DOCSLIB.ORG

Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 215

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 215 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 215 1 Policies Map Changes 1.1 To accompany the draft Local Plan, a new draft Policies Map will be produced and published to reflect the changes proposed in the draft Local Plan. It will include updated boundaries for features that have changed since the Core Strategy was adopted in March 2012. The tables and figures below set out the changes that are proposed to be made to the 2012 Core Strategy Policies Map. Designations/proposals Change Figure (1.x) to be added to Policies Map Highams Park Plan The Council designated 1 Neighbourhood the Highams Park Area/Forum Neighbourhood Area / Forum on 15 July 2014. The Highams Park Map Changes Policies Planning Group (as the 1 designated Neighbourhood Forum ) is the relevant body preparing the neighbourhood plan for the Highams Park area. Table 1.1 Additions to the Policies Map Designations/proposals to Change Figure (1.x) change from 2012 Core Strategy policies map Blackhorse Lane Area Action Plan Removed 2 North Olympic Fringe Area Action Plan Walthamstow Town Centre Area Action Plan Wood Street Area Action Plan Flood Zones Updated in 3 line with the 2018 Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan 216 Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 1 Designations/proposals to Change Figure (1.x) Policies Map Changes Policies change from 2012 Core Strategy policies map Specific proposals to reinstate Included in 4 railway line at Hall Farm Curve ªRail Stationsº and re-open of Lea Bridge Station as Lea Bridge Station is now operational. Borough Employment Area Amended 5-9 BEA9 and BEA10 to reflect completed residential schemes (please see Figure 25 in Blackhorse Lane AAP 2015 for detail of this area). BEA 7 amended as eastern portion is now an ALDI store in A1 use. Removal of BEA4 Dunton Road. Strategic Industrial Locations Amendments 10,11 to SIL4 and SIL7 to correct drafting errors in previous version of the map. Crossrail 2 Safeguarding Line Removed 12 following the updated 2015 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 217 Designations/proposals to Change Figure (1.x) change from 2012 Core Strategy policies map safeguarded route https://crossrail2.co.uk/discover/safeguarding/. Primary Shopping Frontages Renamed to 13 ªPrimary Shopping Areasº Secondary Shopping Frontages Removed. 14 Lea Valley Regeneration Corridor Removed. 15 Conservation areas Amended to 16 Map Changes Policies reflect the 1 addition of Leyton Town Centre, Bakers Arms, and Lloyd Park Conservation areas. Wetland Walk (proposed) Removed. 17 Table 1.2 Changes to the Policies Map London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan 218 Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 1 Policies Map Changes Policies Key Highams Park Neighbourhood Area/Forum Figure 1.1 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 219 Key Area Action Plans Policies Map Changes Policies 1 Figure 1.2 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan 220 Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 1 Policies Map Changes Policies Key Flood Zone 3b Flood Zone 3a Flood Zone 2 Figure 1.3 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 221 Key Lea Bridge Station Policies Map Changes Policies 1 Figure 1.4 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan 222 Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 1 Policies Map Changes Policies Key Borough Employment Area Figure 1.5 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 223 Policies Map Changes Policies 1 Figure 1.6 Figure 1.7 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan 224 Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 1 Policies Map Changes Policies Figure 1.8 Figure 1.9 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 225 Key Strategic Industrial Locations Policies Map Changes Policies 1 Figure 1.10 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan 226 Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 1 Policies Map Changes Policies Figure 1.11 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 227 Key Crossrail 2 Safeguarding Line 2008 Policies Map Changes Policies 1 Figure 1.12 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan 228 Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 1 Policies Map Changes Policies Key Primary Shopping Areas Figure 1.13 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 229 Key Secondary Shopping Frontages Policies Map Changes Policies 1 Figure 1.14 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan 230 Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 1 Policies Map Changes Policies Key Lea Valley Regeneration Corridor Figure 1.15 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 231 Key Conservation Areas Conservation Areas added since 2012 Policies Map Changes Policies 1 Figure 1.16 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan 232 Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 1 Policies Map Changes Policies Key Wetlands Walk (proposed) Figure 1.17 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 233 2 Evidence Base 2.1 Waltham Forest©s evidence base is published on the Council's website. This web page will be updated throughout the plan making process. The Waltham Forest Local Plan must also take account of the London Plan evidence base. Evidence bases published as part of this consultation include: Document Produced by Publication Date Strategic Housing Market Assessment Cobweb Consulting December Evidence Base 2017 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment AECOM In progress Employment Land Study Avison Young In progress Town Centres and Retail Study Avison Young In progress Growth Capacity Study Troy Planning July 2019 Gypsy and Travellers Need Assessment ORS In Progress Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Study CAG Consultants September 2017 Characterisation and Intensification Prior+Partners & July 2019 Study MaccreanorLavington Climate Change Action Plan Burro Happold In progress Economic Growth Strategy Waltham Forest 2016 Town Centres Strategy Waltham Forest 2016 Housing Strategy Waltham Forest June 2019 Open Space Strategy LUC In progress Playing Pitch Strategy 4G In progress Green and Blue Infrastructure Study LUC In progress Business Study Hatch Regenris 2018 Green Belt Review LUC In progress Table 2.1 London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan 234 Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 3 3 Monitoring Indicators and Targets Monitoring Indicators and Targets Monitoring Indicators and Policy Monitoring Indicator Target (if applicable) Policy 3 ©Location and Number of homes South Waltham Forest: Management of Growth© delivered in each sub-area 15,000 homes and 3,250 (net) jobs Number of jobs created in Central Waltham Forest : each sub-area (net) 8,000 homes and 1,600 jobs North Waltham Forest: 4,000 homes and 1,940 jobs Table 3.1 Location and Management of Growth Policy Monitoring Indicator Target (if applicable) Policy 23 ©Increasing Total number of new Measured for each Housing Supply© homes (net and gross) Financial Year against the stepped requirement set - Approved out in Policy 23 ©Increasing Housing Supply©. - Started construction 18,000 homes by 2030 - Completed 27,000 homes by 2035 Policy 24 ©Delivering Percentage and Total 50% of all new homes to genuinely affordable number of new homes be genuinely affordable housing© (net and gross) across the plan period. disaggregated by tenure - Approved - Started Construction - Completed Policy 25 ©Affordable Percentage of units 70% of units to be low Housing Tenure© (gross) on schemes of cost affordable rent more than 10 units by tenure 30% to be of intermediate tenure London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 235 Policy Monitoring Indicator Target (if applicable) - Approved - Started Construction - Completed Policy 26 ©Housing Size Percentage and Total Set out in Policy and Mix© number of units by 26 ©Housing Size and Mix© number of bedrooms - Approved - Started Construction - Completed Percentage of schemes which achieve the desired proportion Policy 29 ©Redevelopment Percentage of Any loss of housing to be and intensification of developments resulting in replaced by new housing existing housing and an increased density at existing or higher Targets Monitoring Indicators and housing estates© (disaggregated by densities with at least the 3 affordability) equivalent level of overall floorspace; - Approved Development provides at - Started Construction least the identical or equivalent level of - Completed affordable housing floorspace; Policy 31 ©Small Sites© Total number of new Draft London Plan target homes which are small of 889 per annum sites (<0.25 ha). - Approved - Started Construction - Completed London Borough of Waltham Forest Local Plan 236 Shaping the Borough - Waltham Forest Draft Local Plan (July 2019) 3 Policy Monitoring Indicator Target (if applicable) Monitoring Indicators and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DEFENDING OUR LINES - Safeguarding Railways for Reopening
    DEFENDING OUR LINES - safeguarding railways for reopening A report by Smart Growth UK April 2020 http://www.smartgrowthuk.org 1 Contents __________________________________________________________________________________ Foreword by Paul Tetlaw 4 Executive summary 6 1. Introduction 8 2. Rail closures 9 3. Reopening and reinstatement 12 4. Obstacles to reinstatement of closed lines 16 5. Safeguarding alignments 19 6. Reopening and the planning system 21 7. Reopening of freight-only or mothballed lines 24 8. Reinstatement of demolished lines 29 9. New railways 38 10. Conclusions 39 Appendix 1 41 2 Smart Growth UK __________________________________________________________________________ Smart Growth UK is an informal coalition of organisations and individuals who want to promote the Smart Growth approach to planning, transportation and communities. Smart Growth is an international movement dedicated to more sustainable approaches to these issues. In the UK it is based around a set of principles agreed by the organisations that support the Smart Growth UK coalition in 2013:- Urban areas work best when they are compact, with densities appropriate to local circumstances but generally significantly higher than low-density suburbia and avoiding high-rise. In addition to higher density, layouts are needed that prioritize walking, cycling and public transport so that they become the norm. We need to reduce our dependence on private motor vehicles by improving public transport, rail-based where possible, and concentrating development in urban areas. We should protect the countryside, farmland, natural beauty, open space, soil and biodiversity, avoiding urban sprawl and out-of-town development. We should protect and promote local distinctiveness and character and our heritage, respecting and making best use of historic buildings, street forms and settlement patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Action Plan Consultation Report
    London Borough of Newham Air Quality Action Plan Consultation Report Submitted by: London Borough of Newham Alice Billings House 2-12 West Ham Lane Stratford London E15 4SF Contact: Robin Whitehouse (LEHO) – 020 8430 3792 [email protected] Submission date of Report: 28th March 2003 Overview Under the National Air Quality Strategy (NAQS), Newham Council is required to assess the air quality within the borough. The NAQS provides objectives and target dates for various pollutants, which the council must achieve. Where it is unlikely that these objectives will be met the council must declare an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA). Under section 84(2) of the Environment Act 1995, where an AQMA is declared Newham Council must agree an Action Plan to work towards the objectives given. Newham Council has been reviewing its air quality since 1998 and has just completed stage IV of this review and assessment process. Stage III identified that Newham Council will not meet the objectives for PM10 (24hr rolling mean) and nitrogen dioxide (annual average) and so the council declared an AQMA in March 2002. As road traffic is the primary source of pollution, the AQMA falls along major roads in the borough. Government Guidelines (2000) state that air quality action plans (AQAP) should be in place 12 to18 months following an AQMA designation. This Action Plan has been produced using guidance from the National Society for Clean Air and Environment (NSCA), the London Mayors Air Quality Strategy (MAQS) and the Action Plan Appraisal checklist developed by Casella-Stanger (acting on behalf of DEFRA).
    [Show full text]
  • Lea Valley Rail Report
    LEA VALLEY RAIL BETTER ACCESS TO JOBS AND HOMES All you want to know about the upgrades of the line! LEA VALLEY RAIL — BETTER ACCESS TO JOBS AND HOMES This report shows how much more the existing railways can achieve and contribute to the Lea Valley’s future economic, social and environmental goals. The Lea Valley requires better connectivity, to help the creation of new jobs and homes and to enable the area’s economic structure to strengthen and grow, with catchments accessible by public transport. This requires smart thinking, better use of existing infrastructure and a few new elements. The Chingford Line Users Association (CLUA) and Railfuture have looked particularly at the Waltham Forest catchments. Waltham Forest is the ‘borough across the Valley’ and needs better integration into the main Lea Valley transport corridors. JRC was commissioned in March 2012 by CLUA and Railfuture (who funded the report) to write an appraisal of three significant rail projects in the Lea Valley, and to set out their merits. This report responds to that commission. It describes each scheme sequentially, the rationales and merits of the proposals, present status, service plans, foreseeable demand and costs, funding matters and next steps. The report’s structure is: Part 1: The Lea Valley’s economic, planning and transport context Part 2: Reopening Lea Bridge station Part 3: Better Lea Valley rail services Part 4: Chingford Line access to Stratford. Practitioners and campaigners will appreciate that securing even small changes in railway services and infrastructure can be a lengthy challenge that needs the best arguments and clarity about the project purpose, and to set out these points to stakeholders, funders and decision-makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Tfl's REPORT to the MAYOR on CONSULTATION
    Draft Mayor’s Transport Strategy Statutory consultation with the public and stakeholders TfL’S REPORT TO THE MAYOR ON CONSULTATION: Appendices 1, 2 and 3 Annexes B and C March 2010 Contents Appendix 1 - List of Stakeholders consulted .............................................................. 3 Appendix 2 - List of Stakeholders who responded to the consultation ..................... 14 Appendix 3 – List of meetings relevant to the development of the draft Mayor’s Transport Strategy.................................................................................................... 19 Annex B – Summary for each stakeholder response received ................................. 24 Annex C - TfL’s consideration of late responses to the consultation ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Study
    LLDC TRANSPORT REVIE W LOCAL PLAN REVIEW - TRANSPORT STUDY Prepared for London Legacy Development Corporation June 2018 CH2M HILL United Kingdom Elms House 43 Brook Green London W6 7EF T +44 203 479 8000 Name Signature Date Prepared by: Philip Edwards Checked by: Graham Stevenson Approved by: Richard Smith In preparing this report, CH2M relied, in whole or in part, on data and information provided by the Client and third parties, which information has not been independently verified by CH2M and which CH2M has assumed to be accurate, complete, reliable, and current. Therefore, while CH2M has utilised reasonable due kill and care in preparing this Report, CH2M does not warrant or guarantee the conclusions set forth in this Report which are dependent or based upon data, information, or statements supplied by third parties or the client. This Report is intended for Client’s sole and exclusive use and is not for the benefit of any third party and may not be distributed to, disclosed in any form to, used by, or relied upon by, any third party without prior written consent of CH2M, which consent may be withheld in its sole discretion. Use of this Report or any information contained herein, if by any party other than Client, shall be at the sole risk of such party and shall constitute a release and agreement by such party to defend and indemnify CH2M and its affiliates, officers, employees and subcontractors from and against any liability for direct, indirect, incidental, consequential or special loss or damage or other liability of any nature arising from its use of the Report or reliance upon any of its content.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Index Issues 1 - 87
    Cumulative Index Issues 1 - 87 Indexing is principally by location, i.e. station / goods yard / depot / etc name. Some line names are indexed too (including all Underground lines) – but the items are always listed under loca- tion name as well. (Articles about a single station only are not necessarily included in the ‘line’ entry). For dead-end branches the terminus station name should be looked up. The name used for stations etc is usually the name applicable in the early BR period (if still open), or the name used at the time of closure (if closed). However no precise or pedantic policy has been followed on this! Stations commonly referred to by more than one name are cross-referenced. Where two or more consecutive stations with the same name existed on different but nearby sites on the same line, no distinction is made. Where there are two or more stations on different lines with the same, or confusingly-similar, names, the company name is appended for clarity. DLR stations are listed individually but Croydon Tramlink stops are not (except, some- times, those that are former stations). Minor refurbishments (including LT retilings), temporary closures, lift replacements, etc are not included in the indexing. Italics indicate current news items (in the For The Record pages). The listing of a long run of pages does not necessarily mean that every one of the pages in question will have references to the station etc in question. All photographs taken at stations etc are listed under the station etc name, except where virtually nothing is visible of the station structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-Regional Transport Plan 2010
    1 CONTENTS Mayoral foreword 3 London Councils foreword 3 Executive summary 4 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Supporting economic development and 28 population growth Chapter 3: Enhancing the quality of life for all Londoners 61 Chapter 4: Improving the safety and security of all 80 Londoners Chapter 5: Improving transport opportunities for all 86 Londoners Chapter 6: Reducing transport‟s contribution to climate 94 change & improving its resilience Chapter 7: Supporting delivery of London 2012 Olympic 99 and Paralympic Games and its legacy Chapter 8: Key places in north sub-region 100 Chapter 9: Delivery of the Plan and sustainability 109 assessment Chapter 10: Next steps 112 Appendices Appendix 1: Implementation Plan 114 Appendix 2: List of figures 124 2 MAYORAL FOREWORD LONDON COUNCILS FOREWORD Following my election in 2008, I set out my desire for TfL to “listen and learn Boroughs play a key role in delivering the transport that London needs and deserves. from the boroughs... help them achieve their objectives and... negotiate However, there are many transport issues that cross borough boundaries and this is where solutions that will benefit the whole of London”. I therefore asked TfL to embark the Sub-regional Transport Plans (SRTPs) are particularly important. The SRTPs fill the gap between the strategic policies and proposals in the Mayor‟s Transport Strategy (MTS) and on a new collaborative way of working with the boroughs, based on sub-regions. the local initiatives in boroughs‟ Local Implementation Plans (LIPs). As well as better collaboration, the sub-regional programme has led to an We have very much welcomed the Greater London Authority and TfL‟s willingness to improved analytical capability, which has enabled travel patterns to be better engage with London Councils and the boroughs on the development of the SRTPs over the understood and provided for.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Lee Valley Development Infrastructure Study | Final Report
    Upper Lee Valley Transport for London Development Infrastructure Study Final Report Our ref: 22763001 September 2015 Upper Lee Valley Transport for London Development Infrastructure Study Final Report Our ref: 22763001 September 2015 Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave Transport for London 28-32 Upper Ground Windsor House London SE1 9PD 42-50 Victoria Street London SW1H 0TL +44 20 7910 5000 www.steerdaviesgleave.com Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material for Transport for London. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer Davies Gleave has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 Aims and Objectives ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BRANCH Annual General Meeting 2017 Saturday 29Th April 2017 University of Westminster’S Cavendish Campus 115 New Cavendish St, London, W1W 6UW
    LONDON & SOUTH EAST BRANCH Annual General Meeting 2017 Saturday 29th April 2017 University of Westminster’s Cavendish Campus 115 New Cavendish St, London, W1W 6UW From Goodge Street station - turn left on exiting and walk for a few minutes, then turn left into Holland Street and keep going - it turns into New Cavendish Street. From Warren Street station - walk a few minutes southwards on Tottenham Court Road, then turn right into Holland Street. From Great Portland Street station. - from the traffic island on which the station sits, negotiate the crossings on the side with one-way traffic. The most direct route is NOT to take Great Portland Street, nor Bolsover Street, but take Cleveland Street (which is opposite the eastern end of the Agenda station island) which intersects New Cavendish Street at your destination. & From Oxford Circus station walk one block Reports east then go north along Great Portland enclosed Street then turn right into New Cavendish Street. AGENDA 10:30 DOORS OPEN (Coffee available) 11:00 Chairman’s introduction followed by Heathrow Expansion – implications for surface access by rail Steve Costello of Heathrow Southern Railway George Bathurst of Windsor Link Railway Network Rail presentation on Western Rail Access to Heathrow 12:30 Lunch (Please make own arrangements and return before 13:50) 14:00 Branch AGM 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Minutes of previous AGM, held 23rd April 2016 3. Matters Arising 4. Election Results 5. Chairman’s Report for 2016 6. Treasurer’s Report for 2016 7. Membership Report for 2016 8. Division’s Reports 2016 a) Eastern b) Kent c) Sussex & Coastway d) Herts & Beds e) Surrey f) Metro 9.
    [Show full text]
  • A North London Economic Development Implementation Plan
    North London Strategic Alliance: North London Sub-Regional Economic Development Plan – Version 4 rev1 – Feb 2006 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ DEVELOPING THE ECONOMY OF NORTH LONDON: A NORTH LONDON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Introduction The North London Strategic Alliance (NLSA) is being funded by the The priorities identified in this document – the Upper Lee Valley, town London Development Agency (LDA) to produce an Economic centres, transport, and internal and external growth drivers – are drawn Development Implementation Plan for the North London sub-region from existing North London strategies and consultation with (SREDIP). The Plan will identify additional or joint actions where stakeholders. These sub-regional priorities were discussed at the NLSA Strategy Group in July 2005, and partners were consulted on them at cross-borough and partnership working is the most effective way to th enable the successful development and growth of North London, the 16 September event, which was attended by just under 100 promote regeneration and attract public and private sector representatives of the public, private and voluntary sectors from across investment. It will not duplicate work more appropriately addressed North London. at the local borough or London regional level. A draft implementation plan was then developed for formal consultation The benefit to North London partners will be a collaborative effort to with an ‘experts group’ and the voluntary and business sectors in sustaining North London as a significant economic sub-region of November / December 2005. Further consultation took place in London, an attractive business location and an attractive place to January / early February 2006 before a final draft is submitted to the work and to live.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Note Chingford to Stratford Rail Service – Operational Feasibility Review
    TECHNICAL NOTE CHINGFORD TO STRATFORD RAIL SERVICE – OPERATIONAL FEASIBILITY REVIEW IDENTIFICATION TABLE Client Waltham Forest Council Project Chingford – Stratford Rail Service Feasibility Operational Feasibility Review – Scheduling Exercises : DRAFT Title of Document v 1 Date 21/10/2016 Reference number 10425612 Number of pages 14 (plus Appendices) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 BACKGROUND 2 1.2 OBJECTIVE 2 1.3 APPROACH 2 2. SERVICE / OPERATIONAL PATTERNS (2016) 5 2.1 PASSENGER SERVICES 5 2.2 EMPTY COACHING STOCK (ECS) 5 2.3 FREIGHT / INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES 6 3. ADDITION OF PLANNED AND PROPOSED PASSENGER SERVICES 6 3.1 THE ADDITIONAL SERVICES 6 3.2 KEY ASSUMPTIONS AND PARAMETERS 6 3.3 OFF-PEAK 7 3.4 MORNING PEAK 9 3.5 EVENING PEAK 11 4. WIDER CONSIDERATIONS 12 5. CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY 13 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.1.1 In 2009, Waltham Forest Council, commissioned an appraisal of a proposal to introduce a direct rail service between Chingford and Stratford, requiring reinstatement of the abandoned Hall Farm curve, connecting the Chingford branch with the direct Tottenham Hale – Stratford route (at Lea Bridge Junction, north of Lea Bridge station). This appraisal was undertaken by Systra, then known as MVA Consultancy. 1.1.2 An earlier report, undertaken by Hyder Consulting and Maines Consulting in 2002, had demonstrated the technical feasibility of this reinstatement; the 2009 Appraisal confirmed that the demand for such a service would be sufficient to support a strong business case for the scheme. 1.1.3 The 2009 Appraisal also confirmed that, against the background of the passenger train services and other train movements (principally freight) operating at that time, it would be operationally feasible to introduce such a service, at a frequency of generally 4 trains per hour (tph).
    [Show full text]
  • Chingford to Stratford Rail Line 27 January 2010
    Chingford to Stratford Rail Line 27 January 2010 Neil Bullen Manager Transport Planning [email protected] The Proposal • Hall Farm Curve reinstated • Lea Bridge Station reopened • 4 trains per hour service between Chingford and Stratford • existing 4 trains per hour service between Chingford and London Liverpool Street Specialist rail consultant MVA appointed to carry out a feasibility study Oct - Dec 2009 Brief: • produce accurate up to date cost estimates for reinstating the Hall Farm Curve and Lea Bridge Station • determine the operational feasibility of a 4 trains per hour Chingford to Stratford service • estimate the demand for the service • carry out an economic appraisal to determine the benefit/cost ratio of the scheme Network Rail receives its funding from the Government in 5 year ‘Control Periods’ Study assumes that the scheme will be funded in CP5 (2014 - 2019) Realistic programme: • 2010 - 2012 DfT/Network Rail approval process • 2013 - 2014 detailed design/commissioning • 2015 construction • 2016 scheme operational Estimated costs of the infrastructure ‘2009 prices’ • £24.3 m - double track Hall Farm Curve with Lea Bridge Station • £18.4 m - single track HFC with LBS • £20.0 m - double track HFC without LBS • £14.3 m - single track HFC without LBS • £4.64m - construct Lea Bridge Station separately Operational feasibility A new 4 trains per hour Chingford to Stratford service can be fitted around existing services on the network Chingford 10.00 10.00 Highams Park 10.04 10.04 Wood Street 10.07 10.07 Walthamstow Central 10.09 10.09 St James St 10.11 10.11 Lea Bridge 10.15 .
    [Show full text]