2004 Final SEIS, Volume II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2004 Final SEIS, Volume II FOREST SERVICE BLM JANUARY 2004 JANUARY Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement To Remove or Modify the Survey and Manage Mitigation Measure Standards and Guidelines Volume II — Appendices Public Lands USA: Use, Share, Appreciate Final SEIS The U.S. Department of Agriculture prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5694 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. administration. Cover artwork compliments of Elizabeth I. Gayner. Drawing includes the Great gray owl (Strix nebulosa), an orchid (Cypripedium montanum), a mushroom (Gyromitra californica), and a snail (Monadenia fidelis). Appendices Appendix 1 - January 2001 Survey and Manage Standards and Guidelines Appendix 2 - BLM Special Status Species Program and FS Sensitive Species Program Appendix 3 - Oregon Natural Heritage Program Rankings Appendix 4 - Proposed Standards and Guidelines for Alternative 3 Appendix 5 - Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered, and Proposed Species and Forest Service Sensitive Species Appendix 6 - Response to Comments Appendix 7 - Comment Letters from Federal, State, and Local Government Agencies Appendix 8 - Previous Analyses Incorporated by Reference 1 Appendix 1 Changes between Draft and Final Minor corrections, explanations, and edits are not included in this list. • Appendix 1 has been updated to reflect delegations from the RIEC and exemptions for wildland fire for resource benefits in all land allocations. 1 Final SEIS to Remove or Modify the Survey and Manage Mitigation Measure Standards and Guidelines Appendix 1 2 3 Final SEIS to Remove or Modify the Survey and Manage Mitigation Measure Standards and Guidelines Appendix 1 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES for Survey and Manage January 2001 Excerpted From ATTACHMENT 1 to the Record of Decision for Amendments to the Survey and Manage, Protection Buffer, and Related Mitigation Measures Standards and Guidelines Includes explanatory notes from Regional Interagency Executive Committee (RIEC) Memorandums dated May 16, 2003, and July 31, 2003. Lead Agencies: Forest Service - U.S. Department of Agriculture Bureau of Land Management - U.S. Department of the Interior Note: Table 1-1 referenced in these standards and guidelines is not included because it was updated as a result of the Annual Species Review Process for Fiscal Years 2001, 2002, 2003. The results of those updates are shown in this 2004 SEIS in the description of Alternative 1 in Chapter 2. Sections IX, X, and XI of these Standards and Guidelines are not included here because they were not part of the Survey and Manage Standards and Guidelines. Those sections deal with certain cavity nesting birds, Canada lynx, and some bat roosts. Those sections are not proposed for removal or modification by any of the alternatives in this 2004 SEIS. 2 3 Final SEIS to Remove or Modify the Survey and Manage Mitigation Measure Standards and Guidelines Appendix 1 4 5 Final SEIS to Remove or Modify the Survey and Manage Mitigation Measure Standards and Guidelines Appendix 1 Table of Contents I. Introduction . 7 Existing Standards and Guidelines Are Amended . 7 Physiographic Provinces. 7 Species Removed from Survey and Manage and other Standards and Guidelines . 8 Arthropod Guilds. 8 Land Allocations . 8 II. Survey and Manage Basic Criteria. 8 Species Persistence Objectives . 8 Concern for Persistence. 10 Relative Rarity . 11 III. Survey and Manage Categories . 11 Introduction . 11 Category A (Rare, Pre-Disturbance Surveys Practical). 12 Category B (Rare, Pre-Disturbance Surveys Not Practical) . 13 Category C (Uncommon, Pre-Disturbance Surveys Practical) . 14 Category D (Uncommon, Pre-Disturbance Surveys Not Practical or Not Necessary) . 15 Category E (Rare, Status Undetermined) . 16 Category F (Uncommon or Concern for Persistence Unknown, Status Undetermined) . 17 IV. Adaptive Management Process. 18 Introduction . 18 Acquiring New Information Relative to Survey and Manage Species 18 Evaluating New Information for Adding, Removing, or Changing a Species In Survey and Manage . 19 Implementing Changes or Refinements to Survey and Manage . 21 V. Management Recommendations . 23 VI. Surveys . 24 Surveys Prior to Habitat-Disturbing Activities (Pre-Disturbance Surveys) . 24 Strategic Surveys . 29 VII. Reports, Monitoring, and Review. 32 Annual Status Reports. 32 Monitoring . 33 Review by the Regional Ecosystem Office . 33 VIII. Additional Mitigation Measures . 34 Manage Sites Known as of September 30, 1999, for Two Mollusk Species . 34 Equivalent-effort Surveys for Eight Mollusk Species. 34 Duration of Additional Mitigation . 34 IX, X, XI. Omitted . 35 XII. Former Protection Buffer Species Without Management Recommendations . 35 TABLES AND EXHIBITS Omitted. However, the current species placements by Survey and Manage category are shown in the Alternative 1 description in Chapter 2. 4 5 Final SEIS to Remove or Modify the Survey and Manage Mitigation Measure Standards and Guidelines Appendix 1 6 7 Final SEIS to Remove or Modify the Survey and Manage Mitigation Measure Standards and Guidelines Appendix 1 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES for Survey and Manage All sections of this document are the complete compilation of standards and guidelines. I. Introduction Existing Standards and Guidelines Are Amended The standards and guidelines in the April 13, 1994, Northwest Forest Plan Record of Decision for Survey and Manage, Protection Buffers, Protect Sites From Grazing, Manage Recreation Areas to Minimize Disturbance to Species, and Provide Additional Protection for Caves, Mines, and Abandoned Wooden Bridges and Buildings That Are Used as Roost Sites for Bats (hereafter referred to as Survey and Manage and related mitigation measures) are removed in their entirety and replaced as described below. See Appendix B of the November 2000 FSEIS for Amendment to the Survey and Manage, Protection Buffers, and other Mitigation Measures for a complete display of the standards and guidelines to be removed. Except for certain cavity-nesting birds and Canada lynx described below, all former Protect Sites from Grazing species and Protection Buffer species are now either Survey and Manage species as described in the standards and guidelines below, or are removed from these standards and guidelines because they do not meet the Survey and Manage basic criteria. Known sites are managed as specified for the category to which they are placed, but the land allocations associated with Protection Buffer species sites (unmapped Late-Successional Reserves and Managed Late-Successional Areas) are returned to their underlying or appropriate surrounding allocation. Other elements of the Northwest Forest Plan not specifically addressed, and implementation memos and other policy interpretations not affected by changes in these standards and guidelines, are not changed. Exceptions to certain standards and guidelines for research or the Adaptive Management Process described in Chapter E of the Northwest Forest Plan Standards and Guidelines, for example, continue to apply to Survey and Manage as under the Northwest Forest Plan Record of Decision. Physiographic Provinces The 1994 Northwest Forest Plan Standards and Guidelines include two different province maps: physiographic provinces and planning provinces. The map of the 12 physiographic provinces appears on page A-3 of the Northwest Forest Plan Standards and Guidelines and is repeated here for reference (see Figure 1 - Physiographic Provinces). The physiographic provinces allow differentiation between areas of common biological and physical processes. Unless otherwise identified, references to “provinces” 6 7 Final SEIS to Remove or Modify the Survey and Manage Mitigation Measure Standards and Guidelines Appendix 1 in these standards and guidelines are to physiographic provinces. The 12 physiographic provinces are: 1. WA Olympic Peninsula 7. OR Coast Range 2. WA Western Lowlands 8. OR Willamette Valley 3. WA Western Cascades 9. OR Klamath 4. WA Eastern Cascades 10. CA Klamath 5. OR Western Cascades 11. CA Coast Range 6. OR Eastern Cascades 12. CA Cascades Species Removed from Survey and Manage and other Standards and Guidelines Species formerly included on Survey and Manage or related mitigation measures that
Recommended publications
  • Revision of the Genus Cotylidia (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales) in the Czech Republic
    CZECH MYCOLOGY 65(1): 1–13, JUNE 10, 2013 (ONLINE VERSION, ISSN 1805-1421) Revision of the genus Cotylidia (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales) in the Czech Republic 1 2 JIŘÍ KOUT *, LUCIE ZÍBAROVÁ 1Department of Biology, Geosciences and Environmental Education, Faculty of Education, University of West Bohemia, Klatovská 51, Plzeň, CZ-306 19, Czech Republic; [email protected] 2Department of Botany, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Na Zlaté stoce 1, České Budějovice, CZ-370 05, Czech Republic; [email protected] *corresponding author Kout J., Zíbarová L. (2013): Revision of the genus Cotylidia (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales) in the Czech Republic. – Czech Mycol. 65(1): 1–13. To date, three species of the genus Cotylidia have been identified in the Czech Republic: C. muscigena, C. pannosa, and C. undulata. The occurrence of Cotylidia undulata in the Czech Re- public was already confirmed and a new locality is published here. The other two species are newly re- ported from the Czech Republic. The remaining two European Cotylidia species are not yet known from the area studied: C. carpatica and the badly known Mediterranean C. marsicana. Finally one specimen found during the study of herbarium material does not correspond well to any known Euro- pean species. The genus was reviewed based on fresh and herbarium specimens. The species of Cotylidia are described and an identification key is added. All three species are rarely reported fungi. Key words: hymenochaetoid clade, taxonomy, distribution, threatened fungi, Europe. Kout J., Zíbarová L. (2013): Revize rodu lupénka – Cotylidia (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales) v České republice. – Czech Mycol. 65(1): 1–13.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Hydropus Mediterraneus</I>
    ISSN (print) 0093-4666 © 2012. Mycotaxon, Ltd. ISSN (online) 2154-8889 MYCOTAXON http://dx.doi.org/10.5248/121.393 Volume 121, pp. 393–403 July–September 2012 Laccariopsis, a new genus for Hydropus mediterraneus (Basidiomycota, Agaricales) Alfredo Vizzini*, Enrico Ercole & Samuele Voyron Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e Biologia dei Sistemi - Università degli Studi di Torino, Viale Mattioli 25, I-10125, Torino, Italy *Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract — Laccariopsis (Agaricales) is a new monotypic genus established for Hydropus mediterraneus, an arenicolous species earlier often placed in Flammulina, Oudemansiella, or Xerula. Laccariopsis is morphologically close to these genera but distinguished by a unique combination of features: a Laccaria-like habit (distant, thick, subdecurrent lamellae), viscid pileus and upper stipe, glabrous stipe with a long pseudorhiza connecting with Ammophila and Juniperus roots and incorporating plant debris and sand particles, pileipellis consisting of a loose ixohymeniderm with slender pileocystidia, large and thin- to thick-walled spores and basidia, thin- to slightly thick-walled hymenial cystidia and caulocystidia, and monomitic stipe tissue. Phylogenetic analyses based on a combined ITS-LSU sequence dataset place Laccariopsis close to Gloiocephala and Rhizomarasmius. Key words — Agaricomycetes, Physalacriaceae, /gloiocephala clade, phylogeny, taxonomy Introduction Hydropus mediterraneus was originally described by Pacioni & Lalli (1985) based on collections from Mediterranean dune ecosystems in Central Italy, Sardinia, and Tunisia. Previous collections were misidentified as Laccaria maritima (Theodor.) Singer ex Huhtinen (Dal Savio 1984) due to their laccarioid habit. The generic attribution to Hydropus Kühner ex Singer by Pacioni & Lalli (1985) was due mainly to the presence of reddish watery droplets on young lamellae and sarcodimitic tissue in the stipe (Corner 1966, Singer 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Argentine Agaricales 4
    Checklist of the Argentine Agaricales 4. Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae 1 2* N. NIVEIRO & E. ALBERTÓ 1Instituto de Botánica del Nordeste (UNNE-CONICET). Sargento Cabral 2131, CC 209 Corrientes Capital, CP 3400, Argentina 2Instituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas (UNSAM-CONICET) Intendente Marino Km 8.200, Chascomús, Buenos Aires, CP 7130, Argentina CORRESPONDENCE TO *: [email protected] ABSTRACT— A species checklist of 86 genera and 709 species belonging to the families Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae occurring in Argentina, and including all the species previously published up to year 2011 is presented. KEY WORDS—Agaricomycetes, Marasmius, Mycena, Collybia, Clitocybe Introduction The aim of the Checklist of the Argentinean Agaricales is to establish a baseline of knowledge on the diversity of mushrooms species described in the literature from Argentina up to 2011. The families Amanitaceae, Pluteaceae, Hygrophoraceae, Coprinaceae, Strophariaceae, Bolbitaceae and Crepidotaceae were previoulsy compiled (Niveiro & Albertó 2012a-c). In this contribution, the families Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae are presented. Materials & Methods Nomenclature and classification systems This checklist compiled data from the available literature on Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae recorded for Argentina up to the year 2011. Nomenclature and classification systems followed Singer (1986) for families. The genera Pleurotus, Panus, Lentinus, and Schyzophyllum are included in the family Polyporaceae. The Tribe Polyporae (including the genera Polyporus, Pseudofavolus, and Mycobonia) is excluded. There were important rearrangements in the families Tricholomataceae and Polyporaceae according to Singer (1986) over time to present. Tricholomataceae was distributed in six families: Tricholomataceae, Marasmiaceae, Physalacriaceae, Lyophyllaceae, Mycenaceae, and Hydnaginaceae. Some genera belonging to this family were transferred to other orders, i.e. Rickenella (Rickenellaceae, Hymenochaetales), and Lentinellus (Auriscalpiaceae, Russulales).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation
    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species (Protection, Conser Va Tion and Regulation of Trade)
    ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSER VA TION AND REGULATION OF TRADE) THE ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND REGULATION OF TRADE) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Preliminary Short title. Interpretation. Objects of Act. Saving of other laws. Exemptions, etc., relating to trade. Amendment of Schedules. Approved management programmes. Approval of scientific institution. Inter-scientific institution transfer. Breeding in captivity. Artificial propagation. Export of personal or household effects. PART I. Administration Designahem of Mana~mentand establishment of Scientific Authority. Policy directions. Functions of Management Authority. Functions of Scientific Authority. Scientific reports. PART II. Restriction on wade in endangered species 18. Restriction on trade in endangered species. 2 ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND REGULA TION OF TRADE) Regulation of trade in species spec fled in the First, Second, Third and Fourth Schedules Application to trade in endangered specimen of species specified in First, Second, Third and Fourth Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Importation of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Introduction from the sea certificate for specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Import of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Introduction from the sea of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Import of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Export of specimens specified in Fourth Schedule. PART 111.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Monophyly and Biogeography of Cryptantha (Boraginaceae)
    Systematic Botany (2018), 43(1): pp. 53–76 © Copyright 2018 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists DOI 10.1600/036364418X696978 Date of publication April 18, 2018 Evaluating the Monophyly and Biogeography of Cryptantha (Boraginaceae) Makenzie E. Mabry1,2 and Michael G. Simpson1 1Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182, U. S. A. 2Current address: Division of Biological Sciences and Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, U. S. A. Authors for correspondence ([email protected]; [email protected]) Abstract—Cryptantha, an herbaceous plant genus of the Boraginaceae, subtribe Amsinckiinae, has an American amphitropical disjunct distri- bution, found in western North America and western South America, but not in the intervening tropics. In a previous study, Cryptantha was found to be polyphyletic and was split into five genera, including a weakly supported, potentially non-monophyletic Cryptantha s. s. In this and subsequent studies of the Amsinckiinae, interrelationships within Cryptantha were generally not strongly supported and sample size was generally low. Here we analyze a greatly increased sampling of Cryptantha taxa using high-throughput, genome skimming data, in which we obtained the complete ribosomal cistron, the nearly complete chloroplast genome, and twenty-three mitochondrial genes. Our analyses have allowed for inference of clades within this complex with strong support. The occurrence of a non-monophyletic Cryptantha is confirmed, with three major clades obtained, termed here the Johnstonella/Albidae clade, the Maritimae clade, and a large Cryptantha core clade, each strongly supported as monophyletic. From these phylogenomic analyses, we assess the classification, character evolution, and phylogeographic history that elucidates the current amphitropical distribution of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • Cui-Ui Recovery Plan
    1 ESA 81 RECOVERY PLAN DRAWING BY: JOSETTECUILEY I CUI-UI RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by the Cui-ui Recovery Team December 1977 TEAM MEMBERS Earl Pyle, Team Leader, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Reno, Nevada John Frazier, Pyramid Lake Paiute Indian Tribe, Nixon, Nevada Donald King, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Reno, Nevada Kay Johnson, Nevada Department of Fish and Game, Reno, Nevada Dale Lockard, Nevada Department of Fish and Game, Reno, Nevada Thomas J.. Trelease, Team Advisor, Verdi , Nevada Published by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Program Region 1 Portland, Oregon Approved Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Title Date TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART I. INTRODUCTION .................. 1 Former Status ................. 2 Reasons for Decline of the Fishery ....... 3 Figure 1 .................... 4 PART II . THE RECOVERY PLAN ............... Objectives and Rationale ............ Accomplishments ................ Specific Problem Areas ............. Recovery Plan Out1 ine ............. Action Diagram ................. Action Narrative ................ PART I11 . SCHEDULE OF PRIORITIES. RESPONSIBILITIES & COSTS APPENDIX A . REFERENCES CITED ................ APPENDIX B . PROPOSED ESSENTIAL HABITAT ........... Maps . Proposed Essential Habitat ....... APPENDIX C . LETTERS OF COMMENT ............... CUI-UI RECOVERY PLAN PART I INTRODUCTION The history of the cui-ui 1 (Chasmistes cujus) and the Pyramid Lake Paiute Indian Tribe is so intimately entwined that the unwritten, ancestral name for the tribe is Kuyuidokado (Wheeler, 1969) or Ku-yu-wi-kut-teh (Hermann, 1973) meaning "sucker eaters". Spawning runs of cui-ui and cutthroat trout (mclarki provided a readily available and dependable source of food. There can be no doubt the shores of Pyramid Lake were highly val- ued as a haven against the uncertainty and hardship of obtaining food in the arid and often inhospitable lands of the Great Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial and Marine Biological Resource Information
    APPENDIX C Terrestrial and Marine Biological Resource Information Appendix C1 Resource Agency Coordination Appendix C2 Marine Biological Resources Report APPENDIX C1 RESOURCE AGENCY COORDINATION 1 The ICF terrestrial biological team coordinated with relevant resource agencies to discuss 2 sensitive biological resources expected within the terrestrial biological study area (BSA). 3 A summary of agency communications and site visits is provided below. 4 California Department of Fish and Wildlife: On July 30, 2020, ICF held a conference 5 call with Greg O’Connell (Environmental Scientist) and Corianna Flannery (Environmental 6 Scientist) to discuss Project design and potential biological concerns regarding the 7 Eureka Subsea Fiber Optic Cables Project (Project). Mr. O’Connell discussed the 8 importance of considering the western bumble bee. Ms. Flannery discussed the 9 importance of the hard ocean floor substrate and asked how the cable would be secured 10 to the ocean floor to reduce or eliminate scour. The western bumble bee has been 11 evaluated in the Biological Resources section of the main document, and direct and 12 indirect impacts are avoided. The Project Description describes in detail how the cable 13 would be installed on the ocean floor, the importance of the hard bottom substrate, and 14 the need for avoidance. 15 Consultation Outcomes: 16 • The Project was designed to avoid hard bottom substrate, and RTI Infrastructure 17 (RTI) conducted surveys of the ocean floor to ensure that proper routing of the 18 cable would occur. 19 • Ms. Flannery will be copied on all communications with the National Marine 20 Fisheries Service 21 California Department of Fish and Wildlife: On August 7, 2020, ICF held a conference 22 call with Greg O’Connell to discuss a site assessment and survey approach for the 23 western bumble bee.
    [Show full text]
  • Pala Park Habitat Assessment
    Pala Park Bank Stabilization Project: Geotechnical Exploration TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ATTACHMENTS Biological Report Summary Report (Attachment E-3) Level of Significance Checklist (Attachment E-4) Biological Resources Map (Attachment E-5) Site Photographs (Attachment E-6) SECTION 2.0 HABITAT ASSESSMENT General Site Information ............................................................................................................... 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 4 Special Status Resources ............................................................................................................. 8 Other Issues ................................................................................................................................ 14 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 14 References .................................................................................................................................. 16 LIST OF TABLES Page 1 Special Status Plant Species Known to Occur in the Vicinity of the Survey Area ........... 10 2 Chaparral Sand-Verbena Populations Observed in the Survey Area ............................. 12 3 Paniculate Tarplant
    [Show full text]
  • Boletus Edulis and Cistus Ladanifer: Characterization of Its Ectomycorrhizae, in Vitro Synthesis, and Realised Niche
    UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA ESCUELA INTERNACIONAL DE DOCTORADO Boletus edulis and Cistus ladanifer: characterization of its ectomycorrhizae, in vitro synthesis, and realised niche. Boletus edulis y Cistus ladanifer: caracterización de sus ectomicorrizas, síntesis in vitro y área potencial. Dª. Beatriz Águeda Hernández 2014 UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA ESCUELA INTERNACIONAL DE DOCTORADO Boletus edulis AND Cistus ladanifer: CHARACTERIZATION OF ITS ECTOMYCORRHIZAE, in vitro SYNTHESIS, AND REALISED NICHE tesis doctoral BEATRIZ ÁGUEDA HERNÁNDEZ Memoria presentada para la obtención del grado de Doctor por la Universidad de Murcia: Dra. Luz Marina Fernández Toirán Directora, Universidad de Valladolid Dra. Asunción Morte Gómez Tutora, Universidad de Murcia 2014 Dª. Luz Marina Fernández Toirán, Profesora Contratada Doctora de la Universidad de Valladolid, como Directora, y Dª. Asunción Morte Gómez, Profesora Titular de la Universidad de Murcia, como Tutora, AUTORIZAN: La presentación de la Tesis Doctoral titulada: ‘Boletus edulis and Cistus ladanifer: characterization of its ectomycorrhizae, in vitro synthesis, and realised niche’, realizada por Dª Beatriz Águeda Hernández, bajo nuestra inmediata dirección y supervisión, y que presenta para la obtención del grado de Doctor por la Universidad de Murcia. En Murcia, a 31 de julio de 2014 Dra. Luz Marina Fernández Toirán Dra. Asunción Morte Gómez Área de Botánica. Departamento de Biología Vegetal Campus Universitario de Espinardo. 30100 Murcia T. 868 887 007 – www.um.es/web/biologia-vegetal Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted. Albert Einstein Le petit prince, alors, ne put contenir son admiration: -Que vous êtes belle! -N´est-ce pas, répondit doucement la fleur. Et je suis née meme temps que le soleil..
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G. Wildlife and Plant Species at the Sacramento River National Wildlife Refuge and Vicinity (Red Bluff to Colusa)
    Appendix G.
    [Show full text]