CENSUS OF INDIA 2001
SERIES 14
MANIPUR
PROVISIONAL POPULATION TOTALS
Paper 2 of 2001
RURAL-URBAN DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION
Directorate of Census Operations, Manipur
PREFACE
This publication is the second in the series of publications to be brought out in connection with the results arising out of the population enumeration of the Census Of India 2001. The provisional total population, sex ratio, population in the age-group 0- 6 years and number of literates by males and females inrespect of the 9 districtsin Manipur have already been published in Provisional Population Totals, Paper 1 of 2001. The figures relating to the above information down to rural and urban areas of every sub-division within each district is now provided in this present publication. Besides giving data for each urban area according to the various size-classes of the towns, the publication also provides data on the comparative growth of the urban areas over the past few decades. The various concepts and definitions adopted in the Census of India, 2001 are also furnished along with the information relating to the changes in the component units of the Urban Agglomeration during 1991-2001. It is hoped that the data provided in this publication will be helpful to the Government and non-Government organis~tions in planning and research.
The publication of this Paper is the result of the sustained support and guidance of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner of India, Sri J.K.Bantia, to whom I am expressing my deep sense of gratitude. I would also like to express my thanks to Sri RG.Mitra, Dy. Registrar General (C&T) for the help and guidelenes extended to me and my staff at the various stages in the preparation of this publication.
Kh.Dinamani Singh,I.A.S Imphal, Director of Census Operations, the 5th Sept, 2001 Manipur
111
FIGURES AT A GLANCE MANIPUR
9 1. Number of districts
22,327 2. Area in sq. km.
Females 3. Total Population Persons Males 2,388,634 1,207,338 1,181,296
4. Population Growth (1991-2001) Absolute 551,485 Percentage 30.02
5. Population density ( per sq.km.) 107
6. Sex Ratio 978
Females 7. 0-6 Population Persons Males Absolute 312,691 159,448 153,243 Percentage 13.09 13.21 12.97
8. Literacy - Absolute 1,429,656 815,944 613,712 Rate 68.87 77.87 59.70
286,500 9. Urban Population 570,410 283,910
10. Percentage of Urban Population to the total population 23.88
11. No. of Urban Agglomeration 1
12. No. of Towns 33
124,379 13. Population of Imphal UA (capital city) 245,967 121,588
v
CONTENTS
Pages
Preface iii
Figures at a glance v
General note 1-12
Tables:
Table 1 Population, child population in the age-group 0-6 and literates by residence and sex - State, District, UA/CityfTown,2001 15-18
Table 2 Population, child population in the age-group 0-6 and literates by residence and sex - State, District,TahsilfTaluk, etc.200 1 19-25
Table 3 Percentage decadal growth, percentage of child population in the age-group 0-6 by residence and percentage of urban population to total population - State and District 2001 26-27
Table 4 Sex ratio of population and sex ratio of child population in the age-group 0-6 - State, District,TahsilITaluk etc. 2001 28-29
Table 5 Literacy rates by residence and sex - State, District, TahsilITaluk 2001 30-31
Table 6 Population, percentage decadal growth 1991-2001, sex ratio, Literacy by sex - UA, City and Town 2001 32-35
Appendix -1 to Table - 6 Population, child population in the age-group 0-6 and literates by sex - Cities and Towns arranged in alphabetical order 2001 36-37
Appendix-2 to Table - 6 List of towns of 1991 declassified in 2001 and towns of 1991 merged with other towns in 2001 38
Table-7: Growth of urban population 1981-2001 39
.. Vll Statements:
Statement 1 Rural-urban distribution of population - India and States,200 1. 43-46
Statement 2 Number of statutory and census towns, 1981 and 1991 47
Statement 3 Ranking of districts by percentage of urban population, 1991 and 2001 48
Statement 4 Trends in urbanization, 1991-2001 49
Maps:
District-wise decadal growth rate of rural population, 1991-2001 53
District-wise percentage of urban population, 2001 54
District-wise decadal growth rate of urban population, 1991-2001 55
Charts and Diagrams:
Distribution of rural-urban population 1901 to 2001 59
Percentage decadal growth in urban population, 1901-1911 to 1991-2001 60
Distribution of population of UAs/cities/towns in different size classes, 1901 to 2001 61
Distribution of rural-urban population in districts, 2001 62
Vlll Acknowledgement
Drafting, compilation and supervision Sri S. Birendra Singh Assistant Director
Basic data Sri R.K. Dorendrajit Singh Investigator Grade II
Sri R. K. Manisana Singh Investigator Grade II
Smt. L. Santibala Devi Compiler
Mapping and Charts Sri M. Manimohon Meetei Cartographer
Sri R.K. Gogosana Singh Senior Draftsman
Sri W. Kumar Singh Senior Draftsman
Smt. Leimakhubi Dratfsman
Sri Th. Dhananjoy Singh Dratfsman
Computer Type Setting Sri L. Okendra Singh Compiler
Sri O. Jugindro Singh Proof Reader
Printing and Proof Reading Sri O. Jugindro Singh Proof Reader
GENERAL NOTE
GENERAL NOTE
As in the past censuses, the data generated from the 2001 Census will be presented for rural and urban areas seperately. Except for some minor variations, the concepts and definitions used for a place to be termed as rural or urban remain almost the same in all the censuses. The concepts used in 2001 Census are given below:
Rural: Rural areas mean all such areas which are not treated as urban. Usually villages constitute the rural areas. Villages are the smallest and the basic unit of administration and cover the entire revenue limits of the villages whether inhabited or uninhabited. Even where the revenue boundaries of the villages are not fixed or settled all the settlement areas whether temporary or permanent not forming part of any urban area are taken as rural. Where any specific area is excluded from the jurisdiction of a city/town, or where only some parts of a village have been included within the limits of a city/town, such excluded area or the remaining parts of such villages are also taken as rural.
Urban: The definition of an urban unit at the 2001 Census is as follows: a) All places with a municipality, corporation, cantonment board or notified town area committee, etc. b) All other places which satisfied the following criteria : i) A minimum population of 5,000 ; ii) At least 75 percent of the male working population engaged in non agricultural pursuits; and iii) A density of population of at least 400 per sq. km. (1,000 per sq. mile).
The same definition was adopted at the 1991 Census also. This will ensure comparability with previous censuses and provide the basis for analysis of urbanisation trends in the country. On the basis of the above criteria two distinct types of urban area emerge. The first type is a group of towns notified by the State Government under special Acts and is known as statutory towns. The second type is based on the fulfillment of the demographic criteria stated in (b) above and is known as Census Towns. While applying the test of occupation of the male working population male main workers engaged in the agricultural activities, namely, Cultivators, Agricultural Labourers and Livestock, Forestry, Fishing and Plantations, Orchards, etc. are excluded for computing the percentage of workers engaged in non-agricultural occupation.
3 All places which have been notified under law and have local bodies like municipal corporations, municipalities, municipal committees, municipal boards, municipal town committees, contonment boards, notified areas, notified area committees, Nagar Panchayats, town committees, town areas, town boards, town municipalities, sanitary boards, etc., irrespective of their demographic characteristics are included in the list of towns.
Urban Agglomeration: The concept of urban agglomerations adopted forthe 1981 and 1991 Censuses will continue for the 2001 Census also. According to this, an urban agglomeration is a continuous urban spread constituting a town and its adjoining urban outgrowths (OGs) or two or more physically contiguous towns together and any adjoining urban outgrowths of such towns. In some cases railway colonies, university campuses, port areas, military camps, etc. would have come up near a city or statutory town outside its statutory limits but within the revenue limits of a village or villages contiguous to the town. Each such individual area by itself may not satisfy the minimum population limit to quality it to be treated as an independent urban unit but may deserve to be clubbed with the towns as a continuous urban spread.
The following are the possible different situation in which urban agglomera- tions would be constituted: i) a city or town with one or more contiguous outgrowths; ii) two or more adjoining towns with their outgrowths; and iii) a city and one or more adjoining towns with their outgrowths all of which form a continuous spread.
For maintaining comparability with the 1991 Census data, it would be desirable to ensure that a place included in an urban agglomeration of 1991 is not taken out of the agglomeration now.
While the total area of an urban agglomeration is treated as one continuous urban spread for the purpose of overall size classification and analysis of the urban data, in reckoning the total number of towns (as distinguished from agglomerations) all individual urban areas that are reckoned as towns in their own right are treated as separate towns. The urban outgrowths which do not qualify to be treated as towns in their own right are not counted as individual towns but only as appendages of another recognised town.
Till 1961 , Manipur continued to have only 1 town, namely, Imphal. During the period from 1961 to 1971, Churachandpur, Thoubal, Kakching, Moirang, Nambol, Bishnupur, and Lamlai were notified as statutory towns by the State Government bringing the total number of towns in 1971 to 8. During the next decade, 23 more places were declared as urban under speCific Acts by the State Government. They are Mao, Karong
4 Senapati, Kangpokpi, Tamenglong, Ukhrul, Singngat, Moreh, Heirok, Sikhong Sekmai, Wangjing, Yairipok, Lilong (Thoubal), Sugnu, Lilong (Imphal West), Wangoi, Mayang Imphal, Samurou, Jiribam, Lamsang, Sekmai Bazar, Ningthoukhong, Kumbi and Oinam . Loktak Hydro Electric Town was also taken as a Census Town on account of the presence of a number of infra structures and urban amenities of the areas covered by the Project. In 1991 Census 7 towns were denotified by the State Govt. while 4 new statutory towns and 2 census towns were added as a net result of which the number of towns in that year stood at 31. In 2001 Census 4 rural areas were treated as new Census Towns while 1 Census Town of 1991, namely Churachandpur, was declassified as rural areas based on the demographic criteria of urban area.
List of Urban Areas: The list of towns adopted for 2001 Census is given below in alphabetical order:-
LIST OF TOWNS FOR 2001 CENSUS
SI.No. Name of Town Status of Town District 1 2 3 4 Statutory Towns: 1 Andro NP Imphal East 2 Bishnupur MCI Bishnupur 3 Heirok NP Thoubal 4 Imphal MCI Imphal West & Imphal East .s Jiribam MCI Imphal East 6 Kakching MCI Thoubal 7 Kakching Khunou NP Thoubal 8 Kumbi NP Bishnupur 9 Kwakta NP Bishnupur 10 Lamlai NP Imphal East 11 Lamshang NP Imphal West 12 Lilong (Imphal West) NP Imphal West 13 Lilong (Thoubal) NP Thoubal& Imphal West 14 Mayang Imphal NP Imphal West 15 Moirang MCI Bishnupur 16 Moreh NP Chandel 17 Nambol MCI Bishnupur & Imphal West 18 Ningthoukhong NP Bishnupur 19 Oinam NP Bishnupur
5 SI.No. Name of Town Status of Town District 1 2 3 4 Statutory Towns: 20 Samurou NP Imphal West & Thoubal 21 Sekmai Bazar NP Imphal West 22 Sikhong Sekmai NP Thoubal 23 Sugnu NP Thoubal 24 Thongkhong Laxmi Bazar NP Imphal West 25 Thoubal MCI Thoubal 26 Wangjing NP Thoubal 27 Wangoi NP Imphal West 28 Yairipok NP Thoubal
Non-Statutory Towns: 29 Khongman CT Imphal East 30 Lamjaotongba CT Imphal West 31 Naoriya Pakhanglakpa CT Imphal West 32 Porompat CT Imphal East 33 Torban ( Kshetri Leikai ) CT Imphal East
Abbreviations used in this publication: The following standardised abbreviations of civic status of cities/towns are used in this publication:
MCI Municipal Council NP Nagar Panchayat STC Small Town Committee CT Census Town UA Urban Agglomeration OG Out Growth M Municipality
Components of Imphal Urban Agglomeration: An urban agglomeration was first created in Manipur in 1991 under the nomenclature of Imphal UA consisting of Imphal city as the core town and Bijoy Govinda CT as adjoining town to which the office and industrial complex of Takyel was attached to as Takyel OG. The compenent units of Imphal UA have been expanded in 2001 to cover certain other areas having distinct urban infrastructures in and around the district headquaters of the newly created Imphal East District. Some other areas classified as Census Towns adjoining the Imphal M CI have also been taken as the component units of Imphal UA. A comparative picture ofthe units forming Imphal UA in 1991 and 2001 is placed below.
6 Component units in 1991 a) Imphal M [Imphal M CI in 2001 ] b) Bijoy Govinda CT [Bijoy Govinda CT and Takyel OG have been i) Takyel OG treated as outgrowths of Imphal M CI in 2001]
Component units in 2001 a) Imphal M CI i) Bijoy Govinda OG ii) Takyel OG iii) Porompat Plan Area OG iv) Kongkham Leikai OG b) Porompat CT c) Khongman CT d) Torban (Kshetri Leikai) CT e) Naoriya Pakhanglakpa CT
Rural-Urban Composition of Population: Out of a total population of 2,388,634 persons found in Manipur as per the provisional totals of 2001 Census, a total of 570,41 0 persons representing 23.88 percent ofthe total population are found residing in the urban areas. The corresponding figures in 1991 Census are 505,645 persons and 27.52 percent. It means that while the absolute number of urban dwellers has increased by 64,765 persons during 1991-2001 the proportion of urban population to the total population has declined by 3.64 percent in 2001 Census. The share of the rural sector, therefore, shows an increase by the same proportion during the period. The pattern of the rural-urban composition of the population at the state level for 1991 and 2001 is presented below.
Population Percentage to the Persons Males Females total population Rural 1991 1,331,504 682,395 649,109 72.48 2001 (provisional) 1,818,224 923,428 894,796 76.12 Absolute Increase 486,720 241,033 245,687
Urban 1991 505,645 255,964 249,681 27.52 2001 (provisional) 570,410 283,910 286,500 23.88 Absolute Increase 64,765 27,946 36,819
7 Growth of Population: The growth rate of population for any decade for census purposes may be defined as the percentage of the difference in population between the two censuses divided by the population of the previous census.The percentage decadal growth rate observed for the period 1991-2001 for the state and districts by rural and urban areas based on the provisional population figures of 2001 Census shows that the decadal growth rate for the rural areas is higher in general than for the urban areas, the rural growth of population for the rural areas during the period being 36.55 percent against a growth rate of 12.81 percent for the urban areas. As alrady stated above, till 1961 Manipur continued to have only 1 town. With notification of more towns the number of towns increased to 8 in 1971 and to 32 in 1981. Consequently the urban population has also grown suddenly to 108.95 percent during 1961-71 and an all-time high growth rate of 165.36 percent during 1971-81. The growth in the urban population from the census context is, however, affected not only by the increase or decrease in popula tion due to the demographic factors of births, deaths or migration but also due to addition of fresh areas as new urban places or deletion of existing urban areas.
The progress of population by rural and urban sectors for the periods from 1901 to 2001 is shown below.
Year 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 Rural 212,231 271,572 304,013 359,802 412,353 574,773 Urban 72,234 74,650 80,003 85,804 99,716 2,862
Year 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 Rural 712,320 931,261 1,045,493 1,331,504 1,818,224 Urban 67,717 141,492 375,460 505,645 570,410
The percentage distribution of the rural and urban population among the districts is presented in the following statement. Out of 9 districts in the state in 2001 only 5 districts have urban areas while the other 4 districts, namely, Senapati, Tamenglong, Churachandpur and Ukhrul are entirely rural. The statement shows that Senapati dis trict has the highest rural population among all the districts representing 20.86 percent of the total rural population of the state. The next highest proportion is found in Imphal East (15.70 percent). The valley districts of Bishnupur, Thoubal, Imphal West and Imphal East together account for 46.75 percent of the total rural population of the state. In respect of the urban areas 42.54 percent of the total urban population of the state are found settled in lmphal West district only. Thoubal district has a share of 23.01 percent.
8 Percentage distribution of population Rural/Urban
SI.No. District Percentage to total population of the state Rural Urban 1 Senapati 20.86 2 Tamenglong 6.13 3 Churachandpur 12.58 4 Bishnupur 7.29 12.85 5 Thoubal 12.93 23.01 6 Imphal West 10.83 42.54 7 Imphal East 15.70 18.98 8 Ukhrul 7.75 9 Chandel 5.93 2.62
The average growth rate of population for the state for the decade 1991-2001 is 30.02 percent. The rate of growth for the total areas for the districts varies widely from the highest of 81.96 percent in Senapati district (and 72.80 percent in Chandel district) to the lowest of 15.42 percent and 13.90 percent observed in Imphal West district and Bishnupur district respectively. The pattern of the growth rate for the rural and urban areas differs slightly from that observed for the total areas. The growth rates for the districts in descending order of magnitude for the period 1991-2001 are shown below for both the rural and urban areas seperately.
Growth rates ( 1991-2001) Rural Urban 1. Senapati 81.96 1. Chandel 54.66 2. Chandel 75.66 2. Imphal East 42.77 3. Churachandpur 60.48 3. Thoubal 22.16 4. Tamenglong 29.23 4. Bishnupur 15.99 5. Ukhrul 28.98 5. Imphal West 12.42 6. Thoubal 26.04 7. Imphal West 19.34 8. Bishnupur 12.79 9. Imphal East 12.13
It has already been stated that urban areas for census purpose include both Census Towns (areas treated as urban based on some demographic criteria) and statutory towns (areas declared as urban under various names by the State Govt. under special Act). All these urban areas are classified into the following size classes depending on the magnitude of the population of the towns. Urban Agglomeration
9 alongwith its various component units together is treated as one town for the purpose of the size classification.
Class I Population of 1,00,000 persons and above Class II Population of 50,000 to 99,999 persons Class III - Population of 20,000 to 49,999 persons Class IV - Population of 10,000 to 19,999 persons Class V Population of 5,000 to 9,999 persons Class VI - Population of less than 5,000 persons
Any town or urban agglomeration having a population of more than 100,000 persons is known as a city according to Indian Census tradition and is further classified into the following categories in 2001 Census.
Class I Population of 100,000 persons and above a) M 7 Population of 5,000,000 persons and above. b) M 6 Population of 2,000,000 to 4,999,999 persons c) M 5 Population of 1,000,000 to 1,999,999 persons d) M 4 Population of 5,00,000 to 999,999 persons e) M 3 Population of 300,000 to 499,999 persons f) M 2 Population of 200,000 to 299,999 persons and g) M 1 Population of 100,000 to 199,999 persons
The number and population of towns and urban agglomeration as per 1991 and 2001 Censuses according to the size classification given above are
Population by size class of Towns 1991-2001
Size Class of No. of Towns Total Population I ncrease or decrease Towns/UA 1991 2001 1991 2001 in population
Class I 1 1* 202,839 245,967 43,128 Class II Class III 3 4 91,114** 110,698 19,584 Class IV 5 7 75,103 97,635 22,532 Class V 17 13 122,705 100,756 (-) 21,949 Class VI 5 4 13,884 15,354 1.470 Total 31 33 505,645 570,410 64,765
* Represents figures for 1 UA consisting of 1 core town, 4 out growths and 4 Census Towns. ** Includes population of Churachandpur CT but declassified as rural in 2001.
10 furnished in the statement shown above. From the statement it can be seen that in Manipur, there is only one town both in 1991 and 2001 censuses having a population of above 1,00,000 persons. There is no town in Size-class II category. In Size-class III the number of towns has increased from 3 to 4 while in Size-class IV the number has grown from 5 to 7 towns. In the case of Size-class V the number has decreased from 17 to 13 due to movement of towns of 1991 to other Size-classes in 2001.
The growth rate of urban population by size class of town is presented in Table 6 alongwith the growth rate for the individual towns for period 1991-2001. The decadal growth of population for the size classes of towns for 1991-2001 has been worked out according to the size class of the towns prevailing in 1991. With respect to the individual towns as many as 5 towns have reported growth rates as low as 1° percent during the decade. Imphal M CI shows a growth rate of only 9.66 percent during the decade while Imphal Urban Agglomeration consisting of all the units taken as a whole shows a growth rate of 21.26 percent mainly due to addition of new constituent units in 2001 as urban components of Imphal UA. Moreh STC recorded the highest growth rate of 54.66 percent. Next comes Kwakta NP with 39.32 percent followed by Lilong (Thoubal) NP with 33.24 percent. Thoubal M CI which is the second largest town in the state has a growth rate of 24.65 percent while Kakching M CI, the third largest town, shows a decadal growth rate of only 17.63 percent.
• • •
11
TABLES en (I) ~ (I) :5
c: o ~ :; oCo a..
c: o i!?" ~ C a: ::> oa.. z « :::c ::>~ :::c (.) M 15 c: ~o a..Q) Q) iii Eu:> Q) u. oc: j a.:J o a.. c: ~~~~~~~ Q)~ a..'I:t ctS ...,£ 0) .....0 ctS. ....: ....: o a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. o a.. a.. ~ZZZZZZ.~ZZ 16 (I) iii E ....C\I u..(I) Ul (I) i iii .... S :::!: :::J c go (ij .... a. (I) c ~,... a.(I) (I) iii Eco u..(I) c 0 (I) ~ iii Il) "S 0. :::!: a.0 c 0 ~ (I) a. 'o:t (!)I-Oa. a. a. I-I-a. a. a. a. «O(!)(!)I-I-I-a.Oa.a. OO~ZZZOOZZZZ ~~OOOOOZ~ZZ 17 CD «iNE ... u.CD .!e IU CD E 0> ;; CD .5 co u. e:o .2 0. CD 15(ijeo c.,:::::J"::!: &.CD ::glUe: :E 0 .,.... .,.... (.) f!? ,.... CD gg Q. CD ~~, «i ...... - ...... ECO <0 <0 .f e: ...... C') C') -.t -.t ' ~ ...... MM "3 o0. Q. ~ oo -U E ti T""" .! VJ ciS ..J "'-(\1 W Q Z .r:. f/J e~ ~ o 0 (.) ::!:Z oi 18 co co co co co co LC) LC) co co • 0) 0) 0)0) as as co co co co ~~co ~~. c;c; . .o!:QO 0)0) 0)0) .,... ~, C\IC\I C\IC\I co LC) 88.,... .,... (]) (ij (]) E £ (]) .£<9 LL o co.,... .,... co co co • ~~ .,...LC) .-LC) 00 • .,... .,... 0)0) 00.,... .- .,... .,...... C') C') .,...C\I ..-C\I ...... ,... 00as as • 00 • co co C\I C\I gg gg 0) 0) LC) LC) 0) 0) 00 ~u; C\I C\I • ...... co co • 0)0) ~~ LC) LC) gg I-II:::> I-II:::> I-II::::> I-II::::> > Ci cD :::> > ti en Ci is ~ cD « :::> «II: en ~ ...J D ~ :::> « o II: z « :::> w ~ a.. U) ...: M 19 (]) en en C\I C\I Il') Il') m m (ij 00 C\I C\I E a:) a:) (]) ctct u. en ~(]) ::i- mm <0 <0 C\I C\I • ct5cO Il') Il') ~ en "'C c C\I C\I as (]) en en • £; "C\iC\i " 8c G) "'C .,....en .,....en ....~~ .,.... co co • Il') Il') • ! ,...:,...: C\iC\i 00 <0 <0 <0 <0 C\IC\I en en co co 00 C\IC\I co co • cor-:r-: .nil').,.... .,.... ~~ .,...... .,....~~ .... .,.... .,.... C\I C\I 1-11::::> 1-11::::> 1-11::::> 1-11::::> :> :> is is cO cD :::> en:::> (/) J: :> I- ..,: is ,.....(/) en 6: cD o :::> «w a z en (!) (!) ~ z z z ...J "o ...J 9 9 :c (!) (!) 11: Z z z « "w w w o ::2: « :5 ::2: (/) ~ ~ ~ cO C\i ~ 20 Q) co co C'i C'i co co C'i CD I'- C> 0 CO C'i " C') C') C> C> C> C> co co co co ~ CD Lt) 0 CD rJ'J I'- I'- CD CD CD CD CD CD Lt) C') ~ 0 C') (b Q) Q) CD CD CD CD Lt) Lt) ~~ C'i C'i I'- C') " ,_. ,_. ~ CD CD 0 I'- C') " 21 Q) co C\J ooo:t 0> co (t) (ij co r-- 0> E to COCO Q) C\J LL >< CI) In "C C CIS Q) -£ 8c CI) .5 <-9 "C o ~ ~ 1-0:::::> 1-0:::::> 1-0:::::> 1-0:::::::> 1-0:::::> :2 :c(,) oc :;:: :;ftI Q. o Il. :> ..... 5 :> :> cD :::> 5 :> 5 C/) cD 5 cD :::> ti :::> a: C/) cD C/) :::> c :::> (!) C/) ...J Cl. z ..J :::> « 22 caOQ) ~ .... >< II) In "C ca Q) ~ £ c II) .£; t9 c: 0 "iii o " ~ e :; ~ c. In g_ co CX) CX) .! .... 32 ct! § r-- .... In co co co f! :c ~ 8 (.) Q) cOlO ~N a.. " "iii5 ('I)l-QCO i cor-- ....-, coO -E U) "S: c 00 ~gfcO Q.J:l• 8 :::s :::s OCl) -N c,.; § a, "~ ~ II) C)-= :; :c ca (/I c. ~ II) 0 o r-.s;:.. S a.. "5 S c CI) o ;: :;ca Q. o Do I-a:::> I-a:::> t-a:::> I-a:::> :2 :c(,) c~ o ~ :::s Q. o Il. :> :> is I ..- 15 [Xl :> cO :> en::::> 15 ::::>en 15 cO cO ~ ::::> (!J ::::> c.. en z en ...J « W J: J: en oen c.. :::2! ~ :::2! :) 0.. :5 N C') 23 )( CI) III 'tJ C Q) 8'" ~ c - CI) '0 .~ ~ gg ~~ l.() l.() ...... co co C\iC\i I.t"l l.() C\J C\J ~ ,...... mm :2 :c(,) co ~ c: ::::f .oiii Q. o .s; a.. i:5, ..0 ;> ~ 15 .--cD ;> ~o ::l 15 .;:: C/) cD til ::l - o C/) Z ::l ~ £D ~ N :::2: a.. C/) :::2: o a: ~ o C/) a.. ci M ,.... 24 >< G.I 1/1 "C C ca CJ) G.I .r. () C - CP c "C o ·iii iii f!! 'S ~ a. a.o cb CJ) CJ) II) II) ggII) II) ...... co co ""00 c o ;: c .!!! o ::::I °iii 0.o 0:; a. is I :> :> .0 15 :> 15 :::l r:b 15 r:b ~ ::::> ::::> CJ r:b :> en 0;;:: en ::::> 15 (!J (/) :c en - I lii ....J r:b z is ::::> ~ ::::> o a; o c a. en a: en ...J ::::> ....J cu ....J W o UJ ;2 U5 ::::> Q z o 0:: a: Z (!J Z ~ :c -< z ~ ~ ~ :x:: UJ I I ::::> o l- () () Lri g; N M ..¢ 25 Table - 4 Sex ratio of population and sex ratio of child population in the age-group 0-6 State, District, Sub-Division 2001 State/OistrictlSub-Oivision Sex ratio of total population Sex ratio of child population in the age-grou~ 0-6 Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MAN'PUR 978 969 1009 961 956 980 1. SENAPATI DIST. 928 928 1007 1007 1. MAO-MARAM SUB-DIV. 910 910 903 903 2. PAOMATA SUB-DIV. 954 954 1571 1571 3. PURUL SUB-DIV. 887 887 896 896 4. SADAR HilLS WEST SUB-DIV. 973 973 1054 1054 5. SAITU GAMPHAZOL SUB-DIV. 896 896 973 973 6. SADAR HILLS EAST SUB-DIV. 977 977 990 990 2. TAMENGLONG DIST. 922 922 950 950 1. TAMENGLONG NORTH SUB-DIV. 949 949 910 910 2. TAMENGLONG WEST SUB-DIV. 981 981 957 957 3. TAMENGLONG SUB-DIV. 876 876 944 944 4. NUNGBA SUB-DIV. 921 921 979 979 3. CHURACHANOPUR DIST. 993 993 927 927 1. TIPAIMUKH SUB-DIV. 942 942 890 890 2. THANLON SUB-DIV. 959 959 1093 1093 3. CHURACHANDPUR NORTH SUB-DIV. 903 903 961 961 4. CHURACHANDPUR SUB-DIV. 1025 1025 895 895 5. SINGNGAT SUB-DIV. 1014 1014 981 981 4. BISHNUPUR DIST. 1004 1015 984 925 903 966 1. NAMBOL SUB-DIV. 1011 1011 1012 931 918 951 2. BISHNUPUR SUB-DIV. 969 971 965 753 670 913 3. MOl RANG SUB-DIV. 1018 1038 978 1028 1037 1010 5. THOUBAL DIST. 998 995 1004 972 964 989 1. LlLONG SUB-DIV. 992 994 988 990 995 983 2. THOUBAL SUB-DIV. 993 991 997 958 940 994 3. KAKCHING SUB-DIV. 1010 1002 1024 980 977 986 6. 'MPHAL WEST DIST. 1007 994 1018 966 935 997 1. LAMSHANG SUB-DIV. 983 979 1002 915 919 896 2. PATSOI SUB-DIV. 1006 998 1045 925 928 907 3. LAMPHELPAT SUB-DIV. 1024 1026 1023 1024 955 1043 4. WANGOI SUB-DIV. 994 985 1003 952 947 957 7. IMPHAL EAST DIST. 992 982 1018 955 955 953 1. JIRIBAM SUB-DIV. 989 978 1046 1004 989 1108 2. SAWOMBUNG SUB-DIV. 940 939 961 969 972 896 3. POROMPAT SUB-DIV. 1008 999 1022 940 939 943 4. KEIRAO BITRA SUB-DIV. 999 1000 993 945 944 955 28 Table - 4 ( contd.) Sex ratio of population and sex ratio of child population in the age-group 0-6 State, District, Sub-Division 2001 State/District/Sub-Division Sex ratio of total population Sex ratio of child population in the age-9rouE! 0-6 Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. UKHRUL DlST. 920 920 969 969 1. UKHRUL NORTH SUB-DIV. 968 968 987 987 2. UKHRUL CENTRAL SUB-DIV. 903 903 916 916 3. KAMJONG CHASSAD SUB-DIV. 840 840 1011 1011 4. PHUNGYAR PHAISAT SUB-DIV. 974 974 1166 1166 5. UKHRUL SOUTH SUB-DIV. 979 979 1017 1017 9. CHAN DEL DIST. 986 990 964 943 947 920 1. MACHI SUB-DIV. 961 961 930 9301 2. TENGNOUPAL SUB-DIV. 969 974 964 965 1013 920 3. CHANDEL SU8-.DIV. 1009 1009 886 886 4. CHAKPIKARONG SUB-DIV. 995 995 964 964 29 .... 8 C'i ~~~~8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8~o~O~~ ~~~g~~~~ffigffig~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ rf R~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~og ~~m~~~~~g~~~~~~~~m~~~wm~ffi~~g~ Lf ~~~re8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~N~g~~~~ffigffig~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ a. ~~~~~N~re~re .qLO .qLO ~~~g~gm~~~?i~ 0.0,0.0LO LO ~ !;;j:~~~~g~f;::j~~ ~CX)g~CiO~~g~:e~g ,f g~~~~~CiO~~~~~~~~~$~~f;::jm ~~~g~~g~~~~~~~~Nm~~~~g~ Q) LL ~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~ ~LO~R~~~~g~g~~g:e~:em~~~m~ n.Q) ~~~~~~~mm~~~~m~~~~~~~ ~Ng~~~~~~~~g~g~~~m~~g~~ ~ gc: a..CD >< 0 ~e 00 .... CO ...N CD ~ c u..CD o f § CD 16 j "3 Ot a. Ot o c( a.. c c: o .e -z e :;:) CD ...... a.. -s. -.a -'C CH!) (!H.!J 0000 32 Q) ~ E Q) LL 0) 00 0 Q) 0)0000 Cij ~ ~~~ ~~; ...... "":cOLti c: ~ Q) a. ia» .....en i I ~ o o o o o o o o ..... N -..... - ::::5 en en en III -$ !!! co (.) i3 33 ...... C"?(X)"' 10001OC"')CIO"' oC ~ a..Q) )( 0 :g enQ)~ ,_ ,.....<:) OC\lC"')OCOC\l oCX) CO CO CO ...... lOC')L{)C')COC")C\I(X)CO Oe")e")Na)o)a)cO-.:itri,....: C\I ...... C\lC\I..-C"? ..-C\I Q) «i E Q) LL co"' CD C o ~ ~ o a..Q) ...... ,.....<:) 8 e<:) > UJ a.. a.. a.. UJ Oa..I-a..a..a..a..a..a..a..O CCI zzz (3 ~zozzzzzzz~ Ol C..c. .-~ .....Q) o 0 ~~ Ne") 34 c Q)~ Q. >< 0 Q)~ (f) .... m~~~:g O"":OMc.O .-..- ..-(\1 c o ~ Q) Q. .... fin; ::3..0 C'")C::3 ..c 0 (f)..c iDl- :> I/) I/) till (3 Q.Q.Q.Q. :> ZZZZ " 35 1: G) "D C !. .g .5 c: o fa:; a. o a... ~ UJ ~::r ~ _J _J ~ « } « ::> :::c (.) or- :::c 0 a... a... :::c ~ '0 ~t:, Q) CJ CJ E Z Z tU 00 Z _J _J ::J::J 36 Q)I'....r--C")C')CX),....o>c.or--N ~~O>..".C')C')N(1)I.()r--O ""' '" N C\I ..- 0> (1) r-- CX) 0 N (\j ,_~ ,..: ,....- ,..: ci ,..: ,..: ,..: ci ci ,.... ~~~8~~~s;~m~ ('r).,..:,..:C\i..,.:~c.O..,.:C\iC\ict),.... c -CII "C C 8- ~ .5 c: o ~ "S 0. ~ oc: (])~ ""'" cO a. 1-c..c..I-a.. a..a...a..a..Ol-a...a...a.. OZZOZ ZZZZ:;a:(.)ZZZ c: :s:o ~ (5 ,.... '0 ....J (]) o E CD ctS z :::ri:« z 37 u -;::- o t5 ...- is en c: ~ ;: c: 0 (1)1- (.) ...... g: '0 fI) j 'Oc:,.... '0 ~ a> -_o CI.I 0 a> II) .~ .a ...... ,. :;- Uco(l)c: -.cen .... - ~ .... .2 ::Jc.. (]) "0c: .c a:I '0- .c 38 .,...... (0 0) C\I 0') CO "! C\J (0 L{) C\I ...... Cf) 0) o ,.... C\J C\J ,.... ,...... -.. I (0 L{) Q) ' _05 oS;II) o.E Q) ::::l C ::::l .r:. C II) en Q) C -:,s (l) o 0 , ...... en '::<3 en > > u.- CI1 en en en en en C\i (.) en en en en en Q) CI1 CI1 CI1 CI1 CI1 (5 « (.) (.) (.) (.) o z 39 STATEMENTS STATEMENT - 1 Rural-Urban distribution of eoeulation - India and states/Union Territories SI. India/State/Union Territory * T/RIU Poeulation Percent no. Persons Males Females urban eoeulation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 INDIA T 1,027,015,247 531,2n,078 495,738,169 27.78 R 741,660,293 381,141,184 360,519,109 U 285,354,954 150,135,894 135,219,060 StatelUnlon Territory * 1 Jammu & Kashmir T 10,069,917 5,300,574 4,769,343 24.88 R 7,564,608 3,925,846 3,638,762 U 2,505,309 1,374,728 1,130,581 2 Himachal Pradesh T 6,On,248 3,085,256 2,991,992 9.79 R 5,482,367 2,754,251 2,728,116 U 594,881 331,005 263,876 3 Punjab T 24,289,296 12,963,362 11,325,934 33.95 R 16,043.730 8,500.647 7,543,083 U 8,245,566 4,462,715 3,782,851 4 Chandigarh * T 900,914 508,224 392,690 89.78 R 92.118 56.837 35,281 U 808,796 451,387 357,409 5 Uttaranchal T 8,479,562 4,316,401 4,163,161 25.59 R 6,309,317 3,143,380 3,165,937 U 2,170,245 1,173,021 997,224 6 Haryana T 21,082,989 11,327,658 9,755,331 29.00 R 14,968,850 8,017,622 6,951,228 U 6.114.139 3,310,036 2.804.103 7 Delhi * T 13,782,976 7,570,890 6,212,086 93.01 R 963,215 533,219 429,996 U 12,819,761 7,037,671 5,782,090 8 Rajasthan T 56,473,122 29,381,657 27,091,465 23.38 R 43,267,678 22,394,479 20,873,199 U 13,205,444 6,987,178 6,218,266 9 Uttar Pradesh T 166,052,859 87,466,301 78,586,558 20.78 R 131,540,230 69,096,765 62,443,465 U 34,512,629 18,369,536 16,143,093 10 Bihar T 82,878,796 43,153,964 39,724,832 10.47 R 74,199,596 38,510,686 35,688,910 U 8,679,200 4,643,278 4,035,922 43 STATEMENT - 1 (contd.) Rural-Urban distribution of population - India and states/Union Territories Slono India/State/Union Territory * T/RiU Population Percent Persons Males Females urban eoeulation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 Sikkim T 540,493 288,217 252,276 11.1 R 480,488 255,386 225,102 U 60,005 32,831 27,174 12 Arunachal Pradesh T 1,091,117 573,951 517,166 20.41 R 868,429 453,560 414,869 U 222,688 120,391 102,297 13 Nagaland T 1,988,636 1,041,686 946,950 17.74 R 1,635,815 846,651 789,164 U 352,821 1195035 157,786 14 Manlpur T 2,388,634 1,207,338 1,181,296 23.88 R 1,818,224 923,428 894,796 U 570,410 283,910 286,500 15 Mizoram T 891,058 459,783 431,275 49.5 R 450,018 233,718 216,300 U 441,040 226,065 214,975 16 Tripura T 3,191,168 1,636,138 1,555,030 17.02 R 2,648,074 1,359,288 1,288,786 U 543,094 276,850 266,244 17 Meghalaya T 2,306,069 1,167,840 1,138,229 19.63 R 1,853,457 939,803 913,654 U 452,612 228,037 224,575 18 Assam T 26,638,407 13,787~799 12,850,608 12.72 R 23,248,994 11,983,157 11,265,837 U 3,389,413 1,804,642 1,584,771 19 West Bengal T 80,221,171 41,487,694 38,733,477 28.03 R 57,734,690 29,606,028 28,128,662 U 22,486,481 11,881,666 10,604,815 20 Jharkhand T 26,909,428 13,861,277 13,048,151 22.25 R 20,922,731 10,660,430 10,262,301 U 5,986,697 3,200,847 2,785,850 21 Orissa T 36,706,920 18,612,340 180,944,580 14.97 R 31,210,602 15,711,853 15,498,749 U 5,496,318 2,900,487 2,595,831 44 STATEMENT - 1 {contd.} Rural-Urban distribution of EOEulation - India and states/Union Territories Sl.no India/State/Union Territory· T/RIU Population Percent Persons Males Females urban ~o~ulation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 22 Chhatisgarh T 20,795,956 10,452,426 10,343,530 20.08 R 16,620,627 8,290,983 8,329,644 U 4,175,329 2,161,443 2,013,886 23 Madhya Pradesh T 60,385,118 31,456,873 28,928,245 26.67 R 44,282,528 22,975,256 21,307,272 U 16,102,590 8,481,617 7,620,973 24 Gujarat T 50,596,992 26,344,053 24,252,939 37.35 R 31,697,615 16,289,423 15,408,192 U 18,899,377 10,054,630 8,844,747 25 Daman & Diu· T 158,059 92,478 6p,581 36.26 R 100,740 63,576 37,164 U 57,319 28,902 28,417 26 Dadra & Nagar Havelli* - T 220,451 121,731 98,720 22.89 R 169,995 91,887 78,108 U 50,456 29,844 20.612 27 Maharashtra T 96,752,247 50,334,270 46,417,977 42.40 R 55,732,513 28,443,238 27,289,275 U 41,019,734 21,891,032 19,128,702 28 Andhra Pradesh T 75,727,541 38,286,811 37,440,730 R 55,223,944 27,852,179 27,371,765 U 20,503,597 10,434,632 10,068,965 29 Karnataka T 52,733,958 26,856,343 25,877,651 33.98 R 34,814,100 17,618,593 17,195,507 U 17,919,858 9,237,750 8,682,108 30 Goa T 1,343,998 685,617 658,381 49.77 R 675,129 339,626 335,503 U 668,869 345,991 322,878 31 Lakshadweep· T 60,595 31,1 18 29,477 44.47 R 33,647 17,196 16,451 U 26,948 13,922 13,026 32 Kerala T 31,838,619 15,468,664 16,369,955 25.97 R 23,571,484 11,450,785 12,120,699 U 8,267,135 4,017,879 4,249,256 45 STATEMENT - 1 (contd.) Rural-Urban distribution of ~o~ulation - India and states/Union Territories Sl.no India/State/Union Territory * T/R/U Po~ulation Percent Persons Males Females urban ~oeulation 2 3 4 5 6 7 33 Tamil Nadu T 62,110,839 31,268,654 30,842,185 43.86 R 34,869,286 17,508,985 17,360,301 U 27,241,553 13,759,669 13,481,884 34 Pondichery* T 973,829 486,705 487,124 66.57 R 325,596 163,586 162,010 U 648,233 323,119 325,114 35 Andaman & Nicobar Island'" T 356,265 192,985 163,280 32.67 R 239,858 128,837 111,021 U 116,407 64,148 52,259 Note The total rural and urban population of India includes the estimated total, rural and urban population of entire Kachchh district, Morvi, Maliya-Miyan and Wankaner taluks of Rajkot district, Jodiya taluka of Jamnar district of Gujarat and estimated total and rural population of entire Kinnaur district of Himachal Pradesh where population enumeration of census of India 2001 could not be conducted due to natural calamities. 2 The figures of total, rural and urban population of Himachal Pradesh state have been arrived at after including the estimated total and rural population of entire Kinnaur district where population enumeration of Census of India, 2001 could not be conducted due to natural calamity. 3 The figures of total, rural and urban population of Gujarat state have been arrived at after including the estimated total rural and urban population of entire kachchh district, Morvi, Maliya-Miyan and Wankaner taluks of Rajkot district, Jodiya taluka of Jamnagar district where population enumera tion of the Census of India, 2001 could not be conducted due to natural calamity. 46 Statement - 2 Number of Statutory and census towns,1991 and 2001 State/District 1991 2001 Statutory Census Total Statutory Census Total Towns Towns Towns Towns 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Manipur 28 3 31 28 5 33 1. Senapati 2. Tamenglong 3. Churachandpur 1 1 4. Bishnupur 7 7 7 7 5. Thoubal 9 9 9 9 6. Imphal West 8 2 10 8 2 10 7. Imphal East 3 3 3 3 6 8. Ukhrul 9. Chandel 1 1 1 1 Note : Where a town is spread over more than district its number is counted in the district in which the bigger portion of the town falls. 47 Statement-3 Ranking of districts by percentage of urban population,1991 and 2001 Rank District Percentage of Rank in Urban population in 2001 2001 1991 1991 1 2 3 4 5 1 Imphal West 42.54 42.69 1 2 Thoubal 23.01 21.25 2 3 Imphal East 18.98 14.99 3 4 Bishnupur 12.85 12.49 4 5 Chandel 2.62 1.92 6 Senapati Tamenglong Churachandpur 6.66 5 Ukhrul Manipur 100.00 100.00 48 Statement - 4 Trends in Urbanization,1901-2001 Census Total Total Total Urban Percentage Decennial Growth Annual year Number of Population Population of Urban exponential UAsrrowns Population Absolute Percent Growth rate 2 3 4 5 6 7 1901 284,465 72,234 25.39 1911 346,222 74,650 21.56 2,416 3.34 0.33 1921 384,016 80,003 20.83 5,353 7.17 0.69 1931 1 445,606 85,804 19.26 5,801 7.25 0.70 1941 1 512,069 99,716 19.47 13,912 16.21 1.50 1951 1 577,635 2,862 0.50 (-) 96,854 (-) 97.13 ( - ) 35.51 1961 1 780,037 fi7,717 8.68 64,855 2,266.07 31.64 1971 8 1,072,753 141,492 13.19 73,775 108.95 7.37 1981 32 1,420,953 375,460 26.42 233,968 165.36 9.76 1991 31 1,837,149 505,645 27.52 130,185 34.67 2.98 2001 33 2,388,634 570,410 23.88 64,765 12.81 1.21 49 MAPS MANIPUR DECADAL GROWTH RATE OF RURAL POPULATION A N D 1991-2001 \.. (DISTRICTS) Y KILOMETRES 10 5 0 10 20 30 .... o M' IIOUNOARIES: INTERNATIONAL STATE GROWTH RATE DISTRICT ... ~ 20.00 & BELOW ITIIl]20.01 - 45.00 -+ STATE AVERAGE 36.55 45.01 -70.00 S-SENAPATI m ~ 70.01 & ABove Baaed upon Survey of india Map With !he per..... "'" of !he Surveyor General of India. © Government of India copyright. 2000. 53 MANIPUR PERCENTAGE OF URBAN POPULATION 2001 (DISTRICTS) KIlOIoIETRE8 10501020 M STATE ...... PERCENTAGE SHARE Of URBAN POPULATION DI8TRJCT ...... ~ BElOW-20.00 ~ 20.01 - 40.00 -+ STATE AVERAGE 23.88 E.R.· ENTIRELY RURAl S·SENAPATI _ 40.01 & ABOVE © __ of IncIa CCIpJrIght, 2000. 54 MANIPUR OECAOAL GROWTH RATE OF URBAN POPULATION A 1991-2001 \.. (DISTRICTS) G KIL'*ETA£S 1Q S 0 10 20 E.R. I: CHURACHANDPUR .... ,...... \" J") ~.-... o v~. v'l "- " A M' ;. M STATE GROWTH RATE DISTRICT ". Immmmi 20.00 & BelOW -+ STATE AVERAGE 12J11 S 20.01'-40.00 E.R •• ENTIRELY RURAL S·SENAPAn ~ 40.01 & ABOVE © 2000. - ...... Swwy of india Mop _!he ...... 1an of !he Surveyor GonoraI of India. _01_ -""'" 55 CHARTS AND DIAGRAMS MANIPUR DISTRIBUTION OF RURAL - URBAN POPULATION, 1901-2001 ~O~UL"T'O" '" L_"S 25 20 15 N - NEGLIGIBLE 10 N URBAN RURAL ,to, 'I" ,.2, 1131 1141 'lSI II.. '171 198. .991 20Qt CENSUS DECADES 59 MANIPUR DECADEL GROWTH IN URBAN POPULATION, 1901-11 TO 1991-2001 GROWTH (in percent) 2280 2240 160 120 80 40 16.21 12.81 7.25 3.24 7.17 1901-11 1911-21 1921·31 1951-61 1961-71 1971-81 1981-91 1991-2001 (-)40 (-)80 (-)97.13 CENSUS DECADES 60 MANIPUR DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION OF UAs / CITIES/TOWNS IN DIFFERENT SIZE CLASSES, 1901-2001 POPULATION (in lokll.) 8 .. : : j SIZE-CLASSES 2 •• j I •• ~ : 1 V IV .~ ~ III t '.. t • 0. ! .• • i. j 0' 10 ~ • j" : 1: II .' j :: . • 00 .. . 00 t '0' .. • - ~ .. o ItOI !til 1921 1931 1t41 -"51 1!81 1971 1ge1 1991 2001 CENSUS DECADES 61 MANIPUR DISTRIBUTION OF RURAL-URBAN POPULATION IN DISTRICTS, 2001 I'O"UL.ATION (in I ... ",) 5 4 E.R. 2 f.R. E.R. URBAN RURAL 0 J.... J.... A: ~ ~ $' ~ Q..'fl' 0 I.~ l' ~ ~ E. R.-ENTIRELY RURAL ~ ~ 4.t ~ ~ ; ~ ~ i rS -.oJ -.oJ ~ ~ ~ ~ r! ,..~ v ~ ~ (.j ~ ~ ~ ,..'fl' ~ J .....J (Ji "' DISTRICTS