DOCSLIB.ORG

FORCE COMBAT Operations Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FORCE COMBAT Operations Manual CANADIAN ARMY PHYSICAL FITNESS INDIVIDUAL BATTLE TASK STANDARD FORCE COMBAT Operations Manual 1st Edition, 2017 Produced by PSP Directorate of Fitness (DFIT) and Canadian Army Doctrine and Training Centre (CADTC) FOREWORD The 1st Edition of this Operations Manual has been prepared to provide instructions and guidance for conducting the Canadian Army physical fitness component of the Individual Battle Task Standard (IBTS). The Canadian Army (CA), in collaboration with the Canadian Forces Morale and Welfare Services (CFMWS), Directorate of Fitness (DFit), has developed an operational physical fitness IBTS titled and hereafter referred to as FORCE combat which, effective 01 October 2017, constitutes the sole CA physical fitness IBTS for land operations. As of 01 August 2017, this Operations Manual is the only reference for conducting FORCE combat. Modifications to this Operations Manual may be made by DFit from time to time and will be forwarded to you accordingly. It is essential that the evaluation protocols and instructions provided in this Operations Manual be strictly adhered to and administered with care and attention in order to ensure valid and reliable results. Evaluators must familiarize themselves with the instructions and ensure that each evaluation is conducted in the safest manner and environment possible. Should you have any questions with the protocols or descriptions found within this Operations Manual you can address them through your chain of command who can contact your Manager, Fitness, Sports & Recreation (or equivalent) or the Directorate of Fitness, Sports and Health Promotion office at [email protected]. Signature Daryl Allard Director, Fitness, Sports, and Health Promotion Personnel Support Programs Canadian Forces Morale and Welfare Services i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 AIM ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 GENERAL ................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 REQUIREMENT AND RESPONSIBILITY ................................................................. 1-4 2 FORCE COMBAT ADMINISTRATION .......................................................................... 2-1 2.1 EVALUATION SCHEDULE ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 PRE-EVALUATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR CAF MEMBERS .................................... 2-1 Table 2-1. Full Fighting Order should be comprised of the following items. Distribution is discretionary (i.e., more water or magazines in substitution of a missing item). Listed here are approximate weights. ............................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 EVALUATOR RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................................................... 2-2 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS FOR THE EVALUATION .................................... 2-2 2.5 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES ................................................................................. 2-3 3 FORCE COMBAT SET-UP ............................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 GENERAL EQUIPMENT........................................................................................... 3-1 Table 3-1. FORCE combat Testing Equipment .............................................................. 3-1 3.2 EVALUATION CENTRE SET-UP .............................................................................. 3-1 Figure 3-1. FORCE combat test lane set-up .................................................................. 3-3 Figure 3-2. Sandbag Drag Kit Set-up ............................................................................. 3-4 Figure 3-3. Sandbag Lift Station Measurements ............................................................ 3-5 4 FORCE COMBAT PROCEDURES ................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 4-1 Figure 4-1. Battle Order ................................................................................................. 4-1 Figure 4-2. Full Fighting Order ....................................................................................... 4-2 4.2 INFORMATION BRIEFING ....................................................................................... 4-3 4.3 EVALUATION PROCEDURES ................................................................................. 4-4 Figure 4-3. Load Bearing March Demonstration ............................................................. 4-4 Figure 4-6. 20 metre Rushes Low Ready Movement Demonstration.............................. 4-6 Figure 4-7. Sandbag Lift Demonstration ......................................................................... 4-7 ii Figure 4-8. Intermittent Loaded Shuttle Demonstration 1 ............................................... 4-8 Figure 4-9. Intermittent Loaded Shuttle Demonstration 2 ............................................... 4-9 Figure 4-10. Intermittent Loaded Shuttle Distances ...................................................... 4-10 Figure 4-11. Sandbag Drag Demonstration 1 ............................................................... 4-10 Figure 4-12. Sandbag Drag Demonstration 2 ............................................................... 4-11 5 FORCE COMBAT SCRIPTS ......................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 WELCOME ............................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 5 KM LOAD BEARING MARCH ................................................................................ 5-2 5.3 20 METRE RUSHES ................................................................................................ 5-2 5.4 SANDBAG LIFT ........................................................................................................ 5-3 5.5 INTERMITTENT LOADED SHUTTLE ....................................................................... 5-4 5.6 SANDBAG DRAG ..................................................................................................... 5-5 6 OUTILS ......................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 TOOL 1 – SANDBAG FILLING PROCESS ............................................................... 6-1 6.2 TOOL 2 – SANDBAG DRAG SURFACE CALIBRATION .......................................... 6-3 6.3 TOOL 3 – CALIBRATION LOG ................................................................................. 6-6 6.4 TOOL 4 – DATA COLLECTION FORM ..................................................................... 6-7 6.5 TOOL 5 – BACK INJURY PREVENTION .................................................................. 6-9 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3-1. FORCE combat test lane set-up ........................................................................... 3-3 Figure 3-2. Sandbag Drag Kit Set-up ...................................................................................... 3-4 Figure 3-3. Sandbag Lift Station Measurements ..................................................................... 3-5 Figure 4-1. Battle Order .......................................................................................................... 4-1 Figure 4-2. Full Fighting Order ................................................................................................ 4-2 Figure 4-3. Load Bearing March Demonstration ...................................................................... 4-4 Figure 4-4. 20 metre Rushes Distances .................................................................................. 4-5 Figure 4-5. 20 metre Rushes Prone Position Demonstration ................................................... 4-5 Figure 4-6. 20 metre Rushes Low Ready Movement Demonstration ....................................... 4-6 Figure 4-7. Sandbag Lift Demonstration .................................................................................. 4-7 Figure 4-8. Intermittent Loaded Shuttle Demonstration 1 ........................................................ 4-8 Figure 4-9. Intermittent Loaded Shuttle Demonstration 2 ........................................................ 4-9 Figure 4-10. Intermittent Loaded Shuttle Distances ............................................................... 4-10 Figure 4-11. Sandbag Drag Demonstration 1 ........................................................................ 4-10 Figure 4-12. Sandbag Drag Demonstration 2 ........................................................................ 4-11 iv LIST OF TABLES TABLE 2-1. FULL FIGHTING ORDER WITH APPROXIMATE WEIGHTS .............................. 2-2 TABLE 3-1. FORCE COMBAT TESTING EQUIPMENT .......................................................... 3-1 TABLE 4-1. FORCE COMBAT TEST ORDER ........................................................................ 4-3 v List of Acronyms Acronym Definition
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser
    ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser: Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff, May 2019 June 2019: Admiral Sir Antony D. Radakin: First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff, June 2019 (11/1965; 55) VICE-ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 February 2016: Vice-Admiral Sir Benjamin J. Key: Chief of Joint Operations, April 2019 (11/1965; 55) July 2018: Vice-Admiral Paul M. Bennett: to retire (8/1964; 57) March 2019: Vice-Admiral Jeremy P. Kyd: Fleet Commander, March 2019 (1967; 53) April 2019: Vice-Admiral Nicholas W. Hine: Second Sea Lord and Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff, April 2019 (2/1966; 55) Vice-Admiral Christopher R.S. Gardner: Chief of Materiel (Ships), April 2019 (1962; 58) May 2019: Vice-Admiral Keith E. Blount: Commander, Maritime Command, N.A.T.O., May 2019 (6/1966; 55) September 2020: Vice-Admiral Richard C. Thompson: Director-General, Air, Defence Equipment and Support, September 2020 July 2021: Vice-Admiral Guy A. Robinson: Chief of Staff, Supreme Allied Command, Transformation, July 2021 REAR ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 July 2016: (Eng.)Rear-Admiral Timothy C. Hodgson: Director, Nuclear Technology, July 2021 (55) October 2017: Rear-Admiral Paul V. Halton: Director, Submarine Readiness, Submarine Delivery Agency, January 2020 (53) April 2018: Rear-Admiral James D. Morley: Deputy Commander, Naval Striking and Support Forces, NATO, April 2021 (1969; 51) July 2018: (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Keith A. Beckett: Director, Submarines Support and Chief, Strategic Systems Executive, Submarine Delivery Agency, 2018 (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Malcolm J. Toy: Director of Operations and Assurance and Chief Operating Officer, Defence Safety Authority, and Director (Technical), Military Aviation Authority, July 2018 (12/1964; 56) November 2018: (Logs.) Rear-Admiral Andrew M.
    [Show full text]
  • WESM - RFI/LOI RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: Weapons Effect System Modernization Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception Des Solicitation No
    1 1 RETURN BIDS TO: Title - Sujet WESM - RFI/LOI RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: Weapons Effect System Modernization Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception des Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Date soumissions TPSGC W8476-216429/A 2021-03-11 11 Laurier St. / 11, rue Laurier Client Reference No. - N° de référence du client GETS Ref. No. - N° de réf. de SEAG Place du Portage, Phase III Core 0B2 / Noyau 0B2 W8476-216429 PW-$$QT-011-28148 Gatineau File No. - N° de dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME Quebec 011qt.W8476-216429 K1A 0S5 Bid Fax: (819) 997-9776 Solicitation Closes - L'invitation prend fin at - à 02:00 PM Eastern Standard Time EST on - le 2021-12-31 Heure Normale du l'Est HNE LETTER OF INTEREST F.O.B. - F.A.B. LETTRE D'INTÉRÊT Plant-Usine: Destination: Other-Autre: Address Enquiries to: - Adresser toutes questions à: Buyer Id - Id de l'acheteur Derby(QT Div), Sandra 011qt Telephone No. - N° de téléphone FAX No. - N° de FAX (873) 355-4982 ( ) ( ) - Destination - of Goods, Services, and Construction: Destination - des biens, services et construction: Specified Herein Précisé dans les présentes Comments - Commentaires Instructions: See Herein Instructions: Voir aux présentes Vendor/Firm Name and Address Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur Delivery Required - Livraison exigée Delivery Offered - Livraison proposée See Herein – Voir ci-inclus Vendor/Firm Name and Address Raison sociale et adresse du fournisseur/de l'entrepreneur Telephone No. - N°de téléphone Facsimile No. - N° de télécopieur Issuing Office - Bureau de distribution Name and title of person authorized to sign on behalf of Vendor/Firm Detection, Simulation and Optical Systems Division (type or print) Place du Portage III, 8C2 Nom et titre de la personne autorisée à signer au nom du fournisseur/ 11 rue Laurier Street de l'entrepreneur (taper ou écrire en caractères d'imprimerie) Gatineau Quebec K1A 0S5 Signature Date Page 1 of - de 1 Weapon Effects Simulation Modernization Request for Information 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Commander Commodore José António Mirones Spanish Navy Commander of Standing Nato Maritime Group Two (Snmg1)
    COMMANDER COMMODORE JOSÉ ANTÓNIO MIRONES SPANISH NAVY COMMANDER OF STANDING NATO MARITIME GROUP TWO (SNMG1) José António Mirones was born in 1965 and joined the Portuguese Navy Naval Academy in 1983, graduating with the class of 88. After Fleet training, including involvement in disaster relief in the North Sea, in the aftermath of Piper Alfa oil rig disaster, and exchange with the United States Navy, in USS Joseph Hewes, his early years were spent at sea as a bridge watch-keeper, carrying out fishery protection and maritime securityoperations. Principal Warfare Officer in several frigates, was also Head of Department (Operations) and Executive officer with operational deployments to the Adriatic, supporting EU and NATO embargo operations; Mediterranean, namely Operation Enduring Freedom, in the wake of September 11th; Baltic; Artic Ocean and wider Atlantic. He completed the specialist ASW´s course in 1999. Took command of the frigate Bartolomeu Dias, in January 2009, as her first Commanding Officer. Promoted to Captain, acted as CTG (EUROMARFOR TG) for two occasions and, more recently, as Commodore, was the force commander for the EU naval operation ATALANTA, in the Indian Ocean. His staff appointments have included two tours at the Naval Staff (Plans and Policy and External Affairs Division). His last shore assignment was as Military Assistant to the Chief of the Defence Staff. José António Mirones personal decorations include the Distinguished Service Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, Navy Cross as well as various campaign ribbons and foreign medals. @NATOMaritimeCommand @NATO_MARCOM @NATO HQ MARCOM Allied Maritime Command I Public Affairs OfficeI [email protected] I www.mc.nato.int.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN RANGERS, Octobre 2010
    A-DH-267-000/AF-003 THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN RANGERS THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN RANGERS BADGE INSIGNE Description Description Gules a Dall ram's head in trian aspect Or all within De gueules à la tête d'un mouflon de Dall d'or an annulus Gules edged and inscribed THE ROCKY tournée de trois quarts, le tout entouré d'un anneau MOUNTAIN RANGERS in letters Or ensigned by the de gueules liséré d'or, inscrit THE ROCKY Royal Crown proper and environed by maple leaves MOUNTAIN RANGERS en lettres du même, sommé proper issuant from a scroll Gules edged and de la couronne royale au naturel et environné de inscribed with the Motto in letters Or. feuilles d'érable du même, le tout soutenu d'un listel de gueules liséré d’or et inscrit de la devise en lettres du même. Symbolism Symbolisme The maple leaves represent service to Canada and Les feuilles d'érable représentent le service au the Crown represents service to the Sovereign. The Canada, et la couronne, le service à la Souveraine. head of a ram or big horn sheep was approved for Le port de l'insigne à tête de bélier ou de mouflon wear by all independent rifle companies in the d'Amérique a été approuvé en 1899 pour toutes les Province of British Columbia in 1899. "THE ROCKY compagnies de fusiliers indépendantes de la MOUNTAIN RANGERS" is the regimental title, and Province de la Colombie-Britannique. « THE ROCKY "KLOSHE NANITCH" is the motto of the regiment, in MOUNTAIN RANGERS » est le nom du régiment, et the Chinook dialect.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialization and the Canadian Forces (2003)
    SPECIALIZATION AND THE CANADIAN FORCES PHILIPPE LAGASSÉ OCCASIONAL PAPER No. 40, 2003 The Norman Paterson School of International Affairs Carleton University 1125 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6 Telephone: 613-520-6655 Fax: 613-520-2889 This series is published by the Centre for Security and Defence Studies at the School and supported by a grant from the Security Defence Forum of the Department of National Defence. The views expressed in the paper do not necessarily represent the views of the School or the Department of National Defence TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 3 Introduction 4 Determinants of Force Structuring 7 Canadian Defence Policy 16 Specialization, Transformation and Canadian Defence 29 Conclusion 36 REFERENCES 38 ABOUT THE AUTHOR 40 2 ABSTRACT Canada is facing a force structuring dilemma. In spite of Ottawa’s desire to promote international peace and stability alongside the United States and the United Nations, Canada’s minimalist approaches to defence spending and capital expenditures are undermining the long-term viability of the Canadian Forces’ (CF) expeditionary and interoperable capabilities. Two solutions to this dilemma present themselves: increased defence spending or greater force structure specialization. Since Ottawa is unlikely to increase defence spending, specialization provides the only practical solution to the CF’s capabilities predicament. Though it would limit the number of tasks that the CF could perform overseas, specialization would maximize the output of current capital expenditures and preserve the CF’s interoperability with the US military in an age of defence transformation. This paper thus argues that the economics of Canadian defence necessitate a more specialized CF force structure.
    [Show full text]
  • GAUTHIER John Louis
    Gauthier, John Louis Private Algonquin Regiment Royal Canadian Infantry Corps C122588 John Louis Gauthier was born on Aug. 28, 1925 to French-Canadian parents, John Alfred Gauthier (1896-1983) and Clara Carriere (1900-1978) living in the Town of Renfrew, Ontario. The family also comprised James (1929-1941); Margaret (1932 died as an enfant); Blanche (1933-present) and Thomas (1937- present). Mr. Gauthier worked at the factory of the Renfrew Electric and Refrigeration Company. Jackie, as he was affectionately known, attended Roman Catholic elementary school and spent two years at Renfrew Collegiate Institute. After leaving high school, he went to work as a bench hand at the same factory as his father. In the summers, he was also a well-liked counsellor at the church youth camp in Lake Clear near Eganville, Ontario. Both his sister, Blanche, and brother, Thomas, recall Jackie’s comments when he decided to sign up for military at the age of 18 years old. “He told our mother that ‘Mom, if I don’t come back, you can walk down Main Street (in Renfrew) and hold your head high‘,” said Blanche. “In those days, men who didn’t volunteer to go overseas to war were called ‘zombies‘.” It was a common term of ridicule during the Second World War; Canadians were embroiled in debates about conscription or compulsory overseas military service. Many men had volunteered to go but others avoided enlistment. By mid-1943, the government was under pressure to force men to fight in Europe and the Far East. 1 Jackie Gauthier had enlisted on Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Arms Trainer Validation and Transfer of Training: C7 Rifle
    L LL Small Arms Trainer Validation and Transfer of Training: C7 Rifle Stuart C. Grant Defence R&D Canada Technical Report DRDC Toronto TR 2013-085 December 2013 Limited D Small Arms Trainer Validation and Transfer of Training: C7 Rifle Stuart C. Grant DRDC, Toronto Research Centre Defence R&D Canada, Toronto Research Centre Technical Report DRDC Toronto TR 2013-085 December 2013 Principal Author Original signed by Stuart C. Grant Stuart C. Grant Defence Scientist Approved by Original signed by Linda Bossi Linda Bossi Section Head, Human Systems Integration Section Approved for release by Original signed by Joseph V. Baranski Joseph V. Baranski Chair, Knowledge and Information Management Committee, Chief Scientist In conducting the research described in this report, the investigators adhered to the policies and procedures set out in the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans (2010) as issued jointly by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of National Defence, 2013 © Sa Majesté la Reine (en droit du Canada), telle que représentée par le ministre de la Défense nationale, 2013 Abstract …….. The Canadian Army uses the Small Arms Trainer (SAT) to support the use of infantry weapons. A trial was conducted at CFB Gagetown to validate the simulator and to determine how live and simulated fire should be used to prepare troops for the Personal Weapons Test Level 3 (PWT3). Six infantry platoons completed the range practices using either x all live fire; x all simulated fire; x simulated fire, completing all range practices twice; or x simulated fire for the first five range practices and live fire for the last three range practices.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historiography of C Force
    Canadian Military History Volume 24 Issue 2 Article 10 2015 A Historiography of C Force Tony Banham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Tony Banham "A Historiography of C Force." Canadian Military History 24, 2 (2015) This Feature is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : A Historiography of C Force FEATURE A Historiography of C Force TONY BANHAM Abstract: Following the Japanese invasion of Hong Kong in 1941, a small number of books covering the then Colony’s war experiences were published. Although swamped by larger and more significant battles, the volume of work has expanded in the years since and is no longer insignificant. This historiography documents that body of literature, examining trends and possible future directions for further study with particular respect to the coverage of C Force. h e f a t e o f the 1,975 men and two women of C Force, sent T to Hong Kong just before the Japanese invaded, has generated a surprising volume of literature. It was fate too that a Canadian, Major General Arthur Edward Grasett, was the outgoing commander of British troops in China— including the Hong Kong garrison— in mid-1941 (being replaced that August by Major General Christopher M altby of the Indian army), and fate that his determination that the garrison be reinforced would see a Briton, Brigadier John Kelburne Lawson, arrive from Canada in November 1941 as commander of this small force sent to bolster the colony’s defences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Militia in the Interwar Years, 1919-39
    THE POLICY OF NEGLECT: THE CANADIAN MILITIA IN THE INTERWAR YEARS, 1919-39 ___________________________________________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board ___________________________________________________________ in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY __________________________________________________________ by Britton Wade MacDonald January, 2009 iii © Copyright 2008 by Britton W. MacDonald iv ABSTRACT The Policy of Neglect: The Canadian Militia in the Interwar Years, 1919-1939 Britton W. MacDonald Doctor of Philosophy Temple University, 2008 Dr. Gregory J. W. Urwin The Canadian Militia, since its beginning, has been underfunded and under-supported by the government, no matter which political party was in power. This trend continued throughout the interwar years of 1919 to 1939. During these years, the Militia’s members had to improvise a great deal of the time in their efforts to attain military effectiveness. This included much of their training, which they often funded with their own pay. They created their own training apparatuses, such as mock tanks, so that their preparations had a hint of realism. Officers designed interesting and unique exercises to challenge their personnel. All these actions helped create esprit de corps in the Militia, particularly the half composed of citizen soldiers, the Non- Permanent Active Militia. The regulars, the Permanent Active Militia (or Permanent Force), also relied on their own efforts to improve themselves as soldiers. They found intellectual nourishment in an excellent service journal, the Canadian Defence Quarterly, and British schools. The Militia learned to endure in these years because of all the trials its members faced. The interwar years are important for their impact on how the Canadian Army (as it was known after 1940) would fight the Second World War.
    [Show full text]
  • Commodore John Barry
    Commodore John Barry Day, 13th September Commodore John Barry (1745-1803) a native of County Wexford, Ireland was a Continental Navy hero of the American War for Independence. Barry’s many victories at sea during the Revolution were important to the morale of the Patriots as well as to the successful prosecution of the War. When the First Congress, acting under the new Constitution of the United States, authorized the raising and construction of the United States Navy, President George Washington turned to Barry to build and lead the nation’s new US Navy, the successor to the Continental Navy. On 22 February 1797, President Washington conferred upon Barry, with the advice and consent of the Senate, the rank of Captain with “Commission No. 1,” United States Navy, effective 7 June 1794. Barry supervised the construction of his own flagship, the USS UNITED STATES. As commander of the first United States naval squadron under the Constitution, which included the USS CONSTITUTION (“Old Ironsides”), Barry was a Commodore with the right to fly a broad pennant, which made him a flag officer. Commodore John Barry By Gilbert Stuart (1801) John Barry served as the senior officer of the United States Navy, with the title of “Commodore” (in official correspondence) under Presidents George Washington, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. The ships built by Barry, and the captains selected, as well as the officers trained, by him, constituted the United States Navy that performed outstanding service in the “Quasi-War” with France, in battles with the Barbary Pirates and in America’s Second War for Independence (the War of 1812).
    [Show full text]
  • INSIDE This Issue
    Pricing in effect Jan. 25 - Feb. 8 1947 - 2017 StagShilo WE WILL MATCH... Shipping to ADVERTISED PRICES ON ELECTRONICS, CAMERAS, COMPUTERS & MAJOR APPLIANCES. DETAILS ARE FREE CFB Shilo AVAILABLE INSTORE OR ONLINE AT WWW.CANEX.CA Your source for Army news in Manitoba 3635 Victoria Ave 204-727-4444 Volume 56 Issue 2 Serving Shilo, Sprucewoods & Douglas since 1947 January 26, 2017 INSIDE This Issue What did you do for Bell Let’s Talk? Page 4 Indoor golf facility can help your game. Page 6 Blessing for family pets It’s not often that Base Padre Maj Greg Costen’s sermons draw a canine audience. But for a blessing of the animals a number of church goers brought along their family pets, mainly canine breeds who sat in the pews patiently awaiting their turn to be blessed up front by Maj Costen. Big or small, it did not matter to the Base Padre, who blessed animals as part of a United Way campaign event. Make healthier choices at This was a fi rst, and Maj Costen CANEX. Page 8 is contemplating doing it again. Photos by Cpl Bryce Cooper 2 Shilo Stag January 26, 2017 Observer: inaugural Base newspaper published on July 18, 1947 Jules Xavier cover was of the artillery training out in the fi eld. Did you know Camp Shilo offered polo? In the late Shilo Stag Words more than photos made up much of the eight 40s, the Base had a polo team besides offering base- pages, with some line drawing advertising provided. ball/fastball — slo-pitch was not invented — with the Early advertisers, with full pages, were the Hud- teams playing communities in the hinterland.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Canada's Role in NATO More Effective
    Making Canada’s Role in NATO More Effective by JulianA Lindley POLICY-French PAPER July, 2016 2016 POLICY REVIEW SERIES Making Canada’s Role in NATO More Effective by Julian-Lindley French CGAI Fellow July, 2016 This essay is one in a series commissioned by Canadian Global Affairs Institute in the context of defence, security and assistance reviews by the Trudeau Government. The views expressed are those of the author and not CGAI. As a Canada Revenue Agency approved charitable organization, CGAI has no ‘views’ but rather acts as a platform and forum for intelligent discussion of Canadian global affairs policy. Prepared for the Canadian Global Affairs Institute 1600, 530 – 8th Avenue S.W., Calgary, AB T2P 3S8 www.cgai.ca ©2016 Canadian Global Affairs Institute ISBN: 978-1-927573-76-1 Making Canada’s Role in NATO More Effective CORE MESSAGES anada is the country that makes NATO an alliance. Without Canada’s membership NATO would be less a community and more a huddled mass of European states under C American protection. As the American world-burden becomes more onerous and the US relationship with NATO more tenuous, and as Europe itself teeters on the edge of deep insecurity and instability, the security and defence choices Canada will make matter not just to the people of Canada but to citizens across the Euro-Atlantic community. The Canada First Defence Strategy (CFDS), first released in 2008, envisions three major roles for the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF): sufficient capabilities to meet the security challenges facing Canadian citizens and Canadian territory; cooperation with the United States in pursuit of shared defence and civil objectives; and the fulfilment of Canada’s multilateral objectives through the United Nations and NATO.
    [Show full text]