Should Boeing and Airbus Sell Planes to Iran Air?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Should Boeing and Airbus Sell Planes to Iran Air? MEMORANDUM Should Boeing and Airbus sell planes to Iran Air? Iran Air and Mahan Air still ferrying militants and weapons to support Syria’s Bashar Assad At least 242 flights from Iran to Syria since the JCPOA commenced November 23, 2016 Executive Summary Earlier this year, Boeing and Iran Air announced a deal for the sale of 100 Boeing planes to the Iranian airline. In addition, Airbus had inked a deal for an additional 118 planes. On November 22, Airbus reported that it had received U.S. government backing for the export of these planes. The export license was granted by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control, and allows Airbus to deliver more than $20 billion worth of jets to Iran Air. This follows initial licenses in September by the U.S. government to Boeing and Airbus to deliver jetliners to Iran Air. Iran Air was designated by the U.S. Treasury Department on June 23, 2011 for “providing material support and services to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL).” MODAFL is designated under Executive Order 13382 for its proliferation activities.” Treasury stated that “commercial Iran Air flights have been used to transport missile or rocket components to Syria.” Treasury stated that “Iran Air has shipped military-related equipment on behalf of the IRGC since 2006 … Iran Air shipped aircraft-related raw materials to a MODAFL-associated company, including titanium sheets, which have dual-use military applications and can be used in support of advanced weapons programs.” It also stated that “rockets or missiles have been transported via Iran Air passenger aircraft, and IRGC officers occasionally take control over Iran Air flights carrying special IRGC-related cargo. The IRGC is also known to disguise and manifest such shipments as medicine and generic spare parts, and IRGC officers have discouraged Iran Air pilots from inspecting potentially dangerous IRGC-related cargo being carried aboard a commercial Iran Air aircraft, including to Syria.” The Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ senior fellow Emanuele Ottolenghi has tracked flights between Iran and Syria’s resupply route and has written extensively about the problem of selling additional planes to Iran. As the chart below shows, Iran Air has not ceased its illicit activities. It continues to fly the supply route, ferrying weapons and militants to the Syrian regime, which has killed almost 500,000 civilians in the last five years. Syria is a designated State Sponsor of Terrorism. Should Boeing and Airbus sell planes to Iran Air? 1 Since the implementation of the JCPOA deal on January 16th 2016, there have been at least 78 Mahan Air flights from Iran to Syria, and 56 Iran Air flights from Iran to Syria. Yet, Iran Air was removed from the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list on January 16, 2016 as part of the nuclear deal with Iran. As the evidence shows, Iran Air’s de-listing was not a consequence of a change in its behavior. Iran Air was designated in 2011 under a non-proliferation Executive Order (13382). It ought to be designated for its continued terrorism activities. State Department spokesman John Kirby said: “I’m not at liberty to go into the reasons behind the fact that it was removed from the SDN list.” Mahan Air, which remains designated by the Treasury for “providing financial, material and technological support to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force,” continues to ferry supplies and recruits to Syria as well. Over the past eight months, Cham Wings Airlines, a Syrian based airline, has been steadily increasing their flights from Tehran to Damascus. In 2015, the U.S. Treasury Department designated Cham Wings’ chairman Issam Shammout and his other airline Sky Blue Bird Aviation, for procuring aircrafts and parts for Iran’s Mahan Air. Cham Wings Airlines has been listed on the Commerce Department’s Entity List since 2011. Iran Air has a fleet of about 36 planes, though it is not clear whether it will decommission these aircraft. The airline could for example use its old planes for illicit activities while the new ones will be used for commercial routes. This raises questions about what Iran Air will do with its current fleet, and with no clear need for three times the number in its current fleet, what it will do with the incoming planes if the Boeing and Airbus deals move forward. Will Iran Air sell, lease, or otherwise provide the excess planes to the other Iranian airlines? Like Mahan Air, the two other Iranian airlines (Yas Air a.k.a. Pouya Air and Aban Air) remain designated for illicit activity by the U.S. government. Beyond the new aircraft, there are other troubling issue with these deals. Annex 2 of the JCPOA specifies that “the United States commits to allow for the sale of commercial passenger aircraft and related parts and services to Iran… provided that licensed items and services are used exclusively for commercial passenger aviation.” This component will provide support not only for the planes in the deal, but also for Iran’s current aircraft as well. If Iran is committed to continuing to use its old planes for illicit activities, this provision within the deal will prolong their shelf life considerably. The Treasury Department, on August 2014, designated Pouya Air on the grounds of “acting for or on behalf of the IRGC-QF”. Specifically, they were found to be “transporting illicit cargo, including weapons, to Iran’s clients in the Levant”. As Ottolenghi notes, Pouya Air remains designated in July 2016. Based on Ottolenghi’s tracking of flights using a publically available real-time tracking service, the chart below records at least 122 flights from Iran to Syria by Iran Air, Mahan Air, Pouya Air, Cham Wings and Iranian Air Force from July 14, 2015 – when the JCPOA commenced – and July 10, 2016. This does not reflect all flights because Iran Air uses deceptive practices, such as turning off its tracking signals and concealing its actual routes. Other flights were simply not tracked. Summary of data: • There were a minimum of 242 Iran Air, Mahan Air, Pouya Air and Iranian Air Force flights from Iran to Syria since the Iran nuclear deal agreement on July 14, 2015. At least 61 of these – or 25 percent – were Iran Air flights. 2 FDD’s Center on Sanctions and Illicit Finance • Since January 16 2016, the JCPOA Implementation Day, there have been 78 Mahan Air flights from Iran to Syria, and 56 Iran Air flights from Iran to Syria. • There were at least 156 flights from Tehran to Damascus and 9 from Tehran to Latakia or other places in Syria. Latakia houses a Russian air base. • There were 62 flights from Abadan, Iran, which serves as a logistical hub for the Revolutionary Guard’s airlifts to Syria. • There were 2 flights from Yazd to Damascus/Syria, one from Tabriz to Damascus, and one from Kermanshah to Damascus. Airline (flight number) Flight registration Departure Destination Date Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAA Tehran Damascus 15-Nov-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 13-Nov-16 Iran Air (IR697) Tehran Damascus 11-Nov-16 Iran Air (IR697) Tehran Damascus 10-Nov-16 Iran Air (IR697) Tehran Damascus 8-Nov-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAA Tehran Damascus 8-Nov-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 6-Nov-16 Mahan Air (W5142) EP-MNV Abadan Damascus 6-Nov-16 Iran Air (IR697) Tehran Damascus 3-Nov-16 Iran Air (IR697) Tehran Damascus 1-Nov-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 1-Nov-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 30-Oct-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBD Tehran Damascus 27-Oct-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 25-Oct-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 23-Oct-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBB Tehran Damascus 20-Oct-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBD Tehran Damascus 18-Oct-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 18-Oct-16 Mahan Air (W5142) EP-MNV Tehran Damascus 18-Oct-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 16-Oct-16 Iran Air (IR697) Tehran Damascus 13-Oct-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBD Tehran Damascus 11-Oct-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 11-Oct-16 Mahan Air (W5142) EP-MNX Tehran Damascus 11-Oct-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 10-Oct-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 9-Oct-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 9-Oct-16 Mahan Air (W5142) EP-MNX Tehran Damascus 6-Oct-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBC Tehran Damascus 6-Oct-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 4-Oct-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBD Tehran Damascus 4-Oct-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 2-Oct-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBD Tehran Damascus 29-Sep-16 Should Boeing and Airbus sell planes to Iran Air? 3 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBC Tehran Damascus 27-Sep-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 27-Sep-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 25-Sep-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBC Tehran Damascus 22-Sep-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBD Tehran Damascus 20-Sep-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 20-Sep-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 18-Sep-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBG Tehran Damascus 15-Sep-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBD Tehran Damascus 15-Sep-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 13-Sep-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 11-Sep-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBC Tehran Damascus 9-Sep-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBC Tehran Damascus 8-Sep-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 8-Sep-16 Mahan Air (W5142) EP-MMJ Tehran Damascus
Recommended publications
  • COVID-19 Updates
    Coronaviru��Update Islamic Republic of Iran| Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) | 20 July 2020 1 No. 152 / 20 July 2020 New Lab Total Lab Confirmed Cases New Deaths Confirmed Cases Total Recoveries Total Deaths IRAN 2,414 217 276,202 240,087 14,405 Trend of COVID‐19 I.R. IRAN Update Daily Laboratory Confirmed COVID-19 Cases, 19 Feb - 20 July 2020 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 19-Feb-20 5-Mar-20 20-Mar-20 4-Apr-20 19-Apr-20 4-May-20 19-May-20 3-Jun-20 18-Jun-20 3-Jul-20 18-Jul-20 Daily confirmed COVID-19 Deaths, 19 Feb - 20 July 2020 250 200 150 100 50 0 19-Feb-20 5-Mar-20 20-Mar-20 4-Apr-20 19-Apr-20 4-May-20 19-May-20 3-Jun-20 18-Jun-20 3-Jul-20 18-Jul-20 COVID-19 Cumulative Laboratory-Confirmed Cases and Recoveries, 19 Feb - 20 July 2020 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 19-Feb-20 05-Mar-20 20-Mar-20 04-Apr-20 19-Apr-20 04-May-20 19-May-20 03-Jun-20 18-Jun-20 03-Jul-20 18-Jul-20 Cumulative Cases Cumulative Recoveries Coronaviru��Update Islamic Republic of Iran| Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) | 20 July 2020 2 COVID-19 Patients in Intensive Care, 26 Mar - 20 July 2020 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 0 26­Mar­20 10­Apr­20 25­Apr­20 10­May­20 25­May­20 09­Jun­20 24­Jun­20 09­Jul­20 24­Jul­20 Laboratory Tests Update (na�onal �OVID‐19 laboratory network) Total Number of Daily COVID-19 PCR Tests 31,000 29,000 27,000 25,000 23,000 21,000 19,000 17,000 15,000 13,000 11,000 9,000 0 12­Apr­20 22­Apr­20 02­May­20 12­May­20 22­May­20 01­Jun­20 11­Jun­20 21­Jun­20 01­Jul­20 11­Jul­20 21­Jul­20 Total cumulative laboratory tests as of today is 2,175,217.
    [Show full text]
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • SDN Changes 2014
    OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL CHANGES TO THE Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List SINCE JANUARY 1, 2014 This publication of Treasury's Office of Foreign AL TOKHI, Qari Saifullah (a.k.a. SAHAB, Qari; IN TUNISIA; a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARIA IN Assets Control ("OFAC") is designed as a a.k.a. SAIFULLAH, Qari), Quetta, Pakistan; DOB TUNISIA; a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARI'AH; a.k.a. reference tool providing actual notice of actions by 1964; alt. DOB 1963 to 1965; POB Daraz ANSAR AL-SHARI'AH IN TUNISIA; a.k.a. OFAC with respect to Specially Designated Jaldak, Qalat District, Zabul Province, "SUPPORTERS OF ISLAMIC LAW"), Tunisia Nationals and other entities whose property is Afghanistan; citizen Afghanistan (individual) [FTO] [SDGT]. blocked, to assist the public in complying with the [SDGT]. AL-RAYA ESTABLISHMENT FOR MEDIA various sanctions programs administered by SAHAB, Qari (a.k.a. AL TOKHI, Qari Saifullah; PRODUCTION (a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARIA; OFAC. The latest changes may appear here prior a.k.a. SAIFULLAH, Qari), Quetta, Pakistan; DOB a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARI'A BRIGADE; a.k.a. to their publication in the Federal Register, and it 1964; alt. DOB 1963 to 1965; POB Daraz ANSAR AL-SHARI'A IN BENGHAZI; a.k.a. is intended that users rely on changes indicated in Jaldak, Qalat District, Zabul Province, ANSAR AL-SHARIA IN LIBYA; a.k.a. ANSAR this document that post-date the most recent Afghanistan; citizen Afghanistan (individual) AL-SHARIAH; a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARIAH Federal Register publication with respect to a [SDGT].
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Misuse of Civilian Aircraft
    Iran’s Misuse of Civilian Aircraft May 2020 1 Overview Iran’s civil aviation industry has historically aided the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) efforts to procure, supply and transport weapons, ballistic missile components and military personnel to its terrorist proxies and allies such as Hezbollah and the Assad regime. According to a July 2019 advisory published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, “Iran has routinely relied upon Iranian commercial airlines to fly fighters and materiel to international locations in furtherance of Iranian state-sponsored terror operations.” The advisory warns, “U.S. and non-U.S. persons operating in the civil aviation industry face potential civil and criminal consequences for violating OFAC’s [Office of Foreign Assets Control, Department of the Treasury] sanctions programs, including by engaging in unauthorized transfers of U.S.-origin aircraft or related goods, technology, or services to Iran.” As well as the notorious Mahan Air, which was sanctioned for its terrorist activities as far back as 2011 and is now banned from landing in all of mainland Europe, a multitude of Iranian civilian airlines are listed as Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGT), including Caspian Air, Meraj Air, Pouya Air, Dena Airways, Khors Aircompany, Qeshm Fars Air. On November 5, 2018, OFAC also added Iran Air, the main civilian airline of the Islamic Republic of Iran, to the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list. All are subject to “secondary sanctions,” which apply to non-U.S. persons outside the U.S. Under the terms of the JCPOA, the United States committed to “allow for the sale of commercial passenger aircraft and related parts and services to Iran by licensing the (i) export, re-export, sale, lease or transfer to Iran of commercial passenger aircraft for exclusively civil aviation end-use.” In December 2016, Boeing entered into a contract with Iran’s national airline, the government- owned Iran Air, for 80 civilian airliners valued at $16.6 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • MIDRMA Board/13-WP/6 3/03/2014 International Civil Aviation
    MIDRMA Board/13-WP/6 3/03/2014 International Civil Aviation Organization Middle East Regional Monitoring Agency Board Thirteenth Meeting (MIDRMA Board/13) (Bahrain, 9 –12 March 2014) Agenda Item 4: RVSM Monitoring and Related Technical Issues MID STATES MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (Presented by MIDRMA) SUMMARY The aim of this working paper is to address the RVSM Minimum Monitoring Requirements (MMR) applicable for each MIDRMA Member State. Action by the meeting is at paragraph 3. REFERENCES − ATM/AIM/SAR SG/13 Report − ICAO Doc 9547 − ICAO doc 9937 − ICAO Annex 6 Part I − MIDANPIRG/14 Report − MID RVSM SMR 2012-2013 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The height-keeping performance of aircraft is a key element in ensuring the safe operations of RVSM airspace. The RVSM height monitoring standards are considered the minimum requirement needed to maintain the safety of operations in the RVSM designated airspace. 1.2 Upon changes to ICAO Annex 6, Operation of Aircraft, Parts I & II, applicable on 18 November 2010, the following standard was adopted by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO): 7.2.7 The State of the Operator that has issued an RVSM approval to an operator shall establish a requirement which ensures that a minimum of two aeroplanes of each aircraft type grouping of the operator have their height-keeping performance monitored, at least once every two years or within intervals of 1000 flight hours per aeroplane, whichever period is longer. If an operator aircraft type grouping consists of a single aeroplane, monitoring of that aeroplane shall be accomplished within the specified period.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly OTP July 2019
    Monthly OTP July 2019 ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AIRLINES Contents On-Time is percentage of flights that depart or arrive within 15 minutes of schedule. Global OTP rankings are only assigned to all Airlines/Airports where OAG has status coverage for at least 80% of the scheduled flights. Regional Airlines Status coverage will only be based on actual gate times rather than estimated times. This July result in some airlines / airports being excluded from this report. If you would like to review your flight status feed with OAG pleas [email protected] MAKE SMARTER MOVES Airline Monthly OTP – July 2019 Page 1 of 1 Home GLOBAL AIRLINES – TOP 50 AND BOTTOM 50 TOP AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance BOTTOM AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size SATA International-Azores GA Garuda Indonesia 93.9% 1 13,798 52 S4 30.8% 160 833 253 Airlines S.A. XL LATAM Airlines Ecuador 92.0% 2 954 246 ZI Aigle Azur 47.8% 159 1,431 215 HD AirDo 90.2% 3 1,806 200 OA Olympic Air 50.6% 158 7,338 92 3K Jetstar Asia 90.0% 4 2,514 168 JU Air Serbia 51.6% 157 3,302 152 CM Copa Airlines 90.0% 5 10,869 66 SP SATA Air Acores 51.8% 156 1,876 196 7G Star Flyer 89.8% 6 1,987 193 A3 Aegean Airlines 52.1% 155 5,446 114 BC Skymark Airlines 88.9% 7 4,917 122 WG Sunwing Airlines Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Vea Un Ejemplo
    3 To search aircraft in the registration index, go to page 178 Operator Page Operator Page Operator Page Operator Page 10 Tanker Air Carrier 8 Air Georgian 20 Amapola Flyg 32 Belavia 45 21 Air 8 Air Ghana 20 Amaszonas 32 Bering Air 45 2Excel Aviation 8 Air Greenland 20 Amaszonas Uruguay 32 Berjaya Air 45 748 Air Services 8 Air Guilin 20 AMC 32 Berkut Air 45 9 Air 8 Air Hamburg 21 Amelia 33 Berry Aviation 45 Abu Dhabi Aviation 8 Air Hong Kong 21 American Airlines 33 Bestfly 45 ABX Air 8 Air Horizont 21 American Jet 35 BH Air - Balkan Holidays 46 ACE Belgium Freighters 8 Air Iceland Connect 21 Ameriflight 35 Bhutan Airlines 46 Acropolis Aviation 8 Air India 21 Amerijet International 35 Bid Air Cargo 46 ACT Airlines 8 Air India Express 21 AMS Airlines 35 Biman Bangladesh 46 ADI Aerodynamics 9 Air India Regional 22 ANA Wings 35 Binter Canarias 46 Aegean Airlines 9 Air Inuit 22 AnadoluJet 36 Blue Air 46 Aer Lingus 9 Air KBZ 22 Anda Air 36 Blue Bird Airways 46 AerCaribe 9 Air Kenya 22 Andes Lineas Aereas 36 Blue Bird Aviation 46 Aereo Calafia 9 Air Kiribati 22 Angkasa Pura Logistics 36 Blue Dart Aviation 46 Aero Caribbean 9 Air Leap 22 Animawings 36 Blue Islands 47 Aero Flite 9 Air Libya 22 Apex Air 36 Blue Panorama Airlines 47 Aero K 9 Air Macau 22 Arab Wings 36 Blue Ridge Aero Services 47 Aero Mongolia 10 Air Madagascar 22 ARAMCO 36 Bluebird Nordic 47 Aero Transporte 10 Air Malta 23 Ariana Afghan Airlines 36 Boliviana de Aviacion 47 AeroContractors 10 Air Mandalay 23 Arik Air 36 BRA Braathens Regional 47 Aeroflot 10 Air Marshall Islands 23
    [Show full text]
  • Mahan Air Bringing Respect to Iran
    Mahan Air Bringing Respect to Iran by Ken Donohue ARRIE DONOHUE C Iran, known as Persia until 1935, is a country with a proud and rich history (the Achaemenid, the First Persian Empire, was founded in 550 BC).Yet it is easily one of the most misunderstood nations in the world. Some are quick to vilify its people, with one world leader using the word ‘evil’ to describe the country. But Mahan Air, a private Iranian airline, is working hard to erase the misconceptions that people have about Iran. In doing so, it is bringing respect to a much-maligned country. CHRISTOPHER STEFANIDIS CHRISTOPHER Mahan Air has operated the Airbus A300B4 since 1999, when two former Thai Airways International examples were acquired. Named after a small town in south-central Iran, Mahan Air was aircraft put Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, on the airline’s network, formed by a son of President Rafsandjani in 1991 when the and allowed Mahan Air to stretch its wings to Bangkok, then Iranian government established a pilot program allowing to Delhi. private air carriers to offer comparable services to those provided Six Airbus A310-300s were bought from THY Turkish by state-run IranAir (Airways, Jan/Feb 1998). Mahan Air was one Airlines in 2002, two for immediate delivery. That year, a plan airline that took advantage of this new policy, and in 1992 to merge with another Iranian independent airline, Kish Air, began scheduled domestic passenger operations with two failed to materialize, as did a scheme to invest in Delsey Airlines Tupolev Tu-154M tri-jets; international service to Damascus of Belgium to offer a connection to New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Is Still Using Pseudo-Civilian Airlines to Resupply Assad by Farzin Nadimi
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 2785 Iran Is Still Using Pseudo-Civilian Airlines to Resupply Assad by Farzin Nadimi Apr 13, 2017 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Farzin Nadimi Farzin Nadimi, an associate fellow with The Washington Institute, is a Washington-based analyst specializing in the security and defense affairs of Iran and the Persian Gulf region. Brief Analysis While some international sanctions against Iranian civil aviation have been lifted, Tehran's insistence on using Mahan Air and other companies to send personnel and weapons to Syria may jeopardize the industry's future. s the aviation community and international media fixate on recent Boeing and Airbus orders by Iranian A airlines, Tehran continues to quietly purchase secondhand aircraft and parts through smaller companies, actively circumventing terrorism-related sanctions against certain airlines and individuals. By combining military and civil aviation components, Iran seeks to bolster its regional airlift capability, but any companies associated with such activity -- even indirectly -- are putting themselves in the crosshairs of U.S. sanctions policy. THE 'SYRIAN EXPRESS' AIR BRIDGE T he Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force has long used pseudo-civilian resources to help Iran's allies in Syria. In addition to close support from Mahan Air (see next section), the IRGC has set up its own cover airlines and service companies to provide logistical assistance and boost revenue. The main airline operated by the IRGC and its Pars Aviation Company is Pouya Air. Its predecessors, Pars Air and Yas Air, were designated as terrorist entities in 2012 by the United States, which accused them of transporting weapons to the Syrian regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Overwhelmed by Technology: How Did User Interface Failures on Board the USS Vincennes Lead to 290 Dead?
    Overwhelmed by Technology: How did user interface failures on board the USS Vincennes lead to 290 dead? Luke Swartz Background On July 3, 1988, the 290 passengers and crew of Iran Air Flight 655 were seemingly distant from the bitter and prolonged Iran-Iraq war. Many of the passengers were ultimately bound for Mecca, making their sacred pilgrimage as prescribed in the Koran. However, at 10:24 AM, seven minutes after the Airbus took off from Bandar Abbas Airport for Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, the United States Navy guided missile cruiser Vincennes fired two missiles at the plane, destroying the hapless target and its civilian occupants with horrific precision. What Went Wrong? Immediately after the tragedy, the US quickly blamed Iran for letting the plane fly over the combat situation below; then-Vice President Bush explained to the UN Security Council that the Vincennes “acted in self-defense,” thinking that Flight 655, after failing to respond to seven warnings, was “an Iranian military aircraft…approaching with hostile intentions.” Iran’s foreign minister charged the US with intentionally downing the plane, adding, “This was a premeditated act of aggression against the integrity of Tehran…a massacre.” While few objective observers think that the Vincennes’ action was intentional, and fewer still believe that its shooting down the civilian airliner was correct, numerous experts have debated what went wrong that fateful day. Many theories deal with aspects of the situation and the key players both on the Vincennes and in the cockpit of Flight 655. Failure to Respond? We may never know why Flight 655 failed to respond to the Vincennes’ repeated warnings, as its “black box” flight recorder could not be recovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Trend of COVID‐19 I.R. IRAN Update 398 / 23 March 2021
    No. 398 / 23 March 2021 New Lab Total Lab Confirmed Cases New Deaths Confirmed Cases Total Recoveries Total Deaths IRAN 7,290 74 1,815,712 1,555,766 61,951 Trend of COVID‐19 I.R. IRAN Update Daily Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 Cases, 19 February 2020 - 23 March 2021 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 19-Feb-20 4-Apr-20 19-May-20 3-Jul-20 17-Aug-20 1-Oct-20 15-Nov-20 30-Dec-20 13-Feb-21 30-Mar-21 Daily Confirmed COVID-19 Deaths, 19 February 2020 - 23 March 2021 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 19-Feb-20 4-Apr-20 19-May-20 3-Jul-20 17-Aug-20 1-Oct-20 15-Nov-20 30-Dec-20 13-Feb-21 30-Mar-21 COVID-19 Cumulative Laboratory-Confirmed Cases and Recoveries, 19 February 2020 - 23 March 2021 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 20-Feb-20 05-Apr-20 20-May-20 04-Jul-20 18-Aug-20 02-Oct-20 16-Nov-20 31-Dec-20 14-Feb-21 31-Mar-21 Cumula�ve Cases Cumula�ve Recoveries Coronaviru��Update Islamic Republic of Iran| Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) | 23 March 2021 2 COVID-19 Patients in Intensive Care, 26 March 2020 - 23 March 2021 6,500 6,000 5,500 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 0 26-Mar-20 10-May-20 24-Jun-20 08-Aug-20 22-Sep-20 06-Nov-20 21-Dec-20 04-Feb-21 21-Mar-21 Laboratory Tests Update (Na�onal COVID­19 Laboratory Network) Total Number of Daily COVID-19 PCR Tests 69,000 67,000 65,000 63,000 61,000 59,000 57,000 55,000 53,000 51,000 49,000 47,000 45,000 43,000 41,000 39,000 37,000 35,000 33,000 31,000 29,000 27,000 25,000 23,000 21,000 19,000 17,000 15,000 13,000 11,000 9,000 0 12-Apr-20 27-May-20 11-Jul-20 25-Aug-20 09-Oct-20 23-Nov-20 07-Jan-21 21-Feb-21 07-Apr-21 Total cumulative laboratory tests as of today is 12,284,847.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Volatility Steadies the Climb
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Global volatility steadies the climb Cirium Fleet Forecast’s latest outlook sees heady growth settling down to trend levels, with economic slowdown, rising oil prices and production rate challenges as factors Narrowbodies including A321neo will dominate deliveries over 2019-2038 Airbus DAN THISDELL & CHRIS SEYMOUR LONDON commercial jets and turboprops across most spiking above $100/barrel in mid-2014, the sectors has come down from a run of heady Brent Crude benchmark declined rapidly to a nybody who has been watching growth years, slowdown in this context should January 2016 low in the mid-$30s; the subse- the news for the past year cannot be read as a return to longer-term averages. In quent upturn peaked in the $80s a year ago. have missed some recurring head- other words, in commercial aviation, slow- Following a long dip during the second half Alines. In no particular order: US- down is still a long way from downturn. of 2018, oil has this year recovered to the China trade war, potential US-Iran hot war, And, Cirium observes, “a slowdown in high-$60s prevailing in July. US-Mexico trade tension, US-Europe trade growth rates should not be a surprise”. Eco- tension, interest rates rising, Chinese growth nomic indicators are showing “consistent de- RECESSION WORRIES stumbling, Europe facing populist backlash, cline” in all major regions, and the World What comes next is anybody’s guess, but it is longest economic recovery in history, US- Trade Organization’s global trade outlook is at worth noting that the sharp drop in prices that Canada commerce friction, bond and equity its weakest since 2010.
    [Show full text]