Aances, Etc. , O T E Nite Tates

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aances, Etc. , O T E Nite Tates Combined Statement OF THE eceipts an is ursements, aances, etc. , o t e nite tates DURING THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 OFFICE O~ SECR~ WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE TREASURT DEPARTMENT. Document No. 2815. Dfefdon og Bookkeeping and Warrants. RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS, BALANCES, ETC. LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, TRANSMITTING A Combined Statement of the Receipts and Disbursements, Balances, etc. , of the Government During the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1917. TREASURY DEPARTMENT) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY) Washington, D. O. , December 8, 191'1 TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. SIR: In compliance with the requirements of section 15 of an act entitled "An act making appropriations for the legislative, "executive, and judicial expenses of the Government for the fIscal year ending June 30, 1895, and for other purposes, approved July 31, 1894 (28 Stat. , p. 210), I have the honor to transmit herewith a combined state- ment of the receipts and disbursements, balances, etc. , of the Government during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1917. Respectfully, W G. McAnoo, secretary. 3 COMBINED STATEMENT OF THE RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS, BALANCES, ETC., OF THE UNITED STATES DURING THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1917. (Details of Receipts on pp. 7 to 25, and of Disbursements on pp. 26 to 181.) TREASURY DEPARTMENT, DIVISION OF BOOKKEEPING AND WARRANTS. SIR: I have the honor to submit herewith statements of the receipts and disbursements of the Government during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1917, as fo)lows: Excess of receipts (+), Cisss. Receipts. Disbursements. excess of disburse- ments ( —). Ordinary . $1, 118, 174, 126. 43 $1, 147, 898, 991. 16 -$29, 724, 864. 73 Special disbursements. 918& 880& 315. 00 —918, 880, 315. 00 Panama Canal 6, 150& 668. 59 19, 262, 798. 32 —13, 112) 129. 73. Public debt 2, 428, 017) 799. 61 677, 544& 782. 25 +1& 750, 473, 017. 36 Total 3& 552& 342& 594 63 2& 763) 586& 886 73 +788) 755& 707 90 During the year 2 per cent consols of 1930, amounting to $36)535,500, and 2 per cent Panama Canal bonds, amounting to $9, 430, 400, a total of $45, 965, 900, were exchanged for $22, 993,900 3 per cent conversion bonds and $22, 972, 000 3 per cent one-year Treasury notes, under the provisions of section 18 of the Federal reserve act of December 23, 1913. In the gold-reserve fund there were redemptions of $38, 559, 910 United States notes. As the notes were at once exchanged for gold in the general fund, the reserve was maintained at the sum fixed by law, which, increased by the sum of $2, 979, 025.63 tax on additional circulation under act of May 30, 1908, amounted on June, '30, 1917, to the sum of $152, 979,025. 63. In the trust funds, reserved against gold and silver certificates and Treasury notes of 1890, there were $1,872, 966, 000 of certificates issued and $1,514, 913,000 of certificates and Treasury notes of 1890 redeemed, resulting in an increase of $358, 053, 000 in the issues during the year, and an increase in the funds to $2, 063, 390,829 on Jung 30, 1917, exclusive of certificates and notes in the Treasury. The postal revenue receipts amounted to $329, 726, 116.36 and the expenditures therefrom for the Postal Service were $319,889, 904.46, an excess of receipts of $9, 836, 211.90. Respectfully, CHAS H MILI ER Chief of Division of BookLceeping and t1'arrants. Hon. W. G. MOAnoo, Secretary of the Treasmry. RECEIPT S. (The port erst named in the following list is the headquarters for the district. } ports. Districts and ports of collection. Place of deposit. Deposits by RECEIPTB INTO THE GENERA, L FUND. From Ctrsforns: Alaska, district No. 31— Juneau Cordova Eagle. Faubanks. Forty Mile Ketchikan. -------. $10, 891. 18 610, 89L 18 Nome Juneau. .. --. St. Michael. Skagway. Sulzer. Unalsska. Wrangell ' Arizona, district No. 26— Nogales Douglas Nogales. .. -. 25, 310. 86 Lochiel. Douglss. .. 3, 256. 56 Naco. 28, 567. 42 Yuma Buffalo, district No. 9— Buffalo. Black Rock Ferry. Dunkirk. Lackawanna. Lewiston. 089, 795. 68 2, 089, 795. 68 Niagara Falls Buffalo. .. 2, North Buffalo. North Tonawanda. Olcott Youngstown Chicago, district No. 39— Chicago. Chicago. 6) 441, 553. 76 Michigan City, Ind Peoria .. 16, 957. 05 Peoria. New York. .. .. 459. 54 6, 458, 970. 35 Colorado, district No. 47— Denver. Denver. .. 65, 188. 32 65, 188. 32 Connecticut, district No. 6— Bridgeport. Greenwich Hartford Bridgeport 6311 362. 47 807. 09 New Haven Hartford . .. .. 810, ew Haven 72, 630. 00 New London 514, 799. 56 Nor walk. 1, Stamford. Dakota, district No. 34— Pembina. Ambrose Antler Crosby. Hannah. Hansboro. Kermit Mowbray Neche Minneapohs Mtnn 210) 042. 36 Northgate Chicago, Ill. .. 648. 00 Noyes. 210, 690. 36 Portal St. John. Sarles Sherwood So uris. Walhalla Westhope. Duluth and Superior, district No. 36— Duluth, Mann. , and Superior, Wis. Ashland, Wis. Baudette, Minn. Bayfield, Wis. Gunflint Lake, Minn Indus, Minn Duluth, Minn. 724) 139. 62 International Falls, Minn Superior, Wis . 109, 288. 44 Isle Royale, Minn. St. Paul, Minn. 303. 70 Pine Creek, Minn. 833, 731. 76 Ranier, Minn. Two Harbors, Minn. Warroad, Minn. Washburn, Wis. RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS, 1917. Beceipts —Continued. Ploce of deposit, Deposits ports, Deposits Districts end ports of collection. by by districts. Prom Customs —Continued. Eagle Pass, district No. 25— Eagle Pass. Eagle Pass. $40& 571. 17 Boquillas. .. Del Rio. 7& 474. 41 Del Rio. $48, 045. Presidio. 58 El Paso, district No, 24— Paso El El Paso. 65& 723. 81 66, 723. 81 Columbus . .. .. Florida, district No. 18— Tampa Apalachicols. Boca Grande. Carr abelle. Cedar Keys Tampa. .. .. 2, 048, 542. 10 Fernandina. .. Fernandina. .. 829. 18 Jacksonville. .. Jacksonville. .. 21, 552. 52 Key West. Key West. 625, 015. 75 Miami. .. .. Pensacola. 15, 002. 17 Pensacola Washington, D. C. 34. 30 Port Inglis. 2, 710, 976. 02 Punta Gorda. St. Andrews. St. Augustine. Tarpon Springs. Galveston, district No. 22— Galveston Texas City. .. 2, 011. 10 Dallas. Galveston. .. 961, 934. 33 Houston. 537. 43 Port Lavaca. Dallas . .. .. 36, Houston. .. 8, 575. 58 San Antonio San Antonio. 33, 296. 87 Texas City 90. 00 Velssco New York, N. Y. 1, 042, 445. 81 Georgia, district No. 17— Savannah. Atlanta. Savannah 18) 082. 02 Brunswick Atlanta. 9, 190. 93 Darien Brunswick. 3, 412. 15 30, 685. 10 Hawaii, district No. 32— Honolulu Hilo. Kahului Honolulu 1, 141, 297. 09 1, 141, 297. 09 Koloa Mahukona. .. Indiana, district No. 40— Indianapolis. Indianapolis 43, 140. 35 Evansville Evansville . 293, 671. 51 336, 811. 86 Iowa, district No. 44— Des Moines. Des Moines 11& 517. 82 Dubuque Dubuque 5, 235. 88 Sioux City Sioux City. 1, 853. 45 18, 607. 15 Kentucky, district No. 42— Louisville. Paducah. Louisville. 89, 444. 99 89, 444 99 Laredo, district No. 23— Laredo. Brownsville. Corpus Christi. Hidalgo. Laredo . 60, 457. 55 Rio Grande City. Brownsville . 4, 862. 32 Roms. 65, 319.87 Santa Maria Maine snd New Hampshire , district No. 1— Portland Bangor. Baring Bath Belfast . Boothbay. Bridgewater Calais. .. Castine. Cutler. Eastport Ellsworth. Fort Fsirfleld. RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS& 1917. Resents —Continued. Districts and ports of collection. Place of deposit Deposits by ports. Deposits by district. Aosrt Cttstoms —Continued. Maine and New Hampshire, district No. 7— Continued. Fort Kent. .. Houlton. sport. ' Jone Portland . .. .. $326& 451. 09 Ikmestone. Bangor. 8, 887'. 80, Lowelltown. Boston, Mass. 2, 000. 00 Lubec Portsmouth, N. H 650. 55 Machias. $337& 989. 44 Madawaska. Mars Hill. Millbridge. Monticello. Moose River Mount Desert Ferry. Portsmouth, N. H Robbinston. Rockland Rockport. St. Luce. South West Harbor. Stonington and Deer Isle Van Bursa. .. .. Vanceboro. Vinalhaven. Maryland, district No. 13— Baltimore, Md. Alexandria, Va. .. .. Baltimore. 1, 745, 214. 12 Annapolis, Md Washington, D. C 88, 812. 96 Crisfield, Md New York, N. Y. 560. 91 Washington D. C. 1, 834, 587. 99 Massachusttes, district No. 4— Boston Barnstable. Fall River. Gloucester. Boston. .. 8, 389, 187. 05 Holyoke. New York, N. Y. 780. 88 New Bedford Gloucester. 2, 033. 14 Plymouth New Bedford. .. 1&642. 83 Provincetown Salem 42. 38 Salem. Springfield . 152, 158. 63 Springfield . Worcester 16, 706. 75 Vineyard Haven. 8, 562, 546. 66 Worcester. Michigan, district No. 38— Detroit. Alpena Bay City Charlevoix. Cheboygan Detour. Escanaba Frankfort Glad stone. Grand Haven. Grand Rapids. Houghton Lake Linden Detroit. .. .. .. 1, 902, 126. 85 Ludington. Bay City. .. .. .. .. 611. 99 Grand Rapids. 72& 304. 45 Mackinaw. .. '.. Manistee. Port Huron. .. .. 166, 690. 81 Manistique. .. Saginaw. .. .. 47 416. 20 Marine City. Sault Ste Marie 24, 128. 47 Marquette. 2, 170, 278. 77 Marysville. Munising. Musk egon. P etoskey. Port Huron. St. Clair. St. Ignace. St. Joseph. Saginaw. Sault Ste. Marie. Minnesota, district 35— No. St. Paul. .. 228, 547. 66 St. Paul and Minneapolis. Minneapolis. .. .. 547, 941. 81 New York, N. Y. .. 303. 70 776, 793. 17 10 RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS& 191?& Receipts —Continued. Distdcts end ports of collection. - Ploce of deposit. Dep f@ br perte. Deposits br dist„cn Prom Customs —Continued. Mobile, district No. 19— Mobile, Ala. Biloxi, Miss. Mobile. .. .. $178, 529. 67 Birmingham, Ala. Birmingham . 3, 102. 06 Gulfport, Miss. Gulfport, Miss 4, 436. 88 Scranton, Miss. $186, 068. 61 Montana and Idaho, district No. 33— Great Falls, Mont . Bsnff, Moat Bsylor, Moat. .. .. Eastport, Idaho. Gateway, Mont. Great Falls, Mont. Hsvre, Mont. .. 55, 889. 36 55, 889. 36 Peskan, Idaho. Plentywood, Mont Porthill, Idaho. Sweetgrase, Mont. New Orleaas, district No. 20— New Orleans. New Orleans. Morgan .. .. 9, 129, SOS. 51 City and Calcasieu Pass. New Vickeburg, Miss. York, N. Y. 2, 216. 25 New York, district No. 10— . 9, 132, 024. 76 New York, N. Y New York, N. Y 154, 229, 252, 55 Albany, N.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 11 ) LAKELAND TOURS, LLC, Et Al.,1 ) Case No
    20-11647-jlg Doc 205 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:16:46 Main Document Pg 1 of 105 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) LAKELAND TOURS, LLC, et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-11647 (JLG) ) Debtors. ) Jointly Administered ) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, Julian A. Del Toro, depose and say that I am employed by Stretto, the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned case. On September 25, 2020, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following document to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A, via electronic mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit B, and on three (3) confidential parties not listed herein: Notice of Filing Third Amended Plan Supplement (Docket No. 200) Notice of (I) Entry of Order (I) Approving the Disclosure Statement for and Confirming the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Lakeland Tours, LLC and Its Debtor Affiliates and (II) Occurrence of the Effective Date to All (Docket No. 201) [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] ________________________________________ 1 A complete list of each of the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases may be obtained on the website of the Debtors’ proposed claims and noticing agent at https://cases.stretto.com/WorldStrides. The location of the Debtors’ service address in these chapter 11 cases is: 49 West 45th Street, New York, NY 10036. 20-11647-jlg Doc 205 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:16:46 Main Document Pg 2 of 105 20-11647-jlg Doc 205 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:16:46 Main Document Pg 3 of 105 Exhibit A 20-11647-jlg Doc 205 Filed 09/30/20 Entered 09/30/20 13:16:46 Main Document Pg 4 of 105 Exhibit A Served via First-Class Mail Name Attention Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 City State Zip Country Aaron Joseph Borenstein Trust Address Redacted Attn: Benjamin Mintz & Peta Gordon & Lucas B.
    [Show full text]
  • A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types
    A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types TRANSPORATION RESEARCH BOARD NAS-NRC PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This report, not released for publication, is furnished for review to members or participants in the work of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the NCHRP. Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research team. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research reported herein was performed under NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15, by Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage. Margaret Slater, AICP, of Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) was principal investigator for this project and led the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of New Madrid Seismic Zone Earthquakes on the Central US
    New Madrid Seismic Zone Catastrophic Earthquake Response Planning Project Impact of New Madrid Seismic Zone Earthquakes on the Central US -- Volume II -- Detailed Methodology and Results MAE Center Report No. 09-03 October 2009 The report “Impact of New Madrid Seismic Zone Earthquakes on the Central US” is comprised of two volumes. A summary of all methodology and results, conclusions and future work is included in Volume I. Volume II includes detailed explanations of all impact assessment methodology and model components. Additionally, comprehensive discussions of all impact assessment model results are included for direct damage, economic loss, social vulnerability, social impacts, response and commodities requirements, medical needs, transportation and utility network models, and uncertainty quantifications. Lastly, a comparison of the research team’s previous earthquake impact assessment of the Central US is provided. A table of contents for Volume II is included and is followed by the table of contents for the summary document, Volume I. Table of Contents for Volume II Appendix 1: Hazard…………………………………………………………………… A1-1 Appendix 2: Inventory………………………………………………………………… A2-1 Appendix 3: Fragility Relationships…………………………………………............... A3-1 Appendix 4: Threshold Values………………………………………………………... A4-1 Appendix 5: Direct Damage and Economic Losses…………………………………... A5-1 Appendix 6: Social Impact and Response Requirements……………………………... A6-1 Appendix 7: Maps for Direct Damage and Economic Loss…………………………... A7-1 Appendix 8: Flood Risk Modeling……………………...…………………….............
    [Show full text]
  • A Context of the Railroad Industry in Clark County and Statewide Kentucky
    MAY 4, 2016 A CONTEXT OF THE RAILROAD INDUSTRY IN CLARK COUNTY AND STATEWIDE KENTUCKY CLARK COUNTY, KENTUCKY TECHNICAL REPORT 15028 15011 SUBMITTED TO: City of Winchester 32 Wall Street PO Box 40 Winchester, Kentucky 40392 10320 Watterson Trail Louisville KY 40299 502-614-8828 A CONTEXT OF THE RAILROAD INDUSTRY IN CLARK COUNTY AND STATEWIDE KENTUCKY OSA Project No. FY15-8453 KHC Project No. FY16-2211 Submitted to: Mr. Matt Belcher City Manager 32 Wall Street PO Box 40 Winchester, Kentucky 40392 859-744-6292 LEAD AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Prepared By: Mathia N. Scherer, MA, Tim W. Sullivan, PhD, RPA, Kathryn N. McGrath, MA RPA, Anne Tobbe Bader, MA RPA, Sara Deurell, BA, and Michelle Massey, BA Corn Island Archaeology, LLC P.O. Box 991259 Louisville, Kentucky 40269 Phone (502) 614-8828 FAX (502) 614-8940 [email protected] Project No. PR15012 Cultural Resources Report No. TR15028 (Signature) Anne Bader Principal Investigator May 4, 2016 A Context of the Railroad Industry in Clark County and Statewide Kentucky ABSTRACT From April 2015 through April 2016 Corn Island Archaeology LLC researched and prepared a historic context for railroad and rail-related buildings, structures, objects, and archaeological resources in Kentucky with a particular focus on the City of Winchester and Clark County. Specifically, Corn Island prepared an inventory of known (recorded) railroad-related cultural resources within the proposed undertaking; assessed the potential for unrecorded railroad- related resources to be present in Clark County; and developed a historical context to allow informed interpretation of these resources as well as those that may be recorded in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 0MB-Mo,4024-00.18 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 1 6A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1 . Name of Property _____ _______^ ___ ______ historic name Newort and Cincinnati Bridge other names/site number Louisville and Nashville (L&N) Bridge (CP-N-153) 2. Location street & number Spans Ohio River n/a D not for publication city or town Newport and Cincinnati n/a D vicinity state Kentucky/Ohio code KY/OH county Campbell/Hamilton code 037/061 zip code 41071/45202 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this KXnomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Damage Assessment of Infrastructure Components in the Central United States
    Rapid Damage Assessment of Infrastructure Components in the Central United States Report No. 09-02 Fikri Acar Post-Graduate Research Associate Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign August 2009 ABSTRACT A number of destructive earthquakes have occurred in the central United States on the New Madrid Fault at the beginning of the 19th century. In the eight central U.S. states included in this investigation, rivers intersect major land routes of importance to commodity flow. The Mississippi River, for example, divides the US into two parts, namely the Eastern and Pacific parts. There are many different long-span bridges crossing these rivers. Moreover, most of the major dams were built on these rivers, and at least thousands of storage tanks are located in cities and towns in the central U.S. If earthquakes occurred in the New Madrid seismic area as large as the historic 19th Century series, some of these major structures would likely suffer at least slight-to-moderate damage. Bridge damage would interrupt the transportation network, and floods caused by dams failures would result in further destruction to regions already devastated by earthquake shaking. As part of the ongoing impact assessment project funded by FEMA, this study deals with the rapid damage assessment of these major river crossings (MRCs) and dams, as well as levees and storage tanks that frequently hold hazardous materials. As a result of a broad classification, six types of MRCs, two types of dams and several types of steel storage tanks have been identified. The majority of the bridges fall into the ‘multispan simply supported and continuous steel truss bridges’, while most dams are classified as ‘earth and concrete gravity dams’.
    [Show full text]
  • Development, Expertise, and Infrastructure Between the Ohio River and Cincinnati Riverfront, 1895-Present
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2019 Development, Expertise, and Infrastructure between the Ohio River and Cincinnati Riverfront, 1895-Present Raymond W. Pettit The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3020 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] DEVELOPMENT, EXPERTISE, AND INFRASTRUCTURE BETWEEN THE OHIO RIVER AND CINCINNATI RIVERFRONT, 1895-PRESENT by RAYMOND PETTIT A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the reQuirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2019 i © 2019 RAYMOND PETTIT All Rights Reserved ii Development, Expertise, and Infrastructure between the Ohio River and Cincinnati Riverfront, 1895-Present by Raymond Pettit This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in satisfaction of the dissertation reQuirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. __________________________ __________________________ Date Jeff Maskovsky Chair of EXamining Committee __________________________ __________________________ Date Jeff Maskovsky Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Jacqueline Nassy Brown Dana-Ain Davis Uwe Lübken THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Development, Expertise, and Infrastructure between the Ohio River and Cincinnati Riverfront, 1895-Present by Raymond Pettit Advisor: Jeff Maskovsky As the first major U.S. urban center located west of the Appalachian Mountains, Cincinnati’s early growth depended on the Ohio River, a vital route for the westward drive of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Form 990-PF
    TAX RETURN FILING INSTRUCTIONS **FORM 990-PF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COPY** FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2018 PREPARED FOR: CONRAD N. HILTON FOUNDATION 30440 AGOURA ROAD AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301 PREPARED BY: DELOITTE TAX LLP 50 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 AMOUNT DUE OR REFUND: NOT APPLICABLE MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: NOT APPLICABLE MAIL TAX RETURN AND CHECK (IF APPLICABLE) TO: NOT APPLICABLE COPY RETURN MUST BE MAILED ON OR BEFORE: NOT APPLICABLE SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: CLIENT EXTENDED TO NOVEMBER 15, 2019 Return of Private Foundation OMB No. 1545-0052 Form 990-PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation | Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Department of the Treasury 2018 Internal Revenue Service | Go to www.irs.gov/Form990PF for instructions and the latest information. Open to Public Inspection For calendar year 2018 or tax year beginning , and ending Name of foundation A Employer identification number CONRAD N. HILTON FOUNDATION 94-3100217 Number and street (or P.O. box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number 30440 AGOURA ROAD (818) 851-3700 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending, check here ~ | AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301 G Check all that apply: Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here ~~ | Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, Address change Name change check here and attach computation ~~~~ | X H Check type of organization: Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here ~ | X I Fair market value of all assets at end of yearJ Accounting method: Cash Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination (from Part II, col.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Regimental and Unit Histories
    Illinois Adjutant General's Report Regimental and Unit Histories Containing Reports for the Years 1861– 1866 Histories of Illinois Civil War Regiments and Units The following histories of Illinois Civil War regiments and units originate from the first eight volumes of the nine volume publication, Report of the Adjutant General of the State of Illinois (1900-1902). (The ninth volume lists units of the Black Hawk, Mexican and Spanish-American Wars as well as the War of 1812.) The histories, some written shortly after the war’s end, are the work of numerous authors throughout the intervening years. The 1886 version of the Adjutant General’s Report included regimental histories compiled by that office which had not previously been published. The final 1900-1902 republication of the report incorporated revisions and corrections to the histories. A listing of regiments and units which have accompanying histories follows. In recognition of the service of Illinois’ six regiments during the Mexican War, the assignment of regimental numbers for infantry began with seven. Please click on the bookmark for the desired regiment or unit to get to the history for that regiment or unit. Illinois Civil War Regimental Histories Official Name Database Abbreviation(s) INFANTRY 7th Illinois Infantry 7 INF, 7 INF CON 8th Illinois Infantry 8 INF 9th Illinois Infantry 9 INF, 9 INF CON 10th Illinois Infantry 10 INF 11th Illinois Infantry 11 INF 12th Illinois Infantry 12 INF 13th Illinois Infantry 13 INF 14th Illinois Infantry 14 INF, 14 INF CON 15th Illinois Infantry
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Spirit Leveling in Kentucky
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIKECTOR BULLETIN 554 RESULTS OF SPIRIT LEVELING IN KENTUCKY 1898 TO 1913, INCLUSIVE R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHER Work from 1902 to 1913, inclusive, done in cooperation with the Kentucky Geological Survey WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation.......................................................... 5 Personnel. ............................................................ 5 Classification.......................................................... 5 Bench marks......................................................... 5 Datum............................................................... 6 Topographic maps.................................................... 7 Precise leveling.......................................................... 8 Austerlitz, Chilesburg, Frenchburg, Georgetown, Hedges, Lee City, Proctor, and Rosslyn quadrangles (Breathitt, Clark, Fayette, Lee, Powell, and Wolfe coTinties).......................................... 8 Frankfort, Georgetown, Louisville, Pleasureville, Prospect, Sadieville, Tayloreville, and Waddy quadrangles (Franklin, Jefferson, Scott, and Shelby counties).................................................... 10 Louisville city survey (Jefferson County)............................... 13 Cobb, Eddyville, Fords Ferry, Gracey, Morganfield, Princeton, Provi­ dence, and Shawneetown quadrangles (Caldwell, Crittenden, Trigg,
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Louisville and Nashville Railroad
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 1939 The origins of the Louisville and Nashville Railroad. Lolla Wurtele 1913-2006 University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Wurtele, Lolla 1913-2006, "The origins of the Louisville and Nashville Railroad." (1939). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1857. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1857 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE THE ORIGINS OF THE LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty Of the Graduate School of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Of Master of Arts Department of History By LOLLA WURTELE 1939 '''''"/,. .. THE ORIGINS OF THE LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE I THE FIRST STEPS TOWARD THE BUILDING OF THE L AND N RAILROAD • • • • • • • • • • • •• 1 II SURVEYS •• • • • • • • • • • • • • 27 III LOCATION ~~ ESTIMATES • • • • • • 39 IV CONSTRUCTION • • • • . • • • • • 56 V FINANCES • • • • • • • • • • • • • 71 BIBLIOGRAPHY • • • • • • • • • • • 89 -----~" -_ ...._--_._. __ .. "' THE FIRST STEPS TOWARD THE BUILDING OF THE L AND N RAILROAD CHAPTER I THE FIRST STEPS TOWARD THE BUILDING OF THE L AND N RAILROAD The world to-day is passing through a second age of mechanization.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Central Railway Company Records 1884-1968
    TENNESSEE CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY RECORDS 1884-1968 Processed by: Bob Bell Archival Technical Services Manuscript Accession Number: 85-010 Microfilm Accession Number : 1653 Date Completed: 7-24-85 Location: XVI-E-J MICROFILMED INTRODUCTION The Tennessee Central Railway Company Records are a part of the record of the east- west railroad through Tennessee that operated between Hopkinsville, Kentucky, and the Harriman-Emory Gap. Judge William E. Miller of the U.S. District Court, Nashville, Tennessee, donated the collection to the Tennessee State Library and Archives. The records occupy 52.08 linear feet of shelf space and number approximately 2,700 items and 46 volumes. Single photocopies of unpublished writings in the Tennessee Central Railway Company records may be made for purposes of scholarly research. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE The Tennessee Central Railway Company Records, 1884-1968, are a partial record of the east-west railroad that crossed Tennessee from Clarksville to Harriman-Emory Gap, with an addition to Hopkinsville, Kentucky, in the west. The railway provided service to the midsection of the state. The organization and construction of the railway functioned similarly to other railroads during the last half of the nineteenth century: small short lines built first, then combined into the larger company. Lack of adequate finances hampered the company from its beginning, with several receiverships and bankruptcies occurring. The company ceased operations on August 31, 1968. A court-appointed trustee divided and sold the property to three competing railroads: the Illinois Central, the Louisville and Nashville, and the Southern Railway System. The collection consists of bills, claims, clippings, correspondence, court records, estimates, exhibits, financial documents, inventories, land records, legal documents, lists, maps, passes, printed materials, reports, schedules and studies.
    [Show full text]