DOCSLIB.ORG

MILL POND RESTORATION PROJECT Phase II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MILL POND RESTORATION PROJECT Phase II MILL POND RESTORATION PROJECT Phase II 2002-2004 Prepared by the NASHUA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION This project was funded in part by a New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Nonpoint Source Program Local Initiative Grant with in-kind services provided by the City of Nashua, the Mine Falls Park Advisory Committee, and the NH DES Watershed Bureau . Nashua Regional Planning Commission Mill Pond Restoration Project 2002-2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................1 II. PROJECT SUMMARY AND GOALS ........................................................................................................1 III. PROJECT TASKS..........................................................................................................................................1 A. Task One - Quality Assurance Protection Plan...................................................................................2 B. Task Two - Monitor flows from the Gatehouse into Mill Pond ......................................................2 C. Task Three - Establish volunteer water quality monitoring program.............................................4 D. Task Four - Calculate drainage area and catch basin information...................................................5 1. Drainage to Outfalls 1-4 ....................................................................................................................5 2. Runoff Calculation.............................................................................................................................5 3. Construction of the Conway Ice Arena-Outfall 1 ..........................................................................7 4. Renovation of Nashua High School-South.....................................................................................7 5. Drainage to Outfall 5 .........................................................................................................................8 6. Drainage to Outfall 6 .........................................................................................................................8 7. Drainage to Outfall 7 and 8...............................................................................................................9 E. Task Five - Develop GIS database and map for Task 4 ...................................................................11 F. Task Six - Assess stormwater management measures.....................................................................12 G. Task Seven - Research treatment systems that could be used ........................................................16 1. Effectiveness of Swirl Separators in Stormwater Treatment......................................................16 H. Task Eight - Water quality sampling..................................................................................................17 1. In-Pond Sampling ............................................................................................................................18 a Transparency ................................................................................................................................19 b. Chorophyll-a.................................................................................................................................19 c. Total Phosphorous .......................................................................................................................20 d. pH ..................................................................................................................................................20 e. Acid Neutralizing Capacity (ANC) ...........................................................................................21 f. Conductivity.................................................................................................................................21 g. Gate House Sample on the Nashua River - August 16 ...........................................................21 2. Stormwater Outfall Sampling.........................................................................................................21 I. Task 9 - Mine Falls Park Master Plan Committee.............................................................................22 IV. CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................................24 V. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................24 = Page i. Nashua Regional Planning Commission Mill Pond Restoration Project 2002-2004 LIST OF TABLES Table III-1: Grass Treatment Swale......................................................................................................................8 Table III-2: Detention Pond Infiltration Volume..............................................................................................10 Table III-3: Summary of Drainage Calculations...............................................................................................11 Table III-4: Stormwater Catch Basin (CB) Assessment – July 17, 2003 .........................................................13 Table III-5: Stormwater Catch Basin Assessment – July 25, 2003 ..................................................................14 Table III-6: Dissolved Oxygen/Temperature Profile ......................................................................................18 Table III-7: Mill Pond Epilimnion Layer – 2 Meters.......................................................................................18 Table III-8: Hypolimnion Layer – 4 Meters .....................................................................................................19 LIST OF MAPS Map III-1: Outfall Watershed Drainage Areas................................................................................................11 Map III-2: Catch Basin Locations ......................................................................................................................15 Map III-3: Water Quality Sampling ..................................................................................................................17 Map III-4: Mine Falls Park .................................................................................................................................23 LIST OF APPENDICES: Appendix A Task Two – Gatehouse Flows Appendix B Task Four - Drainage Calculations for Outfalls 1-4 Prepared by the City of Nashua Engineering Department Appendix C Task Four - Drainage Calculations for Outfalls 1 For the Conway Ice Arena Prepared by Hayner/Swanson, Inc Appendix D Task Four - Drainage Calculations for Outfalls 5-8 For Nashua High School - South Prepared by Hayner/Swanson, Inc. Appendix E Task Seven - Vortechs Stormwater Treatment System NH Design and Operation Specifications Appendix F Task Eight – Laboratory ResultsAnd Field Observations for In-Pond Sampling Appendix G Task Eight – Laboratory Results for Outfall Stormwater Sampling Appendix H Task 9 – Public Outreach = Page ii. Nashua Regional Planning Commission Mill Pond Restoration Project 2002-2004 I. INTRODUCTION The Mill Pond Restoration Project Phase I in 200I assessed the water quality of the 20 acre Mill Pond as well as nonpoint sources of pollution (NPS) impacting the water quality of the pond, and the Nashua River Canal (Canal). Both Mill Pond and the Canal have seen increased growth of aquatic vegetation in the past few years. In 1998, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NH DES) surveyed Mill Pond as part of the Lake Monitoring for Trophic Classification Program. The survey, conducted on July 21, 1998, documented extremely dense growths of Coontail (Ceratphyllum demersum) and Milfoil (Myriophyllum heterophyllum), and indicated that algal mats covered 40% of the pond. Water quality analysis indicated total phosphorous levels of .046 and .098 milligrams per liter (mg/L), at 2.5 and 4 meters respectively, substantially above the recommended level of concern of 0.05 mg/L. The NH DES survey also noted that Mill Pond receives massive urban runoff from parking lots and other impervious areas in the watershed. Milfoil Coontail The drainage area of Mill Pond and the Canal was determined to be approximately 515 acres, with an estimated impervious surface coverage of 41% using Nashua Regional Planning Commission (NRPC) Geographic Information System (GIS) data. Eight outfalls drain directly into Mill Pond from the Nashua High School parking lots and athletic fields, Riverside Drive and approximately 20 businesses between Riverside Drive and West Hollis Street (Route 111). II. PROJECT SUMMARY AND GOALS The goal of the Mill Pond Restoration Project Phase II was to continue to assess drainage in the watershed and establish baseline water quality data in Mill Pond and the Canal. Water quality analysis indicates that conditions have not improved between 1999 and 2002. Untreated stormwater remained a problem during the study period. NRPC worked with many departments in the City of Nashua to ensure that five of the outfalls were rerouted to secondary stormwater treatment devices during construction at Nashua High School – South, and the new Conway Ice Arena. The remaining three outfalls are slated to be treated as part of the Army Corps of Engineers, Section 206, Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Project. III. PROJECT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2014 Durham Ponds Assessment and Plan
    DK Water Resource Consulting LLC Prepared for: Prepared by: VHB DK WRC LLC April 2014 45 Red Brook Circle Wolfeboro, NH 03894 Mill Pond Durham Ponds Assessment and Plan Beards Pond Little Hale Pond i Durham Ponds Assessment and Plan _________________________________ Prepared By: Don Kretchmer CLM DK Water Resource Consulting LLC ii Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. v 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Water Quality and Ecology of the Ponds .................................................................... 2-1 3.0 LLRM Model of Current Conditions ............................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Nutrient Inputs...................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2 Phosphorus Loading Assessment Summary ..................................................................... 3-4 3.3 Phosphorus Loading Assessment Limitations.................................................................... 3-4 3.4 Lake Response to Current Phosphorus Loads .................................................................. 3-5 3.5 Reduction Needed ............................................................................................................... 3-6 4.0 Potential Management Options ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Waste Water Strategies in the Landscape
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Masters Projects 10-2017 Innovative Waste Water Strategies in the Landscape: The Application of Green Infrastructure Principles in Cape Cod, Massachusetts Kellie Fenton University of Massachusetts Amherst, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/larp_ms_projects Part of the Landscape Architecture Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Fenton, Kellie, "Innovative Waste Water Strategies in the Landscape: The Application of Green Infrastructure Principles in Cape Cod, Massachusetts" (2017). Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Masters Projects. 88. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/larp_ms_projects/88 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Innovative Waste Water Strategies in the Landscape: The application of green infrastructure principles in Cape Cod, Massachusetts Kellie Fenton Masters in Landscape Architecture Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning University of Massachusetts, Amherst Innovative Waste Water Strategies in the Landscape: The application of green infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Data Review and Evaluation of Groundwater Monitoring White Mesa Uranium Mill Blanding Utah
    DATA REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER MONITORING WHITE MESA URANIUM MILL BLANDING UTAH AUGUST 2015 PROJECT NO. 2015.A025 PREPARED FOR: Ute Mountain Ute Tribe P.O. Box 448 Towaoc, CO 81334 PREPARED BY: Geo-Logic Associates 1760 E. River Road, Suite 115 Tucson, AZ 85718 Data Review and Evaluation of Groundwater Monitoring White Mesa Uranium Mill, Blanding Utah TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 FACILITY DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY ......................................................................... 1 3.0 DATA ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Hydrogeologic Conditions ....................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Climate ........................................................................................................ 7 3.1.2 Topography ................................................................................................. 7 3.1.3 Local Stratigraphy ....................................................................................... 7 3.1.4 Groundwater Occurrence ........................................................................... 9 3.1.5 Water Level Changes ................................................................................ 12 3.1.6 Hydraulic Properties ................................................................................. 20 3.1.7 Groundwater
    [Show full text]
  • Merrymeeting River & Lake
    MERRYMEETING RIVER & LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE CYANOBACTERIA MITIGATION STEERING COMMITTEE OF NEW DURHAM/ALTON [FINAL September 2019] FB ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES 170 West Road, Suite 6 Portsmouth, NH 03801 www.fbenvironmental.com © John Gisis MERRYMEETING RIVER & LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN FB Environmental Associates ii MERRYMEETING RIVER & LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN MERRYMEETING RIVER & LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by FB ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES in cooperation with the Cyanobacteria Mitigation Steering Committee of New Durham/Alton, DK Water Resource Consulting, and Horsley Witten Group FINAL | September 2019 CONTACT Cyanobacteria Mitigation Steering Committee of New Durham/Alton P.O. Box 243 New Durham, NH 03855 Funding for this project was provided by the towns of New Durham and Alton, New Hampshire. FB Environmental Associates iii MERRYMEETING RIVER & LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY According to the 303(d) New Hampshire List of Impaired Waters, Marsh, Jones, and Downing Ponds are impaired for primary contact recreation due to elevated levels of cyanobacteria hepatotoxic microcystins. Toxic cyanobacteria blooms are often indicative of enhanced nutrient loading, particularly phosphorus, from point source (PS) and nonpoint source (NPS) pollution such as stormwater runoff from developed and agricultural land uses. In this case, point source discharges from the Powder Mill State Fish Hatchery are estimated to contribute 342 kg P/yr (67% of the total load) to the river as it flows into Marsh Pond. Local groups and town officials are working with state and federal agencies to set an appropriate phosphorus load discharge limit for the Powder Mill State Fish Hatchery; this permitted limit will dictate the achievable in-pond concentrations for Marsh, Jones, and Downing Ponds, and thus, the water quality goals described herein should be considered preliminary.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranston's Mill Pond Raw Water Supply November 30, 2016
    Cranston's Mill Pond Raw Water Supply November 30, 2016 Prepared for: Virginia Marine Resource Commission (VMRC) Habitat Management Division 2600 Washington Avenue, 3rd Floor Newport News , Virginia 23607-0756 Prepared By Partners: RS RESTORATION SYSTEMS I LLC November 30, 2016 Director Paylor, Commissioner Bull, and Other Involved Virginia Agencies: The Commonwealth has identified a need to develop water storage sites and diversify its water supply portfolio. Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Land Trust and Restoration Systems are private companies that are recognized in Virginia for finding innovative, market-based approaches to meeting environmental needs. These two companies formed a partnership in 2009 known as Cranston Mill Pond, LLC (CMP) focused on developing water resource-based projects in the Commonwealth of Virginia. With submittal of this Joint Permit Application CMP is seeking to become a partner to the Commonwealth in providing water storage and development of an innovative alternative solution to help address the Commonwealth’s significant water supply challenges in the Eastern Virginia Groundwater Management Area. It is widely accepted, especially in the Eastern portion of the Commonwealth, that innovative, alternative sources of water supply are needed to reduce the amount of water currently withdrawn from groundwater sources, provide adequate additional water for future population and economic growth, and diversify water resource assets. We have participated in various aspects of the Eastern Virginia Groundwater Management Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • Mill Ponds Management Plan Walkers Pond, Upper Mill Pond, and Lower Mill Pond
    Mill Ponds Management Plan Walkers Pond, Upper Mill Pond, and Lower Mill Pond FINAL REPORT November 2014 for the Town of Brewster Prepared by: Coastal Systems Group School for Marine Science and Technology University of Massachusetts Dartmouth 706 South Rodney French Blvd. New Bedford, MA 02744-1221 Mill Ponds Management Report Walkers Pond, Upper Mill Pond, and Lower Mill Pond FINAL REPORT November 2014 Prepared for Town of Brewster Comprehensive Water Planning Committee and Horsley Witten Group 90 Route 6A, Unit 1 Sandwich, MA 02563 Prepared By Ed Eichner, Senior Water Scientist/Project Manager Brian Howes, Director CSP/SMAST Dave Schlezinger, Research Associate CSP/SMAST Mike Bartlett, Technical Associate CSP/SMAST COASTAL SYSTEMS GROUP SCHOOL FOR MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH 706 South Rodney French Blvd., New Bedford, MA 02744-1221 Cover photo: Upper Mill Boat Ramp (6/21/14) Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the contributions of the many individuals and boards who have worked tirelessly for the restoration and protection of the ponds and lakes within the Town of Brewster. Without these pond stewards and their efforts, this project would not have been possible and restoration would not be possible. The authors also specifically recognize and applaud the generosity of time and effort spent by Brewster Pond and Lake Stewards (PALS) and the Comprehensive Water Planning Committee, both past and present members. These individuals gave of their time to collect or support collection of water quality information, which made the development of this management plan possible. Among these groups particular thanks go to Paula Miller, David Bennett, Lem Skidmore, Daniel Ryan, Bruce Evans, Russell Schell, Adam Curtis, Elizabeth Taylor, John O'Reilly, Pat Hughes, and Joanne Hughes.
    [Show full text]
  • Aging and Disabilit
    Washington State Register, Issue 07-05 WSR 07-05-014 WSR 07-05-014 BASIC PERMANENT RULES WAIVER SERVICES YEARLY LIMIT DEPARTMENT OF Speech, hearing and lan- SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES guage services (Aging and Disability Services Administration) [Filed February 9, 2007, 4:03 p.m., effective March 12, 2007] Staff/family consultation and training Effective Date of Rule: Thirty-one days after filing. Transportation Purpose: The division of developmental disabilities has received approval from the federal Centers for Medicare and EMPLOYMENT/DAY PRO- May not exceed Medicaid Services (CMS) to increase the dollar maximum GRAM SERVICES: $((6500)) 6631 for certain services in the basic and basic plus waivers within Community access per year the home and community based service (HCBS) waivers. Person-to-person Citation of Existing Rules Affected by this Order: Prevocational services Amending WAC 388-845-0205 and 388-845-0210. Supported employment Statutory Authority for Adoption: RCW 71A.12.030, 71A.12.120. Sexual deviancy evaluation Limits are deter- Adopted under notice filed as WSR 07-02-065 on mined by DDD December 29, 2006. Respite care Limits are deter- Number of Sections Adopted in Order to Comply with mined by respite Federal Statute: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0; Federal assessment Rules or Standards: New 0, Amended 2, Repealed 0; or Personal care Limits are deter- Recently Enacted State Statutes: New 0, Amended 0, mined by CARE Repealed 0. assessment Number of Sections Adopted at Request of a Nongov- ernmental Entity: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0. MENTAL HEALTH STABILI- Limits are deter- Number of Sections Adopted on the Agency's Own Ini- ZATION SERVICES: mined by a mental tiative: New 0, Amended 0, Repealed 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Ponds East Goshen Township Chester County, PA
    Study of Ponds East Goshen Township Chester County, PA FEBRUARY 2018 Study of Ponds East Goshen Township Chester County, PA FEBRUARY 2018 Hildacy Preserve 1031 Palmers Mill Road Media, PA 19063 610-353-5587 natlands.org with contributions from Toth Brothers Clearing and Dredging Aquascapes Unlimited, Inc. Brandywine Science Center, Inc. Pennoni STUDY OF PONDS – EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP table of contents background .........................................................................................1 approach ...............................................................................................1 additional challenges ..................................................................2 goals of this study .........................................................................3 context ...................................................................................................4 meaning of the results ................................................................6 general recommendations ........................................................7 pond profiles ................................................................................... 13 conclusion ........................................................................................ 38 appendix 1 – subconsultant reports & cost estimates ................................................. 39 appendix 2 – supporting documents ............................. 77 provided in digital format Natural Lands STUDY OF PONDS – EAST GOSHEN TOWNSHIP Natural Lands STUDY OF PONDS –
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Introduction... page 5 Chatham’s Waters Chapter 7... page 39 Together we can make Spare that Shrub! a diff erence! Helpful hints for controlling surface runoff and erosion Chapter 1... page 11 A Water Primer Chapter 8... page 43 Our beautiful blue planet Landscaping for Healthy Watersheds Landscaping choices, garden- ing, composting, and pest Chapter 2... page 20 management techniques A Quick Start for the Water-Wise Chapter 9... page 49 Ten simple things you can Recovery from do right now to begin Lawn Obsession caring for our local waters 12 steps to learn how to grow a natural lawn Chapter 3... page 22 Water, Water Everywhere Chapter 10.. page 53 Saving water is as important as Getting Out on the Water keeping it clean - simple tips for Good Boating Practices water conservation Chapter 4... page 25 Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Chapter 11... page 56 A Wastewater Primer Not Just for Kids Just what does “down the drain” Activities for the whole family mean? - how your sewer or septic system works Chapter 12... page 57 Chapter 5... page 29 Taking Action: Hazardous Waste? Th e Big Picture Not in My House! On our own or together, Good practices for using and let’s make a diff erence! disposing of water soluble household products Chapter 13... page 59 Chapter 6... page 35 Where to Go for Help Rethink/Reuse/Recycle Resources for taking the Improve water quality by pre- next steps cycling, recycling and re-using Page 3 bluepages.indd 3 8/26/2009 1:48:41 PM PLEASANT BAY FOX POND ILL ROAD H X FO CROWS POND BASSING HARBOR SEAPINE
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Water Powered Mill Sites in Candia, NH
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 EARLIEST DAYS 2 CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION 4 EXPLORING CANDIA’S MILL SITES 8 1852 TOWN OF CANDIA MAP 9 2008 MAP AND MILL LOCATIONS 10 KINNECUM POND TO MASSABESIC LAKE 12 GENESEE MILL 12 MAPLE FALLS MILL 13 MAP AND PHOTOS 15 HIGH STREET TO ONWAY LAKE 21 CASS MILL 21 EMERSON MILL AT MAIN STREET DEPOT 23 MAP AND PHOTOS 25 EMERSON MILL AT EAST CANDIA DEPOT 35 WARD BROOK MILL 36 MAP AND PHOTOS 37 MILL STREAM 44 NORTH ROAD NAIL MILL 44 BROWN’S MILL 45 RUNDLETT AND DAVIS MILLS 46 HALL MILL 48 MAP AND PHOTOS 50 CLAY MILL 66 MAP AND PHOTOS 67 NORTH BRANCH OF THE LAMPREY 69 MILLS AT THE VILLAGE 69 BEAN GRIST MILL 70 TURNER MILL 71 MAP AND PHOTOS 73 MILLS AT THE ISLAND 88 EASTMAN MILL 88 BEANE ISLAND MILL 88 MAPS AND PHOTOS 91 STEAM POWER 94 GEOLOGY OF CANDIA 96 CONCLUSION 98 THANKYOU 99 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SUGGESTED READING 100 IMAGES OLD AND NEW INTRODUCTION The Eaton map of Candia published in 1852 showed several mill sites and the question arose, "Are they still there?" With the1852 map as the tour guide, we set out to find, photograph and document the 2005 status of the mill sites. The Candia Heritage Commission wanted to create an historic map of historic sites and Jim Lindsey was involved with this project. We became an adventurous team. This is not, however, an equitable relationship. Jim does all the work and I have all the fun. Jim has done GPS mapping, historical research at the registry of deeds, record keeping, scanning and printing at his computer.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Open Space and Recreation Plan
    Horsley Witten Group Sustainable Environmental Solutions 55 Dorrance Street, Suite 200 • Providence, RI • 02903 Phone - 401-272-1717 • www.horsleywitten.com Open Space and Recreation Plan Burlington, Massachusetts June 27, 2019 Prepared for: Town of Burlington Open Space and Recreation Plan Subcommittee 26 Center Street Burlington, MA 01803 Prepared by: Horsley Witten Group, Inc. Burlington Open Space and Recreation Plan June 27, 2019 Burlington Open Space and Recreation Plan Subcommittee John Keeley Conservation Administrator Eileen Coleman Assistant Conservation Administrator Brendan Egan Parks and Recreation Director Kelly Lehman Parks and Recreation Program Coordinator Josh Morris Senior Planner Elizabeth Bonventre Assistant Planner Chris Hanafin Veterans Services Director & ADA Coordinator Jennifer O’Riorden Conservation Commission Jack Kelly Planning Board Chair Kristine Brown Recreation Commission Chair Table of Contents 1 Plan Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Statement of Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Planning Process and Public Participation .................................................................................... 3 2.3 Enhanced Outreach and Public
    [Show full text]
  • Spirit Lake and the Mill Pond Mess Some History and Some Proposals
    Spirit Lake and the Mill Pond Mess Some History and Some Proposals By Dave Rodgers, April 2002 FORMATION OF SPIRIT LAKE Spirit Lake is unique among the world's lakes. At least parts of it, including the Mill Pond, depend on a "bottom seal' to retain its water. The bottom forms a seal much like a bathtub. If the seal is breached, water will run out like a draining bathtub. It will continue to drain until the currents deposit enough silt to plug the breach. The basic configuration of North Idaho's mountains and valleys were carved out by the glaciers some 15,000 years ago. The essential configuration of Spirit Lake, including the Mill Pond, along with Twin Lakes, Hauser Lake, Newman Lake, and others were probably determined some 12,000 years ago when the last of the great Missoula Floods roared through tile area. Thus, in the thousands of years since the floods, the lake has been shaped by the movement of water, which carried the silt, that formed its vital bottom seal. This paper uses the term "silt" as a convenient reference to silt, clay, sediment, and such other material that may form the seal The Mill Pond part of the lake is located over deep gravel beds and adjacent to the Spokane Valley and Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. If its bottom seal is breached the water flows immediately into the gravel beds. The lake can hold about 54,000 acre-feet of water and has a surface area of 1445.4 acres. There are 70,542 feet of shoreline.
    [Show full text]