One Planet Living in the Suburbs Written by Anna Francis and Joanne Wheeler, November 2006 Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

One Planet Living in the Suburbs Written by Anna Francis and Joanne Wheeler, November 2006 Contents One Planet Living in the suburbs written by Anna Francis and Joanne Wheeler, November 2006 Contents Acknowledgements 2 Introduction 4 One Planet Living 8 Section A: The Suburban Context 12 Sustainable communities 24 Section B: One Planet Living in the Suburbs 28 Zero carbon 29 Zero waste 45 Sustainable transport 54 Sustainable water 67 Sustainable materials 72 Local and sustainable food 77 Natural habitats and wildlife 84 Culture and heritage 87 Equity and fair trade 90 Health and happiness 94 Key findings and conclusions 97 Ecological Footprint Summary 97 Key Recommendations 100 Appendices 108 References 111 1 Acknowledgements This report was funded by WWF and co-authored by Anna Francis (BioRegional Consulting) and Jo Wheeler (WWF). We would like to thank everyone who inputted into the report and in particular the Solihull Residents Association and the Stockholm Environmment Institue who provided the baseline footprinting data. List of Tables Table 1 - OPL principles Table 2 - Types of suburb Table 3 - Local areas by density Table 4 - Barriers and incentives needed to minimise energy demand Table 5 - Average costs and savings from typical energy efficiency improvements Table 6 - Barriers and incentives needed to increase use of sustainable energy sources Table 7 - Ecological footprint of domestic energy for each scenario showing savings compared to scenario 1 Table 8 - Barriers and incentives needed to implement zero waste in the suburbs Table 9 - Ecological footprint of waste and consumer items for each scenario with savings over scenario 1 Table 10 - Barriers and incentives needed to minimise transport demand in the suburbs Table 11 - Barriers and incentives needed to maximise use of sustainable transport options in the suburbs Table 12 - Ecological footprint of mobility for each scenario showing savings compared to scenario 1 Table 13 - Barriers and incentives needed to minimise water use in the suburbs Table 14 - Water demand for each scenario showing savings compared to scenario 1 Table 15 - Environmental impact of window frame materials Table 16 - Ecological footprint of waste and consumer items for each scenario with savings over scenario 1 Table 17 - Barriers and incentives needed to increase provision and procurement of local sustainable food in suburbia Table 18 - Ecological footprint of food for each scenario showing savings compared to scenario 1 Table 19 - Barriers and incentives needed to protect and enhance natural habitats and wildlife in suburbia Table 20 - Barriers and incentives needed to enhance equity and fair trade in suburbia Table 21 - Barriers and incentives needed to enhance health and happiness in suburbia Table 22 - Summary of actions, incentives and policies needed at individual, local and national level to facilitate One Planet Living in suburbia List of Figures Figure 1 - Ecological footprint of Solihull Figure 2 - Population and housing location in the UK Figure 3 – Solihull’s location Figure 4 - Solihull’s population by age group Figure 5 - Solihull multiple deprivation score by ward Figure 6 - Solihull housing stock by tenancy type Figure 7 - Solihull ethnic composition Figure 8 - Solihull’s top 10 ecological footprints Figure 9 - Comparison of Solihull’s and the West Midlands’ ecological footprint Figure10 - DCLG vision for sustainable communities Figure 11 - Kilograms of CO2 for different house ages Figure 12 - CO2 emissions from household heat loss Figure 13 - Per capita energy consumed by north-east households of different sizes Figure 14 - Energy consumption in households by end use 2 Figure 15 - House types in Solihull by ward Figure 16 - Carbon saving and cost per carbon unit saved Figure 17- Average household waste streams Figure 18 - Waste and recyclables according to affluence and area type Figure 19 - Money spent on wasted goods and services in the West Midlands Figure 20 - UK individual transport by purpose Figure 21 - Personal transport patterns by purpose and mode Figure 22 - Transport modes by ward, Solihull Figure 23 - Facilities supported by 5,000 suburban homes 3 Introduction THE CHALLENGE WWF’s Living Planet Report1 tells us that if everyone around the world consumed natural resources and polluted the environment as we currently do in the UK, we would need three planets to support us. The Living Planet Report uses Ecological Footprinting (EF) analysis to reach this conclusion. EF is an accounting tool that represents the environmental impacts of a process or a person’s lifestyle in terms of the area of land or sea that is required to produce sustainably a particular natural resource or to absorb waste from its consumption; or, in the case of energy, to absorb the corresponding CO2 emissions generated, using prevailing technology. EF measures the area of biologically productive land that is required to meet the needs of a given product, person or population; it compares this area with the available area on Earth, and informs us whether we are living within the Earth’s regenerative capacity. The areas of land or sea calculated by EF could be anywhere in the world, and Ecological Footprints are measured in ‘global hectares’. Ecological Footprint figures in the Living Planet Report inform us that it currently takes around 5.6 global hectares of biologically productive land to support each person in the UK. A sustainable Ecological Footprint or ‘Earth Share’, taking into account the protection of biodiversity and areas deemed unproductive, is approximately 1.8 global hectares per person; this figure is falling due to decreasing bioproductivity and increasing human population. Hence, it can be concluded that if everyone on the planet consumed as much as the average person in the UK, we would need three planets to support us. We need to develop sustainable lifestyles that help us reduce our Ecological Footprint to a level that our one planet can sustain – this is vital to ensure the health of our planet and our long-term survival. OUR IMPACTS AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT The image below shows the relative contributions of different lifestyle elements that make up the ‘three planet’ lifestyle of an average resident of Solihull in the West Midlands: 4 Figure 1: Ecological Footprint of Solihull2 3% 4% 22% 19 13 11% 8% 13% 7% % % Food and Drink Energy Land Travel Housing Consumables Services Holiday Activities Capital Investment Government and Other It is evident that all aspects of our lifestyles that contribute towards our Ecological Footprints are inextricably linked to our local and regional physical infrastructure and built environment. We travel to work and school, for leisure, and to access services; we travel to purchase food, which is made available to us through a system that uses roads, warehouses and airports; we use energy and water in our buildings as well as on our roads and in public spaces; we use services such as schools and hospitals that are part of our local built environment and with which we share infrastructure such as energy, waste and telecommunications networks. The built environment offers us many opportunities to live sustainably but also throws up potential barriers to doing so. When our local services are not close by, we tend to drive to them; poorly insulated buildings make us consume more energy than is necessary. However, when given the opportunity, many people choose sustainable lifestyle options: we increasingly choose organic products as they become more easily available in ordinary markets; incentives such as the Clear Skies Grant catalysed actions from a variety of stakeholders and made a substantial contribution to micro energy generation; at BedZEDi the car club helped residents cut their transport 3 related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 1.3 tonnes per resident per year . It is thus crucial that we create places, and put in place incentives, that make it easy for residents and users to choose sustainable lifestyle options. New house-building initiatives (such as the new ‘sustainable communities’ in growth areas such as the Thames Gateway) offer clear opportunities to capitalise on sustainability thinking and put in place energy-efficient, well- connected neighbourhoods, where residents will find it easier than average to live in a sustainable manner, with a reduced Ecological Footprint. These opportunities have been documented in detail by two BioRegional Development Group studies, One Planet Living in the Thames Gateway (2003) (conducted with WWF), and Z- Squared: Enabling One Planet Living in the Thames Gateway (2004)ii. i Beddington Zero (fossil) Energy Development – BedZED – is a mixed-use eco-village in South London. The village comprises 82 homes, live work units, commercial space and community facilities. In addition to the high performance buildings, BedZED offers services and facilities, such as a car club and food-growing areas, to support the residents in living sustainably. ii Both study reports are available from BioRegional’s website, www.bioregional.com 5 Given the predicted timescales of the environmental challenges and climatic changes we face and the significant impact of existing dwellings, we cannot afford to focus solely on new house-building initiatives. EXISTING STOCK IN THE SUBURBS Existing housing stock in the UK contributes 27% of national CO2 emissions, uses half of all public water and generates 8% of total waste4. In addition, renewal rates of existing housing stock are low, at approximately 1% a year, and it is predicted that two-thirds of the dwellings that will be standing in 2050 are already in existence5. Improving the performance of existing communities is therefore vital in helping to reduce the ecological footprint of the UK as a whole. A recent study by the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) examines the CO2 emissions and Ecological Footprint of existing and new buildings in the Leeds city region, looking at how 15 different policy scenarios will affect the CO2 emissions associated with housing between 2003 and 2026. The study concludes that “retrofitting the existing housing stock is the single most important housing policy with regard to CO2 reductions – on a per household basis as well as in reducing long-term overall emissions.
Recommended publications
  • NW Regional Technical Advisory Body 3Rd
    North West Regional Technical Advisory Body 3rd Waste Management Monitoring Report Working towards sustainable waste management in the North West August 2007 Contents Foreword . .2 Executive summary . .3 1. Introduction . .4 2. Municipal waste . .7 3. Commercial and industrial waste . .15 4. Construction, demolition and excavation waste . .19 5. Management of waste at facilities and sites . .20 6. Fly-tipping and enforcement . .27 7. Special waste . .29 8. Agricultural waste . .32 9. Radioactive waste . .33 10. Identification of waste management facilities of national, regional and sub-regional significance . .34 Glossary . .35 Abbreviations . .36 Technical Appendices 1. Additional tables and figures . .38 2. Progress report on implementation of the North West Regional Waste Strategy Action Plan . .44 Photo credits Front cover top: Merseyside Objective 1Programme Front cover bottom: Envirolink Northwest Back cover top: David Jones Photography/Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority 3rd Annual Monitoring Report – Working towards sustainable waste management in the North West 1 August 2007 Foreword The North West Regional Technical Advisory Body (NWRTAB) is (Environment Agency). This has produced a report with broader publishing its 3rd Annual Monitoring Report. This year we have scope and hopefully a better read. sought to broaden the appeal of the document and extend its scope The report covers a period of considerable activity on both policy to encompass matters wider than just core statistics about waste making and development and practical waste management, which activity in the North West. includes: The core purpose of the NWRTAB is to collect, collate and interpret o Movement of the draft Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) through its data and other information about waste activity in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes an Eco-Town?
    What makes an eco-town? A report from BioRegional and CABE inspired by the eco-towns challenge panel Written and published in 2008 by the BioRegional Development Group and the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE). Graphic design: Draught Associates Front cover image: Great Bow Yard housing scheme © Design for homes/ Richard Mullane All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, copied or transmitted without the prior written consent of the publishers except that the material may be photocopied for non-commercial purposes without permission from the publishers. This document is available in alternative formats on request from the publishers. BioRegional is an entrepreneurial charity CABE is the government’s advisor on architecture, which invents and delivers practical solutions urban design and public space. As a public body, we for sustainability. We develop sustainable encourage policymakers to create places that work products, services and production systems for people. We help local planners apply national – and set up new enterprises and companies design policy and advise developers and architects, to deliver them; initiate and guide the persuading them to put people’s needs first. We show development of sustainable communities; public sector clients how to commission projects that and seek to replicate our approach through meet the needs of their users. And we seek to inspire consultancy, communications and training. the public to demand more from their buildings and Our aim is to lead the way to sustainable living spaces. Advising, influencing and inspiring, we work to – through practical demonstration. create well designed, welcoming places.
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking Wood As a Material of Choice Costs Less, Delivers More
    CONTINUING EDUCATION THINKING WOOD AS A MATERIAL OF CHOICE COSTS LESS, DELIVERS MORE Presented by: LEARNING OBJECTIVES After reading this article you will be able to: 1. Compare the material, project and environmental costs of wood to other building materials. 2. Explain innovative wood technologies and how they are contributing to a wide range of sustainable designs. 3. Discuss the environmental impact of wood through- out its life cycle, including its renewability, certifi- cation options, impacts on energy efficiency, low carbon footprint, and end-of-life recycling and reuse. 4. Examine research and examples demonstrating the positive impact of exposed wood on a building’s occupants. CONTINUING EDUCATION AIA CREDIT: 1 LU/HSW GBCI CREDIT: 1 CE Hour AIA COURSE NUMBER: ARmay2015.4 GBCI COURSE NUMBER: 920003245 Use the learning objectives above to focus your study as you read this article. Visit http://go.hw.net/AR515Course4 to read more and complete the quiz for credit. Cathedral of Christ the Light; Oakland, California; Design architect: Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. Photo by Timothy Hursley Designers today are finding new possibilities reimagined use; and a unique human-nature which minimizes construction delays and keeps in one of the oldest building materials on connection that has always been intuitive, but is labor costs competitive. Wood’s adaptability earth. Wood has always been valued for its now being documented in research. and ease of use also translate into faster con- beauty, abundance and practicality, but many struction schedules, while a smaller foundation of wood’s inherent characteristics are rising COST CONSCIOUS may be needed because of its light weight.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies
    Section 4: Case Studies Section 4: Case Studies 18 case studies have been identified in the East Midlands – information on the following are set out below: Sustainable housing in the East Midlands - 119 Section 4: Case Studies Albert Hall Memorial Housing, Coalville Location Coalville, Leicestershire Type of Area Suburban Tenure Social housing rental Built Form Detached bungalow Contact Name East Midlands Housing Association Phone / e-mail (01530) 839091 Summary The development consists of seven dwellings incorporating elements of passive solar design, high levels of insulation and mechanical heat recovery ventilation. It was designed and built by the East Midlands Housing Association for older clients. Extensive monitoring and analysis was carried out by the Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) as part of the project, and much of the information presented here draws on this report. The project demonstrates how more attention and research at the design stage can enhance the benefits that may be derived from such energy saving features. It also shows how the perspectives of success or failure of a design differ between building professionals and residents. Project Objectives To create a high-quality flagship sheltered housing development for older people that is highly energy efficient and incorporates the principles of passive solar design. History of Concept The development, which was constructed in 1990, consists of seven dwellings (three two bedroom and four one bedroom bungalows) and is a memorial to a former member of the housing association, Albert Hall. The association wanted an energy efficient scheme that used electricity as its main heat source. The energy consultants decided on a highly insulated design with controlled ventilation that would meet the regional electricity company’s Civic Shield 2000 standard.
    [Show full text]
  • BR08 Assessor Listing NEW.Qxd 29/05/2008 12:20 Page 23
    BR08 assessor listing NEW.qxd 29/05/2008 12:20 Page 23 June 2008 Assessor listing | BREEAM 23 NEED AN ASSESSOR? A complete listing of certified assessors across the UK Key: Code: Code for Sustainable Homes EcoH: EcoHomes MR: Multi-Residential Type of BREEAM scheme Company and phone number Bespoke Courts Code EcoH Ind MR Offices Retail Schools Prisons 2020 Liverpool 0151 237 2020 ●● 3 Planets 01332 416158 ● ●●●●●●● 3Dee 01202 484248 ● 3DReid 020 7297 5600 ●●● A2 Housing Group 07967 813669 ●● AA Energy Consultants 07884 261631 ● Aardvark EM 01984 624989 ● ab consulting engineers 0121 323 2332 ●● Abacus 01751 460014 ●● Abbey Consultants (Southern) 01923 274427 ●● Abdale Associates (Tring) 01442 382568 ●● ● Active Energy 07793 820897 ● Adams Integra 01243 771304 ●● Adrian Pragnell 07870 838259 ●● Advance Housing and Support Group 01993 772885 ● Aegis Environment 0871 242 5812 ● AEW Architects and Designers 0161 214 4370 ●● AHP (Architects and Surveyors) 020 8313 1023 ●● Alan Tate Consultancy 01274-583408 ●● Allen Tod Architecture 0113 244 9973 ● Ambient Energy & Environment 0114 266 5704 ● ●●●●●●● AmicusHorizon Group 020 8726 8600 ● An Norvys 01767 677577 ● Andre Gardner Associates 020 8599 4018 ●● Andreassen Associates 01344 626997 ●● Andrew Leighton Associates 01633 883030 ●● Aragon Housing Association 01525 840505 ● Architect Holling 01463 223710 ● Architects Design Partnership 0207 287 3224 ●●● Architecture Collective 00 353 56 777 0480 ● Architecture PLB 01962 842200 ●● Ark Consultancy 0121 515 3831 ●● Ark Design & Architecture 01942
    [Show full text]
  • Green Building Certification System Review – Appendices
    PNNL-20966 Prepared for the U.S. General Services Administration under the U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Green Building Certification System Review – Appendices N Wang KM Fowler RS Sullivan March 2012 DISCLAIMER This Report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Appendix Table of Contents Appendix A: EISA Sections 433 & 436 ...................................................................................................... A‐1 Appendix B: High Performance Sustainable
    [Show full text]
  • Bioregional One Planet Sport Part 1
    BioRegional One Planet Sport Part 1 Beyond London 2012 ONE PLANET SPORT Part 1: Beyond London 2012 Supported by: 1 Introduction The London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games Some of very positive sustainability outcomes from are seen as one of Great Britain’s greatest success the Games so far have been the resources produced stories of this century so far. Key ingredients to support sustainability learning and practice, these were the sporting success of the home team, the include the following: spectacular opening and closing ceremonies and the delivery of gigantic and striking venues set in a • The launch of the Learning Legacy website, magnificent new urban park reclaimed from partial which contains a wealth of detailed lessons, dereliction. And, not least, the welcoming, inspiring written by practitioners working to deliver atmosphere that endured throughout Games time. the Games. These Games demonstrated that a mega event • The Commission for Sustainable London can support real progress towards sustainable 2012 has produced excellent annual reports development and act as an inspiring exemplar. providing independent monitoring on progress Despite some challenges and shortfalls, there was a against sustainability. serious and continuous commitment to sustainability • The ISO 20121:2012 Event sustainability from the time London put together its bid almost a management system2 and the Event decade ago through to the Games themselves in the Organisers Sector Supplement (EOSS)3 summer of 2012 and, thus far, their on-going legacy. provide a useful management process and list of KPIs respectively. “Sustainability needs to be built- • Having been a part of the London 2012 in and embedded rather than a journey, from bid to legacy, we want to label on the outside, and this is one share our experience and learning to ensure of the successes..
    [Show full text]
  • Relocating Education for Sustainability: from the Campus to the Community
    RELOCATING EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY: FROM THE CAMPUS TO THE COMMUNITY A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health, and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Nicholas A. Morris December 2016 © Copyright, 2016 by Nicholas A. Morris All Rights Reserved ii A dissertation written by Nicholas A. Morris B.S., Muskingum University, 2001 MAED, Walsh University, 2004 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2016 Approved by ___________________________________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Natasha Levinson ___________________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Averil McClelland __________________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Andrew Lepp Accepted by ___________________________________, Director, School of Foundations, Kimberly S. Schimmel Leadership, and Administration ___________________________________, Interim Dean, College of Education, Health Mark A. Kretovics and Human Services iii MORRIS, NICHOLAS A., Ph.D., December 2016 CULTURAL FOUNDATIONS IN EDUCATION RELOCATING EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY: FROM THE CAMPUS TO THE COMMUNITY (217 pp.) Dissertation Advisor: Natasha Levinson, Ph.D. For 25 years higher education has been challenged to provide a path toward sustainability. This challenge is both lofty and necessary. During this time, higher education has yet to make noticeable change. I argue that this failure is because the movement is based on an inaccurate conceptualization of sustainability and false assumptions of the capacity of higher education. If we dig into the conception of sustainability itself and determine a more appropriate perspective, we may be able to reset the aims of the movement. If higher education can make this transition, it may need to recognize that it is not quite the dominant educational force it intends to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Planning for a Low Carbon Future © TCPA & CHPA 2008
    URBAN PLANNING FOR A LOW CARBON FUTURE © TCPA & CHPA 2008 Prepared for the TCPA & CHPA by Nick Dodd from URBED www.urbed.coop Conceived and commissioned by Michael King (CHPA) and Robert Shaw (formerly of TCPA and now Faber Maunsell). The TCPA is an independent charity working to improve the art and science of town and country planning. The TCPA puts social justice and the environment at the heart of policy debate and inspires government, industry and campaigners to take a fresh perspective on major issues, including planning policy, housing, regeneration climate change. Our objectives are to: — Secure a decent, well designed home for everyone, in a human-scale environment combining the best features of town and country — Empower people and communities to influence decisions that affect them — Improve the planning system in accordance with the principles of sustainable development For more information see www.tcpa.org.uk The Combined Heat and Power Association (CHPA) is the UK’s leading advocate for CHP, district heating and microCHP, aiming to promote the role of these technologies in enhancing energy security, tackling climate change and managing energy costs. The CHPA is a long-established not-for-profit trade association, which acts as a focus for the CHP industry in the UK, providing support across its membership and working to establish and maintain the strong and stable market conditions necessary to grow the application of CHP technology. For more information see www.chpa.co.uk English Partnerships is the national regeneration agency helping the Government to support high quality sustainable growth in England by creating well-served mixed communities where people enjoy living and working.
    [Show full text]
  • Glasgow's Affordable Housing Supply Programme
    Front cover: Commonwealth Games Athletes’ Village 2 GLASGOW’S AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUPPLY PROGRAMME QUALITY, INNOVATION & SUSTAINABILITY 13 Performance Review 2013/14 Table 13 – SAP Ratings Featured Projects – 2014 Commonwealth Games Athletes’ Village CONTENTS PAGE NO Centurian Way INTRODUCTION 2 Holmlea Court HOUSING UNITS 4 Glasgow’s AHSP Project Awards Table 1 – Unit Approvals by Housing Investment Area POST COMPLETION REVIEWS 24 Table 2 – New Build Unit Approvals by Tenure TRANSFORMATIONAL REGENERATION AREAS Table 3 – Unit Approvals by Grant Type (TRAs) 25 Table 4 – Unit Targets and Approvals by Housing Maryhill Investment Area – Wheelchair Housing Gallowgate Table 5 – Unit Targets and Laurieston Approvals by Housing Investment Area North Toryglen – Larger Family Homes Pollokshaws Table 6 – Unit Targets and Completions by Grant Type Sighthill APPENDIX 1A – MAP OF UNIT APPROVALS 30 EXPENDITURE 8 APPENDIX 1B – MAP OF UNIT COMPLETIONS 31 Table 7 – Expenditure by Housing Investment Area Table 8 – Expenditure by Grant Type APPENDIX 2 –FUNDING BY HOUSING 32 Medical Adaptations (Stage 3) ASSOCIATION DEVELOPMENT COSTS, RENTS & GRANT 10 Table 1 – Housing Association GPTs and Out-turns LEVELS – Mainstream Programme Table 2 – Housing Association GPTs and Out-turns Table 9 – Development and Works Costs – LSVT Programme Table 10 – Housing Association Rents in Tender Table 3 – Housing Association GPTs and Out-turns Approvals - Reprovisioning Programme Table 11 – Grant Levels for Tender Approvals Table 4 – National and Regional Housing Associations included in Tables 1, 2 and 3 Table 12 – Grant Levels v Grant Subsidy Benchmark FOREWORD BY LIZ CAMERON, EXECUTIVE MEMBER FOR BUSINESS & THE ECONOMY As the Strategic Housing Authority for our city, Glasgow City Council’s vision is that people will want to live in Glasgow, and that they will have a choice of affordable, high-quality homes across a range of tenures.
    [Show full text]
  • GREEN Vs. SUSTAINABLE: ANALYZING and EXPANDING LEED (LEADERSHIP in ENERGY and ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN)
    Copyright Warning & Restrictions The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a, user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use” that user may be liable for copyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Please Note: The author retains the copyright while the New Jersey Institute of Technology reserves the right to distribute this thesis or dissertation Printing note: If you do not wish to print this page, then select “Pages from: first page # to: last page #” on the print dialog screen The Van Houten library has removed some of the personal information and all signatures from the approval page and biographical sketches of theses and dissertations in order to protect the identity of NJIT graduates and faculty. ABSTRACT GREEN vs. SUSTAINABLE: ANALYZING AND EXPANDING LEED (LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN) by Sonay Aykan This dissertation investigates the possibility of including new socio-economic indicators in green building rating systems in order to promote innovative practices in the building planning, design, construction and operations by introducing a broader definition of sustainability in the building industry.
    [Show full text]
  • VINCI PLC VINCI Construction UK Limited Astral House Imperial Way Watford Hertfordshire, WD24 4WW T: 01923 233433 VINCI PLC Annual Report 2008
    Head Office VINCI PLC VINCI Construction UK Limited Astral House Imperial Way Watford Hertfordshire, WD24 4WW T: 01923 233433 VINCI PLC Annual Report 2008 VINCI PLC is part of VINCI, the world’s leading concessions and construction group. www.vinci.plc.uk VINCI PLC Annual Report 2008 17382 VinciPLC R&A 2008- Cover 1 30/06/2009 09:00 Contents Cover image: Warwick Digital Laboratory, Warwickshire. This page: Newfi eld and Talbot School, Sheffi eld. 17382 VinciPLC R&A 2008- Cover 2 30/06/2009 09:00 “...providesOur mission VINCI is PLCto be with the preferreda national construction, platform to performfacilities all facets and associated of construction services and partner facilities for our clients and to be the benchmark against which services from the smallest to the largest project.” our competitors are measured. Report Operating and Financial Review Company Information 2 Chief Executive’s Report 4 During 2008, the UK economy enteredCorporate into Responsibility more diffi cult circumstances with a noticeable 26 slow down in construction activity,Enhanced particularly Business in Reviewthe private sector where we had fewer 30 opportunities. Turnover in certain sectorsDirectors’ of Report the Group fell by comparison with 2007, with a 32 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 34 reduction in output in Norwest Holst Building Division and John Jones. In regional building, Independent Auditors’ Report 36 turnover increased as a result of the impact of the acquisition of Stradform and Gordon Durham. Accounts The most important event in the year, however,Consolidated was Incomethe acquisition Statement Acquisitions and Disposals 38 in September of Taylor Woodrow ConstructionStatements Limited.
    [Show full text]