DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Port Planning and Investment Toolkit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Port Planning and Investment Toolkit Port Planning and Investment Toolkit Appendices Port Planning & Investment Toolkit APPENDICES Glossary of Terms Additional Bonds Test - The financial test, Asset - Any item of economic value, either sometimes referred to as a “parity test,” that must physical in nature (such as land) or a right to be satisfied under the bond contract securing ownership, expressed in cost or some other value, outstanding revenue bonds or other types of which an individual or entity owns. 2 bonds as a condition to issuing additional bonds. Asset-Backed Debt - Debt having hard asset Typically, the test would require that historical security such as a crane lease or property revenues (plus, in some cases, future estimated mortgage, in addition to the security of pledged revenues) exceed projected debt service revenues. requirements for both the outstanding issue and the proposed issue by a certain ratio.1 Availability Payment - A means of compensating a private concessionaire for its responsibility to Advance Refunding - For purposes of certain tax design, construct, operate, and/or maintain an and securities laws and regulations, a refunding in infrastructure facility for a set period of time. which the refunded issue remains outstanding for These payments are made by a public project a period of more than 90 days after the issuance of sponsor (a port authority, for example) based on the refunding issue.1 particular project milestones or facility Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) - Taxation based performance standards.2 on an alternative method of calculating federal Best and Final Offers (BAFO) - In government income tax under the Internal Revenue Code. contracting, a vendor’s response to a contracting Interest on certain private activity bonds is subject officer’s request that vendors submit their last and to the AMT.1 most attractive bids to secure a contract for a Amortization - The process of paying the principal particular project. Best and final offers are amount of an issue of securities by periodic submitted during the final round of negotiations.3 payments either directly to bondholders or to a Bond Indenture - A contract between the issuer of sinking fund for the benefit of bondholders.1 municipal securities and a trustee for the benefit of Arbitrage Rebate - A payment made by an issuer the bondholders. The trustee administers the to the federal government in connection with an funds or property specified in the indenture in a issue of tax-exempt or other federally tax- fiduciary capacity on behalf of the bondholders. advantaged bonds. The payment represents the The indenture, which is generally part of the bond amount, if any, of arbitrage earnings on bond contract, establishes the rights, duties, proceeds and certain other related funds, except responsibilities and remedies of the issuer and for earnings that are not required to be rebated trustee and determines the exact nature of the under limited exemptions provided under the security for the bonds. The trustee is generally Internal Revenue Code. An issuer generally is empowered to enforce the terms of the indenture required to calculate, once every five years during on behalf of the bondholders.1 the life of its bonds, whether or not an arbitrage Call Date - The date on which bonds may be called rebate payment must be made.1 for redemption as specified by the bond contract. 1 A-1 Port Planning & Investment Toolkit APPENDICES Capacity (Maximum Practical) - Throughput concession is a contractual agreement in which a volume which, if exceeded, would cause a port owner conveys specific operating rights of its disproportionate increase in unit operating cost or facility to a private entity for a specified period of business delay, within the context of a facility’s time. land use, layout, and uncontrollable commercial Convertible Capital Appreciation Bonds (CCABs) drivers. - CABs with a convertibility feature at a future Capital Expenditure (CapEx) - Expenditure on date to CIBs. CCABs can be used to defer interest capital items either at the commencement of the and principal payments, with conversion to project or the cost of their renewal and Current Interest Bonds so that debt service replacement (”R&R”) over the life of the project. requirements begin, thus reducing the cost of funds relative to traditional, non-convertible Capital Appreciation Bonds (CABs) - A municipal CABs. security on which the investment return on an initial principal amount is reinvested at a stated Coupon - The periodic rate of interest, usually compounded rate until maturity. At maturity the calculated as an annual rate payable on a security investor receives a single payment (the “maturity expressed as a percentage of the principal value”) representing both the initial principal amount. The coupon rate, sometimes referred to amount and the total investment return. CABs as the “nominal interest rate,” does not take into typically are sold at a deeply discounted price with account any discount or premium in the purchase maturity values in multiples of $5,000.1 price of the security.1 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - A schedule, Covenants - Contractual obligations set forth in a typically covering a period of less than ten years, bond contract. Covenants commonly made in which outlines expenditures for capital projects on connection with a bond issue may include an annual basis and corresponding funding covenants to charge fees sufficient to provide sources. required pledged revenues (called a “rate covenant”); to maintain casualty insurance on the Capital Structure - The mix of an issuer’s or a project; to complete, maintain and operate the project’s short and long-term debt and equity, project; not to sell or including the terms of such financing and encumber the project; repayment requirements. not to issue parity Capitalized Interest - A portion of the proceeds of bonds or other an issue that is set aside to pay interest on the indebtedness unless securities for a specified period of time. Interest is certain tests are met commonly capitalized for the construction period (“additional bonds” or of a revenue-producing project, and sometimes for “additional a period thereafter, so that debt service expense indebtedness” does not begin until the project is expected to be covenant); and not to operational and producing revenues.1 take actions that would Concession - An alternative method for a public cause tax-exempt sector entity to deliver a public- purpose project interest on the bonds to through long-term contracting with a private become taxable or sector entity. A concession agreement typically otherwise become covers the objectives of the asset concession, arbitrage bonds (“tax 1 compensation, and duration of concession. A port covenants”). A-2 Port Planning & Investment Toolkit APPENDICES Credit Rating - An to comply with a covenant in the bond contract) (a opinion by a rating “springing reserve”). Issuers may sometimes agency of the credit- authorize the provision of a surety bond or letter of worthiness of a credit to satisfy the debt service reserve fund bond.1 requirement in lieu of cash. If the debt service reserve fund is used in whole or part to pay debt Current Interest service, the issuer usually is required to replenish Bonds (CIBs) - A the fund from the first available revenues, or in bond on which periodic repayments over a specified period of interest payments time. are made to the bondholders on a Defeasance - Termination of certain of the rights periodic basis. This and interests of the bondholders and of their lien term is most often on the pledged revenues or other security in used in the context of an issue of bonds that accordance with the terms of the bond contract for includes both CABs and CIBs.1 an issue of securities. This is sometimes referred to as a “legal defeasance.” Defeasance usually occurs Current Refunding - A refunding transaction in connection with the refunding of an outstanding where the municipal securities being refunded will issue after provision has been made for future all mature or be redeemed within 90 days or less payment of all obligations related to the from the date of issuance of the refunding issue.1 outstanding bonds, sometimes from funds Debt Profile - A detailed description of an issuer’s provided by the issuance of a new series of bonds. overall debt portfolio and credit profile that is In some cases, particularly where the bond updated as changes in capital structure occur. A contract does not provide a procedure for debt profile typically includes all of the relevant termination of these rights, interests and lien other information about an issuer’s debt including but than through payment of all outstanding debt in not limited to current ratings, debt service full, funds deposited for future payment of the requirements, debt service coverage ratios and debt may make the pledged revenues available for eligibility for refunding. other purposes without effecting a legal Debt Service Coverage Ratio - The ratio of defeasance. This is sometimes referred to as an available revenues available annually to pay debt “economic defeasance” or “financial defeasance.” service over the annual debt service requirement. If for some reason the funds deposited in an This ratio is one indication of the availability of economic or financial defeasance prove revenues for payment of debt service.1 insufficient to make future payment of the outstanding debt, the issuer would continue to be Debt Service Reserve - A fund in which funds are legally obligated to make payment on such debt placed to be applied to pay debt service if pledged from the pledged revenues.1 revenues are insufficient to satisfy the debt service requirements. The debt service reserve fund may Demand & Revenue Study - A professionally be entirely funded with bond proceeds at the time prepared forecast and report of the market of issuance, may be funded over time through the demand for a port’s cargo, and the ensuing accumulation of pledged revenues, may be funded revenue as a result of charging rates/fees for such with a surety or other type of guaranty policy cargo moving through a port.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Boston Tea Party Grade 4
    Sample Item Set The Boston Tea Party Grade 4 Standard 7 – Government and Political Systems Students explain the structure and purposes of government and the foundations of the United States’ democratic system using primary and secondary sources. 4.7.2 Explain the significance of key ideas contained in the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights SOCIAL STUDIES SAMPLE ITEM SET GRADE 4 1 Sample Item Set The Boston Tea Party Grade 4 Use the three sources and your knowledge of social studies to answer questions 1–3. Source 1 Boston Tea Party Engraving This engraving from 1789 shows the events of December 16, 1773. Dressed as American Indians, colonists dumped nearly 90,000 pounds of British East India Company tea into Boston Harbor in protest against the Tea Act. SOCIAL STUDIES SAMPLE ITEM SET GRADE 4 2 Sample Item Set The Boston Tea Party Grade 4 Source 2 Writing of the Declaration of Independence This picture shows Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson writing the Declaration of Independence in 1776. Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence with help from other members of the Continental Congress. SOCIAL STUDIES SAMPLE ITEM SET GRADE 4 3 Sample Item Set The Boston Tea Party Grade 4 Source 3 Timeline of Events Leading to American Revolution Year Event 1764 Britian passes the Sugar Act on Colonists. 1765 Britian passes the Stamp Act on Colonists. 1767 Britian passes Townshend Acts on Colonists. 1770 Boston Massacre occurs when the British Army kills five Colonists. 1773 Colonists protest at the Boston Tea Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Massachusetts Freight Issues and Priorities
    Identification of Massachusetts Freight Issues and Priorities Prepared for the Massachusetts Freight Advisory Council By Massachusetts Highway Department Argeo Paul Cellucci Jane Swift Kevin J. Sullivan Matthew J. Amorello Governor Lieutenant Governor Secretary Commissioner And Louis Berger and Associates Identification of Massachusetts Freight Issues and Priorities Massachusetts Freight Advisory Council Chairman Robert Williams Project Manager and Report Author Mark Berger, AICP Project Support (Consultant) Adel Foz Wendy Fearing Chris Orphanides Rajesh Salem The preparation of this document was supported and funded by the Massachusetts Highway Department and Federal Highway Administration through Agreement SPR 97379. November 1999 Identification of Massachusetts Freight Issues and Priorities Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1-1 Purpose...........................................................................................................................................................1-1 Massachusetts Freight Advisory Council.........................................................................................................1-1 Contents of Report..........................................................................................................................................1-1 CHAPTER 2: SOLICITATION OF FREIGHT ISSUES..................................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • Director of Airline Route Development
    About Massport The Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) is an independent public authority in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts that is governed by a seven member Board. Massport is financially self-sustaining and contributes to the regional economy through the operation of three airports—Boston Logan International Airport, Hanscom Field and Worcester Regional Airport; the Port of Boston’s cargo and cruise facilities; and property management/real estate development in Boston. Massport’s mission is to connect Massachusetts and New England to the world, safely, securely and efficiently, never forgetting our commitment to our neighbors who live and work around our ports and facilities. Massport is an integral component of a national and worldwide transportation network, operating New England’s most important air and sea transportation facilities that connect passengers and cargo with hundreds of markets around the globe. Massport continually works to modernize its infrastructure to enhance customer service, improve operations and optimize land use, and has invested more than $4 billion over the past decade in coordination with its transportation partners. Massport also strives to be a good neighbor closer to home. Working in concert with government, community and civic leaders throughout Massachusetts and New England, Massport is an active participant in efforts that improve the quality of life for residents living near Massport’s facilities and who make sacrifices every day so that Massport can deliver important transportation services to families and businesses throughout New England. Boston Logan International Airport Boston Logan International Airport (BOS) is New England’s largest transportation center and an economic engine that generates $13.3 billion in economic activity each year.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Boston Haul Road – RAIL CORRIDOR
    Intermodal Corridor To the Port of Boston: The South Boston Haul Road – RAIL CORRIDOR Frank S. DeMasi RTAC Freight Committee November 2009 History of the South Boston Haul Road In the 1850s, the South Boston Haul Road (SBHR) route began to be used for railroad access to Boston from south of the growing city. Before 1900, it was made a two-track, depressed route with 12 overhead bridges. Extensive freight yards and maintenance facilities were constructed near the South Boston waterfront. The present MBTA Red Line subway tunnel, constructed in 1913 along Dorchester Avenue, crosses the cut on a diagonal under a bridge. The top of the tunnel is about 0.6 m (2 feet) below the railroad track on a three-level multimodal structure: passenger subway below freight railroad below highway. The depressed railroad route was widened from two tracks to four by 1920. After the 1940s, passenger service was discontinued and freight service levels declined. The result was that two tracks in the depressed track area and seven yard tracks remained in various levels of deferred maintenance. The other two tracks remained in service for the (usually) daily local freight until the mid-1980s. The route was suggested as a possible multimodal shared-access corridor early in the Central Artery/Tunnel (CA/T) project; community reaction was favorable, and a study of feasibility was authorized in 1987. Rail Facilities Port of Boston Circa 1950 The South Boston Haul Road – RAIL CORRIDOR Property Acquisition During the onset of construction of the Central Artery Tunnel Project, much railroad right-of-way was owned by Conrail, portions owned by Amtrak and Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA).
    [Show full text]
  • Shaped by Function: Boston's Historic Warehouses
    124 Sara E. Wermiel Shaped by Function: Boston’s Historic Warehouses This paper discusses the history of warehouses built before had the leading port. Boston’s port remained one of the busi- 1920 in Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A., with a focus on est through the nineteenth century, and in the latter nine- those in the Fort Point Channel Landmark District (FPCLD). teenth century, port facilities – including piers, warehouses, The FPCLD is a roughly 55-acre (22.3 hectares) area in the and railroad service – expanded in the South Boston area. South Boston neighborhood of the city, and it contains 85 In the twentieth century, other North American ports grew Figure 1: Warehouses in Fort Point Channel District, photo 1925 historic warehouses and lofts, which were built between to outrank Boston. Today, most of the wharves and facilities 1880 and 1930. This is the largest collection of warehouses of the old harbor have disappeared. In South Boston, the in a definable area in the city, and it probably is also one warehouses and lofts of the FPCLD survive. Although they of the most intact warehouse districts in the United States. now serve purposes other than storage and manufacturing, Before discussing the history of the FPCLD, the paper pres- these warehouses and lofts continue to physically represent ents an overview of the development of Boston’s old har- a time when maritime commerce and industry dominated bor and the distinctive warehouse blocks that were once a the city’s economy. These building feature a special form prominent feature of it. Until the mid-eighteenth century, of heavy-timber interior framing, adapted from a regional Boston was the most populous North American town and construction tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boston Economy - 2003
    589 The Boston Economy - 2003 THOMAS M. MENINO, MAYOR CITY OF BOSTON Boston Redevelopment Authority Mark Maloney, Director Clarence J. Jones, Chairman Consuelo Gonzales Thornell, Treasurer Joseph W. Nigro, Jr., Co-Vice Chairman Michael Taylor, Co-Vice Chairman Christopher J. Supple, Member Harry R. Collings, Secretary Report prepared by Dominic Modicamore Jim Vrabel Luis Rosero Policy Development and Research Gregory Perkins, Interim Director Report #589 October 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Boston’s Economy – 2003 ...............................................................................................................1 General...........................................................................................................................................1 Overview of Current Economic Conditions……………………………………………………….1 Statistical Data……………………………………………………………………………………..2 New England, Massachusetts, and Metropolitan Boston Economies .............................................................................................2 Employment Structure, Employment Trends, and Occupational Changes.............................................................................................................3 Unemployment...............................................................................................................................6 Largest Employers .........................................................................................................................7 Labor Force and Education............................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher M. Gordon
    CHRISTOPHER M. GORDON Chris Gordon is a Lecturer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Real Estate and a Senior Lecturer at the Harvard Business School teaching and writing primarily on the subject of complex capital projects. Until 2010 he served as the Chief Operating Officer of the Allston Development Group at Harvard University. In that role he oversaw the development of Harvard’s proposed campus expansion in the Allston section of Boston as well as development projects on the historic Cambridge campus. Before stepping into the role of Chief Operating Officer (COO) for the Allston Development Group in late 2005, Chris was director of Capital Programs and Logan Modernization for the Massachusetts Port Authority. During his decade at Massport, he was responsible for capital programming and project delivery for all capital projects at all Massport facilities, including Logan International Airport (the 13th busiest airport in the world), Hanscom Airfield, Tobin Memorial Bridge, Maritime Terminals on the Port of Boston, and the Worcester Regional Airport. He oversaw the successful completion of the $4.4 billion Logan Modernization Project and as Director of Capital Programs, oversaw a $500 million annual budget. Chris is a former board member of the National Research Council’s Board on Infrastructure and the Built Environment, a former trustee of the Engineering Center Education Trust, a former corresponding editor of the American Society of Civil Engineers Engineering Management Journal, and has been a speaker at numerous conferences. Chris was named the 2001 Person of the Year for the Construction Management Association of America for both the New England region and the country, and was named the 2000 Government Engineer of the Year by the Boston Society of Civil Engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Issues and Solutions in the Boston Metropolitan Area
    Environmental Issues and Solutions in the Boston Metropolitan Area Sponsor: Boston Project Center Director Professor Susan Vernon-Gerstenfeld Submitted to: Project Liaison: Professor Susan Vernon-Gerstenfeld Project Advisors: Susan Vernon-Gerstenfeld, WPI Professor Alexander Wyglinski, WPI Professor Submitted by: Gabriel Louzao Thales Oliveira Oliver Rich Date: October 12, 2010 i ABSTRACT The goal of this project was to help the Boston Project Center refocus its future projects to address environmental problems in the City of Boston. To do this, our objectives were to identify the major environmental problems in Boston, which organizations are addressing these problems, and where they will focus their resources in the future. We concluded that funding is being directed towards addressing climate change and implementing clean energy solutions. Provided in this report is a list of individuals and organizations that could be approached as future project sponsors and a GIS map presenting the locations and general information of these organizations. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank Mr. Douglas Fine from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Mr. Derek Lennon from the Department of Conservation and Recreation, Mrs. Vivien Li from The Boston Harbor Association, Mrs. Kate Plourd from the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center, Mr. Paul Stordy from Massport, and Mr. Vincent DeVito for taking the time to answer our question so that we could better understand Boston‟s environmental situation. Also we would like to thank our project sponsor Professor Susan Vernon-Gerstenfeld and our advisor Professor Alexander Wyglinski for their continuous help. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The greater Boston region must address the issues of pollution and climate change in the upcoming years if it is to continue sustainable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Conley Terminal Modernization Program Soil Reclamation and Reuse Initiatives
    American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) 2020 Environmental Improvement Awards Conley Terminal Modernization Program Soil Reclamation and Reuse Initiatives June 30, 2020 Conley Terminal Modernization Program - Soil Reclamation and Reuse Initiatives Executive Summary Conley Container Terminal is an important economic asset for the New England region, serving more than 2,500 businesses, including nearly 700 enterprises based in rural areas. Increasing demand has led to four consecutive container volume records at Conley Terminal, including 300,762 TEUs in CY2019, a 1 percent jump from CY2018 and the fifth consecutive year of record-breaking volume. Altogether, the working port is now home to more than 9,000 blue-collar jobs and responsible for $8.2 billion in annual economic impact. To maintain its competitiveness, in 2014, the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) commenced the Conley Terminal Modernization Program, an $800 MM investment into the infrastructure of the Port of Boston. This Program included partnering with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on the dredging and deepening of the Boston Harbor, rehabilitation of two existing berths at Conley Terminal (Berths 11 and 12), construction of a new deep-water berth (Berth 10) and expansion of Conley Terminal yard onto an adjacent property, the location of a former oil storage facility. Rather than manage these projects piece- meal, Massport recognized the opportunity to develop and execute a comprehensive and cost-effective Soil Management Program to test, manage, treat, process, and reuse soils onsite for all construction projects at Conley. This successful Soil Management Program allowed Conley Terminal to: Maximize soil reuse onsite. Minimize the amount of imported fill as part of construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Summary Sheet for Boston Harbor Deep Draft Improvements Projects
    Staff Summary Sheet Board of Directors Meeting TO FOR FROM: Approval 1 Sec./CEO Dept.: Office of CFO Presenter: Susan Woods Ext: 9145 Signature X Vote Subject: Boston Harbor Deep Draft Improvements Project/Harbor Dredging 2 BD Info Contract: # 97690 Date: November 2018 Implications: (The implications checked below are involved in this action, are discussed below or in a separate enclosure, and have been considered in the final recommendation.) _X__Capital Budget ___Operating Budget ___Legal ___Other PURPOSE: To request the Board of Directors to authorize MassDOT to extend the contract and increase the funding to the Massachusetts Port Authority to fund the local/state share of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ capital infrastructure in Boston Harbor called the Boston Harbor Deep Draft Improvements Project/Boston Harbor Dredging (CT # 97690) TOTAL PROJECT COST: Current Contract Total: $35,000,000 Net Increase $35,000,000 New Contract Total $70,000,000 DISCUSSION: This amendment for $35,000,000 is to extend the existing contract to fund the FY19 share of the costs from the State Bond Cap as was programmed in the FY19-23 CIP that had been approved by the Board in June, 2018. In partnership with MassPort, MassDOT is committed to matching a federal funding from the Army Corps of Engineers to increase the depth of Boston Harbor to approximately 50 feet, opening the port to increased commercial shipping and will allow for accommodating larger ships and more container traffic, thus generating jobs and economic growth for Boston, the Commonwealth and the entire region. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Because the total costs have been programmed and approved by the Board in the FY19- 23 CIP, there is no financial impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocm40693443-1960.Pdf
    i Q k O C‘ IVTRODUCTIOIV In order to present a frame of reference in which to Under this trusteeship, the Massachusetts Port Authori­ place the Massachusetts Port Authority and its efforts to ty on February 17, 1959, sold a revenue bond issue of aid the commerce of the Commonwealth, we offer the $71,750,000 bearing interest at 4%%, and took over following background information: operation of the Port of Boston facilities, Logan Inter­ national Airport, Hanscom Field, and the Mystic River The taxpayers of the State provided approximately Bridge. $30 million after World War II for improved ship-truck- The Authority is moving toward objectives. It was railroad facilities on the Boston waterfront. Over a longer authorized and empowered in its enabling act “to in­ period, the taxpayers invested approximately $70 million vestigate the necessity for the development and improve­ in airplane-automobile-truck facilities at Logan Inter­ ment of commerce in the city and the metropolitan area national Airport. surrounding the city and for the more expeditious han­ Despite these huge investments and the efforts of State dling of such commerce, including but not limited to, managerial agencies, sizeable annual deficits had to be additional traffic facilities, bus and truck terminals, off- met from tax revenues. In accordance with the “equal and street parking facilities, and passengers at steamship, proportional” tax provision of the State Constitution, the railroad or motor terminals or airports, and to make such users and the non-users of the facilities were treated alike. studies, surveys and estimates as may be necessary to To relieve non-users of additional tax burdens, the determine the feasibility of any such facility .
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Boston Update
    Port of Boston Update Andrew G. Hargens, AICP | LEED AP, Senior Project Manager Massachusetts Port Authority Economic Planning and Development Department Regional Transportation Advisory Council Advisory Transportation Regional Massachusetts Port Authority • State authority created in 1956 • Board appointed by Governor • Self-financing • Primary line departments and facilities – Aviation Department • Logan International Airport • Hanscom Field • Worcester Airport – Maritime Department • Port of Boston terminals • Commercial development Regional Transportation Advisory Council Advisory Transportation Regional Massachusetts Port Authority Economic Planning and Development Department Port of Everett Boston Chelsea Geography and East Ownership Charlestown Boston North End Massport Financial Property District Regional Transportation Advisory Council Advisory Transportation Regional Massachusetts Port Authority Economic PlanningSouth and DevelopmentBoston Department Port of Everett Boston Chelsea Geography and East Ownership Charlestown Boston North End Massport Financial Property District Other Public (USCG & BRA) Regional Transportation Advisory Council Advisory Transportation Regional Massachusetts Port Authority Economic PlanningSouth and DevelopmentBoston Department Port of Everett Boston Chelsea Geography and East Ownership Charlestown Boston North End Massport Financial Property District Other Public (USCG & BRA) Private Port Regional Transportation Advisory Council Advisory Transportation Regional Facilities Massachusetts Port Authority
    [Show full text]