Link10 En 0.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Link10 En 0.Pdf OPEninG REMARkS OF THE PRESiDEnT OF THE Link! EUROPEAn COMMiSSiOn, JOSE MAnUEL BARROSO Link ! hairperson Ping, Deputy Chairperson In my second mandate at the helm of the European Concentrate on results in each of the eight thematic Mwencha, Dear Commissioners, Commission, I express my determination to continue partnerships in the remaining months of the First Crepresentatives of the Regional our pioneering work with Africa, in particular on Action Plan (2008-2010). Economic Communities: it is a great pleasure achieving the MDGs, and making a real impact on the to be here in Addis Ababa. On behalf of all challenges of food and water security, health and Provide guidance to the EU-Africa Summit European Commissioners, I would like to education. preparation and identify what should be its main thank you for your warm welcoming. deliverables. Moreover, the EU’s internal growth strategy - the 2007 is remembered as the year the Lisbon Europe 2020 Strategy – that I have presented in the The European Commission is in the early stages of Summit took Africa-EU relations up to a new beginning of this year, also takes into account the submitting proposals (Communication this autumn) strategic level. Leaving behind old stereotypes, need to invest further in our relations with strategic for the future of the Africa-EU Strategic Partnership. breaking up with the donor-recipient partners, as Africa. I expect that today's discussions can provide useful relationship of the past, Europe and Africa inputs and can stimulate our future work. moved forward defining the terms of a Africa has been through major transformations in modern partnership of solidarity and equality. the last years, and partly due to the impressive work the African Union has been undertaking. I would like Three years after Lisbon, and despite the central role that our two organizations play it is clear that just by 2010 should be remembered as the year therefore to commend your leadership, Chairperson Jean Ping and Deputy Chairperson Mwencha, in ourselves will not be able to deliver on the ambitious Africa and Europe were able to pool efforts Lisbon commitments. and achieve their ambitious Lisbon raising the continental and international profile of the African Union Commission. commitments. Other actors need to do their part. We need the In areas such as peace and security, the African Union political ownership of our Member States, 2010 is the defining moment for both Africa has taken a courageous stance against parliaments, civil society, and the regional economic and Europe to measure the achievement of unconstitutional changes of governments (in communities. the eight thematic partnerships agreed in Mauritania, Guinea, Niger and Madagascar) and Lisbon. We have a collective obligation assumed a crucial role in African peacekeeping, I am pleased to see here today representatives of the towards the people of our continents to bring particularly in Somalia and Sudan. Regional Economic Communities (RECs) associated concrete results. to our work for the first time. The RECs are Your institution has evolved as a central actor for essential actors in the implementation of the Joint This 4th meeting of our two Commissions defending our common principles of democracy and Strategy, particularly when it comes to fostering constitutes an important milestone in taking this good governance. Today, you are an indispensible peace and security and economic integration in the process forward and in preparing the 3rd Africa– partner, both on the African continent and on the continent. EU Summit. international stage. Allow me now to conclude with some You all know my personal commitment and The European Commission has been assisting you in recommendations that should guide today’s that of the European Commission towards this path. In the multilateral setting, the European discussions in the clusters format: Africa. In recent times we showed that this Commission has been strong advocate of the commitment is not only about words but also principle of a better representation of the African 1. Focus on policy coherence, effective division of about deeds. continent in international fora: the G20/G8, the labour and track record of implementation of United Nations and other International Financial commitments. Where can the two Commissions In the last two years the European Institutions (World Bank, IMF). add value? How can we engage our Member Commission has adopted a 1 billion euros States and mobilise ownership of the Strategy? Food Facility, a 500 million euros Vulnerability I see a special role for African institutions (the FLEX mechanism to mitigate the effects of the African Union in particular) and for African representatives in international fora. 2. Treat Africa as One: we should encourage all economic crisis a 200 million Euros, under the actors, Member states, the RECs and EDF, to help developing countries cope with In our bilateral relation, the political and institutional ties between our sister institutions have grown stakeholders to treat North and Sub-Saharan higher food prices; and committed 150 million African as one. euros of fast start financing, up to 2012, as part stronger in the past few years. You know you can count with us to support your reforms’ process. of the overall European pledge of 7.2 billion 3. Strengthen our institutional cooperation: the euros, to tackle the effects of Climate Change. Under the 10th EDF, we have a 55 million euro programme in support to building the capacity of the European Commission remains ready to assist African Union and its organs. the AUC to pursue its capacity-building efforts to In support of the Joint Africa-EU Strategy and strengthen its policy-making and implementing its eight thematic partnerships, the European A strong alliance between the two Commissions has capacity at the continental level. The new Commission alone has committed 24.4 billion been and will continue to be crucial to drive the Memorandum of Understanding which will be euros through its various financial instruments continent-to-continent Partnership forward. signed today will be of essential value in this for the period 2007-2013 (16 billion euros of respect. which related to European Development I suggest that we work with the following guidance in Fund, including regional and national mind: 4. Seek concrete results in the different thematic envelopes). areas. Develop further our political and technical In addition, our Member States (EU15) have cooperation and explore the synergies between the I thank you for your attention and wish us all a provided a total amount of 19 billion euros in EU’s Europe 2020 and the African Union’s Strategic successful working day. Official Development Assistance flows to Africa Plan for 2009-2012. Jose Manuel Barroso, President of European Commision in 2008. 1 Photo: Antony Njuguna 1 2 LiEn! LiEn ! par toutes les Parties prenantes à nos sociétés globales. Cette concertation pourra être respectives. étendue à d’autres questions internationales d’intérêt commun, telles que la situation au Dans ses «Mémoires», Jean Monnet, l’un des Pères Proche-Orient, au problème de la non- de l’Europe affirmait que « ce qui est prolifération des armes de destruction important, ce n’est, ni d’être optimiste, ni massive. pessimiste, mais d’être déterminé ». Devant des incertitudes et des bouleversements d’une 3. Le financement des activités et projets dans ampleur jamais connue par le passé et dans un le cadre du Plan d’Action demeure un monde marqué notamment par l’interdépendance, problème majeur et la discussion sur la la multipolarité, la globalisation et la nécessité création à moyen et à long terme d’une cruciale de la coopération internationale, définie enveloppe panafricaine ou du Fonds « Africa’s selon certains par le retour de la politique et la loi integration Facility » devra être accélérée. De de la rareté, la Commission de l’Union africaine est même, les deux Parties devront s’engager à plus que jamais, déterminée à apporter sa identifier à court et à moyen terme, des contribution à la consolidation et à la sources de financement à partir des concrétisation du partenariat stratégique Afrique- instruments existants. Il importe par ailleurs Jean Ping, Chairperson of AUC UE. C’est dans cet esprit que nous abordons cette de consolider les acquis en poursuivant les Photo: Antony Njuguna rencontre de nos deux Commissions avec les appuis précédemment accordés. observations ci-après : 1. Le partenariat stratégique Afrique-UE prône (…)A l’heure de la mondialisation, s’il est vrai que EXTRAiT DU DiSCOURS inTRODUCTiF DU une approche du Co-développement qui l’Europe ne peut plus avoir et n’a plus une relation PRESiDEnT DE LA COMMiSSiOn DE engage les deux Parties à investir leurs d’exclusivité ni de monopole avec l’Afrique, en ressources et moyens pour l’intérêt commun. dépit de liens historiques, géopolitiques et culturels L'UniOn AFRiCAinE JEAn PinG Pour la partie africaine, il doit être arrimé à qui eux, restent extrêmement forts, le partenariat la vision de l’UA et à sa stratégie de Afrique-UE établi sur la base de valeurs partagées, développement aussi solidement que d’objectifs communs et de respect, a marqué le (…)Plus de deux ans après l’adoption de la d’atteindre les objectifs définis dans le premier Plan possible, en privilégiant la paix et la sécurité, début d’une ère nouvelle dans les relations entre Stratégie commune et du premier Plan d’action, d’action, notre partenariat est désormais bien la sécurité alimentaire, l’intégration régionale nos Institutions respectives qui y ont gagné en notre rencontre offre également, dans la droite lancé. et continentale, l’accélération du processus termes de perception, de considération, de ligne de la 10è réunion de notre Task force de mars d’industrialisation, le développement des dialogue et de modes de travail.
Recommended publications
  • Télécharger (79.278 Kb
    COMMISSION EUROPEENNE Bruxelles, le 8 mars 2013 CALENDRIER du 11 au 17 mars 2013 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Activités des Institutions Déplacements et visites Lundi 11 mars Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) Mr Andris PIEBALGS receives Secretary of State of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation of Portugal, Mr Brites PEREIRA and General Affairs Council (GAC) Secretary of State of European Affairs of Portugal, Mr Transport, Telecommunications and Miguel MORAIS LEITÃO Energy Council (TTE Transport) Ms Androulla VASSILIOU in Dublin: gives a press European Parliament plenary session conference at the Royal Hospital Kilmainham (RHK); (11-14/03) delivers opening speech at the "EU Youth conference 2013" organised by the Irish presidency Ms Maria DAMANAKI and Mr Dacian CIOLOŞ in Dublin: deliver speeches at the meeting of the AgriFish Committees Chairpersons from National Parliaments of the European Union. Mr Dacian CIOLOŞ also delivers a speech at the European Young Farmers conference Ms Kristalina GEORGIEVA attends the Friends of Europe event "Japan Seminar - For a More Resilient Word" Ms Cecilia MALMSTRÖM receives Ms Eva Birgitta OHLSSON, Minister for European Union Affairs of Sweden Ms Cecilia MALMSTRÖM receives Ms Vesna PUSIĆ, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of Croatia Mardi 12 mars Mr Maroš ŠEFČOVIČ meets Ms M. Michel BARNIER rencontre M. Benoît HAMON, Ministre Lucinda CREIGHTON, Minister of délégué auprès du ministre français de l'Economie et des State for European affairs of Ireland,
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Letter to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs And
    Joint letter to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and Vice President of the European Commission and the European Commissioners for Development and Trade 5 December 2013 Dear Catherine Ashton, Andris Piebalgs and Karel de Gucht, First, we very much welcome the opportunity to regularly discuss “policy coherence for development” (PCD) during Foreign Affairs Council (DEV) meetings, in particular during the upcoming meeting that will be held on December 12th. But whilst substantial progress has been made over the past years, we believe more can be done to mainstream PCD across non- development policies, notably across trade policies. We would like also to take the opportunity to thank you for the organization of the next Informal Meeting of EU Experts on Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) in January. In this context, with the EPAs currently being negotiated between the EU and ACP regions precisely conceived as both trade and development tools, we want to highlight that the negotiations between the EU and ACP regions are at a critical stage for us all to be constructively supportive in pursuit of our joint objectives. As you know, our States have always supported development-oriented EPAs. Based on a shared commitment to a trade and development partnership between the EU and the ACP countries and regions, EPAs will promote regional integration and integration into the world economy, and enhance predictability and secure legal certainty. We remain convinced that these gradual and asymmetrical trade liberalization agreements, negotiated on a regional basis, and coupled with targeted co-operation and assistance to help ACP countries implement them, could have a significant positive impact on our partner countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazprom's Monopoly and Nabucco's Potentials
    Gazprom’s Monopoly and Nabucco’s Potentials: Strategic Decisions for Europe Nicklas Norling SILK ROAD PAPER November 2007 Gazprom’s Monopoly and Nabucco’s Potentials: Strategic Decisions for Europe Nicklas Norling © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036, U.S. Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodav. 2, 131 30, Nacka-Stockholm, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org "Gazprom’s Monopoly and Nabucco’s Potential: Strategic Decisions for Europe" is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program. The Silk Road Paper series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, published jointly on topical and timely subjects. The Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program is a joint transatlantic independent and externally funded research and policy center. The Joint Center has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first Institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is today firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders and journalists. The Joint Center aims to be at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, teaching, research cooperation, public lectures and seminars, it wishes to function as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region.
    [Show full text]
  • QUESTIONNAIRE to COMMISSIONER Günther
    QUESTIONNAIRE TO COMMISSIONER Günther OETTINGER On the transfer of portfolio for Budget & Human Resources Questions from the Committee on Budgets 1. "Budget galaxy" What is your vision of the future evolution of the Union budget in the light of the growing use of guarantees, financial instruments, trust funds and facilities? How would you ensure that those instruments do not jeopardize the agreed policies and provide additionality? What measures will you undertake in order to safeguard the unity and transparency of 2. Implementationthe budget and the delays prerogatives / Paymen of thet forecast budgetary authority? Major delays in the implementation of the 2014-2020 programmes led to a drop in payment needs in 2016 and 2017. This is worrying for the programmes itself, and risks the reconstitution of a backlog of unpaid bills at the end of the MFF term. What measures will you take to counter the underimplementation trend? How do you plan to avoid the reconstitution of a payment backlog at the end of the MFF period? After repeated requests, the Commission finally provided a payment forecast until 2020 at the occasion of the MFF mid-term review/revision. Do you commit to update this payment forecast every year, so that the budgetary authority 3. Preparationis provided sufficient of the post information-2020 MFF to take the right decisions? According to Art.25 of the MFF regulation, the Commission shall present a proposal for a new multiannual financial framework before 1st January 2018: • With reference to the above, could you provide details
    [Show full text]
  • European Commission
    COMMISSION EUROPEENNE Bruxelles, le 12 septembre 2014 CALENDRIER du 15 au 21 septembre 2014 (Susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Déplacements et visites Lundi 15 septembre European Parliament plenary session (15-18/9) Mr José Manuel Durão BARROSO receives Mr Beinigno AQUINO III, President of the Philippines Mr Siim KALLAS receives Mr Román ESCOLANO, Vice-President of the European Investment Bank Mr Jyrki KATAINEN in Portugal: meets with Mr Pedro PASSOS COELHO, Prime Minister of Portugal; speech on “European Banking Union in the making" at the Bank of Portugal Mr Andris PIEBALGS and Ms Kristalina GEORGIEVA participate in the High level EU coordination meeting "A European wide response to the Ebola epidemic" Ms Androulla VASSILIOU visits Cyprus: meets Mr Costas KADIS, Minister of Education and Culture; opens of the Centre of Visual Arts and Research, Nicosia Mr Algirdas ŠEMETA in Vilnius: delivers a keynote speech at the Investors Forum "Europe‘s Competitiveness Recipe" Mr Johannes HAHN in Vienna: gives a key note speech at the conference organized by the Austrian Chamber of Economy: "EU structural funds in the period 2014-2020" with the participation of Mr Reinhold MITTERLEHNER, Minister of Economy Ms Connie HEDEGAARD in Copenhagen (Denmark): intervention at the Conference on Green Mobility in the future Mr László ANDOR delivers key note speech at the session "Integration of People with an Intellectual Disability - Policy-making perspective" at the Scientific Symposium of the 2014 Special Olympics European Summer Games (Antwerp)
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter to G20 Finance Ministers
    13 July 2020 OPEN LETTER TO G20 FINANCE MINISTERS Global business, workers and civil society call for comprehensive emergency debt relief to enable developing countries to combat the COVID-19 pandemic Dear Finance Ministers, We are writing further to our joint letter sent on 10 April 2020, which called on G20 Governments to take international debt out of the equation in the fight against COVID-19 ahead of the Spring Meetings of the World Bank Group (WBG) and International Monetary Fund (IMF). On behalf of business, workers and civil society throughout the world, we would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your leadership in establishing the Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI)—and, moreover, applaud the commitment made by several governments to replenish the IMF Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust (CCRT) and Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust. For the real economy and society at large, this package of measures was a welcome signal of the G20’s overarching commitment to eliminate any risk of disorderly sovereign debt crises compounding the human and economic toll of COVID-19. It is increasingly clear, however, that your leadership is urgently required to decisively deliver on this imperative. With the global economy facing an even deeper downturn than projected in April, decisive and comprehensive action is now needed to ensure that debt service does not prevent developing economy governments from protecting the lives and livelihoods of their citizens in the face of the pandemic. We are especially concerned by the growing number of countries already facing or at risk of debt distress—including many countries that are not currently within the scope of the DSSI, whose economies have been highly exposed to the external shocks precipitated by COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE Foreign Affairs
    COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION EN 11022/10 PROVISIONAL VERSION PRESSE175 PRESS RELEASE 3023rdCouncilmeeting Foreign Affairs Luxembourg,14June2010 President Ms Catherine ASHTON HighRepresentativeoftheUnionfor ForeignAffairsand SecurityPolicy. P R E S S Rue de la Loi 175 B – 1048 BRUSSELS Tel.: +32 (0) 2 281 8914 / 6319 Fax: +32 (0)2 281 8026 [email protected] http://www.consilium.europa.eu/Newsroom 11022/10 1 EN PROVISIONAL VERSION 14.VI.2010 Main results of the Council The Council discussed the situation in Kyrgyzstan following the violent confrontation in the south and adopted conclusions underlining the need to restore public order and build democratic institutions and confirming the EU's readiness to provide urgent humanitarian aid. The Council held an exchange of views with International Quartet Envoy Tony Blair on the situation in Gaza following the Israeli operation in international waters against the Flotilla. It adopted conclusions calling for an immediate, full and impartial inquiry, declaring that the situation in Gaza is unsustainable and calling for the policy of closure to be changed and the crossings to be opened for the flow of humanitarian aid, commercial goods and persons. It declared that the EU is ready to contribute to the implementation of a mechanism to permit the reconstruction of Gaza and the revival of its economy. The Council discussed Iran's nuclear programme and adopted conclusions welcoming UN Security Council Resolution 1929 imposing a fourth round of sanctions. It also prepared for the discussion by Heads of State or Government at the European Council on Thursday on measures to accompany and support the UN Resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Address by KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA, Chair of the Executive Board And
    October 18, 2019 Address by KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA, Chair of the Executive Board and Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, to the Board of Governors of the Fund, at the Joint Annual Discussion AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY The IMF’s Purpose: Delivering for People By Kristalina Georgieva, IMF Managing Director 2019 IMF-World Bank Annual Meetings Plenary, October 18, 2019 1. Introduction Mr. Chairman, Governors, distinguished Guests: It is a great honor to address you for the first time as Managing Director of the IMF—and even more so in the presence of James Wolfensohn, who placed the fight against poverty at the heart of the World Bank. I am very fortunate to take over from a remarkable woman, whose vision and dedication have made the IMF stronger, more innovative, and more relevant. Thank you, Christine! And most sincere thanks to David Lipton, who has so ably led the Fund in this interim period. I am delighted to share the stage with Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, the Chair of the Board of Governors; and David Malpass, the President of the World Bank Group. It is a privilege to join you in serving our members. Let me begin by quoting John Maynard Keynes, one of our founding fathers, who once said: “Economics is essentially a moral science and not a natural science. That is to say, it employs introspection and judgments of value.” These words speak to the purpose of the IMF and its staff. For all their methodical work, Fund staff are guided by their commitment to improving people’s lives.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: an Early Assessment
    THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: An Early Assessment John Peterson University of Edinburgh Paper prepared for the 14th Biennial Conference of the EU Studies Association, Boston, 5-7th February 2015 DRAFT: Not for citation without permission Comments welcome [email protected] Abstract This paper offers an early evaluation of the European Commission under the Presidency of Jean-Claude Juncker, following his contested appointment as the so-called Spitzencandidat of the centre-right after the 2014 European Parliament (EP) election. It confronts questions including: What will effect will the manner of Juncker’s appointment have on the perceived legitimacy of the Commission? Will Juncker claim that the strength his mandate gives him license to run a highly Presidential, centralised Commission along the lines of his predecessor, José Manuel Barroso? Will Juncker continue to seek a modest and supportive role for the Commission (as Barroso did), or will his Commission embrace more ambitious new projects or seek to re-energise old ones? What effect will British opposition to Juncker’s appointment have on the United Kingdom’s efforts to renegotiate its status in the EU? The paper draws on a round of interviews with senior Commission officials conducted in early 2015 to try to identify patterns of both continuity and change in the Commission. Its central aim is to assess the meaning of answers to the questions posed above both for the Commission and EU as a whole in the remainder of the decade. What follows is the proverbial ‘thought piece’: an analysis that seeks to provoke debate and pose the right questions about its subject, as opposed to one that offers many answers.
    [Show full text]
  • President High Representative
    First Vice-President High Representative Frans Timmermans Federica Mogherini Better Regulation, Inter-Institutional High Representative of the Union Relations, the Rule of Law and the for Foreign Affairs and Security Poli- Charter of Fundamental Rights cy / Vice-President of the PRESIDENT Commission Vice-President JEAN-CLAUDE JUNCKER Vice-President Kristalina Georgieva Andrus Ansip Vice-President Vice-President Budget & Human Resources Digital Single Market Vice-President Alenka Bratušek Valdis Dombrovskis Jyrki Katainen Energy Union Euro & Social Dialogue Jobs, Growth, Investment and Competitiveness Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Vĕra Jourová Günther Oettinger Pierre Moscovici Marianne Thyssen Corina Creţu Johannes Hahn Justice, Consumers and Gender Digital Economy & Society Economic and Financial Affairs, Employment, Social Affairs, Regional Policy European Neighbourhood Policy Equality Taxation and Customs Skills and Labour Mobility & Enlargement Negotiations Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos Vytenis Andriukaitis Jonathan Hill Elżbieta Bieńkowska Miguel Arias Cañete Neven Mimica Financial Stability, Financial Services and Health & Food Safety Migration & Home Affairs Capital Markets Union Internal Market, Industry, Climate Action & Energy International Cooperation Entrepreneurship and SMEs & Development Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Margrethe Vestager Maroš Šefčovič Cecilia Malmström Karmenu Vella Competition Transport & Space Trade Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Tibor Navracsics Carlos Moedas Phil Hogan Christos Stylianides * The HRVP may ask the Commissioner Education, Culture, Youth and Research, Science Agriculture & Humanitarian Aid & (and other commissioners) to deputise Citizenship and Innovation Rural Development Crisis Management for her in areas related to Commission competence.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for ACP-EU Trade and Trade Negotiations
    The Lisbon Treaty and Commonwealth Developing Countries: Implications for ACP‐EU trade and trade negotiations Christopher Stevens and Paul Goodison1 The Lisbon Treaty which came into force on 1 December 2009 alters institutional arrangements and the distribution of responsibilities within the European Union. Despite being an internal EU change it is certain to produce external effects. Although neither the scale nor precise nature of these effects can yet be predicted clearly, this issue of Commonwealth Trade Hot Topics offers a preliminary guide to the potential areas of change and an assessment of how these might impact upon Commonwealth developing countries in general (including least developed countries and small vulnerable economies) and on members of the ACP group in particular. Less a turning point than a staging post The Lisbon Treaty is the latest in a line of agreements (from Maastricht to Nice via Amsterdam) that modify the basis of the EU’s trade policy process. Addressing aspects of the Nice Treaty that created a degree of confusion and uncertainty it: • changes the Union‐level institutions responsible for external relations; • creates a European External Action Service (EEAS); • changes responsibilities for policy on trade and investment; and • gives new powers to the European Parliament. The broad thrust is to enhance the responsibilities and powers of the Union institutions relative to those of the European member states and to redistribute influence between the former. The Common Commercial Policy, for example, has been extended explicitly to apply with a few exceptions to trade in services, protection of intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment.
    [Show full text]
  • La Coerenza Della Politica Estera Europea Alla Prova: Il Nuovo Servizio Europeo Per L’Azione Esterna
    Istituto Affari Internazionali DOCUMENTI IAI 10 | 10 – maggio 2010 La coerenza della politica estera europea alla prova: il nuovo Servizio europeo per l’azione esterna Michele Comelli e Raffaello Matarazzo Abstract Il Servizio europeo per l’azione esterna (Seae) è una delle più importanti innovazioni previste dal Trattato di Lisbona per accrescere coerenza ed efficacia alla politica estera europea. Dopo l’accordo raggiunto tra gli Stati membri, un intenso negoziato sull’organizzazione del nuovo Servizio si è sviluppato soprattutto tra Alto rappresentante e Parlamento europeo. Quest’ultimo sta cercando di acquisire una capacità di controllo democratico ( accountability ) sulla politica estera, di sicurezza e difesa europea. Quello che conta è che l’ Alto rappresentante riesca, tramite il Seae, ad assicurare un più stretto coordinamento tra i vari aspetti dell’azione esterna dell’Unione europea. Ne beneficerebbero reputazione e credibilità dell’Unione sulla scena internazionale. Parole chiave : Unione europea / Servizio europeo per l’azione esterna (Seae) / Alto rappresentante per gli Affari esteri e la politica di sicurezza / Parlamento europeo / accountability / Politica estera e di sicurezza comune (Pesc) © 2010 IAI Documenti IAI 1010 La coerenza della politica estera europea alla prova La coerenza della politica estera europea alla prova: il nuovo Servizio europeo per l’azione esterna di Michele Comelli e Raffaello Matarazzo ∗ 1. Battaglia interistituzionale Dall’entrata in vigore del Trattato di Lisbona, il primo dicembre 2009, si è venuto sviluppando un intenso negoziato su competenze, funzionamento, criteri di reclutamento del personale e bilancio del nuovo Servizio. Protagonisti del negoziato sono stati sia i tre attori da cui verranno distaccati i nuovi funzionari del Seae (Commissione, Consiglio e Stati membri), sia, soprattutto negli ultimi mesi, il Parlamento europeo (Pe).
    [Show full text]