DOCSLIB.ORG

National Outline Plan NOP 37/H for Natural Gas Treatment Facilities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Outline Plan NOP 37/H for Natural Gas Treatment Facilities Lerman Architects and Town Planners, Ltd. 120 Yigal Alon Street, Tel Aviv 67443 Phone: 972-3-695-9093 Fax: 9792-3-696-0299 Ministry of Energy and Water Resources National Outline Plan NOP 37/H For Natural Gas Treatment Facilities Environmental Impact Survey Chapters 3 – 5 – Marine Environment June 2013 Ethos – Architecture, Planning and Environment Ltd. 5 Habanai St., Hod Hasharon 45319, Israel [email protected] Unofficial Translation __________________________________________________________________________________________________ National Outline Plan NOP 37/H – Marine Environment Impact Survey Chapters 3 – 5 1 Summary The National Outline Plan for Natural Gas Treatment Facilities – NOP 37/H – is a detailed national outline plan for planning facilities for treating natural gas from discoveries and transferring it to the transmission system. The plan relates to existing and future discoveries. In accordance with the preparation guidelines, the plan is enabling and flexible, including the possibility of using a variety of natural gas treatment methods, combining a range of mixes for offshore and onshore treatment, in view of the fact that the plan is being promoted as an outline plan to accommodate all future offshore gas discoveries, such that they will be able to supply gas to the transmission system. This policy has been promoted and adopted by the National Board, and is expressed in its decisions. The final decision with regard to the method of developing and treating the gas will be based on the developers' development approach, and in accordance with the decision of the governing institutions by means of the Gas Authority. In the framework of this policy, and in accordance with the decisions of the National Board, the survey relates to a number of sites that differ in character and nature, divided into three parts: 1. Survey of the Meretz wastewater treatment plant site – an onshore treatment facility with pressure reduction at sea, including an onshore gas treatment facility, and a pipeline from the landfall pipeline crossing to the facility, and from the facility to the transmission system. 2. Survey of the Hagit site – an onshore treatment facility with pressure reduction at sea, including an onshore gas treatment facility, and a pipeline from the landfall crossing to the facility, and from it to the transmission system. 3. A survey of two areas for offshore gas treatment facilities and the pipeline route detailed in this document, from the boundary of the territorial waters to the facilities, and from the facilities to the shore. The offshore gas treatment facility presented in the survey below enables offshore processing of raw gas. The offshore processing options detailed in the survey are varied, and relate to the entire gas treatment process, on the assumption that at this stage of planning, it should be possible to choose a flexible mix of offshore and onshore processing. This mix will be decided at the building permit stage. The offshore components of the treatment facility examined in this survey include: The route of the western pipeline – from the borders of Israel’s territorial waters (to which the Planning and Building Law applies) to the exploration areas of the offshore platform. This site is intended for laying the corridor of the pipeline for transmission of the raw natural gas (and byproducts) to the gas processing platform. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ National Outline Plan NOP 37/H – Marine Environment Impact Survey Chapters 3 – 5 2 The offshore platform exploration areas – the platform's exploration areas stretch from a western limit 7.5 km from the shoreline, in accordance with the Ministry of Environmental Protection directive, for reasons of visibility. The western limit has a depth of 100 m – at this depth, the continental shelf begins. Two sites are planned for locating the facilities: o Site 1 – the northern site, in the offshore area from Dor beach in the north to Or Akiva in the south, and extending over a total area of some 43 km². o Site 2 – extending over a total area of some 55 km² in the offshore area between Beit Yannai beach in the north and the northern section of Netanya in the south. Eastern pipeline site – from the site of the offshore gas processing platforms to the landfall pipeline crossing at Dor or Michmoret. Landfall pipeline crossing – largely described in the onshore Environmental Impact Survey, and also surveyed in part in this document. Since a developer has not yet been chosen to implement the plan, and at this stage there is a planning array in principle for establishing the gas treatment facilities, as with previous sections of the survey, this document will also examine and plan in principle the technological options for offshore treatment in order to examine the treatment facility's maximum impact on the marine environment and allow the future developer maximum planning flexibility in terms of the mix of offshore and onshore facilities. The representative plan for the treatment facility was drawn up by PDI Co., engineering consultants for the plan, and includes the document "Quantification of Emissions & Discharges," attached as Appendix B and which constitutes the basis for planning and assessing impacts in this document. The aim of Chapters 3-5 is to describe the actions arising from implementation of the proposed plan and to detail the assessed environmental impact from this implementation, and means of reducing them. The information below includes an explanation of the gas treatment method and supplements the information detailed in the two sections of the survey already circulated for the Meretz wastewater treatment facility and the Hagit site. Accordingly, the survey relates to the gas treatment process carried out onshore, and explains the principles of the process, but focuses on and goes into detail with regard to the offshore activity and its effects on the environment and population. Since the survey relates to the maximum impacts, it does relate to all types of partial offshore processing, including developing a platform for pressure reduction only. Chapter 3 - Description of Actions Resulting from Implementation of the Proposed Plan This chapter includes a review of the main components of the offshore treatment __________________________________________________________________________________________________ National Outline Plan NOP 37/H – Marine Environment Impact Survey Chapters 3 – 5 3 facility, and a description of the gas treatment process from the drilling well until the treated gas is transmitted to the onshore facility. The description of the treatment process and description of the facility will incorporate the basic assumptions regarding the facility's operation, characterization of its components, the operating regime, and remarks on hazardous materials, monitoring devices, energy sources, and auxiliary infrastructures. The information presented in this chapter is a summarized review of the engineering report on the offshore treatment facility and the engineering- operational report on the pipeline, presented in full in Appendices B and C. The gas comes from the wellhead in raw form, at high pressure, and needs to be treated before it can pass through the transmission system, in accordance with the requirements of INGL. Treatment of the gas is unique to each discovery, and may even change from one well to another in the same discovery, because the treatment depends on the characteristics of the gas: its type and composition, the pressure at which it comes out, the percentage of hydrocarbons it contains, and especially the quantity of gas condensate, the percentage and composition of the water in it, and also the quantity of antifreeze. Below is a general description of the processing chain, from the wellhead until entry into the transmission system, based on the assumption that there is a high percentage of methane in the gas discoveries (on the basis of the percentage that is common in discoveries in Israel). The description of the processing chain includes attention to the main elements that exist in most discoveries around the world: 1. Adjust the gas pressure to the pressure required for natural gas processing if part of the treatment is carried out onshore, in accordance with the guidelines of the Ministry of Energy and Water Resources, by which flow pressures in the pipeline at landfall will be no greater than 110 bar. 2. Reduce the pressure of the gas coming from the well, or compression of the raw gas where the gas in the reservoir is becoming depleted. 3. Initial separation of liquids from the raw gas in a separator, including: Removal of steam from the gas flow (water dew-pointing) Removal of hydrocarbons, such as condensate, which are liable to condense in liquid form in the pipeline (hydrocarbon dew-pointing) Removal of other substances found in the gas that are liable to be toxic. 4. Removal of antifreezes (MEG/TEG). 5. In the future, with changes in pressure in the well, an additional compression process will be added after this stage. 6. Fine separation – the gas goes through an additional cleaning and drying process (gas conditioning) that includes pressure reduction (to around 80 bar, the pressure required on entry to the transmission system), and cooling the gas (and additional __________________________________________________________________________________________________ National Outline Plan NOP 37/H – Marine
Load more

Recommended publications
  • S41591-020-0857-9.Pdf
    correspondence of video consultation (Fig. 1). The board during the day. The video-consultation distancing while preserving the provision of directors prioritized overcoming the pathway was tested with earlier-appointed of healthcare. limitations hindering the scaling up of video super users in the surgical department Because we believe that video consultation. The success of this process who already knew how to operate the consultation holds promise in optimizing required the immediate cooperation and video-consultation software and hardware. outpatient care in the current crisis, we feel dedication of all stakeholders together, Because the first test failed, another test was that others may benefit from our approach which are otherwise known to be important scheduled for the next morning. and efforts. By sharing this roadmap, we aim barriers to the scaling up of any innovation Day 3, the day on which everything to inspire other centers to scale up virtual within a hospital4. needed to come together, started care to cope with COVID-19. ❐ On day 1, a crisis policy team was with a stand-up meeting and a short appointed, consisting of members of the brainstorming session regarding the failed Esther Z. Barsom , Tim M. Feenstra , department heads of the intensive care test of the day before. By the end of the Willem A. Bemelman, Jaap H. Bonjer and units, clinical wards, outpatient clinics, morning, the new test was successful, Marlies P. Schijven ✉ representatives of the internet technology and the video-consultation pathway was Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology department, the EHR service center merged with the live environment of the and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of and chief security officers.
    [Show full text]
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Growing Pains at 60
    Viewpoints Special Edition Israel: Growing Pains at 60 The Middle East Institute Washington, DC Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints are another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US rela- tions with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org The maps on pages 96-103 are copyright The Foundation for Middle East Peace. Our thanks to the Foundation for graciously allowing the inclusion of the maps in this publication. Cover photo in the top row, middle is © Tom Spender/IRIN, as is the photo in the bottom row, extreme left.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Four Cities
    A Tale of Four Cities Dr. Shlomo Swirski Academic Director, Adva Center There are many ways of introducing one to a country, especially a country as complex as Israel. The following presentation is an attempt to do so by focusing on 4 Israeli cities (double Charles Dickens's classic book): Tel Aviv Jerusalem Nazareth Beer Sheba This will allow us to introduce some of the major national and ethnic groups in the country, as well as provide a glimpse into some of the major political and economic issues. Tel-Aviv WikiMedia Avidan, Gilad Photo: Tel-Aviv Zionism hails from Europe, mostly from its Eastern countries. Jews had arrived there in the middle ages from Germanic lands – called Ashkenaz in Hebrew. It was the intellectual child of the secular European enlightenment. Tel Aviv was the first city built by Zionists – in 1909 – growing out of the neighboring ancient, Arab port of Jaffa. It soon became the main point of entry into Palestine for Zionist immigrants. Together with neighboring cities, it lies at the center of the largest urban conglomeration in Israel (Gush Dan), with close to 4 million out of 9 million Israelis. The war of 1948 ended with Jaffa bereft of the large majority of its Palestinian population, and in time it was incorporated into Tel Aviv. The day-to-day Israeli- Palestinian confrontations are now distant (in Israeli terms) from Tel Aviv. Tel Aviv represents the glitzi face of Israel. Yet Tel Aviv has two faces: the largely well to do Ashkenazi middle and upper-middle class North, and the largely working class Mizrahi South (with a large concentration of migrant workers).
    [Show full text]
  • Memory Trace Fazal Sheikh
    MEMORY TRACE FAZAL SHEIKH 2 3 Front and back cover image: ‚ ‚ 31°50 41”N / 35°13 47”E Israeli side of the Separation Wall on the outskirts of Neve Yaakov and Beit Ḥanīna. Just beyond the wall lies the neighborhood of al-Ram, now severed from East Jerusalem. Inside front and inside back cover image: ‚ ‚ 31°49 10”N / 35°15 59”E Palestinian side of the Separation Wall on the outskirts of the Palestinian town of ʿAnata. The Israeli settlement of Pisgat Ze’ev lies beyond in East Jerusalem. This publication takes its point of departure from Fazal Sheikh’s Memory Trace, the first of his three-volume photographic proj- ect on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Published in the spring of 2015, The Erasure Trilogy is divided into three separate vol- umes—Memory Trace, Desert Bloom, and Independence/Nakba. The project seeks to explore the legacies of the Arab–Israeli War of 1948, which resulted in the dispossession and displacement of three quarters of the Palestinian population, in the establishment of the State of Israel, and in the reconfiguration of territorial borders across the region. Elements of these volumes have been exhibited at the Slought Foundation in Philadelphia, Storefront for Art and Architecture, the Brooklyn Museum of Art, and the Pace/MacGill Gallery in New York, and will now be presented at the Al-Ma’mal Foundation for Contemporary Art in East Jerusalem, and the Khalil Sakakini Cultural Center in Ramallah. In addition, historical documents and materials related to the history of Al-’Araqīb, a Bedouin village that has been destroyed and rebuilt more than one hundred times in the ongoing “battle over the Negev,” first presented at the Slought Foundation, will be shown at Al-Ma’mal.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Molluscs and Fish As Biomarkers of Pollution Stress in Littoral Regions of the Red Sea, Mediterranean Sea and North Sea
    Helgol Mar Res (1999) 53:219–243 © Springer-Verlag and AWI 1999 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Vladimir Bresler · Vera Bissinger · Avigdor Abelson Halim Dizer · Armin Sturm · Renate Kratke Lev Fishelson · Peter-Diedrich Hansen Marine molluscs and fish as biomarkers of pollution stress in littoral regions of the Red Sea, Mediterranean Sea and North Sea Received: 2 March 1999 / Received in revised form: 2 August 1999 / Accepted: 3 August 1999 Abstract The intensive development of industry and ur- higher in the surface epithelia of molluscs from a pollut- ban structures along the seashores of the world, as well ed site than that of the same species from control, unpol- as the immense increase in marine transportation and luted stations, providing clear evidence of response to other activities, has resulted in the deposition of thou- stress. Enhanced frequency of DNA lesions (alkaline and sands of new chemicals and organic compounds, endan- acidic DNA unwinding) and micronucleus-containing gering the existence of organisms and ecosystems. The cells was significantly higher in samples from polluted conventional single biomarker methods used in ecologi- sites in comparison to those from the clean sites that ex- cal assessment studies cannot provide an adequate base hibited genotoxic and clastogenic activity of the pollu- for environmental health assessment, management and tants. In all the studied molluscs a negative correlation sustainability planning. The present study uses a set of was found between the MXRtr levels of activity and the novel biochemical, physiological, cytogenetic and mor- frequency of micronucleus-containing hemocytes. The phological methods to characterize the state of health of expression of this was in accordance with the level of selected molluscs and fish along the shores of the Ger- pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 from Survival to Destiny Download Sheet
    Survey: 73% oppose a Palestinian state 85% of them Survey: support SOVEREIGNTY ריבונות Sovereignty A APolitical Political Journal Journal / / Issue Issue no. no. 11 7 // AugustMarch 20192016 73% Published by The SovereigntyPublished by Women Movement in Green founded and the by Forum Women for Sovereignty in Green oppose a Palestinion state 85% of them support MAKINGSovereignty PROGRESS NRG Poll, Jan 2016: Are you in favor of the gradual application of Israeli Law in Judea and Samaria? 44% in favor 44% 38% of gradual application In favor Not in favor of Israeli law in Judea and Samaria 18% No opinion 60% 61% 61% 69% 18% 32% of the youth favor of rightwingers of ultra-orthodox of those who dene of those who dene of those who dene the application of favor the favor the themselves themselves as themselves as leftwing the law on the application of law application of law rightwing favor the leftwingers favor the favor the application of entire area on the entire area on the entire area gradual application application of the law the law on the Jewish of the law on the entire area communities From Survival to Destiny The Jewish "Deal of the Century" Minister Haim Katz: Rep. Alan Clemmons: David P. Goldman: TAMAWe need a declaration of commitment 100 forIt is impossible the for Land a Jew to be of Israel Judea and Samaria in to Judea and Samaria as there was an occupier in his own ancestral a region of failed states. STRATEGICfor the Golan OUTLINE Heights PLAN | ISRAEL 2048 homeland, Judea Time is on Israel’s side Page 4 Page6 Page 12 2 / SOVEREIGNTY22
    [Show full text]
  • UNIT TWO: Rise and Walk Th E Land קו ו התהל באר
    UNIT TWO: Rise and Walk th e Land קום ו התהלך בארץ Student Workbook A curriculum for Israel Engagement Written by Belrose Maram In collaboration with Gila Ansell Brauner Elisheva Kupferman, Chief Editor Esti-Moskovitz-Kalman, Director of Education UNIT 2 Student Workbook Lesson 1: Geographic Uniqueness Part 1. Maps Israel has both a unique as well as strategic location. To help understand this, we are going to explore 3 different maps. A. Map of the Middle East/Mediterranean Israel ©W123, http://www.knittingliberally.com • Israel is situated between 3 continents: Which continents are they? 1. _____________________________ 2. _____________________________ 3. _____________________________ ? • What is the name of the sea to the West of Israel? __________________ 1 UNIT 2 Student Workbook • Israel's position: Taking into account what you have learned, why do you think Israel's geographic position has been strategically important throughout history? ________________________________________________________________________ ? ________________________________________________________________________ B. Israel/Canaan during the C. Map of Israel Today Reign of King David * The orange and the yellow areas belonged to David's Kingdom. *The light beige areas, combined with the West Bank and Gaza, make up Israel since 1967. From The Penguin Atlas of World History Volume One, 1974 http://www.mideastweb.org/palearly.htm 2 UNIT 2 Student Workbook Study and compare these two maps. The one on the left is a map of Israel during King's David period and the map
    [Show full text]
  • Shadows Over the Land Without Shade: Iconizing the Israeli Kibbutz in the 1950S, Acting-Out Post Palestinian-Nakba Cultural Trauma
    Volume One, Number One Shadows over the Land Without Shade: Iconizing the Israeli Kibbutz in the 1950s, acting-out post Palestinian-Nakba Cultural Trauma Lior Libman Abstract: The kibbutz – one of Zionism's most vital forces of nation-building and Socialist enterprise – faced a severe crisis with the foundation of the State of Israel as State sovereignty brought about major structural, political and social changes. However, the roots of this crisis, which I will describe as a cultural trauma, are more complex. They go back to the pioneers' understanding of their historical action, which emanated arguably from secularized and nationalized Hasidic theology, and viewed itself in terms of the meta-historical Zionist-Socialist narrative. This perception was no longer conceivable during the 1948 war and thereafter. The participation in a war that involved expulsion and killing of civilians, the construction of new kibbutzim inside emptied Palestinian villages and confiscation by old and new kibbutzim of Palestinian fields, all caused a fatal rift in the mind of those who saw themselves as fulfilling a universal humanistic Socialist model; their response was total shock. This can be seen in images of and from the kibbutz in this period: in front of a dynamic and troublesome reality, the Realism of kibbutz-literature kept creating pastoral-utopian, heroic-pioneering images. The novel Land Without Shade (1950) is one such example. Written by the couple Yonat and Alexander Sened, it tells the story of the establishment of Kibbutz Revivim in the Negev desert in the 1940s. By a symptomatic reading of the book’s representation of the kibbutz, especially in relation to its native Bedouin neighbors and the course of the war, I argue that the iconization of the kibbutz in the 1950s is in fact an acting-out of the cultural trauma of the kibbutz, the victimizer, who became a victim of the crash of its own self-defined identity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Articles Titled Management of the Underwater And
    MANAGEMENT OF THE UNDERWATER AND COASTAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE IN ISRAEL'S SEAS (II): THE ENDANGERED COASTAL SETTLEMENTS GESTIÓN DEL PATRIMONIO ARQUEOLÓGICO SUBACUÁTICO Y COSTERO EN LOS MARES DE ISRAEL (II): LOS YACIMIENTOS LITORALES EN RIESGO. EHUD GALILI1 - SARAH ARENSON2 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT The two articles titled Management of the underwater and coastal archaeological heritage in Israel's seas – parts A and B aim at presenting the diversity, nature and significance of an important cultural resource at risk, namely the underwater and coastal archaeological sites of Israel. 55 Part I introduces the typology of the sites on the Mediterranean coast and the inland seas (The Sea of Galilee and the Dead Sea). Part II presents the main endangered sites along the Mediterranean coast of Israel, their archaeological and historical significance, the risks they are facing and the measures that have to be taken in order to ensure their long term preservation. KEY WORDS: Near-Eastern Archaeology, Coastal sites, Risk assessment, Submerged prehistory. 1 Israel Antiquities Authority, POB 180 Atlit. Israel, 972 4 6260452. 2 Maritime Historian, Caesarea. E. Galili, S. Arenson, “Management of the underwater and coastal archaeological heritage in Israel’s seas (II): The endangered coastal settlements”, RIPARIA 1 (2015), 55-96. http://hdl.handle.net/10498/17335 ISSN 2443-9762 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25267/Riparia.2015.v1.03 E. GALILI - S. ARENSON RESUMEN Los dos artículos presentados con el título “Gestión del patrimonio arqueológico subacuático y costero en los mares de Israel” apuntan a la diversidad, naturaleza y trascendencia de un importante recurso cultural en riesgo, concretamente los yacimientos arqueológicos submarinos y 56 costeros de Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settler-Colonialism and Apartheid Over Palestine
    Metula Majdal Shams Abil al-Qamh ! Neve Ativ Misgav Am Yuval Nimrod ! Al-Sanbariyya Kfar Gil'adi ZZ Ma'ayan Baruch ! MM Ein Qiniyye ! Dan Sanir Israeli Settler-Colonialism and Apartheid over Palestine Al-Sanbariyya DD Al-Manshiyya ! Dafna ! Mas'ada ! Al-Khisas Khan Al-Duwayr ¥ Huneen Al-Zuq Al-tahtani ! ! ! HaGoshrim Al Mansoura Margaliot Kiryat !Shmona al-Madahel G GLazGzaGza!G G G ! Al Khalsa Buq'ata Ethnic Cleansing and Population Transfer (1948 – present) G GBeGit GHil!GlelG Gal-'A!bisiyya Menara G G G G G G G Odem Qaytiyya Kfar Szold In order to establish exclusive Jewish-Israeli control, Israel has carried out a policy of population transfer. By fostering Jewish G G G!G SG dGe NG ehemia G AGl-NGa'iGmaG G G immigration and settlements, and forcibly displacing indigenous Palestinians, Israel has changed the demographic composition of the ¥ G G G G G G G !Al-Dawwara El-Rom G G G G G GAmG ir country. Today, 70% of Palestinians are refugees and internally displaced persons and approximately one half of the people are in exile G G GKfGar GB!lGumG G G G G G G SGalihiya abroad. None of them are allowed to return. L e b a n o n Shamir U N D ii s e n g a g e m e n tt O b s e rr v a tt ii o n F o rr c e s Al Buwayziyya! NeoG t MG oGrdGecGhaGi G ! G G G!G G G G Al-Hamra G GAl-GZawG iyGa G G ! Khiyam Al Walid Forcible transfer of Palestinians continues until today, mainly in the Southern District (Beersheba Region), the historical, coastal G G G G GAl-GMuGftskhara ! G G G G G G G Lehavot HaBashan Palestinian towns ("mixed towns") and in the occupied West Bank, in particular in the Israeli-prolaimed “greater Jerusalem”, the Jordan G G G G G G G Merom Golan Yiftah G G G G G G G Valley and the southern Hebron District.
    [Show full text]
  • Israelis and Palestinians Seeking, Building and Representing Peace
    ! ! Israelis and Palestinians Seeking, Building and Representing Peace. A Historical Appraisal Ed. by Marcella Simoni Issue n. 5, July 2013 QUEST N. 5 QUEST. Issues in Contemporary Jewish History Journal of Fondazione CDEC Editors Michele Sarfatti (Fondazione CDEC, managing editor), Tullia Catalan (Università di Trieste), Cristiana Facchini (Università Alma Mater, Bologna), Marcella Simoni (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia), Guri Schwarz (Università di Pisa), Ulrich Wyrwa (Zentrum für Antisemitismusforschung, Berlin). Editorial Assistant Laura Brazzo (Fondazione CDEC) Editorial Advisory Board Ruth Ben Ghiat (New York University), Paolo Luca Bernardini (Università dell’Insubria), Dominique Bourel (Université de la Sorbonne, Paris), Michael Brenner (Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München), Enzo Campelli (Università La Sapienza di Roma), Francesco Cassata (Università di Genova), David Cesarani (Royal Holloway College, London), Roberto Della Rocca (DEC, Roma), Lois Dubin (Smith College, Northampton), Jacques Ehrenfreund (Université de Lausanne), Katherine E. Fleming (New York University), Anna Foa (Università La Sapienza di Roma), François Guesnet (University College London), Alessandro Guetta (INALCO, Paris), Stefano Jesurum (Corriere della Sera, Milano), András Kovács (Central European University, Budapest), Fabio Levi (Università degli Studi di Torino), Simon Levis Sullam (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia), Renato Mannheimer (ISPO, Milano), Giovanni Miccoli (Università degli Studi di Trieste), Dan Michman (Yad Vashem, Jerusalem), Michael Miller (Central European University, Budapest), Alessandra Minerbi (Fondazione CDEC Milano), Liliana Picciotto (Fondazione CDEC, Milano), Micaela Procaccia (MIBAC, Roma), Marcella Ravenna (Università di Ferrara), Milena Santerini (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano), Perrine Simon-Nahum (EHESS, Paris), Francesca Sofia (Università Alma Mater di Bologna), David Sorkin (CUNY, New York), Emanuela Trevisan Semi (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia), Christian Wiese (Goethe- Universität Frankfurt am Main).
    [Show full text]