Unit 4: Business Lending and Security

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unit 4: Business Lending and Security Credit Skills Academy Credit Skills Academy Executive Briefing Unit 4: Business Lending and Security ! ! Keith Checkley & Associates ! ! Credit Skills Academy Unit 4 Business Lending and Security Objectives After studying this unit, you should be able to: · quantify the total risk exposure on business lending; · clarify when security should be taken; · consider the various forms of security available from business borrowers and the valuation discounts; · understand the concept of break-up analysis It is not intended to deal with the technicalities of charging security which are well covered in various Banking books. A lender should consider taking security, where the purpose of the advance is to acquire a specific asset, e.g. a medium term loan for the purchase of machinery, or a bridging loan for premises purchase or where the risks of repayment are assessed as to make it essential to have a controlled repayment alternative. If a business is unable to repay its debts, in order to assess the outcome of this event, it will be necessary to carry out a break-up analysis of the balance sheet. This will give a significantly different picture to the balance sheet as a going-concern. For example, many assets lose value as soon as trading ceases. Asset values need to be discounted by the banker to carry out this type of gone-concern approach to credit analysis. The discount factors to be applied will vary from business to business. For example, stock may be out-of-date, obsolete or include work-in- progress. THE ASSESSMENT OF RISK When assessing the risk to the bank, the full extent of the bank’s exposure to the customer must be understood. In addition to overdrafts and loans, the bank may well be asked to enter into many other types of contingent liability for the customer and it will be necessary to incorporate these additional risks into the overall risk ‘exposure’. ! ! Keith Checkley & Associates ! ! Credit Skills Academy Bank Risk Percentages for Contingent Liabilities The below figures are approximations. Precise views on the level of risk in these products vary from bank to bank. % Acceptances 100 Discounts (trade bills) 30 Discounts (accommodation paper) 100 Foreign bills negotiated 30 Forward currency contracts 20 Irrevocable letters of credit 100 Engagements:- - Guarantees 100 - Bid Bonds (tender bonds) 20 - Performance bonds 100 - Advance payment guarantees 100 - Bonds to HM Customs & Excise 200 - Indemnities re. freight irregularities in 10 shipping documents etc. CSA Member Activity 1 Identify the risk assessment criteria in your Bank. How do they compare with this table? Guidelines · Acceptances - 100% When the bank accepts a bill on behalf of a customer the customer then obtains possession of the underlying goods In exchange for the bill. At maturity the bank must honour the bill at face value. · Discounts (trade bills) - 30% When a bill is discounted the bank is, in effect, buying (with recourse) the underlying debt from its customer. On breaking-up a balance sheet you allow 70% for debtors and assuming you will obtain 70% value for the debt your uncovered risk is 30%. The bank may be able to secure a lien over the underlying goods if it feels the need. · Discounts (accommodation paper) - 100% An accommodation bill is a bill drawn by your customer on himself for a funding operation not linked to any underlying trading transaction and your customer will be expected to cover the bill at or before maturity. Thus, your customer is the ultimate debtor and our risk Is 100%. ! ! Keith Checkley & Associates ! ! Credit Skills Academy · Foreign bills negotiated - 30% Treat on the same basis as discounts (trade bills). · Forward currency contracts - 20% Loss could be sustained if the customer is unable to complete the contract. This would necessitate the bank having to buy or sell the currency at spot rate in order to complete. Your risk is dependent upon movements in the exchange rate and for practical purposes you adopt a risk factor of 20% (some banks are as 16w as 10%). · Irrevocable letters of credit - 100% In establishing a credit we undertake to make payment in accordance with the terms thereof. Thus, this risk is assessed at 100%. · Guarantees - 100% Where you have detailed knowledge of the finances of the individual or company being guaranteed (the principal debtor), e.g. recent balance sheet, the risk is capable of accurate assessment. Where you do not, this risk must be 100%. Some banks automatically weight such guarantees at 100% risk. · Bid bonds (tender bonds) - usually 20% In effect, this is an assurance by the bank that a customer's tender for a contract is not of a frivolous nature, i.e. in the event of the contract being awarded to the tenderer, that he will not withdraw, thereby leaving the beneficiary to recommence tender procedure. The bond itself will only be outstanding until a contract is awarded, at which stage it will be cancelled (if the customer has not been awarded the contract) or replaced by a performance bond. The risk factor is therefore 100%, but because the bonds are short term and because many underlying tenders will not be accepted, some banks adopt a 20% risk factor. · Performance bond - 100% Default under a performance bond could arise through your customer's: - Inability to fulfil the contract; or - Withdrawal from the contract. The former case is only likely to arise from insolvency because contractors are highly unlikely to withdraw once the bond has been given. A performance bond is essentially an insolvency bond which generates no cash flow whatsoever. It merely has the effect of placing the contractor in the position that he can go ahead with the contract which in itself may or may not generate cash flow. If and when default occurs you are still not able to quantify your risk at less than the full amount, because it is possible that the whole of the bonded amount will be required to rectify the shortcomings of the contract. Also remember that you are In the beneficiary's hands in that he holds an 'on demand' guarantee and you must pay in full when called upon to do so. Thus, the risk factor is 100%. ! ! Keith Checkley & Associates ! ! Credit Skills Academy · Advance payment guarantee - 100% When a bank's customer is paid In advance for goods not yet delivered, the purchaser may demand in exchange a guarantee of repayment in case of non delivery. As with a performance bond this is, In effect, an insolvency bond which is not capable of quantification at less than the full amount. Customers' balance sheets may show these advance payments in different ways. In some cases the amount of the advance payment is shown as a liability whilst in others it can be shown as a deduction from work in progress. · Bonds to HM Customs & Excise - 200% These are mainly guarantees for deferred VAT and import duty. The bonds normally specify a maximum figure per month, but Customs and Excise could wait until two months' payments are In arrears before claiming. · Indemnities re missing bills of lading, Irregularities in shipping documents etc - 10% It is highly improbable that any customer will ask you to assist him (through the Issue of an indemnity) to procure goods that are not intended for delivery to him. Irregularities in shipping documents are invariably clerical discrepancies and your action In giving indemnities against discrepancies merely oils the wheels of commerce. It is, therefore, considered that the risk factor in these instances is notional at 10%. Indeed, some banks take the view that for an established, reputable customer there is nil risk. BREAK-UP ANALYSIS (The Gone-Concern Approach) If a business goes into insolvency, you need to be able to assess the risk of any loss on your lending by analysing the business’ assets on a ‘gone concern’ basis. Break-up values can be calculated from the latest audited (or interim) figures. Experience has shown that amounts recovered in asset realisations are almost always far less than expected. If there is a general recession hitting trade or area, the market for the assets will be depressed and also when a business fails, many debtors will look for reasons not to pay. ! ! Keith Checkley & Associates ! ! Credit Skills Academy Suggested percentages for asset realisation values (‘Gone-Concern’ basis) % Marketable Investments 80 of current market value Debtors 50-70 Depending on age, spread, quality HP Debtors 60 Stock 15-40 Work-in-progress 20 Property - freehold 40 of balance sheet or manager’s valuation with vacant possession; or 60 of recent professional valuation Long leasehold (30 years plus) 33 1/3 of manger’s valuation or recent professional valuation Private dwelling house - freehold or 66 2/3 of manager’s valuation with vacant leasehold possession Plant and Machinery etc 10-20 Depending on how specialised Vehicles 20 Office furniture, tools etc 10 Payments in advance Nil Ships 50 of recent professional valuation Farming : Cattle and livestock 60 Harvested crops 50 Deadstock - feed Nil Tillages - preparation 50 Note: These percentages are not regarded as rigid. If it is felt necessary to include a different valuation, the reason should be stated in your reports. ! ! Keith Checkley & Associates ! ! Credit Skills Academy DEBENTURES When the bank has a debenture charge, then monthly figures (as well as monitoring business performance through ratio analysis, cash flow and management information) can be called for to help monitor the bank advance. After considering the nature of the debenture charge in general, we will look at the type of monitoring that can be used. Bankers will frequently encounter situations where a company customer has executed a debenture charge to the bank.
Recommended publications
  • HIGH YIELD OR “JUNK' BONDS, HAVEN OR HORROR by Mason A
    HIGH YIELD OR “JUNK’ BONDS, HAVEN OR HORROR By Mason A. Dinehart III, RFC A high yield, or “junk” bond is a bond issued by a company that is considered to be a higher credit risk. The credit rating of a high yield bond is considered “speculative” grade or below “investment grade”. This means that the chance of default with high yield bonds is higher than for other bonds. Their higher credit risk means that “junk” bond yields are higher than bonds of better credit quality. Studies have demonstrated that portfolios of high yield bonds have higher returns than other bond portfolios, suggesting that the higher yields more than compensate for their additional default risk. It should be noted that “unrated” bonds are legally in the “junk” category and may or may not be speculative in terms of credit quality. High yield or “junk” bonds get their name from their characteristics. As credit ratings were developed for bonds, the credit agencies created a grading system to reflect the relative credit quality of bond issuers. The highest quality bonds are “AAA” and the credit scale descends to “C” and finally to “D” or default category. Bonds considered to have an acceptable risk of default are “investment grade” and encompass “BBB” bonds (Standard & Poors) or “Baa” bonds (Moody’s) and higher. Bonds “BB” and lower are called “speculative grade” and have a higher risk of default. Rulemakers soon began to use this demarcation to establish investment policies for financial institutions, and government regulation has adopted these standards. Since most investors were restricted to investment grade bonds, speculative grade bonds soon developed negative connotations and were not widely held in investment portfolios.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Alpha Versus Beta in High Yield Bond Investing
    PERITUS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC Market Commentary Independent Credit Research – Leveraged Finance – July 2012 Understanding Alpha versus Beta in High Yield Bond Investing Investors have come to recognize that there is a secular change occurring in financial markets. After the 2008 meltdown, we have watched equities stage an impressive rally off the bottom, only to peter out. There is no conviction and valuations are once again stretched given the lack of growth as the world economy remains on shaky ground. In another one of our writings (“High Yield Bonds versus Equities”), we discussed our belief that U.S. businesses would plod along, but valuations would continue their march toward the lower end of their historical range. So far, this looks like the correct call. Europe still hasn’t been fixed, the China miracle is slowing and, perhaps, the commodity supercycle is also in the later innings. The amount of debt assumed by the developed world is unsustainable so deleveraging began a few years ago. These are not short or pleasant cycles and both governments and individuals will be grumpy participants in this event. It simply means that economic growth will be subdued for years to come. I have never really been able to understand economic growth rates that are significantly ahead of the population growth anyway…oh yeah, the productivity miracle. I have written chapter and verse on the history of financial markets and where returns have come from: yield. Anyone with access to the internet can verify that dividends, dividend growth and dividend re-investment are what have driven stock returns over the decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of High-Yield Analysis
    Research Foundation Briefs FOUNDATIONS OF HIGH-YIELD ANALYSIS Martin Fridson, CFA, Editor In partnership with CFA Society New York FOUNDATIONS OF HIGH-YIELD ANALYSIS Martin Fridson, CFA, Editor Statement of Purpose The CFA Institute Research Foundation is a not- for-profit organization established to promote the development and dissemination of relevant research for investment practitioners worldwide. Neither the Research Foundation, CFA Institute, nor the publication’s editorial staff is responsible for facts and opinions presented in this publication. This publication reflects the views of the author(s) and does not represent the official views of the CFA Institute Research Foundation. The CFA Institute Research Foundation and the Research Foundation logo are trademarks owned by The CFA Institute Research Foundation. CFA®, Chartered Financial Analyst®, AIMR- PPS®, and GIPS® are just a few of the trademarks owned by CFA Institute. To view a list of CFA Institute trademarks and the Guide for the Use of CFA Institute Marks, please visit our website at www.cfainstitute.org. © 2018 The CFA Institute Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
    [Show full text]
  • GGD-89-48 High Yield Bonds
    GAO Iteport, to Congressional Rcqueskrs -..- ~--. .--- March 1!))I!) HIGH YIELD BONDS Issues Concerning Thrift Investments in High Yield Bonds i ,I unitedstates General Accounting Office GAO Wahington, D.C. 20548 General Government Division B-231276.8 March 2, I989 The Honorable Donald W. Riegle Chairman, Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs United States Senate The Honorable Henry B. Gonzalez Chairman, Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs House of Representatives This report completes our responseto the requirements of Section 1201 of the Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987 (P.L. lOO-86),which directed us to study several aspects of the high yield bond market As required by the act, we did our work in consultation with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal ReserveSystem, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Labor. Copies of this report are being provided to those agenciesand are available to others on request. This report was prepared under the direction of Craig A. Simmons, Director, Financial Institutions and Markets Issues, Other major contributors are listed in the appendix. Richard L. Fogel Assistant Comptroller General Ekecutive Summ~ The growth of the high yield (“junk”) bond market in the 1980s has Purpose been fraught with controversy. Numerous congressionalhearings have focused on the role of these bonds as a tool to finance takeovers-of com- panies. Major figures in the high yield bond market have been the target of investigations by congressionalcommittees, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Justice Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Bonds
    investor’s guide CORPORATE BONDS i CONTENTS What are Corporate Bonds? 1 Basic Bond Terms 2 Types of Corporate Bonds 5 Bond Market Characteristics 7 Understanding the Risks 8 Understanding Collateralization and Defaults 13 How Corporate Bonds are Taxed 15 Credit Analysis and Other Important Considerations 17 Glossary 21 All information and opinions contained in this publication were produced by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) from our membership and other sources believed by SIFMA to be accurate and reli- able. By providing this general information, SIFMA is neither recommending investing in securities, nor providing investment advice for any investor. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment deci- sions, please consult your investment advisor regarding investment decisions. ii W H A T A R E C O R P O R A T E BONDS? Corporate bonds (also called “corporates”) are debt obligations, or IOUs, issued by privately- and publicly-owned corporations. When you buy a corpo- rate bond, you essentially lend money to the entity that issued it. In return for the loan of your funds, the issuer agrees to pay you interest and to return the original loan amount – the face value or principal - when the bond matures or is called (the “matu- rity date” or “call date”). Unlike stocks, corporate bonds do not convey an ownership interest in the issuing corporation. Companies use the funds they raise from selling bonds for a variety of purposes, from building facilities to purchasing equipment to expanding their business. Investors buy corporates for a variety of reasons: • Attractive yields.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions for Credit Analysis
    SOLUTIONS FOR CREDIT ANALYSIS Streamline your issuer and credit research process, seamlessly incorporate names, and easily perform relative value analysis, all in one comprehensive platform. POWER YOUR CREDIT ANALYSIS WITH FIRST-CLASS TECHNOLOGY Improve efficiency with superior analytics and an intuitive, • Quickly compare prospectuses, credit agreements, and other consolidated interface. SEC filings using FactSet’s Blackline technology • Analyze the credit health of public and private issuers • Gain a complete understanding of recourse in a given entity structure • Uncover investment ideas by combining a variety of issuer and issue parameters, such as fundamentals, credit ratings, • Automate your modeling process and bring the latest data and security analytics into your spreadsheets and charts with seamless Microsoft Excel integration • Monitor company news, economic events, and a fully integrated earnings calendar to ascertain how a company’s • Stay connected while on the road with FactSet’s powerful debt cycle will develop mobile applications PERFORM COMPLETE DEBT CAPITAL STRUCTURE RESEARCH View each component of debt reconciled from an issuer’s balance sheet with complete transparency into bonds, bank loans, revolving credit facilities, and other obligations. • Understand a company’s liquidity position and the credit lines that it can draw upon • View dynamic, up-to-date capital structures to identify material changes since the most recent filing • Use FactSet’s entity data mapping to navigate the various issuers of debt in the organizational structure, including credit parent TAKE ADVANTAGE OF UNIQUE REPORTS AND CONTENT ANALYZE BONDS AND RUN SCENARIOS Leverage robust, accurate, timely data to elevate every step of Gain a thorough understanding of bond-level details.
    [Show full text]
  • Moody's Credit Analysis Update Affirms City's Stable A1 Rating
    Memorandum DATE October 12, 2018 CITY OF DALLAS TO Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council SUBJECT Moody’s Investors Service Credit Analysis Update Affirms City’s A1 Stable Rating - INFORMATION On October 8, 2018, Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) released a credit opinion for the City which affirms the City’s A1 stable rating. Moody’s credit analysis focuses heavily on the Dallas Police and Fire Pension unfunded liability but provides positive comments regarding the City’s current efforts and future growth in revenues. In particular, Moody’s report states that, “the stable outlook considers the city’s adequate level of operating reserves, and its enhanced fiscal management as evidenced by its implementation of forward-planning tools, including the biennial budget and longer range financial projections.” Similar to the article released in July, this is a positive reflection on Dallas following the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2018-19 budget and in advance of upcoming bond sales. Please let me know if you need additional information. M. Elizabeth Reich Chief Financial Officer Attachment c: T.C. Broadnax, City Manager Majed A. Al-Ghafry, Assistant City Manager Chris Caso, City Attorney (I) Jon Fortune, Assistant City Manager Carol A. Smith, City Auditor (I) Joey Zapata, Assistant City Manager Bilierae Johnson, City Secretary Nadia Chandler Hardy, Assistant City Manager and Chief Resilience Officer Preston Robinson, Administrative Judge Directors and Assistant Directors Kimberly Bizor Tolbert, Chief of Staff to the City Manager “Our Product is Service” Empathy | Ethics | Excellence | Equity U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE CREDIT OPINION Dallas (City of) TX 8 October 2018 Update to credit analysis Summary The city of Dallas (A1 stable) benefits from growing revenues stemming from strong economic growth and a rapidly expanding tax base, a stable and manageable debt burden even with ramped up investment in city infrastructure, and modestly improving, healthy Contacts operating reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Moody's Approach to Local Government Credit Analysis
    Moody’s Approach to Local Government Credit Analysis Eric Hoffmann, Senior Vice President / Manager, February, 2019 Public Finance Department Agenda 1. Moody’s Credit Rating Basics 2. Initial Credit Rating Process 3. Maintenance of the Rating 4. General Obligation Methodology 5. Lease, Appropriation, Moral Obligation Methodology 6. Municipal Utility Revenue Debt Methodology Moody’s Approach to Local Government Credit 2 Analysis Moody’s Credit Rating 1 Basics The Meaning of a Moody’s Credit Rating » An indication of the relative risk that 1) a municipal debtor may not fully make its debt service payments as scheduled and 2) in the event of non-payment, investors likely financial losses Types of Credit Ratings: » Long-term and short-term » Underlying, enhanced, fully-supported, insured » Issuer Rating » Indicative rating Moody’s Approach to Local Government Credit 4 Analysis Moody’s Global Long-Term Rating Scale Lowest Risk Highest Risk Moody’s Approach to Local Government Credit 5 Analysis Moody’s Short-Term Rating Scales Moody’s Approach to Local Government Credit 6 Analysis Initial Credit Rating 2 Process The 6-Step Rating Process Step 1: Step 2: Step 3: Step 4: Step 5: Step 6: Assignment Methodology Analysis Discussions Committee Publication Assignment Methodology Analysis Discussions Committee Publication The rating The Lead The Lead The Lead The Lead The Lead process starts Analyst identifies Analyst gathers Analyst holds a Analyst Analyst informs with the the appropriate information and credit discussion develops a the marketplace
    [Show full text]
  • Active Fixed Income: a Primer
    Active Fixed Income: A Primer ©Madison Investment Advisors, LLC. September 2016. madisonadv.com Active Fixed Income: A Primer Most investors have a basic understanding of equity securities and may even spend a good deal of leisure time reading about stocks and watching equity-focused news shows. Mention bonds and you often get a glazed look. When it comes to fixed income strategy, some investors are familiar with the simplest approach: buying bonds and holding until maturity. Using this strategy, the investor’s return is approximately the average yield of the bonds in the portfolio. However, few have an appreciation of the techniques and potential advantages of active management. This primer looks at active fixed income management and the methods used in the effort to add value. There are two basic ways to add value: generate a total return above what a buy and hold (or yield only) strategy would generate; or reduce volatility from a fixed income portfolio so that more risk can be taken elsewhere in pursuit of greater overall portfolio rewards. Table of Contents Active Bond Management Overview .............................................................. 1 Duration Management ..................................................................................... 3 Active Yield Curve Management .................................................................... 6 Sector and Spread Management .................................................................... 9 Credit Risk Management ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining the Level of Credit Spreads: Option-Implied Jump Risk Premia in a Firm Value Model
    BIS Working Papers No 191 Explaining the Level of Credit Spreads: Option-Implied Jump Risk Premia in a Firm Value Model Martijn Cremers, Joost Driessen, Pascal Maenhout, David Weinbaum November 2005 JEL Classification Numbers: G12, G13 Keywords: Credit spreads, Firm value model, Jump-diffusion model, Option pricing BIS Working Papers are written by members of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements, and from time to time by other economists, and are published by the Bank. The views expressed in them are those of their authors and not necessarily the views of the BIS. Copies of publications are available from: Bank for International Settlements Press & Communications CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +41 61 280 9100 and +41 61 280 8100 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2005. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is cited. ISSN 1020-0959 (print) ISSN 1682-7678 (online) Foreword On 9-10 September 2004, the BIS held a workshop on “The pricing of credit risk”. This event brought together central bankers, academics and market practitioners to exchange views on this issue (see the conference programme in this document). This paper was presented at the workshop. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not those of the BIS. iii BIS workshop on “The pricing of credit risk” 9-10 September 2004, Basel, Switzerland Conference programme Opening remarks William
    [Show full text]
  • Coporate Bond Valuation and Credit Spreads : Lessons from the Finacial Crisis Achraf Seddik
    Coporate Bond Valuation and Credit Spreads : Lessons from the Finacial Crisis Achraf Seddik To cite this version: Achraf Seddik. Coporate Bond Valuation and Credit Spreads : Lessons from the Finacial Crisis. Economics and Finance. Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2015. English. NNT : 2015USPCD081. tel-01985758 HAL Id: tel-01985758 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01985758 Submitted on 18 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13, SORBONNE PARIS CITÉ Thesis For the degree of Doctor in Economics Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité Presented and defended on November 27 th 2015 by: Achraf SEDDIK CORPORATE BOND VALUATION AND CREDIT SPREADS: LESSONS FROM THE FINANCIAL CRISIS Supervisor: Dominique PLIHON Committee ȱmembers: Professor at Université Paris Ouest Referees ȱ Christophe BOUCHER Nanterre La Défense Associate Professor at I ÉSEG School ȱ Hayette GATFAOUI ȱ of Management Associate Professor at Université Examiners Ahmed KEBAIER Paris 13 Sorbonne Paris Cité Professor at Université Paris Ouest ȱ Michel BOUTILLER Nanterre La Défense Professor at Université Paris 13 Supervisor Dominique PLIHON Sorbonne Paris Cité The University of Paris 13 does not intend giving any approval or disapproval to the opinions expressed in the theses: these opinions must be considered as the author’s own.
    [Show full text]
  • Day 1 Session 6 -- Credit Analysis
    ADVANCED CREDIT ANALYSIS DAVID CARR KEVIN WEBB, CFA 1/17/18 Disclaimer The information presented in this presentation is intended to assist public investment professionals. The content presented is informational and does not constitute investment advice or the recommendation to invest in any or all of the investment instruments discussed. When choosing an investment instrument for a public portfolio, the whole portfolio, investment policy, suitability, financial needs of the public agency and any associated risks should be considered. In addition, the information in this presentation is set to reflect the period in time in which it is presented and any changes that may affect any of the instruments discussed, such as legislation, reform or market conditions, or that may alter the relevancy of any of these instruments, will not be reflective in the post archival records. In such instances, viewers should be advised to use the information only as a reference as no updates to the records will be made. Please consult the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission’s publication Local Agency Investment Guidelines for any interpretive updates. Agenda It’s All About Risk & Reward Treasury Yield Curve Default Risk Credit Spread Risk Downgrade Risk Limited Time, Staff & Resources: What to do? WolframAlpha/WSJ FRED SRI/ESG Risk & Reward "You want a valve that doesn't leak and you try everything possible to develop one. But the real world provides you with a leaky valve. You have to determine how much leaking you can tolerate." Peter L. Bernstein. Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk (Kindle Locations 69-71).
    [Show full text]