DOCSLIB.ORG

3D Printing As an Alternative Manufacturing Method for the Micro­Gas Turbine Heat Exchanger

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3D Printing As an Alternative Manufacturing Method for the Micro­Gas Turbine Heat Exchanger 3D Printing as an Alternative Manufacturing Method for the Micro­gas Turbine Heat Exchanger Wolfgang Seiya and Sherry Zhang July 2015 Department of Energy Technology Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden Pratt School of Engineering, Smarthome Program Duke University Durham, North Carolina, USA 1 Acknowledgements We would like to thank InnoEnergy, Compower, and the ‘‘STandUP for Energy’’ project for providing resourceful background information for this study. We owe our deepest gratitude to our advisor, Anders Malmquist for his continuous support for this study throughout the summer. His guidance, motivation, and expertise were invaluable assets in all areas of the study. Our sincere thanks goes to Joachim Claesson at KTH for his time and knowledge on the subject of heat exchangers. We take this opportunity to thank all the company correspondents that took their time and interest to help us with the vast information needed for this study. Lastly, we are immensely grateful to Duke Smart Home Program and its director Jim Gaston for providing us with the opportunity and necessary funds to live in Sweden while conducting this study. 2 I. Table of Contents List of Figures …………………………………………………………………………….… 6 ​ List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………………….. 7 ​ Abbreviations and Equation Nomenclature ………………………………………………… 8 ​ Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………...… 9 ​ Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………. 9 ​ Methodology ……………………………………………………………………………….. 10 ​ Materials ……………………………………………………………………………….. 10 ​ Manufacturing ………………………………………………………………………….. 13 ​ Materials ………………………………………………………………………………….... 14 ​ Material Overview ……………………………………………………………………... 15 ​ Silicon Carbide ……………………………………………………………………….... 18 ​ i. Creep and Oxidation ……………………………………………………………... 18 ​ ii. Fatigue Toughness ………………………………………………………………. 18 ​ iii. Crack Healing …………………………………………………………………... 18 ​ iv. Compatibility with 3D Printing ………………………………………………… 19 ​ v. Sustainability ……………………………………………………………………. 19 ​ Inconel alloys ………………………………………………………………………….. 19 ​ i. Impact Strength ………………………………………………………………….. 19 ​ ii. Fatigue Strength ………………………………………………………………… 20 ​ iii. Creep and Rupture Properties ………………………………………………….. 20 ​ iv. Corrosion resistance ……………………………………………………………. 20 ​ v. Compatibility with 3D printing …………………………………………………. 21 ​ vi. Sustainability …………………………………………………………………… 21 ​ Haynes 214 Alloy ……………………………………………………………………… 21 ​ i. Oxidation and Creep ……………………………………………………….…….. 21 ​ ii. Cracking ………………………………………………………………….……… 21 ​ iii. Compatibility with 3D Printing ……………………………………………....… 22 ​ iv. Sustainability ………………………………………………………………….... 22 ​ Stainless Steel 304 ……………………………………………………………………... 22 ​ i. Creep and Creep­Fatigue ………………………………………………………… 22 ​ ii. Oxidation ………………………………………………………………………... 23 ​ iii. Compatibility with 3D Printing ………………………………………………… 23 ​ iv. Sustainability …………………………………………………………………… 23 ​ Evaluating high­temperature thermal and tensile properties …………………………... 24 ​ Ranking results ……………………………………………………………………….... 27 ​ 3D Printing / Additive Manufacturing …………………………………………………….. 28 ​ Manufacturing Techniques Overview ……………………………………………….… 29 ​ 3 Powder­Based Fusion Processes (PBF) ……………………………………………….. 30 ​ i. Solid­State Sintering …………………………………………………….………. 31 ​ ii. Chemically­Induced Sintering ………………………………………………….. 32 ​ iii. Liquid­Phase Sintering (LPS) ………………………………………………….. 32 ​ iv. Full Melting …………………………………………………………………….. 32 ​ v. Electron Beam / Electron Beam Melting (EB / EBM) ………………………….. 32 ​ vi. Sustainability …………………………………………………………………… 33 ​ Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing (BJAM) …………………………………….... 33 ​ Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM) ……………………………………………... 33 ​ Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing (EBAM) …………………………………..… 34 ​ Ultrasonic Consolidation (UC) ……………………………………………………….... 35 ​ Ranking Techniques …………………………………………………………………… 36 ​ Companies / Researchers ………………………………………………………………. 37 ​ Arcam AB …………………………………………………………………………. 38 ​ Aurora Labs 3D ……………………………………………………………………. 38 ​ Ceralink ……………………………………………………………………………. 39 ​ EOS ….…………………………………………………………………………….. 39 ​ ExOne ……………………………………………………………………....……… 39 ​ Fabrisonic ………………………………………………………………………….. 40 ​ Renishaw ……………………………………………………………………...…… 40 ​ Sciaky …………………………………………………………………………….... 40 ​ Other Companies ………………………………………………………………..…. 40 ​ Growth ……………………………………………………………………………….… 42 ​ Heat Exchanger Design ………………………………………………………………….… 43 ​ Classification of Heat Exchangers …………………………………………………….. 43 ​ i. From Construction ………………………………………………………………. 43 ​ ii. Based on the Heat Transfer Process ……………………………………………. 45 ​ iii. Based on Surface Compactness ……………………………………………...… 45 ​ iv. Based on Flow Arrangements …………………………………………….….… 45 ​ Thermal Hydraulic Performance of Heat Exchangers ………………………………… 46 ​ i. Heat Transfer Mechanisms in Heat Exchangers ………………………………… 46 ​ ii. Conduction …………………………………………………………………….... 46 ​ iii. Convection …………………………………………………………………...… 46 ​ iv. Heat Transfer and Temperature Difference ………………………………….… 47 ​ Pressure Drops ………………………………………………………………………… 49 ​ Effectiveness and Rating …………………………………………………………….... 50 ​ Design Recommendations …………………………………………………………….. 52 ​ Economics ……………………………………………………………………………….... 54 ​ Barriers ……………………………………………………………………………………. 57 ​ 4 Recycling ………………………………….…………………………………………….… 57 ​ Discussion and Recommendations …………………………………………………...…… 58 ​ Sensitivity Analysis ……………………………………………………………………….. 59 ​ Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………… 61 ​ References ………………………………………………………………………………… 62 ​ Appendix ………………………………………………………………………………..… 69 ​ 5 II. List of Figures Figure 1 ­ AspenPlus model of Compower’s ET10 …………………………………...….. pg. 10 Figure 2 ­ Ashby’s Material and Selection Chart ……………………………………….... pg. 15 ​ ​ Figure 3 ­ Internal oxidation attack in Inconel 601 ………………………………………. pg. 21 Figure 4 ­ Thermal conductivities of the top five materials with temperature ……….…... pg. 24 Figure 5 ­ Specific heat capacities measured from a reference of 20°C ………………….. pg. 24 Figure 6 ­ Coefficient of linear expansion of the top five materials with temperature ….... pg. 25 Figure 7 ­ Yield strengths of top 5 materials with temperature …………………………... pg. 26 Figure 8 ­ Elastic modulus of top five materials with temperature ………………………. pg. 26 Figure 9 ­ Schematic of selective­laser sintering …………………………………………. pg. 31 Figure 10 ­ Schematic of solid­state sintering ……………………………………………. pg. 32 Figure 11 ­ The laminated object manufacturing process ………………………………... pg. 34 Figure 12 ­ Schematic of the ultrasonic consolidation process …………………………... pg. 35 Figure 13 ­ Different types of tubular heat exchangers …………………………………... pg. 44 Figure 14a ­ Different types of plate heat exchangers ……………………………………. pg. 44 Figure 14b ­ Different types of plate heat exchangers ……………………………………. pg. 45 Figure 15 ­ Parallel, counter and cross flow configurations …………………………….... pg. 45 Figure 16 ­ LMTD Method for parallel and counterflow heat exchangers ………………. pg. 48 Figure 17 ­ Temperature profile along a cross­flow heat exchanger …………………….. pg. 48 Figure 18 ­ Brayton cycle ………………………………………………………………... pg. 49 Figure 19 ­ Plot of overall performance coefficient P vs. relevance factor α …………….. pg. 52 Figure 20 ­ Cost in US dollars of commercial computers from 1950 to 1985 ……………. pg. 54 Figure 21 ­ Price index of personal computer and peripheral equipment ……………….... pg. 55 6 III. List of Tables Table 1 ­ Weights for each criteria used to rank the materials …………………………... pg. 11 Table 2 ­ Ranking criteria for top five materials and their respective weights ………….. pg. 12 Table 3 ­ Weights for each criteria used to rank manufacturing techniques …………….. pg. 14 Table 4 ­ All the materials initially considered for the heat exchanger design ………….. pg. 15 Table 5 ­ The top 22 materials and their material properties ……………………………. pg. 16­17 Table 6 ­ Ranking results for the top five materials …………………………………….. pg. 28 Table 7 ­ Overview of additive manufacturing techniques compatible with plastics, metals, and ceramics …………………………………………………………………….. pg. 30 Table 8 ­ Ranking and totals for each manufacturing technique ………………………... pg. 37 Table 9 ­ Machine data from various companies ……………………………………….. pg. 41 7 IV. Abbreviations and Equation Nomenclature Abbreviations Equation Nomenclature 2 ABC­SiC = Aluminum­Boron­Carbon­Silicon Carbide A = Area (m )​ ​ AM = Additive Manufacturing C = Heat capacity (J/kg.K) ​ BJAM = Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing dT/dx = thermal gradient (K/m) BJT = Binder Jetting Technology D = Hydraulic diameter (m) CAD = Computer­Aided Design f = Friction factor CAGR = Compound Annual Growth Rate h = Specific enthalpy (J/kg) 2 CNC = Computer Numerical Control hc = Convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m K​ ) ​ ​ ​ DMLM = Direct Metal Laser Melting k = Material’s thermal conductivity constant (W/mK) DMLS = Direct Metal Laser Sintering L = Length (m) EBAM = Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing m = Mass (kg) EB / EBM = Electron Beam / Electron Beam Melting m’ = Mass flow (kg/s) HX= Heat Exchanger Ns = Number of entropy production units ​ ​ LMTD = Log Mean Temperature Difference Nu = Nusselt number LOM = Laminated Object Manufacturing Q’ = Rate of heat transfer (J/s) LPS = Liquid­Phase Sintering ΔP = Pressure drop (%) PBF = Powder Based Fusion Processes Pr = Prandtl number R&D = research and development Re = Reynold’s number SiC = Silicon Carbide St = Stanton number SLA = Stereolithography T = Temperature (K) SLM = Selective Laser Melting V
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review on Polymeric Materials in Additive Manufacturing ⇑ J.M
    Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Materials Today: Proceedings journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/matpr A review on polymeric materials in additive manufacturing ⇑ J.M. Jafferson , Debdutta Chatterjee VIT University Chennai Campus 600127, India article info abstract Article history: Polymers are the greatest innovation of the millennium. Due to their low price, ease of manufacture, Available online xxxx resistance to water and versatility, polymers have several applications in different domestic and indus- trial sectors. Digital fabrication technology which is also referred to as 3D printing or additive Keywords: Manufacturing (AM) is used for creating physical components from a geometrical representation by Polymeric materials step-by-step addition of materials. This review paper elaborates on the use of polymers for Rapid Additive manufacturing Manufacturing. One such material used is Shape Memory Polymers that have been analyzed as Smart Automotive Materials (4D Printing Materials). Polymers such as Thermoplastics, elastomers, thermosets, and poly- Drug delivery mers with integrated fillers, bio-polymers, and polymers blended with biological materials come under Fabric industry the range of other polymeric materials used in AM. The quality evaluations that are performed are based on mechanical properties, part density and temperature stability. Polycarbonates (PC), acrylonitrile buta- diene styrene (ABS), polyether-ester ketone (PEEK), polyetherimide (ULTEM) and Nylon are usually uti- lized polymers in measures which need thermoplastics, or plastics treated by warming to a semi-fluid state and near the softening point. Properties of materials were reviewed for example, Strength param- eters of a specific list of Polymeric Materials used in 3D printing was revised, where strength tests showed that material such as Polybutylene terephthalate has a high Yield Strength and Polypropylene has a high Ultimate Tensile Strength.
    [Show full text]
  • All-Printed Smart Structures: a Viable Option? John O’Donnella, Farzad Ahmadkhanloub, Hwan-Sik Yoon*A, Gregory Washingtonb Adept
    All-printed smart structures: a viable option? John O’Donnella, Farzad Ahmadkhanloub, Hwan-Sik Yoon*a, Gregory Washingtonb aDept. of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Alabama, Box 870276, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA 35487-0276; bDept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA 92697-3975 ABSTRACT The last two decades have seen evolution of smart materials and structures technologies from theoretical concepts to physical realization in many engineering fields. These include smart sensors and actuators, active damping and vibration control, biomimetics, and structural health monitoring. Recently, additive manufacturing technologies such as 3D printing and printed electronics have received attention as methods to produce 3D objects or electronic components for prototyping or distributed manufacturing purposes. In this paper, the viability of manufacturing all-printed smart structures, with embedded sensors and actuators, will be investigated. To this end, the current 3D printing and printed electronics technologies will be reviewed first. Then, the plausibility of combining these two different additive manufacturing technologies to create all-printed smart structures will be discussed. Potential applications for this type of all-printed smart structures include most of the traditional smart structures where sensors and actuators are embedded or bonded to the structures to measure structural response and cause desired static and dynamic changes in the structure. Keywords: printed smart structures, 3D printing, printed electronics, printed strain sensor 1. INTRODUCTION Decades of research and development have seen the progression of a variety of different additive manufacturing processes [1]. From basic Fused Deposition modeling to the more intricate Energy Beam methods, the ability to print a diverse selection of structures, both complex and simple, on demand with accuracy and precision has become a reality.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Sintering for 3D Printing Applications
    High Speed Sintering for 3D printing applications High Speed Sintering for 3D printing applications Neil Hopkinson, Adam Ellis, Adam Strevens, Manolis Papastavrou and Torben Lange, Xaar plc Introduction High Speed Sintering (HSS) is a transformational inkjet-based 3D printing technology which is being further developed at Xaar by the original inventor, Prof. Neil Hopkinson. This 3D printing (also called Additive Manufacturing) technology involves depositing a fine layer of polymeric powder, after which inkjet printheads deposit a single IR (infrared) absorbing fluid directly onto the powder surface in the required cross-sectional pattern where sintering is desired. The entire build area is then irradiated with an infrared lamp, causing the printed fluid to absorb this energy and then melt and sinter (consolidate) the underlying powder. This process is then repeated layer by layer until the build is complete. The use of digital inkjet printing makes the process considerably faster than point based systems, for example those requiring a laser to sinter/melt material. As with all 3D printing processes there is no requirement for new moulds, plates or other design template related fixtures. High Speed Sintering is a self-supporting process; this means that solid, hollow and complex shapes with internal features are possible without the need to create and subsequently remove support structures, at much higher speeds than other additive manufacturing processes. Today there are many 3D printing technologies and several other sintering technologies available. This paper demonstrates how High Speed Sintering (HSS) fits in the 3D printing space as a fast and cost-effective route to develop and manufacture customised prototypes and products.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of the Printing Parameters on the Stability of the Deposited Beads in Fused Filament Fabrication of Poly(Lactic) Acid
    Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (OATAO ) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the wor of some Toulouse researchers and ma es it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author's version published in: http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/20922 Official URL : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.012 To cite this version: Bakrani Balani, Shahriar and Chabert, France and Nassiet, Valérie and Cantarel, Arthur Influence of the printing parameters on the stability of the deposited beads in Fused Filament Fabrication of poly(lactic) acid. Vol. 25, pp. 112-121 (2019) Additive Manufacturing. Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator: [email protected] Influence of printing parameters on the stability of deposited beads in fused filament fabrication of poly(lactic) acid Shahriar Bakrani Balani 1, 2, a), France Chabert 1, b), Valérie Nassiet 1, c), Arthur Cantarel 2, d), 1 LGP-ENIT-INPT, University of Toulouse, 47 Avenue d’Azereix, BP1629-65016 Tarbes Cedex, France Web Page: http://www.enit.fr/ 2 Institut Clément Ader (ICA), CNRS UMR 5312, University of Toulouse, IUT of Tarbes, UPS, France Web Page: http://www.institut-clement-ader.org/ Corresponding author: b) [email protected] a) [email protected] c) [email protected] d) [email protected] Abstract: Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the various types of additive manufacturing processes. Similar to other types, FFF enables free-form fabrication and optimised structures by using polymeric filaments as the raw material. This work aims to optimise the printing conditions of the FFF process based on reliable properties, such as printing parameters and physical properties of polymers.
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Printing System for Ceramic Materials: Design and Testing of an Experimental Rig
    3D printing system for ceramic materials: design and testing of an experimental rig Armand Yahnn Fabrice Chefdor Thesis to obtain the Master of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering Supervisors : Prof. Marco Alexandre de Oliveira Leite Prof. António Manuel Relógio Ribeiro Examination Committee Chairperson : Prof. Luís Filipe Galrão dos Reis Supervisor : Prof. Marco Alexandre de Oliveira Leite Member of the Committee : Prof. Bruno Alexandre Rodrigues Simões Soares July 2018 Acknowledgements Primarily, I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisors from the Mechanical Engineering Department, Professor Marco Alexandre De Oliveira Leite and Professor António Manuel Relógio Ribeiro, as well as Professor Ana Paula Valagão Amadeu do Serro from the chemical department. They all did an outstanding job by granting me support, knowledge and valuable insight into this interesting subject. I would also like to thank my former colleagues from iMakr who introduced me to the capacities of additive manufacturing and took the time to provide me useful knowledge for this following topic. I would likewise thank my colleagues from the chemical department and the Lab2Prod for their guidance and generous help with diverse tasks regarding my work. Finally, I gratefully acknowledge all the people who allow the Erasmus exchange program to exist, and thus helped me to stay at Técnico for this semester. On the other hand, I do not wish to thank my Erasmus friends who often found a way to take my concentration away from this subject. II Abstract In the context of a constantly growing additive manufacturing market, many processes are acquiring important statuses in the medical field.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Ultrasonic Energy Assisted Metal Processing : Its Correeltion with Microstructure and Properties, and Its Application to Additive Manufacturing
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2019 A study on ultrasonic energy assisted metal processing : its correeltion with microstructure and properties, and its application to additive manufacturing. Anagh Deshpande University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Manufacturing Commons, Metallurgy Commons, and the Other Materials Science and Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Deshpande, Anagh, "A study on ultrasonic energy assisted metal processing : its correeltion with microstructure and properties, and its application to additive manufacturing." (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3239. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/3239 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The nivU ersity of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The nivU ersity of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A STUDY ON ULTRASONIC ENERGY ASSISTED METAL PROCESSING: ITS CORRELTION WITH MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES, AND ITS APPLICATION TO ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING By Anagh Deshpande A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the J.B. Speed School of Engineering of the University of Louisville in Fulfillment
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on 3D Printing and Its Effects on the Future of Transportation
    CAIT-UTC-NC19 A Study on 3D Printing and its Effects on the Future of Transportation September 2018 Submitted by: Omar Jumaah, Doctoral Candidate Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 98 Brett Road Piscataway, NJ 08854-8058 [email protected] External Project Manager Patrick Szary, PhD Associate Director, CAIT Central Administration Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 100 Brett Road Piscataway, NJ 08854-8058 [email protected] In cooperation with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey & State of Department of Transportation & U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration i Disclaimer Statement The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation (CAIT) is a National UTC Consortium led by Rutgers, The State University. Members of the consortium are the University of Delaware, Utah State University, Columbia University, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Princeton University, University of Texas at El Paso, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, and University of South Florida. The Center is funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation. ii CAIT-UTC-NC19 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. CAIT-UTC-NC19 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date A Study on 3D Printing and its Effects on the Future of Transportation September 2018 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Landscape for Additive Manufacturing Research
    THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING RESEARCH A review to map the UK’s research activities in AM internationally and nationally 2016 ICL AMN report Dr. Jing Li Dr. Connor Myant Dr. Billy Wu Imperial College Additive Manufacturing Network Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 4 2. What is additive manufacturing? .................................................................................... 5 2.1. Advantages of additive manufacturing ......................................................................... 5 2.2. Types of additive manufacturing technology and challenges ........................................ 6 2.3. The manufacturing production chain and challenges ................................................... 9 2.4. Conclusions ................................................................................................................12 3. Mapping the international additive manufacturing research landscape ......................... 13 3.1. Global market trend ....................................................................................................13 3.1.1. Growth in market value ........................................................................................13 3.1.2 Additive manufacturing growth in industrial markets.............................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Beginner's Guide to 3D Printing
    2015 BEGINNER’S GUIDE TO 3D PRINTING VERSION 0.1 THINK3D TEAM Welcome to think3D’s Beginner’s Guide to 3D Printing. This document is for people who are completely new to 3D printing technology or who are looking at gaining additional information on 3D printing technology. It is very imperative that 3D printing technology is going to change the world. Experts claim 3D printing is a much bigger revolution than internet. We at think3D, completely agree to those viewpoints. In this document, we shall be providing data to illustrate the true revolutionary nature of 3D printing. This document is structured into 6 chapters, (a) Introduction of 3D printing (b) History of 3D printing (c) 3D Printing Technology (d) 3D Printing Processes (e) 3D Printing Materials (f) 3D Printing Applications (g) 3D Printing Glossary. “3D printing” is an umbrella term for a host of processes and technologies that offer a full spectrum of capabilities for the production of parts and products in different materials. One thing common in all these processes is the manner in which production is carried out – layer by layer in an additive process. That is why “3D Printing” is also called additive manufacturing in contrast to traditional methods of production that are primarily subtractive in nature, also called as “subtractive manufacturing” or molding/casting processes. Applications of 3D printing are emerging almost by the day, and, as this technology continues to penetrate more widely and deeply across industrial, maker and consumer sectors, this is only set to increase. Most reputable commentators on this technology sector agree that, as of today, we are only just beginning to see the true potential of 3D printing.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization of Extrusion-Based 3D Printing Process Using Neural Networks for Sustainable Development
    materials Article Optimization of Extrusion-Based 3D Printing Process Using Neural Networks for Sustainable Development Izabela Rojek 1 , Dariusz Mikołajewski 1 , Marek Macko 2 , Zbigniew Szczepa ´nski 2 and Ewa Dostatni 3,* 1 Institute of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland; [email protected] (I.R.); [email protected] (D.M.) 2 Department of Mechatronic Systems, Faculty of Mechatronics, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland; [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (Z.S.) 3 Institute of Materials Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, pl. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 5, 60-965 Pozna´n,Poland * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Technological and material issues in 3D printing technologies should take into account sustainable development, use of materials, energy, emitted particles, and waste. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether the sustainability of 3D printing processes can be supported by computational intelligence (CI) and artificial intelligence (AI) based solutions. We present a new AI-based software to evaluate the amount of pollution generated by 3D printing systems. We input the values: printing technology, material, print weight, etc., and the expected results (risk assessment) and determine if and what precautions should be taken. The study uses a self-learning program that will improve as more data are entered. This program does not replace but complements previously used 3D printing metrics and software. Citation: Rojek, I.; Mikołajewski, D.; Keywords: optimization; 3D printing; sustainable development; neural networks Macko, M.; Szczepa´nski,Z.; Dostatni, E. Optimization of Extrusion-Based 3D Printing Process Using Neural Networks for Sustainable Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Metal Parts Using Additive Technologies
    3/3/2017 Fundamentals of Additive Manufacturing for Aerospace Frank Medina, Ph.D. Technology Leader, Additive Manufacturing Director, Additive Manufacturing Consortium [email protected] 915-373-5047 Intent of This Talk Introduce the general methods for forming metal parts using additive manufacturing Give multiple examples of each type of method Compare and contrast the methods given Disclaimer: – This talk serves as an introduction to the various additive manufacturing technologies which work with metals. There are so many methods available we will not have time to discuss them all. – Once you determine the right approach for you, please investigate different machine manufacturers and service providers to determine the optimal solution for your needs. – I have tried to be objective in the presentation. Where I can I have given the affiliations for the materials used. If I’ve missed any I apologize in advance. About me and EWI I am a Technology Leader at EWI specializing in additive manufacturing (AM) with a focus on Metals AM. I have over 17 years of AM experience, collaborating with research scientists, engineers, and medical doctors to develop new equipment and devices. Non-profit applied manufacturing R&D company ─ Develops, commercializes, and implements leading-edge manufacturing technologies for innovative businesses Thought-leader in many cross-cutting technologies ─ >160,000 sq-ft in 3 facilities with full-scale test labs (expanding) ─ >$40 million in state of the art capital equipment (expanding) ─ >170 engineers, technicians, industry experts (expanding) 1 3/3/2017 Structural Gap between Research and Application Technology Maturity Scale Source: NIST AMNPO presentation Oct. 2012 EWI Applied R&D Bridges the Gap Between Research and Application EWI Applied R&D: Manufacturing Technology Innovation, Maturation, Commercialization, Insertion Technology Maturity Scale Source: NIST AMNPO presentation Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Multi-Head 3D Printer for Polymer-Metal Composite Component Manufacturing
    technologies Article Open Source Multi-Head 3D Printer for Polymer-Metal Composite Component Manufacturing John J. Laureto 1 and Joshua M. Pearce 1,2,* 1 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Michigan Technological University, 601 M&M Building, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931-1295, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Michigan Technological University, 121 EERC Building, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931-1295, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +01-906-487-1466 Academic Editors: Salvatore Brischetto, Paolo Maggiore and Carlo Giovanni Ferro Received: 1 March 2017; Accepted: 18 April 2017; Published: 15 June 2017 Abstract: As low-cost desktop 3D printing is now dominated by free and open source self-replicating rapid prototype (RepRap) derivatives, there is an intense interest in extending the scope of potential applications to manufacturing. This study describes a manufacturing technology that enables a constrained set of polymer-metal composite components. This paper provides (1) free and open source hardware and (2) software for printing systems that achieves metal wire embedment into a polymer matrix 3D-printed part via a novel weaving and wrapping method using (3) OpenSCAD and parametric coding for customized g-code commands. Composite parts are evaluated from the technical viability of manufacturing and quality. The results show that utilizing a multi-polymer head system for multi-component manufacturing reduces manufacturing time and reduces the embodied energy of manufacturing. Finally, it is concluded that an open source software and hardware tool chain can provide low-cost industrial manufacturing of complex metal-polymer composite-based products. Keywords: open source; 3D printing; RepRap; composite; manufacturing 1.
    [Show full text]