School Design Policy As an Integral Part of Education Reform in Serbia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
War in the Balkans, 1991-2002
WAR IN THE BALKANS, 1991-2002 R. Craig Nation August 2003 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications Office by calling (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or be e-mail at [email protected] ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/ ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-134-2 ii CONTENTS Foreword . v Preface . vii Map of the Balkan Region. viii 1. The Balkan Region in World Politics . 1 2. The Balkans in the Short 20th Century . 43 3. The State of War: Slovenia and Croatia, 1991-92. -
2001 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 4, 2002
Yugoslavia, Federal Republic of Page 1 of 44 Yugoslavia, Federal Republic of Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2001 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 4, 2002 (The report on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is discussed in three separate sections on Serbia, Kosovo, and Montenegro and addresses human rights situations in each of these entities. Since federal authority was exercised effectively only over the Republic of Serbia throughout the year, the human rights situations in Kosovo and Montenegro are dealt with in separate sections following this report.) The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Yugoslavia), a constitutional republic consisting of the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Montenegro, has a president and a parliamentary system of government based on multiparty elections. Vojislav Kostunica was elected President of the Federation in elections held on September 24, 2000 that were closely contested; President Slobodan Milosevic ultimately was unable to manipulate the elections. Massive public protests forced Milosevic to recognize his defeat and cede power on October 6, 2000. Under the constitutional framework, the Federation encompasses the Republics of Serbia and Montenegro; however, the Montenegrin Government has refused to participate in many of the functions of the Federal Government and has acted unilaterally in several areas. The Federal Government presides over a weakened structure, with responsibilities essentially limited to the Foreign Ministry, the Yugoslav Army (VJ), the Customs Administration, civil aviation control, and foreign economic and commercial relations. Although President Kostunica enjoyed wide popular support, significant power was concentrated at the republic level where, in Serbia, Prime Minister Djindjic exercises significant executive authority. -
Serbia's Transition: Reforms Under Siege
SERBIA’S TRANSITION: REFORMS UNDER SIEGE 21 September 2001 Belgrade/Brussels ICG Balkans Report N° 117 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................................i I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................1 A. THE GAVRILOVIC CASE: NOT JUST ANOTHER BELGRADE MURDER.........................................................1 B. THE DSS BIDS FOR POWER........................................................................................................................1 C. NEW ELECTIONS?.......................................................................................................................................3 D. THE DSS LEAVES THE GOVERNMENT .......................................................................................................3 E. STALEMATE................................................................................................................................................4 F. THE DSS CHANGES TACK..........................................................................................................................5 II. BACKGROUND TO THE CRISIS ...................................................................................................7 A. TEN YEARS OF SQUABBLING......................................................................................................................7 B. POST-OCTOBER ARGUMENTS ....................................................................................................................8 -
Download the Discussion Guide (PDF, 640
INTRODUCTION )N/CTOBER 9UGOSLAVDICTATOR3LOBODAN-ILOSEVICWASREMOVEDFROMPOWERNOTBYFORCEOFARMS ASMANYHAD PREDICTED BUTBYADEDICATED NONVIOLENTSTRATEGYOFHONESTELECTIONSANDMASSIVECIVILDISOBEDIENCE-ILOSEVICWAS STRENGTHENEDBYPATRIOTICFERVORWHEN.!4/BOMBED9UGOSLAVIAINEARLY BUTAFEWMONTHSLATER ASTUDENTMOVEMENT NAMED/TPORRESISTANCEIN3ERBIAN LAUNCHEDASURPRISINGOFFENSIVE!UDACIOUSLYDEMANDINGTHEREMOVALOF-ILOSEVIC /TPORRECRUITEDWHEREDISCONTENTWASSTRONGEST INTHE3ERBIANHEARTLAND/TPORgSWEAPONSWEREROCKCONCERTSANDRIDICULE THE)NTERNETANDE MAIL SPRAY PAINTEDSLOGANSANDAWILLINGNESSTOBEARRESTED/TPORSTUDENTSBECAMETHESHOCKTROOPSIN ANARMYOFHUMANRIGHTS PRO DEMOCRACY ANTI WARANDWOMENgSGROUPS ANDOPPOSITIONPOLITICALPARTIES "RINGING$OWNA$ICTATORISTHESTORYOFANONVIOLENTDEMOCRATICMOVEMENTTHATDEFEATEDTHEAUTHORITARIANREGIMEOF 3LOBODAN-ILOSEVICIN3ERBIATHROUGHFREEELECTIONSANDMASSIVECIVILDISOBEDIENCE 4HESTUDENTSOF/TPORTOOKTHELEAD ADOPTINGANONVIOLENTSTRATEGYTHATTRACESITSROOTSTO-OHANDAS'ANDHIANDTHE!MERICANCIVILRIGHTSMOVEMENT AMONG OTHERS 4HISDOCUMENTARYEXAMINESTHOSEIDEASANDHOWTHEYMIGHTBEUSEDAGAINSTTHEWORLDgSREMAININGNON DEMOCRATIC REGIMES (OWTO5SE4HIS'UIDE 4HISGUIDE TOGETHERWITHTHETELEVISIONPROGRAM ISARESOURCEFORINFORMAL DISCUSSIONGROUPSASWELLASASUPPLEMENTINHIGHSCHOOLANDCOLLEGE COURSESINSOCIALSTUDIES WORLDHISTORY INTERNATIONALSTUDIES ANDPOLITICAL SCIENCE 4HESEMATERIALSCORRELATEWITHTHEFOLLOWINGSTANDARDSDEVELOPED BYTHE.ATIONAL#OUNCILFORTHE3OCIAL3TUDIES.#33 0OWER !UTHORITY 'OVERNANCE 0ROVIDEFORTHESTUDYOFHOWPEOPLECREATEANDCHANGESTRUCTURES OFPOWER AUTHORITY ANDGOVERNANCE )NDIVIDUAL$EVELOPMENT)DENTITY -
Russia and NATO Toward the 21St Century: Conflicts and Peacekeeping in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo
1 Russia and NATO Toward the 21st Century: Conflicts and Peacekeeping in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo NATO-EAPC Research Fellowship Award Final Report NATO/Academic Affairs 1999-2001, Submitted in August 2001 Sharyl Cross, Ph.D. Professor of Political Science/International Relations, San Jose State University, San Jose, California, USA 95192 Email: [email protected] Introduction It has now been well over a decade since Mikhail S. Gorbachev unleashed democratic transition in the former Soviet Union culminating in the collapse of the Berlin Wall and a new epoch in East-West relations. Russia and the West were presented with the opportunity to bring about a transition from a relationship of adversarial confrontation to constructive engagement or even “partnership.” In responding to these changing circumstances, in 1990, Dr. Manfred Worner made the first ever visit by a Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to Moscow, stating that: “I have come to Moscow today with a very simple message: we extend our hand of friendship to you. And I have come with a very direct offer to cooperate with you. The time for confrontation is over. The hostility and mistrust of the past must be buried. We see your country, and all the other countries of the former Warsaw Treaty Organization, no longer as adversaries but as partners…”[1] NATO faced the challenge of forging a new relationship with Russia and other nations of the former Warsaw Pact. In 1994, NATO would launch the Partnership for Peace program for developing military-to-military exchanges with Russia and other newly independent nations of the former Soviet Union and East-Central Europe.