Annual Review of Entomology Laboulbeniomycetes: Intimate Fungal Associates of Arthropods Danny Haelewaters,1,2,3 Meredith Blackwell,4,5 and Donald H. Pfister6 1Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA; email:
[email protected] 2Department of Zoology, University of South Bohemia, 37005 Ceskéˇ Budejovice, Czech Republic 3Department of Biology, Research Group Mycology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 4Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA; email:
[email protected] 5Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA 6Farlow Reference Library and Herbarium of Cryptogamic Botany, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA; email:
[email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2021. 66:257–76 Keywords First published as a Review in Advance on biotrophs, fungal life history, Herpomycetales, insect dispersal, August 31, 2020 Laboulbeniales, Pyxidiophorales The Annual Review of Entomology is online at ento.annualreviews.org Abstract Access provided by Harvard University on 01/11/21. For personal use only. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-013020- Arthropod–fungus interactions involving the Laboulbeniomycetes have Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2021.66:257-276. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org 013553 been pondered for several hundred years. Early studies of Laboulbe- Copyright © 2021 by Annual Reviews. niomycetes faced several uncertainties. Were they parasitic worms, red al- All rights reserved gal relatives, or fungi? If they were fungi, to which group did they belong? What was the nature of their interactions with their arthropod hosts? The historical misperceptions resulted from the extraordinary morphological features of these oddly constructed ectoparasitic fungi.