Avoid Bosnia Tribunal's Pitfalls, UN Envoy Says

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Avoid Bosnia Tribunal's Pitfalls, UN Envoy Says NO PEACE WITHOUT JUSTICE id, IE24,1998 U.U. (OWHŒ OH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AH INTERNATIONAL (RIHIHAL COURT Big Fish Remain Free Avoid Bosnia Tribunal's Pitfalls, UN Envoy Says •••he International Gri- The Bosnian government has A Feslering Wound \ ll ;i· minai Court (ICC) particularly accused Yugoslav •IIP' must go beyond the President Slobodan Milosevic of From the IPS le 1 efforts of the UN orchestrating the war effort in • tribunals for the Bosnia-Hercegovina, but other Gossip former Yugoslavia and Rwanda to governments - including the United tal's Up in Rome I) prosecute top officials if it hopes to States - have relied on Milosevic as deter future atrocities, argued a diplomatic counterweight to Bosnia's UN ambassador, extremist nationalist forces in CICC Monitor Muhamed Sacirbey. Serbia. Sacirbey contended that what he The Bosnian envoy told Terra conference at Rome, which has Viva that, so far, the promise of the claims is the "selective" gathering of data by some nations could also debated whether to include war crimes tribunal for the former aggression as one of the crimes the Yugoslavia has not been Court might prosecute, realised because key shows the complexity of indicted suspects are still at the debate over how large. "The tribunal hasn't aggression is defined, really succeeded in Sacirbey said. bringing to justice the "There is a much highest political officials in broader definition of the region responsible for aggression that applies genocide," Sacirbey now than the one thai argued. appears might be codified "I'm not sure that the in the statute," the ICC would serve a useful ambassador argued. "We deterrent function if it cannnot support the idea simply tries the lower-level of a very narrow defini- suspects, and (tries) the tion of aggression, so that highest-level suspects only it only applies to a when they are dead or out situation analogous to the of power, like Pol Pot," he Nazi invasion of Poland." added. In modern times, he argued, In Bosnia's case, the UN pose a potential problem for the ICC. more savvy leaders have been able ambassador has insisted for years "At least some UN Security Council to foment aggression in neigh- that nations have proof that regio- members might not be state parties" bouring countries without resorting nal leaders were complicit in the to the statute that is to create the to obvious invasions. atrocities in the Bosnian war, in Court, Sacirbey said. "Some states The Bosnia war is a case in point, which more than 2(X),(X)0 people are that may have the greatest capacity he said, with the fledgling republic estimated to have been killed. Yet to obtain evidence through attacked by soldiers who belonged many of those leaders hav intelligence-gathering facilities to or were paid by foreign countries thought useful to full might therefore not be parties." - such as Gen Ratko Mladic, a paid negotiationsqjtfi&jcour Nor is that the only problem the soldier of the Yugoslav National been unwilling(Wuii) ICC could inherit from the Bosnia Army - but who would claim to be .them, Sacii tribunal. The current ICC members of Bosnian armed forces, more on page>2 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/dca9ef/ Rome, June 24,1998 Terra Viva is an independent 1C): Consent Régime a Ticket to Immunity publication of Inter Press Service. Publisher .ΐίΐβ* h§:lnternational Criminal Court (ICC) must have inherent jurisdiction over the Roberto Savio if·:; core crimes of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity if it is to be . · '. Κ ' 'Jiffective, argues the Geneva-based International Commission of Jurists (1CJ). Managing Editor lie 1CJ, in a briefing paper prepared this week, contends that "leaving these crimes to Alejandro Kirk the requirement of additional declarations, in addition to the act of ratification, in particular Editor on a case-by-case basis, would mean allowing the states to (make) immune certain individuals Johanna Son from prosecution whenever this would seem politically opportune." TJie Commission evaluates four different options in its brief: a "consent regime", in Senior Reporter which! states can evaluate on a case-by-case basis whether the ÎCC has jurisdiction, and Farhan Haq proposals by Britain, Germany and South Korea. Reporters The British proposal requires the consent - acquired simply by ratifying the ICC statute Alison Dickens - of the state on whose territory the crime was committed; the German proposal argues for Jorge Pifia the ICC to have automatic jurisdiction over all core crimes, even for countries not party to Stefano Fblumbo the statute. The South Korean language is a compromise, in which any one of a broad category of involved states could consent to ICC jurisdiction by ratifying the statute. Art "The very task of the ICC is to investigate and prosecute those crimes states fail to Winnie Dobbs investigate and prosecute," the ICJ argues. "Demanding their consent to dp so will often Photographer endanger the very purpose of this court." The Commission therefore favours the German Mihai Romanciuc proposai for allowing automatic jurisdiction over all core crimes. However, it adds that if states cannot agree on granting such wide-ranging jurisdiction, Chief, Technical Services the Korean compromise "seems to link the Court's jurisdiction sufficiently with the consent Mauro Teodori of interested states" and "should be considered as second best". IPS-lnter Press Service is an international non-profit asso- ciation of journalists. It enjoys continued from page 1 NGO consultative status thereby transforming the fighting from an external to an internal conflict. (Category 1) with the United Nor does Bosnia accept the idea that it must fall to the UN Security Nations Economic and Social Council. Council to define what constitutes aggression. "It's clear that the debate in the Security Council on issues of aggression and genocide is politically Printed at FAO divisive," Sacirbey said, noting that at times the Council has opted instead to use similar, but less legally suggestive, phrases like "acts of aggression" Terra Viva is produced in to depict the same crimes. partnership by IPS and No "Will we end up with a situation...that aggression is so narrowly defined ffeace Without Justice, with the that a charge could never be brought against a standing leader?" he asked. support of the European Union, the Open Society Institute and "If the ICC or its prosecutor are made subject to the control of political the Coalition for an Inter- bodies, whether the Security Council or state parties, it will have no credibility national Criminal Court. and international justice will be seriously compromised," added Justice Richard Goldstone, the former prosecutor for both the former Yugoslav and Rwandan tribunals. Terra Viva and the CICC Monitor Goldstone argued at the conference underway here that the ICC in some are independent publications, respects faces even stronger challenges than the tribunals, which were created respectively, of Inter Press by the Security Council and are enforced under the powerful Chapter Seven :Service and of the NGO of the UN Charter, encountered. "Clearly a war crimes tribunal acting under Coalition for an International Chapter Seven is in the best, most advantageous position," he said. Criminal Court. IPS and CICC are Referring to the lack of arrests of such key Bosnian Serb suspects as solely responsible for the edito- rial content of their respective Mladic and political leader Radovan Karadzic, Goldstone added: "If arrests papers. aren't being carried out (in those cases) ... what hope is there for a treaty- based ICC (to do better)?" Goldstone doubted that the ICC will have any standing police force empowered to make arrests, as the Bosnia tribunal has in effect had with the intermittent cooperation by NATO forces. "The tribunals would seem to have a significantly greater theoretical authority than the ICC, especially as it relates to the duty of natioas to cooperate," Sacirbey it conceded. Yet for all that, the tribunals have not deterred further war crimes in ύ NO PEACE WITHOUT either the former Yugoslavia or in Central Africa's Great Lakes region. JUSTICE As the Bosnian ambassador noted, UN armoured personnel carriers that Coalition were seized during the 1995 Bosnian Serb invasion of Srebrenica - in which CI (or an International some 7,000 Muslim civilians were believed to have been killed - have surfaced Criminal Court in the Yugoslav province of Kosovo where, he argued, they have been used to commit "further acts of ethnic cleansing". Yet despite that, he said, Yugoslav leaders have never been indicted by any tribunal, and remain undeterred in their acts. Farhan Haq/IPS 2 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/dca9ef/ Rome, June 24,1998 Forensic Science Unearths War Crimes LONDON massacres on the scale of crimes against humanity in Iraqi • n late summer of 1996, the world learnt the Kurdistan, and genocide in the former Yugoslavia and Λ importance of forensic science to the Rwanda. I investigation of war crimes when an international Largely due to PHR's work, for the first time since tribunal set up by the U.N. sentscientists to study mass the post-World War II trials at Nuremberg, international graves in the former Yugoslavia. criminal tribunals were set up in 1993 and 1994 to These specialists, however, were simply continuing prosecute individuals for war crimes committed in the work begun earlier by the Physicians for Human Rights former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. (PHR), a Boston-based organisation of health Tribunal prosecutors then asked PHR to assist in professionals, scientists and concerned citizens that uses exhumation and exami- the knowledge and skills of the medical and forensic nation of mass graves. In sciences to investigate and prevent human rights 1996, Haglund and a violations.
Recommended publications
  • Bosnia and the Balkans: Conflict and Reconstruction (Program) Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository IBRL Events Institute of Bill of Rights Law 1999 Bosnia and the Balkans: Conflict and Reconstruction (Program) Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School Repository Citation Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School, "Bosnia and the Balkans: Conflict and Reconstruction (Program)" (1999). IBRL Events. 47. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/ibrlevents/47 Copyright c 1999 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/ibrlevents Conflict and Reconstruction April 9·10, 1999 University Center The College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia Bosnia and the Balkans: Conflict and Reconstruction April 9-10, 1999. University Center The College of William and Mary • Williamsburg, Virginia For the better part of a decade, news of the Balkan conflict has generated great international concern. The break-up of Yugosla- via and the ongoing friction in Bosnia and Kosovo raise difficult questions about such issues as ethnic cleansing, war criminals, and the treatment of refugees. To address these and other topics, the College of William and Mary will host a conference of distinguished international experts from a variety of fields, including law, economics, journalism, political science, and Foreign service. Their experience in the region will guide us as we examine the complex circumstances Ieadlngup to the present situation, and explore the difficulties involved in the reconstruction of a peaceful society after years of internal conflict. "Bosnia and the Balkans: Conflict and Reconstruction" is sponsored jointly by the Reves Center for International Studies and the Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the College of William and Mary, and the Council ForAmerica's First Freedom in Richmond, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Legality Vs. Politics
    Stefan A. Riesenfeld Symposium Keynote Address- Securing International Peace: Legality vs. Politics By His Excellency Muhamed Sacirbey, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Mission of Bosnia-Herzegovina to the United Nations* Rapporteur: Ms. Hannah Garry** I. KEYNOTE ADDRESS Good evening. First of all with all of the eminent educated personalities, in view of the recent history in my country and in our region, I am glad to see that there are no psychiatrists in this group. As you know, Mr. Karadic and others have left their legacy on us. But indeed, I am honored to be among such a distinguished group. And lest we don't take ourselves all too seriously, I thought it would be appropriate to start in that direction. Mrs. Riesenfeld, it is my pleasure to be here at this forum. Dean, I think you've moved in the back, and, Professor thank you for the introduction and welcoming me so much. And particularly, I'd like to thank the student organizers. * Upon admittance of the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina to the United Nations on May 22, 1992, H.E. Sacirbey was appointed Ambassador and Permanent Representative. In 1995, he served as Foreign Minister of the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina for one and a half years where he was a key player in the Dayton Peace talks. Later, in 1996, he resumed his current post as Ambassador and was also named Special Envoy for the Implementation of the Dayton Peace Agreement. He was most recently also appointed as Vice-Chairman of the Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court.
    [Show full text]
  • A Memorial for Bosnia
    Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons Articles & Book Chapters Faculty Scholarship 1994 A Memorial for Bosnia: Framework of Legal Arguments Concerning the Lawfulness of the Maintenance of the United Nations Security Council Arms Embargo on Bosnia and Herzegovina Craig M. Scott Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Francis Chang Peter Copeland Jasminka Kalajdzic Source Publication: Michigan Journal of International Law. Volume 16 (1994), p. 1-140. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works Part of the International Law Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Repository Citation Scott, Craig M.; Chang, Francis; Copeland, Peter; and Kalajdzic, Jasminka, "A Memorial for Bosnia: Framework of Legal Arguments Concerning the Lawfulness of the Maintenance of the United Nations Security Council Arms Embargo on Bosnia and Herzegovina" (1994). Articles & Book Chapters. 2248. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works/2248 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. A MEMORIAL FOR BOSNIA: FRAMEWORK OF LEGAL ARGUMENTS CONCERNING THE LAWFULNESS OF THE MAINTENANCE OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL'S ARMS EMBARGO ON BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Craig Scott* Abid Qureshi Paul Michell Jasminka Kalajdzic Peter Copeland Francis Chang" INTRODUCTION: LEGAL QUESTIONS AT STAKE AND PREMISES ON WHICH A Memorialfor Bosnia Is BASED ...................... 6 A. Overview of the Legal Questions at Stake ................. 6 B. Situating A Memorial for Bosnia in the Context of the Ongoing Case in the International Court of * Associate Professor of Law, University of Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • AFTER DAYTON: Lessons of the Bosnian Peace Process
    AFTER DAYTON: Lessons of the Bosnian Peace Process A Council Symposium COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS AFTER DAYTON: Lessons of the Bosnian Peace Process A Council Symposium Ruth Wedgwood, Editor The Council on Foreign Relations, Inc., a nonprofit, nonpartisan national organization and think tank founded in 1921, is dedicated to promoting understanding of international affairs through free and civil exchange of ideas. The Council's members are dedicated to the belief that America's peace and prosperity are firmly linked to that of the world. From this flows the Council's mission: to foster America's understanding of other nations—their peo- ples, cultures, histories, hopes, quarrels, and ambitions—and thus to serve our nation through study and debate, private and public. From time to time books, reports, and papers written by members of the Council's research staff or others are published as a "Council on Foreign Relations Publication." THE COUNCIL TAKES NO INSTITUTIONAL POSITION ON POLICY ISSUES AND HAS NO AFFILIATION WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. ALL STATEMENTS OF FACT AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION CONTAINED IN ALL ITS PUBLICATIONS ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR OR AUTHORS. For further information on Council publications, please write the Council on Foreign Relations, 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021, or call the Director of Communications at (212) 434-9400. Or visit our website at www.cfr.org. Copyright © 1999 by the Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • S/1994/674/Annex VI Page 758 3099. After Meeting with Bosnian Serb
    S/1994/674/Annex VI Page 758 3099. After meeting with Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadži( in Pale, special envoy Akashi stated: "I have been assured by Dr. Karadži( that so far as his side is concerned there will be full respect for the use for our purposes of Sarajevo airport". 4186/ 3100. Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadži( warned that any NATO air strikes against his people would force them to reconsider all concessions to BiH. "If NATO adopts a new resolution aimed against the Serbs it would most certainly not contribute to the peace process, but instead would cause new difficulties in the search for a peace agreement", Karadži( told the Bosnian Serb news agency SRNA. 4187/ (c) International reported events 3101. NATO leaders said that they were ready to order air strikes in BiH under UN authority to prevent the siege of Sarajevo or to protect other areas, according to a draft of an alliance summit statement. A copy of the statement, which NATO sources said had been agreed to by all 16 leaders and was to be issued Tuesday stated: "We affirm our readiness, under the authority of the United Nations Security Council ... to carry out air strikes in order to prevent the strangulation of Sarajevo, the safe areas and other threatened areas in BiH". 4188/ 3102. In Bonn, BiH President Izetbegovi( and Croatian President Tudjman met face-to-face in the morning for nearly three hours before being joined by mediators Lord Owen and Thorvald Stoltenberg. After a break for lunch and consultations, the four resumed talks.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S576
    S576 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE January 6, 1995 Shultz; Jeane Kirkpatrick; Paul REPUBLIC OF BOSNIA AND MAJORITY PARTY APPOINTMENTS Wolfowitz; Richard Perle; and Max HERZEGOVINA, PERMANENT MIS- TO COMMITTEES SION TO THE UNITED NATIONS, Kampelman—quite an impressive list. Mr. DOLE. Mr. President, I send a Moreover, I would emphasize that the New York, January 4, 1995. Hon. ROBERT DOLE, resolution to the desk and ask for its late Manfred Woerner, the previous Majority Leader, U.S. Senate, Washington, DC. immediate consideration, and I ask Secretary General, advocated helping DEAR MAJORITY LEADER: We wish to reit- that the clerk read the resolution. the victims of aggression, especially erate our full support for Congressional ef- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The when the international community forts, in particular S. 21, to terminate the clerk will read the resolution in full. does not have the resolve to take ac- application of the U.S. arms embargo on the The legislative clerk read as follows: Government of the Republic of Bosnia and tion on behalf of that victim. That is S. RES. 33 surely the case in Bosnia. Herzegovina. We must also express our sin- cere appreciation for these efforts and our Resolved, That the following shall con- It seems to me however, that the admiration for the thoughtful manner by stitute the majority party’s membership on views that should be given the most which this matter has been guided by you. those Senate committees listed below for the weight, are those of the Bosnians. It is The elements of your proposed legislation 104th Congress, or until their successors are their country and their future we are are in complete convergence with our views.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 22 September 2000
    United Nations A/55/411 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 September 2000 Original: English Fifty-fifth session Agenda items 45, 57 and 78 The situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina Implementation of the resolutions of the United Nations Strengthening of security and cooperation in the Mediterranean region Letter dated 21 September 2000 from the Permanent Representatives of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General* Upon the instructions of our respective Governments, we have the honour to forward herewith a joint statement by the Heads of our respective States, issued following their meeting held in New York on 8 September 2000 (see annex). Our Heads of State reiterated their firm commitment towards lasting peace and stability in the region, an integral part of which represents the resolution of all aspects of the issue of succession to the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, including the status of that State and all its successors in the United Nations, on the basis of the principle of equality of all successor States. We should like to request your kind assistance in circulating the present letter as a document of the General Assembly, under agenda items 45, 57 and 78. (Signed) Muhamed Sacirbey Ambassador Permanent Representative of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Signed) Ivan Šimonović Ambassador Permanent Representative of the Republic of Croatia * Also issued as document S/2000/897. 00-65644 (E) 270900 ````````` A/55/411 (Signed) Naste Čalovski Ambassador Permanent Representative of the Republic of Macedonia (Signed) Ernest Petrič Ambassador Permanent Representative of the Republic of Slovenia 2 A/55/411 Annex to the letter dated 21 September 2000 from the Permanent Representatives of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Secretary-General Joint statement by the President of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 ARCHIVES I Uncorrected
    Non- Corrigé 1 ARCHIVES I Uncorrected International Court Cour internationale of Justice de Justice THE HAGUE LA HAYE YEAR 1996 Public si tting held on Wednesday 1 May 1996, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Bedjaoui presiding in the case concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)), VERBATIM RECORD Audience publique tenue le mercredi 1" mai 1996, à 10 heures, au Palais de la Paix, sous la présidence de M. Bedjaoui, Président en l'affaire de l'Application de la convention pour la prévention et la répression du crime de génocide (Bosnie-Herzégovine c. Yougoslavie (Serbie et Monténégro)) COMPTE RENDU ~resent : President Bedj aoui Vice-President Schwebel Judges Oda Gui 11aume Shahabuddeen Weeramantry Ranj eva Herczegh Shi Koroma Vereshchetin Ferrari Bravo Parra-Aranguren Judges ad hoc Lauterpacht KreCa Registrar Vaïencia-Ospina Présents : M. Bedjaoui, Président M. Schwebel, Vice-président MM. Oda Guiliaurne Shahabuddeen Weeramantry Ranj eva Herczegh Shi Kororna Vereshchetin Ferrari Bravo ~.Parra-Aranguren,juges MM. Lauterpacht KreSa, juges ad hoc M. Valencia-Ospina, Greffier The Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina is represented by: H.E. Mr. Muhamed Sacirbey, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the United Nations, AS Agent ; Mr. Phon van den Biesen, Attorney in Amsterdam, As Depu ty-Agen t , Counsel and Advoca te; Mr. Thomas Franck, Professor at the School of Law, New York University; Director, Center for International Studies; Mr. Alain Pellet, Profesçor, University of Paris X-Nanterre and Institute of Political Studies Paris, Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HAGUE La HAYE No 2 COMPTE BERDU
    International Court Cour internationale of Justice de Justice THE HAGUE La HAYE Public sitting held on Thursday 26 August 1993, at 3 p.=., at the Peace Palace, President Sir Robert Jennings presiding in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crie of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)) Requests for the Indication of Provisional Measures No 2 - VEFLBATIM RECORD Audience publique tenue le jeudi 26 août 1993, à 15 heures, au Palais de la Paix, saus la présidence de sir Robert Jennings, Président en I'affaire relative à l'Application de 1s convention pour la prhvention et la répression d~ crime de génocide (Bosnie-Herzégovine c. Yougoslavie (Serbie et ~onténégro)) Demandes en indication de mesures conservatoires no 2 COMPTE BERDU Present : President Sir Robert Jennings Vice-President Oda Judges Schwebel Bed jaoui Ni Evens en Tarassov Guillaume Shahabuddeen Aguilar Mawdsley Weeramantry Ajibola Herczegh Judges ad hoc Lauterpacht Kreca Registrar Valencia-Ospina présents: Sir Robert Jennings, Président M. Oda, Vice-Président MM. Schwebel Bedjaoui Ni Evensen Tarassov Guillaume Shahabuddeen Aguilar Mawdsley Weeramantry Ajibola, juges Herczegh, juges Lauterpacht, Kreca, juges ad hoc M. Valencia-Ospina, Greffier The Govexnment of the Regublic of Bosnia and Herzegovina is represented by: : H. E. Mr. Muhamed Sacirbey, Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the United Nations; Mr. Francis A. Boyle, Professor of International Law, as Agent ; Mr. Phon van den Biesen, Advocate, Mr. Khawar Qureshi, Barrister, England, as Advocates and Counsel; Mr. Marc Weller, Assistant Lecturer in Law, University of Cambridge, Senior Research Fellow of St.
    [Show full text]
  • From War to Peace in the Balkans, the Middle East, and Ukraine
    PALGRAVE CRITICAL STUDIES IN POST-CONFLICT RECOVERY Series Editors: Sultan Barakat and Sansom Milton FROM WAR TO PEACE IN THE BALKANS, THE MIDDLE EAST AND UKRAINE Daniel Serwer Palgrave Critical Studies in Post-Confict Recovery Series Editors Sultan Barakat Department of Politics University of York York, UK Sansom Milton Post-war Reconstruction and Development University of York York, UK This series seeks to advance original research in the broadly defned area of post-confict recovery. The Pivot format of the series is designed to meet the growing need for the provision of timely, focused, theoretically- rigorous, and applied research into confict-affected environments. The aim is to bridge the theory and practice of post-confict recovery across a range of disciplinary approaches and interventionary logics including but not limited to humanitarian action, confict resolution, post-war recon- struction, peacebuilding, state-building, and transitional justice. It wel- comes submissions from researchers, practitioners and policy makers, in particular from the Global South. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14708 Daniel Serwer From War to Peace in the Balkans, the Middle East and Ukraine Daniel Serwer School of Advanced International Studies Johns Hopkins University Washington, DC, USA Palgrave Critical Studies in Post-Confict Recovery ISBN 978-3-030-02172-6 ISBN 978-3-030-02173-3 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02173-3 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018957680 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
    [Show full text]
  • BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA V. YUGOSLAVIA)
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE 11 July 1996 General List No. 91 CASE CONCERNING APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA v. YUGOSLAVIA) PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS Jurisdiction of the Court — Withdrawal of the fourth preliminary objection of Yugoslavia — Article IX of the Genocide Convention: (a) Jurisdiction ratione personae — Intention expressed by Yugoslavia to remain bound by the treaties to which the former Yugoslavia was party — It has not been contested that Yugoslavia was party to the Genocide Convention — Notice of Succession addressed by Bosnia-Herzegovina to the Secretary-General of the United Nations — Accession to independence of Bosnia-Herzegovina and admission to the United Nations — Article XI of the Genocide Convention opens it to "any Member of the United Nations" — Bosnia-Herzegovina could become a party to the Genocide Convention through the mechanism of State succession — Lack of mutual recognition of the Parties at the time of filing of the Application — Article X of the Dayton-Paris Agreement — Principle whereby the Court should not penalize a defect in a procedural act which the applicant could easily remedy. (b) Jurisdiction ratione materiae — Existence of a legal dispute — Dispute falling within the provisions of Article IX of the Genocide Convention — Applicability of the Convention without reference to the circumstances linked to the domestic or international nature of the conflict — The question whether Yugoslavia took part in the conflict at issue belongs to the merits — The obligation each State has to prevent and punish the crime of genocide is not territorially limited by the Convention — Article IX does not exclude any form of State responsibility under the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • How Ethnic and Religious Nationalism Threaten the Bosnian State
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 40 Issue 1 Thirtieth Anniversary Issue of the Fall of Article 8 Communism 2-2020 How Ethnic and Religious Nationalism Threaten the Bosnian State Matthew James Hone Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hone, Matthew James (2020) "How Ethnic and Religious Nationalism Threaten the Bosnian State," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 40 : Iss. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol40/iss1/8 This Article, Exploration, and Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOW ETHNIC AND RELIGIOUS NATIONALISM THREATENS THE BOSNIAN STATE By Matthew James Hone Matthew James Hone is an adjunct professor at Stockton University with a PhD in Latin American Studies from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, where he focused on the U.S. intervention in El Salvador and mass atrocities that occurred in Central America during the Cold War era. The conflict in former Yugoslavia has been his academic, professional, and personal journey during the course of a master`s degree in Holocaust and Genocide Studies from Stockton University, a master`s degree in International Peace and Conflict Studies from Arcadia University, an internship as a press officer at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), and through the profound friendships that he continue to cherish thanks to his firsthand experience analyzing and travelling throughout the Balkans.
    [Show full text]