DOCSLIB.ORG

NARMS – EB 2000 Veterinary Isolates Fig. 18. Resistance Among Salmonella Serotypes for Isolates from Cattle*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NARMS – EB 2000 Veterinary Isolates Fig. 18. Resistance Among Salmonella Serotypes for Isolates from Cattle* NARMS – EB 2000 Veterinary Isolates Fig. 18. Resistance Among Salmonella Serotypes for Isolates from Cattle* S. typhimurium (n=332)** S. montevideo (n=330) Amikacin 0.00% Amikacin 0.00% Amox-Clav 14.46% Amox-Clav 0.61% Ampicillin 66.87% Ampicillin 0.61% Apramycin 1.20% Apramycin 0.00% Cefoxitin 10.54% Cefoxitin 0.61% Ceftiofur 12.65% Ceftiofur 0.61% Ceftriaxone 0.00% Ceftriaxone 0.00% Cephalothin 13.25% Cephalothin 0.61% Chloramphenicol 39.46% Chloramphenicol 0.91% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Gentamicin 3.31% Gentamicin 0.30% Kanamycin 38.86% Kanamycin 0.00% Nalidixic Acid 0.00% Nalidixic Acid 0.00% Streptomycin 66.57% Streptomycin 1.52% Sulfamethoxazole 66.87% Sulfamethoxazole 1.21% Tetracycline 66.57% Tetracycline 2.12% Trimeth-Sulfa 5.42% Trimeth-Sulfa 0.30% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% **including copenhagen S. anatum (n=292) S. newport (n=185) Amikacin 0.00% Amikacin 0.00% Amox-Clav 1.71% Amox-Clav 80.00% Ampicillin 2.40% Ampicillin 80.54% Apramycin 0.00% Apramycin 0.00% Cefoxitin 1.37% Cefoxitin 77.84% Ceftiofur 1.37% Ceftiofur 80.00% Ceftriaxone 0.00% Ceftriaxone 2.16% Cephalothin 2.05% Cephalothin 77.84% Chloramphenicol 1.71% Chloramphenicol 81.62% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Gentamicin 0.68% Gentamicin 7.57% Kanamycin 1.71% Kanamycin 7.57% Nalidixic Acid 0.34% Nalidixic Acid 0.00% Streptomycin 2.05% Streptomycin 82.70% Sulfamethoxazole 2.05% Sulfamethoxazole 74.05% Tetracycline 35.96% Tetracycline 83.24% Trimeth-Sulfa 0.34% Trimeth-Sulfa 25.41% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% *all sources NARMS – EB 2000 Veterinary Isolates Fig. 18. Resistance Among Salmonella Serotypes for Isolates from Cattle* S. kentucky (n=133) S. senftenberg (n=124) Amikacin 0.00% Amikacin 0.00% Amox-Clav 0.75% Amox-Clav 0.00% Ampicillin 0.75% Ampicillin 0.00% Apramycin 0.00% Apramycin 0.00% Cefoxitin 0.75% Cefoxitin 0.00% Ceftiofur 0.00% Ceftiofur 0.00% Ceftriaxone 0.00% Ceftriaxone 0.00% Cephalothin 0.75% Cephalothin 0.00% Chloramphenicol 0.00% Chloramphenicol 0.00% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Gentamicin 0.00% Gentamicin 0.00% Kanamycin 1.50% Kanamycin 0.00% Nalidixic Acid 0.75% Nalidixic Acid 0.81% Streptomycin 15.04% Streptomycin 2.42% Sulfamethoxazole 1.50% Sulfamethoxazole 0.81% Tetracycline 17.29% Tetracycline 0.81% Trimeth-Sulfa 0.00% Trimeth-Sulfa 0.00% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% S. muenchen (n=111) S. reading (n=107) Amikacin 0.00% Amikacin 0.00% Amox-Clav 0.90% Amox-Clav 10.28% Ampicillin 4.50% Ampicillin 10.28% Apramycin 0.90% Apramycin 0.00% Cefoxitin 1.80% Cefoxitin 9.35% Ceftiofur 0.90% Ceftiofur 9.35% Ceftriaxone 0.00% Ceftriaxone 0.00% Cephalothin 1.80% Cephalothin 10.28% Chloramphenicol 3.60% Chloramphenicol 10.28% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Gentamicin 0.90% Gentamicin 1.87% Kanamycin 1.80% Kanamycin 1.87% Nalidixic Acid 3.60% Nalidixic Acid 0.00% Streptomycin 4.50% Streptomycin 11.21% Sulfamethoxazole 5.41% Sulfamethoxazole 10.28% Tetracycline 9.91% Tetracycline 87.85% Trimeth-Sulfa 0.90% Trimeth-Sulfa 0.00% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% *all sources NARMS – EB 2000 Veterinary Isolates Fig. 18. Resistance Among Salmonella Serotypes for Isolates from Cattle* S. cerro (n=80) S. agona (n=78) Amikacin 0.00% Amikacin 0.00% Amox-Clav 2.50% Amox-Clav 21.79% Ampicillin 3.75% Ampicillin 23.08% Apramycin 1.25% Apramycin 0.00% Cefoxitin 2.50% Cefoxitin 21.79% Ceftiofur 1.25% Ceftiofur 21.79% Ceftriaxone 0.00% Ceftriaxone 1.28% Cephalothin 3.75% Cephalothin 21.79% Chloramphenicol 1.25% Chloramphenicol 25.64% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Gentamicin 0.00% Gentamicin 0.00% Kanamycin 1.25% Kanamycin 20.51% Nalidixic Acid 0.00% Nalidixic Acid 1.28% Streptomycin 3.75% Streptomycin 25.64% Sulfamethoxazole 2.50% Sulfamethoxazole 25.64% Tetracycline 11.25% Tetracycline 30.77% Trimeth-Sulfa 0.00% Trimeth-Sulfa 19.23% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% *all sources.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Sensitive Method for Direct Analysis of Impurities in Apramycin and Other Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Using Charged Aerosol
    - SO4 A Sensitive Method for Direct Analysis of Impurities in Apramycin and Other Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Using Charged Aerosol Detection Zhen Long1, Qi Zhang2, Yan Jin1, Lina Liang1, Bruce Bailey2, Ian Acworth2, Deepali Mohindra3 1 2 3 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Chelmsford, MA, USA and Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA Comparison of CAD and ELSD Detection Analysis of Other Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Overview Results Purpose: To develop a sensitive non-derivatization method for impurity assessment of Sample pre-treatment with SPE This method has also been applied to impurity analysis of an additional eleven apramycin sulfate and other aminoglycoside antibiotics. Sample pre-treatment with SPE SPE Column: Dionex OnGuard II A CAD and ELSD are both nebulization-based universal detection technologies. aminoglycoside antibiotics, including neomycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, streptomycin, Comparison between CAD and ELSD under the same chromatographic conditions tobramycin, amikacin, etimicin, netilmicin, sisomicin, ribostamycin and paromomycin. Methods: A 30min gradient method using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography Sample solvent: 80% 5mM ammonium formate, 20% acetonitrile Sulfate is a major interference for apramycin impurity assessment with a HILIC method. demonstrated that CAD is much more sensitive than ELSD. As shown in the Figure 5 shows impurity analysis of kenamycin, etimicin, ribostamycin and paromomycin with charged aerosol detection (HILIC-CAD) was developed for direct analysis of Sample: 220.6 mg/mL in 2 mL sample solvent Without sample cleanup, some early eluting impurities were found to be masked under chromatograms in Figure 4 and data summarized in Table 1, 16 impurities (S/N >3) were using the HILIC-CAD method.
    [Show full text]
  • High Level Aminoglycoside Resistance in Enterococcus, Pediococcus and Lactobacillus Species from Farm Animals and Commercial Meat Products
    Ann Microbiol (2016) 66:101–110 DOI 10.1007/s13213-015-1086-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE High level aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus, Pediococcus and Lactobacillus species from farm animals and commercial meat products George Jaimee1 & Prakash M. Halami1 Received: 10 September 2014 /Accepted: 8 April 2015 /Published online: 2 May 2015 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and the University of Milan 2015 Abstract Inappropriate use of aminoglycosides in animal I40a suggesting its involvement in antibiotic resistant gene husbandry has led to the selection and emergence of high- transfer. Besides, strains of L. plantarum, a species used as level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR) in lactic acid bacte- probiotic, isolated in this study showed the occurrence of ria (LAB). The objective of this study was to assess the pres- aph(3′)IIIa as well as aac (6′)Ie-aph(2″)Ia genes that could ence of aminoglycoside resistant LAB in farm animals and be of concern in human health. The findings of the study meat products. Gentamicin resistant LAB (n=138) were se- highlight the spread and emergence of multi-resistance genes lectively isolated from 50 different meat and farm animal for aminoglycoside antibiotics among beneficial LAB. sources. These native isolates of LAB were subsequently characterized for their minimum inhibitory concentration to Keywords Lactic acid bacteria . Minimum inhibitory seven different aminoglycoside antibiotics. HLAR to genta- concentration . Aminoglycoside . Random amplified micin, kanamycin and streptomycin was found to be 38 %, polymorphic DNA . Integrase 45 % and 15 %, respectively. Selected cultures of LAB were identified by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR and 16S rDNA gene sequencing. Subsequent Introduction detection for the presence of nine aminoglycoside modifying genes [aac(6′)Ie-aph(2″)Ia, aph(3′)IIIa, aad6, ant(6)Ia, The spread of resistance to antibiotics among bacteria is ant(9)Ia, ant(9)Ib, aph(2″)Ib, aph(2″)Ic and aph(2″)Id] was alarming.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Antimicrobials in Swine Feeds in the United States Catherine E
    Dewey CE, Cox BD, Straw BE, et al. Use of antimicrobials in swine feeds in the United ORIGINAL RESEARCH States. Swine Health Prod. 1999;7(1):19–25. Use of antimicrobials in swine feeds in the United States Catherine E. Dewey, DVM, PhD; Barbara D. Cox, MS; Barbara E. Straw, DVM, PhD; Eric J. Bush, DVM, MS; Scott Hurd, DVM, PhD combinations of antimicrobials. Creep, starter, and first-stage Summary grower pigs were more likely to be fed antimicrobials than sec- ond-stage growers, finishers, or adult swine (P=.02). Most (92.2%) Objective: To describe the use of in-feed antimicrobials by stage antimicrobials were fed on a continuous basis. The age groups of production in the United States swine industry. most likely to be fed antimicrobials to treat specific problems Methods: National Swine Survey data from 712 farms were col- were nursery, grower, and finisher pigs. The most commonly used lected by the National Animal Health Monitoring System antimicrobials, listed in order of frequency were: tetracyclines, (NAHMS) between 1989 and 1991. Specifically, producers were carbadox, bacitracin, tylosin, apramycin, and lincomycin. asked to record over one 7-day interval the number of feeds they Carbadox, apramycin, and lincomycin were typically added to used, the phases of production to which those feeds were fed, creep and starter feeds. Bacitracin and tylosin were most often and which antimicrobials had been added to the feeds. Produc- used in feeds for grower and finisher pigs. Tetracyclines were fed ers were also asked whether the antimicrobials were used con- to all ages of pigs but were included more frequently in feeds for tinuously or to treat a specific problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Genetic and Enzymatic Evidence for Oxidative Cyclization in Hygromycin B Biosynthesis
    Articles Cite This: ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 13, 2203−2210 Direct Genetic and Enzymatic Evidence for Oxidative Cyclization in Hygromycin B Biosynthesis † † Sicong Li, Jun Zhang, Yuanzhen Liu, Guo Sun, Zixin Deng, and Yuhui Sun* Key Laboratory of Combinatorial Biosynthesis and Drug Discovery (Wuhan University), Ministry of Education and Wuhan University School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wuhan 430071, People’s Republic of China *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: Hygromycin B is an aminoglycoside antibiotic with a structurally distinctive orthoester linkage. Despite its long history of use in industry and in the laboratory, its biosynthesis remains poorly understood. We show here, by in-frame gene deletion in vivo and detailed enzyme characterization in vitro, that formation of the unique orthoester moiety is catalyzed by the α-ketoglutarate- and non-heme iron-dependent oxygenase HygX. In addition, we identify HygF as a glycosyltransferase adding UDP-hexose to 2-deoxystreptamine, HygM as a methyltransferase responsible for N-3 methylation, and HygK as an epimerase. These experimental results and bioinformatic analyses allow a detailed pathway for hygromycin B biosynthesis to be proposed, including the key oxidative cyclization reactions. ygromycin B is an aminoglycoside antibiotic produced epoxidation,20 desaturation,21 and halogenation22 via radical H by Streptomyces hygroscopicus.1 Since its discovery in the intermediates,17 are responsible for the formation of the 1950s, it has become widely used as a veterinary drug to orthoester linkage. However, no authentic uncyclized precursor control infections of intestinal parasites in chickens and swine. of orthoesters has been isolated so far, and no direct In biological studies, hygromycin B also serves as a useful biochemical evidence for their function has been presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Third ESVAC Report
    Sales of veterinary antimicrobial agents in 25 EU/EEA countries in 2011 Third ESVAC report An agency of the European Union The mission of the European Medicines Agency is to foster scientific excellence in the evaluation and supervision of medicines, for the benefit of public and animal health. Legal role Guiding principles The European Medicines Agency is the European Union • We are strongly committed to public and animal (EU) body responsible for coordinating the existing health. scientific resources put at its disposal by Member States • We make independent recommendations based on for the evaluation, supervision and pharmacovigilance scientific evidence, using state-of-the-art knowledge of medicinal products. and expertise in our field. • We support research and innovation to stimulate the The Agency provides the Member States and the development of better medicines. institutions of the EU the best-possible scientific advice on any question relating to the evaluation of the quality, • We value the contribution of our partners and stake- safety and efficacy of medicinal products for human or holders to our work. veterinary use referred to it in accordance with the • We assure continual improvement of our processes provisions of EU legislation relating to medicinal prod- and procedures, in accordance with recognised quality ucts. standards. • We adhere to high standards of professional and Principal activities personal integrity. Working with the Member States and the European • We communicate in an open, transparent manner Commission as partners in a European medicines with all of our partners, stakeholders and colleagues. network, the European Medicines Agency: • We promote the well-being, motivation and ongoing professional development of every member of the • provides independent, science-based recommenda- Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Danmap 2006.Pmd
    DANMAP 2006 DANMAP 2006 DANMAP 2006 - Use of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from food animals, foods and humans in Denmark Statens Serum Institut Danish Veterinary and Food Administration Danish Medicines Agency National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark Editors: Hanne-Dorthe Emborg Danish Zoonosis Centre National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark Mørkhøj Bygade 19 Contents DK - 2860 Søborg Anette M. Hammerum National Center for Antimicrobials and Contributors to the 2006 Infection Control DANMAP Report 4 Statens Serum Institut Artillerivej 5 DK - 2300 Copenhagen Introduction 6 DANMAP board: National Food Institute, Acknowledgements 6 Technical University of Denmark: Ole E. Heuer Frank Aarestrup List of abbreviations 7 National Veterinary Institute, Tecnical University of Denmark: Sammendrag 9 Flemming Bager Danish Veterinary and Food Administration: Summary 12 Justin C. Ajufo Annette Cleveland Nielsen Statens Serum Institut: Demographic data 15 Dominique L. Monnet Niels Frimodt-Møller Anette M. Hammerum Antimicrobial consumption 17 Danish Medicines Agency: Consumption in animals 17 Jan Poulsen Consumption in humans 24 Layout: Susanne Carlsson Danish Zoonosis Centre Resistance in zoonotic bacteria 33 Printing: Schultz Grafisk A/S DANMAP 2006 - September 2007 Salmonella 33 ISSN 1600-2032 Campylobacter 43 Text and tables may be cited and reprinted only with reference to this report. Resistance in indicator bacteria 47 Reprints can be ordered from: Enterococci 47 National Food Institute Escherichia coli 58 Danish Zoonosis Centre Tecnical University of Denmark Mørkhøj Bygade 19 DK - 2860 Søborg Resistance in bacteria from Phone: +45 7234 - 7084 diagnostic submissions 65 Fax: +45 7234 - 7028 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Apramycin, Colistin, Neomycin and Paramomycin Mic Distribution from Clinical Isolates of Klebsiella Pneumoniae
    Pathology and Hygiene APRAMYCIN, COLISTIN, NEOMYCIN AND PARAMOMYCIN MIC DISTRIBUTION FROM CLINICAL ISOLATES OF KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE Saggiorato M. 1*, Scandurra S. 1, Pradella G. 1, Bacchin C. 2, Guolo A. 2, Agnoletti F. 2 1ELI LILLY Italia S.p.A., Divisione Elanco Animal Health, Via Gramsci 733, Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy 2Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Viale Brigata Treviso 13/a, 31100 Treviso, Italy *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Antimicrobial therapy continues to be important in reducing losses due to enteric forms of Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae ) disease in rabbit intensive farms, in which this bacterium is frequently isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of suckling rabbits, between the 2 nd and 4th week of age, showing a case history of diarrhoea. Commonly K. pneumoniae is characterized by a high resistance to the antimicrobials and for this reason is important to have up to date information in order to define a precision therapy according to principles of antibiotics judicious use guidelines. Although the enteric forms caused by K. pneumoniae diseases have been documented as frequent and economically important in France, Spain and Italy, there are no published reports on the antimicrobial activity of approved compounds against Italian strains. In this study, the authors report the activity of 4 different antimicrobials against 32 recovered isolates of K. pneumoniae. These isolates represent accessions from 2 geographic regions of the North-eastern Italy (Veneto and Friuli Venezia Giulia) where the rabbit breeding represent a widespread zootechnical practice. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined by agar dilution according to the protocol proposed by NCCLS/CLSI (M31-A2 manual, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Apramycin Sulfate Salt (A2024)
    APRAMYCIN SULFATE ProductInformation Sigma Prod. No. A-2024 NH2 CAS NUMBER: 65710-07-8 X H2SO4 OH S PHYSICAL PROPERTIES: HO S S Absolute stereochemistry: Rotation (+) O R Appearance: Faint yellow powder R OH H H Molecular formula: C21H41N5O11 • x H2SO4 H N 2 NH2 H2N O O Molecular weight: 539.58 (free base) R S R S R S R S R S R HO R H O O N H H CH3 OH OH DESCRIPTION: Apramycin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic produced by a strain of Streptomyces tenebrarius. The compound is used as the sulfate in veterinary practice.1,2 STABILITY / STORAGE AS SUPPLIED: Store desiccated at 2-8EC. SOLUBILITY / SOLUTION STABILITY: Aqueous solutions at 25 mg/mL are faint yellow. No solution stability data are currently available. APPLICATIONS: 1. An oral composition of 20 g apramycin sulfate, 1 g pyridoxal HCl, 10 g sodium alginate, 10 g glycine and about 30 powdered apples were fed to calves and swine in order to treat diarrhea. Pyridoxal HCl was added to enhance the bactericidal activity of apramycin sulfate.3 2. Under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act, feed containing 150 g apramycin per ton may be used to control colibacillosis.4 3. Apramycin is a potent inhibitor of protein synthesis in bacteria in vivo and in vitro. To a limited extent, it induces translation errors in cell-free systems from Escherichia coli supplemented with poly(U). Apramycin also inhibits the translocation step of protein synthesis in vivo (e.g., in protoplasts of Bacillus megaterium), and in vitro (e.g., in cell-free systems from E.
    [Show full text]
  • NARMS – EB 1999 Veterinary Isolates Fig. 20
    NARMS – EB 1999 Veterinary Isolates Fig. 20. Resistance Among Salmonella Serotypes for Isolates from Swine* S. derby (n=267) S. typhimurium (n=233)** Amikacin 0.37% Amikacin 0.00% Amoxicillin 0.75% Amoxicillin 2.58% Ampicillin 3.37% Ampicillin 67.81% Apramycin 3.37% Apramycin 4.29% Ceftiofur 1.87% Ceftiofur 2.15% Ceftriaxone 0.37% Ceftriaxone 0.00% Cephalothin 0.75% Cephalothin 2.58% Chloramphenicol 1.50% Chloramphenicol 50.64% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Gentamicin 2.62% Gentamicin 4.72% Kanamycin 2.62% Kanamycin 23.18% Nalidixic Acid 0.00% Nalidixic Acid 0.00% Streptomycin 47.94% Streptomycin 78.11% Sulfamethoxazole 46.07% Sulfamethoxazole 78.11% Tetracycline 55.43% Tetracycline 80.69% Trimethoprim 0.75% Trimethoprim 3.00% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% **including copenhagen S. infantis (n=68) S. anatum (n=65) Amikacin 0.00% Amikacin 0.00% Amoxicillin 1.47% Amoxicillin 1.54% Ampicillin 7.35% Ampicillin 4.62% Apramycin 0.00% Apramycin 0.00% Ceftiofur 1.47% Ceftiofur 3.08% Ceftriaxone 0.00% Ceftriaxone 0.00% Cephalothin 0.00% Cephalothin 0.00% Chloramphenicol 1.47% Chloramphenicol 1.54% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Ciprofloxacin 0.00% Gentamicin 2.94% Gentamicin 1.54% Kanamycin 1.47% Kanamycin 9.23% Nalidixic Acid 0.00% Nalidixic Acid 0.00% Streptomycin 8.82% Streptomycin 13.85% Sulfamethoxazole 13.24% Sulfamethoxazole 16.92% Tetracycline 17.65% Tetracycline 67.69% Trimethoprim 0.00% Trimethoprim 0.00% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% *all sources NARMS – EB 1999 Veterinary Isolates Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Swedres-Svarm 2005
    SVARM Swedish Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Preface .............................................................................................4 Summary ..........................................................................................6 Sammanfattning................................................................................7 Use of antimicrobials (SVARM 2005) .................................................8 Resistance in zoonotic bacteria ......................................................13 Salmonella ..........................................................................................................13 Campylobacter ...................................................................................................16 Resistance in indicator bacteria ......................................................18 Escherichia coli ...................................................................................................18 Enterococcus .....................................................................................................22 Resistance in animal pathogens ......................................................32 Pig ......................................................................................................................32 Cattle ..................................................................................................................33 Horse ..................................................................................................................36 Dog
    [Show full text]
  • Hygromycin B Cell Culture and Plate Preparation Protocol TD-P Date: 10/4/2018
    Protocol TD-P Revision 3.0 Creation Date: 6/1/2016 Revision Date: 10/4/2018 Hygromycin B Cell Culture and Plate Preparation For Bacteria, Plant and Mammalian Cells and Yeast Introduction Hygromycin B is an aminoglycoside antibiotic produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus that inhibits translocation of ribosomes during translation elongation, resulting in protein synthesis inhibition. This antibiotic’s ability to kill bacteria, fungi, and higher eukaryotes has been useful in biomedical and plant research because it functions as a selection marker. Cells that carry the 1 Kb hph gene produce a kinase that phosphorylates Hygromycin B and thus, are resistant and survive. Here, we describe a general protocol for the use of Hygromycin B in selection of bacteria, plants, mammalian cells and yeast. Materials Hygromycin B (GoldBio Catalog # H-270 ES ) Yeast extract Bacto-peptone Dextrose HCl 1M Bacto Agar Trypsin (GoldBio Catalog # T-160 ) Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium Regeneration medium Competent bacteria Yeast Calli Stock Solution and Working Concentrations o Use this protocol to prepare either a stock solution of 50 or 100 mg/ml Hygromycin. o Dilute to the following concentrations, based on the application: For bacteria selection: 20-200 µg/ml. For plant cell maintenance: 20 µg/ml. For plant cell selection: 20-200 µg/ml. For mammalian cell maintenance: 200 µg/ml. For mammalian cell selection: Ranges from 50-1000 µg/ml. For yeast selection: 200 µg/ml. E S : EZ-Pak and Solution available Gold Biotechnology St. Louis, MO Ph : (800) 248-7609 Web: www.goldbio.com Email: [email protected] Gold Biotechnology / FM-000008 TD-P Revision 3.0 Hygromycin B Cell Culture and Plate Preparation Protocol TD-P Date: 10/4/2018 Method Preparation of Yeast Extract-Peptone-Dextrose (YPD) liquid medium and plates with drugs 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinary Use of Antibiotics Highly Important to Human Health
    VETERINARY USE OF ANTIBIOTICS HIGHLY IMPORTANT TO HUMAN HEALTH The World Health Organization, the Food withholding periods and export and Agriculture Organization and the slaughter intervals in the case of food- World Organization for Animal Health producing animals. Where possible, are working to protect the effectiveness choices should be based on culture and of antimicrobials in the face of rapidly susceptibility testing and the narrowest increasing resistance in serious and life- spectrum drugs effective against the threatening pathogens. infection. Antimicrobial use in animals contributes Alternatives to antimicrobial use — such to the selection and spread of resistance. as changes in husbandry, management, Veterinarians must help preserve vaccination and infection prevention existing antibiotics and fight the serious and control — should also be explored public health threat of antimicrobial in each case. The overriding principle resistance. Veterinarians need to of antimicrobial prescribing is to use carefully consider how they prescribe as little as possible but as much as antibiotics, especially those that are necessary to address the infection. critical in human medicine, to help Following diagnosis, consider using preserve these lifesaving drugs for the the first line antimicrobials along with future. alternative treatment approaches. The table on the next page outlines Second line use should be limited where in a broad and general sense how possible to when susceptibility testing or veterinarians should use the antibiotics clinical results have proven that first line highly important to human medicine identified by the Australian Strategic antibiotics are not effective. and Technical Advisory Group on Third line antimicrobials are for AMR (ASTAG). Responsible use of use as a last resort.
    [Show full text]