DOCSLIB.ORG

Fishtraits: a Database on Ecological and Life-History Traits of Freshwater

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fishtraits: a Database on Ecological and Life-History Traits of Freshwater FishTraits database Traits References Allen, D. M., W. S. Johnson, and V. Ogburn-Matthews. 1995. Trophic relationships and seasonal utilization of saltmarsh creeks by zooplanktivorous fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 42(1)37-50. [multiple species] Anderson, K. A., P. M. Rosenblum, and B. G. Whiteside. 1998. Controlled spawning of Longnose darters. The Progressive Fish-Culturist 60:137-145. [678] Barber, W. E., D. C. Williams, and W. L. Minckley. 1970. Biology of the Gila Spikedace, Meda fulgida, in Arizona. Copeia 1970(1):9-18. [485] Becker, G. C. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI. Belk, M. C., J. B. Johnson, K. W. Wilson, M. E. Smith, and D. D. Houston. 2005. Variation in intrinsic individual growth rate among populations of leatherside chub (Snyderichthys copei Jordan & Gilbert): adaptation to temperature or length of growing season? Ecology of Freshwater Fish 14:177-184. [349] Bonner, T. H., J. M. Watson, and C. S. Williams. 2006. Threatened fishes of the world: Cyprinella proserpina Girard, 1857 (Cyprinidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes. In Press. [133] Bonnevier, K., K. Lindstrom, and C. St. Mary. 2003. Parental care and mate attraction in the Florida flagfish, Jordanella floridae. Behavorial Ecology and Sociobiology 53:358-363. [410] Bortone, S. A. 1989. Notropis melanostomus, a new speices of Cyprinid fish from the Blackwater-Yellow River drainage of northwest Florida. Copeia 1989(3):737-741. [575] Boschung, H.T., and R. L. Mayden. 2004. Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Books, Washington. [multiple species] 1 FishTraits database Breder, C. M., and D. E. Rosen. 1966. Modes of reproduction in fishes. The Natural History Press, Garden City, NY. [multiple species] Bryan, J. L., M. L. Wildhaber, and D. B. Noltie. 2004. Threatened fishes of the world: Notorus placidus Taylor, 1969 (Ictaluridae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 70:80. [584] Bryan, S. D. 1999. Threatened fishes of the world: Lepidomeda vittata Cope, 1874 (Cyprinidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 55:226. [461] Burr, B. M., and M. L. Warren, Jr. 1986. A distributional atlas of Kentucky fishes. Volume four. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort, KY. [multiple species] Burr, B. M., and R. L. Mayden. 1981. Systematics, distribution and life history notes on Notropis chihuahua (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Copeia 1981(2):255-265 [772] Byrne, D. M. 1978. Life history of the spotfin killifish, Fundulus luciae (Pisces: Cyprinodontidae), in Fox Creek Marsh, Virginia. Estuaries 1(4):211-227. [329] Carman, S. M. 2006. Colorado River basin chubs recovery plan. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe, NM. [multiple species] Clay, W. M. 1975. The Fishes of Kentucky. Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Frankfort, KY. [multiple species] Coad, B. W. 1995. Encyclopedia of Canadian fishes. Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [multiple species] Coker, G. A, C. B. Portt, and C. K. Minns. 2001. Morphological and ecological characteristics of Canadian freshwater fishes. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2554: iv+89p. [multiple species] Cooper, E. L. 1983. Fishes of Pennsylvania and the northeastern United States. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA. [multiple species] 2 FishTraits database Cowley, D. E., P. D. Shirey, and M. D. Hatch. 2006. Ecology of the Rio Grande silvery minnow (Cyprinidae : Hybognathus amarus) inferred from specimens collected in 1874. Reviews in Fisheries Sciences. 14 (1-2):111-125. [368] Cross, F. B., and J. T. Collins. 1995. The fishes in Kansa. Second edition. University of Kansas Natural History Museum of Public Education Series No. 14. The University of Kansa, Lawrence, KS. 315 pages. [multiple species] Davis, J. R., and D. E. Louder. 1963. Life history and ecology of Menidia extensa. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 98:466-472. [484] DuRant, D. F., J. V. Shireman, and R. D. Gasaway. Reproduction, growth, and food habits of Seminole killifish, Fundulus seminolis, from two central Florida lakes. 1979. 102(1):127- 133. [336] Eisenhour, D. J., and R. M. Strange. Threatened fishes of the world: Phoxinus cumberlandensis Starnes & Starnes, 1978 (Cyprinidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 51:140. [649] Etnier, D. A., and W. C. Starnes. 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN. [multiple species] Everhart, W. H., and C. A. Waters. 1965. Life history of the Blueback Trout (Arctic Char, Salvelinus alpinus (Lennaeus)) in Maine. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 94(4):393-397. [733] Freeman, B. J., and S. J. Wenger. 2006. Desciption and distribution of species covered by the Etowah HCP. Unpublished. [multiple species] Frost, F. O. 2001. Arctic Charr management plan. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Division of Fisheries and Hatcheries, ME. [733] 3 FishTraits database Garcia De Leon, F., J. L. Gonzalez-Garcia, J. M. Herrera-Castillo, K. O. Winemiller, and A. Banda-Valdes. 2001. Ecology of the alligator gar, Atractosteus spatula, in the Vicente Guerrero Reservoir, Tamaulipas, Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist 46(2):151-157. [37] Garrett, G. P., C. Hubbs, and R. J. Edwards. 2002. Threatened fishes of the world: Cyprinodon elegans Baird & Girard, 1853 (Cyprinodontidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 65:288. [79] Garrett, G. P., C. Hubbs, and R. J. Edwards. 2002. Threatened fishes of the world: Dionda diaboli Hubbs & Bro wn, 1956 (Cyprinidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 65:478. [167] Garrett, G. P., C. Hubbs, and R. J. Edwards. 2005. Threatened fishes of the world: Cyprinodon eximius Girard, 1859 (Cyprinodontidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 72:98. [80] Goldsworthy, C. A., and P. W. Bettoli. 2006. Growth, body condition, reproduction, and survival of stocked Barrens Topminnows, Fundulus julisia (Fundulidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 156:331- 343. [327] Harrell, R. D., and D. G. Cloutman. 1978. Distribution and life history of the Sandbar shiner, Notropis scepticus. (Pisces: Cyprinidae). Copeia 3:443-447. [595] Harrington, R. W., Jr., and E. S. Harrington. 1972. Food of female Marsh Killifish, Fundulus confluentus Goode and Bean, in Florida. American Midland Naturalist 87(2):492-502. [321] Hartel, K. E., D. B. Halliwell, and A. E. Launer. 2002. Inland Fishes of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Audubon Society, Lincoln, MA. [multiple species] Heins, D. C., and G. H. Clemmer. 1975. Ecology, foods and feeding of the Longnose Shiner, 4 FishTraits database Notropis longirostris (Hay), in Mississippi. American Midland Naturalist 94(2):284-295. [565] Heins, D. C., J. A. Baker, and J. M. Guill. 2004. Seasonal and interannual components Intrapopulation variation in clutch size and egg size of darter. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 13:258-265. [multiple species] Hoagstrom, C. W., and J. E. Brooks. 2005. Distribution and status of Arkansas River shiner Notropis girardi and Rio Grande shiner Notropis jemezanus, Pecos River, New Mexico. Texas Journal of Science 57(1):35-58. [549 & 560] Hocutt, C. H., and E. O. Wiley. 1986. The zoogeography of North American freshwater fishes. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. [multiple species] Holton, G. D. 1990. A field guide to Montana fishes. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Helena, MT. [multiple species] Hotalling, D. R., and C. A. Taber. 1986. Aspects of the life history of the stippled darter Etheostoma punctulatum. The American Midland Naturalist. 117:428-434. [267] Hubbs, C. L., and K. F. Lagler. 1958. Fishes of the great lakes region. Second Edition. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI. [multiple species] James, P.W. and O. E. Maughan. 1989. Spawning behavior and habitat of the threatened leopard darter, Percina pantherina. Southwestern Naturalist 34(2)298-301. [694] James, P.W., Maughan, O. E., and A. V. Zale. 1991. Life history of the leopard darter Percina pantherina in Glover River, Oklahoma. American Midland Naturalist 125(2):173-179. [694] Jenkins, R. E., and N. M. Burkhead. 1993. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD. [multiple species] 5 FishTraits database Joachim, R. D., J. M. Guill, and D. C. Heins. 2003. Female reproductive life-history traits of the rock darter, Etheostoma rupestre, from Flat Creek, Alabama. The American Midland Naturalist. 150:268–274. [276] Johnson, A. B., and P. W. Bettoli. 2003. Threatened fishes of the world: Fundulus julisia Williams & Etnier, 1982 (Cyprinodontidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 68:240. [327] Johnston, C. E. 1999. The relationship of spawning mode to conservation of North American minnows (Cyprinidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 55:21-30. [multiple species] Keenlyne, K. D., E. M. Grossman, and L.G. Jenkins. 1992. Fecundity of the pallid sturgeon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121:139-140. [732] Kennedy, S. E. 1978. Life history of the spotfin killifish, Fundulus luciae (Pisces: Cyprinodontidae), in Fox Creek Marsh, Virginia. Estuaries 1(4):211-227. [329] Kinney, T. A. and J. D. Lynch. 1991. The fecundity and reproductive season of Fundulus sciadicus in Nebraska (Actinoptergii: Fundulidae). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences 8:101-104. [335] Kneib, R. T. 1978. Habitat, diet, reproduction, and growth of the spotfin killifish, Fundulus luciae, from a North Carolina salt marsh. Copeia. 1:164-168. [329] Koski, R. T. 1978. Age, growth, and maturity of the hogchoker, Trinectes maculatus, in the Hudson River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 107(3):449-453. [not in excel] 6 FishTraits database Kuda, D. B. and J. S. Griffith. 1993. Establishment of Shoshone sculpin (Cottus greenei) in a spring inhabited by mottled sculpin (C. bairdi). Great Basin Naturalist. 53:190-193. [88 & 52] Kuehne, R. A., and R. W. Barbour. 1983. The American darters. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. [multiple species] Laha, M., and H. T. Mattingly. 2006. Identifying environmental conditions to promote species coexistence: an example with the native Barrens topminnow and invasive western mosquitofish. Biological Invasions 8:719-725. [327 & 341] Layman, S. R., 1991. Life-history of the relict, Duskytail darter, Etheostoma (catonotus) sp. in Little River, Tennessee. Copeia 2:478-485. [284] Lee, D. S., C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notropis Girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis Tetranema)
    Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Species Status Assessment Report for the Arkansas River Shiner (Notropis girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) Arkansas River shiner (bottom left) and peppered chub (top right - two fish) (Photo credit U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Version 1.0a October 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Albuquerque, NM This document was prepared by Angela Anders, Jennifer Smith-Castro, Peter Burck (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) – Southwest Regional Office) Robert Allen, Debra Bills, Omar Bocanegra, Sean Edwards, Valerie Morgan (USFWS –Arlington, Texas Field Office), Ken Collins, Patricia Echo-Hawk, Daniel Fenner, Jonathan Fisher, Laurence Levesque, Jonna Polk (USFWS – Oklahoma Field Office), Stephen Davenport (USFWS – New Mexico Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office), Mark Horner, Susan Millsap (USFWS – New Mexico Field Office), Jonathan JaKa (USFWS – Headquarters), Jason Luginbill, and Vernon Tabor (Kansas Field Office). Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species status assessment report for the Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema), version 1.0, with appendices. October 2018. Albuquerque, NM. 172 pp. Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 INTRODUCTION (CHAPTER 1) The Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) are restricted primarily to the contiguous river segments of the South Canadian River basin spanning eastern New Mexico downstream to eastern Oklahoma (although the peppered chub is less widespread). Both species have experienced substantial declines in distribution and abundance due to habitat destruction and modification from stream dewatering or depletion from diversion of surface water and groundwater pumping, construction of impoundments, and water quality degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Funding (Total $2,552,481) $15,000 2019
    CURRICULUM VITAE TENNESSEE AQUARIUM CONSERVATION INSTITUTE 175 BAYLOR SCHOOL RD CHATTANOOGA, TN 37405 RESEARCH FUNDING (TOTAL $2,552,481) $15,000 2019. Global Wildlife Conservation. Rediscovering the critically endangered Syr-Darya Shovelnose Sturgeon. $10,000 2019. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. Propagation of the Common Logperch as a host for endangered mussel larvae. $8,420 2019. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. Monitoring for the Laurel Dace. $4,417 2019. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. Examining interactions between Laurel Dace (Chrosomus saylori) and sunfish $12,670 2019. Trout Unlimited. Southern Appalachian Brook Trout propagation for reintroduction to Shell Creek. $106,851 2019. Private Donation. Microplastic accumulation in fishes of the southeast. $1,471. 2019. AZFA-Clark Waldram Conservation Grant. Mayfly propagation for captive propagation programs. $20,000. 2019. Tennessee Valley Authority. Assessment of genetic diversity within Blotchside Logperch. $25,000. 2019. Riverview Foundation. Launching Hidden Rivers in the Southeast. $11,170. 2018. Trout Unlimited. Propagation of Southern Appalachian Brook Trout for Supplemental Reintroduction. $1,471. 2018. AZFA Clark Waldram Conservation Grant. Climate Change Impacts on Headwater Stream Vertebrates in Southeastern United States $1,000. 2018. Hamilton County Health Department. Step 1 Teaching Garden Grants for Sequoyah School Garden. $41,000. 2018. Riverview Foundation. River Teachers: Workshops for Educators. $1,000. 2018. Tennessee Valley Authority. Youth Freshwater Summit $20,000. 2017. Tennessee Valley Authority. Lake Sturgeon Propagation. $7,500 2017. Trout Unlimited. Brook Trout Propagation. $24,783. 2017. Tennessee Wildlife Resource Agency. Assessment of Percina macrocephala and Etheostoma cinereum populations within the Duck River Basin. $35,000. 2017. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Status surveys for conservation status of Ashy (Etheostoma cinereum) and Redlips (Etheostoma maydeni) Darters.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Listing Deadline Complaint
    Case 1:16-cv-00503 Document 1 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, ) 378 North Main Avenue ) Tucson, AZ 85701, ) Civil No: 16-00503 ) Plaintiff, ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY ) AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF v. ) ) SALLY M.R. JEWELL, Secretary of the ) Interior, U.S. Department of the Interior ) 1849 C Street NW ) Washington, DC 20240, ) ) and ) ) U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, ) 1849 C Street NW ) Washington, DC 20240, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) brings this action under the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1544 (“ESA”), to challenge the Secretary of the Interior’s (“Secretary”) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (“FWS”) (collectively, “Defendants” or “FWS”) failure to make mandatory findings on whether nine highly-imperiled species should be listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b)(3)(B). These species are: alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii), Barrens topminnow (Fundulus julisia), beaverpond marstonia (Marstonia castor), California spotted owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis), Canoe Creek pigtoe (Pleurobema athearni), foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii), Northern Rockies fisher (Martes pennanti), Virgin River spinedace Case 1:16-cv-00503 Document 1 Filed 03/16/16 Page 2 of 25 (Lepidomeda mollispinis mollispinis), and wood turtle (Macrochelys temminckii). Each of these species is experiencing steep population declines and ongoing threats to its existence. 2. To obtain federal safeguards and habitat protections, the Center and/or other conservation groups submitted to FWS petitions to list each of these nine species as “endangered” or “threatened” pursuant to the ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure in the Barrens Topminnow
    Conserv Genet DOI 10.1007/s10592-017-0984-0 RESEARCH ARTICLE Genetic diversity and population structure in the Barrens Topminnow (Fundulus julisia): implications for conservation and management of a critically endangered species Carla Hurt1 · Bernard Kuhajda2 · Alexis Harman1 · Natalie Ellis1 · Mary Nalan1 Received: 5 January 2017 / Accepted: 22 May 2017 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017 Abstract The Barrens Topminnow (Fundulus julisia) with drainage boundaries. Results from AMOVA analysis has undergone a rapid and dramatic decline. In the 1980s, also suggest low levels of genetic connectivity between at least twenty localities with Barrens Topminnows were isolated populations within the same drainage. Here we known to exist in the Barrens Plateau region of middle Ten- propose two distinct evolutionary significant units (ESUs) nessee; currently only three areas with natural (not stocked) and two management units that reflect this population sub- populations remain. The long-term survival of the Barrens structure and warrant consideration in future management Topminnow will depend entirely on effective management efforts. and conservation efforts. Captive propagation and stocking of captive-reared juveniles to suitable habitats have suc- Keywords Conservation genetics · Microsatellites · cessfully established a handful of self-sustaining popula- Mitochondrial DNA · Endangered species · Fundulus tions. However, very little is known about the genetic com- julisia position of source and introduced populations including levels of genetic diversity and structuring of genetic vari- ation. Here we use both mitochondrial sequence data and Introduction genotypes from 14 microsatellite loci to examine patterns of genetic variation among ten sites, including all sites The Barrens Topminnow (Fundulus julisia) is one of with natural populations and a subset of sites with intro- the most critically endangered fish species in the east- duced (stocked) populations of this species.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement
    Record of Decision Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Final Environmental Impact Statement I. Summary of Action and Background The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has completed a final environmental impact statement (EIS) on the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam. The EIS describes the potential effects of modifying the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam to assist in the recovery of four endangered fish, and their critical habitat, downstream from the dam. The four endangered fish species are Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius), humpback chub (Gila cypha), razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), and bonytail (Gila elegans). Reclamation would implement the proposed action by modifying the operations of Flaming Gorge Dam, to the extent possible, to achieve the flows and temperatures recommended by participants of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Recovery Program). Reclamation’s goal is to implement the proposed action and, at the same time, maintain and continue all authorized purposes of the Colorado River Storage Project. The purpose of the proposed action is to operate Flaming Gorge Dam to protect and assist in recovery of the populations and designated critical habitat of the four endangered fishes, while maintaining all authorized purposes of the Flaming Gorge Unit of the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP), including those related to the development of water resources in accordance with the Colorado River Compact. As the Federal agency responsible for the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam, Reclamation was the lead agency in preparing the EIS. Eight cooperating agencies also participated in preparing this EIS: the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, State of Utah Department of Natural Resources, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Status of Humpback Chub, Gila Cypha, and Catch
    Population Status of Humpback Chub, Gila cypha, and Catch Indices and Population Structure of Sympatric Roundtail Chub, Gila robusta, in Black Rocks, Colorado River, Colorado, 1998- 2012 Picture 1. Humpback chub on grid board (2012). Photo credit: T. Francis, USFWS. Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program Project Number 131 (22a3) Final Report April, 2016 Travis A. Francis U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Colorado River Fishery Project 445 West Gunnison Avenue, Suite 140 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 -and- Dr. Kevin R. Bestgen Dr. Gary C. White Colorado State University Larval Fish Laboratory Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 i Suggested Citation: Francis, T.A., K.R. Bestgen, and G.C. White. 2016. Population status of humpback chub, Gila cypha, and catch indices and population structure of sympatric roundtail chub, Gila robusta, in Black Rocks, Colorado River, Colorado, 1998-2012. Larval Fish Laboratory Contribution 199. Final Report from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program, Project Number 131. Grand Junction, Colorado. ii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... vii INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Fish\Eastern Sand Darter Sa.Wpd
    EASTERN SAND DARTER STATUS ASSESSMENT Prepared by: David Grandmaison and Joseph Mayasich Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota 5013 Miller Trunk Highway Duluth, MN 55811-1442 and David Etnier Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee 569 Dabney Hall Knoxville, TN 37996-1610 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 1 Federal Drive Fort Snelling, MN 55111 January 2004 NRRI Technical Report No. NRRI/TR-2003/40 DISCLAIMER This document is a compilation of biological data and a description of past, present, and likely future threats to the eastern sand darter, Ammocrypta pellucida (Agassiz). It does not represent a decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on whether this taxon should be designated as a candidate species for listing as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act. That decision will be made by the Service after reviewing this document; other relevant biological and threat data not included herein; and all relevant laws, regulations, and policies. The result of the decision will be posted on the Service's Region 3 Web site (refer to: http://midwest.fws.gov/eco_serv/endangrd/lists/concern.html). If designated as a candidate species, the taxon will subsequently be added to the Service's candidate species list that is periodically published in the Federal Register and posted on the World Wide Web (refer to: http://endangered.fws.gov/wildlife.html). Even if the taxon does not warrant candidate status it should benefit from the conservation recommendations that are contained in this document. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species (Protection, Conser Va Tion and Regulation of Trade)
    ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSER VA TION AND REGULATION OF TRADE) THE ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND REGULATION OF TRADE) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Preliminary Short title. Interpretation. Objects of Act. Saving of other laws. Exemptions, etc., relating to trade. Amendment of Schedules. Approved management programmes. Approval of scientific institution. Inter-scientific institution transfer. Breeding in captivity. Artificial propagation. Export of personal or household effects. PART I. Administration Designahem of Mana~mentand establishment of Scientific Authority. Policy directions. Functions of Management Authority. Functions of Scientific Authority. Scientific reports. PART II. Restriction on wade in endangered species 18. Restriction on trade in endangered species. 2 ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND REGULA TION OF TRADE) Regulation of trade in species spec fled in the First, Second, Third and Fourth Schedules Application to trade in endangered specimen of species specified in First, Second, Third and Fourth Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Importation of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Introduction from the sea certificate for specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Import of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Introduction from the sea of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Import of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Export of specimens specified in Fourth Schedule. PART 111.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Fish Report
    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Cui-Ui Recovery Plan
    1 ESA 81 RECOVERY PLAN DRAWING BY: JOSETTECUILEY I CUI-UI RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by the Cui-ui Recovery Team December 1977 TEAM MEMBERS Earl Pyle, Team Leader, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Reno, Nevada John Frazier, Pyramid Lake Paiute Indian Tribe, Nixon, Nevada Donald King, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Reno, Nevada Kay Johnson, Nevada Department of Fish and Game, Reno, Nevada Dale Lockard, Nevada Department of Fish and Game, Reno, Nevada Thomas J.. Trelease, Team Advisor, Verdi , Nevada Published by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Program Region 1 Portland, Oregon Approved Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Title Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART I. INTRODUCTION .................. 1 Former Status ................. 2 Reasons for Decline of the Fishery ....... 3 Figure 1 .................... 4 PART II . THE RECOVERY PLAN ............... Objectives and Rationale ............ Accomplishments ................ Specific Problem Areas ............. Recovery Plan Out1 ine ............. Action Diagram ................. Action Narrative ................ PART I11 . SCHEDULE OF PRIORITIES. RESPONSIBILITIES & COSTS APPENDIX A . REFERENCES CITED ................ APPENDIX B . PROPOSED ESSENTIAL HABITAT ........... Maps . Proposed Essential Habitat ....... APPENDIX C . LETTERS OF COMMENT ............... CUI-UI RECOVERY PLAN PART I INTRODUCTION The history of the cui-ui 1 (Chasmistes cujus) and the Pyramid Lake Paiute Indian Tribe is so intimately entwined that the unwritten, ancestral name for the tribe is Kuyuidokado (Wheeler, 1969) or Ku-yu-wi-kut-teh (Hermann, 1973) meaning "sucker eaters". Spawning runs of cui-ui and cutthroat trout (mclarki provided a readily available and dependable source of food. There can be no doubt the shores of Pyramid Lake were highly val- ued as a haven against the uncertainty and hardship of obtaining food in the arid and often inhospitable lands of the Great Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Razorback Suckers Are Making a Comeback in the Upper Colorado River Basin
    Winter 13 Razorback suckers are making a comeback in the upper Colorado River basin iologists are thrilled that the recovery programs’ stocking Hatchery programs have been very successful. In the upper efforts are bearing fruit and razorback suckers are becom- basin, razorback suckers are being raised by the Ouray National Bing more numerous throughout the upper Colorado River Fish Hatchery, Randlett and Grand Valley units near Vernal, Utah basin. “We catch so many razorbacks these days; it takes us lon- and Grand Junction, Colorado. Following analysis of razorback ger to complete our Colorado pikeminnow sampling trips,” says sucker stocking and survival by Colorado State University’s Larval U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) researcher Travis Francis. Fish Lab, the Recovery Program increased the size of razorback Historically, the razorback sucker occurred throughout warm- sucker for stocking from an average of about 11 inches to about 14 water reaches of the Colorado River Basin from Mexico to Wyoming. PHOTOGRAPH COURTESY UDWR-MOAB inches and is stocking the fish in the fall when fish survive better. When this species was listed in 1991, its numbers were much reduced To increase growth, the Program raises the fish in a combination and biologists were worried it might become extinct. Thanks to of outdoor ponds during warmer months and indoor tanks in the the efforts of the San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation winter. Program and the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery This past summer, many wild-spawned razorback larvae drift- Program, these fish are making a real comeback today. Hatchery- ed from a middle Green River spawning bar into the Stewart Lake produced fish are being stocked to re-establish the species in the JUVENILE RAZORBACK SUCKER, MAY, 2013 wetland about 11 miles downstream.
    [Show full text]