DOCSLIB.ORG

Redalyc.Hesperioidea (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) Del Occidente De México

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Folia Entomológica Mexicana ISSN: 0430-8603 [email protected] Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología, A.C. México Salinas Gutiérrez, José Luis; Warren, Andrew D.; Martínez, Armando Luis Hesperioidea (lepidoptera: rhopalocera) del occidente de México Folia Entomológica Mexicana, vol. 44, núm. 3, 2005, pp. 305-320 Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología, A.C. Xalapa, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42444304 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto ISSN-0430-8603 Folia Entomol. Mex., 44(3): 305-320 (2005) HESPERIOIDEA (LEPIDOPTERA: RHOPALOCERA) DEL OCCIDENTE DE MÉXICO JOSÉ LUIS SALINAS-GUTIÉRREZ 1,2, ANDREW D. WARREN 3 Y ARMANDO LUIS-MARTÍNEZ 4 1 Museo de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, Apdo. Postal 70-399, México, 04510 D. F., MÉXICO. 24 <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> 3 Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331, U.S.A. <[email protected]> Salinas-Gutiérrez, J. L., A. D. Warren y A. Luis-Martínez. 2005. Hesperioidea (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) del occidente de México. Folia Entomol. Mex., 44(3): 305-320. RESUMEN. Se integró una lista de 325 especies, 157 géneros, cinco subfamilias y una familia de los Hesperioidea del occidente de México. Es la primera lista de hespéridos para la región occidental de México (Nayarit, Jalisco, Colima y Michoacán), la que incluye el 37% de las especies registradas para el país. Se agrupó las especies de acuerdo a su distribución con base en provincias biogeográficas y rangos altitudinales. PALABRAS CLAVE: Hesperioidea, occidente de México, distribución, hespéridos. Salinas-Gutiérrez, J. L., A. D. Warren, and A. Luis-Martínez. 2005. Hesperioidea (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) of western Mexico. Folia Entomol. Mex., 44(3): 305-320. ABSTRACT. A list of 325 species in 157 genera, five subfamilies and one family of the Hesperioidea of western Mexico is presented herein. It is the first list of skippers for the western region of Mexico (Nayarit, Jalisco, Colima and Michoacán), comprising 37% of the species recorded for the country. The species are grouped according to their distribution in biogeographic provinces and altitudinal ranges. KEY WORDS: Hesperioidea, western Mexico, distribution, skippers. La primera lista de Hesperioidea para México las publicaciones de Freeman (e. g., 1951, 1966, fue presentada por Hoffmann (1941) en su Catá- 1967a, b, 1968, 1969a, b, 1970, 1976, 1977, logo Sistemático y Zoogeográfico de los Lepi- 1979) el trabajo en este grupo fue muy esporá- dópteros Mexicanos. Una década después Evans dico y discreto. (1951, 1952, 1953, 1955) inició la publicación de En los últimos 25 años surgieron nuevos inves- su “A Catalogue of the American Hesperiidae in- tigadores interesados en los Hesperioidea de Mé- dicating the classification and nomenclature xico. Durante este lapso se han publicado cuatro adopted in the British Museum (Natural Histo- listas para el grupo en México. Okano (1981, ry)” en el que incluye registros obtenidos de Mé- 1982), Llorente et al. (1990) y de la Maza et al. xico. En los siguientes 30 años, con excepción de (1991), ofrecieron listas de índole mayormente Salinas-Gutiérrez et al.: Hesperioidea del occidente de México bibliográfica. Warren (2000) presentó una lista Mielke (2004), Llorente et al. (en prensa), Sa- taxonómica de 759 especies, incluyendo sus sinó- linas-Gutiérrez et al. (en prep.) y Warren et al. nimos, y haciendo un recuento de los estudios (en prep.). realizados sobre Hesperioidea en México, desta- cando la obra Biologia Centrali-Americana de MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS Godman y Salvin (1879-1901) de finales del si- Diversidad. Con base en la información obte- glo XIX y principios del XX. nida a partir de una revisión bibliográfica exhaus- El presente trabajo se inició con los estudios tiva y la consulta de Colección de Lepidoptera faunísticos realizados a finales de la década de del Museo de Zoología “Alfonso L. Herrera” de los ochenta y toda la década de los noventa, que la Facultad de Ciencias (MZFC) y la Colección dieron como resultado la descripción de nuevas Nacional de Insectos del Instituto de Biología especies, trabajos taxonómicos, listas regionales (CNIN), ambas en la Universidad Nacional Autó- y estatales, v. gr. Steinhauser (1991, 1996), noma de México, se elaboró una lista de los hes- Burns (1992, 1994, 2000), Freeman (1992), péridos del Occidente de México, comprendien- MacNeill (1993), Warren y González (1996, do los estados de Nayarit (NAY), Jalisco (JAL), 1998), Warren (1995, 1996, 1998), Llorente et Colima (COL) y Michoacán (MICH) (Figura 1). al. (1996), Vargas et al. (1996), Warren et al. Todos los datos están almacenados en una base (1996, 1998), Warren y Llorente (1999), Austin de datos (MARIPOSA), que contiene más de y Warren (2001, 2002), Miekle y Casagrande 450,000 registros. La base está soportada en el (2002), Steinhauser y Warren (2002), Warren y programa Biótica de la CONABIO. FIGURA 1. Ubicación geográfica de los estados en el Occidente de México. 306 Folia Entomol. Mex., 44(3) (2005) Distribución. Con base en las coordenadas de geográficas estudiadas en el análisis Costa del cada localidad se construyó mapas a partir de los Pacífico (CP), Depresión del Balsas (DB), Eje datos de cada especie para delimitar las distribu- Volcánico (EV), Sierra Madre del Sur (SMS) y ciones individuales. Los mapas se crearon con Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO). La provincia ayuda de Sistemas de Información Geográfica Altiplano Sur (AS) no se consideró a pesar de utilizando el programa GeoMedia Pro 3.0 (Inter- abarcar parte de Jalisco, debido a no contar con graph Corp., 1999), y los mapas temáticos pro- registros para esa provincia: Los rangos altitudi- vienen de los presentados en la página electró- nales 0-500, 500-1,000, 1,000-1,500, 1,500- nica de la Comisión Nacional para el Conoci- 2,000, 2,000-2,500, 2,500-3,000 y 3,000-3,500 miento y uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO, msnm; la amplitud del rango altitudinal es arbi- http://www.conabio.gob.mx). traria. Análisis de similitud. Con el fin de realizar una comparación faunística entre los estados, se RESULTADOS elaboró dos matrices de presencia-ausencia de las Diversidad. Se integró la lista taxonómica de especies, con la finalidad de determinar las dife- los Hesperioidea para el occidente de México, re- rencias con base en provincias biogeográficas y gistrando un total de 325 especies (Apéndice 1), rangos altitudinales. La dimensión de cada una de incluidas en 157 géneros, cinco subfamilias y una ellas fue de 5 x 313 y 7 x 313, respectivamente, familia. Las subfamilias con mayor representa- considerando a cada una de las provincias bio- ción en función a la riqueza nacional son Pyrgi- geográficas y los rangos altitudinales como una nae con el 47.6% y Hesperiinae con el 42.4%. Unidad Taxonómica Operacional (UTO). El ín- Heteropterinae representa 38.2%, Pyrrhopyginae dice de Jaccard fue utilizado para evaluar el gra- 33.3% y Megathyminae solo 12.8% (5 especies). do de similitud. A continuación, las matrices de A nivel genérico, las subfamilias Heteropterinae similitud obtenidas se utilizaron para la cons- con 100% y Pyrginae con 72.6%, son las mejor trucción de dendrogramas a partir del método representadas (Cuadro 1 y 2). El estado de Mi- UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with choacán presenta la mayor diversidad, así como Arithmetic Mean). El análisis se llevó a cabo con el mayor esfuerzo de recolecta. el programa NTSYS-PC V1.6. Las provincias bio- Cuadro 1 Total de especies por estado, para el Occidente y México (OCCI, es la suma de los cuatro estados) SUBFAMILIA NAY JAL COL MICH OCCI (%) MEX Pyrrhopyginae 5 7 7 6 8 (33.3) 24 Pyrginae 127 141 126 149 164 (47.6) 344 Heteropterinae 2 9 8 12 13 (38.2) 34 Hesperiinae 83 98 78 104 135 (42.4) 318 Megathyminae 2 4 1 3 5 (12.8) 39 Total 219 259 220 274 325 (42.8) 759 307 Salinas-Gutiérrez et al.: Hesperioidea del occidente de México Cuadro 2 Total de géneros por estado para el Occidente y México SUBFAMILIA NAY JAL COL MICH OCCI (%) MEX Pyrrhopyginae 4 5 6 4 6 (66.6) 9 Pyrginae 58 65 56 64 69 (72.6) 95 Heteropterinae 2 3 3 3 3 (100) 3 Hesperiinae 55 62 51 62 76 (62.8) 121 Megathyminae 2 3 1 3 3 (60) 5 Total 121 138 117 136 157 (67.3) 233 Las localidades suman 277 sitios de recolecta Cuadro 4 para toda el área de estudio. Los estados de Na- Especies registradas por provincia biogeográfica yarit y Colima contribuyen con 46 localidades cada uno, Jalisco 61 y Michoacán 124; del total Provincia Especies de localidades, 92 (33%) no cuentan con datos CP 269 geográficos puntuales. DB 146 En el Cuadro 3 se indica las especies compar- EV 237 tidas y no compartidas entre los estados. El nú- SMS 97 mero de especies registradas por provincia está SMO 26 en el Cuadro 4, interpretado a partir del Cuadro 5, que representa la matriz de similitud que sirvió Cuadro 5 Matriz sintética de especies compartidas entre las provincias de base para la creación del dendrograma de la biogeográficas Figura 2. Las provincias con mayor diversidad son Costa del Pacífico y Eje Volcánico, con 269 CP DB EV SMS SMO y 237 especies, respectivamente. Estas dos pro- CP vincias se ubican físicamente en dos rangos alti- DB 141 tudinales muy diferentes. Además, son dos pro- EV 199 133 vincias que cubren mayor área en la zona de es- SMS 93 82 92 tudio.
Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Checklist of Extant Endemic Species and Subspecies of the Windward Dutch Caribbean (St

    Preliminary Checklist of Extant Endemic Species and Subspecies of the Windward Dutch Caribbean (St

    Preliminary checklist of extant endemic species and subspecies of the windward Dutch Caribbean (St. Martin, St. Eustatius, Saba and the Saba Bank) Authors: O.G. Bos, P.A.J. Bakker, R.J.H.G. Henkens, J. A. de Freitas, A.O. Debrot Wageningen University & Research rapport C067/18 Preliminary checklist of extant endemic species and subspecies of the windward Dutch Caribbean (St. Martin, St. Eustatius, Saba and the Saba Bank) Authors: O.G. Bos1, P.A.J. Bakker2, R.J.H.G. Henkens3, J. A. de Freitas4, A.O. Debrot1 1. Wageningen Marine Research 2. Naturalis Biodiversity Center 3. Wageningen Environmental Research 4. Carmabi Publication date: 18 October 2018 This research project was carried out by Wageningen Marine Research at the request of and with funding from the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality for the purposes of Policy Support Research Theme ‘Caribbean Netherlands' (project no. BO-43-021.04-012). Wageningen Marine Research Den Helder, October 2018 CONFIDENTIAL no Wageningen Marine Research report C067/18 Bos OG, Bakker PAJ, Henkens RJHG, De Freitas JA, Debrot AO (2018). Preliminary checklist of extant endemic species of St. Martin, St. Eustatius, Saba and Saba Bank. Wageningen, Wageningen Marine Research (University & Research centre), Wageningen Marine Research report C067/18 Keywords: endemic species, Caribbean, Saba, Saint Eustatius, Saint Marten, Saba Bank Cover photo: endemic Anolis schwartzi in de Quill crater, St Eustatius (photo: A.O. Debrot) Date: 18 th of October 2018 Client: Ministry of LNV Attn.: H. Haanstra PO Box 20401 2500 EK The Hague The Netherlands BAS code BO-43-021.04-012 (KD-2018-055) This report can be downloaded for free from https://doi.org/10.18174/460388 Wageningen Marine Research provides no printed copies of reports Wageningen Marine Research is ISO 9001:2008 certified.
  • FM), 3-9 July, 3-10 September and 10-13 December 1990

    FM), 3-9 July, 3-10 September and 10-13 December 1990

    BULLETIN OF THE ALLYN MUSEUM 3621 Bayshore Rd. Sarasota, Florida 34234 Published By Florida Museum of Natural History University of Florida Gainesville, Florida 32611 Number 133 14 June 1991 ISSN-0097-3211 THE BUTTERFLIES OF ANEGADA, BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS, WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF A NEW CALISTO (SATYRIDAE) AND A NEW COPAEODES (HESPERIIDAE) ENDEMIC TO THE ISLAND David Spencer Smith Hope Entomological Collections, The University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford, OX! 3PW, England. Lee D. Miller Allyn Museum of Entomology of the Florida Museum of Natural History, 3621 Bay Shore Road, Sarasota, Florida 34234, U.S.A. Faustino KcKenzie Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico, Boulevard del Valle 201, Old San Juan, Puerto Rico 00901, U.S.A. This paper is dedicated to the memory of John Griffith of Jesus College, Oxford. INTRODUCTION Anegada island is the northernmost member of the Lesser Antillean arc, situated at 18" 43'N and 64" 19'W. Its nearest neighbors are Anguilla, about 80 statute miles (127 km} across the Anegada Passage to the east-southeast and Virgin Gorda, about 13 miles (21 km} due south. Whereas the Virgin Islands are generally mountainous, Anegada reaches perhaps 18 ' above mean sea level and much of the island is considerably lower (D 'Arcy, 1975}. It is about 10 miles (16 km} in length, about 15 square miles (39 km'} in area, oriented along the east-west axis and is just over 2 miles (3.5 km} across the widest point (Fig. 16}. From the south coast and into the Anegada Passage to the southeast extends the Horseshoe Reef, long a hazard to navigation.
  • Appendix A: Common and Scientific Names for Fish and Wildlife Species Found in Idaho

    Appendix A: Common and Scientific Names for Fish and Wildlife Species Found in Idaho

    APPENDIX A: COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SPECIES FOUND IN IDAHO. How to Read the Lists. Within these lists, species are listed phylogenetically by class. In cases where phylogeny is incompletely understood, taxonomic units are arranged alphabetically. Listed below are definitions for interpreting NatureServe conservation status ranks (GRanks and SRanks). These ranks reflect an assessment of the condition of the species rangewide (GRank) and statewide (SRank). Rangewide ranks are assigned by NatureServe and statewide ranks are assigned by the Idaho Conservation Data Center. GX or SX Presumed extinct or extirpated: not located despite intensive searches and virtually no likelihood of rediscovery. GH or SH Possibly extinct or extirpated (historical): historically occurred, but may be rediscovered. Its presence may not have been verified in the past 20–40 years. A species could become SH without such a 20–40 year delay if the only known occurrences in the state were destroyed or if it had been extensively and unsuccessfully looked for. The SH rank is reserved for species for which some effort has been made to relocate occurrences, rather than simply using this status for all elements not known from verified extant occurrences. G1 or S1 Critically imperiled: at high risk because of extreme rarity (often 5 or fewer occurrences), rapidly declining numbers, or other factors that make it particularly vulnerable to rangewide extinction or extirpation. G2 or S2 Imperiled: at risk because of restricted range, few populations (often 20 or fewer), rapidly declining numbers, or other factors that make it vulnerable to rangewide extinction or extirpation. G3 or S3 Vulnerable: at moderate risk because of restricted range, relatively few populations (often 80 or fewer), recent and widespread declines, or other factors that make it vulnerable to rangewide extinction or extirpation.
  • Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) in a Coastal Plain Area in the State of Paraná, Brazil

    Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) in a Coastal Plain Area in the State of Paraná, Brazil

    62 TROP. LEPID. RES., 26(2): 62-67, 2016 LEVISKI ET AL.: Butterflies in Paraná Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) in a coastal plain area in the state of Paraná, Brazil Gabriela Lourenço Leviski¹*, Luziany Queiroz-Santos¹, Ricardo Russo Siewert¹, Lucy Mila Garcia Salik¹, Mirna Martins Casagrande¹ and Olaf Hermann Hendrik Mielke¹ ¹ Laboratório de Estudos de Lepidoptera Neotropical, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19.020, 81.531-980, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]٭ Abstract: The coastal plain environments of southern Brazil are neglected and poorly represented in Conservation Units. In view of the importance of sampling these areas, the present study conducted the first butterfly inventory of a coastal area in the state of Paraná. Samples were taken in the Floresta Estadual do Palmito, from February 2014 through January 2015, using insect nets and traps for fruit-feeding butterfly species. A total of 200 species were recorded, in the families Hesperiidae (77), Nymphalidae (73), Riodinidae (20), Lycaenidae (19), Pieridae (7) and Papilionidae (4). Particularly notable records included the rare and vulnerable Pseudotinea hemis (Schaus, 1927), representing the lowest elevation record for this species, and Temenis huebneri korallion Fruhstorfer, 1912, a new record for Paraná. These results reinforce the need to direct sampling efforts to poorly inventoried areas, to increase knowledge of the distribution and occurrence patterns of butterflies in Brazil. Key words: Atlantic Forest, Biodiversity, conservation, inventory, species richness. INTRODUCTION the importance of inventories to knowledge of the fauna and its conservation, the present study inventoried the species of Faunal inventories are important for providing knowledge butterflies of the Floresta Estadual do Palmito.
  • The Butterfly Drawings by John Abbot in the Hargrett Rare Book and Manuscript Library, University of Georgia

    The Butterfly Drawings by John Abbot in the Hargrett Rare Book and Manuscript Library, University of Georgia

    VOLUME 61, NUMBER 3 125 Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 61(3), 2007, 125–137 THE BUTTERFLY DRAWINGS BY JOHN ABBOT IN THE HARGRETT RARE BOOK AND MANUSCRIPT LIBRARY, UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA. JOHN V. C ALHOUN1 977 Wicks Dr., Palm Harbor, FL 34684 ABSTRACT. Artist-naturalist John Abbot completed 105 drawings of insects that are now deposited in the Hargrett Rare Book and Manu- script Library, University of Georgia. The provenance of these drawings is unknown, but available evidence dates them to ca. 1820–1825. The adults in the 32 butterfly drawings are identified and the figures of larvae and pupae are assessed for accuracy. The illustrated plants are also identified and their status as valid hosts is examined. Abbot’s accompanying notes are transcribed and analyzed. Erroneous figures of larvae, pupae, and hostplants are discussed using examples from the Hargrett Library. At least four of the butterfly species portrayed in the drawings were probably more widespread in eastern Georgia during Abbot’s lifetime. Additional key words: Larva, Lepidoptera, pupa, watercolors In 1776, the English artist-naturalist John Abbot METHODS (1751–ca.1840) arrived in Georgia, where he I visited the Hargrett Rare Book and Manuscript documented species of animals and plants for the next Library (University of Georgia) in April, 2005. Digital six decades. Living in Burke, Bullock, Chatham, and photographs were taken of John Abbot’s butterfly Screven Counties of eastern Georgia, he explored a drawings and their accompanying notes. The adult region roughly bound by the cities of Augusta and butterflies were identified and the figures compared Savannah, between the Oconee, Altamaha, and with those in other sets of Abbot’s drawings that are Savannah Rivers.
  • Butterflies and Moths of Pinal County, Arizona, United States

    Butterflies and Moths of Pinal County, Arizona, United States

    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
  • CA Checklist of Butterflies of Tulare County

    CA Checklist of Butterflies of Tulare County

    Checklist of Buerflies of Tulare County hp://www.natureali.org/Tularebuerflychecklist.htm Tulare County Buerfly Checklist Compiled by Ken Davenport & designed by Alison Sheehey Swallowtails (Family Papilionidae) Parnassians (Subfamily Parnassiinae) A series of simple checklists Clodius Parnassian Parnassius clodius for use in the field Sierra Nevada Parnassian Parnassius behrii Kern Amphibian Checklist Kern Bird Checklist Swallowtails (Subfamily Papilioninae) Kern Butterfly Checklist Pipevine Swallowtail Battus philenor Tulare Butterfly Checklist Black Swallowtail Papilio polyxenes Kern Dragonfly Checklist Checklist of Exotic Animals Anise Swallowtail Papilio zelicaon (incl. nitra) introduced to Kern County Indra Swallowtail Papilio indra Kern Fish Checklist Giant Swallowtail Papilio cresphontes Kern Mammal Checklist Kern Reptile Checklist Western Tiger Swallowtail Papilio rutulus Checklist of Sensitive Species Two-tailed Swallowtail Papilio multicaudata found in Kern County Pale Swallowtail Papilio eurymedon Whites and Sulphurs (Family Pieridae) Wildflowers Whites (Subfamily Pierinae) Hodgepodge of Insect Pine White Neophasia menapia Photos Nature Ali Wild Wanderings Becker's White Pontia beckerii Spring White Pontia sisymbrii Checkered White Pontia protodice Western White Pontia occidentalis The Butterfly Digest by Cabbage White Pieris rapae Bruce Webb - A digest of butterfly discussion around Large Marble Euchloe ausonides the nation. Frontispiece: 1 of 6 12/26/10 9:26 PM Checklist of Buerflies of Tulare County hp://www.natureali.org/Tularebuerflychecklist.htm
  • Management Recommendations for Native Insect Pollinators in Texas

    Management Recommendations for Native Insect Pollinators in Texas

    Management Recommendations for Native Insect Pollinators in Texas Texas Parks and Wildlife Department • 4200 Smith School Road • Austin, Texas 78744 • (512) 389-4800 Management Recommendations for Native Insect Pollinators in Texas Developed by Michael Warriner and Ben Hutchins Nongame and Rare Species Program Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Acknowledgements Critical content review was provided by Mace Vaughn, Anne Stine, and Jennifer Hopwood, The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation and Shalene Jha Ph.D., University of Texas at Austin. Texas Master Naturalists, Carol Clark and Jessica Womack, provided the early impetus for development of management protocols geared towards native pollinators. Cover photos: Left top to bottom: Ben Hutchins, Cullen Hanks, Eric Isley, Right: Eric Isley Design and layout by Elishea Smith © 2016 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department PWD BK W7000-1813 (04/16) In accordance with Texas State Depository Law, this publication is available at the Texas State Publications Clearinghouse and/or Texas Depository Libraries. TPWD receives federal assistance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other federal agencies and is subject to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and state anti-discrimination laws which prohibit discrimination the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex or disability. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any TPWD program, activity or facility, or need more information, please contact Office of Diversity and Inclusive Workforce Management, U.S.
  • Current Tracking List

    Current Tracking List

    Nevada Division of Natural Heritage Department of Conservation and Natural Resources 901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 5002, Carson City, Nevada 89701-5245 voice: (775) 684-2900 | fax: (775) 684-2909 | web: heritage.nv.gov At-Risk Plant and Animal Tracking List July 2021 The Nevada Division of Natural Heritage (NDNH) A separate list, the Plant and Animal Watch List, systematically curates information on Nevada's contains taxa that could become at-risk in the future. endangered, threatened, sensitive, rare, and at-risk plants and animals providing the most comprehensive Taxa on the At-Risk Plant and Animal Tracking List are source of information on Nevada’s imperiled organized by taxonomic group, and presented biodiversity. alphabetically by scientific name within each group. Currently, there are 639 Tracking List taxa: 285 plants, Nevada's health and economic well-being depend 209 invertebrates, 65 fishes, 9 amphibians, 7 reptiles, upon its biodiversity and wise land stewardship. This 27 birds, and 37 mammals. challenge increases as population and land-use pressures continue to grow. Nevada is among the top Documentation of population status, locations, or 10 states for both the diversity and the vulnerability of other updates or corrections for any of the taxa on its living heritage. With early planning and responsible this list are always welcome. Literature citations with development, economic growth and our biological taxonomic revisions and descriptions of new taxa are resources can coexist. NDNH is a central source for also appreciated. The Nevada Native Species Site information critical to achieving this balance. Survey Report form is available on our website under Management priorities for the state’s imperiled the Submit Data tab and is the preferred format for biodiversity are continually assessed, providing submitting information to NDNH.
  • Out of the Orient: Post-Tethyan Transoceanic and Trans-Arabian Routes

    Out of the Orient: Post-Tethyan Transoceanic and Trans-Arabian Routes

    Systematic Entomology Page 2 of 55 1 1 Out of the Orient: Post-Tethyan transoceanic and trans-Arabian routes 2 fostered the spread of Baorini skippers in the Afrotropics 3 4 Running title: Historical biogeography of Baorini skippers 5 6 Authors: Emmanuel F.A. Toussaint1,2*, Roger Vila3, Masaya Yago4, Hideyuki Chiba5, Andrew 7 D. Warren2, Kwaku Aduse-Poku6,7, Caroline Storer2, Kelly M. Dexter2, Kiyoshi Maruyama8, 8 David J. Lohman6,9,10, Akito Y. Kawahara2 9 10 Affiliations: 11 1 Natural History Museum of Geneva, CP 6434, CH 1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland 12 2 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, U.S.A. 13 3 Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37, 08003 14 Barcelona, Spain 15 4 The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 16 5 B. P. Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817-0916 U.S.A. 17 6 Biology Department, City College of New York, City University of New York, 160 Convent 18 Avenue, NY 10031, U.S.A. 19 7 Biology Department, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, 23173, USA 20 8 9-7-106 Minami-Ôsawa 5 chome, Hachiôji-shi, Tokyo 192-0364, Japan 21 9 Ph.D. Program in Biology, Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 Fifth Ave., New 22 York, NY 10016, U.S.A. 23 10 Entomology Section, National Museum of the Philippines, Manila 1000, Philippines 24 25 *To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: [email protected] Page 3 of 55 Systematic Entomology 2 26 27 ABSTRACT 28 The origin of taxa presenting a disjunct distribution between Africa and Asia has puzzled 29 biogeographers for centuries.
  • BUTTERFLIES in Thewest Indies of the Caribbean

    BUTTERFLIES in Thewest Indies of the Caribbean

    PO Box 9021, Wilmington, DE 19809, USA E-mail: [email protected]@focusonnature.com Phone: Toll-free in USA 1-888-721-3555 oror 302/529-1876302/529-1876 BUTTERFLIES and MOTHS in the West Indies of the Caribbean in Antigua and Barbuda the Bahamas Barbados the Cayman Islands Cuba Dominica the Dominican Republic Guadeloupe Jamaica Montserrat Puerto Rico Saint Lucia Saint Vincent the Virgin Islands and the ABC islands of Aruba, Bonaire, and Curacao Butterflies in the Caribbean exclusively in Trinidad & Tobago are not in this list. Focus On Nature Tours in the Caribbean have been in: January, February, March, April, May, July, and December. Upper right photo: a HISPANIOLAN KING, Anetia jaegeri, photographed during the FONT tour in the Dominican Republic in February 2012. The genus is nearly entirely in West Indian islands, the species is nearly restricted to Hispaniola. This list of Butterflies of the West Indies compiled by Armas Hill Among the butterfly groupings in this list, links to: Swallowtails: family PAPILIONIDAE with the genera: Battus, Papilio, Parides Whites, Yellows, Sulphurs: family PIERIDAE Mimic-whites: subfamily DISMORPHIINAE with the genus: Dismorphia Subfamily PIERINAE withwith thethe genera:genera: Ascia,Ascia, Ganyra,Ganyra, Glutophrissa,Glutophrissa, MeleteMelete Subfamily COLIADINAE with the genera: Abaeis, Anteos, Aphrissa, Eurema, Kricogonia, Nathalis, Phoebis, Pyrisitia, Zerene Gossamer Wings: family LYCAENIDAE Hairstreaks: subfamily THECLINAE with the genera: Allosmaitia, Calycopis, Chlorostrymon, Cyanophrys,
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List

    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List

    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).