Sentencing in Botswana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sentencing in Botswana SENTENCING IN BOTSWANA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LAW AND PRACTICE by ELIZABETH NYAWIRA MACHARIA Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree LLD In the Faculty of Law University of Pretoria FEBRUARY 2016 SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR ANNETTE VAN DER MERWE i DECLARATION I, Elizabeth Nyawira Macharia, hereby declare that this thesis is my original work and it has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree at any other university or institution. Signed: ________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Place: _________________________________________________ ii DEDICATION For my children Kgotla Zachary Raha Khumo Tashatha Ng’endo Keseitse Neema Mmabotho Yamasa Njeri Sechaba Macharia iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of this work has only been possible through the grace of God in whom all efforts, and particularly the most difficult tasks, find meaning. He has made it possible for me to complete this thesis amidst the many demands of family and professional life. I am indebted and grateful to my supervisor Prof. Annette van der Merwe whose constant encouragement assisted me immensely. Throughout this research, Annette gave me thoughtful insights and directed me to relevant materials. Her guidance and patience has been invaluable to me. She has been instrumental in helping me reach a long-held personal and professional milestone. A heartfelt ‘thank you’ to you Annette. The financial support of the African Academics Program of the Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria has without doubt made this journey possible. Thank you to UP for providing a meaningful and efficient way to enable African academics like me to work and study. I would like to express my gratitude my colleagues in the Faculty of Social Science and in the Department of Law at the University of Botswana for their encouragement and support. I am also immensely grateful for the support of Mrs. Toteng, our capable librarian. I would like to acknowledge and thank my family. First, my parents Professors Judith and John Kamau who by their words and example as career academics have been an inspiration. Second, I thank my sisters Esther, Eva and Tabitha who celebrated every milestone with me. You are a formidable cheer-leading squad! Third, I extend my sincere gratitude to my dear friends in Gaborone and those at Arbor and Lakeview who laughed, cried and prayed with me. And finally, my greatest gratitude goes to my darling husband Unami Mokobi for bearing with me these past few years whilst I researched, wrote and talked about sentencing at the dinner table. Thank you for expertly holding the fort! May God in his abundance bless you all. iv SUMMARY OF THESIS ‘Sentencing in Botswana: A comparative analysis of law and practice’ This thesis considers capital punishment, corporal punishment and mandatory minimum sentencing in Botswana and the continued usefulness of these three sentencing options. The thesis adopts a comparative approach. Firstly, the thesis examines the abolition of capital punishment in South Africa, and the United Kingdom, as well as inroads made in the manner of application of capital punishment in retentionist commonwealth Caribbean states. Secondly, the process leading to prohibition of judicial corporal punishment in South Africa, Namibia, Zimbabwe, England and Wales, as well as the United States is analysed. Thirdly, the thesis considers mandatory minimum sentencing in South Africa, England and Wales and Australia. The imposition of judicial corporal punishment on juvenile offenders is also examined. Alternative sanctions that may replace these sentencing options are investigated. The findings are that the selected sentencing options fall short of international human rights standards and, in particular the right to life and the right to human dignity. The primacy of these rights is notable in sentencing law and practice of each comparative jurisdiction. The promovenda identifies current barriers to dispensing with these sentencing options in Botswana. Drawing from the comparative jurisprudence, she proposes how Botswana may successfully achieve abolition of the death penalty, prohibition of judicial corporal punishment and improvement of the mandatory minimum sentencing regime. Recommendations are also made for suitable alternative sanctions such as life imprisonment, correctional supervision and restorative justice approaches to sentencing of adult and juvenile offenders, which, if incorporated, will advance sentencing law in Botswana. v Key terms Sentencing – Botswana – human rights – capital punishment - judicial corporal punishment - mandatory minimum sentencing - sentencing of juveniles - alternative sentencing- comparative perspective – law reform. vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ACHPR African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights ACRWC African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment CJA Child Justice Act CP&E Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights SALRC South African Law Reform Commission TRC Truth and Reconciliation Commission UDHR Universal Declaration of Human Rights UNCRC United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child UN United Nations vii GLOSSARY Botho Setswana term for the idea or philosophy of human-ness or personhood Dikgosi Setswana term for Chiefs Go kgwathisa Setswana term for judicial corporal punishment under Tswana Customary Law Kibiko Swahili term for hippopotamus and the name of a whip made from hippopotamus hide. However the term has become synonymous with any instrument of corporal punishment like a cane or switch Kgosi Setswana term for Chief Kgosana Setswana term for headman who assists the Chief with his duties Kgotla Setswana term for the traditional meeting place for tribal communities living in Botswana where the Chief meets his tribe or morafe. In the Kgotla every person has a right to be heard and it is in the Kgotla where decisions are taken after a consultative process. Morafe Setswana term for members of a tribe. Mophato Setswana term for an age group of persons initiated in the same season. It is a manner of organising members of a tribe. Mephato can be requested to perform specific tasks for the Chief. Mephato plural of mophato Motshwarelela Bogosi Setswana term for a regent to the Chief Therisanyo Setswana term for consultation. Therisanyo is an important ideal in Setswana culture where decisions affecting the tribe are taken after broad consultation. The principle has found its way into modern life and is often applied by the Government. Before the passing of important new legislation the minister responsible for the statute will hold Kgotla meetings country-wide to gauge the wishes of citizens. Thupa Setswana term for a cane Ubuntu Nguni Bantu term for the idea or philosophy of human-ness or personhood viii Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS VII GLOSSARY VIII CHAPTER ONE 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 2 2.1 Description of terms: Sentence, sentencing and punishment 2 2.2 Why study sentencing? 3 2.3 Sentencing and the Constitution 4 3 LITERATURE REVIEW 6 4 RESEARCH PROBLEM 8 5 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 8 6 RESEARCH METHODS, DESIGN, METHODOLOGY, AND ETHICS 9 6.1 Research methods 9 6.2 Research design and methodology 11 6.2.1 The doctrinal method 11 6.2.2 The comparative method 12 6.3 Outcomes 14 6.4 Ethics 14 6.5 Citation style 15 7 STRUCTURE OF THE STUDY 15 CHAPTER TWO 18 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN BOTSWANA: THE CASE FOR ABOLITION 18 1 INTRODUCTION 18 ix 2 DEFINING THE DEATH PENALTY AND MANNER OF EXECUTION 18 3 THE DEATH PENALTY IN BOTSWANA 21 3.1 Introduction and historical overview 21 3.2 The death penalty under the Botswana Constitution and Statutory Law 28 3.3 Limitations on the imposition of the death penalty 35 3.4 The Presidential warrant and the prerogative of mercy 35 3.5 The constitutionality of the death penalty in Botswana 37 3.6 The death penalty in Botswana: Decisions of the African Commission 47 3.7 Botswana’s international obligations and the death penalty 51 3.7.1 The place of international law in Botswana’s national law 51 3.7.2 Treaties guaranteeing the light to life 52 3.7.3 Treaties prohibiting the torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment 55 3.8 Discourses on the death penalty in Botswana 56 3.8.1 The constitutional savings clause 56 3.8.2 Public opinion 57 3.8.3 Adequacy of representations 58 3.8.4 The prerogative of mercy 59 3.8.5 Secret executions 60 4 INTERNATIONAL AND REGIONAL PERSPECTIVES 60 4.1 The United Nations 63 4.2 The European Union 66 4.3 The inter-American human rights system 68 4.4 The death penalty in Africa 71 4.5 Death penalty: International trends 75 5 COMMON ARGUMENTS IN FAVOUR OF THE DEATH PENALTY 77 5.1 Individual and general deterrence 77 5.2 Retribution 77 5.3 Public opinion 78 5.4 Efficient punishment 78 5.5 Other arguments 79 x 6 ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY 79 6.1 The death penalty is not a deterrent 79 6.2 The death penalty brutalises all those involved in the process 82 6.2.1 The prisoner 82 6.2.2 The executioners 83 6.2.3 The families and friends of the victim and the prisoner 84 6.3 The death penalty and poor and marginalised communities 84 6.4 The death penalty is imposed arbitrarily 85 6.5 The death penalty may result in execution of the innocent 86 6.6 The death penalty is a violation of the fundamental human rights of prisoners 87 6.7 Ineffective clemency process 88 6.8 Death penalty is
Recommended publications
  • The Case of the Zezuru Informal Economy in Botswana
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kyoto University Research Information Repository DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND ETHNIC EXCLUSION : Title THE CASE OF THE ZEZURU INFORMAL ECONOMY IN BOTSWANA Author(s) GWATIWA, Tshepo T. Citation African Study Monographs (2014), 35(2): 65-84 Issue Date 2014-06 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.14989/189521 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University African Study Monographs, 35(2): 65–84, June 2014 65 DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND ETHNIC EXCLUSION: THE CASE OF THE ZEZURU INFORMAL ECONOMY IN BOTSWANA Tshepo T. GWATIWA Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva ABSTRACT This article discusses Botswana’s development policies and its silent exclusion of minority groups, particularly the Zezuru. Focusing on the case of the Zezuru, the paper seeks to demonstrate that historical ethnic discrimination and exclusion has blinded the government’s economic diversification strategy. It draws a parallel between government policies and negligence in particular projects that fall within the scope of the diversification strategy. It discusses the government’s failure to engage the Zezuru into modernizing their informal economy. It also discusses the lack of Zezuru access to the venture capital provided by government meant to improve the formal economy. It looks into the fiscal risks and lost benefits to the government while the Zezuru informal economy remains strong. The author conclusively argues that the economic exclusion of the Zezuru in development policy implementation is a setback in the overall diversification strategy. Key Words: Botswana; Zezuru; Socioeconomic exclusion; Informal economy. INTRODUCTION Botswana is a democratic middle-income state located at the heart of the South- ern African Development Community (SADC).
    [Show full text]
  • S V Chokuramba (CCZ 10-2019) (Corporal Punishment
    Judgment No CCZ 10/19 Constitutional Application No. CCZ 29/15 REPORTABLE (10) THE STATE v WILLARD CHOKURAMBA JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN’S TRUST INTERVENING AS AMICUS CURIAE ZIMBABWE LAWYERS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INTERVENING AS AMICUS CURIAE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF ZIMBABWE CHIDYAUSIKU CJ, MALABA DCJ, ZIYAMBI JCC, GWAUNZA JCC, HLATSHWAYO JCC, MAVANGIRA JCC, BHUNU JCC, UCHENA JCC & MAKONI AJCC HARARE, NOVEMBER 12, 2015 & APRIL 3, 2019 J Uladi, for the State O Zvedi, for the Attorney-General T Biti, representing Justice for Children’s Trust D Hofisi, representing Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights T Mpofu, as amicus curiae MALABA DCJ: INTRODUCTION DISTRIBUTED BY VERITAS e-mail: [email protected]; website: www.veritaszim.net Veritas makes every effort to ensure the provision of reliable information, but cannot take legal responsibility for information supplied. 2 Judgment No CCZ 10/19 Constitutional Application No. CCZ 29/15 The constitutional matter before the Constitutional Court (“the Court”) for determination is whether s 353 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 9:07] (“the Act”) is constitutionally invalid. The section authorises the imposition of a sentence of moderate corporal punishment on a male person under the age of eighteen years who is convicted of any offence. The matter came to the Court by way of the procedure for confirmation of orders concerning the constitutional invalidity of any law or any conduct of the President or Parliament made by another court. The High Court made an order declaring s 353 of the Act constitutionally invalid on the ground that it contravenes s 53 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No.
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Recognition of Minorities and Maginalized People and Their Rights in Botswana
    Evaluation: Securing Recognition of Minorities and Marginalized People and their Rights in Botswana PROJECT EVALUATION REPORT FINAL SECURING RECOGNITION OF MINORITIES AND MAGINALIZED PEOPLE AND THEIR RIGHTS IN BOTSWANA Submitted to: Minorities Rights Group International, 54 Commercial Street, London E1, 6LT, United Kingdom Submitted by: Tersara Investments P.O. Box 2139, Gaborone, Botswana, Africa 2/27/2019 This document is property of Minorities Rights Group International, a registered UK Charity and Company Limited by Guarantee and its Partners. 1 Evaluation: Securing Recognition of Minorities and Marginalized People and their Rights in Botswana Document details Client Minority Rights Group International Project title Consulting Services for the Final Evaluation: Securing Recognition of Minorities and Marginalized Peoples and their Rights in Botswana Document type Final Evaluation Document No. TS/18/MRG/EVAL00 This document Text (pgs.) Tables (No.) Figures (no.) Annexes Others comprises 17 3 7 2 N/A Document control Document version Detail Issue date TS/19/MRG/EVAL01 Project Evaluation Report FINAL for 13 June 2019 MRGI 2 Evaluation: Securing Recognition of Minorities and Marginalized People and their Rights in Botswana Contents Document details ..................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Document control ................................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF FIGURES (TABLES, CHARTS)
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Significance of Human Dignity
    The legal significance of human dignity AC STEINMANN 10375082 Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF LAWS at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West University Promoter: Prof F Venter November 2016 The research for this study was concluded in November 2016. The study reflects the legal position in South Africa as of this date. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis was concluded with the academic and emotional support from different role-players during the course of this study. I am deeply indebted to the following persons and institution for their help and support: Prof Francois Venter, my promoter, for his belief in me, his guidance, constructive criticism and ever-present contribution to my understanding of human dignity, and for his generous financial assistance Hennie Oosthuysen, my husband, for his unwavering support, interest, encouragement and endurance Mariet and Christian my children, for their constant motivation, support and refusal to let me abandon the studies, and especially Mariet for her help with editing and all else Kobus and Johanna, my parents, who taught me to read and who provided me with opportunities for learning and education Personnel and staff at NWU (Vaal) library, for their help with inter-library loans Alan Brimer, for his advice and immaculate proof-reading Petra Gainsford, for her editing and advice My friends and family, for their interest and support ii PUBLICATIONS RESULTING FROM THIS THESIS Steinmann AC "Law and human dignity at odds over assisted suicide" November 2015 De Rebus 24-26 Steinmann AC "The Core Meaning of Human Dignity" 2016 (19) PER 1- 32 iii ABSTRACT The meaning of human dignity has been elusive since its recognition by the Stoics in 128 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern African Perspectives on Banning Corporal Punishment –​ a Comparison of Namibia, Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe
    chapter 10 Southern African Perspectives on Banning Corporal Punishment – A Comparison of Namibia, Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe Julia Sloth- Nielsen 1 Introduction This chapter reviews recent judicial and legislative developments concerning steps towards – and against – the abolition of corporal punishment in four closely connected southern African jurisdictions: South Africa, Namibia, Bo- tswana and Zimbabwe. Not only are these countries neighbours, they share a common legal heritage as recipients of a blend of Roman Dutch law and En- glish law and, in the case of Namibia, the country was, until independence in 1990, a protectorate of South Africa with laws and institutions in common. Hence, all countries under discussion inherited from English law the ‘reason- able chastisement’ defence available to parents utilising physical force against their children. In short, this meant that charges of assault could be countered with the common law defence that the parent was merely exercising legiti- mate parental authority. Although the scope of the application of the defence did narrow to exclude the most egregious forms of abuse in recent decades, in the face of mounting evidence of child abuse and changing social norms, it remained intact. This was the case even in the face of developing legislative measures to counter child abuse in various welfare and protection statutes in all of the four countries at defined points in the 20th century.1 The chapter dissects the legislative developments (in the case of Botswa- na and Namibia and South Africa), and judicial developments (Zimbabwe and South Africa) relating to corporal punishment, with the chief focus be- ing corporal punishment in the home and corporal punishment as a judicial sanction for criminal offending.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Botswana
    REPUBLIC OF BOTSWANA FIRST PERIODIC REPORT TO THE AFRICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AFRICAN CHARTER ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES RIGHTS 1 CONTENTS PAGE NO I. PART I. a. History 5 b. Geography 8 c. Population 9 d. Economy 10 e. Constitutional structure 17 f. Administrative structure 20 II. PART II. ARTICLE 1 25 Recognition by States of rights duties and freedoms under the Charter; and ARTICLE 2- Entitlement to Rights and Freedoms under the Charter ARTICLE 3 28 (a) Equality before the law; and (b) equal protection of the law ARTICLE 4 34 Respect of one‟s life and integrity ARTICLE 5 37 Rights to respect of human dignity, prohibition of slavery; slave trade; torture cruel inhuman and degrading treatment ARTICLE 6 50 Right to Liberty and security ARTICLE 7 61 Right to a hearing; right to appeal; right to presumption of innocence; right to be defended by counsel of choice; right to be tried within a reasonable time 2 ARTICLE 8 66 Freedom of religion and conscience ARTICLE 9 70 Right to receive information; right to express opinion ARTICLE 10 74 Right to free association ARTICLE 11 76 Right to freedom of assembly ARTICLE 12 77 Freedom of movement and right to seek and obtain asylum ARTICLE 13 81 Right to participate freely in government; right to equal access to the public service of ones country; right to access public property ARTICLE 14 83 Right to property ARTICLE 15 85 Right to work under equitable and satisfactory conditions and to receive equal pay for equal work ARTICLE 16 87 Right to health - physical and
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Human Rights Through a Constitutional Court: the Case of South Africa
    Fordham Law Review Volume 66 Issue 2 Article 8 1997 Protecting Human Rights Through a Constitutional Court: The Case of South Africa Brice Dickson Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Brice Dickson, Protecting Human Rights Through a Constitutional Court: The Case of South Africa, 66 Fordham L. Rev. 531 (1997). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol66/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Protecting Human Rights Through a Constitutional Court: The Case of South Africa Cover Page Footnote Professor of Law, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland. The author gratefully acknowledges financial assistance from the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust and the British Academy. He also wishes to thank the staff of the Registrar's Office at the Constitutional Court for facilitating his research. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol66/iss2/8 PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS THROUGH A CONSTITUTIONAL COURT: THE CASE OF SOUTH AFRICA Brice Dickson* INTRODUCTION T HIS article explores the South African Constitutional Court's early record in protecting human rights. After considering the or- igins of the Court and the jurisdiction conferred on it first by the In- terim Constitution of 1994 and then by the Constitution of 1996, this article summarizes the provisions of those constitutions which protect human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Hansard 04 March 2020
    DAILY YOUR VOICE IN PARLIAMENT THE SECONDTHE SECOND MEETING MEETING O OFF THE FIRST FIFTH SESSION SESSION OF THEOF ELEVENTHE TWELFTHTH PARLIAMENT PARLIAMENT WEDNESDAY 04 MARCH 2020 MIXED VERSION HANSARDHANSARD NO. 193196 DISCLAIMER Unocial Hansard This transcript of Parliamentary proceedings is an unocial version of the Hansard and may contain inaccuracies. It is hereby published for general purposes only. The nal edited version of the Hansard will be published when available and can be obtained from the Assistant Clerk (Editorial). THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SPEAKER The Hon. Phandu T. C. Skelemani PH, MP. DEPUTY SPEAKER The Hon. Mabuse M. Pule, MP. (Mochudi East) Clerk of the National Assembly - Ms B. N. Dithapo Deputy Clerk of the National Assembly - Mr L. T. Gaolaolwe Learned Parliamentary Counsel - Ms M. Mokgosi Assistant Clerk (E) - Mr R. Josiah CABINET His Excellency Dr M. E. K. Masisi, MP. - President His Honour S. Tsogwane, MP. (Boteti West) - Vice President Minister for Presidential Affairs, Governance and Public Hon. K. N. S. Morwaeng, MP. (Molepolole South) - Administration Hon. K. T. Mmusi, MP. (Gabane-Mmankgodi) - Minister of Defence, Justice and Security Hon. Dr U. Dow, MP. (Specially Elected) - Minister of International Affairs and Cooperation Hon. E. M. Molale, MP. (Goodhope-Mabule ) - Minister of Local Government and Rural Development Hon. Dr E. G. Dikoloti MP. (Mmathethe-Molapowabojang) - Minister of Agricultural Development and Food Security Minister of Environment, Natural Resources Conservation Hon. P. K. Kereng, MP. (Specially Elected) - and Tourism Hon. Dr L. Kwape, MP. (Kanye South) - Minister of Health and Wellness Hon. T.M. Segokgo, MP. (Tlokweng) - Minister of Transport and Communications Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the World's Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 2016 (MRG)
    State of the World’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 2016 Events of 2015 Focus on culture and heritage State of theWorld’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 20161 Events of 2015 Front cover: Cholitas, indigenous Bolivian Focus on culture and heritage women, dancing on the streets of La Paz as part of a fiesta celebrating Mother’s Day. REUTERS/ David Mercado. Inside front cover: Street theatre performance in the Dominican Republic. From 2013 to 2016 MRG ran a street theatre programme to challenge discrimination against Dominicans of Haitian Descent in the Acknowledgements Dominican Republic. MUDHA. Minority Rights Group International (MRG) Inside back cover: Maasai community members in gratefully acknowledges the support of all Kenya. MRG. organizations and individuals who gave financial and other assistance to this publication, including the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. © Minority Rights Group International, July 2016. All rights reserved. Material from this publication may be reproduced for teaching or other non-commercial purposes. No part of it may be reproduced in any form for Support our work commercial purposes without the prior express Donate at www.minorityrights.org/donate permission of the copyright holders. MRG relies on the generous support of institutions and individuals to help us secure the rights of For further information please contact MRG. A CIP minorities and indigenous peoples around the catalogue record of this publication is available from world. All donations received contribute directly to the British Library. our projects with minorities and indigenous peoples. ISBN 978-1-907919-80-0 Subscribe to our publications at State of www.minorityrights.org/publications Published: July 2016 Another valuable way to support us is to subscribe Lead reviewer: Carl Soderbergh to our publications, which offer a compelling Production: Jasmin Qureshi analysis of minority and indigenous issues and theWorld’s Copy editing: Sophie Richmond original research.
    [Show full text]
  • Report by the Republic of Botswana
    UNITED NATIONS A Distr. General Assembly GENERAL A/HRC/WG.6/3/BWA/1 5 September 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Third session Geneva, 1-15 December 2008 NATIONAL REPORT SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 15 (A) OF THE ANNEX TO HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION 5/1 * Botswana _________________________ * The present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.08- A/HRC/WG.6/3/BWA/1 Page 2 I. METHODOLOGY AND CONSULTATION PROCESS 1. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation was responsible for coordinating an inter ministerial effort towards the preparation of the national report submitted for periodic review by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations1. The report was prepared jointly with the Office of the President/Ministry of Justice, Defence and Security and the Attorney General’s Office (which comprised the Drafting Committee). Once a draft had been prepared the draft was shared with stakeholder government departments and ministries. 2. A working draft was then prepared by the Drafting Committee and was shared with stakeholder Government Ministries and Departments with a view that they provide further contribution and feedback. A stakeholder workshop was then convened on 5-6 August 2008 that brought together all stakeholders including the civil society and non-government organizations (NGOs) to go through the initial draft and make comments, suggestions and recommendations to improve the document. II. BACKGROUND: NORMATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 3. Adopted by Botswana at independence in 1966, the Constitution established a non racial democracy, maintaining freedom of speech, of the press and of association, and affording all citizens equal rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Kgotla) and Natural Resources Management in Ngamiland, Botswana
    In: Rural Livelihoods, Risk and Political Economy… ISBN: 978-1-61122-302-6 Eds: D.L. Kgathi, B. N. Ngwenya et al. © 2011 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. The exclusive license for this PDF is limited to personal website use only. No part of this digital document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted commercially in any form or by any means. The publisher has taken reasonable care in the preparation of this digital document, but makes no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of information contained herein. This digital document is sold with the clear understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, medical or any other professional services. Chapter 13 TRADITIONAL PUBLIC ASSEMBLY (KGOTLA) AND NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN NGAMILAND, BOTSWANA B. N. Ngwenya and D. L. Kgathi ABSTRACT Public assemblies, where people gather around specific institutionalised places, are common in most African countries. This chapter focuses on the kgotla in Botswana as a formal public assembly associated with the institution of traditional leadership. The kgotla allows for public debate on development interventions (policy/programs) and contributes significantly to rural livelihoods and natural resources management, and provide free access to justice for rural households, especially the poor. In the past, kgotla meetings were held in Ngamiland to inform the public about eradication of the district herd, the Integrated Tsetse Eradication Campaign, proposed dredging of Boro river, identification of biodiversity “hotspots” for the Okavango Delta Management Plan (ODMP), and on the adverse effects of forest fires.
    [Show full text]
  • NTLO YA DIKGOSI NTLO YA DIKGOSI CHAIRMAN Kgosi Puso Gaborone Batlokwa DEBATES DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Kgosi T
    NTLO YA DIKGOSI NTLO YA DIKGOSI CHAIRMAN Kgosi Puso Gaborone Batlokwa DEBATES DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Kgosi T. F. Tshipe Mahalapye Region MEMBERS Kgosi K. Boiditswe Serowe Region Kgosi I. Gaoonwe Letlhakeng Region Kgosi B. Garebakwena Molepolole Region Kgosi M. Kahiko III Ghanzi West Kgosi S. H. Kgamane Bangwato Kgosi Kgari III Bakwena Kgosi K. Lempadi Okavango Region Kgosi Lotlamoreng II Barolong Kgosi O. Machilidza Boteti Region Kgosi M. Malema Bobirwa Region Kgosi Malope II Bangwaketse Kgosi T. M. Masunga North East THE PROCEEDINGS Kgosi M. Mmualefhe Chobe Region Kgosi A. O. Monnaathebe Thamaga Kgosi P. K. Montshiwa Kgalagadi North of the Kgosi K. Moremi Batawana Kgosi S. Moroka Tswapong Kgosi J. Moseki Ghanzi East 11TH MEETING Kgosi T. B. Ndzonga Tutume Kgosi B. Ramokone Kanye Kgosi K. Ramokwena Maun 28 January - 01 February 28 January 2013 of the Kgosi E. Potsoeng Ngami Region Kgosi M. Seboko Balete OFFICIAL REPORT - ELEVENTH MEETING OFFICIAL REPORT Kgosi P. Seeletso Tonota Region 2ND NTLO YA DIKGOSI Kgosi P. Sekwenyane Ngwaketse West Kgosi K. Telekelo Moshupa (Official Report) Kgosi Toto II Kgalagadi South Kgosi S. Esterhuizen Specially Elected P O Box 240, Gaborone Tel: 3616800 Fax: 3913103 Kgosi M. Moeti Specially Elected e-mail: [email protected] Sitting from Kgosi M. Seemeko Specially Elected OFFICIAL REPORT - 11TH MEETING Kgosi M. M. Sinvula Specially Elected www.parliament.gov.bw 28 January - 01 February 2013 Kgosi T. Xao Specially Elected OF THE 2ND NTLO YA DIKGOSI i ii Printed by Government Printing and Publishing Services, Gaborone 28 January - 01 February 2013 Table of Contents Chairman’s Remarks ...................................... 4, 21, 66, 85, 154 Customary Courts (Amendment) Bill, 2012 (No.
    [Show full text]