The Procurement of Rhum Bloodstone and the Rhum Bloodstone Exchange Network – a Social Territory in the Scottish Inner Hebrides?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Procurement of Rhum Bloodstone and the Rhum Bloodstone Exchange Network – a Social Territory in the Scottish Inner Hebrides? The procurement of Rhum bloodstone and the Rhum bloodstone exchange network – a social territory in the Scottish Inner Hebrides? Torben Bjarke Ballin Abstract ‒ The purpose of the present paper is to discuss Rhum bloodstone and the distribution of archaeological bloodstone throughout the Scottish Inner Hebrides. The main aim is to discuss the observed distribution patterns, bloodstone procurement and exchange, and the social territory defined by bloodstone distribution. Key words ‒ archaeology; Inner Hebrides; Scotland; Rhum bloodstone; exchange networks; social territories; lithic raw material procure- ment; lithic raw material terminology Titel – Das Rohmaterial ‚Rhum Bloodstone‘: seine Beschaffung und sein Tausch-Netzwerk – Hinweis auf ein soziales Territorium auf den Inneren Hebriden (Schottland)? Zusammenfassung – Der Zweck des vorliegenden Aufsatz ist die Diskussion von “Rhum bloodstone” und die Verbreitung archäologi- scher Artefakte aus ‘bloodstone’ auf den Schottischen Hebriden. Dabei richtet sich der Fokus besonders auf erkannte Verteilungsmuster, die Beschaffung und den Austausch von ‘bloodstone’ und das durch die Verbreitung von ‘bloodstone’ festgelegte Sozialterritorium. Schlüsselwörter – Archäologie; Innere Hebriden; Schottland; Rhum bloodstone; Tauschnetzwerke; Sozialterritorien; Beschaffung von Steinrohmaterial; Terminologie von Steinrohmaterial Introduction What is Bloodstone – the basic lithic raw material terminology Since the publication of Wickham-Jones’ volume on the Kinloch site on the Isle of Rhum in the Scot- Inspection of the archaeological and geological lit- tish Inner Hebrides (1990), it has been obvious that erature shows that, in general, archaeologists and Rhum bloodstone from an archaeological point of geologists agree on the basic notion that blood- view is an interesting lithic raw material, and that stone is a form of jasper (chalcedony), and that as the distribution of this raw material might poten- such it is a form of crypto- (or micro-) crystalline tially enlighten us on a number of points, such as quartz, or silicon dioxide (eg, HEDDLE, 1901; DU- lithic raw material procurement, exchange net- RANT ET AL., 1990; LUEDTKE, 1992; PELLANT, 1992). It works, and social territories. However, at the time may be discussed whether it is a form of chert, as only a small number of bloodstone-bearing sites the definitions of chert and flint vary from coun- were available (CLARKE & GRIFFITHS, 1990), and the try to country (LUEDTKE, 1992, 5). distribution of these sites told us little more than In general terms, two main sets of definitions that some bloodstone, once quarried or collected, of chert exist, namely ‘American’ and ‘British’ was transported off Rhum. definitions, where American nomenclature per- Today, a quarter of a century later, many more ceives chert as more or less synonymous with the bloodstone-bearing sites are known (see fig. 14 term ‘crypto-crystalline quartz’ and includes flint and Appendix), and it is now possible to discuss (LUEDTKE, 1992, 5), whereas British nomenclature the distribution of archaeological bloodstone in defines flint and chert as two different forms of a more meaningful manner. The purpose of the crypto-crystalline quartz, with flint having been present paper is therefore to, first, define blood- formed in Cretaceous chalk formations and chert stone geologically; then, describe the geological in all other formations. Chalcedony (and thereby and archaeological distribution of this raw mate- bloodstone) is commonly (American nomencla- rial; and, finally, attempt to interpret the distribu- ture) seen as forming part of the chert family (eg, tion patterns, to the degree the evidence allows LUEDTKE, 1992, 5), whereas others (British nomen- this. The main questions relate to the character clature) see it as neither a chert nor a flint but a of the territory defined by the distribution of ar- separate type of crypto-crystalline quartz, a min- chaeological bloodstone, as well as the exchange eral (eg, PELLANT, 1992, 88). network responsible for this distribution. In addition, there exists a third set of defini- tions of lithic raw materials, which has been al- Received: 11 Jan 2018 Archäologische Informationen 41, 2018, 241-254 accepted: 28 April 2018 CC BY 4.0 published online: 28 May 2018 241 Torben Bjarke Ballin most entirely overlooked in Anglo-American Scotland, this choice of nomenclature is relevant lithic research, namely the Central European defi - to discussions of procurement and exchange pat- nitions. PŘicHystal (2010; also see GÖTZE, 2010) terns as it allows the various forms of crypto-crys- suggests the following terminology: talline quartzes to be grouped geographically and — Siliceous sediments (silicites) – originating from in relation to one or the other form of bedrock (see chemical, biochemical or diagenetic precipita- the following chapter). tion of SiO2, including chert, fl int, radiolar- The chalcedony family may be subdivided into ites, spongolites, lydites, phtanites and limnic a number of different sub-categories on the basis silicites; the decisive factor […] is fi nding fos- of colours and patterns, such as chalcedony proper sils or microfossils […] in the silica substance. (grey or bluish-grey), jasper (usually red), carnel- — Minerals of SiO2 – this group includes mem- ian (brown), agate (characterized by concentric bers of the quartz family (milky quartz, rock banding), and bloodstone/plasma (green jasper). crystal, smoky quartz, citrine, etc.), members of Bloodstone is also called heliotrope, and heliotrope the chalcedony family (chalcedony, agate, jas- and plasma are frequently found in the same geo- per, bloodstone, carnelian, etc.), and opal, and logical environments (HALL, 2000, 93), such as for samples never contain fossils or microfossils. example around the extinct volcanoes on the Isle1b of — Natural glasses – this group includes obsidian, Rhum in the Scottish Inner Hebrides. pitchstone, and tektites (eg, Moldavite and In terms of specifi c geological attributes and Libyan Desert Glass). formation, chalcedony is generally defi ned in the — Clastic silica sediments – chert, sandstone, etc. following manner: “A microcrystalline variety of — Other rocks – includes a number of altered rocks silicon dioxide […] usually occurring as mammilary The existence of these different sets of defi ni- or botryodal masses. The colour is highly variable. This tions occasionally makes archaeological discus- mineral forms in cavities in rocks of different types, es- sions of assemblages based on crypto-crystalline pecially lavas. Much chalcedony develops at relatively quartz slightly confusing, not least in terms of low temperatures as a precipitate from silica-rich solu- procurement and exchange patterns. Some Euro- tions” (PELLANT, 1992, 88). Heddle (1901, 57) defi nes pean archaeologists choose to apply American no- plasma as: “Chalcedony stained bright green by the menclature whereas others apply British nomen- uniform admixture with Delesite or Celedonite. Lustre, clature, with a small number of archaeologists greasy to horny.” He (ibid.) defi nes heliotrope in preferring the Central European nomenclature. In the following fashion: “Chalcedony stained various archaeological research, the problem is that ana- shades of green, dark to leek-green, by admixtures with lysts tend to apply one or the other of the main Celedonite, and, when sprinkled with red spots, becomes geological terminologies, not realizing that even Bloodstone; when these from confl uence, become blotch- geologists disagree amongst themselves on these es, it is Heliotrope” (fi g. 1). matters, where we, as archaeologists, should con- sider independently which set of defi nitions may serve our archaeological purposes (discussions/ interpretations) best. This is not the place for a general discussion of fl int and chert, or crypto-crystalline quartz, but it is suggested that, to discuss matters such as pro- curement and exchange patterns most sensibly, lithics specialists may be served best by following Přichystal (2010), who perceives chalcedony (and thereby bloodstone) as a form of crypto-crystalline quartz different to fl int and chert (a mineral). Fol- lowing Přichystal (2010), fl int and chert are sedi- mentary rock forms (‘silicites’), formed in sedimen- tary rock formations, and the silica tends to derive from organic sources. Chalcedony/bloodstone, on the other hand, is defi ned by Přichystal (2010), and also Pellant (1992, 88), as being a crypto-crystalline type of quartz, most commonly formed in lavas and related rock formations by the solidifi cation Fig. 1 Flake of gem-quality bloodstone showing the characteristic of hydrothermal fl uids not of organic origin. In red spots and fi laments. Purchased in jewellery shop. 242 Rhum bloodstone and ts exchange network – a social territory in the Scottish Inner Hebrides? In their discussion of bloodstone from Rhum (in WICKHAM-JONES, 1990), DURANT ET AL. (1990) states that “… there is little agreement as to termi- nology in the geological literature, but technically the term bloodstone should be reserved for the fine-tex- tured dark green nodules that are shot through with red.” However, they also conclude that: “… pre- historic people apparently made no distinction between the formal varieties (ie, plasma or heliotrope [blood- stone]).” Furthermore, in terms of characterizing pieces of worked plasma/heliotrope in archaeo- logical assemblages, it would be entirely unreal- istic to attempt to distinguish between these two
Recommended publications
  • The Paleolithic and Mesolithic Occupation of the Isle of Jura, Argyll
    John MERCER, Edinburgh THE PALAEOLITHIC AND MESOLITHIC OCCUPATION OF THE ISLE OF JURA, ARGYLL, SCOTLAND The occupation sequence about to be described has been built up from a dozen sites concentrated in N-Jura (Mercer, 1968-79).It is based on local land-sea relationships, site stratification, pollen analysis, drifted-pumice dating and radiocarbon assay.The paper 1 will begin with a discussion of the inter-linked shorelines and climate, then give an impression of the main sites and, finally, describe and compare the stone implement typology. Late Glacial habitat 2017 Jura is a vast island (fig.1) some 80 km (50 m) long.It rises to about 780 m (2500ft) Biblioteca, in the south and 470 m (1500 ft)in the north. Several recent papers have shown that W-Scotland was suitable for human habita­ ULPGC. tion from 11,000 or 10,500 BC. Kirk and Godwin (1963) described an organic level por at Loch Drama (Ross and Cromarty) which, with a C14 date of 12,810 ± 155 be (Q-457), had not since been overlaid by ice, although in a through valley.Kirk com­ realizada mented: "In view of its location on the exposed, north-west Atlantic rim of Scotland one would except ...an onset of milder oceanic conditions at an earlier date than localities in the English Lowlands or the North European Plain." He concluded his Digitalización contribution: " ... it would appear that in Northern Scotland the process of degla­ ciation was not unlike that established for Scandinavia, namely an early and rapid autores. los melt of the ice in western fjords and a longer survival in uplands east of the Atlantic watershed.The significance of such a possibility for plant, animal and human coloni­ sation needs no stressing." documento, Del Coope (summarised in Pennington, 1974), working on beetle remains, noted that © early in Zone I (12,380-10,000 BC) there was a rapid rise in temperature, from less than 10° C as a July average to almost 17° C, though winters may have remained cold.
    [Show full text]
  • Aberdeen Area, New Light on Old Coin Hoards . . 327-44 Aberdeen, Clarence Street, Coin Hoard ...328 Ross's Cour
    Index Aberdeen coid arealighol w n n ne hoard,to 327-4. s 4 Cnoc Sligeach, Oronsay, Mesolithic site 3 ....2 , 17 . Aberdeen, Clarence Street, coin hoard .......... 328 Colonsay, new evidence for Mesolithic Ross's Court. Upperkirkgate, coin hoard in settlement ............................. 33-41 cauldron ........................ 328-9, 336-8 Druimvargie Cave, Mesolithic site .... 15, 17, 18-19 Shoe Lane, coin hoard ................ 331-20 ,34 SniachanDuc nMa , Early Historic sit 207. e , 209-11 St Nicholas Street, coin hoards ......... 327-80 33 , Dunadd, Early Historic site ............... 191-2, Mill of Maidencraig, Lang Stracht, coin 195,206-7,209-11,214 hoard ................. ............ 333,340-1 Dunollie, Early Historic site ............ 191, 195, ABERDEENSHIRE: 206,210-11,214,221 Aberdee ncoid area lighol n w n hoardne o ,t s 327-44 Duntealtaig, Colonsay, Mesolithic material Aberdeen see Aberdeen from ..................................... 37 Bridg Donf eo , coin hoard ............... 3305 33 , Gleann Mor, Islay, Mesolithic site ............. 33 Chapelden, Tor f Troupeo , excavatiof no Glengarrisdale, Jura, Mesolithic site ........... 35 beaker cist ................ 73-81, fiche l:Bl-8 Glenbatrick, Jura, Mesolithic site .... 12, 14, 16, 21 Valleye De , Mesolithi 23-, c 21 site4 , 19 s , ....14 , .4 Kilmelfort Cave, Mesolithic material from ..... 7-8 Footdee, coin hoards .............. 330-1, 339-40 Lealt Bay, Jura, Mesolithic site ......... 11-13, 16 Newhills, Bankhead Farm, coin hoards ..... 333-4, Loch Staosnaig, Colonsay, Mesolithic site .....5 3 . 340-1 Lower Kilchattan. Colonsay, Mesolithic Peterculter, Baads, coin hoard ............. 333-4 material .................................7 3 . Aberdour Castle, Fife, semicircular enam- Lussa Bay, Jura, Mesolithic site ......... 11-141 2 , elled mount ........................ 230,232-5 Lussa Riverjura, Mesolithic site .......
    [Show full text]
  • ANTARES CHARTS 2020 Full List in Chart Number Order
    ANTARES CHARTS 2020 Full list in chart number order. Key at end of list Chart name Number Status Sanda Roads, Sanda Island, edition 1 5517 Y U Pladda Anchorage, South Arran, edition 1 5525 Y N Sound of Pladda, South Arran, edition 1 5526 Y U Kingscross Anchorage, Lamlash Bay, Isle of Arran, editon 1 5530 Y N Holy Island Anchorage, Lamlash Bay, Isle of Arran, edition 1 5531 Y N Lamlash Anchorage, Lamlash Bay, Isle of Arran, edition 1 5532 Y N Port Righ, Carradale, Kilbrannan Sound, edition 1 5535 Y U Brodick Old Quay Anchorage, Isle of Arran,edition 1 5535 YA N Lagavulin Bay, Islay, edition 2 5537 A U Loch Laphroaig, Islay, edition 2 5537 B C Chapel Bay, Texa, edition 1 5537 C U Caolas an Eilein, Texa, edition 1 5537 D U Ardbeg & Loch an t-Sailein, edition 3 5538 A U Cara Reef Bay, Gigha, edition 2 5538 B C Loch an Chnuic, edition 3 5539 A C Port an Sgiathain, Gigha, edition 2 5539 B C Caolas Gigalum, Gigha, edition 1 5539 C N North Gigalum Anchorge, Gigha, edition 1 5539 D N Ardmore Islands, East Islay, edition 5 5540 A C Craro Bay, Gigha, edition 2 5540 B C Port Gallochoille, Gigha, edition 2 5540 C C Ardminish Bay, Gigha, edition 3 5540 D M Glas Uig, East Coast of Islay, edition 3 5541 A C Port Mor, East Islay, edition 2 5541 B C Aros Bay, East Islay, edition 2 5541 C C Ardminish Point Passage, Gigha, edition 2 5541 D C Druimyeon Bay, Gigha, edition 1 5541 E N West Tarbert Bay, South Anchorage, Gigha, edition 2 5542 A C East Tarbert Bay, Gigha, edition 2 5542 B C Loch Ranza, Isle of Arran, edition 2 5542 Y M Bagh Rubha Ruaidh, West Tarbert
    [Show full text]
  • THE PLACE-NAMES of ARGYLL Other Works by H
    / THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES THE PLACE-NAMES OF ARGYLL Other Works by H. Cameron Gillies^ M.D. Published by David Nutt, 57-59 Long Acre, London The Elements of Gaelic Grammar Second Edition considerably Enlarged Cloth, 3s. 6d. SOME PRESS NOTICES " We heartily commend this book."—Glasgow Herald. " Far and the best Gaelic Grammar."— News. " away Highland Of far more value than its price."—Oban Times. "Well hased in a study of the historical development of the language."—Scotsman. "Dr. Gillies' work is e.\cellent." — Frce»ia7is " Joiifnal. A work of outstanding value." — Highland Times. " Cannot fail to be of great utility." —Northern Chronicle. "Tha an Dotair coir air cur nan Gaidheal fo chomain nihoir."—Mactalla, Cape Breton. The Interpretation of Disease Part L The Meaning of Pain. Price is. nett. „ IL The Lessons of Acute Disease. Price is. neU. „ IIL Rest. Price is. nef/. " His treatise abounds in common sense."—British Medical Journal. "There is evidence that the author is a man who has not only read good books but has the power of thinking for himself, and of expressing the result of thought and reading in clear, strong prose. His subject is an interesting one, and full of difficulties both to the man of science and the moralist."—National Observer. "The busy practitioner will find a good deal of thought for his quiet moments in this work."— y^e Hospital Gazette. "Treated in an extremely able manner."-— The Bookman. "The attempt of a clear and original mind to explain and profit by the lessons of disease."— The Hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassessing the Scottish Mesolithic-Neolithic Transition: Questions of Diet and Chronology
    Bownes, Jessica (2018) Reassessing the Scottish Mesolithic-Neolithic transition: questions of diet and chronology. PhD thesis. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/8911/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] REASSESSING THE SCOTTISH MESOLITHIC- NEOLITHIC TRANSITION: QUESTIONS OF DIET AND CHRONOLOGY Jessica Bownes BA(hons), MSc, FSA Scot MARCH 24, 2018 SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SUERC | College of Science and Engineering | University of Glasgow I declare that, except where explicit reference is made to the contribution of others, that this dissertation is the result of my own work and has not been submitted for any other degree at the University of Glasgow or any other institution. Printed Name: __________________________ Signature: ______________________________ i Acknowledgements There is a long list of people I need thank for their contributions to this work. First and foremost are my supervisors, Dr Philippa Ascough, Professor Gordon Cook and Dr Iona Murray. I must also thank the AHRC and Historic Environment Scotland for funding this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Platforms and a Lithic Scatter, Loch Doilean, Sunart, Lochaber by Clare Ellis (Argyll Archaeology) with Torben Bjarke Ballin and Susan Ramsay
    ARO20: Activities in the woods: platforms and a lithic scatter, Loch Doilean, Sunart, Lochaber by Clare Ellis (Argyll Archaeology) with Torben Bjarke Ballin and Susan Ramsay Archaeology Reports Online, 52 Elderpark Workspace, 100 Elderpark Street, Glasgow, G51 3TR 0141 445 8800 | [email protected] | www.archaeologyreportsonline.com ARO20: Activities in the woods: platforms and a lithic scatter, Loch Doilean, Sunart, Lochaber Published by GUARD Archaeology Ltd, www.archaeologyreportsonline.com Editor Beverley Ballin Smith Design and desktop publishing Gillian McSwan Produced by GUARD Archaeology Ltd 2016. ISBN: 978-0-9928553-9-0 ISSN: 2052-4064 Requests for permission to reproduce material from an ARO report should be sent to the Editor of ARO, as well as to the author, illustrator, photographer or other copyright holder. Copyright in any of the ARO Reports series rests with GUARD Archaeology Ltd and the individual authors. The maps are reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. All rights reserved. GUARD Archaeology Licence number 100050699. The consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, advertising or promotional purposes, the creation of new collective works or resale. Contents Summary 6 Introduction and location 6 Archaeological background 6 Method of excavation 6 Raised terrace 6 Platforms 8 Results 8 Radiocarbon dates 8 Mesolithic 8 Late Iron Age? 10 Medieval platforms 10 Charcoal-burning platforms 17 Specialist reports 25 The lithic artefacts
    [Show full text]
  • Pumice in the North Atlantic
    Ocean-transported pumice in the North Atlantic Anthony Newton PhD University of Edinburgh 1999 Declaration I, Anthony Newton hereby declare that the work contained herein is my own and has not previously been presented for examination. Any contributions by others is acknowledged in the text. September 1999 ii For Keith Newton 1930-1984 iii “Some days we would pass through pumice lying in ridges, each piece uniformly the size and appearance of a bath sponge, then again we should pass through perfect fields of small yellow pumice spread evenly over the surface just for all the world like a green field of grass covered all over with buttercups, and the undulation of the swell of the trade wind produced an indescribably pretty appearance.” (Reeves, 1884). iv Abstract The overall aims of this study are to identify the sources of the widespread Holocene pumice deposits found along the coasts of the North Atlantic region and establish the ages of the source eruptions. In order to tackle this, it is necessary to determine whether it is possible to “fingerprint” the pumice of individual eruptions and link ocean-transported material with the established tephrochronological framework based on the stratigraphy of airfall deposits. Over 1500 electron probe microanalyses and over 200 Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry analyses have been undertaken on pumice and tephra samples. These are the first high quality grain specific analyses carried out on ocean-transported pumice in the North Atlantic. Current knowledge of the extent of pumice distribution in the North Atlantic region is assessed for both shoreline (natural) and archaeological contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Swords, Fragments Of, At, . . . 364 Aberdeen Ca
    INDEX Abbotsford, Bronze Mask from, fount a d Albany, Duke of, Plaster Cast of Panel Torrs, Kelton, (purchase) ..1 2 . with Arms of, from Old Trinity Hos- —— Swords, Fragments of, at, . 364 pital, (donation) ....9 1 . Aberdeen Cathedral, Vestment Tread an s - Alexander, James, ....6 5 , 54 . sure stored, sof Huntln i 7 y 15 Castle . , Allaman Bourgesf do , .... 7 f.n.7 —— Elphinstone, William, Bishop of, . 112 Allan, Jame elected, sH. , ...9 31 . —— King's College, ...... 161 Almon Tayd an d, Roman For t junctioa t n Aberdeenshire e Aberdourse : ; Aboyne; of, . .296,300 Auquharney: Cabrach (The); Clova; Amadeus VIII., Duke of Savoy : see Savoy, Coull; Da van; Gight, Braes of; Duk. eof Huntly Castle; Kildrummy; Lum- Amber Beads, Fragment , froof s m Glen phanan ; Migvie ; Rosehearty; Stand- Trool Hoard, (donation) ... 20 ingstones Farm Deerw Ne ,; Strath- Ancrum, Roxburghshire, Coped Stone bogie. at, .......8 18 . Aberdour, Aberdeenshire, Littoral Basins Anderson, Eric S., elected, .... 60 at, .......6 5 , 55 . 3 . 12 . — —. Grissel . , Aboyne, Aberdeenshire, 4 Famil5 , f 53 Bisse o y. t. — . — Helen . , at, ... f.n. l, 150 . RowandR — r —Si , Deat, hof —— Lordship of, ...... 154 —— —— Obituary notice of, . Account t Salvator'S f o s s Colleget S , —— Rev. R. S. G., on the Discovery of a Andrews, comprisin e Ordinarth g y Rock-Sculpture at Gallows Outon, Revenu Expenditured ean Casuae ,th l Whithorn, Wigtownshire, . 44 d Contingenan t Profits, etc., from Angus, William, elected, .... 2 1679 to 1689, and Details of the Animal Remains in Vessel of Pottery from Revenu 169n ei 1 ....5 32 . Traprain Law, ....
    [Show full text]
  • SCOTTISH ARCHAEOLOGICAL INTERNET REPORTS E-ISSN: 2056-7421
    SCOTTISH ARCHAEOLOGICAL INTERNET REPORTS e-ISSN: 2056-7421 Mesolithic and later activity at North Barr River, Morvern How to cite: MacGregor, G 2019 ‘Mesolithic and later activity at North Barr River, Morvern’. Scottish Archaeological Internet Reports 84 https://doi.org/10.9750/issn.2056-7421.2019.84 Visit http://journals.socantscot.org/index.php/sair to see the journal homepage Please note: This document is the publisher’s PDF of an article published in the Scottish Archaeological Internet Reports journal. This version has been peer- reviewed and contains all final editorial corrections and journal pagination. Copyright © 2019 rests with the Society and the individual authors. Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The permission to reproduce the Society's copyright-protected material does not extend to any material which is identified as being the copyright of a third party. Authorisation to reproduce such material must be obtained from the copyright holders concerned. Mesolithic and later activity at North Barr River, Morvern Gavin MacGregor with contributions by Alistair Becket, Ann Clarke, Nyree Finlay, David Sneddon and Jennifer Miller Address Northlight Heritage, Studio 114, South Block, 64 Osborne Street, Glasgow, G1 5QH Author contact [email protected] Funding Forestry and Land Scotland e-ISSN: 2056-7421 https://doi.org/10.9750/issn.2056-7421.2019.84 Published by the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. Society of Antiquaries of Scotland National Museums Scotland Chambers Street Edinburgh EH1 1JF United Kingdom Managing editor: Catherine Aitken Copy-editor: Helen Bleck Production: Raspberry Creative Type, Edinburgh Copyright © 2019 Gavin MacGregor and individual contributors.
    [Show full text]
  • Revising Settlement Models Around the Mesolithic-Neolithic Transition
    Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 85, 2019, pp. 83–114 © The Prehistoric Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/ppr.2019.2 First published online 14 August 2019 Calling Time on Oronsay: Revising Settlement Models Around the Mesolithic–Neolithic Transition in Western Scotland, New Evidence from Port Lobh, Colonsay By NYREE FINLAY1, RUBY CERÓN-CARRASCO2, RUPERT HOUSLEY3, JEREMY HUGGETT1, W. GRAHAM JARDINE4, SUSAN RAMSAY4, CATHERINE SMITH5, DENE WRIGHT1, JULIAN AUGLEY6 and PETER J. WRIGHT6 For over 120 years, the shell middens of western Scotland and the series of open-air sites on Oronsay have been the focus of debate in European Mesolithic studies. This paper challenges the significance of Oronsay in light of results from the geophysical survey and test-excavation of a new limpet and periwinkle shell midden dated to the late 5th or start of the 4th millennium cal BC at Port Lobh, Colonsay that offers fresh evidence to re-evaluate critically the role of Oronsay and coastal resources in island settlement models ahead of the Mesolithic–Neolithic transition. Test excavations recovered a marine molluscan assemblage dominated by limpet and periwinkle shells together with crab, sea urchin, a fishbone assemblage composed mainly of Gadidae, some identifiable bird and mammal bone, carbonised macroplant remains, and pumice as well as a bipolar lithic assemblage and coarse stone implements. Novel seasonality studies of saithe otolith thin-sections suggest wintertime tidal fishing practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Donations to and Purchases for the Museum, 1972-3
    Donations to and Purchases for the Museum, 1972-3 Donations 1 Surface finds from seven prehistori twentd an c y medieval site Angusn si , Fife, Perthshird ean Stirlingshire. By D HENDERSON, F.S.A.SCOT. 2 Large collection of prehistoric and later finds, mostly from North Uist, formed by the donors' father abovee se ; 287-93p ,p Wy m.MACKENZIEB B , Edinburgh MACKENZIET ,J , Motherwell, FLEMINGM G s ,Mr Kirriemuird an . 3 Casts of two mesolithic antler objects, found with skeletons of stranded whales near Stirling. By THE HUNTERIAN MUSEUM, GLASGOW, per E W MACKIE, F.S.A.SCOT. 4 Flint flake from St Michael's Kirkyard, Inveresk, Midlothian. By G MAXWELL, F.S.A.SCOT. 5 Blade of brown flint from the Culbin Sands, Morayshire. By Mrs V PRITCHARD, Cambridge. 6 Part of a polished stone macehead from west of the Ardow Burn, Dervaig, Isle of Mull (NM 4205 4937) MACLEANN y B . , Tobermory. 7 Flint flakes found with cremated burials by the standing stones at Orwell Farm, Kinross. Messry B s THOS LAWRIE AND SON, Orwel RITCHIEG l FarmN J r , ,pe F.S.A.SCOT . 8 Food vessel fro caira mcisa n t Ballachulisi tna h House, Argyll (NN 048595), excavaten di 1972, fig 1 (RCAMS Inventory of Argyll, vol ii, Lorn, 1975, no. 19). About one-third of the vessee bodth f ylo survives Directore sherdm th Ballachulise ri t only th e B .bu ,f yon o s h Estate Company, per J N G RITCHIE, F.S.A.SCOT. bronzo sherde Tw 9eAg s fro mcaira Nortn i h Wood, Masterton, DunfermlineH G , FifeK y B .
    [Show full text]
  • An Corran, Staffin, Skye: a Rockshelter with Mesolithic and Later Occupation
    AN CORRAN, STAFFIN, SKYE: A ROCKSHELTER WITH MESOLITHIC AND LATER OCCUPATION Alan Saville,1 Karen Hardy,2 Roger Miket3 and Torben Bjarke Ballin4 With contributions by László Bartosiewicz, Clive Bonsall, Margaret Bruce, Stephen Carter, Trevor Cowie, Oliver Craig, Ywonne Hallén, Timothy G. Holden, N.W. Kerr, Jennifer Miller, Nicky Milner, and Catriona Pickard, and with illustrations by Alan Braby, Marion O’Neil, and Craig Angus 1 Corresponding author. Scottish History and Archaeology Department, National Museums Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh, EH1 1JF, Scotland [email: [email protected]] 2 ICREA, Institució Catalana de Recerca I Estudis Avançats, Departament de Pre- història, Facultat de Filosofia i Lletres, Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain [email: [email protected]] 3 The Miller’s House, Yearle Mill, Wooler, Northumberland, NE71 6RA, England. [email: [email protected]] 4 Lithic Research, Banknock Cottage, Denny, Stirlingshire, FK6 5NA, Scotland [email: [email protected]] Scottish Archaeological Internet Report 51, 2012 www.sair.org.uk Published by the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, www.socantscot.org.uk with Historic Scotland, www.historic-scotland.gov.uk and the Council for British Archaeology, www.britarch.ac.uk Editor Helen Bleck Produced by Archetype Informatique SARL, www.archetype-it.com ISBN: 978-1-908332-99-8 ISSN: 1773-3803 Requests for permission to reproduce material from a SAIR report should be sent to the Director of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, as well as to the author, illustrator, photographer or other copyright holder. Copyright in any of the Scottish Archaeological Internet Reports series rests with the SAIR Consortium and the individual authors.
    [Show full text]