Monthly Report – October 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Germany 2018 International Religious Freedom Report
GERMANY 2018 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution prohibits religious discrimination and provides for freedom of faith and conscience and the practice of one’s religion. The country’s 16 states exercise considerable autonomy on registration of religious groups and other matters. Unrecognized religious groups are ineligible for tax benefits. The federal and some state offices of the domestic intelligence service continued to monitor the activities of certain Muslim groups. Authorities also monitored the Church of Scientology (COS), which reported continued government discrimination against its members. Certain states continued to ban or restrict the use of religious clothing or symbols, including headscarves, for some state employees, particularly teachers and courtroom officials. While senior government leaders continued to condemn anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim sentiment, some members of the federal parliament and state assemblies from the Alternative for Germany (AfD) Party again made anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim statements. The federal and seven state governments appointed anti-Semitism commissioners for the first time, following a recommendation in a parliament-commissioned 2017 experts’ report to create a federal anti-Semitism commissioner in response to growing anti-Semitism. The federal anti-Semitism commissioner serves as a contact for Jewish groups and coordinates initiatives to combat anti-Semitism in the federal ministries. In July the government announced it would increase social welfare funding for Holocaust survivors by 75 million euros ($86 million) in 2019. In March Federal Interior Minister Horst Seehofer said he did not consider Islam to be a part of the country’s culture, and that the country was characterized by Christianity. -
Prepared by the European Jewish Congress, Secretariat and Member of the Advisory 2016 Board of the European Parliament Working Group on Antisemitism (WGAS)
Prepared by the European Jewish Congress, Secretariat and Member of the Advisory 2016 Board of the European Parliament Working Group on Antisemitism (WGAS). Page 1 of 40 TABLE OF CONTENT I. REPORTS & POLLS .......................................................................................................... 6 AUSTRIA................................................................................................................................ 6 Antisemitic incidents in Austria up by more than 80% ........................................................... 6 FRANCE ................................................................................................................................. 6 Large dip in French Jewish emigration to Israel ..................................................................... 6 Huge fall in number of antisemitic attacks in France .............................................................. 6 Hate crimes in France down 80% this year ............................................................................. 7 Most French believe Jews responsible for rise in antisemitism................................................ 7 SPCJ statistics and analyses on antisemitism in France in 2015 .............................................. 7 More than 40% of French Jews considering “Aliyah”............................................................. 7 GERMANY ............................................................................................................................. 8 Germany to force Facebook, -
Annual Report on Anti
ANNUAL REPORT ON ANTI - SEMITISM IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2015 ANNUAL REPORT ON ANTI - SEMITISM IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2015 ANNUAL REPORT ON ANTI - SEMITISM IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2015 The text may be used only with a prior permission of the Federation of Jewish Communities in the Czech Republic. Released by the Federation of Jewish Communities in the Czech Republic. Photo on the front page: the station Teplice, September 2015 Have you become a victim or witness of an anti-Semitic incident? Do not keep it to yourself and let us know. Contact e-mail address: [email protected] 2 ANNUAL REPORT ON ANTI - SEMITISM IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2015 YOUR MONEY THEIR BOMBS! http://www.svobodnyodpor.info/post/119434932651/fuck-izrael-va%C5%A1e-pen%C3%ADze-jejich-bomby, 20. 5. 2015 3 ANNUAL REPORT ON ANTI - SEMITISM IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2015 ANNUAL REPORT ON ANTI - SEMITISM IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2015 CONTENT 1. SUMMARY OF THE SITUATION IN 2015 5 2. 2015 IN NUMBERS 6 Incidents 2015 6 Comparison of all categories of anti-Semitic incidents from 2008 to 2015 6 Development of anti-Semitism during 2015 6 Overview of all categories of anti-Semitic incidents during 2015 6 3. INTRODUCTION 7 Purpose of the Report 7 Metodology and terminology 7 Definition of anti-Semitism 8 4. TRENDS IN 2015 10 5. CATEGORIES OF ANTI-SEMITIC INCIDENTS 13 Physical attacks on people and property 13 Threats and harassment 15 Anti-Semitic texts, images and videos 17 6. MANIFESTATIONS OF ANTI-SEMITISM 19 7. -
Antisemitism in Right-Wing Extremism Antisemitism in Right-Wing Extremism Table of Contents
Antisemitism in right-wing extremism Antisemitism in right-wing extremism Table of contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Definition 7 3 Manifestations and expressions 10 3.1 Antisemitism in violence-oriented right-wing extremism 10 3.2 Antisemitism among right-wing extremist political parties 11 3.2.1 Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (NPD) 11 3.2.2 DIE RECHTE 13 3.2.3 Der III. Weg 15 3.3 Antisemitism in the New Right 16 3.4 Antisemitism in right-wing extremist worldview organisations 18 3.5 Antisemitism in right-wing extremist music 20 3.6 Antisemitism in right-wing extremist publications 21 3.7 Antisemitism on the Internet 22 4 Conclusion 24 Imprint 27 3 4 1 Introduction For more than one hundred years, antisemitism has been among the ideological cornerstones of nationalist and völkisch political movements in Germany. Before, hostility towards Jews had been expressed through religiously and economically motivated patterns of argumentation and had been socially and politically motivated. Since the late 19th century, however, Jews or the people considered to be Jews were mainly rejected based on ethno-racist reasoning. This development culminated in the race doctrine propagated by the National Socialists. According to that doctrine, Jews were regarded as “vermin on the people’s body” to be systematically killed in the Holocaust later on. However, antisemitism as such is no relic of National Socialism but rather a constant and Europe-wide phenomenon with a long history. Besides widespread latent antisemitism, i.e. a tacit agreement with anti-Jewish views or a vague aversion to Jews, to the present day, hostility towards Jews has time and again become evident in criminal offences motivated by antisemitism. -
Holocaust Denial Cases and Freedom of Expression in the United States
Holocaust Denial Cases and Freedom of Expression in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom By Charla Marie Boley Submitted to Central European University, Department of Legal Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of … M.A. in Human Rights Supervisor: Professor Vladimir Petrovic Budapest, Hungary 2016 CEU eTD Collection Copyright 2016 Central European University CEU eTD Collection i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Freedom of expression is an internationally recognized fundamental right, crucial to open societies and democracy. Therefore, when the right is utilized to proliferate hate speech targeted at especially vulnerable groups of people, societies face the uncomfortable question of how and when to limit freedom of expression. Holocaust denial, as a form of hate speech, poses such a problem. This particular form of hate speech creates specific problems unique to its “field” in that perpetrators cloak their rhetoric under a screen of academia and that initial responses typically discard it as absurd, crazy, and not worth acknowledging. The three common law jurisdictions of the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom all value free speech and expression, but depending on national legislation and jurisprudence approach the question of Holocaust denial differently. The three trials of Holocaust deniers Zundel, Irving, and the the Institute for Historical Review, a pseudo academic organization, caught the public’s attention with a significant amount of sensationalism. The manner in which the cases unfolded and their aftermath demonstrate that Holocaust denial embodies anti-Semitism and is a form of hate speech. Furthermore, examination of trial transcripts, media response, and existing scholarship, shows that combating denial in courtrooms can have the unintended consequence of further radicalizing deniers and swaying more to join their ranks. -
The Rise of Antisemitism Online During the Pandemic
THE RISE OF ANTISEMITISM ONLINE DURING THE PANDEMIC A study of French and German content Prepared by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue April 2021, Contract number: JUST/2020/RRAC/PR/RIGH/0115 European Commission Directorate-General Justice and Consumers Directorate C – Fundamental rights and rule of law Unit C2 – Fundamental rights policy [email protected] This document was commissioned by the European Commission. The information and views set out herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this document. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for any use of the information provided here. More information on the European Union is available at: http://www.europa.eu Print ISBN 978-92-76-38013-9 doi:10.2838/408086 DS-02-21-656-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-76-38012-2 doi:10.2838/671381 DS-02-21-656-EN-N © European Union, 2021. Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is implemented based on Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). The European Commission is not liable for any consequence stemming from the reuse of this publication. For any use or reproduction of elements that are not owned by the European Union, permission may need to be sought directly from the respective right holders. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021 This report was prepared by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. -
Xenophobia, Radicalism, and Hate Crime in the Osce Area 2018-2020
Moscow Economical Institute European Centre for Democracy Development XENOPHOBIA, RADICALISM, AND HATE CRIME IN THE OSCE AREA 2018-2020 Report Amsterdam - Athens - Ottawa - Berlin - Washington - Warsaw - London - Madrid - Kiev - Moscow - Paris - Rome 2021 1 Editor-in-chief and project manager: Valery Engel, PhD Authors: Dr. Valery Engel, (General Analytics, the Historiography of the Issue), Dr. Jean-Yves Camus (France), Dr. William Allchorne (UK), Dr. Anna Castriota (Italy), Marina Peunova-Connor (USA), Barbara Molas (Canada), Dr. Ali Dizboni (Canada) Dr. Vanja Ljujic (Netherlands), Dr. Pranvera Tika (Greece), Dr. Katarzyna du Wal (Poland), Dr. Dmitri Stratijewski (Germany), Ruslan Bortnyk (Ukraine), Laia Tarragona (Spain), Dr. Semen Charny ( Russia) Xenophobia, Radicalism and Hate Crimes in the OSCE Area. - Riga: 2021. - 161 p. The monograph "Xenophobia, Radicalism and, Hate Crimes in the OSCE Area, 2018-20", prepared by the Moscow Economic Institute with the assistance of the European Center for the Development of Democracy, is a study by leading experts from around the world, based on monitoring and comparative analysis of anti- extremist legislation, law enforcement practice, the level of public tolerance, statistics of hate crimes committed, and activities of radical and extremist organizations from 2018 to 2020 in a number of countries around the world. The geographic scope of the study is designated as the "OSCE area", although we are talking about 10 European countries and 2 North countries including America. Of course, such a set of monitoring countries does not cover all the states that are members of this international organization, however, it allows us to trace general trends in lawmaking, law enforcement practice and other spheres of government and public life that affect the situation with extremism. -
Blickpunkt.Rechts|2017 Eine Dokumentation Rechter Aktivitäten in Der Region Döbeln
blickpunkt.rechts|2017 Eine Dokumentation rechter Aktivitäten in der Region Döbeln S.16 Inhalt Keine Alternative! Thügida & „Roßwein wehrt sich“ S.8 S.14 JN Mittelsachsen 5 Einleitung 7 1.Halbjahr 8 Keine Alternative! 14 JN Mittelsachsen 16 Thügida & „Roßwein wehrt sich“ 3 21 2.Halbjahr 22 AfD (Kreisverband Mittelsachsen) 25 Asylfeindliche Initiativen im Altkreis Döbeln 30 Junge Nationaldemokraten Mittelsachsen 34 YAKUZA - Eine Modemarke von der rechten Szene bis zum Mainstream 39 Chronik rechter Aktivitäten in und um Döbeln 2017 50 Impressum Asylfeindliche Initiativen im Altkreis Döbeln Chronik rechter Aktivitäten in und um Döbeln S.25 2017 S.39 4 Einleitung einer parteinahen Stiftung. Diese Ressourcen ermöglichen der Partei eine zunehmende Ver- stetigung ihrer Aktivitäten. Politisch richtungs- Liebe Leser_innen, weisend waren sowohl der Parteitag in Köln als auch die Vorstandswahlen im Dezember. Dabei hat sich gezeigt, dass sich der völ- halbjährlich veröffentlichen wir die Chronik kisch-nationalistische Flügel weiter durchsetzt „blickpunkt.rechts“, um die Vielzahl rechter und mittlerweile den parteiinternen Diskurs be- Aktivitäten und Vorfälle im Altkreis Döbeln stimmt. Auch im Landkreis Mittelsachsen hat sichtbar zu machen. Hinzu kommt eine Ana- sich dieser Flügel durchgesetzt und bestimmt lyse der regionalen Strukturen und eine Be- die Politik in der Region. trachtung sich wandelnder Entwicklungen und Tendenzen. Ziel ist es, über rechte Strukturen Ein weiterer Schwerpunkt der Chronik liegt aufzuklären, um daran anknüpfend Hand- auf der Betrachtung der JN Mittelsachsen. Im lungsstrategien zu entwickeln. Altkreis Döbeln waren deren Mitglieder u.a. für eine große Anzahl an Propagandaakti- In der vorliegenden Chronik werden sowohl onen, wie beispielsweise Sticker-, Graffiti- die Entwicklungen des ersten Halbjahres, als oder Flyeraktionen mitverantwortlich. -
General Analysis for the Year 2018
The Lester and Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities מרכז קנטור KANTOR CENTER לחקר יהדות אירופה בימינו | For the Study of Contemporary European Jewry Moshe Kantor Database for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism and Racism Antisemitism Worldwide - 2018 - General Analysis The Program for the Study of Jews in Arab Lands The Stephen Roth Institute for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism and Racism Antisemitism Worldwide 2018 / General Analysis Dina Porat, Head of the Kantor Center Editor-in-Chief Esther Webman Editor Talia Naamat Kantor Center Researchers Lidia Lerner – Latin America and Spain Riva Mane – France Michal Navoth – Greece Giovanni Quer – BDS and Legal Research Sarah Rembiszewski – Western Europe and Germany Mikael Shainkman – Scandinavia Raphael Vago – Romania Esther Webman – Arab Countries Contributors Austria - Florian Zeller (FGA) Australia - Julie Nathan (ECAJ) Belgium - Joël Kotek (Sciences Po Paris) Brazil - Alexandre Gomes Canada - Ran Ukashi and Aidan Fishman (Bnai Brith) Chile - Gustavo Guzmán Czech Republic - Zbynek Tarant (University of West Bohemia) and Lucie Neumannova France - SPCJ Hungary - Karl Pfeifer Italy - Stefano Gatti and Betti Guetta (CDEC, Osservatorio Antisemitismo) Mexico - Renee Dayan Shabot (Tribuna Israelita) Moldova - Natalia Sineaeva-Pankowska Netherlands - Hanna Luden (CIDI) Venezuela - Beatriz Rittigstein (CAIV) Poland - Rafal Pankowski (Never Again) Russia and Other Former Soviet countries - Shmuel Barnai Slovakia - Daniella Nemetova South Africa - David Sacks (Board of Deputies) Switzerland -
Nazism and Neo-Nazism in Film and Media Nazism and Neo-Nazism in Film and Media
JASON LEE Nazism and Neo-Nazism in Film and Media Nazism and Neo-Nazism in Film and Media Nazism and Neo-Nazism in Film and Media Jason Lee Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: Girl Scout confronts neo-Nazi at Czech rally. Photo: Vladimir Cicmanec Cover design: Kok Korpershoek, Amsterdam Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 90 8964 936 2 e-isbn 978 90 4852 829 5 doi 10.5117/9789089649362 nur 670 © J. Lee / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2018 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. Contents Acknowledgements 7 1. Introduction – Beliefs, Boundaries, Culture 9 Background and Context 9 Football Hooligans 19 American Separatists 25 2. Film and Television 39 Memory and Representation 39 Childhood and Adolescence 60 X-Television 66 Conclusions 71 3. Nazism, Neo-Nazism, and Comedy 75 Conclusions – Comedy and Politics 85 4. Necrospectives and Media Transformations 89 Myth and History 89 Until the Next Event 100 Trump and the Rise of the Right 107 Conclusions 116 5. Globalization 119 Europe, Asia, Africa, and Latin America 119 International Nazi Hunters 131 Video Games and Conclusions 135 6. Conclusions – The Infinitely Other 141 Evil and Violence 141 Denial and Memorial 152 Europe’s New Far Right and Conclusions 171 Notes 189 Bibliography 193 Index 199 Acknowledgements A special thank you to Stuart Price, Chair of the Media Discourse Group at De Montfort University (DMU). -
Comparison Viagara Cialis Levitra
[email protected] [email protected] www.genshoah.org Generations of the Shoah International Newsletter October, 2016 Dear Members and Friends, This month GSI celebrates its anniversary. The first edition of this newsletter was distributed in October 2002. We have grown considerably since then to become the largest Holocaust survivor family organization in the world. We also serve as the bridge between the survivor community and the major Holocaust institutions/museums/memorials. We thank you, our members, for your continuing support. There is still time to register for the joint GSI, World Federation of Jewish Child Survivors of the Holocaust and Descendants and Kindertransport Association conference in Los Angeles, CA, November 4 – 7, 2016. Keynote speakers this year will be Robert Krell (Founder of the Vancouver Holocaust Education Centre), Stephen Smith (Executive Director, USC Shoah Foundation), E. Randol Schoenberg (past President of the LA Museum of the Holocaust and attorney in the Woman in Gold art case), Michael Berenbaum (Holocaust scholar) and Rabbi David Wolpe (Senior Rabbi of Temple Sinai in LA). For more information and registration: www.genshoah.org/pdfs/gsi_2016_registration_packet.pdf Please remember to send in your Kristallnacht program information. A link to our guidelines for publication is provided in the box below. There is no cost, but we ask you use our format and not submit flyers or press releases. GSI is an all-volunteer organization with no paid staff so we please make it as easy as possible for us to collect and share the information we publish monthly. We hope you will take a moment to read the very special announcements we have posted below. -
A Movement Between Parliamentary Politics and the Pathway to Violence and Terrorism Germany’S Radical Right Narratives and Counter-Narratives 3
1 A MOVEMENT BETWEEN PARLIAMENTARY POLITICS AND THE PATHWAY TO VIOLENCE AND TERRORISM GERMANY’S RADICAL RIGHT NARRATIVES AND COUNTER-NARRATIVES 3 The CARR-Hedayah Radical Right Counter Narratives Project is a year-long project between CARR and Hedayah that is funded by the EU STRIVE programme. It is designed to create one of the first comprehensive online toolkits for practitioners and civil society engaged in radical right extremist counter-narrative campaigns. It uses online research to map nar- ratives in nine countries and regions (Australia, Canada, Germany, Hungary, New Zealand, Norway, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and the United States), proposes counter-narratives for these countries and regions, and advises on how to conduct such campaigns in an effec- tive manner. This country report is one of such outputs. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Maximilian Kreter’s doctoral research focuses on the development of the role of the ideology of right-wing extremism in germanophone White Power music (“Rechtsrock”) from 1977 to 2017. He employs mixed methods content analysis to study song texts of White Power bands. He aims to identify changes and continuities in the narratives, the ideology and the narrative techniques of the germanophone White Power music scene. He has published books, articles and chapters and on White Power Music in (East-)Germany; violence against asylum seekers, social media and the extreme right; right-wing hate crimes in Saxony from 2011 to 2016; and extreme right-wing voting behavior in East-Germany from 2005 to 2011. The views expressed in this practical report are the opinions of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Hedayah, the Centre for Analysis of the Radical Right or the European Union.