“Environmental Sustainability? We Don’t Have That Here”: Freetown Christiania as an Unintentional Eco-village Amanda K. Winter1 Central European University
[email protected] Abstract How did an urban squat come to be termed as an eco-village, and why would this car-free town reject a bicycle path? This article brings pressing urban and environmental issues together through a case study of “Freetown Christiania”, a squatter community located in downtown Copenhagen. With a framework based on Helga Leitner et al. urban neoliberal contestations, I identify Christiania’s alternative socio-spatial imaginaries and practices. Ethnographic field work conducted while living at the community’s researcher house allows for an in-depth exploration of Christiania’s recent history and experiences, and the implications for conventional conceptions of and pathways to sustainability. I show how some of the values and practices found in Christiania differ from the “green” priorities of Copenhagen’s carbon neutral goal. My findings show resistance to the dominant discourse of sustainability, for example through a temporal focus on the present as opposed to the conventional considerations for future generations; and with resistance to Christianshavnruten, a proposed bicycle path that would cut through Christiania. The town’s dedication to self-expression, consensus decision making, and collective ownership, allow for considerations on how urban citizens reclaim their everyday spaces. 1 Published under Creative Commons licence: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works “Environmental Sustainability? We Don’t Have That Here” 130 Introduction This article will discuss Europe’s oldest and largest squatted settlement, Freetown Christiania, in Copenhagen (Denmark), and the puzzle which emerges when one learns that their title as an ‘eco-village’ was not gained through intentional sustainability planning.