TRANSPORTATION Introduction This

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TRANSPORTATION Introduction This CHAPTER 3 – TRANSPORTATION Introduction This Chapter serves to focus not only on the existing transportation system as it pertains to roads, but also the network of alternative means of travel, which include pedestrian, rail, air, water, and mass transit. Identifying all modes of transportation in a comprehensive manner allows for the local governing body to develop plans for improvements to this system that will provide for the efficient movement of people and goods throughout the County. This approach ensures that all governing bodies with jurisdiction over this network will work together for the benefit of this County in a regional context as well. Roads There are several governing jurisdictions within Morgan County that oversee the road system. This includes the State routes under the West Virginia Department of Transportation Division of Highways (DOH), the municipal roads within the towns of Paw Paw and Bath, and to a lesser degree the private road systems that are approved primarily as part of developments in the County. This order of ownership and maintenance is part of the reason for current limitations on the County’s ability to improve the overall road network. Given the County’s automobile dependent population, which has increased from 76% residents driving alone in 1990 to 78% in 2000, other factors influencing this process should also be identified in developing a plan to address these deficiencies. First, the West Virginia Department of Transportation DOH owns and maintains most of the roads in Morgan County. This means that improvements must be programmed, funded and implemented at the State level through an established process. Second, there are no specific requirements within the County’s regulations to assess and mitigate the traffic impacts of new development. Third, the County is wedged between several other counties that cross over four separate states with their own established transportation improvement process and funding priorities. Lastly, the County includes numerous historically significant sites and sensitive areas which create difficulties in constructing necessary improvements in a timely manner. The West Virginia DOH uses a functional system which classifies each public roadway. In Morgan County two functional classifications are represented. This includes feeders, which serve communities and collect and feed traffic to the higher systems, and state-local service roads, which serve local traffic movement in and around the County. U.S. Rt. 522 and WV Rt. 9 are considered feeders, and all other roadways are classified as state-local service. The functional classification system is as follows: • Expressway- connects metropolitan areas and provide service to major interstate or interstate travel • Trunk-line- is the intrastate network intended to serve smaller cities TR-1 • Feeder- serves smaller towns and industrial and recreational areas not served by the higher systems • State-local Service- roads are localized arterial and spur roads which provide access and socio-economic benefits abutting properties and are further sub-classified as Essential Arterials, Collectors, and Land Access • Occasional use- is the lowest classification of the local road, providing access to rural areas on a low-volume basis Level of Service Transportation studies conducted by the West Virginia Department of Highways consider the ability of roadways to provide adequate service for the existing volume of traffic in terms of Level of Service (LOS). Level of service is a comparison of traffic volume and the capacity of the roadway, which are measured in a range from “A” to “F” with “A” being the highest condition and “F” the worst. Level of Service “C” represents stable flow and is generally considered as the goal for service. Table 3-1 Traffic Volume Level of Service Level Description A Zone of condition of free flow, with low volumes and high speeds. B Zone of stable flow, with operating speeds beginning to be restricted somewhat by traffic conditions. Drivers still have reasonable freedom to select their speed and lane of operation. C Zone of mostly stable flow, but speeds and maneuverability are more closely constricted by the higher volumes. D Zone that approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds, however driving speed is considerably affected by changes in operating conditions. E Zone that cannot be described by speed alone. Operating speeds are lower than in Level D, with volume at or near the capacity of the highway. F Zone in which the operating speeds are controlled by stop-and-go mechanisms, causing forced flow. The stoppages disrupt the traffic flow so that the volume carried by the roadway falls below its capacity; without the stoppages, the volume of traffic on the roadway would be higher, or in other words, it would reach capacity. Source: West Virginia Department of Transportation Major Roads Historically, the highest traffic volumes in Morgan County have been experienced on US Rt. 522, particularly in the Berkeley Springs area. Traffic volumes in this location increased from approximately 6,900 vehicles per day in 1980 to 17,100 in 2005, with nearly 20% of the total TR-2 volume being heavy through truck traffic. Other areas along this route that experienced significant development include the Timber Ridge District, which experienced 7,700 vehicles per day in 2005. This route has also seen a significant and continued increase in heavy truck traffic, which is used as an alternate route between I-81 at Winchester, Virginia and I-70 at Hancock, Maryland. Based on standard Level of Service (LOS) measurements for average daily traffic flow, US Rt. 522 operates at level E for its entire length through West Virginia. The second most heavily traveled roadway in Morgan County is West Virginia Route 9. This route enters the County at Paw Paw, running north along the west side of Cacapon Mountain and crossing U.S. Rt. 522 in Berkeley Springs, then turning east toward Martinsburg in Berkeley County. Since 1980 traffic volume has increased from 1,500 vehicles per day at the Berkeley County line and 2,600 in Berkeley Springs to 4,200 and 5,900 respectively in 2005. Traffic on WV Rt. 9 from Berkeley Springs to Great Cacapon ranged from 900 to 2,000 vehicles per day in 1980 to 1,700 to 3,800 in 2005. Unlike the relatively constant and in some cases decreasing average daily flow of traffic south of Great Cacapon near the Paw Paw area in 1980, traffic volumes in this area in 2005 averaged 2,400 vehicles per day. Depending on location, alignment and other factors, WV Rt. 9 operates at various LOS throughout the County, with the worst being a level E at its intersection with US Rt. 522 in Berkeley Springs. Local Roads Aside from the major road improvements to US Rt. 522 and WV Rt. 9, there are ten projects from previous studies outlined in the 1985 Comprehensive Plan that were identified for improvements by the State. Since that time four of the projects have been completed. The remaining projects have either been removed from the State priority list or folded into the major ongoing projects relating to the US Rt. 522 bypass and WV Rt. 9 alignment study. Except for several minor routes that traverse the County, which are also maintained by WVDOT, all other roads outside of the municipal systems are private and/or part of the various subdivisions. However, simply because these types of roads within the transportation network are not owned and maintained by any governing entity does not mean that there are not needs for improvements to segments of these types of roads throughout the County. The Town of Paw Paw includes several miles of local roads, which function primarily as local neighborhood roads connecting to WV Rt. 9. This State route runs east-west through Town, serving as Main Street before crossing the river on the west side of Town, into Maryland. The Town of Bath, which is surrounded by the Berkeley Springs area, includes several miles of roads within the corporate limits. These roads are owned and maintained by the town government, and serve as local connections to US Rt. 522 running north south through the Town. This road, which serves as Main Street through Town is also used as the connection for WV Rt. 9 which enters the north end of Town from the west and heads east out of Town to the south. TR-3 Bridges Due to the terrain, elevation, and number of waterways, bridges play a key role in improvements and expansions to the road network in Morgan County. An assessment of bridge sufficiency ratings was completed in 1984 as part of the overall traffic volume studies, to determine how increased traffic would impact these crossings. From that evaluation six bridges were identified as needing improvements in order to be sufficient in handling projected traffic demand and maintaining a safe passable structure. Since that time only one of the listed bridges has been upgraded. None of the currently listed State transportation improvement projects includes the remaining five bridges identified in the study as needing to be upgraded. Table 3-2 WVDOT Highway Improvement Program Route Location Improvement Cost Year CO-002 Fairview Drive Cont Paving 134,000 2006 CO-522/13 Wilkes Street Improvement 293,000 2006 US-522 Berkeley Springs-VA RD Resurfacing 600,000 2007 US-522 Berkeley Springs-VA RD Resurfacing 300,000 2006 WV-009 Fishers Ford Bridge Reconstruction 2.8 million 2006 WV-009 Paw Paw-Great Cacapon RD Cont Paving 285,000 2007 WV-009 Cacapon-Berkeley Springs Resurfacing 500,000 2010 WV-009 Berkeley Springs-Hedgesville Cont Paving 120,000 2009 WV-009 Berkeley Springs-Hedgesville Cont Paving 200,000 2008 WV-009 Great Cacapon-Berkeley Springs Other 1.24 million 2008 US 522 Hancock Bridge Clean & Paint 2.1 Million N/A CO-8/18 Packing House Br.
Recommended publications
  • The Berkeley County Comprehensive Plan
    Berkeley County Comprehensive Plan Update June 2006 Berkeley County Planning Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 – The Role and Purpose of Planning ....................................1 What the Comprehensive Plan does:.................................................2 Relationship between the Comprehensive Plan and Other Plans in Berkeley County..................................................................................2 Recommended Review Process..........................................................2 Chapter 2 – An Introduction to Berkeley County..................................5 Location and Regional Setting ............................................................5 A Brief History of Berkeley County........................................................5 Quick Facts About Berkeley County ...................................................7 Chapter 3 – Key Trends and Issues ..........................................................9 Demographics ......................................................................................10 Housing...................................................................................................10 Land Use.................................................................................................11 Transportation .......................................................................................11 Community Facilities and Services ....................................................11 Economics .............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley County Comprehensive Plan Update June 2016
    Berkeley County Comprehensive Plan Update June 2016 Chapter 7 – The Transportation Plan The Transportation Plan Goal The transportation plan focuses on providing an efficient and well maintained transportation system to maximize the accessibility and safe movement of people and goods by cooperative transportation planning with Berkeley County; Jefferson County; Morgan County; Washington County, MD; Frederick County, VA; the State of West Virginia; the State of Maryland, and the Commonwealth of Virginia. The following related objectives are based upon the goals identified in the 2006 Comprehensive Plan. Objectives Work with West Virginia Division of Highways (WVDOH) and appropriate agency representatives from surrounding regions to ensure completion of existing and planned highway projects that will improve mobility throughout Berkeley County. Coordinate with the Hagerstown Eastern Panhandle Metropolitan Planning Organization (HEPMPO) in developing a Long Range Transportation Plan that considers all modes of transportation. Work with government agencies, the public and private groups to relieve congestion throughout the roadway system to improve commuter and freight movement. Encourage alternative forms of transportation by creating livable communities through the implementation of workable communities and transit oriented communities. Assist with corridor planning for improvements to WV Route 9 from Virginia to US 522 and WV Route 51 from Charles Town to WV45 and onto US 522. Explore alternative ways of obtaining the necessary rights-of-way needed for improvements, when acquisition is a challenge, to lower the costs of the projects. Pursue gaining authority to issue transportation bonds for needed road improvements. Continue working with legislative leaders and the WVDOH to prioritize the completion of identified projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley County Commercial Solid Waste Facility Siting Plan
    iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ...... ..... ...... .. ..... .. ...... ......... .... ........ .... ... ... ... ...... ... .. .. .. ... .. ... ... ... .... ....... .. ... .. ... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS .... .. ... .. .. ....... .... .................. .............. ..... .... .............. .... .. .. ..... .... iii LIST OF APPENDICES .... ..... ....... ...... .... .......................... ........................... ..... ... ..... ... ... iv SUMMARY ..... ... .. ... .. ........ ..... ... ... ......... ........ .. ................ ... ................. ................. ....... 1 PROVISIONS OF THE BERKELEY COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE LITTER AND SOLID WASTE CONTROL PLAN ..................... ............. ... .. .. .... ... ... ... .. .... .. .... ... ... .. .. .. .... .... .... ... .. .... .. ... .. 3 MINIMUM STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS .... .. .. ... .. ....... ............ ...... .. .. .. .... .. .... ....... .... 6 TITLE 54 SERIES 4 DEFINITIONS ... ..... ... .. .... .. ........ ... ......... ...... .... ........ ... ......... .. ...... .. .. ...7 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION ... ... ....... .. ..... .. ......................... .. ..... ... ..... .......... 9 PRESENT CONDITIONS AND RATIONALE OF ZONES ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .......... ....... ...... .. ... .... ..21 CLASS A LANDFILLS .... ..... ................... .. .. ....... .................. ... ... .. .. ............. .. ..... .... .......... 67 CLASS B LANDFILLS .. ... .. .. ... .. ....... ... ......... ..... .... ...... .. ........ .. ....... ... .... ..................... ..
    [Show full text]
  • BRIGLIAHUNDLEY,C Courtney B
    Case 3:19-cv-00054-GMG Document 1-2 Filed 04/12/19 Page 2 of 13 PageID #: 34 BRIGLIAHUNDLEY,c Courtney B. Harden Direct Dial: (703) 883-0449 [email protected] April 9, 2019 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL Roxul USA, Inc. Attn: Trent Ogilivie, President 4594 Cayce Road Byhalia Mississippi 38611 And Roxul USA, Inc. Attn: Kenneth Cammarato Registered Agent 4594 Cayce Road Byhalia Mississippi 38611 Re: On behalf of Jefferson County Schools Board of Education Offer to purchase Roxul USA, Inc. property located at 665 Northport Ave, Ranson, West Virginia pursuant to West Virginia Code Sections 18-5-8 and 54-2-1, et seq. Dear Mr. Ogilivie: This firm represents the interest of the Jefferson County Schools Board of Education ("JCS"). JCS has determined the need for a Regional Student Support Center to meet the educational needs of the community. The property is anticipated to accommodate the following programmatic components: ■ Handicap accessible, sensory playground equipment ■ ADA Accessible Athletic facilities for special needs populations housed on site ■ Mental Health and other physical health related facilities ■ Alternative education for expansion of the Opportunity Learning Center program ■ Child care center for both student training in child care careers and student parents who require child care to complete their education ■ Therapeutic center for social emotional support including clinical staff and trauma sensitive structures and equipment ■ Virtual School Center ■ Special Education Transition Facility (currently Lally House) ■ Residential facility for populations housed on site for future expansion ■ K-12 Transitional school ■ Homebound services facility ■ STEM center for gifted services 1921 Gallows Road • Suite 750 • Tysons Corner, VA 22182 • T: 703-883-0880 • F: 703-883-0899 www.brigliahundley.com Case 3:19-cv-00054-GMG Document 1-2 Filed 04/12/19 Page 3 of 13 PageID #: 35 Roxul USA, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson County, West Virginia: an Interpretation of a Rural Farmstead
    Bednarchuk UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research IX (2006) Early Nineteenth Century Consumer Preferences at the Mount Pleasant Site (46Jf215) Jefferson County, West Virginia: An Interpretation of a Rural Farmstead Michael A. Bednarchuk Faculty Sponsor: Timothy McAndrews, Department of Sociology/Archaeology ABSTRACT At the turn of the nineteenth century, consumer preference for purchasable items among European Americans was being influenced by many factors including the Industrial Revolution, the ascendancy of Romanticism, Jeffersonian republicanism and by extension the Enlightenment. The Mount Pleasant Site (46Jf215) located in the Route 9 highway corridor of Jefferson County, West Virginia, was an extended Phase II excavation that exposed a late eighteenth to early nineteenth century house site and accompanying rock quarry. The extensive assemblage of over 35,000 artifacts and corresponding excavation of 172 1 x 1 m (3.3 x 3.3 ft.) units allows for further interpretation of material remains to augment the analysis of the final report. Possible motivational influences on the inhabitant’s buying preferences as reflected in observable consumption patterns are explored. Comparisons are made with several sites reported in the immediate vicinity including Harpers Ferry and a still extant eighteenth century German- American house site. Percentages of ceramic types with datable periods of popularity are used as a proxy for comparing consumption patterns at the Mount Pleasant Site with these other locations. Decoration frequencies indicate a possible acceptance of the ceramic fashion cycle with rural conservatism also a playing a role. INTRODUCTION Archaeology has as a central tenet the interpretation of patterns in the material remains of past cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • SHEPHERDSTOWN BATTLEFIELD Special Resource Study / Boundary Study / National Park Service U.S
    SHEPHERDSTOWN BATTLEFIELD SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY / BOUNDARY STUDY / National Park Service ENVIRONMENTAL AssEssMENT U.S. Department of the Interior WEST VIRGINIA AND MARYLAND August 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior Shepherdstown Battlefield West Virginia and Maryland August 2014 Special Resource Study / Boundary Study / Environmental Assessment HOW TO COMMENT ON THIS STUDY Comments are welcome and will be accepted for a HAND DELIVERY: minimum of 30 days after this study is published and distributed. While comments may be submitted by any one Written and/or verbal comments may be made at public of the following methods commenters are encouraged to meetings. The dates, times, and locations of public use the Internet, if possible. meetings will be announced in the media and on the Planning, Environment, and Public Comment site (Web MAIL: address above) following release of this document. National Park Service Please submit only one set of comments. Denver Service Center – Planning Jordan Hoaglund, Project Manager Before including your address, telephone number, e-mail PO Box 25287 address, or other personal information in your comment, Denver, CO 80225-0287 you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made ONLINE: publicly available at any time. Although you can ask us http://parkplanning.nps.gov/shba in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The Department of the Interior, National Park Service study criteria to evaluate the suitability and feasibility (NPS), has prepared this special resource study / boundary of the addition.
    [Show full text]
  • Division I—Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2009
    [House Appropriations Committee Print] Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (H.R. 1105; Public Law 111–8) DIVISION I—TRANSPORTATION, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2009 (1941) VerDate Nov 24 2008 04:55 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00677 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A494P2.XXX A494P2 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING VerDate Nov 24 2008 04:55 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00678 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\A494P2.XXX A494P2 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING CONTENTS, DIVISION I Page Legislative Text: Title I—Department of Transportation .......................................................... 1947 Title II—Department of Housing and Urban Development .......................... 1982 Title III—Related Agencies .............................................................................. 2015 Title IV—General Provisions—This Act ......................................................... 2019 Explanatory Statement: Title I—Department of Transportation .......................................................... 2023 Title II—Department of Housing and Urban Development .......................... 2115 Title III—Related Agencies .............................................................................. 2156 Title IV—General Provisions—This Act ......................................................... 2158 (1943) VerDate Nov 24 2008 06:05 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00679 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 0483 E:\HR\OC\A494P2.XXX A494P2 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING VerDate Nov 24 2008 06:05 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 047494 PO 00000 Frm 00680 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 0483 E:\HR\OC\A494P2.XXX A494P2 rfrederick on PROD1PC65 with HEARING [CLERK’S NOTE: Five sections which precede division I in the Omnibus Appropriations Act apply to all divisions of the Act, in- cluding this one. The text of these sections is as follows:] SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Morgan County Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee
    MORGAN COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PAGE PURPOSE OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INT-1 ROLE OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INT-4 MORGAN COUNTY DESCRIPTION INT-5 HISTORY OF MORGAN COUNTY INT-5 HISTORIC POPULATION INT-6 COMPREHENSIVE POLICIES INT-7 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES INT-9 IMPLEMENTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INT-11 FUNDING OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INT-12 CHAPTER 1 – LAND USE INTRODUCTION LU-1 EXISTING LAND USE LU-1 LAND USE ZONING REGULATIONS LU-4 POPULATION TRENDS LU-5 BUILDING INTENSITY LU-7 POPULATION PROJECTIONS LU-9 FACTORS AFFECTING GROWTH LU-11 LAND USE PLANNING TOOLS LU-12 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES LU-13 CHAPTER 2 – POPULATION AND HOUSING INTRODUCTION PH-1 DEMOGRAPHICS PH-1 POPULATION PH-3 HOUSING PH-6 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES PH-11 CHAPTER 3 – TRANSPORTATION INTRODUCTION TR-1 ROADS TR-1 BRIDGES TR-4 OTHER ROAD DEFICIENCIES TR-4 MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS TR-5 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITIES TR-7 SCENIC BYWAYS TR-8 HIKING AND BIKING TRAILS TR-9 RAILROADS TR-10 AIR FACILITIES TR-11 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TR-11 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES TR-12 CHAPTER 4 – PUBLIC UTILITIES & INFRASTRUCTURE INTRODUCTION INF-1 WATER INF-1 SEWER INF-4 WATER AND SEWER PLAN LIMITATIONS INF-6 CHESAPEAKE BAY INITIATIVE INF-10 SOLID WASTE INF-12 MISCELLANEOUS UTILITIES INF-14 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES INF-14 CHAPTER 5 – PUBLIC SERVICES INTRODUCTION PS-1 EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES PS-1 LIBRARIES PS-5 POLICE PS-6 FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE PS-7 MEDICAL SERVICES PS-9 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PS-11 LOCAL GOVERNMENT PS-12 ANIMAL CONTROL PS-13 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
    N PS Form 10-900 (Rev. 10-90) o United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. Name of Property historic name Newcomer Mansion other names/site number 2. Location street & number 1735 Douglas Grove Road not for publication N/A city or town Martinsburg vicinity t/ state West Virginia _code WV county Berkeley code 003 zip code 25951 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this _ _ nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic meets the procedural andorofessional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property */ meets _ ieet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant __ nationally __ statewide _ _ _ See continuation shpet fo/ additional comments.) of certifying official/Title Dat State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property ___ meets __ does not meet the National Register criteria. ( __ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of commenting official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I herebfy certify that this property is: Date of Action . / entered in the National Register See continuation sheet. determined eligible for the National Register __ See continuation sheet. determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain): Newcomer Mansion Berkeley County, WV Name of Property County and State 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Warrants in Berkeley County Wv
    Warrants In Berkeley County Wv Insecure or cuneiform, Milo never hold any headrooms! Straticulate and phasmid Ricard shingles her Morbihan itemize belligerently or Judaise unrightfully, is Harman ineffaceable? Disillusioning Luis extradite cross-legged, he overpopulates his inclinations very symmetrically. Northern District and West Virginia Department his Justice. Dyaha Yousif, is believed to be helping Felan evade police. Head of Berkeley County Macy's facility arrested West. Thank those that are berkeley police department page as well as probation and is my executor hereafter named as a hotel. Office warrant lookup warrants, wv public information found. Thank dust for showing interest through our state Police Academy. Berkeley County West Virginia on a vicinity of Opequon Creek and settled there. The warrant searches at health commission. Magistrates also update emergency protective orders in cases involving domestic violence. The phone doctor for Berkeley County Probate Court is 43-719-4519 and the fax. Officer Armel also testified that Mrs. Berkeley county arrests record. View city hospital in these options to ensure that mr. WV State Archives County Court Records Microfilm Holdings. Martinsburg city in county warrant was found on pay raises for warrants in berkeley county wv arrest warrant for press conference monday morning. West Virginia Mugshots Arre St cividalecity. This webpage may be found tim to police issue warrants in berkeley county wv arrest history, some important information. President copenhaver reviewed the employee has been arrested shirley. Berkeley County level Search provides detailed information on open an individual has six outstanding warrants for navigate or prevent arrest in Berkeley County, South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Snodgrass Tavern (Boundary Increase) Berkeley County, WV Section Number Illustrations Page 10____
    NPS Form 10-900 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. Name of Property historic name Snodgrass Tavern (Boundary Increase) other names/site number 2. Location street & number N side Hedgesville Road (West Virginia Route 9), W of Hedgesville not for publication N/A city or town Hedgesville___________________________________ vicinity */ state West Virginia code WV county Berkeley code 003 zip code 25427 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this i/ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets theiSrercedural and professiorial requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property >/ meets__ does not meet the National/Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant __ nationally __ statewide */ locally. (__ See continuation sheet for additional coijnmerjjs.) * / / SJfgrjzfture of certifying official/Title State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property __ meets __ does not meet the National Register criteria. (__ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of commenting official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I hereb/ certify that this property is: Date of Action entered in the National Register See continuation sheet. determined eligible for the National Register See continuation sheet. determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain): »noagrass i avern (Dounaary increase) Name of Property County and State 5.
    [Show full text]
  • May I 0 2010
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, EX REL. ROBERT WAKENIGHT, MAY I 0 2010 Petitioner, RORY L. PERRY 11, CLERK • SUI?BEME COlJRT OF APPEALS gmal Jl.lYlSW~\l>1VIRGINIA , vs. lilbmtcrrr:""'r~;s:rg----··...i THE HONORABLE DAVID H. SANDERS, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA, and MELANIE MAINES, Respondents. RESPONSE OF MELANIE MAINES IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION BY ROBERT WAKENIGHT Melanie Maines, individually and as parent and next friend of Ross Wilson, a minor, and Riley Wilson, a minor, Respondents, by Counsel J . t?t. ~ ~W.Va. Bar # 571 ~~W.Va. Bar # 6821 Peter A. Pentony P.O. Box 3612 W.Va. Bar # 7769 Shepherdstown, West Virginia 25443 Law Office of F. Samuel Byrer, PLLC P.O. Box 597 Charles Town, West Virginia 25414 1 I. Summary of Argument Petitioner Robert Wakenight is a drunk driver who had several alcoholic drinks at his home in Maryland, then left his home specifically to travel to a Jefferson County, West Virginia, strip club called "Divas." Wakenight spent approximately five hours in the strip club in Jefferson County, West Virginia, drinking Corona beer and gin and tonic with Beefeater's gin. He then left the bar to drive back to his home near Frederick, Maryland. He was drunk when he left the West Virginia strip club. He drove for fifteen or twenty minutes and, just after crossing into the State of Maryland on his way home from the strip club, lost control of his vehicle, crossed into the opposite lane, and crashed head-on into a car in which West Virginia resident Melanie Maines was a passenger.
    [Show full text]