DOCSLIB.ORG

CUI-UI (Chasmistes Cujus)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CUI-UI (Chasmistes Cujus) TECHNICAL/AGENCY DRAFT CUI-UI (Chasmistes cujus) Second Revision RECOVERY PLAN Original Approved: January 23, 1978 First Update Approved: May 8, 1980 First Revision Approved: November 22, 1983 Prepared by The Cui-ui Recovery Team for Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: • DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. The cost and time required to achieve recovery are presented as estimates because it is uncertain which of the tasks identified will be selected, the degree to which they will be implemented, and how effective each will be. LITERATURE CITATION: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991. Cui-ui Chasmistes cuius) Recovery Plan (2nd revision). Portland, Oregon. pp. Additional copies may be purchased from: Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 5430 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 110 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Telephone: 301/492-6403 Or 800/582-3421 The fee for the plan varies depending on the number of pages of the Plan. 1 a le ( , ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Cui-ui Recovery Team is grateful to: Dr. John Emlen, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Seattle; Bob Young, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation - Sacramento; Dr. Don Frevert, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation - Denver; and Chester Buchanan, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Reno for their valuable assistance throughout the development of the Cui-ui Recovery Plan. Members of the Cui-ui Recovery Team prepared this recovery plan. The team was composed of the following individuals: Tom Strekal, Team Leader U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Carson City, Nevada James J. Cooper Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Carson City, Nevada Jim Curran Nevada Department of Wildlife Fallon, Nevada Dr. W. yr-Minckley Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona G. Gary Scoppettone U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reno, Nevada Dr. Gary Vinyard University of Nevada, Reno Reno, Nevada Paul Wagner Pyramid Lake Fisheries Sutcliffe, Nevada II s a Costs: ($000's) Year Nee&Il Need 2 Need 3 NeehiA Need 5 Total 1992 250 150 100 280 0 780 1993 2,280 320 100 280 100 3,080 1994 3,420 220 100 280 100 4,120 1995 3,250 220 100 280 0 3,850 1996 3,250 220 100 390 0 3,960 1997 3,200 220 500 280 0 4,200 1998 3,200 70 100 280 0 3,650 1999 3,100 70 100 280 0 3,550 2000 3,100 70 100 280 0 3,550 2001 3,100 70 100 390 0 3,660 2002 100 70 100 280 0 550 2003 100 70 100 280 0 550 2004 100 70 100 280 0 550 2005 100 70 100 280 0 550 2006 100 70 100 390 0 660 2007 100 70 100 280 0 550 2008 100 70 100 280 0 550 2009 100 70 100 280 0 550 2010 100 70 100 280 0 550 2011 100 70 100 390 0 660 2012 100 70 100 280 0 550 Recovery Cost 29,250 2,400 2,500 6,320 200 40,670 Date of Recovery: Delisting could be initiated in 2012 if recovery criteria have been met. iv PREFACE The Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon re- established the Cui-ui Recovery Team in March 1989. Its mission was to update or revise the Cui-ui Recovery Plan. The Team decided after reviewing recently collected biological, chemical and hydrological data, and the requirements of Endangered Species Act as amended in 1988, that the plan needed an extensive revision. The Team's revision (second) offers a quantifiable recovery objective (based upon probabilistic analysis of simulated cukui response to various hydrologic conditions using computer models) with site-specific tasks which, if implemented, are expected to achieve recovery (i.e., eventual delisting) of cui-ui. S 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER ........................................................................................................................................................ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE RECOVERY PLAN FOR CUI-UI ....................................................... iii PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................................ LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................................. viii I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Description 1 B. Distribution ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Historical .................................................................................................................. 3 2. Recent ....................................................................................................................... 3 3. Current ..................................................................................................................... 3 C. Life History and Habitat ............................................................................................................... 5 1. Lake Habitat .......................................................................................................... 5 2. River Habitat .......................................................................................................... 5 3. Spawning .................................................................................................................. 6 4. Fecundity .................................................................................................................. 7 5. Growth, Survival and Longevity ......................................................................... 8 6. Population Size ....................................................................................................... 8 7. Food .......................................................................................................................... 8 8. Genetics .................................................................................................................. 9 D. Reasons for Listing ....................................................................................................................... 9 E. Recent Conservation Measures .................................................................................................. 10 1. Recovery Plans and Recovery Team ............................................................... 10 2. Tribal Fishery ....................................................................................................... 11 3. Hatchery Operations .......................................................................................... 11 4. Marble Bluff Dam, Marble Bluff Fish Facility, and Pyramid Lake Fishway .................................................................................................................. 12 5. Stampede Reservoir ............................................................................................. 12 6. Spawning Run Management ............................................................................... 13 7. Research: life history, population dynamics, genetics, and habitat ........... 14 8. Regulation of Newlands Project Water Diversions ......................................... 15 9. Benefits of Conservation Measures .................................................................. 16 F. Future Conservation Measures .................................................................................................. 17 1. Truckee-Carson-Pyramid Lake Settlement Act ............................................... 17 2. Cui-ui Research .................................................................................................. 17 3. Pyramid Lake Nutrient Loading Study ............................................................ 17 4. Management Actions .......................................................................................... 17 vi G. Recovery Strategy ....................................................................................................................... 18 1. Secure and Maintain Habitat ............................................................................ 18 2. Research ............................................................................................................... 19 3. Operate Cui-ui Hatchery .................................................................................... 19 4. No Translocation .................................................................................................. 20 5. Use Computer Models ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Endangered Species (Protection, Conser Va Tion and Regulation of Trade)
    ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSER VA TION AND REGULATION OF TRADE) THE ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND REGULATION OF TRADE) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Preliminary Short title. Interpretation. Objects of Act. Saving of other laws. Exemptions, etc., relating to trade. Amendment of Schedules. Approved management programmes. Approval of scientific institution. Inter-scientific institution transfer. Breeding in captivity. Artificial propagation. Export of personal or household effects. PART I. Administration Designahem of Mana~mentand establishment of Scientific Authority. Policy directions. Functions of Management Authority. Functions of Scientific Authority. Scientific reports. PART II. Restriction on wade in endangered species 18. Restriction on trade in endangered species. 2 ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND REGULA TION OF TRADE) Regulation of trade in species spec fled in the First, Second, Third and Fourth Schedules Application to trade in endangered specimen of species specified in First, Second, Third and Fourth Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Importation of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Introduction from the sea certificate for specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Import of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Introduction from the sea of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Import of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Export of specimens specified in Fourth Schedule. PART 111.
    [Show full text]
  • Cui-Ui Recovery Plan
    1 ESA 81 RECOVERY PLAN DRAWING BY: JOSETTECUILEY I CUI-UI RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by the Cui-ui Recovery Team December 1977 TEAM MEMBERS Earl Pyle, Team Leader, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Reno, Nevada John Frazier, Pyramid Lake Paiute Indian Tribe, Nixon, Nevada Donald King, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Reno, Nevada Kay Johnson, Nevada Department of Fish and Game, Reno, Nevada Dale Lockard, Nevada Department of Fish and Game, Reno, Nevada Thomas J.. Trelease, Team Advisor, Verdi , Nevada Published by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Program Region 1 Portland, Oregon Approved Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Title Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART I. INTRODUCTION .................. 1 Former Status ................. 2 Reasons for Decline of the Fishery ....... 3 Figure 1 .................... 4 PART II . THE RECOVERY PLAN ............... Objectives and Rationale ............ Accomplishments ................ Specific Problem Areas ............. Recovery Plan Out1 ine ............. Action Diagram ................. Action Narrative ................ PART I11 . SCHEDULE OF PRIORITIES. RESPONSIBILITIES & COSTS APPENDIX A . REFERENCES CITED ................ APPENDIX B . PROPOSED ESSENTIAL HABITAT ........... Maps . Proposed Essential Habitat ....... APPENDIX C . LETTERS OF COMMENT ............... CUI-UI RECOVERY PLAN PART I INTRODUCTION The history of the cui-ui 1 (Chasmistes cujus) and the Pyramid Lake Paiute Indian Tribe is so intimately entwined that the unwritten, ancestral name for the tribe is Kuyuidokado (Wheeler, 1969) or Ku-yu-wi-kut-teh (Hermann, 1973) meaning "sucker eaters". Spawning runs of cui-ui and cutthroat trout (mclarki provided a readily available and dependable source of food. There can be no doubt the shores of Pyramid Lake were highly val- ued as a haven against the uncertainty and hardship of obtaining food in the arid and often inhospitable lands of the Great Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History of the Cui-Ui, Chasmistes Cujus Cope, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada: a Review
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 45 Number 4 Article 1 10-31-1985 Life history of the cui-ui, Chasmistes cujus Cope, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada: a review William F. Sigler W.F. Sigler and Associates Inc., Logan, Utah Steven Vigg University of Nevada, Reno Mimi Bres George Washington University, Washington, D.C. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Sigler, William F.; Vigg, Steven; and Bres, Mimi (1985) "Life history of the cui-ui, Chasmistes cujus Cope, in Pyramid Lake, Nevada: a review," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 45 : No. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol45/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Great Basin Naturalist Published AT Provo, Utah, by Bricham Young University ISSN 0017-3614 Volume 45 31 October 1985 No. 4 LIFE HISTORY OF THE CUI-UI, CHASMISTES CUJUS COPE, IN PYRAMID LAKE, NEVADA: A REVIEW William F". Sigler', Steven Vigg", and Minii Bres' Abstract—The cui-ui, Chasmistcs ciijus Cope, a member of the .sucker family and endemic to Pyramid Lake, Nevada, is listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Cui-ui was once a major source of sustenance for native Americans, who have inhabited the Lahontan region for at least 11,000 years. The Northern Paiutes developed sophisticated fishing technology to harvest this resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishtraits: a Database on Ecological and Life-History Traits of Freshwater
    FishTraits database Traits References Allen, D. M., W. S. Johnson, and V. Ogburn-Matthews. 1995. Trophic relationships and seasonal utilization of saltmarsh creeks by zooplanktivorous fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 42(1)37-50. [multiple species] Anderson, K. A., P. M. Rosenblum, and B. G. Whiteside. 1998. Controlled spawning of Longnose darters. The Progressive Fish-Culturist 60:137-145. [678] Barber, W. E., D. C. Williams, and W. L. Minckley. 1970. Biology of the Gila Spikedace, Meda fulgida, in Arizona. Copeia 1970(1):9-18. [485] Becker, G. C. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. Belk, M. C., J. B. Johnson, K. W. Wilson, M. E. Smith, and D. D. Houston. 2005. Variation in intrinsic individual growth rate among populations of leatherside chub (Snyderichthys copei Jordan & Gilbert): adaptation to temperature or length of growing season? Ecology of Freshwater Fish 14:177-184. [349] Bonner, T. H., J. M. Watson, and C. S. Williams. 2006. Threatened fishes of the world: Cyprinella proserpina Girard, 1857 (Cyprinidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes. In Press. [133] Bonnevier, K., K. Lindstrom, and C. St. Mary. 2003. Parental care and mate attraction in the Florida flagfish, Jordanella floridae. Behavorial Ecology and Sociobiology 53:358-363. [410] Bortone, S. A. 1989. Notropis melanostomus, a new speices of Cyprinid fish from the Blackwater-Yellow River drainage of northwest Florida. Copeia 1989(3):737-741. [575] Boschung, H.T., and R. L. Mayden. 2004. Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Books, Washington. [multiple species] 1 FishTraits database Breder, C. M., and D. E. Rosen. 1966. Modes of reproduction in fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History and Status of the Endangered Cui-Ui of Pyramid Lake, Nevada
    Fish and Wildlife Research 1 Life History and Status of the Endangered Cui-ui of Pyramid Lake, Nevada By G. Gary Scoppettone Mark Coleman Gary A. Wedemeyer UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Washington, D.C. • 1986 Contents Page Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area .............................................................................................................................. 3 Spawning Migration ............................................................................................................ Prespawning Aggregation ............................................................................................. History of Recent Spawning Migrations ............................................................... 6 Upstream Migration ....................................................................................................... Reproduction ......................................................................................................................... 8 Fecundity ............................................................................................................................ 9 Spawning Habitat ............................................................................................................. 9 Emigration of Larvae .......................................................................................................... 10 Timing of
    [Show full text]
  • Introgressive Hybridization and the Evolution of Lake-Adapted Catostomid Fishes
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Introgressive Hybridization and the Evolution of Lake-Adapted Catostomid Fishes Thomas E. Dowling1¤a*, Douglas F. Markle2, Greg J. Tranah3¤b, Evan W. Carson1¤c, David W. Wagman2¤d, Bernard P. May3 1 School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America, 2 Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America, 3 Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America ¤a Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit Michigan, United States of America ¤b Current address: California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America ¤c Current address: Biology Department and Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America ¤d Current address: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Newport, Oregon, United States of America * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Dowling TE, Markle DF, Tranah GJ, Carson EW, Wagman DW, May BP (2016) Introgressive Abstract Hybridization and the Evolution of Lake-Adapted Catostomid Fishes. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0149884. Hybridization has been identified as a significant factor in the evolution of plants as groups doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149884 of interbreeding species retain their phenotypic integrity despite gene exchange among Editor: Filippos A. Aravanopoulos, Aristotle forms. Recent studies have identified similar interactions in animals; however, the role of University of Thessaloniki, GREECE hybridization in the evolution of animals has been contested. Here we examine patterns of Received: October 15, 2015 gene flow among four species of catostomid fishes from the Klamath and Rogue rivers using molecular and morphological traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Suckers (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Catostomidae): Further Evidence of Relationships Provided by the Single-Copy Nuclear Gene IRBP2
    Zootaxa 3586: 195–210 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:66B1A0F0-5912-4C52-A9EA-D7265024064B Phylogeny of suckers (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Catostomidae): further evidence of relationships provided by the single-copy nuclear gene IRBP2 WEI-JEN CHEN1 & RICHARD L. MAYDEN2* 1Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, No.1 Sec. 4 Roosevelt Rd. Taipei 10617, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, 3507 Laclede Ave, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, 63103 USA. E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author: R.L. Mayden Abstract The order Cypriniformes and family Catostomidae, the Holarctic suckers, have received considerable phylogenetic attention in recent years. These studies have provided contrasting phylogenies and classifications to historical, morphology-based phylogenetic and prephylogenetic hypotheses of relationships of species and the naturalness of hypothesized genera, tribes, and subfamilies. To date, nearly all molecular work on catostomids has been done using DNA sequence variation of mitochondrial genes. In this study, we add to our previous investigations to identify single-copy nuclear gene markers for diploid and polyploid cypriniforms, and to expand sequences of nuclear IRBP2 gene to 1,933 bp for 23 catostomid species. This effort expands our previous studies using only partial sequences of 849 bp. The extended gene fragment consists of nearly the complete gene across exon1 to exon 4 and is used in two analyses to infer phylogenetic relationships of the currently, or formerly, recognized genera, tribes, and subfamilies. One analysis includes 23 ingroup species for which the larger fragment of IRBP2 could be obtained; these taxa were also included in a second analysis of 67 samples of 52 species for the shorter fragment.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Hierarchy Defines Riverscape Genetics of a North American Desert
    Molecular Ecology (2013) 22, 956–971 doi: 10.1111/mec.12156 Stream hierarchy defines riverscape genetics of a North American desert fish 1 MATTHEW W. HOPKEN,* MARLIS R. DOUGLAS†‡ and MICHAEL E. DOUGLAS†‡ *Graduate Degree Program in Ecology and Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA, †Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign, IL 61820, USA, ‡Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA Abstract Global climate change is apparent within the Arctic and the south-western deserts of North America, with record drought in the latter reflected within 640 000 km2 of the Colorado River Basin. To discern the manner by which natural and anthropogenic drivers have compressed Basin-wide fish biodiversity, and to establish a baseline for future climate effects, the Stream Hierarchy Model (SHM) was employed to juxtapose fluvial topography against molecular diversities of 1092 Bluehead Sucker (Catostomus discobolus). MtDNA revealed three geomorphically defined evolutionarily significant units (ESUs): Bonneville Basin, upper Little Colorado River and the remaining Colora- do River Basin. Microsatellite analyses (16 loci) reinforced distinctiveness of the Bonneville Basin and upper Little Colorado River, but subdivided the Colorado River Basin into seven management units (MUs). One represents a cline of three admixed gene pools comprising the mainstem and its lower-gradient tributaries. Six others are not only distinct genetically but also demographically (i.e. migrants/generation <9.7%). Two of these (i.e. Grand Canyon and Canyon de Chelly) are defined by geomorphol- ogy, two others (i.e. Fremont-Muddy and San Raphael rivers) are isolated by sharp declivities as they drop precipitously from the west slope into the mainstem Colorado/ Green rivers, another represents an isolated impoundment (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 19002010
    Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 Author(s): Noel M. Burkhead Reviewed work(s): Source: BioScience, Vol. 62, No. 9 (September 2012), pp. 798-808 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the American Institute of Biological Sciences Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.5 . Accessed: 21/09/2012 12:59 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and American Institute of Biological Sciences are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to BioScience. http://www.jstor.org Articles Articles Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 NOEL M. BURKHEAD Widespread evidence shows that the modern rates of extinction in many plants and animals exceed background rates in the fossil record. In the present article, I investigate this issue with regard to North American freshwater fishes. From 1898 to 2006, 57 taxa became extinct, and three distinct populations were extirpated from the continent. Since 1989, the numbers of extinct North American fishes have increased by 25%. From the end of the nineteenth century to the present, modern extinctions varied by decade but significantly increased after 1950 (post-1950s mean = 7.5 extinct taxa per decade).
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 3: DELETION TABLES 3.1 Aluminum
    APPENDIX 3: DELETION TABLES APPENDIX 3: DELETION TABLES 3.1 Aluminum TABLE 3.1.1: Deletion process for the Santa Ana River aluminum site-specific database. Phylum Class Order Family Genus/Species Common Name Code Platyhelminthes Turbellaria Tricladida Planarlidae Girardiaia tigrina Flatworm G Annelida Oligochaeta Haplotaxida Tubificidae Tubifex tubifex Worm F Mollusca Gastropoda Limnophila Physidae Physa sp. Snail G Arthropoda Branchiopoda Diplostraca Daphnidae Ceriodaphnia dubia Cladoceran O* Arthropoda Branchiopoda Diplostraca Daphnidae Daphnia magna Cladoceran O* Arthropoda Malacostraca Isopoda Asellidae Caecidotea aquaticus Isopod F Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Gammaridae Crangonyx pseudogracilis Amphipod F Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Gammaridae Gammarus pseudolimnaeus Amphipod G Arthropoda Insecta Plecoptera Perlidae Acroneuria sp. Stonefly O Arthropoda Insecta Diptera Chironomidae Tanytarsus dissimilis Midge G Chordata Actinopterygii Salmoniformes Salmonidae Oncorhynchus mykiss Rainbow trout D Chordata Actinopterygii Salmoniformes Salmonidae Oncorhynchus tschawytscha Chinook Salmon D Chordata Actinopterygii Salmoniformes Salmonidae Salmo salar Atlantic salmon D Chordata Actinopterygii Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Hybognathus amarus Rio Grande silvery minnow F Chordata Actinopterygii Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Pimephales promelas Fathead minnow S Chordata Actinopterygii Perifomes Centrarchidae Lepomis cyanellus Green sunfish S Chordata Actinopterygii Perifomes Centrarchidae Micropterus dolomieui Smallmouth bass G Chordata Actinopterygii
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater And
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Lost River Sucker and Shortnose Sucker
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 71 Number 4 Article 2 1-25-2012 Status of Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker Josh E. Rasmussen U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Klamath Falls, OR, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Rasmussen, Josh E. (2012) "Status of Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 71 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol71/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 71(4), © 2011, pp. 442–455 STATUS OF LOST RIVER SUCKER AND SHORTNOSE SUCKER Josh E. Rasmussen ABSTRACT.—The endangered Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus) and shortnose sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris) are endemic to the Upper Klamath Basin, Oregon and California. The once very abundant populations have declined drastically due to a combination of habitat loss and impairment, disruption of reproduction and gene flow, intensive harvest, and loss of entire populations. Spawning populations within Upper Klamath Lake are declining and have not had significant recruit- ment for over a decade. In addition to habitat loss, these populations are threatened by periodic harmful water conditions resulting from massive algal blooms and entrainment of larvae and juveniles into water delivery systems or hydroelectric structures.
    [Show full text]