DOCSLIB.ORG

Anti-GMO Strategies and Frames: Global Trends in the Growth of Resistance to Gmos

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anti-GMO Strategies and Frames: Global Trends in the Growth of Resistance to Gmos Anti-GMO Strategies and Frames: Global Trends in the Growth of Resistance to GMOs by Jillian Sherman B.A. in Geography, B.A. in Anthropology, June 2012, The Ohio State University A Thesis submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts May 18, 2014 Thesis directed by Mona Atia Professor of Geography and International Affairs © Copyright 2014 by Jillian Sherman All rights reserved ii Acknowledgements The author wishes to acknowledge Dr. Mona Atia for acting as a primary advisor on this project and Dr. Marie Price for acting as a secondary advisor and reader. She also wishes to thank The George Washington University Department of Geography for offering the Campbell Summer Research Grant to complete this project. iii Abstract of Thesis Anti-GMO Strategies and Frames: Global Trends in the Growth of Resistance to GMOs Due to the increasing stresses on the agricultural sector that have been caused by factors such as population growth and changing ecological dynamics, genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been promoted as a technological answer for problems relating to yield increase, pest resistance, and herbicide tolerance. While this technology has experienced high levels of adoption across the globe, it has also experienced great levels of resistance, and has led to the creation of numerous anti-GMO movements. A discourse analysis of various journals, news articles, and social media outlets was completed in order to look at the spatial patterns associated with the success or failure of the anti-GMO movement across the globe. The prevalence of protest activity in each country was compared to ISAAA data on GMO quantities, crops, and traits per country so that trends in GMO adoption and opposition could be established. This paper considers the role of the actor, as well as the role of the political, legal, and social institutions in place in the countries experiencing GMO growth and resistance. It examines a number of different resistance tactics, paying particular attention to case studies employing the labeling (USA), banning (Mexico), and destruction (France) of GMOs in order to determine why some tactics and geographic locations have experienced success in fighting off GMOs while others have not. Finally, the various framing techniques employed by the movement are addressed within the study so that movement success can be explained within the context of each resistance tactic. iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iii Abstract of Thesis .............................................................................................................. iv List of Figures .................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables .................................................................................................................... vii List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................. viii Chapter 1: Introduction, Literature Review, and Methodology .......................................... 1 Chapter 2: Current State of GMO Growth and Resistance ............................................... 32 Chapter 3: Small-Scale Agriculture and Food Sovereignty Framing ............................... 63 Chapter 4: Labeling: The US Case Study ......................................................................... 77 Chapter 5: Moratoria: The Mexican Case Study ............................................................ 119 Chapter 6: Direct Action: The French Case Study ......................................................... 137 Chapter 7: Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 163 References ....................................................................................................................... 175 Appendix A: Coding and Development of Main Themes .............................................. 194 Appendix B: GMO Growth Patterns for Each Case Study ............................................. 195 Appendix C: Development of Specific GMO Traits and Crops ..................................... 196 Appendix D: Overview of Tactics and Locations Included in this Research ................. 197 v List of Figures Figure 1: Study Areas of Interest ...................................................................................... 29 Figure 2: Global Growth of GMOs Per Country .............................................................. 32 Figure 3: Developing vs. Industrial GM Growth (% of Total) ......................................... 34 Figure 4: Relationship Between Seed, Chemical, and Other Companies ......................... 40 Figure 5: Levels of Resistance in the Anti-GMO Movement ........................................... 62 Figure 6: Three Spheres of Food Sovereignty .................................................................. 74 Figure 7: Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States, 1996-2013 ... 84 Figure 8: American States with Proposed Labeling ......................................................... 92 Figure 9: Northeast Labeling Cluster ................................................................................ 94 Figure 10: California Proposition 37 Results .................................................................... 97 Figure 11: Washington Initiative 522 County Results .................................................... 101 Figure 12: Global GE Food Labeling Laws .................................................................... 104 Figure 13: Transgenic Free Territories in Costa Rica......................................................132 Figure 14: Examples of Direct Action from Case Studies and Comparison Cases ........ 153 Figure 15: Schema of Frames, Goals, and Success for Each Case Study ....................... 168 vi List of Tables Table 1: First Year of GMO Commercialization Per Country ......................................... 35 Table 2: Definition of Frames, Goals, and Success for Court Cases ................................ 52 Table 3: Definition of Frames, Goals, and Success for Direct Action ............................. 57 Table 4: Definition of Frames, Goals, and Success for Bans ........................................... 60 Table 5: Use of Framing in Each Country ........................................................................ 64 Table 6: Definition of Frames, Goals, and Success for Labeling ..................................... 81 Table 7: USA Labeling Polls .......................................................................................... 103 Table 8: Frames, Goals, and Success of Moratoria in Mexico ....................................... 126 Table 9: Examples of Crop Destruction Activities in France ......................................... 140 Table 10: Activist Frames, Goals, and Successes in France ........................................... 144 Table 11: Examples of Crop Destruction in Other Countries ......................................... 154 vii List of Acronyms APHIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service AWOC Agricultural Workers Organization Committee CP Confédération Paysanne EPA Environmental Protection Agency FDA Food and Drug Administration FD&C Act Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act FV Faucheurs Volontaires GE Genetic Engineering GM Genetically Modified GMOs Genetically Modified Organisms HYVs High Yielding Varieties IPC International Planning Committee for Food Sovereignty IPR Intellectual Property Rights ISAAA International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications KRRS Karnataka Rajya Ryota Sangha (Karnataka State Farmers Association) LMO Living Modified Organism LOS Legal Opportunity Structures NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement NFWA National Farm Workers Association NIABY Not In Any BackYard NIMB Not In My Body viii NIMBY Not In My BackYard NSM New Social Movement PIP Plant Incorporated Protectant POS Political Opportunity Structure PVPA Plant Variety Protection Act RMT Resource Mobilization Theory TFTs Transgenic Free Territories TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act USDA United States Department of Agriculture WTO World Trade Organization WTP Willingness to Pay ix Chapter 1: Introduction, Literature Review, and Methodology The Green Revolution, and later Gene Revolution, developed at a time when many feared for the fate of global society in the face of exponential population growth. Thomas Malthus said that man is always attempting to use resources at a rate that is “beyond the means of subsistence” (Malthus 2010:4). However, this population expansion is kept from reaching critical numbers due to the existence of checks on population growth such as disease and famine. Paul Ehrlich expanded upon this idea in 1969 by suggesting that if global population rates continued to increase at their current rates, then the world would soon reach the “logical conclusion” of mass starvation (Ehrlich 1969:13). In light of this Malthusian scenario, countries pursued two strategies: reducing population and expanding agricultural yields. Both the Green Revolution and the subsequent Gene Revolution focused on the development of the techniques and technology
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Combatting Monsanto
    Picture: Grassroots International Combatting Monsanto Grassroots resistance to the corporate power of agribusiness in the era of the ‘green economy’ and a changing climate La Via Campesina, Friends of the Earth International, Combat Monsanto Technical data name: “Combatting Monsanto Grassroots resistance to the corporate power of agribusiness in the era of the ‘green economy’ and a changing climate” author: Joseph Zacune ([email protected]) with contributions from activists around the world editing: Ronnie Hall ([email protected]) design and layout: Nicolás Medina – REDES-FoE Uruguay March 2012 Combatting Monsanto Grassroots resistance to the corporate power of agribusiness in the era of the ‘green economy’ and a changing climate INDEX Executive summary / 2 Company profile - Monsanto / 3 Opposition to Monsanto in Europe / 5 A decade of French resistance to GMOs / 6 Spanish movements against GM crops / 9 German farmers’ movement for GM-free regions / 10 Organising a movement for food sovereignty in Europe / 10 Monsanto, Quit India! / 11 Bt brinjal and biopiracy / 11 Bt cotton dominates cotton sector / 12 Spiralling debt still triggering suicides / 12 Stopping Monsanto’s new public-private partnerships / 13 Resistance to Monsanto in Latin America / 14 Brazilian peasant farmers’ movement against agribusiness / 14 Ten-year moratorium on GM in Peru / 15 Landmark ruling on toxic soy in Argentina / 15 Haitians oppose seed aid / 16 Guatemalan networks warn of new biosafety proposals / 17 Battle-lines drawn in the United States / 17 Stopping the
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol for Using Pollinators in Hybrid Vegetable Seed Production an Outline for Improving Pollinator Effectiveness FEBRUARY 2018
    Protocol for using pollinators in hybrid vegetable seed production An outline for improving pollinator effectiveness FEBRUARY 2018 APPROVED BY ISF Working Group Vegetable Seed Production EDITTED BY The listed pollination researchers : Avi GABAI - Hazera, Israel Bernard E. VAISSIÈRE - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UR406 Abeilles et Environnement, 84914 Avignon cedex, France Tjeerd BLACQUIÈRE - Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University & Research, Netherlands Breno M. FREITAS - Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brazil Mike ALLSOPP - Plant Protection Research, Agricultural Research Council, Stellenbosch, South Africa Stan CHABERT - Association Nationale des Agriculteurs Multiplicateurs de Semences Oléagineuses, 17700 Saint Pierre d'Amilly, France Arnon DAG - Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Ministry of Agriculture, Israel Protocol for using pollinators in hybrid vegetable seed production 2 1. INTRODUCTION Pollination in hybrid vegetable seed production is the transfer of pollen from the anthers of the male fertile flowers to the stigma of the male sterile (female) flowers. The pollination phase has a significant impact on final seed yield and quality. In many vegetable crops, such as onion (Allium cepa), carrot (Daucus carota), cabbage (Brassica oleracea), cauliflower (B. oleracea) and radish (Raphanus sativus), pollination is performed mainly by honey bees (Apis mellifera). However, although it is the main managed pollinator, there are other wild and managed pollinators that can be of significant commercial value. Pollination quality is expressed as the quantity of pollen moved to the female flower; this depends on the pollinators’ activity and their mobility between the flowers of the two lines. 2. OBJECTIVES This document details the essential points in using pollinators for commercial hybrid seed production: Honey bee hive management and colony (populated beehive) strength regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal of Updated XYZ System for the Production of Hybrid Wheat Seed
    Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 55, 2019 (1): 35–38 Short Communication https://doi.org/10.17221/45/2018-CJGPB Proposal of updated XYZ system for the production of hybrid wheat seed Tibor Sedláček*, Pavel Horčička SELTON Research Centre, Ltd., Sibřina, Czech Republic *Corresponding author: [email protected] Citation: Sedláček T., Horčička P. (2019): Proposal of updated XYZ system for the production of hybrid wheat seed. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed., 55: 35−38. Abstract: The following updates have been proposed for the XYZ system for the production of hybrid wheat: The waxy characteristics of the grain were used as a classifying mark. The candidate pollen sterility gene TIP2 was detected in silico based on similarity to known pollen sterility genes in rice. In order to maintain a sterile mater- nal component, the addition chromosome 7H was proposed, carrying wild-type alleles Waxy-H and TIP2-H. The concept of practical production of the commercial F1 seed was designed. Keywords: heterosis; male sterility; waxy As one of the most important crops, wheat faces continue to work on developing improved systems the challenge of dramatically increasing its yields of production of hybrid wheat seed. by 2050 (Alexandratos & Bruinsma 2012). And The principle of the XYZ system was published by yet the yield trends achieved using contemporary Driscoll (1972). It uses an addition chromosome varieties and growing systems are insufficient to carrying a gene for pollen fertility and a gene for a achieve this goal (Ray et al. 2013). One of the pos- phenotype marker – blue coloured aleurone layer. sible ways to increase the yield potential of wheat is A disadvantage of the system is the weak coloration to use hybrid varieties (Mette et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Debunking the Hybrid Myth
    Taken from Dr. John Navazio's speech Debunking the Hybrid Myth have the unenviable task here of stripping down what I anyone even knew there were even trade routes. They I consider the overblown ‘myth of hybrids.’ Even though must been handed from person-to-person one mile at a hybrids have worked out okay for many of the farmers time. Seeds, and involvement with seeds, were an everyday that I know, they’ve worked out because there hasn’t been reality of being a farmer. It was a part of the fabric of enough emphasis on the non-hybrids and OP’s. I’m going being a farmer and it was a reflection of whether you ate to tie the topic of comparing OP’s and hybrids and their and whether, as time went on, you were successful or not. relative strengths in with a discussion about what the The thing many people don’t realize is that it really wasn’t true vibrancy and diversity of a real seed system looks until the 1880’s that there was any kind of widespread seed like. Matthew Dillon and I started Organic Seed Alliance companies, regional seed companies indeed, but pre-1880’s because we saw an incredible need for farmers to really isn’t that long ago. Isn’t it amazing really when you think know how to grow high quality seed with all the necessary about that? traits that farmers need. Until the 1880’s basically all agricultural crops were Genetic resources need to be preserved and carefully maintained as what people very frequently now call managed.
    [Show full text]
  • Acceptance and Diffusion of Hybrid Corn Seed in Two Iowa Communities Bryce Ryan University of Ceylon
    Volume 29 Number 372 Acceptance and diffusion of hybrid corn Article 1 seed in two Iowa communities January 1950 Acceptance and diffusion of hybrid corn seed in two Iowa communities Bryce Ryan University of Ceylon Neal Gross University of Minnesota Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/researchbulletin Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Ryan, Bryce and Gross, Neal (1950) "Acceptance and diffusion of hybrid corn seed in two Iowa communities," Research Bulletin (Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station): Vol. 29 : No. 372 , Article 1. Available at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/researchbulletin/vol29/iss372/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station Publications at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Bulletin (Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station) by an authorized editor of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. January, 1950 Research Bulletin 372 Acceptance and Diffusion of Hybrid Corn Seed in Two Iowa Communities By BRYCE RYAN AND NEAL GROSS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION IOWA STATE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND MECHANIC ARTS SOCIOLOGY SUBSECTION ECONOMICS AND SOCIOLOGY SECTION AMES, IOWA CONTENTS Summary ...........................................................................•.......................................... 663 Introduction .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivation of Maize Landraces by Small-Scale Shade Coffee Farmers in Western El Salvador ⇑ Meryl Breton Olson , Katlyn S
    Agricultural Systems 111 (2012) 63–74 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Agricultural Systems journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy Cultivation of maize landraces by small-scale shade coffee farmers in western El Salvador ⇑ Meryl Breton Olson , Katlyn S. Morris, V. Ernesto Méndez University of Vermont, Jeffords Hall, 63 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, United States article info abstract Article history: Small-scale shade coffee agroecosystems have been noted for their potential for tree, bird, and insect bio- Received 4 October 2011 diversity conservation in the tropics. However, there is a lack of research on other productive areas man- Received in revised form 23 April 2012 aged by small-scale coffee farmers such as subsistence maize and bean (milpa) plots, which may be sites Accepted 17 May 2012 of important crop biodiversity conservation, particularly through the on-farm cultivation of native land- races. This study empirically examined the factors that influence farmers’ choices between landraces and improved varieties of maize, how seed type interacts with management decisions, and how yields of local Keywords: maize landraces compare with improved varieties on the farms of small-scale shade coffee farmers in Coffee western El Salvador. We conducted household interviews and focus groups with the membership of a Maize Central America 29-household coffee cooperative and tracked management and maize yields in the 42 milpa plots man- Agroecology aged by these households. Farmers planted both a hybrid improved variety and five local maize land- Biodiversity races. ANOVA and Pearson’s chi-square test were used to compare household characteristics, management, agroecological variables, and yields between plots planted with landraces and plots planted with the improved variety.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of a Male Sterility System for Hybrid Rice Breeding and Seed Production Using a Nuclear Male Sterility Gene
    Correction PLANT BIOLOGY Correction for “Construction of a male sterility system for hybrid rice breeding and seed production using a nuclear male sterility gene,” by Zhenyi Chang, Zhufeng Chen, Na Wang, Gang Xie, Jiawei Lu, Wei Yan, Junli Zhou, Xiaoyan Tang, and Xing Wang Deng, which appeared in issue 49, December 6, 2016, of Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (113:14145–14150; first published November 18, 2016; 10.1073/pnas.1613792113). The authors note that the names of two reviewers were omitted from the reviewer footnotes. James Giovannoni (Cornell University) and Z. Jeffrey Chan (University of Texas) should be acknowledged as having reviewed this manuscript. The corrected reviewer footnotes appear below. Contributed by Xing Wang Deng, August 23, 2016 (sent for review July 13, 2016; reviewed by Z. Jeffrey Chan, James Giovannoni, Yaoguang Liu, and Chuanqing Sun) Reviewers: Z.J.C., University of Texas; J.G., Cornell University; Y.L., South China Agricultural University; and C.S., China Agricultural University. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1619974114 CORRECTION www.pnas.org PNAS | January 3, 2017 | vol. 114 | no. 1 | E107 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 Construction of a male sterility system for hybrid rice breeding and seed production using a nuclear male sterility gene Zhenyi Changa,1, Zhufeng Chena,1, Na Wanga,1, Gang Xiea, Jiawei Lua, Wei Yanb, Junli Zhoua, Xiaoyan Tanga,b,2, and Xing Wang Denga,c,d,2 aShenzhen Institute of Molecular Crop Design, Shenzhen 518107, China; bSchool of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China; cSchool of Advanced Agriculture Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; and dSchool of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Contributed by Xing Wang Deng, August 23, 2016 (sent for review July 13, 2016; reviewed by Yaoguang Liu and Chuanqing Sun) The breeding and large-scale adoption of hybrid seeds is an Photoperiod-sensitive and thermo-sensitive lines are the two important achievement in agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from the Past in the Transition to Open-Pollinated Varieties
    sustainability Article Learning from the Past in the Transition to Open-Pollinated Varieties Dana Freshley 1 and Maria Mar Delgado-Serrano 2,* 1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium; [email protected] 2 Department of Agricultural Economics, WEARE, ETSIAM, Universidad de Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 23 April 2020; Accepted: 5 June 2020; Published: 9 June 2020 Abstract: In Nepal, hybrid seed introduction caused major yield gains in agricultural production, but at high environmental costs. The development of high-yielding open-pollinated varieties has spurred hope for more sustainable production systems. Nepal’s government is interested in boosting their use. This research aimed to identify farmer perceptions on the factors behind the past adoption of hybrid seeds in order to propose guidelines to support the diffusion of open-pollinated varieties. Using in-depth interviews, a focus group and participant observation we explored how the process of hybrid seed diffusion has taken place in Panchkhal valley, a representative case study. Social influencers such as change agents, peers, neighbours and seed sellers, as well as economic gains emerged as major reasons for hybrid seed adoption. We learnt that the role of external agents, on which most of the governmental strategies rely, changed over time as peer-based strategies became essential after the diffusion process started. To boost the adoption of open-pollinated seeds, efforts should concentrate in developing high-yielding varieties, engaging early-adopters among influential caste members and seed sellers, distributing seeds to both disadvantaged and wealthy farmers, and using different instruments, from institutional agencies to NGOs, to deliver training on sustainable farming techniques and their economic and environmental advantages.
    [Show full text]
  • Male-Sterile Tomatoes
    This is the thirteenth article in a series of brief progress reports on the application of the science of ge- Mal e -S t e ri I e To ma to es netics to commercial agriculture. unfruitful mutants offer several advantages for the production of hybrid seed Charles M. Rick Male-sterile tomatoes offer advan- ties, but it is entirely feasible to obtain tages in the production of hybrid seed- a male-sterile mutant in any variety from which substantially higher yields merely by searching for it, provided a than those of parent varieties have been sufficiently large planting-20 to 30 acres reported. -is available for inspection. Because tomatoes are naturally self- Male-sterile plants show the following pollinated, they are highly inbred and characteristics: 1 , pollen is nonviable or resemble corn in respect to the vigor of absent; 2, anthers are reduced in size to hybrids between inbred lines. Dominant varying degrees and are often modified disease resistance or other desirable in color; and 3, the whole flower may be dominant characters of one or both par- slightly smaller than that of normal ents can be combined in the hybrids. plants. In all other features the plants Fertile flower at left; male-sterile flower at appear to be normal. These advantages have not been fully ex- right. Note that male-sterile anthers-in center ploited because large-scale production of of flower-are shorter and more slender. If viable pollen is applied to flowers hybrid tomato seed by the usual methods of male-sterile plants, fruits and seeds is too costly.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Systems)
    FAO SSA Training Handout 0 - Session 3 (Seed systems) Seed and Variety. Definitions SEED Some basic definitions • A seed is an embryo, a living organism embedded in the supporting or the food storage tissue and seed coat which when planted produces normal seedling capable of growing into a plant. • Any part of the plant that can, when planted, produces normal seedlings capable of growing into a plant. • Plant parts with potential to germinate and grow into a plant include sowing e.g. Grains, tubers, bulbs, rhizomes, roots, cuttings, vines Classes of seed Breeder seed - the source for the production of seed of the other classes in a formal plant breeding/formal seed system. Foundation seed - The progeny of breeder seed, used as planting stock for registered and certified seed. Certified seed - Seed of a prescribed standard of quality, produced under a controlled multiplication scheme, either from basic seed or from a previous generation of certified seed. It is intended either for the production of a further generation of certified seed or for sowing to produce food, forage, etc. Quality Declared Seed FAO Seed security Assessment Training S3-H0 Handout - 1 | P a g e VARIETY (CULTIVAR) Variety (Cultivar) - an assemblage of cultivated plants which is clearly distinguishable by a group of characters (morphological, physiological, cytological, chemical or others) and which, when reproduced (sexually or asexually), retains its distinguishing characteristics.” Four different varieties of groundnut that could be distinguished by seed color Open-pollinated variety (OPV) - A heterogeneous variety of a cross-pollinated crop that is allowed to inter-pollinate freely during seed production; in contrast to hybrid seed production representing controlled crosspollination.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination and Seed Development in Hybrid Vegetable Seed Crops
    Pollination and seed development in hybrid vegetable seed crops Philip Brown University of Tasmania Project Number: VG03084 VG03084 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for the vegetable industry. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of South Pacific Seeds and Rijk Zwaan. All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 1399 4 Published and distributed by: Horticultural Australia Ltd Level 1 50 Carrington Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 E-Mail: [email protected] © Copyright 2006 Final Report Pollination and Seed Development in Hybrid Vegetable Seed Crops Project Number: VG03084 (June, 2006) Dr Cameron Spurr Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research Project Number: VG03084 Date: June 2006 Project Leader: Dr Philip Brown School of Agricultural Science / TIAR University of Tasmania Private Bag 98 Hobart Tasmania 7001 Australia Telephone: (03) 6226 2620 Email: [email protected] The purpose of this report is to provide detailed information to the public about vegetable seed production and quality research conducted during this study Any recommendations contained in this publication do not necessarily represent current HAL Limited policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seed Industry in US Agriculture
    Seed Industry Structure Is Characterized by Growth and Consolidation From the first ventures into the commercial production The development and diffusion of hybrid corn vari- of hybrid corn seed in the 1930s, to the recent mergers eties, with their inherent capacity to protect returns to and acquisitions, the seed industry has experienced private investment, transformed the U.S. seed industry. extensive structural change and transition. Beginning in 1930, approximately 150 companies formed to produce hybrid corn seed and some 40 existing seed companies expanded their businesses to Early Industry Structure: 1920-1970 include production of hybrid corn seed. While most firms were established to produce and sell seed, some Until the late 19th century, most U.S. farmers also instituted inhouse research and breeding programs depended on seed saved from their own crops culti- to improve existing hybrids. As long as the lineage of vated in the previous year and did not purchase a company’s hybrid remained unknown to competitors significant quantities of seed from commercial or farmers, the company continued to hold a unique sources. It was not uncommon for farmers to share and marketable product until an even better hybrid was surplus seed with friends and neighbors. The advent developed. By 1944, U.S. sales in the seed corn market and expansion of seed certification programs between had expanded to over $70 million, establishing corn 1915 and 1930 brought about large increases in the seed as the core business of the U.S. seed industry number of farmers who purchased seed from (Duvick, 1998, p. 199). commercial traders instead of producing it them- selves or obtaining it locally from neighbors.
    [Show full text]