Assessment of Ruforum Member Universities in Uganda
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ASSESSMENT OF RUFORUM MEMBER UNIVERSITIES IN UGANDA Daniel Kitone, Lang Gao, and Nienke Beintema October 2018 BACKGROUND Credible quantitative and qualitative information on existing capacities in agricultural higher education agencies in Africa are important for decisionmakers at national, regional, and international levels. Decisionmakers require data and indicators for strategic planning, policy formulation, setting priorities and benchmarks, measuring progress toward benchmarks, and identifying capacity gaps. Decisionmakers need a better understanding of the specifics of existing staffing and student capacities in the higher education sector, as well as in the wider agricultural innovation systems in Africa south of the Sahara. Access to such information will result in better policies addressing capacity issues in agricultural higher education, research, extension, and other areas. The existence of such information, however, remains extremely limited. To fill this data gap, the International Food Policy Research Institute’s Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI/IFPRI) and the Regional Universities Forum for Capacity Building in Agriculture (RUFORUM) initiated a partnership to pilot the collection of this type of data for RUFORUM’s member universities. During phase I of the collaboration, ASTI/IFPRI and RUFORUM developed and launched a prototype of the the Portal on Agricultural Capacity in RUFORUM Universities. Phase II, which is currently being implemented, aims to further develop and launch the portal, and to obtain more detailed quantitative and qualitative information for RUFORUM member universities in Kenya and Uganda. This report summarizes the findings of the in-depth assessment for Uganda. TEACHING STAFF TRENDS The general ASTI survey round comprises 15 agricultural higher education agencies in Uganda. These include various agricultural faculties and other agriculture-related units at the 7 RUFORUM member universities, as well as a small number of non-RUFORUM universities and other higher education agencies. The quantitative overview in this report comprises seven RUFORUM member universities with relevant colleges, faculties, schools, or departments (noting that Makerere University has three separate agriculture-related faculties, so the overall sample includes nine units: ✓ Busitema University, Faculty of Agriculture (BU-FA) ✓ Gulu University, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment (GUCCL-FAE) ✓ Kyambogo University, Faculty of Vocational Studies, Department of Agriculture (KYU-FVS-DA) ✓ Makerere University, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (MAK-CAES) ✓ Makerere University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources, and Biosecurity (MAK-COVAB) ✓ Makerere University, College of Natural Sciences, School of Biosciences (MAK-CONAS-SBS) ✓ Ndejje University, Faculty of Environment and Agricultural Sciences (NU-FAES) ✓ Uganda Christian University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Agricultural and Biological Sciences (UCU-FOST-DABS) ✓ Uganda Martyrs University, Faculty of Agriculture (UMU-FA) ABOUT ASTI/IFPRI AND RUFORUM ASTI/IFPRI Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI) is widely recognized as the authoritative source of information on the status and direction of agricultural research systems in low- and middle-income countries. Facilitated by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), the program functions through collaborative alliances with national research agencies, regional coordinating bodies, and international institutions. ASTI’s mission is to support improved decisionmaking through high-quality data, research, and analyses; to disseminate the results of its analyses to promote advocacy and support policymaking; and to build national and regional capacity for data collection and analysis. RUFORUM RUFORUM is a network of 85 universities in 36 African countries. RUFORUM’s mandate is primarily to strengthen the quality and relevance of postgraduate training and research in African universities—especially in agriculture, science, technology, and innovation. As such, RUFORUM engages in activities including benchmarking, tracer studies, and capacity building aimed at improving the capacity of African universities and research centers to generate knowledge relevant to Africa’s development challenges. Makerere University is Uganda’s oldest university involved in agricultural sciences. A number of new universities were established after 2000, including Busitema University, Gulu University, and Ndejje University. In 2016, the nine sample units accounted for a combined 83 percent of the teaching staff employed at Uganda’s 15 agriculture-related higher education agencies. Total teaching capacity among the RUFORUM members in Uganda ranged from 15 staff at NU-FEAS and UNU-FA to more than 150 at MAK-CAES and BU-FA (Figure 1). The share of teaching staff with PhD degrees also differed widely. With shares 48, 72, and 73 percent, the three MAK faculties employed relatively more PhD-qualified teaching staff, as well as employing no teaching staff only qualified to the BSc- degree level. In contrast, only 13 percent of the teaching staff at NU-FAES and 16 percent of the teaching staff at BU-FA were trained to the PhD-degree level. Figure 1. Total number of teaching staff by qualification level, 2016 200 188 161 150 100 100 46 54 50 41 20 15 Total teaching staff teaching Total 15 0 BSc MSc PhD Source: Compiled by authors from ASTI/IFPRI–RUFORUM surveys. In general, the higher education agencies reported a relatively well-balanced distribution of teaching staff by age (Figure 2). Overall, one- third of the teaching staff with PhD degrees were in their 50s and 60s, but the share for BU-FA was particularly high. As a result, 74 percent of the PhD-qualified teaching staff at BU-FA will retire in the next 10 to 15 years. Figure 2. Total and PhD-qualified teaching staff by age, 2016 a. All teaching staff b. PhD-qualified teaching staff UMU-FA 67 20 13 20 40 40 19 76 5 UCU-FOST-DABS 56 43 2 NU-FEAS 47 40 13 100 MAK-COVAB 37 51 12 4 73 23 MAK-CONAS-SBS 24 43 33 6 48 45 MAK-CAES 40 36 24 20 48 32 KYU-FVS-DA 50 40 10 13 63 25 GUCCL-FAE 37 49 15 21 43 36 3 23 74 BU-FA 41 26 33 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Share (%) Share (%) < 41 41–50 > 50 < 41 41–50 > 50 Source: Compiled by authors from ASTI/IFPRI–RUFORUM surveys. The majority of teaching staff are lecturers and senior lecturers; about a quarter are deans, department heads, or (assistant) professors (Figure 3). MAK-COVAB employed a comparatively high number of assistant lecturers and teaching assistants. –2– Figure 3. Teaching staff by position, 2016 UMU-FA 7 27 33 33 UCU-FOST-DABS na NU-FEAS 20 73 7 MAK-COVAB 23 52 MAK-CONAS-SBS 17 61 20 MAK-CAES 7 17 48 27 KYU-FVS-DA 5 5 55 35 GUCCL-FAE 17 10 71 2 BU-FA na 0 20 40 60 80 100 Share (%) Deans/department heads Professors (incl. ass.) Lecturers (incl. senior) Ass. lecturers/teaching ass. Source: Compiled by authors from ASTI/IFPRI–RUFORUM surveys. Note: Data for UCU-FOST-DABS and BU-FA were not available. Female professors and other teaching staff offer different insights from their male counterparts, so it is important for higher education agencies to employ a balance of male and female lecturers. With 47 percent of its teaching staff being female in 2016, only NU-FAES approached gender parity overall (Table 1). In comparison, BU-FA and GUCCL-FAE reported relatively low shares of female teaching staff (15 and 10 percent, respectively). One in four teaching staff was female at the three MAK faculties, whereas the ratio was one to three for the other agencies in the sample. In general, female teaching staff were younger and less qualified compared with their male counterparts. Table 1. Share of female teaching staff, 2016 Share (%) RUFORUM member Total PhD MSc BSc <41 41‒50 >50 BU-FA 15.4 19.4 10.8 21.8 21.8 16.7 6.5 GUCCL-FAE 9.8 7.1 11.5 — 6.7 15.0 — KYU-FVS-DA 35.0 25.0 41.7 — 50.0 25.0 — MAK-CAES 24.8 23.1 29.5 — 33.8 20.7 15.8 MAK-CONAS-SBS 23.9 18.2 38.5 — 36.4 25.0 13.3 MAK-COVAB 25.0 22.9 26.8 27.3 40.5 13.7 25.0 NU-FEAS 46.7 100.0 41.7 50.0 42.9 33.3 100.0 UCU-FOST-DABS 35.2 28.6 39.1 40.0 50.0 17.4 — UMU-FA 33.3 — 33.3 75.0 50.0 — — Source: Compiled by authors from ASTI/IFPRI–RUFORUM surveys. METHODOLOGY In collaboration with the ASTI/IFPRI team, ASTI’s country focal points (that is, points of contact) at the Uganda’s National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO) and the Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) developed a checklist to capture qualitative and quantitative information from RUFORUM member universities in both countries (Appendix A). The information captured was in addition to other data collected during ASTI’s regular 2017– 2018 survey round, administered to all higher education agencies in Uganda. The information included, but was not limited to the following categories: • Data management • Research outputs and their dissemination • Influence of research in the community • Student trends and motivations • Capacity building plans for students • Benefits of being members of RUFORUM and suggested ways of improvement In Uganda, deans and chairs of faculties and departments relevant to ASTI were interviewed by a team comprising Lang Gao (ASTI/IFPRI) and Daniel Kitone (NARO). –3– In order to fulfill teaching and research mandates effectively, it is important for higher education agencies to have a well-balanced pool of researchers, not only in terms of qualification levels, age distribution, and gender, but also in terms of disciplines. Except for MAK-COVAB, the RUFORUM member universities’ overall focus was agricultural and, as a result, the teaching staff employed by most agencies was qualified across a wide variety of disciplines (Table 2).