DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Taiwan-US Policy Program (TUPP) Washington, DC Schedule June 12-14, 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Taiwan-US Policy Program (TUPP) Washington, DC Schedule June 12-14, 2018 2018 Taiwan-US Policy Program (TUPP) Washington, DC Schedule June 12-14, 2018 Tuesday, June 12 9:00-9:45 AM Welcome breakfast with Bonnie Glaser 9:45-10:00 AM Break 10:00-5:00 PM Shelley Rigger Brown Professor of East Asian Politics Davidson College Wednesday, June 13 9:30-10:00 AM Breakfast 10:00-11:30 AM US-Taiwan Economic Relations Rick Ruzicka Trade and Commercial Programs Director American Institute in Taiwan 11:30-12:00 PM Lunch 12:00-1:30 PM US-China-Taiwan Relations Bonnie Glaser Senior Adviser for Asia and Director, China Power Project Center for Strategic and International Studies 1:30-1:45 PM Break 1:45-3:15 PM US-Taiwan Military and Security Ties Erica Brefka Taiwan Senior Advisor and Mongolia Country Director Office of the Secretary of Defense for Policy US Department of Defense 3:15-4:00 PM Transit to State 4:00-5:30 PM Site Visit: US Department of State US-Taiwan Diplomatic Relations Andrew Ou Foreign Service Officer US Department of State Thursday, June 14 8:00 AM Meet at Union Station 8:30-10:00 AM Site Visit: Capitol Hill US Congress and Taiwan Jennifer Hendrixson White Professional Staff Member (Democratic Staff) US House Committee on Foreign Affairs Igor Khrestin National Security Advisor Capitol Office of Senator Cory Gardner 10:00-10:45 AM Transit to CSIS 10:45-11:00 AM Break 11:00-12:30 PM China’s Military Modernization and Taiwan’s Security Joel Wuthnow Research Fellow Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs National Defense University 12:30-1:00 PM Lunch 1:00-2:30 PM US Policy Towards Taiwan Ivan Kanapathy Director for China, Taiwan, Mongolia National Security Council 2:30-2:45 PM Break 2:45-4:15 PM Taiwan’s Domestic Politics and US-Taiwan Relations Jennifer Hu Vice Chairperson, Board of Directors Global Taiwan Institute Janice Chen Senior Associate Taiwan Democratic Progressive Party Mission in the US 4:15-4:30 PM Break 4:30-5:30 PM 2017 TUPP Panel Emily Holland Erum Jilani Ryan Shaffer 5:30-5:45 PM Break 5:45-7:30 PM Reception at the Global Taiwan Institute 2018 Taiwan-US Policy Program (TUPP) Taiwan Schedule June 16-25, 2018 Saturday, June 16 – Taipei Arrival Sunday, June 17 – Taipei and Hualien 7:30 AM Depart from Hotel 8:05-10:40 AM Taipei – Hualien train 10:40 AM Taroko National Park Lunch at Taroko Village 4:30-5:30 PM Tsu-Chi Monastery 5:40 PM Meeting with Bi-Khim HSIAO 7:00 PM Dinner at Shepherd Bar Monday, June 18 – Hualien and Taipei 8:30 AM Depart Hotel 9:00 AM Hualien Air Force Base 12:00 PM Lunch 1:28-3:40 PM Hualien – Taipei train 4:45 PM Chang Kai-Shek Memorial 6:30 PM Dinner (Night Market Banquet) Tuesday, June 19 – Taipei 9:30 AM Depart from Hotel 10:00 AM Briefing by the Department of International Organizations Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) 11:00 AM National Security Council (NSC) Dr. York W. J. Chen Deputy Secretary-General 12:00-2:00 PM Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (TFD) Lunch Discussion with NGOs Echo LIN Former Secretary-General Environmental Jurists Association Sih-cheng (Sean) DU Director of Policy Advocacy Taiwan Tongzhi Hotline Association Yibee HUANG Chief Executive Officer Covenants Watch Lulu KENG Secretary Open Culture Foundation (OCF) 3:00 PM Legislative Yuan H.E. Chia-Chyuan SU President 5:00-6:00 PM Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) H.E. Joseph Jau-shieh WU Minister 6:30 PM Young Professionals Dinner Wednesday, June 20 – Taipei 9:30 AM Depart from Hotel 10:00 AM Executive Yuan Premier LAI 11:10 AM Ms. Pei-Yi WU DPP Candidate running for City Councilor 1:30 PM Dr. Kuo-chang HUANG Executive Leader New Power Party (NPP) 5:00 PM Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) H.E. Ming-Tong Chen Minister 6:30 PM Dinner at Grace Restaurant Taipei Thursday, June 21 – Taipei 9:00-10:30 AM Breakfast meeting with President SU Taipei Forum 10:30 AM Palace Museum 12:00 PM Lunch at Silk Place at Museum 2:15 PM National Development Council (NDC) Dr. Jiunn-Rong CHIOU Deputy Minister 4:00 PM Meeting with Eric Chu Li-lun Mayor of New Taipei City Friday, June 22 – Taipei 9:30 AM Depart from Hotel 10:00-11:30 AM Individual Meetings - NMD Think Tank - MOEA Bureau of Foreign Trade - Taiwan External Trade Development Council (TAITRA) - Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation - MOFA Department of Treaty and Legal Affairs - National Security Council - Legislator Hsu Yu-Ren 12:10 PM Lunch at Landis Hotel with Professor Fan 2:30 PM Office of Trade Negotiations Senior Negotiator Hsia and Negotiator Luo 4:00-5:30 PM Jing-Mei Human Rights Memorial and Cultural Park (meet with political prisoner Fred Chen) 7:01-8:47 PM High Speed Train: Taipei – Tainan Saturday, June 23 – Tainan 9:15 AM Depart from Hotel 10:00-11:30 AM Chihkan Tower Wu Temple An-Ping Fort An-Ping Tree House 12:30 PM Lunch: Tainan Traditional Noodles 2:00-4:00 PM National Museum of Taiwan History 6:30 PM Dinner Meeting with Mayor of Tainan City Sunday, June 24 – Tainan – Taipei 10:00-11:00 AM Wrap-up Meeting at Silk Place Hotel 11:30 AM Depart Hotel 4:30-6:00 PM Long-Shan Temple 6:30 PM Dinner at Ding-Tai Feng & Taipei 101 Monday, June 25 – Taipei Departure .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Assembly 2016
    General Assembly 2016 Bogota, 14 October 2016 16:00 – 17:30 Corferias Convention Centre Gran Salón #UCLGCongress GENERAL ASSEMBLY BOGOTÁ, 14 OCTOBER 2016 16:00-17:30 Item 1 For adoption DRAFT AGENDA 1. Adoption of the agenda 2. Report from the President on UCLG activities and policy priorities 3. The Peace Prize 4. Report of the Committee on Statutory Affairs on Sections’ nominations for the World Council and appointment of the UCLG World Council 5. Highlights of the activities of the Regional and Metropolitan Sections by the UCLG Vice-Presidents GENERAL ASSEMBLY BOGOTÁ, 14 OCTOBER 2016 16:00-17:30 Item 2 For information REPORT FROM THE PRESIDENT ON UCLG ACTIVITIES 2013-2016 Summary and recommendations This document presents and highlights the major milestones and achievements of the World Organization from 2013 to 2016. It is not an exhaustive document, but features some of the main highlights of the World Organization over the three past years. A full-fledged and detailed report for 2015 is available and a report for 2016 will be published next year. This triennial report showcases in particular the relevance of the agreement with the European Union and the achievements within the framework of the New Urban Agenda and towards Habitat III. The General Assembly is invited to: 1. Take note of the report from the President on UCLG activities. GENERAL ASSEMBLY BOGOTA, 14 OCTOBER 2016 16:00-17:30 Item 2 – Annex 1 TRIENNIAL REPORT OF THE PRESIDENCY 2013-2016 MAIN ACTIVITIES HIGHLIGHTS FROM RABAT TO BOGOTA This document highlights the major milestones and achievements of the World Organisation from 2013 to 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan After the Election
    ANALYSIS CHINA TAIWAN AFTER THE ELECTION Introduction ABOUT by François Godement The Chinese have long been obsessed with strategic culture, power balances and geopolitical shifts. Academic institutions, think tanks, journals Taiwan is important as an unresolved issue. It is also the and web-based debate are growing in number and European Union’s fifth-largest trade partner in Asia and a quality and give China’s foreign policy breadth and source of major investment abroad. For years, Europe has depth. had a very simple two-sided declaratory policy – no use of China Analysis, which is published in both French force and no independence – that has been likened to a “one and English, introduces European audiences to China” policy. Under that mantle, relations have expanded, these debates inside China’s expert and think-tank including a visa-free policy of greeting Taiwanese tourists world and helps the European policy community and businessmen. For these reasons, Europe’s approach understand how China’s leadership thinks appears now stationary. During his first term in the past about domestic and foreign policy issues. While freedom of expression and information remain five years, President Ma Ying-jeou has greatly stabilised restricted in China’s media, these published political cross-strait relations, helped by China’s decision to sources and debates provide an important way of be patient. Taiwan has collected the economic profits and understanding emerging trends within China. also opened itself to visitors from the mainland for the first time since 1949. Each issue of China Analysis focuses on a specific theme and draws mainly on Chinese mainland sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Talk Shows in Taiwan
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School March 2018 Political Talk Shows in Taiwan: First- and Third- Person Effects, Their Attitudinal Antecedents and Consequences Shou-Chen Hsieh University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Mass Communication Commons Scholar Commons Citation Hsieh, Shou-Chen, "Political Talk Shows in Taiwan: First- and Third-Person Effects, Their ttA itudinal Antecedents and Consequences" (2018). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7170 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Political Talk Shows in Taiwan: First- and Third-Person Effects, Their Attitudinal Antecedents and Consequences by Shou-Chen Hsieh A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The Zimmerman School of Advertising and Mass Communications College of Arts & Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Scott S. Liu, Ph.D. Artemio Ramirez, Jr., Ph.D. Roxanne Watson, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 21, 2018 Keywords: attitude toward political talk shows, attitude toward politics, perceived influence of political talk shows, and Taiwan Copyright © 2018, Shou-Chen Hsieh Dedication To my parents and Dr. Scott S. Liu Acknowledgments I would like to extend my sincerest thanks to my major professor, Dr. Scott Liu. There is never enough to express my deepest gratitude to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • One China One Taiwan.Pdf (PDF, 118.82KB)
    One China, One Taiwan Little Chance of a Red Future for Taipei Originally published at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/taiwan/2016-01-12/one-china-one- taiwan January 12, 2016 Salvatore Babones On January 16, the people of Taiwan will go to the polls to elect a new president and new legislative representatives. Like the United States, Taiwan has a two-term limit on the presidency, which means that the incumbent president, Ma Ying-jeou, must step down. And like the 2016 U.S. elections, the 2016 Taiwan elections are wide open. Ma’s governing Kuomintang (KMT) party enters these elections in complete disarray. Its spring 2015 presidential primaries resulted in the nomination of a senior legislator named Hung Hsiu-chu, its first-ever female candidate for president. But then in an unprecedented move, she was displaced by party chairman Eric Chu at a special party convention held on October 17. Chu went on to claim Hung’s former place at the top of the ticket. Chu is widely viewed as a placeholder candidate with a mandate not so much to win January's election as to prevent serious losses for the KMT, especially in the legislature. Tellingly, he has not resigned his position as mayor of New Taipei City, Taiwan's largest local government area. He has instead taken three months’ leave while an acting mayor watches over his suburban Taipei power base. Opposing the KMT is the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and its candidate, Tsai Ing-wen. A veteran campaigner who lost to the KMT’s Ma Ying-jeou in 2012, Tsai is widely expected to emerge from the polls as Taiwan’s first female president.
    [Show full text]
  • Portrayals of China in the Taiwan 2018 Election
    Friend or foe: portrayals of China in the Taiwan 2018 election A discourse analysis of Taiwanese media in relation to cross-strait relations Abstract: This thesis focuses on the 2018 local elections in Taiwan; although the elections were aimed at electing officials at a local level, the relation between Taiwan and China has been heavily discussed. This thesis analyses the way in which the Liberty Times and the United Daily News, as mouthpieces of respectively the DPP and the KMT, have created a discourse on cross-strait relations. In doing so, an analysis is made of Fake News, a topic discussed mostly by the DPP, and the 1992 consensus, a topic mostly discussed by the KMT. This thesis argues that the discourse as created by the DPP-side is less stable compared to the KMT-side, as a result of the traditional viewpoints that both parties adhere to. The image of the DPP as protector of Taiwanese freedom and democracy forces the DPP to a position where they have to paint China as an aggressor, using the issue of Chinese Fake News as one of its tools. In doing so, the DPP itself uses assumptions and exaggerations, thereby becoming a producer of fake news as well. Although the KMT also makes use of assumptions and exaggerations, the fact that the KMT portrays itself as a party aimed at economic progress makes it possible to take a more neutral stance. Name: Erik de Jong Student ID: 1039539 Program: MA East Asian Studies: China track Date: 1 July 2019 Thesis supervisor: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan's 2014 Nine-In-One Election
    TAIWAN’S 2014 NINE-IN-ONE ELECTION: GAUGING POLITICS, THE PARTIES, AND FUTURE LEADERS By John F. Copper* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 2 II. PAN-GREEN’S HANDICAPS ...................... 6 III. PAN-BLUE’S TRAVAILS ........................... 17 IV. PRE-ELECTION POLITICS ........................ 28 A. State of the Economy ............................ 28 B. Sunflower Student Movement ................... 31 C. Gas Explosion in Kaohsiung and Bad Cooking Oil Incidents ..................................... 36 V. THE CANDIDATES AND THE CAMPAIGN ..... 39 A. Taipei Mayor Race: Sean Lien v. KO Wen-je .... 44 B. Taichung Mayor Race: Jason Hu v. LIN Chia- Lung . ............................................ 48 C. Predictions of Other Elections ................... 50 D. How Different Factors May Have Influenced Voting ........................................... 50 VI. THE ELECTION RESULTS ........................ 51 A. Taipei City Mayoral Election Results ............ 53 B. Taichung Mayoral Election Results .............. 55 C. New Taipei Mayoral, Taoyuan Mayoral and Other Election Results ................................. 56 D. Main Reasons Cited Locally for the DPP Win and KMT Defeat ................................ 59 E. Reaction and Interpretation of the Election by the Media and Officialdom in Other Countries . 61 VII. CONCLUSIONS ......... ........................... 64 A. Consequences of This Election in Terms of Its Impact on Taiwan’s Future ...................... 70 * John F. Copper is the Stanley J. Buckman Professor of International Studies (emeritus) at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee. He is the author of a number of books on Taiwan, including Taiwan’s Democracy on Trial in 2010, Taiwan: Nation-State or Province? Sixth edition in 2013 and The KMT Returns to Power: Elections in Taiwan 2008 to 2012 (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2013). He has written on Taiwan’s elections since 1980. (1) 2 CONTEMPORARY ASIAN STUDIES SERIES B.
    [Show full text]
  • City Portraits World Cities Summit Mayors Forum
    CITY PORTRAITS WORLD CITIES SUMMIT MAYORS FORUM 1 | CONTENT 02 03 04 FOREWORD WORLD CITIES LEE KUAN YEW SUMMIT WORLD CITY PRIZE 05 07 66 MAYORS FORUM PARTICIPATING OTHER CITIES & CITY PARTICIPATING • WCS Mayors PROJECTS CITIES Forum 2017 • Top Priorities Executive of Cities Summary • WCS Mayors Forum 2018 • Discussion Format ABOUT THE 70 ORGANISERS EMBRACING THE FUTURE THROUGH INNOVATION AND COLLABORATION 1 | CONTENTS FOREWORD MR LAWRENCE WONG Minister for National Development and Second Minister for Finance, Singapore A very warm welcome to the 9th annual World Cities Summit (WCS) Mayors Forum in Singapore. This year, we are joined by a record of over 120 mayors and city officials, as well as over 100 industry leaders and forerunners. The strong showing at the Mayors Forum is testament to the will of city leaders to develop real and effective solutions in building liveable cities. This year’s Mayors Forum will build on the conclusions reached at the previous Forum held in Suzhou, China. It will explore how city leaders can embrace innovations to improve our cities, attract more investments and enhance the quality of life for our people. This is also an exciting year for Singapore as it is our turn to chair ASEAN. We have chosen Resilience and Innovation as the themes for our chairmanship, and are working with our regional counterparts to develop a network of ASEAN Smart Cities. Hence the discussions at the Forum will provide useful ideas and inputs for us to further strengthen regional collaboration. Thank you for your support and active involvement in the WCS Mayors Forum 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Was 2016 a Realigning Election in Taiwan?
    1 Was 2016 a Realigning Election in Taiwan? Cal Clark, Auburn University Alexander C. Tan, National Chengchi University & University of Canterbury Karl Ho, University of Texas, Dallas Prepared for presentation at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the American Association for Chinese Studies, University of Washington, October 4-6. 2 The January 2016 presidential and legislative elections in Taiwan certainly produced a dramatic and unprecedented victory for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) over its long-time rival the Kuomintang (KMT). While Chen Shui-bian had captured the presidency in 2000 with 40% of the vote and in 2004 with 50%, in 2016 Tsai Ing-wen swept to victory with a decisive 56% majority over the KMT’s Eric Chu (31%) and the People First Party (PFP)’s James Soong (12%). The DPP’s victory in the Legislative Yuan represented even more impressive gains. The DPP had never had a parliamentary majority before 2016, either alone or in a coalition with smaller allied parties. In 2016, in dramatic contrast, it increased its number of seats from 40 in 2012 to 68 in the 113-member Legislative Yuan, as KMT membership collapsed from 64 to 35. One seeming contribution to the DPP triumph was that a substantial number of KMT voters, in particular those residing in China, stayed home, leading to a significant decline in the overall turnout rate from 74% in 2012 to 66% in 2016. Furthermore, while receiving lesser notice, the 3 New Power Party (NPP) won 5 seats, marking the first electoral success in Taiwan politics of a “protest party” not associated with a defecting faction or leader of one of the two major parties (Copper, 2016; Fell, 2016; Hsieh, 2016; Templeman, 2016; Wu, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download the Taiwan Voter 1St Edition Pdf Free Download
    THE TAIWAN VOTER 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Christopher Henry Achen | 9780472053537 | | | | | The Taiwan Voter 1st edition PDF Book Retrieved 26 July Additionally, over the course of , several small nations that previously had diplomatic ties to Taiwan, including Panama, Kiribati, and Solomon Islands, broke off relations in favour of the PRC. DOI: The apparent confrontation comes amid escalating tensions between Taiwan and China. Kuomintang, after fits and starts over procedural disputes, flirted with a high-profile nomination of Foxconn chief Terry Gou. Description Series New Comparative Politics. Retrieved 24 April While in most countries the many tangled strands of competing identities are daunting for scholarly analysis, in Taiwan the cleavages are powerful and limited in number, so the logic of interrelationships among issues, partisanship, and identity are particularly clear. There is also a strong suggestion in the US government's Taiwan Relations Act, passed in , that America could come to the defense of Taipei if it was ever threatened militarily by Beijing. Arby's enters Mexico, and pandemic pushes new U. A Chinese invasion would present the greatest threat to global peace in a generation. China Times. Yet an unambiguous deterrence commitment would be fully consistent with the longstanding U. Fiji was the first Pacific Nation to recognize Beijing over Taipei in Please give an overall site rating:. As mayor, Mr. Mayor of New Taipei — Little can be done to reduce tempers in the current presidential race. Xi to recalculate the costs of an attack. Maggie Lewis, an expert in contemporary Chinese law at Seton Hall University, said that at this time Taiwan needed stability from its relationship with the US, and substantive gestures rather than words of support.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    2017. Proc Ling Soc Amer 2, 14:1-15. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v2i0.4057. ‘Grandmas’ in debate: A first-person story told in Taiwan’s presidential debate as a rhetorical device and public reactions to its credibility Ping-Hsuan Wang* Abstract. This study examines data from a 2016 presidential debate in Taiwan to explore the use of first-person narrative in political discourse as a rhetorical device, and how public reactions to its credibility are influenced by the narrative’s context. While previous studies of political debate discourse (e.g. Kuo 2001) investigate, for example, the use of “constructed dialogue” (Tannen 2007), there is a lack of studies focusing on first-person narrative in political debates. Using three-level positioning as outlined by Bamberg (1997), I analyze a narrative featuring a grandma character told by presidential candidate Eric Chu, also comparing it to another candidate James Soong’s “grandma narrative.” I argue that the context places constraints on the effects of their narratives. Whereas Chu’s narrative, a traditional Labovian first- person story, is widely ridiculed with memes for its lack of credibility, Soong’s narrative, a habitual narrative, receives little attention. The analysis shows how Chu’s narrative serves his rhetorical purposes and suggests why the public doubts its credibility. At level 1 (characters positioned vis-à-vis one another), Chu presents himself as non-agentive with constructed dialogue, thereby excusing an earlier decision he made -- failing to keep his promise to finish his term as a mayor. At level 2 (speaker positioned to audience), he switches from Mandarin to Taiwanese, a local dialect, which can be seen as an appeal to his current audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitional Justice in Taiwan: a Belated Reckoning with the White Terror
    Transitional Justice in Taiwan: A Belated Reckoning with the White Terror Thomas J. Shattuck All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Author: Thomas J. Shattuck Designed by: Natalia Kopytnik © 2019 by the Foreign Policy Research Institute November 2019 Cover Design by Natalia Kopytnik. Photo Sources: Top left to right to bottom Lordcolus/Wikimedia Commons, Wei-Te Wong/Flickr,yeowatzup/Flickr, Prince Roy/Flikcr, Fcuk1203/Wikimedia Commons, Outlookxp/Wikimedia Commons, Joe Lo/Wikimedia Commons, Bernard Gagnon/Wikimedia Commons, A16898/Wikimedia Commons, Chi Hung Lin/panoramio.com, Wei-Te Wong/Flickr, CEphoto/Uwe Aranas, Joe Lo/Flickr, Solomon203/Wikimedia Commons, Shoestring/Wikitravel, Thomas J. Shattuck, Vmenkov/Wikimedia Commons, Outlookxp/Wikimedia Commons, lienyuan lee/panoramio.com. Our Mission The Foreign Policy Research Institute is dedicated to bringing the insights of scholarship to bear on the foreign policy and national security challenges facing the United States. It seeks to educate the public, teach teachers, train students, and offer ideas to advance U.S. national interests based on a nonpartisan, geopolitical perspective that illuminates contemporary international affairs through the lens of history, geography, and culture. Offering Ideas In an increasingly polarized world, we pride ourselves on our tradition of nonpartisan scholarship. We count among our ranks over 100 affiliated scholars located throughout the nation and the world who appear regularly in national and international media, testify on Capitol Hill, and are consulted by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The 19Th Annual Conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economics, Accounting, and Management 第十九屆亞太財務經濟會計及管理會議
    The 19th Annual Conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economics, Accounting, and Management 第十九屆亞太財務經濟會計及管理會議 The Grand Hotel, Taipei, Taiwan 台北 圓山大飯店 July 8 & July 9, 2011 中華民國 100 年 7月 8 日至 7 月 9 日 Conference Organizers 聯合主辦單位: Graduate Institute of Finance, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan /國立交通大學財務金 融研究所 Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation, Taiwan /臺灣證券交易所 Taiwan Securities Association, Taiwan /中華民國證券商業同業公會 Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd., Taiwan /富邦金控 Wintek Corporation, Taiwan /勝華科技股份有限公司 Compal Electronics, Inc., Taiwan /仁寶電腦工業股份有限公司 Kainan University, Taiwan /開南大學 College of Management, National Taiwan University, Taiwan/國立臺灣大學管理學院 Rutgers University, USA /美國羅格斯大學 Foundation of Pacific Basin Financial Research and Development, Taiwan /財團法人亞太金 融研究發展基金會 Guidances 指導單位 : The National Science Council (NSC), Taiwan /行政院國家科學委員會 Conference Co-Organizers 協辦單位 : Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA), National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan / 國立交通大學 EMBA Maywufa Company Ltd. /美吾華股份有限公司 Taishin Financial Holdings Co., Ltd. /台新金融控股股份有限公司 Tung Ho Steel Enterprise Corporation /東和鋼鐵企業股份有限公司 SCSB Educational Foundation Development /財團法人上海商業儲蓄銀行文教基金會 China Development Financial Holding Corporation /中華開發金控 Shin Kong Securities /新光證券股份有限公司 Polaris Securities Co., Ltd. /寶來證券股份有限公司 Grand Fortune Securities Co., Ltd. /福邦證券股份有限公司 National Central University EMBA Program /國立中央大學 EMBA Taipei Foreign Exchange/台北外匯經紀股份有限公司 Sponsors 贊助單位: Taiwan Futures Exchange /臺灣期貨交易所 Gretai Securities Market /財團法人中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心 Hua Nan Bank /華南銀行 Taiwan
    [Show full text]