Big Sky Area Sustainable Watershed Stewardship Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Big Sky Area Sustainable Watershed Stewardship Plan Big Sky Area Sustainable Watershed Stewardship Plan January 26, 2018 BIG SKY AREA SUSTAINABLE WATERSHED STEWARDSHIP PLAN Prepared by Jeff Dunn, Watershed Hydrologist Troy Benn, Water Resources Engineer Zac Collins, GIS Analyst And Karen Filipovich, Facilitator and Analyst Gary Ingman, Water Resources Scientist, Headwaters Hydrology Prepared for And Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Big Sky, MT January 26, 2018 PO Box 160513 Big Sky, MT 59716 Over 2016-2017, the Gallatin River Task Force hosted a collaborative stakeholder driven effort to develop the Big Sky Area Sustainable Watershed Stewardship Plan. The Gallatin River Task Force (Task Force) is a nonprofit organization headquartered in Big Sky, with a focus on protecting and improving the health of the Upper Gallatin River and its tributaries. I would like to take this opportunity to thank the many entities and individuals involved in this effort. The main funders of plan development included the Big Sky Resort Area Tax District, and Gallatin and Madison Counties. Initial seed funding was provided by the Big Sky Water and Sewer District, Lone Mountain Land Company, and the Yellowstone Club. Thank you to the stakeholders and their representative organizations that contributed time, energy, and brain power to become educated in water issues in the Big Sky Community, roll up their sleeves and spend countless hours developing creative solutions to complex water issues. Thank you to the many member of the public who provided input by attending stakeholder and public meetings or taking our survey. Implementation of this plan will ensure that the ecological health of our treasured river systems are enhanced and protected as our community and region continue to grow in residential and visitor population. Cold, clean and abundant water will be critical to sustain the many attractions to the Big Sky area that include our free-flowing rivers, abundant wildlife, world class recreational opportunities, and scenic landscapes This is an ambitious plan and success of this plan will depend entirely on strong community engagement, partnerships, and support in implementation. Now is the time to get involved! Thank you for taking the first step by reviewing this plan. Kristin Gardner Executive Director Gallatin River Task Force Big Sky Area Sustainable Watershed Stewardship Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... iii Appendices ................................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Stakeholder-Driven Process ................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Community Engagement and Input .................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Goals and Objectives for Three Water Resources Focus Areas .......................................................... 5 1.4 Challenges and Opportunities ............................................................................................................. 7 1.5 Expected Outcomes of Implementation ............................................................................................. 8 1.6 Project Area Boundaries ................................................................................................................... 10 1.6.1 River Systems and Subwatersheds ............................................................................................ 10 1.6.2 Ownership Boundaries and Demographics................................................................................ 13 2.0 Alternatives Analysis for Areas of Consensus ....................................................................................... 15 2.1 Ecological Health of River Systems ................................................................................................... 15 2.1.1 Watershed Status and Trends Monitoring Program .................................................................. 19 2.1.2 Watershed Status and Trends Dashboard ................................................................................. 21 2.1.3 Watershed Restoration and Conservation ................................................................................ 25 2.2 Water Supply and Availability ........................................................................................................... 27 2.2.1 Groundwater Monitoring and Modeling ................................................................................... 30 2.2.2 Strategies for Water Conservation ............................................................................................ 32 2.2.3 Stormwater Management.......................................................................................................... 34 2.2.4 Mitigation of Water Rights ......................................................................................................... 36 2.3 Wastewater Treatment and Reuse ................................................................................................... 38 2.3.1 Treat Wastewater to the Limits of Technology ......................................................................... 40 2.3.2 Address Septic Systems and Small Community Systems ........................................................... 43 2.3.3 Expand Water Reuse for Irrigation ............................................................................................ 45 2.3.4 Develop Water Reuse for Snowmaking ..................................................................................... 48 2.3.5 Investigate Shallow Groundwater Recharge .............................................................................. 50 2.4 Alternatives Analysis for Areas that Did Not Receive Consensus ..................................................... 51 3.0 Implementation Plan ............................................................................................................................ 52 1/26/18 i Big Sky Area Sustainable Watershed Stewardship Plan 3.1 Capacity for Implementation ............................................................................................................ 52 3.1.1 Partnerships for Watershed Stewardship Plan Implementation ............................................... 52 3.1.2 Partnership Structures for Continuing Collaboration ................................................................ 54 3.1.3 Funding for Watershed Stewardship Plan Implementation ...................................................... 56 3.2 Action Items for Ecological Health of River Systems ........................................................................ 58 3.2.1 Action Items – Watershed Status and Trends Monitoring Program.......................................... 58 3.2.2 Action Items – Watershed Status and Trends Dashboard ......................................................... 61 3.2.3 Action Items – Watershed Restoration and Conservation ........................................................ 63 3.3 Action Items for Water Supply and Availability ................................................................................ 65 3.3.1 Action Items – Groundwater Monitoring and Modeling ........................................................... 65 3.3.2 Action Items – Strategies for Water Conservation .................................................................... 69 3.3.3 Action Items – Stormwater Management ................................................................................. 73 3.3.4 Action Items – Mitigation of Water Rights ................................................................................ 75 3.4 Action Items for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse ........................................................................ 77 3.4.1 Action Items – High Treatment Levels for Treated Wastewater ............................................... 77 3.4.2 Action Items – Address Septic Systems and Small Community Systems ................................... 79 3.4.3. Action Items – Expand Water Reuse for Irrigation ................................................................... 83 3.4.4 Action Items – Develop Water Reuse for Snowmaking ............................................................. 86 3.4.5 Action Items – Investigate Shallow Groundwater Recharge ..................................................... 90 3.5 Action Items for Areas of Sustaining Funding and Community Engagement ................................... 92 3.5.1 Action Items – Sustaining Funding ............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Haystack Development
    August 2, 2017 HAYSTACK DEVELOPMENT Moonlight Basin Overall Development Plan Wildlife Summary Report HAYSTACK DEVELOPMENT Wildlife Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 EXISTING WILDLIFE AND HABITAT ..................................................................................... 4 2.1 HABITAT ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES ......................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Grizzly Bear .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Canada Lynx ......................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 Wolverine ............................................................................................................................ 10 2.3 OTHER SPECIES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................................ 10 2.3.1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need .............................................................................. 10 2.3.2 Migratory Birds ................................................................................................................... 13 2.3.3 Big Game Species
    [Show full text]
  • Official Race History for Paul Mannelin
    Official Race History for Paul Mannelin Race Code Race Date Race Name Gender Discipline Race Location Position U0381 02/20/2021 Stano Cup Men Giant Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U0382 02/20/2021 Stano Cup Women Giant Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U0379 02/19/2021 Stano Cup Men Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U0380 02/19/2021 Stano Cup Women Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U0377 02/18/2021 Stano Cup Men Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U0378 02/18/2021 Stano Cup Women Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U1194 02/23/2020 Got Snow Tech Qualifiers Women Giant Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U1195 02/23/2020 Got Snow Tech Qualifiers Men Giant Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U1192 02/22/2020 Got Snow Tech Qualifiers Men Giant Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U1193 02/22/2020 Got Snow Tech Qualifiers Women Giant Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U1218 02/21/2020 Got Snow Tech Qualifiers Men Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U1219 02/21/2020 Got Snow Tech Qualifiers Women Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U0288 03/22/2019 Tri-Divisional Championships Men Super G Jackson Hole Referee Mountain Resort, WY U0289 03/22/2019 Tri-Divisional Championships Women Super G Jackson Hole Referee Mountain Resort, WY F0486 03/16/2019 U.S. Ski & Snowboard Western Men Slalom Alpine Meadows,
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Desktop Redirected Printer
    MPDES Permit MT0032051 Response to Comments Page 1 of 15 Response to Comments Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC MPDES Permit MT0032051 On March 22, 2021, the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) issued Public Notice MT-21-07, stating DEQ’s intent to issue a Montana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (MPDES) permit to Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC, for discharges from the Yellowstone Mountain Club Snowmaking on Eglise Mountain. On March 26, 2021, the public comment period was extended and required that all substantive comments be received or postmarked by May 5, 2021, in order to be considered in formulation of the final determination and issuance of the permit. This Response to Comments document includes a summary of all significant comments on the draft permit and fact sheet received during the public comment period and DEQ’s responses to those comments. The Response to Comments document is an addendum to and supersedes relevant portions of the Fact Sheet to the extent specific clarifications or changes are described herein. The table below identifies those individuals who submitted comments. Persons Submitting Significant Comments on the Fact Sheet and Draft MPDES Permit MT0032051 Number Commenter 1 Rich Chandler, Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC 2 Scott Bosse, American Rivers 3 Jon Olsen, Lone Mountain Land Club, Spanish Peaks Resort 4 David Tucker, Gallatin River Task Force 5 Mike Richter and Jodi Moravec-Butash 6 Ron Edwards, Big Sky County Water & Sewer District 7 Charles Wolf Drimal, Greater Yellowstone Coalition 8 Taylor Middleton, Big Sky Resort 9 Andrea Wass, Association of Gallatin Agricultural Irrigators MPDES Permit MT0032051 Response to Comments Page 2 of 15 Persons Submitting Significant Comments on the Fact Sheet and Draft MPDES Permit MT0032051 Number Commenter 10 Patrick Byorth, Trout Unlimited 11 John Meyer, Cottonwood Environmental Law Center 12 Clint Nagel, Gallatin Wildlife Association 13 Joe Gutkoski, Montana Rivers Responses to Comments on the Fact Sheet and Draft MPDES Permit MT0032051 Commenter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Day at Big Sky Resort
    Nov. 22 - Dec. 8, 2016 Volume 7 // Issue #24 Welcome back winter! Opening day at Big Sky Resort Cats claw Griz in rivalry upset Mountain Outlaw hits newsstands Forum wrangles with Big Sky's water issues The New West: Honoring a conservation champion #explorebigsky explorebigsky explorebigsky @explorebigsky ON THE COVER: Big Sky Resort officially opens for the 2016-2017 ski season on Thanksgiving Day! Here, an unknown ripper sends it at the old Ambush terrain park under the Ramcharger chairlift in February 2012. PHOTO BY KENE SPERRY TABLE OF CONTENTS Nov. 22 – Dec. 8, 2016 Volume 7, Issue No. 24 Section 1: News Owned and published in Big Sky, Montana PUBLISHER Opinion.............................................................................5 33 Eric Ladd Local...............................................................................10 EDITORIAL EDITOR / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MEDIA Montana.........................................................................15 Joseph T. O’Connor SENIOR EDITOR/DISTRIBUTION DIRECTOR Section 2: Environment, Sports, & Health Tyler Allen ASSOCIATE EDITOR Environment..................................................................17 Amanda Eggert Sports.............................................................................21 CREATIVE Welcome back winter! SENIOR DESIGNER Business........................................................................25 Taylor-Ann Smith Opening day at Big Sky Resort Health.............................................................................27 GRAPHIC DESIGNER
    [Show full text]
  • Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in Montana - 2018-2019 Ski Season Jeremy L
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research Publications 8-2019 Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in Montana - 2018-2019 Ski Season Jeremy L. Sage Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/itrr_pubs Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in MT 2018-2019 Ski Season Jeremy L. Sage 8/19/2019 This study is a follow-up to a ski industry study conducted by ITRR during the 2009-2010 ski season. Skiers and snowboarders at 6 ski areas were surveyed throughout the season to collect information on skier characteristics and spending. Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in MT Prepared by Jeremy L. Sage Institute for Tourism & Recreation Research College of Forestry and Conservation The University of Montana Missoula, MT 59812 www.itrr.umt.edu Research Report 2019-9 Publication date 8/19/2019 This study was jointly funded by the Lodging Facility Use Tax and the Montana Ski Area Association. Copyright© 2019 Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research. All rights reserved. Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in 2019 MT Abstract Skier visits to Montana ski areas have seen year over year growth for the past four years and a generally positive trajectory for at least the past 30 years. This study surveyed skiers and snowboarders at 6 of Montana’s ski areas to collect information on skier demographics, characteristics, and spending behaviors. Montana ski areas as a whole are seeing increasing proportions of nonresident skiers.
    [Show full text]
  • FLATIRON DEVELOPMENT Planned Unit Development Narrative
    FLATIRON DEVELOPMENT Planned Unit Development Narrative 5520 Sourdough Rd. Bozeman, MT 59715 406-925-0590 Ecosign Mountain Resort Planners 8073 Timber Lane, Box 63 Synergy Engineering and Konsulting Whistler, B.C. Canada 3731 Equestrian Lane, STE 102 Bozeman, MT 59718 406-624-6137 1 | Page Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 Background and Overview .................................................................................................. 14 1.1 Legal Description ............................................................................................................................. 14 1.2 Property Owners and Development Application ............................................................................ 14 1.3 Entitlements Requested .................................................................................................................. 15 1.4 Requested Deviations ..................................................................................................................... 16 1.5 Requested Variances ....................................................................................................................... 17 1.6 Project Location .............................................................................................................................. 18 1.7 Development Concept ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In Re Yellowstone Mountain Club: Equitable Subordination to Police Inequitable Conduct by Non-Insider Creditors Marina Montes
    NORTH CAROLINA BANKING INSTITUTE Volume 14 | Issue 1 Article 20 2010 In Re Yellowstone Mountain Club: Equitable Subordination to Police Inequitable Conduct by Non-Insider Creditors Marina Montes Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncbi Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons Recommended Citation Marina Montes, In Re Yellowstone Mountain Club: Equitable Subordination to Police Inequitable Conduct by Non-Insider Creditors, 14 N.C. Banking Inst. 495 (2010). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncbi/vol14/iss1/20 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Banking Institute by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. In re Yellowstone Mountain Club: Equitable Subordination to Police Inequitable Conduct by Non-Insider Creditors I. INTRODUCTION [C]reditors who cause debtors' financial ruin should not be allowed to use the courts as their collection agents. The United States courts should not be enforcers for loan sharks. The Bankruptcy Code currently gives courts that power to equitably subordinate creditors who act improperly. But... it is applied inconsistently. Equitable subordination provides bankruptcy courts with the authority to place the first lien position of a self-enriching secured creditor in an inferior position to that of other secured or unsecured creditors.2 Historically, bankruptcy judges have been reluctant to use their power to subordinate3 a secured creditor's unjust claims in circumstances where they are not• • fiduciaries.5 For purposes of this Case Comment, a non-insider refers to any creditor that does not have fiduciary obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • Clark Fork River Headwaters
    Montana Headwaters Security Act Endorsements Over 1,000 individual businesses, organizations and governmental bodies have formally endorsed the Montana Headwaters Security Act - draft legislation that designates 37 Wild and Scenic Rivers on public lands in Montana. Note the business and nonprofit organizations that represent hundreds of additional businesses and thousands of individual citizens. Clark Fork River Headwaters Old School Enterprises, LLC Alberton Gore Consulting Missoula Pangaea River Rafting Alberton Headwaters Tree Care Missoula Lozeau Lodge Alberton Hellgate Hunters and Anglers Ekstrom’s Restaurant & (300 members and supporters) Missoula Campground Clinton JM Moran Missoula John Perry Outfitters Clinton Kettlehouse Brewery Missoula JM Bar Outfitters Clinton LB Snow and Paddle Missoula No Anchor Coeur d alene, ID Legal Atlas Missoula Big Blackfoot Riverkeeper Greenough Lewis & Clark Trail Adventures Missoula BHT Outfitters Hamilton Love Boat Paddle Company Missoula American Whitewater Montana River Guides Missoula (80,000 supporters) Missoula Montana River Photo Missoula Backcountry Hunters and Anglers Mountain Press Publishing Missoula (1,800 Montana members) Missoula Mountains to Waves Shuttles Missoula Casting for Recovery Missoula New York Life Missoula Clark Fork Coalition Off Route Photography Missoula (3,000 supporters) Missoula Sargent Sticks Missoula Confluence Construction Missoula Slickery Blends Missoula Conservation Media, LLC Missoula Tarkio Kayak Adventures Missoula DG Creative Missoula Tarkio Lodge Missoula
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sky Town Center Retail Informational Brochure
    BIG SKY TOWN CENTER RETAIL INFORMATIONAL BROCHURE JUNE 2020 PREMIER RETAIL LOCATION W Big Sky is halfway between LONE PEAK S N 11,166’ Bozeman Airport and Yellowstone E National Park PIONEER MOUNTAIN 9,860’ Bozeman is the fastest growing Micropolitan area in the U.S. – has been for the past three years in a row Yellowstone National Park attracts 4 million visitors annually – nearly 70% of them enter through the Montana gates Big Sky Town Center is located at the corner of Main & Main, surrounded by incredible spending power Every car traveling to any destination in Big Sky must pass by the BIG SKY TOWN CENTER intersection of Highway 64 and Ousel BIG SKY MEADOW & GOLF COURSE Falls Road CORNER OF $2.5 billion of real estate sold at MAIN & MAIN Yellowstone Club over the past 10 years $1.5 billion of homes exist in Spanish Peaks and Moonlight Basin 64 Pipeline of approximately 1,000 BOZEMAN INTERNATIONAL future luxury homes in Spanish Peaks AIRPORT (43 MILES) and Moonlight Basin 191 YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK ENTRANCE (45 MILES) GALLATIN RIVER 2 SNAPSHOT: FASTEST GROWING RESORT TOWN IN THE COUNTRY - Big Sky population doubled since 2010 - BZN Airport infrastructure improvements and increased service make Big Sky even more accessible - 11x faster than Aspen and 12x faster than Jackson Hole - Passenger traffic increased 121% since 2008 and 15% since 2018 to 1.6 million passengers annually - Big Sky School District enrollment doubled since 2009 (7.3% CAGR) - BZN is one of the most reliable airports in the country - Lone Peak High School ranked
    [Show full text]
  • COVEY RISE Yellowstone Club
    MOUNTAIN PARADISE A sportsman’s year-round playground set on about 14,000 acres, Montana’s Yellowstone Club redefines the club concept. STORY BY EVERETT POTTER PHOTOGRAPHY BY TERRY ALLEN AND THE YELLOWSTONE CLUB 46 COVEY RISE COVEY RISE 47 he drive from Bozeman, Montana, to the Yellowstone makes it larger than Deer Valley Resort in Utah or Sun Valley in Club takes about an hour, along a meandering road Idaho. The experience of gliding through powder with your best that follows the trophy trout waters of the Gallatin buddy, or carving the corduroy with your kids—accompanied TRiver. The river, the woodlands, and the snow-capped by just a couple dozen other skiers—and doing that all day long mountain peaks announce this as a sportsman’s dream landscape. and for days on end is the biggest selling point of the Yellow- Not long after the entrance to Big Sky Resort you reach the gates stone Club and why it’s been dubbed “Private Powder.” to the Yellowstone Club. The club’s 13,600 acres aren’t surround- Add access to the adjacent 6,000 acres of Big Sky and Moon- ed by fences, but they aren’t needed, given that the club’s security light Basin combined, and the deal sweetens considerably for force is staffed by former Secret Service agents. those who love snow and the outdoors. But as at so many West- Overkill? Not when you have a club whose members include ern resorts built on the concept of celebrating winter, there are some of the world’s wealthiest and highest-profile individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Owner, Developer, Contractor and Operator 2
    FAQs FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS SUMMARY These FAQs have been drafted to answer questions for potential buyers at Montage Residences Big Sky (“Residences”) located at Spanish Peaks Mountain Club in Big Sky, Montana. The project is currently under construction and is expected to open in the fall/winter of 2021. The 39 Residences are part of Montage Big Sky that includes hotel guestrooms, restaurants, outdoor pool, signature Spa Montage, an indoor lap pool and fitness center. CONTENTS 1. Project Management: Owner, Developer, Contractor and Operator 2. Project Description and Amenities 3. Project Schedule 4. Residences Services and Features 5. Purchasing, Customizing and Furnishing a Residence 6. Club Membership Requirements and Benefits a. Spanish Peaks Mountain Club b. Yellowstone Club 7. Optional Montage Rental Program 8. Estimated Cost of Ownership – Exhibit A 9. Residences Sizes and Pricing 1. Project Management: Owner, Developer, Contractor and Operator The Montage Big Sky project, including the Residences, is owned by SP Hotel Owner LLC, an investment entity created by CrossHarbor Capital. CrossHarbor also oversees development and operations at the Yellowstone Club. www.crossharborcapital.com The Montage Big Sky project is being developed by Lone Mountain Land Company (LMLC), an organization also owned by CrossHarbor Capital. LMLC is also the developer of Spanish Peaks, Moonlight Basin and various projects in Big Sky Town Center. www.lonemountainland.com Suffolk Construction Company Inc. is the General Contractor for the project, under contract to the owner. Based in Boston, but active throughout the U.S., Suffolk is responsible for overseeing construction for the project, and for hiring, managing and coordinating local subcontractors for various building trades.
    [Show full text]
  • SW Construction Effective Permits by County (PDF)
    Beaverhead NPDES ID Permittee Name Facility Name Location Address Effective Date MTR107358 SOUTHERN MT TELEPHONE CO INC WISDOM/JACKSON FIBER-TO-THE-PREMISE (FTTP) UPGRADE PROJECT 2018 IN AND AROUND THE TOWN OF JACKSON 6/27/18 MTR107551 WESTERN FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION, FHW NORTH OF MOOSE CREEK NORTH MT DOT 569(3) MT 43 ON THE SOUTH AND MT 1 ON THE NORTH 10/17/18 MTR107665 Deere Creek Excavation, LLC STODDEN SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT 280 SILVER MAPLE LANE 1/11/19 MTR107964 JIM GILMAN EXCAVATING INC CLARK CANYON RES. - BARRETTS INTERSTATE 15, MILE POST 45.9 TO 54.5 7/10/19 MTR108259 SOUTHERN MT TELEPHONE CO INC SOUTHERN MONTANA TELEPHONE - 2020 JACKSON UPGRADE PROJECT 205 MAIN STREET 3/6/20 MTR108420 BARRETTS MINERALS INC BARRETS MINERALS REGAL MINE 15 MI EAST OF DILLON 6/19/20 MTR108783 SOUTHERN MT TELEPHONE CO INC SOUTHERN MONTANA TELEPHONE COMPANY - GRANT FTTP UPGRADE 2021 205 MAIN STREET 3/4/21 MTR108846 SCHELLINGER CONSTRUCTION CO WISDOM - WEST / TRAIL CREEK STRUCTURES MT 43 RP 7.5 TO RP 26.2 4/1/21 MTR108988 MUNGAS COMPANY INC 2021 DILLON - WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS IDAHO STREET 6/22/21 Big Horn NPDES ID Permittee Name Facility Name Location Address Effective Date MTR106659 ALTA VISTA OIL CORP SLAUGHTERVILLE-1H FROM DECKER NE ON HWY 314 2.8 MI. E ON OTTER/QUIET 1/1/18 MTR107081 ALTA VISTA OIL CORPORATION DOC HOLIDAY-1H FROM DECKER NE ON HWY 314 2.8 MI E ON OTTER/QUIETU 1/1/18 MTR107633 NAVAJO TRANSITIONAL ENERGY COMPANY LLC SPRING CREEK MINE WINDMILL DRIVE 12/13/18 MTR108475 MONTANA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION PERITSA CREEK - 6 MILES
    [Show full text]