Special Interest Track
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Paula Franzese*
FRANZESE 8/8/2011 4:15 PM NEW JERSEY COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITIES: PREDICTORS OF DISTRESS AND AN AGENDA FOR REFORM Paula Franzese Prof. John Payne was the quintessential gentleman and scholar. I had the privilege of collaborating with him on several initiatives that aimed to make real the promise of the Mount Laurel mandate, so that decent and affordable housing might one day be available to all. John was a pragmatic idealist. He dared to believe in the nobility of our craft, while finding practical solutions to complex social problems. On several occasions, he taught for us at Seton Hall Law School, and our students adored him. We all did. John taught that wisdom and compassion are indivisible. We are better because of him. I. INTRODUCTION Common interest communities (CIC), a somewhat generic characterization that includes within its grasp planned and single- family home developments, condominiums, housing cooperatives and gated and walled communities all under the umbrella of a homeowner association, are the mainstay of residential development. It has been estimated that one in five Americans now live in some form of homeowner-association (HOA) controlled dwelling.1 In some states, upwards of fifty percent of homeowners find themselves living in a CIC.2 Much has been written about the proliferation of common interest communities, and the phenomenon of privatization that * Peter W. Rodino Professor of Law, Seton Hall University School of Law. The author thanks Steven Siegel, Bretzfelder Constitutional Law Fellow, Columbia Law School, for his immeasurable assistance and insights, and Javier Diaz, Magdalena Czykier, Brigitte Radigan, Nicholas Dimakos and Katelyn Sornik for their invaluable work. -
Sabbatical Panorama 2013-2014
Sabbatical Panorama 2013•2014 i Table of Contents Provost’s Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ i Simone A. James Alexander ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Assefaw Bariagaber ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 David Bénéteau......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Alan Brill ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Janine P. Buckner ................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Martha C. Carpentier ............................................................................................................................................................ 16 Colleen Conway ...................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Jorge López Cortina ............................................................................................................................................................. -
Angela Carmella CV
ANGELA C. CARMELLA Seton Hall University School of Law One Newark Center Newark, New Jersey 07102 [email protected] / 973-642-8843 EXPERIENCE Professor of Law, Seton Hall University School of Law, Newark, New Jersey 1988 - present • The James B. and Anita L. Ventantonio Board of Visitors Research Scholar (2019-2022) • John Courtney Murray Professorship, 2008-2019 • Francis P. McQuade Research Fellow, 2007-2008; Dean’s Fellow, 2006-2007 • Full Professor since 1994 • Courses: Religion and the First Amendment; Property; Zoning, Planning and Land Use Policy • Founding Member, LEO (Legal Education Opportunity) Advisory Board • Adviser, First Generation Law Students Association Visiting Scholar and Lecturer on Religion and Society, Harvard Divinity School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1994 - 1995 Sabbatical • Taught Seminar on Religious Liberty • Fellow, Center for the Study of Values in Public Life • Adviser to Thomas Temple Hoopes Prize Winner (recognized for excellence in faculty supervision) Associate, Csaplar & Bok, Boston, Massachusetts, September 1984 - June 1988 • 1985 - 1988 (Real Estate Department): acquisition, development, and leasing (commercial and residential); rehabilitation and adaptive re-use of historic structures; environmental and zoning regulatory work; and title review • 1984 - 1985: rotations in the finance, corporate, real estate, tax, and litigation departments Other Legal Experience Research Assistant to David Smith, Human Rights Program, Harvard Law School, 1984 Summer Associate, Csaplar & Bok, Boston, Massachusetts, Summer 1982 Summer Associate, Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan, Washington, D.C., Summer 1981 Volunteer Researcher, Amnesty International, Washington, D.C., Summer 1981 Legislative Intern, Methodist Board of Church and Society, Interreligious Task Force on U.S. Food Policy, Washington, D.C., Summer 1979 Congressional Intern, Rep. -
The Fate of Affordable Housing Legislation in New Jersey: How
ADDES UPDATED.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 12/12/2011 2:32 PM THE FATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING LEGISLATION IN NEW JERSEY: HOW GOVERNOR CHRISTIE’S PROPOSED S-1 LEGISLATION THREATENS TO UNDO THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT DECISIONS IN MOUNT LAUREL I AND MOUNT LAUREL II Kirah Addes∗ I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 82 II. BACKGROUND .............................................................................. 85 A. Zoning .................................................................................... 85 B. New Jersey’s Courts Responses to Exclusionary Zoning ....... 87 C. COAH ..................................................................................... 92 D. S-1 and A-3447 ...................................................................... 97 III. THE FATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING LEGISLATION IN NEW JERSEY ..................................................................... 100 A. Constitutionality of S-1: S-1 vs. The Mount Laurel Doctrine .............................................................................. 100 B. Governor Christie Should Sign S-1(2) ............................... 103 IV. CONCLUSION ............................................................................. 105 I. INTRODUCTION The nineteenth century Industrial Revolution brought overcrowding and pollution to cities across the United States.1 In response to these problems, municipalities began implementing zoning ordinances, which allowed cities and towns to control land-planning ∗ J.D. Candidate, -
Tenant Blacklisting and the Denial of Opportunity Paula A
Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 45 Article 2 Number 3 The Realities of Renting 2018 A Place to Call Home: Tenant Blacklisting and the Denial of Opportunity Paula A. Franzese Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Recommended Citation Paula A. Franzese, A Place to Call Home: Tenant Blacklisting and the Denial of Opportunity, 45 Fordham Urb. L.J. 661 (2018). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol45/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A PLACE TO CALL HOME: TENANT BLACKLISTING AND THE DENIAL OF OPPORTUNITY Paula A. Franzese* Introduction ............................................................................................. 662 I. The Practice of Tenant Blacklisting................................................ 666 II. In Their Own Words: Tenants’ Stories ......................................... 673 A. Yanira Cortes ......................................................................... 674 B. Ada Lopez ............................................................................... 678 C. Maurice Smith ......................................................................... 679 D. Lori Dibble ............................................................................. 681 E. Ebony Watson