"Vitenskap I Krig Og Fred"

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

«VITENSKAP I KRIG OG FRED » Astrofysikeren Svein Rosseland i norsk forskningspolitikk 1945-1965 Hovedoppgave i historie av Ole Anders Røberg Historisk Institutt Universitetet i Oslo Våren 2000 Forord Denne oppgaven er en av flere hovedfagsoppgaver som er skrevet i tilknytning til Forum for Universitetshistorie ved UiO. Stor takk i denne sammenheng går i første rekke til min veileder, John Peter Collett, som har bidratt med svært omfattende og intensiv veiledning preget av genuin interesse for oppgavens tematiske felt. Det er foretatt visse endringer i oppgaven i forbindelse med opptrykket i Forums hovedoppgaveserie. For det meste dreier det seg om språkrettinger, men i tillegg er også enkelte avsnitt eller kommentarer lagt til for å forklare eller understreke poenger som jeg følte gikk tapt i den opprinnelige teksten. Lite er trukket fra, men enkelte skjemmende «blødmer» har blitt fjernet, om enn ikke alle. Det som står igjen av uferdige eller urimelige resonnementer går helt på min regning, da min veileder Collett gjorde en heltemodig innsats i innspurtsfasen for å rette opp det aller verste både innholdsmessig og språklig. Takk går også til de som på et eller annet nivå har lest hele eller deler av teksten. Blant disse er Ola Storberg, Vilde Høvik, Audun Røberg Jr., Petter Holm Normann, Anne Vaalund og diverse seminardeltakere ved Forum for Universitetshistorie. Takk til Institutt for teoretisk astrofysikk for å ha gitt meg muligheten til å gå igjennom relativt rikholdige men rotete arkiver i instituttets kontorer og kjellerlokaler, og takk til behjelpelig personale ved både Riksarkivet og UiOs arkiver på Blindern. Takk går til Osloforskning for stipend. En stor takk går også til min mor og far, mer for rent økonomisk støtte enn faglig. Takk til min kjære bror og mine gode venner. Den største takken går til Vilde, min lille sol og kone, som for min del har snudd mørke til lys. Ole Anders Røberg Blindern 28. november 2001 2 Innholdsfortegnelse FORKORTELSER ..................................................................................................................................... 6 INNLEDNING ............................................................................................................................................ 9 ASTROFYSIKEREN SVEIN ROSSELAND – BIOGRAFISK SKISSE................................................................... 10 PROBLEMSTILLINGER OG TESER .............................................................................................................. 14 OPPGAVENS FORLØP OG STRUKTUR......................................................................................................... 17 KILDEMATERIALE OG LITTERATUR.......................................................................................................... 18 METODISKE BETRAKTNINGER ................................................................................................................. 21 Del I: Naturvitenskapelig herredømme og forskningspolitisk etablering.................... 25 VITENSKAP BLIR STORPOLITIKK................................................................................................... 27 BIG SCIENCE OG VITENSKAPENS NATUR.................................................................................................. 28 UTVIKLINGEN FORSKNINGSPOLITISK I USA ETTER WWII. ..................................................................... 34 Debatten om regjeringsstøtte til forskning i krigsårenes USA ............................................................. 39 Vannevar Bush og den frie grunnforskningens premisser.................................................................... 40 Utviklingen etter «Science - The Endless Frontier»............................................................................. 42 En faseinndeling av forskningspolitisk etterkrigshistorie i USA .......................................................... 44 UTVIKLINGEN I NORGE ........................................................................................................................... 46 Forsvarets Forskningsinstitutt ............................................................................................................. 48 Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelig Forskningsråd............................................................................. 48 Norges Allmenvitenskapelige Forskningsråd og tippemidler til forskningen ...................................... 52 «Vitenskap i krig og fred» – det norske svar på «Science – the endless frontier» ............................... 55 Norske faseinndelinger......................................................................................................................... 58 OPPSUMMERING ...................................................................................................................................... 59 ETABLERINGEN AV EN NORSK ATOMFORSKNING................................................................... 61 MENS KATTEN ER BORTE…..................................................................................................................... 64 Radarparet Hauge og Randers legger grunnlaget for norsk atomforskning........................................ 66 Mange men uklare endemål for atomenergien og forsvaret................................................................. 67 Forsvarsforskningen formaliseres........................................................................................................ 69 SIVILE INNVENDINGER MOT MILITÆR ATOMFORSKNING.......................................................................... 71 Diplomatiske signaler fra forsvarsdepartementet i Storgaten.............................................................. 73 NTNFs Atomutvalg............................................................................................................................... 75 Den forskningspolitiske maktens irrganger - «form follows function» ................................................ 76 ATOMUTVALGETS FORMANN .................................................................................................................. 76 Vitenskap i krig og fred – ifølge professor Rosseland.......................................................................... 81 Atomutvalgets innstilling om kjernefysikken i Norge ........................................................................... 84 Statsråd Hauge skaffer penger til uranmilen ....................................................................................... 86 Mot sivilt styrt atomforskning .............................................................................................................. 93 Plan og byggekomiteen – den virkelige stridsplassen.......................................................................... 95 BYGGEFASE MED ØKONOMISKE KOMPLIKASJONER OG URANMANGEL................................................... 102 Rosselands internasjonale nettverk redder den norske atomforskningen .......................................... 103 Samarbeid med Holland og åpning av reaktoren............................................................................... 105 OPPSUMMERING .................................................................................................................................... 108 SENTRALINSTITUTT FOR INDUSTRIELL FORSKNING ........................................................... 111 SENTRALINSTITUTT FOR NASJONSBYGGING?......................................................................................... 112 NTNF bestemmer å utrede mulighetene for et sentralinstitutt............................................................116 NTNF oppretter et utvalg for utredning av SI.....................................................................................120 Tilsynelatende mangel på vilje og ressurser i industrien....................................................................122 Utvalg for industrielt forskningsinstitutt presenterer sin innstilling...................................................124 SI BLIR OPPRETTET ................................................................................................................................126 Fra gode utsikter til nye stridigheter om lokaliseringen av forskningssenteret..................................128 NTH oppretter sitt eget forskningsinstitutt..........................................................................................130 Rosseland taler for en omfattende sentralisering av forskningsressursene til UiO............................132 FREDSSLUTNING MED NTH OG BYGGING AV SI.....................................................................................134 Byggeperioden frem til åpning............................................................................................................136 Et spørsmål om finansiering...............................................................................................................137 OPPSUMMERING.....................................................................................................................................138 ET SOLOBSERVATORIUM FOR UIO...............................................................................................141 VISJONER FOR ET NYTT OBSERVATORIUM VED UIO...............................................................................141 Det gamle observatoriet og planer om nybygg...................................................................................144 Hvorfor et solobservatorium?.............................................................................................................148
Recommended publications
  • Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, 1940-1973
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf2p300278 No online items Inventory of the Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, 1940-1973 Processed by Ronald S. Brashear; machine-readable finding aid created by Gabriela A. Montoya Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=554 © 1998 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection Inventory of the Ira Sprague 1 Bowen Papers, 1940-1973 Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection Inventory of the Ira Sprague Bowen Paper, 1940-1973 The Huntington Library San Marino, California Contact Information Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=554 Processed by: Ronald S. Brashear Encoded by: Gabriela A. Montoya © 1998 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, Date (inclusive): 1940-1973 Creator: Bowen, Ira Sprague Extent: Approximately 29,000 pieces in 88 boxes Repository: The Huntington Library San Marino, California 91108 Language: English. Provenance Placed on permanent deposit in the Huntington Library by the Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection. This was done in 1989 as part of a letter of agreement (dated November 5, 1987) between the Huntington and the Carnegie Observatories. The papers have yet to be officially accessioned. Cataloging of the papers was completed in 1989 prior to their transfer to the Huntington.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early History of the Niels Bohr Institute
    CHAPTER 4.1 Birthplace of a new physics - the early history of the Niels Bohr Institute Peter Robertson* Abstract SCI.DAN.M. The foundation in 1921 of the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen was to prove an important event in the I birth of modern physics. From its modest beginnings as • ONE a small three-storey building and a handful of physicists, HUNDRED the Institute underwent a rapid expansion over the fol­ lowing years. Under Bohr’s leadership, the Institute provided the principal centre for the emergence of quan­ YEARS tum mechanics and a new understanding of Nature at OF the atomic level. Over sixty physicists from 17 countries THE came to collaborate with the Danish physicists at the In­ BOHR stitute during its first decade. The Bohr Institute was the ATOM: first truly international centre in physics and, indeed, one of the first in any area of science. The Institute pro­ PROCEEDINGS vided a striking demonstration of the value of interna­ tional cooperation in science and it inspired the later development of similar centres elsewhere in Europe and FROM the United States. In this article I will discuss the origins and early development of the Institute and examine the A CONFERENCE reasons why it became such an important centre in the development of modern physics. Keywords: Niels Bohr Institute; development of quan­ tum mechanics; international cooperation in science. * School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia. Email: [email protected]. 481 PETER ROBERTSON SCI.DAN.M. I 1. Planning and construction of the Institute In 1916 Niels Bohr returned home to Copenhagen over four years since his first visit to Cambridge, England, and two years after a second visit to Manchester, working in the group led by Ernest Ru­ therford.
    [Show full text]
  • The Establishment of the University Institute of Economics in 1932
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Bjerkholt, Olav Working Paper A turning point in the development of Norwegian economics: The establishment of the University Institute of Economics in 1932 Memorandum, No. 2000,36 Provided in Cooperation with: Department of Economics, University of Oslo Suggested Citation: Bjerkholt, Olav (2000) : A turning point in the development of Norwegian economics: The establishment of the University Institute of Economics in 1932, Memorandum, No. 2000,36, University of Oslo, Department of Economics, Oslo This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/63074 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen
    [Show full text]
  • Forskningspolitikk 3/1996
    Forskningspolitikk 3/1996 • Innspill Småkuriosa fra den norske forskningspolitiske arena • Fokus Høyere utdanning i ulage • Høgskolene - fortsatt annerledes av Hans Skoie Steinar Stjernø om UoH-sektoren • Bøker: Fornuft og romfart av Eugene B. Skolnikoff John Peter Collett (ed.): "Making Sense of Space; The History of Norwegian Space Activities", Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, 1995. • ESA - en norsk arena? av Inge Ramberg • En frontfigur i norsk forskning og forskningsorganisasjon av Øystein Elgarøy • Norsk IT-politikk: visjon eller virkelighet? av Trond Buland • Fusk i forskningen og gatens justis av Berit Mørland • Det forskningspolitiske sektoransvar av Egil Kallerud • Debatt: Publisering og PR - hva mener Forskningsrådet? av Gunnar Sivertsen • Debatt: Materialforskning - én gang til - tilsvar til Kristian Fossheim av Jon Gjønnes • Debatt: Statlege høgskolar og internasjonalt samarbeid av Leiv Storesletten • Debatt: Hvordan skape et innovativt næringsliv? av Inge Ramberg • Bøker: "...uden dog at overskride sin naturlige Begrænsning" av Guri Hjeltnes Suzanne Stiver Lie/ Maj Birgit Rørslett (red.) Alma Maters døtre. Et århundre med kvinner i akademisk utdanning. Pax forlag 1995. • Bøker: "Nur die Fülle führt zur Klarheit" av Bjørn O. Listog Øystein Elgarøy og Øivind Hauge: Svein Rosseland. Fra hans liv og virke. Oslo: Institutt for teoretisk astrofysikk, 1994. • FoU-ressurser og innbyggertall av Terje Bruen Olsen • Utspill Småkuriosa fra den forskningspolitiske arena i utlandet Forskningspolitikk Nr. 3, 1996, 19. årgang. ISSN 0805-8210 Utgitt av NIFU - Norsk institutt for studier av forskning og utdanning Redaksjon: Hans Skoie (ansv. red.), Inge Ramberg (redaktør), Gunnar Sivertsen, Randi Søgnen og Inger Hagen Redaksjonen avsluttet 27. august 1996 Innspill Småkuriosa fra den norske forskningspolitiske arena - En velutdannet og overfladisk generasjon? I kommentarspalten i Dagbladet 14.07.
    [Show full text]
  • CERN Courier – Digital Edition Welcome to the Digital Edition of the March 2018 Issue of CERN Courier
    I NTERNATIONAL J OURNAL OF H IGH -E NERGY P HYSICS CERNCOURIER WLCOMEE V OLUME 5 8 N UMBER 2 M ARCH 2 0 1 8 CERN Courier – digital edition Welcome to the digital edition of the March 2018 issue of CERN Courier. Illuminating antimatter The humble hydrogen atom has taught us much during the past two centuries, ultimately leading to the atomic picture of Bohr. As this month’s cover feature argues, physicists are morally obligated to subject anti-hydrogen to the same analytical tools – in particular to test if antimatter obeys the same fundamental symmetries as matter. Following a long campaign, the ALPHA collaboration at CERN’s Antiproton Decelerator (AD) has recently measured the antihydrogen 1S–2S transition and other spectral properties of antihydrogen, opening a new direction of exploration. Meanwhile, the AD’s BASE experiment has measured the antiproton magnetic moment with exquisite precision, further testing symmetries such as CPT. We also describe a Cornell-Brookhaven project to build the first superconducting multi-turn energy recovery linac, survey the latest attempts to test the validity of the Pauli exclusion principle, and report on an initiative to establish a world-class research infrastructure in South-East Europe following the CERN model. To sign up to the new-issue alert, please visit: cerncourier.com/cws/sign-up. To subscribe to the magazine, the e-mail new-issue alert, please visit: cerncourier.com/cws/how-to-subscribe. EDITOR: MATTHEW CHALMERS, CERN Pauli principle on trial • Energy-saving accelerators • Science for peace DIGITAL EDITION CREATED BY DESIGN STUDIO/IOP PUBLISHING, UK CCMar18_Cover_v4.indd 1 08/02/2018 11:25 CERNCOURIER WWW.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference to AC/137-N/L, Delegation
    A S 'V EXEMPLAIRE N 228 COPY ORIGINAL; ENGLISH •NATO UNCLASSIFIED Ï9th March, 195%" NOTICE mä i m ÂC7I37-N/4 ' . SCIENCE -COMMITTEE REVISED LIST OF NATIONAL REPKESENTATIVES, Note hy the Secretary Further to AC/137-N/l of 17th February, 1958, the names of Representatives for Belgium, France and Turkey are attached hereto» - • Zt With further' reference to AC/137-N/l, delegations are asked to note that the document in question stated that the Danish Repres- entative, Professor Brandt Rehberg', was 'a member of the Danish ' '.„ Research Council» This qualification has been amended to read "Danish Defence Research Council". (Signed) A. CIPPICO DECLASSIFIED - PUBLIC DISCLOSURE / DÉCLASSIFIÉ - MISE EN LECTURE PUBLIQUE LECTURE EN - MISE / DÉCLASSIFIÉ DISCLOSURE - PUBLIC DECLASSIFIED Ai1O UNCLASSIFIED -2- c7I57-N7ïï ELGM . M. Paul Bourgeois: Address: 7, Avenue Circulaire, UCCLE. Mr. Bourgeois is: Director of the Royal Ohservatory of Belgium, Brussels.- • Chairman of the "Commission de Géophysique et d'Astronomie"^ Member of the "Commission Interministérielle de la Recherche Scientifique"$ Representative of the "Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique"to the Conseil d'Administration de la Station Scientifique Inter- nationale du .Juhgfrauj och: 1951-1953 4 Vice-President of the "Centre National de Calcul Mechanlque"11 President of "Un.iversitas Belgica": 1951® Honorary President since.1952$ Vice-President of the "Comité Spécial Belge de l'Année Géophysique Internationale". ANADA Dr. E.W.R. Steacie, OBE, D.Sc., President of the National Research Council of Canada. ENMRK Professor Poul Brandt Rehberg, Doctor of Philosophy and Medicine, of the University of Copenhagen. Professor Brandt Rehberg is, among his other functions? Chairman of the Danish Committee of "International Union Biological Sciences"; Member of the Danish Defence Research Council, of the Danish Academy of Science, the Danish Academy for Technical Science and the Danish Commission for Atomic Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    History of Meteorology 7 (2015) 83 Asking too much? Postwar climate research in Norway, 1947-1961 Magnus Vollset [email protected] AHKR, University of Bergen Following the extremely dry summer of 1947, the head of the Norwegian Water Resources and Electricity Works, Fredrik Vogt, wrote a concerned letter to the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters asking if the climate was changing, and if this would be possible to predict. Vogt was worried about the future stability of Norwegian hydropower: “If you can develop fairly reliable prognosis for climate variations in the coming years or decades, this would be of great practical importance for how we manage the power supply.”1 In response, the Academy established a multidisciplinary taskforce, which gave birth to an Institute for Weather and Climate Research. Parallel to this, the Meteorological Office had its own section for climate. However, by the time the Institute closed in 1960, the question of climate prediction was long forgotten. This paper investigates Norwegian postwar climate research through studying the institution that was set up, its mandate, how the research was funded, which researchers were involved, and how they were recruited. I examine the findings, the concurrent debates on what meteorological research to conduct, and show how ‘climate’ held different meanings for the different actors. The goal of the paper is to explain why Vogt’s request for climate prognosis was not pursued. By focusing on the overlooked period 1947-61, which was when the Institute for Weather and Climate Research operated, and before the computer at the Meteorological Office transformed the capacities of the climatologists, I demonstrate that history is not a linear affair, and that research projects that did not lead to a breakthrough are also part of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae of Hiranya V. Peiris Research Interests Academic
    Curriculum Vitae of Hiranya V. Peiris Research Interests Theoretical and observational cosmology; cosmic microwave background; large scale structure; early universe physics; galaxy evolution; stellar dynamics; Bayesian statistics; machine learning; computational methods. Academic Record Nov 2003: Doctor of Philosophy: Astrophysics, Princeton University Title: “WMAP First Year Results: Cosmological Parameters and Implications for Inflation” Advisor: Prof. David N. Spergel Jun 2001: Master of Arts in Physics, Princeton University Jun 2000: Master of Arts in Astrophysics, Princeton University 1994-1998: Bachelor of Arts and Master of Science in Natural Sciences (Physics) 1st Class Honours, University of Cambridge Research Record Sep 16 – present: Director, Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm Sep 16 – present: Professor in Cosmoparticle Physics, Department of Physics, Stockholm University Oct 15 – present: Professor of Astrophysics, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University College London Oct 12 – Sep 15: Reader, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University College London Oct 09 – Sep 12: University Lecturer, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University College London Oct 09 - Sep 12: STFC Advanced Fellowship, held at University College London Oct 08 - Sep 09: Junior Research Fellowship, King's College, Cambridge Oct 07 - Sep 09: STFC Advanced Fellowship, held at Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge University Oct 04 - Sep 07: Hubble Postdoctoral Fellowship (NASA/STSci), held at the University of Chicago Oct 04 - Sep 07: Enrico
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Space Activities 1958-2003
    HSR-35 October 2004 Norwegian Space Activities 1958-2003 A Historical Overview Ole Anders Røberg and John Peter Collett ii Title: HSR-35 Norwegian Space Activities 1958-2003 – A Historical Overview Published by: ESA Publications Division ESTEC, PO Box 299 2200 AG Noordwijk The Netherlands Editor: D. Danesy Price: !20 ISSN: 1683-4704 ISBN: 92-9092-546-9 Copyright: ©2004 The European Space Agency Printed in: The Netherlands iii Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 The Early Years of Norwegian Geophysical and Cosmic Science..................................................................................... 3 The First Steps Towards a National Space Research Policy in Norway ............................................................................ 5 Two research councils, and two ways of dealing with science administration and policy...........................................5 European politics and Norwegian priorities – ELDO and ESRO ..................................................................................7 Norway’s preparation for ESRO, and sudden abstinence from membership................................................................9 A National Space Policy Emerging Between Science and Technology ........................................................................... 11 Andøya Rocket Range and the contest to establish an auroral launch site for ESRO.................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Niels Bohr Atomic Theory and the Des
    Niels bohr atomic theory and the des Continue Danish physicist Bohr redirects here. For other uses, see Bohr (deambiguation). Niels BohrBornNiels Henrik David Bohr (1885-10-07)October 7, 1885Copenhagen, DenmarkDied18 November 1962 (1962-11-18) (77 years)Copenhagen, DenmarkResting placeAssistens CemeteryAlma materUniversity of CopenhagenKnown for Physics contributions Bohr magnetonBohr modelBohr radiusBohr-Einstein debatesBohr-Kramers-Slater theory Bohr-van Leeuwen teorremBohr-Sommerfeld theoryComplementarity Complementarity Wife(s)Margrethe Nørlund (m. 1912)ChildrenAage, Ernest, four other sons Nobel Prize in Physics (1922) plus praise shughes medal (1921)Matteucci Medal (1923)Franklin Medal (1926) Foreign Member of the Royal Society (1926)Max Planck Medal (1930) Faradaylectureship Prize (1930) Copley Medal (1938)Order of the Elephant (1947) Atoms for Peace Award (1957)Sonning Prize (1957) Scientific careerFieldsTheoretical physicsInstitutionsTrinity College, CambridgeUniversity university of CopenhagenVictoria of ManchesterThesisStudies on electronic metal theory (1911)Doctoral adviserChristian ChristiansOtheren academic advisorsJ. J. ThomsonErnest RutherfordDoctoral studentsHendrik KramersI. H. UsmaniOther notable studentsLev LandauInfluencesErnest RutherfordHarald HøffdingInfluencedWerner HeisenbergWolfgang PauliPaul DiracLise MeitnerMax DelbrückKaren Barad Signature Niels Henrik David Bohr (Danish: [ˈne̝ ls ˈpoưư]; October 7, 1885 – November 18, 1962) was a Danish physicist who made fundamental contributions to the understanding of atomic structure and quantum theory, for which he received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922. Bohr was also a philosopher and promoter of scientific research. Bohr developed the Bohr model of the atom, in which he proposed that electron energy levels are discrete and that electrons rotate in stable orbits around the atomic nucleus, but can jump from one energy level (or orbit) to another. Although the Bohr model has been supplanted by other models, its underlying principles remain valid.
    [Show full text]
  • Svein Rosseland
    Nr. 1 – 2012 74. årgang Fra Utgiver: Norsk Fysisk Selskap Redaktører: Øyvind Grøn Marit Sandstad Fysik ke ns Redaksjonssekretær: Karl Måseide Innhold Øivin Holter: Atmosfærisk CO 2 og temperatur . 5 Verden Ingolf Kanestrøm: Global middeltemperatur . 9 Per Ofstad: Svein Rosseland . 15 G.K. Johnsen, C.A. Lütken, Ø.G. Martinsen og S. Grimnes: Memristoren – en ny komponent . 26 Fra Redaktørene . 2 FFV Gratulerer . 2 Emil J. Samuelsen 75 år In Memoriam . 3 Øivin Holter (1934-2011) Indeks 2011 . 17 Fysikknytt . 30 Glassomer – eit nytt materiale Kommentar . 31 Operation Epsilon og Farm Hall Bokomtale . 33 Helge Kragh: Higher Speculations Nytt fra NFS . 34 Birkelandprisen 2012 Nye Doktorer . 35 PhD Hiroatsu Sato Trim i FFV . 35 «Svein Rosselands hus» ved Universitetet i Oslo. (Se artikkel om Svein Rossland) ISSN-0015-9247 SIDE 2 FRA FYSIKKENS VERDEN 1/12 Fra Redaktørene FFV Gratulerer Den 27. mars 2012 hadde Aftenposten en stor ar­ Emil J. Samuelsen 75 år tikkel med tittelen: Norske lærebøker kan bli borte. Her fremheves et alvorlig misforhold: Mens det gis publiseringspoeng, og dermed penger, til univer­ siteter og høgskoler for vitenskapelige publikasjoner, er det ingen tilsvarende statlig ordning når det gjelder formidlig og skriving av lærebøker. Statssekretær Kyrre Lekve i K unnskapsdeparte­ mentet sier at de mange ganger har gått gjennom problemet med manglende uttelling for formidling som bl.a. inkluderer populærvitenskapelige fore­ drag, aviskronikker og lærebøker, og fortsetter: "Men uten at vi har funnet noen meningsfull og konsekvent måte å legge dette inn i våre belønnings­ systemer på. Vi har ikke planer om å innføre det nå." Dette er en skuffende tafatt holdning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of the Periphery
    Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 125.161.137.127, on 08 Sep 2020 at 06:56:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/7070AC66999C30D35EAE07F0A290963A Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 125.161.137.127, on 08 Sep 2020 at 06:56:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/7070AC66999C30D35EAE07F0A290963A The Power of the Periphery What is the source of Norway’s culture of environmental harmony in our troubled world? Exploring the role of Norwegian scholar-activists of the late twentieth century, Peder Anker examines how they portrayed their country as a place of environmental stability in a world filled with tension. In contrast with societies dirtied by the hot and cold wars of the twentieth century, Norway’s power, they argued, lay in the pristine, ideal natural environment of the periphery. Globally, a beautiful Norway came to be contrasted with a polluted world and fashioned as an ecological microcosm for the creation of a better global macro- cosm. In this innovative, interdisciplinary history, Anker explores the ways in which ecological concerns were imported via Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring in 1962, then to be exported from Norway back to the world at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core. is Associate Professor at The Gallatin School of Indi- vidualized Study, New York University.
    [Show full text]