DOCSLIB.ORG

Example SSO XML Instance Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Example SSO XML Instance Document Example SSO XML Instance Document Alabama Department of Environment Management P.O. Box 301463 Montgomery, Alabama 36130-1463 Tel: (334) 279-3049 Fax: (334) 271-7950 email: [email protected] ADEM Example SSO XML Instance Document Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 2 SSO XML Template File ............................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Download Facility Specific “Blank” SSO XML Template File from E2 ................................................................. 4 2.2 Generate SSO XML Template from SSO Schema .............................................................................................. 4 3 SSO XML File Population ......................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Meta Data Section ................................................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Receiver Data Section ......................................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Facility Identification Section ................................................................................................................................ 8 3.4 Report Identification Section ................................................................................................................................ 8 3.5 Monitoring Data Section ....................................................................................................................................... 9 3.6 Example SSO Instance XML File ....................................................................................................................... 15 4 Appendix Reference for Receiving water ID & Names ........................................................................................ 18 Version Date: 20171015 Page 2 of 135 ADEM Example SSO XML Instance Document 1 Introduction This document contains examples of an instance document used in the SSO (Sanitary Sewer Overflow) Report submission on Alabama Department of Environmental Management’s (ADEM) online electronic environmental (E2) reporting system. For instruction on how to submit SSO-data filled XML file in E2, please see SSO User Guide document. Facility user may download the latest eSSO User Guide & Example XML Instance Document on the E2 login page. Clicking the “eSSO User Guide” link or “Example SSO XML Instance Document” link opens the applicable document in a PDF file. Version Date: 20171015 Page 3 of 135 ADEM Example SSO XML Instance Document 2 SSO XML Template File 2.1 Download Facility Specific “Blank” SSO XML Template File from E2 Facility user may download a “blank” SSO XML Temple with selected Facility and Permit information populated in E2’s “Create New Report” page. Please open the ‘Create a New Report’ page, select ‘SSO Event Report’ as Report Type, and select the desired facility, then click ‘Download SSO XML Template’ button to download the XML template file. 2.2 Generate SSO XML Template from SSO Schema After login into E2, a link is available on the “Home” page for you to download SSO XML Schema. From the SSO XML Schema, you may generate a completely blank SSO XML template for submission. If you are starting/using your own blank SSO XML template, please populate the facility information and permit number data elements/tags accordingly. Version Date: 20171015 Page 4 of 135 ADEM Example SSO XML Instance Document Version Date: 20171015 Page 5 of 135 ADEM Example SSO XML Instance Document 3 SSO XML File Population The SSO XML file includes the following main sections: Meta Data Receiver Submission o Facility . Facility Identification . Report Report Identification Monitoring Data Specific details for each section is reviewed in sections below. 3.1 Meta Data Section For the Meta Data Section <MetaData>, please include the following: <MetaData> <SchemaIdentification>e-SSO Schema version 1.0</SchemaIdentification> <SchemaDescription>e-SSO Work Group Schema version 1.0</SchemaDescription> <SchemaPurpose>Sanitary Sewer Overflow Report submissions</SchemaPurpose> <SchemaVersion>1</SchemaVersion> <SchemaCreateDate>2011-04-29</SchemaCreateDate> <SchemaLastUpdateBy>e-SSO XML Schema Work Group</SchemaLastUpdateBy> <SchemaLastUpdateDate>2011-04-29</SchemaLastUpdateDate> <SchemaContactInformation>[email protected]</SchemaContactInformation> </MetaData> Version Date: 20171015 Page 6 of 135 ADEM Example SSO XML Instance Document 3.2 Receiver Data Section For the Receiver Section <Receiver>, please include the following: <Receiver> <AgencyName>ADEM</AgencyName> <ReceivercontactName>PCS-Data Entry</ReceivercontactName> <ReceivercontactTitle>ADEM</ReceivercontactTitle> <ReceiverMailAddress> <MailingAddressText>1400 Coliseum Blvd.</MailingAddressText> <SupplementalAddressText>P.O. Box 301463</SupplementalAddressText> <MailingAddressCityName>Montgomery</MailingAddressCityName> <MailingAddressStateUSPSCode>AL</MailingAddressStateUSPSCode> <MailingAddressStateName>Alabama</MailingAddressStateName> <MailingAddressCountryName>USA</MailingAddressCountryName> <MailingAddressZIPCode>36110</MailingAddressZIPCode> </ReceiverMailAddress> </Receiver> Version Date: 20171015 Page 7 of 135 ADEM Example SSO XML Instance Document 3.3 Facility Identification Section For the Facility Identification Section <FacilityIdentification>, please include the following: 3.4 Report Identification Section For the Report Identification Section <ReportIdentification>, please include the following: Please make sure to have the correct permit number populated in the <PermitNumber> tag and “SSO” as the <ReportType> Version Date: 20171015 Page 8 of 135 ADEM Example SSO XML Instance Document 3.5 Monitoring Data Section For the Monitoring Data Section <MonitoringData>, please include the following: Please note that “minimum” information required for submission is indicated in “Bold”. 1. <Facility_SSO_Report_ID /> Facility SSO Report ID Mandatory field for report submission Accept Alphanumeric value: minimum one character and maximum 20 characters Please note that: a) It is Facility User’s responsibility to keep track of their own Facility SSO Report ID on the SSO XML file. b) For every new SSO report, Facility User will need to use a “new” unique Facility SSO Report ID on the SSO XML file c) If the Facility User submits a SSO XML file with a Facility SSO Report ID that has been previously submitted in E2, E2 will treat this eSSO submission as a REVISION. d) It is up to the facility user to use the “same” Facility SSO Report ID to revise a previously submitted eSSO report in E2 2. <Date_SSO_Began /> Date/Time SSO Began Mandatory field for report submission Accept date time value in MM/DD/YYYY 00:00:00 AM/PM, null value is not allowed 3. <SSO_OnGoing_Ind /> Is SSO currently ongoing? Mandatory field for report submission Accept one text character value of ‘Y’ for Yes, ‘N’ for No 4. <Date_SSO_Stopped /> Date/Time SSO Stopped Mandatory field for report submission if <SSO_OnGoing_Ind /> tag’s value = ‘N’ Accept date time value in MM/DD/YYYY 00:00:00 AM/PM 5. <Wet_Weather_Ind /> Did the SSO occur during wet weather? Accept one text character value of ‘Y’ for Yes, ‘N’ for No, or null 6. <Extreme_Weather_Event_Ind /> Was the SSO caused by an extreme weather event (e.g. hurricane)? Accept one text character value of ‘Y’ for Yes, ‘N’ for No, or null 7. <Extreme_Weather_Event_Text /> If Yes, describe of the nature of the extreme weather event Accept up to 2000 text characters value 8. <Est_Volume_Range_Value_CD /> Report Estimated Volume as Estimated Value or Range Value Accept one text character value of ‘V’ for Estimated Value, ‘R’ for Range and null 9. <Est_Volume_Range_ID /> Estimated Volume: Accept numeric value from 6 to 15 (to represent the corresponding range value 6: <1,000 gal 7: 1,000 >= gallons < 10,000 8: 10,000 >= gallons < 25,000 9: 25,000 >= gallons < 50,000 10: 50,000 >= gallons < 75,000 11: 75,000 >= gallons < 100,000 Version Date: 20171015 Page 9 of 135 ADEM Example SSO XML Instance Document 12: 100,000 >= gallons < 250,000 13: 250,000 >= gallons < 500,000 14: 500,000 >= gallons < 750,000 15: 750,000 >= gallons < 1,000,000 10. <Est_Volume_Value /> Estimated Volume in gallons Accept up to 18 digit numeric value with two decimal places 11. <Department_Notify_Ind /> Was the Department notified within 24 hours? Accept one text character value of ‘Y’ for Yes, ‘N’ for No and null 12. < Department_Notify_Date /> Date/Time notified for <Department_Notify_Ind /> above Mandatory field if < Verbal_Notify_Ind /> tag’s value = ‘Y’ Accept date time value in MM/DD/YYYY 00:00:00 AM/PM 13. < Department_Notify_Method /> Method of notification for the question, “Was the Department notified within 24 hours?” Mandatory field if < Verbal_Notify_Ind /> tag’s value = ‘Y’ Accept two letter text character value as follows: o VT: Verbal/Telephone, o EE: Electronic via eSSO, o OT: Other 14. <Verbal_Notify_Other_Text> Text for Other Method of Notification: Mandatory field if < Verbal_Notify_Method /> tag’s value = ‘OT’ Accept up to 100 text characters value 15. <Verbal_Notify_Person /> Person that verbally notified: Mandatory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CENTENNIAL: Grand Prairie, Texas 1909-2009
    CENTENNIAL: Grand Prairie, Texas 1909-2009 Foreword “Centennial” is a window into the growth and development of Grand Prairie, Texas, USA Compiled from City Documents and Public Records, the information presented is representative of actions and events in the City of Grand Prairie during its first 100 years. Grand Prairie was given its name by the Texas and Pacific Railroad based on its location on the southern edge of a geological region called “Grand Prairie” that is composed of Eagleford Shale stretching from Texas north through the Dakotas and into Canada. Compiled and Written as a Public Service by Katherine L. Houk May 1, 2008 (The author receives no compensation from sales of this book) CENTENNIAL: Grand Prairie, Texas 1909-2009 CENTENNIAL 2009! 100 YEARS OF GROWTH—GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS FOREWORD CHAPTER 1 GRAND PRAIRIE TODAY CHAPTER 2 THE CITY: 1980-2000 CHAPTER 3 THE CITY: 1960-1980 CHAPTER 4 THE CITY: 1940-1960 CHAPTER 5 THE CITY: 1920-1940 CHAPTER 6 THE CITY: 1909-1920 CHAPTER 7 PRE-1909 CENTENNIAL: Grand Prairie, Texas 1909-2009 CHAPTER 1: 2000-2009 GRAND PRAIRIE TODAY Grand Prairie, Texas, is celebrating its 100th birthday as an incor- porated city in 2009. With a population approaching 170,000 people, the city is no longer a stagecoach stop between Dallas and Fort Worth. In fact, Grand Prairie is the 7th largest city in North Central Texas, enjoying an international economy, with a tax base in excess of $10 Billion. In 2007, the City was the 6th fastest growing municipality in the United States. More than 20% of single family homes have no mortgage.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauging Station Index
    Site Details Flow/Volume Height/Elevation NSW River Basins: Gauging Station Details Other No. of Area Data Data Site ID Sitename Cat Commence Ceased Status Owner Lat Long Datum Start Date End Date Start Date End Date Data Gaugings (km2) (Years) (Years) 1102001 Homestead Creek at Fowlers Gap C 7/08/1972 31/05/2003 Closed DWR 19.9 -31.0848 141.6974 GDA94 07/08/1972 16/12/1995 23.4 01/01/1972 01/01/1996 24 Rn 1102002 Frieslich Creek at Frieslich Dam C 21/10/1976 31/05/2003 Closed DWR 8 -31.0660 141.6690 GDA94 19/03/1977 31/05/2003 26.2 01/01/1977 01/01/2004 27 Rn 1102003 Fowlers Creek at Fowlers Gap C 13/05/1980 31/05/2003 Closed DWR 384 -31.0856 141.7131 GDA94 28/02/1992 07/12/1992 0.8 01/05/1980 01/01/1993 12.7 Basin 201: Tweed River Basin 201001 Oxley River at Eungella A 21/05/1947 Open DWR 213 -28.3537 153.2931 GDA94 03/03/1957 08/11/2010 53.7 30/12/1899 08/11/2010 110.9 Rn 388 201002 Rous River at Boat Harbour No.1 C 27/05/1947 31/07/1957 Closed DWR 124 -28.3151 153.3511 GDA94 01/05/1947 01/04/1957 9.9 48 201003 Tweed River at Braeside C 20/08/1951 31/12/1968 Closed DWR 298 -28.3960 153.3369 GDA94 01/08/1951 01/01/1969 17.4 126 201004 Tweed River at Kunghur C 14/05/1954 2/06/1982 Closed DWR 49 -28.4702 153.2547 GDA94 01/08/1954 01/07/1982 27.9 196 201005 Rous River at Boat Harbour No.3 A 3/04/1957 Open DWR 111 -28.3096 153.3360 GDA94 03/04/1957 08/11/2010 53.6 01/01/1957 01/01/2010 53 261 201006 Oxley River at Tyalgum C 5/05/1969 12/08/1982 Closed DWR 153 -28.3526 153.2245 GDA94 01/06/1969 01/09/1982 13.3 108 201007 Hopping Dick Creek
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Metropolitan Area~ 1975
    Hydrologic Data for Urban Studies in the Fort Worth~ Texas Metropolitan Area~ 1975 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-file report No. 77-266 Prepared in cooperation with the City of Fort Worth Hydrologic Data for Urban Studies in the Fort Worth, Texas Metropolitan Area, 1975 R. M. Slade, ]r. and ]. M. Taylor U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-file report No. 77-266 Prepared in cooperation with the City of Fort Worth June 1977. CONTENTS Page Introduction-------------------------------------------------------- 6 Watershed features-----------------------------~-------------------- 8 Sycamore Creek and Sycamore Creek tributary study are·as-------- 8 Dry Branch and Little Fossil Creek study areas----------------- 9 Hydrologic instruments----------------------------------------~----- 12 Data collection and explanation------------------------------------- 14 Rainfall------------------------------------------------------- 14 Runoff----------.----------------------------------------------- 14 Summary of data for the 1975 water-year----------------------------­ 17 Compilation of data------------------------------------------------- 25 Station description and daily, monthly, and yearly discharge at stream-gaging stations, 1975 water year Sycamore Creek at Interstate Highway 35-W, Fort Worth, Tex.-:___ 26 Sycamore Creek tributary above Seminary South Shopping Cen~er, Fort Worth, Tex.------------------------------------- 27 . Sycamore Creek tributary at Interstate Highway 35-W, Fort Worth, Tex.-------------------------------------------------- 28 Dry Branch at Fain
    [Show full text]
  • Draft: Subject to Change Prior to Commission Action Texas Transportation Commission
    DRAFT: SUBJECT TO CHANGE PRIOR TO COMMISSION ACTION TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION VARIOUS Counties MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of 1 VARIOUS Districts Pursuant to Transportation Code, Chapter 223, Subchapter A, and Title 43, Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 9, Subchapter B, the Texas Department of Transportation (department) solicited and received sealed competitive bid proposals for improvement of the State Highway System, which were publicly opened and read on July 6 and 7, 2006 and deferred from the June 29, 2006 Texas Transportation Commission (commission) meeting as shown on Exhibit A. Pursuant to cited code provisions highway improvement contract bids on a project may be accepted or rejected, but if accepted must be awarded to the lowest bidder. An award is conditional in the event it is subject to Federal Highway Administration concurrence, third party funding or concurrence, and other conditions listed in the contract. The department recommends that the commission respectively award to the lowest bidder or reject, as indicated, those highway and transportation enhancement building construction contracts identified on attached Exhibit A to this order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the commission that the contracts described in Exhibit A be and are hereby respectively awarded to the lowest bidder or rejected as indicated therein. If a contractual requirement of award is not satisfied within the prescribed time limit, including any extension of time allowed by the executive director or the director’s designee, by reason of the action or inaction of the successful low bidder on any contract, including, but not limited to, disadvantaged business/historically underutilized business participation, the contract is automatically in default and the executive director is authorized and directed to retain and deposit the related contract proposal guaranty to the credit of the State Highway Fund and to readvertise that project for competitive bids at the earliest practical subsequent date.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012-2017: Metro North East
    Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012–17: Metro North East Region A new approach for reducing impacts on native species and park neighbours © Copyright State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the Office of Environment and Heritage and State of NSW are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) is part of the Office of Environment and Heritage. Throughout this strategy, references to NPWS should be taken to mean NPWS carrying out functions on behalf of the Director General of the Department of Premier and Cabinet, and the Minister for the Environment. For further information contact: Metro North East Region Metropolitan and Mountains Branch National Parks and Wildlife Service Office of Environment and Heritage PO Box 3031 Asquith NSW 2077 Phone: (02) 9457 8900 Report pollution and environmental incidents Environment Line: 131 555 (NSW only) or [email protected] See also www.environment.nsw.gov.au/pollution Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 PO Box A290, Sydney South, NSW 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Phone: 1300 361 967 (national parks, climate change and energy efficiency information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978 1 74293 625 3 OEH 2012/0374 August 2013 This plan may be cited as: OEH 2012, Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012–17, Metro North East Region: a new approach for reducing impacts on native species and park neighbours, Office of Environment and Heritage, Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to NH Timber Harvesting Laws
    Guide to New Hampshire Timber Harvesting Laws ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This publication is an updated and revised edition prepared by: Sarah Smith, Extension Professor/Specialist, Forest Industry, UNH Cooperative Extension Debra Anderson, Administrative Assistant, UNH Cooperative Extension We wish to thank the following for their review of this publication: Dennis Thorell, NH Department of Revenue Administration JB Cullen, NH Division of Forests and Lands Karen P. Bennett, UNH Cooperative Extension Bryan Nowell, NH Division of Forests and Lands Hunter Carbee, NH Timberland Owners Association, NH Timber Harvesting Council Sandy Crystal, Vanessa Burns, and Linda Magoon, NH Dept. of Environmental Services University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension 131 Main Street, Nesmith Hall Durham, New Hampshire 03824 http://ceinfo.unh.edu NH Division of Forests and Lands PO Box 1856, 172 Pembroke Rd. Concord, NH 03302-1856 http://www.dred.state.nh.us/forlands New Hampshire Timberland Owners Association 54 Portsmouth Street Concord, New Hampshire 03301 www.nhtoa.org UNH Cooperative Extension programs and policies are consistent with pertinent Federal and State laws and regulations on non-discrimination regarding race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, handicap or veteran’s status. College of Life Sciences and Agriculture, County Governments, NH Department of Resources and Economic Development, NH Fish and Game, USDA and US Fish and Wildlife Service cooperating. Funding was provided by: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Economic Action Program Cover photo: Claude Marquis, Kel-Log Inc., works on the ice-damaged Gorham Town Forest August 2004 Table of Contents New Hampshire’s Working Forest ......................................................................................2 Introduction to Forestry Laws ............................................................................................4 Current Use Law .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lane Cove National Park
    Draft Plan of Management Lane Cove National Park Lane Cove National Park Draft Plan of Management NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service September 2012 Acknowledgements The NPWS acknowledges that this park is in the traditional country of the Guringai and Darug peoples. This plan of management was prepared by staff of the Lane Cove Area of the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS), part of the Office of Environment and Heritage, Department of Premier and Cabinet. FRONT COVER: The Lane Cove River at the boatshed, NPWS For additional information or any inquiries about this park or this plan of management, contact the NPWS Lane Cove Area Office, Lady Game Drive, Chatswood West 2067 or by phone on (02) 8448 0400. Disclaimer: This publication is for discussion and comment only. Publication indicates the proposals are under consideration and are open for public discussion. Any statements made in this draft publication are made in good faith and do not render the NPWS liable for any loss or damage. Provisions in the final management plan may not be the same as those in this draft plan. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59–61 Goulburn Street PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 © Copyright State of NSW and the Office of Environment and Heritage NSW: Use permitted with appropriate acknowledgment. ISBN 978 1 74293 733 5 OEH 2012/0588 Printed on recycled paper INVITATION TO COMMENT The National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NPW Act) requires that a plan of management be prepared that outlines how an area will be managed by the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS).
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Impervious Surface Estimates for Coastal New Hampshire
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and PREP Reports & Publications Space (EOS) 12-2002 Developing Impervious Surface Estimates for Coastal New Hampshire David G. Justice [email protected] Fay A. Rubin [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/prep Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Justice, David G. and Rubin, Fay A., "Developing Impervious Surface Estimates for Coastal New Hampshire" (2002). PREP Reports & Publications. 298. https://scholars.unh.edu/prep/298 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space (EOS) at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in PREP Reports & Publications by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVELOPING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ESTIMATES FOR COASTAL NEW HAMPSHIRE A Final Report to The New Hampshire Estuaries Project Submitted by David Justice and Fay Rubin Complex Systems Research Center Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space Morse Hall University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 December, 2002 Revised January, 2003 This report was funded in part by a grant from the Office of State Planning, New Hampshire Estuaries Project, as authorized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to Section 320 of the Clean Water Act. Table of Contents Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………….…. 2 List of Tables………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………………… 3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Project Goals and Objectives………………………………………………………...…………….
    [Show full text]
  • Epping to Thornleigh Third Track Environmental Impact Statement
    Epping to Thornleigh Third Track Environmental Impact Statement 14. Surface and groundwater This chapter considers the potential impacts of the ETTT proposal on surface and groundwater including water quality. 14.1 Existing conditions 14.1.1 Surface water and drainage The proposal site is located predominantly within the upstream areas of the Byles and Zig Zag Creek catchments, and downstream of the Upper Devlins Creek catchment. Surface waterways within the vicinity of the proposal site include Devlins Creek, Byles Creek, Zig Zag Creek and a number of smaller unnamed overland flow paths. These creeks are shown on Figure 14.1 except Zig Zag Creek which is located just to the north of the figure extent. The external catchments between Epping Station and Pennant Hills Road generally drain from the western side of the corridor to the eastern side, towards Devlins Creek and Byles Creek. These creeks discharge to the Lane Cove River. North of Pennant Hills Station, the catchment falls from the eastern to the western side towards Zig Zag Creek, which discharges into Berowra Creek. The ETTT proposal would pass through undulating terrain, with Devlins Creek the only major watercourse crossing the corridor. Flooding of the creek is unlikely to impact the existing rail corridor, as the creek is located more than 20 metres below the corridor level. No works are proposed in Devlins Creek. There are currently 19 drainage culverts which convey surface water across the railway corridor. Due to the construction of the third track, 14 of these culverts would be required to be extended. 14.1.2 Surface water quality Water quality monitoring is undertaken at a number of locations within the Hornsby LGA, and the results are provided in Council’s Annual Water Quality Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog of Hydrologic Units in Kentucky
    James C. Cobb, State Director and Geologist Kentucky Geological Survey UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY CATALOG OF HYDROLOGIC UNITS IN KENTUCKY Daniel I. Carey 2003 CONTENTS HYDROLOGIC UNITS.............................................................................................................................................................................4 Ohio River Basin - Region 05 (38,080 sq. mi.)..........................................................................................................................................5 Big Sandy River Basin - Subregion 0507 (2,290 sq. mi.) ......................................................................................................................5 Big Sandy River - Accounting Unit 050702 (2,290 sq. mi.)...........................................................................................................5 Big Sandy River - Catalog Unit 05070201 (478 sq. mi.) ..............................................................................................................5 Upper Levisa Fork - Catalog Unit 05070202 (359 sq. mi.).........................................................................................................7 Levisa Fork - Catalog Unit 05070203 (1,116 sq. mi.)...............................................................................................................12 Big Sandy River, Blaine Creek - Catalog Unit 05070204 (337 sq. mi.).......................................................................................18 Tygarts Creek, Little Sandy River,
    [Show full text]
  • Macquarie Park to Thornleigh
    Macquarie Park to Thornleigh 4 hrs 30 mins Hard track 4 11.5 km One way 413m Starting from the Macquarie Park train station, you wander down Lane Cove Rd and over De Burghs Bridge to join the main spine of the Great North Walk in the Lane Cove Valley. Here the walk heads under De Burghs bridge then explores the dry grass tree and eucalypt forest along the side of the ridge. The track soon leads you down into the ferny and moist valley beside Lane Cove River. Near the top of the valley, you walk up some stone steps built during the depression to find some rock engravings with 1930's style political satire, Conscript Pass. The side trip provides access to the scout campsite, where the main walk continues leads up through the streets to find Thornleigh train station. 170m 10m Lane Cove National Park Maps, text & images are copyright wildwalks.com | Thanks to OSM, NASA and others for data used to generate some map layers. Eden Gardens Before You walk Grade Eden Gardens is a popular plant nursery at the intersection of Bushwalking is fun and a wonderful way to enjoy our natural places. This walk has been graded using the AS 2156.1-2001. The overall Fontenoy and Ryde Roads. It is a pleasant place to explore and is Sometimes things go bad, with a bit of planning you can increase grade of the walk is dertermined by the highest classification along also home to 'Dragonfly Cafe'. The cafe is open 7 days, 8:30am to your chance of having an ejoyable and safer walk.
    [Show full text]