DOCSLIB.ORG

Contribution to the Knowledge of Snakeflies (Raphidioptera) of Turkey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contribution to the Knowledge of Snakeflies (Raphidioptera) of Turkey Annals of the Upper Silesian Museum (Entomology) 14-15: 43–58. Bytom 29.12.2007 ROLAND DOBOSZ Contribution to the knowledge of snakeflies (Raphidioptera) of Turkey Abstract. The faunistic review of 24 species and subspecies of Raphidioptera of Turkey including new data is given. Their occurrence is given based on original literature data. Six species – Pheostigma (Phe- ostigma) pilicollis, Pheostigma (Crassoraphidia) cyprica, Pheostigma (Pontoraphidia) rhodopica, Di- chrostigma flavipes, Xanthostigma xanthostigma, Parainocellia (Parainocellia) braueri are recorded as new for Turkish fauna. Key words: Insecta, Neuropterida, Raphidioptera, new data, faunistics, Turkey. The Raphidioptera is a small order of Neuropterida. The order comprises only two fam- ilies: Raphidiidae and Inoceliidae, it contains more than 215 species in the world. The range of Raphidioptera covers the Holarctic, except the north-eastern parts of North America. All Raphidioptera represents arboreal faunal elements (ASPÖCK, 1987; ASPÖCK et al. 1991). The Western Palaearctic harbors the highest number of species (about 110). Most of them are restricted to small areas. Before the year 1960, snakeflies of Turkey were very poorly investigated. The history of research on Raphidioptera of Turkey was limited to a few papers, mainly with descrip- tion of the new taxa (ALBARDA, 1891; NAVÁS, 1914, 1915; ESBEN-PETERSEN, 1932). More organised exploration and research on this group of insects started at the beginning of the nineteen sixties. FRANZ RESSL, HUBERT RAUSCH and URLIKE & HORST ASPÖCK carried several expeditions to Anatolia, which were particularly devoted to field work on Raphidioptera of Turkey. This huge material, investigated with respect to its taxonomy, systematics, biology and chorology is presented in few publications (ASPÖCK H., 1987; ASPÖCK H. & ASPÖCK U., 1964, 1965a, 1965b, 1966a, 1966b, 1967a, 1967b; ASPÖCK U. & ASPÖCK H., 1969). The snakeflies fauna of Turkey was investigated by several others neuropterologists, including Turkish specialists, (ASPÖCK H., ASPÖCK U. & SENGONCA, 1976, 1978; CANBULAT & KIYAK, 2006; CANBULAT & ÖZSARAÇ, 2004; GEPP, 1974; POPOV, 1977, 1992; Şengonca, 1979). From the 34 species and subspecies known from Turkey to present time, 19 species are endemic (ASPÖCK et al., 2001). This study on Raphidioptera is based on the original material (more than 1200 speci- mens) collected in the years 1998–2006, during entomological expeditions of the Upper Silesian Museum and Silesian Entomological Society. The authors based also on a small collection of snakeflies from Turkey preserved in the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Sankt-Petersburg. 43 Pheostigma (Pheostigma) pilicollis (STEIN, 1863) (Fig. 1) MATERIAL EXAMINED: 2 ♂♂ 4 ♀♀ - Kırklareli, 12-13 V 2001, Yenice env. pass 41º45’N/27º40’E, NE of Pinarhisar, R. DOBOSZ; 2 ♂♂ 1 ♀ - Kırklareli, 29 V 2002, Yenice env. pass 41º45’N/27º40’E, NE of Pinarhisar, R. DOBOSZ. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION: Greece, Bulgaria, Macedonia (ASPÖCK et al., 2001). Monocentric, Balkano-Ponto-Mediter- ranean faunal element. REMARKS: New for Turkey. Pheostigma (Crassoraphidia) cyprica (HAGEN, 1867) (Fig. 1) MATERIAL EXAMINED: 1 ♀ - Mersin, 11 V 1998, env. of Aydınlar 36º48’N/34º10’E, 25 km N of Erdemli, ce- dar forest, Jerzy Szypuła; 1 ♂ - Mersin, 12 V 1998, env. of Aydınlar 36º48’N/34º10’E, 25 km N of Erdemli, cedar forest, Roman Królik; 1 ♂ - Alanya, 14 V 1998, Gündogmus 36º50’N/32º01’E, 27 km N of Alanya, Jerzy Szypuła; 1 ♀ - Alanya, 15 V 1998, Akseki 37º03’N/31º48’E, Roman Królik; 1 ♂ - Konya, 7 VI 2000, Uğurlu 37º25’N/31º40’E, 30 km S Beyşehir, R. Dobosz; 2 ♂♂ - Mersin, 9-12 VI 2000, 3 km S of Aydınlar 36º44’N/34º08’E, 1400 m, 25 km N of Erdemli, cedar forest, part.: Quercus sp., Cedrus sp., R. Dobosz; 4 ♂♂ 4 ♀♀ - Mersin, 21-22 VI 2004, S of Avgadi vill. 36º41’N/34º10’E, 1000 m a.s.l., 16 km N of Erdemli, oak forest, R. Dobosz; 4 ♀♀ - Mersin, 9-11 VI 2005, Aydınlar N of Erdemli 36º45’N/34º08’E, 1390 m a.s.l., cedar forest, R. Dobosz. Fig. 1. New localities of: ■ – Pheostigma (Ph.) pilicollis, ● – Pheostigma (Crassoraphidia) cyprica in Turkey. 44 GENERAL DISTRIBUTION: Cyprus, Lebanon (ASPÖCK et al., 2001). Cyprio-Syrian faunal element REMARKS: New for Turkey. Pheostigma (Crassoraphidia) knappi (H. ASPÖCK & U. ASPÖCK, 1967) MATERIAL EXAMINED: 1 ♂ 3 ♀♀ - Mersin, 28-30 V 2001, 3 km S of Aydınlar 36º44’N/34º08’E, N of Erdemli, cedar forest, R. Dobosz; 1 ♂ - Kırklareli, 4-5 VI 2001, 7 km S İğneada 41º49’N/27º57’E, 25 m a.s.l., R. Dobosz. DISTRIBUTION IN TURKEY: Bilecik (Şengonca, 1979); Burdur, Denizli (CANBULAT & KIYAK, 2006) GENERAL DISTRIBUTION: SW and S Turkey (ASPÖCKE et al., 2001). Monocentric, Anatolo-Ponto-Mediterranean fau- nal element REMARKS: This species is new for European part of Turkey (Kırklareli) and new for Mersin province. Pheostigma (Crassoraphidia) klimeschiella H. Aspöck, U. ASPÖCK & RAUSCH, 1982 MATERIAL EXAMINED: 1 ♂ 1 ♀ - Antalya, 14 V 2005, Karamanbeli Geçidi 36º57’N/30º10’E, 1342 m a.s.l., 14 km S of Korkuteli, Juniperus sp., R. Dobosz; 1 ♂ - Antalya, 14-15 V 2005, SW of Avlanbeli Geçidi 36º31’N/29º59’E, 1330 m a.s.l., 26 km W of Elmalı, R. Dobosz; 1 ♂ - Antalya, 15 V 2005, NW of Avlanbeli Geçidi 36º34’N/29º58’E, 1025 m a.s.l., 20 km S of Elmalı, R. Dobosz; 1 ♂ - Antalya, 16-17 V 2005, Güğübeli pass 36º51’N/29º45’E, 1820 m a.s.l., 18 km NW of Elmalı, R. Dobosz. DISTRIBUTION IN TURKEY: Antalya (CANBULAT & KIYAK, 2006) GENERAL DISTRIBUTION: SW Turkey (ASPÖCKE et al., 2001). Monocentric, Anatolo-Ponto-Mediterranean faunal ele- ment. Pheostigma (Magnoraphidia) robusta (H. ASPÖCK & U. ASPÖCK, 1966) MATERIAL EXAMINED: 1 ♂ - Balikeşir, 20 V 2005, 12 km S of Balya 39º38’N/27º32’E, 290 m a.sl., R. Dobosz. DISTRIBUTION IN TURKEY: Kızılcahamam (ASPÖCK & ASPÖCK, 1966b) 45 GENERAL DISTRIBUTION: W, NW, SW and NE Turkey (ASPÖCKE et al., 2001). Expansive, monocentric Anatolo-Ponto- Mediterranean faunal element. REMARKS: New for Balikeşir province. Pheostigma (Pontoraphidia) pontica (ALBARDA, 1891) MATERIAL EXAMINED: 2 ♂♂ 1 ♀ - Bitlis, 24 VI 1997, Nemrut Dağı, Lake Van, 20 km NNW of Tatvan, B. Koro- tyaev (ZIN, St. Petersbourg); 1 ♂ - Bingol, 9 VI 1999, Geçidi, 30 km WNW Bingol, M. Volkovich, M. Dolgovskaya (ZIN, St. Petersbourg); 1 ♂ - Tunceli, 17-19 VI 2002, road from Pülümür to Tunceli 39º30’N/39º54’E-39º07’N/39º32’E, R. Dobosz; 13 ♂♂ 13 ♀♀ - Muş, 6-9 VI 2002, Buğlan Geçidi 38º55’N/41º13’E, 1640 m a.s.l., ca 15 km E of Solhan, R. Dobosz; 1 ♂ - Tunceli, 17-19 VI 2002, road from Pülümür to Tunceli 39º30’N/39º54’E- 39º07’N/39º32’E, R. Dobosz; 5 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ - Ankara, 6 VI 2004, 6 km NW of Kızılcahamam 40º31’N/32º36’E, 1010 m a.s.l., R. Dobosz; 2 ♂♂ 3 ♀♀ -Tunceli, 16-17 VI 2004, 12 km S of Pülümür 39º25’N/39º50’E, 1300 m a.s.l., R. Dobosz; 7 ♂♂ 1 ♀ - Tunceli, 16 VI 2004, 3 km N of Pülümür 39º32’N/39º54’E, 1700 m a.s.l., R. Dobosz; 1 ♂ - Erzurum, 13 VI 2004, S of Kop Geçidi 40º00’N/40º32’E, 2000 m a.s.l., 18 km NW of of Aşkale, R. Dobosz; 2 ♂♂ 7 ♀♀ - Muş, 10-12 VI 2004, Buğlan Geçidi 38º56’N/41º09’E, 1800 m a.s.l., 10 km E of Solhan, R. Dobosz; 15 ♂♂ 19 ♀♀ - Adıyaman, 16 VI 2005, Nemrut Daği N.P., top 37º58’N/38º44’E, 1955 m a.s.l., R. Dobosz; 2 ♂♂ - Bolu, 24 V 2006, Abant Lake, 700 m a.s.l., P. Białooki. DISTRIBUTION IN TURKEY: Afyon (ESBEN-PETERSEN, 1932), Erdschias (?) (ASPÖCK & ASPÖCK, 1965a); Bitlis (Gepp, 1974); Kirşehir (CANBULAT & ÖZSARAÇ, 2004); Isparta (CANBULAT & KIYAK, 2006) GENERAL DISTRIBUTION: Turkey, Armenia (ASPÖCKE et al., 2001). Expansive, monocentric, Ponto-Caspian faunal element. REMARKS: New data form Bingol, Tunceli, Muş, Ankara, Erzurum, Bolu and Adıyaman provinces. Pheostigma (Pontoraphidia) setulosa setulosa (H. ASPÖCK & U. ASPÖCK, 1967) MATERIAL EXAMINED: 1 ♂ 1 ♀ - Isparta, 2 VI 2001, 10 km E Bağkonak 38º14’N/31º20’E, 1650 m a.s.l., Sultan Dağılari, Salix sp., R. Dobosz; 5 ♂♂ - İzmir, 12- 13 V 2005, env. of Boz Dağ 38º22’N/ 28º04’E, 1094 m a.s.l., 18 km N of Ödemiş, R. Dobosz; 8 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ - Muğla, 17 V 2005, S of Ceyhan 36º45’N/29º37’E, 1600 m a.s.l., 26 km W of Elmalı, R. Dobosz; 2 ♂♂ 5 ♀♀ - Kütahia, 19 V2005, 10 km E of Tavşanlı 39º32’N/29º36’E, 980 m a.s.l., 20 km W of Kü- tahia, R. Dobosz 46 DISTRIBUTION IN TURKEY: Isparta (CANBULAT & KIYAK, 2006) GENERAL DISTRIBUTION: Bulgaria, Hungary, Macedonia, Turkey (ASPÖCK et al., 2001). Expansive, polycentric Bal- kano-Anatolo-Ponto-Mediterranean faunal element. REMARKS: New for İzmir, Muğla, Kütahia provinces. Pheostigma (Pontoraphidia) rhodopica (KLAPÁLEK, 1894) (Fig. 2) MATERIAL EXAMINED: 2 ♂♂ 4 ♀♀ - Kırklareli, 4-5 VI 2000, Yenice env. pass 41º44’N/27º38’E, 16 km NE of Pinarhisar, R. DOBOSZ; 5 ♂♂ 7 ♀♀ - Kırklareli, 12-13 V 2001, Yenice env. pass 41º45’N/ 27º40’E, NE of Pinarhisar, R. DOBOSZ; 5 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ - Kırklareli, 29 V 2002, Yenice env. pass 41º45’N/27º40’E, NE of Pinarhisar, R. DOBOSZ; 1 ♂ 2 ♀♀ - Kırklareli, 24-25 VI 2002, 7 km S İğneada 41º49’N/27º57’E, R. DOBOSZ; 2 ♂♂ 5 ♀♀ - Kırklareli, 24 VI 2002, Yenice env. pass 41º45’N/27º40’E, NE of Pinarhisar, R. DOBOSZ; 2 ♀♀ - Kırklareli, 13-14 VII 2004, “Strandzha”, env. of Yenice 41º45’N/27º41’E, 700 m a.s.l., NE of Pinarhisar, R. DOBOSZ. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION: Bulgaria (ASPÖCKE et al., 2001). Expansive?, monocentric, Balkano-Anatolo-Ponto-Medi- terranean faunal element. REMARKS: This species is new for Turkey. Fig. 2. New localities of Pheostigma (Ph.) rhodopica in Turkey (european part). 47 Pheostigma (Aegoraphidia) raddai U. ASPÖCK & H. ASPÖCK, 1969 MATERIAL EXAMINED: 1 ♂ - İzmir, 12 V 2005, Boz Dağlari 38º18’N/28º04’E, 1050 m a.s.l., 10 km NE of Ödemiş, R.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000
    MiReKoc MIGRATION RESEARCH PROGRAM AT THE KOÇ UNIVERSITY ______________________________________________________________ MiReKoc Research Projects 2005-2006 Analyzing the Aspects of International Migration in Turkey by Using 2000 Census Results Yadigar Coşkun Address: Kırkkonoaklar Mah. 202. Sokak Utku Apt. 3/1 06610 Çankaya Ankara / Turkey Email: [email protected] Tel: +90. 312.305 1115 / 146 Fax: +90. 312. 311 8141 Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu 34450 Sarıyer Istanbul Turkey Tel: +90 212 338 1635 Fax: +90 212 338 1642 Webpage: www.mirekoc.com E.mail: [email protected] Table of Contents Abstract....................................................................................................................................................3 List of Figures and Tables .......................................................................................................................4 Selected Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction..........................................................................................................................................1 2. Literature Review and Possible Data Sources on International Migration..........................................6 2.1 Data Sources on International Migration Data in Turkey..............................................................6 2.2 Studies on International Migration in Turkey..............................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Structure, Crustal Architecture and Tectonic Evolution of the Anatolian-African Plate Boundary and the Cenozoic Orogenic
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230773503 Seismic Structure, Crustal Architecture and Tectonic Evolution of the Anatolian-African Plate Boundary and the Cenozoic Orogenic... Chapter in Geological Society London Special Publications · December 2009 DOI: 10.1144/SP327.8 CITATIONS READS 66 413 2 authors: Yildirim Dilek Eric Sandvol Miami University University of Missouri 352 PUBLICATIONS 8,128 CITATIONS 204 PUBLICATIONS 4,871 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Extensional Tectonics, Attendant Magmatism & Crustal Evolution in Collisional Orogenic Belts View project Eastern Turkey Seismic Experement View project All content following this page was uploaded by Yildirim Dilek on 13 March 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Seismic structure, crustal architecture and tectonic evolution of the Anatolian–African Plate Boundary and the Cenozoic Orogenic Belts in the Eastern Mediterranean Region YILDIRIM DILEK1* & ERIC SANDVOL2 1Department of Geology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA 2Department of Geology Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: The modern Anatolian–African plate boundary is represented by a north-dipping subduction zone that has been part of a broad domain of regional convergence between Eurasia and Afro–Arabia since the latest Mesozoic. A series of collisions between Gondwana-derived ribbon continents and trench-roll-back systems in the Tethyan realm produced nearly East– West-trending, subparallel mountain belts with high elevation and thick orogenic crust in this region.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Knowledge of Wild Edible Plants of Iğdır Province (East
    Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae DOI: 10.5586/asbp.3568 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Publication history Received: 2016-10-06 Accepted: 2017-11-15 Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants Published: 2017-12-28 of Iğdır Province (East Anatolia, Turkey) Handling editor Łukasz Łuczaj, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Rzeszów, Poland Ernaz Altundağ Çakır* Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Düzce University, 81620 Konuralp, Düzce, Funding Turkey This research was partially supported by the Research * Email: [email protected] Fund of Istanbul University (project No. 1441) and partially conducted at the author’s own expense. Abstract Iğdır Province is situated in the Eastern Anatolian Region of Turkey. Wild edible Competing interests plants and their utilization methods have not been previously documented there. No competing interests have been declared. Tis study was conducted during an ethnobotanical survey of Iğdır Province from 2007 to 2012, in the period from May to October, when plants were in their fower- Copyright notice ing and fruiting periods. Tere were 210 interviews carried out in 78 villages. Tis © The Author(s) 2017. This is an study provides information about 154 wild plant taxa belonging to 27 families that Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative have been used as foodstufs, spices, or hot drinks. Seventeen wild edible plants were Commons Attribution License, recorded for the frst time during this study. Eight endemic species were reported which permits redistribution, as used for their edibility, and new local names for plants were also recorded. Te commercial and non- cultural importance index was calculated for each taxon.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Notes
    Number 18 — May 2014 RESEARCH NOTES THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY Turkey's Presidential Prospects ASSESSING RECENT TRENDS Soner Cagaptay urkey’s incumbent Justice and Development who carried it to power. The CHP, most prominent Party (AKP) won the country’s March 30 local among the opposition parties, seems to be building T elections. In the run-up to the local elections, appeal among urban voters, especially those clustered parties ran nationwide campaigns, rallying voters in wealthy Turkish provinces around Istanbul. The not just behind mayoral and local council candidates traditionally rightist MHP has gained with some but also their national leaders and platforms, delib- disenchanted AKP supporters, along with centrist erately as a “signal” for national popularity. While a and center-right voters, especially in the country’s more-conventional analytical approach compares the middle-income provinces. The BDP, smallest of the parties’ performance in this election to their support four opposition parties and appealing to the Kurdish in the 2009 local elections, an unorthodox analytical vote, has less than 7 percent support, but the Kurd- approach compares this year’s turnout with the most ish nationalist vote could nonetheless be influential in recent 2011 general election results, when parties con- deciding the August presidential outcome by tipping tested for government. it toward either the AKP or its opponents. Most BDP Whichever angle one chooses, however, a new support is concentrated in southeastern Turkey. four-party system has emerged in Turkey, compris- Reading the Election Results ing the ruling AKP—a coalition of center-right and pro-business groups, Islamists, reformed Islamists, The conventional and unconventional analyses of the and conservatives—and the three opposition parties: March AKP victory play out as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethnobotanical Study in Midyat (Turkey), a City on the Silk Road Where Cultures Meet Ali Akgul1*, Ayfer Akgul2, Serdar G
    Akgul et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:12 DOI 10.1186/s13002-017-0201-8 RESEARCH Open Access An ethnobotanical study in Midyat (Turkey), a city on the silk road where cultures meet Ali Akgul1*, Ayfer Akgul2, Serdar G. Senol3, Hasan Yildirim3, Ozcan Secmen4 and Yunus Dogan5 Abstract Background: Studies of ethnobotanical usages in south-eastern Turkey are rare. To widen this field of knowledge, we conducted an ethnobotanical study in Midyat (Mardin Province), Turkey. Methods: The field study was completed during three years (2007–2010). Our aim was to document the ethnobotanical uses of local plants and to make an ethnobotanical inventory of uncommon plants using qualitative interviews. Results: During field studies, 368 voucher specimens were collected in the investigated area. Ninety-two traditionally used plant species were reported from Midyat and surrounding vicinities in Turkey. Among the 92 taxa (129 usages), 35% were used for medical purposes, 22% for food, 13% for animal fodder, 7% as ornamental plants and dyes, 6% as brooms, 4% for latex and as fragrance, 4% for herbal tea, molasses and wine preparation, 3% for agricultural purposes, and 6% for other purposes. Comparative assessment showed that Teucrium polium (0.51), Matricaria aurea (0.26), Alcea setosa (0.21), and Malva neglecta (0.21) have the highest recorded UVs, and the following taxa had UVs between 0.10–0.20: Anthemis cotula (0.12), Allium cepa (0.13), Alcea striata subsp. striata (0.14), Crupina crupinastrum (0.12), Papaver rhoeas (0.13), Salvia multicaulis (0.14), Thymbra spicata (0.11), and Vicia pannonica subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects in 2005 for Internally Displaced Kurds in Turkey
    Human Rights Watch March 2005 Vol. 17, No. 2(D) “Still critical” Prospects in 2005 for Internally Displaced Kurds in Turkey Summary......................................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction................................................................................................................................... 5 Obstacles to Return ...................................................................................................................... 7 Destruction of Infrastructure..................................................................................................7 Insecurity in Areas of Return..................................................................................................8 Village Guard System ............................................................................................................... 9 Unlawful Killings by Security Forces...................................................................................10 Assessing the Scale of the Problem..........................................................................................12 Unreliable Government Figures on Return........................................................................12 Under-recording Initial Displacement.................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Compensation Law with Respect to Internally Displaced People
    December 2006 Number 1 Unjust, Restrictive, and Inconsistent The Impact of Turkey’s Compensation Law with Respect to Internally Displaced People Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 Background..............................................................................................................5 Impact of the ECtHR on provisions for Turkey’s displaced ........................................9 Forced Conciliation ................................................................................................ 13 Trends since the Içyer Judgment ............................................................................ 15 Methods used by damage assessment commissions to reduce or avoid payment ..20 House price scales manipulated to reduce property values ...............................20 Arbitrary reductions in valuations......................................................................22 Underestimation of land holdings .....................................................................23 Insufficient compensation for orchards .............................................................26 Exclusion of stock and stockkeeping.................................................................27 Exaggeration of compensation or assistance already received...........................28 The single-person “rule” ...................................................................................29 The “rule” concerning children born away from the village
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects in 2005 for Internally Displaced Kurds in Turkey
    Human Rights Watch March 2005 Vol. 17, No. 2(D) “Still critical” Prospects in 2005 for Internally Displaced Kurds in Turkey Summary......................................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction................................................................................................................................... 5 Obstacles to Return ...................................................................................................................... 7 Destruction of Infrastructure..................................................................................................7 Insecurity in Areas of Return..................................................................................................9 Village Guard System .............................................................................................................10 Unlawful Killings by Security Forces...................................................................................11 Assessing the Scale of the Problem..........................................................................................13 Unreliable Government Figures on Return........................................................................13 Under-recording Initial Displacement.................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Steering Committee for Culture, Heritage and Landscape (Cdcpp)
    STEERING COMMITTEE FOR CULTURE, HERITAGE AND LANDSCAPE (CDCPP) CDCPP-Bu(2013)19 Strasbourg, 8 October 2013 4th meeting of the Bureau Strasbourg, 16-17 October 2013 CULTURAL POLICY IN TURKEY – NATIONAL REPORT DOCUMENT FOR INFORMATION Item 3.1 of the draft agenda Council of Europe European Programme of National Cultural Policy Reviews CULTURAL POLICY IN TURKEY NATIONAL REPORT Ankara October/2013 INDEX CULTURAL POLICY IN TURKEY – NATIONAL REPORT ..................................... i INDEX......................................................................................................................................... i TABLE INDEX......................................................................................................................... vi GRAPHICS INDEX................................................................................................................. vii PREFACE................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 3 2. LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF CULTURAL POLICY ................... 7 2.1. Fundamental Goals and Priorities in Cultural Policy.................................................. 7 2.1.1 The Constitution and Top Policy Documents....................................................... 7 2.1.2. Fundamental Aims and Targets ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia
    GEOLOGY OF EASTERN AND SOUTHEASTERN ANATOLIA İ. Enver ALTINLI Technical University of Istanbul INTRODUCTION. — The geological sheets to a scale of 1:100,000, mostly accompanied by professional reports, accomplished since the creation of the Mineral Research and Exploration Institute of Turkey (M.T.A. in short and in Turkish), are at present intended for a Geologic Map of Turkey to a scale of 1:500,000 in 21 sheets. Since 1954 the present author spent two years for each of the Van, Cizre and Erzurum sheets, doing actual field investigation, control, correlation, and compilation. The results now permit a comprehensive short paper for Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia, organized accord- ing to the known structural regions, which lays the foundations for detailed stratigraphic and structural future investigations. The writer is most indebted to the authorities of the M.T.A. Institute for assigning to him the study of this highly intricate and little known sector of the country, as well as for permitting him to publish the results in a reorganized form. The accompanying black and white geologic and tectonic maps need to be colored for better understanding. A long and irregular strip is missing in the base maps to the NE of Siirt province, and furthermore an offset is involved; these gaps must be taken into consideration in reading the geologic and tectonic maps, where the link is processed by dotted lines. GEOGRAPHY General The accompanying sketch map shows the natural regions and districts; almost the whole of the Eastern Anatolian region together with Upper Fırat (Euphrates) district, Erzurum - Kars district, Upper Murat district, Van district and Hakkari district, and the northern sector of the Southeastern Anatolian region together with Middle Fırat district, Dicle (Tigris) district enter into the area under discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • “BİNGÖL” There Are Several Myths About the Origin of City's Name, And
    ORIGIN OF “BİNGÖL” There are several myths about the origin of city’s name, and all are based on healing waters or lakes. Historically, Bingöl is named Cebel-ü Cur, Çapakçur, Çapakçur, Çevlik/Çolig. The first name of Bingöl is known to be Çapakçur. Evliya Çelebi, in Seyahatname, states that Çapakçur is named and established by Alexander the Great. According to the myth, even consulting his doctors to relieve unberable pain of him, Alexander the Great can not heal. Thereon he starts to look for adam’s ale which is believed to give immortality. Although he can not find the adam’s ale, he explores a river, which is believed to be raised by adam’s ale. After drinking from that river and thus relieving from his pain, he names the area Çapakçur: “River of Heaven” and builds a castle by the riverside of Murat river. In Islamic literature Bingöl is named Cebel-ü Cur. As lexical meaning, Cebel means mountain and Cur means stream, river. It is said that Cebel-ü Cur has eventually became Çapakçur. Bingöl was also named Çevlik, which means garden, yard. Çevlik is still being used today as Çolig by locals. The city, which was named Çapakçur until 1945, has been named Bingöl since then-as inspired by Bingöl Mountains- due to a legal regulation. Photo 1: General View of Bingöl Photo 2 : Sunrise on Bingöl HISTORY Although Bingöl has a rich history, we know little about the pre-Islamic era of her. Hurrians, seen on Eastern Anatolia Region in 3000BC., spread on a wide region, and had political and military struggles with Hittites; and these affected Bingöl until 2000BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Trend Analizi Yöntemleri Kullanılarak Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Aylık Yağış Miktarlarının Değerlendirilmesi
    Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi European Journal of Science and Technology Sayı 17, S. 807-822, Aralık 2019 No. 17, pp. 807-822, December 2019 © Telif hakkı EJOSAT’a aittir Copyright © 2019 EJOSAT Araştırma Makalesi www.ejosat.com ISSN:2148-2683 Research Article Trend Analizi Yöntemleri Kullanılarak Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Aylık Yağış Miktarlarının Değerlendirilmesi Serkan Şenocak1*, Muhammed Fatih Emek2 1 Atatürk Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü, Erzurum, Türkiye (ORCID: 0000-0002-4962-5349) 2 Karayolları 12. Bölge Müdürlüğü, Erzurum, Türkiye (ORCID: 0000-0001-7378-6460) (İlk Geliş Tarihi 1 Kasım 2019 ve Kabul Tarihi 26 Kasım 2019) (DOI: 10.31590/ejosat.646266) REFERENCE: Şenocak, S. & Emek, M.F. (2019). Trend Analizi Yöntemleri Kullanılarak Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Aylık Yağış Miktarlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (17), 807-822. Özet Bu çalışmada, Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi’ne düşen aylık ve yıllık toplam yağışların trend analizinin araştırılması hedeflenmiştir. Bu amaçla, Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü’nün 46 adet yağış gözlem istasyonundan alınan, 1960 ile 2013 yılları arasında değişen, verilere Run testi ve Pettitt testi uygulanarak homojenlik analizi yapılmıştır. Homojen olduğu belirlenen istasyonlara Mann – Kendall testi ve Spearman’ın Rho testi uygulanarak trend analizi incelenmiş, Sen’in eğim metodu kullanılarak trendlerin eğimi belirlenmiştir. Aylık toplam yağışların trend analizi değerlendirildiğinde yaz aylarında genellikle yağışların artan yönde eğilimde olduğu, kış aylarında ise azalan yönde eğilimde olduğu görülmüştür. Yazın Haziran ayında bölgede azalan yönde bir eğilim hâkimken, Temmuz ayında yerini artan yönde bir eğilime bırakmaktadır. Kasım ayı olduğunda ise bölgeye düşen aylık toplam yağışlarda tekrardan azalan yönde eğilim hakim olmaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi, Trend Analizi, Mann–Kendall Testi, Spearman Rho Testi, Sen Eğim Metodu.
    [Show full text]