DOCSLIB.ORG

Litter Hotspots Program Evaluation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Litter Hotspots Program Evaluation Report Final Report Litter Hotspots Program Final Evaluation Prepared for Metropolitan Waste and Resource Recovery Group Litter Hotspots Program Final Evaluation—Final Report Company information First Person Consulting Pty Ltd ABN 98 605 466 797 www.fpconsulting.com.au Suite 3, Level 2, 190 Queen Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Contact Patrick Gilmour 03 9600 1778 [email protected] Document details: Title: Final Report – Litter Hotspots Final Evaluation Authors: Rebecca Denniss, Danielle Clarke, Patrick Gilmour Version: Final Revision date: 5 October 2017 Client: Metropolitan Waste and Resource Recovery Group Prepared for MWRRG i Litter Hotspots Program Final Evaluation—Final Report Executive summary Background The Metropolitan Waste Resource Recovery Group (MWRRG) is a Victorian Government statutory body responsible for coordinating and facilitating the delivery of municipal solid waste management across Melbourne’s 31 metropolitan local governments. From 2014-2017, MWRRG delivered the Litter Hotspots Program (the Program) in partnership with the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP), funded through the Victorian Government's Sustainability Fund. To meet funding requirements, a full final evaluation of the Program has been undertaken in accordance with the Department of Treasury and Finance (DTF) Lapsing Program Guidelines (Guidelines). This document is the Final Report for the Litter Hotspots Final Evaluation. The Litter Hotspots Program The Program was developed as a pilot in 2013 by MWRRG. The 2013 pilot attracted strong interest from stakeholders and received an additional $1.9 million in funding to implement a more comprehensive three-year program in 2014—ending on 30 June 2017. The Litter Hotspots Program’s stated objectives are to: 1. support the implementation of best-practice litter prevention projects 2. develop partnerships in order to capacity build litter prevention projects 3. improve personal responsibility for litter disposal and prevention 4. improve the amenity of public spaces that impact upon the water quality of the Yarra River and Port Phillip Bay. The Litter Hotspots Program is a catchment-wide capacity building program with a strong partnership focus that has supported and funded 35 local government and community grants projects since 2013 (including 10 pilot projects, which are outside the scope of this evaluation). The Program brought together a combination of government and community partners, influencing leading litter prevention practice and yielding strong partnership, community engagement and litter prevention outcomes. The Program aimed to either build or enhance litter management skills, depending on the skills of each grant recipient. Funded projects ranged from designing new waste technology to attempting to eradicate single-use plastic bags. Evaluation objectives and approach In addition to meeting the requirements of the DTF Guidelines, the objectives of the evaluation were to: undertake a full evaluation of the Litter Hotspots Program to assess performance of the Program against key questions outlined in the funding agreement between DELWP and MWRRG produce a final evaluation report that includes key findings, achievements, outcomes, lessons learned and recommendations to guide future decision making and delivery of future litter prevention initiatives. Prepared for MWRRG ii Litter Hotspots Program Final Evaluation—Final Report In meeting these objectives, and building on ongoing evaluation, monitoring and improvement processes throughout the Program, First Person Consulting undertook an evaluation of the Litter Hotspots Program focused on four key areas: effectiveness, program delivery, justification and value, and looking to the future. This involved: a review and gap analysis of existing evaluation data and program management documentation; undertaking 28 semi-structured phone interviews with MWRRG delivery staff (3), key stakeholders (5) and a selection of project officers from the 25 funded projects (20); analysis and synthesis of all data sources in response to evaluation questions under the four key areas. Key findings The key findings emerging from the Litter Hotspots Program Final Evaluation are summarised below. Effectiveness The Litter Hotspots Program either achieved or made strong progress towards achieving all four stated program objectives. Significant, demonstrable outcomes were achieved across the areas of best practice litter prevention, developing partnerships to build capacity, increasing responsibility for litter disposal and prevention, and improving the amenity of public spaces impacting on the water quality of the Yarra River and Port Phillip Bay. Key achievements of the Litter Hotspots Program include: o Funding projects that targeted diverse audiences, for example, trader groups, school students, businesses, industry organisations, local communities, dog-walkers and smokers. o 382 litter hotspot sites targeted with litter interventions, and an overall improvement in the litter ‘Hotshot’ score across hotspot sites. o $332,753 in additional funding contributed by funded organisations and project delivery partners, and $1,138,870 of in-kind contributions leveraged from funded organisations and project delivery partners. o The creation of 267 new partnerships between organisations on litter management initiatives. o Engagement with 13,227 participants across funded initiatives, 492 community events and 355 media articles and publications. o 175,230 kilograms of litter collected, and 3,317 additional litter infrastructure units installed (for example, bins). o Wide demographic and geographic reach of funded projects across the catchment. At the Program level, consultation, communications and engagement were effective throughout the Litter Hotspots Program. The Program successfully established an ongoing network in the litter prevention space, and broadened and diversified the range of community, council and business organisations partnering on litter prevention initiatives. The majority of organisations funded through the Program have continued to deliver outcomes in litter management beyond the funding period, sometimes as a direct result of the Litter Hotspots Program. Prepared for MWRRG iii Litter Hotspots Program Final Evaluation—Final Report A key characteristic of the Litter Hotspots Program was its alignment and commitment to improving the implementation of litter prevention in metropolitan Melbourne, based on the Victorian Litter Action Alliance’s (VLAA) best practice model. Program delivery The Litter Hotspots Program was generally delivered within scope, on budget and on time. The Program was delivered with relative efficiency and economy. MWRRG demonstrated appropriate governance and risk management practices in delivering the Litter Hotspots Program. Overall, MWRRG is seen to have effectively managed the Litter Hotspots Program between 2014 and 2017. Justification and value Overall, the Litter Hotspots Program provided value, evidenced by the outcomes achieved, and contributed to meeting a demonstrable need. Funding for the Litter Hotspots Program has not been renewed and the Program will be discontinued. However, there is still a need for Victorian Government intervention in litter prevention. Generally, the Litter Hotspots Program was well aligned with Victorian Government priorities, policies and strategies (including those of MWRRG, DELWP and Sustainability Victoria (SV)). During the course of the Program, alignment was strengthened throughout the portfolio with the release of the Victorian Waste Education Strategy, the Victorian Litter Plan and the Metropolitan Waste and Resource Recovery Implementation Plan. Looking to the future The key identified success factor in the Litter Hotspots Program was MWRRG’s management and administration of the Program. A key success factor was the partnership component of projects, but also the collaborative component of the Program itself. Through reflecting on lessons learned from the Litter Hotspots Programs, the following success factors were identified as contributing to the most effective litter interventions: o taking a collaborative, catchment-wide approach o effective engagement with the community o maintaining momentum in intervention approaches and engagement with the community and project partners o capacity building and knowledge sharing with other projects through a community of practice o implementing and developing the best practice model, utilising a range of approaches and activities o targeting litter prevention at the source o others also included: establishing buy-in with delivery organisations and partners, particularly stakeholders at senior levels; effective project planning and strong governance mechanisms; targeting and tailoring interventions (for example, using Prepared for MWRRG iv Litter Hotspots Program Final Evaluation—Final Report culturally appropriate communications); investing in research; and using positive messaging and consistent communications. Four key suggestions for Program level improvements emerged through this evaluation— simplifying application and reporting processes, supporting momentum and ongoing funding for litter prevention interventions, providing grants for 18-month durations as opposed to 12 months or three years, and continuing to develop the catchment-wide approach to litter management. Key ongoing challenges for litter management in metropolitan Melbourne identified through this evaluation include: o balancing support
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stormwater Management Plan 2012-17
    Stormwater Management Plan 2012-17 City of Whittlesea Stormwater Management Plan: 2012-2017 Copyright © 2012 City of Whittlesea Copyright of materials within this report is owned by or licensed to the City of Whittlesea. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under copyright legislation, no part may be reproduced or reused for any commercial purposes whatsoever. Contact [email protected] phone (03) 9217 2170 postal address | Locked Bag 1, Bundoora MDC, 3083 Responsible Council Department Infrastructure Department | Environmental Operations Unit Council Endorsement Council Meeting: 17 Apr 2012 Table of Contents Abbreviations & Acronyms .............................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 4 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Stormwater Management Plan 2003 ............................................................................................ 6 Stormwater Management Plan 2007-10 ....................................................................................... 6 Policy and Strategy Context ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Government Gazette No
    Victoria Government Gazette No. S 89 Tuesday 22 June 1999 By Authority. Victorian Government Printer SPECIAL Environment Protection Act 1970 VARIATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION POLICY (WATERS OF VICTORIA) - INSERTION OF SCHEDULE F7. WATERS OF THE YARRA CATCHMENT The Governor in Council under section 16(2) of the Environment Protection Act 1970 and on the recommendation of the Environment Protection Authority declares as follows: Dated 22 June 1999. Responsible Minister: MARIE TEHAN Minister for Conservation and Land Management SHANNON DELLAMARTA Acting Clerk of the Executive Council 1. Contents This Order is divided into parts as follows - PART 1 - PRELIMINARY 2. Purposes 3. Commencement 4. The Principal Policy PART 2 - VARIATION OF THE PRINCIPAL POLICY 5. Insertion of new Schedule F7. Waters of the Yarra Catchment PART 3 - REVOCATION OF REDUNDANT STATE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION POLICY 6. Revocation of State environment protection policy NO. W-29 (Waters of the Yarra River and Tributaries) PART 1 - PRELIMINARY 2. Purposes The purposes of this Order are to - (a) vary the State environment protection policy (Waters of Victoria) to add to Schedule F a new schedule - Schedule F7. Waters of the Yarra Catchment; and (b) revoke the State environment protection policy NO. W-29 (Waters of the Yarra River and Tributaries) 3. Commencement This Order comes into effect upon publication in the Government Gazette. 4. The Principal Policy In this Order, the State environment protection policy (Waters of Victoria) is called the ÒPrincipal PolicyÓ. PART 2 - VARIATION OF THE PRINCIPAL POLICY 5. Insertion of new Schedule F7. Waters of the Yarra Catchment After Schedule F6.
    [Show full text]
  • Aurora Development Plan : Part 2 (Amendment)
    AURORA DEVELOPMENT PLAN : PART 2 (AMENDMENT) SEPTEMBER 2016 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 5 DEVELOPMENT PLAN OBJECTIVES AND RESPONSES 21 1.1 Development Plan 2 5.1 Subdivision Design and Landscape Character 22 1.2 Aurora and Aurora Development Plan 2 5.2 Housing 29 1.3 Places Victoria and Aurora 3 5.3 Environmental Conservation 30 2 SITE CONTEXT AND ANALYSIS 5 5.4 Cultural Heritage Conservation 35 2.1 Planning Policy and Statutory Controls 6 5.5 Open Space and Recreation 37 2.2 Natural Environment 6 5.6 Community Planning 43 2.3 Cultural Heritage 10 5.7 Retail and Commercial 44 3 ASSESSMENT OF SERVICES AND FACILITIES NEEDS 11 5.8 Northern Town Centre 45 3.1 Land Budget 13 5.9 Southern Town Centre 47 3.2 Population 13 5.10 Secondary Activity Centres 49 3.3 Housing 13 5.11 Local Activity Centres 49 3.4 Social Infrastructure 14 5.12 Transportation System 50 3.5 Retail and Commercial 14 5.13 Engineering Infrastructure 63 3.6 Transportation 15 5.14 Linkages and Compatibility with Adjoining Properties 67 3.7 Engineering Infrastructure 15 6 DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 69 4 GUIDING PRINCIPLES 17 6.1 Development Contribution Requirements 71 4.1 Guiding Principles 19 7 IMPLEMENTATION 73 7.1 Proposed Development Staging 75 7.2 Clauses 54 and 55 and Building Regulations 76 7.3 Development Approvals Process 76 7.4 Design Controls 76 7.5 Dwelling Delivery Methods 76 ii AURORA Development Plan : Part 2 (Amendment September 2016) APPENDICES APPENDIX A LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 77 APPENDIX B REFERENCES 81 APPENDIX C PROJECT TEAM 85 APPENDIX D ENQUIRIES 89 APPENDIX
    [Show full text]
  • Growling Grass Frog Crossing Design Standards 1 Melbourne Strategic Assessment Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning
    Growling Grass Frog Crossing Design Standards Melbourne Strategic Assessment Cover image: A single span bridge over Kalkallo Creek provides easy passage for Growling Grass Frogs moving along the waterway corridor. Photo by Kathy Preece © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN 978-1-76047-323-5 (pdf/online) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136186, email [email protected], or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au. Contents
    [Show full text]
  • PROTECTING URBAN WATERWAYS a Guide to Victoria's Planning System
    PROTECTING URBAN WATERWAYS A Guide to Victoria’s Planning System ii PROTECTING URBAN WATERWAYS A Guide to Victoria’s Planning System FUNDED BY PROTECTING URBAN WATERWAYS | YARRA RIVERKEEPER iii Cover Image: The Maribyrnong River (Jan-Feb 2010) at Essendon West looking south-east towards the high rise of the City of Melbourne, Nick Carson at English Wikipedia, used under Wikimedia Commons license. Westmeadows, at the top of Moonee Ponds Creek. (Photo Credit: Anna Lanigan) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We acknowledge the traditional owners of the State of Victoria. We offer our respect to the Elders past, present and future of these traditional lands, and through them to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People. DISCLAIMER This document is indented to provide an overview of the planning and development framework that applies to Urban Waterways. The information contained in the report is of a general nature, and should not be used for the purposes of decision-making. © Ethos Urban 2019. This Publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. YARRA RIVERKEEPER | PROTECTING URBAN WATERWAYS iv Contents 1 BACKGROUND & CONTEXT 3 4 REFERENCES 51 1.1 This Document 4 4.1 Key References and Resources 52 2 THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 7 5 GLOSSARY 55 2.1 Legislative Framework 8 5.1 Key Terms 56 2.2 Planning Schemes 10 2.3 Planning Policy Frameworks 11 2.4 Planning Zones 14 2.5 Planning Overlays 17 2.6 Other Policies & Strategies 22 3 ENGAGING WITH THE PLANNING SYSTEM 29 3.1 Policy Contribution 30 3.2 Planning Permit Applications 31 3.3 Planning Strategy 34 3.4 Key Issues of Interest to Community Groups 36 3.5 Responding to Planning Issues 46 3.6 Future Opportunities 47 PROTECTING URBAN WATERWAYS | YARRA RIVERKEEPER v YARRA RIVERKEEPER | PROTECTING URBAN WATERWAYS vi Executive Summary Darebin Creek (Photo Credit: Nick Carson) The Greater Melbourne Metropolitan Area and was once both garden and habitat on a waterway Victoria’s other major urban centres are gifted shrinks.
    [Show full text]
  • Meandersmeanders Quarterlyquarterly
    MeandersMeanders QuarterlyQuarterly VOLUME 1, ISSUE 2 SEPTEMBER 2007 INSIDE On-the-ground action 2 Tree custodian Creekside burble project launch Community alliances 3 Propagating passion Featured bird 4 Resident raptors Featured plant 5 Water Plantain Meet a stakeholder 7 Merri Creek Management Committee Restoration project 9 In place of willows WHY MEANDERS? The eroding bends of goose- FROM THE PRESIDENT Our Confluence Tree: Tree neck meanders Custodian Project Launch, Now that the promise of Spring is upon us, we through the July 2008 at the confluence of can all watch with satisfaction the results of our Merri and Edgars Creeks lower floodplains Winter’s work. The months ahead are a busy weeding time for our Tree Custodians, who of Edgars Creek planted thirty River Red-gums along the Creek are part of a down stream from Edwardes Lake during July. Something we can all be proud of natural process. Another twenty enthusiastic ‘friends’ gathered during August, on the banks of a meander Apparently, south of the Kodak bridge in North Coburg, to plant 280 riparian habitat plants. there are no other areas along Again, while we all receive a great deal of sat- isfaction planting and imagining what will be in the urbanised years to come, it is the weeding work we do in sections of Merri Spring and the watering during the heat of Summer that will give these plantings the best and Edgars chance of reaching their potential. Creeks where A series of weed control workshops that the this process can Merri Creek Management Committee is provid- ing for FoEC members, beginning in October, be preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Merri Creek Catchment to Be Read in Conjunction with Part A: a Water Sharing Plan for All Licensed Water Users 2016 1
    February 2016 Drought Response Plan: Part B A Water Sharing Plan for Licenced Water Users in the: Merri Creek catchment To be read in conjunction with Part A: A Water Sharing Plan for all Licensed Water Users 2016 1. Catchment Description Merri Creek starts in the foothills of the Great Dividing Range around Heathcote Junction before joining its western arm north of Wallan. It then flows some 60 kilometres south to its junction with the Yarra River at Dights Falls in Abbotsford. It is one of the Yarra’s major tributaries draining water from a catchment covering 396 square kilometres. It has a number of major tributary systems including: Wallan Creek, Aitken Creek, Malcolm Creek, Merlynston Creek, Central Creek and Edgars Creek. While the Merri Creek catchment is predominantly rural, land use along the course of the creek changes from pastoral to industrial, then urban to residential. Despite a history of land clearing and agricultural development, the rural reaches have retained some natural stream form and feature a number of sites of state and national conservation significance. The endangered growling grass frog is also found in several locations. Merri Creek has a very high social value because of passive recreation and European and Aboriginal heritage. Where Merri Creek and the Yarra River join was once an important Aboriginal meeting place. The creek and surrounding lands were also important to the Aborigines for food, shelter and travel. The map below shows the catchment : Merri Creek Catchment Page 2 2. Ban Triggers Flow levels are monitored by gauges (data logging stations) that provide continuous flow readings.
    [Show full text]
  • Annualreport
    2012 /13 annualreport www.ppwcma.vic.gov.au Contents Port Phillip and Western Port Region 2-3 The Role of the Port Phillip and Westernport CMA 4 2012/13 Highlights 5 Chair’s Message 6 The Board 7 Chief Executive Officer’s Message 8 PPWCMA Staff 9 Summary of Performance 10-11 Achievements and Performance against Key Performance Indicators Coordinating Implementation of the Regional 12 Catchment Strategy Directing Funding to Priority Projects 13-14 Managing Environmental Projects 16-20 Engaging Stakeholder Organisations and 21 This Annual Report outlines the Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority’s (PPWCMA) progress against the performance indicators in its 2012/13 Corporate Plan. Enhancing Community Awareness It also includes information about: Supporting Landcare 22-23 Advising on Natural Resource Management 24 the PPWCMA, its Board and staff; Issues and Opportunities programs and their results; Catchment Condition 25-30 the work of partners and their contribution to the region’s environmental goals; Maintaining a Healthy Organisational Culture and 31-37 the condition of some of the natural resources in the region; High Standards of Business Management and compliance with governance requirements; and Governance financial statements. Financial Statements 38-56 This report is available online at www.ppwcma.vic.gov.au Disclosure Index 57-58 2012/13 PPWCMA Annual Report Index 60 Published by Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Authority, Frankston. P 03 8781 7900 F 03 9781 0199 ISSN 1836-2729 (Print) ISSN 1836-2737 (Online) This Annual Report is printed on uncoated, 100% recycled stock using vegetable based inks and water based glues.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Whittlesea Open Space Strategy August 2016 Acknowledgements
    City of Whittlesea Open Space Strategy August 2016 Acknowledgements The City of Whittlesea has recognised the rich Aboriginal heritage of the municipality and acknowledged the Wurundjeri Willum Clan of the Kulin nations as the traditional custodians of the land. The City of Whittlesea Open Space Strategy has been prepared by Thompson Berrill Landscape Design Pty Ltd in association with Environment & Land Management Pty Ltd for the City of Whittlesea. The population forecast information in the Strategy was prepared by the City of Whittlesea based on .id Consulting forecasts. The areas of forecast change are based on the Housing Diversity Strategy 2013- 2033 (May 2014). Supporting this Strategy is the City of Whittlesea Open Space Strategy Technical Report, which contains the technical research, definitions, analysis and recommendations. Accessibility This plan is available in alternative formats upon request. Telephone 9217 2170 and email [email protected] Index Page # Page # Glossary 6.2 Improve the quality of the open space network 13 1 Introduction 1 6.3 Additional open space 16 1.1 Strategy scope and purpose 1 6.4 Protect and improve biodiversity values 18 1.2 Strategy principles and aims 2 6.5 Environmental sustainability 19 1.3 Relevant strategies and policies 2 6.6 Cultural significance 19 2 Why open space is Important 3 6.7 Open space contributions 19 2.1 Definition of open space 3 7 Established areas precinct recommendations 20 2.2 Open space values 3 7.1 Overview 20 3 Existing open space in the City of Whittlesea 6 7.2
    [Show full text]
  • Batman's Route Revisited
    BATMAN’S ROUTE REVISITED: HIS EXACT STEPS TO A NEW TREATY SITE John Daniels N 1835, JOHN BATMAN set sail for Port Phillip from Van Diemen’s Land with the intention of claiming rights to pasture land for himself Iand his business associates. Past scholars have offered varied interpretations of where Batman and his party actually walked around Melbourne, and, therefore, where the famous treaty with the Indigenous people was signed—which is the purpose of this article. (Commentary on the meaning of the treaty will not be offered, it having been well covered by others.) The Merri Creek in Northcote was unquestioned as the treaty location after Bonwick chronicled Batman’s exploits in 1863, until J.A. Blackburn Jnr controversially suggested the Plenty River at Eltham in 1885. He was followed by Sutherland (1888), who suggested the Darebin Creek near Epping. J.S. Duncan attempted to settle the matter at the time of Victoria’s 150th birthday commemorations in 1986, proposing Edgars Creek in Thomastown. A.H. Campbell countered (1987) with Darebin Creek near Norris Bank in Bundoora. Most recently, Merv Lia (2008) proposed Merri Creek at Coburg Lake. Duncan and Campbell, contemporaries and members of the Royal Historical Society of Victoria, provided quite detailed, but different, accounts of most of Batman’s journey. The following is a new interpretation that aims to plot as accurately as possible the exact route, and suggests a previously unconsidered location on the Merri Creek as the treaty site. In arguing this case, the interpretations of Duncan and Campbell will be reviewed and other documents examined (including settler reminiscences, maps, expert opinion and studies from a number of disciplines).
    [Show full text]
  • Merri Creek and Environs Strategy 2009-2014
    Merri Creek and Environs Strategy 2009 – 2014 Merri Creek Management Committee May 2009 Merri Creek, Galada Tamboore, April 2009 Merri Creek, Galada Tamboore, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Merri Creek and Environs Strategy 2009-2014 is based on a review and revision of the 1999 Merri Creek and Environs Strategy undertaken by Merri Creek Management Committee with input from Councils, State Government Agencies, Friends Groups and the wider community. The 1999 strategy was facilitated by Melbourne Water. The following organisations and people are acknowledged for their contributions to the preparation of this document: Merri Creek and Environs Strategy Implementation Subcommittee Thanks are extended to the Merri Creek and Environs Strategy Implementation Subcommittee – a subcommittee of the Merri Creek Management Committee – for their input to the revision of the Strategy. The Subcommittee’s membership over the period of the preparation of the revision included the following organisations and people: City of Darebin Adam Shalekoff City of Hume Karen Wilson, Rebecca Brown, Anna Zsoldos City of Moreland Karin Hartog, Eamonn Fennessy City of Whittlesea Felicity Ayres City of Yarra Silvana Predebon, Craig McGrath Mitchell Shire Mitchell Shire, whilst not formally represented on the Committee has made detailed comments on various drafts of this version of the strategy. Merri Creek Management Tony Faithfull, Judy Bush, Luisa Macmillan, Ray Radford, Committee Katrina Roberg Friends of Merri Creek Alan Brennan, Allie Dawe, Harold Mackrell, Pascale Pitot, Paul Prentice, Ruth Shiel Friends of Wallan Creek John Robinson Report Production Research and production of the document was undertaken by Tony Faithfull (Project Officer, Merri Creek Management Committee). Cover Photo Merri Creek at Galada Tamboore, looking upstream What is Merri Creek Management Committee? Merri Creek Management Committee Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Naturalist
    The Victorian Naturalist Volume 135 (3) June 2018 Published by The Field Naturalists Club of Victoria since 1884 Research Report (Malacostraca: Decapoda) of the Pilliga Scrub in northern Roger E, Laffan SW and Ramp R (2007) Habitat selection inland New South Wales. The Victorian Naturalist 128, by the Common Wombat (Vombatus ursinus) in a dis- 96–105. turbed environment: implications for the conservation of a Murphy MJ (2014) Roost caves of the Eastern Horseshoe ‘common’ species. Biological Conservation 137, 437–449. Bat Rhinolophus megaphyllus Gray, 1834 (Chiroptera: Rhi- Roger E, Laffan SW and Ramp R (2011) Road impacts a nolophidae) in the Pilliga forest in northern inland New tipping point for wildlife populations in threatened land- South Wales, Australia. Australian Zoologist 37, 117–126. scapes. Population Ecology 53, 215–227. Murphy MJ (2016) Survey of the reptiles and amphibians of Skerratt LF, Skerratt JHL, Banks S, Martin R and Handasyde Yarrigan National Park in the Pilliga forest of northern in- K (2004) Aspects of the ecology of common wombats land New South Wales. Australian Zoologist 38, 147–160. (Vombatus ursinus) at high density on pastoral land in Vic- Murphy MJ and Shea M (2013) Survey of the terrestrial and toria. Australian Journal of Zoology 52, 303–330. freshwater molluscan fauna of the Pilliga forest area in Triggs B (2009) Wombats (2nd edn) (CSIRO Publishing: northern inland New South Wales, Australia. Molluscan Collingwood) Research 33, 237–253. Turbill C and Ellis M (2006) Distribution and abundance of O’Connor L (2017) Are we in wombat territory? Coonamble the south-eastern form of the greater long-eared bat Nyct- Times, Wednesday 30 August 2017, p.
    [Show full text]