seasons and the weather. For this reason, it is important to consider the manufacturing exceeded last year’s levels for the inherent seasonal nature of the industry when entire year. Figure 2-8 presents the yearly trends in analyzing construction employment changes. Figure durable goods manufacturing employment, by month, 2-6 presents trends in construction employment in for both 2005 and 2006. Kansas for 2005 and 2006. Figure 2-8 Figure 2-6 Durable Goods Employment Construction Employment Kansas, 2005-2006 Kansas, 2005-2006 117.0 75.0 116.0 115.0 114.0 70.0 113.0

ands 112.0 65.0 111.0 ous ands h 110.0 T ous

h 60.0 109.0 T 108.0 2006 2005 2006 2005 55.0 107.0 106.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 50.0 Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month

Four important subcategories within the durable goods Manufacturing. The manufacturing sector consists of manufacturing are fabricated metal products, establishments engaged in the mechanical, physical, or machinery, electrical equipment, and transportation chemical transformation of materials, substances, or equipment. Employment in fabricated metal products components into new products. In 2006, manufacturing increased 6.4 percent, employment in manufacturing employment increased 0.8 percent. machinery manufacturing increased 2.4 percent, Monthly manufacturing employment began 2006 employment in electrical equipment manufacturing below last year’s levels, but surpassed 2005 levels in employment increased 2.2 percent, and employment in September and October. Figure 2-7 presents trends in transportation equipment manufacturing increased by manufacturing employment for 2005 and 2006. 4.7 percent.

Figure 2-7 The dynamics of aircraft and parts manufacturing Manufacturing Employment employment in the Wichita metropolitan area are of Kansas, 2005-2006 particular interest when analyzing the Kansas 184.0 economy. As shown in Figure 2-9, transportation

182.0 Figure 2-9 180.0

178.0 Transportation Equipment Employment ands Kansas, 2005-2006

ous 176.0

h 49.5 T 174.0 49.0 48.5 2006 2005 172.0 48.0

170.0 47.5

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ands 47.0

Month ous

h 46.5 T 46.0 45.5 During 2006, durable goods manufacturing employ- 2006 2005 45.0 ment increased by 3.7 percent. Durable goods are 44.5 defined as goods with an expected useful life of more Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec than one year. In 2006, employment in durable goods Month equipment manufacturing employment has been manufacturing. Figure 2-11 presents trends in food significantly above 2005 levels for the entire year and kindred products employment in Kansas for 2005 through October. and 2006.

Employment trends in transportation equipment, a sub- Figure 2-11 component of durable goods manufacturing, are Food Manufacturing Employment important for four reasons. First, transportation Kansas, 2005-2006 equipment manufacturing is a major exporting sub- 32.0 sector within the Kansas economy. Second, aircraft 31.5 and related parts manufacturing is a major subcategory of the transportation equipment manufacturing sub- 31.0 ands sector. Third, the Wichita metropolitan area’s 30.5 economy is driven largely by aircraft-related Thous 30.0 manufacturing. Fourth, the Kansas manufacturing 2006 2005 industry is driven to a considerable extent by the 29.5 Wichita metropolitan area’s manufacturing employ- 29.0 ment. For these reasons, employment changes in Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec transportation equipment manufacturing have a Month potentially significant effect on the Kansas economy. Employment in aerospace products manufacturing This sector accounts for more than 45.0 percent of all increased by 4.4 percent in 2006. nondurable goods employment in Kansas. Although trending upward in 2006, employment in food Nondurable goods are defined as goods with an manufacturing decreased 0.3 percent from a year ago. expected useful life of less than one year. During In fact, food manufacturing employment has been 2006, employment in nondurable goods decreased by below 2005 levels for the entire year through October. 3.9 percent. Within the nondurable goods manufac- However, within food manufacturing, animal turing category, there are three important sub- slaughtering employment increased by 6.0 percent, categories: food manufacturing, printing and related while employment in plastics and rubber manufac- products, and plastics and rubber. Employment in turing declined 13.0 percent, primarily because of the nondurable goods manufacturing has been below 2005 labor stoppage at the Goodyear facility in Topeka. levels for the entire year through October. Figure 2-10 Employment in printing and related products shows nondurable goods manufacturing employment manufacturing held steady. for 2005 and 2006. Figure 2-10 Services Producing Industries Nondurable Goods Employment Kansas, 2005-2006 70.0 The second broad classification of employment by

69.0 place of work is the services producing industries.

68.0 Employment in the services producing industries grew

67.0 at a 0.5 percent rate in 2006. There are eight major

66.0 categories within the services producing industries. ands

65.0 They include trade, transportation, and utilities;

Thous 64.0 information; finance; professional and technical 63.0 services; educational and health services; leisure and 2006 2005 62.0 hospitality services; other services; and government. 61.0 In 2006, five of the major categories experienced Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month increases in employment, while three of the major categories experienced decreases.

The largest of these subcategories, and the one with Trade, Transportation, & Utilities. The trade super- the most effect on the Kansas economy, is food sector is made up of two parts: the wholesale trade sector and the retail trade sector. The wholesale trade public utilities employment for 2005 and 2006 are sector is made up of establishments engaged in presented in Figure 2-12. wholesaling merchandise, generally without trans- formation, and rendering services that are incidental to Figure 2-12 the sale of merchandise. The wholesaling process is Trade, Transport., & Utilities Employment an intermediate step in the distribution of merchandise. Kansas, 2005-2006 Wholesalers are organized to sell or arrange the 268.0 purchase or sale of (1) goods for resale (i.e., goods 266.0 sold to other wholesalers or retailers), (2) capital or 264.0 durable nonconsumer goods, and (3) raw and 262.0 260.0 intermediate materials and supplies used in production. ands Wholesalers sell merchandise to other businesses and 258.0 normally operate from a warehouse or office. Thous 256.0 254.0 2006 2005 The retail trade sector consists of establishments 252.0 engaged in retailing merchandise, generally without 250.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec transformation, and rendering services incidental to the Month sale of merchandise. The retailing process is the final step in the distribution of merchandise. Retailers are, therefore, organized to sell merchandise in small Within the trade, transportation, and utilities category, quantities to the general public. Two main types of there are four subcategories. These categories include retailers exist: store and nonstore retailers. utilities; transportation and warehousing; wholesale trade; and retail trade. Although utilities employment The transportation and warehousing sector includes began the year above 2005 levels, in March 2006, it industries that provide transportation of passengers and declined significantly and remained below last year’s cargo, warehousing and storage for goods, scenic and levels through October. Compared to a year ago, sightseeing transportation, and support activities utilities employment is down 5.4 percent. Figure 2-13 related to modes of transportation. Establishments in presents trends in utilities employment in 2005 and these industries use transportation equipment or 2006. transportation-related facilities as a productive asset. Figure 2-13 The type of equipment used depends on the mode of transportation. The modes of transportation are air, Utilities Employment rail, water, road, and pipeline. Kansas, 2005-2006 7.5 The utilities sector consists of establishments engaged 7.4 in providing utility services, specifically electric 7.3 power, natural gas, steam supply, water supply, and ands sewage removal. Within this sector, the specific 7.2

ous 2006 2005 h activities associated with the utility services provided T 7.1 vary by utility. Electric power includes generation, transmission, and distribution; natural gas includes 7.0 distribution; steam supply includes provision and/or 6.9 distribution; water supply includes treatment and Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec distribution; and sewage removal includes collection, Month treatment, and disposal of waste through sewer systems and sewage treatment facilities. Employment in transportation and warehousing has been below 2005 levels for the entire year through Employment in trade, transportation, and utilities October and is down 3.6 percent compared to a year decreased 1.1 percent in 2006. During 2006, ago. Figure 2-14, which is shown at the top of the employment remained below 2005 levels for most of next page, presents trends in transportation and the year through October. Trends in transportation and warehousing employment in 2005 and 2006. Figure 2-14 Figure 2-16 Transport. & Warehousing Employment Retail Trade Employment Kansas, 2005-2006 Kansas, 2005-2006 45.5 156.0

45.0 154.0

44.5 152.0

44.0 150.0 ands 43.5 148.0 ands

43.0 hous 146.0 ous T h

T 42.5 144.0 2006 2005 42.0 142.0 2006 2005 41.5 140.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 41.0 Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month major component of this sector is the publishing Wholesale trade employment began the year below industry, which includes software publishing, tradi- 2005 levels, rose above last year’s level in March, then tional publishing, and publishing exclusively on the retreated back below last year’s level in October. Internet. The second major component is motion Compared to last year over all, wholesale trade picture and sound recording. The third is employment is down 0.2 percent. Trends in wholesale broadcasting, which includes traditional broadcasting, trade employment for both 2005 and 2006 are shown as well as broadcasting exclusively over the Inter-net. in Figure 2-15. Telecommunications also is a component of this sector, as are Internet service providers and web Figure 2-15 search portals, data processing industries, and the information services industries. Information employ- Wholesale Trade Employment ment levels in 2006 have been running below 2005 Kansas, 2005-2006 63.0 levels all year and continue to trend downward.

62.0 Overall, employment in information decreased 4.6

61.0 percent in 2006. Specifically within that category,

60.0 telecommunications employment decreased by 0.9 ands percent. Figure 2-17 shows the 2005 and 2006 trends 59.0 hous

T for information employment. 58.0

2006 2005 57.0 Figure 2-17

56.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Information Employment Month Kansas, 2005-2006 41.0

During 2006, retail trade employment levels remained 40.0 below 2005 levels for most of the year. Retail trade 39.0 employment is down 0.5 percent compared to last ands year. Trends in retail trade employment during 2005 38.0 and 2006 are shown in Figure 2-16, which appears at Thous 37.0 the top of the next column. 2006 2005 36.0 Information. The information sector includes 35.0 establishments that are engaged in the following Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month processes: (1) producing and distributing information and cultural products, (2) providing the means to transmit or distribute these products, as well as data or Financial Activities. The financial activities super- communications, and (3) processing data. The first sector is made up of two parts: the finance and insurance sector, and the real estate and rental and below 2005 levels, dropped below last year’s levels leasing sector. The finance and insurance sector during the middle of the year, and rebounded in consists of establishments primarily engaged in August. financial transactions (transactions involving the creation, liquidation, or change in ownership of Professional & Business Services. The professional financial assets) and/or in facilitating financial and technical services super-sector is made up of three transactions. Three principal types of activities are parts: the professional, scientific, and technical identified: (1) raising funds by taking deposits and/or services sector; the management of companies and issuing securities and, in the process, incurring enterprises sector; and the administrative/support and liabilities; (2) pooling of risk by underwriting waste management/remediation services sector. The insurance and annuities; and (3) providing specialized professional, scientific, and technical services sector services that facilitate or support financial intermedia- consists of establishments that specialize in perform- tion, insurance, and employee benefit programs. The ing professional, scientific, and technical activities for real estate and rental and leasing sector consists of others. These establishments perform activities that establishments primarily engaged in renting, leasing, include, legal advice and representation; veterinarian or otherwise allowing the use of tangible or intangible services; accounting, bookkeeping, and payroll assets, and those that provide related services. services; as well as architectural, engineering, and specialized design services. Also included in the The major portion of this sector is made up of professional, scientific, and technical services sector establishments that rent, lease, or otherwise allow the are enterprises that provide services related to use of their own assets by others. This sector also computers, consulting, research, advertising, pho- includes establishments primarily engaged in tography, translation, and interpretation. The sector managing real estate for others, selling, renting and/or that is entitled management of enterprises includes buying real estate for others, and appraising real estate. establishments that hold the securities of, or other The main components of this sector are the real estate equity interests in, enterprises for the purpose of lessors industries; equipment lessors industries, owning a controlling interest or influencing manage- including motor vehicles, computers, and consumer ment decisions, as well as establishments that goods; and lessors of non-financial intangible assets, administer sections of the enterprise that normally except copyrighted works. undertake the strategic or organizational planning and decision making role. Government is not included in In 2006, employment in financial activities increased this sector. by 0.7 percent. Within this category insurance employment increased 5.0 percent, credit employment The administrative/support and waste management/ increased 1.4 percent, while real estate employment remediation services sector is made up of establish- decreased by 1.9 percent. As shown in Figure 2-18, ments that perform routine support activities for the financial activities employment levels began the year day-to-day operations of other organizations. These Figure 2-18 essential activities are often undertaken in-house in many sectors of the economy. Activities performed Financial Activities Employment include office administration, hiring and placing Kansas, 2005-2006 personnel, as well as document preparation and similar 71.5 clerical services. It also includes solicitation, collec- 71.0 tion, security and surveillance, cleaning, and waste 70.5 disposal.

70.0 ands Professional and business services employment began 69.5

Thous 2006 above 2005 levels, but dropped in March and 69.0 remained below 2005 levels for much of the year. 68.5 2006 2005 However, in October, employment rebounded. The

68.0 result was a year-over-year increase of 2.4 percent. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Within this category, employment in administrative Month and support services increased 6.4 percent, while employment in professional, scientific, and technical realized in employment in educational services. services increased 0.6 percent. Employment in the Figure 2-20 presents trends in educational and health management of companies and enterprises remained services employment for 2005 and 2006. steady throughout 2006. Figure 2-19 presents trends in professional and business services employment for Figure 2-20 2005 and 2006. Educ. & Health Services Employment Kansas, 2005-2006 Figure 2-19 168.0 Prof. & Bus. Services Employment 167.0 Kansas, 2005-2006 166.0 136.0 165.0 ands 134.0 164.0

163.0 Thous 132.0 162.0 2006 2005 ands 130.0 161.0

Thous 128.0 160.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month 126.0 2006 2005

124.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Leisure & Hospitality Services. The leisure and Month hospitality super-sector is made up of two parts: the arts, entertainment, and recreation sector, and the Educational & Health Services. The education and accommodation and food services sector. The arts, health services super-sector is made up of two parts: entertainment, and recreation sector includes a range the educational services sector and the health care and of establishments that operate facilities or provide social assistance sector. Only privately-owned services to meet varied cultural, entertainment, and establishments are included here because publicly- recreational interests. This sector includes establish- owned establishments that provide education or health ments that are involved in producing, promoting, or services are included in government. The educational participating in live performances, events, or exhibits services sector is made up of establishments that intended for public viewing; establishments that provide instruction and training in a variety of preserve and exhibit objects and sites of historical, subjects. This instruction and training is provided by cultural, or educational interest; and establishments specialized institutions, such as schools, colleges, that operate facilities or provide services that enable universities, and training centers. The health care and patrons to participate in recreational activities or social assistance sector is made up of establishments pursue amusement, hobby, and leisure-time interests. that provide health care and social assistance for The accommodation and food services sector consists individuals. The industries in this sector are arranged of establishments that provide customers with lodging on a continuum starting with those that provide and/or prepare meals, snacks, and beverages for medical care exclusively, continuing with those that immediate consumption. The sector includes both provide health care and social assistance, and finally accommodation and food services establishments those that provide only social assistance. because the two activities are often combined at the same establishment. In 2006, education and health services employment began the year above 2005 levels, dipped below last In 2006, employment in leisure and hospitality year’s levels at midyear, and rebounded above 2005 services remained above 2005 levels for much of the levels in July. The result was an overall 0.5 percent year; however, industry employment was actually gain compared to a year ago. Within this category, down 0.8 percent compared to a year ago. Within that employment in hospitals increased by 4.4 percent and sector, employment in amusement and gambling employment in health care and social assistance increased by 2.3 percent. However, decreases in increased by 0.7 percent. A 1.2 percent decrease was employment were realized in accommodations (-0.3 percent), food services (-0.5 percent), and arts and Government. The government sector is made up of entertainment (-5.0 percent). Figure 2-21 below publicly-owned establishments. This sector includes presents trends in leisure and hospitality employment federal, state, and local government agencies that for 2005 and 2006. administer, oversee, and manage public programs and have executive, legislative, or judicial authority over Figure 2-21 other institutions. These agencies also set policy, create laws, adjudicate civil and criminal legal cases, Leisure & Hospitality Employment and provide for public safety and national defense. Kansas, 2005-2006 Public schools and public hospitals are included in 118.0 government. Figure 2-23 presents trends in govern- 116.0

114.0 ment employment for 2005 and 2006.

112.0 Figure 2-23 110.0 ands 108.0 Government Employment Thous 106.0 Kansas, 2005-2006 104.0 270.0 2006 2005 102.0 260.0 100.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 250.0 Month ands 240.0

Other Services. The other services sector consists of Thous 230.0 establishments engaged in providing services not 220.0 2006 2005 specifically provided for elsewhere in the North 210.0 American Industry Classification System. Establish- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ments in this sector are primarily engaged in activities, Month such as equipment and machinery repair; promoting or administering religious activities; grant making; advocacy; and providing dry cleaning and laundry Total government employment (civilian only) in services, personal care services, death care services, Kansas increased by 2.3 percent in 2006. Local pet care services, photofinishing services, temporary government employment increased 3.0 percent, while parking services, and dating services. In 2006, state government employment increased 1.1 percent, employment in other services increased by 1.1 percent. and federal government employment in Kansas Other services employment remained above 2005 decreased 0.4 percent. Overall government employ- levels for most of the year. Figure 2-22 presents other ment in 2006 was above 2005 levels for the entire year services employment trends for 2005 and 2006. through October. A downturn in government employment typically occurs each July and August Figure 2-22 and is attributable largely to the fact that faculty at public schools and universities are on nine-month Other Services Employment appointments. Kansas, 2005-2006 54.5

54.0

53.5 Farming

53.0 ands Farm employment was above 2005 levels for most of 52.5 2006 through October. Thus, compared to October of Thous 52.0 2005, farm employment was up 0.5 percent in 2006. 51.5 2006 2005 Much of the variation in farm employment during the

51.0 year is due to the inherently seasonal nature of the Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec industry. Figure 2-24 is shown on the next page and Month presents farm employment trends for 2005 and 2006. Figure 2-24 From October 2005 to October 2006, total nonfarm employment in Kansas increased at a 0.7 percent rate Farm Employment Kansas, 2005-2006 compared to a 1.3 percent growth rate realized by the 95.0 Plains region as a whole. Minnesota and South 90.0 Dakota had the highest growth rates at 2.0 percent 85.0 each, followed by Iowa (1.7 percent). Kansas ranked 80.0 sixth out of the seven states in the Plains region. Only 75.0 ands Missouri had a lower growth rate. Increases in Kansas 70.0 employment that were greater than the regional Thous 65.0 average include construction and mining (3.3 percent); 2006 2005 60.0 manufacturing (0.8 percent); other services (1.1 55.0 percent); and government (2.3 percent). Industries in 50.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Kansas that realized employment increases below the Month regional average include financial activities (2.1 percent); professional and business services (2.4 percent); and educational and health services (0.5 percent). During 2006, Kansas realized employment decreases in trade, transportation, and utilities (-1.1 Comparative Employment in the percent), information (-4.6 percent), and leisure and hospitality services (-0.8 percent). Plains Region Natural Resources & Mining. Mining and natural The employment data presented in this section may not resources employment in the Plains region decreased be in exact conformity with data presented earlier 6.2 percent in 2005. However, Kansas realized growth because the data are compiled from different sources. in this sector’s employment, leading the region with a The information in earlier sections is based on data growth rate of 5.6 percent. from the Kansas Department of Labor, Labor Market Information Services, while the information in this Construction. Construction employment in the Plains section is based on data from the U.S. Department of region increased 1.4 percent in 2005. However, in Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. In all cases, this Kansas, construction employment decreased by 0.2 report presents the most recent data available. Table percent, ranking the state sixth out of seven states in 2-4, which is shown on the next page, presents the region. South Dakota led the region with a 5.0 employment growth rates for Kansas and the Plains percent increase, followed by Iowa with a 3.8 percent region from 2004 to 2005. The Plains region increase, and Missouri with a 2.5 percent increase. encompasses seven states, including Iowa, Kansas, During 2006, construction and mining employment in Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and the Plains region, on average, increased by 2.7 percent. South Dakota. Table 2-5, which appears at the top of Kansas ranked third with a 3.3 percent increase. Iowa page 25, shows employment growth rates for Kansas led the region with a 7.5 percent increase, followed by and the Plains region from October 2005 to October South Dakota with a 4.3 percent increase. 2006. Manufacturing. Manufacturing employment in the Plains region increased by 1.0 percent in 2005. North Employment by Industry Type Dakota led the region with a 5.3 percent increase, followed by Iowa and South Dakota with 3.2 percent Total nonfarm employment in Kansas increased at a increases each. Kansas ranked fourth with a 1.6 rate of 0.8 percent in 2005 compared to a 1.3 percent percent increase in manufacturing employment. In growth rate realized in the Plains region as a whole. 2006, manufacturing employment in the region North Dakota experienced the highest rate of increase remained steady. South Dakota experienced the at 2.1 percent, followed by South Dakota at 1.7 largest increase at 4.4 percent, followed by Iowa with percent, and Iowa at 1.6 percent. Kansas had the a 1.9 percent increase, and Kansas with a 0.8 percent lowest growth rate in the seven-state region. increase. Table 2-4 Plains Region Employment Growth Rates, 2004-2005 Percent Change KS IA MN MO NE ND SD Plains Total Nonfarm 0.8 % 1.6 % 1.0 % 1.3 % 1.5 % 2.1 % 1.7 % 1.3 % Natural Resources & Mining 5.6 -- (52.5) 8.3 7.7 17.1 12.5 (6.2) Mining 5.6 NA (1.9) NA NA NA NA 2 .4 Construction (0.2) 3.8 0.6 2.5 (2.1) 1.2 5.0 1.4 Manufacturing 1.6 2.8 0.8 (1.0) 0.5 5.3 2.8 1.0 Durable Goods 3.7 3.7 1.7 (1.0) 2.8 7.4 3.4 1.9 Fabricated Metal Products 7.8 3.6 3.1 (1.2) 2.5 NA NA 2.4 Machinery 2 .4 8.2 1.8 3.9 4.3 13.0 10.4 4.9 Elec. Equip., App., & Components 4.7 NA (1.3) (4.1) NA NA NA (1.9) Transportation Equipment 4.5 2.0 4.0 (2.3) 3.8 NA NA 1.4 Aerospace Products & Parts 5.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 .6 Non-Durable Goods ( 1.7) 1.4 (0.6) (0.9) (1.5) 1.2 1.6 (0.5) Food ( 1.3) 1.6 (0.2) (2.9) (2.3) -- (1.3) (0.8) Animal Slaughtering & Processing (1.1) 1.8 0.6 NA (1.6) NA NA -- Printing & Related Support Activ. (0.9) NA 1.6 (0.6) -- NA NA 0.5 Plastics & Rubber Products -- NA (3.6) NA (6.8) NA NA (3.1) Trade, Transportation, & Utilities (0.3) 0.8 0.7 1.4 1.9 2.2 1.8 1.0 Wholesale Trade 2.2 2.3 1.0 1.8 (0.5) 2.7 2.3 1.6 Retail Trade (1.3) 0.1 -- 1.9 0.6 1.9 1.6 0.5 Motor Vehicles & Parts (1.1) (0.5) (2.0) 0.5 ------(0.6) Grocery Stores (3.4) NA (0.2) NA (0.6) NA NA (1.1) General Merchandise Stores (0.3) 2.0 2.2 3.4 3.4 2.7 7.8 2.5 Transportation & Utilities (0.4) 1.0 2.6 (0.8) 7.0 2.3 3.5 1.6 Utilities 1.4 (12.3) -- -- (10.5) 3.0 4.8 (1.9) Elec. Power Gen., Trans., & Dist. 1.9 NA NA 1.3 NA NA NA 1.5 Transportation & Warehousing (0.9) 3.4 2.9 (1.0) 7.4 2.0 2.1 2.0 Truck Transportation (4.5) 4.6 2.2 0.8 5.2 4.2 NA 2.0 Information (4.8) (1.2) (1.7) (2.2) (3.3) -- 1.5 (2.3) Telecommunications (8.6) NA (2.7) (7.1) NA NA NA (6.7) Financial Activities 0.6 1.5 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.6 2.2 1.3 Finance & Insurance 0 .5 1.8 1.2 1.1 2.4 1.3 1.7 1.4 Credit Intermediation & Rel. Activ. (0.7) 1.0 2.2 0.5 1.4 NA 1.7 1.1 Insurance Carriers & Rel. Activities 0.9 1.5 0.9 3.1 3.2 1.5 NA 1.9 Real Estate & Rental & Leasing 2.0 NA -- 2.1 (1.0) 3.1 5.6 1.2 Professional & Business Services 3 .0 4.0 0.4 4.6 3.0 7.8 0.8 2.9 Professional, Scientific, & Technical 0.7 1.3 1.3 4.6 4.2 8.1 5.7 2.8 Mgmt. of Companies & Enterprises (4.0) NA (1.4) 2.9 2.1 10.0 (7.4) 0.6 Adm. & Sup. & Waste Mgmt & Rem. 5.7 4.0 0.5 5.5 2.3 6.9 (0.8) 3.5 Educational & Health Services 2.4 2.0 2.6 2.3 2.0 0.8 1.6 2.3 Education 5.4 1.5 1.6 2.6 (1.0) ( 12.1) 3.4 1.7 Health Care & Social Assistance 2.1 2.1 2.8 2.2 2.6 1.8 1.4 2.3 Hospitals (1.9) NA 1.2 1.5 -- 1.9 0.6 0.7 Leisure & Hospitality 0.9 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.2 1.9 Arts, Entertainment, & Recreation (4.0) NA (0.3) 2.3 3.7 -- 3.2 0.9 Amusement, Gambling, & Recreation (7.4) NA (0.4) 2.1 2.6 -- NA 0.1 Accommodation & Food Services 1.5 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.9 2.2 1.7 2.1 Food Services & Drinking Places 0 .9 NA 2.5 2.1 2.4 2.7 1.5 2.0 Other Services (0.2) (0.4) (0.4) (0.7) 4.0 -- (1.9) (0.1) Government 0.3 0.4 1.1 -- 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 Federal (0.8) (0.5) (1.5) (0.7) (1.2) (1.0) -- (0.9) State (0.6) (0.5) 3.2 (2.9) 0.3 1.8 1.7 0.0 Local 0.7 0.9 0.7 1.3 1.2 0.5 0.4 0.9 Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics Table 2-5 Plains Region Employment Growth Rates, October 2005-October 2006 Percent Change KS IA MN MO NE ND SD Plains Total Nonfarm 0.7 % 1.7 % 2. 0 % 0. 5 % 1.4 % 1.6 % 2.0 % 1.3 % Construction & Mining 3.3 7.5 1.9 2. 2 (2. 7) 2.1 4.3 2.7 Manufacturing 0 .8 1.9 0. 3 (2. 6) 0.2 (2.3) 4.4 0.0 Trade, Transportation, & Utilities (1.1) 0.7 0.9 0. 9 0.2 1.9 1.9 0.6 Information (4.6) (3.0) 2. 6 (3.1) (5.9) (1.3) 4.3 (1.8) Financial Activities 0.7 2.1 2.6 0. 3 5.1 4.2 3.8 2.1 Professional & Business Services 2.4 3.7 5.2 0. 9 3.3 1.1 6.2 3.0 Educational & Health Services 0.5 2.1 3.3 1. 4 3.3 1.4 1.4 2.1 Leisure & Hospitality Services (0.8) 2.4 3.8 0. 0 1.2 3.8 2.4 1.6 Other Services 1.1 (2.0) 1. 5 0. 8 - - 2.7 1.9 0.7 Government 2.3 0.7 (0. 1) 1. 5 2.2 1.3 (1.6) 1.0

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics

Trade, Transportation, & Utilities. In 2005, trade, growth rate in the region at 0.6 percent. In 2006, transportation, and utilities employment increased by financial activities employment in the Plains region 1.0 percent in the region. North Dakota recorded the grew at a 2.1 percent rate. Nebraska led the region largest employment increase (2.2 percent), followed by with a 5.1 percent growth rate, followed by North Nebraska (1.9 percent), and South Dakota (1.8 Dakota with a 4.2 percent growth rate, and South percent). Kansas was the only state reporting a loss of Dakota with a 3.8 percent growth rate. Kansas ranked employment in this category (-0.3 percent). In 2006, sixth in the region. Only Missouri had a lower growth trade, transportation, and utilities employment growth rate than Kansas (0.7 percent). in the region increased by 0.6 percent. North Dakota and South Dakota led the seven-state region with 1.9 Professional & Business Services. Professional and percent growth rates each, followed by Minnesota and business services employment increased by 2.9 Missouri with 0.9 percent growth rates each. Again, percent in the region as a whole in 2005. North Kansas was the only state in the region reporting a loss Dakota led the region with 7.8 percent growth, of employment (-1.1 percent). followed by Missouri with 4.6 percent growth, and Iowa with 4.0 percent growth. Kansas and Nebraska Information. In 2005, information employment in the tied for fourth place with 3.0 percent growth each. In Plains region decreased by 2.3 percent. Employment 2006, the region as a whole experienced a 3.0 percent in information in South Dakota increased by 1.5 increase in employment in this category. South percent, followed North Dakota with no change in Dakota led the region with 6.2 percent growth, employment, and Iowa with a 1.2 percent decrease. followed by Minnesota with 5.2 percent growth, and Kansas reported the largest decrease (-4.8 percent). In Iowa with 3.7 percent growth. Kansas ranked fifth in 2006, information employment in the Plains region the region with 2.4 percent growth. decreased by 1.8 percent. South Dakota had the highest growth rate (4.3 percent), followed by Educational & Health Services. Educational and Minnesota (2.6 percent), and North Dakota (-1.3 health services employment in the Plains region as a percent). Kansas ranked sixth (-4.6 percent). whole increased 2.3 percent in 2005. Minnesota led the region with a 2.6 percent growth rate, followed by Financial Activities. In 2005, financial activities Kansas with a 2.4 percent growth rate, and Missouri employment grew at a 1.3 percent rate across the with a 2.3 percent growth rate. In 2006, the region as region as a whole. South Dakota led the region with a a whole experienced a 2.1 percent growth rate in 2.2 percent growth rate, followed by Nebraska with a educational and health services employment. 2.1 percent growth rate, and North Dakota with a 1.6 Minnesota and Nebraska led the region with 3.3 percent growth rate. In 2005, Kansas had the lowest percent growth each, followed by Iowa with 2.1 percent growth. Kansas ranked last with 0.5 percent which is treated as a transfer payment. “Persons” is growth. defined as individuals, nonprofit institutions primarily serving individuals, private noninsured welfare funds, Leisure & Hospitality Services. In 2005, leisure and and private trust funds. hospitality services employment in the Plains region as a whole increased at a 1.9 percent rate. Nebraska Personal income is calculated by summing its experienced the highest growth at 2.3 percent, components, which include salaries and wages, other followed by South Dakota with 2.2 percent growth, labor income, proprietors’ income, personal rental and Iowa with 2.1 percent growth. Kansas ranked last income, personal dividend income, personal interest with 0.9 percent growth. In 2006, leisure and income, and personal transfer payments, less personal hospitality services employment increased by 1.6 contributions for social insurance. percent in the region. Minnesota and North Dakota recorded the highest growth at 3.8 percent each, A lag of eight months occurs before final estimates of followed by Iowa and South Dakota with a 2.4 percent state personal income for the previous calendar year growth rates each. Kansas ranked last with a 0.8 are released. Accordingly, 2005 estimates of Kansas percent decrease. personal income were not available until August 2006. Kansas personal income totaled over $90.0 billion in Other Services. Other services employment increased 2005, which is a 5.7 percent increase over 2004. at a 0.5 percent rate in the Plains region in 2005.

Nebraska led the region in other services employment growth with a 4.0 percent increase, followed by North Personal Income by Source Dakota with no change, and Kansas with a 0.2 percent Salaries and wages accounted for over half of Kansas decrease. In 2006, the region as a whole experienced personal income and increased at a 4.0 percent rate in 0.7 percent growth in other services employment. 2005. The second largest source of personal income in North Dakota led the region with 2.7 percent growth, Kansas, is dividends, interest, and rent. Dividends, followed by South Dakota with 1.9 percent growth, interest, and rent increased by 6.4 percent. Other labor and Minnesota with 1.5 percent growth. Kansas income increased 8.2 percent in 2005. This category ranked fourth with 1.1 percent growth in other services consists largely of employer payments for health employment. insurance and other benefits. Other labor income reached a level of approximately $13.4 billion in 2005, Government. Government employment in the Plains indicating the importance of fringe benefits in personal region decreased 0.5 percent in 2005. Minnesota led income growth. Proprietors’ income increased 11.0 the region with a 1.1 percent growth rate, followed by percent in 2005. Specifically, farm proprietors’ Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota with 0.7 income rose by 51.2 percent in 2005, while non-farm percent growth rates each. Kansas ranked sixth with a proprietors’ income increased 8.2 percent. Transfers 0.3 percent growth rate. In 2006, government increased at a 6.5 percent rate in 2005, while personal employment in the Plains region increased by 1.0 contributions for social insurance increased 9.1 percent. Kansas led the region with a 2.3 percent percent. A significant portion of Kansas personal increase, followed by Nebraska with a 2.2 percent income is paid to Kansans from out-of-state sources. increase, and Missouri with a 1.5 percent increase. This portion is particularly significant for residents who live in Johnson and Wyandotte Counties and work in Missouri. This significance is reflected in the residence adjustment of $840.3 million, which Kansas Personal Income Review increased by 10.0 percent in 2005.

Personal income is defined as the income received by, or on behalf of, all residents. It consists of income Nonfarm Earnings by Industry from all sources received by persons, which includes participation in production, both government and Increases in earnings were realized in a number of business transfer payments, and government interest, industries in 2005. Specifically, forestry, fishing, and related activities earnings increased 6.8 percent in Kansas Personal Income Estimates 2005, while mining earnings increased 19.1 percent and utilities earnings increased 5.1 percent. Earnings Personal income in Kansas grew by 6.4 percent in from construction increased 8.4 percent and 2006. Table 2-6, which is shown at the bottom of the manufacturing earnings increased 5.5 percent in 2005. page, presents Kansas personal income in 2005. In Specifically, durable goods manufacturing earnings addition, the table shows the estimates for 2006 and increased 6.5 percent, while nondurable goods manu- the forecasts for 2007. facturing earnings increased 4.0 percent. Wholesale trade earnings increased 6.2 percent, while retail trade In 2006, salaries and wages, which are the largest earnings increased 1.8 percent. Transportation and component of Kansas personal income, increased 6.2 warehousing earnings increased 2.7 percent. percent in 2006, while other labor income increased 10.1 percent, and overall proprietors’ income In 2005, the only decreases in earnings in the services increased 2.7 percent. Specifically, farm proprietors’ industries were realized in information services income decreased by 73.7 percent; however, this earnings (-3.5 percent) and earnings from the arts, significant decrease was offset by a 10.2 percent entertainment, and recreation services (-2.2 percent). increase in non-farm proprietors’ income. The fact Increases were realized in earnings from finance and that a 10.2 percent increase in non-farm proprietor’s insurance (4.2 percent), real estate and rental and income can offset completely a 73.7 percent decrease leasing (7.8 percent), professional and technical in farm proprietors’ income indicates how much more services (9.1 percent), management of companies and income is attributable to non-farm activities. During enterprises (12.0 percent), administrative and waste the same time frame, dividends, interest, and rent services (20.1 percent), and educational services (5.1 increased by 6.2 percent, and transfer payments percent). Increases also were realized in earnings from increased by 7.6 percent. Finally, the residence health care and social assistance services (5.3 percent), adjustment for income earned by Kansas residents accommodation and food services (2.4 percent), and from sources outside the state increased 5.3 percent. other services (2.7 percent) in 2005. In the government sector, earnings grew at a 4.3 percent rate In 2007, Kansas personal income is forecasted to grow in 2005. Within total government, civilian federal at a 5.3 percent rate. Growth in salaries and wages is government earnings increased 0.1 percent, military expected to slow to 4.6 percent. However, other labor earnings grew by 9.1 percent, and state and local income growth is expected to remain high at 7.9 government earnings increased 4.3 percent. Appendix percent. Proprietors’ income growth is expected to A presents a breakdown of Kansas personal income increase 7.2 percent, while growth in dividends, and growth rates by industry for 2004 and 2005. interest, and rent is expected to increase 4.6 percent.

Table 2-6 Kansas Personal Income 2005 Actual, 2006 Estimate, & 2007 Forecast (Dollars in Millions) 2005 2006 2007 Percent Change Actual Estimate Forecast 2005-2006 2006-2007 Salaries & Wages Disbursements $ 4 7,666 $ 50,61 8 $ 52,959 6. 2 % 4.6 % Other Labor Income 13,411 14,771 15,940 10. 1 7.9 Proprietors' Income: 9,062 9,307 9,977 2. 7 7.2 Farm 811 213 145 (73.7) (31.8) Nonfarm 8,251 9,095 9,832 10. 2 8.1 Dividends, Interest, & Rent 14,278 15,158 15,848 6. 2 4.6 Transfers 12,989 13,979 14,735 7. 6 5.4 Residence Adjustment 840 885 911 5. 3 3.0 Less: Social Insurance 7,814 8,497 9,049 8. 7 6.5 Total Personal Income 90,433 96,221 101,320 6. 4 5.3 Transfer payments are expected to grow at a 5.4 ranked 23rd ($32,988); South Dakota ranked 27th percent rate in 2007. ($32,642); Iowa ranked 31st ($31,795); Missouri ranked 32nd ($31,299); and North Dakota ranked 33rd ($31,230).

Comparative Personal Income In terms of per capita personal income growth, the Plains region, which averaged 3.7 percent, lagged

behind the national average of 4.2 percent, and ranked In 2005, personal income growth in Kansas (5.7 seventh out of the eight regions in 2005. The percent) was higher than the growth that occurred in Southwest was the fastest growing region (5.7 percent) the Plains region (4.3 percent) and the U.S. (5.2 followed by the Rocky Mountain region (4.7 percent). percent). Within the Plains region, North Dakota was In 2005 Kansas ranked 10th (5.2 percent) in per capita the fastest growing state with 7.7 percent growth. It personal income, while and North Dakota ranked 1st was followed by Kansas and South Dakota (4.9 in the nation (7.3 percent), South Dakota ranked 34th percent). Appendix B presents a listing of compara- (4.2 percent), Missouri ranked 38th (3.9 percent), tive state personal income and per capita personal Nebraska ranked 46th (3.2 percent), Minnesota ranked income data for all states for 2003 through 2005. 47th (3.1 percent), and Iowa ranked 49th (2.7 percent).

In 2005, Kansas per capita personal income growth Disposable Personal Income. Disposable personal (5.2 percent) exceeded both the Plains region (3.7 income is defined as the amount equal to personal percent) and the U.S. (4.2 percent). North Dakota (7.6 income minus personal taxes. In other words, percent) had the largest increase in per capita personal disposable income is the income available for personal income in both the Plains region and the U.S., use. Nationally, Kansas ranked 31st in disposable followed by Kansas, and South Dakota (4.2 percent). personal income. Other states in the region ranked Personal Income. Nationally, Kansas ranked 31st in higher with Minnesota at 18th, Missouri at 20th, and total personal income, while Minnesota ranked 17th, Iowa at 30th. States in the region that ranked below Missouri ranked 20th, Iowa ranked 30th, Nebraska Kansas include Nebraska (36th), South Dakota (47th), ranked 36th, South Dakota ranked 47th, and North and North Dakota (50th) in 2005. Dakota ranked 50th in 2005. In terms of personal income growth, the Plains region, which averaged 4.3 In terms of disposable income growth, the Plains percent growth, was ranked seventh out of the eight region, which averaged 3.4 percent growth, lagged the statistical regions. The Southwest region was the national average of 4.1 percent and was ranked fifth fastest growing at a rate of 7.7 percent. Nationally, out of the eight statistical regions. The Southeast North Dakota ranked 4th (7.7 percent), while Kansas region was the fastest growing at a rate of 6.8 percent ranked 22nd (5.7 percent), South Dakota ranked 30th followed by the Rocky Mountain region with a growth (4.9 percent), Missouri ranked 33rd (4.7 percent), rate of 5.3 percent. Within the Plains region, North Nebraska ranked 43rd (3.9 percent), Minnesota ranked Dakota ranked 1st in the nation (6.9 percent), Kansas 47th (3.1 percent), and Iowa ranked 49th (2.7 percent). ranked 23rd (4.8 percent), South Dakota ranked 27th (3.4 percent), Missouri ranked 35th (3.0 percent), Per Capita Personal Income. In 2005, the Plains Nebraska ranked 46th (2.2 percent), Minnesota ranked region’s average per capita personal income at $33,362 48th (2.1 percent), and Iowa ranked 49th (2.3 percent). lagged behind the national average, and was ranked Appendix C presents comparative state total and per fourth out of the eight regions. The New England capita disposable personal income data for the U.S., region had the highest per capita personal income of the eight regions, and each state for 2003 through $41,785. It was followed by the Mideast region at 2005. $39,755. Per Capita Disposable Personal Income. The Plains In 2005, Kansas ranked 24th ($32,948) in the U.S. in region’s average per capita disposable personal per capita personal income. The Plains region state income of $29,772 lagged behind the national average that ranked highest nationally was Minnesota’s 10th of $30,441 in 2005. The Plains ranked fourth place with a dollar value of $37,322. Nebraska was regionally. New England had the highest regional per capita personal income ($35,891). The Mideast Minnesota at 48th (2.1 percent), and Iowa at 49th (1.8 followed ($34,259). Of the Plains region states, percent). Minnesota ranked 10th ($32,637) in per capita personal income, while Kansas ranked 25th ($29,560), Per Capita Personal Income Trends. Kansas per South Dakota ranked 22nd ($30,148), Nebraska was capita personal income in 2005 was $32,948, which is 24th ($29,635), Iowa was 29th ($28,722), North a 5.2 percent increase from the 2004 level. This Dakota ranked 30th ($28,542), and Missouri was 34th increase is above both the 4.2 percent growth rate for ($28,001). the U.S. as a whole and the 3.7 percent growth rate for the Plains region. Kansas’ per capita personal income In terms of per capita disposable personal income has lagged behind the Plains region’s average since growth, the Plains region averaged 2.8 percent, which 1994 and continued that trend in 2005. Kansas per was lower than the national average of 3.1 percent. It capita income in 2005 was 1.2 percent below the ranked seventh out of the eight regions nationally. The Plains region’s average and 4.5 percent below the Southwest region was the fastest growing at 4.9 national average. Over the past ten years Kansas per percent followed by the Rocky Mountains with a 3.7 capita income, as a percentage of the national average, percent growth rate. Of the Plains region states, North has ranged from a high of 95.5 percent in 2005, to a Dakota had the highest national ranking at 1st (6.9 low of 92.8 percent in 2000. Table 2-7 presents percent). It was followed by Kansas at 9th (4.4 historical per capita personal income data for Kansas, percent), South Dakota at 23rd (3.4 percent), Missouri the Plains region, and the U.S. from 1994 through at 35th (3.0 percent), Nebraska at 46th (2.2 percent), 2005.

Table 2-7 Per Capita Personal Income, 1994-2005 Kansas, Plains Region, & U.S. Percentage Change Kansas as a from Prior Year Percentage of: Plains Plains Plains Year Kansas Region U.S. Kansas Region U.S. Region U.S.

1994 2 0,990 21,188 22,172 -- % -- % -- % 99 .1 % 94 .7 % 1995 2 1,558 21,934 23,076 2.7 3.5 4.1 98.3 93.4 1996 2 2,845 23,378 24,175 6.0 6.6 4.8 97.7 94.5 1997 2 4,041 24,422 25,334 5.2 4.5 4.8 98.4 94.9 1998 2 5,483 25,928 26,883 6.0 6.2 6.1 98.3 94.8 1999 2 6,195 26,737 27,939 2.8 3.1 3.9 98.0 93.8 2000 2 7,694 28,326 29,845 5.7 5.9 6.8 97.8 92.8 2001 2 8,718 29,047 30,574 3.7 2.5 2.4 98.9 93.9 2002 2 8,980 29,622 30,810 0.9 2.0 0.8 97.8 94.1 2003 2 9,780 30,607 31,463 2.8 3.3 2.1 97.3 94.7 2004 3 1,312 32,164 33,090 5.1 5.1 5.2 97.4 94.6 2005 3 2,948 33,362 34,495 5.2 3.7 4.2 98.8 95.5

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis

Chapter 3

Local & Regional Employment & Income

Major Labor Market Employment Employment reflected the same pattern as the civilian labor force with increases in three of the four metropolitan areas. Employment increased by 2.0 The economy of Kansas generally is concentrated in percent in the Lawrence metropolitan area, 1.8 percent urbanized areas, each with a similar economic base. in the Wichita metropolitan area, and 0.8 percent in For statistical purposes, these geographic areas include the Kansas City metropolitan area, while employment 4 metropolitan areas and 11 selected counties. The decreased in the Topeka metropolitan area by 0.5 metropolitan areas include the Wichita metropolitan percent. area (Butler, Harvey, and Sedgwick Counties), the Topeka metropolitan area (Shawnee County), the Lawrence metropolitan area (Douglas County) and the Although the labor force and employment followed Kansas City, Kansas metropolitan area (Franklin, the same pattern, the unemployment rate followed a Johnson, Leavenworth, Linn, Miami, and Wyandotte different one. In fact, it declined in all four of the Counties). The selected counties each contain a city state’s metropolitan labor markets from October 2005 that is the major economic base for the region. In to October 2006. The unemployment rate fell from addition, the city has a population that is in excess of 5.5 percent to 4.4 percent in the Wichita metropolitan 12,000 people and constitutes at least 50.0 percent of area; from 5.3 percent to 4.8 percent in the Topeka the total county population. The 11 selected counties metropolitan area; from 3.7 percent to 3.5 percent in and associated cities are Barton Co./Great Bend, the Lawrence metropolitan area; and from 5.1 percent Crawford Co./Pittsburg, Ellis Co./Hays, Finney Co./ to 4.7 percent in the Kansas City metropolitan area. Garden City, Ford Co./Dodge City, Lyon Co./ Emporia, McPherson Co./McPherson, Montgomery Co./Coffeyville-Independence, Reno Co./Hutchinson, Employment by Place of Work Riley Co./Manhattan, and Saline Co./Salina. It should be kept in mind that employment estimates reported in Employment by place of work is determined by this section are based on data through October 2006, compiling data primarily from information obtained which were the most recent information available from businesses covered by the unemployment when this report was prepared. insurance program. Employment by place of work data are then categorized by industry type. The two major categories are the goods producing industries Employment by Place of Residence and the services producing industries. The following section first presents employment by place of work for Employment by place of residence is based on a each of the 4 major metropolitan areas. The data for sample survey of households. From the sample each of the 11 counties are presented in the following survey, the civilian labor force is determined. This section. number is then used as the basis from which employment, unemployment, and the unemployment Wichita Metropolitan Area. Based on place of work rates are derived. data, employment in all industries in the Wichita metropolitan area increased 1.8 percent in 2006. From October 2005 to October 2006, the civilian labor Employment in the goods producing industries force increased in three of the state’s four major labor increased by 3.2 percent, while employment in the markets—Lawrence (1.7 percent), Wichita (0.7 service producing industries increased by 1.3 percent. percent), and Kansas City (0.3 percent). However, the Notably, 2.9 percent increases were realized in both civilian labor force in Topeka decreased by 1.1 overall manufacturing employment and aerospace percent. products manufacturing. Table 3-1 presents employ- ment in the Wichita metropolitan area for 2005 and were realized in only two categories. Employment in 2006. the information category decreased 8.5 percent, while employment in the trade, transportation, and utilities Table 3-1 category decreased 0.2 percent. Farm employment in Wichita Metropolitian Area Employment the Wichita metropolitan area remained steady in Butler, Harvey & Sedgwick Counties 2006. October 2005-October 2006 According to Moody’s Economy.com, the economy in 2005 2006 % Chg. the Wichita metropolitan area is improving. Place of Residence Data Employment in the metro area is growing at an above Civilian Labor Force 3 07,390 309,515 0.7 average rate that is driven by strong manufacturing, Employment 29 0,486 295,794 1.8 especially aircraft manufacturing. Personal income Unemployment 16 ,904 13,721 (18.8) growth also has demonstrated signs of improvement. Unemployment Rate 5.5 4.4 (1.1) Housing trends remain modest and are expected to stay that way. The Wichita metropolitan area is Place of Work Data expected to continue to mirror national and state All Industries 28 8,000 293,200 1.8 economic expansion trends. However, the rate of Goods Producing Indus. 75 ,500 77,900 3.2 employment growth is expected to lag slightly behind Nat. Res. & Const. 1 5,900 16,600 4.4 Manufacturing 5 9,600 61,300 2.9 the national rate in the long term. Durable Goods 5 1,000 52,800 3.5 Machinery 5 ,000 5,200 4.0 According to the Center for Economic Development Trans. Equipment 3 4,900 35,900 2.9 and Business Research (CEDBR) at Wichita State Aerospace Prod. 3 4,000 35,000 2.9 University (WSU), the labor market continues to Service Producing Indus. 21 2,500 215,300 1.3 improve. CEDBR expects employment to increase by Trade, Trans. & Util. 4 9,800 49,700 (0.2) 1.6 percent this year. Despite these growth signals, Wholesale Trade 1 0,900 11,100 1.8 there are several indications of economic weakness. Retail Trade 3 0,100 30,000 (0.3) Chief among these are anemic personal income General Mdse. 7,10 0 7,200 1.4 growth, weak retail sales growth, and languishing Trans., Ware., & Util. 8,80 0 8,600 (2.3) Information 5 ,900 5,400 (8.5) consumer expectations. In spite of these indications, Finance 1 1,700 11,800 0.9 the economy next year should continue to exhibit Credit Intermed. 5 ,100 1,000 (80.4) growth, but at a modest rate. In 2007, Wichita’s Prof & Bus. Services 26 ,700 27,500 3.0 overall employment is projected to increase 1.7 Prof. & Tech. Services 8,800 8,500 (3.4) percent with the addition of 5,000 jobs. The service Prof. & Science 1 5,900 16,400 3.1 sector is expected to increase employment by 2.1 Administrative 5,00 0 5,400 8.0 percent with the addition of 2,600 jobs, while the Employment Serv. 4 0,100 41,400 3.2 manufacturing sector is forecasted to increase 1.6 Educ. & Health Serv. 3 5,800 37,000 3.4 percent through the increase of 1,200 jobs. Hospitals 9 ,500 9,600 1.1 Leisure & Hospitality 2 5,300 25,700 1.6 Accom. & Food 22 ,800 22,900 0.4 Despite a projected fourth year of overall employment Food Services 20 ,800 21,200 1.9 gains, 2007 employment in Wichita is forecasted to Other Services 1 2,200 12,700 4.1 stand 2,900 jobs short of its most recent peak that Government 40 ,800 41,100 0.7 occurred in 2001. Employment levels for 2007 are not Farm Employment 6,50 0 6,500 -- expected to return to pre-recession levels, but some Source: Ks Dept. of Labor, Labor Mkt. Info. Service industry sectors are expected to decline significantly. When comparing employment in 2001 to the forecast Within the services producing industries, employment for 2007, the sectors are a mixture. The production increased in six of the categories, including other sectors are anticipated to have 10,900 fewer jobs, services (4.1 percent), education and health services which is a 12.2 percent decline. Along a similar, but (3.4 percent), professional and business services (3.0 not so drastic line, the trade and transportation sectors percent), leisure and hospitality (1.6 percent), finance are anticipated to have 200 fewer jobs, which is a 0.3 (0.9 percent), and government (0.7 percent). Decreases percent decline. Alternatively, the service sectors are anticipated to surpass 2001 employment levels with a the Union Equity Program, which is an initial public net gain of 6,200 jobs and an increase of 5.1 percent. offering (IPO) of Spirit’s stock to union members. The government sectors also are anticipated to surpass The total value of all bonuses is estimated to be nearly 2001 employment levels with a net gain of 2,100 jobs $250.0 million in cash and stock. The bonus plan was and an increase of 5.5 percent. in return for union members agreeing to cuts in wages and benefits. Before the end of December, each union Wichita’s aircraft manufacturing jobs account for more member working under the Spirit contract will receive than one-half of the local economy’s manufacturing $34,556 in cash, which is 56.0 percent of the total sector. The industry can provide a tremendous boost payout. According to the CEDBR, the cash payouts to the local economy when times are good, but can be total approximately $136.0 million, or 17.0 percent, of potentially disastrous when market conditions are December retail sales. In March 2007, qualifying poor. The aviation industry is important not only to union members will receive the balance of the Wichita, but Kansas as a whole because manufacturing payout—$26,884, or 44.0 percent—in stock. They accounts for nearly one-quarter of all jobs in the will receive shares of Spirit’s Class A common stock Wichita Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). at $26 a share, which was the price of Spirit stock at the opening of its IPO. According to CEDBR, aerospace employment is expected to increase at an average rate of 2.4 percent According to the General Aviation Manufacturers per year from 2006 through 2016 and is forecasted to Association (GAMA) there are over 320,000 general account for 2.6 percent of all jobs in Kansas. During aviation airplanes worldwide, with 219,000 of those that same time frame, aerospace payroll is forecast to airplanes based in the United States. General aviation increase at an average rate of 8.9 percent per year and directly contributes more than $41.0 billion ($102.0 will account for 6.2 percent of the entire state’s billion indirectly) to the U.S. economy annually. In payroll. Each aerospace job generates approximately the U.S., general aviation aircraft fly over 28 million 3.9 total jobs throughout the state based on both the hours and carry 166 million passengers annually. The firm’s and the employee’s spending. Each aerospace general aviation industry set a new record for billings wage dollar generates approximately $2.60 in the state in 2005, when it realized a 27.2 percent increase over based on both the firm’s and the employee’s spending. 2004 billings. All segments in the industry—pistons, Aerospace employment alone is forecast to generate turboprops, and jets—experienced healthy growth. approximately $208.0 million in tax revenues in 2006 as a result of direct employment and $900.0 million in In the general aviation sector, deliveries of business tax revenues in 2006 as a result of total employment. jets are expected to be strong over the next decade, The forecast for 2007 is $223.0 million and $1.0 according to Honeywell’s 2007 Business Aviation billion, respectively. Outlook. Honeywell projects record deliveries for According to the Boeing Company’s 2006 Current 2006 and 2007, with customers expecting to purchase Market Outlook, the global market for new airplanes more than 12,000 aircraft valued at over $195.0 billion will be $2.6 trillion by 2025. In addition, 27,210 new between 2006 and 2016. According to Honeywell, airplanes will be added, and the fleet will grow from strong new model backlogs, continuing expansion in 17,330 to 35,970. Of that fleet, single-aisle airplanes fractional ownership, and growing international will account for 61.0 percent of all deliveries. demand are key factors supporting a longer-term outlook for growth. Beyond 2007, the outlook In 2006, Boeing ceased being Wichita’s largest remains strong, with deliveries expected to exceed employer. With the completion of Onex Corporation’s 1,000 aircraft per year for the balance of the decade acquisition of Boeing’s commercial manufacturing with only modest cyclical perturbations. operations in Wichita, Spirit Aero Systems, Inc. was born. As part of the collective bargaining agreement According to Bombardier Aerospace’s Commercial by the Machinists Union, the International Brother- Aircraft Market Forecast, demand is anticipated for hood of Electrical Workers, and the United Auto 11,000 aircraft in the 20 to 149-seat category, Workers with Spirit AeroSystems, approximately representing a total value of $370.0 billion. The 20 to 4,000 union members will receive a bonus of up to 149-seat market comprises three segments, including $61,440 in cash and stock. The payout is the result of the 20 to 59-seat segment, the 60 to 99-seat segment, and the 100 to 149-seat segment. The 20 to 59-seat project from the state and federal governments and the segment powered the development of the regional private sector. The proposed 107,000-square-foot airline industry and represents a strong base for training center will consolidate programs from the continued growth. The 60 to 99-seat segment area’s four community and technical colleges. The represents the current growth phase for regional proposed center will enroll approximately 500 students airlines as the industry moves toward a more cost- in a manufacturing program and approximately 100 driven focus that is characterized by specialization. students in an avionics program. Plans call for an Rapid growth in this category supports the drive of assessment center, aviation center, and manufacturing regional airlines into larger capacity aircraft. center. Sedgwick County plans to issue bonds to cover the cost of construction and use the federal and Economic forces will continue to feed regional airline state grant money to pay off the debt. Almost 21.0 growth in both network expansion and cost percent of Wichita’s jobs—double the national optimization. Much of the cost focus is a result of average—is in manufacturing. The five local aviation shrinking yields brought about by the low fare carriers, companies have said that the number of trained a relatively new market segment that is growing workers they will need in 2006 could exceed 4,150 worldwide. With increasing competition from low and that 1,000 new jobs will be created every year for fare carriers, mainline airlines are forced toward the next decade. further specialization in order to reduce costs while maintaining their networks. As a result, mainline On the non-aviation horizon, the city and developers carriers will continue to outsource short-haul and low- plan to proceed with the next phase of the $130.0 density routes to lower cost operators, currently million WaterWalk development in downtown represented by their regional airline partners. With Wichita. The next phase of the development includes this partnership approach, mainline airlines can a 60,000-square-foot office building and a multiple- maintain frequency and schedule on routes that are not story, multi-use building in the heart of the project. cost-effective with their own narrow body equipment. The city is the major source of an already-announced $30.0 million public investment for WaterWalk Significantly, the Machinists Union and Bombardier infrastructure, the majority of which is being funded Aerospace reached an agreement on a new labor by tax increment financing. WaterWalk developers contract nearly three weeks after hourly workers in have guaranteed a minimum $30.0 million investment Wichita went on strike in October 2006. This was the in the development and future property taxes from that first work stoppage in the Learjet plant’s history. The investment will pay off the majority of that financing. new agreement includes a lump-sum bonus of $1,500; Developers say they actually expect to invest closer to general wage increases of 4.0 percent in the first year $80.0 to $100.0 million over the next decade as the of the contract and 3.5 percent in the second and third project grows. years; an increase in pension payments; and guaranteed maximum caps on insurance premiums in 2008 and 2009. The agreement also addressed issues In addition, Sedgwick County is in the process of surrounding seniority, overtime, and voluntarily finalizing plans for the construction of a new $184.5 working on Sundays. million downtown arena. The new arena will be owned and operated by Sedgwick County. According to Kansas Occupational Outlook 2010, Construction on the arena is expected to begin next manufacturing jobs in southcentral Kansas are year, and it should be available for occupancy in late expected to increase by 7,000 by 2010. These jobs are 2008 or early 2009. expected to have an annual salary of at least $40,000. Of those 7,000 jobs, at least 4,000 will need to be According to the Center for Real Estate (CRE) at filled over the next year in Wichita according to the Wichita State University, the housing market in head of the Wichita aircraft industry’s workforce Wichita is expected to grow through 2007. CRE training effort. In an effort to fulfill that need, the expects the existing home market in Wichita to grow Kansas Technical Training Initiative is attempting to 5.4 percent in 2006 and 3.1 percent in 2007. However, convince various governments to provide $40.0 the CRE expects the new home market to decrease by million to build an aviation technical training center in 3.2 percent in 2006 and then increase 4.6 percent in Wichita. To date, $7.0 million has been raised for the 2007. Topeka Metropolitan Area. Based on place of work (4.2 percent), other services (3.8 percent), finance (1.4 data, all industries employment in the Topeka percent), education and health services (1.2 percent), metropolitan area decreased 0.9 percent in 2006. and trade, transportation, and utilities (0.5 percent). Table 3-2 presents employment in the Topeka Decreases in employment were realized in government metropolitan area for 2005 and 2006. (-1.8 percent), as well as professional and business services (-1.2 percent). Farm employment in the Table 3-2 Topeka metropolitan area held steady in 2006. Topeka Metropolitian Area Employment Moody’s Economy.com’s performance indicators Shawnee County show that Topeka’s economic recovery is very October 2005-October 2006 sluggish. Much like the local economy lagged the 2005 2006 % Chg. national economy going into the recession, the Topeka Place of Residence Data economy also has lagged the national economy in Civilian Labor Force 123,530 122,164 (1.1) recovering. Industrial production remains subdued in Employment 116,954 116,323 (0.5) Topeka, growing slower than both the state and the Unemployment 6,576 5,841 (11.2) nation. Unemployment Rate 5.3 4.8 (0.5) Place of Work Data Significantly, United Steelworkers at 16 Goodyear All Industries 110,700 109,700 (0.9) plants in North America went on strike in October Goods Producing Indus. 14,800 13,700 (7.4) 2006, after the union and the company failed to reach Nat. Res. & Const. 6,200 6,300 1.6 a new labor agreement. The Topeka plant has 1,600 Manufacturing 8,600 7,400 (14.0) employees; 1,300 to 1,400 are members of United Non Durable Goods 6,500 5,100 (21.5) Steelworkers. The Topeka plant manufactures radial Service Producing Indus. 95,900 96,000 0.1 truck tires; over-the-road tires, including big earth Trade, Trans. & Util. 20,100 20,200 0.5 mover tires; and a special two-piece tire for the mining Wholesale Trade 3,600 3,700 2.8 industry. The strike removes approximately $1.5 Retail Trade 11,500 11,700 1.7 million in payroll per week from the Topeka economy. Trans. & Ware. 5,000 4,800 (4.0) Based on an average pay of $20 per hour, a Goodyear Information 2,400 2,500 4.2 worker earns $800 for 40 hours of work. With 1,350 Finance 7,400 7,500 1.4 Fin. & Insurance 6,000 6,200 3.3 workers on strike in Topeka, that equates to a loss of Prof. & Bus. Services 8,200 8,100 (1.2) $1,080,000 in payroll per week. However, the weekly Educ. & Health Serv. 16,800 17,000 1.2 payroll is higher because many employees were Health & Soc. Serv. 16,100 16,400 1.9 working 48-hour weeks and earning higher overtime Hospitals 5,200 5,300 1.9 wages in order for the company to meet demand for its Leisure & Hospitality 7,500 7,500 -- products. Accom. & Food Svcs. 6,600 6,700 1.5 Food Services 5,900 6,100 3.4 The Topeka Goodyear facility is reportedly the sole Other Services 5,200 5,400 3.8 source vendor for High Mobility Multipurpose Government 28,300 27,800 (1.8) Wheeled Vehicles (Humvee) tires. The Humvee is a Farm Employment 5,900 5,900 -- light, flexible, tactical vehicle that is used by all Source: Ks Dept. of Labor, Labor Mkt. Info. Service branches of the military. The four-wheel-drive vehicles are in use by the U.S. military in Iraq and Employment in the goods producing industries Afghanistan. Goodyear announced that it was hiring decreased 7.4 percent, while employment in the temporary workers to continue production of certain services producing industries increased by 0.1 percent. tire lines, including the Humvee tires. Within the goods producing industries, natural resources, mining, and construction employment In addition to payroll, the company spends money increased by 1.6 percent, while manufacturing with local vendors by buying products and services to employment decreased by 14.0 percent. support the plant’s operations. In 2004, the company reports that it spent $21.9 million with local vendors, In Topeka’s service producing industries during 2006, the majority of which was in Shawnee County. employment increases were reported in information According to Goodyear, its total annual salaries and wages for the Topeka plant are approximately $175.0 According to the SCCA, more than 700 drivers million. This figure includes salaries and wages for compete annually in the runoffs, known as the “Super management, nonunion, and union members. A strike Bowl” of amateur road racing. The event, which is in by Goodyear workers in 1976 lasted four months. its 43rd year, took place near Lexington, Ohio, before moving this year to Heartland Park Topeka. The In 2002, the Legislature approved a $10.0 million Topeka track has a three-year contract to host the incentive for Goodyear to retool the Topeka facility. event through 2008. Racers qualified to compete in The money for the state incentive comes from payroll the runoffs by earning a specific number of points at withholding tax from the local Goodyear plant. The SCCA-sanctioned events. Past SCCA racers have incentive money is paid to Goodyear only if it included actors Paul Newman and Tom Cruise, as well maintains the agreed upon employment at the facility. as members of the Andretti, Unser, and Rahal racing Another $750,000 for Goodyear comes from a local families. A Washburn University study conducted in option quarter-cent sales tax designated for economic 2004 estimated that if the runoffs were brought to development. If Goodyear closes the local Topeka Topeka, the annual economic effect on Shawnee plant before a ten-year period is up, the company has County would be more than $11.2 million. to repay the sales tax incentive. In conjunction with these incentives, the company has committed to invest Stormont-Vail Health Care completed its new cancer more than $100.0 million in its Topeka plant to center in the fall of 2006. The 30,000-square-foot, upgrade its manufacturing processes over the next five $13.0 million facility consolidates the hospital’s years. Goodyear’s new Fuel Max Technology is cancer treatment facilities into one place. focused on fuel and tire costs. The Goodyear plant in Topeka is scheduled to produce 7,000 to 8,000 Fuel Even though the Topeka housing market is slowing, Max Fuel Efficient Tires per month. In addition to house-price appreciation will only slow slightly commercial tires, Goodyear Topeka produces because housing prices in the area were never driven earthmover tires, including the Two-Piece Assembly, up to speculative highs. Therefore, no adjustment is which won the NorTech Innovation Award in 2004. expected because of earlier overpricing. According to Two-Piece Assembly production began in 2002. the Coldwell Banker Home Price Comparison Index, Topeka has the fifth lowest housing cost out of 342 The Topeka Joint Economic Development Organi- “moderate to large” metropolitan areas in the country. zation (JEDO), which partners with city and county The index compares the selling price of a 2,200- elected officials to administer money from a half-cent, square-foot home in a middle-class neighborhood with county-wide sales tax, approved an estimated four bedrooms, 2 1/2 bathrooms, and a two-car garage. $125,000 to $175,000 in incentives for Frito-Lay, Inc. Topeka was seventh on the list last year, but moved up to carry out a planned multimillion-dollar expansion after the average price fell slightly from $151,562 to project at its plant in Topeka. The expansion is $148,050. This compares with $200,000 in Kansas targeted at creating 50 to 70 new jobs. The money is City, Missouri and $247,000 in Lawrence. part of a proposed ten-year incentive package being put together by local and state agencies for Frito-Lay. According to Moody’s Economy.com, Topeka’s long- term growth potential is limited by several constraints. Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Corp. is Most notably, the area lacks a dynamic growth driver. constructing another building to handle additional Topeka is a service economy that thrives on the locomotive repairs in Topeka. The new building, spending patterns of its residents, which makes it which is 225 feet long and 70 feet wide, will increase unattractive for migrating businesses to relocate there. capacity for service, repair, and routine maintenance of Furthermore, the area exhibits middling demographic locomotives. Although the new building will not add trends that show no sign of improvement. Lacking any new jobs, it is expected to help maintain the jobs both expected population growth and dynamic that already exist in Topeka. BNSF has 1,200 industrial growth, Topeka will be hard-pressed to find employees in the offices and shops in Topeka. meaningful economic growth in the long term.

In October 2006, Topeka hosted the Sports Car Club Moody’s Economy.com also suggests that the near- of America (SCCA) National Championship Runoffs. term outlook for the Topeka economy looks austere. The strike at Goodyear has already produced a and is the only industry to experience steady growth in measurable effect on the local economy. A prolonged recent months. Furthermore, there has been a sharp strike threatens to destabilize support industries contraction in leisure/hospitality recently. further, such as retail trade and health care. Although the housing market in the Lawrence area has Lawrence Metropolitan Area. Based on place of experienced tremendous growth over the past several work data, all industries employment in the Lawrence years and pushed average home prices up to nearly metropolitan area increased 2.5 percent in 2006. $250,000, the housing market is deteriorating because Employment in the goods producing industries of oversupply and the weakening national market. increased 2.9 percent during that same time frame, and Moody’s Economy.com suggests that the excess employment in the services producing industries supply of single-family homes has been building up in increased by 2.4 percent. Within the service producing the area over the past four years and the build up is industries, employment in professional and technical finally being reflected in house prices. Housing price services increased by 12.5 percent, while trade, growth has dropped below a 3.5 percent year-over- transportation, and utilities increased by 6.1 percent. year rate, which is the lowest rate in more than 10 Alternatively, leisure and hospitality decreased by 3.0 years. Accordingly, single-family building permits percent, education and health service employment have fallen by approximately 30.0 percent from a peak decreased by 1.6 percent, and government decreased earlier in the year. by 1.4 percent. Farm employment remained constant in the Lawrence metropolitan area in 2006. Table 3-3 Moody’s Economy.com concludes that the Lawrence presents employment in the Lawrence metropolitan economy is expected to track the nation over the near area for 2005 and 2006. term. Business/professional and leisure/hospitality services will drive employment growth. Because the Table 3-3 Lawrence economy is not highly diversified, this is Lawrence Metropolitian Area Employment further contributing to its weakening demographic Douglas County trends. October 2005-October 2006 Kansas City, Kansas Metropolitan Area. Because 2005 2006 % Chg. of changes in statistical reporting areas, Kansas City, Place of Residence Data Kansas is now regarded as a separate statistical area. Civilian Labor Force 6 3,409 64,510 1.7 The area includes Franklin, Johnson, Leavenworth, Employment 61 ,042 62,252 2.0 Unemployment 2,3 67 2,258 (4.6) Linn, Miami, and Wyandotte Counties. Employment Unemployment Rate 3.7 3.5 (0.2) by place of work in the Kansas City, Kansas metropolitan area increased 0.5 percent in 2006. Place of Work Data However, employment in goods producing industries All Industries 5 2,300 53,600 2.5 decreased 0.2 percent, while employment in service Goods Producing Indus. 6 ,900 7,100 2.9 Service Producing Indus. 4 5,400 46,500 2.4 producing industries increased 0.6 percent. Trade, Trans., & Util. 8,200 8,700 6.1 Retail Trade 5 ,800 6,100 5.2 Within the goods producing industries, durable goods Prof. & Tech. Serv. 4 ,000 4,500 12.5 manufacturing employment increased 1.0 percent, Educ. & Health Serv. 6 ,400 6,300 (1.6) while non-durable goods manufacturing employment Leisure & Hospitality 6,600 6,400 (3.0) remained unchanged. Within the service producing Government 14 ,600 14,400 (1.4) industries, other services employment increased 2.6 Farm Employment 1,0 00 1,000 -- percent, while education and health services increased Source: Ks Dept. of Labor, Labor Mkt. Info. Service 2.5 percent. Both professional and technical services and government increased 2.1 percent, while leisure According to Moody’s Economy.com, Lawrence’s and hospitality services increased 1.1 percent, and economy is exhibiting considerable volatility, which is financial activities increased 0.7 percent. Decreases evidenced by the inability of the area to produce were realized in trade and transportation employment sustained employment growth. Retail trade is (-2.3 percent) and information employment (-1.8 rebounding from its slowdown over the past two years percent). Farm employment in the area increased 1.4 percent in 2006. Table 3-4 presents employment by they have been almost flat recently. The professional/ place of residence for the Kansas City, Kansas business services industry has been one of the metropolitan area. strongest performers in this metro area of late. The Table 3-4 manufacturing sector continues to lose jobs, thus weighing on the metro area’s performance. Moreover, Kansas City, KS Metro. Area Employment Kansas City’s slowing housing market is also a drag October 2005-October 2006 on the local economy because of the area’s above- 2005 2006 % Chg. average concentration of housing-related employment. Place of Residence Data Civilian Labor Force 431,508 432,722 0.3 Ongoing restructuring among U.S. auto manufac- Employment 409,367 412,545 0.8 turers will continue to be an impediment on the Unemployment 22,141 20,177 (8.9) Kansas City economy. The auto industry’s high Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.7 (0.4) wages have been an important support for incomes and Place of Work Data spending in the metro area. Therefore, there is risk All Industries 428,800 430,900 0.5 that further job cuts at Ford and GM will further Goods Producing Indust. 59,700 59,600 (0.2) weaken Kansas City’s ailing manufacturing sector. Nat. Resources & Const. 23,400 23,100 (1.3) Manufacturing 36,300 36,500 0 .6 Ford shut down its Claycomo, F-150 truck production Durable Goods 20,500 20,700 1 .0 for one week in September and two weeks in October. Computer & Elect. 3,500 3,800 8 .6 The facility also is scheduled to be closed for one Transporation Equip. 4,000 4,000 -- Non-Durable Goods 15,800 15,800 -- week in January 2007, and one week in February Service Providing Indust. 369,100 371,300 0.6 2007. Approximately 2,400 local Ford employees are Trade & Transportation 93,900 91,700 (2.3) expected to be temporarily furloughed during these Wholesale Trade 24,400 24,500 0 .4 periods. However, under the United Auto Workers Durable Goods 12,000 12,000 -- bargaining agreement, members laid off because of Nondurable Goods 7,200 7,200 -- slow sales receive benefits from a company-union Retail Trade 49,100 47,400 (3.5) fund, as well as state unemployment compensation. General Merchandise 12,900 12,100 (6.2) These combined sources are expected to cover Trans, Warehouse & Util. 20,400 19,800 (2.9) approximately 90.0 percent of the average worker’s Information 22,300 21,900 (1.8) take-home pay. Production of the Ford Escape and Telecommunications 16,500 1,000 (93.9) Mercury Mariner at Claycomo will continue because Financal Activities 30,200 30,400 0 .7 consumer demand is good. However, periodic Finance & Insurance 24,200 24,700 2 .1 Saturday shifts that the SUV line had already Insurance Carriers 11,200 11,600 3 .6 scheduled will be eliminated immediately. Approxi- Prof. & Technical Services 66,600 68,000 2 .1 mately 2,400 people work on the SUV line, but the Prof. & Science 28,200 28,700 1 .8 Administrative 34,800 35,400 1 .7 overall employment at the Claycomo plant is 5,100 Edu. & Health Svcs. 48,300 49,500 2 .5 employees. Heath Care & So. 43,400 43,900 1 .2 Hospitals 12,800 13,700 7 .0 Ford recently announced that by 2012, it plans to Leisure & Hospitality 36,500 36,900 1 .1 eliminate more than 30,000 hourly jobs, close 14 Accomodations 30,900 31,400 1 .6 North American plants, and reduce its salaried work Food Services 28,200 28,900 2 .5 force by the equivalent of 4,000 jobs. Ford has not Other Services 15,100 15,500 2 .6 named all the plants to be closed in its downsizing. Government 56,200 57,400 2 .1 The Claycomo plant avoided the first round of plant Farm Employment 7,000 7,100 1 .4 closings originally announced in January 2006. Source: Ks Dept. of Labor, Labor Mkt. Info. Service In addition, the Ford Motor Co. is expanding its early According to Moody’s Economy.com growth in the retirement and buyout offers to all hourly workers and Kansas City economy has weakened recently because making the offers more lucrative to entice employees payrolls in most service industries have plateaued. to leave. This means that approximately 4,800 hourly Service payrolls remain above last year’s levels, but employees at Ford’s Claycomo plant will again have a chance to accept an early retirement or cash-buyout fied the Kansas City area as a national hub for offer. Nearly 1,500 production workers at Ford Motor engineering. Four local firms were ranked in the top Co.’s Claycomo plant already have accepted the latest 50, including Black & Veatch (15), HNTB Corp. (25), offer to leave the troubled automaker, although the Burns & McDonnell (35), and Terracon (50). Seven positions are expected to be refilled. The departures others were included on the overall list. The survey are expected to begin in January 2007 and will be underscored the importance of Kansas City as a spread through September 2007. If all the local national center for engineering and emphasized the employees who accepted the latest offer leave, nearly major contribution that concentration of professionals 2,100 of Claycomo’s 4,900 hourly employees will makes to the local economy. In 2005, the metro- have left Ford from mid-2006 through September politan area employed 7,800 engineers of all stripes 2007. That equates to 43.0 percent of the workforce. and 2,700 engineering technicians, according to the The employees who accepted the latest buyout or early U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. With the average retirement could change their minds anytime before salary for a local engineer ranging from $60,000 to their departure date. Although a large portion of the $75,000, the combined earnings of those professionals current workforce is leaving, Kansas City’s workforce are more than $665.0 million. is expected to remain static because those leaving are being replaced by transferring workers. Burlington Northern-Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) has announced plans to build the BNSF Intermodal and Ford originally offered five different separation Logistics Park in Gardner, Kansas (southwest Johnson packages, including three early-retirement packages. County). The Park will be a $1.0 billion freight hub The most popular early-retirement option was a and warehouse complex. Under the railroad’s plan, $35,000 lump-sum payment for anyone with 30 years trains would be unloaded at the site, with the goods of service who are retiring with full benefits. The cash stored on-site or trucked to other destinations. BNSF buyout option offered a $100,000 lump-sum payment has acquired 800 of the 1,000 acres needed for the for any hourly Ford employee, along with six months Park and will invest $200.0 million for the intermodel of basic medical benefits. Retirement-eligible Ford facility. An economic study shows the distribution employees who select this option must delay receiving center would represent a $650.0 million investment retirement benefits for at least 23 months after leaving. when fully built over a 20-year period. The entire The remaining package would pay departing workers’ facility will create 13,000 jobs in the state over a 20- tuition up to $15,000 annually and one-half of their year period. Of the 13,000 total, approximately 7,500 hourly pay for up to four years if they return to school jobs will be in Gardner, 4,500 will be in other areas of or a vocational training program. Johnson County, and 1,000 will be in the Kansas City metro area. Construction could start in 2007 after land Subsequently, Ford added three more offers in its acquisition and permitting. The facility is expected to expanded program, including an education benefit that be operational in 2008. goes up to two years. The tuition payment is the same, but workers taking this package will receive 70.0 The growth and development of Kansas City, percent of their pay while attending school. Another Missouri’s downtown area earned the city top honors offer is an enhanced cash buyout of $140,000 with as the recipient of the National Civic League’s All- benefits, the same as the $100,000 plan. In this offer, America City award for 2006. Awarded since 1949, employees must have 30 years of service or be age 55 the program is designed to recognize communities of with 10 years of employment to be eligible. The final all sizes in which residents, businesses, not-for-profit package with the newest twist is called the “Family organizations, and government officials work together Scholarship Program.” This option is available to to address critical local issues. A major factor in the departing, retirement-eligible employees. If chosen, rebound of the Kansas City core area is more than $2.4 this option will allow them to receive a $100,000 billion of current and planned investment in the account to be used for approved educational expenses downtown area. Kansas City’s downtown revival is for spouses and children. anchored by the Sprint Center, the Power & Light District (nightlife), the Kauffman Center for the A survey conducted by the engineering trade Performing Arts, and a new ballroom at Bartle Hall. publication, Engineering News-Record (ENR) identi- The new $280.0 million Kansas City Live entertain- ment district is anchored by the $120.0 million H&R looking for a team from the National Basketball Block 14-story downtown corporate headquarters, Association, which has several franchises dealing with which opened in August 2006. Across the street, arena issues, including the teams in Sacramento, construction is beginning on the mammoth Power & Milwaukee, Portland, and Seattle. Light District project being developed by The Cordish Co., based in Baltimore, Maryland. Two blocks to the In April, Jackson County voters approved a Truman east, huge support girders rise from the Sprint Center Sports Complex overhaul, but rejected a rolling roof. Arena, scheduled to open in October 2007. In October The $575.0 million stadium renovations were the first 2006, groundbreaking was held for the $326.0 million priority, locking the Chiefs and Royals into Kansas Kauffman Metropolitan Kansas City Performing Arts City for years to come. The renovations passed with Center. Plans call for two 1,600-seat halls, one for 53.0 percent of the overall vote. The roof garnered symphonic music, the other for opera and ballet, along only 49.0 percent of the vote. Jackson County with a multipurpose facility called Celebration Hall. officials held the election because the government had In addition, the city has pledged $47.0 million to build run out of money to fulfill the 1990 leases that two parking garages for the complex. Construction of mandate “state-of-the-art” stadiums. Without passage the new arena will be financed with a combination of of the vote, the county would have defaulted on the $276.0 million in private and public financing. Major leases at the end of the year, which would have contributors include the Anschutz Entertainment allowed the teams to look for new locations. Now the Group (AEG) ($54.0 million), the National teams are committed at the stadiums until 2031. Association of Basketball Coaches ($10.0 million), and Sprint, which has purchased naming rights for up The decision will impose a 3/8-cent sales tax to raise to $2.5 million per year. Public contributions will $425.0 million that will be used to overhaul come from a new hotel and rental car fee. Arrowhead and Kauffman Stadiums. In addition, the Chiefs are contributing $75.0 million and the Royals Kansas City also has a future National Hockey League will contribute $25.0 million. State officials have franchise for the Sprint Center. Now all it needs is a agreed to provide $50.0 million in tax credits. The team when the downtown arena is scheduled to open teams’ contributions will cover all costs associated in October 2007. William “Boots” Del Biaggio III, the with suites, and the teams will pay cost overruns. founder of a Menlo Park, California, venture-finance With the renovations, concourses will more than company, has entered into a long-term lease with the double in width, and hundreds of restrooms and Sprint Center to own and operate an NHL team if one concession stands will be added. Food options will becomes available through expansion or relocation. expand, including more specialty offerings at As part of his lease with the Sprint Center, Del Arrowhead and a food court and restaurant at Biaggio will have an option to buy in as a 50-50 Kauffman. Arrowhead will receive a new Chiefs store partner in the management of the building. The lease and a museum. Kauffman will add a 9,500-seat, open- calls for a rental payment to the building. In return, air pavilion. Del Biaggio will receive a share of revenue streams from the building. The Big XII football championship was held in Arrowhead Stadium in November 2006. The All 72 private suites have been sold in the Sprint economic effect of this championship is estimated to Center, which will seat 17,297 for hockey and 18,630 be as much as $25.0 million. For a sporting event in for basketball. AEG also has identified 3 of the first Kansas City, that makes it second only to the $150.0 12 founding partners, who will have exclusive million produced by the two racing weekends at advertising rights in the arena. The Big XII men’s Kansas Speedway. Most of the 26,500 rooms in the NCAA basketball tournament is scheduled to be five-county area were filled for portions of the played at the Sprint Center in 2008. First-round and weekend, especially on Saturday night. second-round games of the NCAA men’s basketball tournament will be played at the Sprint Center in 2009, The Kansas City area also is seeing the continued and the NCAA women’s regional semifinals and finals development of specialty and entertainment centers, will be played there in 2010. AEG’s lease with Del some of which include Zona Rosa in the Northland Biaggio does not rule out the Sprint Center from area, the Bass Pro Shop in Independence and Olathe, and the Legends, which is located in Village West publishing federal statistics for a set of geographic adjacent to the Kansas Speedway in Wyandotte areas. Table 3-5, which is shown on the next page, County. In five years, Wyandotte County has more presents employment growth rates for the 23 than doubled its hotel rooms, retail outlets, and other metropolitan areas in the five-state region from venues. Beyond bring entertainment to the area, these October 2005 through October 2006. The additional developments have generated nearly 3,500 jobs in metropolitan areas listed in this table are the result of Wyandotte County. the new OMB definitions.

According to a story reported in the New York Times, Olathe, Kansas showed the biggest jump in the Employment by Industry Type percentage of people paying at least 30.0 percent of their income on rent, as well as in those paying at least 50.0 percent on rent. In the last five years, the average Total nonfarm employment in the major labor markets price for a new home has doubled to approximately in the five-state area increased 1.2 percent from $350,000. The city has added more than 30,000 jobs October 2005 to October 2006. Grand Junction, in the last five years. Since 2000, the portion of the Colorado led the five-state area in employment growth city’s population paying more than 35.0 percent of its with a growth rate of 5.7 percent. It was followed by income to rent grew to 42.0 percent from 19.0 percent. Pueblo, Colorado with a growth rate of 3.2 percent, and Greeley, Colorado with a growth rate of 2.7 percent. Out of the 23 major markets in the five-state area, Lawrence ranked fourth with a growth rate of 2.5 percent and Wichita ranked 9th with a growth rate of Kansas & Adjacent States Metro 1.8 percent. Although Kansas City, Kansas Areas’ Employment Trends experienced a 0.5 percent employment decrease, it still ranked 18th in the five-state area. Topeka was ranked This section presents employment trends through last in the entire region with a 0.9 percent employment October 2006 by major industry types for the region decrease. that includes Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and Oklahoma. In 2005, the Office of Management Construction & Mining. Total construction and and Budget (OMB) updated Census 2000-based mining employment in the major labor markets in the statistical areas using population estimates for 2003. five-state area increased 3.7 percent in 2006. Grand Relative to the 1990s, the updated lists added 49 new Junction, Colorado led the five-state area in Metropolitan Statistical Areas while revising employment growth with a growth rate of 20.0 definitions of existing Metropolitan Statistical Areas. percent. It was followed by Greeley, Colorado with a The list also identified for the first time 578 growth rate of 10.9 percent, and Kansas City, Missouri Micropolitan Statistical Areas. Additionally, the OMB with a growth rate of 8.5 percent. Out of the 23 major designated and defined two new sets of statistical areas markets in the five-state area, Wichita ranked eighth that include 125 Combined Statistical Areas and 25 with a growth rate of 4.4 percent, and Topeka ranked Metropolitan Divisions in the most populous 14th with a 1.6 percent growth rate. Although Kansas Metropolitan Statistical Areas. New England City and City, Kansas realized a 1.3 percent decrease in Town Areas also are defined as an alternative to the employment, it still ranked 16th. county-based metropolitan and micropolitan areas in the six New England states. Manufacturing. Manufacturing employment in the major metropolitan areas in the five-state region The OMB is responsible for maintaining and updating decreased at an average rate of 1.3 percent in 2006. statistical area classifications, a task it has However, Wichita led the five-state area with 2.9 accomplished every decade since the 1950 census. percent growth in manufacturing employment, The OMB establishes and maintains the definitions of followed by Pueblo, Colorado with 2.5 percent these areas solely for statistical purposes. The growth, and Tulsa, Oklahoma with 2.3 percent growth. classification is intended to provide nationally Kansas City, Kansas ranked sixth in the five-state area consistent definitions for collecting, tabulating, and with manufacturing employment growth of 0.6 Table 3-5 Metropolitan Area Employment Growth Rates, October 2005-October 2006 Kansas & Adjacent States

Const. Trade, Educ./ Leisure/ Total & Manu- Trans, & Infor- Finan. Prof/Bus Health Hosp. Other Govern- Nonfarm Mining facturing Utilities mation Activ. Services Services Services Services ment Kansas Lawrence 2.5 % NA % NA % 6 .1 % NA % NA % 12.5 % (1.6) % (3.0) % NA % (1.4) % Topeka ( 0.9) 1.6 (14.0) 0.5 4.2 1.4 (1.2) 1.2 -- 3.8 (1.8) Wichita 1.8 4.4 2.9 (0.2) (8.5) 0.9 3.0 3.2 1.6 4.1 0.7 Kan. City, KS 0.5 (1.3) 0.6 (2.3) (1.8) 0.7 2.1 2.5 1.1 2.6 2.1 Colorado Boulder/ Longmont 1.0 (1.5) (0.5) -- -- 2.7 4.2 1.1 ( 1.2) 2.0 1.3 Colorado Springs 1.8 5.1 (2.7) -- (6.5) (1.6) 5.0 1.6 4.3 1.4 2.9 Denver/ Aurora 1.7 2.9 0.4 1.1 (1.3) 0.6 2.9 1.7 3.9 0.4 1.4 Fort Collins/ Loveland 1.0 1.8 - - 0.4 (4.2) -- 0.6 3.6 1.3 2.3 1.1 Grand Junction 5.7 20.0 (2.9) 3.2 -- 3.0 13.7 2.5 2.9 4.5 4.5 Greeley 2.7 10.9 1.0 0.7 -- -- 4.2 2.7 7.6 -- (1.3) Pueblo 3.2 5.0 2.5 3.7 -- -- 25.6 1.1 1.6 -- (1.7) Missouri Columbia 1.8 NA NA -- NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 .0 Jefferson City (0.6) NA NA 2 .1 NA NA NA NA NA NA (2 .1) Joplin 0.4 NA (2.5) (1.5) NA NA NA 2 .8 NA NA 4 .1 Kan. City, MO 0.6 8.5 (7.3) 1.5 (4.6) 1.2 1.1 (0. 3) 0.7 (1.2) 2.1 St. Joseph MO-KS 1.8 NA NA 2 .6 NA NA NA NA NA NA -- St. Louis MO-IL 0.2 4.2 (3.2) (0.6) (2.4) 0.4 0.1 0.4 1.6 0.3 1.2 Springfield 2.2 2.0 (2.3) 1.9 (2.3) 2.5 1.2 4.1 4.2 -- 3.6 Nebraska Lincoln 1.6 4.7 (2.0) 1.0 (6.5) 6.3 3.3 1.6 3.9 1.3 0.3 Omaha/ Council Bluffs, NE-IA 1.3 (5.6) 0.6 (1.4) (9.0) 3.0 1.3 4.4 6.0 0.6 3.9 Oklahoma Lawton 0.2 -- (7.7) -- 25.0 4.0 3.1 2.6 2.6 (10.5) 0.8 Oklahoma City 1.7 7.4 (0.8) 1.5 -- 1.7 0.8 1.7 3.5 (1.1) 1.6 Tulsa 1.8 2.5 2.3 1.5 (6.7) -- 2.8 2.6 -- (0.9) 4.7 All Area Average 1.2 3.7 (1.3) 0.4 (3.0) 1.1 2.1 1.7 2.5 0.4 1.6

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics percent. Although Topeka ranked 19th, it realized a portation, and public utilities employment growth. It 14.0 percent decrease in manufacturing employment. was followed by Pueblo, Colorado with a 3.7 percent growth rate, and Grand Junction, Colorado with a 3.2 Trade, Transportation, & Public Utilities. Trade, percent growth rate. Topeka ranked 13th with a transportation, and public utilities employment in the growth rate of 0.5 percent. Decreases were realized by major metropolitan areas in the five-state region Wichita with -0.2 percent growth and Kansas City, increased 0.4 percent in 2006. Lawrence led the five- Kansas with -2.3 percent growth. Even with these state area with a 6.1 percent increase in trade, trans- declines in trade, transportation, and public utilities employment, these two metropolitan statistical areas in 2006. Greeley, Colorado had the highest growth still managed to rank 19th and 23rd, respectively. rate in leisure and hospitality services employment at 7.6 percent, followed by Omaha, Nebraska/Council Information. Information employment in the major Bluffs, Iowa with 6.0 percent growth. Colorado metropolitan areas in the five-state region decreased Springs, Colorado followed with 4.3 percent growth. 3.0 percent in 2006. Lawton, Oklahoma had the Wichita ranked 12th (1.6 percent), while Kansas City, highest growth rate in the five-stare area at 25.0 Kansas was ranked 14th (1.1 percent), Topeka ranked percent, followed by Topeka with a 4.2 percent growth 17th (no change), and Lawrence was ranked 19th (-3.0 rate, and Pueblo, Colorado with information percent). employment remaining steady. Although they realized decreases in information employment, Kansas City, Other Services. Other services employment in the Kansas still ranked ninth (-1.8 percent) and Wichita major metropolitan areas in the five-state region ranked 17th (-8.5 percent). increased 0.4 percent in 2006. Grand Junction, Colorado had the highest growth rate in other services Financial Activities. Financial activities employment employment at 4.5 percent, followed by Wichita at 4.1 in the major metropolitan areas in the five-state region percent, Topeka with a 3.8 percent growth rate, and increased 1.1 percent in 2006. Within the five-state Kansas City, Kansas with a 2.6 percent increase in region Lincoln, Nebraska experienced the highest other services employment. growth in financial activities employment at 6.3 percent, followed by Lawton, Oklahoma with 4.0 Government. Government employment in the major percent growth, and Grand Junction, Colorado with 3.0 metropolitan areas in the five-state region increased percent growth. Topeka ranked eighth (1.4 percent), 1.6 percent in 2006. Tulsa, Oklahoma experienced the Wichita ranked 10th (0.9 percent), and Kansas City, highest growth in government employment with a 4.7 Kansas ranked 11th (0.7 percent). percent growth rate. It was followed by Grand Junction, Colorado with a 4.5 percent growth rate and Professional & Business Services. Professional and Joplin, Missouri with a 4.1 percent growth rate. business services employment in the major Kansas City, Kansas ranked eighth (-2.1 percent), metropolitan areas in the region increased 2.1 percent Wichita ranked 16th (-0.7 percent), Lawrence ranked in 2006. Pueblo, Colorado had the highest growth rate 20th (-1.4 percent), and Topeka ranked 22nd (-1.8 in professional and business services employment in percent). the five-state area at 25.6 percent, followed by Grand Junction, Colorado at 13.7 percent and Lawrence, Kansas at 12.5 percent growth. Wichita ranked ninth in the five-state area (3.0 percent), while Kansas City, Regional Labor Market Employment Kansas ranked 12th (2.1 percent), and Topeka ranked 19th (-1.2 percent ). The civilian labor force increased in seven of the state’s eleven secondary labor markets during 2006. Education & Health Services. Education and health Reno County experienced the highest rate of increase services employment in the major metropolitan areas at 4.1 percent. It was followed by Barton County with in the region increased 1.7 percent in 2006. Omaha, a 3.3 percent growth rate. Montgomery County came Nebraska/Council Bluffs, Iowa had the highest growth in next with a 2.7 percent increase. During that same rate in education and health services employment at time period, decreases in the civilian labor force were 4.4 percent, followed by Springfield, Missouri at 4.1 experienced in Ellis County (-5.1 percent), Finney percent and Fort Collins/Loveland, Colorado at 3.6 County (-2.7 percent), and Saline County (-0.2 percent. Wichita ranked fourth in the five-state area percent) County. In keeping with the growth in the (3.2 percent), while Kansas City, Kansas ranked ninth civilian labor force, employment increases were (2.5 percent), Topeka ranked 15th (1.2 percent), and experienced in nine of the state’s secondary labor Lawrence ranked 20th (-1.6 percent). markets in 2006. Again, Reno County experienced the highest rate of growth at 5.1 percent, followed by Leisure & Hospitality Services. Leisure and Barton County at 3.7 percent, and Montgomery hospitality services employment in the major County at 3.0 percent. Most significantly, all of the metropolitan areas in the region increased 2.5 percent state’s 11 secondary labor markets experienced a Table 3-6 County Employment October 2005-October 2006

Percent Change from October 2005 to October 2006 Barton Craw. Ellis Finney Ford Lyon McPher. Mont. Reno Riley Saline

Place of Residence Data Civilian Labor Force 3.3 0.4 (5.1) (2.7) 0.0 0.3 0.6 2.7 4.1 0.5 (0.2) Employment 3.7 0.8 (5.0) (2.1) 0.4 1.2 1.0 3.0 5.1 0.8 0.5 Unemployment ( 5.3) ( 5.8) (9.8) (15.3) (9 .4) (18.7) ( 10.7) (3.0) (14.0) (6.8) (16.2) Unemployment Rate ( 0.4) ( 0.3) (0.2) (0.6) (0. 4) (0.8) (0.3) (0.3) (0.9) (0.3) (0.7)

Place of Work Data All Industries 3.2 6.2 0.3 (0.5) 4.4 10.4 4.2 (0.4) 1.7 21.0 3.3 Ag., For., Fish., & Hunt. 50.0 NA NA ------NA 100.0 NA NA Mining 1.6 -- 2.1 3.1 NA -- -- 20.0 (5.9) NA -- Utilities -- -- NA ------NA 20.0 -- -- (16.7) Construction 54.1 7.7 (1.8) (3.9) 3.2 4.3 24.4 12.2 18.0 ( 13.5) 22.9 Manufacturing 3.1 1.3 -- (0.3) 6.7 14.8 3.1 (1.3) 2.6 (5.3) 5.4 Wholesale Trade 2.8 1.5 -- 1.7 -- -- 7.6 -- 1.0 (3.6) (1.7) Retail Trade 5.3 1.1 0.8 2.1 4.1 (1.1) 8.4 5.2 (0.9) 8.9 0.5 Trans. & Warehousing 2.8 ( 3.6) -- 2.2 (6. 3) (4.8) 8.0 (6.1) 5.3 -- (9.7) Information 33.3 ------4.8 42.4 ( 11.8) -- (6.9) ( 10.0) -- Finance & Insurance ( 15.6) -- 6.0 -- 10.0 2.8 (2.1) (2.3) 3.8 (8.5) 0.8 R.E. & Rental & Leasing ------(12. 5) ------5.9 -- Prof. & Tech. Services -- 3.6 3.7 (6.5) 14.3 -- 5.9 -- 1.9 (4.3) 4.2 Mgmt. of Cos. & Ent. -- -- (4.8) -- -- 100.0 3.0 -- 12.5 -- 2.9 Adm. & Waste Services -- 3.5 4.0 -- -- 18.9 -- (6.5) 4.7 5.3 2.8 Educational Services -- -- 6.7 -- -- (20.0) ( 13.0) (16.7) -- 28.6 -- Health & Social Assist. 1.0 1.6 (0.7) (0.6) 3.1 2.0 3.0 (0.4) (0.5) 0.3 2.2 Arts, Ent., & Recreation 9.1 ------16.7 14.3 28.6 -- 10.3 ( 13.8) (7.7) Accom. & Food Serv. ( 3.8) -- (0.6) 1.7 14.9 4.7 1.9 (5.8) (2.8) (1.3) 2.7 Other Services 2.4 7.9 -- -- 5.1 1.7 1.3 -- 2.9 (1.9) 7.2 Government (0 .8) 20.7 (0.4) (3.2) (1. 4) 18.6 8.7 0.4 (0.4) 73.1 5.1 Farm Employment -- 11.1 -- 2.5 ------2.2 -- -- 2.9

Source: Ks Dept. of Labor, Labor Mkt. Info. Service decrease in their respective unemployment rates in economies. Because of this importance, county 2006. Reno County experienced the largest decrease personal income is presented in this section. of 0.9 percentage point, followed by Lyon County with a 0.8 percentage point decrease, and Saline County with a 0.7 percentage point decrease. Table 3-6 on Total Personal Income county employment, which is shown above, presents employment trends for the 11 selected counties from Total personal income in Kansas grew at a 5.7 percent October 2005 to October 2006. rate in 2005. Johnson County generated the highest level of personal income with $24.2 billion, followed by Sedgwick County with $16.7 billion. Shawnee, Wyandotte, Douglas, Leavenworth, Reno, Butler, County Personal Income Riley, Saline, and Harvey Counties each generated over $1.0 billion of personal income in 2005. The Both the levels and the components of personal lowest levels of income were recorded in Cheyenne, income are important in understanding local Comanche, Greeley, Wallace, Clark, Lane, and Logan Counties, each with less than $50.0 million in total counties. While there are many measured components personal income. of farm owners’ income, the major determinants are farm production of crops and livestock, profitability of The highest growth rates of personal income in 2005 farm operations, and federal government payments to were experienced in Stanton (59.1 percent), Geary farmers. Farm proprietors’ income is larger and out of (30.7 percent), and Coffey (21.6 percent) Counties. At proportion in agriculturally-oriented counties because the other extreme, Cheyenne County experienced a of large-scale production, high profitability, and 41.7 decline in personal income. It should be kept in government support payments. In 2005, farm mind that these rates of change may be distorted by proprietors’ income surged 51.2 percent. Haskell erratic fluctuations in the farm economy. County had the highest farm proprietors’ income in 2005 ($65.5 million), followed by Marshall County Of the state’s major urban counties, Wyandotte County ($61.2 million), and Nemaha County ($61.1 million). had the highest personal income growth in 2005 at 15.3 percent, followed by Shawnee County (8.3 Non-farm Proprietors’ Income. The net earnings of percent), Sedgwick County (7.7 percent), and Johnson unincorporated business owners constitute non-farm County (4.9 percent). Appendix D presents county proprietors’ income. County size also is a major personal income by major components for 2004. determinant in the distribution of this income com- Appendix E shows county personal income estimates ponent. Non-farm proprietors’ income grew at an 8.2 by major components for 2005. Figure 3-1, which is percent rate in 2005. Johnson County had the highest shown on page 47, presents the percent change in level of non-farm proprietors’ income at $2.9 billion county personal income from 2004 to 2005. followed by Sedgwick County with $1.9 billion. Hodgeman, Greeley, Washington, Stanton, Lane, and Salaries & Wages. Salaries and wages are distributed Kearney Counties had the lowest with less than $5.0 across the state in a pattern that generally corresponds million of non-farm proprietors’ income each. to population. The areas with higher population density generally have higher total salaries and wages. Dividends, Interest, & Rent. Dividends, interest, and Salaries and wages in Kansas grew at a 4.0 percent rent increased by 6.4 percent in 2005. This category rate in 2005. Johnson County and Sedgwick County represents a large component of personal income in ranked first and second, with salaries and wages of Johnson County. In fact, the $4.3 billion of dividends, $13.5 billion and $9.5 billion, respectively. Shawnee interest, and rents in that county account for nearly and Wyandotte Counties each generated over $3.0 30.0 percent of the state total. Sedgwick County also billion of salaries and wages in 2005. During that had over $2.4 billion of dividends, interest, and rent. same year, Hodgeman and Wallace Counties had the Only Greeley and Wallace Counties had less than lowest salaries and wages total with less than $15.0 $10.0 million in dividends, interest, and rents in 2005. million each. Transfer Payments. Transfer payments in Kansas Other Labor Income. While the correlation between grew at 6.5 percent rate in 2005 and are largely social salaries and wages disbursements and other labor security benefits. The distribution of transfer income is not exact, the two are closely related. payments across the state generally reflects county County rankings are nearly the same for both population. Collectively, the state’s four urban components. Other labor income in Kansas grew at a counties received over $5.0 billion in transfer rate of 8.2 percent in 2005. Johnson County ranked payments, while Greeley, Wallace, and Stanton first with $3.3 billion in other labor income, followed Counties each received less than $10.0 million. by Sedgwick County at $2.9 billion. At the other end of the spectrum, Wallace, Hodgeman, Greeley, Residence Adjustment. Because personal income is Comanche, and Woodson Counties realized other measured on a residence basis, an adjustment must be labor income of less than $5.0 million. made for out-of-county earnings. A residence adjust- ment is made for salaries and wages, other labor Farm Proprietors’ Income. The relative importance income, and for both farm and nonfarm proprietors’ of farm proprietors’ income, as a component of total income. The residence adjustment for Kansas personal income, varies among the 105 Kansas increased 10.0 percent in 2005. For the state as a whole, the 2005 residence adjustment was $840.3 population as of July 1, 2005, based on the U.S. million. The positive value indicates that, in total, Bureau of the Census’ Current Population Reports. Kansans earn more income out-of-state than income Figure 3-2, which is shown on page 47, presents per earned by non-Kansans in Kansas. capita personal income by county for 2005.

Within Kansas, four situations are present that relate to In 2005, Kansas per capita income was $32,948. residence adjustment. First, for most counties, this Stanton County had the highest per capita income component is relatively small. Second, there are ($48,398), followed by Johnson County ($47,747), and considerable earnings by Riley County residents in Geary County ($46,768). The lowest per capita Geary County. These earnings are associated with income was in Cheyenne County ($9,807). It should Fort Riley. The third situation relates to out-of-county be noted that county per capita income may fluctuate earnings provided in two of the large Kansas counties. dramatically from year to year because of the inherent For example, the Sedgwick County residence volatility of the farm economy, coupled with the adjustment is negative (-$638.2 million.) Most of this relatively low population in many rural counties. income appears in bordering counties. For neighboring Butler County, the adjustment is positive The relatively low-income counties in rural Kansas ($390.9 million). Thus, Sedgwick County provides generally tend to have a high reliance on the farm earnings and jobs for Butler County residents. A economy. Specifically, these counties have a negative, similar situation exists for Shawnee County. The final or low, farm proprietors’ income. In the eastern half situation exists in the Kansas City area. The of the state, particularly the southeastern portion of Wyandotte County residence adjustment is negative Kansas, low-income counties are primarily those that (-$701.5 million), indicating that the county provides have relatively high population densities, but are not net earnings for residents of other counties and perhaps part of major urban areas. for Missouri residents. Johnson County is unique in that its residence adjustment is positive ($672.4 The counties with high per capita incomes are million) and nearly equal to the state’s overall associated with two conditions. First, most relatively residence adjustment of $840.3 million. Besides high per capita income counties are rural and providing jobs for residents of bordering counties, agricultural and, for the most part, are in the even larger earnings of Johnson County residents southwestern part of the state. Second, three of the come from the Missouri side of the Kansas City area. state’s major urban counties have high per capita incomes. This income influences not only the core Personal Social Insurance Contributions. Personal county of the metropolitan area, but also many contributions for social insurance in Kansas grew at a bordering counties that provide the place of residence 9.1 percent rate in 2005. Because of the definition of for individuals who are employed, but may not live in the social security tax base, personal contributions for the core counties. social insurance are closely related to the distribution of salaries and wages, as well as positive proprietors’ income. Personal contributions for social insurance exceeded $500.0 million in each of the state’s four major urban counties during 2005. Johnson County’s The Four Urban Counties contributions totaled $2,222.5 million and Sedgwick County’s were $1,567.2 million. Shawnee followed In Kansas, it also is important to examine personal with contributions of $566.8 million and Wyandotte income levels and related components for the state’s had $531.1 million. four urban counties. These counties are Sedgwick, Johnson, Wyandotte, and Shawnee.

Per Capita Personal Income Total Personal Income Per capita income for each county may be obtained by dividing the total personal income of the county by the In 2005, Johnson, Sedgwick, Shawnee, and Wyandotte total population of the county. The population data accounted for 47.4 percent of the state’s population used for these calculations were estimates of county and 56.6 percent of the state’s total personal income. This indicates that per capita income is higher in the of variable weather conditions and the changing four urban counties than in the state as a whole. location of farm products marketing. Wyandotte County per capita income ($28,139) is significantly below the state average ($32,948), while County data provide helpful insights because they may Sedgwick County ($35,848) and Shawnee County be aggregated over larger regions. For this report, ($34,206) are both slightly above the state average. Kansas has been divided into 11 planning regions, Johnson County ($47,747) is 44.9 percent above the which may be considered the “official” aggregation. state average. For the four urban counties, the average Figure 3-3, which is shown on page 48, presents total per capita income is $39,342, or 19.4 percent, higher personal income by region for 2004 and 2005, while than the state average. Figure 3-4, also shown on page 48, presents the percent change in total personal income by region These four counties generate 63.2 percent of non-farm from 2004 to 2005 and per capita income for 2005. proprietors’ income; 62.7 percent of Kansas’ salaries and wages; 62.5 percent of personal contributions for In terms of total personal income, the 2005 average for social insurance; 60.1 percent of the other labor the 11 regions is $7.8 billion. Region I, which income; 56.1 percent of dividend, interest, and rent surrounds Kansas City, has the highest level of income; and 44.5 percent of Kansas’ transfer personal income with $40.1 billion. The only other payments. Only for farm proprietors’ income and region that is above the average total personal income residence adjustment do these four counties sum to a per region is Region IV, which surrounds Wichita. small share of the Kansas total. Johnson or Sedgwick That region had total personal income of $22.2 billion rank either first or second among the 105 counties in in 2005. The lowest personal income was realized in most income components, as well as total income. Region VIII in northwest Kansas at $721.6 million. Shawnee and Wyandotte rank third and fourth.

Generally, regional population rankings correspond to Regional Personal Income regional personal income rankings. High incomes are associated with large populations. Thus, population Because boundaries of economic activity do not and personal income are highly concentrated in the necessarily respect political boundaries, comparisons state. Accordingly, 72.8 percent of the total personal of county income do not necessarily provide an income is located in Regions I and IV. Less than 1.0 accurate measure of the economic performance of a percent of the state’s total is located in Region VIII. geographic area. Income that is concentrated in a small area is subject to greater variability than is Recent income and population growth have been income spread over a wide area. For example, uneven across Kansas. In 2005, total personal income personal income measures the income received by rose by 5.7 percent across the state. The most rapid individuals on the basis of their residence location and growth was in Regions XI, III, and VII with 9.3 is not directly concerned with the location of earnings. percent, 6.4 percent, and 6.2 percent growth, Thus, a residence adjustment is necessary for each respectively. Region VIII experienced a decrease in county for two reasons. First, the residence adjustment personal income in 2005 (-3.5 percent). is necessary to account for inter-county commuting to work. Second, it is necessary to account for some In terms of per capita personal income, Region I income components, such as farm proprietors’ income, ranked first ($37,509), followed by Region IV where the location of the residence may be far ($32,948). Region VIII, in northwest Kansas, had the removed from the location of the income generation. lowest per capita income ($23,556). The extent of the inequality in regional income is evident because a 59.2 An additional problem exists for states such as Kansas percent difference exists in per capita income from the where farm income is sizeable. Extreme fluctuations highest income region to the lowest income region. in small-area farm earnings occur particularly because This is significant by any measure.

Figure 3-1. Percent Change in County Personal Income, 2004-2005

DONIPHAN 1.8 5.7 4.2 -2.4 -2.7 4.9 5.8 3.1 0.5 13.4 9.3 10.8 4.2 REPUBLIC BROWN CHEYENNE RAWLINS DECATUR NORTON PHILLIPS SMITH JEWELL WASHINGTON MARSHALL NEMAHA 20.3 6.8 3.6 3.3 -0.5 ATCHISON 0.4 3.6 1.5 1.6 3.3 3.6 CLOUD 1.1 POTTAWATOMIE MITCHELL 2.5 RILEY JACKSON SHERMAN THOMAS SHERIDAN GRAHAM ROOKS OSBORNE -3.2 3.9 WYANDOTTE CLAY JEFF. LEAVEN. -3.1 15.3 OTTAWA 1.9 -18.6 -4.1 4.7 5.0 -0.7 30.7 8.3 -9.9 LINCOLN -4.9 GEARY SHAWNEE WALLACE LOGAN GOVE TREGO ELLIS RUSSELL 3.2 4.9 0.1 WABAUNSEE 6.7 DOUGLAS JOHNSON 4.8 SALINE DICKINSON -2.3 -5.0 ELLSWORTH MORRIS 5.9 1.2 4.2 2.2 2.8 -0.2 5.8 OSAGE 1.3 -6.2 RUSH MIAMI BARTON FRANKLIN GREELEY WICHITA SCOTT LANE NESS 6.7 5.4 2.6 0.4 -1.5 21.6 6.7 MCPHERSON LYON -0.2 -0.9 -0.9 RICE 4.2 PAWNEE MARION CHASE COFFEY ANDERSON LINN -0.3 -0.2 HODGEMAN 3.5 HAMILTON KEARNY FINNEY -1.2 0.7 3.5 HARVEY 0.5 10.1 STAFFORD 6.5 EDWARDS RENO -1.5 WOODSON -0.6 4.7 ALLEN -4.4 BOURBON GREENWOOD 59.1 8.1 0.5 5.3 7.7 GRAY FORD 4.4 6.9 5.1 PRATT -1.6 5.2 STANTON GRANT HASKELL KIOWA SEDGWICK BUTLER -0.7 WILSON NEOSHO KINGMAN ELK CRAWFORD 10.7 7.1 6.5 -17.5 -8.9 2.8 3.7 -5.3 7.7 -2.0 6.1 4.7 4.2 -3.8 MONT- MORTON STEVENS SEWARD MEADE CLARK COMANCHE BARBER HARPER SUMNER COWLEY CHAUTAUQUA GOMERY LABETTE CHEROKEE

Figure 3-2. Per Capita Personal Income, 2005 (Dollars in Thousands)

DONIPHAN 27.5 22.2 22.2 24.7 31.1 26.3 27.7 24.9 27.8 35.5 32.0 25.0 REPUBLIC BROWN 23.8 CHEYENNE RAWLINS DECATUR NORTON PHILLIPS SMITH JEWELL WASHINGTON MARSHALL NEMAHA 28.0 25.0 ATCHISON 30.8 28.4 25.5 24.4 27.2 35.2 26.9 24.8 24.5 CLOUD 27.6 POTTAWATOMIE MITCHELL 29.2 RILEY JACKSON SHERMAN THOMAS SHERIDAN GRAHAM ROOKS OSBORNE 22.0 WYANDOTTE CLAY JEFF. 28.2 22.9 LEAVEN. 28.1 25.1 17.5 18.5 31.4 25.1 20.3 OTTAWA 46.8 34.2 21.3 LINCOLN 23.6 GEARY SHAWNEE WALLACE LOGAN GOVE TREGO ELLIS RUSSELL 47.7 25.1 WABAUNSEE 28.7 31.5 DOUGLAS JOHNSON 26.7 SALINE DICKINSON 22.4 21.1 ELLSWORTH MORRIS 27.3 30.8 30.3 24.2 31.9 22.5 30.2 OSAGE 24.6 24.6 RUSH FRANKLIN MIAMI GREELEY WICHITA SCOTT LANE NESS BARTON 24.6 21.4 32.8 22.8 30.5 39.0 27.1 MCPHERSON LYON 25.8 RICE 22.0 22.4 23.3 PAWNEE MARION CHASE COFFEY ANDERSON LINN 30.8 19.9 HODGEMAN 29.7 HAMILTON KEARNY FINNEY 27.5 26.8 27.2 HARVEY 20.9 STAFFORD 27.5 EDWARDS RENO 22.2 WOODSON 25.9 27.5 24.1 ALLEN 26.3 BOURBON 48.4 27.5 27.9 35.8 GREENWOOD 39.6 GRAY FORD 30.7 25.9 25.1 PRATT 23.7 25.5 STANTON GRANT HASKELL KIOWA SEDGWICK BUTLER 20.6 WILSON NEOSHO KINGMAN ELK CRAWFORD 31.3 34.2 28.3 19.5 18.4 25.0 26.7 23.4 27.8 23.8 26.8 25.8 24.6 19.1 MONT- MORTON STEVENS SEWARD MEADE CLARK COMANCHE BARBER HARPER SUMNER COWLEY CHAUTAUQUA GOMERY LABETTE CHEROKEE Figure 3-3. Total Personal Income, by Region, 2004 & 2005 (Dollars in Millions)

Region XI 2004: $1,990 Region VIII Region IX Region X 2005: $2,175 2004: $722 2004: $1,788 2004: $2,610 2005: $696 2005: $1,853 2005: $2,743 Region III 2004: $5,377 Region I 2005: $5,724 2004: $40,099 2005: $42,404

Region VII 2004: $2,516 Region IV 2005: $2,671 Region II Region VI 2004: $22,231 2004: $1,263 Region V 2005: $23,578 2004: $4,273 2005: $1,300 2004: $2,727 2005: $4,518 2005: $2,772

Figure 3-4. Percent Change in Total Income, 2004 & 2005, & 2005 per Capita Income, by Region

Region XI 9.3% Region VIII Region IX Region X $28,906 -3.5% 3.6% 5.1% $23,556 $27,721 $29,029 Region III 6.4% Region I $28,764 5.7% Region VII $37,509 6.2% $26,150 Region V Region IV 1.6% Region VI 6.1% Region II $26,536 2.9% $32,948 5.7% $25,172 $25,782 Chapter 4

Kansas Demographics

Overview Topeka (121,946), and Olathe (111,334). These cities are all located in the eastern half of the state. The The U.S. Census Bureau reported that the nation’s western half of Kansas encompasses 5 of the 20 largest population reached the historic milestone of 300 cities in Kansas, including Salina (45,956), Garden million people on October 17, 2006, at approximately City (27,098), Dodge City (26,104), Liberal (20,257), 8:46 a.m. (CDT). This milestone comes almost 39 and Hays (19,632). Of these five cities, only Liberal’s years after the national population reached the 200 populations increased over the last year. million mark on November 20, 1967. The population that resides in the unincorporated, or According to the Census Bureau, this estimate is based rural, areas in Kansas totals 510,459, which has on the expectation that the United States registers one increased 6,829 since 2004. Also, there are 429 cities birth every 7 seconds and one death every 13 seconds, with populations of less than 1,000 people. These 429 while net international migration is expected to add cities have a total combined population of 133,499, one person every 31 seconds. The result is an increase which is 763 less than last year. The unincorporated in the total population of one person every 11 seconds. areas, when combined with cities with populations of less than 1,000 people, account for 23.5 percent of the When the national population reached the 300.0 total population. This is a slight increase from last million milestone, Kansas had a total population of year’s level of 23.3 percent of the total population. In 2,744,687, which represents only 1.1 percent of the 2000, 24.3 percent of the total population resided in total national population. This figure was certified on unincorporated areas and cities of less than 1,000 July 1, 2006. By state statute (KSA 11-201), the people. official population of Kansas is certified from the latest estimates released by the United States Bureau There are 568 cities in Kansas that have a population of the Census. As of April 1, 2000, the Kansas of less than 5,000 people. These cities have a total population was 2,688,418. On July 1, 2006, the population of 431,867, which is 1,599 fewer people population for calendar year 2005 was certified at residing in this category of cities than last year when 2,744,687. This certification serves as the official the total population was 433,466. When the total population of the state. The certified population for population of these cities is combined with the rural Kansas, all counties, and townships for 2006 is shown areas, 34.3 percent of the total population is in Appendix F. represented. Last year, 34.4 percent of the total population resided in rural areas and cities with As the population in Kansas continues to increase, the populations of less than 5,000. cities with populations of more than 5,000 are realizing the greatest proportion of the increase. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Kansas gained Historically, Kansas has been predominantly rural. 10,990 people and ranked 38th nationally in terms of However, that trend is changing. Of the 626 cities in population gain. The greatest population growth in the Kansas, 58 have populations that exceed 5,000; 568 U.S. occurred in Florida, which gained 404,434 people have populations of less than 5,000; and 429 have during that same period. Texas ranked second with a populations of less than 1,000 people. The total gain of 388,419, and California ranked third with an population of all cities in Kansas is 2,234,228, which increase of 290,109 people. In terms of percentage represents 81.4 percent of the total population. growth, Nevada outpaced the rest of the nation with a growth rate of 3.39 percent. Arizona was second with Of the 20 largest cities in Kansas, 5 have populations a growth rate of 3.35 percent, and Idaho was third with that exceed 100,000, including Wichita (354,865), a rate of 2.37 percent. The growth rate for Kansas was Overland Park (164,811), Kansas City (144,210), 0.40 percent. The West North Central (WNC) Region in the that same year, the internal, or state-to-state, migration Midwest, which includes Kansas, grew at a slower rate for Kansas was -9,998. Natural growth refers to the (0.6 percent) than the nation as a whole (0.9 percent). additions to population from births and the The WNC region also includes Iowa, Minnesota, subtractions from deaths. There were 39,140 births Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota. and 24,658 deaths in Kansas in 2005. Among the WNC states, Minnesota and Missouri realized the greatest growth rate (0.7 percent). These The variables used to produce population estimates are states were followed by South Dakota (0.7 percent), based on data series that capture both migration and Nebraska (0.6 percent), Iowa, (0.5 percent), Kansas natural growth. Variables include vital statistics, such (0.4 percent), and North Dakota (less than 0.1 as births and deaths, school statistics from state and percent). The resident population for the U.S., parochial school systems, and data from federal national regions, states, and Kansas counties for 2000 income tax returns. Also incorporated into the through 2005 is shown in Appendix G. estimates are data pertaining to housing permits issued, certificates of occupancy, and utility hookups. The data used in this report are based on both full The latter three variables were included in the count census information and on estimates. Because methodology beginning with the 1997 estimates. The both methods are presented, a brief discussion of each inclusion of these variables is a significant change in methodology follows. the methodology because, prior to 1997, no housing variables were included. Analysis indicates the inclusion has improved the accuracy of the estimates.

U.S. Census Bureau’s Methodology The Census Bureau offers cautions about comparing decennial census numbers with intercensal model- of Estimating State Populations based estimates. It is important to note that differences between decennial census estimates and National population estimates are formulated by using model-based estimates are ambiguous estimates of the latest decennial census data as a benchmark and changes in the levels of income or poverty at the incorporating administrative data from federal county level. The ambiguity arises because these agencies. Currently, the 2000 census serves as the differences reflect both changes in the levels of benchmark. Each year following a decennial census, income and poverty and differences in the methods by the benchmark is statistically adjusted using numerous which the two cross-sectional estimates were made. variables, and a national estimate is reached. The next For more information, see the Bureau’s explanation at step is to formulate estimates for each state, county or http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/saipe/techdoc/centa parish, city, and township in the United States. All of ble.html. these estimates sum to the national estimate, which is used as a control. There is uncertainty associated with all estimates. For The annual estimates help identify population shifts, as this reason, the Bureau quantifies the uncertainty well as trends and potential changes in some federal through confidence intervals. A confidence interval is grants-in-aid formulas. The total state population and a range of values that describes the uncertainty a state’s proportion of the national total are factors in surrounding an estimate. The Bureau indicates a some formulas used to calculate federal grant-in-aid confidence interval by its endpoints. For example, the program allotments, including the Social Services 90.0 percent confidence interval for the number of Block Grant and the annual state private activity bond people, of all ages, in poverty in the United States in limitations. However, for most grant-in-aid programs, 1995 based on the March 1996 Current Population changes in population do not affect allocations directly. Survey is “35,534,124 to 37,315,094.”

Annual estimates in population change because of two A confidence interval is also itself an estimate. It is factors: migration and natural growth. Migration made using a model of how sampling, interviewing, refers to the net effect of migration into and out of measuring, and modeling contribute to uncertainty each state. In 2005, there were 6,427 individuals who about the relation between the true value of the migrated into Kansas from another country. During quantity that is being estimated and the estimate of that value. How a confidence interval is interpreted is programs that do not use census data are special important. The “90.0 percent” in the confidence education; the administrative portion of the nutrition interval listed above represents a level of certainty program for women, infants, and children; and low- about the estimate. If new estimates were made income home energy assistance. repeatedly using the same procedure, the confidence intervals would contain the average of all the estimates 90.0 percent of the time. This unknown average is treated as valid because the modeling procedure used Poverty by the Census Bureau is defined as the official measure, for example, of poverty. In these cases, the Important items that are determined from the decennial Bureau has produced a single estimate in a way that, if census are the poverty thresholds because they serve repeated indefinitely, would result in 90.0 percent of as a measure of need for a household. Poverty the confidence intervals formed containing the true thresholds originated in 1964. The thresholds were value. The Census Bureau routinely employs 90.0 derived using the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s percent confidence intervals. food budgets, which were designed for families under economic stress. The thresholds also used other data Confidence intervals are one way to represent how relating to what portion of those families’ incomes was “good” an estimate is; the larger a 90.0 percent spent on food. confidence interval for a particular estimate, the more caution is required when using the estimate. Although the methodology has evolved, poverty Confidence intervals are an important reminder of the thresholds are still the dollar amounts used to limitations of the estimates. determine poverty status. Currently, each person or family is assigned one out of 48 possible poverty thresholds. Thresholds vary according to the size of the family and the ages of the family members.

The Decennial Census Although the thresholds in some sense reflect families’ needs, they are intended for use as a statistical Each decennial census yields a wealth of data that are yardstick, not as a complete description of what people important to a diversified user-group. The actual and families need to live. The official measure of count for 2000 was completed on April 1, 2000, and is poverty was established by the Office of Management now the benchmark from which all population and Budget in Statistical Policy Directive 14 and is to estimates are derived through 2009. The decennial be used by federal agencies in their statistical work. census assists in determining how much money states will receive in a number of federal grant programs Government aid programs are not required to use the because several of the programs include population official poverty measure as eligibility criteria. In fact, count as a component of their distribution formulas. many government aid programs use a different poverty measure, such as the Department of Health and Human The electoral effects of the census are understood Services Poverty Guidelines or its variants. fairly well because of the effect on congressional seats. Less understood is the interaction between the Each aid program may define eligibility differently. population count and federal grant programs. The However, the official poverty data come from the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that for the purposes of Current Population Survey Annual Social and reapportioning seats in the House of Representatives, Economic Supplement, which formerly was called the sampling techniques are prohibited. However, the Annual Demographic Supplement or simply the ruling does not prohibit sampling from being used to “March Supplement.” allocate funds for federal formula grant programs. The same thresholds are used throughout the United According to the General Accounting Office, there are States and do not vary geographically. In addition, the 22 large formula grant programs that rely in part on thresholds are updated annually for inflation using the data derived from the decennial census. Medicaid is Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. the largest program. The three large formula grant Appendix H presents the poverty thresholds for 2005. The thresholds are used by comparing total family is less than the threshold and it is called an “income “money” income with the established thresholds. For deficit.” An “income surplus” occurs for families individuals who do not live with family members, their above poverty when its income is greater than the own income is compared with the appropriate threshold. The example family’s income surplus was threshold. If total family income equals or exceeds the $1,892 ($25,000 minus $23,108). threshold, the family (or unrelated individual) is not in poverty. If total family money income is less than the People whose poverty status cannot be determined are threshold appropriate for that family, the family is in not included in any poverty statistics produced by the poverty. If a family is determined to be in poverty, all Census Bureau. Those not included are individuals family members have the same poverty status. living in institutional group quarters (such as prisons or nursing homes), college dormitories, military Income is the primary component used to compute barracks, and living situations without conventional poverty status. The official measure of income that is housing (and who are not in shelters). In addition, used by the U.S. Census Bureau is “money income.” unrelated individuals under age 15, such as foster It includes earnings; unemployment compensation; children, are not included. The reason for this workers compensation; Social Security; Supplemental exclusion is that income questions are asked of people Security Income; public assistance; veterans payments; only age 15 and older. survivor benefits; pension or retirement income; interest; dividends; rents; royalties; income from estates; trusts; educational assistance; alimony; child support; assistance from outside the household; and School District Populations other miscellaneous sources. Non-cash benefits, such as food stamps and housing subsidies, do not count. The school district estimates provided here are derived Income is the total of all these sources before taxes, from the U.S. Census Bureau’s school district mapping and it excludes any capital gains or losses. The project. The latest mapping project for which data are income of all family members is aggregated to available was conducted at the same time as the 2000 determine the household income. The income earned Census. The school district boundary survey is by non-relatives living in the household, such as conducted biennially. The survey used for this project housemates, is not included in a household’s income. asks each state’s Department of Education for a list of all school districts and their boundaries. For example, a family has five members, including two children, their mother, their father, and the The population and poverty estimates for each children’s great-aunt. The appropriate threshold is estimate-year are produced for all school districts $23,108 for a five-member household with two related identified in the most recent boundary update. The children under the age of 18. Assume that the family boundary year does not always match the year to members’ income in 2004 was $25,000, of which which the estimates refer. For example, the 2005 $10,000 was earned by the mother, $5,000 was earned poverty estimates were produced for school districts in by the father, and $10,000 was earned by the great- existence for the 2006-2007 school year. The Bureau aunt. Neither child earned any income. To determine uses the most current list of school districts and this family’s poverty status, the family’s total income associated geography because it allows for efficient is compared with the family’s threshold. Because its allocation of funds under the No Child Left Behind income was greater than the threshold, this family is Act of 2001 for which the estimates are produced. not “in poverty” according to the official definition. A listing of the population estimates for each school Two other measures that are derived from these data district in Kansas in 2003 is shown in Appendix I. are the Ratio of Income to Poverty and the Income This is the most recent year for which data are Surplus/Deficit. The ratio is calculated by dividing the available. Also included in the appendix is the “head family’s total money income by the threshold. The count,” or actual enrollment numbers, for 2003, which example family’s ratio of income to poverty is 1.08. was provided by the Kansas Department of Education. The difference in dollars between total family income It should be noted that the count from the Kansas and the family’s poverty threshold is called the Income Department of Education may not match the Census Surplus/Deficit. For families in poverty, their income Bureau’s estimate. There are several reasons for the difference, but the most significant is that the number federal funding to states for the State Children’s of individuals who are in private or parochial schools Health Insurance Program. and those who are home schooled are not included. The ASEC provides reliable estimates of the net change in the number of uninsured people from one year to the next. However, it does not show how long a person remains uninsured, what percentage of the Health Insurance Coverage uninsured population remains uninsured in the following year, or how many people obtain coverage. The U.S. Census Bureau also provides statistics on Neither does it show any changes in a person’s health insurance coverage. The Bureau collects health coverage within a given year. insurance data using two national surveys, which are the Current Population Survey (CPS) and the Survey These more dynamic measures of health insurance of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). coverage are available from the SIPP. Unlike the ASEC, which is not designed to follow the same The surveys differ in the length because of the detail respondents in consecutive years, the SIPP is a of the questionnaire, the number of households longitudinal survey. This means that the SIPP interviewed, the methodology used to collect and interviews the same respondents three times a year process the data, and, consequently, in the health over the course of three to four years. insurance coverage estimates that are produced. As a result, it is important to understand that different Nationally, the number of people with health insurance surveys and methods produce different results, and coverage increased by 1.4 million in 2005 from 245.9 when it is appropriate to use each survey or method. million to 247.3 million. The total number insured represents 84.1 percent of the total population. In The CPS is useful mainly for examining timely Kansas, the number of people with health insurance estimates of the insured and uninsured population at increased by 33,000, which represents a 0.3 percent the national level. The CPS also is useful as a source increase in the coverage rate. Appendix J shows the of estimates of the insured and uninsured populations health insurance coverage status and type of coverage at the state level. The SIPP is useful mainly for in the U.S. and Kansas from 1988 to 2005. examining the dynamics of health insurance coverage as it changes over time.

The CPS is a monthly survey of approximately 50,000 households conducted by the Census Bureau for the Demographics Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the data are used primarily to estimate the unemployment rate. The Demographics are the components included in the Annual Social & Economic Supplement (ASEC) to the population. The categories used by the U.S. Census CPS, a survey of approximately 78,000 households, Bureau include age, race, gender, and ethnicity. The includes detailed health insurance questions asked of demographic make up of Kansas is becoming more the household respondent for every household diverse. Historically, the population of Kansas has resident. Respondents are asked about health insurance been predominantly of the White race and non- coverage in the previous calendar year. The ASEC Hispanic in ethnicity. The same overall make up provides a consistent historical time series at the remains; however, the proportion of Hispanic ethnicity national level and can be used to examine state-level displays an upward trend. trends and differences by using multi-year averages. However, the large sampling errors of state-level data Appendix K presents the dynamics between the limit its usefulness. decennial census in 2000 and the estimates for 2001 through 2005. Each category, including total The ASEC is perhaps the most widely used source of population by age, race, gender, and ethnicity is data on health insurance coverage in the United States shown. The table also shows each category as a and is the official source of estimates used to allocate percent of the relevant total population. Age year, there were 34.8 million people over the age of 65 in the nation. This report identifies five age categories, including under 5 years of age, 5 to 19 years of age, 20 to 64 The elderly are generally considered to be those who years of age, 65 years of age and older, and 85 years of are 85 years of age or older. In 2000, there was an age and older. It should be noted the category of 85 estimated 4.2 million individuals over the age of 85 in years of age and older is a subcategory of 65 years of the U.S., representing 12.4 percent of the total U.S. age and older. population. During that same year in Kansas, 51,770 individuals were over the age of 85, which represented 1.9 percent of the total state population. In 2005, there Analysis indicates the population of Kansas is aging, were 57,665 individuals who were 85 years of age and but at a slower pace than the rest of the United States. older in Kansas. This age cohort realized an increase As of July 1, 2005, there were 2,744,687 people in of 1,867, or 3.2 percent, since 2004 and 5,895, or 10.2 Kansas with a median age of 36.1 years, which is only percent, since 2000. slightly younger than the national median age of 36.4 years. In addition, when the trends for age are examined, most notably, the population of school age Race children has seen the most significant decrease since 2000, while the older cohorts remain relatively Race and Hispanic origin are distinctly different constant. concepts. The concept of race as used by the Census Bureau is one of self-identification and is directly Included in the 2005 total are 187,949 people who are correlated to the race or races with which people most less than 5 years of age. This category has remained closely identify. These categories are socio-political virtually unchanged since 2000. Proportionally, this constructs and should not be interpreted as being cohort represents 6.8 percent of the total state scientific or anthropological in nature. In addition, the population and is down only 0.1 percent from last Census Bureau’s race categories include both racial year. In 2000, this cohort represented 7.0 percent of and national-origin groups. the total state population. The racial classifications used by the Census Bureau The population of school age children 5 to 19 years of are also used in this report and adhere to the October age totaled 569,356 in 2005. This is a 10,307-person 30, 1997 Federal Register notice entitled “Revisions decrease, or -1.8 percent, since 2004 and a 40,354- to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data person decrease, or -7.1 percent, since 2000. on Race and Ethnicity.” This report was issued by the Proportionally, this cohort represents 20.7 percent of Office of Management and Budget. It is important to the total state population. In 2004, it represented 21.2 remember that the data gathered on race in Census percent of the total state population. In 2000, it 2000 are completely different from previous censuses. represented 22.7 percent. Direct comparisons cannot be made. The racial classifications used are: In 2005, the population from 20 to 64 years of age was 1,630,377 and represented 59.4 percent of the total White. A person having origins in any of the original state population. Last year it represented 58.9 percent peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. and in 2000, it represented 57.1 percent. This cohort It includes people who indicate their race as “white” or increased by 20,104, or 1.2 percent, since last year and report entries such as Irish, German, Italian, Lebanese, by 96,606, or 5.9 percent, since 2000. Near Easterner, Arab, or Polish.

In 2000, the estimated population of Kansans who Black or African American. A person having origins were 65 years of age and older was 356,229. In 2005, in any of the black racial groups of Africa. It includes that number was 357,005, which is an increase of 0.2 people who indicate their race as “Black, African percent from the 2000 level and a 0.5 percent increase American, or Negro” or provide written entries such as over last year. This cohort represents 13.0 percent of African American, Afro-American, Kenyan, Nigerian, Kansas’ total population in 2005. During that same or Haitian. American Indian & Alaska Native. This category Gender includes those who have origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including This category is determined by self-classification Central America) and who maintain an attachment to based on gender as either male or female. In 2004, the their community or tribe. total Kansas population consisted of 1,363,613 males and 1,381,074 females, which is a ratio of 0.98 male to Asian. A person would choose this category if his or 1.00 female. This ratio also was 0.98:1.00 in 2000. her origins are in any of the original peoples of the Far The chronology of data indicates there were more East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent, males than females from birth through middle age. By including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, 65 years of age, the number of females is greater than Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine the number of males, with the ratio increasing as the Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam. This category population ages. The percentage breakdown and ratio includes those who self-identify as Asian Indian, in each age cohort have remained relatively constant Chinese, Filipino, Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, and from 2000 through 2005. The 65 years of age and Other Asian. older category is the first to show more females than males. For the population that is 85 years of age and Native Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islander. This older, the difference between males and females is category includes those who have origins in any of the even more marked. original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific islands. It includes people who indicate their race as Native Hawaiian, Guamanian or Chamorro, Samoan, and Other Pacific Islander. Ethnicity

Some Other Race. This category includes all other The U.S. Bureau of the Census categorizes ethnicity as responses that are not included in one of the categories either Hispanic or non-Hispanic. People who identify listed above. Respondents providing write-in entries with the terms “Hispanic” or “Latino” are those who such as multiracial, mixed, interracial, Wesort, or a classify themselves in one of the specific Hispanic or Hispanic/Latino group (for example, Mexican, Puerto Latino categories—Mexican, Puerto Rican, or Cuban— Rican, or Cuban) also are included here. as well as those who indicate that they are “other Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino.” Interestingly, origin Two or More Races. This category encompasses the can be viewed as the heritage, nationality group, responses where individuals chose to self-identify with lineage, or country of birth of the person or the two or more races by checking two or more race person’s parents or ancestors before their arrival in the response check boxes, by providing multiple write-in United States. Those individuals who self-identify responses, or by some combination of the two. their origin as Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino may be of any race.

Between 2000 and 2004, the demographic makeup by In 2005, there were 228,250 Hispanic individuals in race and by age has remained relatively stable with Kansas, which represented 8.3 percent of the total only minor shifts. In 2005, 89.4 percent of the population. In 2000, there were 188,252 Hispanic population self-identified as white alone, while 5.9 individuals in Kansas, which was 7.0 percent of the percent self-identified as black alone, and 0.9 percent total population. All age cohorts show the same as American Indian or Alaska Native alone. Only 2.1 relative increase from 2000 through 2005. percent self-identified as Asian alone; only 0.1 percent

self-identified as Native Hawaiian and other Pacific

Islander alone; and 1.6 percent self-identified as two or

more races. The only changes occurring in those categories since 2000 were a 0.4 percent decrease in Kansas Population Projections those self-identifying as white alone; a 0.3 percent increase in those self-identifying as Asian alone; and a In Kansas, population estimates and projections are 0.1 percent increase in those self-identifying as two or widely used by state agencies, local governments, and more races. individuals. The variety of uses includes a diversified user base that includes all levels of government, the Since the 2000 Census, the projections have been media, businesses, special interest groups, and updated twice. The first set was produced in 2002. individuals. The most recent set was produced in November 2006 when the Kansas Division of the Budget contracted By state statute, on July 1 of each year Kansas certifies with Moody’s Economy.com to produce population as the official state population the U.S. Census projections, which allows Kansas to fulfill its Bureau’s most recent population estimates for sub- obligation to provide timely, accurate, and useful data. county areas. Unlike the annual certification, the An advantage of contracting out is that an independent state’s population projections are not required to be method provides valuable feedback to the U.S. Census produced each year. As a general rule, the Kansas Bureau. Appendix L shows the population projections Division of the Budget publishes updated population for Kansas and all counties, by age, for 2007 through projections every three to five years. 2018.

Appendix A Kansas Personal Income, 2004-2005 (Dollars in Thousands) Percent Change 2004 2005 2004-2005 Personal Income$ 85,596,373 $ 90,433,004 5.7 % Nonfarm Earnings 65,385,196 68,885,838 5.4 Farm Earnings 992,031 1,254,005 26.4

Earnings by Place of Work 66,377,227 70,139,843 5.7 Less: Personal Contributions for Social Insurance 7,160,409 7,814,362 9.1 Plus: Adjustment for Residence 763,987 840,326 10.0 Equals: Net Earnings by Place of Residence 59,980,805 63,165,807 5.3 Plus: Dividends, Interest, & Rent 13,423,676 14,278,443 6.4 Plus: Transfer Payments 12,191,892 12,988,754 6.5 Equals: Personal Income 85,596,373 90,433,004 5.7

Salaries & Wages Disbursements 45,815,302 47,666,412 4.0 Other Labor Income 12,400,113 13,411,123 8.2 Proprietors' Income 8,161,812 9,062,308 11.0 Farm Proprietors' Income 536,231 810,841 51.2 Nonfarm Proprietors' Income 7,625,581 8,251,467 8.2 Farm Earnings 992,031 1,254,005 26.4 Nonfarm Earnings 65,385,196 68,885,838 5.4 Private Earnings 52,118,158 55,051,842 5.6 Forestry, Fishing, Related Activities, & Other 210,448 224,715 6.8 Forestry & Logging 2,561 (D) NA Fishing, Hunting, & Trapping 3,931 (D) NA Agriculture & Forestry Support Activities 203,956 217,945 6.9 Other -- -- NA Mining 1,116,681 1,329,453 19.1 Oil & Gas Extraction 812,180 983,522 21.1 Mining (except Oil & Gas) 95,495 105,343 10.3 Support Activities for Mining 209,006 240,588 15.1 Utilities 656,721 690,061 5.1 Construction 3,484,392 3,776,568 8.4 Construction of Buildings 875,217 932,875 6.6 Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction 590,436 655,189 11.0 Specialty Trade Contractors 2,018,739 2,188,504 8.4 Manufacturing 11,046,894 11,657,585 5.5 Durable Goods Manufacturing 6,620,271 7,052,393 6.5 Wood Product Manufacturing 87,177 89,955 3.2 Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing 314,327 344,446 9.6 Primary Metal Manufacturing 145,792 155,856 6.9 Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing 551,188 618,229 12.2 Machinery Manufacturing 870,884 902,362 3.6 Computer & Electronic Product Manufacturing 445,518 481,329 8.0 Electrical Equipment & Appliance Manufacturing 257,140 271,633 5.6 Motor Vehicle Manufacturing (D) (D) NA Trans. Equipment Mfg. Excl. Motor Vehicles (D) (D) NA Furniture & Related Product Manufacturing 223,289 229,584 2.8 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 333,352 330,863 (0.7) Appendix A (cont'd) Kansas Personal Income, 2004-2005 (Dollars in Thousands) Percent Change 2004 2005 2004-2005 Nondurable Goods Manufacturing $ 4,426,623 $ 4,605,192 4.0 % Food Manufacturing 1,385,982 1,436,859 3.7 Beverage & Tobacco Product Manufacturing 35,083 37,180 6.0 Textile Mills 4,142 6,525 57.5 Textile Product Mills 48,638 46,432 (4.5) Apparel Manufacturing 65,523 67,408 2.9 Leather & Allied Product Manufacturing 15,782 13,240 (16.1) Paper Manufacturing 182,918 172,275 (5.8) Printing & Related Support Activities 545,613 563,519 3.3 Petroleum & Coal Products Manufacturing 884,933 952,426 7.6 Chemical Manufacturing 775,353 816,313 5.3 Plastics & Rubber Products Manufacturing 482,656 493,015 2.1 Wholesale Trade 3,555,126 3,775,630 6.2 Retail Trade 4,277,971 4,352,951 1.8 Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers 870,991 893,238 2.6 Furniture & Home Furnishings Stores 214,728 209,486 (2.4) Electronics & Appliance Stores 273,889 265,898 (2.9) Building Material & Garden Supply Stores 387,168 407,724 5.3 Food & Beverage Stores 558,755 556,551 (0.4) Health & Personal Care Stores 258,371 269,399 4.3 Gasoline Stations 239,504 230,212 (3.9) Clothing & Clothing Accessories Stores 189,201 198,475 4.9 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, & Music Stores 135,272 137,989 2.0 General Merchandise Stores 783,148 811,713 3.6 Miscellaneous Store Retailers 245,974 243,181 (1.1) Nonstore Retailers 120,970 129,085 6.7 Transportation & Warehousing 2,428,302 2,492,859 2.7 Air Transportation 44,280 35,598 (19.6) Rail Transportation (D) (D) NA Water Transportation 716 769 7.4 Truck Transportation (D) 962,897 NA Transit & Ground Passenger Transportation 77,699 81,218 4.5 Pipeline Transportation 91,113 90,261 (0.9) Scenic & Sightseeing Transportation 2,404 2,619 8.9 Support Activities for Transportation 243,726 280,281 15.0 Couriers & Messengers 280,602 (D) NA Warehousing & Storage 266,878 253,269 (5.1) Information 3,467,382 3,344,634 (3.5) Publishing Industries, except Internet 417,997 444,508 6.3 Motion Picture & Sound Recording Industries 25,387 25,724 1.3 Broadcasting, except Internet 665,274 638,603 (4.0) Internet Publishing & Broadcasting 4,291 4,237 (1.3) Telecommunications 2,180,008 2,044,869 (6.2) ISPs, Search Portals, & Data Processing 150,714 164,100 8.9 Other Information Services 23,711 22,593 (4.7) Finance & Insurance 3,538,371 3,685,225 4.2 Monetary Authorities—Central Bank (D) (D) NA Credit Intermediation & Related Activities 1,409,344 1,459,233 3.5 Appendix A (cont'd) Kansas Personal Income, 2004-2005 (Dollars in Thousands) Percent Change 2004 2005 2004-2005 Finance & Insurance (continued) Securities, Commodity Contracts, Investments $ 550,601 $ 611,673 11.1 % Insurance Carriers & Related Activities 1,548,835 1,585,729 2.4 Funds, Trusts, & Other Financial Vehicles (D) (D) NA Real Estate & Rental—Leasing 1,082,982 1,167,464 7.8 Real Estate 797,611 922,522 15.7 Rental & Leasing Services 261,206 225,386 (13.7) Lessors of Nonfinancial Intangible Assets 24,165 19,556 (19.1) Professional & Technical Services 4,119,237 4,496,016 9.1 Management of Companies & Enterprises 635,516 711,571 12.0 Administrative & Waste Services 2,047,432 2,458,646 20.1 Administrative & Support Services 1,902,637 2,302,836 21.0 Waste Management & Remediation Services 144,795 155,810 7.6 Educational Services 504,491 530,460 5.1 Health Care & Social Assistance 6,120,927 6,448,131 5.3 Ambulatory Health Care Services 3,060,212 3,266,382 6.7 Hospitals 1,670,833 1,722,451 3.1 Nursing & Residential Care Facilities 838,397 883,085 5.3 Social Assistance 551,485 576,213 4.5 Arts, Entertainment, & Recreation 281,209 275,016 (2.2) Performing Arts & Spectator Sports 71,703 67,316 (6.1) Museums, Historical Sites, Zoos, & Parks 22,710 23,945 5.4 Amusement, Gambling, & Recreation 186,796 183,755 (1.6) Accommodation & Food Services 1,614,977 1,654,325 2.4 Accommodations 246,576 256,480 4.0 Food Services & Drinking Places 1,368,401 1,397,845 2.2 Other Services, except Public Administration 1,929,099 1,980,532 2.7 Repair & Maintenance 594,992 603,143 1.4 Personal & Laundry Services 368,032 383,031 4.1 Membership Associations & Organizations 797,350 823,146 3.2 Private Households 168,725 171,212 1.5 Government & Government Enterprises 13,267,038 13,833,996 4.3 Federal, Civilian 2,052,479 2,054,583 0.1 Military 1,732,548 1,889,902 9.1 State & Local 9,482,011 9,889,511 4.3 State Government 3,065,380 3,134,103 2.2 Local Government 6,416,631 6,755,408 5.3

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis

Estimates of earnings are based on the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). (D) Not shown to avoid disclosure of confidential information, but estimates for this item are included in total. Appendix B State Personal Income & Growth Rates, 2003-2005 (Dollars in Thousands) Per Capita Personal Income Percent Change Personal Income Percent Change 2005 Rank 03-04 04-05 Rank 2005 Rank 03-04 04-05 Rank

United States 10,224,761,000 6.2 % 5.2 % 34,495 5.2 % 4.2 %

Far West 1,825,478,643 3 6.9 5.3 4 36,209 3 5.6 4.2 5 Great Lakes 1,538,939,073 4 3.5 4.0 8 33,342 5 3.2 3.6 8 Mideast 1,884,242,364 2 6.4 4.8 5 39,755 2 6.0 4.6 3 New England 595,013,214 7 5.7 4.4 6 41,785 1 5.5 4.3 4 Plains 661,089,374 6 5.7 4.3 7 33,362 4 5.1 3.7 7 Rocky Mountain 329,271,374 8 6.9 6.4 2 32,898 6 5.4 4.7 2 Southeast 2,306,347,451 1 7.0 5.5 3 31,123 8 5.6 4.0 6 Southwest 1,084,379,507 5 7.1 7.7 1 31,637 7 5.2 5.7 1

Alabama 135,017,579 24 7.1 6.4 13 29,623 41 6.5 5.6 6 Alaska 23,515,490 48 5.1 5.9 20 35,433 16 3.6 5.0 14 Arizona 179,113,939 21 9.0 8.9 1 30,157 39 5.9 5.3 9 Arkansas 74,039,707 33 6.7 4.4 36 26,641 48 5.8 3.3 43 California 1,332,918,864 1 6.8 5.4 26 36,890 13 5.6 4.6 23

Colorado 174,753,724 22 6.3 6.2 16 37,459 9 5.0 4.7 17 Connecticut 166,807,307 23 6.7 5.0 29 47,519 2 6.3 4.6 20 Delaware 31,281,356 44 7.1 6.2 15 37,084 12 5.5 4.5 25 District of Columbia 31,010,231 45 7.8 5.9 19 56,329 1 8.5 6.6 2 Florida 606,611,828 4 9.8 7.1 7 34,099 21 7.4 4.7 19

Georgia 282,979,145 11 5.4 6.7 9 31,191 34 3.4 4.9 16 Hawaii 43,952,780 40 8.9 6.7 8 34,468 20 7.7 5.6 5 Idaho 40,583,803 42 9.8 6.5 11 28,398 43 7.7 4.0 36 Illinois 462,857,174 5 3.5 4.6 34 36,264 14 3.0 4.2 33 Indiana 195,371,915 16 4.9 4.0 42 31,150 35 4.4 3.3 44

Iowa 94,315,944 30 8.8 3.1 49 31,795 31 8.4 2.7 49 Kansas 90,433,004 31 5.5 5.7 22 32,948 24 5.1 5.2 10 Kentucky 118,180,386 26 5.4 5.5 25 28,317 44 4.7 4.7 18 Louisiana 111,200,646 28 5.3 (8.9) 51 24,582 51 4.9 (9.2) 51 Maine 40,713,563 41 4.6 3.6 46 30,808 38 4.1 3.0 48

Maryland 235,195,668 14 7.2 6.3 14 41,996 5 6.3 5.5 7 Massachusetts 279,635,404 12 5.4 4.4 38 43,702 4 5.5 4.6 24 Michigan 331,304,150 9 2.1 3.4 48 32,735 25 1.9 3.2 45 Minnesota 191,567,678 17 6.2 3.8 44 37,322 10 5.5 3.1 47 Mississippi 72,809,128 34 4.7 4.8 31 24,925 50 4.0 4.1 35 Appendix B (cont'd) State Personal Income & Growth Rates, 2003-2005 (Dollars in Thousands) Per Capita Personal Income Percent Change Personal Income Percent Change 2005 Rank 03-04 04-05 Rank 2005 Rank 03-04 04-05 Rank

Missouri 181,542,382 20 4.2 % 4.7 % 33 31,299 32 3.5 % 3.9 % 38 Montana 27,046,091 46 6.6 5.4 27 28,906 42 5.6 4.4 29 Nebraska 58,019,364 36 4.6 3.9 43 32,988 23 4.0 3.2 46 Nevada 86,402,521 32 11.5 8.7 2 35,780 15 7.2 5.1 12 New Hampshire 49,561,044 38 6.5 4.4 37 37,835 7 5.6 3.6 41

New Jersey 382,041,165 7 5.9 5.0 28 43,822 3 5.4 4.6 21 New Mexico 53,825,956 37 8.8 6.0 18 27,912 46 7.4 4.6 22 New York 771,567,778 2 7.1 4.1 41 40,072 6 6.8 4.2 31 North Carolina 269,435,097 13 7.4 6.7 10 31,029 36 5.9 4.9 15 North Dakota 19,883,207 50 1.8 7.7 4 31,230 33 1.3 7.6 1

Ohio 365,319,011 8 3.4 3.7 45 31,867 30 3.2 3.6 40 Oklahoma 106,110,572 29 8.0 6.2 17 29,908 40 7.4 5.4 8 Oregon 117,148,817 27 5.8 5.8 21 32,174 29 4.9 4.4 28 Pennsylvania 433,146,166 6 5.0 4.7 32 34,848 19 4.8 4.4 26 Rhode Island 37,902,666 43 4.5 3.4 47 35,219 18 4.1 3.8 39

South Carolina 120,042,913 25 6.0 5.6 24 28,212 45 4.7 4.2 32 South Dakota 25,327,795 47 7.6 4.9 30 32,642 27 6.7 4.2 34 Tennessee 184,566,303 18 5.5 5.6 23 30,952 37 4.6 4.4 27 Texas 745,329,040 3 6.4 7.8 3 32,604 28 4.6 6.0 4 Utah 67,906,174 35 6.8 7.1 6 27,497 47 4.9 5.0 13

Vermont 20,393,230 49 4.3 4.2 39 32,731 26 4.0 3.9 37 Virginia 284,174,406 10 6.5 6.4 12 37,552 8 5.1 5.2 11 Washington 221,540,171 15 6.9 2.9 50 35,234 17 5.6 1.5 50 West Virginia 47,290,313 39 4.4 4.5 35 26,029 49 4.3 4.3 30 Wisconsin 184,086,823 19 5.0 4.2 40 33,251 22 4.4 3.5 42 Wyoming 18,981,582 51 8.0 7.1 5 37,270 11 7.1 6.4 3

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis Appendix C State Disposable Income & Growth Rates, 2003-2005 (Dollars in Thousands) Per Capita Disposable Income Percent Change Disposable Income Percent Change 2005 Rank 03-04 04-05 Rank 2005 Rank 03-04 04-05 Rank

United States 9,022,941,000 6.3 % 4.1 % 30,441 5.3 % 3.1 %

Far West 1,594,611,045 3 7.0 3.9 4 31,630 3 5.7 2.8 6 Great Lakes 1,363,601,660 4 3.8 3.0 8 29,543 5 3.4 2.7 8 Mideast 1,623,751,440 2 6.5 3.4 6 34,259 2 6.1 3.2 3 New England 511,080,439 7 5.7 3.1 7 35,891 1 5.5 3.0 5 Plains 589,955,658 6 6.0 3.4 5 29,772 4 5.4 2.8 7 Rocky Mountain 293,148,522 8 7.2 5.3 2 29,289 6 5.7 3.7 2 Southeast 2,062,572,376 1 7.1 4.5 3 27,834 8 5.7 3.0 4 Southwest 984,219,860 5 7.4 6.8 1 28,715 7 5.6 4.9 1

Alabama 122,383,162 24 7.4 5.5 12 26,851 41 6.9 4.8 5 Alaska 21,337,518 48 5.7 5.0 18 32,151 13 4.3 4.1 12 Arizona 159,763,216 21 8.8 7.7 1 26,899 40 5.7 4.1 10 Arkansas 66,898,874 34 6.9 3.5 34 24,072 48 5.9 2.4 45 California 1,156,599,959 1 6.8 3.9 29 32,010 14 5.6 3.1 33

Colorado 154,530,017 22 6.6 5.1 16 33,124 9 5.3 3.7 18 Connecticut 139,454,925 23 6.6 3.1 41 39,727 2 6.2 2.8 37 Delaware 27,293,292 44 7.1 5.0 19 32,356 12 5.5 3.3 28 District of Columbia 26,663,042 45 7.8 4.4 25 48,432 1 8.5 5.1 4 Florida 541,101,435 4 9.2 5.8 8 30,416 21 6.8 3.4 22

Georgia 251,349,218 10 5.7 5.9 7 27,704 36 3.7 4.1 11 Hawaii 38,876,552 40 9.0 5.5 11 30,487 20 7.8 4.4 8 Idaho 36,565,121 41 10.0 5.6 9 25,586 43 7.8 3.1 32 Illinois 408,081,482 5 3.7 3.4 35 31,973 15 3.2 3.0 34 Indiana 174,959,949 16 5.3 3.2 37 27,896 35 4.8 2.5 44

Iowa 85,198,857 30 9.3 2.3 49 28,722 29 8.8 1.8 49 Kansas 81,132,755 31 5.9 4.8 23 29,560 25 5.6 4.4 9 Kentucky 105,599,690 26 5.9 4.8 22 25,303 46 5.3 4.0 13 Louisiana 101,913,678 28 5.8 (9.3) 51 22,529 51 5.4 (9.6) 51 Maine 36,299,446 42 4.7 2.6 46 27,468 38 4.2 2.1 47

Maryland 202,617,083 14 7.3 5.2 15 36,179 5 6.4 4.5 7 Massachusetts 239,280,386 12 5.5 3.2 39 37,395 4 5.6 3.3 27 Michigan 296,290,597 9 2.6 2.6 45 29,275 27 2.3 2.5 43 Minnesota 167,520,890 18 6.6 2.8 43 32,637 10 5.9 2.1 48 Mississippi 67,140,254 33 5.4 4.1 28 22,985 50 4.7 3.3 26 Appendix C (cont'd) State Disposable Income & Growth Rates, 2003-2005 (Dollars in Thousands) Per Capita Disposable Income Percent Change Disposable Income Percent Change 2005 Rank 03-04 04-05 Rank 2005 Rank 03-04 04-05 Rank

Missouri 162,417,339 20 4.6 % 3.7 % 31 28,001 34 3.9 % 3.0 % 35 Montana 24,313,541 46 6.7 4.2 26 25,985 42 5.6 3.2 31 Nebraska 52,120,852 36 4.7 2.9 42 29,635 24 4.1 2.2 46 Nevada 75,988,798 32 10.9 7.3 2 31,468 17 6.6 3.6 20 New Hampshire 44,443,292 38 7.0 3.3 36 33,928 6 6.1 2.5 42

New Jersey 331,442,583 7 6.5 3.7 32 38,019 3 5.9 3.3 29 New Mexico 48,943,021 37 9.2 5.3 14 25,380 45 7.9 4.0 14 New York 652,273,424 3 6.9 2.4 47 33,876 7 6.6 2.6 41 North Carolina 239,204,404 13 7.8 5.6 10 27,548 37 6.4 3.9 15 North Dakota 18,172,069 50 1.7 7.0 3 28,542 30 1.2 6.9 1

Ohio 321,643,313 8 3.5 2.8 44 28,057 33 3.3 2.6 39 Oklahoma 95,713,220 29 8.3 5.4 13 26,978 39 7.7 4.6 6 Oregon 102,882,448 27 5.8 4.7 24 28,256 32 5.0 3.3 30 Pennsylvania 383,462,016 6 5.3 3.7 30 30,851 19 5.1 3.4 21 Rhode Island 33,405,317 43 4.6 2.4 48 31,040 18 4.2 2.8 38

South Carolina 108,133,749 25 6.2 4.8 21 25,413 44 4.9 3.4 24 South Dakota 23,392,896 47 7.6 4.1 27 30,148 22 6.7 3.4 23 Tennessee 169,400,903 17 5.8 4.9 20 28,409 31 4.8 3.7 19 Texas 679,800,403 2 6.8 7.0 4 29,738 23 5.1 5.1 3 Utah 60,681,090 35 7.0 6.0 5 24,571 47 5.1 3.9 16

Vermont 18,197,073 49 4.4 3.2 40 29,206 28 4.0 2.9 36 Virginia 246,533,356 11 6.7 5.1 17 32,578 11 5.3 3.9 17 Washington 198,925,770 15 7.3 1.6 50 31,637 16 6.0 0.3 50 West Virginia 42,913,653 39 4.8 3.6 33 23,620 49 4.7 3.4 25 Wisconsin 162,626,319 19 5.4 3.2 38 29,375 26 4.8 2.6 40 Wyoming 17,058,753 51 8.2 5.9 6 33,495 8 7.4 5.2 2

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis Appendix D Kansas County Personal Income, 2004 (Dollars in Thousands) Adjust- Less: Personal Salaries Other Dividends, ment Contributions Total & Labor Proprietors' Income Interest, Transfer for for Social Personal County Wages Income Farm Nonfarm & Rent Payments Residence Insurance Income

Allen $153,555 $46,750 $4,643 $30,966 $56,398 $78,762 ($1,551) $25,346 $344,177 Anderson 48,749 13,079 5,781 15,156 30,289 43,344 32,343 8,747 179,994 Atchison 193,213 53,353 8,324 27,731 60,192 80,471 (409) 31,414 391,460 Barber 47,271 13,283 (9,291) 16,761 28,562 31,432 1,085 8,278 120,825 Barton 358,834 90,345 1,004 93,425 168,276 150,389 (1,808) 58,913 801,552

Bourbon 181,469 46,900 4,024 23,834 57,819 87,027 (7,078) 29,540 364,456 Brown 129,548 37,798 13,036 21,530 45,101 58,762 (610) 20,388 284,776 Butler 453,836 137,909 14,624 148,056 240,424 258,002 538,381 76,196 1,715,035 Chase 18,120 5,571 12,609 17,957 11,789 15,301 17,795 3,790 95,349 Chautauqua 22,149 5,855 (5,064) 15,701 24,901 28,849 11,662 4,310 99,742

Cherokee 172,341 49,042 10,117 60,009 61,944 124,351 61,021 30,360 508,464 Cheyenne 22,355 5,588 (16,041) 5,338 17,432 17,748 788 3,633 49,575 Clark 24,771 6,004 (10,524) 6,956 15,156 12,556 2,540 3,408 54,053 Clay 72,336 19,362 7,917 37,710 46,668 45,036 29,517 12,938 245,607 Cloud 91,718 25,233 6,436 12,337 48,195 60,917 6,231 15,325 235,742

Coffey 140,981 46,349 7,392 29,204 46,644 48,273 (18,621) 21,789 278,434 Comanche 14,859 4,371 (7,088) 6,122 11,108 11,115 1,048 2,550 38,985 Cowley 428,950 123,679 7,469 51,950 121,204 203,768 41,818 69,048 909,791 Crawford 474,219 134,857 9,160 8,155 170,836 213,759 (11,930) 72,879 926,175 Decatur 22,404 5,858 (7,480) 6,576 28,265 19,067 2,055 3,751 72,994

Dickinson 178,642 51,211 12,490 15,436 92,137 94,532 66,320 29,988 480,779 Doniphan 70,749 21,686 9,008 8,875 22,039 39,409 18,015 11,205 178,576 Douglas 1,448,392 387,857 4,102 188,353 478,095 323,092 254,179 217,333 2,866,738 Edwards 28,010 7,081 13,281 6,867 17,652 19,129 3,892 4,356 91,556 Elk 15,148 4,668 -- 4,967 10,670 21,082 9,989 2,750 63,775

Ellis 409,618 104,201 10,511 109,975 114,142 122,944 (2,580) 65,892 802,918 Ellsworth 62,357 17,675 6,727 12,412 37,784 33,612 1,190 10,142 161,615 Finney 512,499 128,746 17,422 84,223 99,372 128,353 (22,271) 76,688 871,656 Ford 456,209 119,991 6,803 60,326 102,070 117,988 (17,964) 69,023 776,399 Franklin 270,800 66,498 3,936 37,355 68,618 124,637 108,005 43,259 636,590

Geary 788,754 411,017 (2,838) 28,800 90,567 101,040 (426,954) 110,740 879,647 Gove 28,132 7,268 (9,964) 8,664 17,818 16,506 1,274 4,311 65,388 Graham 25,920 7,015 (8,605) 16,818 13,511 19,820 2,416 4,777 72,118 Grant 117,326 29,143 (3,074) 24,329 23,373 27,643 (10,033) 17,118 191,589 Gray 68,753 16,783 25,835 14,303 19,498 19,576 6,908 9,650 162,005 Appendix D (cont'd) Kansas County Personal Income, 2004 (Dollars in Thousands) Adjust- Less: Personal Salaries Other Dividends, ment Contributions Total & Labor Proprietors' Income Interest, Transfer for for Social Personal County Wages Income Farm Nonfarm & Rent Payments Residence Insurance Income

Greeley $18,052 $3,852 $293 $2,757 $6,691 $6,483 ($1,099) $2,263 $34,765 Greenwood 42,045 11,463 6,915 14,839 28,113 47,184 22,376 7,768 165,167 Hamilton 26,940 6,529 20,980 6,364 11,090 12,575 (270) 3,684 80,523 Harper 58,434 17,418 (7,008) 18,388 32,417 36,330 10,924 10,052 156,852 Harvey 397,826 103,710 15,566 161,666 120,887 169,657 74,265 71,031 972,546

Haskell 47,171 10,902 68,878 9,980 16,740 13,930 5,124 6,205 166,520 Hodgeman 13,139 3,931 10,971 2,505 12,531 10,302 3,309 1,863 54,824 Jackson 125,100 30,863 857 42,725 40,756 57,453 70,414 20,866 347,302 Jefferson 95,910 26,599 7,242 10,944 53,152 79,039 177,593 15,973 434,505 Jewell 22,904 6,821 8,956 10,385 20,982 20,128 6,297 3,988 92,484

Johnson 12,910,345 3,025,668 8,554 2,648,903 3,964,082 1,589,497 933,878 2,012,819 23,068,109 Kearny 35,375 8,861 6,421 4,671 14,588 16,150 8,630 4,658 90,037 Kingman 66,021 17,408 (7,580) 21,338 35,412 42,991 32,960 11,425 197,124 Kiowa 32,558 8,618 2,572 6,571 17,926 21,929 2,583 5,139 87,618 Labette 239,263 65,838 1,400 40,392 68,968 163,819 6,106 39,264 546,523

Lane 20,743 5,035 (7,444) 4,567 13,592 11,742 (456) 2,939 44,841 Leavenworth 950,419 373,876 (1,842) 122,671 287,313 267,024 126,700 141,352 1,984,808 Lincoln 17,952 5,704 (524) 5,945 17,977 17,373 8,590 3,225 69,793 Linn 64,211 20,417 2,720 9,819 35,362 53,263 49,374 10,765 224,401 Logan 29,014 8,137 (11,009) 6,466 16,748 15,244 -- 4,655 59,943

Lyon 492,025 139,786 9,072 27,114 114,660 150,174 (25,758) 74,677 832,396 McPherson 462,668 128,558 22,790 113,407 124,681 138,754 (9,436) 75,061 906,362 Marion 94,979 25,859 8,861 17,490 51,518 67,363 43,710 16,135 293,645 Marshall 141,064 44,485 46,097 24,449 57,957 56,172 (5,977) 25,770 338,476 Meade 42,090 9,811 16,719 7,073 22,426 21,422 8,919 5,649 122,811

Miami 239,984 60,830 1,876 25,052 83,335 132,942 292,630 38,064 798,585 Mitchell 92,113 23,530 10,090 9,544 38,056 36,120 (9,974) 14,293 185,187 Montgomery 441,980 131,048 3,355 54,364 118,828 218,990 (20,365) 73,292 874,909 Morris 40,591 11,920 (205) 9,486 25,913 31,042 27,601 7,535 138,814 Morton 41,204 10,579 (18,650) 6,487 14,022 16,097 (499) 5,709 63,533

Nemaha 114,104 30,653 41,779 11,013 72,295 48,761 1,664 18,094 302,175 Neosho 204,078 57,288 (3,084) 32,356 49,903 97,640 (9,645) 32,970 395,564 Ness 31,629 9,240 (3,973) 15,174 22,066 19,826 5,106 5,717 93,352 Norton 65,618 17,211 (3,543) 9,902 29,539 27,890 (3,307) 10,088 133,221 Osage 71,559 21,364 5,467 8,829 63,554 82,300 141,012 12,560 381,525 Appendix D (cont'd) Kansas County Personal Income, 2004 (Dollars in Thousands) Adjust- Less: Personal Salaries Other Dividends, ment Contributions Total & Labor Proprietors' Income Interest, Transfer for for Social Personal County Wages Income Farm Nonfarm & Rent Payments Residence Insurance Income

Osborne $30,754 $8,742 $ -- $12,944 $23,821 $24,883 $162 $5,672 $95,633 Ottawa 32,635 8,879 2,401 8,213 34,147 27,154 36,934 5,560 144,803 Pawnee 88,537 24,115 1,240 10,964 27,779 33,790 (2,551) 12,799 171,076 Phillips 64,165 23,849 (2,425) 16,888 40,101 32,392 (2,300) 10,790 161,879 Pottawatomie 225,382 58,927 7,160 56,166 83,778 72,817 57,276 36,236 525,271

Pratt 117,671 29,160 (1,491) 27,302 45,231 53,355 (243) 19,052 251,933 Rawlins 21,023 5,901 (10,605) 13,391 16,291 17,415 1,341 3,932 60,825 Reno 818,803 210,287 9,472 76,377 331,779 327,304 25,378 128,588 1,670,811 Republic 44,546 12,465 6,531 10,824 27,286 30,286 1,826 7,426 126,338 Rice 85,113 23,760 7,882 10,348 35,310 51,742 17,357 13,445 218,066

Riley 810,922 224,256 (97) 51,712 247,746 178,284 317,329 116,715 1,713,436 Rooks 50,737 14,757 (3,418) 14,460 25,682 31,513 3,203 8,516 128,417 Rush 30,709 9,050 (6,107) 6,035 18,131 22,460 1,560 5,104 76,734 Russell 59,040 16,266 (1,889) 11,582 40,027 50,101 (1,116) 10,150 163,862 Saline 934,651 249,033 3,490 152,061 256,977 247,973 (101,294) 148,617 1,594,274

Scott 58,700 12,961 452 11,283 34,338 18,530 4,794 7,548 133,510 Sedgwick 9,225,175 2,646,084 3,652 1,710,700 2,275,797 2,068,636 (975,986) 1,444,728 15,509,329 Seward 344,112 89,854 5,428 65,538 50,305 80,007 (35,414) 52,298 547,532 Shawnee 3,431,526 863,000 9,564 282,158 908,557 920,787 (442,967) 526,762 5,445,863 Sheridan 23,409 6,175 17,144 14,449 18,291 13,252 1,173 4,011 89,882

Sherman 77,800 19,118 (13,868) 12,099 26,283 39,311 786 12,119 149,410 Smith 34,902 10,239 1,491 8,153 27,052 25,396 3,686 5,749 105,170 Stafford 35,168 9,975 11,347 9,313 23,705 28,304 6,920 5,456 119,275 Stanton 25,721 5,596 11,907 4,565 13,183 9,316 1,176 3,176 68,287 Stevens 64,068 16,117 22,418 11,591 26,585 21,683 (201) 9,110 153,150

Sumner 171,874 51,751 16,164 27,326 73,014 125,776 178,357 30,491 613,770 Thomas 100,311 26,159 3,840 13,445 35,623 37,589 (1,641) 15,097 200,229 Trego 24,330 7,032 (9,970) 6,187 14,186 18,454 2,864 4,128 58,955 Wabaunsee 33,271 9,279 4,083 12,891 22,888 31,440 64,254 6,060 172,045 Wallace 13,666 3,332 1,438 2,850 9,591 8,814 1,058 1,981 38,769

Washington 46,486 13,694 14,367 3,313 28,422 35,075 13,300 7,472 147,185 Wichita 28,963 6,706 10,749 6,620 11,191 10,585 (784) 3,849 70,180 Wilson 114,091 34,142 97 18,217 32,233 60,500 (1,875) 18,690 238,715 Woodson 15,483 4,770 7,350 7,120 12,695 23,338 6,930 3,261 74,425 Wyandotte 3,189,465 908,844 144 137,687 323,020 817,733 (1,086,972) 490,437 3,799,484

Total $45,815,302 $12,400,113 $536,231 $7,625,581 $13,423,676 $12,191,892 $763,987 $7,160,409 $85,596,373 Appendix E Kansas County Personal Income, 2005 (Dollars in Thousands) Adjust- Less: Personal Salaries Other Dividends, ment Contributions Total & Labor Proprietors' Income Interest, Transfer for for Social Personal County Wages Income Farm Nonfarm & Rent Payments Residence Insurance Income

Allen $158,347 $49,523 $24,108 $32,485 $59,387 $83,133 ($607) $27,366 $379,011 Anderson 50,167 13,962 8,108 15,866 31,362 45,843 23,715 9,432 179,592 Atchison 201,135 58,305 69,147 29,679 62,968 84,348 (398) 34,226 470,958 Barber 49,053 14,248 (12,386) 18,054 30,033 33,146 1,031 8,991 124,188 Barton 373,634 96,879 619 102,039 180,672 159,835 (1,400) 64,326 847,952

Bourbon 189,780 50,954 8,147 24,582 59,855 91,358 (4,018) 32,335 388,322 Brown 136,197 41,395 14,231 23,249 46,750 62,216 (518) 22,392 301,128 Butler 469,901 148,427 21,960 156,442 257,840 275,955 390,909 82,582 1,638,851 Chase 18,932 6,024 11,793 20,070 12,180 16,059 13,042 4,139 93,961 Chautauqua 23,183 6,254 (9,494) 17,249 26,485 30,217 8,583 4,708 97,769

Cherokee 177,871 52,240 27,209 65,189 64,566 131,395 44,480 32,937 530,014 Cheyenne 22,939 5,876 (38,729) 5,431 18,117 18,585 549 3,878 28,890 Clark 25,953 6,355 (22,382) 7,544 15,909 12,985 1,890 3,641 44,615 Clay 75,879 21,067 9,181 41,565 49,026 47,041 22,227 14,200 251,788 Cloud 95,718 27,348 6,100 12,745 50,199 64,049 4,705 16,748 244,115

Coffey 144,004 50,842 46,270 32,003 49,220 51,835 (12,228) 23,324 338,622 Comanche 15,749 4,813 (12,385) 6,537 11,502 11,366 739 2,800 35,522 Cowley 440,979 134,170 50,801 54,478 127,127 216,400 30,586 74,495 980,047 Crawford 486,572 141,684 15,249 8,042 182,234 227,806 (8,568) 78,256 974,762 Decatur 22,666 6,093 (11,702) 6,845 29,822 19,655 1,577 3,957 70,998

Dickinson 185,560 55,627 11,251 15,882 97,513 99,482 48,662 32,582 481,396 Doniphan 74,511 24,090 8,821 9,113 22,756 41,300 17,890 12,331 186,151 Douglas 1,511,522 420,236 9,124 206,090 516,002 347,294 185,662 237,649 2,958,280 Edwards 29,171 7,595 10,024 7,116 18,433 19,925 2,859 4,692 90,433 Elk 15,887 5,061 -- 5,123 11,081 21,841 7,327 3,000 63,320

Ellis 425,167 111,653 9,145 118,618 119,825 130,450 (2,321) 71,704 840,832 Ellsworth 65,086 19,265 6,747 13,089 40,496 35,025 727 11,056 169,378 Finney 526,455 136,821 12,384 87,351 103,592 138,459 (14,589) 82,205 908,267 Ford 470,395 128,598 4,447 63,745 106,803 125,428 (11,870) 74,413 813,133 Franklin 280,956 71,675 15,919 39,600 70,872 133,690 79,184 47,139 644,756

Geary 843,722 456,949 (2,220) 29,784 94,503 108,288 (256,756) 124,475 1,149,796 Gove 29,177 7,721 (19,492) 9,068 18,529 17,355 1,193 4,605 58,945 Graham 27,096 7,555 (11,194) 18,564 14,002 20,670 1,787 5,231 73,248 Grant 123,778 31,771 (3,429) 26,005 23,891 29,967 (6,238) 18,722 207,022 Gray 72,517 18,128 20,785 14,986 19,931 20,209 4,973 10,478 161,052 Appendix E (cont'd) Kansas County Personal Income, 2005 (Dollars in Thousands) Adjust- Less: Personal Salaries Other Dividends, ment Contributions Total & Labor Proprietors' Income Interest, Transfer for for Social Personal County Wages Income Farm Nonfarm & Rent Payments Residence Insurance Income

Greeley $19,252 $4,111 $175 $2,932 $6,856 $6,593 ($665) $2,445 $36,809 Greenwood 43,380 12,198 5,537 15,563 29,054 49,090 16,303 8,394 162,732 Hamilton 28,666 7,091 17,236 7,053 11,359 13,090 (194) 4,021 80,280 Harper 62,540 19,430 (7,242) 19,585 33,990 37,735 7,741 11,185 162,594 Harvey 410,216 111,524 17,923 185,602 126,062 178,042 54,222 77,225 1,006,366

Haskell 50,549 11,843 65,549 10,481 17,392 14,630 3,710 6,769 167,384 Hodgeman 13,636 4,140 9,706 2,507 13,168 10,769 2,386 1,976 54,335 Jackson 134,040 34,324 1,074 46,469 41,966 61,241 49,857 23,391 345,579 Jefferson 98,618 28,455 30,295 11,235 55,140 84,525 129,620 17,241 420,647 Jewell 24,184 7,432 7,054 11,153 21,892 21,048 4,583 4,364 92,983

Johnson 13,549,540 3,301,100 7,091 2,917,824 4,253,747 1,707,781 672,358 2,222,477 24,186,964 Kearny 37,790 9,629 4,543 4,940 14,778 17,123 6,141 5,110 89,834 Kingman 68,735 18,743 (9,859) 22,854 36,985 44,796 24,074 12,434 193,895 Kiowa 34,298 9,409 2,072 7,134 18,655 23,700 1,857 5,645 91,482 Labette 246,038 70,078 1,105 42,266 71,811 179,082 3,935 42,287 572,029

Lane 21,661 5,335 (8,989) 4,825 14,182 12,286 (316) 3,154 45,831 Leavenworth 1,002,430 405,909 (1,177) 131,302 306,294 288,532 85,474 156,310 2,062,453 Lincoln 18,113 5,981 (546) 6,084 18,712 18,041 6,329 3,409 69,304 Linn 66,086 22,190 5,890 10,240 37,143 56,652 35,730 11,617 222,314 Logan 30,395 8,914 (25,677) 6,727 17,583 15,884 -- 5,060 48,767

Lyon 508,645 149,355 10,161 27,785 119,402 159,566 (16,748) 80,803 877,363 McPherson 493,501 141,954 27,493 124,347 130,055 144,839 (11,021) 83,817 967,351 Marion 99,540 27,953 10,682 18,321 54,047 69,898 31,964 17,713 294,693 Marshall 148,943 47,045 61,221 26,108 60,038 58,536 (3,851) 28,181 369,860 Meade 44,387 10,517 22,381 7,360 23,478 22,435 6,323 6,079 130,801

Miami 253,497 66,475 2,452 25,986 86,606 143,332 212,851 42,033 749,166 Mitchell 97,139 25,866 8,375 9,908 40,485 37,804 (6,143) 15,747 197,688 Montgomery 460,586 139,659 7,019 58,122 124,232 231,883 (13,213) 80,150 928,138 Morris 41,008 12,506 (212) 9,862 26,838 32,664 20,899 7,982 135,585 Morton 43,110 11,373 (25,117) 6,798 14,409 17,072 (359) 6,146 61,140

Nemaha 119,845 33,509 61,066 11,423 76,744 50,927 1,087 19,912 334,687 Neosho 210,441 60,538 (2,232) 33,972 51,383 103,540 (6,306) 35,653 415,683 Ness 32,800 9,938 (4,208) 16,133 23,087 20,613 3,764 6,197 95,931 Norton 68,882 18,636 (4,851) 10,312 30,722 29,169 (2,128) 11,016 139,727 Osage 74,173 23,083 13,591 9,033 66,922 86,471 102,895 13,667 362,501 Appendix E (cont'd) Kansas County Personal Income, 2005 (Dollars in Thousands) Adjust- Less: Personal Salaries Other Dividends, ment Contributions Total & Labor Proprietors' Income Interest, Transfer for for Social Personal County Wages Income Farm Nonfarm & Rent Payments Residence Insurance Income

Osborne $31,706 $9,372 $0 $13,715 $24,915 $25,477 $69 $6,134 $99,120 Ottawa 34,096 9,561 2,744 8,876 35,981 28,399 26,801 6,080 140,378 Pawnee 94,393 26,558 775 11,445 29,023 35,248 (750) 14,104 182,589 Phillips 67,245 25,804 (2,662) 17,976 42,336 33,790 (1,434) 11,768 171,287 Pottawatomie 237,407 64,739 9,017 62,390 88,007 77,542 43,343 40,014 542,430

Pratt 123,205 31,279 (1,328) 29,324 47,281 56,397 (203) 20,729 265,225 Rawlins 21,431 6,230 (14,864) 14,758 16,827 18,210 977 4,214 59,354 Reno 836,998 222,775 8,107 79,007 354,421 346,497 20,287 137,994 1,730,098 Republic 44,976 13,016 5,954 11,313 28,382 31,341 1,504 7,837 128,648 Rice 88,832 25,949 10,257 10,517 36,297 53,833 12,612 14,627 223,670

Riley 855,830 244,188 (59) 54,396 265,714 190,726 250,973 128,681 1,733,087 Rooks 53,094 15,860 (4,097) 15,100 26,722 32,848 2,359 9,289 132,596 Rush 31,862 9,806 (9,375) 6,392 18,816 23,354 1,239 5,540 76,552 Russell 61,206 17,515 (1,937) 11,818 41,711 53,188 (463) 11,008 172,031 Saline 962,976 266,202 3,265 157,372 273,432 263,816 (66,271) 160,350 1,700,442

Scott 62,156 13,937 268 11,750 36,620 19,018 3,567 8,149 139,167 Sedgwick 9,510,441 2,877,109 17,838 1,851,993 2,435,144 2,220,408 (638,189) 1,567,163 16,707,581 Seward 353,803 95,691 8,867 69,820 51,919 86,147 (23,833) 56,200 586,214 Shawnee 3,530,148 917,510 44,275 292,617 975,874 993,935 (291,699) 566,764 5,895,896 Sheridan 24,513 6,671 14,828 15,703 19,210 13,903 799 4,367 91,261

Sherman 80,448 20,354 (20,000) 12,590 27,344 41,769 652 13,104 150,052 Smith 36,843 10,913 956 8,684 28,067 26,547 2,756 6,294 108,473 Stafford 36,535 10,655 9,597 9,633 24,775 29,564 5,215 5,838 120,136 Stanton 27,199 6,005 49,614 4,818 13,724 9,849 858 3,413 108,655 Stevens 68,304 17,630 31,099 12,173 27,558 22,904 (51) 10,012 169,606

Sumner 177,505 55,996 16,196 28,209 75,389 131,344 129,349 32,949 581,039 Thomas 103,268 28,064 2,404 13,798 37,323 39,886 (1,078) 16,212 207,452 Trego 25,224 7,605 (14,085) 6,479 14,685 19,018 2,064 4,472 56,517 Wabaunsee 35,273 10,123 6,666 13,611 23,791 33,759 47,019 6,706 163,535 Wallace 14,246 3,548 1,159 2,877 9,940 9,097 779 2,121 39,524

Washington 48,280 14,749 32,474 3,301 29,625 36,591 9,903 8,089 166,835 Wichita 31,183 7,297 7,462 7,143 11,584 11,080 (492) 4,228 71,030 Wilson 120,771 38,386 79 19,138 33,439 64,033 26 20,726 255,147 Woodson 15,482 4,954 7,426 7,688 13,128 24,415 5,148 3,457 74,785 Wyandotte 3,303,207 959,624 183 148,568 340,737 862,822 (701,454) 531,104 4,382,583

Total $47,666,412 $13,411,123 $810,841 $8,251,467 $14,278,443 $12,988,754 $840,326 $7,814,362 $90,433,004 Appendix F Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005

Kansas 2,688,418 2,733,697 2,744,687 56,269 10,990 2.1 % 0.4 %

Allen County 14,385 13,918 13,787 (598) (131) (4.3) (1.0) Bassett city 22 22 22 ------Elsmore city 73 69 68 (5) (1) (7.4) (1.5) Gas city 556 555 552 (4) (3) (0.7) (0.5) Humboldt city 1,999 1,939 1,921 (78) (18) (4.1) (0.9) Iola city 6,302 6,070 6,008 (294) (62) (4.9) (1.0) La Harpe city 706 682 673 (33) (9) (4.9) (1.3) Mildred city 36 36 36 ------Moran city 562 547 541 (21) (6) (3.9) (1.1) Savonburg city 91 91 90 (1) (1) (1.1) (1.1) Bal. of Allen County 4,038 3,907 3,876 (162) (31) (4.2) (0.8) Carlyle township 276 268 266 (10) (2) (3.8) (0.8) Cottage Grove township 282 272 270 (12) (2) (4.4) (0.7) Deer Creek township 142 139 138 (4) (1) (2.9) (0.7) Bal. of Elm township 703 679 673 (30) (6) (4.5) (0.9) Bal. of Elsmore township 296 288 286 (10) (2) (3.5) (0.7) Geneva township 172 168 167 (5) (1) (3.0) (0.6) Humboldt township 273 255 253 (20) (2) (7.9) (0.8) Bal. of Iola township 821 796 789 (32) (7) (4.1) (0.9) Logan township 225 218 216 (9) (2) (4.2) (0.9) Bal. of Marmaton township 291 283 281 (10) (2) (3.6) (0.7) Bal. of Osage township 280 271 269 (11) (2) (4.1) (0.7) Salem township 277 270 268 (9) (2) (3.4) (0.7)

Anderson County 8,110 8,170 8,182 72 12 0.9 0.1 Colony city 397 390 390 (7) -- (1.8) -- Garnett city 3,368 3,354 3,338 (30) (16) (0.9) (0.5) Greeley city 327 334 333 6 (1) 1.8 (0.3) Kincaid city 178 181 181 3 -- 1.7 -- Lone Elm city 27 27 27 ------Westphalia city 165 168 168 3 -- 1.8 -- Bal. of Anderson County 3,595 3,716 3,745 150 29 4.0 0.8 Indian Creek township 132 136 138 6 2 4.3 1.4 Jackson township 453 461 463 10 2 2.2 0.4 Lincoln township 208 213 216 8 3 3.7 1.4 Bal. of Lone Elm township 212 216 219 7 3 3.2 1.4 Monroe township 349 344 345 (4) 1 (1.2) 0.3 North Rich township 112 114 116 4 2 3.4 1.7 Bal. of Ozark township 168 172 174 6 2 3.4 1.1 Putnam township 284 290 291 7 1 2.4 0.3 Reeder township 427 437 441 14 4 3.2 0.9 Bal. of Rich township 168 172 173 5 1 2.9 0.6 Bal. of Walker township 341 348 350 9 2 2.6 0.6 Washington township 268 274 276 8 2 2.9 0.7 Welda township 301 308 309 8 1 2.6 0.3 Bal. of Westphalia township 225 231 234 9 3 3.8 1.3

Atchison County 16,774 16,860 16,804 30 (56) 0.2 (0.3) Atchison city 10,232 10,205 10,169 (63) (36) (0.6) (0.4) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Atchison County (cont'd) Effingham city 588 586 582 (6) (4) (1.0) (0.7) Huron city 87 89 88 1 (1) 1.1 (1.1) Lancaster city 291 298 297 6 (1) 2.0 (0.3) Muscotah city 200 204 203 3 (1) 1.5 (0.5) Bal. of Atchison County 5,376 5,478 5,465 89 (13) 1.6 (0.2) Bal. of Benton township 488 497 496 8 (1) 1.6 (0.2) Center township 676 692 690 14 (2) 2.0 (0.3) Bal. of Grasshopper township 388 395 394 6 (1) 1.5 (0.3) Kapioma township 271 276 276 5 -- 1.8 -- Bal. of Lancaster township 544 555 554 10 (1) 1.8 (0.2) Mount Pleasant township 829 848 846 17 (2) 2.0 (0.2) Shannon township 1,753 1,779 1,774 21 (5) 1.2 (0.3) Walnut township 427 436 435 8 (1) 1.8 (0.2)

Barber County 5,307 4,988 4,958 (349) (30) (7.0) (0.6) Hardtner city 199 190 189 (10) (1) (5.3) (0.5) Hazelton city 144 137 137 (7) -- (5.1) -- Isabel city 108 103 103 (5) -- (4.9) -- Kiowa city 1,055 977 965 (90) (12) (9.3) (1.2) Medicine Lodge city 2,193 2,039 2,028 (165) (11) (8.1) (0.5) Sharon city 210 201 200 (10) (1) (5.0) (0.5) Sun City city 81 77 77 (4) -- (5.2) -- Bal. of Barber County 1,313 1,264 1,259 (54) (5) (4.3) (0.4) Aetna township 3 3 3 ------Deerhead township 11 10 10 (1) -- (10.0) -- Eagle township 42 40 40 (2) -- (5.0) -- Elm Mills township 106 102 102 (4) -- (3.9) -- Bal. of Elwood township 76 73 73 (3) -- (4.1) -- Bal. of Hazelton township 69 66 66 (3) -- (4.5) -- Bal. of Kiowa township 109 104 104 (5) -- (4.8) -- Lake City township 83 79 79 (4) -- (5.1) -- McAdoo township 29 28 28 (1) -- (3.6) -- Bal. of Medicine Lodge township 380 367 364 (16) (3) (4.4) (0.8) Mingona township 57 54 54 (3) -- (5.6) -- Moore township 32 31 30 (2) (1) (6.7) (3.3) Nippawalla township 26 25 25 (1) -- (4.0) -- Bal. of Sharon township 159 157 156 (3) (1) (1.9) (0.6) Bal. of Sun City township 19 18 18 (1) -- (5.6) -- Turkey Creek township 37 35 35 (2) -- (5.7) -- Bal. of Valley township 75 72 72 (3) -- (4.2) --

Barton County 28,205 28,004 28,105 (100) 101 (0.4) 0.4 Albert city 181 181 183 2 2 1.1 1.1 Claflin city 705 686 688 (17) 2 (2.5) 0.3 Ellinwood city 2,164 2,080 2,119 (45) 39 (2.1) 1.8 Galatia city 61 61 61 ------Great Bend city 15,345 15,441 15,440 95 (1) 0.6 -- Hoisington city 2,975 2,980 2,996 21 16 0.7 0.5 Olmitz city 138 137 139 1 2 0.7 1.4 Pawnee Rock city 356 342 346 (10) 4 (2.9) 1.2 Susank city 57 57 57 ------Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Barton County (cont'd) Bal. of Barton County 6,223 6,039 6,076 (147) 37 (2.4) 0.6 Albion township 58 56 57 (1) 1 (1.8) 1.8 Beaver township 108 104 105 (3) 1 (2.9) 1.0 Buffalo township 490 474 477 (13) 3 (2.7) 0.6 Cheyenne township 238 229 231 (7) 2 (3.0) 0.9 Clarence township 125 121 122 (3) 1 (2.5) 0.8 Cleveland township 69 67 68 (1) 1 (1.5) 1.5 Comanche township 452 441 444 (8) 3 (1.8) 0.7 Eureka township 116 112 113 (3) 1 (2.7) 0.9 Bal. of Fairview township 68 66 66 (2) -- (3.0) -- Grant township 79 76 77 (2) 1 (2.6) 1.3 Great Bend township 1,839 1,794 1,801 (38) 7 (2.1) 0.4 Bal. of Independent township 139 134 136 (3) 2 (2.2) 1.5 Lakin township 299 288 290 (9) 2 (3.1) 0.7 Liberty township 321 312 314 (7) 2 (2.2) 0.6 Logan township 176 168 169 (7) 1 (4.1) 0.6 North Homestead township 133 130 131 (2) 1 (1.5) 0.8 Bal. of Pawnee Rock township 188 181 183 (5) 2 (2.7) 1.1 South Bend township 682 661 664 (18) 3 (2.7) 0.5 South Homestead township 343 334 336 (7) 2 (2.1) 0.6 Bal. of Union township 71 69 69 (2) -- (2.9) -- Bal. of Walnut township 155 150 151 (4) 1 (2.6) 0.7 Wheatland township 74 72 72 (2) -- (2.8) --

Bourbon County 15,379 15,082 14,997 (382) (85) (2.5) (0.6) Bronson city 346 342 341 (5) (1) (1.5) (0.3) Fort Scott city 8,297 8,058 7,990 (307) (68) (3.8) (0.9) Fulton city 184 182 181 (3) (1) (1.7) (0.6) Mapleton city 98 97 97 (1) -- (1.0) -- Redfield city 140 138 138 (2) -- (1.4) -- Uniontown city 288 280 278 (10) (2) (3.6) (0.7) Bal. of Bourbon County 6,026 5,985 5,972 (54) (13) (0.9) (0.2) Drywood township 394 393 392 (2) (1) (0.5) (0.3) Franklin township 312 312 311 (1) (1) (0.3) (0.3) Bal. of Freedom township 321 318 317 (4) (1) (1.3) (0.3) Bal. of Marion township 531 525 524 (7) (1) (1.3) (0.2) Bal. of Marmaton township 675 670 669 (6) (1) (0.9) (0.1) Mill Creek township 472 468 467 (5) (1) (1.1) (0.2) Osage township 394 390 389 (5) (1) (1.3) (0.3) Pawnee township 308 306 306 (2) -- (0.7) -- Scott township 2,326 2,312 2,306 (20) (6) (0.9) (0.3) Bal. of Timberhill township 158 157 157 (1) -- (0.6) -- Walnut township 135 134 134 (1) -- (0.7) --

Brown County 10,724 10,348 10,239 (485) (109) (4.7) (1.1) Everest city 314 306 304 (10) (2) (3.3) (0.7) Fairview city 271 261 259 (12) (2) (4.6) (0.8) Hamlin city 53 51 51 (2) -- (3.9) -- Hiawatha city 3,417 3,283 3,236 (181) (47) (5.6) (1.5) Horton city 1,967 1,867 1,843 (124) (24) (6.7) (1.3) Morrill city 277 259 255 (22) (4) (8.6) (1.6) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Brown County (cont'd) Powhattan city 91 87 86 (5) (1) (5.8) (1.2) Reserve city 100 97 97 (3) -- (3.1) -- Robinson city 216 202 199 (17) (3) (8.5) (1.5) Sabetha city (pt.) 7 24 25 18 1 72.0 4.0 Willis city 69 67 66 (3) (1) (4.5) (1.5) Bal. of Brown County 3,942 3,844 3,818 (124) (26) (3.2) (0.7) Bal. of Hamlin township 193 187 186 (7) (1) (3.8) (0.5) Hiawatha township 739 722 717 (22) (5) (3.1) (0.7) Irving township 311 303 301 (10) (2) (3.3) (0.7) Bal. of Mission township 576 561 557 (19) (4) (3.4) (0.7) Bal. of Morrill township 226 219 218 (8) (1) (3.7) (0.5) Bal. of Padonia township 257 250 248 (9) (2) (3.6) (0.8) Bal. of Powhattan township 783 767 762 (21) (5) (2.8) (0.7) Bal. of Robinson township 236 229 228 (8) (1) (3.5) (0.4) Bal. of Walnut township 394 385 382 (12) (3) (3.1) (0.8) Bal. of Washington township 227 221 219 (8) (2) (3.7) (0.9)

Butler County 59,482 61,694 62,354 2,872 660 4.6 1.1 Andover city 6,698 8,605 9,114 2,416 509 26.5 5.6 Augusta city 8,423 8,541 8,608 185 67 2.1 0.8 Benton city 827 816 817 (10) 1 (1.2) 0.1 Cassoday city 130 127 128 (2) 1 (1.6) 0.8 Douglass city 1,813 1,806 1,799 (14) (7) (0.8) (0.4) Elbing city 218 209 208 (10) (1) (4.8) (0.5) El Dorado city 12,057 12,689 12,659 602 (30) 4.8 (0.2) Latham city 164 164 164 ------Leon city 645 647 648 3 1 0.5 0.2 Potwin city 457 437 438 (19) 1 (4.3) 0.2 Rose Hill city 3,432 3,848 3,896 464 48 11.9 1.2 Towanda city 1,338 1,339 1,355 17 16 1.3 1.2 Whitewater city 653 638 639 (14) 1 (2.2) 0.2 Bal. of Butler County 22,627 21,828 21,881 (746) 53 (3.4) 0.2 Augusta township 1,405 1,343 1,343 (62) -- (4.6) -- Bal. of Benton township 1,384 1,385 1,387 3 2 0.2 0.1 Bloomington township 544 553 554 10 1 1.8 0.2 Bal. of Bruno township 3,047 2,745 2,745 (302) -- (11.0) -- Chelsea township 190 222 227 37 5 16.3 2.2 Clay township 83 93 95 12 2 12.6 2.1 Clifford township 259 272 274 15 2 5.5 0.7 Bal. of Douglass township 493 502 503 10 1 2.0 0.2 El Dorado township 1,700 968 969 (731) 1 (75.4) 0.1 Bal. of Fairmount township 293 304 306 13 2 4.2 0.7 Fairview township 491 498 500 9 2 1.8 0.4 Glencoe township 239 257 260 21 3 8.1 1.2 Hickory township 90 107 109 19 2 17.4 1.8 Lincoln township 317 353 358 41 5 11.5 1.4 Bal. of Little Walnut township 357 368 369 12 1 3.3 0.3 Logan township 154 164 166 12 2 7.2 1.2 Bal. of Milton township 483 492 494 11 2 2.2 0.4 Murdock township 378 388 390 12 2 3.1 0.5 Bal. of Pleasant township 2,551 2,529 2,529 (22) -- (0.9) -- Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Butler County (cont'd) Bal. of Plum Grove township 204 214 216 12 2 5.6 0.9 Prospect township 2,033 2,052 2,055 22 3 1.1 0.1 Bal. of Richland township 1,064 1,074 1,076 12 2 1.1 0.2 Rock Creek township 299 310 311 12 1 3.9 0.3 Rosalia township 589 607 610 21 3 3.4 0.5 Spring township 1,566 1,567 1,567 1 -- 0.1 -- Bal. of Sycamore township 203 224 227 24 3 10.6 1.3 Bal. of Towanda township 1,389 1,397 1,398 9 1 0.6 0.1 Bal. of Union township 62 73 75 13 2 17.3 2.7 Walnut township 760 767 768 8 1 1.0 0.1

Chase County 3,030 3,082 3,081 51 (1) 1.7 -- Cedar Point city 53 55 55 2 -- 3.6 -- Cottonwood Falls city 966 963 959 (7) (4) (0.7) (0.4) Elmdale city 50 51 52 2 1 3.8 1.9 Matfield Green city 60 62 62 2 -- 3.2 -- Strong City city 584 586 583 (1) (3) (0.2) (0.5) Bal. of Chase County 1,317 1,365 1,370 53 5 3.9 0.4 Bazaar township 81 84 84 3 -- 3.6 -- Cedar township 116 120 120 4 -- 3.3 -- Bal. of Cottonwood township 131 135 136 5 1 3.7 0.7 Bal. of Diamond Creek township 187 194 194 7 -- 3.6 -- Bal. of Falls township 197 204 205 8 1 3.9 0.5 Homestead township 52 54 54 2 -- 3.7 -- Bal. of Matfield township 95 99 99 4 -- 4.0 -- Bal. of Strong township 156 162 163 7 1 4.3 0.6 Toledo township 302 313 315 13 2 4.1 0.6

Chautauqua County 4,359 4,191 4,109 (250) (82) (6.1) (2.0) Cedar Vale city 723 685 669 (54) (16) (8.1) (2.4) Chautauqua city 113 109 107 (6) (2) (5.6) (1.9) Elgin city 82 79 78 (4) (1) (5.1) (1.3) Niotaze city 122 118 116 (6) (2) (5.2) (1.7) Peru city 183 177 173 (10) (4) (5.8) (2.3) Sedan city 1,342 1,292 1,269 (73) (23) (5.8) (1.8) Bal. of Chautauqua County 1,794 1,731 1,697 (97) (34) (5.7) (2.0) Bal. of Belleville township 379 366 358 (21) (8) (5.9) (2.2) Caneyville township 88 85 83 (5) (2) (6.0) (2.4) Center township 75 72 71 (4) (1) (5.6) (1.4) Bal. of Harrison township 114 110 107 (7) (3) (6.5) (2.8) Bal. of Hendricks township 97 94 92 (5) (2) (5.4) (2.2) Bal. of Jefferson township 111 107 105 (6) (2) (5.7) (1.9) Lafayette township 65 63 62 (3) (1) (4.8) (1.6) Bal. of Little Caney township 231 223 219 (12) (4) (5.5) (1.8) Salt Creek township 123 119 117 (6) (2) (5.1) (1.7) Bal. of Sedan township 318 307 301 (17) (6) (5.6) (2.0) Summit township 106 102 100 (6) (2) (6.0) (2.0) Washington township 87 83 82 (5) (1) (6.1) (1.2)

Cherokee County 22,605 21,797 21,555 (1,050) (242) (4.9) (1.1) Baxter Springs city 4,602 4,316 4,246 (356) (70) (8.4) (1.6) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Cherokee County (cont'd) Columbus city 3,396 3,291 3,259 (137) (32) (4.2) (1.0) Galena city 3,287 3,188 3,163 (124) (25) (3.9) (0.8) Roseland city 101 98 97 (4) (1) (4.1) (1.0) Scammon city 496 480 475 (21) (5) (4.4) (1.1) Treece city 149 146 144 (5) (2) (3.5) (1.4) Weir city 780 761 752 (28) (9) (3.7) (1.2) West Mineral city 243 237 234 (9) (3) (3.8) (1.3) Bal. of Cherokee County 9,551 9,280 9,185 (366) (95) (4.0) (1.0) Cherokee township 336 321 317 (19) (4) (6.0) (1.3) Crawford township 646 624 618 (28) (6) (4.5) (1.0) Garden township 3,039 2,962 2,931 (108) (31) (3.7) (1.1) Lola township 382 372 368 (14) (4) (3.8) (1.1) Lowell township 672 653 647 (25) (6) (3.9) (0.9) Bal. of Lyon township 379 368 364 (15) (4) (4.1) (1.1) Mineral township 254 245 242 (12) (3) (5.0) (1.2) Neosho township 306 298 295 (11) (3) (3.7) (1.0) Pleasant View township 658 640 634 (24) (6) (3.8) (0.9) Bal. of Ross township 549 533 527 (22) (6) (4.2) (1.1) Salamanca township 569 551 546 (23) (5) (4.2) (0.9) Shawnee township 505 491 486 (19) (5) (3.9) (1.0) Sheridan township 249 241 239 (10) (2) (4.2) (0.8) Spring Valley township 1,007 981 971 (36) (10) (3.7) (1.0)

Cheyenne County 3,165 2,968 2,946 (219) (22) (7.4) (0.7) Bird City city 482 443 438 (44) (5) (10.0) (1.1) St. Francis city 1,497 1,390 1,376 (121) (14) (8.8) (1.0) Bal. of Cheyenne County 1,186 1,135 1,132 (54) (3) (4.8) (0.3) Benkelman township 57 55 54 (3) (1) (5.6) (1.9) Bal. of Bird City township 289 276 275 (14) (1) (5.1) (0.4) Calhoun township 57 54 54 (3) -- (5.6) -- Cleveland Run township 67 64 64 (3) -- (4.7) -- Jaqua township 46 44 44 (2) -- (4.5) -- Orlando township 63 60 60 (3) -- (5.0) -- Bal. of Wano township 607 582 581 (26) (1) (4.5) (0.2)

Clark County 2,390 2,336 2,283 (107) (53) (4.7) (2.3) Ashland city 975 965 943 (32) (22) (3.4) (2.3) Englewood city 109 106 104 (5) (2) (4.8) (1.9) Minneola city 717 697 681 (36) (16) (5.3) (2.3) Bal. of Clark County 589 568 555 (34) (13) (6.1) (2.3) Bal. of Appleton township 204 199 196 (8) (3) (4.1) (1.5) Bal. of Center township 122 110 107 (15) (3) (14.0) (2.8) Bal. of Englewood township 62 61 59 (3) (2) (5.1) (3.4) Lexington township 83 82 80 (3) (2) (3.8) (2.5) Liberty township 32 32 31 (1) (1) (3.2) (3.2) Sitka township 86 84 82 (4) (2) (4.9) (2.4)

Clay County 8,822 8,572 8,629 (193) 57 (2.2) 0.7 Clay Center city 4,564 4,368 4,378 (186) 10 (4.2) 0.2 Clifton city (pt.) 234 220 220 (14) -- (6.4) -- Green city 147 141 140 (7) (1) (5.0) (0.7) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Clay County (cont'd) Longford city 94 89 89 (5) -- (5.6) -- Morganville city 198 195 196 (2) 1 (1.0) 0.5 Oak Hill city 35 34 35 -- 1 -- 2.9 Vining city (pt.) 37 36 36 (1) -- (2.8) -- Wakefield city 838 865 874 36 9 4.1 1.0 Bal. of Clay County 2,675 2,624 2,661 (14) 37 (0.5) 1.4 Athelstane township 144 143 145 1 2 0.7 1.4 Blaine township 259 256 259 -- 3 -- 1.2 Bloom township 125 127 129 4 2 3.1 1.6 Bal. of Chapman township 108 108 109 1 1 0.9 0.9 Clay Center township 368 358 364 (4) 6 (1.1) 1.6 Exeter township 81 82 83 2 1 2.4 1.2 Five Creeks township 159 158 160 1 2 0.6 1.3 Garfield township 107 107 109 2 2 1.8 1.8 Gill township 140 139 141 1 2 0.7 1.4 Goshen township 92 93 95 3 2 3.2 2.1 Grant township 132 131 133 1 2 0.8 1.5 Hayes township 206 204 206 -- 2 -- 1.0 Bal. of Highland township 163 160 162 (1) 2 (0.6) 1.2 Bal. of Mulberry township 60 60 61 1 1 1.6 1.6 Bal. of Oakland township 75 76 77 2 1 2.6 1.3 Bal. of Republican township 186 154 156 (30) 2 (19.2) 1.3 Bal. of Sherman township 130 130 132 2 2 1.5 1.5 Union township 140 138 140 -- 2 -- 1.4

Cloud County 10,268 9,746 9,759 (509) 13 (5.2) 0.1 Aurora city 79 76 77 (2) 1 (2.6) 1.3 Clyde city 740 710 709 (31) (1) (4.4) (0.1) Concordia city 5,714 5,375 5,371 (343) (4) (6.4) (0.1) Glasco city 536 503 504 (32) 1 (6.3) 0.2 Jamestown city 399 387 389 (10) 2 (2.6) 0.5 Miltonvale city 523 487 486 (37) (1) (7.6) (0.2) Simpson city (pt.) ------Bal. of Cloud County 2,277 2,208 2,223 (54) 15 (2.4) 0.7 Arion township 105 101 102 (3) 1 (2.9) 1.0 Bal. of Aurora township 90 87 87 (3) -- (3.4) -- Buffalo township 119 115 115 (4) -- (3.5) -- Center township 172 167 169 (3) 2 (1.8) 1.2 Colfax township 49 47 48 (1) 1 (2.1) 2.1 Bal. of Elk township 105 102 102 (3) -- (2.9) -- Bal. of Grant township 80 77 78 (2) 1 (2.6) 1.3 Lawrence township 146 141 142 (4) 1 (2.8) 0.7 Lincoln township 378 368 370 (8) 2 (2.2) 0.5 Lyon township 103 100 101 (2) 1 (2.0) 1.0 Meredith township 77 75 76 (1) 1 (1.3) 1.3 Nelson township 137 134 134 (3) -- (2.2) -- Oakland township 52 51 51 (1) -- (2.0) -- Shirley township 178 172 173 (5) 1 (2.9) 0.6 Sibley township 178 173 174 (4) 1 (2.3) 0.6 Bal. of Solomon township 128 124 125 (3) 1 (2.4) 0.8 Bal. of Starr township 130 126 127 (3) 1 (2.4) 0.8 Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Cloud County (cont'd) Summit township 50 48 49 (1) 1 (2.0) 2.0

Coffey County 8,865 8,740 8,683 (182) (57) (2.1) (0.7) Burlington city 2,790 2,729 2,707 (83) (22) (3.1) (0.8) Gridley city 372 368 365 (7) (3) (1.9) (0.8) Lebo city 961 957 950 (11) (7) (1.2) (0.7) Le Roy city 593 584 579 (14) (5) (2.4) (0.9) New Strawn city 425 402 407 (18) 5 (4.4) 1.2 Waverly city 589 564 556 (33) (8) (5.9) (1.4) Bal. of Coffey County 3,135 3,136 3,119 (16) (17) (0.5) (0.5) Avon township 183 182 181 (2) (1) (1.1) (0.6) Burlington township 300 297 294 (6) (3) (2.0) (1.0) Hampden township 114 114 114 ------Key West township 237 238 236 (1) (2) (0.4) (0.8) Bal. of Le Roy township 76 77 76 -- (1) -- (1.3) Bal. of Liberty township 262 263 262 -- (1) -- (0.4) Bal. of Lincoln township 307 302 301 (6) (1) (2.0) (0.3) Neosho township 140 143 142 2 (1) 1.4 (0.7) Bal. of Ottumwa township 315 315 313 (2) (2) (0.6) (0.6) Pleasant township 272 273 271 (1) (2) (0.4) (0.7) Pottawatomie township 217 219 218 1 (1) 0.5 (0.5) Bal. of Rock Creek township 436 434 433 (3) (1) (0.7) (0.2) Spring Creek township 118 120 120 2 -- 1.7 -- Star township 158 159 158 -- (1) -- (0.6)

Comanche County 1,967 1,912 1,935 (32) 23 (1.7) 1.2 Coldwater city 792 767 774 (18) 7 (2.3) 0.9 Protection city 558 536 541 (17) 5 (3.1) 0.9 Wilmore city 57 57 58 1 1 1.7 1.7 Bal. of Comanche County 560 552 562 2 10 0.4 1.8 Avilla township 58 58 59 1 1 1.7 1.7 Bal. of Coldwater township 294 286 291 (3) 5 (1.0) 1.7 Bal. of Powell township 32 32 33 1 1 3.0 3.0 Bal. of Protection township 176 176 179 3 3 1.7 1.7

Cowley County 36,291 35,697 35,298 (993) (399) (2.8) (1.1) Arkansas City city 11,963 11,764 11,581 (382) (183) (3.3) (1.6) Atlanta city 255 253 250 (5) (3) (2.0) (1.2) Burden city 564 558 553 (11) (5) (2.0) (0.9) Cambridge city 103 102 101 (2) (1) (2.0) (1.0) Dexter city 364 353 350 (14) (3) (4.0) (0.9) Geuda Springs city (pt.) 13 11 11 (2) -- (18.2) -- Parkerfield city 344 342 342 (2) 100.0 (0.6) Udall city 794 779 766 (28) (13) (3.7) (1.7) Winfield city 12,206 11,990 11,861 (345) (129) (2.9) (1.1) Bal. of Cowley County 10,029 9,543 9,483 (546) (60) (5.8) (0.6) Beaver township 244 242 241 (3) (1) (1.2) (0.4) Bal. of Bolton township 1,741 1,712 1,694 (47) (18) (2.8) (1.1) Cedar township 44 49 51 7 2 13.7 3.9 Bal. of Creswell township 2,098 1,647 1,629 (469) (18) (28.8) (1.1) Bal. of Dexter township 142 148 150 8 2 5.3 1.3 Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Cowley County (cont'd) Fairview township 203 202 201 (2) (1) (1.0) (0.5) Grant township 76 81 82 6 1 7.3 1.2 Harvey township 117 124 125 8 1 6.4 0.8 Liberty township 218 222 222 4 -- 1.8 -- Bal. of Maple township 645 635 630 (15) (5) (2.4) (0.8) Bal. of Ninnescah township 377 372 370 (7) (2) (1.9) (0.5) Bal. of Omnia township 102 104 105 3 1 2.9 1.0 Otter township 54 59 61 7 2 11.5 3.3 Pleasant Valley township 838 824 817 (21) (7) (2.6) (0.9) Richland township 178 180 180 2 -- 1.1 -- Rock Creek township 243 242 241 (2) (1) (0.8) (0.4) Salem township 364 359 356 (8) (3) (2.2) (0.8) Sheridan township 159 160 160 1 -- 0.6 -- Bal. of Silver Creek township 206 207 206 -- (1) -- (0.5) Silverdale township 327 325 323 (4) (2) (1.2) (0.6) Spring Creek township 77 82 83 6 1 7.2 1.2 Tisdale township 340 337 334 (6) (3) (1.8) (0.9) Vernon township 502 493 489 (13) (4) (2.7) (0.8) Walnut township 626 618 612 (14) (6) (2.3) (1.0) Bal. of Windsor township 108 119 121 13 2 10.7 1.7

Crawford County 38,242 38,167 38,222 (20) 55 (0.1) 0.1 Arcadia city 391 386 387 (4) 1 (1.0) 0.3 Arma city 1,529 1,498 1,495 (34) (3) (2.3) (0.2) Cherokee city 722 717 718 (4) 1 (0.6) 0.1 Frontenac city 2,996 3,088 3,101 105 13 3.4 0.4 Girard city 2,773 2,694 2,686 (87) (8) (3.2) (0.3) Hepler city 154 152 153 (1) 1 (0.7) 0.7 McCune city 426 423 424 (2) 1 (0.5) 0.2 Mulberry city 577 573 574 (3) 1 (0.5) 0.2 Pittsburg city 19,243 19,215 19,214 (29) (1) (0.2) -- Walnut city 221 219 220 (1) 1 (0.5) 0.5 Bal. of Crawford County 9,210 9,202 9,250 40 48 0.4 0.5 Baker township 3,640 3,578 3,582 (58) 4 (1.6) 0.1 Crawford township 883 887 893 10 6 1.1 0.7 Grant township 247 261 266 19 5 7.1 1.9 Bal. of Lincoln township 551 562 568 17 6 3.0 1.1 Bal. of Osage township 330 341 345 15 4 4.3 1.2 Bal. of Sheridan township 779 792 799 20 7 2.5 0.9 Sherman township 520 528 533 13 5 2.4 0.9 Bal. of Walnut township 249 266 272 23 6 8.5 2.2 Bal. of Washington township 2,011 1,987 1,992 (19) 5 (1.0) 0.3

Decatur County 3,472 3,261 3,191 (281) (70) (8.8) (2.2) Clayton city (pt.) 1 1 1 ------Dresden city 51 49 48 (3) (1) (6.3) (2.1) Jennings city 146 134 130 (16) (4) (12.3) (3.1) Norcatur city 169 161 158 (11) (3) (7.0) (1.9) Oberlin city 1,994 1,854 1,811 (183) (43) (10.1) (2.4) Bal. of Decatur County 1,111 1,062 1,043 (68) (19) (6.5) (1.8) Allison township 39 37 36 (3) (1) (8.3) (2.8) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Decatur County (cont'd) Altory township 16 15 15 (1) -- (6.7) -- Bassettville township 26 25 25 (1) -- (4.0) -- Beaver township 86 82 80 (6) (2) (7.5) (2.5) Center township 60 58 57 (3) (1) (5.3) (1.8) Cook township 44 42 41 (3) (1) (7.3) (2.4) Custer township 27 26 25 (2) (1) (8.0) (4.0) Bal. of Dresden township 90 86 84 (6) (2) (7.1) (2.4) Finley township 39 37 37 (2) -- (5.4) -- Garfield township 41 39 38 (3) (1) (7.9) (2.6) Grant township 31 30 29 (2) (1) (6.9) (3.4) Harlan township 51 49 48 (3) (1) (6.3) (2.1) Bal. of Jennings township 34 32 32 (2) -- (6.3) -- Liberty township 48 46 45 (3) (1) (6.7) (2.2) Bal. of Lincoln township 34 32 32 (2) -- (6.3) -- Logan township 52 49 48 (4) (1) (8.3) (2.1) Lyon township 24 23 22 (2) (1) (9.1) (4.5) Oberlin township 91 88 87 (4) (1) (4.6) (1.1) Olive township 68 66 65 (3) (1) (4.6) (1.5) Bal. of Pleasant Valley township 38 36 36 (2) -- (5.6) -- Prairie Dog township 50 48 47 (3) (1) (6.4) (2.1) Roosevelt township 32 30 30 (2) -- (6.7) -- Sappa township 43 41 40 (3) (1) (7.5) (2.5) Sherman township 25 24 23 (2) (1) (8.7) (4.3) Summit township 22 21 21 (1) -- (4.8) --

Dickinson County 19,344 19,143 19,209 (135) 66 (0.7) 0.3 Abilene city 6,543 6,400 6,409 (134) 9 (2.1) 0.1 Carlton city 38 38 38 ------Chapman city 1,241 1,239 1,243 2 4 0.2 0.3 Enterprise city 836 814 811 (25) (3) (3.1) (0.4) Herington city (pt.) 2,563 2,470 2,467 (96) (3) (3.9) (0.1) Hope city 372 365 367 (5) 2 (1.4) 0.5 Manchester city 102 102 103 1 1 1.0 1.0 Solomon city (pt.) 1,071 1,050 1,055 (16) 5 (1.5) 0.5 Woodbine city 207 206 207 -- 1 -- 0.5 Bal. of Dickinson County 6,371 6,459 6,509 138 50 2.1 0.8 Banner township 148 153 155 7 2 4.5 1.3 Buckeye township 437 440 442 5 2 1.1 0.5 Bal. of Center township 374 375 377 3 2 0.8 0.5 Cheever township 149 154 155 6 1 3.9 0.6 Bal. of Flora township 115 119 121 6 2 5.0 1.7 Fragrant Hill township 251 255 257 6 2 2.3 0.8 Garfield township 189 194 196 7 2 3.6 1.0 Grant township 918 921 925 7 4 0.8 0.4 Hayes township 233 236 239 6 3 2.5 1.3 Bal. of Holland township 69 74 75 6 1 8.0 1.3 Bal. of Hope township 147 151 153 6 2 3.9 1.3 Jefferson township 166 170 172 6 2 3.5 1.2 Bal. of Liberty township 198 202 205 7 3 3.4 1.5 Bal. of Lincoln township 598 597 600 2 3 0.3 0.5 Logan township 202 206 208 6 2 2.9 1.0 Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Dickinson County (cont'd) Lyon township 252 255 257 5 2 1.9 0.8 Newbern township 349 352 354 5 2 1.4 0.6 Bal. of Noble township 489 495 496 7 1 1.4 0.2 Ridge township 160 164 166 6 2 3.6 1.2 Rinehart township 194 198 200 6 2 3.0 1.0 Sherman township 147 150 151 4 1 2.6 0.7 Union township 176 179 181 5 2 2.8 1.1 Wheatland township 152 157 159 7 2 4.4 1.3 Willowdale township 258 262 265 7 3 2.6 1.1

Doniphan County 8,249 7,990 7,816 (433) (174) (5.5) (2.2) Denton city 186 182 178 (8) (4) (4.5) (2.2) Elwood city 1,145 1,190 1,153 8 (37) 0.7 (3.2) Highland city 976 956 941 (35) (15) (3.7) (1.6) Leona city 88 87 85 (3) (2) (3.5) (2.4) Severance city 108 107 104 (4) (3) (3.8) (2.9) Troy city 1,054 1,015 1,017 (37) 2 (3.6) 0.2 Wathena city 1,348 1,316 1,290 (58) (26) (4.5) (2.0) White Cloud city 239 236 230 (9) (6) (3.9) (2.6) Bal. of Doniphan County 3,105 2,901 2,818 (287) (83) (10.2) (2.9) Burr Oak township 153 150 146 (7) (4) (4.8) (2.7) Bal. of Center township 689 653 634 (55) (19) (8.7) (3.0) Independence township 342 327 317 (25) (10) (7.9) (3.2) Bal. of Iowa township 479 457 444 (35) (13) (7.9) (2.9) Marion township 226 217 211 (15) (6) (7.1) (2.8) Bal. of Union township 174 166 162 (12) (4) (7.4) (2.5) Bal. of Washington township 573 481 467 (106) (14) (22.7) (3.0) Wayne township 226 217 211 (15) (6) (7.1) (2.8) Bal. of Wolf River township 243 233 226 (17) (7) (7.5) (3.1)

Douglas County 99,962 102,738 102,914 2,952 176 2.9 0.2 Baldwin City city 3,400 3,703 3,746 346 43 9.2 1.1 Eudora city 4,307 5,120 5,284 977 164 18.5 3.1 Lawrence city 80,098 81,842 81,816 1,718 (26) 2.1 -- Lecompton city 608 598 589 (19) (9) (3.2) (1.5) Bal. of Douglas County 11,549 11,475 11,479 (70) 4 (0.6) -- Clinton township 531 544 546 15 2 2.7 0.4 Bal. of Eudora township 1,264 1,256 1,257 (7) 1 (0.6) 0.1 Grant township 442 421 421 (21) -- (5.0) -- Kanwaka township 1,317 1,310 1,310 (7) -- (0.5) -- Bal. of Lecompton township 1,153 1,148 1,147 (6) (1) (0.5) (0.1) Marion township 836 873 880 44 7 5.0 0.8 Bal. of Palmyra township 2,360 2,370 2,370 10 -- 0.4 -- Wakarusa township 2,237 2,127 2,121 (116) (6) (5.5) (0.3) Willow Springs township 1,409 1,426 1,427 18 1 1.3 0.1

Edwards County 3,449 3,308 3,292 (157) (16) (4.8) (0.5) Belpre city 104 101 101 (3) -- (3.0) -- Kinsley city 1,658 1,559 1,547 (111) (12) (7.2) (0.8) Lewis city 486 476 475 (11) (1) (2.3) (0.2) Offerle city 220 215 214 (6) (1) (2.8) (0.5) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Edwards County (cont'd) Bal. of Edwards County 981 957 955 (26) (2) (2.7) (0.2) Bal. of Belpre township 82 80 80 (2) -- (2.5) -- Franklin township 93 91 90 (3) (1) (3.3) (1.1) Jackson township 98 96 95 (3) (1) (3.2) (1.1) Kinsley township 160 156 156 (4) -- (2.6) -- Lincoln township 143 139 139 (4) -- (2.9) -- Logan township 42 41 41 (1) -- (2.4) -- North Brown township 67 65 65 (2) -- (3.1) -- South Brown township 90 88 88 (2) -- (2.3) -- Bal. of Trenton township 86 84 84 (2) -- (2.4) -- Bal. of Wayne township 120 117 117 (3) -- (2.6) --

Elk County 3,261 3,109 3,075 (186) (34) (6.0) (1.1) Elk Falls city 112 107 106 (6) (1) (5.7) (0.9) Grenola city 231 219 217 (14) (2) (6.5) (0.9) Howard city 808 772 764 (44) (8) (5.8) (1.0) Longton city 394 375 371 (23) (4) (6.2) (1.1) Moline city 457 435 431 (26) (4) (6.0) (0.9) Bal. of Elk County 1,259 1,201 1,186 (73) (15) (6.2) (1.3) Bal. of Elk Falls township 84 80 79 (5) (1) (6.3) (1.3) Bal. of Greenfield township 90 86 85 (5) (1) (5.9) (1.2) Bal. of Howard township 198 189 186 (12) (3) (6.5) (1.6) Liberty township 117 111 110 (7) (1) (6.4) (0.9) Bal. of Longton township 136 130 129 (7) (1) (5.4) (0.8) Oak Valley township 154 148 146 (8) (2) (5.5) (1.4) Painterhood township 68 65 64 (4) (1) (6.3) (1.6) Paw Paw township 116 111 109 (7) (2) (6.4) (1.8) Union Center township 116 110 109 (7) (1) (6.4) (0.9) Bal. of Wildcat township 180 171 169 (11) (2) (6.5) (1.2)

Ellis County 27,507 27,040 26,767 (740) (273) (2.8) (1.0) Ellis city 1,873 1,828 1,812 (61) (16) (3.4) (0.9) Hays city 20,013 19,827 19,632 (381) (195) (1.9) (1.0) Schoenchen city 214 213 212 (2) (1) (0.9) (0.5) Victoria city 1,208 1,174 1,164 (44) (10) (3.8) (0.9) Bal. of Ellis County 4,199 3,998 3,947 (252) (51) (6.4) (1.3) Big Creek township 1,798 1,687 1,664 (134) (23) (8.1) (1.4) Buckeye township 285 276 273 (12) (3) (4.4) (1.1) Catherine township 318 306 302 (16) (4) (5.3) (1.3) Ellis township 386 371 367 (19) (4) (5.2) (1.1) Freedom township 125 120 118 (7) (2) (5.9) (1.7) Bal. of Herzog township 322 311 307 (15) (4) (4.9) (1.3) Bal. of Lookout township 355 341 337 (18) (4) (5.3) (1.2) Bal. of Victoria township 209 201 199 (10) (2) (5.0) (1.0) Wheatland township 401 385 380 (21) (5) (5.5) (1.3)

Ellsworth County 6,525 6,355 6,343 (182) (12) (2.9) (0.2) Ellsworth city 2,965 2,887 2,887 (78) -- (2.7) -- Holyrood city 464 453 452 (12) (1) (2.7) (0.2) Kanopolis city 543 522 516 (27) (6) (5.2) (1.2) Lorraine city 136 133 133 (3) -- (2.3) -- Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Ellsworth County (cont'd) Wilson city 799 766 767 (32) 1 (4.2) 0.1 Bal. of Ellsworth County 1,618 1,594 1,588 (30) (6) (1.9) (0.4) Ash Creek township 58 57 57 (1) -- (1.8) -- Black Wolf township 87 86 86 (1) -- (1.2) -- Carneiro township 57 56 56 (1) -- (1.8) -- Clear Creek township 91 89 89 (2) -- (2.2) -- Columbia township 60 59 58 (2) (1) (3.4) (1.7) Bal. of Ellsworth township 254 248 250 (4) 2 (1.6) 0.8 Empire township 174 173 172 (2) (1) (1.2) (0.6) Garfield township 27 27 27 ------Bal. of Green Garden township 75 74 73 (2) (1) (2.7) (1.4) Langley township 76 77 76 -- (1) -- (1.3) Lincoln township 62 61 61 (1) -- (1.6) -- Mulberry township 44 43 43 (1) -- (2.3) -- Noble township 90 88 88 (2) -- (2.3) -- Palacky township 63 62 62 (1) -- (1.6) -- Sherman township 65 64 63 (2) (1) (3.2) (1.6) Thomas township 72 71 70 (2) (1) (2.9) (1.4) Trivoli township 55 54 54 (1) -- (1.9) -- Bal. of Valley township 113 111 110 (3) (1) (2.7) (0.9) Bal. of Wilson township 95 94 93 (2) (1) (2.2) (1.1)

Finney County 40,523 39,170 38,988 (1,535) (182) (3.9) (0.5) Garden City city 28,451 27,242 27,098 (1,353) (144) (5.0) (0.5) Holcomb city 2,026 1,897 1,888 (138) (9) (7.3) (0.5) Bal. of Finney County 10,046 10,031 10,002 (44) (29) (0.4) (0.3) Garden City township 7,400 7,176 7,131 (269) (45) (3.8) (0.6) Garfield township 331 406 415 84 9 20.2 2.2 Ivanhoe township 666 685 685 19 -- 2.8 -- Pierceville township 551 566 567 16 1 2.8 0.2 Pleasant Valley township 139 161 164 25 3 15.2 1.8 Bal. of Sherlock township 732 787 788 56 1 7.1 0.1 Terry township 227 250 252 25 2 9.9 0.8

Ford County 32,458 33,456 33,751 1,293 295 3.8 0.9 Bucklin city 725 726 734 9 8 1.2 1.1 Dodge City city 25,176 25,901 26,104 928 203 3.6 0.8 Ford city 314 326 330 16 4 4.8 1.2 Spearville city 813 850 858 45 8 5.2 0.9 Bal. of Ford County 5,430 5,653 5,725 295 72 5.2 1.3 Bloom township 113 119 121 8 2 6.6 1.7 Bal. of Bucklin township 175 186 190 15 4 7.9 2.1 Concord township 117 126 129 12 3 9.3 2.3 Dodge township 899 924 933 34 9 3.6 1.0 Enterprise township 1,113 1,156 1,166 53 10 4.5 0.9 Fairview township 346 359 364 18 5 4.9 1.4 Bal. of Ford township 142 153 157 15 4 9.6 2.5 Grandview township 784 805 812 28 7 3.4 0.9 Richland township 931 965 974 43 9 4.4 0.9 Royal township 105 113 116 11 3 9.5 2.6 Sodville township 110 115 117 7 2 6.0 1.7 Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Ford County (cont'd) Bal. of Spearville township 337 359 367 30 8 8.2 2.2 Wheatland township 170 178 181 11 3 6.1 1.7 Wilburn township 88 95 98 10 3 10.2 3.1

Franklin County 24,784 26,130 26,247 1,463 117 5.6 0.4 Lane city 256 260 259 3 (1) 1.2 (0.4) Ottawa city 11,921 12,499 12,597 676 98 5.4 0.8 Pomona city 923 949 942 19 (7) 2.0 (0.7) Princeton city 317 332 327 10 (5) 3.1 (1.5) Rantoul city 241 247 245 4 (2) 1.6 (0.8) Richmond city 510 517 514 4 (3) 0.8 (0.6) Wellsville city 1,606 1,627 1,631 25 4 1.5 0.2 Williamsburg city 351 364 359 8 (5) 2.2 (1.4) Bal. of Franklin County 8,659 9,335 9,373 714 38 7.6 0.4 Appanoose township 293 324 326 33 2 10.1 0.6 Centropolis township 997 1,054 1,057 60 3 5.7 0.3 Bal. of Cutler township 615 666 669 54 3 8.1 0.4 Bal. of Franklin township 946 1,038 1,039 93 1 9.0 0.1 Greenwood township 429 462 464 35 2 7.5 0.4 Harrison township 445 475 477 32 2 6.7 0.4 Hayes township 397 431 433 36 2 8.3 0.5 Homewood township 493 530 531 38 1 7.2 0.2 Lincoln township 797 840 842 45 2 5.3 0.2 Bal. of Ohio township 466 511 514 48 3 9.3 0.6 Ottawa township 868 917 919 51 2 5.5 0.2 Peoria township 626 673 675 49 2 7.3 0.3 Bal. of Pomona township 251 273 275 24 2 8.7 0.7 Bal. of Pottawatomie township 413 451 453 40 2 8.8 0.4 Bal. of Richmond township 302 335 339 37 4 10.9 1.2 Bal. of Williamsburg township 321 355 360 39 5 10.8 1.4

Geary County 27,947 25,145 24,585 (3,362) (560) (13.7) (2.3) Grandview Plaza city 1,184 1,073 1,039 (145) (34) (14.0) (3.3) Junction City city 18,886 16,828 16,402 (2,484) (426) (15.1) (2.6) Milford city 502 454 444 (58) (10) (13.1) (2.3) Bal. of Geary County 7,375 6,790 6,700 (675) (90) (10.1) (1.3) Blakely township 113 117 120 7 3 5.8 2.5 Jackson township 78 84 87 9 3 10.3 3.4 Bal. of Jefferson township 467 440 436 (31) (4) (7.1) (0.9) Liberty township 225 231 236 11 5 4.7 2.1 Lyon township 298 286 286 (12) -- (4.2) -- Bal. of Milford township 1,081 984 968 (113) (16) (11.7) (1.7) Smoky Hill township 4,974 4,505 4,420 (554) (85) (12.5) (1.9) Wingfield township 139 143 147 8 4 5.4 2.7

Gove County 3,068 2,829 2,763 (305) (66) (11.0) (2.4) Gove City city 105 97 95 (10) (2) (10.5) (2.1) Grainfield city 327 305 298 (29) (7) (9.7) (2.3) Grinnell city 329 306 299 (30) (7) (10.0) (2.3) Oakley city (pt.) 0 1 1 1 -- 100.0 -- Park city 151 140 137 (14) (3) (10.2) (2.2) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Gove County (cont'd) Quinter city 961 869 846 (115) (23) (13.6) (2.7) Bal. of Gove County 1,195 1,111 1,087 (108) (24) (9.9) (2.2) Bal. of Baker township 396 368 359 (37) (9) (10.3) (2.5) Gaeland township 46 43 42 (4) (1) (9.5) (2.4) Bal. of Gove township 110 102 100 (10) (2) (10.0) (2.0) Bal. of Grainfield township 103 96 94 (9) (2) (9.6) (2.1) Bal. of Grinnell township 151 141 138 (13) (3) (9.4) (2.2) Jerome township 132 123 120 (12) (3) (10.0) (2.5) Larrabee township 80 74 73 (7) (1) (9.6) (1.4) Lewis township 13 12 12 (1) -- (8.3) -- Bal. of Payne township 164 152 149 (15) (3) (10.1) (2.0)

Graham County 2,946 2,751 2,721 (225) (30) (8.3) (1.1) Bogue city 179 170 169 (10) (1) (5.9) (0.6) Hill City city 1,604 1,472 1,451 (153) (21) (10.5) (1.4) Morland city 164 156 155 (9) (1) (5.8) (0.6) Bal. of Graham County 999 953 946 (53) (7) (5.6) (0.7) Allodium township 46 44 44 (2) -- (4.5) -- Bryant township 115 109 108 (7) (1) (6.5) (0.9) Bal. of Gettysburg township 68 65 64 (4) (1) (6.3) (1.6) Graham township 53 50 50 (3) -- (6.0) -- Happy township 72 68 68 (4) -- (5.9) -- Bal. of Hill City township 143 136 135 (8) (1) (5.9) (0.7) Indiana township 42 40 39 (3) (1) (7.7) (2.6) Millbrook township 150 144 144 (6) -- (4.2) -- Morlan township 68 65 64 (4) (1) (6.3) (1.6) Nicodemus township 52 50 50 (2) -- (4.0) -- Pioneer township 57 55 54 (3) (1) (5.6) (1.9) Bal. of Solomon township 60 57 57 (3) -- (5.3) -- Bal. of Wildhorse township 73 70 69 (4) (1) (5.8) (1.4)

Grant County 7,909 7,644 7,530 (379) (114) (5.0) (1.5) Ulysses city 5,960 5,738 5,650 (310) (88) (5.5) (1.6) Bal. of Grant County 1,949 1,906 1,880 (69) (26) (3.7) (1.4)

Gray County 5,904 5,970 5,861 (43) (109) (0.7) (1.9) Cimarron city 1,934 2,042 2,029 95 (13) 4.7 (0.6) Copeland city 339 328 321 (18) (7) (5.6) (2.2) Ensign city 203 206 199 (4) (7) (2.0) (3.5) Ingalls city 328 322 312 (16) (10) (5.1) (3.2) Montezuma city 966 977 964 (2) (13) (0.2) (1.3) Bal. of Gray County 2,134 2,095 2,036 (98) (59) (4.8) (2.9) Bal. of Cimarron township 445 419 406 (39) (13) (9.6) (3.2) Bal. of Copeland township 201 200 195 (6) (5) (3.1) (2.6) Bal. of East Hess township 169 170 165 (4) (5) (2.4) (3.0) Foote township 126 127 123 (3) (4) (2.4) (3.3) Bal. of Ingalls township 318 321 312 (6) (9) (1.9) (2.9) Logan township 216 217 211 (5) (6) (2.4) (2.8) Bal. of Montezuma township 659 641 624 (35) (17) (5.6) (2.7)

Greeley County 1,534 1,412 1,349 (185) (63) (13.7) (4.7) Horace city 143 135 129 (14) (6) (10.9) (4.7) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Greeley County (cont'd) Tribune city 835 756 722 (113) (34) (15.7) (4.7) Bal. of Greeley County 556 521 498 (58) (23) (11.6) (4.6)

Greenwood County 7,673 7,496 7,338 (335) (158) (4.6) (2.2) Climax city 64 64 62 (2) (2) (3.2) (3.2) Eureka city 2,914 2,806 2,739 (175) (67) (6.4) (2.4) Fall River city 156 155 152 (4) (3) (2.6) (2.0) Hamilton city 334 331 325 (9) (6) (2.8) (1.8) Madison city 857 819 799 (58) (20) (7.3) (2.5) Severy city 359 359 352 (7) (7) (2.0) (2.0) Virgil city 113 112 110 (3) (2) (2.7) (1.8) Bal. of Greenwood County 2,876 2,850 2,799 (77) (51) (2.8) (1.8) Bachelor township 230 230 226 (4) (4) (1.8) (1.8) Eureka township 451 441 433 (18) (8) (4.2) (1.8) Bal. of Fall River township 165 163 160 (5) (3) (3.1) (1.9) Bal. of Janesville township 214 215 211 (3) (4) (1.4) (1.9) Bal. of Lane township 54 52 51 (3) (1) (5.9) (2.0) Bal. of Madison township 298 295 291 (7) (4) (2.4) (1.4) Otter Creek township 211 210 206 (5) (4) (2.4) (1.9) Pleasant Grove township 52 51 51 (1) -- (2.0) -- Quincy township 163 162 159 (4) (3) (2.5) (1.9) Salem township 35 35 34 (1) (1) (2.9) (2.9) Bal. of Salt Springs township 307 306 301 (6) (5) (2.0) (1.7) Shell Rock township 173 171 168 (5) (3) (3.0) (1.8) South Salem township 127 126 123 (4) (3) (3.3) (2.4) Spring Creek township 154 154 151 (3) (3) (2.0) (2.0) Bal. of Twin Grove township 242 239 234 (8) (5) (3.4) (2.1)

Hamilton County 2,670 2,643 2,604 (66) (39) (2.5) (1.5) Coolidge city 86 86 85 (1) (1) (1.2) (1.2) Syracuse city 1,824 1,817 1,788 (36) (29) (2.0) (1.6) Bal. of Hamilton County 760 740 731 (29) (9) (4.0) (1.2) Bear Creek township 69 72 72 3 -- 4.2 -- Bal. of Coolidge township 42 43 43 1 -- 2.3 -- Kendall township 101 103 101 -- (2) -- (2.0) Lamont township 89 92 91 2 (1) 2.2 (1.1) Liberty township 38 39 39 1 -- 2.6 -- Medway township 53 56 55 2 (1) 3.6 (1.8) Richland township 27 28 28 1 -- 3.6 -- Bal. of Syracuse township 341 307 302 (39) (5) (12.9) (1.7)

Harper County 6,536 6,195 6,081 (455) (114) (7.5) (1.9) Anthony city 2,440 2,352 2,302 (138) (50) (6.0) (2.2) Attica city 636 612 604 (32) (8) (5.3) (1.3) Bluff City city 80 78 76 (4) (2) (5.3) (2.6) Danville city 59 57 56 (3) (1) (5.4) (1.8) Freeport city 6 8 8 2 -- 25.0 -- Harper city 1,567 1,500 1,478 (89) (22) (6.0) (1.5) Waldron city 17 16 16 (1) -- (6.3) -- Bal. of Harper County 1,731 1,572 1,541 (190) (31) (12.3) (2.0) Bal. of Township No. 1 364 344 337 (27) (7) (8.0) (2.1) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Harper County (cont'd) Bal. of Township No. 2 127 121 119 (8) (2) (6.7) (1.7) Township No. 3 394 311 305 (89) (6) (29.2) (2.0) Bal. of Township No. 4 146 136 133 (13) (3) (9.8) (2.3) Bal. of Township No. 5 404 381 373 (31) (8) (8.3) (2.1) Township No. 6 296 279 274 (22) (5) (8.0) (1.8)

Harvey County 32,869 33,697 33,843 974 146 2.9 0.4 Burrton city 932 917 913 (19) (4) (2.1) (0.4) Halstead city 1,873 1,897 1,912 39 15 2.0 0.8 Hesston city 3,509 3,618 3,631 122 13 3.4 0.4 Newton city 17,190 18,140 18,229 1,039 89 5.7 0.5 North Newton city 1,522 1,571 1,574 52 3 3.3 0.2 Sedgwick city (pt.) 1,326 1,419 1,419 93 -- 6.6 -- Walton city 284 296 295 11 (1) 3.7 (0.3) Bal. of Harvey County 6,233 5,839 5,870 (363) 31 (6.2) 0.5 Alta township 221 233 234 13 1 5.6 0.4 Bal. of Burrton township 211 222 224 13 2 5.8 0.9 Darlington township 601 617 619 18 2 2.9 0.3 Bal. of Emma township 672 641 645 (27) 4 (4.2) 0.6 Garden township 294 307 309 15 2 4.9 0.6 Halstead township 353 364 366 13 2 3.6 0.5 Highland township 415 429 431 16 2 3.7 0.5 Lake township 173 183 185 12 2 6.5 1.1 Lakin township 357 370 373 16 3 4.3 0.8 Macon township 1,056 532 533 (523) 1 (98.1) 0.2 Bal. of Newton township 428 437 438 10 1 2.3 0.2 Pleasant township 439 454 457 18 3 3.9 0.7 Richland township 360 375 377 17 2 4.5 0.5 Bal. of Sedgwick township 385 398 400 15 2 3.8 0.5 Bal. of Walton township 268 277 279 11 2 3.9 0.7

Haskell County 4,307 4,267 4,232 (75) (35) (1.8) (0.8) Satanta city 1,239 1,194 1,179 (60) (15) (5.1) (1.3) Sublette city 1,592 1,592 1,582 (10) (10) (0.6) (0.6) Bal. of Haskell County 1,476 1,481 1,471 (5) (10) (0.3) (0.7) Bal. of Dudley township 575 579 574 (1) (5) (0.2) (0.9) Bal. of Haskell township 379 378 376 (3) (2) (0.8) (0.5) Lockport township 522 524 521 (1) (3) (0.2) (0.6)

Hodgeman County 2,085 2,120 2,110 25 (10) 1.2 (0.5) Hanston city 259 264 262 3 (2) 1.1 (0.8) Jetmore city 903 918 914 11 (4) 1.2 (0.4) Bal. of Hodgeman County 923 938 934 11 (4) 1.2 (0.4) Benton township 48 49 49 1 -- 2.0 -- Bal. of Center township 218 221 219 1 (2) 0.5 (0.9) Hallet township 62 63 63 1 -- 1.6 -- Bal. of Marena township 173 176 175 2 (1) 1.1 (0.6) North Roscoe township 51 52 52 1 -- 1.9 -- Sawlog township 93 95 94 1 (1) 1.1 (1.1) South Roscoe township 76 77 77 1 -- 1.3 -- Sterling township 144 146 146 2 -- 1.4 -- Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Hodgeman County (cont'd) Valley township 58 59 59 1 -- 1.7 --

Jackson County 12,657 13,193 13,535 878 342 6.5 2.5 Circleville city 185 183 185 -- 2 -- 1.1 Delia city 179 184 188 9 4 4.8 2.1 Denison city 231 228 230 (1) 2 (0.4) 0.9 Holton city 3,353 3,351 3,400 47 49 1.4 1.4 Hoyt city 571 588 600 29 12 4.8 2.0 Mayetta city 312 342 359 47 17 13.1 4.7 Netawaka city 170 169 178 8 9 4.5 5.1 Soldier city 122 123 124 2 1 1.6 0.8 Whiting city 206 212 216 10 4 4.6 1.9 Bal. of Jackson County 7,328 7,813 8,055 727 242 9.0 3.0 Adrian township 150 166 173 23 7 13.3 4.0 Banner township 300 321 332 32 11 9.6 3.3 Bal. of Cedar township 939 985 1,011 72 26 7.1 2.6 Bal. of Douglas township 1,564 1,642 1,685 121 43 7.2 2.6 Franklin township 776 812 833 57 21 6.8 2.5 Bal. of Garfield township 396 421 433 37 12 8.5 2.8 Grant township 212 234 243 31 9 12.8 3.7 Bal. of Jefferson township 309 332 343 34 11 9.9 3.2 Liberty township 513 542 558 45 16 8.1 2.9 Lincoln township 1,046 1,125 1,162 116 37 10.0 3.2 Bal. of Netawaka township 191 210 218 27 8 12.4 3.7 Bal. of Soldier township 281 305 316 35 11 11.1 3.5 Straight Creek township 158 175 183 25 8 13.7 4.4 Bal. of Washington township 337 370 385 48 15 12.5 3.9 Bal. of Whiting township 156 173 180 24 7 13.3 3.9

Jefferson County 18,426 18,951 19,106 680 155 3.6 0.8 McLouth city 868 854 849 (19) (5) (2.2) (0.6) Meriden city 706 700 708 2 8 0.3 1.1 Nortonville city 620 601 598 (22) (3) (3.7) (0.5) Oskaloosa city 1,165 1,151 1,149 (16) (2) (1.4) (0.2) Ozawkie city 552 572 574 22 2 3.8 0.3 Perry city 901 886 883 (18) (3) (2.0) (0.3) Valley Falls city 1,254 1,211 1,209 (45) (2) (3.7) (0.2) Winchester city 579 576 582 3 6 0.5 1.0 Bal. of Jefferson County 11,781 12,400 12,554 773 154 6.2 1.2 Bal. of Delaware township 780 873 894 114 21 12.8 2.3 Fairview township 1,510 1,549 1,559 49 10 3.1 0.6 Bal. of Jefferson township 661 724 739 78 15 10.6 2.0 Kaw township 1,409 1,454 1,466 57 12 3.9 0.8 Bal. of Kentucky township 675 716 725 50 9 6.9 1.2 Bal. of Norton township 335 377 387 52 10 13.4 2.6 Bal. of Oskaloosa township 977 1,039 1,054 77 15 7.3 1.4 Bal. of Ozawkie township 856 901 910 54 9 5.9 1.0 Bal. of Rock Creek township 2,012 2,081 2,102 90 21 4.3 1.0 Rural township 804 844 854 50 10 5.9 1.2 Sarcoxie township 958 990 1,000 42 10 4.2 1.0 Bal. of Union township 804 852 864 60 12 6.9 1.4 Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005

Jewell County 3,791 3,425 3,352 (439) (73) (13.1) (2.2) Burr Oak city 265 233 226 (39) (7) (17.3) (3.1) Esbon city 148 135 133 (15) (2) (11.3) (1.5) Formoso city 129 118 116 (13) (2) (11.2) (1.7) Jewell city 483 447 439 (44) (8) (10.0) (1.8) Mankato city 976 864 843 (133) (21) (15.8) (2.5) Randall city 90 76 74 (16) (2) (21.6) (2.7) Webber city 37 34 33 (4) (1) (12.1) (3.0) Bal. of Jewell County 1,663 1,518 1,488 (175) (30) (11.8) (2.0) Allen township 43 39 38 (5) (1) (13.2) (2.6) Athens township 74 68 66 (8) (2) (12.1) (3.0) Browns Creek township 64 58 57 (7) (1) (12.3) (1.8) Bal. of Buffalo township 91 78 76 (15) (2) (19.7) (2.6) Bal. of Burr Oak township 73 67 65 (8) (2) (12.3) (3.1) Calvin township 65 59 58 (7) (1) (12.1) (1.7) Bal. of Center township 124 113 113 (11) -- (9.7) -- Erving township 60 55 54 (6) (1) (11.1) (1.9) Bal. of Esbon township 74 67 66 (8) (1) (12.1) (1.5) Bal. of Grant township 91 83 81 (10) (2) (12.3) (2.5) Harrison township 52 48 47 (5) (1) (10.6) (2.1) Highland township 49 45 44 (5) (1) (11.4) (2.3) Holmwood township 49 45 44 (5) (1) (11.4) (2.3) Ionia township 100 91 90 (10) (1) (11.1) (1.1) Bal. of Jackson township 86 79 77 (9) (2) (11.7) (2.6) Limestone township 49 45 44 (5) (1) (11.4) (2.3) Montana township 93 85 83 (10) (2) (12.0) (2.4) Odessa township 34 31 30 (4) (1) (13.3) (3.3) Bal. of Prairie township 82 78 76 (6) (2) (7.9) (2.6) Richland township 36 33 33 (3) -- (9.1) -- Sinclair township 67 61 60 (7) (1) (11.7) (1.7) Vicksburg township 28 26 25 (3) (1) (12.0) (4.0) Walnut township 80 73 72 (8) (1) (11.1) (1.4) Washington township 50 46 45 (5) (1) (11.1) (2.2) White Mound township 49 45 44 (5) (1) (11.4) (2.3)

Johnson County 451,086 496,892 506,562 55,476 9,670 11.0 1.9 Bonner Springs city (pt.) 1 3 3 2 -- 66.7 -- De Soto city (pt.) 4,561 5,055 5,169 608 114 11.8 2.2 Edgerton city 1,440 1,603 1,692 252 89 14.9 5.3 Fairway city 3,952 3,850 3,840 (112) (10) (2.9) (0.3) Gardner city 9,396 12,942 14,317 4,921 1,375 34.4 9.6 Lake Quivira city (pt.) 883 869 872 (11) 3 (1.3) 0.3 Leawood city 27,656 29,516 30,145 2,489 629 8.3 2.1 Lenexa city 40,238 42,632 43,434 3,196 802 7.4 1.8 Merriam city 11,008 10,778 10,769 (239) (9) (2.2) (0.1) Mission city 9,727 9,776 9,751 24 (25) 0.2 (0.3) Mission Hills city 3,593 3,526 3,523 (70) (3) (2.0) (0.1) Mission Woods city 165 160 160 (5) -- (3.1) -- Olathe city 92,962 108,440 111,334 18,372 2,894 16.5 2.6 Overland Park city 149,080 162,795 164,811 15,731 2,016 9.5 1.2 Prairie Village city 22,072 21,520 21,454 (618) (66) (2.9) (0.3) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Johnson County (cont'd) Roeland Park city 6,817 7,000 6,975 158 (25) 2.3 (0.4) Shawnee city 47,996 56,201 57,628 9,632 1,427 16.7 2.5 Spring Hill city (pt.) 2,291 3,425 3,661 1,370 236 37.4 6.4 Westwood city 1,533 1,489 1,483 (50) (6) (3.4) (0.4) Westwood Hills city 378 366 365 (13) (1) (3.6) (0.3) Bal. of Johnson County 15,042 14,946 15,176 134 230 0.9 1.5 Aubry township 5,440 5,376 5,444 4 68 0.1 1.2 Gardner township 2,143 2,098 2,128 (15) 30 (0.7) 1.4 Lexington township 1,315 1,415 1,456 141 41 9.7 2.8 McCamish township 878 943 970 92 27 9.5 2.8 Olathe township 1,187 1,108 1,125 (62) 17 (5.5) 1.5 Oxford township 2,020 1,900 1,916 (104) 16 (5.4) 0.8 Spring Hill township 2,059 2,106 2,137 78 31 3.6 1.5

Kearny County 4,531 4,532 4,516 (15) (16) (0.3) (0.4) Deerfield city 884 883 892 8 9 0.9 1.0 Lakin city 2,316 2,311 2,292 (24) (19) (1.0) (0.8) Bal. of Kearny County 1,331 1,338 1,332 1 (6) 0.1 (0.5) Bal. of Deerfield township 220 221 220 -- (1) -- (0.5) East Hibbard township 131 132 131 -- (1) -- (0.8) Hartland township 128 128 127 (1) (1) (0.8) (0.8) Kendall township 157 157 156 (1) (1) (0.6) (0.6) Bal. of Lakin township 271 272 271 -- (1) -- (0.4) Southside township 359 363 363 4 -- 1.1 -- West Hibbard township 65 65 64 (1) (1) (1.6) (1.6)

Kingman County 8,673 8,339 8,165 (508) (174) (6.2) (2.1) Cunningham city 514 488 477 (37) (11) (7.8) (2.3) Kingman city 3,387 3,255 3,183 (204) (72) (6.4) (2.3) Nashville city 111 108 106 (5) (2) (4.7) (1.9) Norwich city 551 536 522 (29) (14) (5.6) (2.7) Penalosa city 27 26 26 (1) -- (3.8) -- Spivey city 80 79 77 (3) (2) (3.9) (2.6) Zenda city 123 120 118 (5) (2) (4.2) (1.7) Bal. of Kingman County 3,880 3,727 3,656 (224) (71) (6.1) (1.9) Allen township 109 106 104 (5) (2) (4.8) (1.9) Belmont township 92 85 84 (8) (1) (9.5) (1.2) Bal. of Bennett township 154 150 147 (7) (3) (4.8) (2.0) Canton township 118 115 112 (6) (3) (5.4) (2.7) Bal. of Chikaskia township 60 59 58 (2) (1) (3.4) (1.7) Dale township 203 195 191 (12) (4) (6.3) (2.1) Bal. of Dresden township 126 122 120 (6) (2) (5.0) (1.7) Eagle township 154 149 146 (8) (3) (5.5) (2.1) Bal. of Eureka township 96 94 92 (4) (2) (4.3) (2.2) Evan township 516 495 486 (30) (9) (6.2) (1.9) Galesburg township 254 244 240 (14) (4) (5.8) (1.7) Hoosier township 162 157 154 (8) (3) (5.2) (1.9) Kingman township 124 120 118 (6) (2) (5.1) (1.7) Bal. of Liberty township 67 66 65 (2) (1) (3.1) (1.5) Ninnescah township 313 303 297 (16) (6) (5.4) (2.0) Peters township 201 198 194 (7) (4) (3.6) (2.1) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Kingman County (cont'd) Richland township 100 97 95 (5) (2) (5.3) (2.1) Bal. of Rochester township 87 85 83 (4) (2) (4.8) (2.4) Bal. of Rural township 104 102 100 (4) (2) (4.0) (2.0) Union township 88 86 84 (4) (2) (4.8) (2.4) Valley township 102 99 97 (5) (2) (5.2) (2.1) Vinita township 249 240 236 (13) (4) (5.5) (1.7) White township 401 360 353 (48) (7) (13.6) (2.0)

Kiowa County 3,278 3,079 2,984 (294) (95) (9.9) (3.2) Greensburg city 1,574 1,449 1,398 (176) (51) (12.6) (3.6) Haviland city 612 588 574 (38) (14) (6.6) (2.4) Mullinville city 279 266 258 (21) (8) (8.1) (3.1) Bal. of Kiowa County 813 776 754 (59) (22) (7.8) (2.9)

Labette County 22,835 22,154 22,169 (666) 15 (3.0) 0.1 Altamont city 1,092 1,067 1,065 (27) (2) (2.5) (0.2) Bartlett city 124 123 124 -- 1 -- 0.8 Chetopa city 1,281 1,231 1,231 (50) -- (4.1) -- Edna city 423 420 422 (1) 2 (0.2) 0.5 Labette city 68 68 68 ------Mound Valley city 418 412 414 (4) 2 (1.0) 0.5 Oswego city 2,046 1,993 1,996 (50) 3 (2.5) 0.2 Parsons city 11,514 11,234 11,212 (302) (22) (2.7) (0.2) Bal. of Labette County 5,869 5,606 5,637 (232) 31 (4.1) 0.5 Canada township 217 207 208 (9) 1 (4.3) 0.5 Bal. of Elm Grove township 375 357 359 (16) 2 (4.5) 0.6 Fairview township 239 229 230 (9) 1 (3.9) 0.4 Bal. of Hackberry township 279 267 268 (11) 1 (4.1) 0.4 Howard township 357 341 343 (14) 2 (4.1) 0.6 Bal. of Labette township 373 358 360 (13) 2 (3.6) 0.6 Bal. of Liberty township 327 312 314 (13) 2 (4.1) 0.6 Montana township 179 170 171 (8) 1 (4.7) 0.6 Bal. of Mound Valley township 388 370 372 (16) 2 (4.3) 0.5 Bal. of Mount Pleasant township 259 247 248 (11) 1 (4.4) 0.4 Neosho township 222 212 213 (9) 1 (4.2) 0.5 North township 612 586 590 (22) 4 (3.7) 0.7 Osage township 703 672 675 (28) 3 (4.1) 0.4 Oswego township 310 296 298 (12) 2 (4.0) 0.7 Richland township 303 289 291 (12) 2 (4.1) 0.7 Walton township 726 693 697 (29) 4 (4.2) 0.6

Lane County 2,155 1,933 1,894 (261) (39) (13.8) (2.1) Dighton city 1,261 1,129 1,106 (155) (23) (14.0) (2.1) Bal. of Lane County 894 804 788 (106) (16) (13.5) (2.0) Alamota township 108 97 95 (13) (2) (13.7) (2.1) Cheyenne township 336 301 296 (40) (5) (13.5) (1.7) Bal. of Dighton township 312 281 275 (37) (6) (13.5) (2.2) White Rock township 26 24 23 (3) (1) (13.0) (4.3) Wilson township 112 101 99 (13) (2) (13.1) (2.0)

Leavenworth County 68,691 72,443 73,113 4,422 670 6.0 0.9 Basehor city 2,238 3,031 3,287 1,049 256 31.9 7.8 Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Leavenworth County (cont'd) Bonner Springs city (pt.) 5 6 6 1 -- 16.7 -- De Soto city (pt.) 0 1 1 1 -- 100.0 -- Easton city 362 361 357 (5) (4) (1.4) (1.1) Lansing city 9,199 10,120 10,214 1,015 94 9.9 0.9 Leavenworth city 35,420 35,285 35,213 (207) (72) (0.6) (0.2) Linwood city 374 382 382 8 -- 2.1 -- Tonganoxie city 2,728 3,599 3,774 1,046 175 27.7 4.6 Bal. of Leavenworth County 18,370 19,658 19,879 1,509 221 7.6 1.1 Alexandria township 859 984 1,007 148 23 14.7 2.3 Delaware township 1,361 1,374 1,387 26 13 1.9 0.9 Bal. of Easton township 883 994 1,014 131 20 12.9 2.0 Bal. of Fairmount township 4,028 4,182 4,206 178 24 4.2 0.6 High Prairie township 1,768 1,909 1,934 166 25 8.6 1.3 Kickapoo township 1,760 1,900 1,923 163 23 8.5 1.2 Reno township 1,143 1,263 1,284 141 21 11.0 1.6 Bal. of Sherman township 1,993 2,134 2,155 162 21 7.5 1.0 Bal. of Stranger township 2,245 2,411 2,437 192 26 7.9 1.1 Bal. of Tonganoxie township 2,330 2,507 2,532 202 25 8.0 1.0

Lincoln County 3,578 3,407 3,411 (167) 4 (4.9) 0.1 Barnard city 123 119 119 (4) -- (3.4) -- Beverly city 199 192 193 (6) 1 (3.1) 0.5 Lincoln Center city 1,349 1,267 1,263 (86) (4) (6.8) (0.3) Sylvan Grove city 324 300 301 (23) 1 (7.6) 0.3 Bal. of Lincoln County 1,583 1,529 1,535 (48) 6 (3.1) 0.4

Linn County 9,570 9,748 9,914 344 166 3.5 1.7 Blue Mound city 277 283 291 14 8 4.8 2.7 La Cygne city 1,115 1,120 1,146 31 26 2.7 2.3 Linn Valley city 562 578 581 19 3 3.3 0.5 Mound City city 821 813 820 (1) 7 (0.1) 0.9 Parker city 281 284 306 25 22 8.2 7.2 Pleasanton city 1,387 1,366 1,368 (19) 2 (1.4) 0.1 Prescott city 280 281 283 3 2 1.1 0.7 Bal. of Linn County 4,847 5,023 5,119 272 96 5.3 1.9 Bal. of Blue Mound township 223 237 245 22 8 9.0 3.3 Centerville township 389 409 421 32 12 7.6 2.9 Bal. of Liberty township 627 649 661 34 12 5.1 1.8 Bal. of Lincoln township 581 600 610 29 10 4.8 1.6 Bal. of Mound City township 600 619 627 27 8 4.3 1.3 Paris township 494 510 519 25 9 4.8 1.7 Bal. of Potosi township 693 711 720 27 9 3.8 1.3 Bal. of Scott township 634 651 662 28 11 4.2 1.7 Bal. of Sheridan township 280 293 300 20 7 6.7 2.3 Stanton township 169 178 183 14 5 7.7 2.7 Valley township 157 166 171 14 5 8.2 2.9

Logan County 3,046 2,817 2,794 (252) (23) (9.0) (0.8) Oakley city (pt.) 2,118 1,947 1,932 (186) (15) (9.6) (0.8) Russell Springs city 32 30 30 (2) -- (6.7) -- Winona city 228 208 205 (23) (3) (11.2) (1.5) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Logan County (cont'd) Bal. of Logan County 668 632 627 (41) (5) (6.5) (0.8) Augustine township 26 25 24 (2) (1) (8.3) (4.2) Elkader township 15 14 14 (1) -- (7.1) -- Lees township 17 16 16 (1) -- (6.3) -- Logansport township 14 14 13 (1) (1) (7.7) (7.7) McAllaster township 29 27 27 (2) -- (7.4) -- Monument township 144 136 135 (9) (1) (6.7) (0.7) Bal. of Oakley township 225 212 212 (13) -- (6.1) -- Paxton township 24 23 23 (1) -- (4.3) -- Bal. of Russell Springs township 39 37 37 (2) -- (5.4) -- Western township 44 42 41 (3) (1) (7.3) (2.4) Bal. of Winona township 91 86 85 (6) (1) (7.1) (1.2)

Lyon County 35,935 35,840 35,609 (326) (231) (0.9) (0.6) Admire city 177 181 178 1 (3) 0.6 (1.7) Allen city 211 219 216 5 (3) 2.3 (1.4) Americus city 938 943 932 (6) (11) (0.6) (1.2) Bushong city 55 52 52 (3) -- (5.8) -- Emporia city 26,760 26,735 26,456 (304) (279) (1.1) (1.1) Hartford city 500 511 505 5 (6) 1.0 (1.2) Neosho Rapids city 274 281 278 4 (3) 1.4 (1.1) Olpe city 504 515 509 5 (6) 1.0 (1.2) Reading city 247 252 249 2 (3) 0.8 (1.2) Bal. of Lyon County 6,269 6,151 6,234 (35) 83 (0.6) 1.3 Bal. of Agnes City township 202 200 210 8 10 3.8 4.8 Bal. of Americus township 584 573 582 (2) 9 (0.3) 1.5 Bal. of Center township 697 688 702 5 14 0.7 2.0 Bal. of Elmendaro township 449 444 455 6 11 1.3 2.4 Emporia township 1,167 1,110 1,114 (53) 4 (4.8) 0.4 Fremont township 842 831 837 (5) 6 (0.6) 0.7 Bal. of Ivy township 127 125 129 2 4 1.6 3.1 Bal. of Jackson township 721 714 723 2 9 0.3 1.2 Pike township 899 893 895 (4) 2 (0.4) 0.2 Bal. of Reading township 300 296 304 4 8 1.3 2.6 Waterloo township 281 277 283 2 6 0.7 2.1

McPherson County 29,554 29,413 29,523 (31) 110 (0.1) 0.4 Canton city 829 817 812 (17) (5) (2.1) (0.6) Galva city 701 747 773 72 26 9.3 3.4 Inman city 1,142 1,192 1,194 52 2 4.4 0.2 Lindsborg city 3,321 3,305 3,305 (16) -- (0.5) -- McPherson city 13,770 13,681 13,695 (75) 14 (0.5) 0.1 Marquette city 542 577 585 43 8 7.4 1.4 Moundridge city 1,593 1,644 1,643 50 (1) 3.0 (0.1) Windom city 137 136 136 (1) -- (0.7) -- Bal. of McPherson County 7,519 7,314 7,380 (139) 66 (1.9) 0.9 Battle Hill township 91 95 97 6 2 6.2 2.1 Bonaville township 66 72 75 9 3 12.0 4.0 Bal. of Canton township 261 262 265 4 3 1.5 1.1 Bal. of Castle township 88 93 95 7 2 7.4 2.1 Delmore township 138 142 144 6 2 4.2 1.4 Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 McPherson County (cont'd) Bal. of Empire township 477 474 477 -- 3 -- 0.6 Groveland township 234 236 239 5 3 2.1 1.3 Gypsum Creek township 215 215 217 2 2 0.9 0.9 Harper township 137 140 143 6 3 4.2 2.1 Hayes township 287 287 290 3 3 1.0 1.0 Jackson township 198 200 202 4 2 2.0 1.0 King City township 544 540 543 (1) 3 (0.2) 0.6 Little Valley township 475 472 475 -- 3 -- 0.6 Lone Tree township 486 482 485 (1) 3 (0.2) 0.6 McPherson township 618 599 601 (17) 2 (2.8) 0.3 Bal. of Marquette township 234 185 187 (47) 2 (25.1) 1.1 Meridian township 341 340 343 2 3 0.6 0.9 Bal. of Mound township 511 438 441 (70) 3 (15.9) 0.7 New Gottland township 354 354 357 3 3 0.8 0.8 Smoky Hill township 297 298 300 3 2 1.0 0.7 South Sharps Creek township 112 117 119 7 2 5.9 1.7 Spring Valley township 373 372 375 2 3 0.5 0.8 Bal. of Superior township 498 415 418 (80) 3 (19.1) 0.7 Turkey Creek township 294 294 297 3 3 1.0 1.0 Union township 190 192 195 5 3 2.6 1.5

Marion County 13,361 13,014 12,952 (409) (62) (3.2) (0.5) Burns city 268 271 275 7 4 2.5 1.5 Durham city 114 111 110 (4) (1) (3.6) (0.9) Florence city 671 655 650 (21) (5) (3.2) (0.8) Goessel city 565 548 547 (18) (1) (3.3) (0.2) Hillsboro city 2,854 2,751 2,731 (123) (20) (4.5) (0.7) Lehigh city 215 210 208 (7) (2) (3.4) (1.0) Lincolnville city 225 220 218 (7) (2) (3.2) (0.9) Lost Springs city 71 69 68 (3) (1) (4.4) (1.5) Marion city 2,110 2,011 2,028 (82) 17 (4.0) 0.8 Peabody city 1,384 1,322 1,302 (82) (20) (6.3) (1.5) Ramona city 94 92 91 (3) (1) (3.3) (1.1) Tampa city 144 144 142 (2) (2) (1.4) (1.4) Bal. of Marion County 4,646 4,610 4,582 (64) (28) (1.4) (0.6) Bal. of Blaine township 68 70 70 2 -- 2.9 -- Bal. of Catlin township 171 170 169 (2) (1) (1.2) (0.6) Centre township 535 522 520 (15) (2) (2.9) (0.4) Clark township 149 148 147 (2) (1) (1.4) (0.7) Bal. of Clear Creek township 367 363 361 (6) (2) (1.7) (0.6) Bal. of Colfax township 124 125 124 -- (1) -- (0.8) Doyle township 75 77 78 3 1 3.8 1.3 Bal. of Durham Park township 116 117 116 -- (1) -- (0.9) East Branch township 188 186 185 (3) (1) (1.6) (0.5) Fairplay township 121 124 123 2 (1) 1.6 (0.8) Gale township 220 217 215 (5) (2) (2.3) (0.9) Grant township 128 132 132 4 -- 3.0 -- Bal. of Lehigh township 155 155 154 (1) (1) (0.6) (0.6) Liberty township 327 321 319 (8) (2) (2.5) (0.6) Logan township 127 128 127 -- (1) -- (0.8) Bal. of Lost Springs township 130 130 129 (1) (1) (0.8) (0.8) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Marion County (cont'd) Menno township 317 312 309 (8) (3) (2.6) (1.0) Bal. of Milton township 80 81 81 1 -- 1.2 -- Moore township 65 67 67 2 -- 3.0 -- Bal. of Peabody township 169 168 167 (2) (1) (1.2) (0.6) Risley township 241 237 235 (6) (2) (2.6) (0.9) Summit township 82 84 84 2 -- 2.4 -- Bal. of West Branch township 459 447 443 (16) (4) (3.6) (0.9) Wilson township 232 229 227 (5) (2) (2.2) (0.9)

Marshall County 10,965 10,416 10,405 (560) (11) (5.4) (0.1) Axtell city 445 433 433 (12) -- (2.8) -- Beattie city 277 267 267 (10) -- (3.7) -- Blue Rapids city 1,088 1,048 1,048 (40) -- (3.8) -- Frankfort city 855 799 795 (60) (4) (7.5) (0.5) Marysville city 3,271 3,158 3,151 (120) (7) (3.8) (0.2) Oketo city 87 84 84 (3) -- (3.6) -- Summerfield city 211 204 204 (7) -- (3.4) -- Vermillion city 107 99 98 (9) (1) (9.2) (1.0) Waterville city 681 629 628 (53) (1) (8.4) (0.2) Bal. of Marshall County 3,943 3,695 3,697 (246) 2 (6.7) 0.1 Balderson township 106 102 102 (4) -- (3.9) -- Bigelow township 66 63 63 (3) -- (4.8) -- Blue Rapids township 78 75 75 (3) -- (4.0) -- Bal. of Blue Rapids City township 113 109 109 (4) -- (3.7) -- Center township 151 146 146 (5) -- (3.4) -- Clear Fork township 54 52 52 (2) -- (3.8) -- Cleveland township 91 88 88 (3) -- (3.4) -- Cottage Hill township 143 137 137 (6) -- (4.4) -- Elm Creek township 178 171 171 (7) -- (4.1) -- Franklin township 337 325 327 (10) 2 (3.1) 0.6 Bal. of Guittard township 177 171 171 (6) -- (3.5) -- Herkimer township 234 224 224 (10) -- (4.5) -- Lincoln township 130 125 125 (5) -- (4.0) -- Logan township 335 322 322 (13) -- (4.0) -- Marysville township 383 273 273 (110) -- (40.3) -- Bal. of Murray township 195 184 184 (11) -- (6.0) -- Bal. of Noble township 110 106 106 (4) -- (3.8) -- Bal. of Oketo township 164 157 157 (7) -- (4.5) -- Bal. of Richland township 130 125 125 (5) -- (4.0) -- Rock township 123 119 119 (4) -- (3.4) -- Bal. of St. Bridget township 97 93 93 (4) -- (4.3) -- Bal. of Vermillion township 157 151 151 (6) -- (4.0) -- Walnut township 144 139 139 (5) -- (3.6) -- Bal. of Waterville township 116 112 112 (4) -- (3.6) -- Wells township 131 126 126 (5) -- (4.0) --

Meade County 4,631 4,587 4,625 (6) 38 (0.1) 0.8 Fowler city 567 571 578 11 7 1.9 1.2 Meade city 1,672 1,623 1,629 (43) 6 (2.6) 0.4 Plains city 1,163 1,153 1,163 -- 10 -- 0.9 Bal. of Meade County 1,229 1,240 1,255 26 15 2.1 1.2 Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Meade County (cont'd) Cimarron township 93 94 95 2 1 2.1 1.1 Crooked Creek township 92 93 94 2 1 2.1 1.1 Bal. of Fowler township 182 183 185 3 2 1.6 1.1 Logan township 100 101 102 2 1 2.0 1.0 Bal. of Meade Center township 296 299 303 7 4 2.3 1.3 Mertilla township 221 224 226 5 2 2.2 0.9 Odee township 50 53 54 4 1 7.4 1.9 Sand Creek township 38 35 36 (2) 1 (5.6) 2.8 Bal. of West Plains township 157 158 160 3 2 1.9 1.3

Miami County 28,351 29,811 30,496 2,145 685 7.0 2.2 Fontana city 149 163 169 20 6 11.8 3.6 Louisburg city 2,576 3,011 3,313 737 302 22.2 9.1 Osawatomie city 4,645 4,616 4,616 (29) -- (0.6) -- Paola city 5,011 5,179 5,292 281 113 5.3 2.1 Spring Hill city (pt.) 436 747 833 397 86 47.7 10.3 Bal. of Miami County 15,534 16,095 16,273 739 178 4.5 1.1 Marysville township 2,575 2,629 2,650 75 21 2.8 0.8 Miami township 506 548 560 54 12 9.6 2.1 Middle Creek township 1,649 1,713 1,732 83 19 4.8 1.1 Mound township 705 738 746 41 8 5.5 1.1 Bal. of Osage township 500 524 533 33 9 6.2 1.7 Osawatomie township 794 824 833 39 9 4.7 1.1 Paola township 1,100 1,112 1,123 23 11 2.0 1.0 Richland township 1,758 1,834 1,857 99 23 5.3 1.2 Stanton township 925 972 983 58 11 5.9 1.1 Sugar Creek township 449 481 491 42 10 8.6 2.0 Ten Mile township 1,259 1,310 1,325 66 15 5.0 1.1 Valley township 1,478 1,529 1,541 63 12 4.1 0.8 Wea township 1,836 1,881 1,899 63 18 3.3 0.9

Mitchell County 6,932 6,519 6,420 (512) (99) (8.0) (1.5) Beloit city 4,019 3,758 3,703 (316) (55) (8.5) (1.5) Cawker City city 521 484 474 (47) (10) (9.9) (2.1) Glen Elder city 439 408 399 (40) (9) (10.0) (2.3) Hunter city 77 73 72 (5) (1) (6.9) (1.4) Scottsville city 21 20 20 (1) -- (5.0) -- Simpson city (pt.) 114 105 103 (11) (2) (10.7) (1.9) Tipton city 243 233 230 (13) (3) (5.7) (1.3) Bal. of Mitchell County 1,498 1,438 1,419 (79) (19) (5.6) (1.3) Asherville township 122 117 115 (7) (2) (6.1) (1.7) Beloit township 222 212 209 (13) (3) (6.2) (1.4) Bloomfield township 83 80 79 (4) (1) (5.1) (1.3) Blue Hill township 36 35 34 (2) (1) (5.9) (2.9) Carr Creek township 31 30 30 (1) -- (3.3) -- Bal. of Cawker township 57 55 54 (3) (1) (5.6) (1.9) Center township 49 47 46 (3) (1) (6.5) (2.2) Bal. of Custer township 55 53 52 (3) (1) (5.8) (1.9) Eureka township 41 39 39 (2) -- (5.1) -- Bal. of Glen Elder township 114 109 108 (6) (1) (5.6) (0.9) Hayes township 21 20 20 (1) -- (5.0) -- Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Mitchell County (cont'd) Bal. of Logan township 54 52 51 (3) (1) (5.9) (2.0) Bal. of Lulu township 69 67 66 (3) (1) (4.5) (1.5) Bal. of Pittsburg township 103 99 97 (6) (2) (6.2) (2.1) Plum Creek township 119 114 113 (6) (1) (5.3) (0.9) Round Springs township 27 26 26 (1) -- (3.8) -- Salt Creek township 39 37 37 (2) -- (5.4) -- Solomon Rapids township 80 77 76 (4) (1) (5.3) (1.3) Turkey Creek township 134 129 127 (7) (2) (5.5) (1.6) Walnut Creek township 42 40 40 (2) -- (5.0) --

Montgomery County 36,252 34,850 34,570 (1,682) (280) (4.9) (0.8) Caney city 2,092 1,992 1,975 (117) (17) (5.9) (0.9) Cherryvale city 2,386 2,291 2,266 (120) (25) (5.3) (1.1) Coffeyville city 11,021 10,467 10,359 (662) (108) (6.4) (1.0) Dearing city 415 454 452 37 (2) 8.2 (0.4) Elk City city 305 300 299 (6) (1) (2.0) (0.3) Havana city 86 85 85 (1) -- (1.2) -- Independence city 9,846 9,377 9,284 (562) (93) (6.1) (1.0) Liberty city 95 94 94 (1) -- (1.1) -- Tyro city 226 223 222 (4) (1) (1.8) (0.5) Bal. of Montgomery County 9,780 9,567 9,534 (246) (33) (2.6) (0.3) Bal. of Caney township 1,017 1,004 1,000 (17) (4) (1.7) (0.4) Cherokee township 541 532 531 (10) (1) (1.9) (0.2) Cherry township 517 509 507 (10) (2) (2.0) (0.4) Drum Creek township 537 530 528 (9) (2) (1.7) (0.4) Bal. of Fawn Creek township 1,536 1,460 1,456 (80) (4) (5.5) (0.3) Independence township 2,342 2,306 2,297 (45) (9) (2.0) (0.4) Bal. of Liberty township 378 372 371 (7) (1) (1.9) (0.3) Bal. of Louisburg township 324 320 318 (6) (2) (1.9) (0.6) Parker township 1,212 1,173 1,169 (43) (4) (3.7) (0.3) Rutland township 302 300 299 (3) (1) (1.0) (0.3) Sycamore township 835 824 822 (13) (2) (1.6) (0.2) West Cherry township 239 237 236 (3) (1) (1.3) (0.4)

Morris County 6,104 5,986 6,049 (55) 63 (0.9) 1.0 Council Grove city 2,321 2,256 2,275 (46) 19 (2.0) 0.8 Dunlap city 81 81 82 1 1 1.2 1.2 Dwight city 330 328 332 2 4 0.6 1.2 Herington city (pt.) 0 1 1 1 -- 100.0 -- Latimer city 21 21 21 ------Parkerville city 73 72 73 -- 1 -- 1.4 White City city 518 493 499 (19) 6 (3.8) 1.2 Wilsey city 191 189 191 -- 2 -- 1.0 Bal. of Morris County 2,569 2,545 2,575 6 30 0.2 1.2 Highland township 94 93 94 -- 1 -- 1.1 Overland township 60 59 60 -- 1 -- 1.7 Bal. of Township No. 1 470 467 473 3 6 0.6 1.3 Township No. 2 688 683 689 1 6 0.1 0.9 Bal. of Township No. 3 173 171 173 -- 2 -- 1.2 Bal. of Township No. 4 179 177 179 -- 2 -- 1.1 Bal. of Township No. 5 168 166 168 -- 2 -- 1.2 Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Morris County (cont'd) Bal. of Township No. 6 90 89 91 1 2 1.1 2.2 Township No. 7 258 255 258 -- 3 -- 1.2 Township No. 8 212 209 212 -- 3 -- 1.4 Bal. of Township No. 9 177 176 178 1 2 0.6 1.1

Morton County 3,496 3,229 3,196 (300) (33) (9.4) (1.0) Elkhart city 2,233 2,064 2,036 (197) (28) (9.7) (1.4) Richfield city 48 44 44 (4) -- (9.1) -- Rolla city 482 447 445 (37) (2) (8.3) (0.4) Bal. of Morton County 733 674 671 (62) (3) (9.2) (0.4) Cimarron township 67 62 62 (5) -- (8.1) -- Jones township 17 16 16 (1) -- (6.3) -- Bal. of Richfield township 170 158 158 (12) -- (7.6) -- Bal. of Rolla township 168 156 155 (13) (1) (8.4) (0.6) Bal. of Taloga township 204 183 181 (23) (2) (12.7) (1.1) Westola township 107 99 99 (8) -- (8.1) --

Nemaha County 10,717 10,439 10,443 (274) 4 (2.6) -- Bern city 204 200 200 (4) -- (2.0) -- Centralia city 534 507 504 (30) (3) (6.0) (0.6) Corning city 170 167 167 (3) -- (1.8) -- Goff city 181 176 175 (6) (1) (3.4) (0.6) Oneida city 70 68 69 (1) 1 (1.4) 1.4 Sabetha city (pt.) 2,582 2,504 2,498 (84) (6) (3.4) (0.2) Seneca city 2,122 2,068 2,068 (54) -- (2.6) -- Wetmore city 362 355 356 (6) 1 (1.7) 0.3 Bal. of Nemaha County 4,492 4,394 4,406 (86) 12 (2.0) 0.3 Adams township 213 209 209 (4) -- (1.9) -- Berwick township 391 384 385 (6) 1 (1.6) 0.3 Capioma township 161 159 159 (2) -- (1.3) -- Center township 200 196 196 (4) -- (2.0) -- Clear Creek township 123 120 120 (3) -- (2.5) -- Bal. of Gilman township 153 150 150 (3) -- (2.0) -- Granada township 122 119 120 (2) 1 (1.7) 0.8 Bal. of Harrison township 218 209 210 (8) 1 (3.8) 0.5 Bal. of Home township 122 119 120 (2) 1 (1.7) 0.8 Bal. of Illinois township 194 190 191 (3) 1 (1.6) 0.5 Marion township 457 447 448 (9) 1 (2.0) 0.2 Mitchell township 305 299 300 (5) 1 (1.7) 0.3 Nemaha township 184 180 180 (4) -- (2.2) -- Neuchatel township 117 114 115 (2) 1 (1.7) 0.9 Red Vermillion township 137 134 135 (2) 1 (1.5) 0.7 Reilly township 153 150 150 (3) -- (2.0) -- Richmond township 538 526 527 (11) 1 (2.1) 0.2 Rock Creek township 302 296 297 (5) 1 (1.7) 0.3 Bal. of Washington township 261 255 256 (5) 1 (2.0) 0.4 Bal. of Wetmore township 141 138 138 (3) -- (2.2) --

Neosho County 16,997 16,533 16,529 (468) (4) (2.8) -- Chanute city 9,411 9,030 9,006 (405) (24) (4.5) (0.3) Earlton city 80 80 80 ------Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Neosho County (cont'd) Erie city 1,211 1,172 1,167 (44) (5) (3.8) (0.4) Galesburg city 150 149 150 -- 1 -- 0.7 St. Paul city 646 652 657 11 5 1.7 0.8 Stark city 106 105 105 (1) -- (1.0) -- Thayer city 500 499 500 -- 1 -- 0.2 Bal. of Neosho County 4,893 4,846 4,864 (29) 18 (0.6) 0.4 Big Creek township 456 453 455 (1) 2 (0.2) 0.4 Bal. of Canville township 491 487 490 (1) 3 (0.2) 0.6 Bal. of Centerville township 417 415 417 -- 2 -- 0.5 Bal. of Chetopa township 394 391 392 (2) 1 (0.5) 0.3 Bal. of Erie township 313 311 313 -- 2 -- 0.6 Bal. of Grant township 278 276 277 (1) 1 (0.4) 0.4 Bal. of Ladore township 398 398 399 1 1 0.3 0.3 Lincoln township 345 343 344 (1) 1 (0.3) 0.3 Bal. of Mission township 281 279 281 -- 2 -- 0.7 Shiloh township 297 296 297 -- 1 -- 0.3 Tioga township 885 862 863 (22) 1 (2.5) 0.1 Walnut Grove township 338 335 336 (2) 1 (0.6) 0.3

Ness County 3,454 3,067 3,009 (445) (58) (14.8) (1.9) Bazine city 311 269 263 (48) (6) (18.3) (2.3) Brownell city 48 43 42 (6) (1) (14.3) (2.4) Ness City city 1,534 1,354 1,326 (208) (28) (15.7) (2.1) Ransom city 338 298 292 (46) (6) (15.8) (2.1) Utica city 223 201 198 (25) (3) (12.6) (1.5) Bal. of Ness County 1,000 902 888 (112) (14) (12.6) (1.6) Bal. of Bazine township 130 117 116 (14) (1) (12.1) (0.9) Bal. of Center township 75 68 67 (8) (1) (11.9) (1.5) Eden township 70 63 62 (8) (1) (12.9) (1.6) Bal. of Forrester township 67 61 60 (7) (1) (11.7) (1.7) Franklin township 132 119 117 (15) (2) (12.8) (1.7) Highpoint township 93 84 83 (10) (1) (12.0) (1.2) Johnson township 76 68 67 (9) (1) (13.4) (1.5) Bal. of Nevada township 141 127 124 (17) (3) (13.7) (2.4) Bal. of Ohio township 122 110 108 (14) (2) (13.0) (1.9) Bal. of Waring township 94 85 84 (10) (1) (11.9) (1.2)

Norton County 5,953 5,733 5,664 (289) (69) (5.1) (1.2) Almena city 469 458 454 (15) (4) (3.3) (0.9) Clayton city (pt.) 65 64 63 (2) (1) (3.2) (1.6) Edmond city 47 46 45 (2) (1) (4.4) (2.2) Lenora city 306 290 285 (21) (5) (7.4) (1.8) Norton city 3,012 2,852 2,806 (206) (46) (7.3) (1.6) Bal. of Norton County 2,054 2,023 2,011 (43) (12) (2.1) (0.6) Bal. of Almena--Dist. 4 township 145 142 140 (5) (2) (3.6) (1.4) Center--District 1 township 1,382 1,366 1,360 (22) (6) (1.6) (0.4) Harrison--District 6 township 12 12 12 ------Bal. of Highland--Dist. 2 township 366 357 354 (12) (3) (3.4) (0.8) Bal. of Solomon--Dist. 3 township 149 146 145 (4) (1) (2.8) (0.7)

Osage County 16,712 17,050 17,150 438 100 2.6 0.6 Burlingame city 1,017 1,015 1,015 (2) -- (0.2) -- Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Osage County (cont'd) Carbondale city 1,478 1,447 1,451 (27) 4 (1.9) 0.3 Lyndon city 1,038 1,041 1,041 3 -- 0.3 -- Melvern city 429 427 430 1 3 0.2 0.7 Olivet city 64 65 65 1 -- 1.5 -- Osage City city 3,034 2,985 2,987 (47) 2 (1.6) 0.1 Overbrook city 947 972 971 24 (1) 2.5 (0.1) Quenemo city 468 459 455 (13) (4) (2.9) (0.9) Scranton city 724 715 712 (12) (3) (1.7) (0.4) Bal. of Osage County 7,513 7,924 8,023 510 99 6.4 1.2 Bal. of Agency township 150 165 168 18 3 10.7 1.8 Arvonia township 136 154 159 23 5 14.5 3.1 Barclay township 239 264 270 31 6 11.5 2.2 Bal. of Burlingame township 751 794 804 53 10 6.6 1.2 Dragoon township 214 230 234 20 4 8.5 1.7 Bal. of Elk township 776 811 820 44 9 5.4 1.1 Fairfax township 513 537 544 31 7 5.7 1.3 Grant township 297 314 319 22 5 6.9 1.6 Junction township 1,210 1,244 1,253 43 9 3.4 0.7 Lincoln township 134 148 152 18 4 11.8 2.6 Bal. of Melvern township 383 407 413 30 6 7.3 1.5 Bal. of Olivet township 199 224 230 31 6 13.5 2.6 Bal. of Ridgeway township 1,183 1,223 1,232 49 9 4.0 0.7 Bal. of Scranton township 549 571 576 27 5 4.7 0.9 Superior township 293 329 334 41 5 12.3 1.5 Bal. of Valley Brook township 486 509 515 29 6 5.6 1.2

Osborne County 4,452 4,101 4,050 (402) (51) (9.9) (1.3) Alton city 117 110 109 (8) (1) (7.3) (0.9) Downs city 1,038 953 938 (100) (15) (10.7) (1.6) Natoma city 367 332 329 (38) (3) (11.6) (0.9) Osborne city 1,607 1,461 1,440 (167) (21) (11.6) (1.5) Portis city 123 117 116 (7) (1) (6.0) (0.9) Bal. of Osborne County 1,200 1,128 1,118 (82) (10) (7.3) (0.9) Bal. of Bethany township 76 70 70 (6) -- (8.6) -- Bloom township 81 76 76 (5) -- (6.6) -- Corinth township 51 48 48 (3) -- (6.3) -- Covert township 19 18 18 (1) -- (5.6) -- Delhi township 37 35 34 (3) (1) (8.8) (2.9) Grant township 28 27 26 (2) (1) (7.7) (3.8) Hancock township 21 20 20 (1) -- (5.0) -- Hawkeye township 36 34 33 (3) (1) (9.1) (3.0) Independence township 32 30 30 (2) -- (6.7) -- Jackson township 42 39 39 (3) -- (7.7) -- Kill Creek township 35 33 32 (3) (1) (9.4) (3.1) Lawrence township 37 35 35 (2) -- (5.7) -- Liberty township 31 29 29 (2) -- (6.9) -- Mount Ayr township 41 38 38 (3) -- (7.9) -- Bal. of Natoma township 35 33 33 (2) -- (6.1) -- Penn township 129 121 121 (8) -- (6.6) -- Bal. of Ross township 128 121 119 (9) (2) (7.6) (1.7) Round Mound township 59 56 55 (4) (1) (7.3) (1.8) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Osborne County (cont'd) Bal. of Sumner township 89 84 84 (5) -- (6.0) -- Tilden township 116 108 107 (9) (1) (8.4) (0.9) Valley township 37 35 34 (3) (1) (8.8) (2.9) Victor township 24 23 22 (2) (1) (9.1) (4.5) Winfield township 16 15 15 (1) -- (6.7) --

Ottawa County 6,163 6,149 6,123 (40) (26) (0.7) (0.4) Bennington city 623 615 614 (9) (1) (1.5) (0.2) Culver city 164 166 165 1 (1) 0.6 (0.6) Delphos city 469 454 449 (20) (5) (4.5) (1.1) Minneapolis city 2,046 2,029 2,015 (31) (14) (1.5) (0.7) Tescott city 339 335 331 (8) (4) (2.4) (1.2) Bal. of Ottawa County 2,522 2,550 2,549 27 (1) 1.1 -- Bal. of Bennington township 493 497 493 -- (4) -- (0.8) Blaine township 111 113 113 2 -- 1.8 -- Buckeye township 101 102 102 1 -- 1.0 -- Center township 72 73 74 2 1 2.7 1.4 Chapman township 67 69 69 2 -- 2.9 -- Concord township 209 211 210 1 (1) 0.5 (0.5) Bal. of Culver township 154 155 155 1 -- 0.6 -- Durham township 25 26 27 2 1 7.4 3.7 Fountain township 190 190 190 ------Garfield township 95 96 97 2 1 2.1 1.0 Grant township 93 95 95 2 -- 2.1 -- Henry township 22 23 24 2 1 8.3 4.2 Lincoln township 143 144 144 1 -- 0.7 -- Logan township 82 83 83 1 -- 1.2 -- Bal. of Morton township 159 160 160 1 -- 0.6 -- Ottawa township 49 51 51 2 -- 3.9 -- Richland township 218 219 218 -- (1) -- (0.5) Bal. of Sheridan township 120 121 121 1 -- 0.8 -- Sherman township 67 68 69 2 1 2.9 1.4 Stanton township 52 54 54 2 -- 3.7 --

Pawnee County 7,233 6,750 6,739 (494) (11) (7.3) (0.2) Burdett city 256 241 241 (15) -- (6.2) -- Garfield city 198 186 186 (12) -- (6.5) -- Larned city 4,236 3,887 3,874 (362) (13) (9.3) (0.3) Rozel city 182 172 171 (11) (1) (6.4) (0.6) Bal. of Pawnee County 2,361 2,264 2,267 (94) 3 (4.1) 0.1 Ash Valley township 49 46 46 (3) -- (6.5) -- Bal. of Browns Grove township 54 51 51 (3) -- (5.9) -- Conkling township 26 24 25 (1) 1 (4.0) 4.0 Bal. of Garfield township 63 59 59 (4) -- (6.8) -- Bal. of Grant township 52 47 47 (5) -- (10.6) -- Keysville township 55 52 52 (3) -- (5.8) -- Larned township 266 253 253 (13) -- (5.1) -- Lincoln township 28 26 26 (2) -- (7.7) -- Logan township 48 45 45 (3) -- (6.7) -- Morton township 56 53 53 (3) -- (5.7) -- Bal. of Orange township 71 68 68 (3) -- (4.4) -- Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Pawnee County (cont'd) Pawnee township 82 77 77 (5) -- (6.5) -- Pleasant Grove township 230 218 218 (12) -- (5.5) -- Pleasant Ridge township 56 53 53 (3) -- (5.7) -- Pleasant Valley township 128 120 120 (8) -- (6.7) -- River township 87 82 82 (5) -- (6.1) -- Santa Fe township 788 782 783 (5) 1 (0.6) 0.1 Sawmill township 24 22 23 (1) 1 (4.3) 4.3 Shiley township 28 26 26 (2) -- (7.7) -- Valley Center township 57 54 54 (3) -- (5.6) -- Walnut township 113 106 106 (7) -- (6.6) --

Phillips County 6,001 5,610 5,504 (497) (106) (9.0) (1.9) Agra city 306 285 278 (28) (7) (10.1) (2.5) Glade city 114 108 106 (8) (2) (7.5) (1.9) Kirwin city 229 218 214 (15) (4) (7.0) (1.9) Logan city 603 557 549 (54) (8) (9.8) (1.5) Long Island city 155 147 145 (10) (2) (6.9) (1.4) Phillipsburg city 2,668 2,485 2,432 (236) (53) (9.7) (2.2) Prairie View city 141 134 131 (10) (3) (7.6) (2.3) Speed city 44 42 41 (3) (1) (7.3) (2.4) Bal. of Phillips County 1,741 1,634 1,608 (133) (26) (8.3) (1.6) Arcade township 96 91 90 (6) (1) (6.7) (1.1) Beaver township 54 51 50 (4) (1) (8.0) (2.0) Bal. of Belmont township 69 65 64 (5) (1) (7.8) (1.6) Bow Creek township 44 42 41 (3) (1) (7.3) (2.4) Crystal township 59 56 55 (4) (1) (7.3) (1.8) Dayton township 53 50 50 (3) -- (6.0) -- Deer Creek township 67 63 62 (5) (1) (8.1) (1.6) Freedom township 85 81 79 (6) (2) (7.6) (2.5) Glenwood township 42 40 39 (3) (1) (7.7) (2.6) Granite township 21 20 19 (2) (1) (10.5) (5.3) Greenwood township 45 43 42 (3) (1) (7.1) (2.4) Bal. of Kirwin township 78 74 73 (5) (1) (6.8) (1.4) Bal. of Logan township 63 57 56 (7) (1) (12.5) (1.8) Bal. of Long Island township 96 91 90 (6) (1) (6.7) (1.1) Mound township 129 122 120 (9) (2) (7.5) (1.7) Phillipsburg township 257 228 227 (30) (1) (13.2) (0.4) Plainview township 23 22 22 (1) -- (4.5) -- Bal. of Plum township 141 134 132 (9) (2) (6.8) (1.5) Bal. of Prairie View township 79 75 73 (6) (2) (8.2) (2.7) Rushville township 23 22 22 (1) -- (4.5) -- Bal. of Solomon township 112 107 105 (7) (2) (6.7) (1.9) Sumner township 43 41 40 (3) (1) (7.5) (2.5) Towanda township 26 25 24 (2) (1) (8.3) (4.2) Valley township 22 21 20 (2) (1) (10.0) (5.0) Walnut township 14 13 13 (1) -- (7.7) --

Pottawatomie County 18,209 18,890 19,129 920 239 4.8 1.2 Belvue city 228 225 223 (5) (2) (2.2) (0.9) Emmett city 277 272 270 (7) (2) (2.6) (0.7) Havensville city 146 147 147 1 -- 0.7 -- Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Pottawatomie County (cont'd) Louisville city 209 211 211 2 -- 0.9 -- Manhattan city (pt.) 3 21 35 32 14 91.4 40.0 Olsburg city 192 186 191 (1) 5 (0.5) 2.6 Onaga city 704 687 683 (21) (4) (3.1) (0.6) St. George city 434 476 495 61 19 12.3 3.8 St. Marys city (pt.) 2,198 2,250 2,252 54 2 2.4 0.1 Wamego city 4,246 4,235 4,243 (3) 8 (0.1) 0.2 Westmoreland city 631 647 655 24 8 3.7 1.2 Wheaton city 92 93 93 1 -- 1.1 -- Bal. of Pottawatomie County 8,849 9,440 9,631 782 191 8.1 2.0 Bal. of Belvue township 176 199 206 30 7 14.6 3.4 Blue township 1,802 1,868 1,890 88 22 4.7 1.2 Bal. of Blue Valley township 147 171 179 32 8 17.9 4.5 Center township 104 119 124 20 5 16.1 4.0 Clear Creek township 113 127 131 18 4 13.7 3.1 Bal. of Emmett township 201 223 229 28 6 12.2 2.6 Bal. of Grant township 147 164 170 23 6 13.5 3.5 Green township 188 211 218 30 7 13.8 3.2 Lincoln township 124 141 146 22 5 15.1 3.4 Bal. of Lone Tree township 147 165 171 24 6 14.0 3.5 Bal. of Louisville township 526 556 566 40 10 7.1 1.8 Bal. of Mill Creek township 296 320 328 32 8 9.8 2.4 Bal. of Pottawatomie township 362 398 410 48 12 11.7 2.9 Bal. of Rock Creek township 159 172 178 19 6 10.7 3.4 St. Clere township 83 99 104 21 5 20.2 4.8 Bal. of St. George township 2,195 2,270 2,292 97 22 4.2 1.0 Bal. of St. Marys township 591 626 638 47 12 7.4 1.9 Shannon township 235 261 269 34 8 12.6 3.0 Sherman township 126 146 152 26 6 17.1 3.9 Spring Creek township 61 80 86 25 6 29.1 7.0 Union township 164 184 190 26 6 13.7 3.2 Vienna township 92 107 111 19 4 17.1 3.6 Bal. of Wamego township 810 833 843 33 10 3.9 1.2

Pratt County 9,647 9,376 9,496 (151) 120 (1.6) 1.3 Byers city 50 49 50 -- 1 -- 2.0 Coats city 112 109 111 (1) 2 (0.9) 1.8 Cullison city 98 95 97 (1) 2 (1.0) 2.1 Iuka city 185 181 184 (1) 3 (0.5) 1.6 Pratt city 6,570 6,371 6,447 (123) 76 (1.9) 1.2 Preston city 164 160 162 (2) 2 (1.2) 1.2 Sawyer city 124 120 122 (2) 2 (1.6) 1.6 Bal. of Pratt County 2,344 2,291 2,323 (21) 32 (0.9) 1.4 Bal. of Township No. 6 401 392 398 (3) 6 (0.8) 1.5 Bal. of Township No. 7 181 177 180 (1) 3 (0.6) 1.7 Bal. of Township No. 8 131 127 129 (2) 2 (1.6) 1.6 Bal. of Township No. 9 219 213 216 (3) 3 (1.4) 1.4 Bal. of Township No. 10 79 77 78 (1) 1 (1.3) 1.3 Bal. of Township No. 11 372 363 368 (4) 5 (1.1) 1.4 Township No. 12 961 942 954 (7) 12 (0.7) 1.3 Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005

Rawlins County 2,966 2,770 2,672 (294) (98) (11.0) (3.7) Atwood city 1,279 1,182 1,139 (140) (43) (12.3) (3.8) Herndon city 149 141 136 (13) (5) (9.6) (3.7) McDonald city 159 144 138 (21) (6) (15.2) (4.3) Bal. of Rawlins County 1,379 1,303 1,259 (120) (44) (9.5) (3.5) Achilles township 83 79 76 (7) (3) (9.2) (3.9) Bal. of Atwood township 51 49 47 (4) (2) (8.5) (4.3) Center township 363 341 329 (34) (12) (10.3) (3.6) Driftwood township 84 79 77 (7) (2) (9.1) (2.6) Bal. of Herl township 237 224 217 (20) (7) (9.2) (3.2) Jefferson township 34 32 31 (3) (1) (9.7) (3.2) Ludell township 136 128 124 (12) (4) (9.7) (3.2) Mirage township 43 41 39 (4) (2) (10.3) (5.1) Bal. of Rocewood township 289 274 265 (24) (9) (9.1) (3.4) Union township 59 56 54 (5) (2) (9.3) (3.7)

Reno County 64,790 63,556 63,558 (1,232) 2 (1.9) -- Abbyville city 128 125 126 (2) 1 (1.6) 0.8 Arlington city 459 440 440 (19) -- (4.3) -- Buhler city 1,358 1,334 1,335 (23) 1 (1.7) 0.1 Haven city 1,175 1,173 1,170 (5) (3) (0.4) (0.3) Hutchinson city 40,787 40,974 40,961 174 (13) 0.4 -- Langdon city 72 72 72 ------Nickerson city 1,194 1,169 1,164 (30) (5) (2.6) (0.4) Partridge city 259 265 266 7 1 2.6 0.4 Plevna city 99 99 99 ------Pretty Prairie city 615 600 600 (15) -- (2.5) -- South Hutchinson city 2,539 2,483 2,481 (58) (2) (2.3) (0.1) Sylvia city 297 296 297 -- 1 -- 0.3 Turon city 436 434 436 -- 2 -- 0.5 Willowbrook city 36 88 88 52 -- 59.1 -- Bal. of Reno County 15,336 14,004 14,023 (1,313) 19 (9.4) 0.1 Bal. of Albion township 222 222 223 1 1 0.4 0.4 Bal. of Arlington township 162 163 164 2 1 1.2 0.6 Bell township 87 89 89 2 -- 2.2 -- Castleton township 256 258 259 3 1 1.2 0.4 Bal. of Center township 413 404 405 (8) 1 (2.0) 0.2 Clay township 3,302 2,149 2,148 (1,154) (1) (53.7) -- Enterprise township 139 139 140 1 1 0.7 0.7 Bal. of Grant township 1,271 1,200 1,200 (71) -- (5.9) -- Grove township 64 66 67 3 1 4.5 1.5 Bal. of Haven township 417 402 403 (14) 1 (3.5) 0.2 Hayes township 106 113 114 8 1 7.0 0.9 Huntsville township 118 119 120 2 1 1.7 0.8 Bal. of Langdon township 88 89 90 2 1 2.2 1.1 Lincoln township 703 694 694 (9) -- (1.3) -- Bal. of Little River township 523 509 510 (13) 1 (2.5) 0.2 Loda township 119 121 122 3 1 2.5 0.8 Medford township 144 144 145 1 1 0.7 0.7 Medora township 1,594 1,568 1,567 (27) (1) (1.7) (0.1) Bal. of Miami township 85 88 89 4 1 4.5 1.1 Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Reno County (cont'd) Ninnescah township 226 225 226 -- 1 -- 0.4 Bal. of Plevna township 136 137 138 2 1 1.4 0.7 Bal. of Reno township 1,957 1,920 1,919 (38) (1) (2.0) (0.1) Bal. of Roscoe township 108 110 111 3 1 2.7 0.9 Salt Creek township 483 483 484 1 1 0.2 0.2 Sumner township 547 543 543 (4) -- (0.7) -- Bal. of Sylvia township 96 98 98 2 -- 2.0 -- Troy township 112 114 115 3 1 2.6 0.9 Valley township 887 876 876 (11) -- (1.3) -- Walnut township 114 115 116 2 1 1.7 0.9 Bal. of Westminster township 115 116 117 2 1 1.7 0.9 Yoder township 742 730 731 (11) 1 (1.5) 0.1

Republic County 5,835 5,223 5,164 (671) (59) (13.0) (1.1) Agenda city 81 73 73 (8) -- (11.0) -- Belleville city 2,239 1,984 1,956 (283) (28) (14.5) (1.4) Courtland city 334 295 291 (43) (4) (14.8) (1.4) Cuba city 231 209 208 (23) (1) (11.1) (0.5) Munden city 122 111 110 (12) (1) (10.9) (0.9) Narka city 93 84 84 (9) -- (10.7) -- Republic city 161 146 145 (16) (1) (11.0) (0.7) Scandia city 436 380 374 (62) (6) (16.6) (1.6) Bal. of Republic County 2,138 1,941 1,923 (215) (18) (11.2) (0.9) Bal. of Albion township 81 73 73 (8) -- (11.0) -- Beaver township 137 124 123 (14) (1) (11.4) (0.8) Belleville township 231 210 209 (22) (1) (10.5) (0.5) Bal. of Big Bend township 94 85 84 (10) (1) (11.9) (1.2) Bal. of Courtland township 116 105 104 (12) (1) (11.5) (1.0) Bal. of Elk Creek township 94 85 84 (10) (1) (11.9) (1.2) Bal. of Fairview township 102 93 92 (10) (1) (10.9) (1.1) Farmington township 81 74 73 (8) (1) (11.0) (1.4) Freedom township 186 169 168 (18) (1) (10.7) (0.6) Grant township 77 70 69 (8) (1) (11.6) (1.4) Jefferson township 107 97 96 (11) (1) (11.5) (1.0) Liberty township 52 47 47 (5) -- (10.6) -- Lincoln township 103 94 93 (10) (1) (10.8) (1.1) Norway township 163 148 146 (17) (2) (11.6) (1.4) Bal. of Richland township 87 79 78 (9) (1) (11.5) (1.3) Bal. of Rose Creek township 101 92 91 (10) (1) (11.0) (1.1) Bal. of Scandia township 105 95 94 (11) (1) (11.7) (1.1) Union township 51 46 46 (5) -- (10.9) -- Bal. of Washington township 82 75 74 (8) (1) (10.8) (1.4) White Rock township 88 80 79 (9) (1) (11.4) (1.3)

Rice County 10,761 10,485 10,452 (309) (33) (3.0) (0.3) Alden city 168 161 161 (7) -- (4.3) -- Bushton city 314 300 298 (16) (2) (5.4) (0.7) Chase city 490 470 467 (23) (3) (4.9) (0.6) Frederick city 11 11 11 ------Geneseo city 272 271 271 (1) -- (0.4) -- Little River city 536 529 528 (8) (1) (1.5) (0.2) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Rice County (cont'd) Lyons city 3,732 3,571 3,554 (178) (17) (5.0) (0.5) Raymond city 95 95 95 ------Sterling city 2,642 2,585 2,576 (66) (9) (2.6) (0.3) Bal. of Rice County 2,501 2,492 2,491 (10) (1) (0.4) -- Atlanta township 233 232 231 (2) (1) (0.9) (0.4) Bell township 18 18 19 1 1 5.3 5.3 Center township 136 135 135 (1) -- (0.7) -- East Washington township 179 180 180 1 -- 0.6 -- Bal. of Eureka township 54 54 54 ------Bal. of Farmer township 127 126 126 (1) -- (0.8) -- Galt township 51 51 51 ------Harrison township 192 191 191 (1) -- (0.5) -- Bal. of Lincoln township 87 87 87 ------Mitchell township 131 130 130 (1) -- (0.8) -- Odessa township 55 55 55 ------Pioneer township 101 101 101 ------Bal. of Raymond township 90 90 90 ------Rockville township 134 133 133 (1) -- (0.8) -- Sterling township 223 222 223 -- 1 -- 0.4 Bal. of Union township 205 204 203 (2) (1) (1.0) (0.5) Bal. of Valley township 108 109 108 -- (1) -- (0.9) Bal. of Victoria township 92 91 91 (1) -- (1.1) -- West Washington township 138 137 137 (1) -- (0.7) -- Wilson township 147 146 146 (1) -- (0.7) --

Riley County 62,843 63,069 62,826 (17) (243) -- (0.4) Leonardville city 398 384 354 (44) (30) (12.4) (8.5) Manhattan city (pt.) 44,828 47,894 48,633 3,805 739 7.8 1.5 Ogden city 1,762 1,545 1,432 (330) (113) (23.0) (7.9) Randolph city 175 149 135 (40) (14) (29.6) (10.4) Riley city 886 759 692 (194) (67) (28.0) (9.7) Bal. of Riley County 14,794 12,338 11,580 (3,214) (758) (27.8) (6.5) Ashland township 150 132 122 (28) (10) (23.0) (8.2) Bal. of Bala township 364 263 242 (122) (21) (50.4) (8.7) Center township 81 74 69 (12) (5) (17.4) (7.2) Fancy Creek township 126 111 103 (23) (8) (22.3) (7.8) Grant township 833 704 645 (188) (59) (29.1) (9.1) Bal. of Jackson township 151 133 123 (28) (10) (22.8) (8.1) Bal. of Madison township 7,287 6,676 6,391 (896) (285) (14.0) (4.5) Manhattan township 3,275 2,244 2,048 (1,227) (196) (59.9) (9.6) May Day township 78 70 65 (13) (5) (20.0) (7.7) Bal. of Ogden township 661 403 369 (292) (34) (79.1) (9.2) Sherman township 524 441 404 (120) (37) (29.7) (9.2) Swede Creek township 157 139 129 (28) (10) (21.7) (7.8) Wildcat township 750 635 582 (168) (53) (28.9) (9.1) Zeandale township 357 313 288 (69) (25) (24.0) (8.7)

Rooks County 5,685 5,375 5,351 (334) (24) (6.2) (0.4) Damar city 155 150 150 (5) -- (3.3) -- Palco city 248 231 228 (20) (3) (8.8) (1.3) Plainville city 2,029 1,892 1,889 (140) (3) (7.4) (0.2) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Rooks County (cont'd) Stockton city 1,558 1,465 1,453 (105) (12) (7.2) (0.8) Woodston city 116 112 111 (5) (1) (4.5) (0.9) Zurich city 126 122 121 (5) (1) (4.1) (0.8) Bal. of Rooks County 1,450 1,403 1,399 (51) (4) (3.6) (0.3) Bal. of Township No. 1 164 158 157 (7) (1) (4.5) (0.6) Bal. of Township No. 2 193 187 186 (7) (1) (3.8) (0.5) Bal. of Township No. 3 120 116 116 (4) -- (3.4) -- Bal. of Township No. 4 24 23 23 (1) -- (4.3) -- Township No. 5 74 72 71 (3) (1) (4.2) (1.4) Township No. 6 60 58 58 (2) -- (3.4) -- Bal. of Township No. 7 63 61 61 (2) -- (3.3) -- Bal. of Township No. 8 96 93 92 (4) (1) (4.3) (1.1) Township No. 9 51 49 49 (2) -- (4.1) -- Bal. of Township No. 10 71 69 68 (3) (1) (4.4) (1.5) Bal. of Township No. 11 351 340 341 (10) 1 (2.9) 0.3 Township No. 12 183 177 177 (6) -- (3.4) --

Rush County 3,551 3,451 3,406 (145) (45) (4.3) (1.3) Alexander city 75 71 70 (5) (1) (7.1) (1.4) Bison city 235 224 220 (15) (4) (6.8) (1.8) La Crosse city 1,376 1,324 1,305 (71) (19) (5.4) (1.5) Liebenthal city 111 109 108 (3) (1) (2.8) (0.9) McCracken city 211 204 203 (8) (1) (3.9) (0.5) Otis city 325 322 319 (6) (3) (1.9) (0.9) Rush Center city 176 175 174 (2) (1) (1.1) (0.6) Timken city 83 82 81 (2) (1) (2.5) (1.2) Bal. of Rush County 959 940 926 (33) (14) (3.6) (1.5) Bal. of Alex.--Belle Prairie twnshp. 64 63 62 (2) (1) (3.2) (1.6) Bal. of Banner township 108 106 104 (4) (2) (3.8) (1.9) Bal. of Big Timber township 53 52 51 (2) (1) (3.9) (2.0) Bal. of Center township 80 79 77 (3) (2) (3.9) (2.6) Garfield township 132 130 128 (4) (2) (3.1) (1.6) Bal. of Hampton--Fairview twnshp. 93 91 90 (3) (1) (3.3) (1.1) Illinois township 47 46 45 (2) (1) (4.4) (2.2) Bal. of La Crosse--Brookdale twnshp. 99 97 95 (4) (2) (4.2) (2.1) Bal. of Lone Star township 84 82 81 (3) (1) (3.7) (1.2) Bal. of Pioneer township 101 99 98 (3) (1) (3.1) (1.0) Pleasantdale township 33 32 32 (1) -- (3.1) -- Union township 65 63 63 (2) -- (3.2) --

Russell County 7,370 6,982 6,845 (525) (137) (7.7) (2.0) Bunker Hill city 101 97 95 (6) (2) (6.3) (2.1) Dorrance city 205 194 189 (16) (5) (8.5) (2.6) Gorham city 360 339 334 (26) (5) (7.8) (1.5) Lucas city 436 428 422 (14) (6) (3.3) (1.4) Luray city 203 191 186 (17) (5) (9.1) (2.7) Paradise city 64 63 62 (2) (1) (3.2) (1.6) Russell city 4,696 4,434 4,342 (354) (92) (8.2) (2.1) Waldo city 48 47 46 (2) (1) (4.3) (2.2) Bal. of Russell County 1,257 1,189 1,169 (88) (20) (7.5) (1.7) Bal. of Big Creek township 155 146 143 (12) (3) (8.4) (2.1) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Russell County (cont'd) Bal. of Center township 154 145 143 (11) (2) (7.7) (1.4) Fairfield township 42 40 39 (3) (1) (7.7) (2.6) Bal. of Fairview township 90 84 82 (8) (2) (9.8) (2.4) Grant township 159 156 152 (7) (4) (4.6) (2.6) Lincoln township 147 138 136 (11) (2) (8.1) (1.5) Bal. of Luray township 67 63 62 (5) (1) (8.1) (1.6) Bal. of Paradise township 105 99 98 (7) (1) (7.1) (1.0) Bal. of Plymouth township 114 107 106 (8) (1) (7.5) (0.9) Russell township 89 85 83 (6) (2) (7.2) (2.4) Bal. of Waldo township 60 56 56 (4) -- (7.1) -- Winterset township 75 70 69 (6) (1) (8.7) (1.4)

Saline County 53,597 53,903 53,919 322 16 0.6 -- Assaria city 438 448 444 6 (4) 1.4 (0.9) Brookville city 259 253 253 (6) -- (2.4) -- Gypsum city 414 403 399 (15) (4) (3.8) (1.0) New Cambria city 150 153 152 2 (1) 1.3 (0.7) Salina city 45,679 45,964 45,956 277 (8) 0.6 -- Smolan city 218 213 211 (7) (2) (3.3) (0.9) Solomon city (pt.) 1 1 1 ------Bal. of Saline County 6,438 6,468 6,503 65 35 1.0 0.5 Bal. of Cambria township 300 303 304 4 1 1.3 0.3 Bal. of Dayton township 133 138 140 7 2 5.0 1.4 Elm Creek township 828 832 834 6 2 0.7 0.2 Bal. of Eureka township 250 254 256 6 2 2.3 0.8 Falun township 260 271 274 14 3 5.1 1.1 Glendale township 104 109 111 7 2 6.3 1.8 Greeley township 809 755 757 (52) 2 (6.9) 0.3 Gypsum township 193 198 200 7 2 3.5 1.0 Liberty township 183 188 190 7 2 3.7 1.1 Ohio township 463 467 468 5 1 1.1 0.2 Pleasant Valley township 422 432 433 11 1 2.5 0.2 Smoky Hill township 324 317 318 (6) 1 (1.9) 0.3 Bal. of Smoky View township 516 521 522 6 1 1.1 0.2 Bal. of Smolan township 531 532 534 3 2 0.6 0.4 Solomon township 311 316 319 8 3 2.5 0.9 Bal. of Spring Creek township 136 148 152 16 4 10.5 2.6 Walnut township 553 558 560 7 2 1.3 0.4 Washington township 122 129 131 9 2 6.9 1.5

Scott County 5,120 4,629 4,600 (520) (29) (11.3) (0.6) Scott City city 3,855 3,499 3,474 (381) (25) (11.0) (0.7) Bal. of Scott County 1,265 1,130 1,126 (139) (4) (12.3) (0.4) Beaver township 302 271 270 (32) (1) (11.9) (0.4) Isbel township 110 98 98 (12) -- (12.2) -- Keystone township 106 94 94 (12) -- (12.8) -- Lake township 95 85 85 (10) -- (11.8) -- Michigan township 88 78 78 (10) -- (12.8) -- Scott township 309 277 274 (35) (3) (12.8) (1.1) Valley township 255 227 227 (28) -- (12.3) -- Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Sedgwick County 452,869 463,383 466,061 13,192 2,678 2.8 0.6 Andale city 766 790 808 42 18 5.2 2.2 Bel Aire city 5,836 6,522 6,557 721 35 11.0 0.5 Bentley city 368 415 442 74 27 16.7 6.1 Cheney city 1,783 1,842 1,843 60 1 3.3 0.1 Clearwater city 2,178 2,190 2,214 36 24 1.6 1.1 Colwich city 1,229 1,299 1,328 99 29 7.5 2.2 Derby city 17,807 20,309 20,543 2,736 234 13.3 1.1 Eastborough city 826 796 790 (36) (6) (4.6) (0.8) Garden Plain city 797 813 823 26 10 3.2 1.2 Goddard city 2,037 3,193 3,337 1,300 144 39.0 4.3 Haysville city 8,502 9,654 9,817 1,315 163 13.4 1.7 Kechi city 1,038 1,209 1,242 204 33 16.4 2.7 Maize city 1,868 2,116 2,117 249 1 11.8 -- Mount Hope city 830 836 842 12 6 1.4 0.7 Mulvane city (pt.) 4,154 4,511 4,574 420 63 9.2 1.4 Park City city 5,814 7,008 7,173 1,359 165 18.9 2.3 Sedgwick city (pt.) 211 226 225 14 (1) 6.2 (0.4) Valley Center city 4,883 5,380 5,508 625 128 11.3 2.3 Viola city 211 213 213 2 -- 0.9 -- Wichita city 344,284 353,562 354,865 10,581 1,303 3.0 0.4 Bal. of Sedgwick County 47,447 40,499 40,800 (6,647) 301 (16.3) 0.7 Afton township 1,290 1,342 1,357 67 15 4.9 1.1 Bal. of Attica township 2,922 2,620 2,628 (294) 8 (11.2) 0.3 Delano township 196 43 44 (152) 1 (345.5) 2.3 Bal. of Eagle township 701 755 767 66 12 8.6 1.6 Erie township 106 157 170 64 13 37.6 7.6 Bal. of Garden Plain township 983 1,036 1,051 68 15 6.5 1.4 Grand River township 607 661 675 68 14 10.1 2.1 Bal. of Grant township 1,577 1,473 1,485 (92) 12 (6.2) 0.8 Bal. of Greeley township 264 293 304 40 11 13.2 3.6 Bal. of Gypsum township 5,807 5,753 5,769 (38) 16 (0.7) 0.3 Bal. of Illinois township 1,620 1,679 1,693 73 14 4.3 0.8 Bal. of Kechi township 784 501 504 (280) 3 (55.6) 0.6 Lincoln township 473 517 529 56 12 10.6 2.3 Bal. of Minneha township 4,258 3,041 3,050 (1,208) 9 (39.6) 0.3 Bal. of Morton township 597 654 668 71 14 10.6 2.1 Bal. of Ninnescah township 735 784 797 62 13 7.8 1.6 Bal. of Ohio township 1,146 1,173 1,186 40 13 3.4 1.1 Bal. of Park township 2,132 1,879 1,887 (245) 8 (13.0) 0.4 Bal. of Payne township 1,119 944 954 (165) 10 (17.3) 1.0 Bal. of Valley Center township 1,214 1,271 1,283 69 12 5.4 0.9 Bal. of Viola township 336 389 402 66 13 16.4 3.2 Bal. of Waco township 3,380 860 869 (2,511) 9 (289.0) 1.0

Seward County 22,510 23,256 23,274 764 18 3.3 0.1 Kismet city 484 519 521 37 2 7.1 0.4 Liberal city 19,666 20,236 20,257 591 21 2.9 0.1 Bal. of Seward County 2,360 2,501 2,496 136 (5) 5.4 (0.2) Bal. of Fargo township 1,200 1,276 1,273 73 (3) 5.7 (0.2) Liberal township 803 849 847 44 (2) 5.2 (0.2) Seward township 357 376 376 19 -- 5.1 -- Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005

Shawnee County 169,871 171,553 172,365 2,494 812 1.4 0.5 Auburn city 1,121 1,124 1,131 10 7 0.9 0.6 Rossville city 1,014 992 996 (18) 4 (1.8) 0.4 Silver Lake city 1,358 1,352 1,352 (6) -- (0.4) -- Topeka city 122,377 121,691 121,946 (431) 255 (0.4) 0.2 Willard city (pt.) 86 84 84 (2) -- (2.4) -- Bal. of Shawnee County 43,915 46,310 46,856 2,941 546 6.3 1.2 Bal. of Auburn township 1,666 1,943 1,994 328 51 16.4 2.6 Bal. of Dover township 1,648 1,902 1,948 300 46 15.4 2.4 Grove township 473 624 651 178 27 27.3 4.1 Menoken township 1,371 1,588 1,628 257 40 15.8 2.5 Mission township 9,070 9,221 9,281 211 60 2.3 0.6 Monmouth township 2,786 3,095 3,150 364 55 11.6 1.7 Bal. of Rossville township 667 938 986 319 48 32.4 4.9 Bal. of Silver Lake township 591 685 702 111 17 15.8 2.4 Soldier township 12,867 13,346 13,442 575 96 4.3 0.7 Tecumseh township 7,822 7,709 7,764 (58) 55 (0.7) 0.7 Topeka township 931 996 1,003 72 7 7.2 0.7 Williamsport township 4,023 4,263 4,307 284 44 6.6 1.0

Sheridan County 2,813 2,598 2,591 (222) (7) (8.6) (0.3) Hoxie city 1,244 1,151 1,149 (95) (2) (8.3) (0.2) Selden city 201 185 185 (16) -- (8.6) -- Bal. of Sheridan County 1,368 1,262 1,257 (111) (5) (8.8) (0.4) Adell township 13 12 12 (1) -- (8.3) -- Bloomfield township 45 41 41 (4) -- (9.8) -- Bowcreek township 54 50 50 (4) -- (8.0) -- East Saline township 66 61 60 (6) (1) (10.0) (1.7) Bal. of Kenneth township 186 172 172 (14) -- (8.1) -- Logan township 115 106 106 (9) -- (8.5) -- Parnell township 104 96 96 (8) -- (8.3) -- Prairie Dog township 71 66 65 (6) (1) (9.2) (1.5) Bal. of Sheridan township 68 63 62 (6) (1) (9.7) (1.6) Solomon township 248 228 227 (21) (1) (9.3) (0.4) Springbrook township 108 99 99 (9) -- (9.1) -- Union township 60 56 55 (5) (1) (9.1) (1.8) Valley township 139 128 128 (11) -- (8.6) -- West Saline township 91 84 84 (7) -- (8.3) --

Sherman County 6,760 6,193 6,153 (607) (40) (9.9) (0.7) Goodland city 4,948 4,516 4,485 (463) (31) (10.3) (0.7) Kanorado city 248 229 228 (20) (1) (8.8) (0.4) Bal. of Sherman County 1,564 1,448 1,440 (124) (8) (8.6) (0.6) Grant township 115 106 105 (10) (1) (9.5) (1.0) Iowa township 44 41 41 (3) -- (7.3) -- Itasca township 321 298 296 (25) (2) (8.4) (0.7) Lincoln township 95 87 87 (8) -- (9.2) -- Llanos township 43 40 40 (3) -- (7.5) -- Logan township 246 228 227 (19) (1) (8.4) (0.4) McPherson township 52 48 48 (4) -- (8.3) -- Shermanville township 51 47 47 (4) -- (8.5) -- Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Sherman County (cont'd) Smoky township 87 81 81 (6) -- (7.4) -- Bal. of Stateline township 96 89 88 (8) (1) (9.1) (1.1) Union township 56 52 51 (5) (1) (9.8) (2.0) Voltaire township 252 233 232 (20) (1) (8.6) (0.4) Washington township 106 98 97 (9) (1) (9.3) (1.0)

Smith County 4,536 4,157 4,121 (415) (36) (10.1) (0.9) Athol city 51 47 47 (4) -- (8.5) -- Cedar city 26 24 24 (2) -- (8.3) -- Gaylord city 145 129 128 (17) (1) (13.3) (0.8) Kensington city 529 493 490 (39) (3) (8.0) (0.6) Lebanon city 303 280 278 (25) (2) (9.0) (0.7) Smith Center city 1,931 1,747 1,725 (206) (22) (11.9) (1.3) Bal. of Smith County 1,551 1,437 1,429 (122) (8) (8.5) (0.6) Banner township 54 50 50 (4) -- (8.0) -- Beaver township 60 56 55 (5) (1) (9.1) (1.8) Blaine township 60 55 55 (5) -- (9.1) -- Bal. of Cedar township 90 83 83 (7) -- (8.4) -- Bal. of Center township 163 156 153 (10) (3) (6.5) (2.0) Cora township 38 35 35 (3) -- (8.6) -- Crystal Plains township 40 37 37 (3) -- (8.1) -- Dor township 46 42 42 (4) -- (9.5) -- Garfield township 33 30 30 (3) -- (10.0) -- German township 34 31 31 (3) -- (9.7) -- Harlan township 100 93 92 (8) (1) (8.7) (1.1) Bal. of Harvey township 104 96 96 (8) -- (8.3) -- Bal. of Houston township 61 56 56 (5) -- (8.9) -- Bal. of Lane township 83 77 77 (6) -- (7.8) -- Lincoln township 73 67 67 (6) -- (9.0) -- Logan township 47 43 43 (4) -- (9.3) -- Martin township 24 22 22 (2) -- (9.1) -- Bal. of Oak township 96 89 88 (8) (1) (9.1) (1.1) Pawnee township 35 32 32 (3) -- (9.4) -- Pleasant township 34 32 31 (3) (1) (9.7) (3.2) Swan township 42 39 39 (3) -- (7.7) -- Valley township 75 69 69 (6) -- (8.7) -- Washington township 63 58 58 (5) -- (8.6) -- Webster township 47 44 43 (4) (1) (9.3) (2.3) White Rock township 49 45 45 (4) -- (8.9) --

Stafford County 4,789 4,536 4,488 (301) (48) (6.7) (1.1) Hudson city 133 128 127 (6) (1) (4.7) (0.8) Macksville city 514 498 494 (20) (4) (4.0) (0.8) Radium city 40 39 38 (2) (1) (5.3) (2.6) St. John city 1,318 1,231 1,215 (103) (16) (8.5) (1.3) Seward city 63 61 61 (2) -- (3.3) -- Stafford city 1,161 1,083 1,067 (94) (16) (8.8) (1.5) Bal. of Stafford County 1,560 1,496 1,486 (74) (10) (5.0) (0.7) Albano township 56 54 53 (3) (1) (5.7) (1.9) Byron township 80 77 77 (3) -- (3.9) -- Clear Creek township 36 34 34 (2) -- (5.9) -- Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Stafford County (cont'd) Cleveland township 68 65 65 (3) -- (4.6) -- Bal. of Douglas township 108 103 103 (5) -- (4.9) -- East Cooper township 90 86 86 (4) -- (4.7) -- Fairview township 98 94 93 (5) (1) (5.4) (1.1) Bal. of Farmington township 77 74 73 (4) (1) (5.5) (1.4) Bal. of Hayes township 79 76 75 (4) (1) (5.3) (1.3) Bal. of Lincoln township 103 99 98 (5) (1) (5.1) (1.0) Bal. of North Seward township 123 118 118 (5) -- (4.2) -- Bal. of Ohio township 71 68 68 (3) -- (4.4) -- Putnam township 19 18 18 (1) -- (5.6) -- Richland township 70 67 67 (3) -- (4.5) -- Rose Valley township 74 71 70 (4) (1) (5.7) (1.4) Bal. of St. John township 57 55 54 (3) (1) (5.6) (1.9) South Seward township 55 53 52 (3) (1) (5.8) (1.9) Bal. of Stafford township 130 125 123 (7) (2) (5.7) (1.6) Union township 41 39 39 (2) -- (5.1) -- West Cooper township 64 61 61 (3) -- (4.9) -- York township 61 59 59 (2) -- (3.4) --

Stanton County 2,406 2,366 2,245 (161) (121) (7.2) (5.4) Johnson City city 1,528 1,490 1,411 (117) (79) (8.3) (5.6) Manter city 178 177 169 (9) (8) (5.3) (4.7) Bal. of Stanton County 700 699 665 (35) (34) (5.3) (5.1)

Stevens County 5,463 5,492 5,412 (51) (80) (0.9) (1.5) Hugoton city 3,708 3,703 3,644 (64) (59) (1.8) (1.6) Moscow city 247 254 251 4 (3) 1.6 (1.2) Bal. of Stevens County 1,508 1,535 1,517 9 (18) 0.6 (1.2)

Sumner County 25,946 25,086 24,797 (1,149) (289) (4.6) (1.2) Argonia city 534 507 500 (34) (7) (6.8) (1.4) Belle Plaine city 1,708 1,636 1,618 (90) (18) (5.6) (1.1) Caldwell city 1,284 1,233 1,215 (69) (18) (5.7) (1.5) Conway Springs city 1,322 1,271 1,253 (69) (18) (5.5) (1.4) Geuda Springs city (pt.) 199 196 194 (5) (2) (2.6) (1.0) Hunnewell city 83 81 80 (3) (1) (3.8) (1.3) Mayfield city 113 111 110 (3) (1) (2.7) (0.9) Milan city 137 134 132 (5) (2) (3.8) (1.5) Mulvane city (pt.) 1,001 1,052 1,054 53 2 5.0 0.2 Oxford city 1,173 1,126 1,117 (56) (9) (5.0) (0.8) South Haven city 390 375 368 (22) (7) (6.0) (1.9) Wellington city 8,647 8,230 8,098 (549) (132) (6.8) (1.6) Bal. of Sumner County 9,355 9,134 9,058 (297) (76) (3.3) (0.8) Avon township 319 312 310 (9) (2) (2.9) (0.6) Bal. of Belle Plaine township 1,796 1,742 1,721 (75) (21) (4.4) (1.2) Bluff township 74 75 75 1 -- 1.3 -- Caldwell township 200 197 196 (4) (1) (2.0) (0.5) Chikaskia township 69 71 71 2 -- 2.8 -- Bal. of Conway township 369 361 358 (11) (3) (3.1) (0.8) Creek township 241 236 235 (6) (1) (2.6) (0.4) Bal. of Dixon township 204 201 199 (5) (2) (2.5) (1.0) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Sumner County (cont'd) Downs township 159 156 155 (4) (1) (2.6) (0.6) Bal. of Eden township 452 437 433 (19) (4) (4.4) (0.9) Falls township 187 183 182 (5) (1) (2.7) (0.5) Bal. of Gore township 1,219 1,181 1,167 (52) (14) (4.5) (1.2) Greene township 80 82 83 3 1 3.6 1.2 Guelph township 164 164 163 (1) (1) (0.6) (0.6) Harmon township 277 270 268 (9) (2) (3.4) (0.7) Illinois township 178 175 175 (3) -- (1.7) -- Jackson township 153 151 150 (3) (1) (2.0) (0.7) London township 774 749 741 (33) (8) (4.5) (1.1) Morris township 35 37 38 3 1 7.9 2.6 Bal. of Osborne township 160 153 152 (8) (1) (5.3) (0.7) Bal. of Oxford township 230 226 225 (5) (1) (2.2) (0.4) Palestine township 249 244 242 (7) (2) (2.9) (0.8) Bal. of Ryan township 102 102 102 ------Seventy--Six township 238 226 224 (14) (2) (6.3) (0.9) Bal. of South Haven township 197 197 196 (1) (1) (0.5) (0.5) Bal. of Springdale township 356 349 346 (10) (3) (2.9) (0.9) Sumner township 150 149 148 (2) (1) (1.4) (0.7) Valverde township 147 146 145 (2) (1) (1.4) (0.7) Bal. of Walton township 232 229 228 (4) (1) (1.8) (0.4) Wellington township 344 333 330 (14) (3) (4.2) (0.9)

Thomas County 8,180 7,793 7,639 (541) (154) (7.1) (2.0) Brewster city 285 268 262 (23) (6) (8.8) (2.3) Colby city 5,450 5,139 5,030 (420) (109) (8.3) (2.2) Gem city 96 93 92 (4) (1) (4.3) (1.1) Menlo city 57 56 55 (2) (1) (3.6) (1.8) Oakley city (pt.) 55 52 51 (4) (1) (7.8) (2.0) Rexford city 157 153 151 (6) (2) (4.0) (1.3) Bal. of Thomas County 2,080 2,032 1,998 (82) (34) (4.1) (1.7) Barrett township 124 121 119 (5) (2) (4.2) (1.7) East Hale township 137 134 131 (6) (3) (4.6) (2.3) Kingery township 93 90 89 (4) (1) (4.5) (1.1) Bal. of Lacey township 36 35 35 (1) -- (2.9) -- Bal. of Menlo township 55 54 53 (2) (1) (3.8) (1.9) Morgan township 755 741 728 (27) (13) (3.7) (1.8) North Randall township 107 104 102 (5) (2) (4.9) (2.0) Rovohl township 143 140 137 (6) (3) (4.4) (2.2) Bal. of Smith township 56 54 53 (3) (1) (5.7) (1.9) Bal. of South Randall township 212 206 203 (9) (3) (4.4) (1.5) Summers township 197 192 189 (8) (3) (4.2) (1.6) Wendell township 84 82 81 (3) (1) (3.7) (1.2) Bal. of West Hale township 81 79 78 (3) (1) (3.8) (1.3)

Trego County 3,319 3,134 3,050 (269) (84) (8.8) (2.8) Collyer city 133 130 125 (8) (5) (6.4) (4.0) WaKeeney city 1,924 1,807 1,773 (151) (34) (8.5) (1.9) Bal. of Trego County 1,262 1,197 1,152 (110) (45) (9.5) (3.9) Bal. of Collyer township 235 222 213 (22) (9) (10.3) (4.2) Franklin township 60 57 55 (5) (2) (9.1) (3.6) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Trego County (cont'd) Glencoe township 70 66 63 (7) (3) (11.1) (4.8) Ogallah township 214 202 194 (20) (8) (10.3) (4.1) Riverside township 117 111 107 (10) (4) (9.3) (3.7) Bal. of WaKeeney township 474 452 436 (38) (16) (8.7) (3.7) Wilcox township 92 87 84 (8) (3) (9.5) (3.6)

Wabaunsee County 6,885 6,862 6,919 34 57 0.5 0.8 Alma city 797 760 764 (33) 4 (4.3) 0.5 Alta Vista city 442 426 425 (17) (1) (4.0) (0.2) Eskridge city 589 573 571 (18) (2) (3.2) (0.4) Harveyville city 267 253 252 (15) (1) (6.0) (0.4) McFarland city 271 265 264 (7) (1) (2.7) (0.4) Maple Hill city 469 485 492 23 7 4.7 1.4 Paxico city 211 213 212 1 (1) 0.5 (0.5) St. Marys city (pt.) -- 1 1 1 -- 100.0 -- Willard city (pt.) ------Bal. of Wabaunsee County 3,839 3,886 3,938 99 52 2.5 1.3 Bal. of Alma township 340 340 344 4 4 1.2 1.2 Farmer township 119 127 130 11 3 8.5 2.3 Bal. of Garfield township 148 151 153 5 2 3.3 1.3 Bal. of Kaw township 242 244 247 5 3 2.0 1.2 Bal. of Maple Hill township 461 464 470 9 6 1.9 1.3 Mill Creek township 293 293 296 3 3 1.0 1.0 Mission Creek township 495 499 505 10 6 2.0 1.2 Bal. of Newbury township 563 566 575 12 9 2.1 1.6 Bal. of Plumb township 373 379 382 9 3 2.4 0.8 Rock Creek township 84 91 94 10 3 10.6 3.2 Wabaunsee township 455 458 463 8 5 1.7 1.1 Washington township 83 87 89 6 2 6.7 2.2 Bal. of Wilmington township 183 187 190 7 3 3.7 1.6

Wallace County 1,749 1,584 1,573 (176) (11) (11.2) (0.7) Sharon Springs city 835 741 733 (102) (8) (13.9) (1.1) Wallace city 67 62 62 (5) -- (8.1) -- Bal. of Wallace County 847 781 778 (69) (3) (8.9) (0.4) Harrison township 85 78 78 (7) -- (9.0) -- Bal. of Sharon Springs township 261 241 240 (21) (1) (8.8) (0.4) Bal. of Wallace township 108 100 99 (9) (1) (9.1) (1.0) Weskan township 393 362 361 (32) (1) (8.9) (0.3)

Washington County 6,483 6,079 6,009 (474) (70) (7.9) (1.2) Barnes city 152 144 142 (10) (2) (7.0) (1.4) Clifton city (pt.) 323 293 288 (35) (5) (12.2) (1.7) Greenleaf city 357 332 328 (29) (4) (8.8) (1.2) Haddam city 169 159 158 (11) (1) (7.0) (0.6) Hanover city 653 600 593 (60) (7) (10.1) (1.2) Hollenberg city 31 29 29 (2) -- (6.9) -- Linn city 425 394 388 (37) (6) (9.5) (1.5) Mahaska city 107 101 100 (7) (1) (7.0) (1.0) Morrowville city 168 159 157 (11) (2) (7.0) (1.3) Palmer city 108 102 101 (7) (1) (6.9) (1.0) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Washington County (cont'd) Vining city (pt.) 21 20 20 (1) -- (5.0) -- Washington city 1,223 1,157 1,145 (78) (12) (6.8) (1.0) Bal. of Washington County 2,746 2,589 2,560 (186) (29) (7.3) (1.1) Bal. of Barnes township 81 77 76 (5) (1) (6.6) (1.3) Brantford township 91 86 85 (6) (1) (7.1) (1.2) Charleston township 99 94 93 (6) (1) (6.5) (1.1) Bal. of Clifton township 115 109 108 (7) (1) (6.5) (0.9) Coleman township 64 60 60 (4) -- (6.7) -- Farmington township 192 177 175 (17) (2) (9.7) (1.1) Bal. of Franklin township 108 102 101 (7) (1) (6.9) (1.0) Grant township 25 24 23 (2) (1) (8.7) (4.3) Bal. of Greenleaf township 93 88 87 (6) (1) (6.9) (1.1) Bal. of Haddam township 77 72 72 (5) -- (6.9) -- Bal. of Hanover township 231 212 210 (21) (2) (10.0) (1.0) Highland township 22 25 24 2 (1) 8.3 (4.2) Independence township 169 160 158 (11) (2) (7.0) (1.3) Kimeo township 75 71 70 (5) (1) (7.1) (1.4) Lincoln township 84 79 78 (6) (1) (7.7) (1.3) Bal. of Linn township 174 164 162 (12) (2) (7.4) (1.2) Little Blue township 93 88 87 (6) (1) (6.9) (1.1) Logan township 109 103 102 (7) (1) (6.9) (1.0) Lowe township 76 72 71 (5) (1) (7.0) (1.4) Bal. of Mill Creek township 106 100 99 (7) (1) (7.1) (1.0) Sheridan township 119 112 111 (8) (1) (7.2) (0.9) Bal. of Sherman township 141 133 131 (10) (2) (7.6) (1.5) Strawberry township 130 122 121 (9) (1) (7.4) (0.8) Bal. of Union township 54 52 52 (2) -- (3.8) -- Washington township 218 207 204 (14) (3) (6.9) (1.5)

Wichita County 2,531 2,342 2,309 (222) (33) (9.6) (1.4) Leoti city 1,598 1,464 1,440 (158) (24) (11.0) (1.7) Bal. of Wichita County 933 878 869 (64) (9) (7.4) (1.0)

Wilson County 10,332 9,893 9,834 (498) (59) (5.1) (0.6) Altoona city 485 474 472 (13) (2) (2.8) (0.4) Benedict city 103 100 100 (3) -- (3.0) -- Buffalo city 284 278 277 (7) (1) (2.5) (0.4) Coyville city 71 69 69 (2) -- (2.9) -- Fredonia city 2,600 2,475 2,455 (145) (20) (5.9) (0.8) Neodesha city 2,848 2,676 2,652 (196) (24) (7.4) (0.9) New Albany city 73 71 71 (2) -- (2.8) -- Bal. of Wilson County 3,868 3,750 3,738 (130) (12) (3.5) (0.3) Bal. of Cedar township 216 211 210 (6) (1) (2.9) (0.5) Center township 618 576 574 (44) (2) (7.7) (0.3) Chetopa township 188 183 183 (5) -- (2.7) -- Bal. of Clifton township 130 125 124 (6) (1) (4.8) (0.8) Colfax township 452 440 439 (13) (1) (3.0) (0.2) Duck Creek township 103 101 101 (2) -- (2.0) -- Bal. of Fall River township 325 316 316 (9) -- (2.8) -- Bal. of Guilford township 102 100 100 (2) -- (2.0) -- Neodesha township 583 570 569 (14) (1) (2.5) (0.2) Appendix F (cont'd) Kansas Certified Population Certified to the Secretary of State by Division of the Budget on July 1, 2006

Pop. 2000 Pop. 2004 Pop. 2005 # Growth # Growth %Chg %Chg 4/1/2000 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 2000-2005 2004-2005 Wilson County (cont'd) Newark township 226 220 219 (7) (1) (3.2) (0.5) Pleasant Valley township 201 196 196 (5) -- (2.6) -- Prairie township 118 116 115 (3) (1) (2.6) (0.9) Talleyrand township 232 226 225 (7) (1) (3.1) (0.4) Bal. of Verdigris township 323 320 318 (5) (2) (1.6) (0.6) Webster township 51 50 49 (2) (1) (4.1) (2.0)

Woodson County 3,788 3,549 3,572 (216) 23 (6.0) 0.6 Neosho Falls city 179 172 174 (5) 2 (2.9) 1.1 Toronto city 312 290 291 (21) 1 (7.2) 0.3 Yates Center city 1,599 1,486 1,493 (106) 7 (7.1) 0.5 Bal. of Woodson County 1,698 1,601 1,614 (84) 13 (5.2) 0.8 Center township 594 556 562 (32) 6 (5.7) 1.1 Liberty township 200 190 191 (9) 1 (4.7) 0.5 Bal. of Neosho Falls township 358 337 339 (19) 2 (5.6) 0.6 North township 71 68 69 (2) 1 (2.9) 1.4 Perry township 103 97 98 (5) 1 (5.1) 1.0 Bal. of Toronto township 372 353 355 (17) 2 (4.8) 0.6

Wyandotte County 157,882 155,981 155,750 (2,132) (231) (1.4) (0.1) Bonner Springs city (pt.) 6,767 6,861 6,933 166 72 2.4 1.0 Edwardsville city 4,146 4,481 4,503 357 22 7.9 0.5 Kansas City city 146,866 144,536 144,210 (2,656) (326) (1.8) (0.2) Lake Quivira city (pt.) 49 49 50 1 1 2.0 2.0 Bal. of Wyandotte County 54 54 54 ------

Sources: Kansas Division of the Budget at http://budget.ks.gov, Kansas Secretary of State's Office, & U.S. Census Bureau

Appendix G Resident Population for U.S., Regions, States, & Kansas Counties, 2001-2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Percent Change Area: (As of 7/1/01) (As of 7/1/02) (As of 7/1/03) (As of 7/1/04) (As of 7/1/05) 2002 2003 2004 2005 U.S. 284,796,887 287,973,924 290,809,777 293,655,404 296,410,404 1.1 % 1.0 % 1.0 % 0.9 %

Regions: Northeast 53,925,319 54,172,792 54,399,446 54,571,147 54,641,895 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 New England 14,047,999 14,134,420 14,205,480 14,238,888 14,239,724 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.0 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont) Middle Atlantic 39,877,320 40,038,372 40,193,966 40,332,259 40,402,171 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 (New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania)

Midwest 64,807,370 65,098,828 65,406,134 65,729,852 65,971,974 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 East North Cent. 45,439,829 45,634,972 45,837,269 46,031,860 46,156,447 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin) West North Cent. 19,367,541 19,463,856 19,568,865 19,697,992 19,815,527 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 (Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota)

South 101,854,183 103,197,968 104,538,348 105,944,965 107,505,413 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 South Atlantic 52,751,062 53,563,636 54,344,651 55,182,959 56,179,519 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.8 (Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia) East South Cent. 17,137,300 17,225,247 17,341,608 17,480,032 17,615,260 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.8 (Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee) West South Cent. 31,965,821 32,409,085 32,852,089 33,281,974 33,710,634 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 (Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas)

West 64,506,941 65,504,336 66,465,849 67,409,440 68,291,122 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 Mountain 18,650,786 19,032,790 19,383,929 19,798,992 20,291,305 2.0 1.8 2.1 2.5 (Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming) Pacific 45,856,155 46,471,546 47,081,920 47,610,448 47,999,817 1.3 1.3 1.1 0.8 (Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington)

States: Alabama 4,466,440 4,478,896 4,500,752 4,530,182 4,557,808 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.6 Alaska 632,674 641,482 648,818 655,435 663,661 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.3 Arizona 5,297,684 5,441,125 5,580,811 5,743,834 5,939,292 2.7 2.6 2.9 3.4 Arkansas 2,692,041 2,706,268 2,725,714 2,752,629 2,779,154 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.0 California 34,533,054 35,001,986 35,484,453 35,893,799 36,132,147 1.4 1.4 1.2 0.7 Colorado 4,428,786 4,501,051 4,550,688 4,601,403 4,665,177 1.6 1.1 1.1 1.4 Connecticut 3,432,550 3,458,587 3,483,372 3,503,604 3,510,297 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.2 Delaware 795,576 805,945 817,491 830,364 843,524 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.6 Dist. of Columbia 572,716 569,157 563,384 553,523 550,521 (0.6) (1.0) (1.8) (0.5) Florida 16,355,193 16,691,701 17,019,068 17,397,161 17,789,864 2.1 2.0 2.2 2.3 Georgia 8,394,795 8,544,005 8,684,715 8,829,383 9,072,576 1.8 1.6 1.7 2.8 Hawaii 1,225,038 1,240,663 1,257,608 1,262,840 1,275,194 1.3 1.4 0.4 1.0 Idaho 1,321,309 1,343,124 1,366,332 1,393,262 1,429,096 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.6 Illinois 12,517,168 12,586,447 12,653,544 12,713,634 12,763,371 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 Indiana 6,126,470 6,156,913 6,195,643 6,237,569 6,271,973 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 Appendix G (cont'd) Resident Population for U.S., Regions, States, & Kansas Counties, 2000-2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Area: (As of 7/1/01) (As of 7/1/02) (As of 7/1/03) (As of 7/1/04) (As of 7/1/05) 2002 2003 2004 2005 States (cont'd): Iowa 2,932,225 2,935,840 2,944,062 2,954,451 2,966,334 0.1 % 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.4 % Kansas 2,700,453 2,711,769 2,723,507 2,735,502 2,744,687 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 Kentucky 4,067,336 4,089,822 4,117,827 4,145,922 4,173,405 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 Louisiana 4,466,001 4,476,192 4,496,334 4,515,770 4,523,628 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.2 Maine 1,284,691 1,294,894 1,305,728 1,317,253 1,321,505 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.3

Maryland 5,383,377 5,450,525 5,508,909 5,558,058 5,600,388 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.8 Massachusetts 6,399,869 6,421,800 6,433,422 6,416,505 6,398,743 0.3 0.2 (0.3) (0.3) Michigan 10,005,218 10,043,221 10,079,985 10,112,620 10,120,860 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 Minnesota 4,985,202 5,024,791 5,059,375 5,100,958 5,132,799 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.6 Mississippi 2,857,716 2,866,733 2,881,281 2,902,966 2,921,088 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.6

Missouri 5,636,220 5,669,544 5,704,484 5,754,618 5,800,310 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.8 Montana 905,954 910,372 917,621 926,865 935,670 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.9 Nebraska 1,719,000 1,727,564 1,739,291 1,747,214 1,758,787 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.7 Nevada 2,094,633 2,167,455 2,241,154 2,334,771 2,414,807 3.5 3.4 4.2 3.4 New Hampshire 1,258,974 1,274,405 1,287,687 1,299,500 1,309,940 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.8

New Jersey 8,504,114 8,575,252 8,638,396 8,698,879 8,717,925 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.2 New Mexico 1,829,110 1,852,044 1,874,614 1,903,289 1,928,384 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.3 New York 19,074,843 19,134,293 19,190,115 19,227,088 19,254,630 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 North Carolina 8,195,249 8,305,820 8,407,248 8,541,221 8,683,242 1.3 1.2 1.6 1.7 North Dakota 636,285 633,911 633,837 634,366 636,677 (0.4) (0.0) 0.1 0.4

Ohio 11,385,833 11,408,699 11,435,798 11,459,011 11,464,042 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 Oklahoma 3,467,181 3,489,700 3,511,532 3,523,553 3,547,884 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.7 Oregon 3,472,629 3,520,355 3,559,596 3,594,586 3,641,056 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.3 Pennsylvania 12,298,363 12,328,827 12,365,455 12,406,292 12,429,616 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 Rhode Island 1,058,992 1,068,326 1,076,164 1,080,632 1,076,189 0.9 0.7 0.4 (0.4)

South Carolina 4,059,818 4,103,770 4,147,152 4,198,068 4,255,083 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.4 South Dakota 758,156 760,437 764,309 770,883 775,933 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.7 Tennessee 5,745,808 5,789,796 5,841,748 5,900,962 5,962,959 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 Texas 21,340,598 21,736,925 22,118,509 22,490,022 22,859,968 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 Utah 2,279,590 2,318,789 2,351,467 2,389,039 2,469,585 1.7 1.4 1.6 3.4

Vermont 612,923 616,408 619,107 621,394 623,050 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 Virginia 7,192,697 7,287,829 7,386,330 7,459,827 7,567,465 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.4 Washington 5,992,760 6,067,060 6,131,445 6,203,788 6,287,759 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 West Virginia 1,801,641 1,804,884 1,810,354 1,815,354 1,816,856 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 Wisconsin 5,405,140 5,439,692 5,472,299 5,509,026 5,536,201 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.5

Wyoming 493,720 498,830 501,242 506,529 509,294 1.0 0.5 1.1 0.5 Appendix G (cont'd) Resident Population for U.S., Regions, States, & Kansas Counties, 2000-2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Area: (As of 7/1/01) (As of 7/1/02) (As of 7/1/03) (As of 7/1/04) (As of 7/1/05) 2002 2003 2004 2005 Kansas Counties: Allen 14,196 14,111 13,907 13,949 13,787 (0.6) % (1.4) % 0.3 % (1.2) % Anderson 8,193 8,140 8,208 8,191 8,182 (0.6) 0.8 (0.2) (0.1) Atchison 16,810 16,748 16,741 16,848 16,804 (0.4) (0.0) 0.6 (0.3) Barber 5,158 5,084 5,034 4,999 4,958 (1.4) (1.0) (0.7) (0.8) Barton 27,777 27,618 27,467 27,957 28,105 (0.6) (0.5) 1.8 0.5

Bourbon 15,362 15,175 15,086 15,066 14,997 (1.2) (0.6) (0.1) (0.5) Brown 10,635 10,482 10,442 10,362 10,239 (1.4) (0.4) (0.8) (1.2) Butler 59,928 60,428 61,127 61,828 62,354 0.8 1.2 1.1 0.9 Chase 2,998 3,067 3,107 3,068 3,081 2.3 1.3 (1.3) 0.4 Chautauqua 4,263 4,193 4,185 4,178 4,109 (1.6) (0.2) (0.2) (1.7)

Cherokee 22,263 21,982 21,815 21,950 21,555 (1.3) (0.8) 0.6 (1.8) Cheyenne 3,093 3,035 2,955 2,979 2,946 (1.9) (2.6) 0.8 (1.1) Clark 2,385 2,361 2,333 2,343 2,283 (1.0) (1.2) 0.4 (2.6) Clay 8,761 8,694 8,573 8,597 8,629 (0.8) (1.4) 0.3 0.4 Cloud 10,081 9,950 9,859 9,779 9,759 (1.3) (0.9) (0.8) (0.2)

Coffey 8,831 8,819 8,815 8,759 8,683 (0.1) (0.0) (0.6) (0.9) Comanche 1,986 1,964 1,915 1,903 1,935 (1.1) (2.5) (0.6) 1.7 Cowley 35,951 36,364 35,860 35,772 35,298 1.1 (1.4) (0.2) (1.3) Crawford 38,289 38,109 38,398 38,060 38,222 (0.5) 0.8 (0.9) 0.4 Decatur 3,434 3,377 3,295 3,274 3,191 (1.7) (2.4) (0.6) (2.5)

Dickinson 19,130 19,141 19,255 19,132 19,209 0.1 0.6 (0.6) 0.4 Doniphan 8,250 8,179 8,149 8,062 7,816 (0.9) (0.4) (1.1) (3.1) Douglas 101,076 102,200 102,983 102,786 102,914 1.1 0.8 (0.2) 0.1 Edwards 3,385 3,344 3,275 3,308 3,292 (1.2) (2.1) 1.0 (0.5) Elk 3,189 3,191 3,167 3,117 3,075 0.1 (0.8) (1.6) (1.3)

Ellis 27,403 27,311 27,212 27,060 26,767 (0.3) (0.4) (0.6) (1.1) Ellsworth 6,450 6,393 6,347 6,350 6,343 (0.9) (0.7) 0.0 (0.1) Finney 40,192 39,432 39,176 39,271 38,988 (1.9) (0.6) 0.2 (0.7) Ford 32,413 32,431 33,012 33,278 33,751 0.1 1.8 0.8 1.4 Franklin 25,036 25,291 25,540 26,049 26,247 1.0 1.0 2.0 0.8

Geary 27,204 26,417 26,313 25,111 24,585 (2.9) (0.4) (4.6) (2.1) Gove 3,008 2,992 2,910 2,845 2,763 (0.5) (2.7) (2.2) (2.9) Graham 2,881 2,863 2,808 2,745 2,721 (0.6) (1.9) (2.2) (0.9) Grant 7,791 7,889 7,745 7,685 7,530 1.3 (1.8) (0.8) (2.0) Gray 5,967 6,046 6,063 5,980 5,861 1.3 0.3 (1.4) (2.0)

Greeley 1,532 1,461 1,420 1,415 1,349 (4.6) (2.8) (0.4) (4.7) Greenwood 7,726 7,628 7,485 7,538 7,338 (1.3) (1.9) 0.7 (2.7) Hamilton 2,677 2,661 2,666 2,654 2,604 (0.6) 0.2 (0.5) (1.9) Harper 6,448 6,288 6,206 6,238 6,081 (2.5) (1.3) 0.5 (2.5) Harvey 32,999 33,366 33,502 33,769 33,843 1.1 0.4 0.8 0.2 Appendix G (cont'd) Resident Population for U.S., Regions, States, & Kansas Counties, 2000-2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Area: (As of 7/1/01) (As of 7/1/02) (As of 7/1/03) (As of 7/1/04) (As of 7/1/05) 2002 2003 2004 2005 Kansas Counties (cont'd): Haskell 4,290 4,248 4,246 4,272 4,232 (1.0) % (0.0) % 0.6 % (0.9) % Hodgeman 2,135 2,154 2,151 2,089 2,110 0.9 (0.1) (2.9) 1.0 Jackson 12,710 12,844 13,017 13,169 13,535 1.1 1.3 1.2 2.8 Jefferson 18,579 18,700 18,798 18,906 19,106 0.7 0.5 0.6 1.1 Jewell 3,621 3,508 3,433 3,422 3,352 (3.1) (2.1) (0.3) (2.0)

Johnson 463,974 476,009 486,515 496,691 506,562 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.0 Kearny 4,600 4,607 4,591 4,515 4,516 0.2 (0.3) (1.7) 0.0 Kingman 8,568 8,399 8,382 8,390 8,165 (2.0) (0.2) 0.1 (2.7) Kiowa 3,138 3,116 3,152 3,084 2,984 (0.7) 1.2 (2.2) (3.2) Labette 22,479 22,339 22,259 22,269 22,169 (0.6) (0.4) 0.0 (0.4)

Lane 2,094 2,001 1,946 1,950 1,894 (4.4) (2.7) 0.2 (2.9) Leavenworth 69,863 70,959 71,546 72,439 73,113 1.6 0.8 1.2 0.9 Lincoln 3,554 3,503 3,498 3,416 3,411 (1.4) (0.1) (2.3) (0.1) Linn 9,700 9,705 9,722 9,775 9,914 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.4 Logan 2,989 2,945 2,855 2,827 2,794 (1.5) (3.1) (1.0) (1.2)

Lyon 35,967 35,774 35,805 35,717 35,609 (0.5) 0.1 (0.2) (0.3) McPherson 29,524 29,362 29,346 29,413 12,952 (0.5) (0.1) 0.2 (56.0) Marion 13,396 13,311 13,299 13,010 10,405 (0.6) (0.1) (2.2) (20.0) Marshall 10,816 10,648 10,589 10,402 29,523 (1.6) (0.6) (1.8) 183.8 Meade 4,684 4,692 4,662 4,592 4,625 0.2 (0.6) (1.5) 0.7

Miami 28,692 28,950 29,187 29,712 30,496 0.9 0.8 1.8 2.6 Mitchell 6,771 6,693 6,707 6,564 6,420 (1.2) 0.2 (2.1) (2.2) Montgomery 35,794 35,229 34,934 34,975 34,570 (1.6) (0.8) 0.1 (1.2) Morris 6,077 6,017 5,995 5,977 6,049 (1.0) (0.4) (0.3) 1.2 Morton 3,372 3,352 3,317 3,269 3,196 (0.6) (1.0) (1.4) (2.2)

Nemaha 10,447 10,472 10,500 10,458 10,443 0.2 0.3 (0.4) (0.1) Neosho 16,883 16,712 16,580 16,555 16,529 (1.0) (0.8) (0.2) (0.2) Ness 3,354 3,285 3,158 3,080 3,009 (2.1) (3.9) (2.5) (2.3) Norton 5,862 5,830 5,796 5,799 5,664 (0.5) (0.6) 0.1 (2.3) Osage 16,721 16,804 16,784 17,091 17,150 0.5 (0.1) 1.8 0.3

Osborne 4,351 4,281 4,179 4,100 4,050 (1.6) (2.4) (1.9) (1.2) Ottawa 6,146 6,197 6,177 6,175 6,123 0.8 (0.3) (0.0) (0.8) Pawnee 7,034 6,914 6,796 6,795 6,739 (1.7) (1.7) (0.0) (0.8) Phillips 5,871 5,760 5,657 5,583 5,504 (1.9) (1.8) (1.3) (1.4) Pottawatomie 18,336 18,429 18,714 18,871 19,129 0.5 1.5 0.8 1.4

Pratt 9,536 9,572 9,437 9,417 9,496 0.4 (1.4) (0.2) 0.8 Rawlins 2,905 2,883 2,843 2,765 2,672 (0.8) (1.4) (2.7) (3.4) Reno 64,446 63,993 63,832 63,676 63,558 (0.7) (0.3) (0.2) (0.2) Republic 5,659 5,443 5,307 5,224 5,164 (3.8) (2.5) (1.6) (1.1) Rice 10,628 10,519 10,412 10,497 10,452 (1.0) (1.0) 0.8 (0.4) Appendix G (cont'd) Resident Population for U.S., Regions, States, & Kansas Counties, 2000-2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Area: (As of 7/1/01) (As of 7/1/02) (As of 7/1/03) (As of 7/1/04) (As of 7/1/05) 2002 2003 2004 2005 Kansas Counties (cont'd): Riley 61,998 61,521 62,291 63,069 62,826 (0.8) % 1.3 % 1.2 % (0.4) % Rooks 5,581 5,487 5,417 5,386 5,351 (1.7) (1.3) (0.6) (0.6) Rush 3,516 3,464 3,418 3,466 3,406 (1.5) (1.3) 1.4 (1.7) Russell 7,144 7,025 6,907 6,978 6,845 (1.7) (1.7) 1.0 (1.9) Saline 53,785 53,902 53,737 53,943 53,919 0.2 (0.3) 0.4 (0.0)

Scott 5,086 4,923 4,806 4,691 4,600 (3.2) (2.4) (2.4) (1.9) Sedgwick 456,351 460,643 462,896 463,802 466,061 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.5 Seward 22,629 22,994 23,091 23,237 23,274 1.6 0.4 0.6 0.2 Shawnee 170,380 170,314 170,902 171,716 172,365 (0.0) 0.3 0.5 0.4 Sheridan 2,712 2,669 2,662 2,614 2,591 (1.6) (0.3) (1.8) (0.9)

Sherman 6,638 6,422 6,277 6,218 6,153 (3.3) (2.3) (0.9) (1.0) Smith 4,425 4,294 4,181 4,179 4,121 (3.0) (2.6) (0.0) (1.4) Stafford 4,737 4,665 4,589 4,512 4,488 (1.5) (1.6) (1.7) (0.5) Stanton 2,414 2,428 2,404 2,374 2,245 0.6 (1.0) (1.2) (5.4) Stevens 5,359 5,340 5,389 5,520 5,412 (0.4) 0.9 2.4 (2.0)

Sumner 25,739 25,484 25,256 25,272 24,797 (1.0) (0.9) 0.1 (1.9) Thomas 8,143 8,049 7,933 7,801 7,639 (1.2) (1.4) (1.7) (2.1) Trego 3,237 3,141 3,103 3,158 3,050 (3.0) (1.2) 1.8 (3.4) Wabaunsee 6,813 6,762 6,767 6,938 6,919 (0.7) 0.1 2.5 (0.3) Wallace 1,700 1,685 1,621 1,579 1,573 (0.9) (3.8) (2.6) (0.4)

Washington 6,304 6,213 6,131 6,107 6,009 (1.4) (1.3) (0.4) (1.6) Wichita 2,541 2,508 2,447 2,360 2,309 (1.3) (2.4) (3.6) (2.2) Wilson 10,248 10,115 10,080 9,946 9,834 (1.3) (0.3) (1.3) (1.1) Woodson 3,758 3,668 3,631 3,553 3,572 (2.4) (1.0) (2.1) 0.5 Wyandotte 158,474 157,715 157,091 156,487 155,750 (0.5) (0.4) (0.4) (0.5)

Source: U.S. Census Bureau Appendix H Poverty Thresholds in 2005, by Size of Family & Number of Related Children under 18 Years

Related Children under 18 Years Eight or Size of Family Unit None One Two Three Four Five Six Seven More One person Under 65 Years $10,160 65 Years and Over 9,367

Two People Two with Householder: Under 65 Years 13,078 $13,461 65 Years and Over 11,805 13,410

Three People 15,277 15,720 $15,735 Four People 20,144 20,474 19,806 $19,874 Five People 24,293 24,646 23,891 23,307 $22,951 Six People 27,941 28,052 27,474 26,920 26,096 $25,608 Seven People 32,150 32,350 31,658 31,176 30,277 29,229 $28,079 Eight People 35,957 36,274 35,621 35,049 34,237 33,207 32,135 $31,862 Nine People or More 43,254 43,463 42,885 42,400 41,603 40,507 39,515 39,270 $37,757

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/threshld/thresh04.html Appendix I Kansas School District Populations, 2003 U.S. Census Bureau's Estimated No. of Ks Dept. of Population of Relevant Children 5-17 Education's Relevant Yrs of Age in Poverty Enrollment Children 5-17 Who Are Related to the District Name Dist. No. County as of 2003 Years of Age Householder Abilene 435 Dickinson 1,480 1,365 119 Altoona-Midway 387 Wilson 281 317 29 Andover 385 Butler 3313 3,408 191 Anthony-Harper 361 Harper 1014 885 132 Argonia 359 Sumner 247 234 26 Arkansas City 470 Cowley 3060 2,810 396 Ashland 220 Clark 254 219 26 Atchison County 377 Atchison 776 895 90 Atchison 409 Atchison 1,702 2,158 264 Attica 511 Harper 142 115 15 Auburn Washburn 437 Shawnee 5096 5,929 201 Augusta 402 Butler 2237 2,287 185 Axtell 488 Marshall 344 361 55 B & B 451 Nemaha 252 244 27 Baldwin City 348 Douglas 1372 1,296 134 Barber Co. 254 Barber 657 600 42 Barnes 223 Washington 461 453 44 Basehor-Linwood 458 Leavenworth 2075 1,886 149 Baxter Springs 508 Cherokee 901 879 145 Bazine 304 Ness 94 67 5 Belle Plaine 357 Sumner 833 719 79 Beloit 273 Mitchell 798 848 107 Blue Valley USD 229 229 Johnson 18489 20,870 439 Blue Valley USD 384 384 Riley 260 281 4 Bluestem 205 Butler 761 851 84 Bonner Springs 204 Wyandotte 2225 2,197 203 Brewster 314 Thomas 158 117 10 Bucklin 459 Ford 292 311 32 Buhler 313 Reno 2245 2,262 145 Burlingame Public School 454 Osage 362 293 34 Burlington 244 Coffey 895 758 77 Burrton 369 Harvey 275 270 37 Caldwell 360 Sumner 321 266 46 Caney Valley 436 Montgomery 948 772 101 Canton-Galva 419 McPherson 436 471 68 Cedar Vale 285 Chautauqua 201 187 44 Central Heights 288 Franklin 661 622 128 Central 462 Cowley 336 398 63 Centre 397 Marion 281 274 32 Chanute Public Schools 413 Neosho 1,919 1,790 286 Chapman 473 Dickinson 1045 1,105 88 Chase County 284 Chase 477 489 69 Appendix I (cont'd) Kansas School District Populations, 2003 U.S. Census Bureau's Estimated No. of Ks Dept. of Population of Relevant Children 5-17 Education's Relevant Yrs of Age in Poverty Enrollment Children 5-17 Who Are Related to the District Name Dist. No. County as of 2003 Years of Age Householder Chase-Raymond 401 Rice 155 177 42 Chautauqua Co. Community 286 Chautauqua 484 447 58 Cheney 268 Sedgwick 794 774 14 Cherokee 247 Crawford 848 901 128 Cherryvale 447 Montgomery 598 577 143 Chetopa 505 Labette 293 260 69 Cheylin 103 Cheyenne 177 179 24 Cimarron-Ensign 102 Gray 700 674 63 Circle 375 Butler 1519 1,788 230 Claflin 354 Barton 327 300 28 Clay Center 379 Clay 1,549 1,407 164 Clearwater 264 Sedgwick 1279 1,189 58 Clifton-Clyde 224 Washington 357 330 34 Coffeyville 445 Montgomery 2000 2,300 379 Colby Public Schools 315 Thomas 1078 1,121 105 Columbus 493 Cherokee 1,347 1,405 233 Commanche County 300 Comanche 308 336 30 Concordia 333 Cloud 1213 1,044 120 Conway Springs 356 Sumner 594 638 33 Copeland 476 Gray 142 190 31 Crest 479 Anderson 254 277 38 Cunningham 332 Kingman 281 300 25 DeSoto 232 Johnson 4,104 3,770 158 Deerfield 216 Kearny 370 335 45 Derby 260 Sedgwick 6,729 7,479 406 Dexter 471 Cowley 196 154 27 Dighton 482 Lane 272 261 29 Dodge City 443 Ford 5,814 6,458 883 Douglass Public Schools 396 Butler 895 815 45 Durham-Hillsboro-Lehigh 410 Marion 711 686 69 Eastern Heights 324 Phillips 169 169 32 Easton 449 Leavenworth 730 772 54 El Dorado 490 Butler 2258 2,137 307 Elk Valley 283 Elk 224 183 43 Elkhart 218 Morton 689 485 60 Ell-Saline 307 Saline 459 357 41 Ellinwood Public Schools 355 Barton 605 545 27 Ellis 388 Ellis 401 357 43 Ellsworth 327 Ellsworth 660 562 48 Elwood 486 Doniphan 336 247 47 Emporia 253 Lyon 5029 4,720 685 Erie-St. Paul 101 Neosho 1120 1,058 121 Appendix I (cont'd) Kansas School District Populations, 2003 U.S. Census Bureau's Estimated No. of Ks Dept. of Population of Relevant Children 5-17 Education's Relevant Yrs of Age in Poverty Enrollment Children 5-17 Who Are Related to the District Name Dist. No. County as of 2003 Years of Age Householder Eudora 491 Douglas 1195 1,167 65 Eureka 389 Greenwood 735 768 107 Fairfield 310 Reno 391 496 91 Flinthills 492 Butler 329 273 26 Ft. Scott 234 Bourbon 2056 2,165 384 Fowler 225 Meade 195 175 11 Fredonia 484 Wilson 817 833 145 Frontenac Public Schools 249 Crawford 769 583 15 Ft. Larned 495 Pawnee 960 1,187 112 Ft. Leavenworth 207 Leavenworth 1989 1,962 49 Galena 499 Cherokee 794 682 161 Garden City 457 Finney 7749 8,315 1,239 Gardner-Edgerton 231 Johnson 3215 3,096 195 Garnett 365 Anderson 1146 1,248 182 Geary County Schools 475 Geary 6429 5,940 915 Girard 248 Crawford 1128 956 160 Goddard 265 Sedgwick 3910 4,309 230 Goessel 411 Marion 303 301 18 Golden Plains 316 Thomas 193 117 7 Goodland 352 Sherman 1,059 977 161 Great Bend 428 Barton 3127 3,106 457 Greeley County Schools 200 Greeley 314 273 29 Greensburg 422 Kiowa 324 277 41 Grinnell Public Schools 291 Gove 129 124 9 Halstead 440 Harvey 734 826 42 Hamilton 390 Greenwood 111 101 24 Hanston 228 Hodgeman 135 108 6 Haven Public Schools 312 Reno 1,143 1,279 167 Haviland 474 Kiowa 175 133 16 Hays 489 Ellis 3,301 3,230 327 Haysville 261 Sedgwick 4526 4,320 346 Healy Public Schools 468 Lane 113 69 2 Herington 487 Dickinson 510 496 59 Hesston 460 Harvey 829 853 44 Hiawatha 415 Brown 1041 999 140 Highland 425 Doniphan 280 201 8 Hill City 281 Graham 454 376 44 Hillcrest Rural Schools 455 Republic 136 103 14 Hoisington 431 Barton 663 651 124 Holcomb 363 Finney 917 874 79 Holton 336 Jackson 1189 1,009 126 Hoxie Community Schools 412 Sheridan 366 349 41 Appendix I (cont'd) Kansas School District Populations, 2003 U.S. Census Bureau's Estimated No. of Ks Dept. of Population of Relevant Children 5-17 Education's Relevant Yrs of Age in Poverty Enrollment Children 5-17 Who Are Related to the District Name Dist. No. County as of 2003 Years of Age Householder Hugoton Public Schools 210 Stevens 1,015 977 135 Humboldt 258 Allen 562 434 39 Hutchinson Public Schools 308 Reno 4,908 5,146 907 Independence 446 Montgomery 2062 2,294 366 Ingalls 477 Gray 253 212 17 Inman 448 McPherson 481 484 50 Iola 257 Allen 1536 1,522 274 Jayhawk 346 Linn 633 602 84 Jefferson County North 339 Jefferson 529 451 61 Jefferson West 340 Jefferson 991 882 29 Jetmore 227 Hodgeman 322 278 29 Jewell 279 Jewell 189 155 22 Kansas City 500 Wyandotte 20,775 23,142 5,201 Kaw Valley 321 Pottawatomie 1121 1,464 162 Kingman-Norwich 331 Kingman 1,277 1,239 158 Kinsely-Offerle 347 Edwards 321 375 41 Kismet-Plains 483 Seward 800 795 118 Labette County 506 Labette 1,707 1,415 149 LaCrosse 395 Rush 350 341 50 Lakin 215 Kearny 741 730 66 Lansing 469 Leavenworth 2083 2,117 29 Lawrence 497 Douglas 10,154 10,822 1,141 Leavenworth 453 Leavenworth 4,372 4,855 753 Lebo-Waverly 243 Coffey 603 508 39 Leoti 467 Wichita 499 476 62 LeRoy-Gridley 245 Coffey 315 300 34 Lewis 502 Edwards 167 156 32 Liberal 480 Seward 4468 4,463 719 Lincoln 298 Lincoln 411 383 46 Little River 444 Rice 293 329 44 Logan 326 Phillips 204 181 29 Lorraine 328 Ellsworth 508 451 46 Louisburg 416 Miami 1348 1,367 51 Lyndon 421 Osage 467 442 31 Lyons 405 Rice 940 721 86 Macksville 351 Stafford 289 261 40 Madison-Virgil 386 Greenwood 292 278 44 Maize 266 Sedgwick 5,585 6,202 193 Manhattan 383 Riley 5369 6,165 667 Mankato 278 Jewell 249 202 25 Marais Des Cygnes Valley 456 Osage 280 337 59 Marion-Florence 408 Marion 709 642 58 Appendix I (cont'd) Kansas School District Populations, 2003 U.S. Census Bureau's Estimated No. of Ks Dept. of Population of Relevant Children 5-17 Education's Relevant Yrs of Age in Poverty Enrollment Children 5-17 Who Are Related to the District Name Dist. No. County as of 2003 Years of Age Householder Marmaton Valley 256 Allen 392 337 49 Marysville 364 Marshall 878 871 46 McLouth 342 Jefferson 568 601 71 McPherson 418 McPherson 2567 2,641 137 Meade 226 Meade 516 440 41 Midway Schools 433 Doniphan 213 230 26 Mill Creek Valley 329 Wabaunsee 544 595 19 Minneola 219 Clark 277 203 28 Montezuma 371 Gray 241 322 34 Morris County 417 Morris 965 950 93 Moscow Public Schools 209 Stevens 296 184 16 Moundridge 423 McPherson 833 584 20 Mullinville 424 Kiowa 134 78 10 Mulvane 263 Sedgwick 1961 2,151 235 Nemaha Valley Schools 442 Nemaha 535 625 33 Neodesha 461 Wilson 841 724 108 Nes Tres La Go 301 Ness 40 58 11 Ness City 303 Ness 303 236 12 Newton 373 Harvey 3690 3,667 425 Nickerson 309 Reno 1,223 1,186 141 North Central 221 Washington 124 140 16 North Jackson 335 Jackson 441 383 25 North Lyon Co. 251 Lyon 715 710 51 North Ottawa Co. 239 Ottawa 634 581 28 Northeast 246 Crawford 570 707 148 Northern Valley 212 Norton 178 157 20 Norton Community Schools 211 Norton 754 627 70 Oakley 274 Logan 431 466 47 Oberlin 294 Decatur 473 482 52 Olathe 233 Johnson 22023 24,264 1,228 Onaga-Havensville-Wheaton 322 Pottawatomie 384 369 44 Osage City 420 Osage 774 752 40 Osawatomie 367 Miami 1,229 1,313 241 Osborne County 392 Osborne 445 382 58 Oskaloosa Public Schools 341 Jefferson 708 694 40 Oswego 504 Labette 563 400 79 Otis-Bison 403 Rush 260 262 33 Ottawa 290 Franklin 2503 2,541 293 Oxford 358 Sumner 408 392 51 Palco 269 Rooks 160 136 10 Paola 368 Miami 2,116 2,212 157 Paradise 399 Russell 144 139 23 Appendix I (cont'd) Kansas School District Populations, 2003 U.S. Census Bureau's Estimated No. of Ks Dept. of Population of Relevant Children 5-17 Education's Relevant Yrs of Age in Poverty Enrollment Children 5-17 Who Are Related to the District Name Dist. No. County as of 2003 Years of Age Householder Parsons 503 Labette 1,646 1,887 324 Pawnee Heights 496 Pawnee 176 130 18 Peabody-Burns 398 Marion 440 474 47 Perry Public Schools 343 Jefferson 1034 1,054 60 Phillipsburg 325 Phillips 660 588 58 Pike Valley 426 Republic 279 230 33 Piper-Kansas City 203 Wyandotte 1313 1,410 37 Pittsburg 250 Crawford 2562 3,003 615 Plainville 270 Rooks 422 434 50 Pleasanton 344 Linn 422 393 90 Prairie Heights 295 Decatur 74 71 10 Prairie View 362 Linn 1018 937 81 Pratt 382 Pratt 1180 1,289 146 Pretty Prairie 311 Reno 329 317 25 Quinter Public Schools 293 Gove 383 289 26 Rawlins County 105 Rawlins 425 367 48 Remington-Whitewater 206 Butler 543 800 56 Renwick 267 Sedgwick 2,021 2,068 83 Republic County 427 Republic 534 444 55 Riley County 378 Riley 637 662 76 Riverton 404 Cherokee 865 702 115 Rock Creek 323 Pottawatomie 782 795 92 Rolla 217 Morton 243 172 21 Rose Hill Public Schools 394 Butler 1,799 1,893 114 Royal Valley 337 Jackson 938 910 76 Rural Vista 481 Dickinson 446 423 64 Russell County 407 Russell 1054 1,009 131 Sabetha 441 Nemaha 982 910 92 Salina 305 Saline 7,663 8,464 1,032 Santa Fe Trail 434 Osage 1312 1,265 139 Satanta 507 Haskell 441 429 51 Scott County 466 Scott 987 867 80 Seaman 345 Shawnee 3,481 3,603 232 Sedgwick Public Schools 439 Harvey 525 428 57 Shawnee Heights 450 Shawnee 3319 3,576 249 Shawnee Mission Pub. Schools 512 Johnson 29,824 38,819 1,738 Silver Lake 372 Shawnee 749 697 19 Skyline Schools 438 Pratt 420 213 38 Smith Center 237 Smith 508 455 53 Smoky Hill 302 Ness 129 107 19 Smoky Valley 400 McPherson 968 968 70 Solomon 393 Dickinson 440 391 64 Appendix I (cont'd) Kansas School District Populations, 2003 U.S. Census Bureau's Estimated No. of Ks Dept. of Population of Relevant Children 5-17 Education's Relevant Yrs of Age in Poverty Enrollment Children 5-17 Who Are Related to the District Name Dist. No. County as of 2003 Years of Age Householder South Barber Co. 255 Barber 299 270 66 South Brown County 430 Brown 668 677 109 South Haven 509 Sumner 233 195 30 Southeast of Saline 306 Saline 677 675 29 Southern Cloud 334 Cloud 205 247 48 Southern Lyon Co. 252 Lyon 607 632 37 Spearville 381 Ford 352 305 20 Spring Hill 230 Johnson 1558 1,545 67 St. Francis Community Schools 297 Cheyenne 405 371 33 St. John-Hudson 350 Stafford 475 344 26 Stafford 349 Stafford 347 270 57 Stanton County 452 Stanton 579 498 61 Sterling 376 Rice 512 493 56 Stockton 271 Rooks 395 362 63 Sublette 374 Haskell 485 516 66 Sylvan Grove 299 Lincoln 168 159 20 Syracuse 494 Hamilton 496 484 70 Tonganoxie 464 Leavenworth 1546 1,544 50 Topeka Public Schools 501 Shawnee 13,932 15,614 2,930 Triplains 275 Logan 90 80 13 Troy Public Schools 429 Doniphan 385 350 31 Turner-Kansas City 202 Wyandotte 3856 3,761 445 Twin Valley 240 Ottawa 646 472 47 Udall 463 Cowley 345 423 23 Ulysses 214 Grant 1794 1,641 204 Uniontown 235 Bourbon 480 436 74 Valley Center Pub. Schools 262 Sedgwick 2,374 2,627 35 Valley Falls 338 Jefferson 448 456 24 Valley Heights 498 Marshall 441 398 60 Vermillon 380 Marshall 577 509 90 Victoria 432 Ellis 302 256 17 Wabaunsee East 330 Wabaunsee 516 554 71 Waconda 272 Mitchell 480 444 30 WaKeeney 208 Trego 399 458 54 Wallace Co. Schools 241 Wallace 257 225 30 Wamego 320 Pottawatomie 1384 1,475 99 Washington Schools 222 Washington 356 334 38 Wathena 406 Doniphan 402 374 53 Wellington 353 Sumner 1,765 1,796 208 Wellsville 289 Franklin 799 837 59 Weskan 242 Wallace 131 83 18 West Elk 282 Elk 475 394 80 Appendix I (cont'd) Kansas School District Populations, 2003 U.S. Census Bureau's Estimated No. of Ks Dept. of Population of Relevant Children 5-17 Education's Relevant Yrs of Age in Poverty Enrollment Children 5-17 Who Are Related to the District Name Dist. No. County as of 2003 Years of Age Householder West Franklin 287 Franklin 947 1,043 67 West Smith Co. 238 Smith 207 154 9 West Solomon Valley Schools 213 Norton 70 96 3 Wheatland 292 Gove 188 153 25 White Rock 104 Jewell 134 162 20 Wichita 259 Sedgwick 48676 57,095 10,072 Winfield 465 Cowley 2,743 2,626 447 Woodson 366 Woodson 592 435 68

Sources: Kansas Department of Education and the U.S. Census Bureau [http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/saipe/saipe.cgi] Appendix J Health Insurance Coverage Status & Type of Coverage for the U.S. & Kansas, 1988-2005 (Numbers in Thousands, Number of People as of March of the Following Year) Not Covered Covered by Private or Gov. Health Ins.

Total Pop. Number Error Percent Error Number Error Percent Error U.S. 2005 293,834 46,577 322 15.9 % 0.1 247,257 325 84.1 % 0.1 2004 291,166 45,820 320 15.7 0.1 245,860 330 84.3 0.1 2003 288,280 44,961 318 15.6 0.1 243,320 335 84.4 0.1 2002 285,933 43,574 314 15.2 0.1 242,360 338 84.8 0.1 2001 282,082 41,207 307 14.6 0.1 240,875 341 85.4 0.1 2000 1 279,517 39,804 300 14.2 0.1 239,714 247 85.8 0.1 1999 2 276,804 40,228 423 14.5 0.2 236,576 412 85.5 0.2 1999 274,087 42,554 433 15.5 0.2 231,533 434 84.5 0.2 1998 271,743 44,281 440 16.3 0.2 227,462 450 83.7 0.2 1997 3 269,094 43,448 437 16.1 0.2 225,646 457 83.9 0.2 1996 266,792 41,716 429 15.6 0.2 225,077 459 84.4 0.2 1995 264,314 40,582 424 15.4 0.2 223,733 463 84.6 0.2 1994 4 262,105 39,718 408 15.2 0.2 222,387 531 84.8 0.2 1993 5 259,753 39,713 421 15.3 0.2 220,040 476 84.7 0.2 1992 6 256,830 38,641 416 15.0 0.2 218,189 482 85.0 0.2 1991 7 251,447 35,445 401 14.1 0.2 216,003 489 85.9 0.2 1990 248,886 34,719 398 13.9 0.2 214,167 495 86.1 0.2 1989 246,191 33,385 379 13.6 0.2 212,807 550 86.4 0.2 1988 243,685 32,680 362 13.4 0.1 211,005 532 86.6 0.1 Kansas 2005 2,695 290 22 10.8 % 0.8 2,405 22 89.2 % 0.8 2004 2,674 297 23 11.1 0.8 2,372 23 88.9 0.8 2003 2,683 294 19 11.0 0.7 2,389 55 89.0 37.0 2002 2,685 280 19 10.4 0.7 2,404 55 89.6 37.0 2001 2,642 301 20 11.4 0.7 2,341 54 88.6 37.0 2000 1 2,653 289 19 10.9 0.7 2,364 55 89.1 37.0 1999 2 2,610 309 32 11.8 1.2 2,301 88 88.2 1.2 1999 2,618 317 33 12.1 1.2 2,300 88 87.9 1.2 1998 2,616 270 30 10.3 1.1 2,346 89 89.7 1.1 1997 3 2,590 304 32 11.7 1.2 2,286 88 88.3 1.2 1996 2,572 292 31 11.4 1.2 2,280 88 88.6 1.2 1995 2,539 316 33 12.4 1.2 2,223 87 87.6 1.2 1994 4 2,527 326 32 12.9 1.2 2,201 83 87.1 1.2 1993 5 2,500 318 33 12.7 1.2 2,182 86 87.3 1.2 1992 6 2,510 274 31 10.9 1.2 2,236 87 89.1 1.2 1991 7 2,581 295 32 11.4 1.2 2,286 88 88.6 1.2 1990 2,512 272 31 10.8 1.1 2,240 87 89.2 1.1 1989 2,434 229 26 9.4 1.0 2,205 80 90.6 1.0 1988 2,399 216 26 9.0 1.1 2,183 84 91.0 1.1

1 Implementation of a 28,000 household sample expansion. 2 Estimates reflect the results of follow-up verification questions and of Census 2000 based population controls. 3 Beginning with the March 1998 CPS, people with no coverage other than access to Indian Health Service are no longer considered to be uninsured. The effect of this change on the overall estimates of health insurance coverage is negligible; however, the decrease in the number of people covered by Medicaid may be particially due to this change. 4 Health insurance questions were redesigned. Increases in estimates of employment-based and military health care coverage may be partially due to questionnaire changes. Overall coverage estimates were not affected. 5 Data collection method changed for paper and pencil to computer-assisted interviewing. 6 Implementation of Census 1990 based population controls. 7 Figures are revised to correct for omitted weights from the original March 1992 CPS file.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau Appendix K Kansas Resident Population, 2000 through 2005 By Age, Race, Gender, & Ethnicity Population Age 4/1/2000 7/1/2001 7/1/2002 7/1/2003 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 Kansas All Ages 2,688,418 2,700,879 2,712,454 2,724,224 2,733,697 2,744,687 < 5 188,708 187,221 188,796 188,667 188,536 187,949 5-19 609,710 599,792 595,019 587,099 579,663 569,356 20-64 1,533,771 1,558,697 1,574,715 1,594,275 1,610,273 1,630,377 > 65 356,229 355,169 353,924 354,183 355,225 357,005 > 85* 51,770 52,981 53,279 54,259 55,798 57,665 Race White Alone All Ages 2,414,428 2,424,103 2,430,696 2,438,246 2,444,629 2,452,657 Black Alone All Ages 157,389 158,301 159,687 160,434 161,016 161,504 Amer. Ind. & AK Nat. Alone All Ages 25,984 25,292 25,441 25,555 25,554 25,786 Asian Alone All Ages 48,239 50,092 52,451 54,775 56,415 57,759 Nat. HI & Other Pac. Isl. Alone All Ages 1,623 1,635 1,708 1,784 1,830 1,867 Two or More Races All Ages 40,755 41,456 42,471 43,430 44,253 45,114 White Alone < 5 161,385 160,695 162,361 162,531 162,842 162,626 Black Alone < 5 13,843 13,345 13,145 12,843 12,428 12,029 Amer. Ind. & AK Nat. Alone < 5 2,130 1,916 1,850 1,753 1,710 1,704 Asian Alone < 5 3,866 3,882 4,002 4,148 4,278 4,391 Nat. HI & Other Pac. Isl. Alone < 5 150 129 122 113 106 100 Two or More Races < 5 7,334 7,254 7,316 7,279 7,172 7,099 White Alone 5-19 532,534 523,509 518,200 510,391 502,959 493,307 Black Alone 5-19 43,942 43,274 43,348 42,905 42,556 41,711 Amer. Ind. & AK Nat. Alone 5-19 7,218 6,842 6,720 6,570 6,400 6,294 Asian Alone 5-19 10,601 10,485 10,645 10,763 10,885 10,887 Nat. HI & Other Pac. Isl. Alone 5-19 456 442 445 458 463 461 Two or More Races 5-19 14,959 15,240 15,661 16,012 16,400 16,696 White Alone 20-64 1,381,462 1,402,082 1,413,878 1,429,197 1,442,118 1,458,871 Black Alone 20-64 87,606 89,647 91,122 92,562 93,806 95,332 Amer. Ind. & AK Nat. Alone 20-64 15,302 15,240 15,490 15,772 15,922 16,151 Asian Alone 20-64 31,759 33,547 35,475 37,341 38,514 39,498 Nat. HI & Other Pac. Isl. Alone 20-64 956 998 1,072 1,138 1,177 1,216 Two or More Races 20-64 16,686 17,183 17,678 18,265 18,736 19,309 White Alone > 65 339,047 337,817 336,257 336,127 336,710 337,853 Black Alone > 65 11,998 12,035 12,072 12,124 12,226 12,432 Amer. Ind. & AK Nat. Alone > 65 1,334 1,294 1,381 1,460 1,522 1,637 Asian Alone > 65 2,013 2,178 2,329 2,523 2,738 2,983 Nat. HI & Other Pac. Isl. Alone > 65 61 66 69 75 84 90 Two or More Races > 65 1,776 1,779 1,816 1,874 1,945 2,010 White Alone > 85* 49,882 51,023 51,272 52,208 53,655 55,328 Black Alone > 85* 1,452 1,487 1,502 1,509 1,555 1,674 Amer. Ind. & AK Nat. Alone > 85* 112 120 130 140 154 179 Asian Alone > 85* 121 143 158 179 195 223 Nat. HI & Other Pac. Isl. Alone > 85* 8 8 9 11 12 13 Two or More Races > 85* 195 200 208 212 227 248 * The age category of > 85 years is a subset of the > 65 years age category. Appendix K (cont'd) Kansas Resident Population, 2000 through 2005 By Age, Race, Gender, & Ethnicity Population Age 4/1/2000 7/1/2000 7/1/2001 7/1/2002 7/1/2003 7/1/2004

Gender Male All Ages 1,328,474 1,336,664 1,343,636 1,351,169 1,357,412 1,363,613 Female All Ages 1,359,944 1,364,215 1,368,818 1,373,055 1,376,285 1,381,074

Male < 5 97,012 96,536 97,528 97,826 97,906 97,590 Female < 5 91,696 90,685 91,268 90,841 90,630 90,359

Male 5-19 313,454 308,183 605,649 601,487 297,917 292,814 Female 5-19 296,256 291,609 289,370 285,612 281,746 276,542

Male 20-64 772,493 785,921 794,151 804,601 813,051 823,135 Female 20-64 761,278 772,776 780,554 789,674 797,222 807,242

Male > 65 145,515 146,024 146,298 147,255 148,538 150,074 Female > 65 210,714 206,145 207,626 206,928 206,687 206,931

Male > 85* 14,612 15,185 15,514 16,197 16,925 17,806 Female > 85* 37,158 37,796 37,765 38,062 38,873 39,859

Ethnicity Non-Hispanic All Ages 2,500,166 2,503,224 2,507,069 2,510,858 2,512,886 2,516,437 Hispanic All Ages 188,252 197,655 205,385 213,366 220,811 228,250

Non-Hispanic < 5 163,929 132,390 163,759 163,570 163,227 162,782 Hispanic < 5 24,779 24,831 25,037 25,097 25,309 25,167

Non-Hispanic 5-19 552,752 541,594 534,941 525,396 516,340 504,470 Hispanic 5-19 56,958 58,198 60,078 61,703 63,323 64,886

Non-Hispanic 20-64 1,433,739 1,450,957 1,461,685 1,475,334 1,486,158 1,500,727 Hispanic 20-64 100,032 107,740 113,030 118,941 124,115 129,650

Non-Hispanic > 65 349,746 348,283 346,684 346,558 347,161 348,458 Hispanic > 65 6,483 6,886 7,240 7,625 8,064 8,547

Non-Hispanic > 85* 51,270 52,403 52,659 53,570 54,993 56,738 Hispanic > 85* 500 578 620 689 805 927 * The age category of > 85 years is a subset of the > 65 years age category.

Appendix K (cont'd) Kansas Resident Population, 2000 through 2005 By Age, Race, Gender, & Ethnicity As a % of Total Population*** Age 4/1/2000 7/1/2001 7/1/2002 7/1/2003 7/1/2004 7/1/2005 Kansas All Ages 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % < 5 7.0 6.9 7.0 6.9 6.9 6.8 5-19 22.7 22.2 21.9 21.6 21.2 20.7 20-64 57.1 57.7 58.1 58.5 58.9 59.4 > 65 13.3 13.2 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 > 85* 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 Race** White Alone All Ages 89.8 % 89.8 % 89.6 % 89.5 % 89.4 % 89.4 % Black Alone All Ages 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 Amer. Ind. & AK Nat. Alone All Ages 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Asian Alone All Ages 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 Nat. HI & Other Pac. Isl. Alone All Ages 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Two or More Races All Ages 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 White Alone < 5 85.5 85.8 86.0 86.1 86.4 86.5 Black Alone < 5 7.3 7.1 7.0 6.8 6.6 6.4 Amer. Ind. & AK Nat. Alone < 5 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 Asian Alone < 5 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 Nat. HI & Other Pac. Isl. Alone < 5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Two or More Races < 5 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.8 White Alone 5-19 87.3 87.3 87.1 86.9 86.8 86.6 Black Alone 5-19 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 Amer. Ind. & AK Nat. Alone 5-19 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Asian Alone 5-19 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 Nat. HI & Other Pac. Isl. Alone 5-19 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Two or More Races 5-19 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 White Alone 20-64 90.1 90.0 89.8 89.6 89.6 89.5 Black Alone 20-64 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 Amer. Ind. & AK Nat. Alone 20-64 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Asian Alone 20-64 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 Nat. HI & Other Pac. Isl. Alone 20-64 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Two or More Races 20-64 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 White Alone > 65 95.2 95.1 95.0 94.9 94.8 94.6 Black Alone > 65 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 Amer. Ind. & AK Nat. Alone > 65 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 Asian Alone > 65 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 Nat. HI & Other Pac. Isl. Alone > 65 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Two or More Races > 65 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 White Alone > 85* 96.4 96.3 96.2 96.2 96.2 95.9 Black Alone > 85* 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 Amer. Ind. & AK Nat. Alone > 85* 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 Asian Alone > 85* 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 Nat. HI & Other Pac. Isl. Alone > 85* <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Two or More Races > 85* 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 * The age category of > 85 years is a subset of the > 65 years age category. ** Percentage of total population for each age group by race is relative to the total population for that age group only. *** Totals may not add because of rounding. Appendix K (cont'd) Kansas Resident Population, 2000 through 2005 By Age, Race, Gender, & Ethnicity As a % of Total Population*** Age 4/1/2000 7/1/2000 7/1/2001 7/1/2002 7/1/2003 7/1/2004

Gender Male All Ages 49.4 % 49.5 % 49.5 % 49.6 % 49.7 % 49.7 % Female All Ages 50.6 50.5 50.5 50.4 50.3 50.3

Male < 5 51.4 51.6 51.7 51.9 51.9 51.9 Female < 5 48.6 48.4 48.3 48.1 48.1 48.1

Male 5-19 51.4 51.4 101.8 102.5 51.4 51.4 Female 5-19 48.6 48.6 48.6 48.6 48.6 48.6

Male 20-64 50.4 50.4 50.4 50.5 50.5 50.5 Female 20-64 49.6 49.6 49.6 49.5 49.5 49.5

Male > 65 40.8 41.1 41.3 41.6 41.8 42.0 Female > 65 59.2 58.0 58.7 58.4 58.2 58.0

Male > 85* 28.2 28.7 29.1 29.9 30.3 30.9 Female > 85* 71.8 71.3 70.9 70.1 69.7 69.1

Ethnicity Non-Hispanic All Ages 93.0 % 92.7 % 92.4 % 92.2 % 91.9 % 91.7 % Hispanic All Ages 7.0 7.3 7.6 7.8 8.1 8.3

Non-Hispanic < 5 86.9 70.7 86.7 86.7 86.6 86.6 Hispanic < 5 13.1 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.4 13.4

Non-Hispanic 5-19 90.7 90.3 89.9 89.5 89.1 88.6 Hispanic 5-19 9.3 9.7 10.1 10.5 10.9 11.4

Non-Hispanic 20-64 93.5 93.1 92.8 92.5 92.3 92.0 Hispanic 20-64 6.5 6.9 7.2 7.5 7.7 8.0

Non-Hispanic > 65 98.2 98.1 98.0 97.8 97.7 97.6 Hispanic > 65 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.4

Non-Hispanic > 85* 99.0 98.9 98.8 98.7 98.6 98.4 Hispanic > 85* 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 * The age category of > 85 years is a subset of the > 65 years age category. Appendix L Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Allen County Total Population 13,668 13,601 13,528 13,448 13,366 13,280 13,200 13,108 13,022 12,930 12,845 12,760 Age 0 thru 4 844 841 837 833 829 824 819 815 808 800 792 785 Age 5 thru 9 752 728 704 681 658 635 615 593 572 551 530 510 Age 10 thru 14 825 796 767 736 705 677 648 620 593 568 543 519 Age 15 thru 19 1,073 1,055 1,032 1,007 979 952 927 901 877 854 830 806 Age 20 thru 24 881 893 903 910 915 910 901 895 889 888 887 884 Age 25 thru 29 957 978 1,003 1,034 1,073 1,120 1,168 1,215 1,258 1,291 1,328 1,368 Age 30 thru 34 678 664 654 644 635 625 613 601 586 573 560 547 Age 35 thru 39 631 598 565 532 500 470 442 417 393 370 348 326 Age 40 thru 44 963 952 939 925 910 892 875 855 838 821 805 788 Age 45 thru 49 1,099 1,113 1,125 1,136 1,144 1,151 1,160 1,168 1,178 1,184 1,190 1,195 Age 50 thru 54 1,020 1,042 1,063 1,081 1,097 1,110 1,123 1,131 1,142 1,156 1,169 1,181 Age 55 thru 59 921 952 981 1,011 1,042 1,078 1,114 1,149 1,184 1,217 1,251 1,285 Age 60 thru 64 684 685 686 686 686 686 684 682 680 677 674 671 Age 65 thru 84 1,932 1,899 1,866 1,832 1,796 1,758 1,724 1,685 1,649 1,611 1,574 1,536 Age 85 & Older 408 405 403 400 397 392 387 381 375 369 364 359

Anderson County Total Population 8,240 8,266 8,292 8,322 8,346 8,369 8,391 8,414 8,432 8456 8473 8,492 Age 0 thru 4 494 494 493 492 490 488 484 479 475 472 468 464 Age 5 thru 9 479 469 458 445 433 420 410 400 389 378 368 357 Age 10 thru 14 559 549 539 528 517 507 494 483 471 460 449 438 Age 15 thru 19 599 597 594 590 585 581 579 576 572 568 563 558 Age 20 thru 24 490 510 532 557 581 598 616 635 651 673 694 717 Age 25 thru 29 556 573 593 618 648 680 715 748 779 808 838 871 Age 30 thru 34 419 415 412 410 408 404 399 395 393 389 384 379 Age 35 thru 39 411 395 378 360 341 324 310 295 281 268 255 243 Age 40 thru 44 644 651 657 664 670 673 676 677 682 686 688 691 Age 45 thru 49 626 641 659 677 697 718 734 749 763 779 796 812 Age 50 thru 54 519 528 537 545 552 559 569 581 591 600 608 616 Age 55 thru 59 481 491 500 507 513 521 528 537 545 553 560 566 Age 60 thru 64 411 413 413 413 412 413 412 412 412 412 411 409 Age 65 thru 84 1,242 1,227 1,212 1,197 1,178 1,159 1,138 1,117 1,096 1,077 1,057 1,036 Age 85 & Older 310 313 315 319 321 324 327 330 332 333 334 335

Atchison County Total Population 16,796 16,793 16,783 16,783 16,786 16,783 16,784 16,783 16,781 16781 16779 16,782 Age 0 thru 4 1,046 1,042 1,037 1,031 1,024 1,017 1,010 1,004 996 988 980 971 Age 5 thru 9 973 952 930 907 884 860 837 813 791 770 749 728 Age 10 thru 14 1,093 1,066 1,037 1,007 978 949 918 890 859 833 806 780 Age 15 thru 19 1,441 1,422 1,398 1,373 1,348 1,322 1,299 1,274 1,253 1,231 1,207 1,182 Age 20 thru 24 1,709 1,780 1,855 1,937 2,024 2,103 2,189 2,268 2,347 2,434 2,524 2,618 Age 25 thru 29 1,049 1,060 1,074 1,094 1,119 1,150 1,178 1,209 1,233 1,252 1,272 1,294 Age 30 thru 34 802 781 761 743 724 705 684 663 642 622 603 585 Age 35 thru 39 904 879 853 827 801 774 747 724 704 681 659 637 Age 40 thru 44 1,048 1,033 1,016 996 974 953 938 919 897 879 860 841 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Atchison County (cont'd) Age 45 thru 49 1,289 1,317 1,345 1,375 1,406 1,433 1,455 1,477 1,504 1,530 1,555 1,580 Age 50 thru 54 1,028 1,041 1,052 1,061 1,067 1,070 1,077 1,086 1,097 1,105 1,112 1,118 Age 55 thru 59 992 1,016 1,039 1,062 1,085 1,111 1,134 1,157 1,181 1,204 1,227 1,250 Age 60 thru 64 782 787 791 795 799 804 806 809 811 813 814 815 Age 65 thru 84 2,161 2,135 2,109 2,084 2,057 2,031 2,003 1,973 1,942 1,912 1,881 1,850 Age 85 & Older 479 482 486 491 496 501 509 517 524 527 530 533

Barber County Total Population 4,842 4,785 4,727 4,664 4,600 4,540 4,479 4,418 4,358 4294 4238 4,180 Age 0 thru 4 173 164 154 144 134 125 118 110 103 95 88 82 Age 5 thru 9 224 211 197 185 172 160 148 138 127 118 108 100 Age 10 thru 14 292 278 263 247 230 214 199 185 173 160 149 137 Age 15 thru 19 372 367 360 351 342 332 321 309 298 287 277 265 Age 20 thru 24 374 402 436 474 517 565 616 666 716 765 818 874 Age 25 thru 29 161 155 150 145 141 136 131 126 123 117 112 107 Age 30 thru 34 148 136 126 116 106 96 87 79 71 64 58 52 Age 35 thru 39 225 211 197 183 169 157 145 133 123 114 104 95 Age 40 thru 44 358 350 342 331 319 308 297 287 275 264 252 241 Age 45 thru 49 445 448 451 453 452 450 447 441 436 431 426 419 Age 50 thru 54 441 455 467 479 490 499 508 520 529 536 542 547 Age 55 thru 59 348 353 357 361 364 366 364 362 359 356 354 350 Age 60 thru 64 277 277 276 274 273 271 268 264 259 254 249 243 Age 65 thru 84 817 789 760 729 697 666 635 603 572 542 512 483 Age 85 & Older 187 189 191 192 194 195 195 195 194 191 189 185

Barton County Total Population 27,939 27,828 27,723 27,614 27,512 27,419 27,317 27,219 27,133 27065 26,999 26,927 Age 0 thru 4 1,664 1,641 1,618 1,593 1,567 1,546 1,520 1,493 1,467 1,442 1,417 1,391 Age 5 thru 9 1,689 1,650 1,609 1,569 1,528 1,490 1,453 1,416 1,379 1,342 1,306 1,270 Age 10 thru 14 1,815 1,767 1,717 1,664 1,609 1,558 1,510 1,462 1,417 1,373 1,329 1,285 Age 15 thru 19 2,225 2,209 2,187 2,157 2,126 2,090 2,055 2,022 1,990 1,964 1,935 1,904 Age 20 thru 24 1,834 1,871 1,909 1,945 1,978 2,006 2,026 2,053 2,088 2,119 2,150 2,179 Age 25 thru 29 1,581 1,584 1,594 1,611 1,636 1,669 1,708 1,738 1,761 1,776 1,793 1,812 Age 30 thru 34 1,203 1,157 1,116 1,077 1,039 1,002 961 921 883 847 813 780 Age 35 thru 39 1,288 1,216 1,144 1,072 1,003 935 876 822 773 726 680 637 Age 40 thru 44 2,103 2,080 2,053 2,021 1,986 1,952 1,917 1,881 1,848 1,818 1,787 1,754 Age 45 thru 49 2,417 2,463 2,510 2,556 2,602 2,641 2,673 2,707 2,742 2,782 2,821 2,858 Age 50 thru 54 2,293 2,376 2,467 2,566 2,670 2,771 2,873 2,978 3,082 3,193 3,307 3,422 Age 55 thru 59 1,663 1,699 1,735 1,774 1,815 1,863 1,910 1,955 1,998 2,039 2,081 2,123 Age 60 thru 64 1,300 1,298 1,297 1,296 1,296 1,298 1,296 1,295 1,291 1,286 1,282 1,277 Age 65 thru 84 3,954 3,893 3,830 3,765 3,698 3,629 3,563 3,494 3,425 3,361 3,295 3,227 Age 85 & Older 910 924 937 948 959 969 976 982 989 997 1,003 1,008

Bourbon County Total Population 15,009 15,016 15,014 15,012 15,004 14,977 14,940 14,906 14,877 14846 14,811 14,783 Age 0 thru 4 1,022 1,030 1,038 1,048 1,059 1,068 1,075 1,082 1,089 1,093 1,097 1,101 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Bourbon County (cont'd) Age 5 thru 9 835 812 786 759 731 704 677 652 628 605 582 560 Age 10 thru 14 1,000 986 971 955 938 919 897 874 854 835 816 797 Age 15 thru 19 1,102 1,083 1,058 1,031 1,003 980 957 936 915 893 869 847 Age 20 thru 24 1,144 1,186 1,230 1,275 1,318 1,346 1,378 1,406 1,434 1,471 1,508 1,545 Age 25 thru 29 935 940 948 958 970 980 987 1,000 1,012 1,018 1,023 1,029 Age 30 thru 34 848 847 850 854 861 864 867 865 864 861 859 857 Age 35 thru 39 758 730 701 672 644 615 588 564 542 519 496 474 Age 40 thru 44 947 935 922 908 894 877 858 838 819 803 786 769 Age 45 thru 49 1,079 1,088 1,096 1,104 1,108 1,113 1,116 1,121 1,126 1,129 1,131 1,132 Age 50 thru 54 1,088 1,118 1,147 1,174 1,196 1,216 1,238 1,260 1,284 1,309 1,332 1,355 Age 55 thru 59 976 1,005 1,032 1,059 1,086 1,117 1,148 1,180 1,208 1,236 1,265 1,294 Age 60 thru 64 811 830 851 876 902 929 951 971 990 1,010 1,030 1,052 Age 65 thru 84 1,965 1,924 1,880 1,834 1,787 1,740 1,691 1,642 1,597 1,551 1,505 1,461 Age 85 & Older 499 502 504 505 507 509 512 515 515 513 512 510

Brown County Total Population 10,117 10,055 9,999 9,931 9,862 9,793 9,715 9,631 9,555 9,478 9,401 9,326 Age 0 thru 4 654 650 646 640 634 630 623 617 611 602 594 586 Age 5 thru 9 608 591 574 556 539 523 507 488 471 454 437 421 Age 10 thru 14 634 612 591 568 545 524 503 482 462 442 423 404 Age 15 thru 19 682 666 647 625 604 581 557 536 517 498 480 461 Age 20 thru 24 740 775 812 853 896 934 971 1,011 1,045 1,085 1,126 1,168 Age 25 thru 29 460 452 444 437 431 426 422 417 413 405 397 389 Age 30 thru 34 437 420 404 388 372 356 342 326 312 298 284 270 Age 35 thru 39 532 512 493 473 453 433 415 398 381 365 348 332 Age 40 thru 44 677 664 650 633 615 601 585 568 552 536 520 504 Age 45 thru 49 793 798 804 807 807 805 798 788 782 779 774 768 Age 50 thru 54 809 832 855 879 899 916 936 956 978 998 1,017 1,036 Age 55 thru 59 707 731 756 781 807 836 864 892 918 944 970 996 Age 60 thru 64 525 529 534 539 544 547 549 549 549 549 549 549 Age 65 thru 84 1,417 1,379 1,341 1,301 1,262 1,224 1,183 1,142 1,103 1,064 1,025 987 Age 85 & Older 442 444 448 451 454 457 460 461 461 459 457 455

Butler County Total Population 63,473 64,278 64,951 65,196 65,044 65,219 65,810 66,305 66,762 67,160 67,523 67,881 Age 0 thru 4 3,547 3,524 3,487 3,415 3,314 3,230 3,166 3,099 3,032 2,961 2,888 2,811 Age 5 thru 9 4,071 4,037 3,989 3,910 3,815 3,747 3,714 3,682 3,647 3,609 3,573 3,534 Age 10 thru 14 4,484 4,439 4,380 4,285 4,168 4,070 4,006 3,945 3,885 3,830 3,778 3,721 Age 15 thru 19 5,288 5,377 5,450 5,485 5,501 5,537 5,614 5,689 5,766 5,850 5,937 6,019 Age 20 thru 24 4,737 4,874 5,032 5,180 5,297 5,461 5,645 5,787 5,908 6,025 6,129 6,274 Age 25 thru 29 4,308 4,458 4,624 4,797 4,983 5,213 5,490 5,757 5,992 6,214 6,458 6,718 Age 30 thru 34 3,336 3,294 3,254 3,201 3,134 3,095 3,073 3,038 2,994 2,944 2,900 2,856 Age 35 thru 39 3,786 3,700 3,600 3,478 3,344 3,238 3,158 3,074 2,985 2,895 2,809 2,724 Age 40 thru 44 5,197 5,253 5,291 5,297 5,275 5,276 5,313 5,329 5,344 5,358 5,375 5,388 Age 45 thru 49 5,538 5,642 5,720 5,739 5,680 5,579 5,505 5,435 5,375 5,320 5,236 5,136 Age 50 thru 54 4,956 5,124 5,279 5,387 5,423 5,422 5,470 5,534 5,601 5,648 5,665 5,663 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Butler County (cont'd) Age 55 thru 59 3,888 4,049 4,205 4,341 4,441 4,529 4,623 4,723 4,825 4,909 4,975 5,030 Age 60 thru 64 2,399 2,404 2,402 2,379 2,330 2,276 2,236 2,194 2,151 2,103 2,048 1,988 Age 65 thru 84 6,810 6,946 7,059 7,112 7,144 7,321 7,531 7,714 7,913 8111 8,328 8,552 Age 85 & Older 1,128 1,157 1,179 1,190 1,195 1,225 1,266 1,305 1,344 1,383 1,424 1,467

Chase County Total Population 3,098 3,108 3,114 3,122 3,129 3,137 3,146 3,152 3,161 3,170 3,179 3,189 Age 0 thru 4 253 261 269 279 289 298 300 300 304 309 313 317 Age 5 thru 9 164 161 157 153 149 144 141 137 134 130 125 121 Age 10 thru 14 171 165 158 152 145 138 132 125 119 113 107 102 Age 15 thru 19 204 202 199 196 192 188 186 183 179 176 171 167 Age 20 thru 24 254 277 304 333 365 403 438 480 522 565 612 663 Age 25 thru 29 137 134 131 127 123 120 120 118 115 112 109 105 Age 30 thru 34 163 161 160 159 158 156 153 151 148 145 142 139 Age 35 thru 39 140 132 123 113 103 95 87 80 74 68 62 57 Age 40 thru 44 271 275 278 281 284 285 287 289 290 291 291 291 Age 45 thru 49 243 247 249 251 253 252 253 251 250 249 248 246 Age 50 thru 54 217 219 222 223 222 221 221 221 222 221 221 219 Age 55 thru 59 203 208 211 214 217 220 221 223 224 225 227 227 Age 60 thru 64 158 159 159 160 161 162 164 165 165 165 164 163 Age 65 thru 84 419 407 395 382 370 357 344 330 317 304 291 278 Age 85 & Older 101 100 99 99 98 98 99 99 98 97 96 94

Chautauqua County Total Population 4,074 4,055 4,032 4,012 3,985 3,956 3,927 3,894 3,862 3,832 3,802 3,775 Age 0 thru 4 165 162 157 153 148 144 140 135 130 125 120 115 Age 5 thru 9 172 163 154 144 134 125 116 108 100 93 86 79 Age 10 thru 14 252 244 234 224 213 202 191 181 171 162 152 143 Age 15 thru 19 308 308 305 302 297 291 287 282 278 272 266 259 Age 20 thru 24 331 361 395 434 479 525 568 612 655 703 756 812 Age 25 thru 29 172 173 174 176 179 181 183 184 184 183 183 182 Age 30 thru 34 130 122 115 108 100 94 87 81 75 70 65 60 Age 35 thru 39 186 178 169 160 151 141 133 124 117 109 102 95 Age 40 thru 44 292 291 289 287 283 279 274 268 262 257 250 244 Age 45 thru 49 305 309 314 319 324 328 331 331 331 331 331 330 Age 50 thru 54 255 251 247 243 236 229 224 220 216 210 203 197 Age 55 thru 59 325 336 346 357 366 375 381 389 397 404 410 415 Age 60 thru 64 217 211 203 194 184 173 163 152 141 133 125 117 Age 65 thru 84 770 752 736 717 697 677 658 639 619 597 574 551 Age 85 & Older 194 194 194 194 194 192 191 188 186 183 179 176

Cherokee County Total Population 21,578 21,570 21,548 21,511 21,443 21,363 21,267 21,167 21,065 20,969 20,880 20,803 Age 0 thru 4 1,286 1,271 1,252 1,228 1,200 1,176 1,148 1,124 1,101 1,078 1,055 1,032 Age 5 thru 9 1,427 1,410 1,392 1,372 1,351 1,329 1,310 1,287 1,264 1,242 1,220 1,198 Age 10 thru 14 1,460 1,434 1,408 1,380 1,350 1,320 1,289 1,256 1,224 1,194 1,165 1,137 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Cherokee County (cont'd) Age 15 thru 19 1,526 1,510 1,491 1,469 1,446 1,424 1,399 1,375 1,352 1,329 1,306 1,283 Age 20 thru 24 1,179 1,180 1,179 1,175 1,167 1,149 1,127 1,107 1,085 1,072 1,059 1,046 Age 25 thru 29 1,447 1,464 1,485 1,510 1,538 1,572 1,616 1,652 1,682 1,705 1,730 1,758 Age 30 thru 34 1,111 1,081 1,050 1,017 981 944 906 871 839 808 778 749 Age 35 thru 39 1,396 1,369 1,339 1,308 1,276 1,246 1,215 1,185 1,154 1,124 1,095 1,066 Age 40 thru 44 1,606 1,604 1,601 1,597 1,592 1,581 1,572 1,564 1,555 1,545 1,534 1,524 Age 45 thru 49 1,632 1,650 1,671 1,694 1,714 1,730 1,738 1,745 1,754 1,763 1,773 1,784 Age 50 thru 54 1,580 1,617 1,654 1,689 1,718 1,741 1,767 1,797 1,828 1859 1,889 1,919 Age 55 thru 59 1,439 1,483 1,523 1,563 1,598 1,639 1,678 1,720 1,758 1,798 1,839 1,881 Age 60 thru 64 1,196 1,215 1,234 1,253 1,272 1,289 1,303 1,313 1,325 1,337 1,350 1,364 Age 65 thru 84 2,775 2,759 2,743 2,727 2,708 2,688 2,663 2,633 2,605 2,575 2,546 2,520 Age 85 & Older 518 523 526 529 532 535 536 538 539 540 541 542

Cheyenne County Total Population 2,904 2,887 2,867 2,843 2,821 2,797 2,769 2,745 2,716 2,685 2,657 2,629 Age 0 thru 4 109 105 101 97 93 88 82 78 74 70 66 62 Age 5 thru 9 133 127 121 114 107 100 94 89 83 78 72 67 Age 10 thru 14 190 185 179 172 166 160 154 147 140 133 127 121 Age 15 thru 19 203 201 199 196 192 187 182 177 171 167 162 157 Age 20 thru 24 170 183 197 213 232 252 275 297 319 340 363 388 Age 25 thru 29 63 59 55 50 46 42 38 35 32 29 26 24 Age 30 thru 34 101 96 91 85 79 73 67 61 56 52 48 44 Age 35 thru 39 167 163 159 155 151 148 144 142 137 133 128 123 Age 40 thru 44 191 186 180 173 165 159 150 143 137 130 124 117 Age 45 thru 49 259 263 268 272 275 275 274 274 273 272 271 270 Age 50 thru 54 236 244 251 258 265 271 278 286 294 299 304 309 Age 55 thru 59 198 202 206 210 215 219 222 223 223 225 226 226 Age 60 thru 64 155 157 159 163 168 173 177 181 185 186 188 190 Age 65 thru 84 550 532 513 492 470 448 425 401 379 358 338 318 Age 85 & Older 179 184 188 193 197 202 207 211 213 213 214 213

Clark County Total Population 2,267 2,259 2,248 2,233 2,222 2,208 2,190 2,176 2,160 2,146 2,130 2,115 Age 0 thru 4 102 99 95 91 87 81 76 72 67 64 60 56 Age 5 thru 9 131 127 123 117 112 106 101 96 92 87 82 78 Age 10 thru 14 166 164 162 159 156 153 150 148 145 141 137 133 Age 15 thru 19 155 152 148 144 138 133 128 122 118 113 108 103 Age 20 thru 24 150 166 184 206 231 255 278 303 328 357 388 421 Age 25 thru 29 74 71 68 64 61 58 55 52 48 46 43 40 Age 30 thru 34 95 91 88 84 81 77 73 69 66 62 59 55 Age 35 thru 39 104 99 94 89 83 78 74 70 66 62 58 54 Age 40 thru 44 157 154 150 146 142 138 133 128 123 118 113 108 Age 45 thru 49 184 186 188 190 191 192 192 191 190 190 188 186 Age 50 thru 54 170 172 173 173 173 172 171 170 170 169 167 165 Age 55 thru 59 169 175 181 186 193 201 208 216 222 227 232 237 Age 60 thru 64 110 109 107 105 103 100 96 92 88 85 82 79 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Clark County (cont'd) Age 65 thru 84 389 383 376 368 360 352 343 334 324 313 302 291 Age 85 & Older 111 111 111 111 111 112 112 113 113 112 111 109

Clay County Total Population 8,567 8,522 8,481 8,438 8,393 8,339 8,294 8,255 8,215 8,175 8,137 8,101 Age 0 thru 4 400 390 380 369 358 346 334 322 311 301 290 280 Age 5 thru 9 414 396 378 360 341 323 306 292 277 263 249 236 Age 10 thru 14 523 504 484 463 442 421 401 380 362 345 328 312 Age 15 thru 19 594 588 581 572 562 551 541 530 519 509 499 488 Age 20 thru 24 631 662 697 737 780 820 858 898 939 981 1,025 1,071 Age 25 thru 29 481 484 489 495 503 515 530 549 562 569 577 585 Age 30 thru 34 406 393 381 370 359 346 335 324 313 301 290 279 Age 35 thru 39 418 398 378 358 339 320 303 288 273 258 244 230 Age 40 thru 44 580 571 560 549 536 522 508 496 483 471 458 445 Age 45 thru 49 664 664 661 656 648 638 627 615 605 597 588 578 Age 50 thru 54 748 774 801 828 853 881 911 941 971 999 1,028 1,056 Age 55 thru 59 592 610 629 647 667 683 700 715 729 745 761 777 Age 60 thru 64 425 426 428 430 432 434 433 433 433 432 430 429 Age 65 thru 84 1,295 1,261 1,229 1,193 1,156 1,117 1,079 1,040 1,003 968 933 898 Age 85 & Older 396 401 405 411 417 422 428 432 435 436 437 437

Cloud County Total Population 9,596 9,515 9,427 9,338 9,254 9,168 9,080 8,995 8,902 8,813 8,728 8,647 Age 0 thru 4 521 519 518 517 517 518 518 518 516 513 510 507 Age 5 thru 9 437 419 401 383 366 349 332 316 301 286 272 259 Age 10 thru 14 524 506 486 466 446 427 409 390 372 355 339 324 Age 15 thru 19 806 793 775 756 736 717 698 681 663 646 629 611 Age 20 thru 24 786 812 838 866 896 921 946 970 993 1,018 1,044 1,070 Age 25 thru 29 529 535 544 556 573 591 610 628 645 656 668 682 Age 30 thru 34 340 321 304 286 268 251 234 220 206 193 181 169 Age 35 thru 39 508 492 476 458 440 423 406 390 375 360 345 331 Age 40 thru 44 629 621 613 605 597 588 578 567 554 544 533 522 Age 45 thru 49 685 689 693 696 698 700 701 702 702 701 700 699 Age 50 thru 54 674 681 686 690 691 690 689 690 691 692 692 691 Age 55 thru 59 653 674 696 718 741 767 791 816 838 860 883 907 Age 60 thru 64 456 450 444 436 428 420 412 402 392 384 375 366 Age 65 thru 84 1,615 1,580 1,542 1,506 1,472 1,436 1,399 1,363 1,325 1,288 1,251 1,215 Age 85 & Older 433 423 411 399 385 370 357 342 329 317 306 294

Coffey County Total Population 8,719 8,727 8,729 8,728 8,724 8,718 8,709 8,704 8,696 8,684 8,672 8,662 Age 0 thru 4 493 490 485 479 473 466 460 454 447 438 430 420 Age 5 thru 9 476 460 443 425 407 391 372 353 336 320 304 288 Age 10 thru 14 576 562 548 532 516 499 482 467 451 435 419 403 Age 15 thru 19 583 570 554 536 517 496 474 454 434 417 399 382 Age 20 thru 24 683 730 782 840 905 970 1,038 1,104 1,174 1,244 1,319 1,398 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Coffey County (cont'd) Age 25 thru 29 447 444 440 437 435 435 433 431 428 422 416 410 Age 30 thru 34 430 419 410 402 392 381 370 357 345 333 321 309 Age 35 thru 39 462 439 415 392 367 346 327 308 290 273 255 239 Age 40 thru 44 690 686 679 670 660 647 632 617 603 590 576 561 Age 45 thru 49 747 755 761 764 764 763 761 760 755 752 748 742 Age 50 thru 54 783 817 853 890 926 957 991 1,025 1,060 1,094 1,127 1,160 Age 55 thru 59 607 630 652 673 692 716 738 762 785 805 825 845 Age 60 thru 64 464 473 483 493 503 515 525 535 543 549 555 560 Age 65 thru 84 1,035 1,013 990 968 946 920 895 870 843 816 788 761 Age 85 & Older 243 239 234 227 221 216 211 207 202 196 190 184

Comanche County Total Population 1,888 1,866 1,848 1,827 1,807 1,784 1,766 1,751 1,735 1,718 1,700 1,682 Age 0 thru 4 66 62 58 54 50 46 42 38 36 33 30 28 Age 5 thru 9 106 103 100 97 95 92 90 88 85 83 80 78 Age 10 thru 14 108 105 101 97 94 90 86 82 78 75 72 68 Age 15 thru 19 121 121 121 122 122 122 123 122 121 121 120 120 Age 20 thru 24 105 112 121 131 141 149 159 171 182 193 206 219 Age 25 thru 29 73 70 68 65 62 60 59 58 56 54 52 50 Age 30 thru 34 100 100 101 103 106 107 109 110 112 112 113 114 Age 35 thru 39 81 76 72 68 63 60 57 54 52 49 46 43 Age 40 thru 44 124 123 121 119 117 114 110 108 104 102 99 96 Age 45 thru 49 136 135 135 134 133 131 130 129 129 127 126 124 Age 50 thru 54 143 144 144 143 141 141 141 141 141 141 140 139 Age 55 thru 59 145 146 147 148 149 150 149 149 149 149 149 149 Age 60 thru 64 128 128 128 127 127 125 124 124 123 122 121 119 Age 65 thru 84 360 350 340 329 318 310 303 295 287 278 269 260 Age 85 & Older 92 91 91 90 89 87 84 82 80 79 77 75

Cowley County Total Population 35,093 34,976 34,842 34,694 34,521 34,341 34,158 33,988 33,825 33,662 33,509 33,320 Age 0 thru 4 2,220 2,207 2,192 2,176 2,157 2,140 2,117 2,097 2,074 2,053 2,031 2,007 Age 5 thru 9 2,100 2,047 1,991 1,932 1,871 1,811 1,753 1,700 1,649 1,599 1,549 1,498 Age 10 thru 14 2,378 2,331 2,283 2,232 2,181 2,128 2,072 2,018 1,967 1,918 1,870 1,820 Age 15 thru 19 2,857 2,835 2,802 2,764 2,723 2,685 2,648 2,612 2,577 2,543 2,507 2,467 Age 20 thru 24 2,831 2,910 2,993 3,080 3,169 3,246 3,305 3,370 3,436 3511 3,590 3,665 Age 25 thru 29 2,049 2,038 2,031 2,028 2,030 2,041 2,043 2,046 2,040 2,032 2,025 2,017 Age 30 thru 34 1,870 1,828 1,791 1,757 1,720 1,684 1,647 1,612 1,575 1,537 1,500 1,463 Age 35 thru 39 1,877 1,798 1,718 1,636 1,556 1,482 1,411 1,345 1,282 1,221 1,162 1,105 Age 40 thru 44 2,561 2,543 2,522 2,499 2,473 2,439 2,406 2,371 2,340 2,311 2,281 2,248 Age 45 thru 49 2,665 2,687 2,708 2,727 2,742 2,749 2,758 2,768 2,781 2,791 2,800 2,805 Age 50 thru 54 2,574 2,631 2,689 2,748 2,802 2,859 2,928 2,997 3,060 3,121 3,184 3,242 Age 55 thru 59 2,150 2,200 2,247 2,292 2,337 2,387 2,435 2,476 2,527 2,573 2,620 2,664 Age 60 thru 64 1,690 1,704 1,719 1,733 1,747 1,760 1,778 1,794 1,804 1,813 1,823 1,831 Age 65 thru 84 4,305 4,244 4,178 4,107 4,027 3,943 3,867 3,791 3,718 3,644 3,572 3,494 Age 85 & Older 966 973 978 983 986 987 990 991 995 995 995 994 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Crawford County Total Population 38,570 38,717 38,836 38,938 39,009 39,075 39,150 39,229 39,297 39,368 39,444 39,542 Age 0 thru 4 2,497 2,514 2,526 2,533 2,533 2,527 2,520 2,510 2,500 2,495 2,488 2,480 Age 5 thru 9 2,231 2,218 2,204 2,190 2,175 2,164 2,150 2,138 2,119 2,097 2,076 2,055 Age 10 thru 14 2,018 1,975 1,929 1,881 1,831 1,781 1,731 1,682 1,635 1,588 1,542 1,497 Age 15 thru 19 2,822 2,781 2,724 2,657 2,582 2,515 2,453 2,394 2,337 2,282 2,223 2,164 Age 20 thru 24 4,956 5,061 5,157 5,239 5,304 5,332 5,335 5,345 5,364 5410 5,450 5,485 Age 25 thru 29 3,782 3,942 4,124 4,335 4,578 4,855 5,174 5,473 5,761 6,031 6,321 6,634 Age 30 thru 34 2,095 2,072 2,052 2,035 2,014 1,988 1,961 1,932 1,904 1,873 1,843 1,814 Age 35 thru 39 1,942 1,890 1,836 1,781 1,727 1,675 1,626 1,576 1,528 1,479 1,430 1,383 Age 40 thru 44 2,208 2,174 2,136 2,093 2,046 1,997 1,947 1,904 1,861 1,818 1,774 1,731 Age 45 thru 49 2,524 2,548 2,569 2,584 2,594 2,596 2,597 2,598 2,597 2,600 2,601 2,601 Age 50 thru 54 2,327 2,366 2,401 2,430 2,448 2,465 2,489 2,511 2,537 2,562 2,583 2,602 Age 55 thru 59 2,110 2,178 2,241 2,302 2,361 2,426 2,485 2,550 2,619 2,683 2,747 2,812 Age 60 thru 64 1,574 1,587 1,600 1,613 1,625 1,638 1,641 1,641 1,638 1,640 1,642 1,644 Age 65 thru 84 4,250 4,164 4,078 3,993 3,907 3,824 3,740 3,664 3,580 3,490 3,402 3,316 Age 85 & Older 1,234 1,247 1,259 1,272 1,284 1,292 1,301 1,311 1,317 1,320 1,322 1,324

Decatur County Total Population 3,084 3,032 2,984 2,941 2,894 2,847 2,796 2,742 2,692 2,640 2,586 2,533 Age 0 thru 4 128 123 118 114 109 104 99 94 90 85 80 75 Age 5 thru 9 126 117 109 102 94 87 80 74 67 61 56 51 Age 10 thru 14 176 167 157 148 139 130 120 111 103 95 88 81 Age 15 thru 19 238 236 234 231 227 221 216 210 204 199 193 187 Age 20 thru 24 185 197 211 228 248 270 290 310 331 351 371 393 Age 25 thru 29 68 62 57 52 47 43 39 35 31 28 25 22 Age 30 thru 34 88 80 73 67 61 55 49 45 40 36 33 29 Age 35 thru 39 148 140 132 125 117 109 102 94 87 81 75 69 Age 40 thru 44 210 203 196 187 177 167 157 147 139 131 123 115 Age 45 thru 49 278 280 282 283 284 282 280 276 273 270 266 261 Age 50 thru 54 271 279 287 297 306 314 323 329 335 340 345 349 Age 55 thru 59 188 187 186 185 183 184 183 182 182 179 176 173 Age 60 thru 64 179 179 179 180 181 181 181 181 180 178 175 173 Age 65 thru 84 646 628 611 592 573 553 533 512 491 470 448 427 Age 85 & Older 155 154 152 150 148 147 144 142 139 136 132 128

Dickinson County Total Population 19,254 19,257 19,254 19,238 19,217 19,189 19,166 19,156 19,145 19,129 19,131 19,128 Age 0 thru 4 1,012 1,000 986 971 954 937 920 904 889 872 855 838 Age 5 thru 9 1,039 1,010 979 945 910 876 844 816 787 758 731 703 Age 10 thru 14 1,254 1,222 1,188 1,150 1,113 1,073 1,036 1,000 966 933 901 869 Age 15 thru 19 1,407 1,405 1,401 1,393 1,385 1,368 1,348 1,331 1,315 1,302 1,288 1,273 Age 20 thru 24 1,265 1,328 1,396 1,473 1,556 1,656 1,751 1,844 1,935 2028 2,129 2,235 Age 25 thru 29 1,036 1,037 1,041 1,048 1,058 1,073 1,085 1,094 1,106 1,109 1,113 1,118 Age 30 thru 34 881 855 831 807 782 756 729 701 676 652 629 606 Age 35 thru 39 1,049 1,007 962 915 867 824 788 753 717 683 650 618 Age 40 thru 44 1,538 1,536 1,531 1,522 1,508 1,486 1,461 1,443 1,429 1,414 1,398 1,380 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Dickinson County (cont'd) Age 45 thru 49 1,640 1,673 1,706 1,738 1,766 1,790 1,819 1,849 1,876 1,901 1,927 1,953 Age 50 thru 54 1,481 1,525 1,573 1,621 1,669 1,713 1,758 1,800 1,839 1,884 1,931 1,976 Age 55 thru 59 1,223 1,255 1,285 1,314 1,342 1,373 1,403 1,438 1,475 1,505 1,536 1,566 Age 60 thru 64 954 957 960 961 962 961 959 954 947 943 940 935 Age 65 thru 84 2,894 2,869 2,842 2,812 2,782 2,746 2,710 2,673 2,635 2,597 2,560 2,521 Age 85 & Older 581 578 573 568 563 557 555 556 553 548 543 537

Doniphan County Total Population 7,715 7,657 7,596 7,527 7,446 7,374 7,319 7,267 7,219 7,179 7,145 7,115 Age 0 thru 4 380 371 360 348 334 321 309 299 289 279 269 260 Age 5 thru 9 473 463 454 443 433 423 416 410 404 399 396 392 Age 10 thru 14 519 511 503 494 486 479 474 470 465 462 460 458 Age 15 thru 19 761 756 750 743 737 732 730 731 735 738 743 748 Age 20 thru 24 489 475 463 452 438 426 412 396 379 364 350 338 Age 25 thru 29 432 429 427 426 428 431 436 437 437 438 441 444 Age 30 thru 34 390 380 371 364 358 352 346 340 334 328 323 319 Age 35 thru 39 425 411 399 387 377 368 361 354 346 338 330 324 Age 40 thru 44 493 481 468 454 441 428 417 406 395 386 378 370 Age 45 thru 49 645 648 648 647 640 629 620 612 605 599 590 580 Age 50 thru 54 629 639 648 655 656 653 651 650 652 653 652 650 Age 55 thru 59 512 526 541 556 568 575 581 590 598 607 615 622 Age 60 thru 64 343 341 339 337 333 328 323 318 313 308 302 296 Age 65 thru 84 1,009 1,007 1,003 996 989 996 1,004 1,009 1,016 1,023 1,032 1,043 Age 85 & Older 215 219 222 225 228 233 239 245 251 257 264 271

Douglas County Total Population 104,385 105,572 106,566 107,276 107,932 108,964 109,957 110,741 111,444 112,048 112,644 113,250 Age 0 thru 4 5,908 5,985 6,052 6,099 6,140 6,195 6,240 6,264 6,276 6,276 6,271 6,264 Age 5 thru 9 4,968 4,973 4,967 4,946 4,932 4,929 4,938 4,952 4,964 4,973 4,990 5,005 Age 10 thru 14 4,964 4,958 4,940 4,901 4,865 4,840 4,813 4,788 4,766 4,755 4,750 4,740 Age 15 thru 19 9,864 9,947 10,005 10,033 10,086 10,209 10,354 10,490 10,621 10,740 10,878 11,012 Age 20 thru 24 16,244 16,352 16,454 16,526 16,565 16,672 16,758 16,771 16,748 16739 16,712 16,730 Age 25 thru 29 13,599 14,088 14,601 15,151 15,792 16,515 17,243 17,909 18,515 19,067 19,661 20,273 Age 30 thru 34 7,049 6,985 6,915 6,833 6,742 6,671 6,585 6,472 6,336 6,204 6,079 5,953 Age 35 thru 39 5,709 5,531 5,333 5,120 4,913 4,740 4,578 4,408 4,241 4,061 3,889 3,719 Age 40 thru 44 6,002 5,889 5,746 5,581 5,408 5,256 5,088 4,909 4,729 4,568 4,410 4,249 Age 45 thru 49 6,469 6,496 6,487 6,430 6,312 6,147 5,976 5,817 5,673 5,523 5,342 5,148 Age 50 thru 54 6,496 6,697 6,869 6,997 7,057 7,024 7,013 7,018 7,034 7,034 6,989 6,917 Age 55 thru 59 5,376 5,650 5,920 6,184 6,429 6,631 6,795 6,972 7,156 7,321 7,451 7,563 Age 60 thru 64 3,204 3,265 3,322 3,368 3,398 3,409 3,416 3,415 3,409 3,388 3,352 3,308 Age 65 thru 84 7,343 7,527 7,690 7,811 7,959 8,319 8,678 9,004 9,349 9,698 10,086 10,497 Age 85 & Older 1,190 1,229 1,265 1,296 1,334 1,407 1,482 1,552 1,627 1,701 1,784 1,872

Edwards County Total Population 3,228 3,198 3,169 3,134 3,102 3,069 3,038 3,009 2,976 2,946 2,915 2,887 Age 0 thru 4 200 198 197 196 194 192 190 187 185 183 180 177 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Edwards County (cont'd) Age 5 thru 9 182 177 172 167 162 157 151 146 140 136 131 126 Age 10 thru 14 194 187 179 171 163 156 150 144 136 130 124 118 Age 15 thru 19 231 228 225 220 215 209 203 198 193 188 184 179 Age 20 thru 24 201 209 220 231 244 258 269 284 296 309 322 336 Age 25 thru 29 113 107 101 95 89 83 79 74 71 66 62 59 Age 30 thru 34 157 152 149 145 141 137 134 130 125 121 117 113 Age 35 thru 39 188 182 177 171 165 160 156 150 145 140 135 130 Age 40 thru 44 243 240 236 230 224 217 210 204 197 192 186 181 Age 45 thru 49 285 292 297 302 306 310 314 319 323 327 330 334 Age 50 thru 54 258 265 273 282 292 302 312 320 329 337 345 354 Age 55 thru 59 193 196 199 201 204 206 208 211 213 214 216 217 Age 60 thru 64 157 154 150 145 141 136 132 128 125 121 117 113 Age 65 thru 84 498 482 466 450 433 417 401 386 371 356 342 327 Age 85 & Older 128 129 128 128 129 129 129 128 127 126 124 123

Elk County Total Population 3,050 3,040 3,024 3,004 2,988 2,965 2,942 2,912 2,886 2,863 2,842 2,819 Age 0 thru 4 128 126 125 123 122 119 115 112 109 106 103 100 Age 5 thru 9 119 114 108 101 95 90 84 79 74 70 65 61 Age 10 thru 14 168 163 156 149 141 133 126 118 112 106 101 95 Age 15 thru 19 220 220 220 219 218 216 213 208 204 201 198 195 Age 20 thru 24 193 202 213 224 236 246 256 264 273 283 294 304 Age 25 thru 29 202 212 223 238 256 275 294 315 336 354 374 395 Age 30 thru 34 116 113 110 106 103 99 95 91 87 84 80 77 Age 35 thru 39 134 129 123 117 111 104 99 94 89 84 79 75 Age 40 thru 44 203 203 202 201 199 198 197 194 191 188 186 183 Age 45 thru 49 221 221 220 218 216 212 207 203 198 194 190 186 Age 50 thru 54 222 223 223 222 221 219 218 217 216 214 212 210 Age 55 thru 59 226 229 232 234 236 238 239 237 236 237 237 236 Age 60 thru 64 199 199 198 197 196 195 197 197 197 195 194 192 Age 65 thru 84 566 555 543 531 518 505 491 477 462 448 434 419 Age 85 & Older 133 131 128 124 120 116 111 106 102 99 95 91

Ellis County Total Population 26,870 26,908 26,934 26,939 26,925 26,908 26,856 26,797 26,739 26,692 26,644 26,602 Age 0 thru 4 1,621 1,622 1,622 1,621 1,618 1,617 1,610 1,599 1,584 1,570 1,555 1,540 Age 5 thru 9 1,303 1,269 1,237 1,204 1,173 1,142 1,107 1,071 1,039 1,003 969 935 Age 10 thru 14 1,196 1,138 1,079 1,020 959 904 850 800 752 707 663 622 Age 15 thru 19 2,077 2,027 1,966 1,898 1,825 1,758 1,691 1,625 1,563 1,504 1,444 1,384 Age 20 thru 24 3,994 4,081 4,157 4,219 4,263 4,265 4,251 4,240 4,257 4276 4288 4,293 Age 25 thru 29 2,685 2,795 2,925 3,077 3,256 3,458 3,661 3,860 4,025 4,194 4,374 4,565 Age 30 thru 34 1,255 1,217 1,183 1,150 1,117 1,083 1,049 1,014 974 937 901 866 Age 35 thru 39 1,258 1,199 1,140 1,082 1,025 972 922 871 825 779 734 692 Age 40 thru 44 1,515 1,474 1,429 1,379 1,326 1,273 1,221 1,173 1,124 1,079 1,034 989 Age 45 thru 49 1,859 1,863 1,862 1,851 1,832 1,805 1,775 1,746 1,720 1,698 1,673 1,645 Age 50 thru 54 1,933 2,008 2,084 2,162 2,237 2,316 2,393 2,469 2,548 2,623 2,698 2,773 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Ellis County (cont'd) Age 55 thru 59 1,428 1,478 1,530 1,585 1,643 1,704 1,764 1,818 1,872 1,923 1,975 2,027 Age 60 thru 64 901 894 886 875 864 854 842 830 816 801 786 771 Age 65 thru 84 3,232 3,222 3,208 3,187 3,158 3,128 3,094 3,058 3,020 2,979 2,934 2,888 Age 85 & Older 613 621 626 629 629 629 626 623 620 619 616 612

Ellsworth County Total Population 6,303 6,287 6,264 6,245 6,225 6,204 6,182 6,160 6,138 6,111 6,089 6,067 Age 0 thru 4 211 204 197 190 183 176 168 159 151 144 137 131 Age 5 thru 9 244 234 223 213 202 193 184 176 168 160 152 144 Age 10 thru 14 312 299 285 271 256 243 229 217 204 193 182 172 Age 15 thru 19 442 438 432 425 418 408 399 389 380 372 364 355 Age 20 thru 24 525 549 579 613 651 688 727 766 802 838 878 919 Age 25 thru 29 311 303 296 289 283 277 272 265 258 251 244 236 Age 30 thru 34 344 338 333 328 324 321 317 312 306 299 292 286 Age 35 thru 39 378 366 353 339 325 311 297 286 277 265 253 242 Age 40 thru 44 441 432 420 407 391 376 361 347 334 322 310 297 Age 45 thru 49 611 626 639 653 665 674 682 690 696 704 712 719 Age 50 thru 54 517 534 550 567 582 596 611 625 640 655 669 683 Age 55 thru 59 437 452 466 480 495 512 526 540 557 570 584 598 Age 60 thru 64 332 334 336 338 341 341 340 338 336 334 333 331 Age 65 thru 84 968 951 933 915 898 882 866 849 832 811 791 771 Age 85 & Older 230 227 222 217 211 206 203 201 197 193 188 183

Finney County Total Population 39,740 40,073 40,392 40,693 40,974 41,236 41,463 41,638 41,757 41,833 41,940 42,113 Age 0 thru 4 3,703 3,685 3,655 3,613 3,561 3,500 3,437 3,374 3,307 3,239 3,170 3,103 Age 5 thru 9 3,763 3,776 3,780 3,774 3,761 3,746 3,724 3,693 3,652 3,611 3,570 3,530 Age 10 thru 14 3,562 3,578 3,594 3,605 3,613 3,622 3,616 3,606 3,589 3,563 3,536 3,513 Age 15 thru 19 3,346 3,353 3,349 3,340 3,328 3,316 3,302 3,278 3,246 3,211 3,174 3,139 Age 20 thru 24 2,347 2,311 2,267 2,213 2,145 2,078 2,024 1,970 1,909 1848 1787 1,729 Age 25 thru 29 1,972 1,877 1,778 1,678 1,576 1,479 1,386 1,298 1,218 1,140 1,065 996 Age 30 thru 34 2,414 2,353 2,288 2,216 2,134 2,050 1,968 1,885 1,799 1,722 1,648 1,577 Age 35 thru 39 3,000 2,985 2,968 2,950 2,930 2,897 2,867 2,835 2,796 2,748 2,702 2,658 Age 40 thru 44 3,242 3,301 3,358 3,415 3,468 3,521 3,567 3,601 3,629 3,650 3,672 3,695 Age 45 thru 49 2,999 3,088 3,180 3,274 3,369 3,455 3,533 3,598 3,663 3,724 3,786 3,852 Age 50 thru 54 2,732 2,884 3,051 3,227 3,411 3,598 3,782 3,969 4,155 4,341 4,537 4,744 Age 55 thru 59 2,146 2,276 2,415 2,568 2,735 2,911 3,085 3,265 3,447 3,621 3,806 4,007 Age 60 thru 64 1,429 1,491 1,559 1,631 1,710 1,788 1,866 1,938 2,006 2,072 2,141 2,217 Age 65 thru 84 2,673 2,694 2,719 2,748 2,781 2,812 2,833 2,846 2,852 2,849 2,846 2,847 Age 85 & Older 412 421 431 441 452 463 473 482 489 494 500 506

Ford County Total Population 34,591 35,001 35,428 35,812 36,182 36,545 36,921 37,274 37,628 37,964 38,330 38,724 Age 0 thru 4 3,375 3,448 3,518 3,580 3,639 3,704 3,766 3,831 3,892 3,954 4,019 4,085 Age 5 thru 9 2,953 2,991 3,026 3,051 3,073 3,095 3,119 3,142 3,167 3,189 3,212 3,236 Age 10 thru 14 2,832 2,865 2,901 2,933 2,965 2,992 3,020 3,043 3,064 3,086 3,111 3,137 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Ford County (cont'd) Age 15 thru 19 2,587 2,590 2,587 2,577 2,567 2,564 2,563 2,562 2,560 2,554 2,547 2,540 Age 20 thru 24 2,421 2,432 2,439 2,434 2,418 2,402 2,386 2,356 2,335 2322 2309 2,296 Age 25 thru 29 2,721 2,748 2,775 2,803 2,830 2,859 2,892 2,922 2,947 2,968 2,992 3,017 Age 30 thru 34 2,542 2,566 2,590 2,609 2,619 2,628 2,638 2,646 2,649 2,656 2,664 2,674 Age 35 thru 39 2,479 2,491 2,508 2,522 2,538 2,552 2,573 2,588 2,604 2,612 2,622 2,634 Age 40 thru 44 2,441 2,475 2,512 2,550 2,588 2,627 2,661 2,693 2,725 2,755 2,787 2,821 Age 45 thru 49 2,122 2,156 2,191 2,224 2,255 2,277 2,299 2,325 2,348 2,373 2,398 2,425 Age 50 thru 54 2,071 2,150 2,236 2,324 2,412 2,498 2,589 2,680 2,780 2,877 2,980 3,087 Age 55 thru 59 1,603 1,669 1,740 1,818 1,903 1,994 2,082 2,174 2,270 2,361 2,459 2,564 Age 60 thru 64 1,109 1,120 1,134 1,149 1,166 1,179 1,194 1,206 1,216 1,225 1,236 1,249 Age 65 thru 84 2,826 2,792 2,764 2,734 2,708 2,678 2,647 2,617 2,586 2,550 2,516 2,484 Age 85 & Older 509 508 507 504 501 496 492 489 485 482 478 475

Franklin County Total Population 26,756 27,008 27,172 27,276 27,344 27,423 27,519 27,607 27,671 27,694 27,709 27,744 Age 0 thru 4 1,692 1,694 1,691 1,683 1,671 1,656 1,636 1,616 1,594 1,571 1,547 1,523 Age 5 thru 9 1,626 1,605 1,576 1,541 1,505 1,476 1,453 1,435 1,415 1,393 1,372 1,351 Age 10 thru 14 1,805 1,787 1,761 1,727 1,691 1,660 1,629 1,599 1,571 1,547 1,524 1,501 Age 15 thru 19 2,061 2,084 2,098 2,105 2,112 2,117 2,128 2,144 2,166 2,183 2,202 2,219 Age 20 thru 24 2,094 2,126 2,160 2,198 2,231 2,252 2,261 2,251 2,228 2210 2,189 2,182 Age 25 thru 29 2,068 2,138 2,213 2,302 2,414 2,540 2,678 2,823 2,952 3,065 3,190 3,329 Age 30 thru 34 1,554 1,550 1,546 1,543 1,544 1,544 1,547 1,543 1,536 1,526 1,519 1,515 Age 35 thru 39 1,555 1,522 1,481 1,435 1,391 1,350 1,315 1,285 1,251 1,215 1,181 1,148 Age 40 thru 44 2,078 2,100 2,110 2,116 2,121 2,130 2,135 2,136 2,139 2,143 2,147 2,153 Age 45 thru 49 2,141 2,182 2,216 2,245 2,257 2,246 2,240 2,234 2,224 2,212 2,190 2,163 Age 50 thru 54 1,801 1,841 1,872 1,897 1,905 1,890 1,881 1,876 1,877 1,870 1,854 1,833 Age 55 thru 59 1,455 1,478 1,491 1,497 1,490 1,478 1,460 1,449 1,440 1,425 1,403 1,378 Age 60 thru 64 1,220 1,236 1,247 1,253 1,252 1,239 1,229 1,217 1,204 1,190 1,170 1,149 Age 65 thru 84 3,000 3,044 3,076 3,091 3,108 3,174 3,237 3,292 3,351 3,403 3,461 3,521 Age 85 & Older 606 621 634 643 652 671 690 707 723 741 760 779

Geary County Total Population 23,809 23,139 22,530 21,844 21,184 20,700 20,231 19,702 19,136 18,565 17,991 17,427 Age 0 thru 4 2,772 2,738 2,714 2,685 2,656 2,650 2,640 2,619 2,587 2,545 2,503 2,460 Age 5 thru 9 1,936 1,873 1,813 1,747 1,681 1,628 1,577 1,521 1,460 1,402 1,343 1,286 Age 10 thru 14 1,625 1,560 1,498 1,428 1,358 1,301 1,247 1,191 1,135 1,080 1,025 972 Age 15 thru 19 1,501 1,433 1,363 1,286 1,210 1,155 1,103 1,049 994 940 888 836 Age 20 thru 24 1,694 1,579 1,470 1,356 1,245 1,144 1,048 959 881 809 741 678 Age 25 thru 29 2,013 1,938 1,872 1,804 1,744 1,705 1,669 1,617 1,561 1,501 1,442 1,385 Age 30 thru 34 1,527 1,458 1,397 1,335 1,276 1,227 1,179 1,125 1,072 1,018 966 916 Age 35 thru 39 1,414 1,331 1,251 1,168 1,090 1,025 963 903 846 790 736 685 Age 40 thru 44 1,604 1,552 1,501 1,442 1,386 1,336 1,287 1,235 1,179 1,130 1,080 1,031 Age 45 thru 49 1,596 1,576 1,556 1,527 1,498 1,476 1,452 1,426 1,395 1,365 1,333 1,300 Age 50 thru 54 1,559 1,586 1,618 1,643 1,670 1,705 1,744 1,774 1,800 1,822 1,841 1,859 Age 55 thru 59 1,050 1,046 1,042 1,032 1,022 1,022 1,018 1,011 999 988 975 960 Age 60 thru 64 822 807 794 778 763 753 746 734 719 702 685 668 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Geary County (cont'd) Age 65 thru 84 2,296 2,257 2,228 2,193 2,158 2,136 2,111 2,083 2,047 2,007 1,964 1,920 Age 85 & Older 400 405 413 420 427 437 447 455 461 466 469 471

Gove County Total Population 2,702 2,667 2,635 2,597 2,557 2,521 2,479 2,435 2,391 2,349 2,304 2,260 Age 0 thru 4 139 135 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 Age 5 thru 9 149 142 134 126 118 110 103 96 89 83 77 71 Age 10 thru 14 187 181 175 168 161 154 146 139 132 125 119 112 Age 15 thru 19 187 183 178 172 165 158 151 145 139 132 126 120 Age 20 thru 24 169 180 194 211 229 253 273 293 314 334 354 377 Age 25 thru 29 53 49 44 40 36 32 28 25 22 20 18 15 Age 30 thru 34 74 68 64 59 54 50 47 44 40 37 34 31 Age 35 thru 39 93 85 78 70 62 56 49 44 39 35 31 27 Age 40 thru 44 192 187 182 177 170 161 153 146 139 132 126 119 Age 45 thru 49 241 243 245 247 248 247 246 243 241 239 235 232 Age 50 thru 54 232 236 240 243 246 248 249 250 250 250 249 247 Age 55 thru 59 194 198 203 207 212 216 221 224 227 229 230 231 Age 60 thru 64 139 136 134 130 127 125 122 118 114 110 106 102 Age 65 thru 84 535 527 518 508 498 487 475 461 446 432 416 401 Age 85 & Older 118 117 116 114 111 109 106 102 99 96 93 90

Graham County Total Population 2,612 2,562 2,509 2,459 2,408 2,356 2,304 2,250 2,200 2,153 2,104 2,052 Age 0 thru 4 89 84 78 73 68 64 60 56 52 49 45 42 Age 5 thru 9 105 97 90 83 76 70 65 59 55 50 46 42 Age 10 thru 14 128 120 111 103 95 88 80 73 66 60 55 50 Age 15 thru 19 163 157 149 142 134 125 118 110 104 98 92 85 Age 20 thru 24 176 185 196 208 221 233 244 254 266 277 288 299 Age 25 thru 29 96 93 91 89 88 88 86 83 80 78 75 73 Age 30 thru 34 65 59 54 48 43 39 35 31 27 24 22 19 Age 35 thru 39 100 91 81 72 63 55 48 43 38 33 29 26 Age 40 thru 44 245 243 241 239 237 232 226 219 212 207 201 195 Age 45 thru 49 218 215 211 206 201 195 188 182 177 171 165 158 Age 50 thru 54 236 242 251 260 271 281 293 305 313 321 328 335 Age 55 thru 59 137 133 128 123 117 112 107 102 97 92 87 82 Age 60 thru 64 152 147 141 135 128 121 114 107 101 96 90 84 Age 65 thru 84 594 590 584 578 570 560 550 539 528 516 503 488 Age 85 & Older 108 106 103 100 96 93 90 87 84 81 78 74

Grant County Total Population 7,576 7,586 7,592 7,585 7,574 7,563 7,538 7,500 7,468 7,443 7,421 7,387 Age 0 thru 4 660 660 658 654 649 645 639 629 619 611 602 592 Age 5 thru 9 567 553 539 523 507 491 475 458 442 426 411 395 Age 10 thru 14 593 579 563 545 527 509 490 472 454 437 420 403 Age 15 thru 19 622 616 606 595 583 571 556 540 526 513 499 485 Age 20 thru 24 577 598 622 646 667 689 707 728 747 765 785 803 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Grant County (cont'd) Age 25 thru 29 268 249 229 209 190 172 154 137 123 112 101 91 Age 30 thru 34 453 446 439 432 423 416 407 399 392 382 373 363 Age 35 thru 39 428 409 391 371 351 331 312 293 276 260 245 230 Age 40 thru 44 622 625 627 629 630 628 625 617 609 604 599 592 Age 45 thru 49 601 608 614 617 618 618 614 609 606 604 601 596 Age 50 thru 54 613 639 664 690 716 742 768 796 820 845 871 895 Age 55 thru 59 474 494 515 538 564 594 626 658 688 715 743 771 Age 60 thru 64 321 330 340 350 363 371 380 385 393 401 408 415 Age 65 thru 84 690 692 695 696 695 694 692 685 679 673 668 661 Age 85 & Older 87 88 90 90 91 92 93 94 94 95 95 95

Gray County Total Population 5,927 5,955 5,994 6,027 6,059 6,088 6,115 6,138 6,155 6,174 6,190 6,201 Age 0 thru 4 461 464 467 468 470 470 468 466 463 461 459 455 Age 5 thru 9 433 425 418 410 401 390 380 370 360 350 340 330 Age 10 thru 14 475 467 460 452 443 435 427 419 409 400 390 380 Age 15 thru 19 467 464 461 455 450 443 436 429 422 416 408 400 Age 20 thru 24 444 465 487 510 532 560 587 612 637 662 688 714 Age 25 thru 29 357 357 357 356 354 353 350 346 341 337 334 329 Age 30 thru 34 335 329 323 317 311 303 295 289 282 275 267 259 Age 35 thru 39 342 331 321 311 302 293 286 279 270 261 252 243 Age 40 thru 44 404 401 399 396 393 386 378 369 360 353 347 339 Age 45 thru 49 434 438 443 448 451 454 455 456 460 462 462 462 Age 50 thru 54 432 449 466 484 503 520 540 557 574 592 610 628 Age 55 thru 59 356 370 383 398 412 430 446 462 478 493 509 524 Age 60 thru 64 283 297 313 332 353 375 399 424 447 469 492 517 Age 65 thru 84 577 573 572 569 566 561 556 550 544 537 529 521 Age 85 & Older 127 125 124 121 118 115 112 110 108 106 103 100

Greeley County Total Population 1,296 1,271 1,245 1,218 1,184 1,153 1,124 1,092 1,064 1,032 997 965 Age 0 thru 4 48 44 40 36 32 28 25 22 19 17 15 13 Age 5 thru 9 84 79 75 70 66 62 59 55 52 48 45 41 Age 10 thru 14 91 86 82 77 71 67 62 58 54 50 46 42 Age 15 thru 19 105 104 102 99 96 93 90 87 84 81 78 74 Age 20 thru 24 69 69 69 69 68 67 67 66 65 64 62 61 Age 25 thru 29 41 39 36 34 31 29 28 27 25 23 21 19 Age 30 thru 34 36 33 30 27 25 22 20 18 16 14 12 11 Age 35 thru 39 61 55 50 45 39 34 30 26 23 20 18 15 Age 40 thru 44 126 124 121 118 114 111 106 102 99 95 91 87 Age 45 thru 49 144 149 154 159 164 167 168 170 171 173 173 174 Age 50 thru 54 109 113 115 119 121 124 127 129 131 132 133 134 Age 55 thru 59 78 78 79 79 79 80 81 81 81 80 79 78 Age 60 thru 64 68 68 68 69 70 69 69 68 68 67 66 65 Age 65 thru 84 206 201 196 190 183 177 170 163 157 150 142 136 Age 85 & Older 30 29 28 27 25 23 22 20 19 18 16 15 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Greenwood County Total Population 7,269 7,229 7,185 7,141 7,099 7,044 6,995 6,938 6,886 6,831 6,772 6,717 Age 0 thru 4 358 351 344 337 328 319 311 303 294 286 278 270 Age 5 thru 9 383 373 363 353 343 332 321 309 298 287 277 267 Age 10 thru 14 413 399 384 368 352 337 323 309 296 283 270 258 Age 15 thru 19 480 472 462 452 441 428 416 404 393 382 371 360 Age 20 thru 24 439 456 473 492 512 527 541 552 563 579 593 608 Age 25 thru 29 497 511 528 548 573 596 621 650 677 698 720 743 Age 30 thru 34 315 308 301 295 290 283 276 268 262 254 247 240 Age 35 thru 39 313 296 278 259 241 224 209 195 182 170 158 147 Age 40 thru 44 530 527 522 517 511 501 491 481 472 463 454 445 Age 45 thru 49 548 553 556 560 563 567 569 571 574 575 575 575 Age 50 thru 54 541 550 556 560 562 563 567 572 576 579 581 582 Age 55 thru 59 523 537 550 564 579 595 608 620 630 642 653 664 Age 60 thru 64 399 399 400 400 401 401 402 400 399 397 394 392 Age 65 thru 84 1,245 1,215 1,188 1,159 1,129 1,101 1,074 1,044 1,017 987 957 927 Age 85 & Older 285 282 280 277 274 270 266 260 253 249 244 239

Hamilton County Total Population 2,637 2,653 2,666 2,687 2,702 2,717 2,729 2,735 2,738 2,742 2,747 2,750 Age 0 thru 4 199 204 210 215 219 223 225 227 228 230 232 234 Age 5 thru 9 158 155 151 147 143 140 137 134 130 126 122 118 Age 10 thru 14 171 166 161 155 148 142 136 129 124 118 113 107 Age 15 thru 19 217 221 225 227 229 230 230 231 231 232 232 231 Age 20 thru 24 194 210 227 245 263 279 298 318 339 361 384 408 Age 25 thru 29 131 129 125 123 120 117 114 110 106 102 99 95 Age 30 thru 34 149 150 150 152 154 155 155 154 153 151 150 149 Age 35 thru 39 135 129 123 118 112 107 101 96 91 86 82 77 Age 40 thru 44 181 181 180 180 179 178 175 173 171 168 166 163 Age 45 thru 49 211 215 218 222 225 228 233 236 237 239 240 241 Age 50 thru 54 200 208 216 227 239 250 262 274 285 295 305 316 Age 55 thru 59 134 137 139 142 145 150 152 154 157 159 160 162 Age 60 thru 64 111 110 109 108 107 105 103 100 97 95 93 90 Age 65 thru 84 349 340 332 325 317 310 304 296 287 278 268 259 Age 85 & Older 97 98 100 101 102 103 104 103 102 102 101 100

Harper County Total Population 5,942 5,883 5,821 5,762 5,696 5,632 5,564 5,493 5,418 5,346 5,274 5,204 Age 0 thru 4 309 302 295 288 279 272 265 257 249 241 233 226 Age 5 thru 9 321 311 300 290 279 269 259 250 240 230 221 211 Age 10 thru 14 349 334 319 304 288 274 260 247 234 222 210 199 Age 15 thru 19 408 404 397 390 381 369 356 344 333 324 314 304 Age 20 thru 24 362 373 385 397 410 420 430 436 444 453 462 470 Age 25 thru 29 340 347 355 366 380 395 411 428 439 449 459 471 Age 30 thru 34 200 188 177 167 156 145 135 125 116 108 100 93 Age 35 thru 39 282 269 256 243 231 219 209 199 188 178 168 158 Age 40 thru 44 410 403 394 385 376 364 353 342 332 322 312 302 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Harper County (cont'd) Age 45 thru 49 454 454 453 451 446 442 435 428 423 417 411 405 Age 50 thru 54 498 512 527 542 558 572 588 605 618 632 645 658 Age 55 thru 59 401 410 419 429 439 454 464 473 481 489 497 504 Age 60 thru 64 302 297 291 285 278 271 263 255 248 240 233 226 Age 65 thru 84 1,052 1,028 1,006 983 958 934 909 883 857 830 804 778 Age 85 & Older 254 251 247 242 237 232 227 221 216 211 205 199

Harvey County Total Population 34,189 34,538 34,810 34,823 34,629 34,659 34,920 35,138 35,347 35,527 35,702 35,885 Age 0 thru 4 2,168 2,193 2,212 2,212 2,195 2,191 2,196 2,198 2,197 2,193 2,187 2,180 Age 5 thru 9 2,084 2,076 2,063 2,035 1,999 1,976 1,972 1,969 1,966 1,960 1,956 1,952 Age 10 thru 14 2,174 2,152 2,124 2,078 2,023 1,984 1,959 1,936 1,911 1,889 1,869 1,848 Age 15 thru 19 2,587 2,602 2,607 2,594 2,570 2,554 2,563 2,574 2,591 2,604 2,620 2,633 Age 20 thru 24 2,574 2,611 2,658 2,694 2,710 2,753 2,803 2,834 2,851 2869 2882 2,912 Age 25 thru 29 2,202 2,262 2,328 2,392 2,460 2,551 2,657 2,756 2,842 2,926 3,019 3,118 Age 30 thru 34 1,763 1,751 1,739 1,720 1,693 1,677 1,669 1,660 1,647 1,630 1,617 1,604 Age 35 thru 39 1,931 1,896 1,856 1,805 1,751 1,709 1,683 1,651 1,618 1,583 1,550 1,518 Age 40 thru 44 2,360 2,366 2,363 2,344 2,312 2,294 2,292 2,281 2,272 2,263 2,255 2,247 Age 45 thru 49 2,650 2,678 2,695 2,683 2,636 2,573 2,526 2,490 2,457 2,421 2,372 2,318 Age 50 thru 54 2,499 2,568 2,629 2,665 2,666 2,650 2,662 2,671 2,685 2,695 2,691 2,679 Age 55 thru 59 2,007 2,068 2,123 2,160 2,177 2,191 2,208 2,230 2,251 2,267 2,274 2,275 Age 60 thru 64 1,403 1,403 1,397 1,377 1,342 1,303 1,274 1,248 1,222 1,193 1,160 1,125 Age 65 thru 84 4,618 4,700 4,764 4,782 4,786 4,889 5,024 5,142 5,271 5,400 5,541 5,689 Age 85 & Older 1,169 1,212 1,252 1,282 1,309 1,364 1,432 1,498 1,566 1,634 1,709 1,787

Haskell County Total Population 4,277 4,298 4,317 4,334 4,351 4,372 4,385 4,400 4,411 4,416 4,427 4,440 Age 0 thru 4 330 327 322 316 309 303 296 290 284 277 271 265 Age 5 thru 9 376 377 379 380 380 381 381 383 384 383 382 381 Age 10 thru 14 335 329 324 316 309 302 295 287 278 271 263 256 Age 15 thru 19 340 338 335 331 327 322 317 311 307 302 297 292 Age 20 thru 24 329 340 349 360 370 380 391 402 410 419 429 439 Age 25 thru 29 236 229 222 214 207 202 196 191 185 178 172 166 Age 30 thru 34 294 296 300 306 314 319 322 324 325 327 329 331 Age 35 thru 39 202 193 184 174 164 154 146 139 132 124 117 111 Age 40 thru 44 294 291 286 282 275 269 263 257 252 246 241 235 Age 45 thru 49 349 356 364 372 380 387 392 398 405 410 415 421 Age 50 thru 54 312 325 337 352 365 377 388 402 415 428 442 456 Age 55 thru 59 237 247 259 270 282 298 315 329 344 358 373 388 Age 60 thru 64 170 174 179 183 188 194 199 203 206 210 214 218 Age 65 thru 84 407 409 409 409 411 412 412 411 410 409 407 405 Age 85 & Older 66 67 68 69 70 72 72 73 74 74 75 76

Hodgeman County Total Population 2,100 2,096 2,098 2,093 2,089 2,084 2,082 2,081 2,078 2,079 2,074 2,070 Age 0 thru 4 124 124 126 127 127 128 128 130 130 129 127 126 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Hodgeman County (cont'd) Age 5 thru 9 87 81 75 69 62 57 52 48 43 39 35 31 Age 10 thru 14 148 142 136 128 120 112 105 98 92 86 80 74 Age 15 thru 19 184 184 183 181 178 174 170 165 161 157 153 147 Age 20 thru 24 164 182 205 232 266 297 327 360 396 435 477 522 Age 25 thru 29 92 90 89 87 85 83 81 79 77 74 71 68 Age 30 thru 34 81 78 75 72 69 66 63 60 57 54 51 48 Age 35 thru 39 91 84 77 70 63 56 50 45 40 36 32 28 Age 40 thru 44 182 182 181 179 176 172 169 166 162 159 154 149 Age 45 thru 49 185 189 192 194 196 198 199 200 199 199 197 195 Age 50 thru 54 174 180 186 192 197 202 208 212 217 221 223 225 Age 55 thru 59 118 119 120 121 121 122 124 124 124 123 122 120 Age 60 thru 64 88 86 84 81 78 75 72 68 65 62 59 56 Age 65 thru 84 305 298 292 283 275 268 261 254 245 236 226 216 Age 85 & Older 77 77 77 77 76 74 73 72 70 69 67 65

Jackson County Total Population 13,864 14,064 14,247 14,400 14,543 14,715 14,851 14,970 15,063 15,138 15,190 15,239 Age 0 thru 4 918 931 942 950 956 967 975 981 982 980 976 971 Age 5 thru 9 895 894 891 884 881 879 875 872 868 864 860 855 Age 10 thru 14 942 933 922 907 892 880 868 857 846 835 824 811 Age 15 thru 19 1,027 1,041 1,051 1,058 1,067 1,076 1,086 1,095 1,103 1,113 1,123 1,131 Age 20 thru 24 1,132 1,187 1,251 1,326 1,404 1,488 1,561 1,624 1,684 1742 1,795 1,862 Age 25 thru 29 822 848 877 910 947 997 1,051 1,100 1,143 1,180 1,219 1,260 Age 30 thru 34 704 699 694 688 681 675 665 653 640 628 616 604 Age 35 thru 39 822 814 803 792 781 774 762 752 741 727 713 699 Age 40 thru 44 1,030 1,042 1,053 1,062 1,072 1,082 1,094 1,104 1,109 1,112 1,115 1,117 Age 45 thru 49 1,090 1,103 1,115 1,122 1,121 1,110 1,099 1,087 1,073 1,059 1,039 1,016 Age 50 thru 54 982 1,006 1,025 1,038 1,041 1,036 1,023 1,017 1,010 1,004 992 976 Age 55 thru 59 929 967 1,002 1,034 1,060 1,079 1,093 1,108 1,125 1,139 1,147 1,152 Age 60 thru 64 651 660 667 670 670 662 655 648 640 631 619 605 Age 65 thru 84 1,583 1,595 1,603 1,604 1,609 1,638 1,661 1,678 1,695 1,711 1,729 1,747 Age 85 & Older 337 344 351 355 361 372 383 394 404 413 423 433

Jefferson County Total Population 19,371 19,541 19,663 19,748 19,819 19,924 20,011 20,072 20,117 20,135 20,141 20,147 Age 0 thru 4 1,018 1,008 994 975 953 936 918 898 878 854 830 805 Age 5 thru 9 1,149 1,133 1,113 1,091 1,070 1,051 1,034 1,019 1,005 988 972 955 Age 10 thru 14 1,283 1,265 1,241 1,213 1,184 1,159 1,133 1,109 1,087 1,066 1,045 1,024 Age 15 thru 19 1,412 1,416 1,413 1,402 1,393 1,390 1,388 1,385 1,382 1,380 1,379 1,374 Age 20 thru 24 1,497 1,554 1,620 1,693 1,770 1,838 1,895 1,940 1,974 2014 2,048 2,095 Age 25 thru 29 1,231 1,277 1,330 1,394 1,475 1,570 1,672 1,767 1,859 1,936 2,022 2,114 Age 30 thru 34 822 793 763 732 701 674 645 617 588 561 535 510 Age 35 thru 39 1,155 1,127 1,092 1,055 1,018 986 954 923 892 860 829 798 Age 40 thru 44 1,537 1,543 1,543 1,542 1,540 1,538 1,532 1,520 1,502 1,490 1,479 1,465 Age 45 thru 49 1,693 1,709 1,719 1,722 1,713 1,690 1,663 1,639 1,616 1,590 1,555 1,517 Age 50 thru 54 1,519 1,544 1,563 1,576 1,577 1,565 1,557 1,549 1,541 1,528 1,507 1,482 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Jefferson County (cont'd) Age 55 thru 59 1,339 1,379 1,410 1,436 1,453 1,457 1,457 1,460 1,463 1,463 1,457 1,445 Age 60 thru 64 1,040 1,057 1,071 1,079 1,081 1,081 1,077 1,070 1,064 1,054 1,040 1,023 Age 65 thru 84 2,290 2,339 2,384 2,421 2,464 2,544 2,620 2,691 2,764 2,832 2,906 2,983 Age 85 & Older 386 397 407 417 427 445 466 485 502 519 537 557

Jewell County Total Population 3,237 3,182 3,127 3,072 3,009 2,940 2,872 2,801 2,733 2,661 2,597 2,538 Age 0 thru 4 93 87 80 74 67 61 56 52 48 43 39 36 Age 5 thru 9 141 133 125 118 110 102 93 86 79 72 67 61 Age 10 thru 14 176 167 158 149 140 130 121 113 105 98 90 84 Age 15 thru 19 221 216 210 204 198 189 181 172 164 156 149 142 Age 20 thru 24 159 168 177 188 200 218 235 251 264 276 289 303 Age 25 thru 29 66 61 55 50 45 40 37 33 30 27 24 21 Age 30 thru 34 89 82 76 70 64 59 53 48 43 39 35 31 Age 35 thru 39 105 95 86 76 67 59 51 44 39 34 29 26 Age 40 thru 44 241 236 230 223 216 208 201 193 186 178 171 163 Age 45 thru 49 271 267 263 256 248 237 226 213 203 194 185 176 Age 50 thru 54 353 364 376 389 400 409 420 430 437 443 450 455 Age 55 thru 59 271 276 282 289 296 303 306 307 309 309 310 311 Age 60 thru 64 216 214 213 212 210 206 202 198 194 188 183 179 Age 65 thru 84 690 674 656 637 615 591 567 543 520 496 473 451 Age 85 & Older 145 142 140 137 133 128 123 118 112 108 103 99

Johnson County Total Population 526,862 536,736 545,212 552,605 559,441 565,898 572,521 578,987 585,030 590,110 594,942 599,916 Age 0 thru 4 36,643 37,189 37,606 37,885 38,071 38,217 38,359 38,451 38,486 38,446 38,353 38,242 Age 5 thru 9 35,399 35,681 35,840 35,871 35,894 35,947 36,071 36,249 36,430 36,589 36,778 36,948 Age 10 thru 14 35,813 36,067 36,210 36,223 36,224 36,231 36,295 36,408 36,531 36,648 36,796 36,924 Age 15 thru 19 35,604 36,411 37,115 37,748 38,457 39,089 39,821 40,642 41,505 42,329 43,207 44,086 Age 20 thru 24 33,540 34,092 34,686 35,312 35,818 36,431 36,909 37,059 36,864 36656 36,412 36,413 Age 25 thru 29 36,712 37,210 37,661 38,149 38,785 39,514 40,235 40,869 41,396 41,816 42,302 42,845 Age 30 thru 34 37,827 38,092 38,358 38,648 38,978 39,255 39,509 39,690 39,781 39,824 39,936 40,097 Age 35 thru 39 38,621 38,437 38,125 37,782 37,557 37,369 37,239 37,091 36,872 36,512 36,194 35,909 Age 40 thru 44 43,678 44,232 44,676 45,128 45,690 46,231 46,811 47,342 47,751 48,092 48,488 48,929 Age 45 thru 49 43,007 43,575 43,943 44,097 43,892 43,249 42,601 42,029 41,523 40,945 40,167 39,297 Age 50 thru 54 39,388 40,547 41,485 42,170 42,430 42,159 42,007 42,013 42,091 42,105 41,882 41,510 Age 55 thru 59 34,893 36,881 38,815 40,755 42,582 44,136 45,527 47,026 48,623 50,121 51,444 52,681 Age 60 thru 64 21,289 21,953 22,598 23,225 23,773 24,113 24,454 24,766 25,078 25,284 25,396 25,461 Age 65 thru 84 46,418 47,901 49,218 50,357 51,630 53,717 55,827 57,869 59,957 61,957 64,110 66,366 Age 85 & Older 8,030 8,468 8,876 9,255 9,660 10,240 10,856 11,483 12,142 12,786 13,477 14,208

Kearny County Total Population 4,586 4,616 4,648 4,671 4,690 4,705 4,719 4,740 4,754 4,770 4,783 4,798 Age 0 thru 4 331 326 321 314 305 297 288 280 271 264 257 249 Age 5 thru 9 377 373 369 363 357 351 346 340 334 328 321 315 Age 10 thru 14 396 392 386 379 370 361 353 345 338 330 322 314 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Kearny County (cont'd) Age 15 thru 19 404 408 410 412 414 416 415 415 413 414 413 412 Age 20 thru 24 350 366 384 400 419 432 445 461 476 493 510 527 Age 25 thru 29 259 259 260 262 264 265 267 271 272 271 271 271 Age 30 thru 34 239 233 227 221 214 208 202 195 189 182 176 170 Age 35 thru 39 250 241 231 221 210 198 187 179 170 162 154 146 Age 40 thru 44 351 352 353 354 354 353 351 348 346 344 341 339 Age 45 thru 49 365 375 385 395 405 414 423 433 442 450 458 467 Age 50 thru 54 316 326 338 349 360 373 384 395 406 418 429 440 Age 55 thru 59 264 277 290 304 319 336 353 370 387 404 421 439 Age 60 thru 64 174 176 179 182 185 186 189 191 193 194 196 197 Age 65 thru 84 466 469 472 473 473 475 477 479 481 481 480 479 Age 85 & Older 44 43 43 42 41 40 39 38 36 35 34 33

Kingman County Total Population 8,145 8,138 8,122 8,103 8,075 8,049 8,017 7,979 7,936 7,886 7,842 7,803 Age 0 thru 4 375 362 348 333 317 302 287 273 259 246 232 220 Age 5 thru 9 463 449 433 417 399 382 365 348 332 316 301 285 Age 10 thru 14 549 531 512 491 468 446 424 402 381 362 343 325 Age 15 thru 19 668 670 671 670 669 664 656 649 640 631 622 613 Age 20 thru 24 530 564 603 647 695 750 815 870 927 981 1,040 1,103 Age 25 thru 29 317 309 302 295 287 280 272 262 252 242 233 224 Age 30 thru 34 310 296 282 269 256 242 229 217 205 193 181 170 Age 35 thru 39 398 379 358 338 317 296 276 257 239 223 208 193 Age 40 thru 44 618 611 602 591 576 560 543 528 511 496 481 465 Age 45 thru 49 773 801 829 859 890 921 944 966 988 1,009 1,030 1,051 Age 50 thru 54 603 617 631 644 655 666 683 698 710 718 726 733 Age 55 thru 59 556 577 598 620 644 670 689 710 731 748 766 784 Age 60 thru 64 378 373 366 357 347 336 324 313 301 291 280 269 Age 65 thru 84 1,298 1,286 1,271 1,254 1,236 1,217 1,196 1,175 1,151 1,124 1,096 1,069 Age 85 & Older 309 313 316 318 319 317 314 311 309 306 303 299

Kiowa County Total Population 2,900 2,851 2,800 2,745 2,691 2,631 2,577 2,522 2,467 2,413 2,363 2,317 Age 0 thru 4 178 176 174 171 169 166 164 160 157 154 151 148 Age 5 thru 9 141 133 125 117 110 103 96 90 84 78 73 68 Age 10 thru 14 177 170 163 156 149 143 135 128 122 116 110 105 Age 15 thru 19 200 194 187 180 173 165 158 152 145 138 132 126 Age 20 thru 24 178 181 181 181 181 180 179 177 174 173 172 170 Age 25 thru 29 140 137 135 133 132 130 129 126 124 121 118 116 Age 30 thru 34 109 103 98 93 88 84 81 77 73 69 65 62 Age 35 thru 39 103 95 86 78 71 64 58 53 48 44 39 36 Age 40 thru 44 170 164 158 151 144 136 128 120 113 107 101 96 Age 45 thru 49 234 233 231 227 223 217 212 207 202 197 193 188 Age 50 thru 54 265 269 273 275 276 277 278 278 279 279 280 280 Age 55 thru 59 234 242 251 261 272 283 295 308 319 329 340 351 Age 60 thru 64 138 134 131 128 124 120 116 112 108 104 100 97 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Kiowa County (cont'd) Age 65 thru 84 509 495 481 466 450 434 418 404 389 375 360 346 Age 85 & Older 124 125 126 128 129 129 130 130 130 129 129 128

Labette County Total Population 21,969 21,855 21,753 21,643 21,535 21,423 21,302 21,183 21,060 20,949 20,845 20,745 Age 0 thru 4 1,283 1,266 1,249 1,230 1,210 1,189 1,166 1,144 1,121 1,101 1,080 1,060 Age 5 thru 9 1,294 1,259 1,223 1,186 1,150 1,115 1,083 1,049 1,015 984 953 922 Age 10 thru 14 1,451 1,415 1,379 1,339 1,299 1,258 1,214 1,176 1,138 1,103 1,069 1,034 Age 15 thru 19 1,677 1,659 1,638 1,616 1,596 1,574 1,553 1,529 1,508 1,487 1,465 1,442 Age 20 thru 24 1,481 1,508 1,537 1,567 1,595 1,621 1,638 1,654 1,674 1696 1,718 1,740 Age 25 thru 29 1,449 1,460 1,477 1,500 1,531 1,569 1,616 1,659 1,694 1,718 1,745 1,774 Age 30 thru 34 1,024 986 952 918 883 848 812 777 742 712 682 654 Age 35 thru 39 1,279 1,235 1,190 1,143 1,096 1,051 1,007 969 932 895 859 824 Age 40 thru 44 1,698 1,696 1,696 1,697 1,700 1,698 1,699 1,695 1,689 1,683 1,678 1,673 Age 45 thru 49 1,585 1,590 1,596 1,601 1,604 1,609 1,609 1,608 1,607 1,606 1,605 1,604 Age 50 thru 54 1,572 1,599 1,622 1,640 1,653 1,661 1,670 1,684 1,695 1,712 1,727 1,740 Age 55 thru 59 1,514 1,559 1,603 1,646 1,690 1,735 1,777 1,821 1,868 1,914 1,961 2,008 Age 60 thru 64 1,169 1,192 1,219 1,250 1,285 1,321 1,353 1,381 1,408 1,435 1,464 1,495 Age 65 thru 84 2,778 2,712 2,650 2,586 2,518 2,448 2,378 2,310 2,242 2,178 2,116 2,054 Age 85 & Older 715 719 722 724 725 726 727 727 727 725 723 721

Lane County Total Population 1,830 1,800 1,766 1,730 1,693 1,659 1,624 1,582 1,541 1,502 1,462 1,425 Age 0 thru 4 92 89 86 84 81 78 76 73 70 67 64 61 Age 5 thru 9 81 76 70 64 59 53 48 43 39 36 32 29 Age 10 thru 14 119 115 110 105 100 95 90 84 79 74 69 65 Age 15 thru 19 120 117 113 109 104 99 94 90 86 82 78 74 Age 20 thru 24 113 117 122 128 134 142 151 159 166 172 178 184 Age 25 thru 29 52 49 47 44 41 39 38 36 34 32 30 28 Age 30 thru 34 49 44 39 34 30 26 22 19 16 14 12 11 Age 35 thru 39 106 101 96 90 85 80 75 71 66 62 58 54 Age 40 thru 44 148 146 142 139 135 131 127 122 117 112 108 103 Age 45 thru 49 163 164 166 166 166 166 166 164 163 161 159 158 Age 50 thru 54 160 161 163 164 165 165 164 163 161 160 159 157 Age 55 thru 59 134 137 138 140 142 144 143 141 140 140 139 138 Age 60 thru 64 109 109 108 108 107 107 107 107 106 105 103 101 Age 65 thru 84 306 298 289 279 270 261 252 241 231 220 210 201 Age 85 & Older 78 77 77 76 74 73 71 69 67 65 63 61

Leavenworth County Total Population 74,480 75,188 75,657 75,945 76,165 76,379 76,610 76,827 76,971 76,984 76,977 77,007 Age 0 thru 4 4,553 4,551 4,529 4,485 4,426 4,365 4,308 4,249 4,187 4,115 4,040 3,963 Age 5 thru 9 4,720 4,679 4,621 4,545 4,468 4,395 4,329 4,271 4,213 4,158 4,107 4,055 Age 10 thru 14 5,125 5,108 5,075 5,025 4,974 4,933 4,888 4,850 4,815 4,780 4,751 4,720 Age 15 thru 19 5,261 5,317 5,350 5,367 5,388 5,405 5,443 5,492 5,544 5,585 5,632 5,677 Age 20 thru 24 5,548 5,657 5,778 5,905 6,021 6,138 6,204 6,218 6,207 6189 6164 6,180 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Leavenworth County (cont'd) Age 25 thru 29 5,269 5,363 5,455 5,559 5,700 5,846 6,005 6,160 6,293 6,398 6,518 6,651 Age 30 thru 34 4,731 4,656 4,581 4,513 4,458 4,413 4,369 4,312 4,239 4,159 4,088 4,024 Age 35 thru 39 5,484 5,333 5,159 4,980 4,816 4,650 4,490 4,331 4,174 4,024 3,882 3,746 Age 40 thru 44 7,023 7,131 7,222 7,317 7,436 7,563 7,700 7,828 7,928 8,014 8,112 8,221 Age 45 thru 49 6,135 6,194 6,219 6,211 6,150 6,026 5,895 5,779 5,681 5,576 5,444 5,300 Age 50 thru 54 5,485 5,627 5,740 5,821 5,849 5,812 5,796 5,803 5,812 5,804 5,766 5,710 Age 55 thru 59 4,466 4,633 4,775 4,902 5,000 5,062 5,109 5,166 5,226 5,276 5,303 5,316 Age 60 thru 64 3,019 3,069 3,105 3,129 3,134 3,116 3,100 3,088 3,076 3,049 3,010 2,965 Age 65 thru 84 6,761 6,943 7,099 7,221 7,364 7,634 7,910 8,171 8,427 8,671 8,934 9,211 Age 85 & Older 900 927 949 965 981 1,021 1,064 1,109 1,149 1,186 1,226 1,268

Lincoln County Total Population 3,385 3,373 3,361 3,351 3,335 3,322 3,304 3,289 3,270 3,248 3,228 3,210 Age 0 thru 4 164 162 159 157 153 149 145 140 135 130 126 121 Age 5 thru 9 169 164 159 154 148 142 135 129 124 118 112 106 Age 10 thru 14 181 172 163 154 145 137 128 120 113 105 98 91 Age 15 thru 19 224 222 218 214 209 203 197 191 184 178 172 166 Age 20 thru 24 228 245 264 285 307 332 358 384 411 437 464 493 Age 25 thru 29 170 173 176 180 185 189 196 199 202 204 206 208 Age 30 thru 34 127 121 115 110 105 100 94 87 82 77 72 68 Age 35 thru 39 155 148 141 135 128 121 114 109 103 97 92 86 Age 40 thru 44 216 209 201 193 183 173 163 153 144 136 128 120 Age 45 thru 49 330 337 343 347 350 354 356 359 360 361 361 361 Age 50 thru 54 338 354 372 390 409 427 442 458 474 489 505 520 Age 55 thru 59 234 240 247 253 260 267 274 281 286 291 294 298 Age 60 thru 64 170 167 165 163 160 158 155 153 149 145 140 136 Age 65 thru 84 578 564 548 532 515 498 481 465 447 429 411 393 Age 85 & Older 101 95 90 84 78 72 66 61 56 51 47 43

Linn County Total Population 10,077 10,141 10,165 10,180 10,194 10,220 10,237 10,246 10,246 10,227 10,211 10,200 Age 0 thru 4 529 525 517 508 497 485 471 458 447 434 422 409 Age 5 thru 9 602 599 593 587 582 581 583 583 579 576 573 570 Age 10 thru 14 606 594 580 564 549 534 518 505 494 482 470 458 Age 15 thru 19 650 648 642 635 629 622 616 610 604 599 594 589 Age 20 thru 24 719 747 778 813 850 886 919 948 970 988 1006 1,031 Age 25 thru 29 715 747 781 823 876 932 993 1,054 1,114 1,167 1,226 1,291 Age 30 thru 34 517 519 520 523 528 535 539 542 542 542 543 544 Age 35 thru 39 489 473 454 434 415 398 383 370 357 342 328 314 Age 40 thru 44 749 756 760 765 771 777 782 783 781 782 784 786 Age 45 thru 49 750 749 743 734 719 698 674 652 634 614 592 569 Age 50 thru 54 756 764 767 766 756 739 725 715 706 694 679 661 Age 55 thru 59 720 734 742 748 748 747 741 735 730 723 713 701 Age 60 thru 64 574 577 578 577 573 562 551 539 527 515 502 487 Age 65 thru 84 1,445 1,450 1,448 1,439 1,434 1,449 1,461 1,466 1,472 1,476 1,481 1,487 Age 85 & Older 256 259 262 264 267 275 281 286 289 293 298 303 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Logan County Total Population 2,755 2,726 2,700 2,667 2,630 2,595 2,563 2,526 2,492 2,456 2,419 2,384 Age 0 thru 4 148 143 139 134 128 123 118 114 109 104 100 95 Age 5 thru 9 170 166 163 159 155 153 150 147 144 140 136 133 Age 10 thru 14 161 154 147 139 131 124 117 111 104 99 93 87 Age 15 thru 19 207 205 202 198 194 189 184 178 174 169 165 160 Age 20 thru 24 77 74 70 65 61 57 52 48 44 41 38 36 Age 25 thru 29 144 142 140 138 136 132 129 125 122 119 116 113 Age 30 thru 34 132 130 128 127 126 126 125 123 121 119 116 114 Age 35 thru 39 108 100 92 84 76 69 64 59 54 50 45 41 Age 40 thru 44 209 206 203 198 192 186 180 174 169 164 159 154 Age 45 thru 49 273 281 289 298 305 311 318 325 332 338 344 350 Age 50 thru 54 237 242 249 256 263 269 276 280 285 290 295 300 Age 55 thru 59 167 170 173 177 181 186 190 194 199 202 205 208 Age 60 thru 64 127 124 121 118 114 111 108 104 100 96 93 89 Age 65 thru 84 494 487 481 472 463 453 445 436 427 417 406 396 Age 85 & Older 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 108 108 108 108

Lyon County Total Population 35,726 35,780 35,796 35,820 35,830 35,842 35,866 35,889 35,897 35,893 35,888 35,898 Age 0 thru 4 2,544 2,554 2,562 2,568 2,572 2,574 2,577 2,576 2,571 2,566 2,561 2,555 Age 5 thru 9 2,154 2,115 2,071 2,025 1,977 1,933 1,890 1,848 1,808 1,765 1,721 1,679 Age 10 thru 14 2,158 2,114 2,065 2,015 1,963 1,912 1,862 1,812 1,761 1,713 1,665 1,618 Age 15 thru 19 2,842 2,794 2,734 2,667 2,598 2,534 2,470 2,407 2,346 2,289 2,229 2,169 Age 20 thru 24 4,176 4,209 4,231 4,246 4,248 4,221 4,190 4,171 4,153 4143 4,129 4,112 Age 25 thru 29 3,087 3,143 3,207 3,283 3,373 3,483 3,607 3,713 3,802 3,881 3,964 4,053 Age 30 thru 34 1,909 1,873 1,840 1,811 1,777 1,738 1,699 1,655 1,609 1,569 1,530 1,493 Age 35 thru 39 1,860 1,788 1,714 1,640 1,567 1,499 1,435 1,377 1,320 1,262 1,205 1,151 Age 40 thru 44 2,395 2,373 2,343 2,311 2,275 2,236 2,201 2,164 2,127 2,092 2,056 2,019 Age 45 thru 49 2,644 2,691 2,736 2,780 2,822 2,857 2,888 2,916 2,948 2,981 3,011 3,042 Age 50 thru 54 2,442 2,529 2,615 2,704 2,789 2,874 2,955 3,042 3,133 3,226 3,320 3,414 Age 55 thru 59 1,939 2,009 2,076 2,147 2,220 2,301 2,386 2,475 2,569 2,651 2,736 2,824 Age 60 thru 64 1,433 1,469 1,506 1,546 1,590 1,635 1,678 1,718 1,754 1,791 1,829 1,869 Age 65 thru 84 3,275 3,239 3,204 3,171 3,139 3,111 3,080 3,052 3,019 2,978 2,937 2,896 Age 85 & Older 868 880 892 906 920 934 948 963 977 986 995 1,004

Marion County Total Population 12,963 12,966 12,954 12,932 12,890 12,840 12,791 12,744 12,702 12,660 12,609 12,563 Age 0 thru 4 605 596 585 572 556 540 525 511 497 484 470 457 Age 5 thru 9 651 629 605 579 550 525 499 476 452 431 411 390 Age 10 thru 14 865 852 837 820 801 781 761 739 722 704 685 666 Age 15 thru 19 1,022 1,024 1,022 1,019 1,015 1,004 992 981 972 963 953 943 Age 20 thru 24 950 989 1,032 1,079 1,128 1,175 1,219 1,263 1,309 1355 1,402 1,451 Age 25 thru 29 611 614 618 623 631 641 651 659 666 669 672 676 Age 30 thru 34 535 519 504 489 473 455 438 420 405 390 374 360 Age 35 thru 39 635 609 583 555 526 497 471 447 424 403 382 361 Age 40 thru 44 908 903 893 880 863 846 826 809 792 777 761 744 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Marion County (cont'd) Age 45 thru 49 1,091 1,118 1,146 1,174 1,199 1,227 1,255 1,279 1,302 1,326 1,348 1,371 Age 50 thru 54 963 993 1,024 1,054 1,082 1,107 1,139 1,172 1,205 1,235 1,265 1,294 Age 55 thru 59 795 813 828 841 852 862 870 881 891 901 910 918 Age 60 thru 64 688 691 695 698 700 705 708 707 705 704 702 701 Age 65 thru 84 2,064 2,034 1,999 1,966 1,933 1,895 1,858 1,821 1,784 1,744 1,704 1,665 Age 85 & Older 580 582 583 583 581 580 579 579 576 574 570 566

Marshall County Total Population 10,242 10,163 10,084 10,008 9,920 9,830 9,744 9,656 9,566 9,475 9,383 9,300 Age 0 thru 4 522 513 505 498 492 485 477 466 457 446 435 425 Age 5 thru 9 460 437 415 394 372 352 334 317 299 281 265 249 Age 10 thru 14 558 527 495 463 429 397 366 337 312 290 268 248 Age 15 thru 19 806 803 794 783 770 753 736 722 706 693 678 662 Age 20 thru 24 674 703 733 764 796 832 875 908 940 973 1,006 1,041 Age 25 thru 29 495 495 498 505 515 526 536 550 562 565 568 573 Age 30 thru 34 339 319 300 283 265 248 232 216 201 187 174 162 Age 35 thru 39 421 390 360 329 299 270 244 221 201 183 166 150 Age 40 thru 44 831 827 821 813 801 787 773 758 743 730 715 700 Age 45 thru 49 912 924 937 948 954 956 955 955 955 956 955 954 Age 50 thru 54 899 932 969 1,008 1,047 1,088 1,132 1,171 1,211 1,249 1,287 1,326 Age 55 thru 59 627 635 641 647 652 656 656 660 661 661 661 660 Age 60 thru 64 549 551 552 554 557 560 562 562 559 556 553 550 Age 65 thru 84 1,759 1,722 1,685 1,647 1,606 1,565 1,520 1,477 1,432 1,387 1,343 1,299 Age 85 & Older 390 385 379 372 365 355 346 336 327 318 309 301

McPherson County Total Population 29,824 29,959 30,087 30,195 30,290 30,385 30,479 30,572 30,647 30,716 30,796 30,893 Age 0 thru 4 1,658 1,649 1,638 1,624 1,608 1,591 1,569 1,551 1,532 1,511 1,490 1,468 Age 5 thru 9 1,616 1,583 1,548 1,511 1,473 1,438 1,405 1,369 1,333 1,296 1,259 1,224 Age 10 thru 14 1,739 1,688 1,633 1,572 1,508 1,443 1,382 1,323 1,264 1,213 1,162 1,112 Age 15 thru 19 2,462 2,461 2,450 2,432 2,409 2,379 2,345 2,313 2,285 2,259 2,230 2,200 Age 20 thru 24 2,519 2,596 2,678 2,762 2,846 2,926 3,011 3,104 3,191 3268 3,349 3,433 Age 25 thru 29 1,837 1,869 1,906 1,950 2,004 2,068 2,122 2,164 2,202 2,238 2,276 2,317 Age 30 thru 34 1,390 1,360 1,335 1,312 1,289 1,266 1,248 1,229 1,207 1,178 1,151 1,126 Age 35 thru 39 1,440 1,378 1,315 1,250 1,185 1,123 1,066 1,014 963 914 866 820 Age 40 thru 44 2,068 2,045 2,017 1,981 1,938 1,892 1,846 1,798 1,753 1,714 1,674 1,633 Age 45 thru 49 2,517 2,579 2,639 2,695 2,746 2,793 2,837 2,879 2,919 2,963 3,006 3,049 Age 50 thru 54 2,348 2,444 2,544 2,642 2,738 2,830 2,934 3,039 3,143 3,248 3,356 3,465 Age 55 thru 59 1,918 2,003 2,090 2,182 2,276 2,379 2,470 2,563 2,658 2,755 2,856 2,962 Age 60 thru 64 1,357 1,380 1,405 1,430 1,457 1,487 1,517 1,544 1,567 1,586 1,606 1,627 Age 65 thru 84 4,063 4,033 4,002 3,971 3,940 3,906 3,871 3,833 3,789 3,741 3,692 3,644 Age 85 & Older 892 891 887 881 873 864 856 849 841 832 823 813

Meade County Total Population 4,674 4,703 4,723 4,745 4,765 4,781 4,799 4,813 4,829 4,840 4,848 4,862 Age 0 thru 4 326 326 324 320 315 310 306 301 296 292 286 281 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Meade County (cont'd) Age 5 thru 9 364 363 361 358 354 350 344 339 334 329 324 319 Age 10 thru 14 375 374 372 370 368 366 364 361 357 353 348 344 Age 15 thru 19 339 342 343 344 345 343 340 337 336 334 332 329 Age 20 thru 24 297 312 327 343 359 377 395 416 438 456 475 495 Age 25 thru 29 262 262 261 261 261 260 261 262 261 259 257 255 Age 30 thru 34 241 235 229 223 215 206 198 189 181 174 167 160 Age 35 thru 39 299 298 296 295 294 296 298 299 300 298 295 293 Age 40 thru 44 297 293 288 281 273 263 252 242 234 227 219 211 Age 45 thru 49 393 405 418 431 444 460 474 487 498 510 522 534 Age 50 thru 54 354 375 398 426 456 484 516 547 579 611 645 681 Age 55 thru 59 187 189 190 191 193 193 193 193 193 192 191 191 Age 60 thru 64 161 158 154 150 145 140 136 131 127 122 118 114 Age 65 thru 84 628 620 611 602 593 584 574 563 551 540 528 516 Age 85 & Older 151 151 151 150 150 149 148 146 144 143 141 139

Miami County Total Population 31,373 31,739 32,037 32,310 32,570 32,794 32,986 33,151 33,279 33,347 33,395 33,451 Age 0 thru 4 2,061 2,082 2,097 2,106 2,110 2,110 2,113 2,109 2,105 2,091 2,075 2,057 Age 5 thru 9 1,936 1,917 1,891 1,860 1,829 1,797 1,769 1,745 1,719 1,693 1,668 1,641 Age 10 thru 14 2,130 2,107 2,076 2,037 1,997 1,959 1,918 1,882 1,847 1,815 1,783 1,750 Age 15 thru 19 2,260 2,272 2,274 2,269 2,265 2,260 2,257 2,255 2,257 2,256 2,256 2,253 Age 20 thru 24 2,585 2,716 2,867 3,045 3,239 3,430 3,597 3,738 3,847 3961 4,076 4,223 Age 25 thru 29 2,126 2,196 2,275 2,371 2,492 2,633 2,791 2,955 3,108 3,228 3,361 3,506 Age 30 thru 34 1,590 1,557 1,521 1,485 1,449 1,416 1,382 1,344 1,307 1,268 1,232 1,197 Age 35 thru 39 2,023 1,984 1,936 1,884 1,835 1,782 1,736 1,693 1,644 1,596 1,550 1,504 Age 40 thru 44 2,639 2,667 2,683 2,697 2,712 2,725 2,727 2,719 2,713 2,712 2,711 2,709 Age 45 thru 49 2,684 2,717 2,742 2,759 2,755 2,725 2,692 2,659 2,630 2,593 2,543 2,486 Age 50 thru 54 2,421 2,491 2,556 2,613 2,650 2,646 2,640 2,637 2,637 2,638 2,624 2,600 Age 55 thru 59 1,856 1,895 1,923 1,944 1,951 1,947 1,938 1,937 1,937 1,924 1,903 1,875 Age 60 thru 64 1,469 1,492 1,510 1,525 1,532 1,518 1,499 1,481 1,462 1,444 1,419 1,390 Age 65 thru 84 3,067 3,110 3,143 3,167 3,200 3,279 3,347 3,405 3,464 3,515 3,570 3,626 Age 85 & Older 526 536 543 548 554 567 580 592 602 613 624 634

Mitchell County Total Population 6,315 6,253 6,194 6,134 6,066 5,999 5,933 5,861 5,785 5,711 5,639 5,569 Age 0 thru 4 281 273 265 257 249 242 234 226 218 210 202 195 Age 5 thru 9 299 286 274 262 249 237 226 215 204 193 183 173 Age 10 thru 14 374 359 343 327 310 293 277 261 246 233 220 208 Age 15 thru 19 651 647 643 637 630 622 614 606 596 587 577 567 Age 20 thru 24 319 323 328 332 336 342 345 348 350 352 354 355 Age 25 thru 29 219 211 203 196 190 182 177 170 164 157 150 144 Age 30 thru 34 233 222 212 203 193 184 176 165 155 147 139 131 Age 35 thru 39 268 251 234 218 201 186 171 159 147 136 126 116 Age 40 thru 44 477 472 467 462 456 448 440 431 421 412 403 395 Age 45 thru 49 518 522 527 530 531 531 532 532 532 531 530 528 Age 50 thru 54 547 562 577 591 603 613 623 632 643 653 663 672 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Mitchell County (cont'd) Age 55 thru 59 476 494 513 532 553 577 601 625 647 667 689 710 Age 60 thru 64 354 358 363 369 375 380 384 388 391 393 395 397 Age 65 thru 84 1,035 1,012 988 965 942 920 897 874 849 823 797 773 Age 85 & Older 264 261 257 253 248 242 236 229 222 217 211 205

Montgomery County Total Population 34,000 33,739 33,468 33,192 32,909 32,626 32,338 32,040 31,741 31,442 31,152 30,875 Age 0 thru 4 2,059 2,038 2,016 1,995 1,973 1,952 1,923 1,894 1,866 1,838 1,810 1,782 Age 5 thru 9 1,902 1,843 1,781 1,718 1,656 1,595 1,540 1,484 1,432 1,379 1,328 1,278 Age 10 thru 14 2,177 2,124 2,069 2,011 1,950 1,891 1,832 1,774 1,713 1,660 1,607 1,556 Age 15 thru 19 2,480 2,436 2,384 2,330 2,274 2,221 2,166 2,115 2,066 2,017 1,968 1,918 Age 20 thru 24 2,249 2,291 2,335 2,379 2,420 2,447 2,469 2,479 2,491 2518 2,544 2,570 Age 25 thru 29 1,982 1,976 1,974 1,977 1,987 2,008 2,036 2,068 2,085 2,087 2,091 2,098 Age 30 thru 34 1,629 1,577 1,528 1,481 1,431 1,379 1,329 1,278 1,232 1,186 1,142 1,099 Age 35 thru 39 1,888 1,820 1,753 1,685 1,620 1,560 1,501 1,445 1,393 1,338 1,285 1,233 Age 40 thru 44 2,339 2,308 2,274 2,238 2,201 2,160 2,121 2,081 2,036 1,997 1,958 1,919 Age 45 thru 49 2,463 2,453 2,442 2,428 2,410 2,389 2,368 2,344 2,322 2,300 2,276 2,254 Age 50 thru 54 2,616 2,670 2,723 2,773 2,820 2,861 2,909 2,962 3,016 3,064 3,112 3,160 Age 55 thru 59 2,279 2,323 2,362 2,399 2,433 2,475 2,504 2,536 2,570 2,603 2,636 2,668 Age 60 thru 64 1,984 2,024 2,067 2,116 2,172 2,228 2,281 2,325 2,368 2,410 2,454 2,501 Age 65 thru 84 4,816 4,714 4,613 4,510 4,405 4,301 4,198 4,094 3,992 3,889 3,788 3,689 Age 85 & Older 1,137 1,142 1,147 1,152 1,157 1,159 1,161 1,161 1,159 1,156 1,153 1,150

Morris County Total Population 6,023 6,007 5,992 5,971 5,951 5,931 5,912 5,901 5,889 5,875 5,860 5,849 Age 0 thru 4 277 269 260 251 241 231 223 215 208 199 191 182 Age 5 thru 9 315 305 293 281 269 258 247 237 225 215 205 194 Age 10 thru 14 366 353 339 324 309 293 277 261 248 235 222 210 Age 15 thru 19 443 442 440 436 432 426 420 417 411 405 398 391 Age 20 thru 24 438 473 515 564 621 680 743 808 868 935 1,007 1,086 Age 25 thru 29 298 298 299 301 304 308 312 318 323 323 323 323 Age 30 thru 34 228 216 206 195 184 175 165 157 149 140 132 124 Age 35 thru 39 316 302 288 273 259 244 230 217 205 194 182 171 Age 40 thru 44 442 439 435 429 420 411 401 393 386 378 369 359 Age 45 thru 49 493 495 497 496 492 490 486 481 478 474 468 462 Age 50 thru 54 533 553 573 594 614 630 644 656 669 685 700 714 Age 55 thru 59 390 395 400 403 407 410 413 417 421 422 422 422 Age 60 thru 64 341 345 350 354 359 364 370 373 376 378 379 380 Age 65 thru 84 889 865 838 810 779 750 721 692 664 636 609 581 Age 85 & Older 254 257 259 260 261 261 260 259 258 256 253 250

Morton County Total Population 3,162 3,140 3,121 3,096 3,075 3,055 3,025 2,992 2,958 2,924 2,893 2,862 Age 0 thru 4 228 224 220 214 208 201 193 186 178 172 166 160 Age 5 thru 9 249 245 241 237 234 229 224 218 213 207 202 196 Age 10 thru 14 242 236 231 225 220 215 210 206 200 193 187 181 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Morton County (cont'd) Age 15 thru 19 224 220 215 209 203 196 189 181 173 167 161 154 Age 20 thru 24 180 183 185 187 188 192 194 195 196 197 197 198 Age 25 thru 29 112 105 98 91 84 78 71 65 59 54 50 45 Age 30 thru 34 138 131 125 119 113 107 101 95 90 85 80 75 Age 35 thru 39 169 162 155 147 140 132 126 120 115 109 103 98 Age 40 thru 44 221 215 208 200 192 184 176 166 157 150 143 136 Age 45 thru 49 318 331 346 363 382 402 417 433 450 466 482 499 Age 50 thru 54 213 215 217 218 218 218 217 217 216 215 214 213 Age 55 thru 59 208 213 218 223 229 236 243 250 255 259 263 268 Age 60 thru 64 154 153 153 152 151 151 150 148 148 146 144 142 Age 65 thru 84 436 435 436 436 436 435 432 429 424 419 415 410 Age 85 & Older 70 72 73 75 77 79 82 83 84 85 86 87

Nemaha County Total Population 10,439 10,432 10,424 10,407 10,389 10,368 10,352 10,332 10,306 10,281 10,271 10,256 Age 0 thru 4 618 605 590 574 555 537 518 499 482 466 449 432 Age 5 thru 9 702 688 673 657 641 623 605 588 570 552 535 517 Age 10 thru 14 743 727 709 690 669 647 626 606 587 568 548 529 Age 15 thru 19 790 788 783 776 767 754 742 728 714 703 691 677 Age 20 thru 24 730 777 832 894 964 1,049 1,131 1,211 1,291 1372 1462 1,557 Age 25 thru 29 450 444 439 435 433 433 435 434 431 425 420 415 Age 30 thru 34 383 364 346 327 308 290 271 254 237 222 208 195 Age 35 thru 39 535 512 488 462 437 411 388 367 349 329 311 293 Age 40 thru 44 824 831 836 840 842 838 837 833 827 824 820 815 Age 45 thru 49 816 836 856 875 893 908 922 937 951 964 977 989 Age 50 thru 54 734 761 791 822 854 887 920 951 981 1,011 1,043 1,073 Age 55 thru 59 541 552 564 576 588 600 612 625 636 645 654 663 Age 60 thru 64 427 423 420 415 411 405 397 390 382 374 367 359 Age 65 thru 84 1,711 1,694 1,674 1,652 1,628 1,600 1,573 1,543 1,510 1,478 1,447 1,414 Age 85 & Older 435 430 423 412 399 386 375 366 358 348 339 328

Neosho County Total Population 16,451 16,406 16,358 16,297 16,238 16,181 16,113 16,046 15,974 15,911 15,847 15,788 Age 0 thru 4 1,008 1,004 1,001 997 994 991 988 988 986 980 974 968 Age 5 thru 9 908 882 855 826 797 772 746 720 694 670 647 623 Age 10 thru 14 1,042 1,013 983 952 920 888 856 825 796 769 741 715 Age 15 thru 19 1,274 1,264 1,248 1,229 1,208 1,184 1,161 1,138 1,116 1,098 1,078 1,057 Age 20 thru 24 1,125 1,154 1,184 1,212 1,241 1,262 1,284 1,301 1,319 1343 1366 1,389 Age 25 thru 29 1,039 1,050 1,065 1,084 1,109 1,141 1,178 1,213 1,241 1,262 1,283 1,308 Age 30 thru 34 801 777 755 734 713 692 670 649 629 608 588 569 Age 35 thru 39 942 913 883 851 821 789 758 730 702 676 650 625 Age 40 thru 44 1,146 1,130 1,113 1,093 1,071 1,051 1,031 1,009 987 968 948 928 Age 45 thru 49 1,307 1,330 1,353 1,375 1,397 1,417 1,431 1,446 1,462 1,478 1,495 1,511 Age 50 thru 54 1,204 1,229 1,254 1,277 1,297 1,313 1,332 1,354 1,376 1,397 1,418 1,438 Age 55 thru 59 1,074 1,110 1,147 1,185 1,225 1,269 1,306 1,344 1,381 1,421 1,462 1,504 Age 60 thru 64 801 800 799 797 794 794 791 788 783 779 774 769 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Neosho County (cont'd) Age 65 thru 84 2,274 2,239 2,203 2,166 2,128 2,090 2,050 2,007 1,966 1,925 1,885 1,845 Age 85 & Older 506 511 515 519 523 528 531 534 536 537 538 539

Ness County Total Population 2,873 2,807 2,740 2,667 2,598 2,534 2,470 2,394 2,322 2,247 2,173 2,100 Age 0 thru 4 128 123 117 110 105 99 94 88 83 78 73 68 Age 5 thru 9 129 120 112 104 96 89 82 75 68 62 57 52 Age 10 thru 14 160 151 142 134 126 119 112 104 98 90 84 78 Age 15 thru 19 161 154 146 137 127 117 108 99 91 84 77 71 Age 20 thru 24 140 145 150 156 163 173 181 190 197 202 208 213 Age 25 thru 29 41 36 31 26 22 18 15 12 10 9 7 6 Age 30 thru 34 91 85 79 73 68 64 60 56 53 48 44 41 Age 35 thru 39 95 84 74 64 55 47 40 34 29 25 21 18 Age 40 thru 44 259 254 249 244 237 229 221 212 202 194 186 177 Age 45 thru 49 275 275 274 272 269 267 264 259 255 250 245 238 Age 50 thru 54 266 272 278 284 290 293 298 300 302 303 303 303 Age 55 thru 59 203 205 206 207 208 211 211 211 211 209 206 204 Age 60 thru 64 159 154 150 144 139 135 130 124 117 112 106 100 Age 65 thru 84 621 606 592 575 560 545 530 512 493 472 452 432 Age 85 & Older 145 143 140 137 133 128 124 118 113 109 104 99

Norton County Total Population 5,631 5,616 5,601 5,579 5,554 5,526 5,491 5,455 5,420 5,387 5,355 5,322 Age 0 thru 4 230 225 220 214 209 203 196 189 182 177 171 165 Age 5 thru 9 253 245 236 227 218 208 198 188 179 171 163 155 Age 10 thru 14 316 308 300 291 282 273 265 256 247 238 230 222 Age 15 thru 19 372 369 367 364 362 356 350 345 340 335 330 324 Age 20 thru 24 459 478 498 518 538 563 590 614 639 662 686 711 Age 25 thru 29 327 324 320 317 315 312 309 305 300 296 291 287 Age 30 thru 34 318 311 305 299 292 285 276 267 259 251 244 236 Age 35 thru 39 362 352 341 329 316 303 289 277 267 256 246 235 Age 40 thru 44 466 467 467 465 461 459 458 457 454 451 448 445 Age 45 thru 49 478 488 499 510 519 526 529 533 539 545 551 557 Age 50 thru 54 394 400 406 411 415 419 422 424 425 428 430 432 Age 55 thru 59 358 367 376 384 393 401 408 415 422 429 436 443 Age 60 thru 64 293 296 300 304 308 313 318 324 328 331 333 336 Age 65 thru 84 728 706 683 661 638 615 592 569 546 525 504 483 Age 85 & Older 277 280 283 285 288 290 291 292 293 292 292 291

Osage County Total Population 17,344 17,476 17,589 17,664 17,740 17,837 17,923 17,987 18,045 18,080 18,112 18,143 Age 0 thru 4 842 826 807 783 758 734 714 691 668 645 621 597 Age 5 thru 9 1,066 1,056 1,044 1,028 1,015 1,004 993 984 975 965 957 948 Age 10 thru 14 1,185 1,170 1,153 1,132 1,113 1,094 1,077 1,060 1,044 1,030 1,017 1,002 Age 15 thru 19 1,323 1,343 1,361 1,377 1,399 1,421 1,445 1,469 1,495 1,520 1,547 1,574 Age 20 thru 24 1,191 1,223 1,260 1,300 1,339 1,381 1,419 1,447 1,460 1479 1,493 1,516 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Osage County (cont'd) Age 25 thru 29 1,129 1,165 1,207 1,256 1,319 1,396 1,470 1,543 1,613 1,672 1,738 1,809 Age 30 thru 34 852 844 839 837 836 837 837 836 830 821 815 808 Age 35 thru 39 903 871 836 798 761 727 695 665 637 608 581 554 Age 40 thru 44 1,418 1,434 1,446 1,456 1,466 1,475 1,484 1,488 1,485 1,488 1,492 1,495 Age 45 thru 49 1,494 1,518 1,540 1,557 1,565 1,561 1,551 1,540 1,536 1,526 1,510 1,490 Age 50 thru 54 1,302 1,332 1,359 1,380 1,393 1,390 1,392 1,397 1,403 1,404 1,398 1,389 Age 55 thru 59 1,114 1,139 1,159 1,175 1,186 1,193 1,192 1,195 1,200 1,199 1,193 1,184 Age 60 thru 64 886 891 893 892 885 870 853 834 817 801 782 761 Age 65 thru 84 2,173 2,190 2,203 2,205 2,210 2,244 2,275 2,300 2,330 2,357 2,389 2,422 Age 85 & Older 466 474 482 488 495 510 526 538 552 565 579 594

Osborne County Total Population 3,941 3,888 3,831 3,772 3,708 3,646 3,579 3,511 3,447 3,382 3,315 3,253 Age 0 thru 4 166 160 154 148 142 137 131 125 119 113 107 102 Age 5 thru 9 166 156 146 135 125 115 106 98 90 83 76 70 Age 10 thru 14 237 226 214 201 188 176 164 153 141 132 122 113 Age 15 thru 19 314 314 312 310 307 302 296 290 286 280 274 268 Age 20 thru 24 229 240 251 265 279 297 315 336 355 370 386 403 Age 25 thru 29 114 108 103 98 92 87 81 75 70 66 61 57 Age 30 thru 34 110 103 95 89 82 75 69 64 59 54 49 45 Age 35 thru 39 149 137 124 112 101 90 80 71 63 57 51 45 Age 40 thru 44 323 321 318 313 306 301 295 287 280 273 266 258 Age 45 thru 49 353 355 357 358 359 358 356 352 349 345 341 337 Age 50 thru 54 355 369 385 401 418 430 441 451 461 473 483 494 Age 55 thru 59 228 226 223 219 215 211 207 203 200 195 190 184 Age 60 thru 64 240 242 244 246 248 252 256 257 257 256 255 253 Age 65 thru 84 743 720 697 673 647 621 595 568 542 516 491 467 Age 85 & Older 214 211 208 204 199 194 187 181 175 169 163 157

Ottawa County Total Population 6,198 6,238 6,279 6,317 6,347 6,374 6,399 6,421 6,442 6,459 6,479 6,499 Age 0 thru 4 322 320 318 316 312 309 304 298 292 286 281 275 Age 5 thru 9 328 319 310 300 289 278 267 257 246 236 226 216 Age 10 thru 14 393 385 377 367 357 347 338 330 321 311 301 291 Age 15 thru 19 455 456 456 454 449 439 429 419 412 405 398 390 Age 20 thru 24 412 446 486 531 581 638 687 743 797 856 921 990 Age 25 thru 29 300 297 294 292 289 288 287 285 283 279 274 270 Age 30 thru 34 325 323 321 320 319 317 314 310 306 301 296 290 Age 35 thru 39 312 297 281 264 247 230 215 201 189 177 165 153 Age 40 thru 44 541 548 554 559 560 562 563 563 562 562 560 558 Age 45 thru 49 551 565 578 590 600 607 615 622 630 636 642 647 Age 50 thru 54 516 535 555 575 596 613 632 650 667 684 701 717 Age 55 thru 59 397 406 413 420 426 431 438 446 452 456 460 463 Age 60 thru 64 359 367 376 385 394 406 418 424 432 438 444 450 Age 65 thru 84 829 821 814 805 796 784 774 762 749 734 718 703 Age 85 & Older 158 153 146 139 132 125 118 111 104 98 92 86 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Pawnee County Total Population 6,625 6,558 6,476 6,398 6,317 6,244 6,168 6,092 6,018 5,933 5,859 5,790 Age 0 thru 4 297 287 276 265 253 241 230 219 210 200 191 181 Age 5 thru 9 363 355 346 338 331 325 318 312 304 296 288 280 Age 10 thru 14 354 338 321 304 287 271 255 240 226 212 200 188 Age 15 thru 19 572 568 561 553 545 537 527 517 507 497 487 477 Age 20 thru 24 463 481 498 516 535 558 582 608 635 655 677 701 Age 25 thru 29 308 299 289 280 271 266 260 253 245 236 228 221 Age 30 thru 34 326 316 307 298 289 277 265 253 243 232 223 213 Age 35 thru 39 335 315 295 275 256 239 224 211 198 185 172 161 Age 40 thru 44 506 500 493 485 476 470 462 452 442 432 423 413 Age 45 thru 49 530 525 517 509 499 486 472 459 448 437 426 415 Age 50 thru 54 603 622 642 664 686 705 730 752 774 793 814 835 Age 55 thru 59 429 434 438 441 444 450 453 455 457 458 459 461 Age 60 thru 64 384 388 391 395 398 401 403 404 403 403 403 404 Age 65 thru 84 864 834 802 770 738 707 676 645 614 586 558 531 Age 85 & Older 291 296 300 305 309 311 311 312 312 311 310 309

Phillips County Total Population 5,362 5,289 5,221 5,142 5,066 4,990 4,912 4,832 4,752 4,670 4,589 4,511 Age 0 thru 4 272 265 258 250 243 235 229 220 212 204 196 189 Age 5 thru 9 282 272 262 252 242 232 222 212 203 194 185 176 Age 10 thru 14 310 296 281 265 250 234 219 204 191 179 168 157 Age 15 thru 19 407 404 401 397 393 387 382 378 372 366 359 353 Age 20 thru 24 246 251 256 260 264 271 279 283 285 288 292 295 Age 25 thru 29 159 149 139 130 120 112 103 96 90 83 77 71 Age 30 thru 34 201 189 179 169 158 149 139 129 120 112 104 97 Age 35 thru 39 271 257 243 228 215 201 188 177 167 156 146 137 Age 40 thru 44 398 392 387 381 376 368 360 351 342 334 325 317 Age 45 thru 49 417 414 411 406 400 395 387 380 372 365 357 349 Age 50 thru 54 485 494 504 512 519 523 526 529 532 536 539 541 Age 55 thru 59 443 460 478 497 518 542 565 590 611 631 651 672 Age 60 thru 64 293 290 287 283 279 275 270 264 260 254 249 243 Age 65 thru 84 965 948 932 915 897 880 864 846 827 806 785 764 Age 85 & Older 213 208 203 197 192 186 179 173 168 162 156 150

Pottawatomie County Total Population 19,532 19,721 19,912 20,105 20,306 20,498 20,691 20,878 21,068 21,253 21,449 21,650 Age 0 thru 4 1,339 1,338 1,334 1,328 1,321 1,319 1,314 1,309 1,302 1,293 1,284 1,274 Age 5 thru 9 1,295 1,277 1,257 1,234 1,209 1,184 1,158 1,134 1,109 1,085 1,060 1,035 Age 10 thru 14 1,399 1,381 1,361 1,337 1,310 1,283 1,254 1,226 1,201 1,175 1,149 1,123 Age 15 thru 19 1,500 1,506 1,507 1,506 1,504 1,496 1,489 1,480 1,472 1,466 1,458 1,448 Age 20 thru 24 1,483 1,562 1,648 1,744 1,849 1,954 2,063 2,165 2,269 2379 2,496 2,620 Age 25 thru 29 1,287 1,307 1,332 1,363 1,402 1,444 1,488 1,529 1,565 1,593 1,624 1,656 Age 30 thru 34 1,032 1,012 995 979 963 947 927 904 884 862 842 822 Age 35 thru 39 1,110 1,074 1,036 996 957 920 887 858 829 797 766 735 Age 40 thru 44 1,538 1,545 1,550 1,554 1,555 1,550 1,542 1,537 1,530 1,525 1,519 1,512 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Pottawatomie County (cont'd) Age 45 thru 49 1,568 1,607 1,645 1,680 1,713 1,741 1,766 1,788 1,815 1,843 1,870 1,896 Age 50 thru 54 1,474 1,535 1,598 1,660 1,720 1,778 1,842 1,912 1,981 2,051 2,121 2,191 Age 55 thru 59 1,225 1,286 1,350 1,419 1,492 1,569 1,646 1,726 1,807 1,888 1,973 2,062 Age 60 thru 64 809 825 840 855 869 882 896 904 914 925 936 946 Age 65 thru 84 2,063 2,053 2,043 2,032 2,022 2,007 1,993 1,978 1,961 1,941 1,921 1,900 Age 85 & Older 410 413 416 418 420 424 426 428 429 430 430 430

Pratt County Total Population 9,476 9,463 9,456 9,440 9,418 9,394 9,369 9,342 9,320 9,298 9,283 9,264 Age 0 thru 4 525 519 513 504 494 484 473 463 453 442 431 419 Age 5 thru 9 523 511 499 486 474 462 450 438 425 411 398 384 Age 10 thru 14 528 508 487 466 444 422 401 379 359 340 322 304 Age 15 thru 19 718 701 682 659 634 612 589 569 548 528 507 486 Age 20 thru 24 928 991 1,061 1,138 1,220 1,302 1,381 1,462 1,547 1635 1,727 1,823 Age 25 thru 29 466 464 462 460 460 460 459 458 457 452 447 441 Age 30 thru 34 391 377 365 354 342 330 317 304 292 279 267 255 Age 35 thru 39 445 422 399 376 354 333 313 295 278 261 244 228 Age 40 thru 44 639 626 610 591 569 546 524 503 482 463 444 425 Age 45 thru 49 812 820 825 827 824 820 818 813 808 803 796 788 Age 50 thru 54 899 948 1,004 1,064 1,129 1,192 1,255 1,313 1,373 1,436 1,501 1,567 Age 55 thru 59 492 495 498 500 500 501 500 501 501 498 495 491 Age 60 thru 64 432 431 429 426 421 416 411 404 397 390 383 375 Age 65 thru 84 1,324 1,293 1,262 1,227 1,189 1,148 1,110 1,072 1,034 996 959 920 Age 85 & Older 354 357 360 362 364 366 368 368 366 364 362 358

Rawlins County Total Population 2,576 2,527 2,477 2,423 2,373 2,315 2,260 2,204 2,150 2,098 2,043 1,989 Age 0 thru 4 77 71 65 60 54 48 43 38 33 30 26 23 Age 5 thru 9 103 95 87 79 71 63 56 50 45 40 35 30 Age 10 thru 14 146 137 127 118 108 99 90 82 73 66 59 52 Age 15 thru 19 173 167 159 151 142 131 121 112 104 96 88 80 Age 20 thru 24 209 233 262 297 341 386 430 471 514 558 604 652 Age 25 thru 29 29 25 22 18 15 13 11 97654 Age 30 thru 34 60 54 49 43 38 33 29 25 21 18 15 13 Age 35 thru 39 97 88 80 71 63 55 48 42 36 32 27 23 Age 40 thru 44 189 182 175 167 158 148 139 129 120 111 103 94 Age 45 thru 49 230 227 224 219 213 205 198 191 183 174 164 154 Age 50 thru 54 246 250 254 257 259 258 257 254 251 246 240 233 Age 55 thru 59 192 191 190 188 185 184 179 175 170 164 157 149 Age 60 thru 64 165 163 160 157 155 150 146 142 137 131 124 117 Age 65 thru 84 524 508 488 465 441 415 390 366 343 318 294 269 Age 85 & Older 136 136 135 133 130 127 123 118 113 108 102 96

Reno County Total Population 63,714 63,792 63,855 63,915 63,948 63,953 63,950 63,916 63,850 63,795 63,750 63,732 Age 0 thru 4 3,969 3,959 3,946 3,928 3,906 3,878 3,848 3,817 3,786 3,754 3,721 3,688 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Reno County (cont'd) Age 5 thru 9 3,777 3,730 3,681 3,631 3,581 3,535 3,484 3,431 3,373 3,315 3,259 3,203 Age 10 thru 14 3,745 3,661 3,575 3,484 3,390 3,298 3,209 3,118 3,029 2,943 2,858 2,775 Age 15 thru 19 4,308 4,261 4,200 4,131 4,058 3,989 3,918 3,847 3,777 3,710 3,640 3,571 Age 20 thru 24 4,511 4,609 4,703 4,791 4,867 4,913 4,962 5,004 5,040 5099 5158 5,215 Age 25 thru 29 4,255 4,284 4,325 4,380 4,451 4,537 4,626 4,711 4,783 4,828 4,878 4,933 Age 30 thru 34 3,401 3,333 3,278 3,229 3,180 3,128 3,072 3,010 2,948 2,883 2,820 2,761 Age 35 thru 39 3,482 3,351 3,218 3,085 2,955 2,830 2,713 2,605 2,503 2,397 2,293 2,194 Age 40 thru 44 4,566 4,522 4,467 4,404 4,333 4,255 4,181 4,105 4,027 3,959 3,888 3,817 Age 45 thru 49 5,018 5,071 5,121 5,163 5,194 5,225 5,250 5,262 5,276 5,297 5,315 5,333 Age 50 thru 54 5,004 5,165 5,330 5,498 5,660 5,805 5,960 6,122 6,286 6,453 6,623 6,795 Age 55 thru 59 4,176 4,330 4,486 4,649 4,821 5,002 5,171 5,345 5,522 5,698 5,880 6,070 Age 60 thru 64 3,028 3,060 3,093 3,127 3,163 3,202 3,241 3,273 3,295 3,317 3,340 3,364 Age 65 thru 84 8,569 8,511 8,448 8,389 8,320 8,247 8,165 8,078 7,983 7,889 7,794 7,700 Age 85 & Older 1,905 1,945 1,984 2,026 2,069 2,109 2,150 2,188 2,222 2,253 2,283 2,313

Republic County Total Population 4,989 4,904 4,822 4,730 4,637 4,535 4,435 4,329 4,225 4,119 4,020 3,919 Age 0 thru 4 204 197 190 182 174 166 158 149 142 134 126 118 Age 5 thru 9 213 203 193 183 173 163 154 145 135 126 118 109 Age 10 thru 14 245 230 214 198 181 165 150 137 124 113 103 93 Age 15 thru 19 353 348 341 334 326 313 300 286 272 261 249 237 Age 20 thru 24 289 309 332 358 387 419 462 504 546 579 616 655 Age 25 thru 29 96 87 79 71 64 57 50 44 39 35 31 27 Age 30 thru 34 165 155 146 137 128 119 110 101 93 85 78 72 Age 35 thru 39 182 167 152 137 123 110 98 87 78 69 62 55 Age 40 thru 44 359 349 338 326 313 298 283 269 255 242 229 216 Age 45 thru 49 448 449 450 448 443 437 429 419 409 400 390 379 Age 50 thru 54 470 480 491 501 511 518 525 532 539 541 543 543 Age 55 thru 59 361 364 367 368 370 369 364 358 350 344 338 331 Age 60 thru 64 302 299 296 292 287 285 282 276 269 261 254 246 Age 65 thru 84 1,082 1,053 1,025 994 963 929 891 852 812 774 736 699 Age 85 & Older 220 214 208 201 194 187 179 170 162 155 147 139

Rice County Total Population 10,439 10,436 10,421 10,413 10,392 10,368 10,330 10,291 10,257 10,225 10,198 10,175 Age 0 thru 4 590 585 580 575 569 561 550 540 530 521 512 503 Age 5 thru 9 554 537 520 503 485 470 455 439 423 408 393 378 Age 10 thru 14 620 603 585 567 548 528 505 484 464 447 429 412 Age 15 thru 19 950 948 939 928 913 897 881 865 852 839 826 812 Age 20 thru 24 1,197 1,245 1,294 1,344 1,394 1,446 1,500 1,560 1,616 1672 1731 1,789 Age 25 thru 29 529 531 534 539 547 556 562 564 563 564 565 567 Age 30 thru 34 434 421 410 399 389 378 368 359 348 337 326 315 Age 35 thru 39 442 420 396 373 350 329 309 290 274 257 241 226 Age 40 thru 44 674 666 655 643 628 612 595 578 564 550 536 522 Age 45 thru 49 840 859 877 897 915 932 947 960 973 987 1,000 1,014 Age 50 thru 54 742 764 787 814 839 861 883 905 929 951 974 997 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Rice County (cont'd) Age 55 thru 59 590 601 611 622 634 647 656 666 674 682 690 699 Age 60 thru 64 479 476 472 468 463 460 455 448 442 435 429 423 Age 65 thru 84 1,469 1,449 1,428 1,406 1,381 1,352 1,324 1,294 1,268 1,239 1,211 1,184 Age 85 & Older 329 331 333 335 337 339 340 339 337 336 335 334

Riley County Total Population 62,370 61,988 61,624 61,170 60,669 60,348 60,103 59,897 59,694 59,491 59,298 59,101 Age 0 thru 4 4,035 4,025 4,027 4,034 4,046 4,061 4,069 4,072 4,072 4,070 4,071 4,073 Age 5 thru 9 2,696 2,610 2,528 2,446 2,364 2,292 2,227 2,162 2,094 2,028 1,965 1,902 Age 10 thru 14 2,322 2,222 2,124 2,021 1,916 1,825 1,738 1,656 1,580 1,508 1,438 1,370 Age 15 thru 19 6,491 6,371 6,231 6,064 5,889 5,758 5,632 5,518 5,409 5,298 5,184 5,066 Age 20 thru 24 16,635 16,675 16,695 16,661 16,574 16,502 16,425 16,365 16,340 16322 16296 16,255 Age 25 thru 29 7,456 7,545 7,670 7,825 8,020 8,254 8,531 8,798 9,000 9,186 9,387 9,602 Age 30 thru 34 3,691 3,613 3,550 3,493 3,437 3,386 3,332 3,269 3,212 3,151 3,094 3,038 Age 35 thru 39 2,631 2,515 2,404 2,295 2,190 2,095 2,005 1,926 1,848 1,768 1,691 1,617 Age 40 thru 44 2,464 2,366 2,266 2,161 2,053 1,958 1,875 1,792 1,714 1,641 1,570 1,500 Age 45 thru 49 2,699 2,677 2,651 2,612 2,563 2,523 2,484 2,448 2,417 2,389 2,358 2,325 Age 50 thru 54 2,490 2,514 2,530 2,530 2,518 2,501 2,491 2,488 2,490 2,499 2,504 2,504 Age 55 thru 59 2,158 2,225 2,290 2,351 2,410 2,485 2,562 2,641 2,727 2,808 2,891 2,976 Age 60 thru 64 1,292 1,282 1,271 1,257 1,240 1,226 1,214 1,201 1,186 1,174 1,161 1,149 Age 65 thru 84 4,306 4,313 4,321 4,323 4,321 4,324 4,325 4,332 4,340 4,348 4,352 4,354 Age 85 & Older 1,004 1,035 1,066 1,097 1,128 1,158 1,193 1,229 1,265 1,301 1,336 1,370

Rooks County Total Population 5,260 5,211 5,161 5,105 5,052 4,999 4,945 4,893 4,838 4,783 4,731 4,679 Age 0 thru 4 268 261 254 246 238 231 223 216 209 201 194 186 Age 5 thru 9 271 259 247 234 222 210 198 187 176 166 157 147 Age 10 thru 14 326 312 298 283 269 255 241 228 215 203 191 180 Age 15 thru 19 371 368 363 358 352 345 338 332 325 318 310 302 Age 20 thru 24 411 436 464 495 530 567 605 644 683 720 760 802 Age 25 thru 29 192 183 173 164 155 146 138 129 121 114 107 100 Age 30 thru 34 250 241 233 224 216 207 199 190 182 174 166 158 Age 35 thru 39 256 242 227 211 195 181 168 156 144 133 123 114 Age 40 thru 44 414 410 404 398 391 382 373 365 357 349 340 331 Age 45 thru 49 461 473 486 498 511 522 532 540 546 554 561 568 Age 50 thru 54 365 370 375 379 381 382 383 385 387 388 388 387 Age 55 thru 59 335 342 350 358 367 376 384 391 397 402 407 412 Age 60 thru 64 242 236 231 224 217 211 205 199 192 185 179 172 Age 65 thru 84 885 866 846 825 803 782 760 737 714 690 666 643 Age 85 & Older 213 212 210 208 205 202 198 194 190 186 182 177

Rush County Total Population 3,344 3,317 3,287 3,260 3,230 3,202 3,175 3,143 3,114 3,085 3,057 3,031 Age 0 thru 4 180 179 179 178 177 176 175 173 171 168 166 163 Age 5 thru 9 148 141 134 128 121 115 109 103 98 92 87 82 Age 10 thru 14 184 177 170 162 154 147 139 132 126 120 113 107 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Rush County (cont'd) Age 15 thru 19 212 210 207 204 200 196 192 187 181 177 172 168 Age 20 thru 24 235 254 274 296 321 347 376 405 435 465 498 532 Age 25 thru 29 147 146 144 143 142 140 139 138 135 133 130 128 Age 30 thru 34 126 120 114 109 104 99 94 87 82 77 73 68 Age 35 thru 39 152 144 136 128 119 112 106 101 95 89 84 78 Age 40 thru 44 231 228 223 218 212 205 197 190 184 178 172 165 Age 45 thru 49 274 276 277 277 276 273 270 266 262 259 256 252 Age 50 thru 54 283 290 296 302 308 313 318 322 326 329 332 335 Age 55 thru 59 241 247 252 259 266 275 282 288 295 300 304 309 Age 60 thru 64 165 161 157 153 149 145 141 137 132 128 123 119 Age 65 thru 84 630 610 592 573 553 534 515 495 476 457 437 418 Age 85 & Older 136 134 132 130 128 125 122 119 116 113 110 107

Russell County Total Population 6,716 6,653 6,585 6,516 6,438 6,356 6,272 6,190 6,110 6,027 5,950 5,879 Age 0 thru 4 343 339 335 331 326 321 315 310 305 299 292 286 Age 5 thru 9 313 299 286 272 258 245 233 221 208 197 186 175 Age 10 thru 14 377 364 351 338 325 310 296 282 270 257 245 233 Age 15 thru 19 388 377 364 349 333 317 302 289 275 263 251 238 Age 20 thru 24 465 495 528 565 607 654 699 741 782 826 873 924 Age 25 thru 29 236 227 217 209 200 194 189 185 178 170 163 156 Age 30 thru 34 264 253 244 235 225 215 205 194 185 175 166 158 Age 35 thru 39 300 280 260 240 221 201 183 167 152 139 127 116 Age 40 thru 44 507 502 496 490 482 476 468 461 453 443 434 425 Age 45 thru 49 555 559 563 565 566 562 558 554 550 546 541 537 Age 50 thru 54 536 545 553 561 565 569 571 574 578 580 582 583 Age 55 thru 59 484 492 499 506 513 518 520 521 524 526 527 528 Age 60 thru 64 389 388 386 384 382 378 377 375 371 366 361 356 Age 65 thru 84 1,217 1,186 1,152 1,117 1,079 1,039 999 960 923 886 850 814 Age 85 & Older 342 347 351 354 356 357 357 356 356 354 352 350

Saline County Total Population 54,484 54,719 54,916 55,092 55,243 55,383 55,528 55,684 55,831 55,978 56,126 56,270 Age 0 thru 4 3,610 3,609 3,601 3,588 3,565 3,544 3,517 3,494 3,474 3,452 3,428 3,402 Age 5 thru 9 3,488 3,449 3,403 3,353 3,298 3,242 3,192 3,138 3,081 3,030 2,977 2,923 Age 10 thru 14 3,674 3,641 3,604 3,561 3,515 3,473 3,424 3,374 3,326 3,279 3,231 3,182 Age 15 thru 19 3,610 3,574 3,523 3,462 3,396 3,338 3,287 3,241 3,190 3,140 3,088 3,033 Age 20 thru 24 4,048 4,155 4,262 4,369 4,472 4,541 4,606 4,677 4,749 4835 4,922 5,007 Age 25 thru 29 3,616 3,625 3,640 3,661 3,694 3,747 3,800 3,838 3,867 3,884 3,903 3,923 Age 30 thru 34 3,191 3,133 3,080 3,028 2,973 2,909 2,838 2,772 2,706 2,643 2,582 2,522 Age 35 thru 39 3,398 3,318 3,233 3,147 3,063 2,985 2,915 2,854 2,790 2,717 2,644 2,572 Age 40 thru 44 3,961 3,935 3,901 3,863 3,818 3,765 3,714 3,666 3,619 3,575 3,529 3,480 Age 45 thru 49 4,275 4,340 4,402 4,457 4,505 4,546 4,592 4,628 4,669 4,713 4,754 4,793 Age 50 thru 54 4,049 4,174 4,300 4,424 4,542 4,654 4,775 4,910 5,043 5,176 5,310 5,444 Age 55 thru 59 3,520 3,676 3,836 4,006 4,190 4,392 4,582 4,775 4,977 5,181 5,394 5,616 Age 60 thru 64 2,349 2,376 2,403 2,429 2,459 2,489 2,521 2,546 2,569 2,590 2,611 2,633 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Saline County (cont'd) Age 65 thru 84 6,499 6,492 6,480 6,468 6,449 6,427 6,405 6,380 6,351 6,319 6,285 6,248 Age 85 & Older 1,196 1,222 1,248 1,276 1,304 1,331 1,360 1,391 1,420 1,444 1,468 1,492

Scott County Total Population 4,508 4,453 4,397 4,344 4,287 4,228 4,168 4,099 4,032 3,960 3,886 3,814 Age 0 thru 4 298 294 291 288 284 282 279 274 268 262 255 248 Age 5 thru 9 258 247 235 224 213 202 192 183 173 163 153 144 Age 10 thru 14 295 282 268 254 240 226 212 199 187 175 164 153 Age 15 thru 19 351 344 336 328 320 312 303 293 283 273 262 252 Age 20 thru 24 321 335 350 366 385 400 414 427 442 455 467 480 Age 25 thru 29 188 179 171 163 155 147 140 133 126 119 112 105 Age 30 thru 34 230 223 216 211 206 201 196 190 185 178 171 164 Age 35 thru 39 219 205 190 176 162 149 138 126 115 105 96 87 Age 40 thru 44 333 325 316 308 299 288 277 266 255 245 234 223 Age 45 thru 49 398 398 397 396 393 388 382 375 368 361 354 346 Age 50 thru 54 415 425 436 447 457 467 474 478 482 486 490 493 Age 55 thru 59 369 382 395 410 425 445 466 490 510 524 539 554 Age 60 thru 64 247 249 250 250 252 252 252 250 248 246 243 240 Age 65 thru 84 466 448 431 411 389 366 344 322 301 283 265 248 Age 85 & Older 120 117 115 112 107 103 99 93 89 85 81 77

Sedgwick County Total Population 471,949 476,766 480,456 480,866 478,581 479,042 482,732 485,791 488,672 491,124 493,527 496,002 Age 0 thru 4 37,273 37,792 38,237 38,416 38,367 38,504 38,863 39,127 39,330 39,464 39,577 39,680 Age 5 thru 9 33,870 33,900 33,821 33,483 33,016 32,779 32,833 32,908 32,985 33,047 33,150 33,239 Age 10 thru 14 34,580 34,779 34,918 34,807 34,574 34,561 34,811 35,032 35,259 35,512 35,820 36,119 Age 15 thru 19 32,909 33,219 33,410 33,367 33,225 33,354 33,782 34,233 34,685 35,097 35,554 36,003 Age 20 thru 24 32,685 32,446 32,216 31,799 31,083 30,571 30,207 29,643 28,975 28436 27,823 27,385 Age 25 thru 29 34,472 34,871 35,257 35,547 35,806 36,358 37,134 37,841 38,432 38,913 39,481 40,089 Age 30 thru 34 31,152 31,171 31,226 31,188 31,049 31,103 31,322 31,398 31,406 31,385 31,440 31,523 Age 35 thru 39 30,493 30,160 29,751 29,196 28,598 28,236 28,104 27,918 27,674 27,338 27,048 26,772 Age 40 thru 44 34,926 35,154 35,252 35,135 34,894 34,866 35,062 35,142 35,172 35,245 35,354 35,458 Age 45 thru 49 36,865 37,331 37,612 37,510 36,959 36,240 35,754 35,337 34,991 34,596 34,032 33,393 Age 50 thru 54 33,704 34,671 35,505 35,992 36,004 35,789 35,873 36,045 36,280 36,458 36,453 36,340 Age 55 thru 59 26,902 27,818 28,654 29,300 29,679 29,972 30,360 30,771 31,237 31,617 31,873 32,065 Age 60 thru 64 18,270 18,495 18,678 18,731 18,617 18,462 18,430 18,395 18,338 18,210 18,016 17,795 Age 65 thru 84 45,734 46,464 47,050 47,208 47,204 48,220 49,552 50,747 52,015 53,280 54,686 56,178 Age 85 & Older 8,114 8,495 8,869 9,187 9,506 10,027 10,645 11,254 11,893 12,526 13,220 13,963

Seward County Total Population 23,886 24,199 24,489 24,769 25,043 25,294 25,532 25,768 26,008 26,239 26,476 26,707 Age 0 thru 4 2,629 2,708 2,786 2,868 2,951 3,030 3,114 3,192 3,265 3,343 3,423 3,503 Age 5 thru 9 2,050 2,068 2,082 2,092 2,101 2,109 2,111 2,113 2,121 2,124 2,127 2,128 Age 10 thru 14 1,896 1,905 1,912 1,916 1,919 1,918 1,913 1,906 1,898 1,893 1,887 1,880 Age 15 thru 19 1,900 1,907 1,906 1,899 1,891 1,883 1,874 1,869 1,862 1,854 1,844 1,832 Age 20 thru 24 1,504 1,493 1,476 1,452 1,420 1,383 1,341 1,300 1,266 1238 1,209 1,179 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Seward County (cont'd) Age 25 thru 29 1,738 1,733 1,725 1,716 1,706 1,700 1,693 1,687 1,679 1,667 1,654 1,640 Age 30 thru 34 1,631 1,625 1,619 1,610 1,597 1,578 1,555 1,531 1,509 1,490 1,471 1,450 Age 35 thru 39 1,769 1,779 1,787 1,793 1,799 1,810 1,819 1,824 1,831 1,832 1,833 1,834 Age 40 thru 44 1,726 1,751 1,773 1,796 1,816 1,829 1,846 1,864 1,880 1,895 1,909 1,922 Age 45 thru 49 1,673 1,726 1,780 1,837 1,893 1,945 1,994 2,043 2,096 2,148 2,201 2,255 Age 50 thru 54 1,463 1,527 1,594 1,664 1,738 1,812 1,895 1,978 2,059 2,141 2,226 2,314 Age 55 thru 59 1,099 1,144 1,192 1,245 1,302 1,361 1,416 1,475 1,534 1,591 1,652 1,715 Age 60 thru 64 764 781 798 817 839 862 884 905 925 942 961 980 Age 65 thru 84 1,640 1,634 1,628 1,620 1,614 1,604 1,594 1,584 1,572 1,558 1,544 1,529 Age 85 & Older 404 418 431 444 457 470 483 497 511 523 535 546

Shawnee County Total Population 173,570 174,685 175,476 176,066 176,721 177,713 178,611 179,412 180,178 180,822 181,520 182,290 Age 0 thru 4 12,143 12,292 12,425 12,542 12,661 12,784 12,878 12,951 13,006 13,039 13,068 13,096 Age 5 thru 9 11,130 11,135 11,118 11,090 11,089 11,125 11,163 11,216 11,269 11,323 11,400 11,476 Age 10 thru 14 11,270 11,254 11,224 11,175 11,152 11,158 11,186 11,211 11,237 11,269 11,323 11,377 Age 15 thru 19 11,837 11,903 11,932 11,942 11,989 12,080 12,200 12,340 12,482 12,614 12,767 12,919 Age 20 thru 24 11,024 10,795 10,566 10,320 10,019 9,762 9,491 9,157 8,803 8492 8,162 7,891 Age 25 thru 29 11,936 12,105 12,290 12,527 12,848 13,246 13,656 14,030 14,354 14,619 14,929 15,265 Age 30 thru 34 10,284 10,226 10,181 10,157 10,161 10,178 10,154 10,099 10,019 9,947 9,899 9,860 Age 35 thru 39 10,204 10,002 9,780 9,566 9,392 9,240 9,088 8,927 8,745 8,557 8,387 8,223 Age 40 thru 44 12,261 12,237 12,175 12,109 12,070 12,055 12,023 11,960 11,884 11,818 11,769 11,719 Age 45 thru 49 13,463 13,473 13,422 13,309 13,118 12,831 12,541 12,280 12,047 11,806 11,519 11,215 Age 50 thru 54 13,751 14,070 14,339 14,551 14,668 14,636 14,623 14,655 14,715 14,755 14,730 14,667 Age 55 thru 59 11,975 12,414 12,833 13,251 13,645 13,971 14,250 14,564 14,882 15,163 15,399 15,616 Age 60 thru 64 8,157 8,238 8,306 8,363 8,398 8,385 8,356 8,321 8,291 8,234 8,153 8,063 Age 65 thru 84 20,713 21,026 21,286 21,488 21,746 22,343 22,920 23,460 24,033 24,613 25,263 25,960 Age 85 & Older 3,422 3,515 3,599 3,676 3,765 3,919 4,082 4,241 4,411 4,573 4,752 4,943

Sheridan County Total Population 2,529 2,496 2,468 2,442 2,413 2,382 2,351 2,316 2,282 2,246 2,217 2,184 Age 0 thru 4 125 121 118 116 112 108 105 101 97 92 88 84 Age 5 thru 9 111 104 97 90 83 77 70 64 58 53 48 44 Age 10 thru 14 153 143 134 124 115 105 96 88 81 74 68 62 Age 15 thru 19 214 213 211 209 206 199 193 186 180 174 168 162 Age 20 thru 24 181 193 208 224 242 265 288 310 334 354 376 400 Age 25 thru 29 53 48 44 40 36 32 30 27 24 22 20 17 Age 30 thru 34 74 69 64 60 55 50 46 41 37 34 31 28 Age 35 thru 39 91 82 73 65 57 50 44 39 34 30 27 23 Age 40 thru 44 215 213 210 207 203 198 192 186 180 174 168 162 Age 45 thru 49 237 238 238 238 237 235 232 228 223 219 214 209 Age 50 thru 54 256 267 278 290 303 315 325 335 344 352 361 368 Age 55 thru 59 170 172 175 178 180 183 185 188 189 189 189 188 Age 60 thru 64 120 116 112 107 103 98 92 87 82 77 73 68 Age 65 thru 84 469 460 452 443 434 423 411 398 384 370 356 342 Age 85 & Older 60 57 54 51 47 44 42 38 35 32 30 27 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Sherman County Total Population 6,052 6,000 5,938 5,871 5,802 5,730 5,661 5,585 5,503 5,423 5,340 5,269 Age 0 thru 4 335 327 318 310 301 293 284 275 266 258 249 241 Age 5 thru 9 330 318 307 295 284 275 266 257 247 237 228 218 Age 10 thru 14 358 345 331 317 302 288 273 260 247 235 224 213 Age 15 thru 19 538 532 522 511 499 489 480 471 460 449 438 428 Age 20 thru 24 415 417 416 413 409 402 395 387 380 374 368 363 Age 25 thru 29 287 279 272 264 257 252 248 245 240 233 227 221 Age 30 thru 34 255 245 236 226 217 205 196 186 177 169 160 153 Age 35 thru 39 268 253 238 223 209 197 185 174 163 152 142 133 Age 40 thru 44 405 399 392 384 374 363 353 344 333 324 314 305 Age 45 thru 49 504 509 513 517 520 524 527 529 532 533 533 534 Age 50 thru 54 461 470 479 489 498 504 510 514 517 522 527 532 Age 55 thru 59 387 393 398 403 408 414 419 425 431 435 438 442 Age 60 thru 64 352 355 359 363 367 370 373 372 372 373 373 374 Age 65 thru 84 935 929 921 912 903 892 881 867 853 838 823 809 Age 85 & Older 222 229 236 244 254 262 271 279 285 291 296 303

Smith County Total Population 3,999 3,940 3,879 3,816 3,752 3,685 3,621 3,559 3,489 3,420 3,355 3,288 Age 0 thru 4 151 146 141 136 131 127 123 120 116 111 106 101 Age 5 thru 9 163 154 146 137 128 119 110 101 93 86 80 73 Age 10 thru 14 215 205 194 183 171 160 149 139 129 120 111 103 Age 15 thru 19 265 260 254 247 240 231 222 215 207 199 190 182 Age 20 thru 24 231 248 267 289 314 344 380 414 449 481 515 552 Age 25 thru 29 119 115 110 106 102 99 95 91 86 82 78 74 Age 30 thru 34 107 98 90 82 74 67 60 53 48 43 39 34 Age 35 thru 39 169 157 145 133 121 109 100 91 83 75 68 62 Age 40 thru 44 325 322 319 314 310 302 294 287 279 271 263 254 Age 45 thru 49 347 350 353 355 357 356 352 349 344 340 336 331 Age 50 thru 54 314 318 321 323 325 324 325 324 322 320 318 314 Age 55 thru 59 287 291 296 300 305 312 315 317 317 317 317 316 Age 60 thru 64 214 210 204 199 193 187 180 174 167 161 154 147 Age 65 thru 84 873 852 830 808 783 756 730 704 676 648 620 592 Age 85 & Older 219 214 209 204 198 192 186 180 173 166 160 153

Stafford County Total Population 4,381 4,336 4,282 4,221 4,162 4,102 4,046 3,985 3,927 3,871 3,814 3,757 Age 0 thru 4 203 196 188 179 171 162 153 143 135 128 121 114 Age 5 thru 9 247 238 228 218 208 200 192 183 174 166 158 150 Age 10 thru 14 283 271 258 243 229 215 202 190 179 168 158 148 Age 15 thru 19 384 387 389 390 391 388 386 384 381 378 375 372 Age 20 thru 24 248 259 270 282 296 309 323 335 347 358 370 382 Age 25 thru 29 149 143 136 130 124 118 113 109 103 98 93 88 Age 30 thru 34 144 134 125 116 108 100 92 86 80 74 68 62 Age 35 thru 39 222 209 195 181 167 154 142 130 120 111 102 94 Age 40 thru 44 372 371 368 364 358 351 344 337 330 324 317 309 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Stafford County (cont'd) Age 45 thru 49 383 387 390 392 393 392 390 385 382 380 377 374 Age 50 thru 54 394 409 426 444 463 483 504 527 549 568 586 605 Age 55 thru 59 271 274 276 277 279 281 282 282 282 282 281 280 Age 60 thru 64 226 226 225 224 221 220 219 217 214 211 208 205 Age 65 thru 84 668 644 620 594 568 544 522 498 475 452 430 408 Age 85 & Older 187 188 188 187 186 185 182 179 176 173 170 166

Stanton County Total Population 2,227 2,221 2,216 2,205 2,193 2,179 2,160 2,146 2,127 2,109 2,091 2,067 Age 0 thru 4 164 161 159 156 153 150 146 142 139 136 132 128 Age 5 thru 9 158 154 149 144 139 135 130 125 120 116 111 106 Age 10 thru 14 169 164 161 156 151 147 142 136 130 126 121 116 Age 15 thru 19 164 162 160 157 154 150 146 144 141 138 134 131 Age 20 thru 24 127 126 125 123 121 119 116 114 111 108 106 103 Age 25 thru 29 118 115 112 109 106 103 100 96 92 89 86 82 Age 30 thru 34 127 123 120 116 113 109 105 102 98 94 90 86 Age 35 thru 39 143 139 135 130 125 119 115 110 105 100 96 91 Age 40 thru 44 191 194 196 197 198 197 198 199 198 198 198 197 Age 45 thru 49 176 178 180 181 182 184 183 183 183 183 182 181 Age 50 thru 54 170 179 190 203 216 229 242 258 271 284 299 313 Age 55 thru 59 91 90 89 88 87 87 85 83 81 79 78 76 Age 60 thru 64 86 86 85 84 82 81 79 79 78 77 75 73 Age 65 thru 84 293 299 302 305 308 309 310 310 312 312 312 311 Age 85 & Older 50 51 53 56 58 60 63 65 68 69 71 73

Stevens County Total Population 5,460 5,477 5,492 5,511 5,528 5,542 5,553 5,558 5,570 5,576 5,591 5,610 Age 0 thru 4 425 425 424 422 420 414 409 404 399 395 391 387 Age 5 thru 9 428 424 419 414 409 403 397 391 385 379 374 368 Age 10 thru 14 437 433 427 422 416 413 410 405 400 394 389 384 Age 15 thru 19 442 442 441 439 436 428 421 415 412 408 403 399 Age 20 thru 24 383 398 414 430 446 470 492 511 525 543 563 584 Age 25 thru 29 266 257 248 240 231 223 216 211 205 198 191 185 Age 30 thru 34 354 354 356 359 363 367 369 369 369 369 369 370 Age 35 thru 39 263 250 236 222 208 194 183 173 163 154 145 136 Age 40 thru 44 444 447 448 450 450 448 444 440 439 437 436 434 Age 45 thru 49 465 479 496 516 537 555 574 592 610 628 647 668 Age 50 thru 54 336 344 353 362 371 382 392 401 411 419 429 438 Age 55 thru 59 279 285 290 294 298 302 308 313 319 323 328 332 Age 60 thru 64 254 260 266 273 281 290 295 301 309 315 321 328 Age 65 thru 84 548 539 531 521 511 498 486 473 462 450 439 429 Age 85 & Older 136 140 143 147 151 155 157 159 162 164 166 168

Sumner County Total Population 24,468 24,404 24,282 24,009 23,633 23,447 23,447 23,397 23,338 23,267 23,183 23,088 Age 0 thru 4 1,459 1,440 1,417 1,385 1,346 1,317 1,295 1,270 1,246 1,220 1,193 1,166 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Sumner County (cont'd) Age 5 thru 9 1,508 1,468 1,424 1,372 1,318 1,278 1,250 1,224 1,197 1,171 1,146 1,121 Age 10 thru 14 1,737 1,692 1,643 1,584 1,520 1,472 1,440 1,406 1,375 1,345 1,316 1,287 Age 15 thru 19 1,997 1,993 1,984 1,961 1,935 1,924 1,931 1,940 1,945 1,952 1,961 1,967 Age 20 thru 24 1,677 1,705 1,739 1,770 1,793 1,837 1,899 1,944 1,977 2009 2,036 2,077 Age 25 thru 29 1,228 1,224 1,221 1,216 1,212 1,223 1,243 1,259 1,265 1,269 1,276 1,283 Age 30 thru 34 1,028 991 955 918 879 848 825 800 773 746 721 697 Age 35 thru 39 1,256 1,206 1,153 1,096 1,038 993 957 919 884 849 815 782 Age 40 thru 44 1,768 1,745 1,714 1,671 1,622 1,584 1,564 1,537 1,508 1,484 1,461 1,436 Age 45 thru 49 2,281 2,304 2,319 2,314 2,285 2,249 2,223 2,199 2,178 2,157 2,126 2,088 Age 50 thru 54 2,045 2,094 2,137 2,166 2,172 2,170 2,192 2,216 2,240 2,256 2,263 2,261 Age 55 thru 59 1,576 1,615 1,650 1,673 1,684 1,693 1,708 1,726 1,746 1,758 1,764 1,765 Age 60 thru 64 1,113 1,106 1,096 1,078 1,051 1,025 1,008 988 969 947 922 895 Age 65 thru 84 3,117 3,126 3,119 3,084 3,045 3,076 3,125 3,154 3,191 3,231 3,277 3,324 Age 85 & Older 678 695 711 721 733 758 787 815 844 873 906 939

Thomas County Total Population 7,544 7,489 7,436 7,369 7,294 7,215 7,141 7,068 6,995 6,914 6,834 6,751 Age 0 thru 4 427 415 403 390 375 363 350 338 326 313 300 288 Age 5 thru 9 470 456 442 427 412 395 380 365 351 336 321 307 Age 10 thru 14 502 488 473 459 444 429 413 396 380 364 349 334 Age 15 thru 19 728 715 701 684 667 649 633 618 602 584 566 547 Age 20 thru 24 508 500 489 475 457 435 416 399 382 367 352 337 Age 25 thru 29 468 467 469 471 474 477 479 477 477 474 471 467 Age 30 thru 34 335 325 316 307 299 290 279 270 261 251 241 231 Age 35 thru 39 334 313 292 271 250 232 215 199 184 170 156 144 Age 40 thru 44 520 510 500 487 473 456 439 424 407 393 379 364 Age 45 thru 49 586 585 582 576 567 558 551 543 535 527 517 506 Age 50 thru 54 716 758 806 858 914 970 1,025 1,082 1,141 1,199 1,260 1,322 Age 55 thru 59 412 419 426 433 439 448 456 464 470 474 478 481 Age 60 thru 64 337 339 341 341 341 341 342 340 338 336 334 331 Age 65 thru 84 986 980 973 963 952 938 925 911 895 878 861 842 Age 85 & Older 215 219 223 227 230 234 238 242 246 248 249 250

Trego County Total Population 2,968 2,927 2,883 2,839 2,792 2,742 2,697 2,649 2,600 2,551 2,507 2,465 Age 0 thru 4 141 137 133 128 124 121 116 113 109 105 100 96 Age 5 thru 9 140 133 127 121 115 110 104 99 94 88 83 78 Age 10 thru 14 164 157 151 144 137 129 122 115 108 102 96 90 Age 15 thru 19 209 202 194 184 174 164 154 144 136 128 121 113 Age 20 thru 24 168 177 186 196 208 221 238 255 266 278 291 305 Age 25 thru 29 106 102 98 95 92 88 85 81 77 73 70 67 Age 30 thru 34 105 99 94 90 86 82 79 75 71 66 62 59 Age 35 thru 39 125 116 107 99 90 82 75 68 63 58 53 48 Age 40 thru 44 186 178 168 158 147 136 127 117 108 101 94 87 Age 45 thru 49 330 340 349 357 365 373 380 387 393 399 404 409 Age 50 thru 54 253 260 267 276 285 291 299 305 311 317 322 327 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Trego County (cont'd) Age 55 thru 59 169 168 168 167 167 166 163 160 157 154 151 149 Age 60 thru 64 154 151 147 143 139 135 132 128 124 119 115 111 Age 65 thru 84 548 535 520 505 487 468 447 426 407 389 372 355 Age 85 & Older 170 172 174 176 176 176 176 176 176 174 173 171

Wabaunsee County Total Population 6,942 6,964 6,981 6,985 6,982 6,982 6,966 6,942 6,910 6,868 6,817 6,759 Age 0 thru 4 353 347 340 332 323 313 302 290 280 269 258 248 Age 5 thru 9 412 406 401 394 389 386 384 383 380 375 371 366 Age 10 thru 14 431 420 409 395 382 371 361 352 342 332 323 313 Age 15 thru 19 504 504 503 499 496 490 482 476 470 467 463 458 Age 20 thru 24 519 538 561 590 619 653 686 715 735 755 774 797 Age 25 thru 29 351 354 356 360 366 377 388 397 405 408 412 416 Age 30 thru 34 330 325 321 317 314 310 306 303 298 291 285 279 Age 35 thru 39 348 334 319 303 288 275 261 247 236 224 212 200 Age 40 thru 44 559 560 560 559 556 551 545 536 526 519 513 505 Age 45 thru 49 654 665 675 683 686 683 674 667 662 656 646 633 Age 50 thru 54 587 601 614 625 631 633 633 635 634 633 629 623 Age 55 thru 59 486 497 506 514 519 519 522 525 529 528 524 519 Age 60 thru 64 370 372 372 372 371 366 359 352 346 339 330 320 Age 65 thru 84 869 868 866 860 855 860 861 856 853 852 851 850 Age 85 & Older 169 173 178 182 187 195 202 208 214 220 226 232

Wallace County Total Population 1,538 1,521 1,497 1,478 1,456 1,434 1,409 1,383 1,354 1,331 1,306 1,283 Age 0 thru 4 91 89 87 85 83 80 79 76 73 70 68 65 Age 5 thru 9 76 70 64 58 52 48 43 38 34 31 27 24 Age 10 thru 14 131 129 126 123 119 116 112 108 104 100 95 91 Age 15 thru 19 109 104 99 93 87 80 74 68 64 59 54 50 Age 20 thru 24 133 143 154 167 183 199 213 227 240 254 269 284 Age 25 thru 29 51 49 46 44 41 39 38 36 34 32 30 28 Age 30 thru 34 49 46 42 39 36 34 31 29 26 24 22 20 Age 35 thru 39 52 46 41 37 32 28 24 21 18 16 14 12 Age 40 thru 44 102 98 93 88 83 77 72 68 63 59 55 51 Age 45 thru 49 142 143 144 143 143 141 138 135 133 130 127 124 Age 50 thru 54 143 148 152 156 160 162 165 166 166 167 168 168 Age 55 thru 59 106 109 112 115 118 121 124 126 127 128 129 130 Age 60 thru 64 65 63 60 58 55 53 50 48 45 43 40 38 Age 65 thru 84 234 229 223 217 210 202 193 184 175 167 159 150 Age 85 & Older 54 55 54 55 54 54 53 53 52 51 49 48

Washington County Total Population 5,873 5,808 5,742 5,672 5,596 5,521 5,448 5,372 5,297 5,221 5,149 5,077 Age 0 thru 4 275 266 257 247 237 227 217 208 199 191 183 175 Age 5 thru 9 326 317 308 300 291 283 275 268 260 252 244 236 Age 10 thru 14 346 333 319 305 291 277 263 249 237 225 213 203 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Washington County (cont'd) Age 15 thru 19 427 425 422 419 417 413 409 405 401 396 392 387 Age 20 thru 24 267 272 279 286 292 301 311 317 324 329 336 342 Age 25 thru 29 208 201 194 188 181 174 167 160 153 147 141 135 Age 30 thru 34 247 238 230 222 214 207 200 194 187 180 172 166 Age 35 thru 39 277 263 249 234 219 205 191 179 168 158 148 138 Age 40 thru 44 441 438 435 430 424 417 411 402 394 388 381 374 Age 45 thru 49 499 509 521 534 545 554 561 569 577 585 593 600 Age 50 thru 54 450 458 466 474 480 487 493 501 507 513 519 524 Age 55 thru 59 404 410 415 419 424 429 435 440 445 448 451 454 Age 60 thru 64 362 364 367 369 373 375 377 377 377 376 376 376 Age 65 thru 84 1,057 1,030 1,001 971 940 909 880 851 822 793 766 738 Age 85 & Older 287 284 279 274 268 263 258 252 246 240 234 229

Wichita County Total Population 2,254 2,222 2,188 2,148 2,107 2,069 2,029 1,992 1,956 1,918 1,875 1,839 Age 0 thru 4 137 132 125 118 111 105 99 94 88 83 78 73 Age 5 thru 9 177 173 168 164 159 155 150 145 141 136 131 127 Age 10 thru 14 164 160 155 151 147 143 138 133 127 122 117 113 Age 15 thru 19 137 132 126 120 114 109 103 98 94 89 84 80 Age 20 thru 24 130 131 131 129 128 127 126 126 127 126 124 123 Age 25 thru 29 99 94 89 84 79 74 70 65 61 58 54 50 Age 30 thru 34 118 113 109 105 100 95 90 85 81 76 72 68 Age 35 thru 39 136 132 128 123 119 116 112 108 105 101 96 92 Age 40 thru 44 140 135 130 125 119 112 106 100 95 90 85 80 Age 45 thru 49 192 192 192 192 191 190 188 187 185 184 181 179 Age 50 thru 54 202 210 219 228 237 248 258 268 279 288 297 307 Age 55 thru 59 137 138 140 141 143 144 145 146 145 145 145 145 Age 60 thru 64 116 115 115 114 113 112 112 112 112 111 110 109 Age 65 thru 84 299 296 292 286 281 274 268 262 255 249 242 235 Age 85 & Older 70 69 69 68 66 65 64 63 61 60 59 58

Wilson County Total Population 9,790 9,768 9,733 9,695 9,649 9,595 9,543 9,486 9,425 9,368 9,308 9,255 Age 0 thru 4 493 484 474 464 452 440 426 413 401 390 378 367 Age 5 thru 9 533 518 501 482 463 446 430 416 400 385 370 356 Age 10 thru 14 644 627 608 589 569 548 528 507 486 468 450 433 Age 15 thru 19 716 714 711 707 703 699 693 687 680 673 666 659 Age 20 thru 24 612 632 652 671 689 700 712 723 738 753 767 781 Age 25 thru 29 595 606 618 631 647 664 681 697 713 725 737 750 Age 30 thru 34 499 494 490 487 484 480 474 467 460 452 445 438 Age 35 thru 39 460 439 417 395 373 351 333 315 297 281 265 250 Age 40 thru 44 668 658 646 633 618 601 583 564 547 533 518 503 Age 45 thru 49 778 785 792 798 802 806 810 814 816 818 819 820 Age 50 thru 54 812 842 873 904 935 965 998 1,032 1,064 1,096 1,129 1,162 Age 55 thru 59 613 625 635 644 651 661 669 675 678 684 689 695 Age 60 thru 64 534 538 541 545 548 550 552 555 559 559 559 559 Appendix L (cont'd) Kansas Population Projections, by County, by Age Cohort for 2007 through 2018

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Wilson County (cont'd) Age 65 thru 84 1,472 1,442 1,408 1,376 1,343 1,311 1,279 1,246 1,211 1,177 1,143 1,110 Age 85 & Older 361 364 367 369 372 373 375 375 375 374 373 372

Woodson County Total Population 3,502 3,465 3,427 3,390 3,347 3,306 3,264 3,220 3,177 3,139 3,096 3,059 Age 0 thru 4 171 167 163 160 156 153 151 147 143 139 134 130 Age 5 thru 9 170 167 164 162 160 157 154 151 147 143 139 135 Age 10 thru 14 139 128 117 106 95 85 76 68 61 55 50 44 Age 15 thru 19 247 243 238 232 227 219 211 202 194 187 180 173 Age 20 thru 24 228 235 242 247 252 253 251 249 248 249 250 250 Age 25 thru 29 253 265 279 297 317 342 375 407 438 463 488 517 Age 30 thru 34 144 138 134 129 124 119 113 107 102 97 92 87 Age 35 thru 39 153 143 134 125 115 106 97 89 81 75 68 63 Age 40 thru 44 234 229 222 216 208 201 193 186 178 171 164 157 Age 45 thru 49 280 278 275 270 264 257 249 242 235 229 222 215 Age 50 thru 54 309 320 331 342 353 365 377 385 395 404 413 421 Age 55 thru 59 219 220 220 219 218 218 215 212 209 207 203 200 Age 60 thru 64 207 209 211 214 216 218 219 221 221 221 220 219 Age 65 thru 84 589 565 541 516 490 464 437 411 386 364 342 321 Age 85 & Older 159 158 156 155 152 149 146 143 139 135 131 127

Wyandotte County Total Population 154,874 154,362 153,308 152,099 150,880 149,713 148,647 147,630 146,606 145,475 144,464 143,631 Age 0 thru 4 13,353 13,450 13,507 13,549 13,608 13,649 13,677 13,692 13,691 13,676 13,665 13,666 Age 5 thru 9 11,328 11,193 11,014 10,816 10,644 10,508 10,411 10,339 10,271 10,187 10,126 10,074 Age 10 thru 14 11,433 11,353 11,242 11,107 10,989 10,874 10,772 10,683 10,608 10,553 10,522 10,499 Age 15 thru 19 10,763 10,647 10,473 10,280 10,106 9,999 9,932 9,895 9,856 9,792 9,748 9,710 Age 20 thru 24 10,691 10,437 10,155 9,857 9,503 9,138 8,753 8,347 7,933 7,562 7,200 6,901 Age 25 thru 29 11,625 11,583 11,509 11,458 11,451 11,475 11,521 11,558 11,561 11,543 11,555 11,592 Age 30 thru 34 11,408 11,421 11,434 11,479 11,563 11,648 11,741 11,802 11,844 11,873 11,942 12,043 Age 35 thru 39 9,820 9,611 9,366 9,132 8,933 8,751 8,602 8,463 8,313 8,140 7,988 7,855 Age 40 thru 44 11,454 11,464 11,425 11,393 11,397 11,405 11,417 11,416 11,401 11,398 11,419 11,459 Age 45 thru 49 11650 11693 11682 11643 11534 11314 11091 10903 10743 10567 10354 10133 Age 50 thru 54 10438 10575 10660 10715 10683 10541 10428 10339 10273 10197 10082 9948 Age 55 thru 59 8721 8871 8993 9112 9194 9224 9233 9264 9302 9303 9278 9244 Age 60 thru 64 6020 5976 5915 5851 5766 5626 5482 5350 5221 5089 4946 4802 Age 65 thru 84 13536 13395 13190 12921 12670 12623 12555 12464 12390 12316 12270 12239 Age 85 & Older 2634 2693 2743 2786 2839 2938 3032 3115 3199 3279 3369 3466

Source: Moody's Economy.com