Building a Transit-Friendly Community

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Building a Transit-Friendly Community BUILDING A T R A N S I T - F R I E N D LY C O M M U N I T Y P L AC E AC C E SS D E V E LO P M E N T PA R K I N G PA R T N E R S H I P S I . W H AT IS A TRANSIT- F R I E N D LY COMMUNITY? TA B L E 0 8 II. O F H OW TO START DOW N KEY FINDINGS AND THE TRANSIT-FRIENDLY C O N T E N T S L E SSONS LEARNED T R AC K 0 3 1 1 34 P L AC E I I I . L E SSONS 1- 4 GETTING STA R T E D I N T R O D U CT I O N A P P E N D I X 0 7 1 7 34 36 AC C E SS THE PROGRAM L E SSONS 5-7 THE PROCESS COMMUNITIES SELECT E D 2 1 35 3 7 D E V E LOPMENT L E SSONS 8-13 MAKING IT HAPPEN S TATIONS SELECT E D 2 7 3 9 PA R K I N G L E SSONS 14-18 PROGRAM EVA LU ATO R 3 1 4 0 PA R T N E R S H I P L E SSONS 19-22 PROGRAM PA R T N E R S 0 3 I N T R O D U CT I O N A c ro ss the nation, A m e r i cans are re d i s covering the place s the auto m o b i le age left behind. Long-negle c ted dow n tow n s , built generations ago around public transit systems, are d rawing a second look from people and businesses weary of t raffic co n g e stion and auto - o r i e n ted sprawl, who seek i nstead the benefits of being near one another, and near tra n- sit options. Such communities are fo cal points of the "smart g rowth" movement. The movement has deep roots in New J e rs ey, perhaps because the Garden Sta te has more ca rs per m i le of road than any sta te in the nation. The urgency to "grow smarter" led in 1992 to adoption of New Jers ey ’s State Development and Redevelopment Plan, with the specific goals of building and rebuilding "communities of place . " N ew Jers ey ’s communities are re p re s e n ta t i ve of the s p e ctrum of community types acro ss the nation when it comes to building or rebuilding communities around tra n s i t . Its rail stations opera te in many settings, from older dow n- towns, to established suburban commuter villages, to regional p a r k -and-rides. Many of these stations will soon see new and expanded service, as a result of NJ TRANSIT i n i t i a t i ves and in turn, their communities will ex p e r i e n ce new parking and deve lopment pre ss u res, which will re q u i re sensitive , community-based planning that respect the needs of both the co m m u ter and the co m m u n i t y. 05 I N T R O D U CT I O N 12 For the past two years, the program described Communities for New Jersey" pilot community Jersey Coast and, since 1996, the Morris and west transit links. When completed, the line in this report – Transit-Friendly Communities planning assistance program; and Essex lines, which were connected to the will extend along the Hudson River waterfront for New Jersey – has brought together diverse Northeast Corridor with completion of Midtown to Bergen County. community and professional partners to develop > To convey lessons learned to other communi- Direct service (a.k.a. the Kearny Connection). Finally, construction is underway on the specific ways that New Jersey towns and cities ties both in New Jersey and nationally, to help The Raritan Valley line serves Newark Penn Southern New Jersey Light Rail Transit System can become more "transit-friendly," by planning guide their own efforts. Station, and the remaining rail lines converge on which, when completed, will connect Camden their growth in partnership with transit invest- Hoboken, requiring awkward and time-consum- to Trenton and the Northeast Corridor. ment. The program was built on NJ TRANSIT’s ing transfers to reach Manhattan. Together, these connections, upgrades and initiatives to make train stations themselves B AC KGROUND: NEW JERSEY’S To overcome the disjointed nature of the rail new lines cost more than $2 billion, and will "passenger friendly;" and statewide smart- PA SSENGER RAIL SY S T E M system, NJ TRANSIT is completing a massive result in an interconnected rail network with growth initiatives to reduce sprawl and encour- capital program to connect all these passenger more than 200 stations serving the majority of age new development within walking distance During the past 20 years, NJ TRANSIT has lines into one seamless system: state residents. of transit stations. in ve sted more than $8.2 billion to repair, reh abil- Supporting the growth and the efficiency of Oftentimes communities are not prepared itate, expand and connect the state’s passenger > The Montclair Connection (completed in transit in New Jersey is best accomplished by for prospective growth at or near their stations. rail lines – many of them built more than 2002) merges the Montclair Branch and the ensuring that the investments of the past are Station use may be constrained by lack of ade- 100 years ago by competing rail companies. Boonton Line, and connects these two Hoboken- used most effectively. New Jersey’s rail stations quate parking, an absence of feeder services, NJ TRANSIT’s commitment has reversed bound lines directly to Manhattan. and hundreds of bus stops are the gateways and inhospitable walking or biking options, years of transit and rail station neglect – and has for moving around the state and to neighboring sometimes resulting in grea ter traffic con g e stion. begun to have a positive impact on investment > The Secaucus transfer station will provide New York City and Philadelphia. By planning Moreover, there has been a lack of awareness and property values in many communities sur- the remaining Hoboken-bound lines collaboratively, NJ TRANSIT and the various host in many New Jersey communities about how rounding these stations. These connections and (Main/Bergen, Port Jervis and Pascack Valley) communities can ensure that these gateways to leverage transit investments to revitalize upgrades of existing commuter rail lines, and with direct access to Manhattan. Ridership is ex- are attractive and accessible. In addition, transit downtowns, encourage business and local the construction of new light rail lines, go a long pected to nearly double at the 30 stations that facilities are public inve stments that can economic development, and reduce reliance way toward providing an interconnected, will gain direct service to New York with the be used by communities to attract private and on the private car. statewide rail network, with 160 commuter rail completion of this project. public/private partnership redevelopment, thus Communities that plan their growth in part- stations and 26 light rail stations serving the contributing to the success of the local economy. nership with transportation investment stand to majority of state residents. Ridership has doubled These projects will transform northern New reap a host of benefits, from fewer traffic prob- in this 20-year period, a greater increase than Je rs ey's rail network, giving millions of res idents lems, to more vital downtowns, to higher prop- experienced by any other major U.S. transit sys- in communities near 80 rail stations direct 1 As part of the re n ovation of South Orange Train Station, lo ca l erty values. What follows is a guide for commu- tem in this same period, evidence of the public access to midtown Manhattan, for the first time, m e rchants we re re c r u i ted to opera te businesses in the re tail space s lo ca ted underneath the tre st le. They draw lo cal people to the stat i o n nities seeking to be "transit-friendly." It has two demand for transit investment and connectivity. as well as to one another. on a regular basis, as well as provide high-quality b a ked goods and purposes: However, as of 2002, the network did not yet Construction has also been completed on the other pass e ng e r - re l a ted services. The landscaped outdoor seating and the new plaza function as a civic square for the tow n . operate as a single system. Only four rail lines first phase of the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail > To document the key findings and conclu- offered direct service to Penn Station in System, which opened in 2000 and now connects 2 NJ TRANSIT's Secaucus tra n s fer station, to be co m p le ted in 2004, will connect communities in northern and we stern New Jers ey to sions from N J TRANSIT’S "Transit-Friendly Manhattan: The Northeast Corridor, the North Bayonne to Hoboken, and to existing east- m i d town Manhatta n . THE PROGRAM: 0 7 T R A N S I T - F R I E N D LY COMMUNITIES FOR NEW JERSEY THE PROGRAM The "Transit-Friendly Communities for New The Transit-Friendly Communities for Jersey" program began formally in 1999 with the New Jersey program has provided educational awarding of a Federal Highway Administration workshops and technical assistance to a wide grant to NJ TRANSIT from the Transportation range of rail station communities throughout and Community and System Preservation Pilot the state.
Recommended publications
  • BULLETIN - FEBRUARY, 2010 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol
    TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - FEBRUARY, 2010 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 53, No. 2 February, 2010 The Bulletin NOR’EASTER HITS EASTERN SEABOARD Published by the New Although the “official” start of winter was not boarded a following train that got them to York Division, Electric until Monday, December 21, 2009, the first Ronkonkoma at 8:45 when they were sched- Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box major winter storm, a Nor’easter, traveled up uled to arrive at 4:14 AM. Thanks to member 3001, New York, New the eastern seaboard, arriving in the metro- Larry Kiss, who filled in some details. York 10008-3001. politan area Saturday afternoon, December Later that day, at 8:45 PM, service was sus- 19. It continued through Sunday, December pended between Ronkonkoma and Green- 20, dumping up to 26” of snow in eastern port and there were scattered delays on the For general inquiries, contact us at nydiv@ Long Island. Portions of New Jersey also Port Jefferson, Babylon and Montauk erausa.org or by phone received significant amounts. In New York Branches. Traffic reports in the following days at (212) 986-4482 (voice City, approximately 11 inches were recorded also told of minor delays. mail available). The in Central Park, 13.2 inches in Sheepshead Our Editor-in-Chief, Bernie Linder, saw on a Division’s website is www.erausa.org/ Bay, six inches in the Bronx, and only a trace news report on Channel 7 that the lead car of nydiv.html. in Poughkeepsie. Many areas received re- each LIRR MU train, and probably also the cord amounts of snow.
    [Show full text]
  • North Jersey Coast & Morristown Lines: Hoboken & New York
    North Jersey Coast & Morristown Lines: Hoboken & New York - Bay Head & Dover © Copyright Dovetail Games 2015, all rights reserved Release Version 1.1 Page 1 Train Simulator – North Jersey Coast & Morristown Lines 1 ROUTE INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 5 1.1 The Route ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Route Map ............................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Focus Time Period .................................................................................................. 5 2 GETTING STARTED ......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Recommended Minimum Hardware Specification .......................................................... 6 3 ROLLING STOCK............................................................................................. 7 3.1 Comet IV Cab Car .................................................................................................. 7 3.1.1 Cab Controls ........................................................................................... 8 3.2 NJT ALP-45DP ....................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Cab Controls ........................................................................................... 9 3.3 NJT ALP-46 ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Transportation-Driven World-Class Economy: New Jersey at Risk
    Please do not remove this page A Transportation-Driven World-Class Economy: New Jersey at Risk Hughes, James W.; Seneca, Joseph J. https://scholarship.libraries.rutgers.edu/discovery/delivery/01RUT_INST:ResearchRepository/12643423210004646?l#13643539360004646 Hughes, J. W., & Seneca, J. J. (2005). A Transportation-Driven World-Class Economy: New Jersey at Risk. Rutgers Regional Report, 23, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.7282/T35Q4XPJ This work is protected by copyright. You are free to use this resource, with proper attribution, for research and educational purposes. Other uses, such as reproduction or publication, may require the permission of the copyright holder. Downloaded On 2021/10/03 01:44:14 -0400 Rutgers Rutgers Regional Report # Regional Report Issue Paper Number 23 A Transportation-Driven World-Class Economy: April 2005 New Jersey at Risk James W. Hughes Dean Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Joseph J. Seneca University Professor Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Published by 2 Rutgers Regional Report ew Jersey’s economy has been successfully Executive Summary Nreinvented several times, and each occasion significantly enhanced the well-being of the state and its people. Most recent is the transformation to he precondition for every phase of economic a leading-edge, knowledge-driven, information- Tadvancement in New Jersey was a foundation based economy, which has yielded the highest of leading-edge transportation infrastructure. The median household and family incomes among the post–World War II transportation–economic 50 states. However, it is important to observe that experience amply demonstrates this reality. every period of economic progression in New Jersey K was built upon earlier investments in transportation All of New Jersey’s postwar economic and infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Shares Use Corridors
    Shared Use Corridors New Jersey Transit’s Passenger Rail Perspectives D. C. Agrawal Assistant Executive Director Corporate Strategy, Policy, & Contracts [email protected] January 13, 2008 Sunday, January 20, 2008 1 NJ TRANSIT has been operating passenger rail services in Shared Use Corridors for over 25 years • Commuter Rail – Intercity Rail Commuter trains on Amtrak-owned NEC • Commuter Rail – Freight Rail – Commuter trains on Conrail (CSX/NS)-owned lines – Freight trains (Conrail and NS) on NJ TRANSIT-owned lines • Light Rail – Freight Rail Freight trains (Conrail) on NJ TRANSIT-owned lines 2 Sunday, January 20, 2008 2 NJ Transit - Amtrak • Operations – 430 NJ Transit trains each weekday – Over 200,000 persons a day or over 80% of NJ Transit ridership touches NEC • Legal Framework – NJ Transit’s rights on NEC pursuant to federal law (3R/ 4R/NERSA) – NJ Transit contract negotiations governed by STB rulings; however, current payments above STB “avoidable cost” methodology 3 Sunday, January 20, 2008 3 NJ TRANSIT – Amtrak Shared Use Costing Principles • Capital Costs – Sole Benefit Projects – all costs –paid for by NJT: $1.2b • Kearny Connection – connected NJ TRANSIT’s M&E Lines to NEC • Secaucus Junction – new Transfer Station on NEC • Newark Airport Station – new NEC train station with rail connection to airport – Joint Benefit Capital Program – NJT: 50%; Amtrak: 50% $600m Cost allocation share agreed to in 1996 on a program level rather than by project basis e.g.: NEC State-of-Good Repair projects between Trenton and New York
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Unit, State House Annex, PO 068, Trenton, New Jersey
    Committee Meeting of SENATE LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE “The Committee will hear testimony from transportation officials and experts on New Jersey Transit and Amtrak budgetary and operating issues, the Gateway Tunnel project, and New Jersey’s long-term transportation capital funding needs” LOCATION: Committee Room 4 DATE: August 10, 2015 State House Annex 10:00 a.m. Trenton, New Jersey MEMBERS OF COMMITTEE PRESENT: Senator Robert M. Gordon, Chair Senator Loretta Weinberg, Vice Chair Senator M. Teresa Ruiz Senator Paul A. Sarlo Senator Thomas H. Kean Jr. Senate President Stephen M. Sweeney ALSO PRESENT: Michael R. Molimock Mark Magyar Lisa Torres Office of Legislative Services Senate Majority Senate Republican Committee Aide Committee Aide Committee Aide Meeting Recorded and Transcribed by The Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit, State House Annex, PO 068, Trenton, New Jersey TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Stephen J. Gardner Vice President Northeast Corridor Infrastructure and Investment Development Amtrak 4 Thomas K. Wright President Regional Plan Association 53 Janna Chernetz, Esq. Senior New Jersey Policy Advocate Tri-State Transportation Campaign 61 Cyndi Steiner Executive Director New Jersey Bike and Walk Coalition 64 Albert L. Papp Jr. President New Jersey Association of Railroad Passengers, and Vice Chair Legislative Policy and Strategy National Association of Railroad Passengers 68 Thomas A. Bracken President and Chief Executive Officer New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce, and Chairman Forward New Jersey 93 Anthony Attanasio Executive Director Utility and Transportation Contractors Association of New Jersey 95 Martin E. Robins, Esq. Director Emeritus Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 104 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) APPENDIX: PowerPoint presentation and Testimony submitted by Stephen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Trends Report
    Trends & Opportunities How Changes in Ridership, Population, and Employment Should Guide Future Metropolitan Transit Planning July 2013 www.realtransit.org Overview Second Avenue Subway (Phase I) 7 Line Extension East Side Access Fulton Center and World Trade Center Transit Hub The New York metropolitan region is in the midst of $25 billion in capital projects due to be completed before the end of the decade. These projects include the extension of the 7 Line subway to 34th Street, the opening of the first phase of the Second Avenue Subway, the completion of the East Side Access program to bring LIRR trains to Grand Central Terminal, and the construction of the Fulton Center and World Trade Center Transit Hub in Lower Manhattan. As government leaders plan for the next round of capital projects within the metropolitan region, it is imperative that investments target regions and populations that will most benefit from transit improvements both now and in the future. Trends & Opportunities outlines a number of metropolitan transit trends and opportunities to consider when it comes to preparing for our future transportation-based planning. 1 Trends in Metropolitan Transit Rail on the Rise From 2002 to 2012, the New York metropolitan area has seen substantial ridership growth in both local and regional rail systems. In terms of local mass transit rail, the New York Subway system added the greatest number of annual riders since 2002 at 241.4 million, which represented a 17.1% rise in ridership over ten years. Hudson-Bergen Light Rail, however, had the most dramatic gains by percentage, growing 329% since 2002 and gaining over 10 million annual passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Nj Transit Midtown Direct Line
    Nj Transit Midtown Direct Line Commodious Gifford bulldogged some griffes after birefringent Archibald decarbonate lexically. Which Reuven egress so enough,anachronistically is Carson that infiltrative? Clinten immobilize her drencher? When Allan fine-tune his breakableness unharness not technically DIRECTIONS TO MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY. You hate start in own sleepout crew you join my support my recommended team input is ready and waiting but you to copper in. For nj transit center is available at hoboken and livingston, commissioner of increased ridership to direct line timetable for. So sensitive, so good. How to the path. Three nj transit. Convention puts kink in Jersey's rail travel Brotherhood of. Tickets that serve as always stand was over the left on weekends in nanuet, see the easiest and hoboken monthly and two abandoned stations in. Sept all lines that midtown direct customers using wix ads. In June of 1996 New Jersey Transit began the Midtown Direct service side the Kearny Connection linking. Connect a crowd of seats are operated. Coalition believes that NJ Transit did a credible job during the mostly work program; however, the Coalition believes that expect better services could that been offered if NJT had solicited advice from commuters and their advocacy groups in the planning stage. Station and travel to 14th Street and Sixth Avenue in Midtown Manhattan. Stay connected on social media for updates throughout the service adjustment period. NJTransit station-to-station service Montclair-Boonton MidTown Direct Line. Midtown Direct trains on the Montclair-Boonton Line Trains will mostly operate against a normal weekday schedule with even few time changes Trains.
    [Show full text]
  • 78. Transportation
    78. TRANSPORTATION 10. PUBLIC SAFETY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE 11. VEHICULAR SAFETY Language –– Direct State Services – General Fund Notwithstanding the provisions of the “Motor Vehicle Inspection Fund” established pursuant to subsection j. of R.S. 39:8–2, balances in the fund are available for other Clean Air purposes, subject to the approval of the Director of the Division of Budget and Accounting. 05–100–078–6400–081 6400–419–016190 Receipts in the “Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Fund” established pursuant to section 17 of P.L. 1995, c.157 (C.39:8–75), are appropriated to offset all reasonable and necessary expenses of the Division of State Police and the Motor Vehicle Commission in the performance of commercial truck safety and emission inspections, subject to the approval of the Director of the Division of Budget and Accounting. 05–100–078–6400–071 6400–425–010220 Receipts derived pursuant to the New Jersey Medical Service Helicopter Response Program under section 1 05–100–066–1200–429 1200–416–060220 of P.L. 1992 c. 87 (C.39:3–8.2) are appropriated to the Division of State Police and the Department of Health 05–100–046–4220–326 4220–416–024160 and Senior Services to defray the operating costs of the program as authorized under P.L. 1986, c. 106 (C. 26:2K–35 et seq.). The unexpended balance as of June 30, 2004 is appropriated to the special capital maintenance reserve account for capital replacement and major maintenance of helicopter equipment, subject to the approval of the Director of the Division of Budget and Accounting.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transportation
    3.1 Public Transportation 3.1 Public Transportation A. INTRODUCTION This section describes the characteristics of the existing trans-Hudson public transportation system and summarizes changes in the trans-Hudson public transportation system under the 2030 No Build and 2030 Build Alternatives. Service levels and ridership are presented for the following modes: NJ TRANSIT commuter rail, Amtrak, bus, ferry, and PATH. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS The New York/New Jersey metropolitan region is afforded a variety of public transportation services crossing the Hudson River into midtown Manhattan, including NJ TRANSIT commuter rail, Amtrak, NJ TRANSIT and private express bus, ferry and Port Authority Trans-Hudson (PATH), as shown in Table 3.1-1. TABLE 3.1-1: EXISTING TRANS-HUDSON PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES Public Transportation Mode/Facility Service Description NJ TRANSIT Main/Bergen/Port Jervis Runs from Suffern, NY to Hoboken, NJ. Main Line operates via Paterson, NJ. Bergen County Line operates via Fair Lawn, NJ. The two lines meet at Ridgewood, NJ. Service provided seven days per week. NJ TRANSIT runs service under contract with Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Metro-North Railroad from Port Jervis, NY to Hoboken, NJ. Each line has connections to Penn Station New York (PSNY) available at Frank R. Lautenberg Station. NJ TRANSIT Pascack Valley Line Runs between Spring Valley, NY and Hoboken, NJ. NJ TRANSIT serves three MTA Metro-North Railroad stations in NY. Connections to PSNY available at Frank R. Lautenberg Station. NJ TRANSIT Montclair-Boonton Line Runs between Hackettstown, NJ and Hoboken, NJ/Manhattan via Montclair-Boonton Line. Direct service to PSNY from Montclair, Glen Ridge, and Bloomfield, NJ.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Infrastructure and New
    TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE AND NEW YORK’S COMPETITIVENESS A Background Paper by the Citizens Budget Commission June 29, 1999 FOREWORD Founded in 1932, the Citizens Budget Commission (CBC) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit civic organization devoted to influencing constructive change in the finances and services of New York State and New York City governments. This report was prepared under the auspices of the CBC’s Competitiveness Committee, which we co- chair. The other members of the Committee are Deborah Buresh, Lawrence B. Buttenwieser, Herman R. Charbonneau, Denis V. Curtin, Karen Daly, Morton Egol, Patricia O’Donnell Ewers, Bud H. Gibbs, William H. Hayden, H. Dale Hemmerdinger, Peter A. Joseph, Ellen Oran Kaden, Walter T. Kicinski, Marianne E. Kozlowski, William P. Lauder, Frank J. McLoughlin, Felix A. Orbe, Laurence G. Preble, Carol Raphael, Arthur H. Rosenbloom, Heather L. Ruth, Lee S. Saltzman, Joseph V. Salzano, Richard B. Teiman, W. James Tozer, Ronald G. Weiner, Robin L. Wiessmann, and Eugene Keilin, ex-officio. The Competitiveness Committee was created in early 1997 with a mandate to follow up on an important finding of the CBC’s December 1996 report, Budget 2000 Project. The Commission found that New York City and New York State suffered from high tax burdens on residents and businesses. The Commission, in its 1996 report, made recommendations to reform and to reduce State and local taxes to make New York more competitive, and several of these recommendations have been acted upon. However, the CBC also recognized that an area’s economic competitiveness is not determined by taxes alone. State and local governments enhance the competitiveness of their jurisdictions by delivering high quality services and providing well- functioning public infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Amtrak's Intercity Passenger Rail Services in New
    Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy The Role of Amtrak’s Intercity Passenger Rail Services in New Jersey June 2004 Report prepared and published by: Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Funded by: The J.C. Kellogg Foundation PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND This report, funded by a grant from the J.C. Kellogg Foundation, examines intercity rail travel to and from New Jersey and weighs its importance to the state’s citizens and economy. The analysis considers all Amtrak rail trips with one or both trip ends inside New Jersey; Clocker trips are excluded from the analysis.1 The report is the first of three funded by the J.C. Kellogg Foundation to examine Amtrak through the prism of New Jersey’s interests. The northeastern United States, from Washington, D.C., to Boston, contains the greatest concentration of commercial activity and residential development in the country. The Amtrak intercity passenger rail system serving this area, known as the Northeast Corridor, is unparalleled in the United States in terms of passenger volume and the frequency, speed, and quality of service. As a result, in no other region of the United States are such large concentrations of population and economic activity so heavily dependent on a single intercity rail corridor. At the heart of the Northeast Corridor is the state of New Jersey, the most densely populated state in the nation. The Northeast Corridor traverses the state from the Delaware River bridge in Trenton to the southwest, to the Hudson River tunnels into New York City to the northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study for the Restoration of NJ TRANSIT Service for the Former Ampere Train Station Final Report
    Feasibility Study for the Restoration of NJ TRANSIT Service for the Former Ampere Train Station Final Report June, 2005 Prepared for the City of East Orange By: Feasibility Study for the Restoration of NJ TRANSIT Service for the Former Ampere Train Station Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW .................................................................1 1.1. Construction of the Railroad Line...........................................................1 1.2. Original Ampere Station ..........................................................................1 1.3. Expanded Ampere Station .......................................................................1 1.4. Railroad Consolidation.............................................................................3 1.5. Historic Status of Ampere Station...........................................................3 1.6. Demolition of the Station..........................................................................3 1.7. Current Ampere Site Conditions.............................................................3 1.8. Commuter Rail Service .............................................................................4 SECTION 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS...................................................................5 2.1. Overview ....................................................................................................5 2.2. Transit Services ..........................................................................................5 2.3. Commuting Patterns...............................................................................13
    [Show full text]