Review on Molecular Markers for Identification of Orchids

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review on Molecular Markers for Identification of Orchids LIFE SCIENCES | BIOTECHNOLOGY regions used as barcodes should match some key criteria: i) The universality of amplification and sequencing; ii) The Review on molecular markers pattern of intraspecific vs. interspecific variation; and iii) The power to identify for identification of Orchids species [7]. Thi Huyen Trang Vu1*, Thi Ly Le2, Truong Khoa Nguyen3, Duy Duong Tran3, The selection of a barcode locus is Hoang Dung Tran4 complicated due to the trade-off that 1School of Agricultural Science and Biotechnology, Nguyen Tat Thanh University arises between the need for universal 2School of Biotechnology, Ho Chi Minh International University 3Genetic Engineering Division, Institute of Agricultural Genetics application in a wide range of taxa and 4Nguyen Tat Thanh University sequence substitution saturation [5]. Received 1 March 2017; accepted 2 June 2017 The single region 5’ end of cytochrome c-oxidase 1 (CO1) from the mitochondrial Abstract: genome is quite successfully used for the Orchidaceae is one of the most valuable plant groups all over the world, identification of animals [8, 9]. However and is also an impressively large and complex family of flowering plants. searching for DNA barcode in plants is Effective molecular tools used for the identification of orchid species should far more challenging than in animals. be developed to support traditional morphological approaches. This study Mitochondrial genes, including CO1, reviews most of the DNA fragments that have been used as taxon identifiers in plants have low rates of synonymous in researches conducted on Orchidaceae in order to assess potential molecular markers and metric measurements for the identification of orchid species. substitution [10, 11], a large structural rearrangement in the genome, and Keywords: DNA barcode Orchids, DNA fingerprinting, molecular identification import of sequences from nucleus and Orchidaceae, molecular markers, molecular phylogeny. chloroplast [12]. Because of these Classification number: 3.5 problems, they are not recommended to use for DNA barcodes for plants. So, the nuclear and chloroplast genomes are Introduction traditional classification; even those with focused to look for identifying markers fertile parts. Besides this, the species Orchidaceae is one of the largest for plants. Until now, no single sequences can be transported in a vegetative state, can be sufficient to identify all plant and most complex families of flowering as seeds or as fragments [3]. Accurate species. Even the use of a combination of plants, comprising of approximately authentication of orchid species is multi-locus barcodes also gives different 22,500 species belong to 736 currently critical for biodiversity conservation and levels of discrimination in different recognised genera [1]. Orchids have effective utilisation of orchids as plant groups of plants (Table 1). many values ranging from the beauty resources [4]. of their flowers to therapeutic properties The aim of this paper is to assess Many researchers have, therefore, in some species. However, taxons of potential molecular markers for the tended to develop genetic tests that Orchidaceae are endangered, this is can cheaply and easily determine the identification of orchids. We review most mainly because of over-collection and present species. “DNA barcodes” tools of the DNA fragments that have been habitat destruction, and all species are are promising options in providing a used as taxon identifiers in researches included in Conventions on International practical, standardised, species-level on Orchidaceae and other land plants, Trade of Endangered Species of Fauna identification approach that can be used including orchids. The capability of taxon and Flora (CITES) I and II [2]. Illegal for biodiversity assessment, life history, discrimination is often evaluated along trade and imitations have also become ecological studies, and forensic analysis with the construction of a phylogenetic increasing problems. Unfortunately, [5]. DNA barcode refers to the use of tree. So we also use phylogenetic laws banning these issues and their a single segment of DNA to identify articles as literature sources for seeking enforcement have met obstacles mostly specific coding information that offers suitable sequences. Highly evaluated due to the imperceptible difference discriminating ability of the living taxa, markers proposed by previous authors of species’ morphology. So, it is very even if only a small fragment of the will be deeply discussed to summarise difficult to identify orchid species organism at any stage of development a database of molecular candidates for and their inter-species hybrids using is available [6]. The potential DNA orchid authentication. *Corresponding author: Email: [email protected] 62 Vietnam Journal of Science, JUNE 2017 • VOL.59 NUMBER 2 Technology and Engineering LIFE SCIENCES | BIOTECHNOLOGY Table 1. Summary of advantages and disadvantages of molecular loci in plants. pseudogenes [22]. The coexistence of Loci Advantages Disadvantages variation orthologous copies of the ITS Nuclear regions - High variability - Universal across different groups of in the hybrid genomes of Paphiopedilum (such as ITS) - High number copies in cell organisms unexpected contamination leads to poor-quality sequences which - Biparental inheritance more information - Intra-genomic variability, divergent paralogous copies (multiple functional copies), consisted of multiple peaks. Thus, the pseudogenes poor-quality sequences ITS was not found to be suitable neither Chloroplast gene - High copy number - Low evolutionary rate few choices for species resolution nor for getting an - Maternal inheritance information no insight into the parentage of the hybrids reflection of complexity - Some genes are highly variable (50% species resolution for eight natural - The high variable regions used for low- species) [6]. Another disadvantage of the level identification (species, under-species) ITS was that it could not be amplified - The lower variable regions used for high- level identification (genus, family, tribe…) from some barium samples because the Mitochondrial genes - Low rate of sequence change ITS is too variable to guarantee reliable - Genome structure of mitochondrial in plant alignments and contains variable indels rapidly change (insertion/deletions) at the species level Intergenic spacer and - High variability (do not encode any - Difficult to amplify, sequence and align intron products faster evolve than coding regions) - Too variable, even intra-species [23]. Low-copy nuclear - High variability - Low copy number However, the internal transcribed genes (such as Xdh) - The present and absent of introns, the size spacer region (ITS) of ribosomal DNA of introns, the substitution rate are greatly variable and poorly studied no universal has proved to be an effective marking barcoding progress. At the genus Studied barcodes for Orchid taxa In addition, the ITS with nuclear genes level, the ITS clearly distinguishes can provide more complex information Single locus barcodes between the two genera Paphiopedilum which relates to biparental inheritance and Phragmipedium, and also the The ITS region: In plants, nuclear in comparison with plastid markers [17]. Cypripedioid genera [24]. At the genes (particularly introns) and spacers The length of the ITS is about 600 bp species level, Kress, et al. (2005) [5] exhibit the highest variability [13]. [18-20], which can satisfy the length has evaluated that the ITS has a much The internal transcribed spacers (ITS) requirements of barcoding. higher divergence value than any of of nuclear ribosomal regions were proposed as a variable molecular marker for detecting genetic variation among genera, species, and within species. The two internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) do not encode any product but permit it to evolve at a faster rate than the ribosomal coding regions. For example, the ITS length of the aligned sequence Fig. 1. Coding genes. in Holcoglossum (Orchidaceae) was 567 bp and it contained 26 informative The ITS spacer, although often the plastid regions studied and has sites and 27 variable sites [14]. The ITS highly variable, also reached a number of an amplification success rate of 88%. exhibits high resolution at the species limits for DNA barcoding [5]. Using the Therefore this region was proposed as level [5]. The ITS has been shown to ITS as a barcode still has its challenges a potentially usable DNA region for the have unparalleled species resolutions [21]. The high variability among intra- application of barcoding to flowering compared with candidate barcodes genomic systems, on the contrary, was a plants using the optional supplementary proposed thus far [15]. Besides that, disadvantage of species discrimination marker trnH-psbA. The ITS was also they exist in cells with high numbers of [22]. The CBOL Plant Working Group evaluated to be an effective candidate copies [5, 9]. The flanked regions 5.8S did not recognize the ITS as a suitable DNA barcode for Orchidaceae [16, 18, at the middle and 18S, 26S at the two locus for DNA barcoding because 25]. The PCR success rate of the ITS ends of the ITS fragment, are conserved there were many factors that affected was high [16], 100% in 158 wild orchid sequences which are useful to develop the quality of sequences from direct samples [18], and in Holcoglossum [6, primers [9] (Fig. 1). The high retrieval sequencing of PCR products, including 14]. Although the combination of the
Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Ingwehumbe Management Plan Final 2018
    Ingwehumbe Nature Reserve KwaZulu-Natal South Africa Management Plan Prepared by KwaZulu-Natal Biodiversity Stewardship Programme Citation Johnson, I., Stainbank, M. and Stainbank, P. (2018). Ingwehumbe Nature Reserve Management Plan. Version 1.0. AUTHORISATION This Management Plan for Ingwehumbe Nature Reserve is approved: TITLE NAME SIGNATURE AND DATE KwaZulu-Natal MEC: Economic Development, Environmental Affairs and Tourism Recommended: TITLE NAME SIGNATURE AND DATE Chief Executive Officer: EKZNW Chairperson: EKZNW, Biodiversity Conservation Operations Management Committee Chairperson: People and Conservation Operations Committee Management Authority INGWEHUMBE NATURE RESERVE MANAGEME N T P L A N I TABLE OF CONTENTS AUTHORISATION I TABLE OF CONTENTS II LIST OF TABLES III LIST OF FIGURES III ABBREVIATIONS IV 1) BACKGROUND 1 1.1 Purpose of the plan 1 1.2 Structure of the plan 2 1.3 Alignment with METT 4 1.3 Introduction 4 1.4 The values of Ingwehumbe Nature Reserve 5 1.5 Adaptive management 7 2) DESCRIPTION OF INGWEHUMBE NATURE RESERVE AND ITS CONTEXT 9 2.1 The legislative basis for the management of Ingwehumbe Nature Reserve 9 2.2 The regional and local planning context of Ingwehumbe Nature Reserve 10 2.3 The history of Ingwehumbe Nature Reserve 12 2.4 Ecological context of Ingwehumbe Nature Reserve 14 2.6 Socio-economic context 20 2.7 Operational management within Ingwehumbe Nature Reserve 23 2.8 Summary of management issues, challenges and opportunities 24 3) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK 26 3.1 Ingwehumbe Nature Reserve vision 26
    [Show full text]
  • In Nigeria, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, and the Republic of the Congo
    Plant Ecology and Evolution 153 (3): 399–426, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2020.1609 REGULAR PAPER Revision of Eulophia (Orchidaceae) in Nigeria, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, and the Republic of the Congo Emma Ortúñez1,2,*, Roberto Gamarra1,2, Sara Gestal1, Álvaro Hernando1 & Pablo Galán Cela3 1Departamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, ES–28049 Madrid, Spain 2Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CBIC–UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/ Darwin 2, ES–28049 Madrid, Spain 3Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, ES–28040 Madrid, Spain *Corresponding author: [email protected] Background and aims – The genus Eulophia (Orchidaceae) is revised for Nigeria, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, and the Republic of the Congo. The aims are: to present a morphological characterization of the main vegetative and reproductive features of Eulophia to clarify the delimitation of the taxa within the genus in the studied countries; to provide an updated identification key and an updated checklist of the genus with nomenclatural data, distribution maps, ecological information, and preliminary conservation status. This revision may serve as a basis for future studies of the genus in other regions of Africa. Material and methods – Relevant material kept in BM, BR, FHI, HBG, K, MA, P, and WAG was examined, using standard practices of herbarium taxonomy. Vegetative and reproductive structures were analysed. MapMaker was used to produce the distribution maps. Key results – A total of 24 species are recognised in the study area. The variability of perennating organs, leaves, sepals and petals, lip (including ornamentation), spur, and anther cap are described and depicted, and were found to be informative for species recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • George J. Wilder Jean M. Mccollom Naples Botanical Garden Natural Ecosystems 4820 Bayshore Drive 985 Sanctuary Road Naples, Florida 34112-7336, U.S.A
    A FLORISTIC INVENTORY OF CORKSCREW SWAMP SANCTUARY (COLLIER COUNTY AND LEE COUNTY), FLORIDA, U.S.A. George J. Wilder Jean M. McCollom Naples Botanical Garden Natural Ecosystems 4820 Bayshore Drive 985 Sanctuary Road Naples, Florida 34112-7336, U.S.A. Naples, Florida 34120-4800, U.S.A [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Documented presently as growing wild within Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary (Collier Co. and Lee Co., Florida, U.S.A) are individuals of 126 families, 401 genera, 756 species, and 773 infrageneric taxa of vascular plants. Those data, combined with records from previous workers, yield a total of 770 species and 787 infrageneric taxa documented for the Sanctuary. Of the 773 infrageneric taxa documented presently, 611 (79.0%) are native to Florida. Herein, seven main kinds of habitats are recognized for the study area, and individual taxa inhabit one or more of those habitats. Twenty-nine presently reported infrageneric taxa are listed as Endangered (16 taxa) or Threatened in Florida (13 taxa). For South Florida, 36 infrageneric taxa listed as Extirpated (3 taxa), as Historical (5 taxa), or as Critically Imperiled (28 taxa) were documented during this study. RESUMEN Existen documentados individuos de 126 familias, 401 géneros, 756 especies, y 773 taxa infragenéricos de plantas vasculares que actual- mente crecen silvestres en Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary (Collier Co. y Lee Co., Florida, U.S.A). Estos datos, combinados con los registros de investigadores anteriores, dan un total de 770 especies y 787 taxa infragenéricos documentados para el Sanctuary. De los 773 taxa infra- genéricos documentados actualmente, 611 (79.0%) son nativos de Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Reversals to Terrestrial Habit in Galeandra Orchids 1
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/224709; this version posted November 24, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 From tree tops to the ground: reversals to terrestrial habit in Galeandra orchids 2 (Epidendroideae: Catasetinae) 3 4 Authors: Aline C. Martins1*, Thuane Bochorny2, Oscar A. Pérez-Escobar3, Guillaume 5 Chomicki4,5, Silvana H. N. Monteiro6& Eric de Camargo Smidt1 6 7 1. Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de Ciências Biológicas, Centro Politécnico, 8 Jardim da Américas, Curitiba - PR, 81531-980. C. P. 19031, Brazil. 9 2. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia 10 Vegetal, Campinas - SP, 13083-970. C.P. 6109, Brazil. 11 3. Identification and Naming Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, 12 TW9 3AB, UK 13 4. Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Park Road, Oxford OX1 14 3RB, UK. 15 5. The Queen’s college, High St, Oxford OX1 4AW, UK. 16 6. Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Programa de Pós-Graduação em 17 Botânica, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, BR 116N km 3, 44031-460 Feira de 18 Santana, BA, Brazil 19 20 *Correspondence author: [email protected] 21 22 23 24 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/224709; this version posted November 24, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 25 Abstract 26 27 The colonization of the epiphytic niche of tropical forest canopies played an important 28 role in orchid’s extraordinary diversification in the Neotropics.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe-Mozambique)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys 145: 93–129 (2020) Plant checklist for the Bvumba Mountains 93 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.145.49257 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Mountains of the Mist: A first plant checklist for the Bvumba Mountains, Manica Highlands (Zimbabwe-Mozambique) Jonathan Timberlake1, Petra Ballings2,3, João de Deus Vidal Jr4, Bart Wursten2, Mark Hyde2, Anthony Mapaura4,5, Susan Childes6, Meg Coates Palgrave2, Vincent Ralph Clark4 1 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa, 30 Warren Lane, East Dean, E. Sussex, BN20 0EW, UK 2 Flora of Zimbabwe & Flora of Mozambique projects, 29 Harry Pichanick Drive, Alexandra Park, Harare, Zimbabwe 3 Meise Botanic Garden, Bouchout Domain, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860, Meise, Belgium 4 Afromontane Research Unit & Department of Geography, University of the Free State, Phuthaditjhaba, South Africa 5 National Her- barium of Zimbabwe, Box A889, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe 6 Box BW53 Borrowdale, Harare, Zimbabwe Corresponding author: Vincent Ralph Clark ([email protected]) Academic editor: R. Riina | Received 10 December 2019 | Accepted 18 February 2020 | Published 10 April 2020 Citation: Timberlake J, Ballings P, Vidal Jr JD, Wursten B, Hyde M, Mapaura A, Childes S, Palgrave MC, Clark VR (2020) Mountains of the Mist: A first plant checklist for the Bvumba Mountains, Manica Highlands (Zimbabwe- Mozambique). PhytoKeys 145: 93–129. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.145.49257 Abstract The first comprehensive plant checklist for the Bvumba massif, situated in the Manica Highlands along the Zimbabwe-Mozambique border, is presented. Although covering only 276 km2, the flora is rich with 1250 taxa (1127 native taxa and 123 naturalised introductions).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Checklist of Orchid Species from Cuba0
    LANKESTERIANA 15(3): 219—269. 2015. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/lank.v15i3.22613 A NEW CHECKLIST OF ORCHID SPECIES FROM CUBA0 ERNESTO MÚJICA1,3 & ELAINE GONZÁLEZ2 1 Centro de Investigaciones y Servicios Ambientales ECOVIDA. Carretera a Luis Lazo, km 2.5, Pinar del Río. C.P. 20200, Cuba 2 Jardín Botánico Orquideario Soroa. Universidad de Pinar del Río. Carretera a Soroa, km 8, Candelaria, Artemisa, Cuba 3 Author for correspondence:[email protected] ABSTRACT. In 2014, James D. Ackerman and collaborators published the last checklist of Cuban orchid species in the book, “Orchid Flora of the Greater Antilles”. The aim of our study was to determine the current number of orchid species in Cuba and adjacent islands culminating in an updated checklist. We consulted numerous publications and reports, visited four herbaria, and refer to ongoing collaboration with leading specialists. A total of 91 genera and 312 species are documented. We provide comments on taxonomic status on noteworthy species. KEY WORDS: taxonomy, checklist, orchids, Cuba Introduction. Since the 18th century, the orchids of (Hermano León) published within “Flora de Cuba” Cuba have been in the crosshairs of scholars given (volume 1) a new expose with few changes compared the island’s unique geographic position and large size to earlier catalogues. After an updated treatment in among the Antilles, and the fact that Cuba became 1951 by Alex D. Hawkes, little new information a major regional trade and communications center. was reported for the next 33 years. Finally in 1984, Already in 1799 Baltasar Boldo and José Estévez a new checklist was published based on the studies in their Cubensis Prima Flora had described 10 conducted by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama Inventory List
    Alabama Inventory List The Rare, Threatened, & Endangered Plants & Animals of Alabama Alabama Natural August 2017 Heritage Program® TABLE OF CONTENTS ALABAMA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM® ........................................................................... 1 CHANGES FROM ALNHP TRACKING LIST OF AUGUST 2015 .................................................. 3 DEFINITION OF HERITAGE RANKS ................................................................................................ 5 DEFINITIONS OF FEDERAL & STATE LISTED SPECIES STATUS ......................................... 10 VERTEBRATES ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Birds....................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Mammals ............................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Amphibians ............................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Reptiles .................................................................................................................................................................................. 23 Lizards, Snakes, and Amphisbaenas .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Orchid Research Newsletter No. 64
    Orchid Research Newsletter No. 64 What began as the germ of an idea hatched by Phillip Cribb and Gren Lucas (Keeper of the Herbarium at Kew) in the late 1990s blossomed into a 15-year orchid project that was produced chiefly at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, but involved more than 200 contributors throughout the world when everyone is taken into account – systematists, anatomists, palynologists, cytogeneticists, ecologists, artists, photographers, growers, and hybridizers. In the sixth and final volume of Genera Orchidacearum published on 6 February of this year, 28 experts provided up-to-date information on nomenclature, derivation of name, description, distribution (with maps), anatomy, palynology, cytogenetics, phytochemistry, phylogenetics, ecology, pollination, uses, and cultivation for 140 genera in tribes Dendrobieae and Vandeae. Both tribes were difficult to treat because of the sheer number of species (Dendrobieae with about 3650 and Vandeae about 2200) as well as the dearth of reliable morphological synapomorphies for them; consequently, much of what we know about their relationships had to be drawn from phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences. An Addendum updates a few generic accounts published in past volumes. A cumulative glossary, list of generic synonyms with their equivalents, and list of all series contributors round out the volume. At the end of this era, it is important to recognize those stalwart individuals who actively contributed to all volumes and helped to make them the authoritative sources that they have now become – Jeffrey Wood, Phillip Cribb, Nigel Veitch, Renée Grayer, Judi Stone – and thank especially my co-editors Phillip Cribb, Mark Chase, and Finn Rasmussen.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Rescue and Protection Plan
    Establishment of various infrastructure at the authorised Msenge Emoyeni WEF, Eastern Cape Environmental Management Programme November 2020 PLANT RESCUE AND PROTECTION PLAN 1. PURPOSE The purpose of the Plant Rescue and Protection Plan is to implement avoidance and mitigation measures, in addition to the mitigations included in the EMPr to reduce the impact of the various infrastructure establishment at the authorised Msenge Emoyeni WEF on listed and protected plant species and their habitats during construction and operation. This subplan is required in order to ensure compliance with national and provincial legislation for vegetation clearing and any required destruction or translocation of provincially and nationally protected species within the development footprint. The Plan first provides some legislative background on the regulations relevant to listed and protected species, under the Eastern Cape Nature Conservation Ordinance No. 19 of 1974 and trees protected under the National List of Protected Tree Species. This is followed by an identification of protected species present within the development area and actions that should be implemented to minimise impact on these species and comply with legislative requirements. 2. IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIES OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Plant species are protected at the national level as well as the provincial level and different permits may be required for different species depending on their protection level. At the national level, protected trees are listed by the Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries (DEFF) under the National List of Protected Trees, which is updated on a regular basis. Any clearing of nationally protected trees requires a permit from DEFF. At the provincial level, all species red-listed under the Red List of South African plants (http://redlist.sanbi.org/) as well as species listed under the Eastern Cape Nature Conservation Ordinance No.
    [Show full text]
  • SANPC Additions and Updates Oct2013
    South African National Plant Checklist Report on additions and updates made to the South African National Plant Checklist during the period 10/2013–3/2018 Contents Names added ..............................................................................................................................2 Taxonomic status change: accepted names that became synonyms ................................... 123 Taxonomic status change: synonyms that became accepted names ................................... 175 Publications incorporated ..................................................................................................... 185 Report compiled on 28/3/2018 by Dr Ronell R Klopper SA National Plant Checklist Co-ordinator Biosystematics & Biodiversity Collections Division South African National Biodiversity Institute Pretoria 1 Names added ACANTHACEAE ACANTHODIUM DELILE Acanthodium capense (L.f.) Nees var. a Nees, Prodr. [A. P. de Candolle] 11: 276 (1847) = Blepharis capensis (L.f.) Pers., Syn. Pl. [Persoon] 2(1): 180 (1806) Acanthodium capense (L.f.) Nees var. b Nees, Prodr. [A. P. de Candolle] 11: 276 (1847) = Blepharis capensis (L.f.) Pers., Syn. Pl. [Persoon] 2(1): 180 (1806) Acanthodium capense (L.f.) Nees var. integrifolium Nees, Prodr. [A. P. de Candolle] 11: 277 (1847); Type: South Africa, Cape Province, "montis Konabshooyde inter Konab et Vischrivier". Not traced. = Blepharis capensis (L.f.) Pers., Syn. Pl. [Persoon] 2(1): 180 (1806) Acanthodium capense (L.f.) Nees var. leucographum Nees, Linnaea 15: 361 (1841); Type: South Africa, Ecklon & Zeyher 99.12 (S, lecto.; BOL, O, S, W, isolecto.). Designated by Vollesen, Blepharis a taxonomic revision: 72 (2000). = Blepharis capensis (L.f.) Pers., Syn. Pl. [Persoon] 2(1): 180 (1806) Acanthodium capense (L.f.) Nees var. villosum Nees, Linnaea 15: 361 (1841); Type: South Africa, Ecklon & Zeyher 44.5(S, lecto.). Designated by Vollesen, Blepharis a taxonomic revision: 72 (2000). = Blepharis capensis (L.f.) Pers., Syn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Specific DNA Barcodes Based on Chloroplast Genes for Species
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The specifc DNA barcodes based on chloroplast genes for species identifcation of Orchidaceae plants Huili Li1,2, Wenjun Xiao1,2, Tie Tong1, Yongliang Li1, Meng Zhang1, Xiaoxia Lin1, Xiaoxiao Zou1, Qun Wu1 & Xinhong Guo1* DNA barcoding is currently an efective and widely used tool that enables rapid and accurate identifcation of plant species. The Orchidaceae is the second largest family of fowering plants, with more than 700 genera and 20,000 species distributed nearly worldwide. The accurate identifcation of Orchids not only contributes to the safe utilization of these plants, but also it is essential to the protection and utilization of germplasm resources. In this study, the DNA barcoding of 4 chloroplast genes (matK, rbcL, ndhF and ycf1) were used to provide theoretical basis for species identifcation, germplasm conservation and innovative utilization of orchids. By comparing the nucleotide replacement saturation of the single or combined sequences among the 4 genes, we found that these sequences reached a saturation state and were suitable for phylogenetic relationship analysis. The phylogenetic analyses based on genetic distance indicated that ndhF and ycf1 sequences were competent to identifcation at genus and species level of orchids in a single gene. In the combined sequences, matK + ycf1 and ndhF + ycf1 were qualifed for identifcation at the genera and species levels, suggesting the potential roles of ndhF, ycf1, matK + ycf1 and ndhF + ycf1 as candidate barcodes for orchids. Based on the SNP sites, candidate genes were used to obtain the specifc barcode of orchid plant species and generated the corresponding DNA QR code ID card that could be immediately recognized by electronic devices.
    [Show full text]