OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL

Wednesday, 10 February 2016, 10:00 a.m.

Andrew S. Haydon Hall, 110 West

MINUTES 25

Note: Please note that the Minutes are to be considered DRAFT until confirmed by Council.

The Council of the City of met at Andrew S. Haydon Hall, 110 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 beginning at 10:00 a.m.

The Mayor, Jim Watson, presided and led Council in a moment of reflection.

NATIONAL ANTHEM

The national anthem was performed by the Nepean High School Choir.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 2 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

ANNOUNCEMENTS/CEREMONIAL ACTIVITIES

RECOGNITION - MAYOR'S CITY BUILDER AWARD

Mayor Jim Watson and Councillor George Darouze presented the Mayor’s City Builder Award to Bruce Brayman in recognition of his contributions, through generous ongoing volunteering and inspiring leadership, to the quality of life of Greely residents.

PRESENTATION OF 10TH ANNIVERSARY ACCESSIBILITY FOR ONTARIANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (AODA) CHAMPION AWARDS

Mayor Jim Watson and Mr. Cahl Pominville, Past President, Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of (AMCTO), presented the AODA 10th Anniversary Champion Awards to Ms. Danielle Gravel, Ms. Christine Malone, and Ms. Karen Coffey in recognition of their passion and commitment in the promotion of awareness of accessibility and inclusiveness in their community.

PRESENTATION OF GOVERNOR GENERAL’S CERTIFICATE OF COMMENDATION

Mayor Jim Watson, on behalf of the Governor General of Canada, His Excellency the Right Honourable David Johnston, presented the Governor General’s Certificate of Commendation to four of six recipients, Mr. Anthony Di Monte, Mr. Rodney Hamberger, Mr. Adam Whiteford, and Mr. Martin Magnan. The two other recipients, Ms. Margaret Lerhe and Ms. Barbara Winters, were unavailable to attend. The certificate is presented to these individuals for their outstanding assistance provided to Corporal Nathan Cirillo after he was shot at the National War Memorial on October 22, 2014.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 3 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

ROLL CALL

All members were present except Councillor J. Mitic.

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

The Minutes of the regular meeting of 27 January 2016 were confirmed.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST INCLUDING THOSE ORIGINALLY ARISING FROM PRIOR MEETINGS

No declarations of interest were received.

COMMUNICATIONS

The following communications were received.

Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO):

 Members’ Update on Provincial Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Strategy for First Responders

REGRETS

Councillor J. Mitic advised he would be absent from the City Council meeting of 10 February 2016, due to City Business.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 4 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

MOTION TO INTRODUCE REPORTS

MOTION NO. 25/1

Moved by Councillor C. McKenney

Seconded by Councillor R. Brockington

That Election Compliance Audit Committee Report 1; the report from the Ottawa Police Services Board, entitled “Board Activity, Training & Performance: 2015 Annual Report”; Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee Report 12; Finance and Economic Development Committee Report 11; Planning Committee Report 20A; and Transportation Committee Report 11 be received and considered.

CARRIED

POSTPONEMENTS AND DEFERRALS

CITY COUNCIL – 27 JANUARY 2016

PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT 19A

ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT – 4495, 4499, 4509 AND 4515

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for 4495, 4499, 4509 and 4515 Innes Road, shown in Document 1, to permit a mix of non-residential uses, including a community centre, place of assembly, place of worship, and medical facility, as detailed in Document 2.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 5 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

MOTION NO. 24/3

Moved by Councillor S. Blais

Seconded by Councillor J. Harder

WHEREAS Zoning By-Law Amendment – 4495, 4499, 4509 and 4515 Innes Road, was approved at the Planning Committee meeting of December 8, 2015, and is listed as Item 4 on the Ottawa City Council Agenda of January 27, 2016; and

WHEREAS, on January 26, 2016, the applicant expressed interest in deferring this item to allow time to confirm that the zoning details will fully accommodate the proposal; and

WHEREAS staff has no objections to the request for deferral;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council defer the item titled “Zoning By-Law Amendment – 4495, 4499, 4509 and 4515 Innes Road” (Item 4 of the agenda) to the Council meeting of February 10, 2016; and

That the associated By-law noted on the agenda at (ll) also be deferred to the Council meeting of February 10, 2016.

DEFERRAL CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 6 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

CITY COUNCIL – 10 FEBRUARY 2016

1. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT – 4495, 4499, 4509 AND 4515 INNES ROAD

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for 4495, 4499, 4509 and 4515 Innes Road, shown in Document 1, to permit a mix of non-residential uses, including a community centre, place of assembly, place of worship, and medical facility, as detailed in Document 2.

MOTION NO. 25/2

Moved by Councillor S. Blais

Seconded by Councillor J. Harder

WHEREAS the report recommends zoning provisions for the proposed development including the location of parking on the lot; and

WHEREAS the owner has requested the ability to undertake the proposed development in phases; and

WHEREAS the first phase consists of the upgrade and expansion of the existing parking lot prior to the construction of the proposed building; and

WHEREAS the proposed zoning provisions are premised on all parking being located behind the proposed building and not within the front yard; and

WHEREAS without the existence of the proposed building, which establishes a front yard beyond the parking lot, the parking lot would be in non-conformity with the proposed zoning provisions;

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 7 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Document 2 – Details of Recommended Zoning of the report be amended to delete items (f) and (g)(i), the result being that the enlargement of the parking lot may occur prior to the construction of the proposed building; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act.

CARRIED

Item 1, as amended by Motion No. 25/2, and set out in full below for ease of reference, was then put to Council:

That Council approve:

1. An amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for 4495, 4499, 4509 and 4515 Innes Road, shown in Document 1, to permit a mix of non-residential uses, including a community centre, place of assembly, place of worship, and medical facility, as detailed in Document 2, as amended by the following:

a. That Document 2 – Details of Recommended Zoning of the report be amended to delete items (f) and (g)(i), the result being that the enlargement of the parking lot may occur prior to the construction of the proposed building.

2. That there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 8 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

REPORTS

ELECTION COMPLIANCE AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT 1

2. ELECTION COMPLIANCE AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT ON DISPOSITION OF ELECTION COMPLIANCE AUDITS AND OTHER RELATED MATTERS

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That City Council:

1. Receive this report for information; and

2. Consider the Election Compliance Audit Committee’s request to grant authority to the Election Compliance Audit Committee to make an independent submission relating to the matters related to their mandate to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing with regards to the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, as outlined in this report.

RECEIVED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 9 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

OTTAWA POLICE SERVICES BOARD

3. BOARD ACTIVITY, TRAINING AND PERFORMANCE: 2015

BOARD RECOMMENDATION

That Council receive this report for information.

RECEIVED

COMMITTEE REPORTS

AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE REPORT 12

4. TRAFFIC, PEDESTRIAN AND ROAD SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AND AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council receive this report for information.

RECEIVED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 10 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

5. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT – 5511, 5537 MCCORDICK AND 5510

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED

That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for part of 5511, 5537 McCordick Road, and 5510 Fourth Line Road, to prohibit residential uses on the retained farmland, as detailed in Document 2, as amended by the following:

1. That the following text, under the heading Summary of requested Zoning By-law amendment proposal, “The intent is to prohibit residential uses on the retained lands”, be replaced with, “The intent is to prohibit residential uses on the retained lands and to recognize a reduced lot width of 20 metres”; and

2. That Document 2 – Details of Recommended Zoning be replaced with the following:

“The proposed changes to the Comprehensive Zoning By- law for part of 5511, 5537 McCordick Road, and 5510 Fourth Line Road are as follows:

a) Rezone the lands shown as Area A on Document 1 from AG to AG4[xxxr].

b) Add a new exception, AG4[xxxr], with a provision similar in effect to the following, “Minimum lot width is 20 metres”; and

3. That no further notice be provided pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 11 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

FINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT 11

6. GLEBE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA APPLICATION FOR AN EXEMPTION BY-LAW TO THE RETAIL BUSINESS HOLIDAYS ACT

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council enact a by-law in the form of Document 3 to exempt the Glebe Business Improvement Area from the store closing requirements of the Retail Business Holidays Act, as described in the Report.

CARRIED with Councillors S. Blais, R. Brockington, R. Chiarelli, D. Deans, K. Egli, J. Leiper, and C. McKenney dissenting.

7. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL TO EXPROPRIATE LANDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE RICHMOND FORCEMAIN PROJECT PURSUANT TO SECTION 4 OF THE EXPROPRIATIONS ACT

COMMITTEE RECOMMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED

That Council enact a by-law, as set out in Document 1, approving the making of an application for approval to expropriate lands pursuant to Section 4 of the Expropriations Act, that are required for purposes of the Richmond Forcemain Repairs and Modifications Project, as amended by the following:

1. That the report title be changed to “Application for Approval to Expropriate Lands for the Purpose of the Richmond Forcemain Project Pursuant to Section 4 of the Expropriations Act“; and

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 12 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

2. That the draft by-law listed as document 1 in the report (ACS2016-PAI-REP-0004) be changed to “a by-law to provide for the making of an application for approval to expropriate property in the city of Ottawa, for purposes of the Richmond forcemain project as more particularly described in schedules “A” and “B” to this By-law”.

CARRIED

8. LAND LEASE FOR 45 RUSKIN STREET TO THE OTTAWA HOSPITAL (CIVIC CAMPUS)

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council:

1. Approve the lease of 2.85 acres (1.1551 ha) of land located at 45 Ruskin Street to The Ottawa Hospital (Civic Campus) for an initial term of ten (10) years commencing 1 January 2016 and ending 31 December 2025, at an annual base rent of $267,168 plus HST, for a total rent of $2,671,680 plus HST for the term of the lease as outlined in this report; and

2. Delegate authority to the Director of the Real Estate Partnerships and Development Office to execute the land lease with The Ottawa Hospital (Civic Campus) as outlined in this report.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 13 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT 20A

9. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT – 151 AND 153 CHAPEL STREET

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED

That Council:

1. endorse an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for 151 and 153 Chapel Street to permit two 25-storey buildings with 586 residential units, commercial on the ground floor and second storey, a podium of varying heights, and underground parking, as detailed in Documents 2 and 3, as amended by the following:

a. That Document 2 be replaced with the attached Proposed Building Height Schedule (as set out in supporting Document 1 below);

b. That the following provisions be added to the proposed exception in Document 3:

“Within Area B on Schedule XXX above the 8th storey, the maximum floor plate size is 925 square metres

Within Area E on Schedule XXX above the 9th storey, the maximum floor plate size is 925 square metres”;

2. endorse the attached Official Plan Amendment, attached as Document 7 to the staff report; and

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 14 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

3. approve that there be no further notice pursuant to Section 34 (17) of the Planning Act.

CARRIED

DIRECTIONS TO STAFF

Direct staff to review the urban park funding policy in advance of the next Development Charge review, as well as work with the applicant to find a solution to fund the park at this location.

Direct staff to work with the applicant to try to find a solution that keeps the Beausoleil/Chapel intersection closed. If the maintained closure is not possible, that staff report back to Council, before the OMB Hearing, to detail the mitigation factors to eliminate cut through traffic from Beausoleil to Chapel St.

10. NEW EDINBURGH HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED

That Council adopt the New Edinburgh Heritage Conservation District Plan, attached as Document 1, as amended by the following:

a. Under Section 8.5.1, Demolition and Relocation, reorder the guidelines so that guidelines 3 and 4 are last in this section, becoming guidelines 6 and 7, and re-number the guidelines accordingly;

b. Under Section 8.5.2, Conservation and Maintenance, Exterior Cladding, replace subsection 2 with the following:

If original cladding requires replacement it should be replaced in kind. Only deteriorated portions should be replaced.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 15 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

c. Under Section 8.5.3, Additions to Existing Buildings (Contributing and Non-Contributing), General Guidelines, replace subsection 3 with the following:

Additions shall normally be located in the rear yard. However, there may be instances where an addition elsewhere may be appropriate because it does not have a negative impact on the cultural heritage value of the HCD. These situations will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the community.

CARRIED

11. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT – PART OF 8900 JEANNE D’ARC BOULEVARD NORTH

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for part of 8900 Jeanne d’Arc Boulevard North, shown in Document 1 and detailed in Document 3, to facilitate the future development of taller apartment buildings on the site.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 16 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

12. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT – 350 AND 137 BAY STREET

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for 350 Sparks Street and 137 Bay Street to permit a 23-storey high-rise apartment building and a 27-storey hotel, as detailed in Document 2.

CARRIED

13. ROCKCLIFFE PARK HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED

That Council:

1. Adopt the Rockcliffe Park Heritage Conservation District Plan, attached as Document 1, as amended by the following:

a) Under Section 6.0, Statement of Cultural Heritage Value, add the following under Description of Heritage Attributes:

 The regular front yard setbacks on some streets such as Sir Guy Carleton Street, Blenheim Drive and Birch Avenue

 The irregular front yard setbacks on some streets, such as Mariposa Avenue between Springfield and

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 17 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

Lisgar Roads, Crescent Road, Acacia Avenue and Buena Vista between Springfield and Cloverdale Roads

b) Under Section 7.1, District Policies, replace subsection 5 with the following:

 Severances to existing lots shall only be permitted where the resulting lots are consistent with the general lot sizes within the associated streetscape and the zoning bylaw in force at the time in order to respect the character of the associated streetscape.

c) Under Section 7.2, Management Guidelines, include the following under a new heading:

 Periodic Review

The City shall undertake a review of the Rockcliffe Park Heritage Conservation District Plan and whether it is meeting its objectives no more than 10 years after it has come into force. The failure to review the contents of the Plan within the scheduled review guideline will in no way invalidate the Plan or its ability to be enforced.

d) Under Section 7.3.1, Demolition and Relocation, replace that section with the following text:

1. Demolition or relocation of contributing buildings will only be permitted in extraordinary circumstances such as fire or natural disaster.

2. Demolition applications for contributing buildings shall be accompanied by a rationale that sets out the reasons that the demolition of the building is being proposed and why retention is not possible. A report prepared by a structural engineer with expertise in heritage buildings may be required.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 18 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

3. In the rare instance that the demolition of a contributing building is permitted, the proposed replacement building will be permitted only where the siting, form, and materials are consistent with and sympathetic to the surrounding natural and cultural environment. All new construction will comply with the relevant Guidelines contained within this Plan.

4. In the rare instance that the demolition of a contributing building is permitted, heritage staff may require that the building be recorded and the information be deposited at the City of Ottawa Archives. In addition, consideration should be given to salvaging historic materials as the building is demolished.

5. While acknowledging that the retention of both contributing and non-contributing buildings in the HCD is an objective of this Plan, the demolition of non-contributing buildings in the HCD may be considered. Any application to demolish a non- contributing building in the HCD shall be accompanied by plans for the proposed replacement building.

6. Any application to demolish an existing non- contributing building will be reviewed with consideration of its historical and architectural significance, its contribution to the historic character of the streetscape, and the appropriateness of the proposed redevelopment. Demolition will be recommended only where the existing building is of little significance and the proposed building is sympathetic to the traditional surrounding natural and cultural environment. All new construction will comply with the relevant Guidelines contained within this plan.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 19 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

e) Under Section 7.3.2, Roofs and chimneys, replace subsection 5 with the following:

 Solar panels should ideally be located on the rear slope of the roof if possible or on a flat roof. In addition, solar panels shall be installed in a manner that will not impact the heritage fabric of the building if they are removed.

f) Under Section 7.3.3 Driveways, landscape features, lighting guidelines, replace subsection 7 with the following:

 Modern equipment (utility boxes, air conditioning units, satellite dishes) shall be located in a manner that is discreet and not visible from the street. Screening with strategically located plant material is encouraged.

g) Under Section 7.3.3, Lot size, replace subsection 1 with the following:

 The retention of existing lots, large and small, is important to the preservation of the character of the HCD. New lots created through severance or by joining smaller lots together shall be consistent with the general lot sizes within the associated streetscape and the zoning bylaw in force at the time in order to respect the character of the associated streetscape.

h) Under Section 7.4.1, Alterations and Additions to Existing Buildings, General Guidelines, replace subsection 6 with the following:

 Terraces on the top storey of buildings do not form part of the heritage character of the HCD, however, a terrace on the top storey may be permitted if it is set back from the roof edge, it and its fixtures are not

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 20 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

visible from the surrounding public realm and the terrace does not have a negative effect on the character of the surrounding cultural heritage landscape.

i) Under Section 7.4.2 replace subsection 3 with the following:

 Construction of new buildings will be recommended for approval when the new building does not detract from the historic landscape characteristics of the associated streetscape, the height and mass of the new building are consistent with the contributing buildings in the associated streetscape, and the siting and materials of the new building are compatible with the contributing buildings in the associated streetscape. Where there are no contributing buildings in the associated streetscape, the height and mass of the new building shall respect the character of the existing buildings and shall not have a negative impact on the associated streetscape or the cultural heritage value of the HCD. These situations will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the community in accordance with Section 4.1 of this Plan.

j) Under Section 7.4.2, replace subsection 7 with the following:

 In order to protect the expansive front lawns, and the generous spacing and setbacks of the buildings, identified as heritage attributes of the HCD, the following Guidelines shall be used when determining the location of new houses on their lots:

a) New buildings on interior lots shall be sensitively sited in relation to adjacent buildings. Unless a new building maintains the front yard setback of a

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 21 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

building it is replacing, the front yard setback of the new building shall not be less than that of the adjacent building that is set closest to the street. A new building may be set back further from the street than adjacent buildings.

b) In general, unless a new building on a corner lot maintains the setbacks of the building it is replacing, the new building shall not be closer to the street than both adjacent buildings. The new building may be set back further from both streets than the adjacent buildings. If the front yard setbacks of the adjacent buildings cannot reasonably be used to determine the front yard and exterior side yard setbacks of a new building, the new building shall be sensitively sited in relation to adjacent buildings on both streets.

k) Under Section 7.4.2, Guidelines for new buildings, replace subsection 10 with the following:

 Terraces on the top storey of buildings do not form part of the heritage character of the HCD, however, a terrace on the top storey may be permitted if it is set back from the roof edge, it and its fixtures are not visible from the surrounding public realm and the terrace does not have a negative effect on the character of the surrounding cultural heritage landscape.

l) Under Section 7.4.2, delete subsection 14, which refers to development on Beechwood. This guidance is contained in the Rockcliffe Park Secondary Plan and the Zoning By-Law.

m) Add definition to Glossary:

 Associated streetscape: Means both sides of the

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 22 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

street in the same block as the subject property;

2. Receive the Heritage Survey and Evaluation Forms for properties within the Heritage Conservation District; and

3. Direct the Heritage Services Section, Planning and Growth Management Department, to undertake a study of the significant views into and out of the Rockcliffe Park Heritage Conservation District and to provide options for their management and protection.

MOTION NO. 25/3

Moved by Councillor T. Nussbaum

Seconded by Councillor J. Harder

WHEREAS the goal of adopting a Rockcliffe Park Heritage Conservation District Plan (the “HCD”) is to provide clear and enforceable guidelines for managing change in the HCD that retains, conserves and enhances its cultural heritage value, as defined through the heritage attributes; and

WHEREAS community consultation and review following the release of the draft HCD plan identified opportunities to further increase clarity and consistency in the plan in a manner that respects the HCD’s heritage attributes; and

WHEREAS Planning Committee passed a motion at its January 26, 2016 meeting to amend the draft HCD; and

WHEREAS there are further changes to clarify language proposed to the draft HCD;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Document 1 of the report, being the draft Rockcliffe Park Heritage Conservation District Plan, as amended by Planning Committee at its meeting of January 26, 2016, be further amended as follows:

1. Under Section 7.3.1 Demolition and Relocation, replace Guideline 6 with the following:

“Any application to demolish an existing non-contributing building will be reviewed with consideration of its historical and architectural significance,

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 23 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

its contribution to the historic character of the streetscape, and the appropriateness of the proposed redevelopment. Demolition will be permitted only where the existing building is of little significance and the proposed building is sympathetic to the traditional surrounding natural and cultural environment. All new construction will comply with the relevant Guidelines contained within this plan.”

2. Under Section 7.3.1 Demolition and Relocation, add the following as a new Guideline at the end of the section:

“7. When a building is proposed for demolition and replacement, the Environment Section of the heritage survey form and existing conditions shall be reviewed to identify significant landscape features to be retained.”

3. Under Section 7.4.2 replace Subsection 3 with the following:

“Construction of new buildings will only be permitted when the new building does not detract from the historic landscape characteristics of the associated streetscape, the height and mass of the new building are consistent with the contributing buildings in the associated streetscape, and the siting and materials of the new building are compatible with the contributing buildings in the associated streetscape. Where there are no contributing buildings in the associated streetscape, the height and mass of the new building shall respect the character of the existing buildings and shall not have a negative impact on the associated streetscape or the cultural heritage value of the HCD. These situations will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the community in accordance with Section 4.1 of this Plan.”

4. Throughout the document replace the terms “contributing property” with “Grade I property, “contributing building” with “Grade I building”, “non- contributing property” with “Grade II property”, and “non-contributing building” with “Grade II building”.

5. Add the following definitions to the Glossary in alphabetical order:

“Grade I: All properties that contribute to the cultural heritage value of the HCD through their landscaped setting, architecture and environment and reflect the “Statement of Cultural Heritage Value and Attributes.” Elsewhere

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 24 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

in the City of Ottawa Grade I properties are referred to as “Contributing properties.”

Grade II: All properties that do not contribute to the cultural heritage value of the HCD through their landscaped setting, architecture and environment and reflect the “Statement of Cultural Heritage Value and Attributes.” Elsewhere in the City of Ottawa Grade II properties are referred to as “Non- contributing properties,” and

6. Replace the Map entitled “Rockcliffe Park Heritage Conservation District plan MAP” with the attached map.

7. Amend Planning Committee Recommendation 1) f. to read as follows:

Under Section 7.3.3 Driveways, landscape features, lighting guidelines, replace subsection 7 with the following:

 Modern equipment (utility boxes, air conditioning units, satellite dishes) shall be located in a manner that is discreet and not visible from the street. Screening with strategically located plant material is encouraged. Such measures shall be at the cost of the property owner.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff be directed to provide for a monitoring period of three years after the adoption of the Heritage Conservation District Plan, after which the Heritage Services Section would bring an information report to the Built Heritage Sub-committee on the initial implementation of the Plan.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 25 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

CARRIED

Item 13, as amended by Motion No. 25/3, and set out in full below for ease of reference, was then put to Council:

That Council:

1. Adopt the Rockcliffe Park Heritage Conservation District Plan, attached as Document 1, as amended by the following:

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 26 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

a) Under Section 6.0, Statement of Cultural Heritage Value, add the following under Description of Heritage Attributes:

 The regular front yard setbacks on some streets such as Sir Guy Carleton Street, Blenheim Drive and Birch Avenue

 The irregular front yard setbacks on some streets, such as Mariposa Avenue between Springfield and Lisgar Roads, Crescent Road, Acacia Avenue and Buena Vista between Springfield and Cloverdale Roads

b) Under Section 7.1, District Policies, replace subsection 5 with the following:

 Severances to existing lots shall only be permitted where the resulting lots are consistent with the general lot sizes within the associated streetscape and the zoning bylaw in force at the time in order to respect the character of the associated streetscape.

c) Under Section 7.2, Management Guidelines, include the following under a new heading:

 Periodic Review

The City shall undertake a review of the Rockcliffe Park Heritage Conservation District Plan and whether it is meeting its objectives no more than 10 years after it has come into force. The failure to review the contents of the Plan within the scheduled review guideline will in no way invalidate the Plan or its ability to be enforced.

d) Under Section 7.3.1, Demolition and Relocation, replace that section with the following text:

1. Demolition or relocation of contributing buildings

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 27 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

will only be permitted in extraordinary circumstances such as fire or natural disaster.

2. Demolition applications for contributing buildings shall be accompanied by a rationale that sets out the reasons that the demolition of the building is being proposed and why retention is not possible. A report prepared by a structural engineer with expertise in heritage buildings may be required.

3. In the rare instance that the demolition of a contributing building is permitted, the proposed replacement building will be permitted only where the siting, form, and materials are consistent with and sympathetic to the surrounding natural and cultural environment. All new construction will comply with the relevant Guidelines contained within this Plan.

4. In the rare instance that the demolition of a contributing building is permitted, heritage staff may require that the building be recorded and the information be deposited at the City of Ottawa Archives. In addition, consideration should be given to salvaging historic materials as the building is demolished.

5. While acknowledging that the retention of both contributing and non-contributing buildings in the HCD is an objective of this Plan, the demolition of non-contributing buildings in the HCD may be considered. Any application to demolish a non- contributing building in the HCD shall be accompanied by plans for the proposed replacement building.

6. Any application to demolish an existing non- contributing building will be reviewed with consideration of its historical and architectural

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 28 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

significance, its contribution to the historic character of the streetscape, and the appropriateness of the proposed redevelopment. Demolition will be permitted only where the existing building is of little significance and the proposed building is sympathetic to the traditional surrounding natural and cultural environment. All new construction will comply with the relevant Guidelines contained within this plan.

7. When a building is proposed for demolition and replacement, the Environment Section of the heritage survey form and existing conditions shall be reviewed to identify significant landscape features to be retained.

e) Under Section 7.3.2, Roofs and chimneys, replace subsection 5 with the following:

 Solar panels should ideally be located on the rear slope of the roof if possible or on a flat roof. In addition, solar panels shall be installed in a manner that will not impact the heritage fabric of the building if they are removed.

f) Under Section 7.3.3 Driveways, landscape features, lighting guidelines, replace subsection 7 with the following:

 Modern equipment (utility boxes, air conditioning units, satellite dishes) shall be located in a manner that is discreet and not visible from the street. Screening with strategically located plant material is encouraged. Such measures shall be at the cost of the property owner.

g) Under Section 7.3.3, Lot size, replace subsection 1 with

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 29 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

the following:

 The retention of existing lots, large and small, is important to the preservation of the character of the HCD. New lots created through severance or by joining smaller lots together shall be consistent with the general lot sizes within the associated streetscape and the zoning bylaw in force at the time in order to respect the character of the associated streetscape.

h) Under Section 7.4.1, Alterations and Additions to Existing Buildings, General Guidelines, replace subsection 6 with the following:

 Terraces on the top storey of buildings do not form part of the heritage character of the HCD, however, a terrace on the top storey may be permitted if it is set back from the roof edge, it and its fixtures are not visible from the surrounding public realm and the terrace does not have a negative effect on the character of the surrounding cultural heritage landscape.

i) Under Section 7.4.2 replace subsection 3 with the following:

 Construction of new buildings will only be permitted when the new building does not detract from the historic landscape characteristics of the associated streetscape, the height and mass of the new building are consistent with the contributing buildings in the associated streetscape, and the siting and materials of the new building are compatible with the contributing buildings in the associated streetscape. Where there are no contributing buildings in the associated streetscape, the height and mass of the new building shall respect the character of the existing buildings and shall not have a negative impact on the

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 30 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

associated streetscape or the cultural heritage value of the HCD. These situations will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the community in accordance with Section 4.1 of this Plan.

j) Under Section 7.4.2, replace subsection 7 with the following:

 In order to protect the expansive front lawns, and the generous spacing and setbacks of the buildings, identified as heritage attributes of the HCD, the following Guidelines shall be used when determining the location of new houses on their lots:

a) New buildings on interior lots shall be sensitively sited in relation to adjacent buildings. Unless a new building maintains the front yard setback of a building it is replacing, the front yard setback of the new building shall not be less than that of the adjacent building that is set closest to the street. A new building may be set back further from the street than adjacent buildings.

b) In general, unless a new building on a corner lot maintains the setbacks of the building it is replacing, the new building shall not be closer to the street than both adjacent buildings. The new building may be set back further from both streets than the adjacent buildings. If the front yard setbacks of the adjacent buildings cannot reasonably be used to determine the front yard and exterior side yard setbacks of a new building, the new building shall be sensitively sited in relation to adjacent buildings on both streets.

k) Under Section 7.4.2, Guidelines for new buildings, replace subsection 10 with the following:

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 31 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

 Terraces on the top storey of buildings do not form part of the heritage character of the HCD, however, a terrace on the top storey may be permitted if it is set back from the roof edge, it and its fixtures are not visible from the surrounding public realm and the terrace does not have a negative effect on the character of the surrounding cultural heritage landscape.

l) Under Section 7.4.2, delete subsection 14, which refers to development on Beechwood. This guidance is contained in the Rockcliffe Park Secondary Plan and the Zoning By-Law.

m) Add the following definitions to the Glossary in alphabetical order:

 Associated streetscape: Means both sides of the street in the same block as the subject property;

 Grade I: All properties that contribute to the cultural heritage value of the HCD through their landscaped setting, architecture and environment and reflect the “Statement of Cultural Heritage Value and Attributes.” Elsewhere in the City of Ottawa Grade I properties are referred to as “Contributing properties.”

 Grade II: All properties that do not contribute to the cultural heritage value of the HCD through their landscaped setting, architecture and environment and reflect the “Statement of Cultural Heritage Value and Attributes.” Elsewhere in the City of Ottawa Grade II properties are referred to as “Non-contributing properties,” and

n) Throughout the document replace the terms “contributing property” with “Grade I property, “contributing building” with “Grade I building”, “non-

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 32 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

contributing property” with “Grade II property”, and “non-contributing building” with “Grade II building”.

o) Replace the Map entitled “Rockcliffe Park Heritage Conservation District plan MAP” with the attached map (shown below).

2. Receive the Heritage Survey and Evaluation Forms for properties within the Heritage Conservation District; and

3. Direct the Heritage Services Section, Planning and Growth Management Department, to undertake a study of the significant views into and out of the Rockcliffe Park Heritage Conservation District and to provide options for their management and protection.

4. That staff be directed to provide for a monitoring period of three years after the adoption of the Heritage Conservation District Plan, after which the Heritage Services Section would bring an information report to the Built Heritage Sub- committee on the initial implementation of the Plan.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 33 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 34 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT 11

14. 2016 PARKING SERVICES BUSINESS PLAN

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED

That Council approve:

1. The 2016 Parking Services Business Plan report, as described in Document 1;

2. That the Annual Business Improvement Area (BIA) Parking Initiatives Grant Program continue in accordance with the Municipal Parking Management Strategy and the City of Ottawa’s Grants and Contributions Policy; and

3. That staff be directed to explore alternative governance models for the Municipal Parking Management Program and the potential opportunities and drawbacks of each as part of its overall update of the Municipal Parking Management Strategy.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 35 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

15. AIRPORT PARKING DIRECTIONAL SIGNS

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve the addition of Section 7.21 to the City’s Tourism and Public Service Signs Policy to permit Airport Parking Directional Signs, as per this report.

CARRIED

BULK CONSENT AGENDA

AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE REPORT 12

A. O’KEEFE MUNICIPAL DRAIN – AMENDMENT TO THE ENGINEER’S REPORT

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council adopt the Engineer’s Report prepared by Robinson Consultants Inc., entitled Amendment to the Engineer’s Report for the O’Keefe Municipal Drain dated December 2015 and give 1st and 2nd reading to the By-law attached as Document 2 to this report in accordance with Sections 42 and 45 of the Drainage Act.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 36 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

B. EASTBORO PETITION – APPOINTMENT OF ENGINEER

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council proceed with the drainage works and appoint Mr. Andy Robinson, P. Eng of Robinson Consultants Inc. as the Engineer of record to prepare a report under Section 8 of the Drainage Act in response to a petition received under Section 4 of the Drainage Act, as described in this report.

CARRIED

C. SEABROOK DEVELOPMENT – APPOINTMENT OF ENGINEER

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council proceed with the drainage works and appoint Mr. Andy Robinson, P. Eng of Robinson Consultants Inc. as the Engineer of record to prepare a report under Section 8 of the Drainage Act in response to a petition received under Section 4 of the Drainage Act, as described in this report.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 37 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

D. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT – 6345 GARVIN ROAD

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for part of 6345 Garvin Road to prohibit residential uses on the retained farmland, as detailed in Document 2.

CARRIED

E. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT – 5985 FRANK KENNY ROAD

COMMITTEE RECOMENDATION

That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for part of 5985 Frank Kenny Road to prohibit residential uses on the retained farmland, as detailed in Document 2.

CARRIED

F. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT – 5063 UPPER

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for part of 5063 Upper Dwyer Hill Road to prohibit residential uses

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 38 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

on the retained farmland, as detailed in Document 2.

CARRIED

G. COMPREHENSIVE ZONING BY-LAW 2008-250: ANOMALY- 2940 AND 2946 , 5705 AND 6801 HAZELDEAN ROAD

PLANNING COMMITTEE AND AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve amendments to Zoning By-law 2008-250, as shown in Document 1 and detailed in Document 2 and 3.

CARRIED

H. INSTALLATION OF STOP SIGNS – MCNEELY ROAD AND WHISPERING WILLOWS DRIVE

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve the installation of stop signs on McNeely Road at Golf Course and Whispering Willow Drive and complete any associated works required to establish a four-way stop control configuration at that intersection.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 39 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

FINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT 11

I. COMPREHENSIVE LEGAL SERVICES REPORT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2015

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council receive this report for information.

RECEIVED

J. APPOINTMENTS TO THE KANATA NORTH BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA BOARD OF MANAGEMENT

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve the appointments of Amy MacLeod, John Luszcek and Daniel Scott to the Kanata North Business Improvement Area Board of Management for the term expiring November 30, 2018.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 40 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

K. NATURAL GAS PROCUREMENT STRATEGY

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve the continued practice of forward purchasing of natural gas when required, as detailed in this report.

CARRIED

L. SALE OF LAND – SOUTH VILLAGE DRIVE

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council:

1. Declare a non-viable strip of vacant land described as Block 138, Registered Plan 4M-1265 shown hatched on Document “1” as surplus to City needs; and

2. Waive City policy pertaining to the sale of land at market value and approve the sale of the land outlined in Recommendation 1, subject to any easements that may be required, to 1374421 Ontario Limited for $1.00 pursuant to an Agreement of Purchase and Sale that has been received.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 41 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

M. DECLARE 2140 BASELINE ROAD AS SURPLUS TO CITY REQUIREMENTS AND TRANSFER TO THE OTTAWA COMMUNITY LANDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (OCLDC) FOR FUTURE DISPOSAL

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council:

1. Declare 2140 Baseline Road as surplus to City requirements; and

2. Authorize staff to transfer 2140 Baseline Road to Ottawa Community Lands Development Corporation (OCLDC) for future disposal.

CARRIED

N. BROWNFIELDS GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION – 300-320

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council:

1. Approve the Brownfields Rehabilitation Grant and Development Charge Reduction Program application submitted by Colonnade Development Inc., owner of the property at 300-320 Moodie Drive, for a grant under the 2010 Brownfield Redevelopment Community Improvement Plan

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 42 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

Program, not to exceed $181,554 over a maximum of five years, subject to the establishment of, and in accordance with, the terms and conditions of the Brownfields Rehabilitation Grant Agreement; and

2. Delegate the authority to staff to execute a Brownfields Rehabilitation Grant Agreement with Colonnade Development Inc., establishing the terms and conditions governing the payment of the grant for the redevelopment of 300-320 Moodie Drive, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Planning and Growth Management Department, the City Clerk and Solicitor and the City Treasurer; and

3. Resolve to exempt the proposed redevelopment of 300-320 Moodie Drive from paying future municipal development charges up to a maximum of $72,744, under Section 7(t) of the Development Charges By-law 2014-229, under the Guideline for the Development Charge Reduction due to Site Contamination Program, approved by Council June 11, 2014 and included in the $181,554 grant request, as outlined in Recommendation 1.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 43 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT 20A

O. APPLICATION FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AT 600 MINTO PLACE, A PROPERTY DESIGNATED UNDER PART V OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT AND LOCATED IN THE ROCKCLIFFE PARK HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council:

1. Approve the application to construct a new building at 600 Minto Place, according to plans prepared by Barry Padolsky Associates Inc. Architects dated and received November 30, 2015 subject to the following conditions:

a. The moulded polyurethane millwork that is proposed for the architectural detailings (such as the dentil mouldings, soffits, entrance porch, and dormers), is revised to a natural material in consultation with staff in the Heritage Section as indicated in the Rockcliffe Park Heritage Conservation District Guidelines.

2. Approve the proposed landscape plan for 600 Minto Place, prepared by Jason Smalley Landscape Design Architects dated and received December 18, 2015;

3. Delegate authority for minor design changes to the General Manager, Planning and Growth Management Department; and

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 44 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

4. Issue the heritage permit with a two-year expiry date from the date of issuance.

(Note: The statutory 90-day timeline for consideration of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act will expire on February 28, 2016.)

(Note: Approval to alter this property under the Ontario Heritage Act must not be construed to meet the requirements for the issuance of a building permit.)

CARRIED

P. APPLICATION TO ALTER 122 DALY AVENUE, A PROPERTY DESIGNATED UNDER PART V OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT AND LOCATED IN THE SANDY HILL WEST HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council:

1. Approve the application to alter 122 Daly Avenue, according to the plans submitted by Robertson Martin Architects on December 1, 2015, conditional on the approval of other required planning applications;

2. Issue the heritage permit with a two-year expiry date from the date of issuance; and

3. Delegate authority for minor design changes to the General Manager, Planning and Growth Management Department.

(Note: The statutory 90-day timeline for consideration of this

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 45 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

application under the Ontario Heritage Act will expire on February 29, 2016.)

(Note: Approval to alter this property under the Ontario Heritage Act must not be construed to meet the requirements for the issuance of a building permit.)

CARRIED

Q. DESIGNATION OF THE FLEWELLYN/JONES HOUSE, 5897 FERNBANK ROAD, UNDER PART IV OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED

That Council issue a Notice of Intention to Designate the Flewellyn/Jones House, 5897 Fernbank Road, under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act according to the Statement of Cultural Heritage Value attached as Document 5, as amended by the following:

a. That the apple orchard and distance from the road be removed from the list of heritage attributes in the Statement of Cultural Heritage Value, attached as Document 5 to report ACS2015-PAI-PGM-0156;

b. That the cultural heritage value of the apple orchard be acknowledged and staff be directed to work with the property owner to retain and incorporate as much of the orchard as possible through the development review process; and

c. That staff be directed to work with the new property owner to assess the condition of the building and if a new foundation is required, the potential relocation of the building on the site.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 46 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

R. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT – 3100 BRIAN COBURN BOULEVARD

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council approve an amendment to Zoning By-law 2008-250 for parts of 3100 Brian Coburn Boulevard to implement the zoning in accordance with the related approved draft plan of subdivision, as shown in Document 1 and detailed in Document 2.

CARRIED

S. SANDY HILL CULTURAL HERITAGE CHARACTER AREA UPDATE

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council:

1. Approve the amended boundary for the Sandy Hill Cultural Heritage Character Area, as shown in Document 1; and

2. Approve an amendment to the Sandy Hill Cultural Heritage Character Area Guidelines to include the guidelines for the King Edward Avenue corridor, as detailed in Document 2.

CARRIED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 47 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT 11

T. GREENBANK ROAD SPEED REDUCTION

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

That Council approve the following:

1. A school speed zone be installed along Greenbank Road between a point 150m north of St. Joseph High School property line (3333 Greenbank Road) and a point 150m south of St. Joseph High School property line with a speed limit of 40km/h on school days between 7:00 am to 9:00 am, 11:30 am to 1:00 pm, and 2:00 pm to 3:30 pm; and

2. Upon completion of the re-aligned Greenbank Road in front of St. Joseph High School, the school speed zone be removed.

CARRIED

DISPOSITION OF ITEMS APPROVED BY COMMITTEES UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

That Council receive the list of items approved by its Committees under Delegated Authority, attached as Document 1.

RECEIVED

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 48 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

MOTION TO ADOPT REPORTS

MOTION NO. 25/4

Moved by Councillor C. McKenney

Seconded by Councillor R. Brockington

That Election Compliance Audit Committee Report 1; the report from the Ottawa Police Services Board, entitled “Board Activity, Training & Performance: 2015 Annual Report”; Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee Report 12; Finance and Economic Development Committee Report 11; Planning Committee Report 20A; and Transportation Committee Report 11 be received and adopted as amended.

CARRIED

MOTIONS OF WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY GIVEN

MOTION NO. 25/5

Moved by Councillor C. McKenney

Seconded by Councillor J. Cloutier

WHEREAS the Business Improvement Area (BIA) will host the annual Glow Fair Music Light Art event;

AND WHEREAS many of the Glow Fair activities will be happening outdoors on Bank Street and Gloucester Street, including a main stage for performances;

AND WHEREAS the BIA has requested the closure of Bank Street from Slater Street to James Street, and Gloucester Street from O’Connor Street to Bank Street, from 1:00 p.m. on Friday, June 17th to 6:00 a.m. on Sunday, June 19th 2016, to increase the safety and security of the area;

AND WHEREAS the City of Ottawa’s Special Events on City Roads (2001-260) By-law prohibits road closures before 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday;

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 49 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Council approve the road closure for Bank Street from Slater Street to James Street, and Gloucester Street from O’Connor Street to Bank Street, from 1:00 p.m. on Friday, June 17th to 6:00 a.m. on Sunday, June 19th 2016 for the Glow Fair Music Light Art event, providing it meets the requirements, conditions and approval of Special Events Advisory Team (SEAT).

CARRIED

MOTION NO. 25/6

Moved by Mayor J. Watson

Seconded by Councillor M. Fleury

WHEREAS the City of Ottawa is supporting the efforts of the Ottawa Sports and Entertainment Group (OSEG) and the Grey Cup Organizing Committee in their bid for the 105th Grey Cup game in 2017; and

WHEREAS, should Ottawa be selected as the Host City for the 105th Grey Cup game, Celebrations Ottawa Inc., Economic Development Branch and other City event coordination resources such as Events Ottawa would be working directly with the Canadian Football League (CFL) and OSEG to ensure a successful event; and

WHEREAS the City Manager has the delegated authority to provide, when required, a consent, approval, agreement or decision on behalf of the City within the financial and legal parameters currently in the finalized and executed Lansdowne Partnership Plan Legal Agreements and the delegated authority to enter into the necessary service agreement(s) and ancillary contracts with Celebrations Ottawa Inc. required to support the Ottawa 2017 celebrations;

WHEREAS funding letters from Events Ottawa and the Celebrations Ottawa Inc. have been received by the City of Ottawa outlining their financial commitment to the City of Ottawa to cover the City’s in-kind support; and

WHEREAS, given those letters, the City of Ottawa has provided the following

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 50 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

Host City commitments to OSEG and the Grey Cup Organizing Committee in support of the bid for the 105th Grey Cup game in 2017 as follows:

• In-kind support to the CFL for a range of City services that are required and essential for events of this magnitude, including paramedic services, public works traffic control, fire services and by-law control functions for game day and for a parade event in 2017;

• The provision of in-kind marketing resources and direct access to City advertising and communication assets by the City of Ottawa’s Corporate Communications Department;

• Ottawa Police Service support for the event day itself and for the five day festival surrounding game day;

• The provision of transit services by OC Transpo for those attending the 2017 Grey Cup in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the Lansdowne Partnership Agreement, which provides for frequent transit service to TD Place from all parts of the City, including from up to eight park and ride lots, and including:

• Allowing Grey Cup tickets to serve as a ticket to ride transit service across the city for five days adjoining game day, from Thursday to Monday. This will help visitors enjoy all of Ottawa’s attractions and events surrounding the Grey Cup festival and travel to and from the train station and airport, at no additional cost; and

• The provision of an additional shuttle service between the Shaw Centre, key downtown hotels and Lansdowne for six hours per day for four days surrounding game day; and

• The waiver of the daily rental fee for the historic Aberdeen Pavilion for four days, for the use of event organizers; and

WHEREAS a motion of Council support for the City of Ottawa’s commitments with respect to acting as the Host City for the 105th Grey Cup game would help the Ottawa Sports and Entertainment Group (OSEG) and the Grey Cup Organizing Committee in their bid for the 2017 game;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that City Council approve the commitments

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 51 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016 outlined in this motion as a measure of the City’s strong support in being the Host City for the 105th Grey Cup game; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this motion be provided to the Ottawa Sports and Entertainment Group (OSEG) and the Grey Cup Organizing Committee to be used as part of their bid for the 105th Grey Cup game to be held in 2017.

CARRIED

NOTICES OF MOTION (FOR CONSIDERATION AT SUBSEQUENT MEETING)

MOTION

Moved by Councillor D. Deans

Seconded by Councillor M. Wilkinson

WHEREAS in 1910 women delegates from around the world met in Copenhagen to propose that Women’s Day become an international event to promote equal rights for women; and

WHEREAS the first International Women’s Day was held in 1911; and

WHEREAS in 1977, the United Nations officially called for all countries to mark a day for the recognition of women's economic, political and social achievements; and

WHEREAS the year 2016 marks the 100th anniversary of the first women in Canada winning the right to vote; and

WHEREAS every year thousands of events are held around the world to inspire, celebrate and honour women;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Ottawa City Council declare March 8, 2016, to be International Women’s Day in the City of Ottawa.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 52 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

MOTION

Moved by Councillor K. Egli

Seconded by Councillor M. Fleury

WHEREAS on September 9, 2015, Council approved the Streetside Spots Pilot Project Report (ACS2015-PAI-PMG-0151); and

WHEREAS the Streetside Spots Pilot Project Report stated that the streetside spots fee structure for patios and vending stalls would align with the outdoor patio permit fee structure; and

WHEREAS Council approved the Outdoor Patio Review Report (ACS2015-PAI- PGM-0060) on April 29, 2015, which included the patio fee set at a daily rate of $1.18 per square metre; and

WHEREAS Council approved Motion 23/6 on December 9, 2015, that froze the 2016 patio fees at 2015 rates;

WHEREAS staff has determined that, based on the 2015 actuals, Council will exceed the 2016 revenue projections for patio fees even if the patio fees are frozen at 2015 rates;

WHEREAS streetside spot fees were not specifically addressed within Motion 23/6; therefore not freezing those rates at 2015 outdoor patio fee rates; and

WHEREAS a maximum of 25 parking spots can be approved based on the pilot Streetside Spots project guidelines; and

WHEREAS aligning the 2016 Streetside Spots Pilot Project fee structure to the approved 2016 patio fee structure would reduce anticipated revenue by less than $1,000;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the 2016 City of Ottawa Operating Budget be amended such that the Streetside Spots Pilot Project fees mirror the adopted 2016 patio fees structure, which includes the patio fee set at a daily rate of $1.18 per square metre, first time review fee $305.00, and permit processing fee $56.00.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 53 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

MOTION

Moved by Councillor J. Leiper

Seconded by Councillor D. Deans

WHEREAS in July 2015 the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) ruled that large cable and telecom providers would have to make their new fiber-optic infrastructure available to smaller competitors; and

WHEREAS the decision made by the CRTC aims to promote competition and affordable internet for Canadians including those residents living in the City of Ottawa; and

WHEREAS in the fall of 2015 a request was filed with the Governor in-Council to review and vary the Commission’s decision; and

WHEREAS a final decision has not yet been made by the Federal Government with regards to this request to review and vary so the City of Ottawa still has an opportunity to share its position; and

WHEREAS other major municipalities, such as Calgary, have expressed their support for the CRTC decision and where the City of Toronto recently carried a similar motion requesting council support competitive and affordable internet prices.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Ottawa support the CRTC’s decision to require the sharing of fiber-optic networks between large and small competitors; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the outcome of this motion be shared with the Minister of Innovation, Science, and Economic Development, the Minister of Infrastructure and Communities, the Minister of Finance, the Minister of Canadian Heritage, and Premier Kathleen Wynne and the Ontario Minister of Economic Development, Employment and Infrastructure to ensure the City’s position is known as recommendations are prepared.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 54 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

MOTION TO INTRODUCE BY-LAWS

MOTION NO. 25/7

Moved by Councillor C. McKenney

Seconded by Councillor R. Brockington

That the by-laws listed on the Agenda under Motion to Introduce By-laws, First and Second Readings be read, and Three Readings, be read and passed.

FIRST AND SECOND READINGS

A By-law of the City of Ottawa to provide for amendments to the existing O’Keefe Municipal Drain upstream of McKenna Casey Drive in the City of Ottawa.

THREE READINGS

2016-51 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to impose special annual drainage rates upon lands in respect of which money is borrowed under the Tile Drainage Act, R.S.O 1990, c.T.8.

2016-52 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to establish certain lands as common and public highway and assume them for public use (, Fourth Line Road, 9th Line Road, Stagecoach Road).

2016-53 A by-law to provide for the making of an application for approval to expropriate property in the City of Ottawa, for purposes of the Richmond Forcemain Project as more particularly described in Schedules “A” and “B” to this by-law.

2016-54 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2003-499 respecting fire routes.

2016-55 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate certain lands at 185 Lyon Street on Plan 3922, as being exempt from Part Lot Control.

2016-56 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of lands known municipally as

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 55 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

4495, 4499, 4509 and 4515 Innes Road.

2016-57 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of lands known municipally as 350 Sparks Street and 137 Bay Street.

2016-58 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of part of the lands known municipally as 3100 Brian Coburn Boulevard.

2016-59 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of part of the lands known municipally as 8900 Jeanne D’Arc Boulevard North.

2016-60 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of part of the lands known municipally as 6345 Garvin Road.

2016-61 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of part of the lands known municipally as 5985 Frank Kenny Road.

2016-62 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of part of the lands known municipally as 5511, 5537 McCordick Road, and 5510 Fourth Line Road.

2016-63 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2001-301 to appoint Municipal Law Enforcement Officers in the Infrastructure Services Branch of the Department of Public Works and Services.

2016-64 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to change the zoning of part of the lands known municipally as 5063 Upper Dwyer Hill Road.

2016-65 To amend By-law No. 2008-250 of the City of Ottawa to correct technical anomalies and make minor corrections to the zoning of various properties throughout the City of Ottawa.

2016-66 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2004-60 to appoint Municipal Law Enforcement Officers in accordance with private property parking enforcement.

OTTAWA CITY COUNCIL 56 MINUTES 25 WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

2016-67 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend the Regional Regulatory Code to permit the retail business establishments located within the Glebe Business Improvement Area to remain open for business on specified holidays.

CARRIED

CONFIRMATION BY-LAW

MOTION NO. 25/8

Moved by Councillor C. McKenney

Seconded by Councillor R. Brockington

THAT By-law 2016-68 to confirm the proceedings of Council be enacted and passed.

CARRIED

ADJOURNMENT

Council adjourned the meeting at 10:50 a.m.

______

CITY CLERK MAYOR