DOCSLIB.ORG

Species Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Species Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011 Appendix F - Species Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011 U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Region Species Diversity Report George Washington National Forest April 2011 Appendix F - Species Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.0 Species Diversity..................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Ecosystem Context for Species ............................................................................................ 5 2.2 Identification and Screening of Species ............................................................................... 6 3.0 Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................................................... 7 3.1 Threatened and Endangered Species List ............................................................................ 7 3.2 Threatened and Endangered Species Descriptions and Plan Components .......................... 8 3.2.1 Indiana Bat ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.2.2 Virginia Big-Eared Bat ................................................................................................... 19 3.2.3 James Spinymussel ......................................................................................................... 22 3.2.4 Shale Barren Rock Cress ................................................................................................ 25 3.2.5 Smooth Cone Flower ...................................................................................................... 27 3.2.6 Virginia Sneezeweed ...................................................................................................... 28 3.2.7 Swamp Pink .................................................................................................................... 32 3.2.8 Northeastern Bulrush ...................................................................................................... 35 3.3 Threatened and Endangered Species Summary of Plan Components ............................... 39 4.0 Other Species Addressed ..................................................................................................... 40 4.1 Species list ......................................................................................................................... 40 4.2 Species Groups .................................................................................................................. 40 4.2.1 Alkaline Glade and Barren Associates ........................................................................ 42 4.2.2 Calciphile Associates .................................................................................................. 43 F-i Appendix F - Species Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011 4.2.3 Cave Associates .......................................................................................................... 44 4.2.4 Cavity Tree, Den Tree and Snag Associates .............................................................. 45 4.2.5 Cliff, Talus and Large Rock Outcrop Associates ....................................................... 46 4.2.6 Cove Forest Associates ............................................................................................... 47 4.2.7 Fire Dependent and Fire Enhanced Associates ........................................................... 47 4.2.8 Hard and Soft Mast Associates ................................................................................... 48 4.2.9 High Elevation Coniferous, Deciduous and/or Mixed Forest Associates ................... 48 4.2.10 Late Successional Hardwood Dominated Forest Associates .................................... 50 4.2. 11 Area Sensitive Mature Coniferous, Deciduous, and/or Mixed Forest Associates .... 50 4.2.12 Lepidopterans ............................................................................................................ 51 4.2.13 Mafic Rock Associates ............................................................................................. 52 4.2.14 Species Needing Occurrence Protection ................................................................... 52 4.2.15 Open Area Associates ................................................................................................ 54 4.2.15a Area Sensitive Grassland and Shrubland and Open Woodlands Associates .......... 54 4.2.15.b Area Sensitive GrasslandsAssociates .................................................................... 55 4.2.15.c Area Sensitive Shrubland and Open Woodland Associates ................................... 55 4.2.15.d Grassland Associates ............................................................................................. 55 4.2.15.e High Elevation Opening (Grassy Or Shrubby) or Open Woodland Associates .... 56 4.2.15.f Shrubland Associates .............................................................................................. 57 4.2.15.g Regenerating Forest Associates ............................................................................. 58 4.2.15.h Open Woodland Associates ................................................................................... 58 4.2.16 Riparian Area Associates .......................................................................................... 60 4.2.17 Ruderal Associates ..................................................................................................... 63 4.2.18 Sandstone Glades and Barrens Associates ................................................................ 64 F-ii Appendix F - Species Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011 4.2.19 Species Sensitive to Over-Collection ........................................................................ 64 4.2.20 Species Sensitive to Recreational Traffic ................................................................. 65 4.2.21 Shale Barren Associates ............................................................................................ 65 4.2.22 Species with Habitat in Special Biologic Areas ....................................................... 66 5.0 Effects of Alternatives on Species ....................................................................................... 69 6.0 Plan Components for Species Diversity .............................................................................. 78 6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 78 6.2 Species Groups Covered by Ecosystem Diversity Plan Components ............................... 79 6.3 Species Groups Requiring Additional Plan Components .................................................. 81 6.3.1 Calciphile Associates ................................................................................................... 81 6.3.2 Cavity Tree, Den Tree and Snag Associates ............................................................... 81 6.3.3 Cliff, Talus and Rock Outcrop Associates .................................................................. 82 6.3.4 Hard and Soft Mast Associates ................................................................................... 83 6.3.5 High Elevation Coniferous, Deciduous and/or Mixed Forest Associates .................... 83 6.3.6 Lepidopterans .............................................................................................................. 83 6.3.7 Species Needing Occurrence Protection ..................................................................... 84 6.3.8 Open Area Associates .................................................................................................. 85 6.3.9 Ruderal Associates ...................................................................................................... 85 6.3.10 Sandstone Glades and Barrens Associates ................................................................ 86 6.3.11 Species Sensitive to Over-Collection ......................................................................... 86 6.3.12 Species Sensitive to Recreational Traffic ................................................................. 86 6.3.13 Species with Habitat in Special Biologic Areas ....................................................... 87 Literature Cited .......................................................................................................................... 89 F-iii Appendix F - Species Diversity Report George Washington National Forest Draft EIS April 2011 1.0 Introduction Planning for ecological sustainability is an iterative two-stage process that involves first providing for a diversity of ecosystems and then by developing additional direction to meet the biological needs of specific species or species groups. Most plant and animal species will be sustained by managing for a diversity of ecosystems in the Plan area. However, additional provisions may be needed to help provide ecological conditions for specific species such as federally listed threatened and endangered (T&E) species,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio Glaucus, P. Marcellus, P. Philenor, Pieris Rapae, Colias Philo Dice, Antho­ Caris Genutia, Anaea Andria, Euptychia Gemma
    102 REMINGTON: 1952 Central Season Vol.7, nos.3·4 Papilio glaucus, P. marcellus, P. philenor, Pieris rapae, Colias philo dice, Antho­ caris genutia, Anaea andria, Euptychia gemma. One exception to the general scarcity was the large number of Erynnis brizo and E. juvenalis which were seen clustered around damp spots in a dry branch on April 9. MERRITT counted 67 Erynnis and 2 Papilio glaucus around one such spOt and 45 Erynnis around another. Only one specimen of Incisalia henrici was seen this spring. MERRITT was pleased to find Incisalia niphon still present in a small tract of pine although the area was swept by a ground fire in 1951. Vanessa cardui appeared sparingly from June 12 on, the first since 1947. In the late summer the season appeared normal. Eurema lisa, Nathalis iole, Lycaena thoe, and Hylephila phyleus were common. Junonia coenia was more abundant around Louisville than he has ever seen it. A rarity taken in Louisville this fall was Atlides halesus, the first seen since 1948. The latest seasonal record made by Merritt was a specimen of Colias eury­ theme flying south very fast on December 7. EDWARD WELLING sent a record of finding Lagoa crispata on June 27 at Covington. Contributors: F. R. ARNHOLD; E. G. BAILEY; RALPH BEEBE; S. M. COX; H. V. DALY; 1. W . GRIEWISCH; J. B. HAYES; R. W. HODGES; VONTA P. HYNES; R. LEUSCHNER; J. R. MERRITT; J. H. NEWMAN; M. C. NIEL­ SEN; 1. S. PHILLIPS; P. S. REMINGTON; WM. SIEKER; EDWARD VOSS; W. H . WAGNER, JR.; E. C.
    [Show full text]
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road
    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • On Italian Pseudoscorpions XLVIII)
    Arachnologische Mitteilungen 49: 21-33 Karlsruhe, Juni 2015 The species of the pseudoscorpion genus Pseudoblothrus (Pseudoscorpiones: Syarinidae) in Italy (on Italian pseudoscorpions XLVIII) Giulio Gardini doi: 10.5431/aramit4903 Abstract. The species of the genus Pseudoblothrus Beier, 1931 from Italy are revised. Two species are present in this area: P. peyerimhoffi (Simon, 1905) (Piedmont) and P. regalini Inzaghi, 1983 (Lombardy). The following synonymy is proposed: Pseudoblothrus ellingseni (Beier, 1929) is a junior subjective synonym of P. peyerimhoffi (Simon, 1905) (syn. nov.). A key to all species of the genus Pseudoblothrus is provided. Keywords: Alps, biospeleology, new synonymy, taxonomy Three genera of the family Syarinidae are known these rare pseudoscorpions for this purpose. Moreo- from Italy: Microcreagrina Beier, 1961 with the epi- ver, examination of further specimens of P. regalini gean M. hispanica (Ellingsen, 1910) from Sicily and from Lombardy allows a supplementary description Sardinia, Hadoblothrus Beier, 1952 with the subterra- of this species. nean H. gigas (di Caporiacco, 1951) from Apulia and Pseudoblothrus Beier, 1931 with three subterranean Material and methods species from northern Italy (Gardini 2000). This study is based on the examination of 38 adult The genus Pseudoblothrus, established for Ideo- specimens and 1 tritonymph of Pseudoblothrus, all blothrus roszkovskii Redikorzev, 1918 from Crimea, lodged in the collection of the author. Specimens is represented in Europe by ten subterranean species were cleared in 60% lactic acid and temporarily (Harvey 2013), described from the Azores Archipe- mounted – after dissection of right palp, chelicera, lago (P. oromii Mahnert, 1990 and P. vulcanus Mah- legs I and IV – in cavity slides with the same medi- nert, 1990), the French and Italian western Alps [P.
    [Show full text]
  • Conotoxin Diversity in Chelyconus Ermineus (Born, 1778) and the Convergent Origin of Piscivory in the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific
    GBE Conotoxin Diversity in Chelyconus ermineus (Born, 1778) and the Convergent Origin of Piscivory in the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific Cones Samuel Abalde1,ManuelJ.Tenorio2,CarlosM.L.Afonso3, and Rafael Zardoya1,* 1Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biologıa Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, Spain Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article-abstract/10/10/2643/5061556 by CSIC user on 17 January 2020 2Departamento CMIM y Q. Inorganica-INBIO, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Cadiz, Puerto Real, Spain 3Fisheries, Biodiversity and Conervation Group, Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, Faro, Portugal *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted: July 28, 2018 Data deposition: Raw RNA seq data: SRA database: project number SRP139515 (SRR6983161-SRR6983169) Abstract The transcriptome of the venom duct of the Atlantic piscivorous cone species Chelyconus ermineus (Born, 1778) was determined. The venom repertoire of this species includes at least 378 conotoxin precursors, which could be ascribed to 33 known and 22 new (unassigned) protein superfamilies, respectively. Most abundant superfamilies were T, W, O1, M, O2, and Z, accounting for 57% of all detected diversity. A total of three individuals were sequenced showing considerable intraspecific variation: each individual had many exclusive conotoxin precursors, and only 20% of all inferred mature peptides were common to all individuals. Three different regions (distal, medium, and proximal with respect to the venom bulb) of the venom duct were analyzed independently. Diversity (in terms of number of distinct members) of conotoxin precursor superfamilies increased toward the distal region whereas transcripts detected toward the proximal region showed higher expression levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2012 Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM LIST OF THE RARE PLANTS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2012 Edition Edited by Laura E. Gadd, Botanist and John Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Office of Conservation, Planning, and Community Affairs Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1601 MSC, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601 www.ncnhp.org Table of Contents LIST FORMAT ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NORTH CAROLINA RARE PLANT LIST ......................................................................................................................... 10 NORTH CAROLINA PLANT WATCH LIST ..................................................................................................................... 71 Watch Category
    [Show full text]
  • Central Appalachians FLN 2015 Year in Review
    Fire Learning Network Central Appalachians FLN Notes from the Field 2015 Year in Review Over the last decade, the Central Appalachians FLN has built strong, Landscapes of the Central Appalachians FLN diverse partnerships and demon- Heart of the Appalachians Virginia / West Virginia strated the synergistic effect this level of collaboration can have in Keystone Appalachians Pennsylvania restoring the role of fire to an eco- Cumberland River Kentucky logically significant scale. Potomac Headwaters Maryland / West Virginia Good Fire Despite a wet start to the 2015 collaboration in Pennsylvania’s The success of this crew led prescribed fire season in many parts Keystone Appalachians landscape the chapter to again contract with of the region, landscape partners also allowed for burning across WRI, this time through a participat- were able to burn nearly 8,700 acres Pennsylvania Game Commission, ing agreement funded by a Forest in the Heart of the Appalachians, Fort Indiantown Gap, PADCNR and Service Supplemental Wildland Fire 12,900 acres in the Keystone Ap- Conservancy lands. Hazardous Fuels (WFHF) project, to palachians and 6,200 acres in the provide a four-person module for the Cumberland River landscapes this spring of 2016. With additional fund- year. Achieving 28,000 acres of ing from the Forest Service Region good fire across the network can be 8, two more modules will be sup- attributed to the increased coordi- ported in the Southern Blue Ridge nation among partners making the FLN. The three modules—based in most of small burn windows. Virginia, North Carolina/Tennessee Among the highlights was the 400- and Georgia/South Carolina—will be acre Summers Mountain burn in the available for three months, for work Highland Wildlife Management Area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Butterfly Drawings by John Abbot in the Hargrett Rare Book and Manuscript Library, University of Georgia
    VOLUME 61, NUMBER 3 125 Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 61(3), 2007, 125–137 THE BUTTERFLY DRAWINGS BY JOHN ABBOT IN THE HARGRETT RARE BOOK AND MANUSCRIPT LIBRARY, UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA. JOHN V. C ALHOUN1 977 Wicks Dr., Palm Harbor, FL 34684 ABSTRACT. Artist-naturalist John Abbot completed 105 drawings of insects that are now deposited in the Hargrett Rare Book and Manu- script Library, University of Georgia. The provenance of these drawings is unknown, but available evidence dates them to ca. 1820–1825. The adults in the 32 butterfly drawings are identified and the figures of larvae and pupae are assessed for accuracy. The illustrated plants are also identified and their status as valid hosts is examined. Abbot’s accompanying notes are transcribed and analyzed. Erroneous figures of larvae, pupae, and hostplants are discussed using examples from the Hargrett Library. At least four of the butterfly species portrayed in the drawings were probably more widespread in eastern Georgia during Abbot’s lifetime. Additional key words: Larva, Lepidoptera, pupa, watercolors In 1776, the English artist-naturalist John Abbot METHODS (1751–ca.1840) arrived in Georgia, where he I visited the Hargrett Rare Book and Manuscript documented species of animals and plants for the next Library (University of Georgia) in April, 2005. Digital six decades. Living in Burke, Bullock, Chatham, and photographs were taken of John Abbot’s butterfly Screven Counties of eastern Georgia, he explored a drawings and their accompanying notes. The adult region roughly bound by the cities of Augusta and butterflies were identified and the figures compared Savannah, between the Oconee, Altamaha, and with those in other sets of Abbot’s drawings that are Savannah Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Pinal County, Arizona, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • NJ Native Plants - USDA
    NJ Native Plants - USDA Scientific Name Common Name N/I Family Category National Wetland Indicator Status Thermopsis villosa Aaron's rod N Fabaceae Dicot Rubus depavitus Aberdeen dewberry N Rosaceae Dicot Artemisia absinthium absinthium I Asteraceae Dicot Aplectrum hyemale Adam and Eve N Orchidaceae Monocot FAC-, FACW Yucca filamentosa Adam's needle N Agavaceae Monocot Gentianella quinquefolia agueweed N Gentianaceae Dicot FAC, FACW- Rhamnus alnifolia alderleaf buckthorn N Rhamnaceae Dicot FACU, OBL Medicago sativa alfalfa I Fabaceae Dicot Ranunculus cymbalaria alkali buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot OBL Rubus allegheniensis Allegheny blackberry N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, FACW Hieracium paniculatum Allegheny hawkweed N Asteraceae Dicot Mimulus ringens Allegheny monkeyflower N Scrophulariaceae Dicot OBL Ranunculus allegheniensis Allegheny Mountain buttercup N Ranunculaceae Dicot FACU, FAC Prunus alleghaniensis Allegheny plum N Rosaceae Dicot UPL, NI Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry N Rosaceae Dicot Hylotelephium telephioides Allegheny stonecrop N Crassulaceae Dicot Adlumia fungosa allegheny vine N Fumariaceae Dicot Centaurea transalpina alpine knapweed N Asteraceae Dicot Potamogeton alpinus alpine pondweed N Potamogetonaceae Monocot OBL Viola labradorica alpine violet N Violaceae Dicot FAC Trifolium hybridum alsike clover I Fabaceae Dicot FACU-, FAC Cornus alternifolia alternateleaf dogwood N Cornaceae Dicot Strophostyles helvola amberique-bean N Fabaceae Dicot Puccinellia americana American alkaligrass N Poaceae Monocot Heuchera americana
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Hesperioidea (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) Del Occidente De México
    Folia Entomológica Mexicana ISSN: 0430-8603 [email protected] Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología, A.C. México Salinas Gutiérrez, José Luis; Warren, Andrew D.; Martínez, Armando Luis Hesperioidea (lepidoptera: rhopalocera) del occidente de México Folia Entomológica Mexicana, vol. 44, núm. 3, 2005, pp. 305-320 Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología, A.C. Xalapa, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42444304 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto ISSN-0430-8603 Folia Entomol. Mex., 44(3): 305-320 (2005) HESPERIOIDEA (LEPIDOPTERA: RHOPALOCERA) DEL OCCIDENTE DE MÉXICO JOSÉ LUIS SALINAS-GUTIÉRREZ 1,2, ANDREW D. WARREN 3 Y ARMANDO LUIS-MARTÍNEZ 4 1 Museo de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, Apdo. Postal 70-399, México, 04510 D. F., MÉXICO. 24 <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> 3 Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331, U.S.A. <[email protected]> Salinas-Gutiérrez, J. L., A. D. Warren y A. Luis-Martínez. 2005. Hesperioidea (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) del occidente de México. Folia Entomol. Mex., 44(3): 305-320. RESUMEN. Se integró una lista de 325 especies, 157 géneros, cinco subfamilias y una familia de los Hesperioidea del occidente de México. Es la primera lista de hespéridos para la región occidental de México (Nayarit, Jalisco, Colima y Michoacán), la que incluye el 37% de las especies registradas para el país.
    [Show full text]