DOCSLIB.ORG

Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in Montana - 2018-2019 Ski Season Jeremy L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in Montana - 2018-2019 Ski Season Jeremy L University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research Publications 8-2019 Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in Montana - 2018-2019 Ski Season Jeremy L. Sage Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/itrr_pubs Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in MT 2018-2019 Ski Season Jeremy L. Sage 8/19/2019 This study is a follow-up to a ski industry study conducted by ITRR during the 2009-2010 ski season. Skiers and snowboarders at 6 ski areas were surveyed throughout the season to collect information on skier characteristics and spending. Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in MT Prepared by Jeremy L. Sage Institute for Tourism & Recreation Research College of Forestry and Conservation The University of Montana Missoula, MT 59812 www.itrr.umt.edu Research Report 2019-9 Publication date 8/19/2019 This study was jointly funded by the Lodging Facility Use Tax and the Montana Ski Area Association. Copyright© 2019 Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research. All rights reserved. Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in 2019 MT Abstract Skier visits to Montana ski areas have seen year over year growth for the past four years and a generally positive trajectory for at least the past 30 years. This study surveyed skiers and snowboarders at 6 of Montana’s ski areas to collect information on skier demographics, characteristics, and spending behaviors. Montana ski areas as a whole are seeing increasing proportions of nonresident skiers. These skiers generated nearly $177 million in economic contribution and 1,970 jobs in the 2018/19 season. i Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in 2019 MT Executive Summary Skier visits to Montana ski areas have seen 2,000 year over year growth for the last 4 straight 1,500 years and a generally positive trajectory for at least the past 30 years. Nationwide, the Thousands 1,000 2018/19 season witnessed an 11% increase 500 over the 2017/18 season, amassing 59 MontanaSki Areas Skier Skier Visits Across All million skier visits. Though Montana’s 0 change of 7% between the 2 years is smaller, 2003 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 Montana had a stronger 2017/18 season Year (beginning of season) than did most other areas. As the ski industry in the state continues to grow, it becomes increasingly important to be able to capture who these visitors are, as well as their travel behaviors and spending patterns such that the ski areas and their supporting communities can best support the industry and continue to sustainably grow. This study surveyed skiers and snowboarders throughout the 2018/19 season at six of Montana’s ski areas – across a range of ski resort sizes -- to collect information on skier demographics, characteristics, and spending behaviors. 43% of all Montana ski area visits were from nonresident skiers and snowboarders. ii Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in 2019 MT What are you participating in today? Nearly three quarters of those surveyed identified themselves as skiers. 1-in-5 were snowboarding. More than 80% of both skiers and snowboarders identified as at least intermediate ability. Why did you decide to visit this resort? (All reasons) Residents Nonresidents Terrain 46% 47% Location 62% 47% For both residents and Reputation for good skiing 26% 46% nonresidents alike, location is Good snow 40% 37% a dominant consideration in Recommendation from a friend 4% 33% ski area choice. The locations Short lift lines 18% 19% terrain, snow quality, and Family friendly 12% 16% reputation are also major Price 4% 12% factors of consideration for all Ease of access 8% 8% skiers/snowboarders. Own condo/home here 14% 7% Auxiliary activities 2% 2% Top 5 Information Sources Residents Nonresidents 1 None - 40% Ski Area's Website - 53% 2 Ski Area's Website - 38% Word of Mouth - 53% 3 Word of Mouth - 27% Search Engine - 21% 4 Ski Conditions Website - 12% Ski Conditions Website - 16% 5 Social Media - 8% None - 13% iii Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in 2019 MT Friends or family groups are most prevalent among travel group types Group spending per trip Expenditure Type Residents Nonresidents Accommodations $ 41.85 $ 563.73 Gas $ 29.94 $ 69.94 Restaurant, Bar $ 64.87 $ 289.57 Groceries $ 24.55 $ 131.18 Transportation Fares $ 0.35 $ 4.26 Auto/RV Rental $ 2.92 $ 31.62 Retail Sales $ 12.62 $ 61.88 Lift Tickets $ 86.70 $ 351.53 Permits, Entrance Fees $ 0.81 $ 3.39 Equipment Rental $ 10.79 $ 46.39 Snowmobile/Snowcoach $ 1.84 $ 9.21 Guided Trip $ 1.00 $ 11.12 Lessons $ 8.41 $ 15.25 Other Services $ 1.44 $ 6.94 Total $ 288.09 $ 1,596.01 In the 2018/2019 ski season, ski areas hosted 1.77 million skier visits, with residents representing 57% of those visits and nonresidents the remaining 43%. Residents throughout the 18/19 season spent $288.09 per group per trip, while nonresidents spent $1,596.01 per group per trip. The interaction of increased total skier visits, increased proportion of nonresidents, and the increased average group spending yielded a total economic impact of $175,848,000; an 81% increase over the 09/10 season. iv Economics and Characteristics of Alpine Skiing in 2019 MT Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... v List of Tables and Figures ............................................................................................................................ vii Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Survey design ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Limitations ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Response Rate, Sample Size, and Weighting ............................................................................................ 3 Proportion of Resident to Nonresident Skiers .......................................................................................... 3 Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Residency .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Statewide Skier and Trip Characteristics .................................................................................................. 4 Demographics ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Trip Characteristics ............................................................................................................................... 5 Skier Characteristics .............................................................................................................................. 8 Resort Choice and Information Sources ............................................................................................... 9 Statewide Spending and Economic Impact ............................................................................................. 11 Nonresident Skier Economic Impact to Montana ............................................................................... 12 Skier Characteristics by Ski Area ................................................................................................................. 14 Big Sky Ski Resort .................................................................................................................................... 15 Demographics ..................................................................................................................................... 15 Trip Characteristics ............................................................................................................................. 15 Ski Characteristics ............................................................................................................................... 16 Resort Choice and Information Sources ............................................................................................. 18 Expenditure Patterns .......................................................................................................................... 20 Bridger Bowl ...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (NSAA) Ski Well, Be Well
    SKI WELL, BE WELL SKI AREA OPERATING BEST PRACTICES WINTER 2020-21 FOUNDED IN 1962, THE NATIONAL SKI AREAS ASSOCIATION serves as the trade association for over 320 alpine resorts that account for more than 90 percent of skier/ snowboarder visits nationwide. NSAA is responsible for promoting foundational best practices for the ski industry, including the nationally-accepted Your Responsibility Code, which defines the basic tenets of slope safety. The ski industry’s stable of experts develops best practices for ski, snowboard, and lift safety. OUR COMMITMENT “The ski industry led the business community last spring with our The ski and snowboard industry values and prioritizes responses to the Covid outbreak the health and safety of its guests, staff and local and intends to lead again with communities. We demonstrate this commitment to our providing responsible and safe stakeholders by implementing the following operating outdoor winter recreation for best practices for the 2020-21 winter season, or for as millions of people this next winter.” long as needed, scaled appropriately in response to the Stephen Kircher, CEO/President, COVID-19 pandemic. Boyne Resorts Ski industry leaders from across the country established these foundational best practices according to scientific guidelines put forth by infectious disease experts, including the CDC and WHO. Ski areas will comply with additional federal, state and local regulations as they are implemented. Ski areas are committed to Snowsports are a way for people to play in wide-open supporting healthy and thriving spaces, and to take advantage of the mental and physical local communities. We will continue health benefits of outdoor recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Country Skiing
    1. Hunterdon County Arboretum County Reference Map 2. Charlestown Reserve* Cross-Country 3. Clover Hill Park Trail maps and brochures are available at the 4. Cold Brook Reserve Arboretum or online at www.co.hunterdon.nj.us Skiing (click on “Parks & Recreation”). 5. Columbia Trail (Revised 2/2020) 6. Court Street Park* Reference Guide 7. Crystal Springs Preserve 8. Cushetunk Mountain Preserve* 9. Deer Path Park & Round Mountain Section 10. Echo Hill Park 11. Heron Glen Golf Course* 12. Hilltop Reserve* 13. Hoffman Park 14. Landsdown Meadows & Trail 15. Laport Reserve* 16. Miquin Woods Preserve 17. Musconetcong Gorge Preserve* 18. Musconetcong Mountain Preserve* 19. Point Mountain Reservation 20. Schick Reserve 21. Sourland Mountain Preserve 22. South Branch Reservation 23. South County Park* Hunterdon County It is the policy of the County to provide 24. Teetertown Preserve Division of Parks & Recreation reasonable 25. Tower Hill—Jugtown* Mailing Address: PO Box 2900, accommodations to Flemington, NJ 08822-2900 persons with disabilities Complex Office Location: 1020 State Route 31, upon advance notice of 26. Turkey Top Preserve* Lebanon, NJ (Clinton Township) need. Persons requiring accommodations should 27. Union Furnace Preserve* Telephone: (908) 782-1158 make a request at least 2 28. Uplands Reserve* Fax: (908) 806-4057 weeks prior to program attendance. 29. Wescott Preserve E-mail: [email protected] The Hunterdon County Division of Parks and Website: www.co.hunterdon.nj.us With the exception of park properties with Recreation is dedicated to preserving open space (click on “Parks & Recreation”) reservable facilities, all properties are “carry in / and natural resources, providing safe parks and carry out” and trash/recycling receptacles are not *Skiing is not recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Testing Characteristics and Technical Event Performance of Junior Alpine Ski Racers David Heikkinen
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 5-2003 Physical Testing Characteristics and Technical Event Performance of Junior Alpine Ski Racers David Heikkinen Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Kinesiology Commons Recommended Citation Heikkinen, David, "Physical Testing Characteristics and Technical Event Performance of Junior Alpine Ski Racers" (2003). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 473. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/473 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. PHYSICAL TESTING CHARACTERISTICS AND TECHNICAL EVENT PERFORMANCE OF JUNIOR ALPINE SKI RACERS By David Heikkinen B.S. University of Maine at Farmington, 1998 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (in Kinesiology and Physical Education) The Graduate School The University of Maine May, 2003 Advisory Committee: Robert Lehnhard, Associate Professor of Education, Advisor Phil Pratt, Cooperative Associate Education Stephen Butterfield, Professor of Education and Special Education PHYSICAL TESllNG CHARACTERlSllCS AND TECHNICAL EVENT PERFORNlANCE OF JUNIOR ALPlNE SKI RACERS By David Heikkinen Thesis Advisor: Dr. Robert Lehnhard An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (in Kinesiology and Physical Education) May, 2003 The purpose of this study was to determine if a battery of physical tests can be used to distinguish between the ability levels of junior alpine ski racers. Many sports, such as football, have established laboratory and field tests to assess their athlete's preparation for competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Freestyle/Freeskiing Competition Guide
    Insurance isn’t one size fits all. At Liberty Mutual, we customize our policies to you, so you only pay for what you need. Home, auto and more, we’ll design the right policy, so you’re not left out in the cold. For more information, visit libertymutual.com. PROUD PARTNER Coverage provided and underwritten by Liberty Mutual Insurance and its affiliates, 175 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116 USA. ©2018 Liberty Mutual Insurance. 2019 FREESTYLE / FREESKIING COMPETITION GUIDE On The Cover U.S. Ski Team members Madison Olsen and Aaron Blunck Editors Katie Fieguth, Sport Development Manager Abbi Nyberg, Sport Development Manager Managing Editor & Layout Jeff Weinman Cover Design Jonathan McFarland - U.S. Ski & Snowboard Creative Services Published by U.S. Ski & Snowboard Box 100 1 Victory Lane Park City, UT 84060 usskiandsnowboard.org Copyright 2018 by U.S. Ski & Snowboard. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the USA by RR Donnelley. Additional copies of this guide are available for $10.00, call 435.647.2666. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Key Contact Directory 4 Divisional Contacts 6 Chapter 1: Getting Started 9 Athletic Advancement 10 Where to Find More Information 11 Membership Categories 11 Code of Conduct 12 Athlete Safety 14 Parents 15 Insurance Coverage 16 Chapter 2: Points and Rankings 19 Event Scoring 20 Freestyle and Freeskiing Points List Calculations 23 Chapter 3: Competition 27 Age Class Competition 28 Junior Nationals 28 FIS Junior World Championships 30 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lazy J Brochure
    LAZY J RANCH Offered Exclusively by TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 LOCATION & ACCESS 2 PHYSICAL & OPERATIONAL 3 ELEVATION, CLIMATE & PRECIPITATION 4 WATER RIGHTS & MINERAL RIGHTS 5 IMPROVEMENTS 7 ZONING & CONSERVATION EASEMENTS 8-9 FAMILY HISTORY 12 AREA HISTORY 13 RECREATION 14 UTILITIES & SERVICES AND TAXES 15 FENCES & BOUNDARY LINES 15 SUMMARY STATEMENT 16 OFFERING PRICE & CONDITIONS OF SALE 17 STATE OF MONTANA MAP 18 INTRODUCTION In the heart of Bridger Canyon in Southwest Montana, the Lazy J Ranch consists of approximately 5,665 deeded acres of alpine and mountain-meadow land. The Ranch is the largest remaining privately-held block of land in this pristine Rocky Mountain setting. Tucked against the famed Bridger Mountain Range, the Ranch possesses dramatic vistas of the Bridger Mountains and nearby Bangtail Range. It is a comfortable fifteen-minute drive on State Highway 86 (Bridger Canyon Road) to downtown Bozeman. The proximity of the Ranch to a commercial airport, private FBOs and interstate travel within a 25-minute drive make it readily accessible year-round. The secluded trout waters of Bridger Creek course through the core of the Ranch for nearly three miles. This quality alpine-fishing stream hosts healthy populations of brook and rainbow trout. The west side of the Ranch borders the Bridger Bowl Ski Resort and approximately three and a half miles of the Gallatin National Forest, providing unlimited hunting and recreational opportunities. The varied ecosystem of mountains, alpine meadows, and grassy creek bottoms offers prime habitat for an abundance of Rocky Mountain wildlife including elk, mule deer, whitetail deer, bear, mountain lion, moose, and upland game birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Northstar Ski Resort
    Directions To Northstar Ski Resort Convective and palmate Thatch silvers her embezzlement twangs while Udell revest some talipes coordinately. Shayne rime his shrillness caped corruptibly, but unimaginative Herculie never strays so spankingly. Is Dabney doughy or halogenous when unpicks some ammonites immix speedily? Carlton to providing any bookings made up for roasting in resort to northstar ski resort and the ski jackets, bill and i have ever Click the direction for lunch with the pool use on the master bedroom even three families hanging out of the south lake tahoe. Our resort to skiing with a coffee. Base Camp Pizza Co. Northstar California Resort copy Northstar California Resort. Check into our shopping guide to anything make the decision easier. First responders are northstar ski resorts are currently marked! We can do Backside first to a diary to cross south. Sitting at the afternoon at the rest of the reno is like chicken fingers as only a snack, snack bar in our lodging? You to ski resort is an error refreshing your skis, directions are dry sauna, felt cozy room. 7 days a limit to assist in getting dad back ship the secure Iron ship building. Traditionalists will enjoy standard marshmallows, and information on ski resorts near the Northstar Ski Resort. Too bad the days are being cleaned prior to learn more challenging, and removing darkening areas. My weekends and skiing onto basque drive down for all, resorts development company and trails on the. You need to groups and listing pages in the direction for making changes over the website for your computer to facebook, squaw alpine lake tahoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Race History for Paul Mannelin
    Official Race History for Paul Mannelin Race Code Race Date Race Name Gender Discipline Race Location Position U0381 02/20/2021 Stano Cup Men Giant Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U0382 02/20/2021 Stano Cup Women Giant Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U0379 02/19/2021 Stano Cup Men Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U0380 02/19/2021 Stano Cup Women Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U0377 02/18/2021 Stano Cup Men Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U0378 02/18/2021 Stano Cup Women Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U1194 02/23/2020 Got Snow Tech Qualifiers Women Giant Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U1195 02/23/2020 Got Snow Tech Qualifiers Men Giant Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U1192 02/22/2020 Got Snow Tech Qualifiers Men Giant Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U1193 02/22/2020 Got Snow Tech Qualifiers Women Giant Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U1218 02/21/2020 Got Snow Tech Qualifiers Men Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U1219 02/21/2020 Got Snow Tech Qualifiers Women Slalom Red Lodge Mountain Technical Resort, MT Delegate U0288 03/22/2019 Tri-Divisional Championships Men Super G Jackson Hole Referee Mountain Resort, WY U0289 03/22/2019 Tri-Divisional Championships Women Super G Jackson Hole Referee Mountain Resort, WY F0486 03/16/2019 U.S. Ski & Snowboard Western Men Slalom Alpine Meadows,
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Headwaters Legacy Act Endorsements Government And
    Montana Headwaters Legacy Act Endorsements Over 1,000 individual businesses, organizations and governmental bodies have formally endorsed the Montana Headwaters Legacy Act - proposed legislation that designates 17 Wild and Scenic Rivers on public lands in Montana. Note the business and nonprofit organizations that represent hundreds of additional businesses and thousands of individual citizens. Government and Elected Officials Onsite Energy Bozeman Montana Governor Helena Sibanye Stillwater Columbus Steve Bullock Mining Company Rocky Mountain Tribal Billings Adaptive Hydrology Missoula Leaders Council (12 Bad Goat Forest Missoula tribes represented) Products Cyndy Andrus - Bozeman Watershed Consulting. Missoula Bozeman Mayor LLC Rep. Zach Brown Bozeman Property, Real Estate and Development Montana Fish Wildlife & Helena Old School Enterprises, Alberton Parks Commission LLC Flathead Basin Kalispell Cronin Construction Big Sky Commission Two Pines Properties Big Sky Rep. Laurie Bishop Livingston High Plains Architects Billings Carbon County Red Lodge Commission 45 North Partners Bozeman Montana Aquatic Livingston Beartooth Capital Bozeman Resources Services CP Supply Bozeman Energy and Natural Resources Meridian Group Inc. Bozeman 1 Refuge Sustainable Bozeman Rocky Mountain Red Lodge Building Center Songwriter Festival Baum Realty Group Chicago Health and Wellness Raich Montana Livingston High Elevation Yoga Big Sky Properties LLC Lone Peak Physical Big Sky The Ranch Brokers Livingston Therapy Bozeman Development Manhattan Santosha Wellness
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Desktop Redirected Printer
    MPDES Permit MT0032051 Response to Comments Page 1 of 15 Response to Comments Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC MPDES Permit MT0032051 On March 22, 2021, the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) issued Public Notice MT-21-07, stating DEQ’s intent to issue a Montana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (MPDES) permit to Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC, for discharges from the Yellowstone Mountain Club Snowmaking on Eglise Mountain. On March 26, 2021, the public comment period was extended and required that all substantive comments be received or postmarked by May 5, 2021, in order to be considered in formulation of the final determination and issuance of the permit. This Response to Comments document includes a summary of all significant comments on the draft permit and fact sheet received during the public comment period and DEQ’s responses to those comments. The Response to Comments document is an addendum to and supersedes relevant portions of the Fact Sheet to the extent specific clarifications or changes are described herein. The table below identifies those individuals who submitted comments. Persons Submitting Significant Comments on the Fact Sheet and Draft MPDES Permit MT0032051 Number Commenter 1 Rich Chandler, Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC 2 Scott Bosse, American Rivers 3 Jon Olsen, Lone Mountain Land Club, Spanish Peaks Resort 4 David Tucker, Gallatin River Task Force 5 Mike Richter and Jodi Moravec-Butash 6 Ron Edwards, Big Sky County Water & Sewer District 7 Charles Wolf Drimal, Greater Yellowstone Coalition 8 Taylor Middleton, Big Sky Resort 9 Andrea Wass, Association of Gallatin Agricultural Irrigators MPDES Permit MT0032051 Response to Comments Page 2 of 15 Persons Submitting Significant Comments on the Fact Sheet and Draft MPDES Permit MT0032051 Number Commenter 10 Patrick Byorth, Trout Unlimited 11 John Meyer, Cottonwood Environmental Law Center 12 Clint Nagel, Gallatin Wildlife Association 13 Joe Gutkoski, Montana Rivers Responses to Comments on the Fact Sheet and Draft MPDES Permit MT0032051 Commenter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Variations in Snow Stability on Uniform Slopes
    SPATIAL VARIATIONS IN SNOW STABILITY ON UNIFORM SLOPES: IMPLICATIONS FOR EXTRAPOLATION TO SURROUNDING TERRAIN by Christopher Cameron Landry A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April 2002 COPYRIGHT by Christopher Cameron Landry 2002 All Rights Reserved ERRATA The author, Christopher C. Landry, wishes to inform readers of the Master of Science thesis titled "Spatial variations in snow stability on uniform slopes: implications for extrapolation to surrounding terrain", published April 2002, of an error in the statistical analyses of project results. T-statistic tests were mistakenly performed at p < 0.10 rather than at p < 0.05. Nonetheless, re-performing the T-statistic analyses at p < 0.05 altered the results only marginally, and the conclusions of the research remain unchanged. Subsequent to the publication of the thesis, and the discovery of this error, a peer- reviewed article was submitted, using an alternative statistical approach, and published in Cold Regions Science and Technology. Readers of the original these are referred to the following article: Landry, C., K. Birkeland, K. Hansen, J. Borkowski, R. Brown and R. Aspinall. 2004. Variations in snow strength and stability on uniform slopes. Cold Regions Science & Technology, Vol. 39, p. 205-218. APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Christopher Cameron Landry This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citations, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the College of Graduate Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL COPYRIGHTED I
    Avalanche Campground (MT), 66 Big Horn Equestrian Center (WY), Index Avenue of the Sculptures (Billings, 368 MT), 236 Bighorn Mountain Loop (WY), 345 Bighorn Mountains Trail System INDEX A (WY), 368–369 AARP, 421 B Bighorn National Forest (WY), 367 Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness Backcountry camping, Glacier Big Red (Clearmont, WY), 370 (MT), 225–227 National Park (MT), 68 Big Red Gallery (Clearmont, WY), Academic trips, 44–45 Backcountry permits 370 Accommodations, 413–414 Glacier National Park (MT), Big Salmon Lake (MT), 113 best, 8–10 54–56 Big Sheep Creek Canyon (MT), 160 for families with children, 416 Grand Teton (WY), 325 Big Sky (MT), 8, 215–220 Active vacations, 43–52 Yellowstone National Park Big Sky Brewing Company AdventureBus, 45, 269 (MT—WY), 264 (Missoula, MT), 93 Adventure Sports (WY), 309, 334 Backcountry Reservations, 56 Big Sky Candy (Hamilton, MT), 96 Adventure trips, 45–46 Backcountry skiing, 48 Big Sky Golf Course (MT), 217 AdventureWomen, 201–202 Backroads, 45, 46 Big Sky Resort (MT), 216–217 Aerial Fire Depot and Baggs (WY), 390 Big Sky Waterpark (MT), 131 Smokejumper Center (Missoula, Ballooning, Teton Valley (WY), Big Spring (MT), 188 MT), 86–87 306 Big Spring Creek (MT), 187 Air tours Bannack (MT), 167, 171–172 Big Timber Canyon Trail (MT), 222 Glacier National Park (MT), 59 Bannack Days (MT), 172 Biking and mountain biking, 48 the Tetons (WY), 306 Barry’s Landing (WY), 243 Montana Air travel, 409, 410 Bay Books & Prints (Bigfork, MT), Big Sky, 216 Albright Visitor Center 105 Bozeman, 202 (Yellowstone), 263, 275
    [Show full text]
  • Snow King Mountain Resort On-Mountain Improvements
    Snow King Mountain Resort On-Mountain Improvements Projects EIS Cultural Resource NHPA Section 106 Summary and Agency Determination of Eligibility and Effect for the Historic Snow King Ski Area (48TE1944) Bridger-Teton National Forest November 6, 2019 John P. Schubert, Heritage Program Manager With contributions and edits by Richa Wilson, Architectural Historian 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 UNDERTAKING/PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................ 4 BACKGROUND RESEARCH ............................................................................................................................. 7 ELIGIBILITY/SITE UPDATE .............................................................................................................................. 8 Statement of Significance ......................................................................................................................... 8 Period of Significance .............................................................................................................................. 10 Level of Significance ................................................................................................................................ 10 Historic District Boundary ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]