Introduction Landscape, Character, and Analogical Imagination
1 introduction Landscape, character, and Analogical imagination If historical writing is a continual dialectical warfare between past and present—a continual shaping and forcing of the configuration of the past so as to release from it the meanings it always had, but never dared to state out loud, the meanings that permeated it as an unbreathable atmosphere or shameful secret—then what entities and images will come first? —T. J. Clark, “Reservations of the Marvellous” Over its short life, the nation of South Africa has become known for its turbulent political history as well as the distinctiveness of its landscapes, yet relatively little at- tention has been paid to how these two factors might have been connected. The emer- gence of a white society that called itself “South African” in the twentieth century has usually been ascribed to an intertwining of economics, class, and race, and the role of geographical factors in this process has largely been seen in instrumental terms, focusing on resource competition, the spatialization of ideology through segregation- ist legislation, and shifting attitudes toward nature.1 While much has been written on land use, settlement patterns, property relations, and the influence of the frontier experience on the subsequent human-land relationships in the subcontinent,2 the imaginaries and iconographies that underpinned this territorialization have only recently started to receive attention, more often from archaeologists, cultural histori- _________ 1 ans, literary theorists, and architects than from geographers.3 This is understandable. landscape, Because the politics of imperialism, nationalism, economic maximization, and racial character, and difference have dominated South Africa’s history over the last century, utilitarian analogical rather than aesthetic analyses have often seemed more appropriate to thinking about imagination relations between humans and the environment in the subcontinent.
[Show full text]